NC0026042_Wasteload Allocation_19930426

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING% COVER SHEET
NC0026042
Robersonville WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
f
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 26, 1993
This document is printed an reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re -sr -erne side
rok
Ink
,.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0026042
PERMIT FEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Town of Robersonville
Robersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 1.8 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 20 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 80 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: Flat swamp
Class: C-Swamp NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-03-06
Reference USGS Quad: E30NW (please attach)
County: Martin
Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 12/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: class IV
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles.
Requested by:
Prepared by ,rwaa,,,.,
Reviewed by: � --,(ICl/Y rJ -
o,� 6.5 (s(a)
PLATTED
Randy Kepler iR
Date: 2/2/93
Date: 4/2z f q3
Date: q/I-3
9.3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
5Prvo
Z(4\c13
-13z5
Drainage Area (mi2 ) J e3
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): I
7Q10 (cfs) 6, Z7 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 6.73 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC t u % Acute/Chronic' , FA:
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters Tt',rvi PEtzhTu.'L - D. 0 . r cn t- 65 L t F C(rvDKCT, 1 ry
Location AT- l.t +sr loo/ u►lsT+zt 4
Location 'l74;wNl7rzeAen AT SR Go(
Upstream
Downstream
y
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
5
5
NH3-N (mg/1)
Z
2-
D.O. (mg/1)
L
TSS (mg/1)
-
F. Col. (/100 ml)
2o0
Zoo
pH (SU)
6. _ 1
6 _�
CovPea (ktfi/
MoNIIlea_ —___----
,.tvN t7eR.
64vOt.T
MuN 1 Tv-(Z
L1aID (itricU/I) '
1N �G_(44).2--- -
Mre.Nc-lviL-
MDNI 'rv2
iV wI1TV1z-
MONI r-
Mef a y { :
1/L.)
kapgtDe (rL 4):_
luvnlsTom
c Ni T o/z.
Comments: ;t od.6 5t-11.u4 Cw•1-r2ol,5 nn1 Nur2u r 1-,MITs
Mhy (Lu:2e rN Tim 4uror C FCC a Ttj 15 (roT PART t
A590u i- lont

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Robersonville WWTP
NC0026042
20% dom/ 80% ind
Existing
Renewal
Flat Swamp'Fi
C-Sw, NSW
030306
Martin
WaRO
R. Kepler
2/2/93
E3ONW
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
73 aii 1 4 1993
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
D.EM.
18
0.27
0.73
18
91%
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
A Level C study was performed for this facility. Anoxic conditions were predicted even at 5/2 due
to wastewater and natural swamp conditions; 5/2 limits were recommended to minimize impacts.
The model included the Eagle Snacks discharge downstream.
No violations of limits are indicated on the compliance system. Instream data pulled in 6/92
indicate low D.O.'s upstream and higher D.O.'s appx. 3.5 miles downstream. (Summer 1992
data does not indicate D.O.'s under 5 mg/1).
Robersonville is not part of the Tar Pam Basin Assoc. If they expand, they will be subject to
nutrient limits. The facility should be warned that "more stringent controls on nutrient inputs may
be required in the future" even if the facility does not expand.
Pretreatment information indicates that the facility is implementing a program. The facility had a
meeting with TSB 6/92 asking for relaxation of their limits (small tax base and major SIU [Perdue]
was pressuring the Town to lower costs); TSB denied request for relaxation of limits due to the
predicted anoxic conditions on Flat Swamp.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: /rwa�.. 'I . �(%l �,ve�- Date: '7 � 3
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: , , _ /�L _ ,�:..� Date:
Permits & Engineering: Date:4 Z443____
Date: 4 /g13
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAY 1 1 1993

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 1.8 1.8
BOD5 (mg/1): 5 5
NH3N (mg/1): 2 2
DO (mg/1): 6 6
TSS (mg/1): 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000 1000
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (14/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD): 1.8 1.8
BOD5 (mg/1): 5 5
NH3N (mg/1): 2 2
DO (mg/1): 6 6
TSS (mg/1): 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (1.tg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Hoc) ou rt cLe Crnc ) me-v+-L- ✓ ti,uck r4-e t. j�
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal coliform
New facility information
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

