Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020834_Permit (Issuance)_20100505NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET NC0020834 Warrenton WWTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: '''hermit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Correspondence Owner Name Change Compliance Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Document Date: May 5, 2010 This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore aizy content on the re-srer+se side ATA . NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary May 5, 2010 Mr. John Freeman, Town Administrator Town of Warrenton P. O. Box 281 Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0020834 Warren County WWTP Warren County Dear Mr. Freeman: The Division of Water Quality (Division) personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the _attached NPDES discharge _permit. It is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007, or as subsequently amended. , This final permit includes one significant change from the draft permit sent to you on March 3, 2010. Quarterly monitoring for cyanide was added. Your March, 2008 sample result (15 pg/L) was above the freshwater standard for aquatic life, which is 5 jug/L. Additional monitoring was therefore deemed necessary. Please be aware that the Division received comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission in reference to your proximity to the Fishing Creek Aquatic Habitat, a significant natural heritage area. The Commission recommended tighter effluent limits for ammonia. Although your ammonia limits did not change, the Division is awaiting new ammonia criteria from US EPA, which may affect your permit limits in the future. If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days after receiving this letter. Your request must take the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such demand is made, this permit remains final and binding. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-807-63001 FAX: 919-807.6492\ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 4An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer NorthCarolina XaturaUy This permit is not transferable except after notifying the Division of Water Quality. The Division may modify and re -issue, or revoke this permit. Please notice that this permit does not affect your legal obligation to obtain other permits required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or other federal or local governments. If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Mr. Gil Vinzani at [gil.vinzani@ncdenr.govj or call (919) 807-6395. %st ��oleen H. Sullins (..t, / Enclosure: NPDES Permit FINAL NC0020834 cc: Raleigh Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section NPDES Permit File Central Files Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Susan Meadows (E-mail copy) EPA Region 4, Marshall Hyatt (permit and fact sheet, E-mail copy) 1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919.807.63001 FAX: 9 19-807.64921 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org An Equal Opportunity 1 Al! mat ve Action Employer One North Carolina Naturally • Permit NC0020834 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Town of Warrenton is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Warren County Wastewater Treatment Plant Off US Highway 401 Southwest of Warrenton Warren County to receiving waters designated as Fishing Creek in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective June 1, 2010. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2014. Signed this day May 5, 2010: leen Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission • Permit NC0020834 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. Town of Warrenton is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 2.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant including the following components: • Influent pump station • Mechanically cleaned bar screen • Vortex grit chamber • Dual oxidation ditches • Two secondary clarifiers • Four tertiary sand filters • Gas chlorination • Dechlorination (sulfur dioxide) • Aerobic digesters • Cascade post aeration • Effluent flow measurement The facility is located off US Highway 401, southwest of Warrenton, Warren County. 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Fishing Creek, classified C-NSW, in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Warren County WWTP - NC0020834 USGS Quad Name: Warrenton Receiving Stream: Fishing Creek Stream Class: C NSW Subbasin: Tar Pamlico - 030304 Lat.: 36°22'47" Long.: 78°10'07" 8-Digit HUC: 03020102 . (Not to Scale) F _ - Permit NC0020834 A (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS •. Monthly Average Weekly Average. Daily Maximum Measuremt. Frequency Sample Type Sample -Location Flow 2.0 MGD Continuous Recording I or E BOD, 5-day, 202 C z (April 1 — October 31) 9.0 mg/L 13.5 mg/L 3/Week Composite E,I BOD, 5-day, 202 C 2 (November 1 — March 31) 18.0 mg/L 27.0 mg/L 3/Week Composite E,1 Total Suspended Solids 4 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L 3/Week Composite E,I NH3 as N (April 1 — October 31) 2.0 mg/L 6.0 mg/L 3/Week Composite E NH3 as N (November 1 — March 31) 4.0 mg/L 12.0 mg/L 3/Week Composite E pH 6.0 — 9.0 standard units 3/Week Grab E Dissolved Oxygen 3 - 3/Week Grab E Dissolved Oxygen . Variable 4 Grab U, D Fecal Coliform (geo. mean) 200/100 ml 400/100mI 3/Week Grab E Fecal Coliform (geo. mean) Variable 4 Grab U, D Total Residual Chlorine 22 pg/L b 3/Week Grab E Temperature (2C) Daily Grab E Temperature (QC) Variable 4 Grab U, D Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) 6 Monitor and Report (mg/L) Weekly (Calculated) E Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Monitor and Report (mg/L) Weekly Composite E Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (NO2-N+NO3-N) 6 Monitor and Report (mg/L) Weekly Composite E Total Phosphorus b Monitor and Report Smg/L) Weekly Composite E Chronic Toxicity 7 Quarterly Composite E Total Cyanide Quarterly Composite E Total Copper Quarterly Composite E Total Zinc Quarterly Composite E Effluent Pollutant Scan ° Annually Composite E Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E-Effluent, I -Influent, U-100 feet above the ouffall, D-Downstream at NCSR 1600. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 percent of the respective monthly average influent value (85% removal). 3. The daily average dissolved oxygen concentration in the effluent shall not fall below 5.0 mg/L. 4. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week June 1 through September 30 and once per week October 1 through May 31. Due to your membership in the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association, instream monitoring required by this permit is provisionally waived. It will be immediately reinstated should you end your participation in the Association. 5. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 pg/L to be in compliance with this permit. However, you shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 pg/L. 6. See Special Condition A (3) regarding nutrients. 7. Chronic Toxicity. (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 76%: March, June, September, and December; see Special Condition A (2). Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals monitoring. 8. See Special Condition A (4) regarding effluent pollutant scan. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam. • Permit NC0020834 A (2)-CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 76%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Permit NC0020834 A (3) NUTRIENT REDUCTION (1) Point source dischargers in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin are subject to the terms and conditions of the Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Implementation Strategy: Phase 111(the "Agreement"), agreed to on April 14, 2005; and the nutrient TMDL for the Basin, approved by the USEPA on August 10, 1995. (2) The Permittee is a member of the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association, which consists of the following fifteen facilities: Membership of Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Permit Owner Facility NC0030317 City of Rocky Mount Tar River Regional WWTP NC0023931 Greenville Utilities Commission GUC WWTP NC0020605 Town of Tarboro Tarboro WWTP NC0025054 City of Oxford Oxford WWTP NC0020648 City of Washington Washington WWTP NC0069311 Franklin County Franklin County WWTP N00020.834 Town of Warrenton Warrenton WWTP NC0026042 Town of Robersonville Robersonville WWTP NC0020231 Town of Louisburg Louisburg WWTP NC0026492 Town of Belhaven Belhaven WWTP NC0025402 Town of Enfield Enfield WWTP NC0023337 Town of Scotland Neck Scotland Neck WWTP NC0020061 Town of Spring Hope Spring Hope WWTP NC0020435 Town of Pinetops Pinetops WWTP NC0042269 Town of Bunn Bunn WWTP (3) The Agreement defines nitrogen and phosphorus caps for the Association as follows: Phase III Nutrient Caps - Tar -Pamlico Basin Association' Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus (Ib/yr) (kg/yr) (Ib/yr) (kg/yr) 891,272 404,274 161,070 73,060 1) Includes allowed adjustment to the 1991 baseline The Agreement also specifies that the Association has properly accrued and banked nitrogen offset credits in the following amounts: Nitrogen Offset Credits - Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Nitrogen Credits Timeframe (lb) (kg) Phase I 10,138 4,608 Phase II 30,276 .13,762 Phase III 10,564 