20140503 Ver 1_401 Application_20140519

WITHERS I- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
E Attached
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
LETTER Oo FTRANSWTTAL
DATE 5/16/14
1 JOB NO 0212o446.00
ATTENTION
Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONE# [phone]
RE Courtyards at O'Kelly Chapel
NWP 12 & IWGPl00000 PCN Submittal
021204 6.00
NWP 12 & IWGPl00000 PCN
1
5/16/14
02120446.00
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Diskette ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
5
5/16/14
021204 6.00
NWP 12 & IWGPl00000 PCN
1
5/16/14
02120446.00
Check for $24o Application Fee
1
5/16/14
021204 6.00
CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
COPYTO: File SIGNED: Troy Beasley
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
May 16th, 2014
NC- Division of Water Resources
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Courtyards at O'Kelly Chapel — NWP 12 & IWGPs00000 PCN Submittal
W &R Project #02120446.00
Dear Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of EPCON Communities, we are requesting a NCDWR 401 Water Quality Certification for 68
if of permanent isolated stream impacts for construction of a stormwater BMP, as well as 0.02 acres
of temporary wetland impacts and 85 if of temporary stream impacts for construction of a gravity
sewer line that will service the proposed subdivision.
The project site is ±31 acres in size and is located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of
O'Kelly Chapel Road and Pittard Sears Road in Cary, Chatham County (Lat: 35.84474o °N; Long: -
78.919134 °W)• The project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030002) and onsite
waters drain to Nancy Branch (Stream Index: 16- 41-1-17-3-2; WQC: WS- IV;NSW).
Proposed Proiect
The proposed project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision and associated
infrastructure (i.e. roads, utilities, stormwater management, etc.) The project also requires the
construction of an offsite gravity sewer line, which will begin at the western project boundary and
flow south to an existing sewer line at Pittard Sears Road and tie into an existing manhole (Lat:
35.835602 °N; Long: - 78.924216 °W). The proposed sewer line has been sized to provide additional
capacity for future development, and will be turned over to the Town of Cary upon completion.
Project History
Onsite wetlands and streams were delineated by Withers and Ravenel in June 2013. The Corps of
Engineers field verified the wetland delineation on January 22, 2014 and will be issuing the JD in
conjunction with the issuance of the NWP 12.
Please note that Andy Williams with the Corps of Engineers has requested that the proposed sewer
line be permitted under a NWP 12 since there are no impacts to 404 jurisdictional features from the
subdivision and the sewer line will be turned over to the Town of Cary.
The Town of Cary issued a Buffer Determination for the subdivision site on August 27, 2013. A copy
of the Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix. Please note that impacts to
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832

Jordan Lake Buffers for construction of the subdivision will be permitted through the Town of Cary as
a delegated municipality.
The proposed sewer alignment crosses both the Town of Cary and Chatham County jurisdictions in
regards to riparian buffer ordinances. Therefore, the buffer determination /requirements for multi -
jurisdictional projects default to NCDWR. NCDWR issued a Stream /Buffer Determination for the
proposed sewer line on February 24, 2014 OBRRO #13 -386). Please note that there are no impacts to
buffered features for construction of the sewer line outside of the subdivision limits. The buffer
impacts from the sewer line within the subdivision will be permitted through the Town of Cary.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 68 if of permanent isolated stream impacts, 0.02 acres of
temporary wetland impacts and 85 if of temporary stream impacts.
The proposed 68 if of permanent isolated stream impacts (Impact #2) are necessary for construction
of a stormwater BMP (wet detention pond).
The proposed 85 if of temporary stream impacts and 0.02 acres of temporary wetland impacts are
necessary for construction of a gravity sewer line that will connect to an existing sewer line along
Pittard Sears Road. Please note that the 0.02 acres of temporary wetland impacts (Impact #1) are
necessary to stub the sewer line to the western property line, which is a requirement by the Town of
Cary.
Impacts to riparian buffers within the subdivision will be permitted through the Town of Cary as a
delegated municipality.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
The stream and associated loo' Town of Cary Urban Transition Buffers along the western property
line resulted in constraints on site design. The isolated stream proposed to be impacted is
intermittent and has very low functional value due to the small size and the fact that there are no
wetlands immediately adjacent upstream or downstream of this feature. Also, any flow from the
isolated stream must sheetflow over uplands approximately 550 if before reaching the UT to Nancy
Branch. The isolated stream essentially retains water for a very short period following a rain event,
which results in it being of very little value to aquatic life.
The proposed BMP will result in impacting the entire 68 if isolated stream. Redesigning the site plan
to relocated the BMP and avoid impacts to this feature were not feasible for several reasons. First,
moving the BMP to avoid the isolated stream would have resulted in a loss of several lots to
accommodate the BMP. The loss of up to 5 lots would have greatly impacted the financial feasibility
of the project. Secondly, by relocating the BMP "uphill ", the entire site would have to be raised to in
order to maintain positive gravity flow for the stormwater management system. This would have
resulted in increased construction costs for the additional fill, as well as result in a loss of additional
lots along the western stream buffers because the backslopes for these lots would then encroach
into the riparian buffers. The cost of the property, lower value of the individual lots due to the
current economic climate, construction costs for the subdivision itself and additional construction
WITHERS , RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