3
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
COD (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/l):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/l):
Lead (ug/1):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Phenols (ug/l):
Mercury (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Recommended Limits
COD (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/l):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/l):
Phenols (ug/l):
Mercury (ug/1):
Silver (ug/l):
TOXICS/METALS
Chronic
Chronic Quarterly P/F at 91%
Chronic Quarterly P/F at �% (�i 0 7o)
Feb, May, Aug, Nov
Limits Changes Due To:
New pretreatment information
Daily Max.
Daily Max.
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
WQ or EL
C sop PDR. ktATe Rs)
Parameter(s) Affected
Based on
"domestic/uncontrollable"
pretreatment information
(elevated values) C.,
Failing toxicity test
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
_X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

4
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream Location: downstream at SR 1506
Parameters: temperature, D.O., Fecal coliform, conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name RBePsoN\11 [.t.E Vil,ITP Permit # COOZ(o0
Z Pipe
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ccriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.procedure Carolina Chronic Bioassay
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is q n % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina
guermonitoring using this procedure to establish compliancewith ture he document).
mit conditThe ion. holder
first test will b
performedafter thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of will be
A . Effluent sampling for this testis shall be
permitted final e `i uent discharge below all treatment processes g performed at the NPDES
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well all dose/response data Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upspecified
nep s ng, thilimits; monthly test requirementwill
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
0-"'7
cfs
Permitted Flow I. MGD
IWC
Basin & Sub -basin _ 030 3o to (T-4,eo 6�
Receiving Stream _ Fti r SwamP Chic
County
Recommended by:
,.
Date 4/6/1$
QCL PIF Version 9191

i
•i •
--
jr: J1n1Tt /2S
--7 "--'2
PE'C,'ar 7, • ,5, _ -- : j rid ; If ; r
- /41%)oyrC CO,/f,r-
:Ror- ilV,!
2 -I,a.
wr
8c,S
,-6
r
/Q(.9,0=o.73
_ ,- ;
if /f,'�J;r�<
orJ1' �riv'r�
i ;rf •
. v . ! ts-lr t" ,
Cc9/./ 1 .
A c'�fl, C. _%1/.D j'_= / /AV./,%i - » irtr. L �- '/._�' +�.X- y + Cis 7 �F�c 7�IW �i C
II
J
•a r-
:vJ 9. L
IVY

//•2 '2;j
ry-a f^5 L
T S�C,qe- 2 & �� /,/SfJ
- .5 �-
i !=fit' •
/2Ogra /Vru.r !S tio?
I? /N
,44 of r /74' f/sIt/ ;•90ci4'7204 �/Uo er
,5721 414 CO T £ 9,vi eo1..5. • 1 /./v r ' - /JT 1/1/P ✓ S fZZp! /N
R.4 T.'i..4 r it rite/�'
.
T
UCH.
i r i'
L!/v("T . 73,
) ` Ox ;1.
,
Cr_
-71
-T h
or3fT5an01,", ', . 4P!-mac
:jai/Jr elf:. 7q. 'tf
''- `!
4f..• ! . 7.9!-.
•
•
/1��rd 9/. r.l
•

River Mill MHP / Uniprop
(NEW FLOWS)
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug/I)
Fecal Limit
(based on 331 : 1)
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
0.27 7010 (CFS)
1.8 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
2.79 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
91.18 IWC (%)
18.65 Allowable Concentration (mg/l)
200 mg/I
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/I)
0.27
1.8
2.79
1.0
0.22
91.18
1.08
0.47
1.8
2.79
1.8
0.22
85.58
2.07
f-hCIi,(r'1 AL- /k Nfls sr2JA4e,Jr 1\11-13-!i LikiT4N9 t v
13-IJ/ CUoIC.E Ow, 06
NC0056499
4/6/93

