20010608 Ver 3_401 Application_20140430

ENV
EnvironmemW Consuming Services Inc.
Apnl 25, 2014
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE Hawks Landing PCN
DWQ# 99- 0409 -V2
To Whom It May Concern
3764 Rominger Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Ph 828 -297 -6946
Fax [phone]
e-mail john @env -ecs com
Transmitted with this letter are 5 copies of the PCN for the referenced project and a check for $570 00
to cover the 401 permit fee ENV Inc is the consultant and authorized agent (form in PCN) and
contact for this application Please include me on the copy list of all project related correspondence
If you have any questions regarding these items please call John Vilas at 828 - 297 -6946, thank you
Sincerely,
Jon C Vilas
President, ENV Environmental Consulting Services Inc
cc Ross Adickman

o�0F W ALIE;9 PAID
O 'c
1,10D 0
*a o (o08v 2
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
El Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 29 ATF or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record
❑ Yes
only for Corps Permit
® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Hawks Landing
2b
County
Buncombe
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Weaverville
2d
Subdivision name
Hawks Landing
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
NA
3.
Owner Information
ganch
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Hawks Landing, LTD
3b
Deed Book and Page No
4225/1194 & 2074/0337
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Ross Adickman
3d
Street address
2400 NE 2nd Ave
3e
City, state, zip
Miami, FL 33137
3f
Telephone no
561- 239 -8614
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
SEE BELOW
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
John Vdas
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ENV -ECS, Inc
5c
Street address
3764 Rominger Rd
5d
City, state, zip
Banner Elk, NC 28604
5e
Telephone no
828- 297 -6946
51'
Fax no
5g
Email address
john @env -ecs com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Buncombe PIN 9763 -24 -2650 & 9764 -04 -8181
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 72 Longitude. 82 5 -
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
Current phase approx 150 acres, original phase (1999)
approx 116 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
Reems Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C - Trout
2c
River basin
French Broad
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Hawks Landing is a phased single family development. The initial phase was started in the late 1990's
and is basically sold off and built out. The current phase was started in 2007 -08, it was permitted in
2008 but never completed and has existed in a state of partial completion since. The current phase is
partially complete and contains graded roads with ditches and pipes installed. The site has been
maintained over the years and is eg nerally stable. Surrounding land use is either undeveloped or
similar type single family residential.
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 17 acres
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
The project site contains approximately 9690 linear feet of streams
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project purpose is to complete construction of subdivision infrastructure started in 2008
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project will involve completion of subdivision roads and new construction of additional roads not
yet started in the current phase of the development. All work in the original phase of the development
was completed roughly 14 years ago. The overall project (both phases) involved involved 300 linear
feet of stream impact and 0.005 acres of wetland impact. All proposed impacts have already occurred
except for 40 linear feet of stream impact and 0.005 acres of wetland impact (Impacts 7 & 6
respectively).
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Wetland flagging and stream determination was
initially made in 2008 by WNR and confirmed by Lori
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Beckwith with USACE - Asheville JD was reissued 4-4 -2014
by Lori Beckwith
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ preliminary ® Final
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) Neill Yelverton, WNR
Agency /Consultant Company WNR consultants
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
April 4, 2014, see attached Determination of Jurisdiction
S. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
401 WQC was issued under DWQ Prol # 99- 0409 -V2 on 9 -26 -2008, 404 (NWP -29) was issued under Action ID 2008-
00402 on 9 -8 -2008, 404 was reissued under 2008 -00402 (Revernfication #1) on 4-4 -2014 Impact quantities and
locations have not changed
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
While this is a phased protect, the area to be constructed under the requested permit is the final phase and no further
work is contemplated beyond that proposed in this application
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
#6 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Linear seep
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0 005
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 005
2h Comments A small wetland area will be impacted by fill associated with road construction
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
#1 ®P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -Reems Ck
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
10
60
#2 ®P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -Reems Ck
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
10
20
#3 ®P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -UT Reems Ck
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
40
#4 ®P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -UT -Reems Ck
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
5
80
#5 ®P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -UT -UT Reems
❑ PER
® Corps
4
60
Ck
® INT
® DWQ
#7 ® P ❑ T
Pipe, Fill
UT -Reems Ck
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
7
40
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
300
31 Comments All impacts have already occurred except for #7 1 -2 in 1999. 3 -5 in 2008
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuanes, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 []PDT
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required
B1 ❑P ❑T
F] Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Stream and wetland impacts associated with the Hawks Landing project have been avoided and minimized in
the current phase by reducing development density to the maximum extent practicable while still achieving
the project purpose. The 1999 phase of the project involved the creation of 52 lots on approximately 116
acres (2.2ac /lot), the current phase involves the creation of 22 lots on 150 acres (6.8ac /lot). All proposed lots
are buildable without additional encroachments into Jurisdictional areas.
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
The last remaining pipe to be installed will be installed in the dry as required by permit conditions
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
® DWQ ® Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
® Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Stream
Quantity 150
3c Comments A total of 600 stream mitigation credits are needed for this protect according to the 2008 permits, 150 stream
credits are proposed to be purchased from the Anderson Farm Bank See attached 3 -19 -2014 letter to Lori Beckwith and
associated supporting documents that comprehensively describe the mitigation plan
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
450 stream mitigation credits will be obtained through on -site preservation at a 5 1 ratio, a total of 2250 linear feet of
stream channel will be protected in permanent preservation easements See attached 3 -19 -2014 letter to Lori Beckwith
and associated supporting documents that comprehensively describe the mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Current phase only is 4 2%
Impery
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Project meets all low density criteria, low
imperviousness, no stormwater collection system, and runoff is to be conveyed via grass lined ditches
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Buncombe County
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached9
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) The permit issued
in 2008 was for after - the -fact impacts and this is lust a reauthorization of that There are no new unauthorized impacts
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
Two additional parcels have been created that will likely be developed in the future as a result of this project, however,
the layout of the two remaining parcels is such that the portion of UT -New River left undisturbed lies between the parcels
and will be protected by a buffer Also, any future development on the two parcels will have to comply with state
stormwater rules in force at the time of development because they were created as part of a subdivision that involved
impacts to Waters of the US requiring a 401 WQC
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Lots are individually served by well and septic
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Ecos fws gov /tess_public /countySearch for Buncombe County
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http / /www habitat noaa gov /protection /efh /habitatmapper html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Gis ncdcr gov /hpo gov one site is located at the main entrance to the Hawks Landing Development (Bngman- Chambers
House, ID BNo271) 1880 frame house Proposed work will have no impact on this structure
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Buncombe County, NC Flood Maps and GIS data
T� Vi-jG.S
7 —Zk —(y
Applicant/As Printed Name
Date
/Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signatur is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6ut,A&hoAiifi6"O`r'M'
ject-i Lan
. -,Date:, 1,241-2013
"'
j'j!fo Site-
`2
42-4 �OW
z�ffiff 3 6% &97 04 918,ftOw"
VOY
94 74
�',,,DWN 4225/1-1, ;,&'20
"i g
11 1,',, `J11k, , 4" ,
Sfti6t,A
-d
q
1PL 31
a04�2400,N&-2ifd
OWN R,
V
-owbers,�df
b"
odty, A
The - ihe,,66 i6t prof
gis prof
il of "EC-S, t w y',
ju&6hm,,,,Mj.j6fin`;C.-V TMW W46 �o
"' '
t :
A,
boitheprocessig,issuance:qn #c ptan 96-o
- - a ,,
-any'and" and spe.'@' iton s, ftsch�d-
:mA �,a i
on, �V-bihitte& ih�this-dppl��ati6n Ls-trud and, accurate to
YAhe.iWv'e,`- rMati
of 'M', Y" IM,
n "S
zie'd -4i`,-,'
77 . ..... 7
n Nikie,',,�-,
Pr 'i
'A"
-j
,j� 'Ir �,f 't t.
PJ,
q-
yt

c
C CL
-- f`
i
y
C
i
Y
4
L
O
c
�
a
�
C
1 0
�
y
c
�
C�
1
Z
_ :r

C? Q.
C �
� O
J O N
m 3Oa
G� = J
m �
T
V° J
y LA
V° Branch
v
F
.v
7
1
U
C
CO
m
O
Co I \
1
4 r -
-o a ao
N � �
� � Z
�1 w c p U
U L 4
'v o a F a
'E c >
O E Z a
t
U
LL.
0g `
z f
3

HAWKS LANDING PCN
4 -17 -2014
• IMPACT MAPS FROM 2008 404/401 PERMITS, ALL IMPACT SIZES AND LOCATIONS REMAIN THE
SAME
• 404 PERMIT ISSUED 4 -4 -2014

N
� e
Hawk's Landing
(Current Phase)
w� �a w.w ••
,,weep •{_ r *I�y� r-._` V -/• _ ,5'`'.`.``, \4•.`:
-ff' - � _ ;�� `.- = -, . • _ •,; . �� � � ; ; ,: , is _ _, _ _ - ,� ti V `
r _,� .��` \�ti� ♦'_rr � }J:f #'' "r• •, X11..' - - • "`•.'y�� Il l��.
�� `',� ': ♦�'`. f 1 � 1�, _ if
,. I
SKI"` "..` •,, •,•� � ,` t ,,'.! t, � � i ,'r'i''� �r ,•�, j 'I I�� �`,y •-r1 � 1.
Hawk's Landing
(Initial Phase)
J •� 1 281'
se W
nnGie �n� n • ' OA 0'b d(r 082* 29' 30.00' W
Name: CRAGGY PINNACLE
Date: 7111 r2008
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location. 732839 ft. N 961844 ft. E
Caption: Hawks' Landing

fJ �,
1
Impact 3
None Existing
Installed 40' for lot access
Therefore 40' New Impact
N�,
Impact 2
20' Existing
Replaced with 40' in 1999
Therefore 20' New Impact
1
\1 I
I
Impact 1
20' Existing
Replaced with 80' in 1999
Therefore 60' New Impact
®
N O FLT"
LEGQIB
WM
. y: WdlaodendNd"RMW=Comolhe
P.O. Box 882 Cw ma, M C. 21716
.- '+• 12&648 -8801
M, 1 of4 1:300, wNR 0741.0
Phase 1 -4
�`'� . r........ta
✓`�
Hawks Eanding
Bumomhe CmmtY. Nud6 Ca DWM
Haws Laad'mg LTD HUA000

Impact 6
0.005 acres wetland impact
Impact 5
None Existing
Installed 60' in 2007--,\ Imnnrt 7
Impact 4
1
20' Existing
k
Replaced
with 80 In 2007
�'•;
and
20' fill below pipe
!r
Therefore
80' New Impact
i
l!com
�......v..ee
zofa 1 a 07-0-08
7
Pn�s -
..........4,
�
C�
Welland Nelural Resource Consultants
NORTH
oww it earn
•••
•y_
and
P.a Boar 882 Cm2ou N C. 29716
'S.. ft Coucay, N.& C..r.
r �r
828.6488801
Hawles Lan6mg, LTD f8Lt000

is map depicts the stream preservation area. ApproArnately 1,770 linear
of stream preservation is proposed. These streams will be surveyed
• • with a buffer area measures 1 ' horizontally out • the top of .r
model bank. This area will be preserved using deed resbictions; following Corps
guidance.
• 1��� ►thy ii��tJ C Q -
♦e0a 1t Ab
♦t;1♦ AIt•1
Ot 1Y;ht1M
At�t4)��tt -
,� Pt ►tt�f�yc -
�ttt��ttt4)t4},��1
rJY��`1���4)��i14► �
Atttt ♦t� - - --
• ��..��♦ •moo
© J♦ ��
04)��J
bttY.ltt�? .
LLMp 4 of 4 1:100 was •7-0Y
® . ,...... o...w 6 wsfl�� Shwo Prescrvation Am
G� , ........,�,
NORTH O`��•+' -+• We�� � BwkombaCamty, Noah Carol'ma
82S448-MI
W
Hawk's Lm�g. Lm H LIOW

