Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020834_Permit (Issuance)_20160429NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNING: COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0020834 Warrenton WWTP Document Type: Permit Issuance 2 Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Correspondence Owner Name Change Compliance Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Document Date: April 29, 2016 This; document iti printed on rewse paper - ignore any content on the re'rerse raids PAT MCCRORY Water Resources ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALITY April 29, 2016 Mr. Robert Davie, Town Administrator Town of Warrenton P. O. Box 281 Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Dear Mr. Davie: Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance Permit No. NC0020834 Warrenton WWTP Warren County Facility Class III Director The Division of Water,Resources is forwarding herewith the Final NPDES permit. This permit renewal is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). The following changes have been incorporated into this renewal: • The quarterly monitoring for Total Phenolic Compounds was added to the permit based on the results of the Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The quarterly monitoring for Total Thallium was added to the permit based on the results of the Reasonable Potential Analysis. • : The monitoring frequency for BOD, TSS, Fecal Coliform and Ammonia Nitrogen was reduced to 2/week based on the Monitoring Frequency Reduction Evaluation. • - The Limits for Cyanide were added to the permit based on the results of Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The Following special conditions were added to the permit to assure compliance with the nutrient limits: A. (3.) Calculation of Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus Loads, A. (4.) Annual Limits for Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus, and A. (5) Nutrient Allocations. • The Mercury Minimization Plan (Please see A. (8.)) was added to the permit based on the results of the Mercury Evaluation. • Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 1617 Mail service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611 919 707 9000 DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to the permit. (Please see Special Condition A. (7)). If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources, the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit. If you have any questions on this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at 919-807-6386. Sincerely, Jay Zimmerman, P.G. 'Director, Division of Water Resources Hardcopy: Central Files NPDES Files Raleigh Regional Office, SWPS Email: US EPA, Region IV WSS/Aquatic Toxicology Unit WSS/Ecosystem Branch/Monitoring Coalition Coordinator • Permit NC0020834 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Town of Warrenton is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Warren County Wastewater Treatment Plant 738 US Highway 401 South Southwest of Warrenton Warren County to receiving waters designated as Fishing Creek in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other applicable conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and N hereof. This permit shall become effective June 1, 2016. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2019. Signed this day April 29, 2016. aM erS. Jay Zimmerman P.G., Director Division of Water Resources - By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Page 1 of 11 Permit NC0020834 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. Town of Warrenton is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 2.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant including the following components: • Influent pump station • Mechanically cleaned bar screen • Vortex grit chamber • Dual oxidation ditches • Two secondary clarifiers • Four tertiary sand filters ♦ Gas chlorination • Dechlorination (sulfur dioxide) ♦ Aerobic digesters • Cascade post aeration ♦ Effluent flow measurement The facility is located off US Highway 401, southwest of Warrenton, Warren County. 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Fishing Creek, classified C-NSW, in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Page 2 of 11 Permit NC0020834 Part I A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.] During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the permittee,is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored9 by the Permittee as specified below EFFLUENT GHAit?A f, ,ERISTICS• ' -_ - _ •.. ._ LIMITS • . .._ .?. _ MONI-TORING: REQUIREMENTS �. , `- Monthly• Avera e� ..... _.. �.. Weeks ' ' Avera a r yetage Dail y Maxim` . - - um `Measuremt Frequency .. Sample .:,Type.. Sample i Locatton Flow 2.0 MGD Continuous Recording I or E Total Monthly Flow (MG) Monitor and Report Monthly Recorded or Calculated I or E BOD, 5-day, 20° C 2 . (April 1— October 31) 9.0 mg/L 13.5 mg/L 2/Week8 Composite E,I BOD, 5-day, 20° C 2 (November 1— March 31) 18.0 mg/L 27.0 mg/L 2/Week8 Composite E,I Total Suspended Solids 2 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L 2/Week8 . Composite E,I NH3 as N (April 1.— October 31) 2.0 mg/L .6.0 mg/L 2/Week8 - Composite E NH3 as N (November 1— March 31) 4.0 mg/L 12.0 mg/L 2/Week8 Composite E PH 6.0 — 9.0 standard units 3/Week Grab E Dissolved Oxygen 3, mg/L 3/Week Grab E Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L Variable4 Grab U, D Fecal Coliform (geo. mean) 200/100 mL 400/100 mL 2/Week8 Grab E Fecal Coliform (geo. mean) - 1 Variable4 Grab - U, D Total Residual Chlorine 22 µg/L 5 3/Week Grab E Temperature (°C) Daily Grab E Temperature (°C) Variable4 Grab U, D Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TT{N) Monitor and Report (mg/L) • Weekly (Calculated) E Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Monitor and Report (mg/L) Weekly . Composite E Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (NO2-N+NO3-N) Monitor and Report (mg/L) _ Weekly Composite E Total Phosphorus Monitor and Report (mg/L) Weekly Composite E Chronic Toxicity6 Quarterly Composite E Total Cyanide 6.6 µg/L 28.0 µg/L Monthly Grab E Total Copper, µg/L Quarterly Composite E Total Zinc, µg/L Quarterly Composite E Total Phenolic Compounds, mg/L - Quarterly Composite E Total Thallium, µg/L Quarterly Composite E Total Mercury, µg/L • Quarterly Composite E Total Nitrogen (IN) Loads° Monitor and Report, lb/month 2$,523 lb/years 1 Monthly Annually Calculated E Total Phosphorus (TP) Loads° Monitor and Report, lb/month 5,155lb/yearn Monthly Annually Calculated E Effluent Pollutant Scan7 Footnote 7 Composite E Footnotes: Page 3 of 11 Permit NC0020834 1. Sample locations: E-Effluent, I -Influent, U-100 feet above the outfall, D-Downstream at NCSR 1600. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 percent of the respective monthly average influent value (85% removal). 3. The daily average dissolved oxygen concentration in the effluent shall not fall below 5.0 mg/L. 4. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week June 1 through September 30 and once per week October 1 through May 31. Due to your membership in the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association, instream monitoring required by this permit is provisionally waived. It will be immediately reinstated should you end your participation in the Association. 5. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with this permit. However, you shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L. 6. Chronic Toxicity. (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 76%: March, June, September, and December; see Special Condition A. (2.). Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals monitoring. 7. See Special Condition A. (6.) regarding effluent pollutant scan. 8. The sampling shall be conducted on any two non-consecutive days during the calendar week. 9. Starting on December 21, 2016, begin submitting Discharge Monitoring Reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. Please See Special Condition A. (7). 10. TN or TP Load is the mass quantity of Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus discharged in a given period of time. See Special Condition A. (3.) CALCULATION OF TN OR TP LOADS. 11. Compliance with mass limits shall be determined in accordance with Special Conditions A. (4) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN OR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS and A. (5) NUTRIENT ALLOCATIONS. There shall be no discharge ofl'oating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) [15A NCAC 02B .0200 et seq.] The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 76%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWR Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: NC DEQ / DWR / Water Sciences Section 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623 Page 4 of 11 Permit NC0020834 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Water Section at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to indude alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. A. (3.) CALCULATION OF TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS LOADS [G.S. 143-215.1(b)] (a.) The Permittee shall calculate monthly and annual TN Loads as follows: Monthly TN .