The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCS000513_2022_01_20_Harrisburg_Meeting Agenda_20220506MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) PROGRAM AUDIT REPORT NPDES PERMIT NO. NCS000513 Harrisburg, NORTH CAROLINA 4100 Main Street, Suite 101 Audit Date: April 26, 2022 Report Date: May 13, 2022 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources Stormwater Program 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th floor 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (This page intentionally left blank) NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 TABLE OF CONTENTS AuditDetails............................................................................................................................................1 Permittee Information List of Supporting Documents RA 3 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment........................................................................4 Public Education and Outreach................................................................................................................8 Public Involvement and Participation..................................................................................................... 11 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination(IDDE).................................................................................. 13 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations...............................................16 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1......................................................................................... 18 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 2......................................................................................... 21 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1.................................................................................................. 23 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 2.................................................................................................. 25 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 1 27 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 2......................................................................................... 29 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1.......................................... 31 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 2.......................................... 33 Appendix A: Supporting Documents Appendix 13: Photograph Log DISCLAIMER This audit consists of an evaluation of program compliance with the issued permit and implementation of the approved Stormwater Management Plan. This audit report does not include a review of all program components, and program deficiencies in addition to those noted may be present. The permittee is required to assess program progress and permit compliance, and to implement the approved Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the issued permit. NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 ii This page intentionally left blank NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 iii Audit Details Audit ID Number: Audit Date(s): NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220513 April 26-27, 2022 Minimum Control Measures Evaluated: 0 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment 0 Public Education & Outreach 0 Public Involvement & Participation 0 Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls — No delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls — Delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls 0 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations ❑ Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Field Site Visits: 0 Municipal Facilities. Number visited: Choose an litern, 0 MS4 Outfalls. Number visited: Choose an litern, ❑ Construction Sites. Number visited: Choose an litern, ❑ Post -Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls. Number visited: Choose an litern, ❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an litern, ❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an litern, Inspector(s) Conducting Audit Name, Title Organization Jesse IMdI'>onn0, IEnvironrrrenta� Speciah t INCIDIDEQ Zahid Khan, IICegionalia.ngineer, INCIDEQ Audit Report Author: Jesse McDonnell Date: Signature Audit Report Author: Zahid Khan Date Signature NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 1 of 36 Permittee Information MS4 Permittee Name: Town of Harrisburg Permit Effective Date: February 20, 2017 Permit Expiration Date: February 19, 2022 Mailing Address: P.O Box 100, Harrisburg, NC 28075-0100 Date of Last MS4 Inspection/Audit: Not Applicable Co-permittee(s), if applicable: Not Applicable Permit Owner of Record: Carl Palmer, City Manager Primary MS4 Representatives Participating in Audit Name, Title Organization Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director Town of Harrisburg Wayne Krimminger, Grading Inspector Town of Harrisburg Clay Heath, Engineer in Training Town of Harrisburg Corey Jones, Public Works Supervisor Town of Harrisburg MS4 Receiving Waters Waterbody Classification Impairments VUand Creek C: Copper, and "IFurbidity Codd, Creek C "IFurbidity and IBenth o P VIr:Kee Creek C I: enth o Rocky IfCiver, C Copper', "IFurbidity and II' enth o P Back Creek C Fair Il io rare sifir:adon Reedy Creek C Fair Il io rare sifir:adon 1=u da Creek C None NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 2 of 36 List of Supporting Documents Item Number Document Title When Provided (Prior to/During/After) I Draft SWIMP Prior to 2 OutfaH and Storm Sewer, IIMap Prior to 3 Sedimentation PoHudon Contr,6 Ar-t 1973 Prior to 4 IRegionaStormwater, Partnership Prior to 5 "Fown of Harrisburg HDIDIE Ifs an Prior to 6 MS4 Operation and III aintenam-e INan Prior to 7 Good Housekeep IIManu a Prior to 8 NCS000513—Harrisburg MS4 Audit20220506 Page 3 of 36 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment Staff Interviewed: Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director, Facilitates the Stormwater Program (Name, Title, Role) Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.A.1 The permittee fundingand staffingimplementmanage 11 KStafin and s unnW the provisions of the Stormwater Plan and meet all of the permit Funding repor t The Stormwater Plan identifies a specific position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Parfiall Responsibilities for all components of the Stormwater Plan are documented and position(s) assignments provided. The permittee is current on payment of invoiced administering and compliance monitoring fees (see stormwater e-payments on DEMLR MS4 web page). Yes ...... Comments (Briefly describe funding mechanism, number of staff, etc.) Has str�rr�erwr��tr.,�r. fee, and d�u�e�,l �m��t pays drrr, staff r� � projects, �wr.t P :.