This map depicts potential homesite and driveway access for lots 4-6 and
20-24. This is to ensure that the lots, which all contain jurisdictional features
can indeed be developed without further impact to jurisdictioani features.
r -aora r— MOD I 'wwR
Lots 4-6 and 20 24
Hawks Landing
Bye Cm ay. Noth Cmolioa
Hawks Tadm LM 11-10M
LJ:(;Fl1D
a a.rr ot�
NORTH
� w
r -aora r— MOD I 'wwR
Lots 4-6 and 20 24
Hawks Landing
Bye Cm ay. Noth Cmolioa
Hawks Tadm LM 11-10M
W�v
L
�J�
0154-
Wdtbad and NdwW Raou�ce CoumdMob
P.O Box 882 CWm N.C. 48716
828698.8801
r -aora r— MOD I 'wwR
Lots 4-6 and 20 24
Hawks Landing
Bye Cm ay. Noth Cmolioa
Hawks Tadm LM 11-10M

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 2008 -00402 (Reverification #1) County: Buncombe
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Hawk's Landing, LTD
Attn: Mr. Ross Adickman
Address: 2400 NE 2 —a Avenue
Miami, Florida 33137
Telephone No.: 561- 239 -8614
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The project is located on a
281 -acre property off of Reems Creek Road in the Hawk's Landing Development near Weaverville,
Buncombe County, North Carolina.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 29 (After - the -fact)
Description of project area and activity: The original NWP was issued on September 8, 2008, and
authorized impacts to 300 linear feet (If► of unnamed tributaries to Reems Creek and 0.005 acre of
wetland in order to construct roads and other access for the Hawk's Landing residential
development. Impacts #1 -5 were after - the -fact (ATF) and impacts #6 (0.005 acre wetland fill) and
#7 (401f of culvert/stream fill) were proposed. The permittee did not comply with the special
conditions of the verification letter and proposed a modification to the compensatory mitigation
plan on March 19,2014; the authorized impacts have not changed from 2008.
The USACE has reviewed this modified compensatory mitigation plan and determined that it is
acceptable. As such, the permittee is authorized to impact 3001f of streams and 0.005 acre of
wetland and this NWP verification letter replaces the letter issued on September 8 2008 which is
no longer valid. The current authorization and resolution of the ATF impacts is conditioned on
strict accordance with the information submitted to date, the attached conditions, and the followin
special conditions:
Special Conditions
1. All work must be performed in strict compliance with the description of work and plans in the application
dated July 7, 2008, as amended by the additional information and plans /survey submitted in the request for
modification to the compensatory mitigation plan, dated March 19, 2014. Any modification to the
description of work and/or the permit plans must be approved by the USACE prior to implementation.
2. In order to compensate for a portion of the impacts associated with this project, mitigation shall be
provided in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any
special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit The
permittee must purchase this mitigation, and provide a receipt of this purchase to the USACE, within 60
days of the date of issuance of this NWP verification letter.
3. In order to compensate for the remainder of impacts associated with this project, the permittee shall execute
and cause to be recorded restrictive covenants that reflect the preservation of no less than 2,250 linear feet
of stream with a 30' buffer on each side of the stream (from top of bank); the areas to be placed under
restrictive covenant are depicted on the attached survey titled "Survey of HAWKS LANDING
CONSERVATION AREA." Because a portion of the preservation area is located within lot lines, the

-2-
permittee shall ensure that waters of the U S are depicted on these plats as legally preserved areas and the
new owners are given copies of the recorded restrictive covenants. The permittee shall execute and cause
to be recorded these restrictive covenants, and furnish the USACE with a copy of the recorded restrictive
covenants, within 60 days of the date of issuance of this NWP venfication letter.
4. All conditions of the attached North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission letter of July 22, 2008, are
hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit.
5. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and conditions of this
authorization letter in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its
contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this project with a copy of this
authorization letter, all conditions, and any authorized modifications. A copy of this authorization letter, all
conditions, and any authorized modifications, shall be available at the project site during construction and
maintenance of this project
Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a
stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification You should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Lori Beckwith at 828 -271 -7980.
Digitally signed by
BECKWITH.LORETT BECKWnHLORMAANN1173452264
DN C =US, o =U 5 Govemment, ou =DoD,
Corps Regulatory Official: Lori Beckwith PKi,ou =USA,
A.ANN.1 17345 4-Cn=BECKWITH LORMAANN 1173452264
Date 2014 04 04 1608 11 - 04'00'
Date: Aaril 4, 2014 Expiration Date or Verification: March 18, 2017

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued—. Action ID
E. Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The site contains a wetland, as determined by the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Dehneation Manual Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region. This wetland is adjacent to a stream channel located
on the property that exhibits indicators of an ordinary high water mark The stream channels on the property are
unnamed tributaries to Reems Creek, which flows into the French Broad River. The French Broad River is a water
of the U.S regulated pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This jurisdictional
determination is valid for the impact and mitigation areas only.
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for
the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland
conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or
anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as
indicated in B and C above).
(This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site Ifyou object
to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
Enclosed you will find a request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must
submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division �
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of
the date of the NAP Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 2,
2014
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence ** BECKWITH.LORETT Digitally signed by
SECKWlTH LORETTA.ANN 1173452264
DN c--US, o=U S Government, ou =DoD, ou =PKL
Corps Regulatory Official: Lori Beckwith n n n r` i 1 1 7 3 4 c 2 -y c `USA,
- 't<7°98CINdtTp'tOREtTR:ANN 1173452264
Date 201;04 04 16,0&27 - 04'00'
Issue Date- Anril 4, 2014 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Date

-4-
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished by e -mail: Environmental Consulting Services, Inc., Attn: Mr. John Vilas

H`AW',KS LANDING
MONFIED -MITIGATI04 PLAN

V
BIV1101011d -a- m-b-d'U11y Se1' Inc.
March 19, 2014
Ms Loretta A Beckwith
USACE, Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Ave, Rm 208
Asheville, NC 28801
RE- Hawks Landing Project Modified Mitigation Plan
Buncombe County, NC
Action ID 200SM402
Dear Ms. Beckwith,
3764 Romuger Road
Banner Elk, NC 28804
Ph 825-287 -6946
Fax [phone]
e-mail john @env -ecs corn
The purpose of this letter and attached supporting materials is to request a modification to the existing
compensatory mitigation plan for the referenced project
Attached to this letter are the following materials.
1 New Preservation Area Site Selection Map
2 Copy of Plat showing both ewsbng Preservation Area and Proposed new Preservation Area
3 Copy of letter from AFFP, LLC, owner of Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank indicating
availability of credits and Intent to sell to Hawks Landing, LTD.
4 DWQ Stream Sheets and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms for each of the three
streams evaluated
5 Copies of 2008 404 and 401 permits
Background
A CWA 404 permit was Issued for the Hawks Landing project on September 8, 2008 This permit
(NWP 29) authorized 300 linear feet of impacts to unnamed tributaries to Reems Creek and 0 005
acres of wetland Impacts All authorized impacts were demonstrated to be necessary in order to
construct roads for a proposed residential development. The 2008 permit was Issued as an after -the-
fad permit. As a condition of the permit, compensatory mitigation was required for the 300 linear feet of
stream impact in the French Broad River Basin (HUC- 8.06010105). The mitigation requirement was to
be satisfied In two parts
1. 300 stream mitigation credits were to be purchased from NCEEP
2. Restrictive covenants were to be recorded to reflect the preservation of 1,500 linear feet of
stream channel with minimum 30 foot -wide buffer on each side from the top of the stream
bank The area to be preserved was shown on maps submitted by the Applicant Additionally,
all residential lots that overlap the preservation area were to be encumbered by the same
restrictive covenants as the preservation area and all property owners were to be given copies
of the recorded restrictive covenants The Corps was also to be given copies of all recorded
restrictive covenants.
In 2009 the project began to have financial problems and was unable to make the required mitigation
payment to NCEEP, the preservation area was surveyed and recorded but without all the required
restrictive covenants By 2010 the protect had been completely stopped and the owning entity nearty
went bankrupt but managed to stay afloat through a major corporate restructuring. In mid -2013 as the
economy began to show signs of life the owners began to Inquire about what needed to happen In
order to finish the project. The restructured company simply was not able to generate the funds to
make the NCEEP payment and Is seeking this modification to the mitigation plan in order to fulfill all
permit obligations and complete a project that was started 15 years ago
Basic Outline of Modified Mitigation Plan

• Page 2 March 19, 2014
The proposed modification to the 2008 Mitigation Plan involves increasing the percentage of total
stream mitigation to be satisfied through preservation. The 2008 plan specifies 50% of the total (300
linear feet of 600 linear feet total) stream mitigation requirement can be covered by preservation The
proposed Mitigation Plan increases that percentage to 75% (450 linear feet of 600 linear feet total) The
balance of the stream mitigation requirement (150 linear feet) is to be satisfied through purchase of
stream mitigation credits from the Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank. Other than the change
described in this paragraph, all requirements of the 2008 Mitigation Plan remain and will be satisfied by
the owners
Modified Mitigation Plan Components:
1 Ob ives• Impacts to unnamed tributaries to Reams Creek associated with the Hawks
0 Landing development consisted of 7 piped stream crossings and one wetland crossing totaling
approximately 300 linear feet of stream impact and 0 005 acres of wetland impact The effect
on the resource due to the pipe impacts appear minimal at this time, the greater potential
impact appears to be associated with encroachment into stream buffer zones, which occurred
in the older section of the development and prior to implementation and effective enforcement
of stream buffer protection rules. The proposed Modified Mitigation Plan directly addresses this
threat by expanding the amount of permanently protected stream corridor within the
boundaries of the Hawks Landing development The area of expanded preservation will
establish a natural corridor in an area where lot lines could have extended to the center of the
stream The portion of mitigation to be satisfied through a local stream mitigation bank will be
used in the French Broad Basin to address documented watershed needs.
2 Site Selection: The Modified Mitigation Plan proposes to increase the length of preserved
steam on the site over that indicated in the 2008 Mitigation Plan Site selection issues will be
limited to only the proposed new preservation area. Three different stream readies (see Site
Selection Map) were evaluated to determine which one or oombination would best meet the
selection criteria outlined below
a Ecological Significance. determined by water quality and riparian condition, measured
using NC-DWQ Stream Identification Form and USACE Stream Quality Assessment
Worksheet
b Continuity relationship or connectivity to previously approved preservation area.
c Threat Protection
d. Other Factors: habitat value, unique features, other
Findings of the site selection evaluation process are discussed below
➢ Site 1 This reach is located upstream of the existing preservation area and separated
by a subdivision road and culvert The length of this reach is only 304 linear feet
before transitioning into a linear wetland. The drainage area is approximately 22
aces. The stream scored a 38 on the NC DWR Stream ID Form and scored a 79 on
the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet. This stream reach is relatively
stable and is adjacent to 4 proposed residential lots
➢ Site 2: This reach is located east of the existing preservation area, it is a tributary of a
tributary to the existing preservation reach. The reach is very steep with bedrock
control near the downstream limits becoming flatter and somewhat poorly defined
upstream The channel actually goes completely subsurface for almost 100 linear feet
before re- emerging above. The stream scored a 30 25 (downstream section) on the
NC DWR Stream ID Form and scored a 77 5 on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet. This stream reach is relatively stable and is adjacent to one
proposed residential lot
➢ Site 3• This reach is located east of the existing preservation reach with a confluence
point near the mid -point of the existing reach. The site 3 reach is over 700 feet in
length with a drainage area of approximately 177 acres. The reach is relatively steep
with numerous bedrock controls including a large (30 foot -high) waterfall There are
several wetland seeps adjacent to the channel and several shallow caves in the
waterfall area. The stream scored a 40.5 on the NC DWR Stream ID Form and
Hawks Landing Mod MitigaWn Plan ENV -ECS, tnc

