20220618 Ver 1_HL-0033 suporting IP info Airport Boulevard Extension Phase I and Phase II_20220428

Airport Boulevard Extension Phase I
Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) between Garden Square Lane and SR 1637
(Church Street) in Morrisville, Wake County

Airport Boulevard Extension Phase II
Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of Church Street (SR 1637) to east of
NC 54 (Capel Hill Road) in Morrisville, Wake County
Table of Contents
Cover sheet…………………………………………………………………………..…………..…….....…….……..….Page 1
Phase I Stormwater management plan………………………………………………..….…….…….…..…..Page 2
Phase I Wetland and surface water impacts permit drawing set……….………………….……....Page 3
Phase I Buffer impacts permit drawing set……………………………………………………….…….….….Page 13
Phase II-Alternate 1 Wetland and surface water impacts permit drawing set………………..Page 17
Phase II-Alternate 1 Buffer impacts permit drawing set…………………………………………..…….Page 25
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services Mitigation letter for Phase I only………………………..Page 34
Phase I Catawba Indian Nation response letter……………………………………………………………… Page 35
Phase II Catawba Indian Nation response letter………………………………………………………….…..Page 36
No archaeology survey required form…………………………………………………………….……………….Page 37
Historic Architecture and Landscapes no survey required form………………………………….……Page 43
Categorical Exclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………………....Page 45
Phase I Notification of Jurisdictional Determination…………………………………………………………Page 61
Phase I Determination of Applic. to Neuse Buffer Rules and Stream Mitigation Rules………Page 65
Phase II Notification of Jurisdictional Determinations (4/27/21 and 2/18/22) …….……………Page 67
Phase II Determination of Applicability to Neuse Buffer Rules……….………………………….………Page 78
USFWS updated information for Phase I and Phase II………………………………………………………..Page 83
Purpose and Need Tech Memo for Phase I and Phase II…………………………………………………….Page 85
Phase I and Phase II USGS Topo Map…………………………………………………………………………………Page 87
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
36249.4033 TIP/Proj No:HL-0033 County(ies):Wake Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Yes
Design/Future:Year:2045 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
No N/A
N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Impairments:None
NRTR Stream ID:Buffer Rules in Effect:Neuse
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
City/Town:
9.4
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
0.7
0.435 miles
Project Description
Proposed Project
NeuseRiver Basin(s):
John Braxton
Raleigh, NC 27699-1573
WBS Element:
New LocationWBS Element:
Reid Robol, PE - VHBNCDOT Contact:
919-707-6219
Raleigh, NC 27606
Contractor / Designer:
919-754-5005
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
[e-mail]
WakeMorrisville
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
3,600
20' grass median 4@12' lanes, 2' 6" curb and gutter, and 5' sidewalk on left and right
2021
[e-mail]
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.ac.
No road along proposed -L- line
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1573 Mail Service Center Address:
General Project Information
HL-003336249.4033
Address:
3/2/2022
17,000
Suburban residential
Surface Water Body (1): UT to Crabtree Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.:27-33-(1)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
This is a new location roadway project that was designed to minimize impacts to water quality as much as practicable. 2:1 side slopes with guardrail were used to reduce the
length of jurisdictional stream impacts to UT to Crabtree creek. 2:1 side slopes were also used in the footprint of the wetland to minimize impacts. The roadway grade was also
lowered as much as possible to maintain clearance from a Duke transmission line and still provide an adequate level of service for the roadway. Streams along UT to Crabtree
Creek are subject to Neuse River Buffer Rules. Approaching drainage was design to minimize impact to adjacent riparian buffers by avoiding deep ditches for stormwater
conveyance that would require clearing of buffers. In its place, storm drainage systems were connected to the 8'x7' RCBC to aid in energy dissipation prior to outfalling to UT to
Crabtree Creek. Temporary diversion channels were utilized on the east side of the 78 inch RCP to minimize impacts of Wetland A. Phase II impacts were based on slope
stakes +25'. Due to the new location nature of the project, excessive outside easement areas were minimized as construction access through the corridor will be possible.
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification:
CHRISTINA YOKELEY, PE
BRIAN K. EASON, PE
WAKE COUNTY

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
3,600
17,000
10
60
4
50
%
%
MPH
ADT
ADT
2021
2045
% *
DUAL 3%

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
* TTST =1%
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
Prepared in the Office of:
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/99 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
9:12:53 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_TSH.dgnnblahutCONTRACT:TIP PROJECT:ARTMEN
N ASO
H
DEPT
O
F TRA SPORTTIONTATEOFNRTCAR
O
LI
NAH. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NCDOT CONTACT
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF MORRISVILLE
VICINITY MAP
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD (SR 3126)
FROM GARDEN SQUARE LANE TO CHURCH ST (SR 1637)
IN MORRISVILLE
PE, R/W, UTIL36249.4033
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
=0.435 Miles
=0.435 Miles
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
JOHN BRAXTON
THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT
N/A
HL-0033HL-0033
JULY 19, 2022
DEC. 08, 2021
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-0033
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRADING, DRAINAGE, CULVERT, SIGNALS, AND PAVING
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
SHEET 1 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
04
05
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
SITE 4
CHRISTINA YOKELEY, PE
BRIAN K. EASON, PE
WAKE COUNTY

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
3,600
17,000
10
60
4
50
%
%
MPH
ADT
ADT
2021
2045
% *
DUAL 3%

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
* TTST =1%
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K

H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF MORRISVILLE
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD (SR 3126)
FROM GARDEN SQUARE LANE TO CHURCH ST (SR 1637)
IN MORRISVILLE
PE, R/W, UTIL36249.4033
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
TO DAVI
S DRTO I-40
-Y2- STA. 27+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 15+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 25+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- STA. 10+50.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTIONHALL DRTOWN -Y1-CHURCH STSR 1637-Y2-AIRPORT BLVD EXT
SR 3126
-L-
AIRPORT BLVD EXTFUTURESR 3126
-L-
JOHN BRAXTON
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MORRI
SVI
LLEMORRISVILLEMORRISVILLETHIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD __
-L- POT STA. 36+55.15
END CONSTRUCTION
N/A
-L- POC STA. 13+60.00
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
HL-0033
-L- POT STA. 36+25.47
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
JULY 19, 2022
DEC. 08, 2021-Y-INDIAN TRAIL GREENWAY
GARDEN SQUARE LANE
GRADING, DRAINAGE, CULVERT, SIGNALS, AND PAVING
UT TO CRABTREE CREEKPROP. 7x8 RCBC
-Y- STA. 10+25.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- STA. 14+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
CRABTREE
LAKE
3095
3119
1625
3057
1617
1617
3006
1623
1624
3014
1633
1726
1613
1637
1638
1706
1706
3094
1637
1635
1613
1635
1635
1632
1632
1613
3014
3060
1641
1640
3015
3015
1637
1637
1789
1792
3010
1002
1002
3084
1635
3059
1634
3104
1613
1639
3015
1625
Morrisville
pop. 26,280
SEABOARDSOUTHERNRAILROADCr
e
e
k
Cr
abtr
eeCreek
Stirr
u
pIron
CreekFREEWAY40
40
55
540
540
540
54
55
55
54
2
C15" RCP-III CNAD 83/ 2011NAD 83/ 2011
PB
2
0
0
9
PG

3
2
6
DB

13
6
0
0
PG

2
5
8
4
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
PB
20
0
9
PG
3
2
5
DB
13
6
00
PG
2
58
4
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10445 PG 1715
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 16307 PG 342
ETNS PROPERTY LLC
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10600 PG 2236
WIFE SANDRA C. SHIPP
SEBASTIAN SHIPP AND
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 14398 PG 1578
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 12157 PG 2165
AND PREETHI ABU
KUTTAN I JAYARAM
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 10106 PG 579
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ASSOCIATION INC
PROPERTY OWNERS
TOWN HALL COMMONS
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9426 PG 203
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 17677 PG 1537
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9583 PG 1904
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126DB 10907 PG 1688
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17215 PG 1424AND WIFE MEGAN D. ELLISONDAVID D. ELLISON
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17596 PG 2597ELSIE KATUMKEERYIL ABRAHAMAND WIFE ABRAHAM J. KATUMKEERYIL
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE 100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
50.00'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WDB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'DB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'PB 1998 PG 2054PB 2007 PG 67530' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT2
0.0
0'vv
vvBK SLTLT48
" MTL
4
8" MTLLTPOND
BK S
POND
WOOD
S
WOODS
WOODSCBCB48" M
TL9.5' CONC48" MTLWOODS12" R
C
P10" DIP10" DIP72" WD
72" WD
15' CONC1
6' CONCGARDEN SQUARE LN 27' BSTCONC I
S
LCONC ISL18" C&G3
0" C&GSR 3126 AI
RPORT BLVD
V
ARI
ABLE BST30" C&G30" C&G18" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G54" C
O
N
C 54" CO
N
C 54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC N 32°26'33" W100.24'SANDHYA RAO
JAIDEV P. RAO
ERIN A. SPRINGER
JUDITH SPRINGER
N 64°02'51" W197.34'N 27°08'56" W153.64'EIP-R/W 0.12'EIP
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9627 PG 628
N 09°57'13" E
211.58'
S 46°37'35" W
124.81'
MICHELLE ROGERS HUMPHRES
CHRISTOPHER W. HUMPHRES S
8
8°3
7'2
6" W14
1.3
0'162.47'N49°04'40"WS 08°25'05" E129.58'THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
VISHNU PRIYA
THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
N 30°59'09" W
7.51'N 30°59'09" W104.35'N 30°59'09" W54.91'EMILY J. HARTER
CLARK D. HARTER
EXISTINGR /WN 80°05'24" W124.30'S 32°41'01" E39.99'EIPEIP
EIP
EIPEIP2.25'EI
P-R/WN 19°02'41" W116.86'N 36°36'04" W10.54'N 36°35'27" W117.46'
N 19°50'14" W
12.44'N 19°50'14" WS 76°56'03" W1
77.20'N 13°03'57" W191.02'N
5
1°
4
9'
3
2
" W3
5.
1
2'
N74°17'05"
W
PB 2009 PG 326EASMENT20' PRIVATE STORMW/FES15" RCP20.00
'EIP
EIP EIP EIP EIP EIP
EIP
EIP EIP
EIP
EXISTIN R/WMONICA L. MONEY
EDWARD B. MONEY 0.10'R/W-EIPS 30°32'14" E168.66'R/W-EIP 0.08'S 30°36'55" E86.25'S 57°30'32" W
9.55'
S 57°30'32" W
240.62'
S 57°28'53" W
7.41'
S 57°48'14" W
73.51'
S 57°42'22" W
114.82'
S 57°45'45" W
44.05'N 05°44'49" W75.80'EIPN 05°44'49" W86.78'N 05°44'49" W94.66'S
8
9°2
2'4
7" W5
7.7
8'N
0
2°3
9'
4
1" W2
5.
3
0'S
8
7°
2
0'
19" W1
2
0.
0
8'N
8
7°
2
0'
1
9" E12
0.
0
0'N
0
2°2
5'19" W2
0.0
0'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WS 76°56'07" W
112.52'45.12'38.89'38.83'N 79°27'14" E53.19'N79°33'14"EN79°07'36"EN79°34'55"E48
" M
T
L
EI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PN 02°50'23" WN 02°50'23" W60.00'S
8
9°5
7'3
5" E2
6
7.6
1'S 10°32'46" E90.43'N 76°56'07" E46.67'38.83'S 13°03'53" ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES 85°
3
7'58" W97.14'N 04°09'27" E52.83'N 85°38'08" E70.08'38.36'N04°09'27"ES 01°21'16" E110.70'EI
P
EIPN
0
4°0
9'
3
3" E14.4
5'EI
PEI
P
4
8" MTLN
8
8°48'11" W42.91'N
8
8°48'11" WEI
P
GARDEN SQUARE LN 22' BST EASEMENT PB 2003 PG 51420' PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERRYAN DAVIDSON
JENICA DAVIDSON
JULIA VADAKKUMPADAN
FIJOY VADAKKUMPADAN
N 18°04'58" W117.20'37.50
'EXISTING R/WN64°31'31"EEIPEIPEIPBL101
BL102
BL103
-EL-
BL104
N 13°03'53" W399.69'PADMAJA MARELLAANJAN MARELLA
RA
P
R
IP
S
18" RCP
24" TCCONC
30.00'
EL=368.06'
SAG POINT
POWERLINEHHHHTHHBOXELECTRICMETERELECTRICENDGTSEND2"4"4"4"2"2"12"12"12"8"8"FOFOFOFOFOFOFO
FOF
OF
OWALLVAR BKELECTRI
C
M
ETER54"CONC EIP
S 11°12'14" E170.10'PB
2002
PG
129
DB
9612
PG
2248
SHARON
M
IRADOR
RANDY
D
M
IRADOR 2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD
2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2
S
F
D2
S
F
D2
S
F
DS 21°26'23" WFOFO 04
NAD 83/ 2011SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE -L- STA. 25+50HL-0033
TRANSMISSION LINE
EXISTING DUKE ENERGY
CREEKCRABTREE UT TO
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED*
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
SITE 2SITE 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'100'
0'50'50'
INSET SCALE
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
SITE 3
SHEET 2 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
E E IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION15
+00
20+00 25+00
-L- PT Sta. 25+16.49
-L- PC Sta. 23+62.98
-L- PT Sta. 17+53.24
-L- PCC Sta. 14+36.95
-L- PC Sta. 12+17.25
10+00-Y- POT Sta. 14+32.86
-Y- PT Sta. 14+15.53
-Y- PC Sta. 13+76.10
-Y- PT Sta. 13+30.70
-Y- PC Sta. 12+89.09
-Y- PT Sta. 11+71.45
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74
-Y- PCC Sta. 10+48.43
-Y- PC Sta. 10+09.21
-Y- POT Sta. 10+00.00
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8:13:33 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_PSH_04.dgnnblahut8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 2022840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
150' TAPER24'48'24'24'20'8'24'20'24'5' SIDEWALK
1'-6" C&G1'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
+30.0036'
TYP
INC
+93.2436'+18.98TYP
INC
36'
C&G
2'-6" 215' TAPER TO EXISTING230' RIGHT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE230' RIGHT 400' RIGHT AND LEFT TURN STORAGESQUARE LNGARDEN SQUARE LNGARDEN EXI
STI
NG100' TA
PER TO 100'
T
A
PE
R+60.00+30.0024'24'BLVDAI
RPORT 11'16'
+25.00TYP.INC.
16'TYP.INC.+48.0016'TYP.INC.+96.0016'TYP.INC.+68.00-Y- STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- STA. 14+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
5' SIDEWALK TPR
25'+15.00MEDIAN
GRASS
-L- STA. 13+75.00
TIE TO EXISTING 48'24'GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
CAT-1
CAT-1
GREU TL-3
G
R
EU

T
L
-3CAT-1
CAT-1
36'
TYP
INC +77.245" CONC.
MONO. ISLANDCREEK GREENWAYEXISTING INDIANPATH
10' MULTI-USE
MONOLITHIC ISLAND
5" CONCRETE
-L- STA. 13+60.00
END MILL & FILL 1.5"
-L- POC STA. 12+00.00
BEGIN MILL & FILL 1.5"
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT HL-0033
64'HW
78" RCP-IV Buri
ed 1'
R
E
T
A
IN
RETAINRETAINADJUST CB
ADJUST CB
CB
CB CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
DI DI
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
0414
0411
0410
0408
0409
0406
0407 0413
0405
0415 0416
0418
0419
0420
0421
0422
0423
0425
0424
0403
0402
0401
EX 0404
0412
0427
0428
0426
CB15
" RCP-
I
V
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
1@8'x7' RCBC
SEE DETAIL 2
L= 24 FT
EST 35 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 30 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
STABILIZATION W/
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL
24" RCP-IV
24" RCP-IV
18" RCP-IV
SEE DETAIL 4
L=34 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 60 SY
EST 30 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 5
L=33 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 SY
EST 105 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
(Variable)
Channel Bed
IN STREAMBED
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP COUNTERSUNK 15" RCP-III
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextileb=1.5 Ft.
d=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B RIP RAP
FROM STA. 10+90 TO STA. 11+72 -Y- LT
FROM STA. 15+82 TO STA. 16+54 -L- RT
FROM STA. 15+68 TO STA. 16+50 -L- LT
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABLIZATION
PIPE INLET
DETAIL 3
AT STA. 16+20 -L- LT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
(Variable)
CHANNEL BED
Type of Liner = CLASS I RIP RAPEXISTING BANKEXISTING BANKMIN. 2:1 TO TIEMI
N.
2:
1 TO TI
E0429
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
NTS
2:12:1
EST 25 CY
EXCAVATION
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP
NG
1.0' SILL
INLET DETAIL 4
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
NTS
OUTLET DETAIL 5
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP2:1 2:1NG
EST 67 CY
EXCAVATION
1.0' SILL
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
AT STA 19+00 -L- LT AT STA 18+52 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 3
L= 10 FT
EST= 15 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST= 8 TONS
ON BANKS ONLY
BANK STABILIZATION
PIPE INLET
°°
***********S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
IN WETLANDS
EXCAVATION
S
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
PB
2
0
0
9
PG
3
2
5
DB
13
6
0
0
PG
2
5
8
4
PB 2009 PG 326EASMENT20' PRIVATE STORMEIP
-L- PT Sta. 17+53.24
-Y- PT Sta. 11+71.45
1'-6" C&G
TPR
25'
HW
78" RCP-IV Buried 1'INV=327.4
TOP=332.5
HW/D25=1.0
BURIED 1.0'
INV=324.4
INV=323.1
***********SS
SS
SS
S
S
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ASSOCIATION INC
PROPERTY OWNERS
TOWN HALL COMMONS
EIP N 19°02'41" W116.86'EIP
S 57°42'22" WN 05°44'49" W75.80'BL102
-Y- PT Sta. 13+30.70
-Y- PC Sta. 12+89.09
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74
1'-6" C&G
.01.00.0136'
TYP
INC.02CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 1@8'x7' RCBC
24" RCP-IV
24" RCP-IV
O
O
°°
S
S
S
S 57°48'14" W
BL103
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74 150' TAPER24'+30.0036'+93.24PATH
10' MULTI-USE
CB 15" RCP-IV 0418
18" RCP-IV
IN WETLANDS
EXCAVATION
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
AT STA. 16+54 -L- RT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL 2
2'
NWS
NWS
Geotextile
2'
F
F
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
F
F
F C
F
F
F
F
F C
C
C
C
C F
C
F
C F
FC
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
C C
322322
3233233233233233
2
3
323 3243243243243243
2
4
3253253253
2
5
325325325325325325325325325 325
325 325325
326326326326326326
3263
2
6
3263
2
7327
3273273273273273273273273273273273273273
28328
328328328328328
3283283283283283283
2
8 32832
8
3283293
2
9
3293293293293293293293293
2
9
3
2
9 330330330330
3303303
3
0330
330330330330
3
3
0
330330
330330330330330 3303303
3
0
330
330 331331331331331331331331
3313313313
3
1
331
332332
3
3
2
332
332332332332332332
332332
332
332333333333333333333333 333333334334334334334334334 334334335335335
335335
3353
3
5
33
5
335335335335335 335335335335335
335335
3353363363
3
6
336336336336336336
3
3
6
3373373
3
7
337337337337338
338 338338338338338338338338
339339
339 339339339
3393393403403403 4 0
340340340 340340340340340
340
3403
4
0
340
3403403403
4
0
340341341
341341341341
341341341
341341341342342342342342
3423423423423423
4
2343
343
343 343343343343
343
343343343343344344
344 344344
344344
344
344345345345345345345345345345345345
345
345
3453
4
5
3453
45345345 346346346 346346346346
346
3
4
6 3463463463463463463473473473473
4
7 347347347
347347
3
4
7
3473473
4
7
347
348
348348348 348348348348
348
3483483483
4
8349
349349
349349349 349349349
349350350350350350350350350
350
350351351351
351351351351352352352352353353 353354
354
354
354355355355355 355355356356
357
358360
PB
2
0
0
9
PG