(or TP) Load (lb/mo) = TN (or TP) x TMF x 8.34 where: TN or TP = the average Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus concentration (mg/L) of the composite samples collected during the month TMF the Total Monthly Flow of wastewater discharged during the month (MG/mo) 8.34 = conversion factor, from (mg/L x MG) to pounds (ii.) Annual 'IN (or TP) Load (lb/yr) = Sum of the 12 Monthly TN (or TP) Loads for the calendar year (b.) The Permittee shall report monthly Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus results (mg/L and lb/mo) in the appropriate discharge monitoring report for each month and shall report each calendar year's results (lb/yr) with the December report for that year. A. (4.) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN OR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS [G.S.142-125.1(b)] (a-) (b.) Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) allocations and load limits for NPDES dischargers in the Tar -Pamlico River basin are annual limits and apply on a calendar year basis. For any given calendar year, the Permittee shall be in compliance with the annual TN (or TP) Load limit in this Permit if: (i.) the Permittee's annual TN (or TP) Load is less than or equal to the effective limit, or (ii.) the Permittee is a Co-Permittee Member of a compliance association. Page 5 of 11 Permit NC0020834 (c) If the Permittee is not a co-permittee member of a compliance association and the Permittee's cumulative annual TN (or TP) discharge exceeds the effective 'IN (or TP) Load limit in this permit at any point during the calendar year, the Permittee is in violation of its TN (or-TP) Load limit for the remainder of the calendar year, and each day of continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation. Compliance with annual limits shall be determined separately for each calendar year, and an exceedance in one year does not carry forward to subsequent years. (d.) The 'IN (or TP) Load limit in this Permit (if any) may be modified as the result of allowable changes in the Permittee's allocations. Allowable changes include those resulting from purchase of TN (or TP) allocation from an authorized mitigation banker, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program, or other source allowed under applicable regulations; purchase, sale, trade, or lease of allocation between the Permittee and other dischargers; and other transactions approved by the Division and consistent with the Tar -Pamlico River Basin Association Agreement, as revised. The Permittee may request a modification of the 'IN (or TP) Load limit in this Permit to reflect allowable changes in its allocation(s). Upon receipt of timely and proper application, the Division will modify the permit as appropriate and in accordance with state and federal program requirements. (iii) Changes in TN (or TP) limits become effective on January 1 of the year following permit modification. The Division must receive application no later than August 31 for changes proposed for the following calendar year. (iv.) Application shall be sent to: NCDWR / Wastewater Permits Branch Attn: Tar -Pamlico River Basin Coordinator 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 • (e) If the Permittee is a member and co-permittee of an approved compliance association on January 1 of a given year, its TN and TP discharges curing that year are governed by that association's group NPDES permit and the limits therein. (i.) (i.) (m•) The Permittee shall be considered a Co-Permittee Member for any given calendar year in which it is identified as such in Appendix A of the association's group NPDES permit. Association roster(s) and members' TN and TP allocations will be updated annually and in accordance with state and federal program requirements. (iv.) If the Permittee intends to join or leave a compliance association, the Division must be notified of the proposed action in accordance with the procedures defined in the association's NPDES permit. (A.) Upon receipt of timely and proper notification, the Division will modify the permit as appropriate and in accordance with state and federal program requirements. (B.) Membership changes in a compliance association become effective on January 1 of the year following modification of the association's permit. (f.) The 'IN and TP monitoring and reporting requirements in this Permit remain in effect throughout the term of the Permit and are not affected by the Permittee's membership in a compliance association. A. (5.) NUTRIENT ALLOCATIONS [G.S.143-125.1(b)] (a.) Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) allocations represent the maximum TN and TP loads that a discharger or group of dischargers is potentially allowed under the Tar -Pamlico nutrient management strategy. Allocations are not enforceable limits but are the basis for TN and TP limits established in individual or group NPDES permits. Page 6 of 11 Permit NC0020834 (b.) The allocations originally assigned to the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association members total 891,271 lb/yr (404,274 kg/yr) TN and 161,070 lb/yr (73,060 kg/yr) TP. These group allocations have been divided among the members in proportion to the maximum permitted flow in each member's permit; that is, Individual Permitted Flow (MGD) Individual Allocation (TN or TP) =Total Permitted Flow, TPBA (MGD) x Group Allocation, TPBA (IN or TP) For the purposes of this distribution, individual permitted flows for the Association members are those in effect as of July 2014 and result in a Total Permitted Flow of 62.495 MGD. (c.) The following table lists, for information purposes only, the TN and TP allocations assigned to, acquired by, or transferred to the Permittee in accordance with the Tar -Pamlico River Basin Phase IV Agreement. Applicable 'IN or TP limits are established in the Effluent Limitations conditions of this permit or in the NPDES permit of a compliance association of which the Permittee is a Co-Permittee Member. ALLOCATION TYPE . . SOURCE-• ` :. , DATE �� ' ALLOCATION AMOU NT (1) STATUS ,.. (lb/yr). (kg/Yr) , Total Nitrogen Tar -Pamlico River Basin Phase IV Agreement 7/9/2015 28,523 12,938 Active Total Phosphorus Tar -Pamlico River Basin Phase IV Agreement 7/9/2015 5,155 2,338 Active (d.) Any addition, deletion, or modification of the listed allocation(s) (other thah to correct typographical errors) or any change from Reserve to Active status of any of the listed allocations shall be considered a major modification of this permit and shall be subject to the public review process afforded such modifications under state and federal rules. A. (6.) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN [G.S. 143-215.1 (b)] The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One scan must be performed in. each of the following years: 2017; 20.18, and 2019. Analytical methods shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present in concentrations greater than applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly toxicity test each year, and must represent seasonal variation [i.e., do not sample in the same quarter every year]. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable." Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Chlorine (total residual, TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene Hardness 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Di-n-butyl phthalate Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,2-dichlorobenzene Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzene Page 7 of 11 Chromium Copper Lead Mercury (EPA Method 1631E) Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Cyanide Total phenolic compounds Volatile organic compounds: Acrolein Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromoform Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodibromomethane Chloroethane 2-chloroethylvinyl ether Chloroform Dichlorobromomethane 1,1-dichloroethane 1,2-dichloxoethane Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Acid -extractable compounds: P-chloro-m-cresol 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,4-dimethylphenol 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 2,4-dinitrophenol 2-nitrophenol 4-nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Base -neutral compounds: Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzidine Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene 3,4 benzofluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane Permit NC0020834 1,4-dichlorobenzene 3,3-dichlorobenzidine Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate 2,4-dinitrotoluene 2,6-dinitrotoluene 