NC0026042_Environmental Assessment_19960930

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0026042
Robersonville WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Correspondence
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
September 30, 1996
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re -terse reside
014
Oft
Iie
.•
eft
P'`

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee 4.6)
FROM: Preston Howard
7T/Pvi,A
�EHNR
September 30,1996
RE: Comments on Robersonville; DEHNR # 97-0072 & 97-0104
NEPA Environmental Review at the Community Level
CDBG for WWTP Improvements; Martin County
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed the above NEPA environmental
documents submitted by the Town of Robersonville for funding for wastewater
improvements to the Town's sewage treatment plant on Flat Swamp Creek. The
Division believes that the project can be developed to meet the water quality
protection needs of the area but that there are some significant concerns which will
need to be addressed. Those concerns relate to the excessive nutrients and oxygen -
demanding loading already present in many parts of the river . Information available
at this time is not sufficient to enable final decisions to be made relative to the
permitting issue. This information would need to be provided during the
environmental review and permit application phases of the Division's permitting
process.
It is our understanding that the above documents do not, nor were they ever
intended to, satisfy the requirements for environmental review under the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA). Under NCEPA, the project as proposed would be
considered a publicly -funded project and would be above the minimum criteria for
requiring an environmental document (i.e., the proposed 0.6 MGD expansion would
exceed the 0.5 MGD threshold). A separate environmental document that satisfies
NCEPA would therefore need to be prepared for this project before NPDES permit
decisions could be made by our Division.
We have been asked to provide more details on the issues that need to be
addressed and the information that would need to be obtained before a permit
decision could be made. We have also been asked to provide information on what an
environmental assessment document should include to enable processing of an
application. Since it is our policy to include as much relevant information as possible
during the environmental assessment development phase of a project, we have
discussed the major concerns as they would be addressed in an environmental
assessment and included them in the attached list. This list contains specific
environmental issues discussed with the Town and its consultants at an August 21
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Melba McGee
September 30,1996
Page Two
meeting with Division staff as well as standard EA content requirements.
We realize the needs of the town to act expeditiously on this project and are
willing to work with them in obtaining information necessary for final decisions to be
made.
If you should have any questions, please call Boyd DeVane at 733-5083, ext. 559
or Michelle Suverkrubbe at ext. 567.

Town of Robersonville WWTP Expansion
EA Requirements and Other Information Needs
prepared by: NC Division of Water Quality
9/25/96
Project - Specific Issues
1. Permit Limitations. A critical concern of the Division involves the ability to provide
treatment, either for land application or stream discharge, to meet the stringent
needs for stream dissolved oxygen protection. The existing Robersonville WWTP
has a wasteflow of 1.8 mgd with advanced tertiary limits for BOD5 and NH3N (5
mg/1 and 2 mg/1 respectively). The Town is also required to monitor for several
metals and toxicants due to the percentage of industrial waste. The plant is
proposed for expansion to 2.4 mgd to accept additional flow from the Eagle Snacks
production facility. The Tar -Pamlico River Basinwide Water Quality Management
Plan identifies the Flat Swamp Creek as having existing low dissolved oxygen
levels and very low assimilative capacity. An EA must include a detailed discussion
of the receiving stream and its assimilative capacity. It must also address permit
limitations for the proposed expanded flow in light of this assimilative capacity and
include a discussion of total design flow available for oxygen consuming wastes,
metals or nutrients. The consultant needs to request a "speculative analysis" from
our Division. For this discharge expansion into Flat Swamp, the limits for BOD5
and NH3N will remain the same as the existing permit (summer BOD and NH3
limits of 5 and 2 mg/1 respectively), although requirements for metals and toxicants
may change.
2. Nutrients The control of nutrients to the Tar -Pamlico Basin is a major concern of
the Division staff. The Phase II Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) strategy for the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin was adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission in December 1994. Rules to implement portions of this strategy are at
public workshop currently. The Phase II NSW document has nutrient removal
requirements for facilities that are not members of the Tar -Pamlico Basin, such as
Robersonville. Under the Phase II strategy, existing facilities with design flows
greater than or equal to 0.5 mgd have to meet monthly average total phosphorus
(TP) limits of 1 mg/1 and monthly average total nitrogen (TN) limits of 6 mg/1 in
December 1999. Discharges expanding to z 0.5 mgd will receive limits of Total
Phosphorus =1 mg/1 and Total Nitrogen = 6 mg/1 monthly average when the plant
becomes operational.
In addition, the Phase II strategy proposed that expanding dischargers that are not
members of the Association offset the increase in TN and TP loading that results
from the expansion by funding nonpoint source control programs in the basin. If
adopted, these rules might affect the Robersonville discharge. An EA prepared for
the project would need to discuss how the Town would address these possible
requirements.
3. Waste Characteristics. The nature of the waste that would be generated by the
proposed snack factory is assumed to include high concentrations of BOD,

