NC0069311_Permit (Issuance)_20160226

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0069311
Franklin County WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance``)
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Approval
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
February 26, 2016
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rezrerse side

1
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 26, 2016
Mr. J. Bryce Mendenhall, Director
Franklin County Public Utilities
1630 US Hwy 1
Youngsville, North Carolina 27596
PAT MCCRORY
Gnremo,
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit NC0069311
Franklin County WWTP
Franklin County
Class IV Facility
Dear Mr. Mendenhall:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum
of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
The final permit contains the following changes from your previous permit:
• In response to the County's comments on the draft permit the address for the facility
and the facility description were corrected. The flow trigger for the 3.0 MGD tier was not
modified as it was correct in the draft permit. The 3 MGD flow tier is triggered when
average flow reaches 1.8 MGD.
• Sampling frequency for the effluent pollutant scan was modified to three times during
the permit cycle. See Special Condition A. (9). This condition was also modified to add
narrative for four seasonal 2nd species toxicity tests.
• Individual limits for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus were added to the permit
according to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin 2015 Permitting Strategy. Special Conditions
A. (5), A. (6), and A. (7) describe how to calculate nutrient loads and establish how
compliance will be determined.
• A mercury evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Permitting Guidance
developed for the implementation of the statewide Mercury TMDL to determine the
need for a limit and/or a Mercury Minimization Plan (MMP). A limit will not be
required but you will be required to develop a MMP. See Special Condition A. (11).
• Due to the timing involved in issuing the final permit Special Condition A. (10.) which
addresses the requirement for you to provide electronically -submitted Discharge
Monitoring Reports (eDMRs) was modified to include the final implementation date.
The implementation date when all facilities should be reporting electronically is ,
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Mr. Mendenhall
February 26, 2016
December 21, 2016. See Condition A.(10.) in permit. For information on eDMR,
registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following
web page:
http:/ /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr.
For information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the
following web site:
http: / /www2.epa.gov/compliance/proposed-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect
the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water
Resources or any other Federal, State, or Local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at telephone
number [phone] or at email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jay Zimmerman, Director
517'Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: NPDES Files
Central Files
EPA Region 4 (e-copy)
Raleigh Regional Office / Water Quality Program
Aquatic Toxicology Branch, Susan Meadows (e-copy)
Ecosystems Branch, Carrie Ruhlman (e-copy)

Permit No. NC0069311
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Franklin County Public Utilities
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Franklin County WWTP
1099 Lane Store Rd., Franklinton
Franklin County
to receiving waters designated as Cedar Creek in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in accordance with effluent
• limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective April 1, 2016.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on September 30, 2019.
Signed this day February 26, 2016.
!Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
eelDirector, Division of Water Resources
By Authority of Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked.
As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. '
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
Franklin County Public Utilities
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 3.0 MGD wastewater treatment facility located at 1099 Lane Store
Rd., Franklinton, Franklin County, and consisting .of:
• Influent pump station with mechanical and manual bar screens
• Grit chamber
• Dual aeration/anaerobic/anoxic basins
• Dual clarifiers
• Dual tertiary filters
• Dual train W system
• Parshall flume
• Post aeration
• Aerobic digester; and
- 2. Discharge from said treatment works, through Outfall 001, into .Cedar Creek, a Class C- NSW water
in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin, at the location specified on the attached map.
Page 2 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
PART I
A. (1) EFFLUENT. LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B
.0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until the monthly average flow equals or exceeds
90% of 2.0 MGD (1.8 MGD)1, or until permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated
wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored2 by the Permittee as specified
below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average,
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
:
Sample
Location 3
Flow
2.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
Total Monthly Flow (MG)
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Recorded or
Calculated
I or E
BOD5 (summer) 4, 5
' 8.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Composite
I, E
BOD5 (winter) 4.5
18.0 mg/L
27.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Solids 4
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Composite
I, E
NH3 as N (Summer) 5
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Composite
E
NH3 as N (Winter) 5
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily average not less than 5.0 mg/L
3/ Week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform
200/100 nil
400/100 ml
3 / Week
Grab
E
Temperature (°C)
3/ Week
Grab
E
Conductivity (umhos)
3/ Week
Grab
E
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
3/ Week
Grab
E
TKN (mg/1)
Monitor and Report•
Weekly
Composite
E
NO2-N+ NO3-N (mg/1)
Monitor and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TN (mg/1) 6
Monitor and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TN Load 7
Monitor and Report (lb/mo)
42,784 lb/yr (effective 1/1/2016) 8
Monthly
Annually
Calculated
Calculated
E
TP (mg/1) 6
Monitor and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TP Load 7
Monitor and Report (lb/mo)
7,732 lb/yr (effective 1/1/2016) 8
Monthly
Annually
Calculated
Calculated
E
Total Copper 9 (µg/I)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Zinc 9 (µg/1)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity 10
Quarterly
Composite
E
Effluent Pollutant Scan
Monitor and Report
Footnote 11
Footnote 11
E
Footnotes:
1. See Condition A. (3) for Flow Considerations.
2. Beginning on December 21, 2016 begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC
DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A.(10).
3. ' I: Influent. E: Effluent. See condition A. (4) for instream monitoring requirements.
4. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
5. Summer shall be defined as April 1— October 31 with winter defined as the balance of the year.
6. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2-N, where TN is Total Nitrogen, TKN is
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3-N and NO2-N are Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen, respectively. TP is
Total Phosphorus.
Page 3 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
7. TN or TP Load is the mass quantity of Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus discharged in a given
period of time. See Special Condition A. (5) Calculation of TN or TP Loads.
8. Compliance with mass limits shall be determined in accordance with Special Condition A.(6) Annual
Limits for Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus.
9. Sample Copper and Zinc quarterly in conjunction with WET testing.
10. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) @ 66 %, January, April, July and October; see condition A. (8).
11. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit. See Special
Condition A. (9).
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR FOAM VISIBLE IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B
.0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the date monthly average flow increases above 90% of 2.0 MGD (1.8 MGD)1 and lasting until
permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored2 by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location 3
Flow
3.0 MGD
T
Continuous
Recording
I or E
Total Monthly Flow (MG)
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Recorded or
. Calculated
I or E
BOD5 (summer) 4,5
8.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
BOD5 (winter) 4,5
18.0 mg/L
27.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Solids 4
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
NH3 as N (Summer) 5
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E
NH3 as N (Winter) 5
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily average
not less than 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature (°C)
Daily
Grab
E
Conductivity (umhos)
Daily
Grab
E
pH
Between 6.0
and 9.0 Standard
Units
Daily
Grab
E
TKN (mg/1)
Monitor
and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
NO2-N+ NO3-N (mg/1)
Monitor
and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TN (mg/1) 6
Monitor
and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TN Load 7
Monitor
42,784 lb/yr
and Report (lb/mo)
(effective 1/1/2016)
7
Monthly
Annually
Calculated
Calculated
E
TP (mg/1) 6
Monitor
and Report
Weekly
Composite
E
TP Load
Monitor
7,732 lb/yr
and Report (lb/mo)
(effective 1/1/2016)
7
Monthly
Annually
Calculated
Calculated
E
Total Copper 9 (µg/1)
Quarterly
• Composite
E
Total Zinc 9 (µg/1)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity 10
Quarterly
Composite
E
Effluent Pollutant Scan
Monitor and Report
Footnote 11
Footnote 11
E
Footnotes:
1. See Condition A. (3) for Flow Considerations.
Page 4 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
2.. Beginning on December 21, 2016 begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC
DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A. (10).
3. I: Influent. E: Effluent. See condition A. (4) for instream monitoring requirements.
4. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
5. Summer shall be defined as April 1— October 31 with winter defined as the balance of the year.
6. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2-N, where TN is Total Nitrogen, TKN is
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3-N and NO2-N are Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen, respectively. TP is
Total Phosphorus.
7. TN or TP Load is the mass quantity of Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus discharged in a given
period of time. See Special Condition A. (5) Calculation of TN or TP Loads.
8. Compliance with mass limits shall be determined in accordance with Special Condition A.(6) Annual
Limits for Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus.
9. Sample Copper and Zinc quarterly in conjunction with WET testing.
10. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) @ 74 %, January, April, July and October; see condition A. (8).
11. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit. See Special
Condition A. (9).
A. (3) FLOW MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [G.S. 143-215.66]
Each month, the facility shall evaluate the monthly average flow, expressed as MGD, for the previous
month. If the monthly average flowrate is equal to or greater than 1.8 MGD, the facility shall move up to
the 3.0 MGD flow regime on the permit. The facility shall call the Water Quality Program Supervisor at
the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] and inform him or her of the flow regime change, so that the
BIMS database can be updated. The flow limit does not go back down if the Monthly Average flow
decreases.
A. (4) INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B .0500 et seq.]
Instream monitoring is required for the following parameters at the locations specified:
EFFLUENT
Measurement Frequency.