3
2
6
DB

13
6
0
0
PG

2
5
8
4
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
PB
20
0
9
PG
3
2
5
DB
13
6
00
PG
2
58
4
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10445 PG 1715
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 16307 PG 342
ETNS PROPERTY LLC
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10600 PG 2236
WIFE SANDRA C. SHIPP
SEBASTIAN SHIPP AND
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 14398 PG 1578
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 12157 PG 2165
AND PREETHI ABU
KUTTAN I JAYARAM
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 10106 PG 579
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ASSOCIATION INC
PROPERTY OWNERS
TOWN HALL COMMONS
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9426 PG 203
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 17677 PG 1537
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9583 PG 1904
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126DB 10907 PG 1688
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17215 PG 1424AND WIFE MEGAN D. ELLISONDAVID D. ELLISON
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17596 PG 2597ELSIE KATUMKEERYIL ABRAHAMAND WIFE ABRAHAM J. KATUMKEERYIL
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE 100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
50.00'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WDB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'DB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'PB 1998 PG 2054PB 2007 PG 67530' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT2
0.0
0'vv
vvBK SLTLT48
" MTL
4
8" MTLLTPOND
BK S
POND
WOOD
S
WOODS
WOODSCBCB48" M
TL9.5' CONC48" MTLWOODS12" R
C
P10" DIP10" DIP72" WD
72" WD
15' CONC1
6' CONCGARDEN SQUARE LN 27' BSTCONC I
S
LCONC ISL18" C&G3
0" C&GSR 3126 AI
RPORT BLVD
V
ARI
ABLE BST30" C&G30" C&G18" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G54" C
O
N
C 54" CO
N
C 54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC N 32°26'33" W100.24'SANDHYA RAO
JAIDEV P. RAO
ERIN A. SPRINGER
JUDITH SPRINGER
N 64°02'51" W197.34'N 27°08'56" W153.64'EIP-R/W 0.12'EIP
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9627 PG 628
N 09°57'13" E
211.58'
S 46°37'35" W
124.81'
MICHELLE ROGERS HUMPHRES
CHRISTOPHER W. HUMPHRES S
8
8°3
7'2
6" W14
1.3
0'162.47'N49°04'40"WS 08°25'05" E129.58'THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
VISHNU PRIYA
THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
N 30°59'09" W
7.51'N 30°59'09" W104.35'N 30°59'09" W54.91'EMILY J. HARTER
CLARK D. HARTER
EXISTINGR /WN 80°05'24" W124.30'S 32°41'01" E39.99'EIPEIP
EIP
EIPEIP2.25'EI
P-R/WN 19°02'41" W116.86'N 36°36'04" W10.54'N 36°35'27" W117.46'
N 19°50'14" W
12.44'N 19°50'14" WS 76°56'03" W1
77.20'N 13°03'57" W191.02'N
5
1°
4
9'
3
2
" W3
5.
1
2'
N74°17'05"
W
PB 2009 PG 326EASMENT20' PRIVATE STORMW/FES15" RCP20.00
'EIP
EIP EIP EIP EIP EIP
EIP
EIP EIP
EIP
EXISTIN R/WMONICA L. MONEY
EDWARD B. MONEY 0.10'R/W-EIPS 30°32'14" E168.66'R/W-EIP 0.08'S 30°36'55" E86.25'S 57°30'32" W
9.55'
S 57°30'32" W
240.62'
S 57°28'53" W
7.41'
S 57°48'14" W
73.51'
S 57°42'22" W
114.82'
S 57°45'45" W
44.05'N 05°44'49" W75.80'EIPN 05°44'49" W86.78'N 05°44'49" W94.66'S
8
9°2
2'4
7" W5
7.7
8'N
0
2°3
9'
4
1" W2
5.
3
0'S
8
7°
2
0'
19" W1
2
0.
0
8'N
8
7°
2
0'
1
9" E12
0.
0
0'N
0
2°2
5'19" W2
0.0
0'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WS 76°56'07" W
112.52'45.12'38.89'38.83'N 79°27'14" E53.19'N79°33'14"EN79°07'36"EN79°34'55"E48
" M
T
L
EI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PN 02°50'23" WN 02°50'23" W60.00'S
8
9°5
7'3
5" E2
6
7.6
1'S 10°32'46" E90.43'N 76°56'07" E46.67'38.83'S 13°03'53" ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES 85°
3
7'58" W97.14'N 04°09'27" E52.83'N 85°38'08" E70.08'38.36'N04°09'27"ES 01°21'16" E110.70'EI
P
EIPN
0
4°0
9'
3
3" E14.4
5'EI
PEI
P
4
8" MTLN
8
8°48'11" W42.91'N
8
8°48'11" WEI
P
GARDEN SQUARE LN 22' BST EASEMENT PB 2003 PG 51420' PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERRYAN DAVIDSON
JENICA DAVIDSON
JULIA VADAKKUMPADAN
FIJOY VADAKKUMPADAN
N 18°04'58" W117.20'37.50
'EXISTING R/WN64°31'31"EEIPEIPEIPBL101
BL102
BL103
-EL-
BL104
N 13°03'53" W399.69'PADMAJA MARELLAANJAN MARELLA
RA
P
R
IP
S
18" RCP
24" TCCONC
30.00'
EL=368.06'
SAG POINT
POWERLINEHHHHTHHBOXELECTRICMETERELECTRICENDGTSEND2"4"4"4"2"2"12"12"12"8"8"FOFOFOFOFOFOFO
FOF
OF
OWALLVAR BKELECTRI
C
M
ETER54"CONC EIP
S 11°12'14" E170.10'PB
2002
PG
129
DB
9612
PG
2248
SHARON
M
IRADOR
RANDY
D
M
IRADOR 2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD
2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2
S
F
D2
S
F
D2
S
F
DS 21°26'23" WFOFO 04
NAD 83/ 2011SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE -L- STA. 25+50HL-0033
TRANSMISSION LINE
EXISTING DUKE ENERGY
CREEKCRABTREE UT TO
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED*
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
SITE 2SITE 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'100'
0'50'50'
INSET SCALE
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
SITE 3
SHEET 3 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
E E IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION15
+00
20+00 25+00
-L- PT Sta. 25+16.49
-L- PC Sta. 23+62.98
-L- PT Sta. 17+53.24
-L- PCC Sta. 14+36.95
-L- PC Sta. 12+17.25
10+00-Y- POT Sta. 14+32.86
-Y- PT Sta. 14+15.53
-Y- PC Sta. 13+76.10
-Y- PT Sta. 13+30.70
-Y- PC Sta. 12+89.09
-Y- PT Sta. 11+71.45
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74
-Y- PCC Sta. 10+48.43
-Y- PC Sta. 10+09.21
-Y- POT Sta. 10+00.00
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8:15:37 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_PSH_04_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 2022840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
150' TAPER24'48'24'24'20'8'24'20'24'5' SIDEWALK
1'-6" C&G1'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
+30.0036'
TYP
INC
+93.2436'+18.98TYP
INC
36'
C&G
2'-6" 215' TAPER TO EXISTING230' RIGHT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE230' RIGHT 400' RIGHT AND LEFT TURN STORAGESQUARE LNGARDEN SQUARE LNGARDEN EXI
STI
NG100' TA
PER TO 100'
T
A
PE
R+60.00+30.0024'24'BLVDAI
RPORT 11'16'
+25.00TYP.INC.
16'TYP.INC.+48.0016'TYP.INC.+96.0016'TYP.INC.+68.00-Y- STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- STA. 14+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
5' SIDEWALK TPR
25'+15.00MEDIAN
GRASS
-L- STA. 13+75.00
TIE TO EXISTING 48'24'GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
CAT-1
CAT-1
GREU TL-3
G
R
EU