costs associated with the construction of the offsite sewer to service the project has resulted in a
very small profit margin for this project. Therefore, the loss of several lots would potentially result in
the project no longer being financially feasible. Therefore, impacts to the isolated stream (Impact
#2) could not be avoided.
W &R conducted a site visit with Cherri Smith the NCDWR on 9/17/13 to review the isolated stream in
regards to the proposed impacts to the isolated stream. Ms. Smith concurred that the functional
value of the isolated stream is minimal, and had no opposition to impacting the isolated stream for
construction of the proposed BMP.
Impacts from the construction of the proposed sewer line have been minimized by designing the
sewer line to cross the wetlands and stream at nearly perpendicular angles.
Mitigation
Because the proposed permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, there is no mitigation
proposed.
The current request is for 68 if of permanent isolated stream impacts, 85 if of temporary stream
impacts and 0.02 acres of temporary wetland impacts for construction of the proposed project (see
the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel Exhibit
• USGS Quadrangle Map
• Chatham Co. Soil Survey
• NCDWR Stream /Buffer Determination Letter
• Town of Cary Buffer Determination Letter
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS , RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

4�0' \N AT F'
o � �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number: IWGP100000
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
N Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Courtyards at O'Kelly Chapel Residential Subdivision
2b.
County:
Chatham
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Pennie Ellis Coussit
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 1494; Page: 0056
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
1120 Cheryl Lane
3e.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28405
3f.
Telephone no.:
910 - 617 -4404
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
ptunebyrd @yahoo.com
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: EPCON Communities - Contract Purchaser
4b.
Name:
Todd Pomorski
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
EPCON Communities
4d.
Street address:
500 Stonehenge Parkway
4e.
City, state, zip:
Dublin, OH 73017
4f.
Telephone no.:
614 - 761 -1010
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
tomorski @epconcommunities.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
Subdivision — PIN: 0726 -32 -7074
Sewer Line: PIN: 0726 -30- 6959.000
PIN: 0726 -30- 4388.000
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN: 0725 -29- 7023.000
PIN: 0725 -29- 7694.000
PIN: 0725 -29- 5455.000
PIN: 0725 -29- 0405.000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Subdivision: Lat: 35.844740 °N Long: - 78.919134 °W
Sewer - South: Lat: 35.835602 °N; Long: - 78.924216 °W
1 c.
Property size:
±31 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Nancy Branch (Stream Index: 16- 41- 1- 17 -3 -2)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS- IV;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear (HUC 03030002)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists
of residential and commercial land use, as well as undeveloped woodlands.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±0.1 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Subdivision - Jurisdictional Streams — 875 If
Subdivision - Isolated Stream — 68 If
Sewer — Jurisdictional Stream - 85 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and associated infrastructure (i.e. roads,
sewer, utilities, stormwater management, etc.). The project also involves the construction of an offsite gravity sewer line
which will connect to an existing sewer line along Pittard Sears Road to provide sewer service to the Courtyards at
O'Kelly Chapel subdivision. The proposed sewer line has been sized to provide additional capacity for future
development, and has been stubbed to the western property line per Town of Cary's requirements. Upon completion of
construction, the sewer line will be turned over to the Town of Cary.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of construction of a residential subdivision, roads, utilities and stormwater management, as well as
an offsite gravity sewer line. Standard commercial construction equipment will be used to construct the proposed project.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Withers & Ravenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps of Engineers conducted a field review of the wetlands and streams within the Courtyards at O'Kelly Chapel
Road project area on January 22, 2014. The JD Request, dated August 16, 2013 and revised exhibits emailed on
December 6, 2013, included the wetland delineation for the proposed sewer alignment. However, due to a lack of written
documentation of access authorization, the Corps did not review the delineation for the proposed sewer alignment. The
only jurisdictional features within the proposed sewer alignment are two intermittent streams. We are requesting a JD for
only the impact areas within the sewer alignment, which will be issued in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 12.
Since the proposed sewer line crosses both the Town of Cary and Chatham County jurisdiction, the buffer
determination /requirements for the features within the proposed sewer alignment defaulted to NCDWR. NCDWR issued
a Stream /Buffer Determination for the proposed sewer alignment on February 24, 2014 (JBRRO 13 -386). A copy of the
DWR Stream /Buffer Determination has been provided as an Appendix.
The Town of Cary issued a Buffer Determination for the subdivision site on August 27, 2013. A copy of the Buffer
Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix. Please note that impacts to Jordan Lake Buffers for
construction of the subdivision will be permitted through the Town of Cary as a delegated municipality.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The subdivision will be constructed in phases. However, all impacts necessary for construction of the entire project are