��b d�u� tim U d � and 01 f e staff paid by Pwr fee, - Fu lly staffed in engerning department and can cover, the program, 6 staff for, engineering department, 5 of the 6 persons do SW work, need oW S IIViP - About 700k budget rams are y, 5.62/li:quivaent IR PidentU Unit (Iia.IRU) - ?W 1) did about t $ U mill SW reno, grill redo every few year's, - SW SCIIVI maintenance is budgeted trio P r�rW S IIViP that i P out o ,ate the positions P are li Ptc.d with re P:ro PiI ihtie P does not have - I.0 , � w w � , a r:u.rrrrret II.A.2 Stormwater The permittee evaluated the performance and effectiveness of the program Plan components at least annually. Implementation and Evaluation If yes, the permittee used the results of the evaluation to modify the program components as necessary to accomplish the intent of the Stormwater Program. Yes ...... Did the permitted MS4 discharges cause or contribute to non -attainment of an applicable water quality standard? No If yes, did the permittee expand or better tailor its BM Ps accordingly to address Not the non -attainment? AppificilN lle Comments - IDoes not have documentation rrtImer than the annu ar report, since 2.W9 had rriontWy meetings with S IIViP with a co Pukant, need meeting minutes NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 4 of 36 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment I I.A.3 Keeping the The permittee kept the Stormwater Plan up to date.irl Stormwater Plan Up to Date The permittee notified DEMLR of any updates to the Stormwater Plan. Not Applficablie Comments (Indicate the date of latest Storm water Plan and describe the nature of any updates, if applicable). - Hasod pr an, does not have adopted pr an, has S IIViP that was put together last year, II.A.4 Availability The permittee kept an up-to-date version of its Stormwater Plan available to the of the Stormwater Division and the public online. No Plan The online materials included ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, or a list identifying the ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, providing the legal Yes webs'ite authority necessary to implement and enforce the requirements of the permit. Comments (Note what materials are available on line) - No S IIViIP online, w - Has ordinance and edu�r:��io �a� niateria� � o lir�e, II.A.3 & II.A.5 Stormwater Plan Did DEMLR require a modification to the Stormwater Plan? No Modifications If yes, did the permittee complete the modifications in accordance with the Not established deadline? AppificilN lle Comments (Note date of DEMLR notification, modifications required, and date modifications were completed, as applicable) - No modifications required II.A.6 Sharing Responsibility Are any control measures implemented by an entity other than the permittee? Naas„ If yes, is there a written agreement in place? No Comments (List the specific control measures implemented by others that do not have adequate written agreements, if applicable) - NCDEQ does EC, partially gains info from reginal partnership ll.A.7 The permittee maintained written procedures for implementing the six minimum Written measures. Yescontrol Procedures Written procedures identified specific action steps, schedules, resources and responsibilities for implementing the six minimum measures. Naas„ ...... Comments (List the specific minimum measures that do not have adequate written procedures, if applicable) - Not in SWIIViP NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 5 of 36 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment IllA The permittee maintained documentation of all program components including, but Proram°b`b.^ g not limited to, inspections, maintenance activities, educational programs, •••••• Documentation implementation of BMPs, enforcement actions etc., on file for a period of five years. )°n IItte'n° Comments (List the specific program components that do not have adequate documentation on file and why, if applicable) 111.13 The permittee submitted annual reports to the Department within twelve months Annual Report from the effective date of the permit (See Section III.B. for the annual reporting Naas„ Submittal period specific to this MS4). The permittee submitted subsequent annual reports every twelve months from the scheduled date of the first annual report submittal. Naas„ ...... The Annual Reports included appropriate information to accurately describe the progress, status, and results of the permittee's Stormwater Plan, including, but not limited the following: 1. A detailed description of the status of implementation of the Stormwater Plan as a whole. This will include information on development and implementation Not of each major component of the Stormwater Plan for the past year and IReviewed schedules and plans for the year following each report. 2. An adequate description and justification of any proposed changes to the Stormwater Plan. This will include descriptions and supporting information for Not the proposed changes and how these changes will impact the Stormwater IReviewed Plan (results, effectiveness, implementation schedule, etc.). 