dissolved solids and sodium. Specifics on the quantity and concentrations of these
items should be presented in an EA.
4. Physical Plant Changes / Service Area. The construction and operation details of
the existing facility, in addition to all changes and improvements proposed in the
expansion of the plant must be presented in an EA. All environmental impacts of
these proposed changes must also be discussed. Maps and site plans must be
included that clearly show existing and proposed plant improvements (including the
proposed pretreatment facility), in addition to the existing and proposed plant
service areas.
5. Industrial Wastewater Receiving (Pretreatment) Facility. Details of the
construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed Industrial Wastewater
Receiving (Pretreatment) Facility and the 18,000 linear feet of force main to
transport the treated wastewater to the Town's WWTP must be discussed in an EA,
along with all the anticipated environmental impacts of its construction and
operations activities. This new force main will require a Non -Discharge
construction and operation permit from the State Engineering Group. Please check
with Dianne Williams -Wilburn in the Facilities Assessment Unit (at 733-5083, ext.
232) to determine what specific information would be required in an EA for the
pretreatment facility portion of the project.
6. Capacity Analysis. Existing and proposed capacity of the Town's wastewater
treatment plant must be provided hi an EA, with a discussion of available versus
committed capacities. If expanded as proposed, what percentage of the 2.4 mgd
treatment plant capacity would be available (i.e. not committed to other uses) to
handle future growth in the service area? Preliminary evaluation of the known
commitments by the Town to other users indicated to the Division that even if
expanded as proposed, the Town would still be left with only 20% available _
capacity. This would need to be discussed.
7. Alternatives Analysis. An engineering alternatives analysis that addresses the
environmental impacts and fiscal costs of other wastewater treatment alternatives
(including retaining the existing spray irrigation system, or a combination of other
options, as discussed at the August 21 meeting) would be required in an EA. If the
applicant is proposing to operate the spray irrigation fields for 2 years during
construction of the pretreatment facility and upgrading the WWTP, why cannot the
company continue using this facility for all future operations? Convincing
environmental arguments must be presented in the Alternatives section of an EA to
justify the proposed discharge alternative over the existing non -discharge system.
8. Interim Operations Plan. An Interim Operations Plan must be provided in an EA
that details how the Nutri-Turf facility is to operate in the 2-3 years that it takes to
construct the WWTP improvements. The existing non -discharge permit for the
operation of the Eagle Snacks spray irrigation system (Permit No. WQ0000581)
will need to be amended to reflect the Interim Plan. The environmental impacts of
this interim plan would need to be provided as part of the EA for the project. Once
the Interim period is completed and the wastewater is being handled by the WWTP,
the Town will need to request Permit No. WQ0000581 be rescinded.
9. Land Applications of Residuals. The Town will need to evaluate the existing land
application of residuals permit for its WWTP (WQ0002897) to determine if an
increase in solids production due to the increase in wastewater treatment plant
2

capacity can be handled adequately by the current site. A discussion of this issue
and the environmental impacts of this increase must be addressedin an EA.
10. Surface Waters and Wetlands. An EA for the proposed project must discuss the
following items:
a. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. • The stream
classifications should be current. Are the streams supporting their uses?
b. Identify the linear feet of stream crossings/channelizations/relocations. If
the original stream banks were vegetated, it is requested that the
channelized/relocated stream banks be revegetated.
c. Number of stream crossings.
d. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed
on the WWTP and pretreatment facilities.
e. Make provisions that ensure that sediment and erosion control measures are
not placed in wetlands.
f. If a Section 401 Certification will be required for any aspect of the project,
please contact John Donley with the Environmental Sciences Branch of the
Division (733-1786) for information on what must be provided in an EA to
address WQ certification and wetland impacts.
11. Permits and Certifications. Neither 401 Water Quality Certifications or Water
Quality Permits can be issued until a FONSI has been issued by DEHNR. In
addition, it is standard Division Policy to require completion of the FONSI through
the State Clearinghouse prior to acceptance of any WQ permit or 401 certification.
General EA Requirements
According to the State Environmental Policy Act and current EA document preparation
requirements in the Division, the following issues are required to be included in all EA documents:
1. Existing environmental setting and conditions
2. Existing facilities on the project site
3. Need for the proposed project
4. Reasonable alternatives to the recommended course of action
5. Environmental effects of the proposed activity and alternatives. Environmental
effect is defined as including direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts for the project
or program that may be significant, depending on the manner in which the activity
is carried out.
6. Methods proposed to mitigate or avoid significant adverse environmental impacts
Robersonvillc.BDV
3

- m*. wl 1'obcaronvi-11e
- Grd - doca t 1. d c,rno ediait
Dot 1.3 Pucka.- prrmtiet4
0.23 clo ohc..I tXun oltable (1gCQ5 heceir r3
0.1 4-1e Ov 04.14.4A small ' ( 3
pc, w, d,
_Srctocuct v,;,. I.3 0.i Camm.I4eCE 1•v grd{rct_
J-r�3�1.(.c3
a to z i-gbrar d
_ J,sAV S2 : iS I'o of- pet jotted PGY)oi cn (a.' 4 /n&11 )
Sictrk cafinQ rmt�, fr�rn ll ut aw& th r7 er1 x k.
--caPactki rlufr' Turf ,

1 ;
f_Dir,p63W I L.A-
ca Tf� .
Sf
33 -.0,* 3 1)
A)
29J--3S// d7 % ',Jo,7u)//e
74
-235_:51)237gad.603
9i532?r-7
o Let. f`ut.4.1 ci /9 73 -50)8. C.55
5 (fANK-/'rr- i"1t5 R7
frcJ ChQ0lL/'s
)); atinf.‘)/de 4.444, r
CIL - t2R .-ctS 3 J
911-2Zg-C)S31
a - -33 -SC a3
nrx�l ram, s.mw7
\,v .a-E,0q
w � AA/4.0
T G} C Hl Ca c T M IJ C 0_
q/9 /733- 505'3 ", ? 31._
104O (C2.
Pre.

