The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20181031 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2022_20220606Mitigation Project Information Upload ID#* 20181031 Version* 1 Select Reviewer: * Erin Davis Initial Review Completed Date 06/06/2022 Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/6/2022 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name: * Matthew Reid Project Information ID#:* 20184131 Existing ID# Project Type: Project Name: County: Email Address: * matthew.reid@ncdenr.gov Version:* 1 DMS • Mitigation Bank Round Hill Branch Restoration Site Buncombe Document Information Mitigation Document Type: * Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: Signature ............................................ Print Name: * Signature:* Existing Version RoundHillBranch_100066_MY0_2022.pdf 7.79MB Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Matthew Reid MYUU MONITORING REPORT Round Hill Branch Restoration Site Buncombe County,North Carolina French Broad River Basin - 06010105 DMS Project#100066 DMS Contract#7534 DMS RFP #16-007334 (Issue date: September 8, 2017) USACE AID #: SAW 2108-01168 DWR#: 2018-1031 Monitoring Data Collected: 2022 • .441W5, 4 • • • Prepared for: NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699 NORTH CAROL NA Department of Environmental Quality Monitoring and Design Firm Prepared by: KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 (919) 783-9214 Project Contact: Adam Spiller Email: adam.spillerC kci.com Round fill Branch Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 MY00 Monitoring Report KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PA ENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS MEMORANDUM 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh NC 27609 (919) 783-9214 (919) 783-9266 Fax Date: May 16, 2022 To: Matthew Reid, DMS Project Manager From: Adam Spiller, Project Manager KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA Subject: MY-00 Monitoring Report Comments Round Hill Branch DMS #7534, Contract 100066 French Broad River Basin CU 06010105 Buncombe County, North Carolina Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-00 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS received on March 22, 2022 for the Round Hill Branch Restoration Site. 1. The site currently has two unresolved property disputes with adjacent land owners. The first at the beginning of RHB and the second at the end of RHB. Currently, the Stewardship Program will not accept the conservation easement with a known unresolved dispute. When KCI responds to the comment letter, please provide a detailed response to how KCI plans to resolve these issues moving forward. The Task 6 invoice payment and initial credit release will be delayed until a resolution has a path forward. ICI Response: KCI has sent letters to these landowners stating that their fences are in the conservation easement and will be moved/reconstructed on their property. The letter will provide information about the survey and ask that the landowner reach out to KCI with any concerns about this remedy. These landowners will be free to provide evidence from a licensed surveyor and ICI will then work to resolve this inconsistency. DMS and SRO will be provided documentation as this process progresses. 2. Please add (Issue date: September 8, 2017) after RFP #16-007334. ICI Response: This change has been made. 3. The Project Summary discusses a large scale rain event that occurred from August 15-18, 2021 followed by repairs in September 2021. Was the asbuilt survey field work completed prior to this event, or does the asbuilt survey represent the site post storm repairs? ICI Response: The as -built survey was completed on August 11, 2021, before the storms damaged the site; however, the post storm repairs largely returned the site to the as -built condition. The only minor differences are some isolated areas offloodplain scour that are acting as vernal pools and enhance ecological function to the site. An entry for `As -built Survey" has been added to Table l0 to clam this. 4. Photo point 5 and SG2 are shown in the incorrect position on the CCPV relative to the asbuilt. Please review and revise. ICI Response: The locations shown on the CCPV are the correct ones. The as -built drawings will be corrected to match the actual locations of these features. This error has been corrected. KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com Employee -Owned Since 1988 5. XS3, XS4, photo point 5 and SG2 all shifted upstream by one meander length. This appears to be the only deviation from the proposed monitoring plan in the approved mitigation plan. Please provide a brief explanation why the location was changed. ICI Response: Photo point 5 was installed in the location shown on the proposed monitoring plan (the location shown on the as-builts was not correct and has been corrected). XS3 and 4 were moved upstream to avoid the large tree that was left intact in the location of the proposed cross -sections. SG2 (which has been relabeled as SG-RHB) was moved downstream from its proposed location to XS5 to better capture bankfull events that occur on site. 6. Please include the installed fence layer and existing fence layer on the CCPV and asbuilt/redline drawing. The installed fence should be a surveyed layer to verify correct placement. ICI Response: The installed fence and existing fence layers have been added to the CCPV and the asbuilt/redline drawing. 7. Please add "Site Instituted — April 25, 2018" as the first entry on Table 10. ICI Response: This change has been made. 8. Planting tables shown on sheet 5 show no deviations from the Mitigation Plan. Please verify that plant species and quantities did not deviate from the approved list. If there is a deviation from the approved planting plan, this should be noted as redline changes to these tables. ICI Response: No changes were made from the proposed planting plan and species and quantity were planted as shown on sheet 5 of the as -built drawings. 9. The two areas of property/conservation easement dispute should be clearly marked in red on the asbuilt. Construction of riffle enhancement at the top of RHB did not extend to the CE bounds y. Construction stopped at the existing fence line within the CE boundary. ICI Response: These hvo arers have been addressed in the report and asbuilt plan sheets. 10. Two photo points are shown on the asbuilt/redline drawing, but they are not labeled. One on RHB near sta: 10+00 and another near sta: 12+50, but no photos are included for these stations. Please update photolog to include these stations in MY1. ICI Response: These symbols represent filler photo points that were being used to set up the as - built drawings before we had the exact locations. They have been removed from the as -built drawings. 11. Please call out on the asbuilt and CCPV where crediting begins on RHB 1, T 1 and T2. Notes indicate crediting begins at fi11l30' width buffer, but it is unclear where this point is. Recommend adding stationing of where credit begins under the noteslcomments section on Table 1 for each of the reaches. ICI Response: This information has been added to the report. 12. Two pattern deviations are shown on the asbuilt, but not called out as redline changes. RHB 12+00 and Tributary 1 104+00. Please update asbuilt and explain deviation. ICI Response: These hvo small pattern deviations are due to bedrock in the channel that was discovered during construction. They have been called out as redline changes on the as -built drawings. 