• Page 3 March 19, 2014
scored a 89 on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet. This stream
reach is relatively stable and is adjacent to 3 proposed residential lots
Final Selection Discussion.
Based on the findings for each of the 3 sites, Site 3 was considered to be the most
suitable reach for the additional preservation mitigation. Site 3 had the largest
drainage area, highest scores on both the stream ID sheet and the Stream Quality
sheet, and included unique features and strong habitat values. As with Sites 1 and 2,
Site 3 is contiguous with the wasting preservation reach and occurs adjacent to
proposed residential lots
3 Site Protection Instrument All preservation areas on the project site will be permanently
protected in accordance with the guidelines. The protective measures will be defined and enforced
by way of restrictive covenants included on recorded plats for the preservation easements. The
language proposed is as follows
The areas shown on this recorded plat as conservation areas shall be maintained in
perpetuity in their natural or mitigated condition. No person or entity shall perform any
of the following activities on such conservation area.
a. fill, grade, excavate or perform any other land disturbing activities b. cut, mow, burn,
remove, or harm any vegetation c. construct or place any roads, trails, walkways,
buildings, mobile homes, signs, utility poles or towers, or any other permanent or
temporary structures d. drain or otherwise disrupt or alter the hydrology or drainage
ways of the conservation area e. dump or store soil, trash, or other waste f. graze or
water animals, or use for any agricultural or horticultural purpose This covenant is
intended to ensure continued compliance with the mitigation condition of a Clean Water
Act authorization issued by the United States of America, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Action ID SAW -2008- 00402, and therefore may be enforced by the
United States of America. This covenant is to run with the land, and shall be binding on
the Owner, and all parties claiming under it. This restrictive covenant cannot be
amended or modified without the express written consent of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District.
4 Baseline Information The proposed preservation area is located on the same property, along
the same stream, and possesses the same ecological characteristics as the impacts sites
5 Determination of Credits Total stream impacts associated with the Hawks Landing project are
300 linear feet of stream impact A mitigation ratio of 2.1 was established during the initial permitting
process that occurred in 2008, this ratio resulted in a requirement of 600 stream mitigation credits
for the project The Modified Mitigation Plan calls for these credits to be obtained through a
combination of preservation and payment into the NC EEP In -Lieu Fund or a local stream mitigation
bank if available. Specifically, 150 mitigation credits will be obtained through a purchase of stream
mitigation credits from a local bank and 450 mitigation credits will be obtained through preservation
of on -site streams at a 51 ratio. Total stream length to be preserved will not be less than 2250 linear
feet
6 Mitigation Work Plan- There is no design or construction work needed to implement the
proposed mitigation plan The following activities must all be completed prior to any further
construction in jurisdictional areas•
• Request an invoice from Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank, submit payment for
full amount indicated on invoice and send copy of receipt to USACE
• Execute and record restrictive covenants, the form of which is to be approved by
USACE prior to recordation, reflecting the preservation of no less than 2250 linear feet
of stream with a minimum NY buffer on each side of stream (from top of bank) The
area to be preserved shall be approved by the USACE prior to recordation, a
Hawks LanKng Mod M*gahon Wan EW -ECS, Inc

• Page 4 March 19, 2014
preliminary map/plat showing preservation areas and restrictive covenants will be
submitted to USAGE for review and approval prior to recordation. The
Owner /Applicant shall furnish the USAGE with a copy of the recorded restrictive
covenants within 60 days of the date of recordation
7 Maintenance Plan No maintenance plan is needed as the preservation area is intended to be
left in a natural state.
8 Performance Standards. No performance standards, other than those incorporated into the
Nationwide Permit Verification, are needed for this type of mitigation.
9 Monitoring Requirements No specfic monitoring and/or reporting requirements are included in
this mitigation plan. The Owner/Applicant understands that all conditions and restrictions for the
preservation area contained in the Restrictive Covenants are binding legal obligations.
10 Long Term Management Plan: No long -term management plan is proposed for the preservation
areas except for as spelled out in the Restrictive Covenants
11. Adaptive Management Plan- No adaptive management plan is included in the proposed
mitigation plan
12 Financial Assurances- No financial assurances are needed for this mitigation plan It is
understood that all elements of this plan, 1) payment to stream mitigation bank and 2) recordation of
preservation easement, must be comps prior to any further construction in Jurisdictional areas
If you have any questions regarding this Modified Mitigation Plan or other aspects of this project please
do not hesitate to contact John Vilas at 828- 297 -6946. Thank you
Sincerely,
J n C. Was
President, ENV -ECS, Inc
CC Tim Fox, NC DWR
Ross Adickman, Hawks Landing
Mark Brooks, PE, Brooks Engineenng
Hawks Landing Mod. Mffigafion Mn EW -ECS, bw

l ;
g
New Preservation Area o s
Site Selection Map N "
Hawks Landing
Modified Mitigation Plan g �_
Nm March 2014 �- p
ED
m
o ° -
W C
y N 2 +�
C
° ° Qoo� 0) >NQ --
°`
° , �oQ� x v�o N a aw
o a) �
o L- co
2
s
O (a W t0
e°
CI) U)
a
� C °'
°
ln 1, s �s�ai: L' (� �ry
N y
nl 25 sp"e
_ _ in 2- M
Cm
y)
^`
-r.� 1' '�,s\.`'_ '��,,Y� - �`- _ 16'x°6 � r' - `\` ,'t�•'«��'Y�'�'i:'�'
EO
S,,'Slrs3 E Ca W) M .�- 'jj��y�j_ - zf
=W E 23293'
" o
M.LrezroS
LO C%4 oc�o��0'4�'�
X1 09, +� W
n
G 04 -
V �® U
OD
(Wp �
n Pn'
CZ OLZ
3lt N "
66Z1Z 3 .SI,90= N rr L9Z 3 .Q 91100 N ,9699f 3 .91 9QOO N W U)
CO O N
- - - O 0M
00
3 a04 0 `
Q

Mill
9 all
a
7 � �
�ggg9
� � i ii i
HI
$aA w$
fill
A � Iffl It i lj# p
gat o 1 3� $ ; k.
fill! m II
II
1 � ,
I ,
� I .
I
I a
II
;I
ll
/
I
1 I 1
I;
1 I I
a�
,tee
/l
I ^ 1
,a
1 I 1
I I
I
I
I
I/ �y
I F
I I
\
\
\
HIM
¢ t $�s$
a
,z �6 ski a
Ada ,

4ffP. PLC t
A Waft Street
Suite -592 . t
Ash -VAB,, K299I/
March 7, 2014
John C. Vilas
3764 Raminger Rd.
Bannor Elk, NC 28604
RE: Request to purchase Stream Mitigation Credits from Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation
Bank
Dear Mr. Vilas:
We roceived your inquiry on behalf of Hawks Landing, LTD to purchase 150 stream mitigation
credits from the Anderson Farm Stream Mitigation Bank, located3n the French Broad River
Basin Hydrologic Unit 06010105. We have the 150 credits available to sell to Hawks Landing,
LTD according to the following terms: Purchase price of $350 per credit, with a total purchase
price of $52,500. We also require a 10% down payment of the total to be held in our escrow
account until Army Corps of Engineers approves the creddsale. Please send a letter indicating
that Hawks Landing, LTD agrees to these terms along with the $5,250 down payment.
Thank you for your interest. Please contact Allison Kiehl at t �_ _r or 1828)-
337 -5288 for questions.
AFFP, LLC
s
I

/ I
` April 7, 2014,
"John -C. Visas
3764 Rominger-Road
Banner Eik, NC 28604
` Acknovrle�ement of Receipt, '
Dear Mr. Vitas:
This letter is`to,ackrtowledge receipt -of, check #138016r $5250 from Hawks landing LTD,
representing °i0%, down payment on their,pun ase °of'iS0'stmam mitigation credits °from,the
Anderson`Farm Stream Mitigation Bank. The remaining balance due is,now $47,250.
Sincerely,
Lisa Fancher,
Finance Director
AFFP, LLC

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #I (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET y'"
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Apphcancs time w�5 L 2. Evaluator's name: �^ V A i''S
3. Date of evaluation:.. 1 l - %S ' 1 4. Time of evaluation
S. Name of stream- SAT- 12 eon S C N e, k 6. River basin:
7. Approximate dramage area 7,2 4-4, 3 8. Stream order � S
i
9. Length of reach evaluated. .3 V V lo. County- S to a a m `A-
11. Site coordinates (if known) preform decimal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if any) Yoiwif /-A,064
Latitude (es. 34 872312). S S' � Z Longitude (ea. -77 556611): o Z . srO
Method location determined (c=14 GPS po Shoe (Aenal) Photo/ IS er G Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (no roads and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Sgm�n S. le Sale, -6-^ m q
14. Proposed channel work (if any) &A
15. Recent weather conditions Or y
16. Site conditions at time of visit PtW it!° -y new bjj
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known. _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters _ -Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use' 10 % Residential % Commercial ,% Industrial _% Agricultural
10 . Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width. 5 - 6 / 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)) O •
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) .Gentle (2 to 40A) Moderate (4 to 10%) X Steep (>10 %)
25. Charnel sinuosity Straight ,Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g , the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature � 4�L C V(-' Date--L-L/ S " / J
This channel evaluation forA is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,I ,

Vir ilWn Ctrpam irilpntifiiratinn Fnrm Vercinn 4.11
Date: — I S ='3_- _ -- - - -- - - -- -
Project/Site' Na'^i�-' `"^%
Latitude:
Evaluator: TV
County: a; -r - e-,,
Longitude:
0
1
2
Total Points: g
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least mtermment
Ephemeral Intermittent reran a
e g Quad Name:
rf 2 19 or perennial if 2 30'
0
1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Co 5
3
3 In- channel structure- ex Piffle -pool, step -pool,
npple-pool sequence
0
1
/.�'� --7
l%
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes - 3
2
3
6 Depostbonal bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
24 Amphibians
2
CIP
9 Grade control
0
05
1
CUP
L10 Natural valley
0
05
1
CfV
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdminciv (Subtotal = �L_ 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bactena
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
Co 5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debns
1
05
1
15
16 Organic detins lines or piles
0
M=
1
1,5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
i No = 0
Yes - 3
C. Bloloav (Subtotal = / L 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
3
22 Fish
rdp
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
0 5
1
5
25 Algae
0
1
I 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
1 5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes- M odv w •`
j ; u
Sketch:
_
a