3. Documentation of any necessary changes to programs or practices for assessment of management measures implemented through the Stormwater Not eviewed Plan. 4. A summary of data accumulated as part of the Stormwater Plan throughout the year along with an assessment of what the data indicates in light of the Not eviewed Stormwater Plan. 5. An assessment of compliance with the permit, information on the establishment of appropriate legal authorities, inspections, and enforcement Not eviewed actions. Comments (Note dates that annual reports cover under current permit and generally describe report deficiencies, if any) .. Chedi� 1L.aserlichObr e°tllr1YhMW reports, IV.B Annual Reporting The Annual Reports document the following: 1. A summary of past year activities, including where applicable, specific Not quantities achieved and summaries of enforcement actions. IReviewed 2. A description of the effectiveness of each program component. Not eviewed 3. Planned activities and changes for the next reporting period, for each Not program component or activity. IReviewed NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 6 of 36 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment 4. Fiscal analysis. ° of Comments (Note dates that annual reports cover under current permit and generally describe report deficiencies, if any) Additional - Four years ago, no real SW program, has grown since then, Comments: - No full time staff dedicated to SW, has four people who work with SW, - Public works does maintenance of SW and Engineering is - Has strong volunteer program from the communication department with mailings and social media, - Post construction has new program for reminders to tell people to inspect and submit - GIS is growing, working on mapping, about 85% mapped, actively mapping the remaining NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 7 of 36 Public Education and Outreach Staff Interviewed: Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director, Facilitates the Stormwater Program (Name, Title, Role) Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. 11.B.2.a The permittee defined goals and objectives of the Local Public Education and Goals and woad„ Outreach Program based on community wide issues. Objectives Comments (Generally describe process for establishing goals/objectives) - Yes, has goals and objectives based on community wide issues. Need document 11.13.2.1b The permittee maintained a description of the target pollutants and/or stressors and Target Pollutants likely sources. Comments (List target pollutants, note any that are missing or not appropriate) - Has within draft SWMP but not within the separate document for education and outreach. 11.13.2.c The permittee identified, assessed annually and updated the description of the target Target Audiences audiences likely to have significant storm water impacts and why they were selected. Comments (Describe any changes made, if applicable) - Within specific annual reports. - Has been doing monthly meetings since July 2019 NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 8 of 36 Public Education and Outreach II.B.2.d Residential The permittee described issues, such as pollutants, the likely sources of those and Industrial/ pollutants, potential impacts, and the physical attributes of stormwater runoff in Naas„ Commercial Issues their education/outreach program. Comments (Generally describe the residential/industrial/commercial issues addressed) - Yes, has list of pollutants online and SWMP, has stuff online for education materials 11.B.2.e The permittee promoted and maintained an internet web site designed to convey the Informational program's message. Naas„ Web Site Comments (list web page address and general contents, or attach screen shot of landing page) - Yes, website I I. B.2.f The permittee distributed stormwater educational material to appropriate target Public Education Naas„ Materials groups. Comments (List distributed materials and quantity, message, distribution mechanism, target audience for each if not included in program documentation/annual reporting) - Has social media, has flyers, has meetings for HOA turn over of the, need documentation of social media posts and mailings II.B.2.g The permittee promoted and maintained a stormwater hotline/helpline for the Hotline/Help Line purpose of public education and outreach. Yes Comments (Note hotline contact information and method(s) for advertising it) - Has a customer service number to get a work order and send to the stormwater person II.B.2.h The permittee's outreach program, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement, included a combination of approaches designed to Naas„ reach the target audiences. NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 9 of 36 Public Education and Outreach Public Education and Outreach For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or Program through a cooperative agreement the permittee estimated and recorded the extent Naas„ of exposure. Comments (Generally describe approaches, extent of exposure. Note any cooperating entities, agreements and scope of services, or reference comments in Section II.A.6. above.) - Need documentation of mailing, postings, hoa meetings ect. Additional Comments: NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 10 of 36 Public Involvement and Participation Staff Interviewed: Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director, Facilitates the Stormwater Program (Name, Title, Role) Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.C.2.a Volunteer Community The permittee included and promoted volunteer opportunities designed to promote Involvement Yes ...... ongoing citizen participation. Program Comments (Note opportunities promoted and date(s) of volunteer events) - Advertise opportunities social media, has email on website for people who want to get involved. II.C.2.b Mechanism for The permittee provided and promoted a mechanism for public involvement that Public provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program. Yes ...... Involvement Comments (Note mechanism(s) for input and how promoted) - Public hearings when things change, not a specific stormwater meeting - Need public hearing process for that process/agenda/minutes II.C.2.c The permittee promoted and maintained a hotline/helpline for the purpose of public Hotline/Help