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Fluoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Isophorone Naphthalene Nitrobenzene N-nitro s o di-n-p ropylamin e N-nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosodiphenylamine Phenanthrene Pyrene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene Reporting. Testfresults shall be reported on DWR Form-A•MR-PPA1 (or in a form approved by the Director) by December 31st of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the following address: NC DEQ / DWR / Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617. Additional Toxicity Testing Requirements for Municipal Permit Renewal. Please note that Municipal facilities that are subject to the Effluent Pollutant Scan requirements listed above are also subject to additional toxicity testing requirements specified in Federal Regulation 40 CFR 122.21(j)(5). The US EPA requires four (4) toxicity tests for a test organism other than the test species currently required in this permit. The multiple species tests should be conducted either quarterly for a 12-month period prior to submittal of the permit renewal application, or four tests performed at least annually in the four and one half year period prior to the application. These tests shall be performed for acute or chronic toxicity, whichever is specified in this permit. The multiple species toxicity test results shall be filed with the Aquatic Toxicology Branch at the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623 Contact the Division's Aquatic -Toxicology Branch at 919-743-8401 for guidance on conducting the additional toxicity tests and reporting requirements. Results should also be summarized in Part E (Toxicity Testing Data) of EPA Municipal Application Form 2A, when submitting the permit renewal application to the NPDES Permitting Unit. Page 8 of 11 Permit NC0020834 A. (7.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS [G.S. 143-215.1(b)] Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and program reports and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit monitoring data and reports electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The final NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21, 2015. NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this permit (Standard Conditions forNPDES Permits): • Section B. (11.) • Section D. (2.) • Section D. (6.) • Section E. (5.) Signatory Requirements Reporting Records Retention Monitoring Reports 1. Reporting Requirements [Supersedes Section D: (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)] Effective December 21, 2016, the permittee shall report discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application. Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address: NC DEQ / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Permitting Section A 1'1'.b NTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above. See "How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below. Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge. Starting on December 21, 2020, the permittee must electronically report the following compliance monitoring data and reports, when applicable: • Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports; • Pretreatment Program Annual Reports; and • Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) Annual Reports. Page 9 of 11 Permit NC0020834 The permittee may seek an electronic,reporting waiver from the Division (see "How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below). 2. Electronic Submissions In accordance with 40 CFR 122.410)(9), the permittee must identify the initial recipient at the time of each electronic submission. The permittee should use the EPA's website resources to identify the initial recipient for the electronic submission. Initial recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities means the entity (EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity for receiving electronic NPDES data [see 40 CFR 127.2(6)1 EPA plans to establish a website that will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for each type of electronic submission and for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting tool will be available as well. Information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule is found at: http://ww v2.epa.gov/compliance/final-national-pollutant-discharge-elimination-system-npdes-electronic- reporting-rule. Electronic submissions must start by the dates listed in the "Reporting Requirements" section above. 3. How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting The permittee may seek a temporary electronic reporting waiver from the Division. To obtain an electronic reporting waiver, a permittee must first submit an electronic reporting waiver request to the Division. Requests for temporary electronic reporting waivers must be submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required under this permit to begin submitting monitoring data and reports. The duration of a tempora.7 waiver shall not exceed 5 years and shall thereupon expire. At such time, monitoring data and reports shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary electronic reporting waiver by the Division. Approved electronic reporting waivers are not transferrable. Only permittees with an approved reporting waiver request may submit monitoring data and reports on paper to the Division for the period that the approved reporting waiver request is effective. Information on eDMR and the application for a temporary electronic reporting waiver are found on the following web page: http: / /deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources /edmr 4. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and Supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)] All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting purposes. For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/edmr Page 10 of 11 Permit NC0020834 Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED: "7 certj, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system, or tho to persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are signcant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." 5. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)] The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41]. A. (8.) MERCURY MINIMIZATION PLAN (MMP) [G.S. 143-215.1(b)] Mercury Minimization Plan (Mv :P). The permittee shall develop and implement a mercury minimization plan during this permit term. The MIvIP shall be developed within 180 days of the NPDES Permit Effective Date, and shall be available for inspection on -site. A sample MMP was developed through a stakeholder review process and has been placed on the Division website for guidance (http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water- resources-permits/wastewater-branch/npdes-wastewater-permits, under NC Model Mercury Minimization Plan). The MMP should place emphasis on identification of mercury contributors and goals for reduction. Results shall be summarized and submitted with the next permit renewal. Performance of the Mercury Minimization Plan will meet the requirements of the TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) for mercury approved by USEPA on October 12, 2012, unless and until a Waste Load Allocation specific to this facility is developed and this NPDES permit is . amended to require further actions to address the Waste Load Allocation: Page 11 of 11 Outfall 001 Warren County WWTP - NC0020834 USGS Quad Name: Warrenton Receiving Stream: Fishing Creek Stream Class: C NSW Subbasin: Tar Pamlico - 030304 Lat.: 36°22'47" Long.: 78°10'07" 8-Digit HUC: 03020102 (Not to Scale) 1f)7,OIbo PUBLIC NOTICE North Carolina Environmental Management Cosru:?i3sion/NP- DES er.i: 1617 Mail Serv. -e Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES 1Nastewater Permit The North Caro- lina Environmental Mr.nagement Com- mrssrr.rr proposes to issue a NPDES wastewater dis- charge permit to the pers<,n(s) listed Written c-:r,;rien+;.-- regard- ing the proposed permit will be ac- cepted until 30 days after the pub- lish date of this no- tice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a public hearing should there be a significant degree of public Interest. Please mail com- ments and/or infor- mation requests to DWR at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to re- view information on file. Additional information on NP- DES permits and this notice may be found on our web - site: http://portal, ncdenr.org/web/ wq/swp/ps/npdes/ calendar, or by call- ing (919) 807-6304 The Town of Warrenton has re- quested renewal of Permit NC0020834 for Warren County WWTP in Warren County; this facility discharge is treated municipal waste- water to Fishing Creek, Tar -Pamlico River Basin. (CHG 1/20) gra Affidavit of Printer's Proof NORTH CAROLINA WARREN COUNTY I. JANIE MILLER, Office Manager of The Warren Record, a weekly newspaper publication in the town of Warrenton. Warren County, and state of North Carolina, do so solemnly swear that a legal action entitled: ptAbli cn no-h ce a true copy of which is made a part of this affidavit, did appear in the said The Warren Record in the following consecutive issues: Vao 2016. Sworn to and subscribed before me this a !) day of b.