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #3 (indicate on attached map)
:.a.: STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: -� -
1. Applicant's name a m/ s 1 �-� �i 2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of evaluation: ��' /S' 13 4. Time of evaluation. l /
S. Name of stream: U T - LA I - (A T - 6. River basm
7. Approximate drainage area:. CR 4 0.c nt I 8. Stream order � s
9. Length of reach evaluated N 4Y 00 hiA - F�1, 10. County. 1360AC V ,,."
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (m 34 8773 t2) SS-11+1 Longitude (es. -77.556611)
Method location detemuned (cimle� GPS o(o S p Ortho (AOP oto/GI5 et G Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note, roads and ks and attach map identifying streams) location):
See
14. Proposed channel work (if any). C,0 N zJ Sec
15. Recent weather conditions
16. Site conditions at tame of visit: OVtrc
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
-4Trout waters _Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed —0-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES S If yes, estimate the water surface area
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (� 3 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Lc)-,Y. Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
4D % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( JP
22. Bankfull width 3-q 23_ Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10%) ,Steep ( >109/6)
25. Channel sinuosity Straight XO�onal beads Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determmmg the most appropriate ecoregron based on
location, terram, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregron Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregron. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 74. 5` Comments:
Evaluator's Signature �/� !/( Date / 1 5=-13
This channel evaluation fo is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectiSite 1 S k ' z c~
Latitude:
Evaluator: TV'
County: Z
Longitude:
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
LAnc C-0—la-f—
1
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
her
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30' 30 , Z S
Ephemeral Intermittent P
e g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(115_7-
5
2
3
3 In- channel structure. ex. nffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool s uence
0
1
CD
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
-i
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1
10. Natural valley
0
05
1
0
11 Second or greater order channel
No ED
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = & )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 )
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
(115_7-
5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
05
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
1
5
1
15
17. Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10,7 )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0­?
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
.5
25 Algae
7
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 0 751 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes*
t✓�4�,2 gee /r� in
Sketch. t,,U.r 5� b �
P'v4d Lyt_j
►� t� v+2r.
dot its ! s1.�,�� s{•s
l eN � s k-. -c J� �. � � Qp�
24
� •.>! ,. � z � �r S �rri M, S
4v 71Lr 4

USACE AID#! DWQ # Site #_ -�L (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET"`'
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name 9k,4(,; e-!n �
2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of evaluation: J/- 16 - l
4. Tune of evaluation.
5. Name of stream Ll T- tAT- 1?ee —s &44k
6. River basin:
t
7. Approximate drainage area / :V4- "k i
& Stream order
//,,
9. Length of reach evaluated 4SD + /. LA, i~s•s.f
10. county.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
12. Subdivision name (if any): A4, 4 s L,,,4 -*' -C
Latitude (ca. 34.872312). 3 j T Z
Longitude (ea. -T7 556611): L. %'U
Method location determined (circle). GPS To6pt Ortho ( GIS r S Other
1a�ks location).
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and
and attar inaP identtfyuig streams)
See
14. Proposed channel work (if any) Ald,"
15. Recent weather conditions D L-,Z
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 01ow as f Lta o l
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section
10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _
Nutnent Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ® If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ® NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: f (%% Residential _% Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
10 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Benkfull width. �4- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 40A) Moderate (4 to 10°x6) -Y_ Steep (>10%)
25. Channel smuosity Straight ,%Occasional bends Frequent meander TVery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g , the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
r each. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality-
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature .� `' �`- Date �� / S" /3
This channel evaluation fo s intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26

�Az 3
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
• These chawtaistics are not assessed m coastal steams+
` � ���4t�;✓;�
L
- t' F .� 3n . : f - _, � iva i [���SV '� Via_ _k ' ��"i . �� >x
:�iM^.
..�.1 --•+
r^hr- -8
MA
y�
^ASY++}. F_VI`+f,6.� Y .S� 1 _ Y _ ��;A 4.Y^i.` ��M'�k��-
✓
7o
r _
✓
`
M
Via^ .,,.<a,,.- .>,
yam= .ale �.�..
"""pn`
ra e+-
..?' - -
2.a+;•
M-�"Sra.�;-- ^,...,y
"SR}7er
F S.
vi
�
^
,_.0
. � :9 4
w S'�ayy�
0 a�.. i� Y —E��. ,�,.i'
.
►��5/�$�/[., �
�'y��li �.�
�
�j�
��1
A'(' C; - 'aY
bb+` pHY3'
- �`i._.4xn5 "FA3 •w` .,.RC*k„�6,`
^
m
-,:
^
°�.,.._. _,. - _ ..y..�.:...«.,j..: • -•.' ` � � � w :.y.,2Y.a.. � }iaa
`....:.g...:}.... `
_ w�.+- ` n..mtF3'` ���� `~ b1F
_
• These chawtaistics are not assessed m coastal steams+

4v aid �.� r'.c w« Ili• i�"ti•�l C 1,"'
NC'' nWn Ctream identificatinn Fnrm Vercinn 4.11
Date: l 1 = 13
Project/Site' w 3
Latitude:
Evaluator: TV-
County: �.rz
Longitude:
Total Points:
Streams at least intermittent
� `�
Stream Determination (circle-0021
Ephemeral Intermittent erem n
Other
e g Quad Name:
/
if a 19 or perennial d a 30' ' J
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal 7_1 ? i _J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
n le- of sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
7 2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0,�
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
Nor
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdrolnov (Suhtntal = 51 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
2
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles
0
05
Cl
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes t 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = /5-- 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
22 Fish
0
05
1
75
23. Crayfish
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
1
CrD
25 Algae
0
0
FACW = 0 75; OBL
1 15
1 her = 0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes'
Sketch'

U.S. ARMS' CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 2008 -00402 County: Buncombe
GENERAL PERNHT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Hawk's Landing, LTD
Address: 3800 S. Ocean Drive, Suite 218
Hollywood, FL 33019
Telephone No.: (954) 458 -7828
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The project is located on a
281 -acre property off of Reems Creek Road near Weaverville in Buncombe County, North_
Carolina. Coordinates for the site are 35.7125 north and 82.4960 west.
Description of projects area and activity: The permittee is authorized to impact 300 linear feet of
unnamed tributaries to Reems Creek and 0.005 acre of wetland in order to construct roads and
access for the Hawk's Landing residential development. This is an after- the -fact verification letter
because a portion of the work is already completed.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 29 (After- the -fact)
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached conditions, the conditions in the attached letter from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
your submitted plans, and the following special conditions:
1. You shall mitigate for the unavoidable impacts to 300 linear feet of stream associated with this project
by payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) in the amount necessary to
perform restoration to 300 linear feet of cold stream in the French Broad River Basin (Cataloging Unit
06010105). Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property (excluding the after - the -fact work in
jurisdictional areas already completed) shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment with
certified check to the NCEEP, and the NCEEP has made written confirmation to the District Engineer that it
agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph IV.D. of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4,1998.
2. Prior to further work in jurisdictional waters of the U.S. on the property, you shall execute and cause
to be recorded restrictive covenants, the form of which is to be agreed upon by the Corps prior to
recordation. The restrictive covenant will reflect the preservation of 1,500 linear feet of stream with a 30'
buffer on each side of the stream (from top of bank); this area is depicted by the hatching on the attached
maps. Additionally, because the preservation areas are located within lot lines, you will ensure that waters of
the U.S. are depicted on these plats as legally preserved areas and the new owners are given copies of the
recorded restrictive covenants. You shall furnish the Corps with a copy of the recorded restrictive covenants
within 60 days of the date of recordation.
Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a
stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity

-2-
completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as mdicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Lon Beckwith at 828 - 271 -7980.
Corps Regulatory Official: Lori Beckwith ' Date: September 8, 2008
V 71010
Expiration Date of Verification: September 8, 2010

F WAIF
o 90
AG
Michael F Easley, Governor
41 -11 r
William G Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment Natural Resources
Qy
and
O -�
Coleen H Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
September 26, 2008
DWQ Project # 99- 0409 -V2
Buncombe County
Ross Adickman
Hawk's Landing, LTD
3800 S. Ocean Drive
Suite 218
Hollywood, FL 33019
Subject Property: Hawk's Landing Subdivision
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Adickman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.005 acres of wetlands and 300 feet of streams for the
purpose of residential housing development at the subject property, as described within your
application dated July 7, 2008 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
July 30, 2008. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3705 (GC3705). The Certification(s) allows
you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 29 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non - discharge, stormwater and trout buffer regulations. Also, this approval
to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions fisted below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and t•>Q"ttr,C0
North Carolma Division of Water Quality 2090 U S Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet www wwomquaidy o►9 FAX [phone].623 -6748
G 1WPDATAIDEMWQ1Buncornbe1401sWawksLandmg 199 - 0409 — Approval 9 -25 -08 doc
An Equal Oppaautq /Aftnative Action Ertployer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Constaner Paper

Applicant Ross Adickman
Page 2 of 5
Date September 26, 2008
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
2. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. A
final compensatory mitigation plan must be approved in writing by this Office
before any of the impacts approved herein are conducted. Additionally, the
compensatory mitigation plan must be completely constructed and implemented
according to the plans approved by this Office before any permanent building or road
associated with the project is occupied or opened. The mitigation must be maintained
according to the approved plan and permanently protected by the use of conservation
easements or similar protections. Any repairs or adjustments to the mitigation site must
be made according to the approved plan or must receive written approval from this Office
to make the repairs or adjustments.
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the NCDENR Wetlands Trust Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Until the EEP
receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The
EEP should be contacted at (919) 715 -0476 if you have any questions concerning
payment into the fund.
You have 60 days from the date of this approval to make the required EEP payment elff -3q,N 74)01
payment.
For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the
NCDENR Wetlands Trust Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation
requirement:
Amount Approved nits
Plan Location or Reference
Stream
300 feet
PCN Page 4
404 /CAMA Wetlands
0.005 acres
PCN Page 4
2. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. A
final compensatory mitigation plan must be approved in writing by this Office
before any of the impacts approved herein are conducted. Additionally, the
compensatory mitigation plan must be completely constructed and implemented
according to the plans approved by this Office before any permanent building or road
associated with the project is occupied or opened. The mitigation must be maintained
according to the approved plan and permanently protected by the use of conservation
easements or similar protections. Any repairs or adjustments to the mitigation site must
be made according to the approved plan or must receive written approval from this Office
to make the repairs or adjustments.
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the NCDENR Wetlands Trust Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Until the EEP
receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The
EEP should be contacted at (919) 715 -0476 if you have any questions concerning
payment into the fund.
You have 60 days from the date of this approval to make the required EEP payment elff -3q,N 74)01
payment.
For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the
NCDENR Wetlands Trust Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation
requirement:
In addition, per your application dated July 7, 2008 and in accordance with the mitigation
agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you intend to preserve 1,770 feet of
the unnamed tributary of the French Broad located on the property through deed lI
restrictions protecting 30 -foot riparian buffers along both stream banks Properly
recorded deed restrictions should be provided to the DWQ at the letterhead address
within 60 days of the date of this approval.
3. Protective Fencing
Compensatory Mitigation
Required
River and Sub -basin
Number
Stream
300 linear feet
French Broad - 6010105
In addition, per your application dated July 7, 2008 and in accordance with the mitigation
agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you intend to preserve 1,770 feet of
the unnamed tributary of the French Broad located on the property through deed lI
restrictions protecting 30 -foot riparian buffers along both stream banks Properly
recorded deed restrictions should be provided to the DWQ at the letterhead address
within 60 days of the date of this approval.
3. Protective Fencing

Applicant Ross Adickman
Page 3 of 5
Date Septanber 26, 2008
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing;
4. Impervious Surface Thresholds
You have indicated an impervious surface area of 12 % in the PCN Application dated
July 7, 2008 and approved by this written 401 Water Quality Certification. You are
reminded that if a compliance inspection determines that you have triggered Condition
No. 12 in GC No. 3705, you will be required to develop, submit for DWQ approval, and
implement Stormwater Management Plans. The stormwater management plan must
include construction plans, specifications, stormwater BMP worksheets, and supporting
calculations. The stormwater best management practices are required to be appropriate
for the surface water classification and designed to remove at least 85% TSS according to
the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual.
S. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B..0200. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control practices must be used to meet this standard.
6. Trout Moratorium
The stream is a Class C/Trout Waters. In order to protect downstream uses for Class
C/Trout Waters a requirement of this Certification is that any additional work conducted
within the stream may not occur between the dates of October 15 through April 15.
7. Culvert Installation
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved
BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance
Activities manual
(hAR://www.ncdot.or,q/doh/oi&mtions/BMP manual/download/BMP Manual.pdB
such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to
prevent excavation in flowing water.
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original
stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below
locations of each culvert.
Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to
prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched,

Applicant Ross Adickman
Page 4 of 5
Date September 26, 2008
the appropriate stream grade shall be re- established or, if the pipes installed in a perched
manner, the pipes shall be removed and re- installed correctly
8. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards.
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
9. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
10. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.