Line involvement and participation. Comments (Note hotline contact information and how it is promoted) - Customer service hotline. NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 11 of 36 Public Involvement and Participation Additional Comments: NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 12 of 36 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Staff Interviewed: Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director, Facilitates the Stormwater Program (Name, Title, Role) Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.D.2.a IDDE Program The permittee maintained a written IDDE Program. Yes If yes, the written program includes provisions for program assessment and Yes ...... evaluation and integrating program. Comments (Note any deficiencies) Yes, has P ODE program separate from SUMP The permittee maintained an IDDE ordinance or other regulatory mechanism(s) that II.D.2.b provides the legal authority to prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the MS4. Yes ...... Legal Authorities If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the corporate limits of the permittee. [Permit Part I. DJ Yes ...... Comments Have .. I -I'' Iirnk to ordnance �rra:rr that was provialr.,al. II.D.2.c The permittee maintained a current map showing major outfalls" and receiving Storm Sewer Yes System Map streams. Comments Has map with 85"% mapped and remaining is being mapped, look at the Zink and see if you can access the US rY1ap *Major ouff alh are discharges from;,, 36" diameter pipes or drainage areas of;,, 50 acres. In areas zoned for industrial aaa°tivity, maajor ouffaalh are;,, 12" or drainage area;,, 2 acres. II.D.2.d The permittee maintained a program for conducting dry weather flow field Dry Weather Flow Yes observations in accordance with written procedures. Program Comments (Generally summarize program, including frequency of observations and # or % of outfalls screened) Has investigation ation process and ODE SOP for the annua� reviewr. NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 13 of 36 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) II.D.2.e The permittee maintained written procedures for conducting investigations of Investigation identified illicit discharges. Naas„ Procedures Comments (Generally describe what procedures are documented) Within the IDDE prograrn plan II.D.2.f For each case of an illicit discharge or potential illicit discharge, the permittee documented and tracked the Track and following: Document Investigations 1. The date(s) the illicit discharge was observed Naas„ 2. The results of the investigation Naas„ 3. Any follow-up of the investigation Naas„ 4. The date the investigation was closed Naas„ Comments (Note whether a standard inspection form is utilized to capture consistent information and a tracking mechanism is used) - Tracking in 2020 started, has all this information in the spreadsheet II.D.2.g Employee The permittee implemented and documented a training program for appropriate Training municipal staff who, as part of their normal job responsibilities, may come into Naas„ contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection. Comments (Generally describe the staff training program, including frequency and which staff are trained) Has training for new staff for HII'>IIDIE and annu a , need sign iris sheet II.D.2.h The permittee informed public employees of hazards associated with illegal .��1.rah' Public Education discharges and improper disposal of waste. Yes i�v��'.' The permittee informed businesses of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. Naas„ ...... The permittee informed the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. Naas„ ...... Comments (Note how each sector was informed, if applicable) Need training log Needflyer arnountsfor businesses and companies Need social rnedia and mailers, NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 14 of 36 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) II'D'2.i The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for the Public Reporting public to report illicit discharges. Yes Mechanism The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for staff to report illicit discharges. Yes ...... The permittee established and implemented response procedures for citizen requests/reports. Yes ...... Comments (Generally describe reporting mechanisms and how promoted/publicized/facilitated/established) Customer service Imothne, they put in a work order, to system Yes, in the training rams aHy �n III.>II">IF nianu a , has an investigation process II.D•2.1 The permittee implemented a mechanism to track the issuance of notices of violation Enforcement enforcement actions administered by the permittee. Yesand If yes, the mechanism includes the ability to identify chronic violators for initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance. Yes ...... Comments (Generally describe the established tracking mechanism, if applicable) iWor, s is somas ofNOV issues and e nforr err ent Additional Comments: NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 15 of 36 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Staff Interviewed: Mallory Hodgson, Interim Engineering Director, Facilitates the Stormwater Program (Name, Title, Role) Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.G.2.a The permittee maintained a current inventory of facilities and operations owned Facility Inventory and operated by the permittee with the potential for generating polluted Naas„ stormwater runoff. Comments (Note number of facilities, typical inventory data and any facilities that are not inventoried that should be) 17000k population Within goodhosuekeeping manual II.G.2.b The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally Operation and owned and operated facilities with the potential for generating polluted Naas„ Maintenance (O&M) stormwater runoff. for Facilities If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of inspections. Naas„ If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of routine maintenance requirements. If yes, the permittee evaluated the O&M