being addressed under this application.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Impact #1
El ®T
Sewer Crossing
Sewer
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El
® Corps
® DWQ
0.02 acres
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.02 acres
2h. Comments: The proposed temporary wetland impacts are required to stub the sewer line to the property boundary per the
Town of Cary requirements.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #2
Fill
UT to Nancy
❑ PER
❑ Corps
3'
68 If
® P El
(Isolated Stream)
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Total Permanent Isolated Stream Impacts
68 If
Impact #3
Sewer Crossing
UT to Nancy
El PER
® Corps
4'
39 If
El ®T
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Impact #4
Sewer Crossing
UT to Nancy
El PER
® Corps
4'
46 If
® P El
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
Total Temporary Stream Impacts
85 If
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
153 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Impacts to Jordan Lake Buffers will be permitted through the Town of Cary as the delegated municipality.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site design, the Applicant completed a formal delineation of onsite jurisdictional wetlands and streams so that impact
could be minimized. Impacts have been minimized to one stream crossing and one wetland crossing for installation of the
sewer, and impacts to a 68 If isolated stream for construction of a BMP.
The construction of the sewer line will require a two stream crossing (Impact #3 & 4), which will result in 85 If of temporary
stream impacts. The sewer construction will also result in one wetland crossing (Impact #1), resulting in 0.02 acres of
temporary stream impacts. Please note that Impact #1 is necessary to stub the sewer line at the western property line, which
is a requirement by the Town of Cary in order to provide a sewer connection for future development of the property to west of
the proposed project.
The proposed 68 If of permanent isolated stream impacts (Impact #2) will occur from construction of a stormwater BMP. The
isolated stream has virtually no functional value, as there are no wetlands located upstream or immediately downstream, and
the isolated stream is located ±550 If from the downstream unnamed tributary to Nancy Branch. In order to maintain a
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

feasible site design and avoid impacts to the onsite jurisdictional streams, the BMP must be constructed within the location of
the isolated stream. In order to avoid impacting the isolated stream, the site would have to be redesigned, resulting in a loss
of multiple lots in order to provide an adequately sized BMP. A site visit was conducted with Cherri Smith with NCDWR on
September 17th, 2013 to review the condition of the isolated stream. During the site visit, Ms. Smith agreed that the functional
value of the isolated stream was minimal.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping into downstream waters. Also,
temporary stream and wetland impact areas will be restored to pre- existing grades. Disturbed wetlands will be seeded with
rye grass to provide temporary stabilization until natural recruitment re- vegetates the disturbed wetlands and provides long
term stabilization.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. if yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Impacts to Jordan Lake Riparian Buffers within the subdivision site will be permitted through the Town of Cary
as a delegated municipality.
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The Stormwater Management Plan and diffuse flow requirements will be
❑ Yes ® No
reviewed and approved by the Town of Cary. Upon issuance of the Stormwater
Management Approval by the Town of Cary, a copy will be provided to NCDWR.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
37%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan consists of two wet detention ponds. The stormwater management plan is being
reviewed by the Town of Cary. Upon issuance of approval by the Town of Cary, a copy will be provided to NCDWR.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is located within a heavily developed area of Wake County and is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future
development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Cary sanitary sewer.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data, provided by John Finnegan with NCNHP, to identify if there
were any known occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species on or near the proposed project. The
review of the NHP database did not identify any recent occurrences of federally listed species or critical habitat on the
subject property or within 2.0 miles of the project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Chatham County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within the proposed project or within 0.5 miles.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley
Authorized Agent
5/16/14
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WITHERS ��-RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser EPCON Communities (Client) does hereby appoint Troy
Beasley / Withers & Ravenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the
appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams,
riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit
applications /requests for the Ellis Property (PIN 072632- 7070).
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date: �3
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel. Inc.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel. [phone]
Signature of Client:
4050 I o60 rWotosy —r .U('K_ D>,VEIo
fame-Print) (Title)
(Signature)
600 �oJ � SI E— fit.- wy
Mailing Address
t�wSuK-) DO- `{3of?
City State Zip
Phone: 614 Flo( (oto
Email: -�bOrvtO A-i Q Q�P�n GntvtunlTtCS• C• LL
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 I tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 25403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