(\U(0 \' , 20 l (0. jilakQQAOSL ZiaCk Notary Public My commission expires: la 'Co —n Z o ► S vti4f),Dr' kilikt\ DEQ/DWR FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT NPDES No. NC0020834 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Town of Warrenton/Warrenton WWTP Applicant Address: P.O. Box 281; Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Facility Address: 738 US Highway 401 South, Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Permitted Flow 2.0 MGD Type of Waste: Domestic, Light industrial; no pretreatment program Facility/Permit Status: Class III /Active; Renewal County: Warren County Receivin ' Stream: Stream Classification: 303(d) Listed? Subasin: Drainage Area (mi2): 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) Aver. • - Flow cfs : IWC (%): Miscellaneous Fishin • Creek Re . 'onal Office: 03-03-04 State Grid / USGS Quad: Permit Writer: Rale' • h B26NW/Warrenton Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. December 14, 2015 Lat. 36° 22' 47" N Long. 78° 10' 07" W BACKGROUND The Warrenton WWTP (Class III) has a permitted flow of 2.0 MGD. This facility receives and treats domestic wastewater. It has no Significant Industrial Users and does not implement a pretreatment program, in the past the facility treated industrial waste. Warrenton WWTP discharges into Fishing Creek, classified C NSW at this point, in the Tar Pamlico Basin. The receiving waters are listed as impaired on the current 303 (d) list due to the low level of the dissolved oxygen. Since the Town of Warrenton is a member of the Tar Pamlico Nutrient Trading Association, their permit includes nutrient limits. The required language relating to nutrient limits has been added to the permit. NUTRIENT CONTROLS History of Nutrient Management Strategy for Point Sources On September 12, 1989, the Environmental Managements Commission classified the Tar -Pamlico River Basin as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW). On February 13,1992, the Commission approved a revised NSW Implementation Strategy that established the framework for a nutrient reduction trading program between point and nonpoint sources of pollution. The Strategy also established certain conditions to be met by an association of dischargers known as the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association (the Association). Those conditions are defined in the Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Implementation Strategy (the "Agreement"). Information on the evolution of the program Page 1 of 4 and past and present versions of the Agreement are available at http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps /nps/tarpampointsource. Addition of Nutrient Limits In 2009, the U.S. EPA Region 4 offices raised concerns that, although the Agreement set collective nutrient caps for the members of the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association, the members' NPDES permits lacked nutrient limits and, as a result, EPA had no means to enforce nutrient controls should it become necessary. As part of the 2009 permit renewals, the Division added the group caps for nitrogen and phosphorus, along with related special conditions, to the permits of the fifteen TPBA member facilities. The Division could not add individual N and P limits at that time, because no basis existed at the time for dividing the available wasteload allocations among the members. Instead, the Division agreed to work with the Association to determine an appropriate distribution and to then add individual N and P limits to the permits as part of the 2014 renewals. With the consent of the Association, the group caps are distributed among the members in proportion to their 2014 maximum permitted flows, as follows: TPBA Members and Nutrient Allocations/ Limits • Permit Owner Facility TN Load (1b/yr) 299,491 TP Load (1b/yr) 54,124 NC0030317 City of Rocky Mount Tar River Regional WWTP NC0023931 Greenville Utilities Commission GUC WWTP 249,576 45,103 NC0020605 Town of Tarboro Tarboro WWTP 71,307 12,887 NC0025054 City of Oxford Oxford WWTP 49,915 9,021 NC0020648 City of Washington Washington WWTP 52,054 9,407 NC0069311 Franklin County Franklin County WWTP 42,784 7,732 NC0020834 Town of Warrenton Warrenton WWTP 28,523 5,155 NC0026042 Town of Robersonville Robersonville WWTP 25,671 4,639 NC0020231 Town of Louisburg Louisburg WWTP 19,538 3,531 NC0026492 Town of Belhaven Belhaven WWTP 14,261 2,577 NC0025402 Town of Enfield Enfield WWTP 14,261 2,577 NC0023337 Town of Scotland Neck Scotland Neck WWTP 9,626 1,740 NC0020061 Town of Spring Hope Spring Hope WWTP 5,705 1,031 NC0042269 Town of Bunn Bunn WWTP 4,278 773 NC0020435 Town of Pinetops Pinetops WWTP 4,278 773 Given the size and characteristics of the river basin, transport losses were judged to be somewhat uniform across the basin and were not considered in these calculations. Thus, nutrient limits equal the nutrient allocations for each facility, unlike in other nutrient management strategies in the state. The draft permit includes new conditions designed to meet the Division's 2009 commitment. The group caps and related conditions have been deleted and replaced with individual N and P limits and a new set of related special conditions. The nutrient limits are annual mass limits and become effective January 1, 2016. Each members' limits are equivalent to approximately 4.7 mg/L TN and 0.85 mg/L TP for the member's full permitted flow. The special conditions document the N and P allocations assigned to the facility and provide for consistent calculation of nutrient loads by all members. They also establish how compliance with the N and P limits will be determined if the Association members apply for and obtain a group NPDES permit to control their nutrient discharges collectively. The members have indicated they plan to Page 2 of 4 apply for such a permit, and the Division initiated discussions with the members on that approach in 2012. MONITORING FREQUENCY REDUCTION EVALUATION The effluent was evaluated in accordance with the Monitoring Frequency Reduction Review Guidance. The facility has met the requirements of the guidance for TSS, BOD, Fecal Coliforms and Ammonia nitrogen. Therefore, monitoring for these parameters will be reduced from 3/Week to 2/Week. REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS (RPA) The Division conducted EPA -recommended analyses to determine the reasonable potential for toxicants to be discharged at levels exceeding water quality standards/EPA criteria by this facility from outfall 001. For the purposes of the RPA, the background concentrations for all parameters were assumed to be below detections level. The RPA uses 95% probability level and 95% confidence basis in accordance with the EPA Guidance entitled "Technical Support Document for Water Quality -based Toxics Control." The long term discharge data on the EPA Form 2C was used in the analysis. Calculations included: As, Be, Cd, Total Phenolic Compounds, Cr, Cu, CN, Pb, Hg, Ni, Se, Ag, Zn, Sb and T1 (please see attached). Based on the RPA, the limits for CN and Quarterly monitoring for Total Phenolic Compounds and Thallium will be added to the permit. MERCURY EVALUATION The State of North Carolina has a state-wide mercury impairment. The TMDL has been developed to address this issue in 2012. The TMDL included the implementation strategy, both documents were approved by EPA in 2012. The mercury evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Permitting Guidelines for Statewide Mercury TMDL. Year 2010 2011 _ 2013 Annual average concentration (ng/L) <200 <200 3.57 Maximum sampling result (ng/L) <200 <200 3.57 The allowable mercury concentration for this facility is 15.9 ng/L. None of the annual average concentrations exceed the allowable concentration. Therefore, based on the Permitting Guidelines for Statewide Mercury TMDL, the Mercury WQBEL is not required. However, the Mercury Minimization Plan will be added to the permit since there are multiple detections above 1 ng/L. TOXICITY TESTING-OUTFALL 001, OUTFALL 002, OUTFALL 004, AND OUTFALL 008 Current Requirement: Outfall 001 — Chronic P/F @ 76% using Ceriodaphnia dubia Recommended Requirement: Outfall 001 — Chronic P/F @ 76% using Ceriodaphnia dubia This facility has passed all toxicity tests during the previous permit cycle (23 out of 23), please see attached. COMPLIANCE SUMMARY During the last 5 years, the facility has exceeded limit 2 times, please see attached. The limit violations were for pH and BOD. Page 3 of 4 PERMIT LIMITS DEVELOPMENT • BOD limits in the permit are based on the water quality model. • TSS limits in the permit are based on the requirements of the 