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Water Quality Section
August 16, 1996
Memorandum
To: Michelle Suverkrubbe
From: Carla Sanderson Cd
Through: Ruth Swanek1S
Subject: Town of Robersonville WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0026042
EA Review for Expansion
An Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Town of Robersonville WWTP expansion has
been reviewed by the Instream Assessment Unit (IAU). The Town wishes to accept
additional flow from the Eagle Snacks production facility which has high concentrations of
BOD, dissolved solids and sodium. The Town discharges into Flat Swamp in the Tar
River Basin. The existing permitted has a wasteflow of 1.8 MGD with advanced tertiary
limits for BOD5 and NH3N (5 mg/1 and 2 mg/1 respectively). The Town is also required
to monitor for several metals and toxicants due to the percentage of industrial waste.
The EA has not addressed permit limitations for the expanded flow. The document
indicates that the plant capacity will be increased to 2.4 MGD, but it did not include
proposed limitations for oxygen consuming wastes, metals, or nutrients. Usually a
speculative analysis is requested to use in facility planning and development of the EA. For
this discharge expansion into Flat Swamp, the limits for BOD5 and NH3N will remain the
same as the existing permit (summer BOD and NH3 limits of 5 and 2 mg/1 respectively),
although requirements for metals and toxicants may change.
The document also did not address nutrients sufficiently. The Phase II Nutrient Sensitive
Waters (NSW) strategy for the Tar -Pamlico River Basin was adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission in December 1994. The Phase II NSW document has nutrient
removal requirements for facilities that are not members of the Tar -Pamlico Basin
(Robersonville is not a member). Under the Phase II strategy, existing facilities with
design flows greater than or equal to 0.5 MGD have to meet monthly average total
phosphorus (TP) limits of 1 mg/1 and monthly average total nitrogen (TN) limits of 6 mg/1
in December 1999. Discharges expanding to Z 0.5 MGD will receive limits of Total
Phosphorus = 1 mg/1 and Total Nitrogen = 6 mg/1 monthly average when the plant becomes
operational.
In addition, the Phase II strategy proposed that expanding dischargers that are not members
of the Association offset the increase in TN and TP loading that results from the expansion
by funding nonpoint source control programs in the basin. These nonpoint source
payments must be made before an NPDES permit can be issued and before each
subsequent renewal of the permit. This language has been drafted into rule form, and the
proposed rules are being taken to public hearing on September 3 and September 5 in
Greenville and Nashville respectively. I would encourage the Town of Robersonville to
attend one of the meetings as the proposed rule will directly affect them.
If you have any questions, please call me.

The
Wooten
Company
Engineering
Planning
Architecture
120 N. Boylan Avenue
Raleigh. NC
27603
919-828-0531
Since 1936
August 13, 1996
Ms. Michelle Suverkrubbe
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Re: Wastewater Treatment Improvements Project
Robersonville, North Carolina
TWC No. 2524
Dear Ms. Suverkrubbe:
Enclosed as per our telephone conversation of August 12 and my conversation with
Ms. Melba McGhee this date are seven (7) copies of the Preliminary Engineering
Report dealing with the proposed high strength wastewater receiving facility and
wastewater treatment plant upgrade at Robersonville, North Carolina. Also
enclosed are seven copies of an 8 1/2 x 11 inch map showing the proposed
locations of the major project components. Please advise your water quality
monitoring group that this project is expected to result in elimination of the
discharge allowed by NPDES Permit No. N00051195.
If you should require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call
Sincerely,
The Wooten Co p y
Ford Chambliss
cc: Mr. Ralph Mobley, Town of Robersonville
Ms. Mary Lilley

Co
re
.• Celli
n
71e
Cern
.5',,, 1 On?) .
t�
19
1,
.• a2
,
4. 1(
Oak, i%•ISS
•I(ISnO
l ~ , \ J
-•• �j` (/,/ • l (.
. \ 1,; rtlr li 1
?? \ ( 1 �
•
i e
(... •�\ten • sLr
r. •.� *I. 1
.1( (....l \ :1 I ---
I. c ( 1 I') / ‘!\ � I ;
It
1 ; . •�I •I i \� Wastewater Trrat11irtlt • •
1.) :• 1 •, .•; '• ; t ih., glint Expansion and '
1 ( • ' // (\ ' \ c � ,..„ Upgrading Site ' . At 4. 99
1.1 kit:. 1
if \\A -,,
/ 4,,- • 1 \
tnlii
, ) ), s
t• i
•
\.(116?))
\. • `
/Y1159)
<l Swamp usi 4em
A:
,
f
kit* ,4 • .• i t , t... •t •
r iiii .1;.
1 / \ \',1
Itobersot>tvillerg/ :\
7(i1511
x \
r 1
' / �, ��. / -- ) 1
Location MapProposed Wastewater Treutlnent. Facilities
ltubersuhvilli, North c:uroiiini
irr
i
M ii)il81•/
New hare Main
1 ► ,
1 iigh SItength Industrial t
'
'' Wastewater Receiving
• • Facility Site (t xisitng '1
Eagle Snacks band
Application System)
....::;.,::-..LA::• "Ii• • ...--• 1..1
i2' 6::s
1▪ 1▪ 111
,A,•
•
rrr
•
•
toirlpil
1168
ISnon
11000
17000
10000
gone
8000
7000
0 el
0 saw
•
inoo
3000
1000
towril
le ccrell

Environmental Review Tracking Sheet
DWO - Water Quality Section
MEMORANDUM
TO:
g/IZ/qln
Env. Sciences Branch
* WeJlands
John Dorney
❑ Eric Galamb (DoT)
❑ Greg Price (airports)
❑ Steve Kroeger
0
* Bio. Resources, Habitat, End. Species
❑ Trish MacPherson
❑ Kathy Herring (forest/oRw/hQw)
0
* Toxicology
❑ Larry Ausley
Planning Branch
Technical Support Branch
"Colleen Sullins, P&E
Dave Goodrich, P&E, NPDES
IR/Carolyn McCaskill, P&E, State
❑ Bradley Bennett, P&E, Stormwater
"Ruth Swanek, Instream Assess. (modeling)
tYCarla Sanderson, Rapid Assess.
0
Operations Branch
Dianne Wilburn, Facility Assessment
GeTom Poe, Pretreatment
O Lisa Martin, Water Supply Watershed
Regional Water Quality Supervisors
❑ Asheville ❑ Mooresville 0 Washington
❑ Fayetteville ❑Raleigh ❑ Wilmington
❑ Winston-Salem
FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Planning Branch
RE:
EA.) trotAwic+.d-iQ AcsessmeAA-1-``fie--C��-2 •ri��. D-f 12ober.5o►n0i(6 c-i)134, ,
�cc�lc Svukc s ; U rai . Ut) WT-P C'.pA ,$4,t,tet�r� iv ea Feu i ii'y
Attached is a copy of the above document. Subject to the requirements of the North Carolina
Environmental Environmental Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant impacts
to the environment, especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority.
Please check the appropriate box below and return this form to me along with your written comments, if
any, by the date indicated.
0/19 lglo
Thank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining and expediting this process are
greatly appreciated!
Notes:11; wit/ V'GSpoWSe_ Aa is r - r u.t_'i', sni ous pro Lilews
We tx9aat-6 I-I4-c ifiAA 0AA sei- It ii4UD(Jca(
P ri ov- fie.. oh dam. ti.lt�n� k i R01e.A.a .
You can reach me at: u
phone: [phone], ext. 567 fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
mis:'circmemo.doc