Applicant Ross Adickman
Page 5 of 5
Date September 26, 2008
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Ian McMillan or Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919 - 733 -1786 or Chuck Cranford in the DWQ Asheville Regional
Office at 828 - 2964664.
CHSIcbc
Enclosures: GC 3705
Certificate of Completion
cc: Neill Yelverton — WNR, Inc.
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
is,
Sincerely,
*y C.
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Filename G IWPDATAIDEMWQ1Buncombc% 40l sU{ awksLandmg199 .0409_Approval_9 -25 -08 doc

WETLANDS AREAS "A"
THRU "
F "
LINE
TABLES
W
W101 *N
.17.
73°09'47': E.
76;
11.41
W132,
W133.N
00°07'35"
.
W.
.
24.91'
W102.S
61°11'25" E.
13.02'
W134.N
3b°58'41"
E.
17.58'
W103.S
24035'57" W.
17.64'
W135.14
10006'56"
W.
14.97'
W104.S
59°40'13" W.
12.91'
W136.N
29014'23"
E.
37.99'
W105.N
46°17'17" W.
12,.30'
W137.N
49°25'40"
E.
20.51'
W138.S
71°56157"
E.
19.91'
AREA OF
WETLANDS A
=0.01+/- ACRES.
W139.S
13°02'39"
W.
24.98'
(494.83+/-
sq. ft. l
W140.S
01°11'42"
909.63 (
W.
18.94'
W141.S
22°50'47"
1668
W.
14.63'
W142.S
16°07'43"
�
TIMOTHYE.
W.
11.30'
VICINITY
MAP
W143.S
45°22'52"
(
SCOTT A.
W.
39.00'
JOHN J. BELL, Jr.
D.B.315.PG.337
LAR
J
* * ats3 S77 -50,0 ,,E PG.283 ! PG. 311 NELLIE C.GARNER
aiso rtsrts2 9 905, 10, D. B. 270.PG. 321
430
V1 38 cn / 370.00,q/
11137 139wi
o SSB°9 p BRYAN T.BOWAN
11136 ( / /
,�,: rt4tNCDENR r ETAL BRYAN T.BOWAN
ata ISOLATED CO x134 11142 WETLANDS '29 F \ NO REFERENCE ETAL
W143 AREA E \ ' NO REFERENCE
WAYNE STYRON 1113 x132
�. B. 91 3. PG. 399 fid' \
a
`,dip♦ ry0w!*r�� 1Maa.m tT \ j.'' /,.
A �
° BRYAN T.BOWAN 7
ETAL
NCDENR D.B.386
ISOLATED \`� �/
WETLANb `.ice\ Pc_281 'r BRYANT.BOWAN
AREA "C" \ \ J ETAL
tIS NO REFERENCE
11114 N68s09T28'a
arts y - 11116 Tit LINE
1� 11?
3k 11118 NCDENR
60.16 11112
N44.22'211%W x124 ISOLATED
Tit LINE W122 � A V1119WETLANDS
'�` 11120 m12 � ! rt2s AREA "0" r i
11121 11126
NCDENR x109 110 11131 11111111 T° % i''
S NO a
11108 " �t M1 it
WETLA11127
rtOtatO 11128
Ds
AREA "e" 11tOT 03 11/29 r r `•`� �� '' / //' ti~��eP
too
42.22• x104 ST.ts'
N68° t 3' S9'a wt Os N38' t S 40 E
NcoENR TIE LINE
TIE LINE ISOLATED r'J - --
- , �, Q
WETLAND
-- - - - -- AREA "A"
W106.5 83"51'03" W. 18.93'
W107.N 45°59'22" W. 15,.03'
W108.N 13°54'16" E. 15.28'
W109.N 65°31'55" E. 19.97'
W110.S 44°25'59" E. 17.37'
W111.S 12°1"33'06" W. 19.61'
AREA OF WETLANDS 8 = 0.02+/- ACRES.
( 806.50+/- sq. ft.)
W112.N 06°06'35" W. 33.79 '
W113.N 41°51'56" E. 35.43'
W114.14 70034'11" E. 23.88'
W115.S 03°09'29" E. 33.58'
W116.S 10025'42" E. 17,82'
W117.S 49056'54" E. 19.32`
W118.S 43048'46" W. 22,73'
W119.S 54°50'54" W. 33.07'
W120.S 18°31'36" W. 16.79`
W121.N 36'27'33" W. 25.20'
W122.14 01°22'33" E. 26.65'
AREA OF WETLANDS C = 0.10+/- ACRES.
(4211.37+/- Sq. ff.I
W123.N 51°54'46" E. 30.17'
W124.S 31012'36" E. 23°07'
W125.S 14°34'30 W. 18.29'
W126.S 18°56'02 W. 41.63 '
WT279S 29032'03" W - 15.14'
W128.S 88°51'11" W. 8.94'
W129.N 39046'59" W. 19.82'
W130.N 21°41'21" E. 15.17'
W131.N 07°56'25" E. 42.63'
AREA OF WETLANDS 0 = 0.06+/- ACRES.
(2424-32+/- sq. ft. )
AREA OF WETLANDS E _ 0.08+/- ACRES
( 3634.55+/- sq. ft.)
W158.S 77°50'26" E. 53.01'
W159.S 26047'26" W. 8.92'
W157. " 22-95'
W156.5 Q2°24'39" E. 18.85`
W155.S 72056'42" W. 18.61'
W154.S 34°46'32" W. 46.39'
W153.S 56°32'01" W. 18.25'
W152.S 76°36'46" W. 11.84'
W151.S 73955'29" W. 13.65,
W150.N 06°55'37" W. 24.23'
W149.N 17019'49" E. 20.76'
W148.N 31 ° 37' 15" E. 30.30'
W147.N 32026'36" E. 16.51'
W146.N 48023'17" E. 26.00'
W145.N 05°06'42" W. 12.23'
W144.N 05006'42" We 5.56'
5.56'
AREA OF WETLANDS F -~ 0.13+/W ACRES
(5722.60+/- sq. ft.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLANDS
= 17294,17+/- SQUARE FEET
(0°40-+'/- ACRES)
1111 / NOTES:
1. NO KNOWN WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
EX/Sr-'+ - - - �' - !'!! ` 44 �' OF EXCAVATION AREAS.
PRtVpT� RVqp -✓ - - yQ�7' !!!! � Cy / 2.) TRACT SHOWN IS LOCATED IN FLOOD
3 '` rip �„ ZONE X (AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE
r!� _ - - -- ------ 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) AS CLASSIFIED
-_-_-_y --- EIP �' AND SHOWN ON F.E.M.A. CARTERET COUNTY FLOOD
r! E-I!:P'- _ `-"%� -� S87°33'39"W-257.82'; ;' INSUREANCE RATE MAP. NUMBER 3720632800J EFFECTIVE
'' !�� �)$• Q f S$3a3i7wwdwwdwmwiiW-1gq•02 �4 /; DATE JULY 16, 2003.
3.) BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM
SURVEY BY W.D. DANIELS, Jr.(L2673)
DECEMBER MAY
16, 1998; LAST AMENDED
PROJECT NO. m PM7s6-9,-002
DRAWING NO. e PM756-9'-002 REVISED WETLANDS 2014 2D. DGN
r -
M
N
WALTON KEITH GARNER
D.B.792.PG.136 `r
CD
N
0
z R 11A0�__ LEGEND:
acs
WETLAND IMPACT AREA AREA OF IMPACT (SO. FT.)
A +/-4
+/- .A
+1-4,211.37
ly
TOTAL=
NOTE NO IMPACTS ARE BEING REQUESTED FOR AREA F.
1 C 50 0 100 200
1CRAPH I C SCALE: 1 "=100'
gTS BONDECM EXISTING TE
EIP EXISTING IRONRPIPEMONUMENT
fpl4B E I R EXISTING IRON ROD
EPK EXISTING PK NAIL
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
PP POWER POLE
TEL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MHW MEAN HIGH WATER
RRS RAILROAD SPIKE
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
® WETLANDS
EM BUFFER AREA
Gr4F?� Ori
�.rrsasL°�rsw Z/
•
,7A�f
02C>ti81 .
°°•:�G1NEe°°°
°wp{wl!HwAAw►ww°��
IO
uri l;.i 6
♦fe�1 `' ,tree!
Its
iLg
APiR.�._�,
a
20140420
R E V I S I O N S
ax
SHEET
1
OF
1
ROBERT W.PYER
SITE
a
�
D.B.838.PG.761
(
/
r
S77w50 (
CLINTON R.
2S "F-
HALL
909.63 (
DPG.
1668
�..
�
TIMOTHYE.
VICINITY
MAP
1114 11159
\
(
SCOTT A.
JOHN J.
JURISDICTIONAL 11145 �� ts, 1 '•
\ (
D. B.1217 (
MANLEY
BROOKS
USCOE-EPA W146
404 WETLAND Srt4T x156 ric
\ �
PG -273 (
D, B. 1 199
DPG. 11 3984
DOROTHY
AREA F � rigs
164. �-
(
PG. 109 (
(TRUMAINE
VAUGHEN
W148V1 S4
�s
( COLLINS `
ROSS
■149 ,k SokD.
B. 1416
D. B. 1 365
LAR
J
* * ats3 S77 -50,0 ,,E PG.283 ! PG. 311 NELLIE C.GARNER
aiso rtsrts2 9 905, 10, D. B. 270.PG. 321
430
V1 38 cn / 370.00,q/
11137 139wi
o SSB°9 p BRYAN T.BOWAN
11136 ( / /
,�,: rt4tNCDENR r ETAL BRYAN T.BOWAN
ata ISOLATED CO x134 11142 WETLANDS '29 F \ NO REFERENCE ETAL
W143 AREA E \ ' NO REFERENCE
WAYNE STYRON 1113 x132
�. B. 91 3. PG. 399 fid' \
a
`,dip♦ ry0w!*r�� 1Maa.m tT \ j.'' /,.
A �
° BRYAN T.BOWAN 7
ETAL
NCDENR D.B.386
ISOLATED \`� �/
WETLANb `.ice\ Pc_281 'r BRYANT.BOWAN
AREA "C" \ \ J ETAL
tIS NO REFERENCE
11114 N68s09T28'a
arts y - 11116 Tit LINE
1� 11?
3k 11118 NCDENR
60.16 11112
N44.22'211%W x124 ISOLATED
Tit LINE W122 � A V1119WETLANDS
'�` 11120 m12 � ! rt2s AREA "0" r i
11121 11126
NCDENR x109 110 11131 11111111 T° % i''
S NO a
11108 " �t M1 it
WETLA11127
rtOtatO 11128
Ds
AREA "e" 11tOT 03 11/29 r r `•`� �� '' / //' ti~��eP
too
42.22• x104 ST.ts'
N68° t 3' S9'a wt Os N38' t S 40 E
NcoENR TIE LINE
TIE LINE ISOLATED r'J - --
- , �, Q
WETLAND
-- - - - -- AREA "A"
W106.5 83"51'03" W. 18.93'
W107.N 45°59'22" W. 15,.03'
W108.N 13°54'16" E. 15.28'
W109.N 65°31'55" E. 19.97'
W110.S 44°25'59" E. 17.37'
W111.S 12°1"33'06" W. 19.61'
AREA OF WETLANDS 8 = 0.02+/- ACRES.
( 806.50+/- sq. ft.)
W112.N 06°06'35" W. 33.79 '
W113.N 41°51'56" E. 35.43'
W114.14 70034'11" E. 23.88'
W115.S 03°09'29" E. 33.58'
W116.S 10025'42" E. 17,82'
W117.S 49056'54" E. 19.32`
W118.S 43048'46" W. 22,73'
W119.S 54°50'54" W. 33.07'
W120.S 18°31'36" W. 16.79`
W121.N 36'27'33" W. 25.20'
W122.14 01°22'33" E. 26.65'
AREA OF WETLANDS C = 0.10+/- ACRES.
(4211.37+/- Sq. ff.I
W123.N 51°54'46" E. 30.17'
W124.S 31012'36" E. 23°07'
W125.S 14°34'30 W. 18.29'
W126.S 18°56'02 W. 41.63 '
WT279S 29032'03" W - 15.14'
W128.S 88°51'11" W. 8.94'
W129.N 39046'59" W. 19.82'
W130.N 21°41'21" E. 15.17'
W131.N 07°56'25" E. 42.63'
AREA OF WETLANDS 0 = 0.06+/- ACRES.
(2424-32+/- sq. ft. )
AREA OF WETLANDS E _ 0.08+/- ACRES
( 3634.55+/- sq. ft.)
W158.S 77°50'26" E. 53.01'
W159.S 26047'26" W. 8.92'
W157. " 22-95'
W156.5 Q2°24'39" E. 18.85`
W155.S 72056'42" W. 18.61'
W154.S 34°46'32" W. 46.39'
W153.S 56°32'01" W. 18.25'
W152.S 76°36'46" W. 11.84'
W151.S 73955'29" W. 13.65,
W150.N 06°55'37" W. 24.23'
W149.N 17019'49" E. 20.76'
W148.N 31 ° 37' 15" E. 30.30'
W147.N 32026'36" E. 16.51'
W146.N 48023'17" E. 26.00'
W145.N 05°06'42" W. 12.23'
W144.N 05006'42" We 5.56'
5.56'
AREA OF WETLANDS F -~ 0.13+/W ACRES
(5722.60+/- sq. ft.)
TOTAL AREA OF WETLANDS
= 17294,17+/- SQUARE FEET
(0°40-+'/- ACRES)
1111 / NOTES:
1. NO KNOWN WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
EX/Sr-'+ - - - �' - !'!! ` 44 �' OF EXCAVATION AREAS.
PRtVpT� RVqp -✓ - - yQ�7' !!!! � Cy / 2.) TRACT SHOWN IS LOCATED IN FLOOD
3 '` rip �„ ZONE X (AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE
r!� _ - - -- ------ 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) AS CLASSIFIED
-_-_-_y --- EIP �' AND SHOWN ON F.E.M.A. CARTERET COUNTY FLOOD
r! E-I!:P'- _ `-"%� -� S87°33'39"W-257.82'; ;' INSUREANCE RATE MAP. NUMBER 3720632800J EFFECTIVE
'' !�� �)$• Q f S$3a3i7wwdwwdwmwiiW-1gq•02 �4 /; DATE JULY 16, 2003.
3.) BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM
SURVEY BY W.D. DANIELS, Jr.(L2673)
DECEMBER MAY
16, 1998; LAST AMENDED
PROJECT NO. m PM7s6-9,-002
DRAWING NO. e PM756-9'-002 REVISED WETLANDS 2014 2D. DGN
r -
M
N
WALTON KEITH GARNER
D.B.792.PG.136 `r
CD
N
0
z R 11A0�__ LEGEND:
acs
WETLAND IMPACT AREA AREA OF IMPACT (SO. FT.)
A +/-4
+/- .A
+1-4,211.37
ly
TOTAL=
NOTE NO IMPACTS ARE BEING REQUESTED FOR AREA F.
1 C 50 0 100 200
1CRAPH I C SCALE: 1 "=100'
gTS BONDECM EXISTING TE
EIP EXISTING IRONRPIPEMONUMENT
fpl4B E I R EXISTING IRON ROD
EPK EXISTING PK NAIL
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
PP POWER POLE
TEL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MHW MEAN HIGH WATER
RRS RAILROAD SPIKE
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
® WETLANDS
EM BUFFER AREA
Gr4F?� Ori
�.rrsasL°�rsw Z/
•
,7A�f
02C>ti81 .
°°•:�G1NEe°°°
°wp{wl!HwAAw►ww°��
IO
uri l;.i 6
♦fe�1 `' ,tree!
Its
iLg
APiR.�._�,
a
20140420
R E V I S I O N S
ax
SHEET
1
OF
1