Sample Type ,
Sample . "
Locationl :.
CHARACTERISTICS.
Dissolved Oxygen
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1 /week
Temperature CC)
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
rootnotes:
1. U - Upstream at NC 1116, D- Downstream at NC 1114
Instream monitoring requirements are waived as long as the Permittee maintains membership in the
Tar -Pamlico Basin Association. If Permittee ceases membership, then all instream monitoring
requirements specified in this permit are immediately reinstated.
Page 5 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
A. (5) CALCULATION OF TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOADS [G.S.
143-215.1(b)]
(a)
(b•)
The Permittee shall calculate monthly and annual TN Loads as follows:
(i.)
Monthly TN (or TP) Load (lb/mo) = TN (or TP) x TMF x 8.34
where:
TN or TP =
TMF
8.34
the average Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus concentration (mg/L) of
the composite samples collected during the month
the Total Monthly Flow of wastewater discharged during the month
(MG/mo)
conversion factor, from (mg/L x MG) to pounds
(ii.) Annual TN (or TP) Load (lb/yr) = Sum of the 12 Monthly TN (or TP) Loads for the
calendar year
The Permittee shall report monthly Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus results (mg/L and lb/mo)
in the appropriate discharge monitoring report for each month and shall report each calendar year's
results (lb/yr) with the December report for that year.
A. (6) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN OR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS [G.S. 143-
215.1(b)]
(a.)
(b)
Total Nitrogen (IN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) allocations and load limits for NPDES dischargers
in the Tar -Pamlico River basin are annual limits and apply on a calendar year basis.
For any given calendar year, the Permittee shall be in compliance with the annual TN (or TP) Load
limit in this Permit if:
(i.) the Permittee's annual TN (or TP) Load is less than or equal to the effective limit, or
(ii.) the Permittee is a Co-Permittee Member of a compliance association.
(c.) If the Permittee is not a co-permittee member of a compliance association and the Permittee's
cumulative annual TN (or TP) discharge exceeds the effective TN (or TP) Load limit in this permit at
any point during the calendar year, the Permittee is in violation of its TN (or TP) Load limit for the
remainder of the calendar year, and each day of continuing violation shall constitute a separate
violation. Compliance with annual limits shall be determined separately for each calendar year, and an
exceedance in one year does not carry forward to subsequent years.
(d.) The TN (or TP) Load limit in this Permit (if any) may be modified as the result of allowable changes
in the Permittee's allocations.
(i.)
(m•)
Allowable changes include those resulting from purchase of TN (or TP) allocation from an
authorized mitigation banker, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program, or other source allowed
under applicable regulations; purchase, sale, trade, or lease of allocation between the Permittee
and other dischargers; and other transactions approved by the Division and consistent with the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin Association Agreement, as revised.
The Permittee may request a modification of the TN (or TP) Load limit in this Permit to reflect
allowable changes in its allocation(s). Upon receipt of timely and proper application, the
Division will modify the permit as appropriate and in accordance with state and federal program
requirements.
Changes in TN (or TP) limits become effective on January 1 of the year following permit
modification. The Division must receive application no later than August 31 for changes
proposed for the following calendar year.
(iv.) Application shall be sent to:
Page 6of14

Permit No. NC0069311
(e)
(f)
NCDEQ / Wastewater Permits Branch
Attn: Tar -Pamlico River Basin Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If the Permittee is a member and co-permittee of an approved compliance association on January 1 of
a given year, its TN and TP discharges during that year are governed by that association's group
NPDES permit and the limits therein.
The Permittee shall be considered a Co-Permittee Member for any given calendar year in which
it is identified as such in Appendix A of the association's group NPDES permit.
Association roster(s) and members' TN and TP allocations will be updated annually and in
accordancewith state and federal program requirements.
If the Permittee intends to join or leave a compliance association, the Division must be notified
of the proposed action in accordance with the procedures defined in the association's NPDES
permit.
(A) Upon receipt of timely and proper notification, the Division will modify the permit as
appropriate and in accordance with state and federal program requirements.
Membership changes in a compliance association become effective on January 1 of the
year following modification of the association's permit.
The TN and TP monitoring and reporting requirements in this Permit remain in effect throughout the
term of the Permit and are not affected by the Permittee's membership in a compliance association. -
(B)
A. (7) NUTRIENT ALLOCATIONS [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
(a.) Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (1P) allocations represent the maximum TN and TP
loads that a discharger or group of dischargers is potentially allowed under the Tar -Pamlico nutrient
management strategy. Allocations are not enforceable limits but are the basis for TN and TP limits
established in individual or group NPDES permits.
(b.) The allocations originally assigned to the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association members total 889,274 lb/yr
(404,274 kg/yr) 'IN and 160,372 lb/yr (73,060 kg/yr) TP. These group allocations have been divided
among the members in proportion to the maximum permitted flow in each member's permit; that is,
Individual Allocation (TP or TN) = Individual Permitted Flow (MGD) x Group Allocation, TPBA (TN or TP)
Total Permitted Flow, TPBA (MGD) .
(c.)
For the purposes of this distribution, individual permitted flows for the Association members are
those in effect as of July. 2014 and result in a Total Permitted Flow of 62.495 MGD.
The following table lists, for information purposes only, the TN and TP allocations assigned to,
acquired by, or transferred to the Permittee in accordance with the Tar -Pamlico River.Basin Phase IV
Agreement. Applicable TN or TP limits are established in the Effluent Limitations conditions of this
permit or in the NPDES permit of a compliance association of which the Permittee is a Co-Permittee
Member.
Page7of14

Permit No. NC0069311
ALLOCATION
TYPE
SOURCE
DATE .
ALLOCATION AMOUNT
STATUS
(lb/yr)
(kg/yr)
Total Nitrogen
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin Phase IV
Agreement
7/9/2015
42,784
19,406
Active
Total Phosphorus
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin Phase IV
Agreement
7/9/2015
7,732
3,507
Active
(d) Any addition, deletion, or modification of the listed allocation(s) (other than to correct.typographical
errors) or any change from Reserve to Active status of any of the listed allocations shall be considered
a major modification of this permit and shall be subject to the public review process afforded such
modifications under state and federal rules.
A. (8) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) [15A NCAC 02B .0200 et seq.]
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 66% (2 MGD) or 74% (3 MGD).
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent
versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
December 2010) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April,
July, and October. These months signify the first month of each three-month toxicity testing quarter
assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for .this testing must be obtained during representative effluent
discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES. permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in 'a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -December 2010) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B
for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWR Form AT-3 (original) is to
be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
Page 8 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
signature.' Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form
indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the
notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Water
Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring
will be required during the following month. Assessment of toxicity compliance is based on the toxicity
testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that begins on the first day of the month in which
toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues until the final day of the third month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last
day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Page 9 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
A. (9) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One
scan must be performed in each of the following years: 2016, 2017, and 2018. Analytical methods shall be in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are
present in concentrations greater than applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one
quarterly toxicity test each year, and must represent seasonal variation [i.e., do not sample in the same quarter .
every year]. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Oil and grease
Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury (EPA Method 1631E)
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds:
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
1,1-dichloroethylene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid -extractable compounds:
P-chloro-m-cresol
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Base neutral compounds:
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Reporting. Test results shall be reported on DWR Form -A MR-PPA1 (or in a form approved by the
Director) by December 31st of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the
Page 10 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
followindaddress: NCDEQ / DWR / Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-1617.
Additional Toxicity Testing Requirements for Municipal Permit Renewal. Please note that Municipal
facilities that are subject to the Effluent Pollutant Scan requirements listed above are also subject to
additional toxicity testing requirements specified in Federal Regulation 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5). The US EPA
requires four (4) toxicity tests for a test organism other than the test species currently required in this permit.
The multiple species tests should be conducted either quarterly for a 12-month period prior to submittal of
the permit renewal application, or four tests performed at least annually in the four and one half year period
prior to the application. These tests shall be performed for acute or chronic toxicity, whichever is specified
in this permit. The multiple species toxicity test results shall be Filed with the Aquatic Toxicology Branch at
the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
Contact the Division's Aquatic Toxicology Branch at 919-743-8401 for guidance on conducting the
additional toxicity tests and reporting requirements. Results should also be summarized in Part E (Toxicity
Testing Data) of EPA Municipal Application Form 2A, when submitting the permit renewal application to
the NPDES Permitting Unit.
A. (10) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS [G.S.143-
215.1(b)]
Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and program
reports and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees
must submit monitoring data and reports electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The final NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21, 2015.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard Conditions forNPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.)
• • Section D. (2)
• Section D. (6)
• Section E. (5)
Signatory Requirements
Reporting
Records Retention
Monitoring Reports
1. Reporting Requirements [Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)]
Effective December 21, 2016, the permittee shall report discharge monitoring data electronically using
the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring
data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR
application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR),
permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using
eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one
signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address:
Page 11 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Permitting Section
A 1'1'ENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access,
then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and
discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms
approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above. See
"How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below.