40 CFR 133.102. and 15A NCAC 2B .0406 • The Ammonia limits in the permit are based on the water quality model. The Division uses ammonia criteria that were developed by EPA: 1 mg/L - summer; 1.8 mg/L — winter. • The pH limits in the permit are based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0200. • The Fecal Coliforms limits in the permit are based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0211. • The TRC limit in the permit is based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0211. • The Whole Effluent Toxicity limit is based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0500. • The Water Quality Based Effluent Limits for Cyanide are based on the results of the Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The Total Nitrogen load and the Total Phosphorus load are established in accordance with the Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Implementation Strategy. PROPOSED CHANGES • The quarterly monitoring for Total Phenolic Compounds was added to the permit based on the results of the Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The quarterly monitoring for Total Thallium was added to the permit based on the results of the Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The monitoring frequency for TSS, BOD, Fecal Coliform and Ammonia Nitrogen was reduced to 2/week based on the Monitoring Frequency Reduction Evaluation. • The Limits for Cyanide were added to the permit based on the results of Reasonable Potential Analysis. • The Following special conditions were added to the permit to assure compliance with the nutrient limits: A. (3.) Calculation of Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus Load, A. (4.) Annual Limits for Total Nitrogen or Total Phosphorus, A. (5.) Nutrient Allocations. • The Mercury Minimization Plan (Please see A. (8.)) was added to the permit based on the results of the Mercury Evaluation. • Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation. The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to the permit. (Please see Special Condition A. (7.)). Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: January 12, 2016 March 7, 2016 NPDES Contact If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at (919) 807-6386. Page 4 of 4 Warren County WWTP NC0020834 Qw (MGD) = 2.00 1Q1OS(cfs)= 0.84 7Q1OS(cfs)= 1.00 7QIOW (cfs) = NO 7Q10w DATA 30Q2 (cfs) = 8.90 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 46.70 Receiving Stream: Fishing Creek 2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 W WTP/WTP Class: Ill IWC @ 1QIOS = 78.680203% IWC @ 7Q10S = 75.609756% IWC@7Q1OW= N/A IWC @ 30Q2 = 25.833333% IWC @ QA = 6.224900% Stream Class: C NSW Outfall 001 Qw=2 MGD PARAMETER TYPE (1) STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2) PQL UNITS REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NC WQS / Applied V2 FAV / Chronic Standard Acute Max Pred ri # Det Cw Allowable Cw Arsenic Arsenic C C 50 FW(7Q10s) 10 HH/WS(Qavg) ug/L ug/L 3 0 Note: n <9 Limited data se 3 0 Note: n <_ 9 15.0 Default C.V. 15.0 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ —_— __-- Chronic: 66.1 N_ o value > Allowable__C_w _ Chronic: 160.6 No value> Allowable Cw oo limit_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Beryllium NC 6.5 FW(7Q10s) ug/L 3 0 Note: n<9 Limited data set 7.5 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ —_— __—_ Chronic: 8.6 No value > Allowable Cw no limit __----------- — — — — — — — Cadmium NC 2 FW(7Q10s) 15 will- 3 0 Note: n <9 Limited data set 7.5 Default C.V. Acute: 19.1 _ _ ______ ____ Chronic: 2.6 No value > Allowable Cw no limit _ _ _ _ _ _ _______________ all values below detect Chlorides (AL) NC 230 FW(7Q10s) mg/L 0 0 N/A Acute: NO WQS _ _ _ — — _ _ — Chronic: 304 nla _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds NC 1 A(30Q2) ug/L 0 0 N/A Acute: NO WQS -_ —Chronic: _ -----3.9 --- n/a ---------------------------- Total Phenolic Compounds NC 300 A(30Q2) ug/L 3 3 Note: n <9 Limited data set 39,000.0 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ —__ _ _ Chronic: 1,161.3 2 value(s) > Allowable Cw add quarterly monitoring _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — Chromium NC 50 FW(7Q10s) 1022 ttg/I, 3 0 Note: n<9 Limited data set 15.0 Default C.V. Acute: 1,298.9 _ ---__ __-- Chronic: 66.1 No value > Allowable Cw no limit _-------------- — — — --- — Copper (AL) NC 7 FW(7Q10s) 7.3 ug/L 20 13 26.8 Acute: 9.3 Chronic: 9.3 9 value(s) > Allowable Cw no limit Action Level Standard Cyanide NC 5 Pl1'(7QIUs) _- 10 ug/L 19 4 17.9 Acute: 28.0 _ _—_— __—_ Chronic:6.6 3 value(s)> Allowable Cw add limit —_---------------_-----_---- Page 1 of 2 20834-RPA-2015, rpa 12/9/2015 Warren County WWTP NC0020834 2014 Freshwater RPA - 95%, Probability/95% Confidence Outfall 001 Qw=2 MGD Fluoride NC 1800 FW(7Q10s) us%I. 0 0 N/A Acute: NO WQS __ _ ---_ _ _ -2---------------------------- Chronic:,380.d n;a Lead NC 25 FW(7Q10s) 33.8 ug/L 3 0 Note: n<9 Limited data set 15.0 Default C.\%. Acute: 43.0 Chronic: 33.1 No value > Allowable Cw no limit — — — — — — — — — — — Mercury NC 12 FW(7Q10s) 0.5 ng/L 3 I Note: a<9 Limited data set 10,710.0 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS - ------addfmit- Chronic: 15.9 3 value(s)> Allowable Cw `✓_, --._-_---------- ` Molybdenum NC 2000 HH(7Q10s) ug/L 0 0 N/A Acute: NO WQS Chronic: 2,645.2 ---------------------------- Na Nickel NC 88 FW(7Q10s) ',,I ug/L 3 3 Note: n<9 Limited data set 5.0 Default C.V. Acute: 331.7 _ _ _ Chronic:116.4 ---- -- No value > Allowable Cw no limit ------------------------- --- Selonium NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 56 u_/L 3 0 Note: n 5.9 Limited data set 15.0 Default C.V. Acute: 71.2 _ _ _ _ _ _ Chronic: 6.6 No value > Allowable Cw no limit _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ all values below detect _ _ _ _ _ _ Silver(AL) NC 0.06 FW(7Q10s) 1.23 ug/L 3 0 Note: n < 9 Limited data set 15.000 Default C.V. Acute: 1.563 _ _ _____ _ __ Chronic: 0.079 3 value(s)> Allowable Cw no limit _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________ Action Level Standard Zinc (AL) NC 50 FW(7Q10s) 67 ug/L 20 20 115.2 Acute: 85.2 _ _ Chronic----- _ 66.1_--- 8 value(s)> Allowable Cw no limit ---------------------------- Action Level Standard Thallium NC 0.47 HH(7Q10s) µg/L 3 0 Notc: n < 9 Limited dale set 30.00000 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ ______ _ __ Chronic: 0.62161 I value(s)> Allowable Cw add quarterly monitoring ____________________________ Antimony NC 640 HH(7QI0s) µg/L 3 0 Note: n < 9 Limited data set 37.50000 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ _ _ _ _ Chronic:846.45161 No value > Allowable Cw no limit _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 N/A Acute: --------- Chronic: ---------------------------. 0 0 N/A Acute: • _ ---------- Chronic: ------------------------- -- Page 2 of 2 20834-RPA-2015, rpa 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 1 Arsenic - FW Standard Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 10 5 Std Dev. 2 < 5 2.5 Mean 3 < 5 2.5 C.V. (default) 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL. Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 2 Arsenic - HHIWS Standards Automatically copies Arsenic data from FW Standard entries Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1.4434 1 1/0/1900 < 10 5 Std Dev. 1.4434 3.3333 2 1/0/1900 < 5 2.5 Mean 3.3333 0.6000 3 1/0/1900 < 5 2.5 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3 4 n 3 5 3.00 6 Mult Factor = 3.00 5.0 ug/L 7 Max. Value 5.0 uglL 15.0 ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 15.0 ug/L 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 20834-RPA-2015, data - 1 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 3 Beryllium Date Data BDL=1120L Results 1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 2 < 2 1 Mean 3 < 2 1 C.V. (default) 4 n 5 6 Mull Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 4 Cadmium Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 0.8660 1 < 2 1 Std Dev. 1.5000 2 < 5 2.5 Mean 0.6000 3 < 5 2.5 C.V. (default) 3 4 n 5 3.00 6 Mult Factor = 2.5 ug/L 7 Max. Value 7.5 ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL. Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 0.8660 2.0000 0.6000 3 3.00 2.5 ug/L 7.5 ug/L -2- 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 5 Chlorides (AL) Date Data BDL=II2DL Results 1 Std Dev. 2 Mean 3 C.V. 