13. A site visit was conducted on March 9, 2022 with KCI, and following items were observed and will need to be rectified before MYO can be finalized and invoiced. o Fence at the beginning of RHB is currently located approximately 5 feet inside of the conservation easement boundary. This section of fence will need to be moved and located on the easement line or outside of the easement. KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com Employee -Owned Since 1988 o Fence at the bottom of RHB is also located within the conservation easement and will need to be relocated. KCI Response: KCI is working towards a resolution to disputed fencing locations at the top and bottom of RHB (see response to first comment above). Landowner has logs and gravel stored near sta: 18+00 on RHB that is encroaching into the easement. This material will need to be stored outside of the conservation easement. KCI Response: KCI has spoken to the landowner about the items stored in the conservation easement and these items have since been removed. o A drainage swale has been constructed on the left floodplain on the upstream side of the crossing near sta: 13+50 on RHB to alleviate land owner concerns for water that was directed into the crossing. This feature was not depicted on the asbuilt or CCPV. Please include this feature on the asbuilt, CCPV and include a feature shape file in the digital deliverable. Please verify the property owner understand this swale cannot be maintained as it is inside the conservation easement. DMS recommends mulch, seed and matting for this feature. KCI Response: This feature has been added to the as -built drawings and the landowner has been informed that this swale may not be maintained. o DMS recommends over seeding portions of the site with temporary and permanent seed this spring to help with the impact caused by intense winter storms. KCI Response: Any portions of the site that are deemed to be lacking in adequate herbaceous cover will be over seeded this spring. Digital Deliverable Comments 1. The submitted stream features represent the mitigation plan lengths. Please submit a set of features that reflect the asbuilt ft/ac column. KCI Response: The as -built stream shapefile has been added to the digital deliverables. 2. Please include unique ID's in the attribute table of the stream pressure transducers. KCI Response: The unique ID's have been added to the attribute table of the stream pressure transducers. 3. If available, please submit features that represent the condition of the stream before restoration (e.g. existing stream features). KCI Response: The pre -construction existing streams shapefile has been added to the digital deliverables. 4. Please include a .dwg file with the digital submittal. KCI Response: This has been added to the digital deliverables. Sincerely, Adam Spiller Project Manager KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com Employee -Owned Since 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Summary 1 Table 1. Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits 1 Current Conditions Planview 2 Table 2. Goals, Performance, and Results 4 Table 3. Project Attributes Table 5 Baseline Conditions 6 References 6 Appendix A — Visual Assessment Data Table 4. Visual Stream Stability Assesment 7 Table 5. Visual Vegetation Assessment 10 Photo Reference Points 11 Vegetation Plot Photos 13 Appendix B — Vegetation Plot Data Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data Table 15 Table 7. Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table 16 Appendix C — Stream Geomorphology Data Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary 18 Table 9. Cross-section Morphology Monitoring Summary 21 Cross-section Plots 22 Longitudinal Profiles 32 Appendix D — Project Timeline and Contact Info Table 10. Project Activity and Reporting History 37 Table 11. Project Timeline and Contacts 37 Appendix E — As -Built Plan Sheets As -Built Plan Sheets 39 Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 MY00 Monitoring Report PROJECT SUMMARY The Round Hill Branch Restoration Site (RHBRS) was completed in December 2021 and restored a total of 2,142 linear feet of stream. The RHBRS is a riparian system in the French Broad River Basin (06010105 8-digit cataloging unit) in Buncombe County, North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic regime has been substantially modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, livestock impacts, and clearing of the riparian buffers. This site offers the chance to restore streams impacted by pasture and agriculture to a stable stream ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and floodplain access. Site grading was initially completed in June 2021 with no major changes from the construction plans. From August 15 — 18, 2021, the site received 7.6" of rain. This large scale rain event caused a significant amount of deposition to the upper portion of RHB-1, mainly upstream of the first crossing. This deposition, along with a few areas of bank scour along RHB-2, was repaired in September 2021. These repairs involved removing the sediment that had been deposited in the stream and sloping back and reinstalling coir matting on the scoured banks. One small area of floodplain scour located on the left bank, just downstream of the confluence of RHB and T2, was left as a floodplain depression. This area is stable and is not anticipated to expand. It also acts as an ephemeral pool and provides beneficial habitat diversity to the site. Project planting was completed on December 20, 2021 and the monitoring components were installed on January 19, 2022. Table 1. Round Hill Branch Restoration Site fID-100066) Proiect Mitigation Quantities and Credits Project Segment ❑ riginal Mitigation Plan FtJAc As- Built Ft/ Ac Original Mitigation Category Original Restoration Level Original Mitigation Ratio (X:1) Credits Comments Stream Crediting at full 30'-width buffer (STA 10+21); 20' exception for crossing STA 13+51 to 13+71; exception at crossing STA 17+11 to 17+26 RHB Reach 1 705 702 Cool R 1.00000 670.000 RHB Reach 2 622 619 Cool R 1.00000 555.000 No credit (limited widths/crossing) from STA 17+26 to 17+92 RHB Reach 3 284 284 Cool R 1.00000 284.000 Tl 387 384 Cool R 1.00000 375.000 Crediting begins at full 30'- width buffer (STA 100+09; no credit at crossing from STA 103+84 to 103+97 Crediting begins at full 30'- width buffer (200+53) T2 258 253 Cool R 1.00000 258.000 Total: 2,142.000 Project Credits Restoration Level Stream Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland Coastal Marsh Waim Cool Cold Restoration 2142.000 Re-establishment Rehabilitation Enhancement Enhancement I Enhancement 11 Creation Preservation Total 2142.000 Round Hill Branch Restoration Site DMSProject #100066 'WI Associates of NC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report 200+00 R', l - yin et 3 zoz ' � �;` 3 • fin + • • •n. • • 4 n �... < _= ' cry¢. ' F PP4 • . •r' V • 2 •a :a i • 7► a �'U'�+3 N PPfi r Rt =a 20+00 ti .. 47+00 : -,..'L.:, a,V o ' i "+..;per gs % •:`�,7 k• .. o r PP2 ra + 0 A Y 3"`•-PP7 I. • - xS2 �- ' *- . •' i 5+00 &A - ‘ ltiti\limo Begin cr ,4 ' ` 'editing r•1 -14+00 j tilwit,-.)'2' A ..• • M I _ �Project Easement (4.24 ac) p .t Z. Installed New Fencing ---- �g Existing Fencing , 0 Stream Gauges . ' - '�, - •- .i, .0o m Photo Point Locations • ;? 'r .itit►9 - —Monitoring XS • •� `V• "•�' • ,geran CI- Veg Plots • ,• ;71.1 ,,�. � ��'i0+nn —Stream Restoration ; } y1 ; . _ " No Credit CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW N 0 75 150 ROUND HILL BRANCH RESTORATION SITE Image Source:NCOneMa. Feet 2019❑rthoim agery. BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NC Table 2. Round Hill Branch Restoration Site (ID-100066} Goals, Performance and Results Goal Objective/Treatment Likely Functional Uplift Performance Criteria Measurement Cumulative Monitoring Results Restore channelized and livestock- impacted streams to stable C and B-type channels Relocate or stabilize channelized and/or incised streams to connect to a floodplain or floodprone area Hydraulics 4 bankfull events in 4 separate years; 30 consecutive days of flow 1 pressure transducer on RHB-2; 2 pressure transducers and cameras on T 1 and T2 Install a cross-section sized to the bankfull discharge Geomorphology BHR<1.2, ER>2.2 10 cross - sections; annual visual inspection Create bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures Geomorphology Percent riffle and pool, pool - to -pool spacing, and facet slopes as designed Longitudinal profile in MY00ual visual inspection Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading Fence out livestock to reduce nutrient, bacterial, and sediment impacts from adjacent grazing and farming practices to the project tributaries. Geomorphology No change >10% in cross- section measurements between monitoring events 10 cross - sections; annual visual inspection Physiochemical Fencing installed as designed, vegetation meeting success criteria Estimated reductions based on converted land use Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and a herbaceous seed mix Geomarpholgy and Species composition 260 stems/acre and average height of 6' after 5 years, 210 steins/acre and average height of 8' after 7 years; at least 4 species from