PARCEL EXHIBIT

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
PIN 0726 -32 -7074
PIN 0726 -30- 6959.000
PIN 0726 -30- 4388.000
0
0
ui PIN 0725 -29- 7023.000
0
0
N PIN 0725 -29- 7697.000
6
N
ti
0
Z
a
PIN 0725 -29- 5455.000 zz
COURTYARDS AT O'KELLY CHAPEL PARCEL EXHIBIT WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
GARY CHATHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

USGS QUAD MAP &
CHATHAM CO. SOIL SURVEY

OF GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 Inch = 600 ft.
lot
t
r
� �,�►"`�,, I I !!!111111
M -
ray. `Pr y` .fit !J
ELLIS PROPERTY USGS QUAD -GREEN LEVEL WITHERS RAVENEL
iNGIMKSRS 1 PLAT IRS I SYlYlY6ts
CARY 1:1 lA I HAMCOUNlY NC?Rl {I t11RL711 N.1

-- Wh B � r .� . - -
" GRAPHIC SCALE
'•i R� 0 300 600
B
1 inch = 600 ft.
bk
- Ia r j
III f *I w
•■hC d 6
y 1Ynvf
' o ,
hC
k
CrB
Wh D
Wh C
1 r
r
A
MWhB .
Wh D
D w
+ChA
1 `'3 Wh D
e
Wh C
D
CrC
m
ELLIS PROPERTY CHATHAM CO. SOIL SURVEY WITHERS RAVENEL
GREEN LEVEL ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
CARY (— IAfIlA.MCo t)NJY .y{]KI'llS..1NiNitiin

NCDWR STREAM /BUFFER
DETERMINATION LETTER

FA I
'NCDENR
North Carolina Department of -Environment and Natural Resources
Qivi8,ibn of WaterResources,
Water Quality Firpgram-s',
Pat ;McCrory Thomas A. RoedOr Jbhn,'E.,SkvaHa, 111,
Governor Director 'Secretary
February 24, 2014
Mdrtir Ridhffibnd
1, 15 Macken an bfive
NC 27-54 L
- mnail
�:,Surf#e Water Determination Letter
___ -
JBRRO411-386
Chatham County
Debarmination Type
'Buffer'Call-
lsolated.,qr EIP Call,
F1'Neuse(15ANQ-AC2B 0233_)
Starf*,
❑Tar-,Parnlico,(1'5A NCAG,2B 10259)
[_1'Epheft§ral/1 nterrnitteht/P&e_nni6l,Det6rrni nation
US�G8,
❑ 1`solatecl'Wetland Det6rmination
Jorclan,(15A NCAC 213, 0267)'
L
:Piojeci.Name: Pittard Sears, Sewer Easement
Locatibn/birections Project, is,;a e
a
e
§ewr,esmdfit extending sadth,6fO'Kell' �ChagelRodand
- - , 1 - y
west of PiftardSears, Road in.Chatham,County
S'ubjecvStrearn: UT to Nancy Branch,
Determination bate: Januar-y 1,.'2014 Staff-, Sarwknies
Feature/Flag
'E/l/P*
Not,
Subjectlo
Starf*,
Stopg
So , il
US�G8,
Subject
Buffers-
Survey
Topb
to�
Buffers'
A
P
X
S,4
Throughout
X
I
X
Throughout
Throughout
E**
j
X
I DWQ,F1'ag
13WQ Flag
*&11P =,fPhaMi?rq11Inhe_r Mitt&ntlPerMh4dI
,**)7'edtupes�,L)- ,&,E'dre�hot'4epicFte-d+on Chdthain Countt -$oil'Sfar,,Oldndlor USGSV1 bs. F&atz&&D&Edr-,e -�4bject
o 4041isolateld'yqtm permihtlng
Explanation: 'The •feature(§),Iisted,,above,?hasaor,havd been .located on,the 9dil,'SufveY,of ChatharitC6uhty, North
'Caroliha,or,the mostrecent copy,of,the QSGS Topogr4phivmq,at a,1,:24,000 scale. Each"feature -that is s checked
"Not Subject" has'been. determined not to'be,a stream or i§,not,preserit onthe property. Feafures,Ihai-are checked'
"Subject" have been located.,on the property and,possess characteristics, thafqualify'iuo be a stream. 'There may be
,other'streaffis"Wated on
your. property that,domof§how up,on-themaps,,reference.d above but, still'may-be�
NoonLiCarblina
JVatur
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 16281,Mail Ser-vibe,Center Raleigh,,NC1,27699-1,628 Phone - (9;19) 791,4266
Internet www'ncwaterq ality org Location .3800 Barrett Drive Ralei6h,,NG,27609 - Fax [phone],
An Equal qpporlunity/Affirmative,Action Employer - 50% Recyded/,1 00%'PostConsu-mer'Paper