T
L
-3CAT-1
CAT-1
36'
TYP
INC +77.245" CONC.
MONO. ISLANDCREEK GREENWAYEXISTING INDIANPATH
10' MULTI-USE
MONOLITHIC ISLAND
5" CONCRETE
-L- STA. 13+60.00
END MILL & FILL 1.5"
-L- POC STA. 12+00.00
BEGIN MILL & FILL 1.5"
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT HL-0033
64'HW
78" RCP-IV Buri
ed 1'
R
E
T
A
IN
RETAINRETAINADJUST CB
ADJUST CB
CB
CB CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
DI DI
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
0414
0411
0410
0408
0409
0406
0407 0413
0405
0415 0416
0418
0419
0420
0421
0422
0423
0425
0424
0403
0402
0401
EX 0404
0412
0427
0428
0426
CB15
" RCP-
I
V
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
1@8'x7' RCBC
SEE DETAIL 2
L= 24 FT
EST 35 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 30 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
STABILIZATION W/
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL
24" RCP-IV
24" RCP-IV
18" RCP-IV
SEE DETAIL 4
L=34 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 60 SY
EST 30 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 5
L=33 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 SY
EST 105 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
(Variable)
Channel Bed
IN STREAMBED
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP COUNTERSUNK 15" RCP-III
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextileb=1.5 Ft.
d=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B RIP RAP
FROM STA. 10+90 TO STA. 11+72 -Y- LT
FROM STA. 15+82 TO STA. 16+54 -L- RT
FROM STA. 15+68 TO STA. 16+50 -L- LT
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABLIZATION
PIPE INLET
DETAIL 3
AT STA. 16+20 -L- LT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
(Variable)
CHANNEL BED
Type of Liner = CLASS I RIP RAPEXISTING BANKEXISTING BANKMIN. 2:1 TO TIEMI
N.
2:
1 TO TI
E0429
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
NTS
2:12:1
EST 25 CY
EXCAVATION
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP
NG
1.0' SILL
INLET DETAIL 4
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
NTS
OUTLET DETAIL 5
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP2:1 2:1NG
EST 67 CY
EXCAVATION
1.0' SILL
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
AT STA 19+00 -L- LT AT STA 18+52 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 3
L= 10 FT
EST= 15 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST= 8 TONS
ON BANKS ONLY
BANK STABILIZATION
PIPE INLET
°°
***********S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
IN WETLANDS
EXCAVATION
S
3
2
43253253253263263
2
7327328328329329
3
2
9 3303
3
0
3303303303303
3
0 3313313
3
1333
334334335336COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
PB
2
0
0
9
PG
3
2
5
DB
13
6
0
0
PG
2
5
8
4
PB 2009 PG 326EASMENT20' PRIVATE STORMEIP
-L- PT Sta. 17+53.24
-Y- PT Sta. 11+71.45
1'-6" C&G
TPR
25'
HW
78" RCP-IV Buried 1'INV=327.4
TOP=332.5
HW/D25=1.0
BURIED 1.0'
INV=324.4
INV=323.1
***********SS
SS
SS
S
S 323323323324324325325325325325326 3263263
2
6327327327
328328328
3283283283
2
8 3293
3
0
330330
3
3
0
3
3
0 3313
3
1
332
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ASSOCIATION INC
PROPERTY OWNERS
TOWN HALL COMMONS
EIP N 19°02'41" W116.86'EIP
S 57°42'22" WN 05°44'49" W75.80'BL102
-Y- PT Sta. 13+30.70
-Y- PC Sta. 12+89.09
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74
1'-6" C&G
.01.00.0136'
TYP
INC.02CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 1@8'x7' RCBC
24" RCP-IV
24" RCP-IV
O
O
°°
S
S
S
330331332 3333343
3
5
3
3
5 335336337338S 57°48'14" W
BL103
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74 150' TAPER24'+30.0036'+93.24PATH
10' MULTI-USE
CB 15" RCP-IV 0418
18" RCP-IV
IN WETLANDS
EXCAVATION
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
AT STA. 16+54 -L- RT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL 2
2'
NWS
NWS
Geotextile
2'
F
F
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
F
F
F C
F
F
F
F
F C
C
C
C
C F
C
F
C F
FC
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
C C
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10507 PG 100
SAMEER S. GOTKHINDIKAR
PB 2002 PG 129DB 9426 PG 203PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9656 PG 1801
PB 2001 PG 957
DB 8941 PG 1356
WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
PB 2011 PG 36
DB 13850 PG 2679
LAURA HOLLAND UZZELL FOUNDATION
PB 1977 PG 257DB 8474 PG 550AND WIFE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNINGTONPB 1989 PG 351DB 10760 PG 2785 HELEN MARSHBURN HELEN MARSHBURNOTTO C. LYONSPB 1989 PG 351 DB 2749 PG 160CHARLIE MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W80.00'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W2
0.0
0'
PB 2011 PG 38
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
20' WIDE TOWN OF CARY
PB 2011 PG 38
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
20' WIDE TOWN OF CARY GRS
S
1SFD1SM
D
SOILGR2SBKDDECK
SGRSLTLTLT2SFDDECK2SFDPATIO72" WD
WD72" WD LTCONCLT2SFDBK WALL36"
M
TL1SMDSOILMTL72" WD72" WD 60" MTLSO
IL
P
ONDWOODSWOODSWOODSWOODS WOODSLTCBCBCBBK DECKDIDICBCBCBDIDIDICBDIWOODSCBCBCBCBS
S
S
S 15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCP30" RCP30" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCPTOP=350.57'TOP=351.38'8" PVC8" PVCW/FES18"RCP18" RCP60" WWS
S
18"
H
D
PE
W
/
M
TL FESW/FES15" HDPER
IPRAP
CONC
RIPRAP60" WW
4
8" CHL15" HDP
E
W/FES15" HDPE60" CONC12" HDPE15" HDPETOWN HALL DR VARIABLE BSTTOWN HALL DR VARIABLE BSTISLCONC ISLCONC 21' BST30" C&G30" C&G18" C&G18" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC CBBRANDONMARTHA HICKS12" RCPDB 2537 PG 36760" WW S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'CONCS 84°03'05" E
107.00'EIPEIPS
68°04'55" W
125
.60'EIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 14°32'54" W194.07'N 14°44'03" W46.17'N 34°46'39" W18" RCPCONC100.00'100.00'EXISTING
R
/W
EXISTING
R
/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EIP
EIP
ECM N 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" W100.41'N 18°03'44" W173.10'15" RCP15" RCPCONCPB 1989 PG 351 DB UNKOWNPB 1986 PG 2134 DB 11E PG 271PB 1986 PG 2134 DB 11E PG 27130" RCPCB
CBCBW
/
F
E
S18" HD
P
EEIP
MARINA E. HARRELL
GREGORY KENDAL HARRELLS 78°36'28" W
166.74'
EIP
EIP-
R/W 0.23'
N 64°02'51" W197.34'
EIP
EIPEIPEIPEIPR/W-EIP 0.08'EASEMENT PB 2003 PG 51420' PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERS 28°07'14" W176.38'OWNERS ASSOCIATION INCTOWN HALL COMMONS PROPERTYN 73°18'52" W137.58'
S
40°34
'18" E
47
.08
'101
.00'R/WEXISTINGR/WEXISTING89.00
'EXISTING R/WR/WEXISTING48" CHL24" RCP54" CONCBY108-EY-BL105-EY-BL106
BL107 GPS3CBSRIPRAPRIPRAP&SILT42" WIRE24" RCPRCP24"18" RCP18" RCPCBCB CBDIHHHHHHHHBOXELECTRICHHHHHANDHOLEGOOGLE EMPTYHANDHOLEGOOGLE EMPTYFOFO2"6"6"6"12"12"12"12"INNERDUCTINNERDUCTINNERDUCTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO9' CONCEIP DI
R ONLY18" HDP
ER
IPRAP
2SFD
30" C&G54" CONC
54" CONC BO WOODSS
CHOOL2
SBK BSTVARVAR
CONC
24" C&G
24" C&G
24" C&G
C&G
2
4"24" C
&
GN 40°36'16" W141.05'EIPEIPEIP30" RCPHHBOXHOTFO8
"
24" C&G
66" WD 66" WD66" WD66" WDDI24" C&G -EY1-66" WDDECKDECKS-Y1- POC Sta. 19+90.13
-L- POT Sta. 27+21.15=
30+00
35+00
-L- POT Sta. 36+55.15
-L- PT Sta. 31+94.94
-L- PC Sta. 29+88.62
-Y1- PC Sta. 17+18.80
-Y1- PT Sta. 15+12.8115+0020+0020+00-Y1-END CONSTRUCTION
Sta. 38+00.00
-L- POT
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
2:53:56 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_PSH_05.dgnnblahut8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 2022840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
24'48'48'24'.02.01.01.02.04.03.02.01.00.01.02.02.01.01.0224'16'36'8'8'CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
26
'14
'26
'12
'14
'48'5' SIDEWALK
5' SIDEWALK
5' SIDEWALK
10' MULTI-USE PATH
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
5' SIDEWALK
-Y1- STA. 15+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.0065.0065.02.03.04.02
.03
.031
.028
.02
.01
.00
.01
.02
.02
.01
.00
.01
.02
C&G
2'-6"
36'
36'+25.00+25.00INC. TYP.+52.6248'
48
'INC. TYP
.+30.94.003.00.00348
'INC
. TYP
.+70.00400
' RIGHT
TURN
STORAGE
360
' LEFT
TURN
STORAGE
150
' TAPER
100
' TAPER
400' RIGHT TURN STORAGE
150
' TAPER
375' LEFT TURN STORAGE
215' TAPER TO EXISTING230' RIGHT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE325' LEFT +65
.00
+00
.00
525' LEFT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE535' LEFT 435' RIGHT TURN STORAGE27
'5
'24
'41
'16
'TIE TO
EXISTING 100' TAPERTOWN HALL DRTOWN HALL DRSR 1637CHURCH ST200'R70'R
600'R 36'36'+75
.00INC. TYP.INC. TYP.+54
.00
.02
.025' SIDEWALKCR
CRCR
CR
CR
CR
.01
.02
.00
.01
.02
.02
.02
.01
.007
.01
.00
.007
.007
.00
.02
.01.01
.007
.02
36'INC. TYP.+52.00
36'+64.00
C&G
2'-6" TYP.INC. 36'TYP.INC.+11.59 RIGHT TURN STORAGE180' LEFT AND -Y2- STA. 15+75.00TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK-Y2- STA. 15+25.00TIE TO EXISTING C&G20' DRW-Y2- POT STA. 19+19.56
-L- POT STA. 36+25.47
END TIP PROJECT HL-0033
MONOLITHIC ISLAND
5" CONCRETE
11
'26
'ISLAND
MONOLITHIC
5" CONCRETE
PS
4
' 48'48'24'36'24'
16'
14
'26
'PS
4
'5" CONC.
MONO. ISLAND
5' SIDEWALK INTERSECTION TO -Y2- STA. 26+00.00600' TAPER FROM -L-/-Y2- INTERSECTION TO -Y2- STA. 26+00.00600' TAPER FROM -L-/-Y2- STORAGE
400'
PS
4
'64'64'59'62'
45'
45'57'
39
'40
'60.00' RT
+00.00 -Y1-
80.00' RT
62.00' &
+00.00 -Y1-
80.00' RT
63.06' &
+57.00 -Y1-
05
NAD 83/ 2011SEE SHEET 4MATCHLINE -L- STA. 25+50SEE
SHEET
7
MATCHLINE
-Y2-
STA
. 16+00
SEE
SHEET
8
MATCHLINE
-Y2-
STA
. 22+50
SEE SHEET 6
MATCHLINE -Y1- STA. 22+50
HL-0033
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
5' SIDEWALK
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED**
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SITE 4
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'100'
0'50'50'
INSET SCALE
SITE 4
SITE 4
SHEET 4 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextileb=1.5 Ft.
d=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B RIP RAP
FROM STA. 20+27 TO STA. 21+00 -Y2- LT
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
DI
DI DI DI
DI DI
DI
DI
DI
DI
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
1
5" RCP-I
V 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 30" RCP-I
V30" RCP
-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15"REMOVE18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV RCP-IV
18" 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 0533
0536
0538
0501
0530
0528
0529
0531
0527
0532
0524
0526
0523
0525
0522
0537
0535
0534
0502
0503
EX 0508
0507
0506
0505
0510
0504
0511
0512
0513
0516
0515
0519
0514
0517
0518
0520
0521
0541
REMOVEREMOVE0539
CB
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL 2
L= 10 FT
EST 20 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 15 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
STABILIZATION W/
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
18" RCP-IV
FLOWABLE FILL
F
ILL
FLOWABLE
FLOWABLE
F
ILL
0540
CB
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
15" RCP-IV
(Variable)
Channel Bed
IN STREAMBED
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP COUNTERSUNK CHARLIE MAYODIS
S
18" RCP30" RCP30" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCPRIPRAP30" C&G54" CONC DB 2537 PG 367PB 1989 PG 351 DB UNKOWN30" RCPCBFOFO2"9' CONC20+00CR
.02
.01
.00
.00.003CR
SYSTEM
REMOVE
CB
30" RCP-I
V30
" RCP
-IV 15" RCP-IV 0538
0537REMOVE
FLOWABLE
F
ILL
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
AT STA. 19+77 -Y2- RT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL 2
2'
NWS
F
F
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
CFCFCFFFFCCFCFFFFFCCCCCCF
F
F
328329330330
331331332332333333
333
334 334334335
335335335335335
336
336337337337338
338
338338339339339339339340340340
3403403403413
4
1
341341342
342342343
343343
34334434
4
3443443443453453
4
5
345
345
345345345
3453453453453
4
5
345
345345
345346346
346346346346346346346346346346346347347347347347 347347347347347347347347347347347347 347348348348348348
34834
8348348348348
3483483483483483483
4
8
3483483483483483483483483483
4
8
349
349349349
349349
3493493
4
9
349349349349
349349349349349349349349
349349349
34934934934934935
0
3
5
0
350350350350350
350350350350350 350350350350 350350350350 350350350
350 3503503
5
0
350
350
350350350350350350350350350350350350350 350350350
350350
3
5
0
350
350350
350
350
3
5
0
350350
3
5
0
35135135135
1351351351
351351 351351351351351351351 3513
5
1 3513513
5
1 351351351 3513 5 1
3513523523523523
52
3
5
2
352352
352352352352352352352352352352352352352352352
352
352
352
352
352352352352352352352352352353353353353 353353353353353353353353353353353353353
353
3
5
3
353353353353353
3533
5
3
3
5
3354354 354 3543543543
543543 5 4
354354354354
354354354355355355355
3
5
5
3
5
5
35
53553553 5 5
3 5 5
3
5
5
355
355355355355355355355
3
5
5
3553553553553563563
5
6 356356356356
3563563563563563
5
6
356357357 357
357
3573573
57
3573573573
5
7
358
358358358358358
3583583583583
5
8
3
593
5
9
359
3
5
9
359359359
359359359359359359360360360
3
60
360
3
6
0
3603603
6
0
3
60
360
360360360
3603603603603603613613
6
1 361361361
361361
3623623623623
6
2
362 362362363
363363 363 3633
63363363364364 3643
6
4
365
365
365365
3
65 365PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10507 PG 100
SAMEER S. GOTKHINDIKAR
PB 2002 PG 129DB 9426 PG 203PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9656 PG 1801
PB 2001 PG 957
DB 8941 PG 1356
WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
PB 2011 PG 36
DB 13850 PG 2679
LAURA HOLLAND UZZELL FOUNDATION
PB 1977 PG 257DB 8474 PG 550AND WIFE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNINGTONPB 1989 PG 351DB 10760 PG 2785 HELEN MARSHBURN HELEN MARSHBURNOTTO C. LYONSPB 1989 PG 351 DB 2749 PG 160CHARLIE MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W80.00'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W2
0.0
0'
PB 2011 PG 38
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
20' WIDE TOWN OF CARY
PB 2011 PG 38
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
20' WIDE TOWN OF CARY GRS
S
1SFD1SM
D
SOILGR2SBKDDECK
SGRSLTLTLT2SFDDECK2SFDPATIO72" WD
WD72" WD LTCONCLT2SFDBK WALL36"
M
TL1SMDSOILMTL72" WD72" WD 60" MTLSO
IL
P
ONDWOODSWOODSWOODSWOODS WOODSLTCBCBCBBK DECKDIDICBCBCBDIDIDICBDIWOODSCBCBCBCBS
S
S
S 15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCP30" RCP30" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCPTOP=350.57'TOP=351.38'8" PVC8" PVCW/FES18"RCP18" RCP60" WWS
S
18"
H
D
PE
W
/
M
TL FESW/FES15" HDPER
IPRAP
CONC
RIPRAP60" WW
4
8" CHL15" HDP
E
W/FES15" HDPE60" CONC12" HDPE15" HDPETOWN HALL DR VARIABLE BSTTOWN HALL DR VARIABLE BSTISLCONC ISLCONC 21' BST30" C&G30" C&G18" C&G18" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC CBBRANDONMARTHA HICKS12" RCPDB 2537 PG 36760" WW S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'CONCS 84°03'05" E
107.00'EIPEIPS
68°04'55" W
125
.60'EIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 14°32'54" W194.07'N 14°44'03" W46.17'N 34°46'39" W18" RCPCONC100.00'100.00'EXISTING
R
/W
EXISTING
R
/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EIP
EIP
ECM N 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" W100.41'N 18°03'44" W173.10'15" RCP15" RCPCONCPB 1989 PG 351 DB UNKOWNPB 1986 PG 2134 DB 11E PG 271PB 1986 PG 2134 DB 11E PG 27130" RCPCB
CBCBW
/
F
E
S18" HD
P
EEIP
MARINA E. HARRELL
GREGORY KENDAL HARRELLS 78°36'28" W
166.74'
EIP
EIP-
R/W 0.23'
N 64°02'51" W197.34'
EIP
EIPEIPEIPEIPR/W-EIP 0.08'EASEMENT PB 2003 PG 51420' PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERS 28°07'14" W176.38'OWNERS ASSOCIATION INCTOWN HALL COMMONS PROPERTYN 73°18'52" W137.58'
S
40°34
'18" E
47
.08
'101
.00'R/WEXISTINGR/WEXISTING89.00
'EXISTING R/WR/WEXISTING48" CHL24" RCP54" CONCBY108-EY-BL105-EY-BL106
BL107 GPS3CBSRIPRAPRIPRAP&SILT42" WIRE24" RCPRCP24"18" RCP18" RCPCBCB CBDIHHHHHHHHBOXELECTRICHHHHHANDHOLEGOOGLE EMPTYHANDHOLEGOOGLE EMPTYFOFO2"6"6"6"12"12"12"12"INNERDUCTINNERDUCTINNERDUCTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO9' CONCEIP DI
R ONLY18" HDP
ER
IPRAP
2SFD
30" C&G54" CONC
54" CONC BO WOODSS
CHOOL2
SBK BSTVARVAR
CONC
24" C&G
24" C&G
24" C&G
C&G
2
4"24" C
&
GN 40°36'16" W141.05'EIPEIPEIP30" RCPHHBOXHOTFO8
"
24" C&G
66" WD 66" WD66" WD66" WDDI24" C&G -EY1-66" WDDECKDECKS-Y1- POC Sta. 19+90.13
-L- POT Sta. 27+21.15=
30+00
35+00
-L- POT Sta. 36+55.15
-L- PT Sta. 31+94.94
-L- PC Sta. 29+88.62
-Y1- PC Sta. 17+18.80
-Y1- PT Sta. 15+12.8115+0020+0020+00-Y1-END CONSTRUCTION
Sta. 38+00.00
-L- POT
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
2:54:11 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_PSH_05_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 2022840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
24'48'48'24'.02.01.01.02.04.03.02.01.00.01.02.02.01.01.0224'16'36'8'8'CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
CR
26
'14
'26
'12
'14
'48'5' SIDEWALK
5' SIDEWALK
5' SIDEWALK
10' MULTI-USE PATH
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
5' SIDEWALK
-Y1- STA. 15+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.0065.0065.02.03.04.02
.03
.031
.028
.02
.01
.00
.01
.02
.02
.01
.00
.01
.02
C&G
2'-6"
36'
36'+25.00+25.00INC. TYP.+52.6248'
48
'INC. TYP
.+30.94.003.00.00348
'INC
. TYP
.+70.00400
' RIGHT
TURN
STORAGE
360
' LEFT
TURN
STORAGE
150
' TAPER
100
' TAPER
400' RIGHT TURN STORAGE
150
' TAPER
375' LEFT TURN STORAGE
215' TAPER TO EXISTING230' RIGHT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE325' LEFT +65
.00
+00
.00
525' LEFT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE535' LEFT 435' RIGHT TURN STORAGE27
'5
'24
'41
'16
'TIE TO
EXISTING 100' TAPERTOWN HALL DRTOWN HALL DRSR 1637CHURCH ST200'R70'R
600'R 36'36'+75
.00INC. TYP.INC. TYP.+54
.00
.02
.025' SIDEWALKCR
CRCR
CR
CR
CR
.01
.02
.00
.01
.02
.02
.02
.01
.007
.01
.00
.007
.007
.00
.02
.01.01
.007
.02
36'INC. TYP.+52.00
36'+64.00
C&G
2'-6" TYP.INC. 36'TYP.INC.+11.59 RIGHT TURN STORAGE180' LEFT AND -Y2- STA. 15+75.00TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK-Y2- STA. 15+25.00TIE TO EXISTING C&G20' DRW-Y2- POT STA. 19+19.56
-L- POT STA. 36+25.47
END TIP PROJECT HL-0033
MONOLITHIC ISLAND
5" CONCRETE
11
'26
'ISLAND
MONOLITHIC
5" CONCRETE
PS
4
' 48'48'24'36'24'
16'
14
'26
'PS
4
'5" CONC.
MONO. ISLAND
5' SIDEWALK INTERSECTION TO -Y2- STA. 26+00.00600' TAPER FROM -L-/-Y2- INTERSECTION TO -Y2- STA. 26+00.00600' TAPER FROM -L-/-Y2- STORAGE
400'
PS
4
'64'64'59'62'
45'
45'57'
39
'40
'60.00' RT
+00.00 -Y1-
80.00' RT
62.00' &
+00.00 -Y1-
80.00' RT
63.06' &
+57.00 -Y1-
05
NAD 83/ 2011SEE SHEET 4MATCHLINE -L- STA. 25+50SEE
SHEET
7
MATCHLINE
-Y2-
STA
. 16+00
SEE
SHEET
8
MATCHLINE
-Y2-
STA
. 22+50
SEE SHEET 6
MATCHLINE -Y1- STA. 22+50
HL-0033
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
5' SIDEWALK
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED**
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SITE 4
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'100'
0'50'50'
INSET SCALE
SITE 4
SITE 4
SHEET 5 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextileb=1.5 Ft.
d=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B RIP RAP
FROM STA. 20+27 TO STA. 21+00 -Y2- LT
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
SYSTEM
REMOVE
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
CB
DI
DI DI DI
DI DI
DI
DI
DI
DI
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
1
5" RCP-I
V 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 30" RCP-I
V30" RCP
-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15"REMOVE18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV RCP-IV
18" 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV 18" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 0533
0536
0538
0501
0530
0528
0529
0531
0527
0532
0524
0526
0523
0525
0522
0537
0535
0534
0502
0503
EX 0508
0507
0506
0505
0510
0504
0511
0512
0513
0516
0515
0519
0514
0517
0518
0520
0521
0541
REMOVEREMOVE0539
CB
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL 2
L= 10 FT
EST 20 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 15 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
STABILIZATION W/
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
18" RCP-IV
FLOWABLE FILL
F
ILL
FLOWABLE
FLOWABLE
F
ILL
0540
CB
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
15" RCP-IV
(Variable)
Channel Bed
IN STREAMBED
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP COUNTERSUNK 3373383393403
4
13423433
4
4344345345346346347348
CHARLIE MAYODIS
S
18" RCP30" RCP30" RCP15" RCP15" RCP18" RCPRIPRAP30" C&G54" CONC DB 2537 PG 367PB 1989 PG 351 DB UNKOWN30" RCPCBFOFO2"9' CONC20+00CR
.02
.01
.00
.00.003CR
SYSTEM
REMOVE
CB
30" RCP-I
V30
" RCP
-IV 15" RCP-IV 0538
0537REMOVE
FLOWABLE
F
ILL
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
AT STA. 19+77 -Y2- RT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL 2
2'
NWS
F
F
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
CFCFCFFFFCCFCFFFFFCCCCCCF
F
F
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION5/14/99SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
7HL-0033
10:13:24 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase1_PSH_pfl.dgnnblahutDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
SHEET 6 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
350 150'100'50'0 50'100'150'
320
330
340 SKEW = 113°
GP = 330.89'
1.0' SILLS INLET/OUTLET
W/6" BEVELED HW
1@8'x7' RCBC
CL STA 18+78.00 -L-
TOP OF BANK LT
TOP OF BANK RT
EX BED
SLOPE = 0.476%
CL ELEV = 320.32'
1.0' SILL
1.0' SILL
MAY BE SUBJECT TO PERMIT CONDITIONS.
APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER AND
MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO
CULVERT CONSTRUCTION. NATIVE
AT THE PROJECT SITE DURING THE
EXCAVATED FROM THE STREAM BED
CONSIST OF MATERIAL THAT IS
TO SILL HEIGHT. NATIVE MATERIAL
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL
PERPINDICULAR TO THE RCBC WALLS.
FROM THE INLET AND OUTLET
INSTALL 1' SILL AT A 3' OFFSET
100 YR WSEL = 328.7'
PROPOSED 25YR &
INVERT = 323.9'
IN WEST WALL
15" CLASS IV RCP
INVERT = 323.1'
IN EAST WALL
24" CLASS IV RCP
07/02/2021
DATE OF SURVEY
NWSEL = 323.3'
00
00
55
55
1010
1010
1515
1515
2020
2020
2525
2525
3030
3030
3535
3535
4040
4040
4545
4545
5050
5050
5555
5555
6060
6060
6565
6565
7070
7070
7575
7575
11:10:24 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\HL-0033_HYD_Permit_XPL_L.dgnnblahutPROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0
6/23/16335 335
340 340
330 33015+50.00
330 330
335 335
340 340
325 325
16+00.00
325 325
330 330
335 335
340 340
320 320
16+50.00
330 330
335 335
325 325
17+00.00
X-2HL-0033
-L-
2.5 5
WETLAND
WETLAND
SITE 1
SITE 1
SHEET 7 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLANDSWETLANDS
FILL IN WETLANDSWETLANDSWETLANDS
FILL IN
EXTENDS TO +/-83' LT
MECHANIZED CLEARING
TO+/-110' RT
EXTENDS
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
WETLANDS
FILL IN
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
330.24 2:12:1 336.62335.63334.89333.740.04
0.04
328.53
2:1
2:1332.09333.24333.98334.970.04
0.04
00
00
55
55
1010
1010
1515
1515
2020
2020
2525
2525
3030
3030
3535
3535
4040
4040
4545
4545
5050
5050
5555
5555
6060
6060
6565
6565
7070
7070
7575
7575
1:46:59 PM\\vhb.com\gbl\proj\Raleigh\39004.04 Lochner-Airport BlvdExt\NCDOT\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\HL-0033_HYD_Permit_XPL_L.dgnnblahutPROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0
6/23/16330 330
335 335
325 325
19+50.00
330 330
335 335
325 325
330 330
335 335
325 325
20+58.00
335 335
330 330
335 335
340 340
330 330
340 340
335 335
X-4HL-0033
-L-
2.5 5
SHEET 8 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLANDSCLEARING
MECHANIZED
SITE 3
WETLANDSWETLANDS19+50.00
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
556065707595908580100
SITE 2 55' LTSTA. 19+50MATCHLINE -L- 55' LTSTA. 19+50MATCHLINE -L- EXCAVATION WETLANDSSTA. 20+58
IMPACTS REPRESENT THOSE AT
CUT, SEE PLAN VIEW
BETWEEN FILL AND
AREA IS TRANSITIONING
334.332:12:1332.71333.32333.32332.710.02 0.02
331.15
2:1 2:1330.87331.48331.59331.300.02 0.008
00
00
55
55
1010
1010
1515
1515
2020
2020
2525
2525
3030
3030
3535
3535
4040
4040
4545
4545
5050
5050
5555
5555
6060
6060
6565
6565
7070
7070
7575
7575
11:06:02 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\HL-0033_HYD_Permit_XPL_Y2_P1.dgnnblahutPROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0
6/23/16340 340
345 345
350 350
355 355
19+00.00
335 335
340 340
345 345
350 350
355 355
19+50.00
340 340
345 345
350 350
355 355
20+00.00
345 345
350 350
355 355
20+50.00
X-22
-Y2-
2.5 5
HL-0033
SHEET 9 OF 10
PERMIT DRAWINGWETLANDSWETLANDS
FILL IN
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
WETLANDSSITE 4
347.80
0.0200.0094:1 348.464
:1
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)
1 -L- 15+49/16+72
Fill, Toe Protection, Excavation
to allow for installation of
diversion channel.
0.15 < 0.01 0.07
1 -L- 16+15/16+58 78" RCP-IV 0.01 < 0.01 184 19
2 -L- 18+34/19+29 1 @ 8'x7' RCBC < 0.01 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 192 29
3 -L- 20+47/20+59 Excavation < 0.01 < 0.01
4 -L- 35+56/35+92 Fill, Toe Protection < 0.01 < 0.01
4 -L- 36+59/37+09 30" RCP-IV < 0.01 < 0.01 44 19