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form •
❑ Project located in 7th floor library
Project Number: County:
6/4+Doi
Date:
spc,
9'l'�oL,,s-d /12oL44sn�oil(e 6oVi ,��2Va.4
0‘4,44 12,14(ti fht-110LPb4^1^-71-
This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Date Response Due (firm deadline):
Xlan
Regional Office/Phone
Regional Office Area
In -House Review
❑ Asheville
❑ Fayetteville
❑ Mooresville
❑ Raleigh
Washington
Wilmington
❑ Winston-Salem
0 All RIO Areas
Y1 • it
:: ater
?roundwater
-Land Quality Engineer
❑ Recreational Consultant
❑ Soil and Water
■ Marine Fisheries
.
0 Water Planning
y Environmental Health
❑ Solid Waste Management
❑ Radiation Protection
• Coastal Management
• Water Resources
sigWildlife
Forest Resources
0 Land Resources
Parks and Recreation
Environmental Management
Monica Swihart
• David Foster
❑ Other (specify)
■ Coastal Management Consultant
0 Others
PWg
Manager Sign-Off/Region:
Date:
In -House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and complete by Regional Manager. • In -House Reviewer complete individual response.
0 No objection to project as proposed
0 No Comment
❑ Insufficient information to complete review
0 Approve
0 Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
❑ Applicant has been contacted
❑ Applicant has not been contacted
0 Project Controversial (comments attached)
❑•Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
❑ Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked) 0 Consistency Statement not needed
❑ Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached)
❑ Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attached/authority(ies) cited)
0 Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
0 Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee
PS-104
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs

♦
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL
'Agency responsible for Project
Town of
Robersonville
:Contact Person:
Mary Lilley
1 Location: (City and County)
;Clearing House No ' Date Completed
Robersonville/Martin ; 8-1-96
A. Project Description
'Briefly Describe Project:
Address Martin Co. Chamber of Commerce
PO Box 311, Williamston, NC 27892
Phone
919-792-4131
In October of 1995, Andheuser-Busch announced the closure of all Eagle Snacks production facilities. Subsequently, in the Spring
of 1996, the Eagle Snacks facility in Robersonville closed displacing approximately 500 workers. lnterBrands Corporation USA is
now considering the purchase of the Eagle Snacks facility from Andheuser-Busch for production of nut products and croutons with a
strong emphasis on the export markets. InterBrands proposes to create an estimated 325+ jobs and is strongly committed to
re-employing those persons displaced by the closing of the Eagle Snacks facility. The Eagle Snacks facility in Robersonville
consists of a 230,000+ square foot manufacturing facility, 200+ acres of land in total, manufacturing equipment, and a wastewater
treatment facility operated by Nutri-Turf (still operated by the Andheuser-Busch Company, but scheduled to close September 1,
1996). While the purchase agreement between InterBrands and Andheuser-Busch would include the Nutri-Turf facility, InterBrands
does not have the expertise or interest in operating this facility and will acquire the Eagle Snacks production facility only if the
Town of Robersonville is able to accept and treat its relatively high strength wastes. The Town of Robersonville has received a
preliminary engineering report from the Wooten Company identifying costs required to upgrade the Town's existing facility to
accommodate the high strength wastes generated by snack foods production. The most feasible solution for the Town to consider
would be the construction of an Industrial Wastewater Receiving Facility and upgrade of Town's wastewater treatment capacity
estimated at 54,445,000.
Project Activities
1. Land/Building Acquisition
2. Equiprnent
CMG/HOME Funds
$
Other Funds
$ 5,000,000
2,000,000
Environmental Impact Status
Exccipt CAT. Excluded E.A.
X
3.Electrical Expansion
250,000 ; I X
4.Wastewater Improvements 1,000,000
5.
'3,500,000
6. TOTAL
1,000,000 10,750,000
7.
B.
9.
10.
EIS Required
Original
Revision Dated
Amendment Dated
Prior Clearing Review
Has Taken Place
Signature of C�i'ef Elected Official
Mayor
Title
Town of Robersonville
Agency and Address
PO Box 487, Robersonville, NC 27871

Data Sources and Documentation
Historic Properties
Review requested, see exhibit 1
Flood Plain Management
See Narrative
Wetlands Protection
Martin Co. Soil Conservation Service
Noise
Field Observation, Cathy Scott, 7-23-96
Air Quality
see exhibit 2
Manmade Hazards
see exhibit 3
Water Quality
Water Quality Section, DEHNR, Telephone
7-31-96
Solid Waste Disposal
See exhibit 4
Coastal Areas
See exhibit 5
Endangered Species
See exhibit 6
Farmlands Protection
Martin Co. Cooperative Extension Service
7-31-96
Wild and Scenic Rivers
See exhibit 7
State or Local Statutes
CDBG Regulations/NC Building Code
Send 14 copies of this form and all maps to: Director, Division of Community Assistance,
Suite 250, P. O. Box 12600, Raleigh, NC 27605-2600
The ERR for Economic Development projects should be sent directly to the State
Clearinghouse: Director, NC State Clearinghouse Dept. of Administration, 116 W Jones
Street, Raleigh, NC 27603-8003.