the approved planting plan in each plot wl no species making up >50% of the stems 6 vegetation monitoring plots Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 3 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 3. Round Hill Branch Restoration Site (ID-100066) Project Attribute Table Project Name Round Hill Branch Restoration Site County Buncombe County Project Area (acres) 4.24 Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude decimal degrees) 35.6305 N and -82.7369 W Project Watershed Summary Information Physiographic Province Mountain River Basin French Broad USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 06010105 DWR Sub -basin 04-03-02 Project Drainage Area (acres) 471 Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 3% Land Use Classification Forest (62%), Pasture/Farmland (25%), Low -density Residential Development (12%), and Roads (1%). Reach Summary Information Parameters Pre -project length (feet) 2,214 Post -project (feet) 2,289 Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined) Partially confined to confined Drainage area (acres) 471 acres Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Intermittent - Perennial NCDWR Water Quality Classification C (Aquatic life, secondary recreation) Dominant Stream Classification (existing) F41641E4 Dominant Stream Classification (proposed) B41C4 Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) if applicable Stage IV Wetland Summary- Information Parameters W1 & W3 W2 W4 Pre -project (acres) 0.17 & 0.01 0.10 0.10 Post -project (acres) 0.17 & 0.01 0.10 0.10 Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian) Riparian Riparian Riparian Mapped Soil Series Tate Loam French Loam Tate Loam Soil Hydric Status No No No Regulatory Considerations Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs? Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes Yes SAW-2018-01168 Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes Yes DWR 18-1031 Endangered Species Act Yes Yes USFWS Historic Preservation Act No N/A N/A Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA) No N/A N/A Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMSProject #100066 4 KCI Associates of NC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report BASELINE CONDITIONS The site was planted on December 20, 2021. The baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted January 18, 2022. The average plot stem density from the six surveyed plots is 951 planted stems/acre. Baseline monitoring was conducted during dormancy, so many of the stems were not identified to species. During MY01, these trees will be identified to species. The baseline longitudinal profile was surveyed in August 2021. The baseline cross -sections were surveyed on January 19, 2022. The baseline survey found that the stream was constructed as designed and all structures were installed as planned with no major changes from the construction plans. The profile and cross-section survey found that the dimension and profile of the stream are as designed, with some small variation as is typical for stream restoration projects. There are two issue areas in terms of fencing with adjoining landowners. One area is at the top of Round Hill Branch where there is existing fence located approximately 5 feet inside of the conservation easement. The second area is at the bottom of Round Hill Branch where existing fence pole is within the conservation easement. Both areas are being addressed by sending the adjoining landowners letters notifying them where their property line is and having the fence moved to the appropriate locations. Documentation of this will be in subsequent monitoring reports. REFERENCES NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC. https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed Planning/Yadkin River B asin12009%20Upper%20Yadkin%2ORBRP Final%20Fina1%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services. June 2017. "As -built Baseline Monitoring Report Format, Data and Content Requirement." https://files.nc. gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%24Libra ry/Guidance%20and%20Template%20Documentsl6 AB Baseline Rep Templ June %202017.pdf NCIRT. October 24, 2016. "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update." https:l/saw-reg.usace.army.niillPN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation- Update.pdf USACE, Sprecher, S. W.; Warne, A. G. 2000. "Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology." https:I/ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA378910.xhtml Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 5 MY00 Monitoring Report APPENDIX A Visual Assessment Data Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 6 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 4. Round Hill Branch Resotration Site (ID-100066) Visual Stream Stability Assessment Reach ■ Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length RHB-1 702 1404 Assessment Date: 1/19/2022 _Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As -built Amount of L us table Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended Bank Surface Scour:/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply fiompoar growth and/or surface scour 0 100° o Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does NOT include 0 100% undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, shtmping, calving, or collapse 0 100% Totals 0 100% Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 7 7 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does mai exceed 15%. (See guidance far this table in DMS monitoring guidance document) 7 - 100% Table 4. Round Hill Branch Resotration Site (ID-100066) Visual Stream Stability Assessment Reach Assessed StreairLength Assessed Bank Length RHB-2 590 1180 Assessment Date: 1/19/2022 Major Channel Category _Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As -built Amount of 1.nstable Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended Bank Surface Scour/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or surface scour 0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank faihire appears likely. Does NOT inchide 0 100% undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechniral - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100% Totals 0 100% Structure Grade Control Grade control structures eaibibiting maintenance of grade across the sill_ 2 7 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance docunrnt) 2 lOD% Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMS Project #100066 7 KCIAssociates of NC; PA MYOO Monitoring Report Table 4. Round Hill Branch Res otration Site (ID-100066) Visual Stream Stability As sessnrnt Reach Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length RHB-3 284 568 Assessment Date: 1/19/2022 Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As -built Amount of Unstable Footage ° o Stable, Performing as Intended $ ank Surface Scour/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoor growth and/or surface scour 0 100% Toe Erasion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failiue appears likely. Does NOT include 0 100% undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank Failure Fhivial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100% Totals 0 100% Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill N/A N A NrA Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance document) N/A h A \ A Table 4. Round Hill Branch Res otration Site (IQ100066) Visual Stream Stability As sessnrnt Reach Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length T1 385 770 Assessment Date: 1/1912022 Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As -built Amount of Unstable Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended Bank Surface Scour/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoor growth and/or surface scour 0 100% Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that hank failure appears likely. Does NOT include 0 100° o undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank Failure Fhrvial and geotechnical - rotational, shimping, calving, or collapse 0 100% Totals 0 100% Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 4 4 100% Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance document) 4 100% Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMS Project #100066 8 KC1Associates of NC; PA MY00 Monitoring Report Table 4. Round Hill Branch