STEEL POST
IRE FABRIC
EXXON GTFIOIS OR
WQUREL SECURED TO
FILL WITH EARTH
JOHN J. BELL, Jr. SILT FENCE SECTION
D.8.315.PG.337 N.T_S_
J 9
/ PERMIT BOUNDARY
aw I T E
VICINITY MAP r/� '•�'``
/� 30'UNDSTURBED
NATURAL SURFACE
r
5 FT
F MIN. 71
SURFACE LENGTH = 1
STORAGE DEPTH 1.6
.. •._i' w � �, • •.c.11sr 1111
:,-,., .1111 .,�.y .,s •� + RFs.+►
#57 STONE
a
SEDIMENT STORAGE
CLASS "B" RIP RAP
DESIGN 18'
SETTLED 21"
TOP MlN. %
uknal111i1�unlnlll
4 FT MIN. \
ROBERT W.PYER 5 FT `\
MAX. '' �
r PROPEF'YLINE
BUFFER & LIMIT
.altl I SD I CT I O
USCOE-EP
LINE
OF DIS`T!JRBANCE
j 404 WETLAN
E.
11.41'
W133,N
00°07'35"
I� & EXCAVATION
BOUNDARY
/ •
W,
24.91'
/
E.
S
W134.N
36°58'41"
MAINE EXCAVATION AREA = 9.16
ACRES
PERMIT BOUNDARY
FABRIC
W103,S 24035'57"
W104,S 59°40'13"
W.
W.
17.64'
12.91'
ttt 3$
10°06'56"'
29°14'23"
MINE & RYCiAVATION .137 I k W134
BOUt
W.
E.
14.97'
37.99'
11140
W.
%
W136 f, 311
` 140
49°25'40"
p
.135 x142
1:1 SIDE
1 /
ffit34 X043
n
ANNA INK MINE # 2
�W132
LARRY WAYNE STYRON
MIN.
W13
(
TEMPORARY DITC-e
/�2.1
DBA 248
D.B.913.PG.399
SIDE SLOPES
--�
13002'39"
_v 5` x 15'
Z TEMPORARY DEWATERING
W.
i SEDIMENT TRAP
(494.83+/- Sq. ft.)
6.)
/ (SEE DETAIL)
s
OWNER: LARRY A. STRYON
(
_
`
'TIMOTHY
WE'_ANOS BUFFER
/ TEMPORARY 30FT & L'1;1IT OF DISTURBANCE /
VEGATATED SWALE
\
J r 5:1 SIDE SLOPES
W.
ROWAN (
j
' Cx. DITC
NCDENR `\
ISOLATED
�(TS
h
!`'
WETLAND
"C"
` ''"'`'� '
o
AREA
tt5
MANLEY (
I
.ii4
t
'FW - 1
\
/
TIE LINE i
.113 t .116 1
D.B.1184
PG. 391
%
Wile 1
o�
60.16'
I sy E
NCDENR 1
11212 ISOLATED 11
tl224
PG. 109 (
TIE LINE
11119 WETLANDS f
"122 .,� r
AREA 0 11
VI 48 p15�1 -• ��X o)�
11120 W12 I "125
M121 W126 1111
( COLLINS ROSS
it
dl
NCDENR W109
e1111o11 W131 t 1111
d,ROk,'00©S
'
qpp ISOLATED 11108 111 eta,-
WETLAND•• ' °
A 106.101111
D. B. 1416 ` D 8 1365
B 91 o?
e229Nt28 1"
103
30' UNDISTU ! �� Y�
° PROPERTY LINE • �� -Y-t -�/ - ^yam- �2.?2'
BUFFER & LIMIT I HAUL ORAD W68 13'59 e
U104 S7. IS' i 11
a/05 0058° 15' 40`E 1 1
/
TIE
-MA
OF DISTURBANCE / r (GIRAVEL) TIE LINE
NCDENR tlgE /
---------
-� _ 11 �rF� ,
1
ISOLATED 1
WETLAND 1
AREA "A" /
-
\tel
p
E"xrsT
ROAD
/
_
11�
VAIN HAUL ROAD
('RAVEL)
_ 1i
5 FT
F MIN. 71
SURFACE LENGTH = 1
STORAGE DEPTH 1.6
.. •._i' w � �, • •.c.11sr 1111
:,-,., .1111 .,�.y .,s •� + RFs.+►
#57 STONE
a
SEDIMENT STORAGE
CLASS "B" RIP RAP
DESIGN 18'
SETTLED 21"
TOP MlN. %
uknal111i1�unlnlll
4 FT MIN. \
ROBERT W.PYER 5 FT `\
MAX. '' �
�7
1.5 FT
MIN. FREEBOARD
3.0'
FILTER
FABRIC
OVERFILL 6"
FOR SETTLEMENT
WE TL ANDS AREAS "'A"
THRU ''F
"'
LINE
TABLES
W101.N 73°09'47"
E.
11.41'
W133,N
00°07'35"
OFFSITE
0.52
W,
24.91'
FILTER
E.
(
W134.N
36°58'41"
APRI
EO
FABRIC
W103,S 24035'57"
W104,S 59°40'13"
W.
W.
17.64'
12.91'
W135,N
W136.N
10°06'56"'
29°14'23"
® BUFFER AREA
W.
E.
14.97'
37.99'
(
W.
' CLINTON R.
W137.N
49°25'40"
LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
1:1 SIDE
20°51'
CLEARING & GRUBBING
n
ANNA INK MINE # 2
W138.S
71°5657"
MIN.
SLOPE MAX
(
19.91'
DBA 248
A
= 0.01+/- ACRES,
W139.S
13002'39"
NES"'PORT TOWNSHIP CARTERET COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA'
5.)
W.
PG.166 (
(494.83+/- Sq. ft.)
6.)
W140.S
01°11'42"
OWNER: LARRY A. STRYON
(
_
W•
'TIMOTHY
E.
SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAIL
W.
ROWAN (
SCOTT A.
JOHN J.
�(TS
W142.S
A
` ''"'`'� '
,��� \ (
D. B. 1 21 7 (
MANLEY (
BROOKS
d •146
DSe14?
'FW - 1
\
PG. 273
(
D.B. 1199 (
D.B.1184
PG. 391
DOROTHY
(TRUMAINE
`k 5 -
�6q
(
PG. 109 (
VAUGHEN
VI 48 p15�1 -• ��X o)�
19
( COLLINS ROSS
1*
*
D. B. 1416 ` D 8 1365
�7
1.5 FT
MIN. FREEBOARD
3.0'
FILTER
FABRIC
OVERFILL 6"
FOR SETTLEMENT
WE TL ANDS AREAS "'A"
THRU ''F
"'
LINE
TABLES
W101.N 73°09'47"
E.
11.41'
W133,N
00°07'35"
OFFSITE
0.52
W,
24.91'
W102,S 61°11'25"
E.
13°02'
W134.N
36°58'41"
APRI
EO
17.58'
W103,S 24035'57"
W104,S 59°40'13"
W.
W.
17.64'
12.91'
W135,N
W136.N
10°06'56"'
29°14'23"
® BUFFER AREA
W.
E.
14.97'
37.99'
W105,N 46°17'17"
W.
12°30'
W137.N
49°25'40"
LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
E.
20°51'
CLEARING & GRUBBING
n
ANNA INK MINE # 2
W138.S
71°5657"
.LV�T
.A, aY
E.
19.91'
AREA OF WETLANDS
A
= 0.01+/- ACRES,
W139.S
13002'39"
NES"'PORT TOWNSHIP CARTERET COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA'
5.)
W.
24.98'
(494.83+/- Sq. ft.)
6.)
W140.S
01°11'42"
OWNER: LARRY A. STRYON
W•
18,94'
W141.S
22°50'47"
W.
14.63'
W142.S
16°07'43"
W.
11.30'
W143.S
45°22'52"
W.
39.00'
_4
7 EMERGENCY
2:1 SIDE BY-PASS
SLOPE MAX 6" BELOW
SETTLED TOP
W106,S
W107.N
W108.N
W109, N
W1 10. S
W1 1 1 , S
83°51'03"
45°59'22"
13054'16"
65°
44025'59"
12°
31 '
53'
55"
06"
W.
w.
E.
E.
E.
W.
18.93' AREA OF WETLANDS E = 0.08+/- ACRES
15.03' 03034.55+/- sq. ft.)
15.28'
19.97'
17.37'
19-61'
OF DAM
\NATURAL
GROUND
AREA OF WETLANDS B
(806.50+/- Sq. ft.)
= 0.02+/ -*ACRES.
149 3k; WA33 S77°5o o„ ( PG. PG;311 NELLIE C.GARNER
.ISO pt6rts2 43 05.10,, I D. 8.270. PG. 321
I
w
NCDENR
ISOLATED
WETLANDS
AREA E
HAUL ROAD T-_1
TEMPORARY
STOCKPILE
s OCKP L;
Inn,
TEMPORY
STOCKPILE
5T W �O
��oPE 6" MIN. SOIL COVER PERMIT BOUNDARY �8 - - ••
�11
CLQ AT RECLAMATION "A == -
N pX J OVERBURDEN WITH SEEDING r''v
3 REFUSE SPOIL BANKS NOTE: EX. GRAVEL ROAD IS INCLUDED AS
OFFSITE HAUL ROAD AREA.
OVERBURDEN RECLAMATION DETAIL
N. T. S
w
z
J
r
r
w
a_
MAX. SIDE SLOPE = 3:1 0
-- EXISTING GRADE
-------------
MHW
= TOPSOIL
� r
X w
O a SAND
h� cv a
CUT SLOPE X -SECTION
N. T. S
SEED PER SEEDING
�- SCHEDULE
� O4�
2.' 1
TEMPORARY DITCH DETAIL
N.T.S
PROJECT NO.: PM756-9-002
DRAWING NO.: 001
EXISTING GRADE
WAL.TON KEITH GARNER
D.B.792,PG.136
OQ
Off'
PEIRMIT BOUNDARY
30' UNDISTURBEO
BUFFER & LIMIT
OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY
TOPSOIL
STOCKP I'°_E
I -
-----------------•---------
FILL SLOPE -SECTION
N. T. S
ND115
1. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS WILL BE PROVIDED.
2 OFLMUDEINTO STREETTS.NPERIODICTTOP DRESSINGLWITH STONETWILLIBE NECESSARY.FLON
3. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY WILL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY.
C - sa FT. MIN -•°•�
o�000poop 0 0 0 00 0 000 000 0 o Z
000 O 00 00 0000 O O O 000
C-} 000 0 po�p00000sc0000 aoo0 00 o 00
X00- "0 00 000 00 0008 " ,O t&
0pO p 00000 00 00090
0 000 000 p!
O 0 p 00 D D 0 p O O0006 O
D AGGREGAC" COARSE
TEHICK
0
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
N.T.S
,4 ,..
1 3j0.00,