\-,
Statutory Checklist
Checklist of Applicable Statutes
and Regulations
Project Name and Identification No. InterBr_ .nds Corporation, USA
2. Attach project map.
3. Are all activities o; this project exempt from NEPA procedures? 0 Yes E No
(If yes, this Statutory Checklist need not be filled out.)
4. Are activities of this project categorically excluded from NEPA procedures? ❑ Yes ® No
(If yes, this Statutory Checklist and all required actions must be completed.)
Area of Statutory —Regulatory
Compliance
Note Compliance Documentation
Impact Categories
Historic Properties
X
Attachment 1
Floodplain Management
X
See Narrative
Wetlands Protection
X
See Narrative
Noise
X
See Narrative
Air Quality
X
See Narrative •Manmade
Hazards
Thermal/Explosive Hazards
X
See Narrative
Airport Clear Zones
X
See Narrative
Water Quality
Navigable Waters
X
See Narrative
Aquifers
X
See Narrative
Solid Waste
X
See Narrative
Coastal Areas
Coastal
Zone Management
X
See Narrative
Coastal
Barrier Resources
X
•
See Narrative
Endangered Species
X
See Narrative
"Attach evidence that required actions have been taken.
ei'

COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION FOR STATUTORY CHECKLIST
CDBG-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
ROBERSONVILLE, NC
The Compliance Documentation for the Statutory Checklist is included herein for The Town
of Robersonville's CDBG-Economic Development Project as described below:
.k -1
cilities ubsequently, in the Springof 1996, the Eagle Snacks facilityin Robersonville closed
g
displacing approximately 500 workers. InterBrands Corporation USA is now considering the
purchase of the Eagle Snacks facility from Andheuser-Busch for production of nut products and
croutons with a strong emphasis on the export markets. InterBrands proposes to create an
estimated 325+ jobs and is strongly committed to re-employing those persons displaced by the
closing of the Eagle Snacks facility.
The Eagle Snacks facility in Robersonville consists of a 230,000+ square foot manufacturing
facility, 200+ acres of land in total, manufacturing equipment, and a wastewater treatment
facility operated by Nutri-Turf (still operated by the Andheuser-Busch Company, but scheduled
to close September 1, 1996). While the purchase agreement between InterBrands and
Andheuser-Busch would include the Nutri-Turf facility, InterBrands does not have the expertise
or interest in operating this facility and will acquire the Eagle Snacks production facility only if
the Town of Robersonville is able to accept and treat its relatively high strength wastes.
The Town of Robersonville has received a preliminary engineering report from the Wooten
Company identifying costs required to upgrade the Town's existing facility to accommodate the
high strength wastes generated by snack foods production. The most feasible solution for the
Town to consider would be the construction of an Industrial Wastewater Receiving Facility and
upgrade of Town's wastewater treatment capacity estimated at $4,445,000.
Historic Properties
There are no properties of historic or architectural significance within the immediate project
area.
Floodplain Management
The proposed project area is not located within a floodplain area as delineated by FEMA and
identified by Flood Insurance Program Panel #370155-0075B.
Wetlands Protection
Freshwater wetlands are defined as any low land covered by non -saltwater, either frequently or
intermittently by precipitation or overflow from rivers, streams, and creeks. Wetlands include

swamps, pocosins, shallow lakes, ponds, and river overflow lands. None of these situations will
be impacted by the acquisition of the Eagle Snacks facility by InterBrands Corporation USA.
Noise
There are no unusual sources of noise in the project area. Vehicular traffic is the largest source
of noise and is not sufficient to generate measurable noise problems.
Air Quality
An air quality permit was issued for the former Eagle Snacks facility. it is anticipated that the
InterBrands project will require modification and/or transfer of this permit. All permit
applications will be submitted to the Air Quality Division prior to plant operation.
Manmade Hazards
Thermal/Explosive No thermal or explosive hazards will be stored at
the project site.
Airport Clear Zones --There are no military or commercial service airports
in the vicinity of the project area.
Water Quality
There are no navigable waters within the project area.
Acquifers
There are no sole source acquifers nor wellhead protection areas located within North
Carolina.
Solid Waste
The Town of Robersonville contracts with Martin County for solid waste collection services.
Wastes are disposed of at the Bertie Regional Landfill in Bertie County. InterBrands
Corporation will contract with a private source for solid waste collection at the proposed
facility.

Coastal Areas
Coastal Zone Management --The coastal zone includes the coastal salt waters and adjacent
shore lands including intertidal areas, barrier and other islands, estuaries and the land use of
which would have significant impact on coastal waters. North Carolina operates an approved
Coastal Zone Management Plan. The proposed project will not affect the Coastal Zone
Management Plan.
Coastal Barrier Resources --The Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982 is administered by the
Department of the Interior. The purpose of this act is to minimize the loss of human life,
wasteful expenditures of Federal Revenues, and damage to fish, wildlife, and other natural
resources associated with the coastal barriers along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts by restricting
future federal expenditures which may encourage development of coastal barriers. This Act is
not applicable to Robersonville's project.
Endangered Species
There are no known endangered species within the project area. The project area consists of
developed properties including residential, commercial, and industrial properties.
Farmland
Farmland is a unique natural resources found in Martin County. The acquisition of the former
Eagle Snacks facility by InterBrands Corporation will not impact farmland in Robersonville or
Martin County.
Wild & Scenic Rivers
There are no wild and scenic rivers in the immediate project area or will any be affected by the
re -opening of the former Eagle Snacks facility.
State or Local Statutes
The following statutes and regulations will be applicable to Robersonville's CDBG-Economic
Development Project.
NC CDBG-Economic Development Project Regulations
NC State Building Code (any building renovations)

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
Page 1
Project Name and Identification No
InterBrands Corporation, USA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
c rc
O 0
' ,...e 4.,te i.4#2,
,4 *ae `me' A` Source or Documentation •
``o ...'� y `�� a ,A� F (Note date of contact or
/1'`Ic• c.f i?4, .2 page reference)
�°' a� �� � tti.V� a Additional material may be
Impact Categories t'° Q° AO' Q4°P .e 41' attached.
Land Development
Conformance With
Comprehensive
Plans and Zoning
X
Ralph Mobley
Town Manager
7- 3 0- 9 6
Compatilbility and
Urban Impact
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-16-96
Slope
.
X
Field Observation • .
Cathy Scott
7-16-96
Erosion
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott •
7-16-96
Soil Suitability
X
Martin Co. Soil Cons. Service
7-30-96
Hazards and
Nuisances, Including
Site Safety
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-1 6 - 9 6
Energy
Consumption
X
Ralph Mobley
Town Manager
7-30-96
Noise •
Effects of Ambient
Noise on Project and
Contribution to Cam•
munity Noise Levels
X
4.................
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7- 3 0- 9 6 .