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the
issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
Starting on December 21, 2020, the permittee must electronically report the following compliance
monitoring data and reports, when applicable:
• Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports;
• Pretreatment Program Annual Reports; and
• Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) Annual Reports.
The permittee may seek an electronic reporting waiver from the Division (see "How to Request a
Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below).
2. How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting
The permittee may seek a temporary electronic reporting waiver from the Division. To obtain an
electronic reporting waiver, a permittee must first submit an electronic reporting waiver request to the
Division. Requests for temporary electronic reporting waivers must be submitted in writing to the
Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required
under this permit to begin submitting monitoring data and reports. The duration of a temporary waiver
shall not exceed 5 years and shall thereupon expire. At such time, monitoring data and reports shall be
submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new
temporary electronic reporting waiver by the Division. Approved electronic reporting waivers are not
transferrable. Only permittees with an approved reporting waiver request may submit monitoring data
and reports on paper to the Division for the period that the approved reporting waiver request is
effective.
Information on eDMR and the application for a temporary electronic reporting waiver are found on the
following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
3. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and Supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)]
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II, Section
B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting
purposes.
Page 12 of 14

1
Permit No. NC0069311
. For et` )MR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's
eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following
web page:
http: //portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the
following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED:
"1 certify, underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygather and evaluate the information submitted
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief; trite, accurate, and complete.1 am aware
that there are sign jcant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations."
4. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)]
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions.
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report.
This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41].
A. (11) MERCURY MINIMIZATION PLAN [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
The permittee shall develop and implement a mercury minimization plan during this permit term. The MMP shall be
developed within 180 days of the NPDES Permit Effective Date, and shall be available for inspection on -site. A
sample MMP was developed through a stakeholder review process and has been placed on the Division website for
guidance (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes, under Model Mercury Minimization Plan). The MMP
should place emphasis on identification of mercury contributors and goals for reduction. Results shall be summarized
and submitted with the next permit renewal. Performance of the Mercury Minimization Plan will meet the
requirements of the TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) for mercury approved by USEPA on October 12,
2012, unless and until a Waste Load Allocation specific to this facility is developed and this NPDES permit is
amended to require further actions to address the Waste Load Allocation.
Page 13 of 14

Permit No. NC0069311
Franklin County WWTP
Receiving Stream: Cedar Creek Stream Class: C-NSW
Permitted Flow: 2.0/3.0 MGD
Drainage Basin: Tar -Pamlico River Basin
Sub -Basin: 03-03-01 Latitude:
State Grid: Franklinton Longitude:
362 04' 12" N
782 25' 01" W
Facility Location (not to scale)
40011111111111P
NPDES Permit NC0069311 - Franklin County
Page 14 of 14

Z-O Gmm n l
(Fpink1in
r•••• ounty
rgOPTr� _A , .
,a Resrar:h rr a/ 411c Region ('onuruunty
October 30, 2015
Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Re: Permit NC0069311/Draft permit renewal
Teresa,
Public Utilities
1630 US #1 Hwy
Youngsville, NC 27596
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.franklincountync.us
RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
NOV 0 2 2015
Water Quality
Permitting Section
My WWTP staff has reviewed the draft permit renewal and other than a few typos is
satisfied with the content. I have attached a copy to this letter that highlights the areas of
correction. If you have further questions or concerns for this operation, please feel free to
contact me directly at [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter and we look forward to any further
comments that may be generated during this process.
7LCC
•
r,
e en Brycdenhall
Director
"Equal Opportunity Employer"

zvis P,N.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
Ad Number
0001992710
Advertiser Name. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Address: attn Wren Thedford
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER PROTECTION SECTION/ POINT
RALEIGH, NC 276991617
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Wake
County North Carolina, duly commissioned and
authorized to administer oaths, affirmations, etc.,
personally appeared R. C. Brooks, who being duly
sworn or affirmed, according to law, doth depose
and say that he or she is Accounts Receivable
Specialist of The News & Observer Publishing
Company a corporation organized and doing
business under the Laws of the State of North
Carolina, and publishing a newspaper known as
The News & Observer, in the City of Raleigh, Wake
County and State aforesaid, the said newspaper in
which such notice, paper, document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time of
each and every such publication, a newspaper
Meeting all of the requirements and qualifications
of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes
of North Carolina, and that as such he or she
makes this affidavit; and is familiar with the books,
files and business of said corporation and by
reference to thefiles of said publication the
attached advertisement for DEPARTMENT OF
WATER RESOURCES was inserted in the
aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows:
09/29/2015
R.: C. Brooks, Accnts Receivable Specialist
ClVake County, North Carolina
Public Notice
North Carolina Envir ental..
Management Commisst�DES Unit
'grit Servlce ter •
Rcleigh. NC 27699-16' W�7
Notice,of (gilt" Issue a NPDES
. Wastewater Permit
The North Carolina Environmental
Management , Commission proposes to
issue •a NPDES wastewater discharge
permit to the person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding the pro-
posed permit will be accepted until 30
days after the publish date of this notice.
The Director of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) may hold a public
hearing should there be a significant de-
gree of public interest. Please mall com-
ments and/or Information requests fa
DWR at the above address. Interested
persons may visit the DWR at512 N. Sal-
isbury Street-, Raleigh, NC to -review lo-
tion on fife. Additions informa-
tion on NPDES permits and tt s notice
P •
Y bte found on our ebsite:
arts nCdenr.org/we oJsw p n es/
calendar, or by calling 9W)
Franklin County Public Utilities re-
quested renewal of NPDES Permit
NC0069311, discharging to Cedar Creek
in the Tar -Pamlico River •Basin. This
discharge may affect future allocations
to the receiving stream.
N80: September29, 2015
```�111111 i l it
�yptaPI putltc
wake Coufl%V _—
*ertfrttirti
11
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This 29th day of September, 2015
My Commission Expires: FEB 1 7 2020

\c, Lq e--
Fact Sheet
NC0069311
DEQ/DWR
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0069311
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Franklin County Dept. Of Public Utilities/ Franklin County WWTP
Applicant Address:
1630 US HWY 1, Youngsville, NC 27596
Facility Address:
1099 Lane Store Road, Franklinton, NC 275525
Permitted Flow:
2.0 MGD / 3.0 MGD
Type of Waste:
94 % Domestic, 6% Industrial
Facility Classification:
III / IV
Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Franklin
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Cedar Creek
Regional Office:
RRO
Stream Classification:
C NSW
State Grid / USGS Quad:
C25SW/ Franklinton
303(d) Listed?
No
Permit Writer:
Teresa Rodriguez
Basin/Subbasin:
03-03-01
Date:
9/8/2015
Drainage Area (mi2):
25.3
Lat. 36° 04' 12" N Long. 78° 25' 01" W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
1.6
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
5.2
30Q2 (cfs)
7.0
.1verage Flow (cfs):
25.3
IWC (%):
66/74
Summary:
Franklin County operates a 3.0 MGD WWTP permitted with three flow tiers; 1 MGD, 2 MGD and 3 MGD. The
facility is operating at the 2 MGD flow tier since March 2015. The effluent requirements for 1 MGD will be
removed from the permit. The 3.0 MGD treatment system consists of an influent pump station with mechanical
and manual bar screens, a grit chamber, dual aeration/anaerobic/anoxic basins, dual clarifiers, tertiary filters, a
dual train UV disinfection system, parshall flume, post aeration and aerobic digester. Franklin County has an
approved full pretreatment program with one SIU and one CIU. The permit will require that the County
continue the implementation of the approved pretreatment program.
The permittee requested reduction in monitoring for BOD, TSS, NH3-N and fecal conform. Since they are
operating under a new flow tier of 2 MGD since March of this year and have had BOD and ammonia violations
the reduction in frequency can't be granted until 3 years of data is collected.
Receiving Stream:
This facility discharges to Cedar Creek in the Tar Pamlico River Basin, HUC 03020101. Cedar Creek is classified
as C — NSW. Cedar Creek [A.U. 28-29-(2)] is not listed as impaired in the 2014 NC 303(d) list.
Compliance/DMR Data Review:
Compliance
The facility received three NOVs for ammonia weekly average and monthly average exceedances in 2014, ten
NOVs for BOD weekly average and monthly average exceedances for May and June 2015. The facility is working
on investigating and addressing the compliance issues.
Page 1 of 5

Fact Sheet
NC0069311
The monthly average flow since March 2015 has been above 0.9 MGD which was the trigger flow to move into
the next flow tier of 2 MGD.