Pittard Sears Sewer Ease'ni0
Chatham'County,
February'24, 2044
Page 2' of;2
considered' jurisdictional�according,,to the,US Army Corps,of Engineers,and/or'to,the Division.of-Water Resources
,(DWR).
This on -site determination shall expire'five (5),,years from, theidate of "this letter. 'L'andowners or,affected,parties that
dispute,a,d'eterniinatiowmade by,the,DWR,or Delegated Local Authority °may request a determination by the
Director. An. appeal,request mustube madewithin sixty�(60) days of date,of,this,letter or from'the date ;the,affected
party (includingJownstream and /or adjacent�owners) is notified',of this1etter: A request fora determination liy,the
.Di'rectorshall be,referred to the DirectorIn writing;c /o Karen +Higg`ins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit; 1650 Mail Service.
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This,determination is'final and' binding unless,�as detailed above, you ask for a hearing;or appeal within sixty (60),
days.
The owner /fut'urerowners should' notify the Division of Water Resources (including any otherLocal,,State,,and
Federal.Agencies),of'this decision concerning any'future correspondences regarding�the,subject property (stated
above): 'This project °may require a,Section 404/401 Permit for the. proposed�aetivity: Any inquiries should :lie
di'rected'to the Division of Water, Resources (Central Office) at (919,)- 807 -6300, and - the ,, US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) =554 -4884.
If 'you have questions regarding thi's determination, please feel freeato contact'Sara" ies at (919) 791 -4260.
`Respe tfully; a
Danny.Smith,- upervisor
WatevQuality� Secfion
Raleigh'Regional, Office
cc:, RRO/,S" File:Copy
Rosa,Les PfHzfrd'S6ars Road „Duham, NC 277,13
, 6 ”
Davis Residence Holdings & HF investors, LLC,,€8368 &S ,Forks, Road, Suite,2021,Raleigh,,NC 27615
James Slade, TO PittardSears Road, Durham, N027711
Julia Slade, 5,15 S. Harrison,Ave, Cary, NC, 27511
Aisha ,'Devrouas,,60 ConcordRoad, Apt ; #1, Billerica, MA'01821

.F
•
r
FEATURE A
FEATURE A
f 17 lk
1,14 .. f
i F •
COURTYARDS AT OXELLY CHAPEL
�vu
"4,a
Call
r
FEATURE D
d �
t
USGS QUAD - GREEN LEVEL
4f
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 so
1 inch - 500 k.
+aw
FEATURE T C t
F
FEATURE B
N
F)
WITHERS &-RAVENEL
154III1MMM I PLAMMItf 1 MMMYMtOMM