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL- Values" then "COPY" Maximum data points = 58 6 Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A mg/L N/A mg/L Use "PASTE SF Values" then ", . Maximum points = Date Data BDL=II2DL Results 1 Std Dev. NO DATA 2 Mean NO DATA 3 C.V. NO DATA 4 n 0 5 6 Mult Factor = N/A 7 Max. Value N/A 8 Max. Pred Cw N/A 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 20834-RPA-2015, data - 3 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS ECIAL COPY" iata 18 7 Total Phenolic Compounds ug/L ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 13 13 Std Dev. 2 13000 13000 Mean 3 7700 7700 C.V. (default) 4 5 6 Mull Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 8 Chromium 6529.9584 6904.3333 0.6000 3 3.00 13000.0 ugIL 39000.0 ugIL Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 2 < 10 5 Mean 3 < 10 5 C.V. (default) 4 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE Sr Values" then " 1 . Maximum points = 5 1.4434 4.1667 0.6000 3 3.00 5.0 15.0 - 4 - 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS ?ECIAL COPY" 'Iata 9 Copper (AL) I " Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 20 20 Std Dev. 2 19 19 Mean 3 15 15 C.V. 4 14 14 n 5 14 14 6 14 14 Mult Factor = ug/L 7 13 13 Max. Value ug/L 8 12 12 Max. Pred Cw 9 12 12 10 < 10 5 11 < 10 5 12 < 10 5 13 < 10 5 14 < 10 5 15 < 10 5 16 < 10 5 17 8.5 8.5 18 7.7 7.7 19 5 5 20 2 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY- . Maximum data points = 58 10 Cyanide 5.3246 9.5600 0.5570 20 1.34 20.0 ug/L 26.8 ug/L Use "PASTE Sr Values" then "I . Maximum 8 points ='_ Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 5 5.0 Std Dev. 2.7059 2 < 5 5.0 Mean 6.11 3 < 5 5.0 C.V. 0.4432 4 < 5 5.0 n 19 5 < 5 5.0 6 < 5 5.0 Mult Factor = 1.28 7 < 5 5.0 Max. Value 14.0 8 < 5 5.0 Max. Pred Cw 17.9 9 < 5 5.0 10 < 5 5.0 11 < 5 5.0 12 < 5 5.0 13 < 5 5.0 14 < 5 5.0 15 8 5.0 16 10 10.0 17 12 12.0 18 14 14.0 19 < 10 5.0 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 20834-RPA-2015, data - 5 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS t>tECIAL Fops late J 11 Fluoride Date Data BDL=1/20L Results 1 Std Dev. 2 Mean 3 C.V. 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = ug/L 7 Max. Value ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use"PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maxirnum data points = 68 12 Lead NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A ug/L N/A ug/L Use"PASTE SF Values" then ", . Maxirnum r points = 5 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 10 5 Std Dev. 1.4434 2 < 5 2.5 Mean 3.3333 3 < 5 2.5 C.V. (default) 0.6000 4 n 3 5 6 Mult Factor = 3.00 7 Max. Value 5.0 8 Max. Pred Cw 15.0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 -6- 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 13 ECIAL coPr iata • i8 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 200 100 Std Dev. 2 < 200 100 Mean 3 3570 3570 C.V. (default) 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = ug/L 7 Max. Value ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Mercury Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 2003.4054 1256.6667 0.6000 3 3.00 3570.0 ng/L 10710.0 ng/L 14 Use"PASTE SF Values" then "i . Maximum t points = 5 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 S1d Dev. NO DATA 2 Mean NO DATA 3 C.V. NO DATA 4 n 0 5 6 Mult Factor = N/A 7 Max. Value N/A 8 Max. Pred Cw N/A 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Molybdenum 20834-RPA-2015, data - 7 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS ,ECIAL• COPY" Jata ;8 15 Nickel Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 10.0 5 Std Dev. 2 < 10.0 5 Mean 3 < 10.0 5 C.V. 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = ug/L 7 Max. Value ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use"PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 16 Selenium 0.0000 5.0000 0.0000 3 1.00 5.0 ug/L 5.0 ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 c 10 5 Std Dev. 2 c 2 1 Mean 3 c 2 1 C.V. (default) 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 - 8 - 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 17 Silver (AL) 2.3094 2.3333 0.6000 3 3.00 5.0 ug/L 15.0 ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 2 < 10 5 Mean 3 < 10 5 C.V. (default) 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values' then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 18 Zinc (AL) 1.4434 4.1667 0.6000 3 3.00 5.000 ug/L 15.000 ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 96 96 Std Dev. 2 91 91 Mean 3 90 90 C.V. 4 89 89 n 5 75 75 6 73 73 Mult Factor = 7 72 72 Max. Value 8 70 70 Max. Pred Cw 9 66 66 10 64 64 11 61 61 12 59 59 13 54.3 54.3 14 54 54 15 52 52 16 48 48 17 45.5 45.5 18 45 45 19 34 34 20 10 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 20834-RPA-2015, data - 9 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 19 Thallium 21.0996 62.4400 0.3379 20 1.20 96.0 ug/L 115.2 ug/L Date Data < BDL=1/2DL 20 10 1 0.5 1 0.5 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. (default) n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw Use "PASTE SPECIAL. Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 20 Antimony 5.4848 3.6667 0.6000 3 3.00 10.000000 pg/L 30.000000 pg/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL 25 12.5 < 3 1.5 < 3 1.5 - 10 - 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. (default) n Use 'TASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 21 0 6.3509 5.1667 0.6000 3 Mult Factor = 3.00 Max. Value 12.500000 pg/L Max. Pred Cw 37.500000 Ng/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw Use"PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 22 0 NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A N/A Date Data BDL=1/2DL 20834-RPA-2015, data - 11 - 12/9/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mull Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw Use"PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A N/A - 12 - 20834-RPA-2015, data 12/9/2015 Templeton, Mike From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:51 PM To: Templeton, Mike; Hennessy, John Cc: Risgaard, Jon Subject: RE: action on tar-pam permits Since we did not have any kickoff for this basin, it might be good to put a note in the permit files to remind permit writers to not start renewals until Ph 4 completed. Drafts can go to public notice without the Supervisor review. Tom Belnick Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit NCDWR/Water Quality Programs 919-807-6390 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Templeton, Mike Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 11:20 AM To: Hennessy, John Cc: Belnick, Tom; Risgaard, Jon Subject: action on tar-pam permits John — You, Tom, and I decided a few months ago that it would be best to delay action on permits for the 15 Association members until the Phase IV agreement is worked out; we would then add nutrient limits and get those permits going. We also agreed that the rest of the Tar -Pam permits could go out any time. I saw last week that draft permits for two members of the Tar -Pam Association went out to public notice in mid - February: Scotland Neck, NC0023337, and Spring Hope, NC0020061. We will have to come back and modify these permits when the agreement is finalized, to add the new nutrient conditions. The mods will require a second public notice at some cost to us. The three of us decided to hold these 15 permits precisely to avoid the added expense, though we knew it would temporarily add to the backlog. This was a branch -level decision, not a unit decision. In addition, it has taken a good deal of effort over several years to get the Tar -Pam dischargers on board with the new requirements. It does not help our credibility that, after John Huisman and I (with a nod from you and Tom) told them we would delay their renewals, these two drafts went to notice. I'd be glad to talk to you and Tom further if we need to revisit this decision, but until a different decision is made please continue to hold the permits for Tar -Pam Association members. - Mike T Michael E. Templeton, P.E. Wastewater Branch Water Quality Permitting Section NCDENR • DWR Raleigh, NC Tel: 919.807.6402 Fax: 919.807.6489 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1/1 Zoi�c t44i Walter M. Gardner, Jr. Mayor TOWN OF WARRENTON Historically Great - Progressively Strong" P 0 Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589-0281 Robert Davie Administrator April 3, 2014 NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Permitting Unit: RECEIVE ENR/DW R APR -8 D d Water Resource8 Permitting Section Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Town of Warrenton NPDES Permit #NC0020834 Warren County The Town of Warrenton is submitting the renewal application for NPDES permit #NC0020834. The permit application consists of: - Cover letter - Form 2A — NPDES Application for Permit Renewal - Supplemental Application Information — Parts D & E Pollutant Analysis results for the years of: 2013, 2012, and 2011 Topographic Map - Process Flow Schematic Sludge Management Plan 3-year data summary for "exceptional compliance" Two copies of "Application for Permit Renewal" The Town was unaware that second species toxicity testing was required for the permit renewal. Once we were told of this requirement, we made arrangements to conduct the tests. One second species toxicity test has already been done and the others will be completed and submitted prior to permit expiration and results submitted