DMR data were reviewed for the period of June 2010 to June 2015. Data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Data Summa
Parameter
Units
Average
Max
Min
Flow
MGD
0.605
1.797
0.111
BOD summer
mg/1
3.7
41.5
< 2
BOD winter
mg/1
3.9
55.1
< 2
NH3N summer
mg/1
1.0
4.8
< 1
NH3N winter
mg/1
1.2
10.8
< 1
TSS
mg/1
3.2
16.2
< 2.5
pH
SU
7.6
8
7
Temperature
°C
18.7
27.8
7.9
DO
mg/1
8.8
14
5.6
Conductivity
umhos/cm
2134
3155
980
TN
mg/1
8.4
80.7
0.28
TP
mg/1
0.55
23
< 0.02
Fecal Coliform
#/100 ml
1.6
> 1280
< 1
Effluent Toxicity The facility performs chronic toxicity at 49%. The facility failed tests in January and October
2013. Subsequent tests resulted in passing. Under the 2 MGD flow tier the test requirement will be at 66%.
Reasonable Potential Analysis
A reasonable potential analysis was performed for arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, cyanide, lead,
molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver and zinc. Copper and zinc demonstrated reasonable potential to exceed the
action level standards. Quarterly monitoring will be maintained in the permit for both parameters. The rest of the
parameters will continue to be monitored under the pretreatment program long term monitoring plan. See
attached RPA results.
Priority Pollutant Scan
Three effluent pollutant scans were submitted with the permit application. There were no parameters detected in
the scan.
Mercury Evaluation
A mercury evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Permitting Guidance developed for the
implementation of the statewide Mercury TMDL to determine the need for a limit and/or Mercury Minimization
Plan (MMP). Based on dilution the water quality based effluent limitation (WQBEL) for mercury is 18 ng/l. The
technology based effluent limit (TBEL) is 47 ng/l. No annual average vas above the WQBEL. No limit will be
required in the permit. Since there were detections of mercury above 1 ng/1 a MMP will be required.
Table 2. Mercury Evaluation
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Annual Average ng/1
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.5
Maximum ng/1
2.55
2.55
2.56
2
2.07
Instream Monitoring
The permit requires instream monitoring for dissolved oxygen, temperature and conductivity. As members of the
Tar Pamlico Basin Association monitoring is waived. The Association monitors two stations on Cedar Creek, one
upstream (01600000) and one downstream (01920000) of the discharge. Dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH,
Page 2 of 5

Fact Sheet
NC0069311
ammonia, TKN, and total phosphorus follow the same trends in both upstream and downstream stations and are
within water quality standards. Conductivity and turbidity are higher at the downstream station.
Nutrient Controls:
History of Nutrient Management Strategy for Point Sources
On September 12, 1989, the Environmental Managements Commission classified the Tar -Pamlico River Basin as
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW). On February 13,1992, the Commission approved a revised NSW
Implementation Strategy that established the framework for a nutrient reduction trading program between point
and nonpoint sources of pollution. The Strategy also established certain conditions to be met by an association of
dischargers known as the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association (the Association). Those conditions are defined in the
Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Implementation Strategy (the "Agreement"). Information on the evolution
of the program and past and present versions of the Agreement are available at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/nps/tarpampointsource.
Addition of Nutrient Limits
In 2009, the U.S. EPA Region 4 offices raised concerns that, although the Agreement set collective nutrient caps
for the members of the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association, the members' NPDES permits lacked nutrient limits and,
as a result, EPA had no means to enforce nutrient controls should it become necessary. As part of the 2009
permit renewals, the Division added the group caps for nitrogen and phosphorus, along with related special
conditions, to the permits of the fifteen TPBA member facilities. The Division could not add individual N and P
limits at that time, because no basis existed at the time for dividing the available wasteload allocations among the
members. Instead, the Division agreed to work with the Association to determine an appropriate distribution and
to then add individual N and P limits to the permits as part of the 2014 renewals.
With the consent of the Association, the group caps are distributed among the members in proportion to their
2014 maximum permitted flows, as follows:
Table 2. TPBA Members and Nutrient Allocations/ Limits
Permit
Owner
Facility
TN Load
(1b/yr)
299,491
TP Load
(lb/yr)
54,124
NC0030317
City of Rocky Mount
Tar River Regional WWTP
NC0023931
Greenville Utilities Commission
GUC WWTP
249,576
45,103
NC0020605
Town of Tarboro
Tarboro WWTP
71,307
12,887
NC0025054
City of Oxford
Oxford WWTP
49,915
9,021
NC0020648
City of Washington
Washington WWTP
52,054
9,407
NC0069311
Franklin County
Franklin County WWTP
42,784
7,732
NC0020834
Town of Warrenton
Warrenton WWTP
28,523
5,155
NC0026042
Town of Robersonville
Robersonville WWTP
25,671
4,639
NC0020231
Town of Louisburg
Louisburg WRF
19,538
3,531
NC0026492
Town of Belhaven
Belhaven WWTP
14,261
2,577
NC0025402
Town of Enfield
Enfield WWTP
14,261
2,577
NC0023337
Town of Scotland Neck
Scotland Neck WWTP
9,626
1,740
NC0020061
Town of Spring Hope
Spring Hope WWTP
5,705
1,031
NC0042269
Town of Bunn
Bunn WWTP
4,278
773
NC0020435
Town of Pinetops
Pinetops WWTP
4,278
773
Given the size and characteristics of the river basin, transport losses were judged to be somewhat uniform across
the basin and were not considered in these calculations. Thus, nutrient limits equal the nutrient allocations for
each facility, unlike in other nutrient management strategies in the state.
The draft permit includes new conditions designed to meet the Division's 2009 commitment. The group caps and
related conditions have been deleted and replaced with individual N and P limits and a new set of related special
conditions.
The nutrient limits are annual mass limits and become effective January 1, 2016. Each members' limits are
equivalent to approximately 4.7 mg/L TN and 0.85 mg/L TP for the member's full permitted flow.
Page 3 of 5

Fact Sheet
NC0069311
The special conditions document the N and P allocations assigned to the facility and provide for consistent
calculation of nutrient loads by all members. They also establish how compliance with the N and P limits will be '
determined if the Association members apply for and obtain a group NPDES permit to control their nutrient
discharges collectively. The members have indicated they plan to apply for such a permit, and the Division
initiated discussions with the members on that approach in 2012.
Limits/Permit conditions:
Current conditions, as well as the basis for the limits are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Current Conditions and Proposed Changes
Parameters
Affected
Limits/Permit
Conditionsu
Change from
Previous Permit
Basis for Condition/Change
Flow
1 MGD/2.0 MGD/3.0
MGD
Eliminated effluent
requirements for 1
MGD
Monthly average flows are above 1 MGD,
15A 2B .0505
BOD5
Summer:
8 mg/1 MA
12 mg/1 WA
Winter:
18 mg/1 MA
27 mg/1 WA
No changes
Limits based on results of water quality
model for protection of DO standard.
NH3-N
Summer:
1 mg/1 MA
3 mg/1 WA
Winter:
2 mg/1 MA
6 mg/1 WA
No changes
Limits based on results of water quality
model for protection of DO standard.
TSS
45 mg/1 WA
30 mg/1 MA
No changes
Secondary treatment standards/40 CFR
133 / 15A 2B .0406
Fecal coliform
400 /100m1 WA
200 /100m1 MA
No changes
State WQ standards, 15A 2B .0200
DO
> 5 mg/1
No changes
State WQ standards, 15A 2B .0200
pH
6 — 9 SU
No changes
State WQ standards, 15A 2B .0200
Total Copper
Total Zinc
Quarterly monitoring
No changes
Reasonable potential to exceed action level
standard, 15A 2B .0200
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Monitor
42,784 lb/yr
7,732 lb/yr
Tar Pamlico 2015 Nutrient Permitting
Strategy
Conductivity
Monitor
No changes
15A 02B .0508
Priority Pollutant
Analysis
Annual
Three times during
permit cycle
40 CFR 122
1. MGD — Million gallons per day, MA - Monthly Average, WA — Weekly Average, DM — Daily Max
Summary of Proposed Changes:
1. The permit includes a special condition with new requirements for electronic reporting of DMRs.
2. Effluent pollutant scan monitoring frequency was modified from annual to three times during the permit
cycle. The special condition for the effluent pollutant scan was modified to include requirements for the
second species toxicity test.
3. A special condition was added describing requirements for a Mercury Minimization Plan.
Page 4 of 5

e
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Permit to Public Notice: September 23, 2015
Scheduled to be issued: November 16, 2015
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
Fact Sheet
NC0069311
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Teresa
Rodriguez at [phone].
NAME:/5"---....(14DATE: //'I iiir
Page 5 of 5

2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
1Q10s (cfs)
Data Source(s)
❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
Franklin Co
III
NC0069311
001
2.000
Cedar Creek
C - NSW
1.60
5.20
7.00
25.00
1.34
Follow directions for data entry. In some cases a
comment menu list the available choices or a
dropdown menu will provide a list you may select
from. Error message occur if data entry does not
meet input criteria.