4,802 Permit NC0020834 (4) Consistent with TMDL requirements of 40 C.F.R. 122.44(d)(1), 122.44(d)(1)(vii)(A) and (B), and Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the federal Clean Water Act, the Phase 111 nutrient caps and applied credits are hereby incorporated into this permit as enforceable limitations on the aggregate discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus by the Association, as follows: (5) Nutrient Load Limits — Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus (Ib/yr) (kg/yr) (lb/yr) (kg/yr) Nutrient Caps 891,272 404,274 161,070 73,060 Applied Credits 0 0 N/A N/A Effective Load Limits 891,272 404,274 161,070 73,060 In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Phase III Agreement, the Association may apply additional nitrogen offset credits in anticipation of future exceedances. Application of credits shall be made through modification of the members' NPDES permits. (6) The Division reserves the rght to reopen this permit and make appropriate modifications in the event that: (7) a. The current Agreement is revised to add or modify the nutrient caps, reporting requirements, or other requirements relevant to this permit. b. The terms of the Agreement are violated, in which case the Division will implement the strategy in Section X. of the Agreement, Violation of Terms of this Agreement. c. The Director determines that additional requirements, including effluent limitations, are necessary to prevent localized adverse impacts to water quality. No later than March 1 of each year, the Association shall prepare an annual report of its performance for the previous calendar year to the Division at the following address: Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch Attn: Tar -Pamlico NPDES Coordinator 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 The report shall include each member's monthly mass loadings and the Association's aggregate annual loadings for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus for the subject calendar year. A (4) POLLUTANT ANALYSIS The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the attached table (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). Samples should represent seasonal variations, being taken at different times in the different years. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable." Ammonia (as N) Chlorine (total residual, TRC) Dissolved oxygen Nitrate/Nitrite Total Kjeldahl nitrogen Oil and grease Total Phosphorus Total dissolved solids Hardness Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury (Method 1631 E) Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Cyanide Total phenolic compounds Volatile organic compounds: Acrolein Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromoform Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodibromomethane Chloroethane 2-chloroethylvinyl ether Chloroform Dichlorobromomethane 1,1-dichloroethane 1,2-dichloroethane Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene 1,1-dichloroethylene '1,2-dichloropropane 1,3-dichloropropylene Ethylbenzene Methyl bromide Methyl chloride Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene Toluene 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,1,2-trichloroethane Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Acid -extractable compounds: P-chloro-m-cresol 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,4-dimethylphenol 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 2,4-dinitrophenol 2-nitrophenol 4-nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Base -neutral compounds: Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzidine Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene 3,4 benzofluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane Permit NC0020834 Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether Butyl benzyl phthalate 2-chloronaphthalene 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether Chrysene • Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1,3-dichlorobenzene 1,4-dichlorobenzene 3,3-dichlorobenzidine Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate 2,4-dinitrotoluene 2,6-dinitrotoluene 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Fluoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Isophorone Naphthalene Nitrobenzene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosodiphenylamine Phenanthrene Pyrene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DMR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the Director, within 90 days of sampling. A copy of the report shall be submitted to Central Files to the following address: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617. This submittal must also be included with the next permit renewal application form. REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Warrenton WWTP NC0020834 Time Period 0 Ow (MGD) 2 7010S (cfs) 1 7010W (cfs) 0 3002 (cis) 8.9 Avg. Stream Flow, OA (cfs) 46.7 Rec'ving Stream Example Creek WWTP Class IV 1WC (%) @ 7Q10S 75.61 ® 7010W N/A 3002 25.833 ® QA 6.2249 Stream Class C Outfall 001 Qw = 2 MGD PARAMETER TYPE (1) STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NC WQS/ ff FAy/ Chronk Acute n • Dot Max Prod Ca. MowtbN Cw Arsenic C 50 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<12 Limited data 1.5 set Acute: N/A _ _ Chronic: •— 803—• ——•---•—•-------�—�——•------- Beryllium C 6.5 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<12 Umited data 1.0 set Acute: N/A Chron�: •104-- ---•-----•—•--------------------- Cadmium NC 2 15 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<12 Ltmited data 1.0 set Acute: 15 Chronic: •-- 3 -- ---•---•—•—•-------•—•—•---•---•— Chromium NC 50 1,022 ug/L 4 0 Nola: n<12 Limited data 2.5 set Acute: 1,022 Chronic:- 66 -- —•---•—•—•—•—•—•—•---•— -----•--- Copper NC 7 AL 7.3 ug/L 17 17 309.5 Acute: 7 RP demonstrated, as action level paramer contineu quarter sampling _ Cyanide NC 5 N 22 10 ug/L 4 1 Note: n<12 Limited data 82.5 set Acute: 22 __ Chronic:_ 7 RP demonstrated by one result over the standard. Will Include quarterly monitoring ---•—•---•—•-----•—•------- --- — Fluoride NC 1,800 ug/L 0 0 N/A Acute: WA Lead NC 25 N 33.8 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<12 Limited data 2.5 set Acute: 34 Chronb: •—• 33 — — —•— - —•— —�—•— ——•—�—�— — Mercury NC 12 2.0000 ng/L 4 1 Note: n<12 Limited data 1.0000 set Acute: WA Chronic: •—• 1fi -- ——•-------•---•---•---•--- — — Molybdenum A 3,500 ugIL 0 0 N/A Acute: N/A _ _ _ _ Chron0: 13,548 - ----•-----------•——__.—.—.---_— Nickel NC 88 261 ug/L 1 1 Note: n<12 Umited data WA set Acute: 261 Chronic: �—�116—• — -—�—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—_—•—�—�—�—•— Phenols A 1 N ug/L 0 0 N/A Acute: N/A Selenium NC 5.0 56 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<12 Limited data N/A set Acute: 56 Chronic: --- 7--- ---•-------------------- —___ —_— Silver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ug/L 4 0 Note: n<72 Limited data 2.5 set Acute: 1 _ _ --- --- Chronic: 0 --- --- --------------------------- Zinc NC 50 AL 67 ug/L 17 17 209.8 Acute: 67 _ _ _ Chronic: —• -- RP demonstrated, as action level paramer conttneu quarter sampling --------___________________ Legend:: C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic " Freshwater Discharge Warrenton rpa 20834, rpa 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Arsenic Beryllium 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data < < T; =_ ='x Tam tr - „' ,. tea" . . = . a: ` = _ +r ` _ = , BDL=1/2DL 3.0 1.5 3.0 15 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 4 1.0000 1.5 ug/L 1.5 ug/L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data < < < < `I BDL=1/2DL 2 1.0 2 1.0 2 1.0 2 1.0 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 4 1.0000 1.0 ug/L 1.0 ug/L Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Cadmium Chromium 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data < < < < BDL=1/2DL 2 1.0 2 1.0 2 1.0 2 1.0 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 4 1.0000 1.0 ug/L 1.0 ug/L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data < < < -< ,. d = .*1 :mow rry r: =9 .-a r...i t;' BDL=1/2DL 5 2.5 5 2.5 5 2.5 5 2.5 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw 0.0000 2.5000 0.0000 4 1.0000 2.5 ug/L 2.5 ug/L -2- Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Copper Cyanide Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 11.0 Std Dev. 20.0160 1 < 5 5.0 Std Dev. 5.0000 2 13 13.0 Mean 16.5294 2 < 5 5.0 Mean 7.5000 3 C.V. 1.2109 3 < 5 5.0 C V. 0.6667 4 12 12.0 n 17 4 Mar-2008 ; 15 15.0 n 4 5 5 6 I 10.0 Mult Factor= 4.6200 6 -x Mult Factor= 5.5000 7 60 60.0 Max. Value 67.0 ug/L 7 x` Max. Value 15.0 ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 309.5 ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw 82.5 ug/L 9 9 10 5 5.0 10 11 67 67.0 11 . s 12 12 e."a 13 13 14 5 5.0 14 15 14 14.0 15411 16 5 5.0 16 17 i 5 5.0 17 18 5 5.0 18 fn 19 44 44.0 19 -"" 20 5 5.0 20 21 5 5.0 21 «;j 22 5 5.0 22 23 23 24 10 10.0 24 25 25 =,= 26 26 41 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 ` >4 35 35 36 36 1 37 . _ 37 38 38 39 39 r 40 r 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 `� 45 =_ 45 46 46 47 . 