to NC DWR as required. The test dates for other second species testing are the months of: March, June and September. The Town would like to request that the following modifications be made to the permit: The WWTP has passed all toxicity testing for this permit period. Since copper and zinc monitoring/limits are usually added due to toxicity failures, we request that these parameters be removed from the permit. The sample results for copper show very little fluctuation in the past permit period. This indicates that there are no direct sources of copper into the treatment plant and that these levels should remain consistently low. Additionally, the majority of the effluent copper results have been below detection levels. The effluent zinc levels have been pretty consistent for the permit term with no noticeable effects on the receiving stream and no effects on toxicity. It is requested that daily effluent monitoring for temperature be removed. Temperature of the effluent is an uncontrollable parameter and has no bearing on the receiving waters. The flow into the treatment facility is domestic in nature and is not subject to any unexpected fluctuations. The permit has a monitoring requirement for Cyanide. Effluent test results for the review period show that cyanide levels are below detection levels. We request that this parameter be removed from the permit. The WWTP had an active Industrial Pretreatment Program at one time. Due to loss of industry, the Pretreatment Program in now inactive. The flow to the WWTP is mainly domestic in nature with commercial and minor manufacturing dischargers. Monitoring data for the past three scans show "No Detect" on all volatile organic compounds, acid - extractable compounds and base -neutral compounds. We request that the monitoring requirement for the Effluent Pollutant Scan be removed from the permit. - If second species monitoring is to be continued to be required for permit renewal, we request that one per year be included in the permit. - We request that monitoring for BOD, TSS, Ammonia Nitrogen and Fecal Coliform be reduced under the "exceptionally performing facilities" criteria. The attached data (summarized in the following table) indicates that the WWTP effluent has exceeded the minimum criteria for reduced monitoring. The most restrictive limits were used for BOD and Ammonia Nitrogen. In addition to the monitoring results, the plant meets the other listed criteria in the guidelines. Analysis of testing results for the past three years: - Percent of Monthly Average Limit Parameter Monthly Limit 3-Year Average % of Limit BOD 9.0 mg/1 1.2 mg/1 13% TSS 30.0 mg/L 1.4 mg/L 5% Ammonia N 2.0 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 2.5% Fecal Coliform 200/100 ml 30.5 colonies/100 ml 15% - Number of Samples Over 200% of Monthly Average Limit Parameter 200% of Monthly Limit Number of Samples Over BOD 18 mg/1 1 TSS 60 mg/L 0 Ammonia N 4.0 mg/L 0 Eight (8) Fecal Coliforms exceeded the upper reporting of 300 colonies per ml We thank you for your consideration in these matters. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call Bill Perkinson at (252)257-1776. Sincerely, i. Robert Davie, Town Administrator Town of Warrenton Warren County WWTP NC0020834 — Qutfall 001 Supplement to NPDES Permit Renewal (Tar -Pamlico) E 4. Summary of Chronic Toxicity Data (previously submitted) Collection Date Start Date Sample Type Test Method Test Result 06/7/09 06/8/09 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 03/15/09 03/16/09 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 12/5/10 12/6/10 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 09/12/10 09/13/10 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 06/6/10 067/10 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 03/7/10 03/8/10 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 12/11/11 12/12/11 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 09/11/11 09/12/11 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 06/12/11 06/13/11 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 03/13/11 03/14/11 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 12/9/12 12/10/12 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 09/9/12 09/10/12 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 06/3/12 06/4/12 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 03/11/12 03/12/12 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 12/8/13 12/9/13 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 09/15/13 09/16/13 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 06/2/13 06/3/13 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass 03/3/13 03/4/13 24 Hour Composite NC Chronic Pass N .3-416teiftxrimi szidEfri • • CHLORINE CONTAC TERITIARY •► FILTERS POST AERATION WW ATEWATER PUMP STATION t EFFLUENT PARSHAL FLUME MAC.HANICAL BAR SCREEN . aET MOVAI' FACILITY • INFLUENT 1 _ r CHLORINE FEED AND/ / / • HANDLING • SYSTEM • CLARIFIERS.• N. 1 SLUDGE RECIRCULATION AND. WASTE -• PUMP STATION . I1LTER BACKWASH WASTE PUMP STATION r . _ +WASTE • SLUDGE LIME FEED SYSTEM AEROBIC' . (....1 DIGESTER VACUUM ---r SLUDGE DRYING BEDS • DIGESTED SLUDGE . 1• • EXHIBIT" I - • . BED UNDER -DRAINAGE SCHEMATIC FLOW PATTERN OF WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE 'AT WARREN COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OXIDATION DITCHES • . SLUDGE DRYING BEDS ICONVEN.T1ONA • Warren County WWTP NC0020834 — Outfall 001 Supplement to NPDES Permit Renewal (Tar -Pamlico) Sludge Management Plan The Town of Warrenton operates a 2.0 MGD activated sludge treatment plant. The facility has the following solids handling tanks: • Two 125,000 gallon aerobic sludge digesters Thickened wastewater treatment residuals are wasted from the secondary clarifiers to the sludge digester. In the digester, the solids are stabilized and thickened. When the sludge in a digester is thickened, it is aerated until a land application event. Prior to pumping the thickened sludge for land application, the sludge is lime stabilized for Vector Attraction and Pathogen reduction. The stabilized sludge is pumped to sludge transport vehicle for land application by a certified land application contractor. In the event land application cannot occur or if there are any other problems that would necessitate alternate disposal, the WWTP has conducted a pilot study for the use of dewatering boxes and composting as an alternate. Three Year Data Summary - Town of Warrenton NC0020834 2013 BOD Ave BOD Max TSS Ave TSS Max FC Ave FC Max NH3 Ave NH3 Max January 1.1 4.4 1.6 4.9 43 68 0.04 0.13 February 1.2 2.6 1.4 3.9 28 63 0.05 0.17 March 2.4 6.9 0.5 2.7 54 77 0.04 0.06 April 1.8 6.6 1.2 2.5 25 68 0.09 0.07 May 1.5 6.6 0.3 3.7 29 59 0.02 0.07 June 0.5 3.8 1.2 1.2 76 300 0.01 0.01 July 4.2 27.8 1.2 2.5 59 112 0.01 0.01 August 1.1 9 1.2 1.2 64 300 0.01 0.01 September 1.2 6.7 1.2 1,2 43 88 0.01 0.01 October 0.6 3.1 1.2 1.2 49 175 0.01 0.28 November 2 3.1 4.6 20 76 300 0.01 0.02 December 4.6 6.7 3 6 161 300 0.01 0.01 2012 BOD Ave BOD Max TSS Ave TSS Max FC Ave FC Max NH3 Ave NH3 Max January 0.3 2.2 0.9 3.1 19 98 0.03 0.07 February 1.2 3.2 0.4 2.9 17 105 0.09 0.32 March 0.2 2.5 1.2 1.2 26 250 0.19 2.50 April 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 30 58 0.04 0.10 May 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 24 70 0.01 0.06 June 1.0 1.0 0.8 10.6 33 73 0.04 0.07 July 1.0 1.0 0.2 2.5 37 72 0.03 0.10 August 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 13 105 0.02 0.08 September 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 30 265 0.04 0.12 October 0.2 2.2 1.2 1.2 10 52 0.05 0.16 November 1.2 2.6 1.1 3.5 45 59 0.11 0.22 December 0.9 3.3 1.4 2.5 63 290 0.1 0.32 2011 BOD Ave BOD Max TSS Ave TSS Max FC Ave FC Max NH3 Ave NH3 Max January 2.7 11.0 6.8 9.4 70 157 0.12 0.18 February 0.6 2.7 2 5.5 66 170 0.08 0.20 March 1.0 2.8 1.1 3.2 36 >300 0.14 1.24 April 0.8 2.9 1.2 1.2 11 51 0.09 0.43 May 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 13 17 0.01 0.01 June 0.1 2.0 1.2 1.2 22 >300 0.01 0.03 July 0.3 2.1 0.7 5.4 25 285 0.01 0.12 August 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 9 66 0.01 0.09 September 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 12 >300 0.02 0.09 October 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 20 >300 0.02 0.16 November 0.6 2.7 0.2 2.8 11 270 0.08 0.30 December 3-Year Average 1.2 1.4 30.5 0.05 Permit Limit 9.0 30.0 200 2.0 % of Limit 13% 5% 15% 2.5% Walter M. Gardner, Jr. Mayor TOWN OF WARRENTON Historically Great - Progressively Strong" P O Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589-0281 Robert Davie Administrator February 1, 2016 NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Permitting Unit: RECEIVEDINCDEQIDWR FEB 052015' Water Quality Permitting Section Subject: NPDES Draft Permit - Comments Town of Warrenton NPDES Permit #NC0020834 Warren County The Town of Warrenton received a draft NPDES permit dated January 12, 2016 for review and comment. We appreciate