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
j I inch 400 ft.
4
_7
.-FEA-TU
FEp' -, U RE C
7o
FEAT RE B,/
tEATURE A
7�-
LFEATURE D
WV
4
D�wjtlm_

i
-
,• ^ 0 150 300
I inch 00
START
r
i
CHANNEL �1iI ' 1 k PROPOSED SEW
FLAG S-4 � y ALIGNMENT
FEATURE A'r'.,
r r
h, FEATURE D r!
NOT SHOWN ON USGS OR
SOIL SURVEY
START CHANNEL @FLAG S -5
'(I � r Il'� i s +Ya4 •

TOWN OF CARY
BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER

August 27, 2013
Troy Beasley
Withers and Ravenel
1410 Commonwealth. Drive, Unit "101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Jordan Lake Watershed - Urban Transition Buffer Rules
Ellis Property
SW quadrant of O'Kelly Chapel Rd and Pittard Sears Rd
Real ID: 19946
TC R B 13 -009
Dear Mr. Beasley:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
The site location map and other information that was provided, allowed a determination to be made as
to whether or not the referenced site would require compliance with The Town of Cary Urban Transition
Buffer (UTB) Rules. This project, as referenced by the Town of Cary as TCRB 13 -009, includes
features as depicted on the attached maps. The table below summarizes the stream determinations
made in a site visit on August 27, 2013. This determination is valid until August 27, 2018.
Reference ID
USGS Map 100 Ft. Buffer
.Soil Survey Map (50 Ft. Buffer)
Not Subject
A
Start Fla S -1; Stop Flag S. 1 A
B
Start Fla S -3; Stop Fla S -3A
Sincerely,
Jan Patterson
Town of Cary Engineering Department
TOWN O
�f
CARY
318 North Academy Street • Cary, NC 27513 • PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512 -8005
te1919- 469 -4030 • fax [phone] • www.townofcary.org

GRAPHIC SCALE
o 250 Soo
1 inch = 500 ft.
�r
C kle so,
,. FEATURE A,
FEATURE C
FEATURE B
Id
k /Ilk
, I
ELLIS PROPERTY USGS QUAD -GREEN LEVEL WITHERS RAVENEL
[M +IN�iRi I �LAMMlIIS I 11J1Y�1'01!!
CARY CHATHAMCY}UWY NORTH(ARLXINA

" - - GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
r �� F
- 1 inch = 500 ft.
u
r
•
U`Ih B -
�=� r� � Vilh D
j. WhB'
"` .... /000)
f r �
IR p
e
Wh C
1x. CrD
Dr
Wh D
Y Wh C M,
Wh
,� a e;� • too !.
..,
4
ELLIS PROPERTY CHATHAM CO. SOIL SURVEY WITHERS RAVENEL
SHEET 6 -GREEN LEVEL srtasMaaas d r�rMMaas I suavaraRs
CARY CI ]A TI {AM CAIN I NOR I C.ARQ1 INA

s
a
0
s
°a
i
a
0
m
N
O
I
a
0
m
100' TOC
BUFFER
FLAG
START STREAM\
/ j I UNMAPPED
/ FEATURE C
j I NOT SUBJECT
/J I
1 FEATURE A
l
SUBJECT
\ 50' JL
BUFFER
1.
l
I�
I ( 100' TOC
IBUFFER
I
FLAG S -1A \
STOP STREAM 1
1 50 JL
BUFFER
FLAG S -3A
FEATURE B' / \1 /START
\ /STOP STREAM \
WETLAND FEATURE
FLAGS T
STREAM
150' 75' 0' 150'
NOTE:
BUFFER DETERMINATIONS BASED ON FIELD DETERMINATION
SCALE IN FEET
BY JAN PATTERSON WITH THE TOWN OF CARY ON 8/2713.
FILE. EPCONBUFFER
BUFFER LOCATION EXHIBIT MAP OF
WITHERS
RAV E N E L
EPCON COMMUNITIES CAROLINAS, L.L.C.
OF
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS
I SURVEYORS
E L L I S PROPERTY
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina
27511 License No. C -0832
tel:[phone] fax:[phone]
TOWNSHIP: WILLIAMS COUNTY: CHATHAM
SURVEY DATE: 9 -3 -13
SURVEYED BY: TM
STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" =150'
DRAWN BY: MJB
ZONING: R -1 PIN NO. 0726 -32 -7074
CHECKED & CLOSURE BY: MG