W}IOI.G EPIC' TC)X(CITY TE.SfING 0(SELP-NIOM"rOR1NCi SUNI\9ARYMon, Feb I.S. I993
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YETI( JAN I1•:Il MAR APR MAY JUN 1111, AttG SEP OCT NOV. DFC
RIVIJ( HIIN Lrn!.TI'I ES PERM (1II( I.IM:JIYt;.1(:11All) 09 --- -•• .-. --- ... ..- ... .,.
NC0060291 Begin:I✓01/89 Frequency:Q P/F A JAN Alit JUL. OCI' NonCanp: 90 N1 N1 N1 141 r4"i FAIL Ni -•- PASS LATE PASS »•
County: BRUNSWICK Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17 91 PASSSIG - -- LATE bt FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS NR FAIL LATE
PF:0.025 Special 92 PASS ••- - PASS --- --- FAIL PASS -• PASS -- --
7Q10:0.09 RVC(%):30.06 order. 93
ROADSIDE TRUCK PLAN-11f)l PERM CI IR LIM:10% Y 89 hA PASS Ni - - Ni PASS PASS PASS --
N00032867 121cpn:12/17/87 Frequency: Q P/F OCT IAN APR JUL NonComp: 90 PASS -- -- PASS - - bt - -• PASS - FAIL
County: CLI.NIJ.AND Region: MRO Suhlnsiit: Cr1305 91 WI PASS LATE PASS Ni Ni PASS -- -•
PF:0.01 - Special 92 PASS -- PASS •» -- PASS - FAIL.FAIL PASS
7QI0:0.20 DVC(%):10.10 Oren 93
ROBBINS WWI? PERM CHRJAC LIM:I8%/ FTHD 241IR LC50
NC0062855 Dcpn:12/01/91 Frequency: Q PM A JAN APR JUL ocr NonComp:
County:MOORE Region: FRO SobbasimCPF10
PF: 1.0 Special
7QI0:15.9 BVq%):8.9 Order:
89 --
90 --
91 PASS
92 P.NONEI
93 PASS.PASS
35.41,FAIL PASS.>1001 --
PASS
PASS.>1001 --
PASS
PASS.79.0I -
ROBERSONVILLE WWTP PERM CHR LIM:91 % 89 PI5' NONE' NONE' NONE' NONE' NONE' NONE' NONE' 27.4' `. E' >90 NONE'
N00026042 Begin:01/01/88 Frequency: Q P/F FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp: 90 -- PASS -- - bt -- PASS N3 bt PASS FAIL FAIL
County:MARTIN Region: WARO Suhbasin:TAR06 91 PASS PASS PASS -- -- PASS -- -- FAIL PASS
PF: 1.80 Specie 92 -- PASS -- LATE/FAIL PASS PASS PASS --
7Q10:0.27 IWq%):91.18 - -
- - -
RO➢ESON CO. SCHOOLS PERM CHR LIM:99%. 89 -- -
N00034100 Begin: I0/01/90 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp: 90 -• --
County: ROBESON Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM5I 91 N I PASS
PF:0.006 Special SOC: 1113/92.9/1/95TOXREQ WAIVED. 92 H --
7Q10:0.0 IWq%):100 Order 93
NR
Not
N3
ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY COLLEGE PERM 0IR LIM:99% (GRAD) 89 -. -- _.
NC0046337 Begin: 12/01/90 Frequency. Q P/F A JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp: 90 -- -. -- -.- -. _. _. _- -- _- -.
County:ROCKINGHAM Region:WSRO Subbasin:ROA03 91 FAIL N1 Nt FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL N1 FAIL FAIL
PF:0.03 Special 92 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL 64.0,FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
7910: 0.0 IWq%):100 Omer 93 FAIL
ROCKINGHAM WWTP PERM CHR LIM:28% 89 - - -- -- -- - --
NC0020427 Begin:09/01/90 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp: 90 -- -- FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS -• PASS -
County:RICHMOND Region: FRO Subbasin: YAD16 91 -- PASS - - PASS -- -- FAIL PASS PASS
PF:6.0000 Special 92 -- PASS PASS -- PASS - PASS
7910: 23.4 IWq%):28.4 Orden 93
ROCKWELL SOUTH WWTP PERM CHR L1M:99%, 70%0>0.2 MGD Y 89 FAIL FAIL FAIL bt bt,FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL F.17ChV FAIL PASS
NO3021768 Begin:09/01/90 Frequency. Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp: 90 F,28ChV FAIL bt FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL LATE
County:ROWAN Region:MRO Sc -6sin:YAD04 91 PASS PASS PASS -- - 83.2 83.2 -- >99 -- -- 83.2
PE:0.20 Special SOC: 4/8/91-10/31/93 OR EXPAN-OW MONNT Q 92 - - >99.0 - >419.0 -- >99.0 -- 37.5
7Q10:0.00 IWq%):100.00 Order (99%,70,61,23,8) 93
ROCKY MOUNT REGIONAL WWI? PERM CHR LIM:21 % Y 89 PASS - PASS PASS - NA bt -- LATE PASS - MR
NC0030317 Begin: I I/0I/88 Frequency. Q P/F JAN APR JUL OCr NonComp: 90 PASS - -- PASS - FAIL -• NR PASS
County:EDGECOMBE RegioreRRO SubbasireTAR02 91 PASS - -- PASS - PASS - - PASS -
PF: 14.0 Special 92 PASS - PASS - PASS PASS
7Q10:83.00 1Wq%):20.73 Otter 93
ROSE HILL WWTP PERM CHR LIM:99% 89 - - -- N3 - FAIL FAIL - - NR
NC0056863 Begim07/01/89 Frequary:QP/F JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp: 90 FAIL - -- FAIL - -- FAIL - - PASS
County:DUPLIN RegionWSRO SnbbasimCPF22 91 FAIL - PASS - bl PASS - PASS
PF:0.45 Special 92 PASS PASS -- FAIL -• - PASS
7QICt 0.00 IWq%):100.00 Order: 93 PASS
0 2 consecutive failures = significant noncompliance Y Pre 1989 Data Available
PE R.M = Permit Requirement LET Letter --Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly: M- Monthly: BM- Illnwuthly: SA-Scrnlannnnlly; A- Annually:OWI)- Only when discharging; D. DIscurdhured monitoring requirement: IS. Conducting independent study
Benin=First month required 7Q10=Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) A =quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur - ex. JAN,APRJUL,OCI NonComp =Current Compliance Requirement
PP=Perrdtied flow (MGD) IWC%= Instream waste concentration P/F = Pass/Fall chronic test AC = Acute CHR =Chronic
Data Notation: f- Fathead Minnow: • - Cedodaolmia so.: my - Mvsid shrimp: ChV - Chronic value: P - Mortality of stated lerantaste at highest concentration: at - Performed by DEM Act Tox Grotto: bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: - = Data not required; NA - Not reported; ( ) . Beginning of Quarier Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Newly Issucd(To construct): 11- Active but not discharging SIG = ORC signature needed
4