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
!continued. pace �+
Project Name and Identification No. InterBrands Corporation, USA
2• / 3 / 4 /5 /6 /7
c'
t.
c do '6 � � :: .c .
`-4 `1` .4* `.9/ 44 Source Or Documentation
`.T .� „ `^ " •„�� ., (Note date of contact or
e o �e t4 •4' �41 •eta' page reference)
0 oa a c` �� c Additional material may be
Impact Categories Z 4 �4� 4� Q- attached.
Air Quality
Effects of Ambient Air
Quality on Project and
Contributtion to Corn.
munity Pollution Levels
X
Air Quality Division
NCDEHNR 7-30-96
Environmental Design and Historic Values
Visual Quality
Coherence, Diversity
Compatible Use. and
Scale
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott 7-16-96
Historic, Cultural,
and Archaeological
Resources
X
NC Dept. of Cultural Res.
7-30-96
Socioeconomic
Demographic/
Character Changes
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-16-96 .
Displacement
X
_
Field Observation
Cathy Scott •
7-16-96
Employment and
Income Patterns
X
Mary Lilley
Martin County Chamber of Comm.
7-23-96
Community Facilities and Services
Educational Faciltt,es
X
Mary Lilley
Martin County Chamber of Comm.
7-23-96
Commercial Faciltnes
X
Mary Lilley
Martin County Chamber of Comm.
7-23-96
Health Care
X
Mary Lilley
Martin County Chamber of Comm.
7-23-96
Social Services
X
Mary Lilley .
Martin County .Chamber of Comm.
7-23-96

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
!continued. page 31
Project Name and Identification No.
InterBrands Corporation, USA
Impact Categories
20
3 4 5 6 '7
c
O
Source or Documentation
(Note date of conmct or
page reference)
Additional material may be
attached.
Community Facilities and Services (Continued)
Solid Waste
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
Waste Water
X
Ford Chamblis
The Wooten Company
7-26-96
Storm Water
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
Water Supply
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-24-96
Public Safety Police
•
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-24-96
F1Te
•
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
Emergency
Medical
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96 b
Open Open Space
Space and
Recreation
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-23-96
Recreation
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-23-96
cultural
Facilities
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
X
•
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-30-96
Transportation

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
CDBG-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
ROBERSONVILLE, NC
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Comprehensive Plans & Zoning
In October of 1995, Andheuser-Busch announced the closure of all Eagle Snacks production
facilities. Subsequently, in the Spring of 1996, the Eagle Snacks facility in Robersonville closed
displacing approximately 500 workers. InterBrands Corporation USA is now considering the
purchase of the Eagle Snacks facility from Andheuser-Busch for production of nut products and
croutons with a strong emphasis on the export markets. InterBrands proposes to create an
estimated 325+ jobs and is strongly committed to re-employing those persons displaced by the
closing of the Eagle Snacks facility.
The Eagle Snacks facility in Robersonville consists of a 230,000+ square foot manufacturing
facility, 200+ acres of land in total, manufacturing equipment, and a wastewater treatment
facility operated by Nutri-Turf (still operated by the Andheuser-Busch Company, but scheduled
to close September 1, 1996). While the purchase agreement between InterBrands and
Andheuser-Busch would include the Nutri-Turf facility, InterBrands does not have the expertise
or interest in operating this facility and will acquire the Eagle Snacks production facility only if
the Town of Robersonville is able to accept and treat its relatively high strength wastes.
The Town of Robersonville has received a preliminary engineering report from the Wooten
Company identifying costs required to upgrade the Town's existing facility to accommodate the
high strength wastes generated by snack foods production. The most feasible solution for the
Town to consider would be the construction of an Industrial Wastewater Receiving Facility and
upgrade of Town's wastewater treatment capacity estimated at $4,445,000.
The project is consistent with Robersonville's comprehensive land use plans and zoning
regulations.
Compatibility & Urban Impact
The proposed InterBrands Corporation project will be located on property currently zoned
and Industrial and used for the production of nut products. Additionally, there are commercial
establishments located in the project vicinity. The proposed facility will be compatible with
surrounding land uses.

• Slope
The topography of the project area is level to gently sloping. The re -opening of the former
Eagle Snacks facility will have no negative impact on the slope of the project area.
Erosion
Due to the level topography of the Town, the area lends itself to minimum amounts of erosion.
Any land disturbing activities associated with the construction of wastewater treatment
improvements will require the preparation and implementation of a soil and sedimentation
control plan. Proper construction practices will be implemented to minimize or even eliminate
any negative impacts.
Soil Suitability
Soils in the project area and the Town of Robersonville consist primarily of the Goldsboro,
Lynchburg, and Norfolk associations and contain the physical capabilities to support the
construction of wastewater improvements.
Hazards & Nuisances Including Site Safety
There are minimal potential risks to the public or project area residents from man-made
hazards in the project area. Normal dangers exist from conflicts resulting in the interface of
vehicular and pedestrian traffic. However, this is considered to be an everyday occurrence
rather than a hazard. There are no unusual site features which represent a hazard or nuisance
for users of this property. Additionally, modern construction practices will be utilized during
the construction of any wastewater treatment improvements ensure the minimization of
hazards and nuisances.
Energy Consumption
Electric power is supplied to the project area by the Town of Robersonville. Sufficient
capacities exist with the Company to accommodate the existing and future needs of the
proposed facility.
Noise
There are no unusual sources of noise in the project area. There are existing commercial
business establishments located in the general project area.