TOTALS*:0.16 < 0.01 0.08 0.05 < 0.01 420 67
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 10 OF 10
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033
36249.4033
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
3/18/2022
At station 16+20 -L- LT, the 10 ft of rip rap is to be placed on banks only at the inlet of the 78" RCP and at station 19+00 -L- LT,
the 34 ft of rip rap is to be placed on banks only at the inlet of the 8'x7' RCBC

CHRISTINA YOKELEY, PE
BRIAN K. EASON, PE
WAKE COUNTY

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
3,600
17,000
10
60
4
50
%
%
MPH
ADT
ADT
2021
2045
% *
DUAL 3%

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
* TTST =1%
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
Prepared in the Office of:
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/99 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
9:19:15 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase1_TSH.dgnnblahutCONTRACT:TIP PROJECT:ARTMEN
N ASO
H
DEPT
O
F TRA SPORTTIONTATEOFNRTCAR
O
LI
NAH. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NCDOT CONTACT
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF MORRISVILLE
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD (SR 3126)
FROM GARDEN SQUARE LANE TO CHURCH ST (SR 1637)
IN MORRISVILLE
PE, R/W, UTIL36249.4033
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
=0.435 Miles
=0.435 Miles
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
JOHN BRAXTON
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT
N/A
HL-0033HL-0033
JULY 19, 2022
DEC. 08, 2021
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-0033
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRADING, DRAINAGE, CULVERT, SIGNALS, AND PAVING
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 4
BUFFER DRAWING
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
04
05
04
05
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
HALL DRTOWN -Y1-CHURCH STSR 1637-Y2-GARDEN SQUARE LANE
AIRPORT BLVD EXTFUTURESR 3126
-L-
-L-
AIRPORT BLVD EXT
SR 3126
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
TO DAVI
S DRTO I-40
-Y2- STA. 27+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 15+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 25+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- STA. 10+50.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNALMORRISVILLEMORRISVILLEMORRISVILLE-L- POT STA. 36+55.15
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- POC STA. 13+60.00
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
-L- POT STA. 36+25.47
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
INDIAN TRAIL GREENWAY
GARDEN SQUARE LANE
UT TO CRABTREE CREEKPROP. 7x8 RCBC
-Y- STA. 10+25.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- STA. 14+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
CRABTREE
LAKE
3095
3119
1625
3057
1617
1617
3006
1623
1624
3014
1633
1726
1613
1637
1638
1706
1706
3094
1637
1635
1613
1635
1635
1632
1632
1613
3014
3060
1641
1640
3015
3015
1637
1637
1789
1792
3010
1002
1002
3084
1635
3059
1634
3104
1613
1639
3015
1625
Morrisville
pop. 26,280
SEABOARDSOUTHERNRAILROADCr
e
e
k
Cr
abtr
eeCreek
Stirr
u
pIron
CreekFREEWAY40
40
55
540
540
540
54
55
55
54
2
BOXHOTCBOXHOTCNAD 83/ 2011NAD 83/ 2011
PB
2
0
0
9
PG

3
2
6
DB

13
6
0
0
PG

2
5
8
4
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
COMMONS
OWNERS
ASSN
INC
THE
TERRACES
AT
TOWN
HALL
PB
20
0
9
PG
3
2
5
DB
13
6
00
PG
2
58
4
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10445 PG 1715
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 16307 PG 342
ETNS PROPERTY LLC
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 10600 PG 2236
WIFE SANDRA C. SHIPP
SEBASTIAN SHIPP AND
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 14398 PG 1578
PB 2003 PG 514
DB 12157 PG 2165
AND PREETHI ABU
KUTTAN I JAYARAM
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 10106 PG 579
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
ASSOCIATION INC
PROPERTY OWNERS
TOWN HALL COMMONS
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9426 PG 203
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 17677 PG 1537
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9583 PG 1904
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 12190 PG 2763
PB 2002 PG 126DB 10907 PG 1688
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17215 PG 1424AND WIFE MEGAN D. ELLISONDAVID D. ELLISON
PB 2002 PG 126DB 17596 PG 2597ELSIE KATUMKEERYIL ABRAHAMAND WIFE ABRAHAM J. KATUMKEERYIL
PB 2002 PG 129
DB 12378 PG 2521
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE 100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W100.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
50.00'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WDB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'DB 2231 PG 637100' CP&L EASEMENT100.00'PB 1998 PG 2054PB 2007 PG 67530' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT2
0.0
0'vv
vvBK SLTLT48
" MTL
4
8" MTLLTPOND
BK S
POND
WOOD
S
WOODS
WOODSCBCB48" M
TL9.5' CONC48" MTLWOODS12" R
C
P10" DIP10" DIP72" WD
72" WD
15' CONC1
6' CONCGARDEN SQUARE LN 27' BSTCONC I
S
LCONC ISL18" C&G3
0" C&GSR 3126 AI
RPORT BLVD
V
ARI
ABLE BST30" C&G30" C&G18" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G30" C&G54" C
O
N
C 54" CO
N
C 54" CONC 54" CONC 54" CONC N 32°26'33" W100.24'SANDHYA RAO
JAIDEV P. RAO
ERIN A. SPRINGER
JUDITH SPRINGER
N 64°02'51" W197.34'N 27°08'56" W153.64'EIP-R/W 0.12'EIP
PB 2002 PG 126
DB 9627 PG 628
N 09°57'13" E
211.58'
S 46°37'35" W
124.81'
MICHELLE ROGERS HUMPHRES
CHRISTOPHER W. HUMPHRES S
8
8°3
7'2
6" W14
1.3
0'162.47'N49°04'40"WS 08°25'05" E129.58'THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
VISHNU PRIYA
THANIGAIVEL RANGARAJAN
N 30°59'09" W
7.51'N 30°59'09" W104.35'N 30°59'09" W54.91'EMILY J. HARTER
CLARK D. HARTER
EXISTINGR /WN 80°05'24" W124.30'S 32°41'01" E39.99'EIPEIP
EIP
EIPEIP2.25'EI
P-R/WN 19°02'41" W116.86'N 36°36'04" W10.54'N 36°35'27" W117.46'
N 19°50'14" W
12.44'N 19°50'14" WS 76°56'03" W1
77.20'N 13°03'57" W191.02'N
5
1°
4
9'
3
2
" W3
5.
1
2'
N74°17'05"
W
EXISTING R/WPB 2009 PG 326EASMENT20' PRIVATE STORMW/FES15" RCP20.00
'EIP
EIP EIP EIP
EIP
EIP
EIP EIP
EIP
EIP EIP
EIP
EXISTIN R/WMONICA L. MONEY
EDWARD B. MONEY 0.10'R/W-EIPS 30°32'14" E168.66'R/W-EIP 0.08'S 30°36'55" E86.25'S 57°30'32" W
9.55'
S 57°30'32" W
240.62'
S 57°28'53" W
7.41'42.34'S79°46'57"W
S 57°48'14" W
73.51'
S 57°42'22" W
114.82'
S 57°45'45" W
44.05'N 05°44'49" W75.80'EIPN 05°44'49" W86.78'N 05°44'49" W94.66'S
8
9°2
2'4
7" W5
7.7
8'N
0
2°3
9'
4
1" W2
5.
3
0'S
8
7°
2
0'
19" W1
2
0.
0
8'N
8
7°
2
0'
19" E12
0.
0
0'N
0
2°2
5'19" W2
0.0
0'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WS 76°56'07" W
112.52'45.12'38.89'38.83'N 79°27'14" E53.19'N79°33'14"EN79°07'36"EN79°34'55"E48
" M
T
L
EI
PEI
PEI
PEI
PN 02°39'41" W120.00'N 02°50'23" W60.00'N 02°50'23" W60.00'S
8
9°5
7'3
5" E2
6
7.6
1'S 10°32'46" E90.43'S 24°45'39" W
59.70'
N 76°56'07" E89.00'46.67'38.83'38.83'38.83'38.84'S 13°03'53" E48.12'S13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES13°03'53"ES 85°
3
7'58" W97.14'N 04°09'27" E52.83'N 85°38'08" E70.08'38.36'N04°09'27"ES 01°21'16" E110.70'EI
P
EIPN
0
4°0
9'
3
3" E14.4
5'EI
PEI
P
4
8" MTLN
8
8°48'11" W42.91'N
88°48'11" WEI
P
GARDEN SQUARE LN 22' BST EASEMENT PB 2003 PG 51420' PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERRYAN DAVIDSON
JENICA DAVIDSON
JULIA VADAKKUMPADAN
FIJOY VADAKKUMPADAN
N 18°04'58" W117.20'37.50
'EXISTING R/WN64°31'31"EEIPEIPEIPBL101
BL102
BL103
-EL-
BL104
N 13°03'53" W399.69'PADMAJA MARELLAANJAN MARELLA
RA
P
R
IP
S
18" RCP
24" TCCONC
30.00'
EL=368.06'
SAG POINT
POWERLINEHHHHTHHBOXELECTRICMETERELECTRICENDGTSEND2"4"4"4"2"2"12"12"12"8"8"FOFOFOFOFOFOFO
FOF
OF
OWALLVAR BKELECTRI
C
M
ETER54"CONC EIP
S 11°12'14" E170.10'PB
2002
PG
129
DB
9612
PG
2248
SHARON
M
IRADOR
RANDY
D
M
IRADOR 2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD
2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD
2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2SFD2
S
F
D2
S
F
D2
S
F
DS 21°26'23" WFOFO 04
NAD 83/ 2011SEE SHEET 5MATCHLINE -L- STA. 25+50HL-0033
TRANSMISSION LINE
EXISTING DUKE ENERGY
CREEKCRABTREE UT TO
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'100'
0'50'50'
INSET SCALE
SHEET 2 OF 4
BUFFER DRAWING
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 315
+00
20+00 25+00
-L- PT Sta. 25+16.49
-L- PC Sta. 23+62.98
-L- PT Sta. 17+53.24
-L- PCC Sta. 14+36.95
-L- PC Sta. 12+17.25
10+00-Y- POT Sta. 14+32.86
-Y- PT Sta. 14+15.53
-Y- PC Sta. 13+76.10
-Y- PT Sta. 13+30.70
-Y- PC Sta. 12+89.09
-Y- PT Sta. 11+71.45
-Y- PRC Sta. 11+10.74
-Y- PCC Sta. 10+48.43
-Y- PC Sta. 10+09.21
-Y- POT Sta. 10+00.00
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
11:16:42 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase1_PSH_04.dgnnblahut8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 2022840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
150' TAPER24'48'24'24'20'8'24'20'24'5' SIDEWALK
1'-6" C&G1'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
2'-6" C&G
+30.0036'
TYP
INC
+93.2436'+18.98TYP
INC
36'
C&G
2'-6" 215' TAPER TO EXISTING230' RIGHT TURN STORAGETURN STORAGE230' RIGHT 400' RIGHT AND LEFT TURN STORAGESQUARE LNGARDEN SQUARE LNGARDEN EXI
STI
NG100' TA
PER TO 100'
T
A
PE
R+60.00+30.0024'24'BLVDAI
RPORT 11'16'
+25.00TYP.INC.
16'TYP.INC.+48.0016'TYP.INC.+96.0016'TYP.INC.+68.00-Y- STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- STA. 14+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
5' SIDEWALK TPR
25'+15.00MEDIAN
GRASS
-L- STA. 13+75.00
TIE TO EXISTING 48'24'GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
CAT-1
CAT-1
GREU TL-3
G
R
EU