Resotration Site (1D-100066) Visual Stream Stability Assessment Reach Assessed Stream Length Assessed Bank Length T2 253 506 Assessment Date: 1/19/71177 Major Channel Category Metric Number Stable, Performing as Intended Total Number in As -built Amount of T]ns table Footage % Stable, Performing as Intended Bank Surface Scour/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resuking simply frompoor growth and/or surface scour 0 100° o Toe Erosion Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank faihsre appears likely. Does NOT include 0 100°0 undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat. Bank Failure Fhivial and geotechnical - rotational, stumping, calving, or collapse 0 100° 0 0 1N°o Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill 5 5 1CK1° o Bank Protection Bank erasion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring guidance document) 5 5 100° o Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMS Project #100066 KClAssociates of NC, PA 9 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 5. Round Hill Branch Restoration Site tID-1000661 Visual Veietatiou Assessment PI:urte d ac r e ago 3.68 Vegetation Category Definitions flapping Threshold Comlined Acreage % of Planted Acreage Bare Areas Very limited cover ofboth woody and herbaceous material 0.10 acres 000 0.0% Low StemDensity Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MYstemcount criteria. 0.10acres 000 0.0% Total 0_00 0.0%n Areas of Poor Growth Rates Planted areas where average height is not neeting current MYPerfomance Standard. 0.10 acres 0.00 0.0% Ctirrmrlatiw Total 0_00 0.0%n Easement Acreage 4.24 Vegetarian Category Definitions ]lapping Threshold Camlined Acreage % of Easement Acreage Invasive Areas ofConcem Invasives nay occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the total easement acreage -Include species with the potential to directly outconipete native, young, woody stems in the short-term or connunity structure far siting connimatirc_ Species included m sunnatron above should be identified in report sunmary. 0.00acres 0.00 0.0% Easement Encroachment Areas Encroachment may be point, line, or polygon. Encroachment to be napped consists of any violation of restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Conmon encroachments are mowing, cattle access, vehicular access. Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact area. none # Encroachments noted Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMSProject #100066 10 ICCI Associates of NC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report Imo, a Photo Reference Photos tr wl.P.Nr"111711111.101 I . ti .'..., l I t I ` r f • r �t----� �- - , ^.f :tt, . , ;=;tin t ri.'-' \ --140 , .„.._ I { n o r{i 1.}41 '"- ` by.- i,: PP1 -MY-00- 1/18/22 PP2-MY-00- 1/18/22 -. - Lam' :0r•..,.,.i.•f•4'•.: - t" 14ii •= y ;•. '`' .,T. ram.-.. ax . i 4 a• f .-......4.)..l•..„..1: .,. i. • j$ _. 1. gafF.S` - - _ -fit ,. _ - •.. i 3.. ,..g +':. .. F ,mom ''�+ M1 Y; ..,.:• .r :i l xa PP3 - Y-00- 1/18/22 PP4-MY-00- 1/18/22 imi imetio._..., ir i i i.in in miyi ji • P'. '�Y DI " r ham: �ro� • • • •r doom ^�_AN PP5 -MY-00- 1/18/22 PPG-MY-00- 1/18/22 Round Hill Branch Restoration,Site KCI Associates afNC,PA DMS Project#100066 1I MY00 Monitoring Report 440 :"t.,.i:',...i: ' .'.0t ..Ar---11",- ' . . a,''''.'''„,, . . . . 717711111"4'y - Ayi - '� ..max ..,� :.i�..: �_ 4,-'ram- 1. Tic.'4..,4 - .. 1 -. 1 ! CI PP7-MY-00- 1/18:'22 PP8-MY-00- 1/18/22 IiiiIiii... I • PP9-MY-00- 1/18/22 Round Hill Branch Restoration,Site KCI Associates ofNC,PA DMS Project#100066 12 MY00 Monitoring Report Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos I A . _,, �t..,' :':.. ' A t - ' j Vegetation Plot 1 —MY-00— 1/18/22 Vegetation Plot 2—MY-00— 1/18122 �sl n ate. I,- :-- J ,�' . $: ` t ,. -r..'. Sis. - • , • , WV - ' ir ,-- ipmoket, itIc -.- .4., , , p Vegetation Plot 3—MY-00— 1/18/22 Vegetation Plot R1 —MY-00— 1/18/22 : .: 5• ►.- . .. _ _. : - , - q ' � -. '. :=ice ,� �� - x► �,�., y � . ,_• ". 1 dilY Ak 49* ' -....•-•'''4,...- I-... ^ • .-.. . oc..46">‘;›It:< , iirc- -; Voi -4 41/46; , 41* . Vegetation Plot R2—MY-00— 1/18/22 Vegetation Plot R3—MY-00— 1/18/22 Round Hill Branch Restoration,Site KCI Associates ofNC,PA DMS Project#100066 13 MY00 Monitoring Report APPENDIX B Vegetation Plot Data Round Hill Branch Restoration Site KCI Associates ofNC; PA DAIS Project #100065 14 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 6. Vegetation Plot Data Round Hill Branch Restoration Site (ID-100066) Scientific Name Common Name Tree/S hrub Indicator Status Veg Plot 1 F Veg Plot 2 F Veg Plot 3 F Veg Plot 1 R Veg Plot 2 R Veg Plot 3 R Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Total Total Total Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan Aesculus (lava yellow buckeye Tree FACU 4 4 5 1 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree FACW 3 3 1 2 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub FACW 1 1 6 3 1 other 15 15 6 6 14 14 7 9 15 Piatanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree FACW 6 6 1 1 1 5 6 Quercus alba white oak Tree FACU 4 4 1 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree FACU 1 1 Quercus sp. 3 = 1 1 4 4 5 Salix nigra black willow Tree OBL 5 Sambucus canadensis American black elderberry Tree 1 Sum Performance Standard 21 21 19 19 19 19 24 29 29 Mitigation Plan Performance Standard Current Year Stem Count 19 24 29 29 Stems/Acre 850 1 769 972 1174 1174 Species Count 2 u 4 6 8 5 Dominant Species Composition (%) 71 32 74 29 31 52 Average Plot Height (ft.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 % Invasives 0 0 0 0 0 0 Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard Current Year Stem Count 21 19 19 24 29 29 Stems/Acre S5D 769 769 972 1174 1174 N 1 Species Count 2 6 4 6 8 Dominant Species Composition (%) 71 32 74 29 31 Average Plot Height (ft.) 1 1 1 1 1 % Invasives=MIMI 0 - 0 0 0i 1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been appioved. 2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The ' Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized). 3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems. Round Hill Branch Restoration ,Site DMSProject #100066 15 KCI Associates ofNC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report Planted Acreage Date of Initial Plant Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s) Date(s) Mowing Date of Current Survey Plot size (ACRES) 3.68 2021-12-20 2022-01-18 0.0247 Table 7. Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table Round Hill Branch Restoration Site (ID-100066) Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table Veg Plot 1 F Veg Plot 2 F Veg Plot 3 F Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Monitoring Year 7 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 1 Monitoring Year 0 850 1 2 0 769 1 P 769 1 Veg Plot Group 1 R Veg Plot Group 2 R Veg Plot Group 3 R Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Monitoring Year 7 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 1 Monitoring Year 0 972 1 6 0 1174 1 8 0 1174 5 0 Round Hill Branch Restoration Site DMS Project #100065 16 KCI Associates ofNC; PA MY00 Monitoring Report APPENDIX C Stream Geomorphology Data Round Hill Branch Restoration Site DAIS Project #100065 KCI Associates ofNC, PA 17 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Round Hill Branch, RHB-1 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple) Design Monitoring Baseline (MYO) Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 5.2 6.0 6.0 6.8 4 9.8 13.3 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 18.5 33.4 27.5 60+ 4 40 52 56.9 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2 4 0.8 0.7 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.9 4 1.3 1.5 1 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 5.4 6.0 6.1 6.3 4 7.6 8.9 1 Width/Depth Ratio 4.3 6.1 6.2 7.6 4 12.6 19.8 1 Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 6.0 4.6 12.3 4 4.1 5.3 4.3 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 4 1.0 1.0 1 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 48 52 39 Rosgen Classification F4/E4 C4/B4c C4/B4c Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 27.9 39.2 39.2 Sinuosity (ft) 1.07 1.1 1.1 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.020 0.021 0.020 Other Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Round Hill Branch, RHB-2 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple) Design