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Name
Type Chronic
modifier Acute
PQL
c'•
w
w
Unitsn.
Arsenic
C
50
FW
ua/L
-
Arsenic
1 C
10
HHANS
ug/L
■
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW
ug/L
•
Cadmium
NC
2
FW
15
ug/L
•
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230
FW
mg/L
•
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A
ug/L
•
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300
A
ug/L
•
Chromium
NC
50
FW
1,022
uo/L
•
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW
7.3
ug/L
•
Cyanide
NC
5
FW
22
1 10
ug/L
•
Fluoride
NC
1.800
FW
ua/L
❑
Lead
NC
25
FW
33.8
ug/L
•
Mercury
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
•
Molybdenum
NC
2.000
HH
ug/L
•
Nickel
NC
88
FW
261
ug/L
IN
Selenium
NC
5
FW
56
ug/L
•
Silver (AL)
NC
0.06
FW
1.23
ugiL
•
Zinc (AL)
NC
50
FW
67
ug/L
•
■
•
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, input
9/21/2015

Franklin Co
NC0069311
2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw (MGD) = 2.00
1QIOS(cfs)= 1.34
7QIOS(cfs)= 1.60
7Q10W (cfs)= 5.20
30Q2 (cfs) = 7.00
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 25.00
Receiving Stream: Cedar Creek
WWTP/WTP Class: III
IWC @ 1QIOS = 69.819820%
IWC @ 7Q10S = 65.957447%
IWC @ 7Q1OW = 37.349398%
IWC @ 30Q2 = 30.693069%
IWC @ QA = 11.032028%
Stream Class: C - NSW
Outfall 001
Qw = 2 MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
STANDARDS 8 CRITERIA (2)
PQL
UNITS
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS /
Chronic
Applied
Standard
'/ FAV /
Acute
Il
Max Pred
# Det. Cw Allowable Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50
10
FW(7Q10s)
HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
ug/L
15
15
0
0
6.4
6.4
Acute: NO WQS
_ _
Chronic---- 75.8---
No value > Allowable Cw
Chronic: • 90.6
No value > Allowable Cw
-- — -—--—-—-—- — - — ---
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_
-- _-----9.9 ---
Chronic:
---
-------------------------
Cadmium
NC
2
FW(7Q10s)
If,
ug/L
1r,
0
1.0
Acute: 21.5
_ ---- _
Chronic: —3.0 ---
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
---------------------------
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230
FW(7Q10s)
mull,
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _
---- ---
Chronic: 349
----------------------------
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A(30Q2)
u�Jl.
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _ --------
Chronic:3.3
--
-------------------------
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300
A(30Q2)
will,
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ ---- _ _ --
Chronic: 977.4
----------------------
--- ---
Chromium
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
1022
ug/L
16
0
5.9
Acute: 1,463.8
—
_- _—- - — -
Chronic: 75.8
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
—-—-—-—-—-—-—---------------
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
ug/L
24
20
30.0
Acute: 10.5
_ ---- __ -----------
--
Chronic: 10.6
15 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP, monitor quarterly
------------------
Cyanide
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
22
10
ug/I,
16
3
5.0
Acute: 31.5
-- _----- ------------------------------
Chronic:76
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
—
Page 1 of 2
69311 RPA 2015.x(sm, rpa
9/21/2015

Franklin Co
NC0069311
2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Outfall 001
Qw=2MGD
Fluoride
NC
1800
FW(7Q10s)
ug/I.
0
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
__ _ ---_ _ _
-2-------------------------- Chronic:,729.0
--
Lead
NC
25
FW(7Q10s)
33.8
:_ I.
if,
6.3
Acute: 48.4
__ _ ----_ _ ------------------------------
Chronic: 37.9
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
Mercury
NC
12
FW(7Q10s)
(Lf,
n^IL
((
0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _
----- _---
Chronic 18.2
----------------------------
Molybdenum
NC
2000
HH(7Q10s)
u,.'I.
i r,
11
41!
Acute: NO WQS
_ ---_ _ ----------------------------.
Chronic--3,032.3
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
Nickel
NC
88
FW(7Q10s)
2,1
:_ I.
i,
I i,
5.0
Acute: 373.8
_ --- _ _ --
Chronic-- 133.4
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
----------------------------
Selenium
NC
5
FW(7Q10s)
56
I.
11•
1
7.3
Acute: 80.2
_ _ ---- _ ---
Chronic:—7.6
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
------------------------- ---
Silver(AL)
NC
0.06
FW(7QI0s)
I.2;
iiH.
15
0
2.500
Acute: 1.762
_ ___ _ _ __
Chronic: 0.091
15 value(s) > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____________
All values less than detection
Zinc (AL)
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
67
uc'I.
2.1
24
176.5
Acute: 96.0
_ ---- _ ---
Chronic: 75.8
2 values) > Allowable Cw
RP, monitor quarterly
---
-------------------------
0
N/A
Acute:
_
Chronic:
0
N/A
Acute:
_ -------------------------------------
Chronic:
u
0
N/A
Acute:
_ _ ----------
Chronic:
--
--------------------------
0
0
N/A
Acute:
_ _ --------------------------------------
Chronic:
Page 2 of 2
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, rpi
9/21/2015

Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTPNVTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
1Q10s (cfs)
Data Source(s)
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Franklin County
Franklin Co WWTP
NC0020656
001
1.000
Cedar Creek
C-NSW
1.60
5.20
7.00
25.30
❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
Follow directions for data entry. In some cases a
comment menu list the available choices or a
dropdown menu will provide a list you may select
from. Error message occur if data entry does not
meet input criteria.
2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DMA ENTRY MISSING/INSUFFICIENT DATA
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Name
Type Chronic Modifier Acute
(M
uJ
W
a
PQL Units
Arsenic
C
50
FW
ug/L
•
Arsenic
C
10
HH/WS
ug/L
Beryllium
NC
6.5
FW
ug/L
❑
Cadmium
NC
2
FW
15
ug/L
•
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230
FW
mg/L
•
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1
A
ua/L
IN
Total Phenolic Compounds
I NC
300
A
ug!L
•
Chromium
NC
50
FW
1,022
ug/L
•
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW
7.3
ug/L
•
Cyanide
NC
5
FW
22
10
ug/L
•
Fluoride
NC
1,800
FW
24000
I ug!L
■
Lead
NC
25
FW
33.8
ug/L
•
Mercury
NC
12
FW
0.5
nglL
■
Molybdenum
NC
2,000
HH
ug/L
■
Nickel
NC
88
FW
261
ug/L
IN
Selenium
NC
5
FVV
56
uglL
•
Silver (AL)
NC
0.06
FW
1.23
ug/L
•
Zinc (AL)
NC
50
FW
67
ug/L
■
fluoride
NC
24000
mg/L
•
■
■
■
?DATA?
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, input
9/14/2015

Franklin County
NC0020656
2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw (MGD) = 1.00
IQIOS (cfs)= NO 1Q10s DATA
7QIOS(cfs)= 1.60
7QIOW (cfs)= 5.20
30Q2 (cfs) = 7.00
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 25.30
Receiving Stream: Cedar Creek
WWTP/WTP Class: Franklin Co WWTP
IWC ® IQIOS = N/A
IWC ®7QIOS= 49.21%
IWC GI 7QIOW = 22.96%
IWC®30Q2= 18.13%
IWC®QA= 5,77%
Stream Class: C-NSW
Outfall 001
Qw=1 MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(s)
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
-r
2
N
ti
z
m
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS /
Chronic
Applied
Standard
% FAV /
Acute
Il
Mao Pred
N Det. Allowable Cw
Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50
10
FW(7Q10s)
HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
ug/L
15
15
1
0
64
oA
Acute: NO WQS
—_— _
Chronic: 101.6
No value > Allowable Cw
Chronic 173.3
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
__—_—___—.—.—_____—_________
Cadmium
NC
2
FW(7QI0s)
15
uelL
16
0
1.0
Acute: IWC?
.. ___—___—___—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_
Chronic 4.1
Nn value> Allowable Cw
No RP
Chromium
NC
50
FW(7QI0s)
1022
ug/L
16
0
50
Acute: IIVC?
Chronic 101.E
No value> Allowable Cw
no RP
Copper(AL)
NC
7
FW(7Q10s)
7.3
ug/L
24
20
30.0
Acute: lIVC?
_ _ ___—_ _ ______________________________
Chronic:14.2
.1 ':duc(sl ' Allowohlc Co
RP. quarterly monitor
Cyanide
NC
FW(7QI0s)
22
10
ue/L.
16
3
c n-'-------------------_------
.Acute: /11'C.?
Chronic 10.2
No value> Allowable Cw
No RP
Lead
NC
25
FW(7Q10s)
33.8
ue/L
16
0.3
Acute: IN'C?
_ __.—.