47 48 48 49 49 50 fV,5 50 51 51 52 52 53 53 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 199 199 200 200 -3- Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Fluoride Lead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A 0.0 ug/L N/A ug/L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data < = :. J `_ '= - - 1 5 5 5 5 BDL=1/2DL 2 5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Results Std Dev. Mean C.V. n Mult Factor = Max. Value Max. Pred Cw 0.0000 2.5000 0.0000 4 1.0000 2.5 ug/L 2.5 ug/L -4- Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Mercury Molybdenum Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 1.01 1.0 Std Dev. 0 0000 2 <: 1 1.0 Mean 1.0000 3 <`: 1 1.0 C.V. 0.0000 4 1 1.0 n 4 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 1.00 1.0 ng/L 1.0 ng/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 Std Dev. NO DATA 2 Mean NO DATA 3 C.V. NO DATA 4 n 0 5 6 Mult Factor = N/A 7 Max. Value 0.0 ug/L 8 Max. Pred Cw N/A ug/L 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 -5- Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Selenium Silver Date Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 BDL=1/2DL Results 2 #REFI Std Dev. #REFI 2 1.0 Mean #REF! 2 1.0 C.V. #REFI 2 1.0 n 4 Mult Factor = N/A Max. Value #REF! ug/L Max. Pred Cw N/A ug/L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.5000 < 5 2.5 C.V. 0.0000 < 5 2.5 n 4 Mult Factor = 1.0000 Max. Value 2.5 ug/L Max. Pred Cw 2.5 ug/L 7 Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Zinc Date Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 BDL=1/2DL Results 63 63.0 Std Dev 23.1469 59. 59.0 Mean 58.8235 80. 80.0 C.V. 0.3935 32. 32.0 n 17 61. 61.0 73. 73.0 Mult Factor = 1.8400 as. 85.0 Max. Value 114.0 ug/L 40. 40.0 Max. Pred Cw 209.8 ug/L 44. 44.0 59. 59.0 46. 46.0 114. 114.0 42. 42.0 90 90.0 3a. 38.0 43.0 3+. 31.0 -8- Warrenton rpa 20834, data 5/4/2010 Vinzani, Gil From: Nisely, Myrl Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:23 PM To: Vinzani, Gil Cc: Herzberg, Barry Subject: FW: Warrenton Attachments: NC0020834 Warrenton WWTP, 03-09.pdf; NC0020834 NCG110087 Warrenton 03-09.doc; Memo to File 2 5_10.docx Gil, The last Warrenton inspection was by Dave Parnell, RRO in March 2009. Letter and inspection checklist are attached. In addition, a memo to file from a proactive call received from Bill Perkinson, ORC. There was a related newspaper article that I inserted into our permit file, but I cannot find an electronic version. Can fax it to you if you are interested. Some of the citizen comments in reaction to the future increase in utility rates were pretty funny. RRO heartily recommends issuing the draft permit. Myrl Nisely Barry, please enter this as a staff report in your Staff Report database. Thanks From: Parnell, David Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:45 PM To: Nisely, Myrl Subject: Warrenton Dave Parnell Environmental Specialist NCDENR- Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Office (919) 791-4260 Fax (919) 788-7159 Please note my email address has changed to david.parnell@ncdenr.gov E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. i Vinzani, Gil From: Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:24 PM To: Vinzani, Gil Subject: RE: re NC0020834, Warren Co. WWTP EPA has no comments on this draft permit. 1 E North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Gil Vinzani, Surface Water Protection Section — Point Source Branch Division of Water Quality FROM: Shari L. Bryant, Piedmont Region Coordinator --ZILa- - i��. �e Habitat Conservation Program DATE: 9 March 2010 SUBJECT: NPDES Permit Renewal for Town of Warrenton, Warren County Wastewater Treatment Plant, Warren County, NPDES Permit No. NC0020834 Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.), and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 10I.0102. The Town of Warrenton has applied for a renewal of its NPDES permit to discharge treated wastewater into Fishing Creek in the Tar -Pamlico River basin. There are records for the federal and state endangered Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana); the federal species of concern and state endangered Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) and yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolata); the federal species of concern and state significantly rare pinewoods shiner (Lythrurus matutinus); the state threatened triangle floater (Alasmidonta undulata), Least brook lamprey (Lampetra aepyptera), and creeper (Strophitus undulatus); and the state special concern North Carolina spiny crayfish (Orconectes carolinensis), Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi), and notched rainbow (Villosa constricta) in Fishing Creek. The Significant Natural Heritage Area — Fishing Creek Aquatic Habitat — is located adjacent to, upstream, and downstream of the discharge. The public notice indicates BOD, ammonia nitrogen, and total residual chlorine are water quality limited. Freshwater mussels are among the most sensitive aquatic organisms tested for impacts from ammonia, and ammonia may be a significant limiting factor for unionids (Augspurger et al., 2003). Augspurger et al. (2003) found that ammonia concentrations that may be protective of freshwater mussels range from 0.3 to 1.0 mg/L total ammonia as N at pH 8. We are concerned about impacts to Tar spinymussel and other listed aquatic species in Fishing Creek. Therefore, we offer the following recommendations to reduce impacts to aquatic resources. Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028 • Page 2 9 March 2010 Warren County Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES Permit No. NC0020834 1. If the wastewater treatment plant uses chlorine systems for disinfection, these should be replaced by ultraviolet light or ozone systems. Chlorine is acutely toxic to aquatic organisms and can form secondary compounds that are detrimental to aquatic life. Valenti (2006) concluded the impact of long term exposure to low doses of chlorine may impact juvenile mussels and reduce the chance of them being recruited to the reproducing population. 2. If current ammonia limits exceed those listed above, we recommend a re-evaluation of the ammonia limits based on the research discussed above and readjusting the limits. Please contact Tom Augspurger with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at (919) 856-4520 for additional information. 3. If not already in place, we suggest the installation of a stand-by power system. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit renewal. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (336) 449-7625. Literature cited Augspurger, T., A. E. Keller, M. C. Black, W. G. Cope, and F. J. Dwyer. 2003. Derivation of water quality guidance for protection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) from ammonia exposure. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22(11):2569-2575. Valenti, T.W., D.S. Cherry, R.J. Currie, R.J. Neves, J.W. Jones, R. Mair, and C.M. Kane. 2006. Chlorine toxicity to early life stages of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25(9):2512-2518. ec: Rob Nichols, NCWRC Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below. Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may hold a public hearing should there be a significant degree of public Interest. Please mall comments and/or information requests to DWQ at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to review information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: www.ncwaterquality.org, or by calling (919) 807-6304. The Town of Warrenton has requested renewal of NPDES Permit NC0020834 to discharge treated wastewater to Fishing Creek in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. o` ,E LEE �'tc,o o ., it1OTk 0 Affidavit of Printer's Proof NORTH CAROLINA WARREN COUNTY I, C .1i 1e, i l l er, Editor or Office Manager of The Warren Record, a weekly newspaper publication in the town of Warrenton, Warren County, and state of North Carolina, do so solemnly swear that a legal action entitled: . $n4le-P. a true copy of which is made a part of this affidavit, did appear in the said The Warren Record in the following consecutive issues: 3 J10/ 20 Edito r Office Manager Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of mat , 20 IQ . Notary Public My commission expires: tca`ta `11 . Pubila �Notice: • • Management CammissionlNi DENS -Unit- r' '1617 Mali rVicerCenter Rateis(t, NC 27699,16171 .Not of f` I dto ,sire o ,NPR ,, • . l en hC`.omrnitisstt flnvirmaerilssuee a. N .DESwastewater rite ,rmittothe' person(s)listed bet , Written com. ents p�rdtn'' the;proposed ; acce ei! until 30.days after ; s Mite. The Director t ere , a significant' rea�of public�ln%Fest:+Pleose° mail comments and/or• information regUpsis to DWQ at.,the . above address. Interested • -•ppeersons•ritaY visit,;the DCWQ at.512'N. Saiis- 'tr n of ; B Aee ditldhall raiutipnno ••NPDES permitssand.