Monitoring Baseline (MYO) Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 5.5 1 11.4 9.7 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 35.0 1 44 65 73.9 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.3 1 0.9 0.6 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1 1.4 1.1 1 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 7.1 1 10.2 6.1 1 Width/Depth Ratio 4.2 1 12.8 15.5 1 Entrenchment Ratio 6.4 1 3.9 5.7 7.6 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 57 39 30 Rosgen Classification F4/E4 C4/B4c C4/B4c Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 35.5 47.5 47.5 Sinuosity (ft) 1.05 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.020 0.014 0.016 Other Round Hill Branch Restoration Site DAIS Project #100065 13 KCl,4ssociates ofNC; PA MY00 Monitoring Report Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Round Hill Branch, RHB-3 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple) Design Monitoring Baseline (MYO) Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 11.5 1 11.8 12.3 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 29.4 1 38 55 56.1 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 1 0.9 0.7 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1 1 1.5 1.5 1 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 9.0 1 11.2 8.6 1 Width/Depth Ratio 14.6 1 12.5 17.7 1 Entrenchment Ratio 2.6 1 3.2 4.7 4.5 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 34 47 32 Rosgen Classification F4/E4 C4/B4c C4/B4c Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 42.7 55.6 55.6 Sinuosity (ft) 1.12 1.1 1.1 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.018 0.017 0.016 Other Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Round Hill Branch, Ti Parameter Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple) Design Monitoring Baseline (MYO) Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 3.8 4.1 2 6.8 6.6 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 7.9 19.0 30.0 2 35 45 50.2 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 2 0.5 0.5 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 1.0 1.1 2 0.9 0.9 1 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fie) 2.5 2.7 2.9 2 3.7 3.5 1 Width/Depth Ratio 5.8 5.9 5.9 2 12.7 12.2 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 4.9 7.9 2 5.1 6.6 7.6 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.4 1.7 2 1.0 1.0 1 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 34 29 26 Rosgen Classification F4 C4/B4c C4/B4c Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 10.0 14.2 14.2 Sinuosity (ft) 1.10 1.13 1.13 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.020 0.019 0.017 Other Round Hill Branch Restoration Site DAIS Project #100065 19 KCI Associates ofNC; PA MY00 Monitoring Report Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Round Hill Branch, T2 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition (applicaple) Design Monitoring Baseline (MYO) Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft) 9.7 1 6.4 6.2 1 Floodprone Width (ft) 11.8 1 27 34 36.1 1 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 1 0.5 0.5 1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 1 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 3.3 1 3.1 3.1 1 Width/Depth Ratio 28.1 1 13.2 12.6 1 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1 4.2 5.3 5.8 1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull 31 48 54 Rosgen Classification G4 B4/C4b B4/C4b Bankfull Discharge (cfs) 10.3 14.0 14.0 Sinuosity (ft) 1.06 1.13 1.13 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.031 0.031 0.037 Other Round Hill Branch Restoration Site KCI Associates ofNC; PA DAIS Project #100065 20 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 9. Cross-section Morphology Monitoring Summary Round MI Branch Restoration Site (ID-100066) Cross Section 1 (Riffle - RHB-1) Cross Section 2 (Pool - RHB-1) Cross Section 3 (Riffle - RHB-2) MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MYS MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on 2168.8 2168.0 2161.1 AB-Bankfull Area Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bank -full Area 1.0 1.0 Thalweg Elevation 2167.3 21(35.8 2160.1 LTOB Elevation 2168.8 2168.0 2161.1 LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.5 2.1 1.1 LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 8.9 15.5 6.1 Cross Section 4 (Pool - RHB-21 Cross Section 5 (Riffle - RHB-3) Crass Section 6 (Pool - RHB-3) MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MYS MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 VY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2160.7 2154.4 2153.8 Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.0 Thalweg Elevation 2157.5 2152.9 2150.6 LTOB Elevation 2160.7 2154.4 2153.8 LTOB Max Depth (ft) 3.2 1.5 3.2 LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 29.7 8.6 26.4 Cross Section 7 (Riffle - T1) Cross Section 8 (Pool - T1) Cross Section 9 (Riffle - T2) MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 VY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MYS VY7 VY+ Bank -Full Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2167.7 2167.2 2162.5 Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bankfull Area 1.0 1.0 Thalweg Elevation 2166.8 2165.4 2161.7 LTOB Elevation 2167.7 2167.2 2162.5 LTOB Max Depth (ft) 0.9 1.8 0.8 LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 3.5 10.2 3.1 Cross Section 10 (Pool - T2) MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MYS MY7 VY+ Bank -Full Elevation (ft) - Based on AB -Bank -full Area 2161.4 Bank Height Ratio - Based on AB Bank -full Area Thalweg Elevation 2159.8 LTOB Elevation 2161.4 LTOB Max Depth (ft) 1.6 LTOB Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 6.8 Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site DMSProject #100066 KCIAssociates ofNC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad Site: Round Hill Branch T~XS ID XS1 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0-46 _ Date: 1/19t2022 - - .-_ f- - _ .se- _ _ - Field Crew TS,KB w1311 i . ;-VTAIIII - r Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA w 1 w 0.0 2170.66 Banldull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2168.79 , _ 0.2 2170.20 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 8-9 t_ ..--` - 4_4 2170.14 LIOB Cross-Sectional Area: 8-9 . 5.5 2169.79 Banldull Width: 13.3 - . ` WO 216928 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 2170.31 rag‘ =.:.+ i' - ..k.ilm‘ Ilk At.1. ., 10-3 2168.82 Flood Prone Width: 56-9 a 'It. 13.1 2168.80 LIOB Max Depth 1-5 it +ti ' --'a yr 14.3 2168.86 LTOB Mean Depth 0.7 _ , 15-4 2168.69 W 1 D Ratio: 19-8 - 17-9 2167.82 Entrenchment Ratio: 4-3 �` - 18-3 2167.82 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 19-1 2167.39 Thalweg Elevation: 216726 19-4 2167.35 19-8 2167.27 20 2 2167 26 Round Hill Branch,XS1,Riffle,RHB-1 2171 21-3 2167.32 21.5 2167.61 22.5 2167.70 It 23.9 2168.47 2170 252 2168.61 /1/7--------> - 28-1 2168.79 332 2168.76 - 40-6 2168.66 .td2169 46.7 2168.67 c • 49-8 2169.47 u - 55-0 2169.84 2168 56-8 2170.05 57.1 2170.43 - 2167 • I I 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Station{feet) .SmkFll �.IMod Pine Rea -MY00 Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad Site: Round Hill Branch XS ID X52 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0-46 { 4 off► '- k + - Date: 1/19t2022 -. d.4- • —;?: . ` Field Crew TS,KB - _ Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - 0.0 2170-52 Bonilla Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2167.95 } + 0.1 2170.10 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 15-5 1, 4-3 2170-01 LIOB Cross-Sectional Area: 15-5 - 5-8 2169.60 BanldullWidth: 11-8 9-0 2168.94 Flood Prone Area Elevation: — ✓ •k ' 11-8 2168.46 Flood Prone Width: — ' 13-4 2168-11 LIOB Max Depth 2.1 - 14-5 2168-10 LTOB Mean Depth 1-3 + e 15-7 2168.09 W 1 D Ratio: — 18-2 2168.07 Entrenchment Ratio: — ~',. 20-4 2167.95 Bank Height Ratio: — : 21.2 2167.75 Thalweg Elevation: 2165.80 21.8 2167-37 23.3 2166-61 Round Hill Branch,XS2,Pool,RHB-1 24-7 2166-38 2171 25-9 2165-97 26.9 2165-81 k 27-6 2165-80 2170 — 292 2166.08 302 2166-69 2169 J 31-5 2167-59 32-5 2168-10 332 2168-34 A 2168 36.7 2168.28 c 42-0 2168.29 2167 46-3 2168.67 E 50-3 2168-81 53-8 2169.01 2166 56.9 2168.94 57-0 2169.47 2165 0 10 20 30 40 50 Station{feet) �.s�tdt —MYua Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad _ �ry , Site: Round Hill Branch as- 4 it XS ID XS3 } /� Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.59 - - - - - Date: 1/19/2022 - Field Cress: TS,KB 'L •. t ' ' Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - ~- 0-0 2166.41 Banlditll Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2161.12 '+' -- - . __ .