Chronic 50.8
No value> Allowable Cw
No RP
Molybdenum
NC
2000
IIH(7QI0s)
ugiL
15
11
41.6
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic: 4,064.2
Nu value > Allowable Cw
No RP
Nickel
NC
88
FW(7QI0s)
261
nol.
16
16
5.0
Acute: /IIC?
Chronic:178.8
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP
Selenium
NC
5
FW(7QI0s)
1
I6
1
73
Acute: !WC?
_ _ ______
Chronic 10.2
No value> Allowable Cw
No RP, LTMP
Silver(AL)
NC
0.06
FW(7Q10s)
1.23
.:^ I.
15
0
2 500
Acute: 111C?
Chronic: 0.122
15 value(s) > Allowable Cw
All values a detect
Zinc(ALI
NC
50
FW(7Q10s)
67
ug/L
24
24
176.5
Acute: !11'C?
.. _ ___—__ _ _.
Chronic:101.6
1 value(s)> Allowable Cw
RP. continue monitonng quarterly
____________________________
Page 1 of1
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, rpa
9/14/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
1
Arsenic - FW Standard
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
naro Data
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
• 5
< 5
< 5
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
BDL=IJ2DL Results
2.5 Std Dev.
2.5 Mean
2.5 C.V.
2.5 n
2.5
2.5 Mult Factor =
2.5 Max. Value
5 Max. Pred Cw
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Use "PASTE SPECIAL -
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
1.2910
3.8333
0.3368
15
1.27
5.0 ug/L
6.4 ug/L
-1-
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, data
9/14/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Cadmium
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 1/1/2011 < 2 1 Std Dev.
2 < 2 1 Mean
3 < 2 1 C.V.
4 < 2 1 n
5 < 2 1
6 < 2 1 Mult Factor =
7 < 2 1 Max. Value
8 < 2 1 Max. Pred Cw
9 < 2 1
10 < 2 1
11 < 2 1
12 < 2 1
13 < 2 1
14 < 2 1
15 < 2 1
16 < 2 1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use "PASTE SPECIAL.
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
8
Chromium
0.0000
1.0000
0.0000
16
1.00
1.0 ug/L
1.0 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Date
Data
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
BDL=1/2DL Results
2.5 Std Dev.
2.5 Mean
2.5 C.V.
2.5 n
2.5
2.5 Mult Factor =
5 Max. Value
2.5 Max, Pred Cw
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY-
. Maximum data
points = 58
9
Copper (AL)
0.6250
2.6563
0.2353
16
1.17
5.0 ug/L
5.9 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL
1 15 15
2 11 11
3 14 14
4 13 13
5 12 12
6 12 12
7 14 14
8 25 25
9 < 10 5
10 13 13
11 < 10 5
12 10 10
13 13 13
14 < 10 5
15 15 15
16 13 13
17 7 7
18 7 7
19 13 13
20 < 9 4.5
21 19 19
22 9 9
23 10 10
24 13 13
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use"PASTE SF
Values" then "I
. Maximum t
points = 5
Results
Std Dev. 4.7395
Mean 11.5625
C.V. 0.4099
n 24
Mult Factor = 1.20
Max. Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 30.0
-2-
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, data
9/14/2015
•

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
10
Cyanide
Fy Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 5 5 Std Dev.
2 5 5 Mean
3 , 5 5 C.V.
4 5 5 n
5 5 5
6 .. 5 5 Mult Factor =
ug/L 7 6 5 Max. Value
ug/L 8 5 5 Max. Pred Cw
9 r 5 5
10 5 5
11 5 5
12 5 5
13 5 5
14 5 5
15 5 5
16 5 5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use "PASTE SPECIAL.
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
12
Lead
0.0000
5.00
0.0000
16
1.00
5.0 ug/L
5.0 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev.
2 < 5 2.5 Mean
3 < 5 2.5 C.V.
4 < 5 2.5 n
5 < 5 2.5
6 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor =
7 < 5 2.5 Max. Value
8 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw
9 < 10 5
10 < 10 5
11 < 10 5
12 < 10 5
13 < 10 5
14 < 10 5
15 < 10 5
16 < 10 5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
Maximum data
points = 58
14
Molybdenum
1.2910
3.7500
0.3443
16
1.26
5.0 ug/L
6.3 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev.
2 6 6 Mean
3 10 10 C.V.
4 16 16 n
5 18 18
6 26 26 Mult Factor =
7 10 10 Max. Value
8 16 16 Max. Pred Cw
9 < 5 2.5
10 < 5 2.5
11 6 6
12 < 5 2.5
13 9 9
14 6 6
15 12 12
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
-3-
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, data
9/14/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Use "PASTE SPECIAL.
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
15
Nickel
6.9093
9.6667
0.7148
15
1.60
26.0 ug/L
41.6 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 10.0 5 Std Dev.
2 < 10.0 5 Mean
3 < 10.0 5 C.V.
4 < 10.0 5 n
5 < 10.0 5
6 < 10.0 5 Mult Factor =
7 < 10.0 5 Max. Value
8 < 10.0 5 Max. Pred Cw
9 < 10.0 5
10 < 10.0 5
11 < 10.0 5
12 < 10.0 5
13 < 10.0 5
14 < 10.0 5
15 < 10.0 5
16 < 10.0 5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
16
Selenium
0.0000
5.0000
0.0000
16
1.00
5.0 ug/L
5.0 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 2 1 Std Dev.
2 < 2 1 Mean
3 < 2 1 C.V.
4 < 2 1 n
5 < 2 1
6 < 2 1 Mult Factor =
7 4 4 Max. Value
8 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw
9 < 10 5
10 < 10 5
11 < 10 5
12 < 10 5
13 < 10 5
14 < 10 5
15 < 10 5
16 < 10 5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
17
Silver (AL)
1.9653
3.4375
0.5717
16
1.45
5.0 ug/L
7.3 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL
1 < 5 2.5
2 < 5 2.5
3 < 5 2.5
4 < 5 2.5
5 < 5 2.5
.6 < 5 2.5
7 < 5 2.5
8 < 5 2.5
9 < 5 2.5
10 < 5 2.5
11 < 5 2.5
12 < 5 2.5
13 < 5 2.5
14 < 5 2.5
15 < 5 2.5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
-4-
69311 RPA 2015.xlsm, data
9/14/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Results
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
n
Mutt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Use "PASTE SPECIAL.
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
18
Zinc (AL)
0.0000
2.5000
0.0000
15
1.00
2.500 ug/L
2.500 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Date Data BDL=1/2DL
38
38
42
46
41
89
39
139
39
33
22
29
49
42
51
42
27
37
46
48
31
19
25
28
38
38
42
46
41
89
39
139
39
33
22
29
49
42
51
42
27
37
46
48
31
19
25
28
Results
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
n
Mutt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
24.5475
43.3333
0.5665
24
1.27
139.0 ug/L
176.5 ug/L
69311 RPA 2015.x!sm, data
5 - 9/14/2015

9/14/15 WQS = 12 ng/L MERCURY WQBEL/TBEL EVALUATION V:2013-5
Facility Name: Franklin County
No Limit Required
No MMP Required
Total Mercury 1631E PQL = 0.5 ng/L 7Q10s = 1.600 cfs WQBEL = 24.39 ng/L
Date Modifier Data Entry Value Permitted Flow = 1.000 47 ng/L
1.51
1.83
0.5
2.55 1.6 ng/L - Annual Average for 2011
0.5
1.61
1.3
2.55 1.5 ng/L - Annual Average for 2012
1.45
0.5
0.5
2.56 1.3 ng/L - Annual Average for 2013
0.5
1
1.3
1.5
1.87
2 1.4 ng/L - Annual Average for 2014
0.5
2.04
1.91
1.79
2.07
0.5 1.5 ng/L - Annual Average for 2015
1/1/11 1.51
3/1/11 1.83
6/1/11 < 1
10/1/11 2.55
1/1/12 < 1
2/1/12 1.61
3/1/12 1.3
6/1/12 2.55
1/1/13 1.45
3/1/13 < 1
6/1/13 < 1
10/1/13 2.56
1/7/14 < 1
4/17/14 1
7/8/14 1.3
10/21/14 1.5
11/18/14 1.87
12/1/14 2
1/13/15 < 1
2/3/15 2.04
3/3/15 1.91
4/14/15 1.79
5/5/15 2.07
6/2/15 < 0.005

MONITOR! MONITOR PARAMETER
NG ING
REPORT REPORT
MONTH YEAR
1 2013
10 2013
10 2014
12 2014
12 2014
5 2015
5 2015
5 2015
5 2015
5 2015
6 2015
6 2015
6 2015
6 2015
6 2015
6 2015
7 2015
7 2015
7 2015
7 2015
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) •
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) •
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) •
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg: C) - Conce
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) - Conce
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
VIOLATION UNIT LIMIT CALCU % OVER
DATE OF LATED
MEAS VALUE
URE
01/21/2013
10/07/2013
10/18/2014 mg/I 3 4.1
12/06/2014 mg/I 6 7.2
12/31/2014 mg/I 2 2.9
05/09/2015 mg/I 12 13.8
05/23/2015 mg/I 12 13.4
05/30/2015 mg/I 12 16.5
05/31/2015 mg/1 8 13.9
05/31/2015 mgd 1 1.0
06/20/2015 mg/1 12 19.8
06/27/2015 mg/1 12 17.9
06/06/2015 mg/I 12 25.4
06/13/2015 mg/I 12 27.5
06/30/2015 mg/1 8 23.1
06/30/2015 mgd 1 1.1
07/04/2015 mg/I 12 20.0
07/11/2015 mg/I 12 24.9
07/31/2015 mg/I 8 14.7
07/31/2015 mgd 1 1.1
VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION VIOLATION LAST UPDATEDIBY
COMMENT ID
Aquatic toxicity permit limit viol; Proceed to NOV
Aquatic toxicity permit limit viol; Proceed to NOV
38 Weekly Average Exceeded
20 Weekly Average Exceeded
46 Monthly Average Exceeded
------ -----
15 Weekly Average Exceeded
12 Weekly Average Exceeded
38 Weekly Average Exceeded
74 Monthly Average Exceeded
3 Monthly Average Exceeded
65 Weekly Average Exceeded
49 Weekly Average Exceeded
112 Weekly Average Exceeded
129 Weekly Average Exceeded
189 Monthly Average Exceeded
10 Monthly Average Exceeded
66 Weekly Average Exceeded
108 Weekly Average Exceeded
84 Monthly Average Exceeded
6 Monthly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
No Action, BPJ
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
No Action, BPJ
None
None
None
None
RPI NC NOV john.giorgino
RP I NC NOV john.giorgino
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
mitch.hayes
bimsprod.cron
bimsprod.cron
bimsprod.cron
bimsprod.cron

G931t
Templeton, Mike
From: Belnick, Tom
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:51 PM
To: Templeton, Mike; Hennessy, John
Cc: Risgaard, Jon
Subject: RE: action on tar-pam permits
Since we did not have any kickoff for this basin, it might be good to put a note in the permit files to remind permit
writers to not start renewals until Ph 4 completed. Drafts can go to public notice without the Supervisor review.