T
L
-3CAT-1
CAT-1
36'
TYP
INC +77.245" CONC.
MONO. ISLANDCREEK GREENWAYEXISTING INDIANPATH
10' MULTI-USE
MONOLITHIC ISLAND
5" CONCRETE
-L- STA. 13+60.00
END MILL & FILL 1.5"
-L- POC STA. 12+00.00
BEGIN MILL & FILL 1.5"
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT HL-0033
64'HW
78" RCP-IV Buri
ed 1'
R
E
T
A
IN
RETAINRETAINADJUST CB
ADJUST CB
CB
CB CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
CB CB
CB
CB CB
DI DI
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV 15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
0414
0411
0410
0408
0409
0406
0407 0413
0405
0415 0416
0418
0419
0420
0421
0422
0423
0425
0424
0403
0402
0401
EX 0404
0412
0427
0428
0426
CB15
" RCP-
I
V
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
1@8'x7' RCBC
SEE DETAIL 2
L= 24 FT
EST 35 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 30 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
STABILIZATION W/
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL
24" RCP-IV
24" RCP-IV
18" RCP-IV
SEE DETAIL 4
L=34 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 60 SY
EST 30 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 5
L=33 FT
GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 SY
EST 105 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
(Variable)
Channel Bed
IN STREAMBED
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP COUNTERSUNK 15" RCP-III
SEE DETAIL 1
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextileb=1.5 Ft.
d=1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CLASS B RIP RAP
FROM STA. 10+90 TO STA. 11+72 -Y- LT
FROM STA. 15+82 TO STA. 16+54 -L- RT
FROM STA. 15+68 TO STA. 16+50 -L- LT
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABLIZATION
PIPE INLET
DETAIL 3
AT STA. 16+20 -L- LT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
(Variable)
CHANNEL BED
Type of Liner = CLASS I RIP RAPEXISTING BANKEXISTING BANKMIN. 2:1 TO TIEMI
N.
2:
1 TO TI
E0429
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
NTS
2:12:1
EST 25 CY
EXCAVATION
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP
NG
1.0' SILL
INLET DETAIL 4
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
NTS
OUTLET DETAIL 5
THICKNESS = 2'
W/ GEOTEXTILE (TYP)
CLASS II RIP RAP2:1 2:1NG
EST 67 CY
EXCAVATION
1.0' SILL
1 @ 8' x 7' RCBC
AT STA 19+00 -L- LT AT STA 18+52 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 3
L= 10 FT
EST= 15 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST= 8 TONS
ON BANKS ONLY
BANK STABILIZATION
PIPE INLET
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
AT STA. 16+54 -L- RT
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL STABILIZATION
DETAIL 2
2'
NWS
NWS
Geotextile
2'
F
F
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
F
F
F C
F
F
F
F
F C
C
C
C
C F
C
F
C F
FC
F
C
C
C
Site Station Structure
No.(From/To)Size / Type
1 -L- 15+62/17+25 78" RCP-IV X 12565 8599 21164
2 -L- 17+58/19+74 1 @ 8'x7' RCBC X 12643 7836 20480
3 -L- 18+92/20+46 Stream C X 1293 2213 3506
0 0 0 26501 18648 45149 0 0
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 3 OF 4
ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE
3/18/2022
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
36249.4033
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
IMPACTS
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TOTALS*:
ROAD
CROSSING BRIDGE PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TYPE
ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
1 -L- 15+62/17+25 78" RCP-IV 6391 2361
2 -L- 17+58/19+74 1 @ 8'x7' RCBC 107 7
3 -L- 18+92/20+46 Stream C 0 1
6498 2369
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 4 OF 4
Structure Size
/ Type
WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
36249.4033
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
3/18/2022
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
SITE
NO.
STATION
(FROM/TO)
TOTAL:
Rev. Jan 2009
CHRISTINA YOKELEY, PE
BRIAN K. EASON, PE
WAKE COUNTY
25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
ADT
ADT
2021
2045
DUAL 3%
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
* TTST =1%
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
Prepared in the Office of:
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/99 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
11:18:13 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_TSH.dgnnblahutCONTRACT:TIP PROJECT:ARTMEN
N ASO
H
DEPT
O
F TRA SPORTTIONTATEOFNRTCAR
O
LI
NAH. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NCDOT CONTACT
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF MORRISVILLE
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD (SR 3126)
PE, R/W, UTIL36249.4033
=0.435 Miles
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
JOHN BRAXTON
THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT
N/A
HL-0033
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-0033
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRADING, DRAINAGE, CULVERT, SIGNALS, AND PAVING
09
10
11
SHEET 1 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033TO DAVI
S DR-L- POT STA. 78+64.86
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033TO I-40
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
####R = ####Tc = ####Lc = ####D = (LT)####¬c = ####PIc -L7CUR DATA -
CRABTREE
LAKE
3119
1617
1617
1624
3014
1633
1726
1613
1638
1706
1706
3094
1637
1635
1635
1632
1632
1613
3014
3060
1641
1640
3015
3015
1637
1637
1002
3084
1635
3059
1634
3104
1613
3015
Morrisville
pop. 26,280SOUTHERNRAILROADCrabtree
Creek
Stirr
u
p
CreekTRIANGLE
PARK
540
55
55
540
54
54
2
540
40
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
PHASE II - ALT 1
PRELIMINARY PERMIT
SITE 1
SITE 2 SITE 3
SITE 4
SITE 5
SITE 6HL-0033 PHASE II - ALT 1SITE 7
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
AIRPORT BLVD CHAPEL HILL RDWALDRON CTARTECH DROF CHAPEL HILL RD (NC 54) IN MORRISVILLE
FROM CHURCH ST (SR 1637) TO NORTHEAST
27
SB1
28
SB2 29
SB3
30
SSA1
31
SSA2
32
SS
A3
33
SSA4
34
SSA5
35
SSA6
36
SSA7
37
SSA8
38
SSA9
39
SSA10
40
SS
A11
41
SS
A12
42
SS
B1CUL
VERTOUT
43
SSB2
44
SSB3
45
SSB4
46
SSB5
47
SSB6
48
SS
B7 BAC
K IN
49
SSB8 BAC
K IN
50
SSB9 BACK IN 51
SSB10 BACK IN 52
SSB11 BACK IN 53
SSB12 CULVERT
54
SSC CONFL TO CULVERT AT SSB
55
SSC2
56
SSC3
57
SSC4
58
SSC5
59
SSC6
60
SSC7 AT RR
2
SS
D2 AT SSA 1
SSD1 AT SSA3
SSD3 AT SSA4
SSD4 AT SS
A5
SSD5 AT SSA culvert
culvert
culvert
Non 404
pond NAD 83/ 2011
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.1:06:16 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH09.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
P P
(POND)
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SHEET 2 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 02
09
SEE SHEET PSH-10STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SLOPE STAKES +25'AND WI
FE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1DB
10
7
6
0
P
G
2
7
8
5
HELEN MARS
HBURN HELEN MARS
HBURNOTTO C. LYONS
S
YLVES
TER K. HARRI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
2
7
4
9 PG
16
0
P
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
9
8
3
7
P
G
4
20
CHARLI
E MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WBRANDONMARTHA HI
CKSDB
2
5
3
7
P
G
3
6
7 S 79°26'25"
W19
3.38'N 18°19'40" W641.17'S 25°45'15" E223.07'S 78°07'55" W19
7.94'S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'
S
68°26'05" W
624
.68'S 28°11'38" E408.42'EIPEIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" WP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB UNKOWNP
B
19
8
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
11
E
P
G
2
7
1
P
B
1
98
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
1
1E
P
G
2
7
1N 17°32'40" W465.58'BM 2
0
17 P
G
8
5
5
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4AMF
P I
V WATERF
ORD LLCDB
17
5
7
5
P
G
10
7CHURCH ST.3
0
S
S
A1
31
S
S
A2
3
2
S
S
A3
3
3
S
S
A4
3
4
S
S
A5
3
5
S
S
A6
36
S
S
A7
3
7
S
S
A8
38
S
S
A9
39
S
S
A10
4
0
S
S
A11
4
1
S
S
A12
4
2
S
S
B1
CULVERTOUT4
3
S
S
B2
4
4
S
S
B3
4
5
S
S
B4
4
6
S
S
B5
4
7
S
S
B6
2
S
S
D2 AT
S
S
A1
S
S
D1 AT
S
S
A3
S
S
D3 AT
S
S
A4
S
S
D4 AT
S
S
A5
S
S
D5 AT
S
S
Ac
ulvert
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
SITE 4
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.12:32:02 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH09_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
P P
(POND)
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SHEET 3 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 02
09
SEE SHEET PSH-10STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SLOPE STAKES +25'AND WI
FE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1DB
10
7
6
0
P
G
2
7
8
5
HELEN MARS
HBURN HELEN MARS
HBURNOTTO C. LYONS
S
YLVES
TER K. HARRI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
2
7
4
9 PG
16
0
P
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
9
8
3
7
P
G
4
20
CHARLI
E MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WBRANDONMARTHA HI
CKSDB
2
5
3
7
P
G
3
6
7 S 79°26'25"
W19
3.38'N 18°19'40" W641.17'S 25°45'15" E223.07'S 78°07'55" W19
7.94'S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'
S
68°26'05" W
624
.68'S 28°11'38" E408.42'EIPEIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" WP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB UNKOWNP
B
19
8
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
11
E
P
G
2
7
1
P
B
1
98
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
1
1E
P
G
2
7
1N 17°32'40" W465.58'BM 2
0
17 P
G
8
5
5
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4AMF
P I
V WATERF
ORD LLCDB
17
5
7
5
P
G
10
7CHURCH ST.3
0
S
S
A1
31
S
S
A2
3
2
S
S
A3
3
3
S
S
A4
3
4
S
S
A5
3
5
S
S
A6
36
S
S
A7
3
7
S
S
A8
38
S
S
A9
39
S
S
A10
4
0
S
S
A11
4
1
S
S
A12
4
2
S
S
B1
CULVERTOUT4
3
S
S
B2
4
4
S
S
B3
4
5
S
S
B4
4
6
S
S
B5
4
7
S
S
B6
2
S
S
D2 AT
S
S
A1
S
S
D1 AT
S
S
A3
S
S
D3 AT
S
S
A4
S
S
D4 AT
S
S
A5
S
S
D5 AT
S
S
Ac
ulvert
SITE 1
SITE 2
SITE 3
SITE 4
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
S 32°08'32" W
474.37'RBW REALTY LLCBM
2
0
17
P
G
8
5
5DB
9
7
8
5
P
G
6
2
6
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4DB
8
9
16
P
G
113TOWN OF MORRI
S
VI
LLE DB
117
6
6
P
G
115
P
BS REAL ES
TATE LLCROGER HONBARRI
ER I
NVES
TMENTS I
NCDB
14
7
3
2
P
G
13
9
1BM
2
0
15
P
G
2
15
1DB
16
2
6
4
P
G
6
3
0WILLIAM TERRY BARBER & TONY AVI
S BARBERDB
114
2
0
P
G
2
5
4
7TODD ANTHONY BARBERP
ANS
Y LEE BRANNAN DB
17
6
2
1
P
G
9
4
7TMMNC LLCBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16DB 14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18QUALITY OI
L CO LLCBM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7 DB
14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18BM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7QUALITY OI
L CO LLCDB
15
3
0
0
P
G
3
9
4NATIONAL RETAI
L
P
ROP
ERTI
ES LP LI
MI
TED
P
ARTNERS
HI
PBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16
DB
16
4
6
1
P
G
18
9
7EMINENT
P
ROP
ERTI
ES, LLCBM
19
9
9
P
G
4
5
6 AI
RTECH DR.CHAPEL HILL RD.NC RAI
LROAD COMP
ANYNO REF
F
ERENCEDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.12:32:19 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH10.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SHEET 4 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 04
10
SEE SHEET PSH-09STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SLOPE STAKES +25'
P P
(POND)
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
4
8
S
S
B7 BACK I
N4
9
S
S
B8 BACK I
N5
0
S
S
B9 BACK I
N5
1
S
S
B10 BACK I
N5
2
S
S
B11 BACK I
N5
3
S
S
B12 CULVERT5
4
S
S
C CONF
L TO CULVERT AT
S
S
B5
5
S
S
C2
5
6
S
S
C3
5
7
S
S
C4
58
S
S
C5
5
9
S
S
C6
6
0
S
S
C7 AT RRculvert
culvert
Non
40
4
po
n
d
SITE 5
SITE 7
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
S 32°08'32" W
474.37'RBW REALTY LLCBM
2
0
17
P
G
8
5
5DB
9
7
8
5
P
G
6
2
6
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4DB
8
9
16
P
G
113TOWN OF MORRI
S
VI
LLE DB
117
6
6
P
G
115
P
BS REAL ES
TATE LLCROGER HONBARRI
ER I
NVES
TMENTS I
NCDB
14
7
3
2
P
G
13
9
1BM
2
0
15
P
G
2
15
1DB
16
2
6
4
P
G
6
3
0WILLIAM TERRY BARBER & TONY AVI
S BARBERDB
114
2
0
P
G
2
5
4
7TODD ANTHONY BARBERP
ANS
Y LEE BRANNAN DB
17
6
2
1
P
G
9
4
7TMMNC LLCBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16DB 14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18QUALITY OI
L CO LLCBM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7 DB
14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18BM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7QUALITY OI
L CO LLCDB
15
3
0
0
P
G
3
9
4NATIONAL RETAI
L
P
ROP
ERTI
ES LP LI
MI
TED
P
ARTNERS
HI
PBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16
DB
16
4
6
1
P
G
18
9
7EMINENT
P
ROP
ERTI
ES, LLCBM
19
9
9
P
G
4
5
6 AI
RTECH DR.CHAPEL HILL RD.NC RAI
LROAD COMP
ANYNO REF
F
ERENCEDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.12:32:37 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH10_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
SHEET 5 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 04
10
SEE SHEET PSH-09STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SLOPE STAKES +25'
P P
(POND)
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
4
8
S
S
B7 BACK I
N4
9
S
S
B8 BACK I
N5
0
S
S
B9 BACK I
N5
1
S
S
B10 BACK I
N5
2
S
S
B11 BACK I
N5
3
S
S
B12 CULVERT5
4
S
S
C CONF
L TO CULVERT AT
S
S
B5
5
S
S
C2
5
6
S
S
C3
5
7
S
S
C4
58
S
S
C5
5
9
S
S
C6
6
0
S
S
C7 AT RRculvert
culvert
Non
40
4
po
n
d
SITE 5
SITE 7
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.12:32:53 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH11.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
SHEET 6 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 06
11
SITE 6
-L- POC STA. 76+57.35
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
SLOPE STAKES +25'
SITE 6
AIRPORT BLVD
27SB128SB229SB327SB128SB229SB3BM 1999 PG 801DB 17122 PG 211WONG, RAYMOND WAI
-TAT WONG, YUK-MUI
BM 1999 PG 456DB 11526 PG 1032TCC PROPERTI
ES LLCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 10291 PG 250DOVE ASSOCI
ATES
I
V LLCDB 15619 PG 772BONETT LLCDB 11253 PG 1600SK REALTY LLCDB 13098 PG 1020MI
NESH
I
NC ET AL PATEL, NI
LA NDB 15551 PG 294I
NVESTMENTS LLCSULLI
VAN SOUTHERN DB 15352 PG 1225NCA PROPERTI
ES NO 1 LLCBM 1986 PG 179DB 13340 PG 1490SULLI
VAN SOUTHERN
I
NVESTMENTS LLCAI
RP
ORT BLVDWALDRON CT.NAD 83/ 2001C
C
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.12:33:09 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_wet_Phase2_Alt1_PSH11_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
SHEET 7 OF 8
PERMIT DRAWING
HL-0033 06
11
SITE 6
-L- POC STA. 76+57.35
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
SLOPE STAKES +25'
SITE 6
AIRPORT BLVD
27SB128SB229SB327SB128SB229SB3BM 1999 PG 801DB 17122 PG 211WONG, RAYMOND WAI
-TAT WONG, YUK-MUI
BM 1999 PG 456DB 11526 PG 1032TCC PROPERTI
ES LLCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 10291 PG 250DOVE ASSOCI
ATES
I
V LLCDB 15619 PG 772BONETT LLCDB 11253 PG 1600SK REALTY LLCDB 13098 PG 1020MI
NESH
I
NC ET AL PATEL, NI
LA NDB 15551 PG 294I
NVESTMENTS LLCSULLI
VAN SOUTHERN DB 15352 PG 1225NCA PROPERTI
ES NO 1 LLCBM 1986 PG 179DB 13340 PG 1490SULLI
VAN SOUTHERN
I
NVESTMENTS LLCAI
RP
ORT BLVDWALDRON CT.NAD 83/ 2001C
C
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
1 -L- 36+25/42+10 Fill Stream D 0.08 698
2 -L- 38+50/39+67 Fill Open Water A 0.40
3 -L- 39+67/40+25 Fill Wetland G 0.02
4 -L- 41+89/42+25 Fill Stream A 0.03 236
5 -L- 54+46/54+86 Fill Wetland E 0.01
6 -L- 69+40/69+60 Fill Wetland D < 0.01
7 -Y2- 23+60/24+30 Fill Open Water B 0.08

TOTALS*:0.04 0.58 934 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 8 OF 8
Impacts are based on slope stakes +25'.