� =. 0.1 2166.05 Banlditll Cross-Sectional Area: 6-1 r_ Y 4.1 2165.60 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 6.1 r - 7-2 2164.68 Banldull Width: 9-7 9-9 2163.85 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 2162.17 15-6 216197 Flood Prone Width: 73-9 4 • - 17-9 2161.58 LTOB Max Depth 1.1 22-0 2161.50 LTOB Mean Depth 0-6 _ a. • 27-8 2161.52 W 1 D Ratio: 15-5 32.1 216120 Entrenchment Ratio: 7-6 , r 33.1 2160.88 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 rr 36-4 2160.90 Thalweg Elevation: 2160.07 40.0 2161.11 449 2161.43 46-7 216127 Round Hill Branch,XS3,Riffle,RHB-2 47-9 2160.91 2167 _ 49-3 2160.48 2166 49-9 2160.25 50.6 2160.25 2165 N 51-3 2160.07 51-7 2160.07 216452-3 2160.08 53-3 2160.09 2163 54-1 2160.32 e 55-7 2160.94 •2 2162 ti 56-9 2161-11 t 2161 ' ---___.. .._' 57-7 2161.12 W 59-5 2161.14 2160 63.0 2161.16 68-9 2161.13 2159 1 I I I I 92.5 2163.02 0 20 40 60 80 100 96.4 2163.52 98-5 216420 Station(feet) 101-8 2164.39 ----Flood Prone Area -MYuo 101.8 2164.71 Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad t 'sA 1 ! /!(': Site: Round Hill Branch XS ID X54 _ �4 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.59 ' q' Date: 1119l2022 �.-�ti. Field Crew TS,KB - c - Station Elevation SL"A311L4RY DATA � -�-'-: y .� �_r r- 0.0 2164.77 BankfuB Elevation(ft)-Based an AB-Bankfull Area 2160.70 ati = t_ al 216428 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 29.7 _ :4 '' ► -- - F-_ , 4.0 216425 LIOB Cross-Sectional Area: 29.7 4.6 2164.23 Bankfull Width: 18.3 - '"��"- 6.4 2163.38 Flood Prone Area Elevation: -- - - ' 9.7 2161.99 Flood Prone Width: - r a 12.0 2161.34 LTDB Max •Depth 3.2 S • - '' 13.9 2160.91 LTOB Mean Depth 1.6 • • 18.8 2160.69 WIDRatio: - - • 20.2 2160.70 Entrenchment Ratio: - 20.8 2160.43 Bank Height Ratio: - Ai 21.7 2160.15 ThalwegElevation: 215754 ,rt 21.8 2159.44 22.3 2158.29 23.1 2157.90 Round Hill Branch, .S4,Pool,RHB-2 24.3 2157.54 2166 -_ 25.2 2157.58 2165 26.6 2158.00 27.3 2158.18 2164 • 28.1 2158.06 29.7 2158.65 2163 31.3 2158.88 2162 32.7 2159.48 il 34.1 2159.81 2161 ____ 36.9 2160.72 2160 ____----'--Y ' 38.3 2160.86 40.1 2160.87 0 2159 45.6 2160.68 50.1 2160.68 2158 54.6 2160.44 2157 1 81.1 2163.74 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 81.9 2163.99 84.2 2164.08 Station{feet) 84.3 2164.50 ___. -MYpp Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad Site: Round Hill Branch XS ID X55 - - Drainage Area(sq mi): 0-74 - - F -- . ,-. - Date: 1/19/2022 - Field Crew TS,KB -latik4 , _i i -. - ..-7- Station Elevation SUMMARY DATAy -' 0-0 2159-20 Banldull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2154-39 1' 0-1 2158-76 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 8-6 ..�' + - 5.4 2158-41 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 8-6 ' :� 7.0 2158-40 Banldull Width: 123 f ` - 8-0 2157-91 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 2155-85 J • 'j '"e 11-2 2157-07 Flood Prone Width: 56-1akitt / �1 15-0 2155-84 LTOB Max Depth 1-5 -A 17-9 2154-84 LTOB Mean Depth 0-7 -. 20-7 2154-52 W 1 D Ratio: 17-7 If] / 25-4 2154-47 Entrenchment Ratio: 4-5 ' '4 29-7 2154-41 Bank Height Ratio: 1-0 • ' 31-4 2154-39 Thalweg Elevation 2152-93 32-6 2154-37 342 2153-97 35-6 2153-71 Round Hill Branch,XS5,Riffle,RIM-3 36-3 2153-39 2160 37-1 2153.382159 372 2152-9797 37-9 2152-96 2158 _ 38-8 2152-94 39-4 2152-93 2157 39-6 2152-93 40-0 2153-50 a 2156 40-9 2153-49 u _ 42-7 2154-11 •2 2155 \1/4...........N\----.. . `a - 43-9 2154-43 44-8 2154-41 ran 2154 47-0 2154-37 2153 48-5 2154-36 49-3 2154-18 2152 49-9 2154-30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 75-3 2157-25 762 2157-51 Station{feet) 76-8 2157-51 —MYua 76-9 2157-93 Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad - 41111111116 Site: Round Hill Branch - - , XS ID XS6 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0-74 Date: 1/19/2022 f Field Cress TS,KB liv, ;*.- 'A ir 11 I, - _ Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA — —_ _ - -" - =t 0-0 2158-25 Banldull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2153-84 - - -.' - 0-0 2157_83 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 26-4 , 3-8 2157-83 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 26-4 - �••e 4_ - -y 6-0 2157-82 Banldull Width: 14-2 - L 6-9 215729 Flood Prone Area Elevation: -- -Z 10-1 2156-00 Flood Prone Width: — -_ ' 'w 13-5 2154-92 LTDB Max Depth 3-2 ` • - 16-2 215421 LTOB Mean Depth 1-9 18-2 2153-98 W 1 D Ratio: — tiP . - - 20-2 2154-00 Entrenchment Ratio: • — 20-9 2153-99 Bank Height Ratio: — 21-6 2153-86 ThalwegElevaflao: 2150-63 _ , 22-8 2153-02 23-5 2152-60 242 2152-07 Round Hill Branch,XS6,Pool,RBB-3 25-5 2151-24 2159 26-6 2150-74 2158 27-5 2150-64 - 28-9 2150-64 2157 29-9 2150-63 2156 30-8 2151-47 .\N"- 31-5 2151-47 u 2155 322 2152-50 il 32-9 2152-93 a 2154 . , 34-1 2153-14 •2 3 2153 \\*\-... 362 2153-70 37-1 2153-84 Et1 2152 38-3 2153-83 44-3 2153-79 2151 482 2153-76 2150 I I I 53-7 2153-72 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 72-4 2156-70 73-3 2157-15 Station(feet) 74-5 2157-15 ----emu —mvoa 74-8 2157-63 Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broadvlogn 411140*-- Site: Round Hill Branch DSID 0.11 1 II Drainage Area(sq mi): -1 t 1 � '- i '•� Date: 1/19/2022 _ - - -' �' Field Crew TS,KB .. �• 14. Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - - 0-0 2170.39 Banldull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 2167.68 '°- = 0-0 2170.13 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.5 _ - _ __ - 2.8 2170.11 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 3-5 i4 7'4 - - -- - - 42 2169-57 BanldullRidth: 6-6 F 72 2168.64 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 2168.61 1D2 21fi7-T2 Flood Prone Width: SD2 t. 14-1 2167.56 LTOB Max Depth 0-9 �T 4111mrr� -e n 18.4 2167.58 LTOB Mean Depth 0-5 •` 21-1 2167.70 W 1 D Ratio: 12_2 _ ` - - Jib ; 23.4 2167.68 Entrenchment Ratio: 7-6 _ iMr� _ 4 242 2167.69 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 - �• ` 24-8 2167.40 Thalweg Elevation: 2166.76 - - _ ��'.. • - 25-9 2167.19 26-1 2166.77 262 2166-77 Round Hill Branch,XS7,Riffle,T1 26-9 2166.76 2172 - 27-3 2166.77 28-4 2166.83 2171 29-1 2167.31 i 30-0 2167.44 2170 - 30-8 2167.68 32.0 2167.70 35.2 2167.98 a 2169 41-0 2167.79 u - ' 45-3 2167.83 •Q ...-----77Z `a 2168 53-4 2167.85Th. , 55-5 216821 W 58-0 2168-72 2167 64.1 2170.40 652 2170.60 2166 682 2170.62 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 68-4 2171.09 Station{feet) ---•sou ----rimer a� -MYua Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad 'er Site: Round Hill Branch XS ID XS8 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.11 - Date: 1/19/2022 _ i t Y Field Crew TS,KB j } s Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ~- 0-0 2170.09 Banldull Elevation(it)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 216720 - - -`v gM 0-0 2169.89 Banldull Cross-Sectional Area: 10-2 a� •__. 32 2169.87 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 10-2 t 4, % - MI 5.5 216927 Banldull Width: 8-8 •- ' 4pirllo - a -- -.- - 7.9 2168.18 Flood Prone Area Elevation: - - 1 10-3 2167.50 Flood Prone Width: - 11-1 2167.30 LTDB Max Depth :.8 1 15-7 216727 LTOB Mean Depth . _ _ E:'c 19-8 216724 ATI D Ratio: - - y ` 23-7 216723 Ennenchment Ratio: - y• 26-8 2167.23 Bank Height Ratio: - 29-3 2167.22 Thalweg Elevation: 2165.39 - 30-3 2167.20 31-4 2166.52 31-9 216630 Round Hill Branch,XS8,Pool,Ti 32.9 2166.02 2171 33.6 2165.43 - JJ 34-7 III 21702169 2168 u 43.9 2167.47 Q ^ `a 2167 45.3 2167.71 46.7 2167.95 41 \ ,...