Tom Belnick
Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDWR/Water Quality Programs
919-807-6390
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Templeton, Mike
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 11:20 AM
To: Hennessy, John
Cc: Belnick, Tom; Risgaard, Jon
Subject: action on tar-pam permits
John —
You, Tom, and I decided a few months ago that it would be best to delay action on permits for the 15 Association
members until the Phase IV agreement is worked out; we would then add nutrient limits and get those permits going.
We also agreed that the rest of the Tar -Pam permits could go out any time.
I saw last week that draft permits for two members of the Tar -Pam Association went out to public notice in mid -
February: Scotland Neck, NC0023337, and Spring Hope, NC0020061.
We will have to come back and modify these permits when the agreement is finalized, to add the new nutrient
conditions. The mods will require a second public notice at some cost to us. The three of us decided to hold these 15
permits precisely to avoid the added expense, though we knew it would temporarily add to the backlog. This was a
branch -level decision, not a unit decision.
In addition, it has taken a good deal of effort over several years to get the Tar -Pam dischargers on board with the new
requirements. It does not help our credibility that, after John Huisman and I (with a nod from you and Tom) told them
we would delay their renewals, these two drafts went to notice.
I'd be glad to talk to you and Tom further if we need to revisit this decision, but until a different decision is made please
continue to hold the permits for Tar -Pam Association members.
- Mike T
Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
Wastewater Branch
Water Quality Permitting Section
NCDENR • DWR Raleigh, NC
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address moy be subject; to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1/1

F,rink1in
balm• ounty
NORTH •'::.. ..
A Research Triangle Region Commmiity
Public Utilities
1630 US #1 Hwy
Youngsville, NC 27596
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.franklincountync.us
NC DENR / DWR / Water Quality Permitting Section / Wastewater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Cover Letter
NPDES Permitting Group
APR 3 7014
Water Resources
Permitting Section
This cover letter is to formally submit application for and request NPDES Permit renewal
be granted to Franklin County WWTP #NC0069311.
The site is requesting reduction in required testing for BOD, TSS, NH3-N and Fecal.
Included in the submittal package is a spreadsheet with the last three years of effluent
data to prove this request is warranted. If approved the site would go from three days to
two days a week testing. It is understood that if approved these sample days cannot be
consecutive, and this would be the minimum testing required, more testing could be
required in upset conditions, or as needed to show compliance.
Since the last permit was issued there have been no operational or significant structural
changes that would affect the operation of FC WWTP.
Personnel changes included a new ORC in August 2013
Please contact me with any questions or comments.
inc rely,
((/
J. BrSIendenhall
Director
Franklin County Public Utilities
"Equal Opportuniy Employer"

AFrnnk1in
ICbunty
A Research Reoion (.onnnut�ily
Public Utilities
1630 US #1 Hwy
Youngsville, NC 27596
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.franklincountync.us
NC DENR / DWR / Water Quality Permitting Section / Wastewater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED/DENRIDWR
Subject: Sludge Handling and Disposal
NPDES Permitting Group
APR -32014
Water Resources
Permitting Section
Franklin County WWTP, #NC0069311, digests its waste activated sludge for
approximately sixty days in a .500 mg aerobic digester. The sludge is then gravity
thickened and land applied.
Currently the sludge is hauled off site and land applied under contract by Granville
Farms, Inc. Permit #WQ0000838.
Please contact me with any questions or comments.
n rely,
B denhall
Director
Franklin County Public Utilities
"Equal Opportunity Employer"

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
FRANKLIN COUNTY WWTP, NC0069311
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
TAR-PAMLICO
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAJCERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. ONE
b. Number of ClUs. ONE
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
-
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Southern Lithoplate Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9400
Wake Forrest, NC 24588
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Aluminum coil andonizinq , SIU receives uncoated metal, andonizes, cuts, and packages for shipment.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Aluminum andonized plates
Raw material(s): Uncoated aluminum coils
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
175,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes El No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
M
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
FRANKLIN COUNTY VVWTP, NC0069311
Renewal
Tar -Pamlico
Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as
necessary.
Name: Novozymes NA. Inc.
Mailing Address: 77 Perry Chapel Road
Franklinton, NC 27525
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures enzymes for various commercial products
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.6.
Principal product(s): Enzymes
Raw material(s):
Flow Rate.
H2O, various chemicals, reagents and raw materials
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd)
and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
400,000 gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
18.000
gpd ( continuous or
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
NA
a. Local limits
b. Categorical pretreatment standards
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
intermittent)
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets,
interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe each episode.
• January 2010, SIU Novoenzymes had a phosphoric acid spill that impacted treatment plant alkalinity and lost the ability to Nitrify. The site received a
NOV for Ammonia.
• February 2014 green diatoms were received at treatment plant causing turbidity and TSS problems. No violation at the FCWWTP facility,
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACLITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
FRANKLIN COUNTY WWTP, NC0069311
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
TAR-PAMLICO
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
0 Yes © No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

0
3
N ..4+00
N 3+00
N 2+50
N 2+00
N 1+50
N 1+00
N 0+50
0+00
S 0+50
5 1+00
0
3
ID R• 1i6 •
.. DIRT DRIVE:
— • PROPOSED INFLUENT SPLITTER
BOX AND VORTEX GRIT REMOVAL
.. SYSTEM W/ CLASSIFIER
5 1+50
S 2+00
S 2+50
S 3+D0
S 3+50
5 4+00
S 4+50
0
m
3
0
0
r
3
0
1n
+
so
3
0
0
3
3
3
o
o 0
O 0 ill +
+ to
to
a 3 3
3 3
I EXISTING CHAIN.
LINK FENCE
•
•
•
1 F 1
I :% I.
PROPOSED 1.5 MGD •-
. AERATION/ ANAEROBIC/
ANOXIC BASIN 1
J
._., LA
PROPOSED 70'0
CLARIFIER N0.
PROPOSED
TREE LINE
PROPOSED 8 CELL
CONTINUOUS BACKWASH
FILTERS
TBM: EXISTING MANHOLE RIM
ELEV.: 258.59'
N 844790.0556
E 2169488.8725
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
CLEARING AND GRUBBING FROM THE EXISTING TREE
LINE THROUGH TO THE PROPOSED TREE LINE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN
LINK FENCE AS NEEDED AND USE AS MUCH OF
THE EXISTING AS POSSIBLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE.