BRYA ETA.L OWAN 1 BRYAN T.BOWAN
NO REFERENCE ETAL
\ NO REFERENCE
BRYAN T.BOWAN
ETAL
v`) - D.B. 386
Pc.281 BRYA ETALOWAN
.I'
NO REFERENCE
w112.N 06°06'35" W. 33.79'
W1 139N 41°51'56" E, 35.43'
W1 14.N 70°34'11" E. 23.88'
W115.S 03°09'29" E. 33.58"
W116,S 10°25'42" E. 17.82'
W1 17,S 4905654" E. 19-32'
W118.S 43048'46" W. 22.73'
W119.S 54°50'54" W. 33.07'
W120.S 18°31'36" W. 16.79'
W121.N 36°27'33" W. 25°20'
W122.N 01°22'33" E. 26.65'
AREA OF WETLANDS C = 0.10+/- ACRES.
(4211.37+/- Sq. ft.)
W123,N 51°54'46" E - 30.17'
W124,S 31°12'36" E. 23.07'
W125.S 14°34'30" W• 18.29'
W126.S 18056'02" W. 41.63'
W127.S 29032'03" W, 15.14.'
W128.S 88°51'11" W. 8.94'
W129,N 39°46'59" W- 19.82'
W1309N 21°41`21" E. 15.17'
W131.N 07°56'25" E. 42.63'
AREA OF WETLANDS D = 0.06+/- ACRES.
( 2424.32+/- Sq. ft. )
W158,S 77°50'26°' E. 53.01'
W159, S 26047'264" W. 8.92`'
W157,S 26°47'26" W. 22.95'
W156,S 02024'39" E. 18,85''
W1 559S 72°56'42 W. 18.61`
W154.S 34°46'32" W. 46.39'
W153.S 56032'01" W. 18.25'
W152.S 76°36`46" W. 11.84'
W151.S 7305529" W. 13.65'
W150.N 06°55'37" W, 24.23'
W149.N 17019'49" E. 20.76'
W148.N 31037'15" E. 30.30'
W147.N 32026'36" E. 16.51'
W146.N 480 23'17" E. 26.00'
W145.N 05°06'42" W. 12.23'
W144.N 05006'42" W• 5.56'
AREA OF WETLANDS F =0.13+/- ACRES
( 5722.60+/- Sq. ft. )
TOTAL AREA OF WETLANDS
= 17294.17+/- SQUARE FEET
(0.40+/- ACRES)
NOTES:
1.) NO KNOWN WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF EXCAVATION AREAS.
2.) TRACT SHOWN IS LOCATED IN FLOOD
�' �� \\ • i ,��� Q� `' ZONE X ( AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE
0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) AS CLASSIFIED
Q� AND SHOWN ON F.E.M.A. CARTERET COUNTY FLOOD
���� • G�4� ,� INSUREANCE RATE MAP, NUMBER 3720632800) EFFECTIVE
DATE JULY 16, 2003.
J
APPROX. 2.4 •,�tr'S©Q��O Q 3.) TEMPORARY STOCKPILES & WASTE PILES
ACRES c. ` SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PREMISES PRIOR
^a�p� TO RECLAMATION PROCESS. ON SITE ROAD -
CONSTRUCTION �p ,' WAYS SHALL BE REGRADED & RESEEDED
•ENTRANCE "} / PRIOR TO RECLAMATION PROCESS.
° 14PPROX.WOODSLINE `� ti� r
A.) EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING SHALL DE
i' STRICTLY PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE.
5.) NO FUEL TANKS, SOLVENTS, OR OTHER
3' CHEMICAL REAGENTS SHALT_ BE STDRFD
v ,411� ON SITE.
6.) BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM
1 SURVEY BY W.D. DANIELS, Jr.(L2673)
DATED MAY 6. 1998, LAST AMENDED
DECEMBER 16, 1998.
• `� 7.) DELINEATION DENOTED AS "MINE
EXCAVATION LIMIT" IS 5' INSIDE
a PROPOSED BUFFER AREA. MINE EXCAVATION
AREA EXCLUDES HAUL ROAD AND WETLANDS
w POCKETS.
N
8.) THE HAUL ROAD BETWEEN THE WETLANDS WILL BE
1, USED ONLY TO TRANSPORT TOPSOIL TO THE STOCKPILE
AREA.THIS ROAD IS CURRENTLY GRASS AND MAY DEVELOPE
z 4a LEGEND BARE AREAS OR RUTS. IF THIS AREA BECOMES ERODED A
Gk
13r 11 STONE BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE ROADWAY.
R©AD EEIP EXISTING IRON IR EXISTING IRONRPIPEMONUMENT 9. > AETLAND SURVEYIBYORMATION E. GLENNWAS TAKEN CORBETT, PLSM
R EPR EXISTING PK NAIL STROUD ENGINEERING DATED MARCH 7. 2014.
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
CATEGORY
AFFECTED
ACREAGE
TOTAL TRACT AREA
27.27 AC
PROPOSED PERMIT AREA
25.39 AC
DITCH/POND AREA
0.1 AC
HAUL ROAD AREA
ONSITE
0.2 AC
OFFSITE
0.52
MINE EXCAVTION AREA
9.16 AC
PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA
14.31 AC
100 50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=100'
SEEDING SCHEDULE
SEED BED PREPARATION
LIME------------------- 2 TONS/AC.
10-10-20 -------- -------- 1.000 LB /AC
0-20-0------ 500 LBS. /AC ( AFTER S `�-DlNG,�
ASPHALT TACK -------200 GAL. /TON OF '"MULC-C-�r
SEEDING MIXTURE
(FEBRUARY 1 -APRIL 30)
TALL FESCUE------------- 50 LBS./AC
PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS-----10 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA
(SCARIFIED) --------------50 LBS./AC
(MAY 1 -AUGUST 31)
TALL FESCUE------------- 50 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA
(SCARIFIED) --------------50 LBS./AC
BROWNTOP MILLET----------- 25 LBS./AC
( SEPTEMBER 1 - JANUARY 31 )
TALL FESCUE----------------- 60 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA
(UNSCARIFIED)-------------- 6O LEIS./AC
RYE (GRAIN)--------------- 25 LBS./AC
FOR SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER ADD 30 LBS./AC
SERICEA LESPEDEZA
LANDSCAPING MIXTURE
(JANUARY 1 - MARCH 31)
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS(UNHULLED)---20LBS/AC
(APRIL 1 JULY 31)
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS(HULLED) --- 12 LBS./AC
R E V I S I O N S
4 A ° g
• SEAL
025D81
p o
yn
v
d, Jne bs gYSC. e!
J.A. WUNDAY, P.E.
P.O. BOX 1402
ADDRESS: MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557 DRAWN:
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
DATE: 5-21`-2013
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
107-B COMMERCE STREET SCALE:. 1" 100'
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27858
(252 ) 756-9352 LICENSE NO -C-064? SHEET, 1 OF I
PP POWER POLE
��� ! ,(7 FcjO jAm 1 8/9/13 DENR COMMENTS
TEL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
II 3" 4/t/i-A ETLANI? SURVE
OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MHW MEAN HIGH WATER"
RRS RAILROAD SPIKE
APRI
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
® WETLANDS
i
® BUFFER AREA
2 0 4 Q, 4,2, Q
#u
CHRONOLOGICAL SEQUENCE OF
LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
MINE AND RECLAMATION MAP
1.)
CLEARING & GRUBBING
n
ANNA INK MINE # 2
2.)
INSTALLATION OF EROSION
.LV�T
.A, aY
CONTROL MEASURES
-�
3.)
4.)
DEWATERING
EXCAVATION OF SAND
®®'®�1" CAIq t®®d•®
NES"'PORT TOWNSHIP CARTERET COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA'
5.)
HAULING OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
�,`®.�.p4••F65g6'���'�•�p'.
6.)
RECLAMATION OF AFFECTED LAND
; Q,O 0� �.
OWNER: LARRY A. STRYON
4 A ° g
• SEAL
025D81
p o
yn
v
d, Jne bs gYSC. e!
J.A. WUNDAY, P.E.
P.O. BOX 1402
ADDRESS: MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557 DRAWN:
PHONE: [phone]
APPROVED:
DATE: 5-21`-2013
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
107-B COMMERCE STREET SCALE:. 1" 100'
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27858
(252 ) 756-9352 LICENSE NO -C-064? SHEET, 1 OF I