_81a fo
fNU UWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 ) Project/Site: E lf" 5 pro Latitude:
Evaluator: -rr, County: C�`�ow>7 Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Deter njoalijQn circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent n
if >_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* ! - Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= (5-S-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip le- ool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
25. Algae
2
g
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
CNO = 0
Yes = 3
amriciai ancnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = ? .5- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
f.q
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
V. tilf)IOQV itiubtiotal = S .-i i
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
M
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Ca� rre 14 -- Above P(0-3 S-1
PI u it W t l stream ldentitication 1+'orm Version 4.11
Date: 2 ProjectlSite: Flit 5 -pror Latitude:
Evaluator: Tro q a3�s le - County: Gka+�& Longitude:
Total Points.. Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or erennial if ? 30" Ephemra e Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= c� S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
M
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
2
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
CD
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes = 3
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
etp
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
24. Amphibians
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
CdU
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ` <- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Bioloov !Subtotal = 14 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
W
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
AR
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
etp
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other =
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

ea-ur _ o u)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 4 3 13
Project/Site: �l 5 P�
Latitude:
Evaluator: I as� ��
County: CVI�t.'f'YIOt M
Longitude:
Other
Quad Name:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent a I
Stream Deter (circle one)
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
if a 19 or perennial if 2 30'
2
e.g
A. Geomor hold (Subtotal =__LL_5_J
0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a-Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
f"1 _
0--cp
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
Z2
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
26. Wetland plants in streambed
8. Headcuts
CD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
. artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
�'q i� W►
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= U.,`j ) /'
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
[).
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ; )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Fea4LCr2 15 - &lialrtw T-14_5 S r 3 A
iN u U w v stream lcientitication v orm Version 4.11
Date: (Q 3 3 Project/Site: Gil /,•S Pro 10 ` Latitude:
Evaluator: ' o �2c�s(e �� County: c1M1ArY1 Longitude:
Total Points: StEcam.12etermination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or erennial if ? 30' phemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hold (Subtotal = S• S }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0. )
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
1,5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
PA
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
Co,.Q
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 )
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see disc ions in manual
o
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = � �
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
OD
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
175
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0. )
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
G. Bloloav (Subtotal= r%C 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
3n,
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 )
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1,5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

IMPACT EXHIBITS

0
p �I
o
1 PZ
I
TLA N DS
PORARY)
.02 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
1 inch = 300 ft.
I
I
No. Rey sion Date I l3v III D.i­ I -,h III
♦dF t gyp' Sheet �.,
Dawn By Date COURTYARDS ON O'KELLY CHAPEL WITHERS &- RAVENEL
Checked By 1�,b N., OVERALL WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
•an 120" Cary Chatham County North Carolina 11 1 115 Mz ...Drive C— NldhC.li -275„ W 91 -3340 wm—ene... --N..-2

MH 47 I
Ss
SS
SS ,�
ITS
IMPACT #1
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
0.02 ACRES
i
FES 40
I
1>1'N
i 4Q
a
ro
6
1 1 \
B 3 In �
ES 1 \ I
B 2 `
� � N
e••Ss
I
BMP #1
R 1 /
/ co
/
M H 1 s 7—
E 8
S
-
i
31
H 16
IMPACT #2
PERMANENT ISOLATED STREAM IMPACT
68 LF
18 I
17 I
16 I
CB 11
33
'4
104,8.74 .
35
No. Revision [)ate I By I se.e, III
♦1F � !0° sneer NO.
D- is COURTYARDS ON O'KELLY CHAPEL STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS WITHERS RAVENEL
cneea ur ��� i��n No�u ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
*a, 12o..au ca ry Chatham County North Carolina
liSMacKenan Drive r -y, North -lina21511 rer. 919- 469 311f� wlheesraveneLrom L cense NO. 60832

1\ \ I II \\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ IMPACT #3 I
\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ I \ \ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT I
I I \ 39 LF
I I
/ SS \ III \ so o RAPHZC SCALso Goo
lit
I11 I \ S \ 1 inch — 50 ft.
IMPACT #4
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
46 LF
I \
I /
\ x
\ 5zz
It 1k" \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \
Designer �� ti�.ih '• -
Dawn By Dale in COURTYARDS ON O'KELLY CHAPEL
WITHERS &- RAVENEL Sh- N..
STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAPS ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS 3
115 M—... Drive Cary North Carolina 27511 tel:919-06A3340 ..—M— —Isom License No.-32