Effects of Ambient Air Quality on Project and Contributions
to Community Pollution Levels
No significant concentrations of pollutants such as carbon monoxide, lead, or nitrogen dioxide
are expected to be used or stored at the proposed manufacturing facility. No impacts are
anticipated.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN & HISTORIC VALUES
Visual Quality -Coherence, Diversity, Compatible Use & Scale
Visual quality refers to the impact of the project on the visual character of its surroundings and
ultimately on the users and/or visitors of the project area. The Town's proposed CDBG-ED
Project involves the purchase and operation of an existing manufacturing facility The project
conforms with the visual quality of the project area and is compatible in use with project area.
Historic, Cultural & Archaeological Resources
No historic, cultural, or archaeological resources are located within the project area.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Demographic Character Changes
The proposed project site is located in an area that is primarily zoned for commercial and
industrial purposes. The project site is located in the Grimes Street Area of Robersonville.
There are some residential structures near the project area, however, no residential area will
be affected by this project and no major demographic character changes are anticipated.
Displacement
Displacement refers to the dislocation of people, businesses, institutions, or community
facilities as a result of project activities. No persons, families, or facilities are proposed to be
dislocated to accomplish project activities. However, it is anticipated that persons displaced by
the closing of the former Eagle Snacks facility will be rehired by InterBrands Corporation USA.

Employment Incomes & Patterns
Employment related impacts of this project include the creation of 325+ new jobs within a two
year period and over $2 million in new payroll revenues. These jobs will be vital to the
economic well-being of the Town of Robersonville and Martin County and will alleviate the
economic distress experienced by the Town due to the closing of the Eagle Snacks
manufacturing facility.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES & SERVICES
Educational Facilities
The two fundamental considerations regarding the project activities and their relationship to
the impact on schools are: I) adequate capacity for children in school; and 2) safe access.
Since this project will not cause an increase in the school age population nor create unsafe
school access, the educational facilities located in the Town or County will not be adversely
affected.
Commercial Facilities
Adequate commercial facilities exist in Robersonville to serve the project area. Easily accessible
streets make it convenient to secure goods and services in the Town.
Health Care
Health Care services are provided Robersonville residents and businesses by the Martin County
Health Department and Martin General Hospital. The health services in the area are adequate
to accommodate the needs of the proposed snack foods manufacturing facility and its
employees.
Social Services
Social services are provided by the Martin County Department of Social Services located in
Williamston, NC. The facility is located within reasonable proximity to proposed project area.

Solid Waste
Solid waste disposal services are available to the project area by Martin County through a
contractual arrangement with the Town of Robersonville. Additionally, several private sources
are available for solid waste collection and disposal. Wastes are disposed of at the Bertie
Regional Landfill in Bertie County.
Wastewater
The Town of Robersonville currently operates a 1.8 million gallons per day wastewater
treatment facility with current usage estimated at 1.5 million gallons per day and has reserved
treatment capacity of an additional 200,000 gallons per day usage for residential and industrial
users. InterBrands Corporation has estimated their wastewater needs at 250,000 gallons per
day. Additionally, the high strength wastes to be generated by snack foods production will
require the Town to construction an industrial waste receiving facility to screen wastes prior
to treatment at the Town's wastewater treatment facility.
Storm Water
Storm water in the project area is adequately dissipated by infiltration and surface draining
systems including open ditches and storm drainage systems. The proposed project is not
anticipated to adversely impact the storm water facilities in existence in the project area.
Water Supply
The Town of Robersonville operates a 2.4 million gallon per day water system with current
usage estimated at 1.6 million gallons per day. The Town possesses sufficient excess water
capacity to meet InterBrands 250,000 gallon per day requirements.
Public Safety -Police -Fire -Emergency Medical
Public safety in the project area is provided by the Town of Robersonville Police Department.
This Department offers topnotch public safety services to meet the needs of the proposed
project area. Fire protection is provided by local volunteer fire departments. Emergency
Medical Services are provided by commercial and volunteer rescue operations.
Open Space, Recreation, Cultural Facilities
The proposed project will not impact open spaces, recreational, or cultural facilities.

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
(continued, page 4)
Project Name and Identification No
Impact Categories
InterBrands Corporation, .USA
7
Source or Documentation
(Note date of contact or
page reference)
Additional material may be
attached.
Natural Features
Water Resources
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
Surface Water
X
Ralph Mobley
Robersonville Town Manager
7-30-96
Floodplains
•
X
Martin County Flood Ins. Prgm.
Maps Viewed 7-31-96
Wetlands
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-30-96
Coastal Zone
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-30-96
Unique Natural
Features and
Agricultural Lands
X
Field Observation
Cathy Scott
7-30-96
Vegetation and
Wildlife .
X
Field Observation, Cathy Scott
7-30-96
NC Natural Heritage Program

NATURAL RESOURCES
Water
The Town of Robersonville's water supply comes from seven ground wells and is sufficient to
meet the needs of the InterBrands production facility.
Surface Water
Surface waters are frequently the source of irrigation, drinking and industrial processing as well
as important sources for recreational activities. The nearest surface water to the project area
Collie Swamp. No impact is anticipated on existing surface waters as a result of this project.
Floodplains
The proposed project area is not located within a floodplain as delineated by FEMA and
identified by Flood Insurance Program Map #37013-0035C, Panel #35 of 170.
Wetlands
None wetlands are located within the project sites. No impact is anticipated.
Coastal Zone
Martin County is not located in the Coastal Zone as established by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972 and the North Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1975. Therefore,
no impact is anticipated.
Unique Features & Agricultural Lands
Unique natural features are primarily geological features which are unique in the sense that
their occurrence is infrequent or they are of special social/cultural, economic, educational,
aesthetic, or scientific value. Examples of unique natural features include: sand dunes, waterfalls,
unique rock formations, caves canyons, and petrified forests. Also included are unique stands of
trees or colonies of animals. There are no rare features such as the ones aforementioned in
the project area.

Vegetation & Wildlife
The vegetation in the vicinity of the project area is comprised mainly of the following species:
Ioblolly pine, shortleaf pine, oak, and hickory. The proposed project activities will not affect any
endangered species since none have been reported to be located in the project area.