•tills natt - etnoy be fo bn ateiqubsltl3:. ; . • ncworeraualttY orgy eir by acL lnl(lpi{s (9i99rl`e807:6 : hard llevipli of NPbES'Pe '4it.N , is- i- a hargctreated Wa3� ter to Filhins C k •in the Tar-Pamiloa'�R ier.Baslr1; iN&O March 4, 2010 ti AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NORTH CAROLINA. Wake County. ) Ss. . termit will p1 'the Ubli d f t aylioid a p. btllc•he Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Wake County North Carolina, duly commissioned and authorized to administer oaths, affirmations, etc., personally appeared Debra Peebles, who, being duly swom or affirmed, according to law, doth depose and say that she is Accounts Receivable Specialist of The News and Observer a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of the State of North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper known as The News and Observer, in the City of Raleigh , Wake County and State aforesaid, the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and that as such she makes this affidavit; that she is familiar with the books, files and business of said corporation and by reference to the files of said publication the attached advertisement for NCDENR/ DWQ/ POINT SOURCE was inserted in the aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows: 03/04/10 Account Number: 80763040 The above is correctly copied from the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation and publication. Debra Peebles, Accounts Receivable Specialist Wake County, North Carolina Sworn or affirmed to, and subscribed before me, this 05 day of MARCH , 2010 AD by, Debra Peebles In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year aforesaid. #0e Ti. Winslow, Notary Public My commission expires 02nd day of June 2013. DENR/DWQ FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT NPDES No. NC0020834 Facility information Applicant/Facility Name: Town of Warrenton/Warrenton WWTP Applicant Address: P.O. Box 281; Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Facility Address: 738 US Highway 401 South, Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Permitted Flow 2.0 MGD Type of Waste: Domestic, Light industrial; no pretreatment program Facility/Permit Status: Class III /Active; Renewal County: Warren County Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Fishing Creek C NSW Regional Office: State Grid / USGS Quad: Raleigh (RRO) B26NW/Warrenton 303(d) Listed? Subasin: No 03-03-04 Permit Writer: Date: Gil Vinzani August 12, 2009 Drainage Area (mi`): 51.9 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) Average Flow (cfs): IWC (%): 1 8.9 46.7 76 Lat. 36° 22' 47" N Long. 78° 10' 07" W Background The Warrenton WWTP (Class III) has a permitted flow of 2.0 MGD. The current permit expires October 31, 2009, and the Town of Warrenton submitted an application for renewal in May 4, 2009. This facility receives primarily domestic (with some light industrial) wastewater. It has no Significant Industrial Users and does not implement a pretreatment program. The facility did not note any changes to the WWTP in their application. Warrenton WWTP discharges into Fishing Creek, classified C NSW at this point, in the Tar Pamlico Basin. A scan of the Basin Plan shows that the receiving waters are not listed as impaired on the current 303 (d) list. Since the Town of Warrenton is a member of the Tar Pamlico Nutrient Trading Association, their permit includes nutrient monitoring without limits. The required special condition language relating to nutrient reduction has been added to the permit. DMR Review DMR effluent data from January 2005 through June 2009 were reviewed. Daily average data are summarized below: 5- ear 2009 Flow BOD TSS (mg/L) NH3-N TN (mg/L) TP (mg/L) (MGD) (mg/L) (mg/L) 0.492 0.564 1.87 2.34 3.9 0.7 10.0 13.5 unknown 2.13 * Less than 2 mg/L Nutrient Controls History and Status of Nutrient Management Strategy for Point Sources. On September 12, 1989, the Environmental Managements Commission classified the Tar - Pamlico River Basin as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW). On February 13, 1992, the Commission approved a revised NSW Implementation Strategy that established the framework for a nutrient reduction trading program between point and nonpoint sources of pollution. The Strategy also established certain conditions to be met by an association of dischargers known as the Tar -Pamlico Basin Association (the Association). Those conditions are defined in the Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Implementation Strategy (the "Agreement"). The Association agreed to meet specific conditions in order to have the opportunity both to pursue alternative approaches to managing its nutrient discharges and to reduce nutrient loading in the most cost-effective manner, including the option to fund agricultural best management practices (BMPs). These conditions included the development of an estuarine hydrodynamic computer model, engineering evaluations of wastewater treatment plants, annual monitoring reports on nutrient loading, and minimum payments for the administration and implementation of agricultural BMPs. The Association met all conditions established in Phase I. The Phase I Agreement set collective, technology -based discharge loading limits for the Association in the form of an annually decreasing, combined nitrogen and phosphorus cap. During the 1990 to 1991 period, low cost operational changes were implemented at several facilities to reduce nitrogen loadings. The engineering evaluation of member facilities and implementation of the study's recommended nutrient removal improvements also yielded significant loading reductions. These changes, combined with installation of nutrient removal at several of the larger facilities, allowed the Association to reduce its nutrient loads and stay beneath its caps throughout Phase I. The Phase II Agreement spanned ten years from January 1995 through December 2004. Modeling of the Pamlico River estuary during Phase I provided a foundation for water quality - based loading goals for Phase II. Based on the estuary modeling, Phase II established overall performance goals for the nutrient strategy of 30 percent reduction in nitrogen loading from a baseline year of 1991 and no increase in loading of phosphorus from that baseline. Based on these goals, it also established nitrogen and phosphorus discharge loading caps for the Association. These caps also accounted for the load reductions achieved through operational changes implemented during the 1990/1991 period. The Association stayed beneath both caps throughout Phase II, steadily reducing its loading of both nutrients despite steady increases in flow. Overall, from 1990 through 2003, the Association decreased nitrogen loads to the river by approximately 45% and phosphorus loads by over 60%, while flows increased approximately 30%. The attached table summarizes caps and loads through 2008. The success of this collective cap approach may be attributed in part to the element of time it provided for individual facilities to implement nutrient removal as it became most cost-effective for them. Phase II also established requirements for non -Association point source dischargers and called for rulemaking to fully enact those requirements. That rulemaking became effective in April 1997. It required new and expanding dischargers over certain sizes to meet effluent concentration limits and to fully offset new or increased loads using the same offset approach developed for the Association. During Phase II, there were no new dischargers to the basin, and no existing dischargers became subject to the rule's requirements. Phase II also established instream nutrient goals for nonpoint sources and called for a separate nonpoint source (NPS) strategy. These were used to establish a nutrient TMDL, which was approved by the USEPA on August 10, 1995. Fact Shot N PI)ES NCO02OS ;4. IZ; nc\vai Page 2 The NPS strategy was put into effect in January 1996 as a voluntary effort that would work from existing programs, seeking additional funds and developing accounting tools. After two years of voluntary implementation, the EMC found progress insufficient and initiated nonpoint source rulemaking. Rules were fashioned after those recently adopted in the adjacent Neuse River basin. They addressed riparian buffer protection, agriculture, urban stormwater, and fertilizer management. The rules became effective during 2000 and 2001 and are currently in various stages of implementation. Phase III of this Agreement was approved by the EMC on April 14, 2005. It spans an additional ten years through December 31, 2014. This third phase continues the structure established in Phase II including overall performance goals for the nutrient strategy of 30 percent reduction in nitrogen loading from a baseline year of 1991 and no increase in loading of phosphorus from that baseline. The Phase III Agreement updated Association membership and related nutrient caps. It proposed action in the first two years to improve the offset rate, resolve related temporal issues, and revisit alternative offset options. The parties to the Agreement met several times during the first four years of the Agreement to work on addressing these action items and came to agreement on issues related to banked credit and credit life. In 2006 DWQ contracted the NCSU Water Quality Group to estimate the cost-effectiveness of agricultural BMPs to use for updating the nitrogen offset rate in the Agreement and to establish a phosphorus offset rate. As a result of the study, the parties to the Agreement indentified actions to be taken by the conclusion of Phase III and addressed in the Phase IV Agreement: 1. Evaluate whether the Agricultural Cost Share Program continues to provide the most efficient vehicle to implement the pollution credits trading program. This evaluation should consider the effect of delays in BMP implementation relative to nutrient cap exceedance and how such delays may impact the allowable point source nutrient budget. 2. Evaluate the trading offset credit cost calculation method to ensure the offset rate reflects all actual costs incurred in program development and implementation and reflects the costs of the type of agricultural BMPs implemented through this program. 