the reduction in monitoring granted for exceptional compliance. In our permit renewal cover letter, we had requested that several changes be made to the permit and these changes were not made in the draft permit. We will reiterate our request for these changes along with additional comments. The Town would like to request the following changes to the permit: A. The draft permit contained a quarterly monitoring requirement for mercury. We are requesting that monitoring be removed from the permit. Effluent mercury results for the plant have been below detection for 50% of the results and just about detection levels for the other 50% of the samples. NC DWR implemented a Mercury Post-TMDL Permitting Strategy (September 12, 2012) that establishes criteria for the permitting and monitoring of mercury. Based on our understanding of the strategy, as a major municipal facility without existing limits, that mercury monitoring is to be conducted only in conjunction with the priority pollutant analysis. We ask that the permit be modified to reflect these requirements. B. The Division denied our request for removing Cyanide from the permit and added a limit because of the potential to exceed instream concentration. The wastewater plant changed contract laboratories at the end of 2013. This change was due to continuing problems with the accuracy of the test results. In changing laboratories, the preservation/de- chlorination process for cyanide also changed. Since changing laboratories, results for cyanide for the past 24 months have been below detection. We feel that the cyanide detections prior to 2014 were due to false positives due to de -chlorination issues and/or laboratory problems. We request that the cyanide monitoring and limits be removed from the permit. C. Monitoring for Total Thallium was added to the permit based on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA). Our review of the Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) results show that all results were below detection with the exception of one result which was equal to the detection level. We don't feel that one result that is equal to the detection level should warrant additional monitoring. We request that the monitoring requirement for thallium be removed from the permit. D. Monitoring for Total Phenolic Compounds were added to the permit based on the RPA. In comparing the laboratory results with the reported results, it was discovered that the unit conversion was not done. As stated above, there was a change in laboratories and the previous laboratory reported Phenols in ug/Ls. The DMR had reporting limits of mg/L and the conversion was not made. For the years 2011 and 2010 the Total Phenolic Compounds were reported from the laboratory as 13 ug/L and 7.7 ug/L and reported on the DMRs as 13 mg/L and 7.7 mg/L. We have attached the laboratory report for your review. If the phenolic compounds were reported in the proper units, it's our belief that the RPA results are in error and no further monitoring is required except in the PPAs. We request that the monitoring requirement for Total Phenolic Compounds be removed from the permit. E. Monitoring for copper and zinc remain in the new permit. One of the methods the Division uses to control copper and zinc is through the whole -effluent toxicity program. The plant has consistently passed the toxicity tests for over ten years. Using the available on-line calculator from NC DWR, we estimated the possible copper limit as 10.4 ug/L and the zinc limit as 167.6 ug/L. We realize that we have had multiple times in which the copper limit would have been exceeded. The highest zinc concentration over the last four years has been 91 ug/L which is half the expected limit. Based upon our record on passing toxicity and the test results, we again ask that monitoring for copper and zinc be removed from the permit. We thank you for your time and efforts. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Bill Perkinson, Public Works Director, at 252/425-5334. Sincerely, Robert Davie, Town Administrator Town of Warrenton 0 a Page 1 of 4 Lob Location R' NCNVW Cert.#: 067 NC/DW Cert.#: 37731 6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 Ph: (919) 834-4984 Fax: (919) 834-6497 `J`MiTEST Laboratory Report Lob Location 'C' NCNVW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 Ph: (336) 766-7846 Fax: (336) 766-2514 iran-ww>*asn tis+-r.:!r��arr���wv.��SEu4�cx �rr�..yrnv�w.•sx+rsu�r.-1M-.ra-r—.a +t Project No.:01 Project ID: Effluent Pollutant Scan --- Prepared for --- Bill Perkinson Warrenton WWTP, Town of Corner of Market & Bragg P.O. Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589 Lab Location 'W' NCNVW Cert.#: 075 NC/DW Cert.#: 37721 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411 Ph: (910) 763-9793 Fax: (910) 343-9688 Report Date: 7/2/2010 Date Received: 6/9/2010 Work Order #: Cust. Code: Cust. P.O.#: 1006-00614 WA1777 No. Sample ID 001 Effluent Date Sampled 6/9/2010 Time Sampled 8:02 Matrix WW Sample Type Condition Composite 4 +/- 2 deg C Test Performed Method Results Lab LocAnazed Date Time Qualifier Ammonia Nitrate -Nitrite Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Total Dissolved Solids TOTAL HARDNESS (WW) Calcium Magnesium Total Hardness Calculation Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead • Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc EPA 350.1 EPA 353.2 EPA 351.2 EPA 365.4 EPA 160.1 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 245.1 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 <0.02 mg/L as N 16.5 mg/L as N 0.94 mg/L 0.35 mg/L 388 mg/L 49.0 mg/L 2.87 mg/L 134 mg/L <0.003 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.002 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.010 mg/L <0.010 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.2 ug/L <0.010 mg/L <0.002 mg/L <0.010 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.052 mg/L R 6/15/10 9:00 R 6/15/10 12:54 R 6/16/10 13:20 R 6/16/10 12:53 R 6/10/10 11:18 R 0:00 R 6/14/10 12:08 R 6/14/10 12:08 R 6/14/10 12:08 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/15/10 8:35 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 R 6/11/10 12:06 No. Sample ID 002 Effluent Date Sampled 6/9/2010 Time Sampled 10:35 Matrix WW Sample Type Grab Condition 4+1-2deg C Test Performed Method Results Lab LocAnazed Date Time Qualifier Oil & Grease Cyanide Phenols w/chloroform extr. Volatile TTOs by GC/MS EPA 1664A EPA 335.2/335.3 SM 510A-B <5.0 mg/L <0.005 mg/L 7.7 ug1L R 6/15/10 8:00 R 6/16/10 8:45 R 6/11/10 8:50 R 6/10/10 10:07 0 0 J3oTEST Page 1 of 4 Laboratory Report _.__.__.... lab Location 'R' NC/WW Cert.#: 067 NC/DW Cert.#: 37731 r 6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 Ph: (919) 834-4984 Fax: (919) 834-6497 Lab Location 'C' NC/WW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 Ph: (336) 766-7846 Fax: (336) 766-2514 Project No.:01 Project ID: Effluent Pollutant Scan --- Prepared for --- Bill Perkinson Warrenton WWTP, Town of Corner of Market & Bragg P.O. Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589 Lob Location 'W' NC/WW Cert.#: 075 NC/DW Cert.#: 37721 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411 Ph: (910) 763-9793 Fax: (910) 343-9688 Report Date: 10/20/2011 Date Received: 9/15/2011 Work Order #: 1109-01057 Cust. Code: Cust. P.O.#: WA1777 No. Sample ID 001 Effluent Date Sampled Time Sampled 9/15/2011 12:43 Matrix WW Sample Type Condition Composite 4 +1- 2 deg C Test Performed Method Results Ana Lab Loc Time Qualifier Ammonia Nitrate -Nitrite Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Total Dissolved Solids TOTAL HARDNESS (WW) Calcium Magnesium Total Hardness Calculation Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc EPA 350.1 EPA 353.2 EPA 351.2 EPA 365.4 EPA 160.1 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 245.1 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 EPA 200.8 <0.02 mg/L as N 16.0 mg/L as N 0.71 mg/L 2.71 mg/L 378 mg/L 72.0 mg/L 5.60 mg/L 203 mg/L <0.002 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.002 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.010 mglL <0.010 mg/L <0.005 mg/L <0.2 ug/L <0.010 mg/L <0.002 mg/L <0.010 mg/L <0.001 mg/L 0.055 mg/L R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/21/11 9/21/11 9/21/11 9/21/11 9/21/11 9/21/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/22/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/20/11 11:30 10:00 16:00 8:38 11:10 0:00 10:56 10:56 10:56 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 15:39 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 17:36 No. Sample ID 002 Effluent Date Sampled Time Sampled 9/15/2011 12:49 Matrix VVW Sample Type Grab Condition 4+/-2deg C Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc uate Time Qualifier Oil & Grease Cyanide Phenols w/chloroform extr. Volatile TTOs by GC/MS EPA 1664A EPA 335.2/335.3 SM 510A-B <5.0 mg/L <0.005 mg/L 13.0 ug/L R 9/21/11 16:00 R 9/19/11 15:00 R 9/23/11 8:41 R 9/16/11 7:06