HomeMy WebLinkAbout170004_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220517Facility Number
Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ?.Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
SJ 1 4 Mt -Arrival Time:
-eatknft 1401(-) mS
I410l1 LAY _
Departure Time:
County: ( ewe I \ Region: 110S plc
Owner Email: VI I(nt @ eAn 19(1.(-ivy) 6k 1 I• (orn
Phone: ' l aq 1-1 416101 ? VY1')
Mailing Address: } g 1 ('t)i 1 v DM ' E00,6 a 0 L\(N , Z \2
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Lei j Cl� LAN_ Title: Phone: �3 1- J �(D
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: 3 L IS 'Sr Longitude: 7'1 b) 0 ' 14,
N C Nivl `6l0 a,c) On -1v Ce.“n-h) HOW. s4,61 ( vrn a n
(1-Itt isg�
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr Poultr Ca aci Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Y.Dairy
Cow
LON
O
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 17No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA LI NE
❑ Yes )t,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes 121No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes pENo 1 NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: - 6 l-
Date of Inspection: S I 117
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (stnuctural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: Heim{ LdW X
Spillway?: t/
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ri Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes 10No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? gi Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 171 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes g•No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN E PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus n Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ri Yes JX.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [i Yes XI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 34 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA 1 1 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? yKf Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CI-Waste-Applieation Weekly Freeboard ._ Waste -Analysis— ❑ Soil Analysis— ,�] Waste..xansfers _El-Weather-eode—
.Rainfall . tockirrg ❑ CI up Yield 9-Minute-Inspections AMonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections .e-Rlntlge-Smwey-
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [,NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: j - - �1L
Date of Inspection: ' ) ) 7,7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes gNo ❑NA ❑NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No gi NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes 12r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0'NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes No E NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes prNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes ❑ No] NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34..Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
n Yes r gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C\'\rNCk-b-V,(\ Cut C1k%fGee. W\k \ nod t& noV
S 6 .\\s c ck 7.471 (of\ ck.\\ 063 \'v r i e,v c\ w as=-z.b` q
G-( Y\ hoc h o\ 7 E ry\\0 c.lc lr+,,m s-7. w w ,t (mv, d fn o h o1 Q , m 6 w s oc„ai
VhY\ � Gt '`(4 V
WeJV-Iy %),boa(A `ieS
Iry OPflisioctl(s`4-
ac; 5s,`A- S -uAl ockx c� �x .rvt lb I Z$ 7 c Z 1
S c\as o-C E(T Loon7 Wc Qo\y a e (t,r+ 11 I5h11 \nave, CU(.d W?k.P N\TLC S
.c) tiP �i' tx. On : r WA ,+11'1n \m - CCn'v e Y--Pin51(01PA
Y VII V
,g
CkA Cal '
tjAtVI Q--
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
SA) qW9
/1�/n7t
5/12/2020