3. Conduct a water quality trend analysis, including evaluation of TN losses occurring during transport to the estuary. This analysis will inform the parties regarding the need for changes in acceptable Toads and the relative impacts of point and non -point contributions. Fact Sheet N PDl :S N('€ 020834 Rcne„ ai agc 3 Nutrient Limits. Point source dischargers in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin are subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and to the nutrient TMDL developed for the Basin. The Agreement provided a cost-effective alternative to uniform technology -based nutrient concentration limits. It later added elements of the TMDL, including estuary loading goals and point and nonpoint source allocations. As of December 2009, the Association consists. of fifteen members. The member facilities are listed in the following table, and their locations are shown on the attached map. Membership of Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Permit Owner Facility NC0030317 City of Rocky Mount Tar River Regional WWTP NC0023931 Greenville Utilities Commission GUC WWTP NC0020605 Town of Tarboro Tarboro WWTP NC0025054 City of Oxford Oxford WWTP NC0020648 City of Washington Washington WWTP NC0069311 Franklin County Franklin County WWTP NC0020834 Town of Warrenton Warrenton WWTP NC0026042 Town of Robersonville Robersonville WWTP NC0020231 Town of Louisburg Louisburg WWTP NC0026492 Town of Belhaven Belhaven WWTP NC0025402 Town of Enfield Enfield WWTP NC0023337 Town of Scotland Neck Scotland Neck WWTP NC0020061 Town of Spring Hope Spring Hope WWTP NC0020435 Town of Pinetops Pinetops WWTP NC0042269 Town of Bunn Bunn WWTP The nitrogen and phosphorus caps for the Association are defined in the Phase III Agreement as follows: Phase III Nutrient Caps — Tar -Pamlico Basin Association' Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus (Ib/yr) (kg/yr) (Ib/yr) (kg/yr) 891,272 404,274 161,070 73,060 1 Includes allowed adjustment to the 1991 baseline The Agreement further provides that the Association may accrue and bank nitrogen credits by funding nonpoint source nutrient reduction measures (e.g., agricultural BMPs) and that it may purchase credits or apply banked credits in anticipation of future cap exceedances. The current Agreement specifies that the Association holds offset credits in the following amounts: Fact She.! NP1)I S NCoo.2Os;4 Rcncwai Pag'4 Nitrogen Offset Credits — Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Nitrogen Credits Timeframe (lb) (kg) Phase I 10,138 4,608 Phase II 30,276 13,762 Phase III 10,564 4,802 The Association has consistently and reliably kept its nutrient loadings beneath the caps without relying on banked credits. By calendar year 2008, the group had reduced its loads to 63% of its nitrogen cap and 60% of the phosphorus cap. Since the Tar -Pamlico strategy's inception, the EPA has praised the strategy for its innovative and integrative approach to nutrient management and has touted it repeatedly as a model for others to use. However, guidance released by the EPA's Office of Water Management in 2007 re -iterates that federal NPDES regulations (40 C.F.R. 122.44(d)(1)) and Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the federal Clean Water Act require that NPDES permits include any applicable limitations established in or based upon an approved TMDL. The Tar -Pamlico permits have not included nutrient limits, because the Agreement specified the Association's caps and, until recently, the EPA Region 4 office had accepted that approach. In light of the 2007 guidance, Region 4 has modified its position on the matter and is requiring that the members' permits include the group nutrient limits at this time and individual limits in 2014. Therefore, the Division proposes at this time to include the Phase III nutrient caps as enforceable permit limits in the members' individual permits. These limits, like the caps, apply to the aggregate discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus by the Association members as a group. In order to establish individual nutrient limits by 2014, the Division must conduct additional technical studies (e.g., determine delivery rates for each discharger, develop individual N and P allocations) and work with the Association to complete major revisions to the Tar -Pamlico strategy and the Agreement. It is also likely that the Division must adopt rules to provide for the operation of the Association under a group NPDES permit. Annual Nutrient Loads and Caps, Tar -Pamlico Basin Association Phase I Combined 19911 19921 19931 19941 N+P Loading Cap a N (kg/yr) 525,00 500,00 475,000 425,000 0 0 Actual Load N (kg/yr) 461,39 436,12 417,217 371,200 4 8 % of Cap N 88 87 88 87 Average Daily Flow (MGD) 24.88 26.86 28.46 26.65 Fact Sheet NPDES NCOu20S 4 Renewal Page 5 Phase II Separate 19952 19962 19972 19982 19992 20002 20013 20024 20034 20044 20055 2006 2007 2008 N. P Loading Cap a 405,256 405,256 405,256 405,256 405,256 405,256 421,972 426,782 426,782 426,782 404,274 404,274 404,274 404,274 N (kg/yr) P (kg/yr) 69,744 69,744 69,744 69,744 69,744 69,744 73,060 73,694 73,694 73,694 73,060 73,060 73,060 73,060 Actual . Load 372,582 354,219 320,670 344,781 309,476 297,988 279,958 279,330 309,724 256,791* 242,020 232,568 246,465 253,818 N (kg/yr) P (kg/yr) 37,360 43,266 36,532 36,864 32,052 30,277 32,730 34,076 30,856 33,566* 39,267 46,995 50,077 43,821 % of Cap 92 87 79 85 76 74 66 65 72 60* 60 58 61 63 N P 54 62 52 53 46 43 45 46 42 45* 54 64 69 60 Average Daily Flow 31.03 33.57 29.84 33.31 33.39 32.74 30.21 30.54 36.86 29.56 29.21 32.85 27.05 27.39 (MGD) Loads were estimated by NC Division of Water Quality as the sum of calendar -year monthly load values for each facility. which are based on minimum biweekly nutrient concentrations and daily mass flows. a Cap values and changes result from the following: 1. Phase I - Original 12-member Association. 2. Phase II through 2000 - 14-member Association. 3. Robersonville added in 2001, making a 15-member Association. 4. Scotland Neck added in 2002, making a 16-member Association. 5. National Spinning Removed in 2005, making a 15 member Association in Phase III Fact sheet addendum with revisions — May 2010 RPA Analysis Copper and Zinc data were scanned from the DMRs and from the submitted PPAs (see attached). Although reasonable potential to exceed WO standards at levels toxic to aquatic life was present, the plant has consistently passed its toxicity tests. It is therefore recommended that quarterly sampling continue. Cyanide had one hit over the detection level (15pg/L compared to 5pg/L). The decision was made to require quarterly monitoring for this parameter, to acquire more data during this next renewal period. Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, and silver either did not show any hits above the quantitation limits or did not show reasonable potential. Compliance The Warrenton WWTP has not received any NOVs since January of 2005. The facility has also been in compliance with its toxicity limit during this entire permit term. Summary of Proposed Changes In keeping with Division policies, the following will be incorporated into the permit: • Special condition A. (3) for nutrient reduction was added (see above). This change has been made in the permit renewals for each member of the Tar -Pamlico Association. It includes the Phase III nutrient caps as enforceable permit limits in each members' individual permit. These limits, like the caps, apply to the aggregate discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus by the Association members as a group. • The special condition for mercury monitoring was removed. Method 1631 is specified within the PPA list, and will be required for all mercury sampling in the future. • The TRC limit was reduced to 22 ug/L, to agree with the IWC of 75.6%. This will not be a substantial change, since the new footnote for TRC compliance allows all values below the quantification level (50ug/L) to be considered compliant. • Added TKN and Nitrite -Nitrate monthly composite sampling, as per strategy for Association - member renewals in the Tar -Pamlico basin (see previous discussion under "Nutrient Controls". • A modification made after the public comment period includes quarterly monitoring for cyanide, in response to the 15pg/L sampling hit in the March 2008 PPA. Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: March 3, 2010 May 2010 NPDES Contact If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Gil Vinzani at (919) 807-6395. SIGNED: Regional Office Comments: See attached DATE: 5- i{ 2c2 U IWC Calculations Facility: Town of Warrenton WWTP NC0020834 Prepared By: GTV Enter Design Flow (MGD): Enter s7Q10 (cfs): Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 2 1 Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Maximum Limit (ug/I) s7Q10 (CFS) DESIGN FLOW (MGD) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) STREAM STD (UG/L) Upstream Bkgd (ug/I) IWC (%) Allowable Conc. (ug/I) Fecal Coliform Monthly Average Limit: (If DF >331; Monitor) (If DF<331; Limit) Dilution Factor (DF) 1 2 3.1 17.0 0 75.61 22 Ammonia (Summer) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1) s7Q10 (CFS) DESIGN FLOW (MGD) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) STREAM STD (MG/L) Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) IWC (%) Allowable Conc. (mg/I) Ammonia (Winter) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/I) w7Q10 (CFS) 200/100mI DESIGN FLOW (MGD) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.32 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) IWC (%) Allowable Conc. (mg/I) Total Residual Chlorine 1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity Ammonia (as NH3-N) 1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only 2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I 3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/1 4. BAT for Minor Domestics: 2 mg/I (summer) and 4 mg/I (winter) 5. BAT for Major Municipals: 1 mg/I (year-round) 1 2 3.1 1.0 0.22 75.61 1.3 0 2 3.1 1.8 0.22 100.00 1.8 Fecal Coliform 1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni) NPDES Server/Current Versions/WLA; TB 1/16/2009 Memo to File From: Myri Nisely February 5, 2010 Re: Telephone Conversation w/ Bill Perkinson on Conditions at Warrenton WWTP Permit No. NC0020834 Bill initiated the call. Authorities in Warren County government have recently been sensitized to the fact that the plant is now 30 years old and is showing signs of needed infrastructure repair. Several have visited the treatment plant (some for the first time) and were able to see the status of the clarifiers and tertiary filters, along with general conditions. The county was able to secure a grant from CWMTF for some $50,000 to study plant conditions. This report has helped convince all that planning must begin to put money into the plant. There has been a well -written newspaper article recently that speaks for the likely need for utility rate increases in coming years. (attached — the public comments at the end, too.) They are currently seeking grant money of about $850, 000 to upgrade the two secondary clarifiers and to install SCADA. The tertiary filters will receive attention after these higher priority needs are satisfied. Walter M. Gardner, Jr. Mayor TOWN OF WARRENTON Historically Great - Progressively Strong" P 0 Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589-0281 John Freeman Administrator August 21, 2009 Mr. Charles Weaver NC DENR-DWQ-NPDES 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mr. Weaver: I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you on the phone this morning. I understand from a series of emails relating to our application for renewal of our operating permit that there is some confusion about the status of the Warren County Waste Water Treatment Plant, with the implication that the plant owner must also be the permittee. Through the 1970's the Town of Warrenton operated its own treatment plant on Town owned property. That plant was designed primarily to serve contemporary Town needs which did not include the real and planned growth of the county. Soul City was expected to become a major population center and infrastructure had to be provided for it and other anticipated county growth. Because the Town facility was dated and inadequate to meet largely county needs it was decided that the county would build a new regional treatment plant on county property adjacent to the existing plant. This new county plant was completed in 1980 and a thirty year management agreement was signed in September 1980 under which the Town staff would operate the plant under the existing Town permit with expenses divided among three entities (Warrenton, Norlina and Warren County). This made sense for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was that Town staff then —as now —had the necessary experience. As a full management contract, the Town is responsible for hiring personnel, ensuring their training and certifications, and all compliance issues. The county takes no responsibility for personnel and compliance. That is how it stands today —the county owns the plant which is operated by the Town under a longstanding management agreement based on the Town's permit. To my knowledge the fact that the owner and permittee are separate entities has not been an issue in the past. It is important to us that this arrangement continues into the future through a renegotiated contract next year, and the Town will not voluntarily yield its permit. I hope this helps explain what may be an unusual situation. Our Town staff, Mayor and Commissioners would be pleased to discuss this matter with you or to provide any additional information that you require. Thank you again for the opportunity of speaking with you about the treatment plant and our application for permit renewal. incerely, ‘‘,,/ hn Freeman own Administrator 252-257-1122 RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2009 DENR - WATER QUALITY POINT SOURCE BRANCH ? OT4TH CAROLINA • WARREN COUNT1 • ftt♦3T•'1 •TZ T :�•n1�•T. T ! V�jf T::X •G!it ��•,�t ^\ T iI11�Jt. �t1 :•.�t� 1!?.�•tl�'t�•Lt1. JLAJi.�HI fil7.►•�•r.'�..�1�:. THIS AGREEMENT, made and c,' ered into by and among WJC 1N COUNTY, herein- after referred to as the "COUNT—, ', a body politic and corporate, exiatinL pursuant to the laws of the Sta.'. of North Carolina; the TOWN Or WAR ENTON, hereinafter referred to as "„A-ztRi3N'ON", a municipal corporation organized (lnci existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina; and the TOWN OF NOHLIN;. . hereinafter referred to as "NORLINA", a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, both municipalities being situated in Warren County, North Carolina. 1TNESSET H: THAT WHEREAS, pursuant to a 201 Area Plan for Western Warren County, Warren County is in the process of completing construction of a regional waste- water treatment plant which will complete a project providing sewer service6 for Western Warren County, Warrenton and Norlina. The total estimated cost of the treatment plant project is 5.79 million dollars, and WHEREAS, , Warren County has financed and will continue to finance the construction cost of the regional wastewater treatment system, including the treatment plant, intercepter lines, a forced main, and other facilities ne ca-- sary to provide wastewater treatment for Norlina, Warrenton and the area of land now included in the Soul City Sanitary District, with a combination of Federal, State and local funds, and WHE EAS , Warrenton and Norlina are authorized by Chapter 160A, Article 161 Part 1, of the General Statutes of North Carolina, to acquire, construct, estab- lish, enlarge, improve, maintain, own and operate sewage collection .and ui*- posal systems and are permitted to enter into contracts with other units of local government pursuant to Chapter 160A, Article 20, of the General Statutes of North Carolina, to execute such functions, and WHEREAS, W rren County has similar authorization pursuant to North Caro- lina General Statutes Section 153A-271i(2), 153A-275, and 1.53A--41i5, raid •.2 Wh?i23AS, each of the parties hereto dcaires to enter into this joint wastewater treatment :.system ,lgrecmcnt , and has, through actions of its respective Boards of Commissioners, been duly authorized to enter into this Agreement for such purposes a: hereinafter stated. NOW, THER3FOR131 in consideration of the mutual covcnanty and agreements contained herein, the parties do covenant and agree, each for itself and its respective successors and assigns, as follows: 1. AUTHORIZATION; EFFZCTIV , i1 T . Each party hereby certifies that authority to enter into this Agreement has been established by a duly passed Resolution of its respective Board of Commissioners. This Agreement shall become effective upon the signature of all duly authorized parties and shall continue in force until such time as it ex- pires by its terms, is terminated or modified as provided herein. ' 2. PURPOSE. • The purpose of this Agreement is to provide an efficient wastewater treat- ment system for the benefit of Warrenton, Norlina, that area of Western Warren County now comprised within the limits of the Soul City Sanitary District, and other persons, firms, corporations and governmental units desiring wastewater treatment and agreeing to purchase wastewater treatment services in accordance with this Agreement. 3. TERM. This Agreement shall exist and continue for a period of thirty (30) years from the effective date hereof. IT IS EXPRESSLY AGR 'D that this Agreement may be renewed or extended for such term ofterms as may be mutually agreeable to the parties hereto, and itchall be binding during its term, and all extensions and renewals thereof, on the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. 4. TITLE. The title to all lands, rights -of -way, easements, forced sewer main, inter ceptcr,, and All facilities located thereon, Funded and acquired by Warren County, shall be and remain vested in Warren County. In order to operate and maintain the wastewater treatment system, the County hereby agrees to lease to Warrenton, upon such terns and conditions as chall be :.yet forth in a sepfiraLe • Lease Agreement between the County and Warrenton, all property, real and personal, necessary for the operation of said system, which Lease shall con- tain provisions providing; for tho use of the property leased for the benefit of the parties hereto, and subject to the contractual interests of said partieq. 