0
m
r
0
0
r
3
o
0o
0
'^ o + + m
cc, 'O 3 3
3 3
O 0
+ a
3 3
O
+csi
3
O
0
+
3
0
o O
o O 0 J1 +
cfl + +O O O
+ W
3
3
3
9‘,4`
WELL
PROPOSED 1.5 MGD 'MODIFIED
ANAEROBIC/ ANOXIC
��~ t
fir----.::SiMH5 • PROPOSED SLUDGE
p� 1 ., �i DRAW OFF BOX.
Y''' PROPOSED UV DISINFECTION/
PARSHALL FLUME W/
POST AERATION SYSTEM
0
+
r-�
3
▪ :.......i.,..fj� ....,....
... ...
PROPOSED GRAVEL=
ACCESS AREA
lir'.
0
0
+
3
..MH #8;.-
PROPOSED 5200 GPM
INFLUENT PUMP STATION •
AND HEADWORKS CHAMBER
EX151ING
SLUDGE
EXISTING CHAIN
LINK FENCE
EXISTING MANHOLES
PROPOSED 20'
DOUBLE SWING GATE
0
3
0
0
3
MATC LH INESTA. 2+50.00
0
N
W
MATCHUNE STA. 2+50.00
0
0
M
W
MH gl9 EXISTING HEAD WALL
CREEK
0
0
a
W
N 4+00
N 3+00
N 2+50
N 2+00
N 1+50
N 1+00
N 0+50
0+00
s 0+50
S 1+00

0
0
co
3
• N 3+00
- 2+50
N 2+00
N 1+50
N 1+00
N 0+50
0+00
S 0+50
2
t•-•
3
••:
0
0
r.•
3
0
Lo
3 3
DIRT DRIVE
'''' .' ••-• --6—
.
: • '• -2--•
• .
:
, ...YARD .0.-
El-sYDRANT.I. h ANOk"IAii,;;i '' (Typ---...)-- ..
........
0
to
3
'''''' '' .• • •
S 1+00
S 1+50
S 2+00
0
0
t)
3
W. I
il\vc
_FiEmOvE ExisTiNCE- 20- illtOw
AND CONNECT NEW 6 DRAIN UNES
FROM cRIT cHAMBER AREA AND' NEVI
NEW AERATIOR! BASIN ---
-
0
in
3
0
0
3
NEW 'REUSE
LOADING STATION
0
II)
3
CONNECT NEW 2 REUSE WATER
UNE TO EXISTING 1 PVC WATER
•
UNE TO FEED
.•
- HYDRO -PNEUMATIC
WATER TANK
-
7C7?-"Sr
EXisriNG PUMP STATION
• NO.2 CONVERTEDTO NEW
REUSE WATER PUMP STATION
•
' .
WAS PUMP STATION \ IBM
EXISTING PUMP STATION
NO.1 CONVERTED TO NEW
ONCE THE NEW WVITP IS INTO °PERM ON REMOVE
EXISTING 90- ELBOW- AND CONNECT EXISTING
DISCHARGE FROM EXISTING PUMP STATION NO.1 TO
EXISTING El" FORCEMAIN TO AEROBIC DIGESTER.
S 2+50
CONTRACTOR SHALL PIGOUT EXISTING 8" FM PRIOR
TO PLACING LINE INTO SERMCE. EXISTING Er FM TO
BE RECONNECTED TO AEROBIC DIGESTER FOR NEW
WAS UNE, NEW 5'0 METER VAULT SHALL BE CUT
INTO EXISTING 8FM. RELOCATE 6' MAC METER.
S 3+00
S 3+50
S 4+00
S 4+ 50
0
0
co
3
0
r3
-
0
r-
0
to
to
3
.....
0
3
: NEW Vio DOGHOUSE MH
CONTRACT III IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 24" D.I.P. GRAVITY
SEWER AND SETTING MH #1, MH ft A
AHD MH #2 :
..........
0
3
L)
.4
3
3
EXISTING 12" INFLUENT
to
3
r
0
t<>
3
0
,r)
3 3
0
4.
C.4
3
DISCONNECT EXISTING 1' PVC
WATER UNE FOR SITE FEED
FROM WELL AND PLUG ENDS
... .
0
0
3
.. POTABLE „,. • 01 vrtcP"
.. :"..,:-...*:". .. . .... ........ ......,,;.,-4.--crsg.:..,......:. —;____--......,_
................... ..
..... ... .............. .,.. ..... • •
i ; l• .: . ... •
GRAVEL
..... . A...,;.... ... . ......... , .... _
. •
0
L)
0
• ...:
• • < ,
, .. ..... •-•
e
•
• -. . ,
NEW 5"0'..PRECAST :
8MMIRIC11IROW ILE•TO' HOUSE NEW ...... .... .....
" MgTER.1,;
... . ie.
ONCE wwrP is' !NTO's„ 4;6';
OPERA CONNECT 8'X15 `•-•-•
REDUC EXISTIHG
.. .. ....
0
0
0
; „ „ •••••,
! •
1 ..1
. . ..,
EllONTRACT
BEiquCONTRACT III AT
MH,I1 BY TIEING NEW 36'
O.I.P. FROM NEM HEADWORKS
. : .,.
ENO CONTRACT I AND . ,t
BEGIN CONTRACT III AT ..
.<•• - 45" BEND IN 15" PVC
In SDR 21 REUSE WATER MAIN
*1 ,
0
10
c‘a
0
0
c‘i
3
••L _
MATCHLINE STA. 2+50.00
0
Ln
0
w
0
in
4.
LLI
1 AFTER NEW 1.5 MCI)PLANT 15 IN
FULL OPERATION THE DUSTING 4"
%eau. BE ABANDONED.' RDALOVE . .
EXISTING 4' D.I.P. UP TO THE -
EXISTING 13--90' ELL AND INSTALL
NEW 8 .PFROM D.I.P. FM.•SIE SHOETEXG-401STINCFOR8 DETAILS •
1 •
ONCE THE NEW %Map IS INTO OPERATION
RELOCATE THE EXISTING 8 NAG ME1tR i... ............ ..
TO THE NEW WAS SLUDGE UNE AND- .....
INSTALL NEW tr TURBINE NETER • . .
. .-
• . .•
•
MATCHUNE STA. 2+50.0_0 _
- -
STA. 0+00.00
16 D.I.P. DUTTALL
CREEK
PS.
0
.41
N 4+00
N 3+00
N 2+50
N 2+00
N 1+50
N 1+00
0+00
s 0+50
S 1+00
0
(7)
6
a
co
00
E
E I
,73
i
z
II.-
E
A 're
ct
g
LA
z „
Oz
rn
o
c..) 0
z
gz z
L.- 2
z
w
cc
PROPOSED PIPING PLAN
DATE:
APRIL. 2003
DESIONEEt
MCW
DRAM:
RDM
CHECKED:
MCW
SCALE:
1"=50'
SHEET NO.
—

EXISTING SLUDGE FACILITY
500.000 GALLON
AEROBIC DIGESTER
129,000 GALLON
LUDGE THICKEN
75,000 GALLON
SLUDGE HOLDING
BASIN
LAND APPLICATION
.00 P'I64
8" WAS FM
0.019 •(r1D
EXISTING
12" OUTFALL
z
J
f
PROPOSED
24" OUTFALL
100 GPM
WAS PUMP
STATION
5200 GPM
INFLUENT
PUMP STATION
36" S.S. MECHANICAL
00. BAR SCREEN
8" FILTER BACKWASH
18" WAS/ RAS LINE . .00 hrPD
1.5 MGD AERATION/ ANAEROBIC/ ANOXIC BASIN
7.5 MGD
VORTEX
GRIT REMOVAL
20" D.I. FORCEMAIN
jSa 6-eK f r 51 J—E,
CONNP To
AERATION
AEROBIC'
RECYCLE
SPUTTER BOX
20"
20" D.I.P.
z
J
w
ANOXIC
NAEROBIC
ANOXIC
RECYCLE
AERATION
AEROBIC
RECYCLE
1 .5 MGD AERATION/ ANAEROBIC/ ANOXIC BASIN
18"
D.I.P.
18"
D.I.P.
LSLUDGE DRAW
OFF BOX
70' 0 CLARIFIER
14' SWD
FLOW SCHEMATIC
3.0 MGD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
18" WAS/ RAS LINE
0.5-O0 1)/619
Up' OUTFALI
w
0
0
0
tn
0
0
POST
AERATION
.24.
0i
vp
12" PARSHALL
FLUME
UV
DISINFECTION
DUAL TRAIN
2X4
0
N
20" D.I.P. 1'1
CONTINUOUS
BACKWASH
FILTERS
16 DISKS
0.25 MGD EACH
R use
CEDAR
CREEK
1700 GPM RE -USE
PUMP STATION
12" WWTP SITE
WASHDOWN
STORAGE
16" TO FUTURE RE -USE
DISTRIBUTION STORAGE
0
DATE:
APRIL. 2003.
DESHCHVEK
MCW
DRAWN:
ROM
CHECKER
MCW
SCALE:
N.T.S.
SHUT NO.
G — 1 2