Page 1
Note for Dana Folley
From: Dana Folley
Date: Wed, Mar 31, 1993 2:07 PM
Subject: RE:
To: Susan Wilson
Susan -
About Oxford, I have some additional data of Oxford's influent and effluent for 5 of the six
pollutants for you to use. Please call me when you get back and I'll bring it over. In
general, after you redo the numbers using the additional data, Julia and I recommend you
revise the limits/monitoring requirements for these pollutants following the interim APAM
policy. Please talk to Carla about what this policy is. Carla has a version that she gave to
Julia; Julia gave her an alternative policy back, now they both will be discussing these
versions with their respective staffs and then getting back to discuss a final interim policy. I
have copies of both of these policies if you need them. We in pretreatment went over the two
this morning and we like our version best for a variety of reasons that Julia will brief Carla
on soon. Julia and I recommend you use our version for these parameters for Oxford.
About Robersonville, I have misplaced your sheets so I looked at my PIRF - I assume the
parameters were CU, ZN, and HG. In general, we recommend you proceed with the limits/
monitoring requirements as you have determined as this is how everyone else has been
treated. When we come up with our new policy, we will revise Robersonville's permit then.
From: Susan Wilson on Wed, Mar 24, 1993 10:10 AM
To: Dana Folley
1) What's the status on Oxford ?
2) Have you spoken with Julia about possible Hg limit and Cu,Zn monitoring for
Robersonville?
thanks!

03/03/93 ver 3.1 T O X I C S R E V I E W
. Facility: robersonville
NPDES Permit No.: nc0026042
Status (E, P, or M) : e
Permitted Flow: 1.8 mgd
Actual Average Flow: 1.0876 mgd
Subbasin: '030306
Receiving Stream: flat swp crk I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: c-sw,nsw I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI
7Q10: 0.27 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 91.18 % 1 Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) 1 it (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 0% 1 I
Chromium S 50.0 1 0% 1 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 86% 0.0677 0.0000 0.0677 1 1 N
Nickel S 88.0 1 0% 1 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 0% 1 1 U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 79% 0.1354 0.0000 0.1354 1 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 0% 1 I
Mercury S 0.012 1 60% 0.0003 0.0000 0.0003 I 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 0% I I E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 1 1 T
Phenols S NA 1 0% 1 1 I
NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 O
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
I Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Pollutant 1 Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 0.02 2.194 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 A
Chromium S 1 0.53 54.839 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 N
Copper AL 1 0.53 7.677 1.044 0.000 0.00 Monitor 1 1 A
Nickel S 1 0.93 96.516 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 L
Lead S 1 0.26 27.419 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 Y
Zinc AL 1 2.51 54.839 3.133 0.000 0.00 Monitor 1 1 S
Cyanide S 1 0.05 5.484 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.00 0.013 0.013 ✓ 0.000 0.00 Limit 1 1 S
Silver AL 1 0.00 0.066 0.000 0.000 0.00 1
Selenium S 1 0.05 5.484 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 0.53 54.839 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U
T.R.Chlor.AL 1 18.645 0.00 1 I L
I I I T
I I S