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
03/01/2022
CHRISTINA YOKELEY, PE
BRIAN K. EASON, PE
WAKE COUNTY
25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
ADT
ADT
2021
2045
DUAL 3%
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
* TTST =1%
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
Prepared in the Office of:
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/99 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
11:17:54 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_TSH.dgnnblahutCONTRACT:TIP PROJECT:ARTMEN
N ASO
H
DEPT
O
F TRA SPORTTIONTATEOFNRTCAR
O
LI
NAH. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27612
H. W. LOCHNER, INC.
2840 PLAZA PLACE, SUITE 202
Number F-0159
NC License
[phone]
RALEIGH, NC 27612 Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
NCDOT CONTACT
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF MORRISVILLE
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
EXTENSION OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD (SR 3126)
PE, R/W, UTIL36249.4033
=0.435 Miles
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
JOHN BRAXTON
THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT
N/A
HL-0033
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-0033
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRADING, DRAINAGE, CULVERT, SIGNALS, AND PAVING
09
10
11
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033TO DAVI
S DR-L- POT STA. 78+64.86
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033TO I-40
BEGIN PROJECT
END PROJECT
####R = ####Tc = ####Lc = ####D = (LT)####¬c = ####PIc -L7CUR DATA -
CRABTREE
LAKE
3119
1617
1617
1624
3014
1633
1726
1613
1638
1706
1706
3094
1637
1635
1635
1632
1632
1613
3014
3060
1641
1640
3015
3015
1637
1637
1002
3084
1635
3059
1634
3104
1613
3015
Morrisville
pop. 26,280SOUTHERNRAILROADCrabtree
Creek
Stirr
u
p
CreekTRIANGLE
PARK
540
55
55
540
54
54
2
540
40
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
HL-0033 PHASE II - ALT 1PHASE II - ALT 1
PRELIMINARY PERMIT
SITE 4
SITE 5
SITE 6
AIRPORT BLVD EXT
SITE 7
SITE 2
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
AIRPORT BLVD EXT CHAPEL HILL RDARTECH DRWALDRON CT
OF CHAPEL HILL RD (NC 54) IN MORRISVILLE
FROM CHURCH ST (SR 1637) TO NORTHEAST
2
WA2
1
WA1
3
WA3
4
WA4
5
WA5
9
WB1 10
WB2
11
WB312WB4
23
WD1
24
WD2
25
WD3
26
WD4
62
WE2
63
WE3
64
WE4
65
WE5
66
WE6
67
WE7
68
WE8
69
WE9
70
WE10
71
WE11
72
WE12
73
WE13
74
WE14
75
WE15
76
WE16
77
WE17
78
WE18
79
WE19
80
WE20
81
WE20A82
WE20B83
WE20C
84
WE21
85
WE22
86
WF1
87
WF2
88
WF3
89
WF4
90
WF5
91
WF6
92
WF7
93
WF8
94
WF9
95
WF10
6
TA1
7
TA2
13
TB1
14
TB2
15
TB3
16
TC1
17
TC2
27
SB1
28
SB2 29
SB3
30
SSA1
31
SSA2
32
SS
A3
33
SSA4
34
SSA5
35
SSA6
36
SSA7
37
SSA8
38
SSA9
39
SSA10
40
SS
A11
41
SS
A12
42
SS
B1CUL
VERTOUT
43
SSB2
44
SSB3
45
SSB4
46
SSB5
47
SSB6
48
SS
B7 BAC
K IN
49
SSB8 BAC
K IN
50
SSB9 BACK IN 51
SSB10 BACK IN 52
SSB11 BACK IN 53
SSB12 CULVERT
54
SSC CONFL TO CULVERT AT SSB
55
SSC2
56
SSC3
57
SSC4
58
SSC5
59
SSC6
60
SSC7 AT RR
2
SS
D2 AT SSA 1
SSD1 AT SSA3
SSD3 AT SSA4
SSD4 AT SS
A5
SSD5 AT SSA
6
WG17
WG2
8
WG3
9
WG4
10
WG5 11WG6
3
WI1
4
WI2
5
WI3
6
WI4
7
WI5
8
WI6
9
WDEX1
10
WDE
X2
11
WDEX3
culvert
culvert
culvert
Non 404
pond NAD 83/ 2011
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.8:31:18 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH09.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 02
09
SEE SHEET PSH-10STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SHEET 2 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
AND WI
FE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1DB
10
7
6
0
P
G
2
7
8
5
HELEN MARS
HBURN HELEN MARS
HBURNOTTO C. LYONS
S
YLVES
TER K. HARRI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
2
7
4
9 PG
16
0
P
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
9
8
3
7
P
G
4
20
CHARLI
E MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WBRANDONMARTHA HI
CKSDB
2
5
3
7
P
G
3
6
7 S 79°26'25"
W19
3.38'N 18°19'40" W641.17'S 25°45'15" E223.07'S 78°07'55" W19
7.94'S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'
S
68°26'05" W
624
.68'S 28°11'38" E408.42'EIPEIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" WP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB UNKOWNP
B
19
8
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
11
E
P
G
2
7
1
P
B
1
98
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
1
1E
P
G
2
7
1N 17°32'40" W465.58'BM 2
0
17 P
G
8
5
5
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4AMF
P I
V WATERF
ORD LLCDB
17
5
7
5
P
G
10
7CHURCH ST.3
0
S
S
A1
31
S
S
A2
3
2
S
S
A3
3
3
S
S
A4
3
4
S
S
A5
3
5
S
S
A6
36
S
S
A7
3
7
S
S
A8
38
S
S
A9
39
S
S
A10
4
0
S
S
A11
4
1
S
S
A12
4
2
S
S
B1
CULVERTOUT4
3
S
S
B2
4
4
S
S
B3
4
5
S
S
B4
4
6
S
S
B5
4
7
S
S
B6
2
S
S
D2 AT
S
S
A1
S
S
D1 AT
S
S
A3
S
S
D3 AT
S
S
A4
S
S
D4 AT
S
S
A5
S
S
D5 AT
S
S
Ac
ulvert
SITE 2
SITE 4
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.8:33:22 AMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH09_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-L- POC STA. 36+25.47
BEGIN STIP PROJECT HL-0033
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 02
09
SEE SHEET PSH-10STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SHEET 3 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
AND WI
FE BETTY MARSHBURNROBERT G. MARSHBURN ROBERT LEE PENNI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1DB
10
7
6
0
P
G
2
7
8
5
HELEN MARS
HBURN HELEN MARS
HBURNOTTO C. LYONS
S
YLVES
TER K. HARRI
NGTONP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
2
7
4
9 PG
16
0
P
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB
9
8
3
7
P
G
4
20
CHARLI
E MAYO60
.00
'EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/WBRANDONMARTHA HI
CKSDB
2
5
3
7
P
G
3
6
7 S 79°26'25"
W19
3.38'N 18°19'40" W641.17'S 25°45'15" E223.07'S 78°07'55" W19
7.94'S 22°48'55" E101.05'N 78°22'45" E196.16'
N
67°22'52" E
222
.54
'
N
68°26'05" E
585
.66'
S
68°26'05" W
624
.68'S 28°11'38" E408.42'EIPEIPN
67°47'25" E
54
.32'EIPN 18°03'44" W72.89'N 18°03'44" WP
B
19
8
9
P
G
3
5
1 DB UNKOWNP
B
19
8
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
11
E
P
G
2
7
1
P
B
1
98
6
P
G
2
13
4 DB
1
1E
P
G
2
7
1N 17°32'40" W465.58'BM 2
0
17 P
G
8
5
5
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4AMF
P I
V WATERF
ORD LLCDB
17
5
7
5
P
G
10
7CHURCH ST.3
0
S
S
A1
31
S
S
A2
3
2
S
S
A3
3
3
S
S
A4
3
4
S
S
A5
3
5
S
S
A6
36
S
S
A7
3
7
S
S
A8
38
S
S
A9
39
S
S
A10
4
0
S
S
A11
4
1
S
S
A12
4
2
S
S
B1
CULVERTOUT4
3
S
S
B2
4
4
S
S
B3
4
5
S
S
B4
4
6
S
S
B5
4
7
S
S
B6
2
S
S
D2 AT
S
S
A1
S
S
D1 AT
S
S
A3
S
S
D3 AT
S
S
A4
S
S
D4 AT
S
S
A5
S
S
D5 AT
S
S
Ac
ulvert
SITE 2
SITE 4
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
S 32°08'32" W
474.37'RBW REALTY LLCBM
2
0
17
P
G
8
5
5DB
9
7
8
5
P
G
6
2
6
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4DB
8
9
16
P
G
113TOWN OF MORRI
S
VI
LLE DB
117
6
6
P
G
115
P
BS REAL ES
TATE LLCROGER HONBARRI
ER I
NVES
TMENTS I
NCDB
14
7
3
2
P
G
13
9
1BM
2
0
15
P
G
2
15
1DB
16
2
6
4
P
G
6
3
0WILLIAM TERRY BARBER & TONY AVI
S BARBERDB
114
2
0
P
G
2
5
4
7TODD ANTHONY BARBERP
ANS
Y LEE BRANNAN DB
17
6
2
1
P
G
9
4
7TMMNC LLCBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16DB 14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18QUALITY OI
L CO LLCBM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7 DB
14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18BM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7QUALITY OI
L CO LLCDB
15
3
0
0
P
G
3
9
4NATIONAL RETAI
L
P
ROP
ERTI
ES LP LI
MI
TED
P
ARTNERS
HI
PBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16
DB
16
4
6
1
P
G
18
9
7EMINENT
P
ROP
ERTI
ES, LLCBM
19
9
9
P
G
4
5
6 AI
RTECH DR.CHAPEL HILL RD.NC RAI
LROAD COMP
ANYNO REF
F
ERENCEDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.4:37:34 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH10.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 04
10
SEE SHEET PSH-09STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SHEET 4 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
4
8
S
S
B7 BACK I
N4
9
S
S
B8 BACK I
N5
0
S
S
B9 BACK I
N5
1
S
S
B10 BACK I
N5
2
S
S
B11 BACK I
N5
3
S
S
B12 CULVERT5
4
S
S
C CONF
L TO CULVERT AT
S
S
B5
5
S
S
C2
5
6
S
S
C3
5
7
S
S
C4
58
S
S
C5
5
9
S
S
C6
6
0
S
S
C7 AT RRculvert
culvert
Non
40
4
po
n
d
SITE 5
SITE 7
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
S 32°08'32" W
474.37'RBW REALTY LLCBM
2
0
17
P
G
8
5
5DB
9
7
8
5
P
G
6
2
6
BM
2
0
0
1
P
G
7
8
4DB
8
9
16
P
G
113TOWN OF MORRI
S
VI
LLE DB
117
6
6
P
G
115
P
BS REAL ES
TATE LLCROGER HONBARRI
ER I
NVES
TMENTS I
NCDB
14
7
3
2
P
G
13
9
1BM
2
0
15
P
G
2
15
1DB
16
2
6
4
P
G
6
3
0WILLIAM TERRY BARBER & TONY AVI
S BARBERDB
114
2
0
P
G
2
5
4
7TODD ANTHONY BARBERP
ANS
Y LEE BRANNAN DB
17
6
2
1
P
G
9
4
7TMMNC LLCBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16DB 14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18QUALITY OI
L CO LLCBM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7 DB
14
4
6
7
P
G
2
0
18BM
19
9
8
P
G
4
3
7QUALITY OI
L CO LLCDB
15
3
0
0
P
G
3
9
4NATIONAL RETAI
L
P
ROP
ERTI
ES LP LI
MI
TED
P
ARTNERS
HI
PBM
19
9
1
P
G
10
16
DB
16
4
6
1
P
G
18
9
7EMINENT
P
ROP
ERTI
ES, LLCBM
19
9
9
P
G
4
5
6 AI
RTECH DR.CHAPEL HILL RD.NC RAI
LROAD COMP
ANYNO REF
F
ERENCEDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.4:37:45 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH10_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 04
10
SEE SHEET PSH-09STA. 48+62.90 -L-MATCHLINE SHEET 5 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
4
8
S
S
B7 BACK I
N4
9
S
S
B8 BACK I
N5
0
S
S
B9 BACK I
N5
1
S
S
B10 BACK I
N5
2
S
S
B11 BACK I
N5
3
S
S
B12 CULVERT5
4
S
S
C CONF
L TO CULVERT AT
S
S
B5
5
S
S
C2
5
6
S
S
C3
5
7
S
S
C4
58
S
S
C5
5
9
S
S
C6
6
0
S
S
C7 AT RRculvert
culvert
Non
40
4
po
n
d
SITE 5
SITE 7
AIRPORT BLVD NAD 83/ 2001
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.4:37:56 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH11.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 06
11
SITE 6
-L- POC STA. 76+57.35
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
SHEET 6 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SITE 6
AIRPORT BLVD
27SB128SB229SB327SB128SB2BM 1999 PG 801DB 17122 PG 211WONG, RAYMOND WAI
-TAT WONG, YUK-MUI
BM 1999 PG 456DB 11526 PG 1032TCC PROPERTI
ES LLCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 10291 PG 250DOVE ASSOCI
ATES
I
V LLCDB 15619 PG 772BONETT LLCDB 11253 PG 1600SK REALTY LLCDB 13098 PG 1020MI
NESH
I
NC ET AL PATEL, NI
LA NDB 15551 PG 294I
NVESTMENTS LLCSULLI
VAN SOUTHERN DB 15352 PG 1225NCA PROPERTI
ES NO 1 LLCBM 1986 PG 179DB 13340 PG 1490SULLI
VAN SOUTHERN
I
NVESTMENTS LLCAI
RP
ORT BLVDWALDRON CT.NAD 83/ 2001
C
C
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.1:44:50 PMR:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\Phase 2\Alternative 1\HL-0033_Hyd_prm_buf_Phase2_Alt1_PSH11_CON.dgnnblahut8/17/99INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'50'50'
HL-0033 06
11
SITE 6
-L- POC STA. 76+57.35
END STIP PROJECT HL-0033
SHEET 7 OF 9
BUFFER DRAWING
SLOPE STAKES +25'
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SITE 6
AIRPORT BLVD
27SB128SB229SB327SB128SB2BM 1999 PG 801DB 17122 PG 211WONG, RAYMOND WAI
-TAT WONG, YUK-MUI
BM 1999 PG 456DB 11526 PG 1032TCC PROPERTI
ES LLCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 8380 PG 1164RYDER TRUCK RENTAL
I
NCBM 1999 PG 456DB 10291 PG 250DOVE ASSOCI
ATES
I
V LLCDB 15619 PG 772BONETT LLCDB 11253 PG 1600SK REALTY LLCDB 13098 PG 1020MI
NESH
I
NC ET AL PATEL, NI
LA NDB 15551 PG 294I
NVESTMENTS LLCSULLI
VAN SOUTHERN DB 15352 PG 1225NCA PROPERTI
ES NO 1 LLCBM 1986 PG 179DB 13340 PG 1490SULLI
VAN SOUTHERN
I
NVESTMENTS LLCAI
RP
ORT BLVDWALDRON CT.NAD 83/ 2001
C
C
Site Station Structure
No.(From/To)Size / Type
2 -L- 38+19/40+78 Open Water A X 18460 15446 33906
4 -L- 41+29/42+80 Stream A X 13890 9286 23176
5 -L- 56+87/57+57 Stream B X 0 558 558
6 -L- 69+72/70+77 Stream C X 1855 2633 4488
7 -Y1- 20+75/25+01 Open Water B X 11204 11948 23152
0 0 0 45408 39871 85279 0 0
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 8 OF 9
ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE
3/2/2022
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
IMPACTS
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TOTALS*:
ROAD
CROSSING BRIDGE PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TYPE
ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
2 -L- 38+19/40+78 Open Water A 5 309
4 -L- 69+72/70+00 Stream C 0 107
5 416
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 9 OF 9
Structure Size /
Type
WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
3/2/2022
WAKE COUNTY
HL-0033
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
SITE
NO.
STATION
(FROM/TO)
TOTAL:
Rev. Jan 2009
March 30, 2022
Mr. Chris Murray
NCDOT Division 5 Project Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 5 Project – TIP HL-0033 – Phase I: SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard Extension) from Garden Square Lane to
SR 1637 (Church Street), Wake County, WBS # 36249.4033
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality – Division
of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information
received from you on March 30, 2022, the impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River basin in the Central
Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Neuse
03020201
CP
Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-
Riparian
Coastal
Marsh Zone 1 Zone 2
Impacts
(feet/acres) 0 0 376.000 0.250 0 0 26,501.000 18,648.000
All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. The
NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed
upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWR’s Buffer Authorization Certification, DMS will transfer funds
from the NCDOT 2984 Fund into the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of the transfer payment,
NCDOT will have complete its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for TIP Number HL-0033 in Wake County.
DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with
this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If
the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new
mitigation acceptance letter will be required from NCDEQ-DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
James B. Stanfill
DMS Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Andy Williams, USACE – Raleigh
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
Mr. Brad Chilton, NCDOT – EAU
File: HL-0033 – Division 5
for

September 11, 2020

Attention: Christopher Murray
NC Department of Transportation
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704

Re. THPO # TCNS # Project Description
2020-193-206
Airport Boulevard extension from Church Street to NC 54 with additional
improvements along existing airport boulevard extension in Morrisville, NC

Dear Mr. Murray,

The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.

If you have questions please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
[e-mail].

Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Catawba Indian Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730

Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 6
20-01-0007

NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: Aviation Blvd Extension County: Wake
WBS No: 46249.4033 Document: M C C
F.A. No: TBD Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: usace
Project Description: REVISED (May 2021): Updated, final Area of Potential Effects was provided for
comments and review to ensure full coverage and consideration. There are new, relatively small extensions
and expansions along previously reviewed APE, mostly along existing roadways and easements. The same
factors and conclusions apply for the additional area with regards to archaeological review. Mapping has
been updated with this newly submitted form.
REVISED: This archaeological review has been updated to include a proposed second phase of the
Aviation Blvd Extension project. Updated mapping and discussion are incorporated into this document to
reflect a revised, longer APE. Note, a portion of the additional area has been surveyed for a separate
archaeological study.
The new portion of the APE is about 4000 feet (combined with the original for about 6200 feet). This
continues new location extension from Church Street which crosses over a railroad and NC 54 before
tapering back to Airport Blvd within 2000 feet northeast of of NC 54. The width varies up to 700 feet to
accommodate two or more alternatives. Close to a half of the new APE is urban, developed for commercial
use, while the other half includes rolling wooded and pasture landforms. Federal involvement is assumed
through permitting; therefore Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act applies.
Additional comments for the added APE are italicized below.
NCDOT proposes to extend Airport Boulevard (SR 3126) from Garden Square Lane to Church Street (SR
1637). Town Hall Drive and Church Street would also be enhanced with minor widening. Federal funding
is expected through FHwA and USACE permitting is anticipated. Preliminary design plans were available
at the time of this review. This Area of Potential Effects (APE) is shown below (See Figures 1 and 2). This
new location project length is about 2200 feet (approximately 0.41 miles). The study APE is about 200
feet in width.
This is a federally funded and permitted project and thus falls under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act for purposes of archaeological review.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:

Approximately 4000 feet of additional APE has been added to this review, generally east of the original
review. Half of the added APE is urbanized with modern gas stations, parking, graded lots and commercial
parcels present along with normal utilities. The remaining area is undeveloped, with some land used for
agricultural pursuits namely an open pastured hillside for cattle (Figure 1, revised).
Various historic maps and aerials were reexamined, paying closer attention to this new area of
consideration. No notable features were mapped or seen on the maps and images. The property has been
under constant agricultural use during the span of aerial photography, spanning 60-70 years back. The
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 6
20-01-0007
tree lines have been steady within the APE, though a portion of the hilltop was cleared in the middle to
third quarter of the last century.

Note, the western portion of the expanded APE includes a farm pond. This pond is visible in 1950s aerial
photography but not on earlier twentieth century mapping until the Cary 1973 USGS map. Generally, the
result of terrain modification and frequently bulldozing that reduces the integrity of any archaeological
sites that might otherwise be present, the immediate surroundings of the pond are not considered high
probability.

Soil types in the expanded APE are designated urban (~60%) or Carbonton-Brickhaven complex of varying
slopes (~30%), Creedmoor-Greenlevel soils (~5) or the frequently flooded Chewacla or Wahadkee soils
(~5%). Of these soils, the elevated, somewhat level hilltop within the Carbonton-Brickhaven complex may
hold the most potential for the presence of archaeological sites. This larger landform has small drainages
along its perimeter, an attractive location for camps or farmhouses. As former and current agricultural
lands which can be seen in aerials dating back into the 1950s, the hill is likely to be eroded which would
diminish the quality of information a site might yield. In contrast, the Urban soils characteristically contain
modified, disturbed soils because of grading, terrain modification, and constructing roads, parking lots,
infrastructure, commercial buildings, and residences. Present within the APE especially along the
developed roads, these modified locations are less likely to contain intact, significant archaeological sites.
The sloped and wet soils, due to the less desirable topography and drainage, are also unlikely to have
archaeological sites present because of less frequent and continual use that would result in significant,
intact archaeological remains.

Note, there was unintentional overlap with the original review between the Programmatic Agreement and
the Office of State Archaeology (ER 20-0811). OSA concluded after examining nearby known resources
and results of archaeological surveys, soils comparison, aerial photography and a physical walk-over that
no archaeological survey was warranted, noting the conditions and a scatter of small sites that were not
determined eligible for listing on the NRHP. That review only applies to the original half of the project,
called Phase I. Phase II covering the current study area east of Church Street.

A sewage easement runs parallel through the new APE and appears was subjected to environmental review.
The exact ER number and data could not be obtained, though the resulting review did not apparently result
in the discovery of any archaeological resources.

Another portion of the current APE was included in a 2001 archaeological survey conducted by Legacy
Research Associates, Inc., on behalf of Celestica Development. The report documents three archaeological
sites, 31Wa1486, 31Wa1487 and 31Wa1488**, of which 31Wa1487 is mapped on the higher probability
landform overlapping into the current APE (ER 01-9702, Bib # 4783). The hilltop was subjected to
subsurface testing which yielded cultural material in 13 positive shovel test pits out of 23 excavated. The
Native American site included quartz and rhyolite debitage and a small number of ceramic sherds. The
report recommends 31Wa1487 as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, noting the low
density and eroded conditions. The NC Office of State Archaeology concurred with the recommendations
for this site.

The portion of proposed roadway to be developed is curently wooded or recently cleared and largely
undeveloped according to USGS mapping (Cary) (Figure 1) and modern aerial photography (Figure 2).
Parcels to either side of the proposed route have been developed especially in the past two decades and
aerial photography from 2002 shows the western half was cleared and graded during construction of
neighborhoods. Areas that have been stripped or recontoured are less likely to contain intact archaeological
sites.
Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 6
20-01-0007
Google and Bing street view tools were used and confirm the generally developed nature of portions of the
proposed road. Since the road doesn't yet exist, the length could not be viewed, though certain locations
had virtual views of the project from adjacent neighborhoods. Wake County GIS mapping shows the APE
already contains a defined ROW which is 100 feet across. Project notes suggest that a wider impact than
the current ROW may be required to accommodate proposed multi-use paths or for slope cuts and fill.
Historic maps were examined to determine if any late historic structures, roads or other notations were
present to help establish the a context of the recent past, especially farms, industry, land and transportation
features which might offer hints to the presence of archaeological sites. The 1914 Soils Map of Wake
County (MC.099.1914b) depicts only Church Street (SR 1637) as being in existence with no other roads,
buildings or other features mapped at the time. This lack of representation on an otherwise detailed and
accurate map decreases expectations for late nineteenth or turn of the 20th century archaeological sites.
The Office of State Archaeology research was examined to review archaeological mapping and to reference
any known archaeological surveys. Several environmental reviews cross the APE though few, if any, were
recommended for archaeological survey. Those include three NCDOT project in close vicinity to the
current undertaking, PA 17-07-0002, PA 17-07-0004 and PA 18-12-0028. Northeast of the project, three
archaeological sites have been identified, one historic site, 31Wa1483, and two Native American sites
31Wa1486 and 31Wa1487. Those sites were not listed as been eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP). According to USGS mapping, other GIS sources and NCDOT
cemetery data maintained by Paul Mohler, no other cemeteries are recorded within the APE.
The Civil War Battle of Morrisville Station occurred southeast of the project area centered around the train
station about one mile southeast. The fighting on April 13, 1865 involved attempts to stop a train which
did retreat to some safety though the Union Army then occupied the town. Little of the battle in known to
remain though some earthworks and a occassional shell have been reported in the past two decades. The
current APE is outside of the battle landscape.
Soil mapping of the project APE shows that about a third of the terrain is Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,
noted as frequently flooded and not well drained. This is the western portion of the APE associated with
Kit Creek and tributaries. The remainder is listed as urban land. Neither soil type is especially promising
for containing intact, signficant archaeological sites.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
6/3/2021 Minor revisions to the APE have been incorporated into this form. Considerations and factors
remain the same for these new, adjacent expansions. Mapping has been updated. Please note that aerial
mapping from approximately 2008 shows major earthmoving and grading as part of modern development
at the western end of the project. This is in addition to the c. 2002 clearing noted elsewhere in this form.
The conclusion and recommendation remains the same for this review.

An archaeological review of additional APE for this project revealed similar conditions to the original
examination (which was inadvertently also considered by OSA staff which concluded that no survey was
warranted). For the current expansion, there are ER reviews from OSA in the immediate vicinity, at least
two of which overlap the current APE. For one of those earlier reviews on an unrelated project, an
archaeological survey was recommended, and subsurface testing occurred on the eroded, but higher
probability hilltop at the edge of a pasture. As a result, site 31Wa1487 was documented partially within
the current APE. The Native American lithic and ceramic site was found to have an eroded context and
determined not to be eligible for listing on the NRHP. OSA staff concurred with the finding. As the only
landform with increased probability for archaeological sites has already been considered and subjected to
subsurface testing of an archaeological site found to be present but not eligible for the NRHP, no further
archaeological survey is warranted. Other portions of the APE are low probability as noted above, being
modified and graded for modern development, sloped, or poorly drained.