5. SERVICES PROVIDED. D. Upon the completion of construction of the wastewater system and transfer of the property and facilities to Warrenton, Warrenton agrees to operate and maintain the wastewater treatment system in the following manner: (a) It :hall maintain a separate regional sewage system account, and all revenues and disbursements received or expended in connection with said wa&tewater treatment system shall be deposited•in and disbursed from said account. •(b) It shall furnish and pay from the revenue received from said wastewater treatment system all labor, utilities, supplies, administration and other maintenance and operating costs necessary for the efficient operation of said system. •(c) It shall operate saicl sewage cyotem so as to provide treatment of wastewater received by said system from the parties hereto and other users accepted to use said cys tern. (d) It shall maintain and keep in proper repair all of the forced main and intercepters which are a part of this system, provided that it chall not be responsible for maintaining aewer lines and sewer facilities under the terms of this Agreement which are located within the corporate limits of Warrenton, Norlina, or the Soul City Sanitary Diatrict, or any extensions thereof, presently existing or hereafter constructed. (e) It shall furnish to the parties- hereto an operating statement of income and expenses each month. An independent auditing fire reasonably acceptable to all partiec shall audit the accounts of the operation of the regional sewage aystew no bus than once each year, and sufficient copies of the audit shall be made available to the parties hereto. Mb 3 (f) It shall have the authority to permit other users and customers to tap on to said sewer system, subject to the approval of the County. 6, ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICES. Norlina agrees to accept the sewer services as herein provided and to use the system for disposal of wastewater from its customers within the corporate limits and those customers outside of the city limits served by the Norlina sewer system, and it further agrees to*pay the cost of such services in ac- cordance with the terms of this .agreement. The County agrees to accept the sewer services as herein provided for the benefit of such persons, firms, corporations and other governmental units as it may desire to transfer or assign its allocated portion of sewage treatment capacity. The County shall be responsible for payment of all costs of sewage treatment used by it for obligations it may assume, its transferees and as- signs, in accordance with charges applicable to the other parties, provided that it is understood and agreed that the users of the County portion of the treatment capacity may reimburse the County for the services used or the County! may notify Warrenton to render statements directly to each user, whereupon the user shall be liable. In any event, that portion of the services used on be- half of the County shall be charged and paid in an amount equal to that charged: and paid by Norlina and Warrenton. Warrenton agrees to accept the sewer services as herein provided and to use the system for disposal of wastewater from its customers within the corporate limits and those customers outside of the city limits served by its sewer system. It further. y agrees to pay the cost of such services in accordance. with the terms of this Agreement from its separate revenues in the same manner as the other parties and users. . 7. ALLOCATION OF CAPACITY. The respective parties hereto shall have the right at any time to purchase without any cost other than that set out herein, the following percentages of the total sewage treatment capacity of the original plant: (a) ,Darren County (b) Warrenton ' (c) Norlina 58'; 25ZJ 1Th The allocation of treatment capacity in respect to the original plant shall not be changed except by mutual agreement of all the parties hereto. In the event any party to this Agreement shall need treatment capacity over and above its original allocation, it shall have the right to purchase from the other parties their unused capacity on terms mutually agreeable. "Unused capacity" as used in this paragraph shall mean the difference between the capacity allocated to a party and the maximum actual daily flow of sewage for treatment reasonably anticipated by that party to occur during the succeeding twelve --month period. In the event any party needs treatment capacity in addition to the originail .allocation, and is unable to obtain it from the other parties from their paused'. capacity, it shall have the right to expand the treatment plant and any other facilities necessary for the delivery of such additional capacity at its own expense, provided it does not act to the. detriment of any of the other partieu. Its allocation of capacity available for purchase shall thereafter be in- creased by the amount of additional treatment capacity which can be delivered to it by reason of said expansion. 8. METERING. It is agreed that all wastewater being treated, the wastewater entering the transmission line from the area comprising the Soul City Sanitary District, and the wastewater entering the transmission line from Norlina, Warrenton and other users on the system, shall each be accurately metered so as to provide Warrenton with the exact amounts of wastewater treated for each party or authorized user. All parties shall have the right to inspect and approve the metering devices. 9. NON --PROFIT OP I ATi0N. IT IG UNDERST0OD AND AGU;•.D that Warrenton is not eng;i.ging in the saic of sewage treatment to the other parties to this Agreement, or other users con- n ec tech to the system, for a profit. The par tied and other users shall be charged for raid sewage treatment 'on the basis of actual coat of production, which shall include the cost of salaries of personnel, utilities, su: Alien, administration and audits. While "cost of production" shall not include amortization of the initial cost of the system, it shall include provision:: for any reasonable reserves for repairs to and maintenance of the system, for other reasonable.contingencies relative to the system, and for amortization and reasonable rental of any equipment, vehicles, and other property purchased or used by Warrenton for the operation and maintenance of the system. All "cost of production" shall relate directly to. the operation and maintenance of the regional system, and shall not include any cost for separate sewer systems operated by the parties or users. 10. BILLING AND DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE. Each of the parties hereto shall be rendered a statement for services on the first day of each month, and the parties shall pay Warrenton within fiftee4 (15) days of rendering the statement. Warrenton shall have the right to dis- continue service to any party hereto, or any other customer using the system, who does not pay any funds owing to arrenton for services rendered pursuant ' to the terms of this Contract, and fails to remedy the failure to pay within fifteen (15) days after notice to the user. 11. RESALE. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AG2Z-ED that the parties hereto each have the right to sell the capacity allotted and used by it at such rates, fees, charges, penalties. and varying schedules as said party may individually determine. 12. INTERRUPTIONS OF St. VICE. Warren County and Warrenton :hall not be liable for any failure to recciv4 and treat cewa:e or otherwise perform this Contract in the event such failure is due to acts of God, strike, power failure, line breaks, system repairs, catastrophes or other causes beyond the contro.. of the County, !-,,irrenton, and .their a,;enta and employees. P2OVID�:i?, however, Warrenton nhall Give :ill parties using the system reasonable notice of any interruptions in service which might be reasonably anticipated. Warrenton, in agreeing to operate and maintain the wastewater system, shall not be liable for any cost of the system other than the charges for the sewer services it uses. It is understood and agreed by all. parties that the system is contemplated to operate within the revenues paid for cervices rendered, and neither party shall be obligated to pay additional fund; to the system above the cost of production without its consent. 13. COMPLIANCEE WITH LAW. In providing and receiving all services pursuant to this Contract, the parties shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations per- taining to or regulating the provision of such services, including those now in effect and those hereafter adopted. Arty violation of said statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations shall constitute a material breach of this Contract and shall entitle the parties to terminate this Contract immediately upon delivery of written notice to the party breaching the same. 14. ASSIGNM iT. It is agreed that any party to this Agreement may assign its interest and rights herein to any successor, PROVIDED, however, that such assignment shall be upon the condition that said assignee shall assume all of the as- signor's obligations hereunder, and be boundby the terms of this Agreement. 5. AM niDNENTS. This Agreement may be amended by the consent of all the parties hereto pursuant to resolution of their respective Boards of Commissioners. The parties agree that this Contract is entered into in order to provide more ef- ficient and economical wastewater treatment for the area of Warren County served by the wastewater treatment system, and that the relations be tween the parties shall be fair and equitable, with due regard to each participating party, according to their respective vested rights in the allocated portion of wastewater treatment capacity. If amendments to this Agreement arc necor jitat4 ed to provide improved services to the p<.irticu and other users, the parties agree that consent to such amendments will not hn unresir nn:ihl n wi thhnl rl . "`n this end the parties, acting through :their duly authorized representqcive3, agree to meet jointly at such tires as necessary to review the operation of the system. 