-1- 48-3 2168.73 2166 512 2169.53 52.6 2169.96 2165 1 58-5 2169.93 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 612 2169.91 fil-4 217D-40 Station(feet) ---•S�1i LL _my, Cross-Section Plots River Basin: French Broad Site: Round Hill Branch XS ID XS9 Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.11 t Date: 1/19/2022 -' Field Crew TS,KB Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - - 0-0 2166.54 Banlditll Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 2162.51 r- _ 0-1 2166.14 Banlditll Cross-Sectional Area: 3.1 4.8 2166.10 LIDB Cross-Sectional Area: 3.1 .., 7-9 2166.07 Banldull Width: 6.2 9-0 2166.06 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 2163.31 , ti • 9-9 2165.80 Flood Prone Width: 36-1 14-9 2164.07 LTDB Max Depth 0.8 18-6 2163-13 LTOB Mean Depth 0-5 +1, 20-8 2162.66 AT1 D Ratio: 12-6 r" 21-7 2162.63 Entrenchment Ratio: 5-8 s e $ '' 25-1 2162.63 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 27-4 2162.63 Thalweg Elevation 2161.71 29.9 2162.52 31-0 2162.51 31-4 2162-51 Round Hill Branch,XS9,Riffle,T2 32-9 2161.94 2170 33.4 2161.94 2169 33.6 2161.82 - 33.9 2161.75 2168 34-0 2161.76 2167 = - 34-5 2161.71 E 34-8 2161.72 u 2166 35-5 2161.78 36-1 2161.99 a 2165 37-1 2162.31 •2 37-9 2162-59 i 2164 38.7 2162.50 r*1 2163 42-3 216248 s 46-6 2162.46 2162 50-6 2162.71 2161 52-5 2162.91 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 54-3 2163.38 69-7 2168.53 Station(feet) 70-7 2168.77 ---'B 1 ---'Flood Prone P a -MY°a I 73.8 2168.85 73.8 2169.39 Cross-Section Plots Ricer Basin: French Broad , Site: Round Hill Branch r xs m xslo Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.11 Date: 1/19/2022 . •w.�. --a Field Cress: TS,KB • •••• -"'�� x' -w Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA .. - 0-0 2166-43 BanlduB Elevation(ft)-Based an AB-Bankfull Area 2161.44 - • 0-1 2166-02 Banlditll Cross-Sectional Area: 6.8 3.4 216595 LIOB Cross-Sectional Area: 6.8 - 7-4 2165-85 Banldull Width: 8-7 2165-67 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 10.2 2165_06 Flood Prone Width: --- k �.- 12-9 2164_17 LTOB Max Depth :.6 i 17.5 2162.34 LTOB Mean Depth 0.9 - K 1 20.1 2161.73 W1DRatio: - 23-2 2161.71 Entrenchment Ratio: - 26-4 2161.61 Bank Height Ratio: - 312 2161.46 Thalweg Elevation: 2159.83 342 2161.45 35-0 2161.44 35-7 2161-10 Round Hill Branch,XS10,Pool,T2 36-8 2160.49 2168 37-1 2160.18 2167 37-7 2160.17 38-3 2159.83 2166 39-0 2159.83 2165 39-8 2160.03 40-5 2160.54 2164 41-3 2161.00 il 42-0 2161.17 a 2163 42-8 2161.51 Q i 2162 43-6 2161.57 45-9 2161.75 Et1 2161 48-1 2161.97 50-0 2162.31 2160 52-3 2163.03 2159 55-6 2164.48 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 592 2165.52 63-4 2166.41 Station/feet) 63-9 2167-12 -MYot 66-8 2167.23 668 2167.54 2181 2180 2179 2178 2177 2176 2175 2174 2173 2172 2171 2170 2169 2168 2167 2166 2165 2164 2163 2162 2161 Longitudinal Profile Round Hill Branch Restoration Site - RHB Reach 1 Monitoring Year 00, 2022 ■ ■ ■ r. ■ ■ St = 0.02x + 2200.7 •• 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ 11 — ... — 0-0-1: "' ■ Sws =-0.0202x + 2200.1 • R • ■ 7 • �■ ■ ■ 2160 1000 1100 1200 1300 Station (ft) 1400 1500 1600 Design MY00 Water Surface • Bankfull ❑ Cross Section • Structure 1700 2167 2166 2165 2164 2163 2162 2161 2160 2159 2158 2157 2156 2155 2154 2153 2152 2151 2150 2149 2148 2147 2146 2145 2144 1730 Longitudinal Profile Round Hill Branch Restoration Site - RHB Reach 2 & 3 Monitoring Year 00, 2022 ■ ■ RHB Reach 2 RHB Reach 3 ` • �� ■ L� SBKF =-0.0168x + 2194.5 ■ • • sws =-U.01b4x + 2192. • ED ijD❑■ ■ ■ —— _ • •• ■ u ...• .. • • • SBKF=-0.0174x+2196.3 • 5W5=-0.0163x+2192.8 —n - , ■ ■ 1 1 1 1830 1930 2030 2130 Station (ft) 2230 2330 2430 2530 Design MY00 Water Surface • Bankfull ❑ Cross Section • Structure 2630 2175 — 2170 - 2165 2160 ■ SBKF =-0.017x + 2341.5 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑❑ e I. 10000 10050 10100 ■ Longitudinal Profile Round Hill Branch Restoration Site - T1 Monitoring Year 00, 2022 Sws =-0.017x + 2340.7 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 10150 ■ 4�` ■ ■ 10200 Station (ft) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ • .,• ......~ ❑❑ ❑ J LLF ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 10250 10300 10350 10400 Design MY00 Water Surface • Bankfull ❑ Cross Section • Structure 2166 2165 2164 2163 2162 2161 2160 2158 2157 2156 2155 2154 2153 2152 20000 Longitudinal Profile Round Hill Branch Restoration Site - T2 Monitoring Year 00, 2022 ❑ ■ ■ ■ t, ■ '.....__ ■ ■ ■ ■ -- —0m. * 1 ■ ■ mi. .rm .... ■ ♦' ■ SBKF 0.0363x + 2890.7 0 ■■ ■ ■ i1 Sws =-0.0373x + 2909.7 f+ ■ •., - ■ 20050 20100 20150 Station (ft) 20200 20250 20300 Design MY00 Water Surface • Bankfull p Cross Section • Structure APPENDIX D Project Timeline and Contact Info Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 36 MY00 Monitoring Report Table 10. Project Activity & Reporting History Round Hill Branch Restoration Site, DMS Project #100066 Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Site Instituted April 25, 2018 Mitigation Plan Nov. 13, 2020 Final Design - Construction Plans Feb. 12, 2021 Construction Grading Completed June 18, 2021 As -built Survey August 11, 2021 Repairs from Stonn Damage Completed Sept. 26, 2021 Planting Completed Dec. 20, 2021 Baseline Monitoring/Report February 2022 Vegetation Monitoring January 18, 2022 Stream Survey January 19, 2022 Table 11. Project Contacts Round Hill Branch Restoration Site, DMS Project #100066 Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278-2512 Fax: (919) 783-9266 Construction Contractor KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats 1983 Jefferson Highway Waynesboro, VA 22980 Contact: Mr. David Coleman Phone: (540) 941-0067 Monitoring Performers KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site DMS Project #100066 37 KCI Associates of NC, PA MY00 Monitoring Report APPENDIX E As -Built Plan Sheets Round fill Branch Restoration ,Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMSProject #100066 38 MY00 Monitoring Report STATE CONTRACT NUMBER SMUT TOTAL ,.., u NCDEO DIVISION OF MITIGATION SE �� VICES N.C. 7534 1 SHEETS 8 NIss J ® REVISED PER DMS COMMENTS MAY 2022 ROUND HILL BRANCH PROJECT F. LOCATION ti' RESTORATION SITE am [[y ,a�- ! qO f ,, 1 G C'kEEIy 7vAf) VA �� BUNCOMBE FRENCH COUNT, NORTH CAROLINA BROAD RIVER BASINfCATALOGING UNIT 06010105 GpFFti VICINITY MAP 49l4 �y"Pa NOT TO SCALE I END RH B BEGIN TRIBUTARY 1 b C m rrl , N TRIBBEGIUTARY 2 4qo fin AS BUILT PLANS NOTES: Nql (...) THERE WAS A LARGE STORM EVENT ON AUGUST 16, 2021 AND THE SITE WAS REPAIRED TO THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. BEGIN RHB SHEETS 3, 5, 7 1 SHEETS 4, 6, 8 IJIRECTIONS TO SITE INDEX OF SHEETS Prepared !n The Office of: PROJECT ENGINEER `• 4/ ,= SS 1CAR TITLE SHEET o jo • FROM ASHEVILLE, TAKE U.S. 74 An.ASSOCIATES 2 GENERAL NOTES &PROJECT LEGEND • DF 9 USE THE TWO RIGHT LANES TO TAKE A RIGHT ONTO NC-63 WEST. TURN LEFT ONTO NEWFOUND ROAD. TAKE 3-4 SITE PLAN 5-8 PLANTING PLAN 7-8 BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN ENCINEERs•PLA l2ERS.ECCLDCI5T$ 55D5 FALLS OF REUSE RO&O SUITE 400 RaLEcR,Rc ncae• _: - - Q f '. SEAL • - eiti RABBIT HAM ROAD TO GREEN VALLEY ROAD. THE STREAM PROJECT ENTRANCE Prepared for: Prepared byr KRISTIN E. KNIGHT, PE D40899 1,040899 •' WILL BE ON ON THE LEFT AT 588 GREEN MATTHEW REIO PROJECT ENGINEER `,�` , •/ • • ICE. [? S��C (....) VALLEY ROAD, LEICESTER, NC 28748. DMS PROJECT MANAGER ALEX FRENCH ,f1��„, ,,r E. PROJECT DESIGNER }51t'• 02 -off' -2022 P.E. ` `` J J SIGNATURE: J GENERAL NOTES: BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: ALL BEARINGS ARE NAD 1983 GRID BEARINGS. ALL DISTANCES AND COORDINATES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL (GROUND) VALUES. UTILITY/SUBSURFACE PLANS: NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING A UTILITY LOCATOR AND ESTABLISHING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT REACH. PROJECT LEGEND: Designed Thalweg w/Approximate Bankfull Limits Installed Riffle Enhancement Installed Riffle Grade Control Installed Cascade Structure Installed Step Pool Installed Live Lift Former Channel Filled Photo Point 0 M Stream Gauge Vegetation Plot ,'. f�,id I I Cross—section Minor Contour Line (As —Built) Major Contour Line (As —Built) As —Built Thalweg w/Approximate Bankfull Limits Existing Fencing n New Fencing o tt,t111+, , CARO,J • SEAL 040899 - 02 -08 -2022 z VI cr BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA rum FEBRUARY 2222 u4E. N.T.B. GENERAL NOTES & PROJECT LEGEND SHEET 2 OF a IC GPID IAD '8 -40' -20' 0' 40' BO' GRAPHIC SCALE ISSUE WITH ADJOINING LANDOWNER AND FENCE LINE IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING ADDRESSED. DOCUMENTATION OF THIS WILL BE IN SUBSEQUENT MONITORING REPORTS. BEGIN RHB POOL READJUSTED DUE TO BEDROCK IN CHANNEL. BEGIN CREDITING INSTALLED 'STEP POOL. INSTALLED 'CASCADE RIFFLE'. INSTALLED 'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT. INSTALLED 'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL /'ROCK FORD. DRAINAGE SWALE INSTALLED TO REDIRECT WATER FROM CROSSING. ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021. INSTALLED 'LIVE LIFT'. EXISTING WETLAND 'W1' EXISTING CHICKEN COOPS REMOVED BEGIN CREDI ING BEGIN TRIBUTARY 1 EXISTING 18" CMP CULVERT REMOVED EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. TYPICAL ALL " •" NSTALLED (21 24" DIA. x 24' HDPE FLOG LAIN CULVERT EXISTING PLUNGE POOL BANKS REMAINED AS -IS FILLED EXISTING CHANNEL (TYPICAL ALL HATCHING) INSTALLED 'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. INSTALLED PLUNGE POOL. COORDINATED WITH DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE TO INSTALL OVER -WIDENED BANKS IN THIS AREA. STABILIZED INCOMING DRAINAGE WITH ROCK OUTLET. EXISTING WETLAND 'W4' POOL READJUSTED DUE TO BEDROCK IN CHANNEL. HOUSE HOUSE INSTALLED CLASS 1 / B STONE MIXTURE CULVERT PROTECTION MATCH LIN E - SEE SHEET 4 0 a ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS a*E. FEBRUARY 2022 GRAPHIC SITE PLAN SHEET 3 OF a NAD Nc 'as eAm -40' -20' 0' 40' 80' GRAPHIC SCALE MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3 INSTALLED 'STEP POOL'. INSTALLED 'LIVE LIFT. \� INSTALLED 'RI FELE ENHANCEMENT'. INSTALLED'CASCADg RIFFLE. EXISTING WETLAND'W2 INSTALLED 'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. SHED REMOVED FILLED FORMER CHANNEL (TYPICAL ALL HATCHING) ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS -BUILT SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. TYPICAL ALL "." INSTALLED PLUNGE POOL. COORDINATED WITH DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE TO INSTALL OVER -WIDENED BANKS IN THIS AREA. FLOODPLAIN SCOUR LEFT UNREPAIRED FROM AUGUST 2021 STORM. THIS SMALL AREA IS NOT A THREAT TO THE STABILITY OF THE SITE AND PROVIDES BENEFICIAL HABITAT DIVERSITY. BEGIN TRIBUTARY 2 EXISTING WETLAND W3' `` 411511171 r1,, so SEAL - 040899 - _ ', 02 -08 -2022 z 0 a w ISSUE WITH ADJOINING LANDOWNER AND FENCE LINE IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING ADDRESSED. DOCUMENTATION OF THIS WILL BE IN SUBSEQUENT MONITORING REPORTS. 1 BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FEBRUARY 2022 SC4E GRAPHIC SITE PLAN SHEET c OF PLANTING ZONE 1 = 1.49 ACRES 12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL 968 STEMS/ACRE (9' X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS % OF TOTAL # OF PLANTS HAZEL ALDER PAWPAW YELLOW BIRCH AMERICAN HORNBEAM SUGARBERRY SILKY DOGWOOD SPIGEBUSH BLACK GUM AMERICAN SYCAMORE ALNUS SERRULATA ASIMINA TRILOBA BETULA ALLEGHANIENSIS CARPINUS CAROLINIANA CELTIS LAEVIGATA CORNUS AMOMUM LINDERA BENZOIN NYSSA SYLVATICA PLATANUS OCCIDENTAUS PLANTING ZONE 2 = 2.19 ACRES OBL 10 144 FAC 10 144 FAC 10 144 FAC 10 144 FACW 10 144 FACW 10 144 FAC 10 144 FAC 10 144 FACW 20 290 12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL 968 STEMS/ACRE (9' X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME 1,442 STATUS % OF TOTAL # OF PLANTS YELLOW BUCKEYE SWEET BIRCH BITTERNUT HICKORY PIGNUT HICKORY TULIP POPLAR AMERICAN SYCAMORE WHITE OAK SOUTHERN RED OAK CHESTNUT OAK NORTHERN RED OAK STREAM ZONE AESCULUS FLAVA BETULA LENTA CARYA CORDIFORMIS CARYA GLABRA LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA PLATANUS OCCIDENTAL'S QUERCA ALBA QUERCUS FALCATA QUERCUS MONTANA QUERCUS RUBRA LIVE STAKES: 1.5' TO 2' LENGTHS, 1/2' TO 2" DIAMETER, PLANT ONE ROW PER BANK AT 3' SPACING, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT. COMMON NAME BLACK WILLOW SILKY WILLOW SILKY DOGWOOD ELDERBERRY NINEBARK SCIENTIFIC NAME SALIX NIGRA SALIX SERIGEA CORNUS AMOMUM SAMBUGUS CANADENSIS PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS FACU 10 FACU 10 FACU 10 FACU 10 FACU 10 FACW 10 FACU 10 FACU 10 UPL 10 FACU 10 ii ='�� ►� ► ♦ �� _ _-40'-20' 0' 40' 80' 2,120 III. 111 • , W _4-. -% • 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 xc anxo • _ 'ea GRAPHIC SCALE MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 8 ,,tt Il1I I11++,, •c), CAf�OC,,, SEAL - 040899 - 1 I1Itlt1t, 02 -08 -2022 z 0 a w BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA a*E. FEBRIJARY 2022 sc.E. GRAPHIC PLANTING PLAN SHEET 5 OF H • • PLANTING ZONE 1 PLANTING ZONE 2 STREAM ZONE *NOTE: SEE SHEET 5 FOR PLANTING QUANTITIES SQUARE CUT BUDS (FACING UPWARD) LIVE CUTTING (0.5" TO 2" DIAMETER) ANGLE CUT 30°-45°- STREAMHAWK CROSS-SECTION PLANTING NOTES: RIFFLES - 1 ROW OF LIVE STAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL. POOLS - NO LIVE STAKES ON INNER BANKS, INSTALLED STAKES ONLY ON THE OUTER BANKS. LIVE STAKES SCALE: NTS MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5 tt,t, II+I++++ •c), CAf�OC,,, SEAL - - 040899 - ft �+++Iflllt155t� 02 -08 -2022 ,s1 rc sam HAD '89 -40` -20` 0` 40' 80' GRAPHIC SCALE UPDATED PUNTING ZONES TO ALIGN IMTN WETLAND SHAPES z 0 w BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA a*E. FEBRUARY 2022 s646. GRAPHIC PLANTING PLAN SHEET 6 OF e IC GPID IA0 'as -40•-20' 0' 40' 80' GRAPHIC SCALE I, • TIED NEW FENCE INTO EXISTING FENCE EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WAS MARKED WITH METAL OR SALT TREATED WOOD POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100' INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY. WHEN APPROPRIATE, PROVIDER MARKED EXISTING TREES NATH CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AND 1 OR BLAZED PROPERTY LINES AT APPROXIMATELY EYE LEVEL. O 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE 1MTNESS POSTS AND 5/8" REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-114" ALUMINUM CAPS ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS. CAPS MEET DMS SPECIFICATIONS (BERNSTEN RB05325IMPRINTED 1MTH NC STATE LOGO #B9DS7 OR EQUIVALENT) AFTER INSTALLT1ON, CAPS WERE STAMPED W1TH THE CORRESPONDING NUMBER. • 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE 1MTNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT. POSTS ARE MADE OF MATERIAL THAT W1LL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS. THE PROVIDER ATTACHED A CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACED ADDITIONAL SIGNS AT NO MORE THAN 100-FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES. -x— INSTALLED NEW WOVEN W1RE FENCE DO NOT INSTALL FENCE -CONSERVATION EASEMENT EXISTING CATTLE FENCE Q INSTALLED ACCESS GATE TIED NEW FENCE INTO EXISTING FENCE AND INSTALLED FENCING ALONG EASEMENT BOUNDARY V i MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 8 i 1111511171r1,, •��H CAR�4' ossro;�9f2-57 SEAL - 040899 - !NY-. E,. 11'+11111111j11 02 -08 -2022 z 0 w TIED NEW FENCE INTO EXISTING FENCE INSTEAD OF RUNNING FENCE ALONG EASEMENT BOUNDARY ROUND HILL BRANCH RESTORATION SITE rare FEBRUARY 2022 sc. E GRAPHIC BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN SHEET 7 OF a ND BPID NAD 'as -40' -20' 0' 40' 80' GRAPHIC SCALE EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WAS MARKED WITH METAL OR SALT TREATED WOOD POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100' INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY. WHEN APPROPRIATE, PROVIDER MARKED EXISTING TREES NATH CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AND 1 OR BLAZE DPROPERTY LINES AT APPROXIMATELY EVE LEVEL. O/ 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POSTS AND 518' REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-114" ALUMINUM CAPS ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS. CAPS MEET DMS SPECIFICATIONS IBERNSTEN RBD5325 IMPRINTED WITH NC STATE LOGO 9087 OR EOUIVALEN11AFTER INSTALLATION CAPS WERE STAMPED NUN THE CORRESPONDING NUMBER. . 8-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT. POSTS ARE MADE OF MATERIAL THAT WALL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS. THE PROVIDER ATTACHEDA CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACED ADDITIONAL SIGNS AT NO MORE THAN 100-FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES. - x INSTALLED NEVI/WOVEN IMRE FENCE DO NOT INSTALL FENCE -CONSERVATION EASEMENT — 'a — EXISTING CATTLE FENCE INSTALLED ACCESS GATE MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 7 TIED NEW FENCE INTO EXISTING FENCE 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 //• TIED NEW FENCE INTO EXISTING FENCE `` 111511171r1,, •�OPOF S °DC,%�9 SEAL 040899 - _ j1E ''�+I1111115j1' 02 -08 -2022 z 0 a w 1 BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FEBRUARY 2022 NC.LE. GRAPHIC BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN SHEET a OF e