Project Tracking No.:
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 6
20-01-0007
As Wake County has been identified as an area of interest to the Catawba Indian Nation, Tribal
Consultation has already occurred earlier on this project. A response was noted to be dated January 13,
2020. We recommend updating this information, as necessary.
Much of the APE has been modified by modern development, especially the construction of installation of
residential developments. The probability for intact soils is low, as would be undisturbed, significant
archaeological sites.
There are no known, recorded archaeological sites presents. There are no NRHP archaeological sites
present. It is unlikely that significant, intact archaeological remains would be present and impacted by the
project. For archaeological review, this state funded undertaking should be considered compliant with
Section 106.
Please note that Wake County has been identified as an area of interest to the Catawba Indian Nation. It is
recommended that you contact each federal agency involved with this project to determine their Section
106 Tribal Consultation requirements. We note that you may have already done so and received comments
from the Catawaba Indian Nation on a letter dated January 13, 2020.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
(original 1/28/2020) Revised 8/3/2020 Revised 6/3/2021
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
Project Tracking No.: “No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 5 of 6 20-01-0007 Figure 1. Vicinity of PA 20-01-0007, the proposed extension of Airport Boulevard in Morrisville, Wake County. The area is now more heavily developed than the USGS map shows (Cary). The revised APE is displayed in yellow with using a bold, black outline. CarySoutheast DurhamI-40I-40N C -5 4
NC-540N C -5 4
NC-540S R -1 6 3 7SR-1002SR-3015S R -1 6 1 3SR-1795SR-1635SR-1 7 8 9 SR-1652SR-2103SR-3097
SR -3 0 8 4
SR-1706SR-1641
SR-3126SR-1790SR-1640SR-2154SR-1792S R -161 3SR-1002SR-3015Bri er Cr eek Haleys BranchKit CreekB l a c k C r e e k
Crabtree CreekEsri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community, Copyright:© 2013 NationalGeographic Society, i-cubed0 4,000 8,0002,000 Feet¯
Project Tracking No.: “No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 6 of 6 20-01-0007 Figure 2. Aerial map of PA 20-01-0007, the proposed extension of Airport Boulevard in Morrisville, Wake County. The APE is shown in yellow, portions of which have been surveyed previously. Revisions expand the APE and are shown in this updated map.

Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM

This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: County: Wake
WBS No.: 36249.4033 Document
Type:
MCC
Fed. Aid No: N/A Funding: State Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
Yes No Permit
Type(s):
N/A
Project Description: Extension of Airport boulevard (SR 3126) in Morrisville from Garden
Square Lane to Church Street (SR 1637).

SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on May 11, 2021 for the UPDATED STUDY AREA along Church Street. Based on
this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, or DE properties in the Area of P otential Effects,
which is defined on the following maps. There is one survey site within the APE, WA-R047
(House). Visual survey shows that the house is heavily altered and unremarkable; it is not
eligible for National Register listing. All other properties within the APE over fifty years of age
are unremarkable and do not warrant further evaluation. There are no National Register listed or
eligible properties and no survey is required. If design plans change, additional review will be
required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the
Wake County survey, Wake County GIS/Tax information, and Google Maps are considered
valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There
are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Map(s) Previous Survey Info. Photos Correspondence Design Plans

FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN

Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED

Kate Husband May 11, 2021
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date

20-01-0007
UPDATE
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)

Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 2

State Historic Preservation Office GIS. Updated Study Area.

WA-R047, looking south. Does not warrant further evaluation.

1

Type III Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form

STIP Project No. HL-0033
WBS Element 36249.4033
Federal Project No. TBD

A. Project Description:

The Town of Morrisville, in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
proposes to extend Airport Boulevard (SR 3126) from its existing terminus at
Garden Square Lane to its existing terminus at Chapel Hill Road (NC 54), a
distance of approximately 0.8 miles. Construction of the project will complete the
current missing link of this route. As shown in Figure 1, the project study area is
located in the vicinity of the Town of Morrisville. For right-of-way acquisition and
construction, the project is divided into two phases, although an environmental
study is being completed for the entire length of the project. Phase 1 of the project
is from Garden Square Lane to Church Street (SR 1637) and Phase 2 of the project
is from Church Street to Chapel Hill Road (NC 54). The Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization (CAMPO) has awarded construction funds for Phase 1 of this
project to the Town of Morrisville using Locally Administered Projects Program
(LAPP) funding in Federal Fiscal Year 2022. The Town has entered into an
agreement with NCDOT Division 5 to manage the project’s planning and design. It
is anticipated that Phase 1 right-of-way acquisition will occur in Federal Fiscal Year
2022, with construction letting occurring before September 2022. Phase 2 is
currently unfunded for right-of-way acquisition and construction. The project is being
developed with federal funds under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA.)
The project is included in the NCDOT 2020-2029 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) as Project No. HL-0033.

B. Description of Need and Purpose:

The 2019 Town of Morrisville Comprehensive Transportation Plan identifies Airport
Boulevard as one of the Town’s strategic corridors, noting its importance in helping
to support and manage the Town’s rapid growth. The need for the project arises
from the current convoluted traffic patterns necessary to travel between key
locations in Morrisville. Key locations include schools, government offices, and
businesses along Town Hall Drive, which is another of the Town’s strategic
corridors, and along Church Street. Key locations in Morrisville also include the
commercial and office developments on the existing segment of Airport Boulevard
northwest of Chapel Hill Road.
The Town of Morrisville has also identified existing capacity concerns about several
intersections on Davis Drive, including the Morrisville-Carpenter Road intersection.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

2

The existing convoluted traffic patterns described above also contribute to this
concern.
The purpose of the proposed action is to improve overall, multi-modal traffic mobility
on the Town of Morrisville’s roadway network and to enhance roadway connectivity
between Davis Drive and Chapel Hill Road. The proposed action begins and ends
at established roadways and will improve the local roadway network independently
of any future projects, providing an alternative route between Davis Drive and
Chapel Hill Road. The proposed action also completes a missing link in the Airport
Boulevard corridor, which improves connectivity to employment centers in Research
Triangle Park (RTP) as well as to I-40 and Raleigh-Durham International Airport
(RDU).
Secondary benefits of the project would include addressing the Town’s capacity
concerns about existing intersections on Davis Drive and fulfilling the Town’s
multimodal policy recommendations.
The proposed design for the project is consistent with the 2019 Town of Morrisville
Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
The project’s Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum, 36249.4033_PandN
Tech Memo, dated April 2020, can be located here

C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: Type III

D. Proposed Improvements:

The existing segment of Airport Boulevard between Davis Drive and Garden Square
Lane is a four-lane curb and gutter facility with a raised grass median and five-foot
sidewalks on each side, and a posted speed of 45 mph. The current Phase 1, as
shown on Figure 2, proposes to extend Airport Boulevard from Garden Square Lane to
Church Street with a similar typical section. In lieu of the sidewalks on each side, the
Phase 1 utilizes a ten-foot wide multi-use use path on the south side, a five-foot
sidewalk on the opposite side, along with a five-foot utility strip on each side. There will
also be a dedicated pedestrian crosswalk where the Indian Creek Greenway crosses
the new segment of Airport Boulevard. The new location portion of the Indian Creek
Greenway will be constructed prior to closing the existing trail, with access to the trail
maintained during construction.

The improvements along Town Hall Drive and Church Street, consist of the additions of
turn lanes to accommodate Airport Boulevard. These improvements also include
replacement of existing sidewalks disturbed due to the widening. No additional
widening along Town Hall Drive and Church Street other than the addition of turn lanes
are included in this project.

Phase 2, which extends Airport Boulevard from end of Phase 1 at Church Street to
Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) currently is unfunded. Phase 2 has two alternatives as shown
on Figure 3, both would cross over the North Carolina Railroad, with a grade
separation. Due to the grade separation’s proximity to Chapel Hill Road, the bridge will
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

3

also extend over Chapel Hill Road before tying back to existing Airport Boulevard.
Each of the two alternatives do have connections back to Chapel Hill Road. The
existing segment of Airport Boulevard between Chapel Hill Road and Aviation Parkway
is a five-lane facility with a center turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and a posted
speed of 45 mph.

E. Special Project Information:

Airport Boulevard is a major thoroughfare with two existing segments in the Morrisville
area—one from Davis Drive (SR 1613) to Garden Square Lane and another from
Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) to Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) in the vicinity of the Raleigh
Durham International Airport. The existing segment from Chapel Hill Road to Aviation
Parkway includes an interchange with I-40. The CAMPO 2045 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan identifies the extension of Airport Boulevard from Garden Square
Lane to Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) as a 2035 horizon year project, identifying the future
facility as a minor thoroughfare.

The project is being developed using a Complete Streets concept, including a sidewalk,
a multi-use path, and a dedicated pedestrian crosswalk where the Indian Creek
Greenway crosses the new segment of Airport Boulevard.

Alternatives

Due to the constraints created by existing development on either side of the proposed
path for Phase 1, one alignment was studied for Phase 1 of the project (See Figure 2),
while two alternatives were examined for Phase 2 (See Figure 3). The first of these
would align directly with the existing location of Airport Boulevard and include a bridge
spanning the existing rail line and Chapel Hill Road, requiring construction of a loop
from Airport Boulevard to Chapel Hill Road. The second alternative would also require
a bridge across the rail line and Chapel Hill Road but would be shifted slightly to the
east of the existing location of Airport Boulevard. During final design of Phase 2, the
railroad grade separation shall be designed to accommodate a four-track layout with a
twenty four foot- three inch (24’-3”) vertical clearance.

Based on current cost projections, the total anticipated cost for Phase 1 of the project is
$8,600,000. This includes $8,000,000 in construction costs, $540,000 in right-of-way
costs, and $60,000 in utility relocation costs.

Due to the additional jurisdictional and business relocations impacts produced by
Phase II Alternative 2, as shown in Tables 2 and 3, the department recommends
Alternative 1 be selected as the Preferred Alternative for Phase II.

Jurisdictional Features and Agency Coordination

A Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) was completed for Phase I of the
project in July 2021 and another NRTR was completed for Phase II in September 2020.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

4

The NRTRs noted that several species that are federally protected under the
Endangered Species Act are located in Wake County. For most of these species,
suitable habitat is not present in the project study area, so the Biological Conclusion
was No Effect. Field surveys for Michaux’s sumac, for which the study area contains
suitable habitat, were completed, but no specimens were located, resulting in a
Biological Conclusion of No Effect. The Biological Conclusion for the Northern long-
eared bat is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect under a programmatic biological
opinion established by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT in
eastern North Carolina. The project will not affect the bald eagle and no Eagle Act
permit will be required. Table 1 identifies the Endangered Species Act Protected
Species for Wake County. Although not currently listed by USFSW in Wake County,
we also include the northern long-eared bat as discussed in NRTR for Phase 1, July
2021.

Table 1. ESA Federally protected species listed1 for Wake County
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Recommended
Biological
Conclusion
Notropis mekistocholas Cape Fear Shiner E No No Effect
Noturus furiosus Carolina madtom E No No Effect
Necturus lewisi Neuse River waterdog T No No Effect
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker E No No Effect
Fusconaia masoni Altantic pigtoe PT No No Effect
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf wedgemussel E No No Effect
Parvaspina steinstansana Tar River spinymussel E No No Effect
Elliptio lanceolata Yellow lance T No No Effect
Rhus michauxii Michaux’s sumac E Yes No Effect
Myotis septentrionalis Northern long-eared bat T (4d) Yes MA-LAA
1IPaC countywide data checked on 6/22/21, E-Endangered, T-Threatened, PT-Proposed Threatened
MA-LAA-May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect

The NRTRs documented the location of water resources in the project area, noting that
the project study area is in the Neuse River basin. Several stream segments are
located in the project area; none of them are High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW), or water supply watershed WS-I or WS-II waters. The stream
segments in Phase II are tributaries to a portion of Crabtree Creek that is on the North
Carolina 2018 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters. Streamside riparian zones within the
study area are protected under the provisions of the Neuse Buffer Rules administered
by NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). All but one of the stream segments in
the project area, as identified in the Phase I NRTR corridor, are subject to buffer rule
protection. Four jurisdictional wetlands were identified in the Phase I area and seven
jurisdictional wetlands were identified in the Phase II corridor area. The Jurisdictional
Determination (April 27, 2021) for Phase II of the project identified five wetlands in the
project corridor area. Table 2 summarizes the jurisdictional impacts of the proposed
improvements

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

5

Table 2. Jurisdictional Impacts – Airport Boulevard Extension Project
Streams (linear feet) Wetlands (acres)
Permanent Temporary Permanent
Phase I 424 85 0.223
Phase II – Alternative 1 640 -- 0.035
Phase II – Alternative 2 1345 -- 0.320
Notes: Impacts were calculated based on current designs within the slopes stakes plus 25 feet on either side. Temporary
impacts for the Phase II alternatives are not yet available because only functional designs have been prepared.

NCDOT has coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and NC
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR)
throughout the planning phase of this project. In lieu of holding an in-person scoping
meeting, NCDOT distributed project information to and solicited input from resource
and regulatory agency representatives. This scoping information was distributed to the
agencies in March 2020. NCDOT completed Merger Pre-Screening with USACE and
determined that the project does not need to follow the NEPA/404 Merger Process.
However, in order to meet USEPA’s requirement of holding a coordination meeting 30
days before a Section 404 permit application is submitted, a Merger 4B/4C-equivalent
pre-application meeting will be held.

The NRTR for Phase I of the project can be accessed here and the NRTR for Phase II
of the project can be accessed here.

The USACE has been provided information on anticipated jurisdictional impacts for
Phase I and Phase II. The agency indicated that the stream crossings on Phase I are
separate crossings and the project can likely be permitted using Nationwide Permits.

Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Community Effects

Notable community features of the project area include two schools; one of the schools,
Sterling Montessori Academy, includes a soccer field and playground adjacent to the
project corridor and the other school, Cedar Fork Elementary School, is also used as a
local community center. None of these uses will be affected by the project. The Indian
Creek Greenway, a public greenway trail, crosses the project corridor; the project will
include development of a dedicated pedestrian crosswalk where the trail crosses the
corridor. While minority populations are present in the project area, no notably adverse
community impacts are anticipated with this project; thus, impacts to minority and low-
income populations do not appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits
and burdens resulting from the project are anticipated to be equitably distributed
throughout the community. No disparate impacts are anticipated under Title VI and
related statutes.

The project has a low-to-moderate potential to influence growth and development.
While the project will create a new roadway connection and reduce travel times, the
small scale of the project and the fact that the vicinity of the project is relatively built out
suggests that the ability of the project to stimulate growth and development will be
limited. The relative lack of developable land and the lack of notable sensitive natural
resources in the project area suggest that the project is unlikely to contribute to
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

6

cumulative effects in the area. A Land Use Scenario Assessment was not determined
to be necessary for this project.

The Community Impact Assessment (CIA) for Phase I Report, Final Airport Blvd Short-
form CIA, dated July 2021, can be accessed here and the CIA update report,
36249.4033_CIA Report, dated July 2020 prepared for Phase II can be accessed here.
The Indirect and Cumulative Effects Report, Final Airport Blvd Short-form ICE, dated
April 2020 for Phase I of the project can be accessed here and the ICE update,
Airport_Blvd_ICE_update_Final 07-15-2020, dated July 2020 prepared for Phase II can
be accessed here.

Residential and Business Impacts:

The project will impact a few residences on both phases, and a few businesses in
phase II. The following table shows the residential and business relocations per
phase/alternative.

Table 3. Residential and Business Relocations – Airport Boulevard Extension Project
Relocations
Residential Business
Phase I 2 0
Phase II – Alternative 1 2 0
Phase II – Alternative 2 2 2

Archaeological Survey

Both Phase I and Phase II portions of the project were assessed to determine if
Archaeological Surveys were required. Surveys were not required for either phase.
The Phase I, No Survey Required form, PA 20-01-0007 newly REVISED June 2021
Airport Blvd Ext No Archaeological Survey Required Wake, dated June 3, 2021 can be
located here. The Phase II, No Survey Required form, PA 20-01-0007 REVISED for
Phase II Airport Blvd Ext No Archaeological Survey Required Wake, dated August 3,
2020 can be located here.

Historic Architecture and Landscapes

Both Phase I and Phase II portions of the project were assessed to determine if Historic
Architecture and Landscapes Surveys were required. Surveys were not required for
either phase. The Phase I, No Survey Required form, 20-01-
0007NoSurveyUpdate2021, dated May 11, 2021 can be located here. The Phase II, No
Survey Required form, 20-01-0007Update, dated July 2, 2020, can be locate here.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

7

Public Involvement Summary

A Virtual Public Information Meeting was held on April 20, 2021. Sixty-two individuals
logged on to the meeting’s virtual platform. Common topics addressed by public
comments included:

· Questions about the long-range planning process and the project’s status with
respect to the Town of Morrisville 2019 Transportation Plan and the CAMPO
2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
· The need for the project and for widening other roadways in the area.
· The desire to see funding for construction of both phases of the project.
· Concerns about the planned posted speed limit (45 mph) for the project.
· Safety concerns regarding pedestrians, particularly children walking to school
and recreational sites.
· A desire for bike lanes to be included on both sides of the project.

NCDOT and the Town will consider all feasible options to make sure the project would
be safe for all users. One such option may include lowering the speed limit during
school’s commuting hours.

Traffic Noise Analysis

A Traffic Noise Analysis (TNR) was completed for both Phase I and Phase II of the
project. The report, Traffic Noise Analysis, Lochner, dated July 2021, can be located
here.

Traffic Noise Impacts

The maximum number of receptors in each project alternative predicted to be impacted
by future traffic noise is shown in the table below. The table includes those receptors
expected to experience traffic noise impacts by either approaching or exceeding the
FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria or by a substantial increase in exterior noise levels as
defined in the NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy.

Table 4. Predicted Traffic Noise Impacts by Alternative*

Traffic Noise Impacts
Alternative Residential
(NAC B)
Places of
Worship/Schools,
Parks, etc. (NAC C & D)
Businesses
(NAC E)
Total
Build 1 6 2 0 8
Build 2 6 2 0 8
*Per TNM®2.5 and in accordance with 23 CFR Part 772

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

8

Traffic Noise Abatement Measures

Measures for reducing or eliminating the traffic noise impacts, including noise barriers,
were considered for all impacted receptors in each alternative. Noise barriers include
two basic types: earthen berms and noise walls. These structures act to diffract,
absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise.

This project will maintain uncontrolled right of way access, meaning that most noise-
sensitive land uses will have direct access connections to the proposed project, and
most intersections will adjoin the project at grade. The traffic noise analysis for this
project confirmed that the physical breaks in potential noise barriers that would occur
due to the uncontrolled right of way access would prohibit any noise barrier from
providing the minimum required traffic noise level reductions at predicted traffic noise
impacts, as defined by the noise abatement measure feasibility criteria of the NCDOT
Traffic Noise Policy. Therefore, noise abatement would not be feasible.

Based on this preliminary study, traffic noise abatement is not recommended, and no
noise abatement measures are proposed. This evaluation completes the highway
traffic noise requirements of Title 23 CFR Part 772. No additional noise analysis will be
performed for this project unless warranted by a substantial change in the project’s
design concept or scope.

In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy, the Federal/State governments are not
responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new development for which
building permits are issued after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public
Knowledge of the proposed highway project will be the approval date of the Type III
Categorical Exclusion Checklist. NCDOT strongly advocates the planning, design and
construction of noise-compatible development and encourages its practice among
planners, building officials, developers, and others.