NOTES:
1. HAWKS LANDING IS LOCATED IN REEMS CREEK, BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NC
2. EACH LOT WILL BE SERVED BY A SEPTIC TANK FOR SANITARY SEWER
AND WATERWELL FOR DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
8.21 ac
HAWK'S LANDING'. LOT SIZING INFORMATION
DEVELOPMENT INFO
OWNER DEVELOPER HAWKS LANDING LIMITED
2400 NE 2nd AVE, STUDIO B
MIAMI, FL 33197
4-a
PIN No.
LOT SIZE
0
OVERLAY DISTRICT INFO
Proposed No. Units - Density
PROPOSED LOTS
3. ALL ROADS TO BE PRIVATE.
....... .. .
I N
Size Is the lot in an
(ac): overlay?:
■
%\
Max
Impervious
(ac):
0
E
4. ALL PARCELS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
94,090
2.16 Steep Slope Overlay
ENGINEER JOHN KINNAIRD, PE
-
0.32
0.17
0.30
OU
2,
108,543
BROOKS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PA
1.5
-
0.37
6.12ac
5. ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES TO BE 30 OR MORE FEET FROM STREAMS.
0.20
3
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
V)
15 points
-
42-4(
JHAWK
'Pik: PAR?
"D.B.
7
0.40
q
:21
1.64 No
0
-
PERMITS FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR.
NOTES:
1. HAWKS LANDING IS LOCATED IN REEMS CREEK, BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NC
2. EACH LOT WILL BE SERVED BY A SEPTIC TANK FOR SANITARY SEWER
AND WATERWELL FOR DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
Subdivision Name:
HAWK'S LANDING'. LOT SIZING INFORMATION
DEVELOPMENT INFO
OWNER DEVELOPER HAWKS LANDING LIMITED
2400 NE 2nd AVE, STUDIO B
MIAMI, FL 33197
4-a
PIN No.
LOT SIZE
0
OVERLAY DISTRICT INFO
Proposed No. Units - Density
PROPOSED LOTS
3. ALL ROADS TO BE PRIVATE.
....... .. .
I N
Size Is the lot in an
(ac): overlay?:
■
%\
Max
Impervious
(ac):
Proposed
Disturbed
Area (ac):
E
4. ALL PARCELS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
94,090
2.16 Steep Slope Overlay
ENGINEER JOHN KINNAIRD, PE
-
0.32
0.17
0.30
OU
2,
108,543
BROOKS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PA
1.5
-
0.37
0.20
5. ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES TO BE 30 OR MORE FEET FROM STREAMS.
0.20
3
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
V)
15 points
-
42-4(
6. NO STREAMS OR WETLANDS SHALL BE DISTURBED WITHOU APPROPRIATE
7
0.40
828-232-4700
:21
1.64 No
0
-
PERMITS FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR.
N/A
0.60
0.40
0
V)
96,552
2.22 Steep Slope Overlay
2
-
0.33
0.18
SURVEYOR PAUL SEXTON, PE RLS
V)
6
122,599
2.81 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.42
BROOKS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, PA
"5;
0.22
71
C
I
3.16 No
-
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
M
0,60
0.40
8
151,966
3.49 Prot. Ridge Overlay
828-232-4700
200
0,52
0.28
0.50
0.25
9
115,781
2.66 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.40
0.21
0.40
0.20
10
0
2.56 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
3
THERESA K. MITCHELL LIVING TRUST
0.21
0.35
0.20
V)
190,712
4.38 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
D.B. 4163, PG. 0927j`E
0.66
0.35
ry
0.30
12,
119,219
P.B. 0082, PG. 0124
2.0
200
0.41
0.22
0.40
0.20
13
9763-03-1,2-.9281vm-
5.38, Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.81
0.43
0-60
0.40
14
161,124
3.70 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.55
0.30
An
EARNEST ENTERPRISES, LLC
15
163,505
3.75 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.56
0.30
D.B. 4186, PG. 1857
0.30
16
213,140
4,89 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.73
P.B. 0076, PG. 0082
0.60
0.30
17
266,517
6.12 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
Vo
1 763 v
9 -03-22-3479
0.49
0.80
0.40
Z
274,129
6.29, Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
D.B.'085p, P(,3. 04153"'
13-
A
P.B., 101, P6.0048
1 64ac
Z�,
9763-03-01-8292
YOUNG LIFE El
>
D.B. 2542, PG. 0804
-
4z,
P.B. 0119, PG. 0189
,RIVE
976000-00-91685.38ac
I)-
2.22ac
} „ . i,\ f� \ JEAN AND DOUGLAS BARNETT
s
. .. ... D.B. 1727, PG. 0206
P.B. 0000, PG. 0000
�: / 3.16ac
I,Z'
9763-03-01-5975
3.49ac NORTH
NORTH
2.81 ac 2.66ac Z 2.74ac
LD -,RHOENIX CREEK DEVELOPMENT
D.B. 4256, PG. 0812
P.B. 0000, PG. 0000
PR03ECT SUMMARY
Subdivision Name:
HAWK'S LANDING'. LOT SIZING INFORMATION
Total Project Area
160.62 Ac.
PIN No.
LOT SIZE
Existing / Proposed Zoning
OVERLAY DISTRICT INFO
Proposed No. Units - Density
PROPOSED LOTS
LOT
....... .. .
I N
Size Is the lot in an
(ac): overlay?:
■
%\
Max
Impervious
(ac):
Proposed
Disturbed
Area (ac):
Proposed
Impervious
Area (ac):
1
94,090
2.16 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
-
0.32
0.17
0.30
0.16
2,
108,543
2.49 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.37
0.20
0.35
0.20
3
83,967
1.93 No
15 points
-
42-4(
N/A
7
0.40
4
71,328
1.64 No
0
-
N/A
N/A
0.60
0.40
5
96,552
2.22 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.33
0.18
0.30
0.17
6
122,599
2.81 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
PR03ECT SUMMARY
Subdivision Name:
HAWK'S LANDING'. LOT SIZING INFORMATION
Total Project Area
160.62 Ac.
PIN No.
LOT SIZE
Existing / Proposed Zoning
OVERLAY DISTRICT INFO
Proposed No. Units - Density
PROPOSED LOTS
LOT
Size (A:
Size Is the lot in an
(ac): overlay?:
Min. Min.
Overlay Lot Overlay Lot
Size (ac): Width (ac):
Max
Disturbed
Area (ac):
Max
Impervious
(ac):
Proposed
Disturbed
Area (ac):
Proposed
Impervious
Area (ac):
1
94,090
2.16 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
-
0.32
0.17
0.30
0.16
2,
108,543
2.49 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.37
0.20
0.35
0.20
3
83,967
1.93 No
15 points
-
N/A
N/A
0,60
0.40
4
71,328
1.64 No
0
-
N/A
N/A
0.60
0.40
5
96,552
2.22 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.33
0.18
0.30
0.17
6
122,599
2.81 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.42
0.23
0.40
0.22
71
137,747
3.16 No
-
N/A
N/A
0,60
0.40
8
151,966
3.49 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0,52
0.28
0.50
0.25
9
115,781
2.66 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.40
0.21
0.40
0.20
10
111,657
2.56 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.38
0.21
0.35
0.20
11
190,712
4.38 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.66
0.35
0.60
0.30
12,
119,219
2.74 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.41
0.22
0.40
0.20
13
234,350
5.38, Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.81
0.43
0-60
0.40
14
161,124
3.70 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.55
0.30
0.50
0.30
15
163,505
3.75 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.56
0.30
0.50
0.30
16
213,140
4,89 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.73
0.39
0.60
0.30
17
266,517
6.12 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
-
0,92
0.49
0.80
0.40
18
274,129
6.29, Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
0.94
0.50
0.80
0.40
19
187,253
4.30 Prot. Ridge Overlay
2.0
200
0.64
0.34
0.60
0.33
20
357,749
8.21 Steep Slope Overlay
1.5
-
1.23
0.66
0.80
0.60
21,
249,751
5.73 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
-
0,86
0.46
0.80
0.40
22
111,289
2.55 Steep Slope Overlay
1.6
-
0.38
0.20
0.30
0.20
TOTAL
11.70
6.73
PR03ECT SUMMARY
Subdivision Name:
HAWKS LANDING
Total Project Area
160.62 Ac.
PIN No.
9763-04-8181, 9763-24-2650
Existing / Proposed Zoning
OU
Proposed No. Units - Density
22 - 0.137 units per acre
Max. Building Height
35'
Township
Reems Creek
Water
Individual Well
Water Supply Watershed
N/A
Sewer
Individual Septic
Length of Private Roads:
4,310 linear feet
Length of Shared Drives:
6,270 linear feet
Disturbed Area (Infrastructure only):
10.55 acres (6.57%)
Site Location Latitude:
350 41.758' N
Site Location Longitude:
820 31.148'W
Note: No portion of z his site is within the 100yr floodplain.
Note: Construction estimated to begin 6-01-13.
HILLSIDE CALCULATIONS
AVERAGE NATURAL SLOPE
Acreage of Property:
160.62 acres
Contour Interval:
51
Length of Contours:
657,499 feet
Average Natural Slope:
47.07%
Allowed Density:
0.128 units / acre
NOTE: This subdivision is, NOT a Drastic
Variation Hillside Development.
MAXIMUM ALLOWED UNITS
20 units
PERMITTING ROUTE:
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
IMPERVIOUS AREA:
o
Impervious Area for Infrastructure:
3.82 acres (2.38%)
Impervious Area for homesites:
6.73 acres (4.19%)
TOTAL IMPERVIOUSE AREA:
10.55 acres (6.57%)
DISTURBED AREA:
Disturbed Area for Infrastructure:
13.40 acres (8.34%)
Disturbed Area for homesJtes:
11.70 acres (7.28%)
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA,:
25.10 acres (15.63%)
Bonus Points for Disturbed Area:
20 points
OPEN SPACE:
68.19 acres (42.5%)
Bonus Points for Open Space:
15 points
DENSITY BONUSES:
M
NCO)
Total Points
35 points
Bonuses Allowed from Fig. 6
130% Increase in Density
20 allowed units *130 =:
26 allowed units
Z
0
D
U) 06
0 >
Z W
Z
< CL
J
co
W
W
Z
M
Z
W
N
n
75
Z
-J
0
0
0
Z
re's
Z
LU
E
o
N
i
00
en
0
U')
-
A
4-1
r=,J
-
N
-V
8
-
V)
C
J
M
NCO)
N
rd
0
00
r-4
00
0
00
(N
0
r-,
C
0
Il
(D
C-
Z
0
D
U) 06
0 >
Z W
Z
< CL
J
co
W
W
Z
M
Z
W
N
n
75
Z
-J
0
0
0
Z
re's
Z
LU