program annually and updated it as necessary. Comments Has document for, Good hm pourwdr'r.,eping Specifies inspections Has activities that are done but no maintenance requernrr.,nt P Needs to be updated, no current list of updates II.G.2.c Spill Response The permittee had written spill response procedures for municipal operations. Naas„ Procedures Comments ShmoWd be in book, not in book Need documentation of written procedures II.G.2.d Streets, The permittee evaluated existing and new BMPs that reduce polluted stormwater Roads, and Public runoff from municipally -owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within itsirfil Parking Lots corporate limits annually. Maintenance If yes, the permittee evaluated the effectiveness of existing and new BMPs based on cost and the estimated quantity of pollutants removed. Naas„ ...... NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 16 of 36 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Comments Yes, within the new draft S II%P VIonO ly street sweeper', has brads per, month fortonnage, need tonnage r:ak:Wation II.G.2.f The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for the stormwater O&M for Catch sewer system including catch basins and conveyance systems that it owns and Naas„ Basins and Conveyance Systems maintains. Comments (Briefly describe O&M program) Has an O« .VI for storm sewer, system, provided document aIready II.G.2.g The permittee maintained a current inventory of municipally -owned or operated Structural structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with the permittee's post- Naas„ Stormwater Controls construction ordinance. Comments (Describe inventory information and number of controls in inventory) Yes, has map of SCIIVI P, can find on the ¢'�� S map provided II.G.2.h The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally - O&M for Structural owned or maintained structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with Naas„ Stormwater Controls the permittee's post -construction ordinance. If yes, then: The O&M program specified the frequency of inspections and routine maintenance requirements. Naas„ ...... The permittee documented inspections of all municipally -owned or maintained structural stormwater controls. Naas„ ...... The permittee inspected all municipally -owned or maintained structural stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee. Naas„ ...... The permittee maintained all municipally -owned or maintained structural stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee. Naas„ ...... The permittee documented maintenance of all municipally -owned or maintained structural stormwater controls. No Comments - Has O&M, need to document maintainer, inspections are documented II.G.2.i The permittee ensured municipal employees are properly trained in pesticide, Pesticide, Herbicide herbicide and fertilizer application management. Yes and Fertilizer Application The permittee ensured contractors are properly trained in pesticide, herbicide and Management fertilizer application management. Naas„ NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 17 of 36 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations The permittee ensured all permits, certifications, and other measures for C "1n'rn'rSe applicators are followed. an Iltern, Comments - Has lisnced employee, - Yes - Yes II.G.2.j The permittee implemented an employee training program for employees involved Staff Training in implementing pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices. Yes Comments Yes, reed training II.G.2.k The permittee described and implemented measures that prevent or minimize Vehicle and contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment Yawn„ Equipment Cleaning cleaning. Comments Wash bay with aril water, separated, Additional Comments: Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1 Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 18 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1 Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector): Name(s) and Title(s) of Facility Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Facility Documentation/Training Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 19 of 36 I Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1 I Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? Inspection Results Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)? If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 20 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 2 Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Date and Entity): Name(s) and Title(s) of Facility Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Facility Documentation/Training Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 21 of 36 I Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 2 I Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? Inspection Results Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)? If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 22 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1 Outfall ID Number: Date and Time of Site Visit: Outfall Location: Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.): Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate, Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.): Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date): Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches: Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Observations Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations? Inspection Procedures Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Does the inspector's process include taking photos? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 23 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1 1 Inspection Results Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)? Will a follow-up outfall inspection be conducted? If so, for what reason? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 24 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 2 Outfall ID Number: Date and Time of Site Visit: Outfall Location: Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.): Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate, Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.): Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date): Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches: Name of MS4 Inspector(s): Observations Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations? Inspection Procedures Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Obtain copy. Does the inspector's process include taking photos? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 25 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 2 1 Inspection Results Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)? Will a follow-up outfall inspection be conducted? If so, for what reason? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 26 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 1 Site/Project Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Site/Project Address: Operator: Project Type (Commercial, Industrial, Residential, CIP, Roadway, etc.): NCG Permit ID Number: Disturbed Acreage: Recent Enforcement Actions (Include Date): Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Site Documentation/Training Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it site -specific? Does the site have approved erosion and sedimentation control plans onsite? Are they representative of current site conditions? What type of stormwater training do site employees receive? How often? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 and NCG010000 requirements for construction sites? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about erosion and sedimentation control/stormwater pollution prevention BMPs? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 27 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 1 Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist? Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing approved plans (erosion and sedimentation control and/or SWPPP)? Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious violations? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? Does the MS4 inspector's process include providing construction stormwater educational materials to the site contact? Compliance/Enforcement What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? Notes/Comments/Recommendations NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 28 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 2 Site/Project Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Site/Project Address: Operator: Project Type (Commercial, Industrial, Residential, CIP, Roadway, etc.): NCG Permit ID Number: Disturbed Acreage: Recent Enforcement Actions (Include Date): Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Site Documentation/Training Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it site -specific? Does the site have approved erosion and sedimentation control plans onsite? Are they representative of current site conditions? What type of stormwater training do site employees receive? How often? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 and NCG010000 requirements for construction sites? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about erosion and sedimentation control/stormwater pollution prevention BMPs? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 29 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Construction Site No. 2 Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist? Obtain copy. Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing approved plans (erosion and sedimentation control and/or SWPPP)? Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious violations? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? Does the MS4 inspector's process include providing construction stormwater educational materials to the site contact? Compliance/Enforcement What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? Notes/Comments/Recommendations NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 30 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1 Site Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Site Address: SCM Type: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity): Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Enforcement Activity (Include Date): Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Site Documentation Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan? Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, O&M requirements, etc.)? Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format? Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 31 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1 1 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? Compliance/Enforcement What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 32 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 2 Site Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Site Address: SCM Type: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity): Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Enforcement Activity (Include Date): Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Observations Site Documentation Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan? Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual? Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls? Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, O&M requirements, etc.)? Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format? Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections? NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 33 of 36 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 2 1 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain: Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? Compliance/Enforcement What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? I Notes/Comments/Recommendations I NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 34 of 36 APPENDIX A: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 35 of 36 /_la a 9111 VIG 39a:Iel ti d T-Ala.I iZcl NCS000513_Harrisburg MS4 Audit_20220506 Page 36 of 36