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
page 8?
5. Topography
Types of Vegetation
Slope
Acres
% of
Area
Soi: Types
(use USDA and SCS classification)
Forested 1 Non -Forested
0-5%
5-10%
over 1O%
200+ 100
Goldsboro, Lynchburg, Norfol]4
Pine Hardwood Mixed Brush {Grassland Iotne:
o. tream that surface runoff from project area drains into (illustrated relative position on maps used in Section):
Collie Swamp
❑ Yes Site includes/borders on
® No classified trout waters ® No estuarine waters
❑ Yes Site includes/borders on ❑ Yes Site includes/borders on
® No drinking water source
The project will involve impoundment or withdrawal of water. If yes, mark impoundment on map. If impoundment is plannec
the amount of water
O Yes
No to be impounded is approximately
acre/feet and
surface acres/feet
7. Note classes of wildlife known to exist in the general area:
O Bear
❑ Deer
❑ Turkey
❑ Waterfowl
® Small Game (squirrel, quail, rabbit, racoon, dove, etc.)
O Endangered/Threatened Species (osprey eagle, alligator, red cockaded woodpecker, etc
8. Will proposed forestry practices such as burning clearcutting, or thinning have adverse effects on any of the above specials
Explain:
N/A
9. Are proposed pesticides or herbicides known to have adverse effects on humans or any of the above species? Whic
pesticides/herbicides? Which species?
N/A

Environmental
Assessment Checklist
,:,n:wtucc. pa,:
1. Supply a clear. legible map of the proposed site and surrounding area. Mark area to be acquired and construction site.
a Utilities
Utilities to serve Project
. Electric
Projected Demand Length of Lines to be Capacity of Lines Environmentally Sensitive Areas
per Dav Constructed i (inches diameter) to be Cut (for Utility acres)
tbd N/A ' N/A N/A
Potable Water
N/A N/A N/A i N/A
Sewage
Solid Waste Disposal
'Natural Gas
Water
:250,000 gpd'N/A
N/A N/A
400 cf • N/A
N/A N/A
' N/A ! N/A N/A N/A
• 3. Land Alterations
250,000 gpd:• N/A
N/A ' N/A
Alteration
(planned use)
To Be Acquired
' To Be Developed
Present Use
(before change)
0
Previous Use
(historical) Acres
0 0
Percent of
Project Area
0
i To Be Originally Cleared
!To Be Landscaped
0 0
0 0
0 0 ! 0 0
0
0
0 i 0
) To Be Covered by Imperme-t ;
table Surface (square feat) 0 0 l 0 0
To Be Cut (cubic yards) I0 j 0 0 0
i
'To Be Filled (cubic yards) I
0 0 0 0
14. Guttural Resources (arche 1ogicat, historical, architectural)
la) Please give any known archeological or historical, sites on project land:
N/A
i b) What kind, if any. site preparation has already been conducted:
Site is already developed.
lc) Has area been previously surveyed by archeologist? If so, give name of principal investigator and date of survey:
Unknown
id) X YES NO Are buildings/structures on site now? (abandoned barns. farmhouse, tobacco sheds. bridges. etc.)
i Manufacturing facility constructed in 1972.
le) Ages of each building/structure:
1 Manufacturing building - 1972
If) Will any of these structures be demolished? (indicate which):
No
1g) Will any of these structures be rehabilitated or renovated? (indicate which):
No
. 1h) Please include photographs of any buildings constructed prior to WWII if project activities include Rehabilitation, Acquisition,
Clearance or Demolition. N / A
r

Environmental
.Assessment Checklist
o-t:aucti. page 91
10. Give name, position and office telephone number of an individual in the appropriate local government unit that ca
confirm the compatibility of the proposed activity with existing and/or proposed land use economic developmer
plans:
Name: Position: Phone:
Mary-Lilley, Exec. Director, Martin Co. Chamber of Comm. 919-792-4131
11. List all N.C. State permits, authorizations and license that must be acquired to initiate and complete propose
activity:
Permit
NC General Statute
Application Date
Approval Date
a) Stationary Air Contaminant Source .
143.215.108
b) Air Quality Complex Source
143.215.109
c) Construction of Wastewater Pretreatment Facilities
143.215.1
d) Wastewater Discharge (to surface waters)
143.215
e) Approval to Construct Public Waters Facility
f) Dredge and Fill
113.229
g) Withdrawal of Water from "Capacity Use Area"
143.215.15
h) Erosion Control Plan
113A.61
i) Zoning Change or Variance
:` Coastal Resource Commission
113A.118
..) Noise Control Regulations
153A.113
1) Others (list)
97.53(2 —k
(supp) (OSHA)
1. is project in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations? L] Yes ❑ No
2. ' is an EIS required? 0 Yes ® No
3. A Finding of No significant Impanct (FONSI) can be made. Project will not
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. ® Yes 0 No
4. Send 14 copies of this ERR for State Environmental/Clearinghouse Review To: Director, Division of Community Assistancc
Suite 250, 1307 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, N.C. 27605
Prepared by • Title
PRO
328 Hamilton Street
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
late: 8 — 1 — 9 6

Exhibit #1
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by the NC Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives & History on
7-23-96.

ti
Exhibit #2
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by the Air Quality Division, NC Department of Environment, Health & Natural
Resources, on 7-23-96.

Exhibit #3
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by the Hazardous Waste Section of the NC Department of Environment, Health &
Natural Resources, on 7-23-96.

Exhibit # 4
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by the Solid Waste Management Branch of the NC Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources, on 7-23-96.

Exhibit #5
The project area is not located in a coastal area.

Exhibit #6
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by NC Natural Heritage Program on 7-23-96.

Exhibit #7
The Town of Robersonville, via Progressive Resources & Opportunities, has requested a review
of this project by the NC Natural Heritage.Program on 7-23-96.

6
9O3i
W•••
••••••,.
.11A
olgo
1 0011511
les Ale '11
dowslit!!bersonville
01
or one
11
D. 1993 DeLonne Mapping
SS A
Mat S%
amp
o-r 1-1. RF FAciLti
JI
LEGEND
Population Center
State Route
Town, Small City
US Highway
County Boundary
Street, Road
Major Street/Road
State Route
US Highway
Railroad
Scale 1:31.250 (at center)
2000 Feet
1000 Meters
• • Interbrands Project Location, Robersonvill
Mag 14.00
Thu Aug 01 13:36:34 1996