HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0036196_Inspection_20220531ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
James Wentz
City of Newton
Post Office Box 550
Newton, North Carolina 28658
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 31, 2022
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Newton
NPDES Permit No. NC0036196
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Wentz:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Report for the inspection of the City of Newton's
Industrial Pretreatment Program on May 18, 2022, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please advise the City's Pretreatment staff
of our findings by forwarding the enclosed report.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at (704) 235-2192 or at
wes.bell@ncdenr.gov.
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
Cc: NPDES Program Files - Laserfiche
DE
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
A14CC681 AF27425...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 1 Mooresville. North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 1 Mooresville. North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Newton
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Eric Jones, Stacy Rowe, McKenna Blevins
3. Title(s): WWTP Superintendent, Chief Operator, Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 7/27/21 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Main Program Permit Number
NC0036196
MM/DD/YY
05/18/2022
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
2
8. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
0
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
16. Number of CIUs in SNC?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
/1 YES ❑ NO
See Comments Section
❑ YES /1 NO
Limits: None
Reporting: None
)lished: N/A
N/A
❑ YES /1 NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
❑ NO
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 1
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element
Clark Creek WWTP (NC0036196)
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
11/10/17
/1 Yes ❑ No
6/6/19
/1 Yes ❑ No
10/1/22
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
10/24/19
/1 Yes ❑ No
3/4/20
/1 Yes ❑ No
10/1/24
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/18/12
/1 Yes ❑ No
2/11/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/28/19
0 Yes ❑ No
2/5/20
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
6/30/15
a Yes ❑ No
8/5/15
/1 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW
29. User Name 1. Technibilt
2. Special Metals
3.
30. IUP Number
1018
1015
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
7/31/25
7/31/25
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433.17
471.35
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
A Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►NYes •No
b. •Yes ■No
a. ►NYes ■No
b. •Yes ■No
a. •Yes •No
b. •Yes ■No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►NYes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a. ►NYes ■No
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a. •Yes MN()
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
A Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
NYes❑No❑N/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
■ Yes • No L NA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
Days?
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoDN/A
e.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
o.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes r No
❑ Yes ❑ No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 2
Requested Information For You?
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
17. An effluent total residual chlorine daily maximum limit violation was reported in November 2021.
20. Special Metal's Consent Order expired on 1/21/22.
25. Overall, all effluent LTMP analyses were reported on the eDMRs; however, effluent zinc results were not included.
35. The POTW performed the SIU inspections on 9/30/21 (Technibilt) and 7/27/21 (Special Metals).
39. The POTW's on -site certified laboratory analyzes BOD, TSS, ammonia, COD, and pH. Meritech Labs has been contracted to perform all
remaining LTMP and SIU analyses.
41a. Technibilt and Special Metals both contract Pace Analytical Services to perform IUP analyses.
46. The POTW issued NOVs to Special Metals for chromium IUP limit violations in August and November 2021 and nickel IUP limit
violations in July, August and September 2021. Special Metals was also issued NOVs for the failure to monitor fluoride during the fourth
quarter of 2021 and chromium and nickel during the week of 7/12/21 — 7/16/21. Technibilt was issued a NOV for the failures to monitor pH
during July 2021; however, the POTW will need to verify if the SIU did violate the IUP pH monitoring requirement.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and well maintained. The POTW must ensure the nickel reporting level (Meritech
and Pace Analytical Services) and cyanide reporting level (Pace Analytical Services) is at or below the required IUP reporting levels.
The POTW will need to amend all applicable eDMRs to include the effluent zinc results. In addition, the POTW must rescind the NOV to
Technibilt for pH monitoring violations (January, June and July 2021) if the SIU did meet the IUP's monitoring requirement following
verification.
Overall, the POTW's Industrial Pretreatment Program was being properly implemented.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:
PCI REVIEWED BY:
—DocuSigned by:
'—A61606D9OCC3437_.
DATE: 5/31/2022
Wes Bell, Environmental Specialist 11, MRO/WQROS, DWR
E—DocuSigned by:
'—A14CC681AF27425...
DATE: 5/31/2022
Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor, MRO/WQROS, DWR
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 3