16. ASSURANCES. The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that Federal funding; has been obtained and used in connection with the construction of the wastewater treat- ment system, and hereby agree to execute any and all documents required by Federal agencies providing the funds, relative to equal employment opportuni- ties and non-discrimination on the part of the recipient of said Federal grant:. , or its respective grantees, assigns and successors in interest. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,' the County of Warren, Town of Warrenton and Town of Norlina have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, all pursuant to resolutions passed by their respective gov-- . erning bodies. • (SEAL) • ATTEST: • Ai. it 4 (SEAL) ATTEST: .&6244./ /H. a (SEAL) ATTEST: / //1/( . WARREN COUNTY / BY: l� . ,'`�' VIalter . Barr is, GI ULMIAN • TOWN OF :l.L'?:; I°00 BY: (\":1 B. G. White, 1•IAiOR TO'.IN OF NOItLTNA BY: / 4i -1 E. L. i erry, HAM? • NORTH CAROLINA WARREN COUNTY MODIFICATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 3 , 51-' day of de---ec��. 2004, by and among WARREN COUNTY, the TOWN OF WARRENTON and the TOWN OF NORLINA, all being situated in Warren County, North Carolina, WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, on or about September 19, 1980, the parties hereto entered into a contract, a copy of which is hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, said Warren County, the Town of Warrenton and the Town of Norlina have each agreed to modify certain terms of said contract; and WHEREAS, each local government unit has approved this Modification Agreement by resolution of their respective Boards of Commissioners and authorized its execution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed, that in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained, the following portions of the Wastewater System Agreement are modified and changed as follows: 1. Paragraph 8. METERING is changed to add the following sentence as the second sentence: Each metering device shall be calibrated by a certified technician on an annual basis. 2. Paragraph 10. BILLING AND DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE changed to provide as follows: Percent contribution of each entity shall be determined by the actual monthly contribution of each entity within its territorial service boundary. Each entity will be responsible for reading its own meter(s) at the end of each month. This reading should be provided to the Town of Warrenton by the first working day of the month, for production of the monthly invoice. The method of calculation shall be: Percent Contribution: • Actual Monthly Waste Treatment Volume • Less Warren County's contribution for that month • Less Town of Norlina's contribution for that month • Equals Town of Warrenton's contribution for that month The actual percent will be calculated using the contribution determined from the above calculation. A Monthly statement for each entity will be calculated as follows: • ACTUAL monthly expenditures of the Waste Water Treatment Plant • Plus 25% of that month's ACTUAL expenses of the TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S SALARY+TOWN ASSISTANT CLERK'S SALARY+FICA (for the TOWN ADMINISTRATOR and ASSISTANT CLERK)+RETIREMENT (for the TOWN ADMINISTRATOR and ASSISTANT CLERK)+HOSPITAL (for the TOWN ADMINISTRATOR and ASSISTANT CLERK)+LIFE INSURANCE (for the TOWN ADMINISTRATOR and ASSISTANT CLERK) • Multiplied times the monthly Percent Contribution (calculated above). Each of the parties shall be rendered a statement for services rendered on the fifth working day of each month with accompanying general ledger expenditure reports, and the parties shall pay Warrenton within fifteen (15) days of the rendering the statement. Warrenton shall have the right to discontinue service to any party hereto, or any other customer using the system, who does not pay any funds owing to Warrenton for services rendered pursuant to the terms of this Contract, and fails to remedy thelailure to pay within fifteen (15) days after notice to the user. It is agreed that the above modifications shall be in effect from and after July 1, 2004, and shall remain in effect until such time as Warren County, the Town of Warrenton and the Town of Norlina agree to a new Wastewater System Agreement or change the provisions of the Agreement by amendment. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Warren County, the Town of Warrenton, and the Town of Norlina have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, all pursuant to resolutions adopted by their respective goveming bodies. ULYSSES S. ROSS, CHAIRMAN OF THE WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: TOWN OF NORLINA BY: ATTEST: WARREN COU BY: ULfSSES S. ROSS, CHAIRMAN OF THE WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TOWN OF WARRENTON BY: A "1'EST: TOWN OF NORLINA BY: ATTEST: Town Of Warrenton April 30, 2009 Ms. Dina Sprinkle NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Ms. Sprinkle: P. 0. Box 281 Warrenton, NC 27589 Phone 252-257-3315 E-mail tow@vanceiref NWB 3J?1f OS 1NIOd undno NINA\- NN3a 6COZ ti - 2AI333?J This letter is in reference to our current NPDES permit (NC0020834), which will expire on October 31, 2009. To satisfy the requirement of the renewal package, this letter is to serve as official notice for the Town of Warrenton's request for the renewal of said permit. We also want to include in this cover letter the required narrative regarding our facility sludge management plan. It is as follows: The sludge generated at the plant is wasted to aerobic digesters, where it is aerated until it is suitable for land application. The sludge is then hauled away and land applied by Granville Farms of Oxford, NC (Permit No. WQ0000838). Sludge Vector Attraction and Pathogens reduction are accomplished in accordance with EPA 503 Regulation, Option 6 (Addition of Akali). We appreciate your direction and assistance in connection with our permit renewal. If you have any questions regarding our application, please contact William Perkinson at 252-257-1776. Sincerely, 75) 614:1411,110,1/t" (John Freeman Town of Warrenton Administrator pc: William Perkinson Town of Warrenton WWTP Superintendent 1 - CHLORINE CONTACT TANKS-- -. t P I. 4 TERITIARY-- FILTERS POST AERATION WASTEWATER PUMP STATION EFFLUENT _ PARSHAL FLUME `FISHING CREEK MAC}IANI CAL BAR SCREEN • REMOVAL FACILITY ' INFLUENT CHLORINE FEED AND/ HANDLING • SYSTEM • N. 56 z. � 4 SLUDGE RECIRCULATION AND. WASTE PUMP STATION FILTER BACKWASH WASTE PUMP STATION D It=4"- RITITCMIED WASTE SLUDGE AEROBIC DIGESTER DIGESTED SLUDGE • CLARIFIERS.• • • • • EXHIBIT* 1-el 1 N J OXIDATION DITCHES . , LIME FEED SYSTEM r0EO UNDERDRAINAGE • S.L - S (CONVENTIONAL • SCHEMATIC FLOW (PATTERN OF WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE 'AT WARREN COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACT SHEET —TAR PAM RIVER BASIN REVIEW FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS (Instructions for Permit Writer) Basic Informationto Determine Potential for Expedited Permit Renewal Reviewer(s) / Date: %� ; ,f%r.G_ l/k/Z0OX Check If ✓ Permit Number: NC0020834 Facility Name: Warrenton WWTP ✓ Sub -basin number: • 03-03-04 1--- Receiving Stream: Fishing Creek L.---- Permit Stre -Classification: C, NSW v' Public W P Private WWTP WTP Industrial Other * If WTP, add permitted flow limit(MC{ COGREEN Ro IE Pretreatment? YES 0 (If YES then contact PERCS for data RPA) TRC limit/footnote? NO (I. f in permit edit FOOTNOTE see TRC FOOTNOTE text) ES/ADD** WET testing/footnote? YES/ADD** NO Of in permit edit SPECIAL CONDITION see WET language text, check FOOTNOTE) NH3 limit? 6ES/ADD* NO (If in permit check, edit LIMIT for applicable LIMITS categories, monthly/weekly or weekly/ daily) ** IWC evaluation needed? YES N) IWC calculation in file? YES NO ***Association member? YES NO (Check, edit SPECIAL CONDITION and FOOTNOTE as warranted) * * * Instream monitoring? Y- ' NO (Check, edit FOOTNOTE where warranted) Permit Special Conditions YES/ADD NO (If facility has BACKUP CHLORINATION see SPECIAL CONDITION and FOOTNOTE text) 303(d) listed? YES) NO Watch Listed? YES NO Permit MODs since last renewal? YES (NO_ Compliance issues? YES NO Existing expiration date: 10/31/20 Next cycle expiration date: 10/31/2014 neous Comments * Apply WTP Permitting Strategy, WET may be required ** IWC requires 7Q10 flow data, check with Basin Coordinator for best source *** Members now in Phase III, members have wavier on instream monitoring Select Expedited Catergory That Applies To This Permit Renewal SIMPLE EXPEDITED - administrative renewal with no changes, or only minor ❑ changes such as TRC or ownership change. Includes conventional WTPs (does not include permits with Special Conditions, Reverse Osmosis, or Ion -exchange WTPs). COMPLEX EXPEDITED - includes Special Conditions such as EAA, Wastewater ❑ Management Plan, 303(d) listed, toxicity testing, instream monitoring, compliance• concerns, edit NH3 limit, phased limits, stream re -class, association membership). NOEXPEDITED - Mark all of the following that apply: L`f Major Facility (municipal/industrial) liPermitted flow >_0.500 MGD (requires full Fact Sheet) ❑ Minor Municipal with Pretreatment Program (SIUs) El Minor Industrial subject to Federal Effluent guidelines Limits based on RPA (toxicants/metals, GW remediation for organics) ❑ Other 2009 Tar Pam Basin Permit Review/Shared Drive/Lumber Basin