GeoEnvironmental Phase I Report

A GeoEnvironmental Phase I Report was completed in August 2021, the findings of
which include four (4) sites of concern within the project’s study area. Each of these
are in the Phase II portion of the project and all are located near NC 54 (Chapel Hill
Road) and/or existing portion of Airport Boulevard. Once Final Right of Way plans are
complete, a review will be completed to determine if a Phase II investigation and Right
of Way recommendations are necessary. The final report, No TIP-
364294033_GEOENV PHASE I_149201, dated August 2021, can be located here.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

9

F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:

Type III Actions Yes No
If the proposed improvement is identified as a Type III Class of Action answer all questions.
· The Categorical Exclusion will require FHWA approval.
· If any questions are marked “yes” then additional information will be required for those question in
Section G.
1 Does the project involve potential effects on species listed with the US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries (NMFS)? ☒ ☐
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)? ☐ ☒
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ ☒
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to
low-income and/or minority populations? ☐ ☒
5 Does the project involve substantial residential or commercial displacements
or right of way acquisition? ☐ ☒
6 Does the project include a determination under Section 4(f)? ☐ ☒
7 Is a project-level analysis for direct, indirect, or cumulative effects required
based on the NCDOT community studies screening tool? ☐ ☒
8 Is a project level air quality Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) analysis
required? ☐ ☒
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ☐ ☒
10
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
(ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical
Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
☒ ☐
11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated
mountain trout streams? ☐ ☒
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
Section 404 Permit? ☐ ☒
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) licensed facility? ☐ ☒
14
Does the project include Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) effects determination other than a no effect, including archaeological
remains? Are there project commitments identified?
☐ ☒
15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills? ☐ ☒
16
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely effecting a
regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood)
elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and
23 CFR 650 subpart A?
☐ ☒
17
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and
substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
☐ ☒
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ☐ ☒
19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area? ☐ ☒
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

10

Type III Actions (continued) Yes No
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ☐ ☒
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. USFS, USFWS, etc.) or Tribal
Lands? ☐ ☒
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control? ☐ ☒
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
community cohesiveness? ☐ ☒
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ☐ ☒
25
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning
Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where
applicable)?
☐ ☒
26
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish
Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA), Tribal Lands, or other unique areas or special lands that were
acquired in fee or easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions
or covenants on the property?
☐ ☒
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)? ☐ ☒
28 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy? ☒ ☐
29 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by
the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)? ☐ ☒
30 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that
effected the project decision? ☐ ☒

G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F

Question 1 – Protected Species

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has revised the previous programmatic biological
opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat
(NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire
NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities.
Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are currently only known in
22 counties, but may potentially occur in 8 additional counties within Divisions 1-8.
NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two conservation measures which will
avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These conservation measures only apply to the
30 current known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the PBO at this time. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to
Adversely Affect. The PBO will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act for ten years (effective through December 31, 2030) for all NCDOT
projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Wake County , where
HL-0033 is located.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

11

Question 10 – Buffer Rules

Streamside riparian zones within the study area are protected under provisions of the
Neuse Buffer Rules administered by NCDWR. All but one of the stream segments in
the project area are subject to buffer rule protection. Potential impacts to protected
stream buffers will be determined once a final alignment and design have been
determined.

Question 28 – Noise

Based on the preliminary Traffic Noise Analysis, traffic noise abatement measures are
unlikely for this project in accordance with 23 CFR 772 and the NCDOT Traffic Noise
Policy (October 2016). It is recommended that all reasonable efforts be made to
minimize exposure of noise-sensitive areas to construction noise impacts. Unless
there are changes to the project design which were not evaluated during this
environmental study, further study of traffic noise impacts and potential abatement
measures is not recommended. The Traffic Noise Analysis report for the project can
be accessed here.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

12

H. Project Commitments

Wake County
Extension of Airport Boulevard (SR 3126)
From Garden Square Lane to Chapel Hill Road (NC 54)
Federal Project No. - TBD
WBS No. 36249.4033
TIP No. HL-0033

In addition to the standard Section 404 Nationwide Permit conditions, any Section 404
Special Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency Conditions, NCDOT’s
Guidelines for Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters, General
Certifications, and Section 401 Conditions of Certification, the following special
commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:

Division 5 Construction, Resident Engineer’s Office
Access to the Indian Creek Greenway will be maintained throughout construction of the
project.

Division 5
While the project is not following the NEPA/404 Merger Process, to meet USEPA’s
requirement of holding a meeting 30 days before a Section 404 application, a Merger
4B/4C-equivalent pre-application meeting will be held.

Division 5 and Roadside Environmental Unit – Landscaping
NCDOT Division 5 will conduct a meeting with Town of Morrisville to review NCDOT and
Town of Morrisville landscaping standards.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110

13

I. Categorical Exclusion Approval

STIP Project No. HL-0033
WBS Element 36249.4033
Federal Project No. TBD

Prepared By:

Date Brian Eason, PE, Senior Project Manager
Lochner

Prepared For:

Reviewed By:

Date Zahid Baloch, PE, Project Development Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation

NCDOT certifies that the proposed action qualifies as a Type III Categorical
Exclusion.

Date Ben Upshaw, PE, Division Team Lead
North Carolina Department of Transportation

FHWA Approval:

Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Town of Morrisville, NC
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812
9/9/2021
9/9/2021
9/9/2021
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110
9/13/2021
DavisDrC
h
u
r
c
h
S
t
C
h
a
pel Hill R
dMcCrimmonPkwy AirportBlvdAviationPkwyInternationalDrKoppersRd
P
a
g
e
S
t
Evans RdGreen D r
C
o
tt
e
n
D
r
JMorris
C
o
mmonsLnPerimeterParkDrMorrisville Carpenter Rd Fairview A v e
T ria n g le P k w y
Carolina StStella
CtCrescen doDrK e y b rid g e D rGratiotDrHollyCre ekRdBrentfieldLoop
T r e y b r o o k e D r Nova Dr
Southcenter CtAirtech Dr
Waldron Ct
Vail Ct
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, EsriJapan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS User Community
Figure 1Project VicinityAirport Boulevard Extension, Morrisville, NCWake CountyWBS: 3 6249.4033: STIP HL-003 3
Leg end
Major_Utility_Easements
Phase 1
Phase 2
DOT Roads
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors,CC-BY-SA
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1 Miless
North CarolinaDepartment o f Transportation
M o r r i s v i l l eMorrisville
TNC 54
TNC 54
Project Vicinity
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110
Exi
st
i
ng
I
ndi
an Creek Trai
l
E xisting Treybrooke TrailCHURCH
S
T
TO
W
N HALL DR
T R E Y B R O O K E D R
AIRPORT BLVD GARDENSQUARELNLIBERTYROSEDRJ U S T I C E W A L K A V E
F
A
MI
L
Y

F
A
R
M
R
D
CHI
NA DRHAMMOND WOOD PL
TROLLEY CAR W AYG
O
V
E
R
N
O
R
S
H
O
U
S
E
D
RCOUNCI
L
MANCTS P R IN G FIELDVALLEYRDH
O
L
L
Y
FI
ELDDRP ARKPLACE A V ECHURCHSTEEPLEL
N
L E G IS L A T IV E P L
O L D E S T A T E H O U S E D R
STATE HOUSE DR TRO
L
L
EYCARWAYSterling Montessori
Cedar Fork Elementary
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
K PHASE 1 DESIGNAIRPORT BOULEVARDNORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONPROJECT DEVELOPMENT ANDENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
WAKE C OUNTY
0 200 400100Feet WBS: 36249.4033TIP: HL-0033
NC Public Schools
Existing Greenway
Proposed Culvert
Proposed EOT
Proposed Construction Easement
Proposed PDE
Proposed ROW
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Concrete Island
Begin Project
End Project
FIGURE 2
A
A
A BC
C
B
D
D
Wetland and stream information matches the NRTR dated July 2021.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110
C
H
U
R
C
H

S
T
C
H
A
P
E
L
H
IL
L
R
D
AIRPORT BLVDINTERNATIONALDRS O U T H P O R T D RMCCRIMMON PKWYC
O
U
RT
HOUS
E
D
R
COPELAND OAKS DR
AIRTECH DRM
E
E
T
I
NGH
A
LL
D
R
WALDRON CT
P
A
R
KPLACEAVEROSERIDGEDRCedar Fork Elementary
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
K FUTURE PHASE 2 ALTERNATIVESAIRPORT BOULEVARDNORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONPROJECT DEVELOPMENT ANDENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT WAKE C OUNTY
0 200 400 600100Feet WBS: 36249.4033TIP: HL-0033
Begin Phase 2
End Phase 2
FIGURE 3 LegendPhase 2 Alternative 1 Alignment
Phase 2 Alternative 2 Alignment
Phase 2 Study Area
Phase 1 Alignment
NC Public Schools
SD
S
A
OWA
SB SBTBTCTAWA
WB
WFWE
WC
WI
WG
WD
SC
Wetlands and streams match the WET file dated February 23, 2021. WA, WB, TA, and WC were identified as non-404 features(Jurisdictional Determination, April 27, 2021).
OWB
DocuSign Envelope ID: 297AD477-F75F-4204-9CF0-9E1E19285812DocuSign Envelope ID: 3EBE618E-2615-4574-8391-B7485B84B110
Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2020-00587 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Cary

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Property Owner/Applicant: VHB
Heather Smith
Address: 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606

Telephone Number: 919-754-5019

Size (acres) 24 (approximate) Nearest Town Morrisville
Nearest Waterway Kit Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.834665
Longitude: -78.840111

Location description: The site is located at the Chapel Hill Road, Airport Boulevard intersection in Morrisville, Wake
County, North Carolina (see attached map).

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:

A. Preliminary Determination

X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.

There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.

B. Approved Determination

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
SAW-2020-00587

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on ______________. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
[phone] or [e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.

D. Remarks: None

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.

F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)

If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: Not Applicable.
SAW-2020-00587

It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date: September 15, 2021

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy Furnished (via email):

Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
Project Delivery Unit
NCDOT-Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Courier: 17-27-03
Durham, North Carolina 27704
[e-mail]

[phone] office

Date: 2021.09.15 13:49:23
-04'00'
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community³3000300150FeetLegendExpanded Study Area Original Study AreaWetland (potential wetland waters)Intermittent Stream (potential non-wetland waters)Perennial Stream (potential non-wetland waters)Minor Contour, 2-Foot Interval Major Contour, 20-Foot IntervalFigureNOTES:1. Potential aquatic resources in original study area have been verified by the USACEand NCDWR.2. Field delineation performed by VHB on Jan. 16, 2020, with additional study area fieldwork on July 13, 2021.3. All features are shown based on the .wet file by VHB.Wetland AStream AStream BStream CWetland BWetland DStream DWetland CPOTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES AIRPORT BLVD. EXTENSION PHASE 12017 Aerial from NCOneMap.comNORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 5County:Division:Date:Wake5Rev. JuO\ 2021WBS:36249.4033********
Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2020-00587 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Cary

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Property Owner/Applicant: NCDOT
Jason Dilday
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598

Telephone Number: 919-607-6111

Size (acres) 61 (approximately) Nearest Town Morrisville
Nearest Waterway Crabtree Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.83466
Longitude: -78.840111

Location description: The site is located at the Chapel Hill Road, Airport Boulevard intersection in Morrisville, Wake
County, North Carolina.

Both Approved and Preliminary jurisdictional determinations (JDs) were conducted at this site. The specific waters
that were reviewed under the Approved JD (AJD) are identified as follows: Wetlands WA, WB and WC. Surface water
features TA, TC-Eph and OWB. These features are bounded by 4 purple polygons (see attached map).

The specific waters that were reviewed under the Preliminary JD (PJD) are as follows: Tributary reaches SA, SB, SC,
SD and TC-Intermittent, and an impoundment (Pond PA). The PJD also includes Wetlands WD, WE, WF, WG and
WI. These 5 tributary reaches, 5 wetlands and 1 open water impoundment are also shown on the attached map and
include all potential waters not reviewed under the AJD. The project area for these waters are bounded by a solid red
polygon (indicated as Study Area), excluding the areas bounded by the purple polygons, described above (See attached
map).

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:

A. Preliminary Determination

X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC §
403). The waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to
be sufficiently accurate and reliable. Therefore, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the
permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the
permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not
an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for
further instruction.

There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.

B. Approved Determination

SAW-2020-00587

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on ______________. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
the date of this notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
[phone] or [e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: See the attached Approved and Preliminary jurisdictional forms.

D. Remarks: USACE conducted a site visit on December 9, 2020. Waters identified in the AJD
are excluded waters and are not subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.

F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)

If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

SAW-2020-00587

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: June 25, 2021.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date: April 27, 2021
Expiration Date: April 27, 2026 (AJD only)

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy Furnished (via email):

NCDOT
Chris Murray, NCDOT
[e-mail]

Date: 2021.04.27 13:08:58 -04'00'
/00.1 0.20.05MilesFigure 3. Potential Jurisdictional Features Map Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of SR 1637 (Church Street) to east of NC 54(Chapel Hill Road) in MorrisvilleWake County, North Carolina(Post JD Visit 12/09/2020) updated 2/22/21EphemeralAirport Blvd Ext Study AreaPotential StreamsPotential WetlandsPotential Open WaterStream SCWetland WDWetland WFWetland WEWetland WGStream SAStream SDStream SBOWAWC was deemednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.Wetland WIAJD Review AreaTCWA, WB and TA were deemednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.AJD Review AreaEphemeral Portion of TCAJD Review AreaAJD Review AreaOWB
/00.05 0.10.025MilesFigure 3.1 Potential Jurisdictional Features Map Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of SR 1637 (Church Street) to east of NC 54(Chapel Hill Road) in MorrisvilleWake County, North Carolina(Post JD Visit 12/09/2020) updated 2/22/21EphemeralAirport Blvd Ext Study AreaPotential StreamsPotential WetlandsPotential Open WaterStream SCWetland WDAJD Review AreaWA, WB and TA were deemednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.AJD Review AreaOWB
/00.055 0.110.0275MilesFigure 3.2 Potential Jurisdictional Features Map Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of SR 1637 (Church Street) to east of NC 54(Chapel Hill Road) in MorrisvilleWake County, North Carolina(Post JD Visit 12/09/2020)Airport Blvd Ext Study AreaPotential StreamsPotential WetlandsPotential Open WaterEphemeral StreamWetland WFWetland WEWetland WGStream SAStream SDStream SBOWAWC was deemednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.Wetland WITCAJD Review AreaEphemeral Portion of TC to beIncluded in Approved JD AreaCulvertCulvertCulvert
Page 1 of 6
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2020-00587 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Cary

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Applicant: Chris Murray
NC Department of Transportation, Division 5
Address: 2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704

Telephone Number: [phone]

Size (acres) 5 (approximately) Nearest Town Morrisville
Nearest Waterway Crabtree Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.83466
Longitude: -78.840111

Location description: The site is located at the Chapel Hill Road, Airport Boulevard intersection in Morrisville, Wake
County, North Carolina.

Both Approved and Preliminary jurisdictional determinations (JDs) were conducted at this site. The specific water that
was reviewed under the Approved JD (AJD) is identified as follows: Wetland WC. This feature is bounded by 1 red
polygon (indicated as AJD Review Area) (see attached map).

The specific waters that were reviewed under the Preliminary JD (PJD) are as follows: Surface water features TA, TC-
Eph and OWB; wetlands WA and WB. These 5 aquatic features are also shown on the attached map and include all
potential waters not reviewed under the AJD. The project areas for these waters are bounded by 3 separate purple
polygons (indicated as PJD Review Area), (See attached map).

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:

A. Preliminary Determination

X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC §
403). The waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to
be sufficiently accurate and reliable. Therefore, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the
permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the
permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not
an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for
further instruction.

There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.

B. Approved Determination

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
SAW-2020-00587
Page 2 of 6
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on ______________. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
the date of this notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
[phone] or [e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: See the attached Approved and Preliminary jurisdictional forms.

SAW-2020-00587
Page 3 of 6
D. Remarks:
x On April 27, 2021, USACE provided an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) for
all the waters listed in this correspondence. The April 27, 2021 AJD was conducted under
the Navigable Water Protection Rule (NWPR).
x The Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the agencies”)
are in receipt of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona’s August 30, 2021, order
vacating and remanding the Navigable Waters Protection Rule in the case of Pascua Yaqui
Tribe v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In light of this order, the agencies have
halted implementation of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”) nationwide and
are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory
regime until further notice.
x USACE will not rely on NWPR AJDs in making new decisions on regulatory actions. Until a
new definition of “waters of the United States” is promulgated, the Corps will make
decisions on new regulatory actions pursuant to the currently applicable regulatory regime
(i.e., the pre-2015 regulatory regime).
x Based on the above and discussions between USACE and NCDOT, NCDOT requested a new
combined PJD/AJD for those waters previously reviewed under the April 27, 2021 AJD/PJD.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.

F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)

If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: April 18, 2022.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date: February 18, 2022
Expiration Date: February 18, 2027 (AJD only)

Date: 2022.02.18
15:35:29 -05'00'
SAW-2020-00587
Page 4 of 6
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy Furnished (via email):

NCDOT
Jason Dilday
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
[e-mail]

/00.1 0.20.05MilesFigure 3. Aquatic Features Map Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of SR 1637 (Church Street) to east of NC 54 (Chapel Hill Road) in MorrisvilleWake County, North Carolina(Post JD Visit 12/09/2020) updated 2/22/21potential waters-tributary Potential waters-tributary Potential Open WaterWetland WGWC--stormwater pond constructed in uplands.TCAJD Review AreaOWBPJD Review AreaAJD Review Area

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.
REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director

February 23, 2021

To: Christopher A. Murray, Project Engineer for Planning & Environmental Studies, NCDOT Division 5

From: Rob Ridings, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Branch

Subject: NCDOT Project: SR 3126 Extension Phase II, Wake County.

Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233)

Dear Mr Murray;

On February 23, 2021, NC Division of Water Resources received your request to confirm your on-site determinations of drainage
features at the above-referenced project for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The drainage features are approximated on
referenced package received by DWR.

NCDWR has confirmed that the drainage features labeled below are as follows:
*SUBJECT to Buffer Rules: Streams SA, SB, & SC. OWA (Open Water A).
*NOT Subject to Buffer Rules: OWB, Features 1 & 2.

No other stream or buffer sites were identified in this request. Also, this letter only addresses applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules
at the sites specifically marked on the referenced maps and does not apply to reaches of the channels further downstream from the
project area, or to any other drainage features in the vicinity.

This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffer, Waters of the United
States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers must comply wi th the Neuse Buffer Rules, 404/401
regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B .0216), and any other required federal, state and local regulations. Plea se be
aware that even if no direct impacts are proposed to the protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater runoff as per 15A NCAC
2B.0233 is required.

The owner (or future owners) or permittee should notify NCDWR (and other relevant agencies) of this determination in any futu re
correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this
letter.

Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the mitigation ru les may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman, NCDWR Transportation Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Serv ice
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.

Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that “exempts” a surface water from the mitigation
rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative hearings. You must
file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice and the date th e affected
party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in
the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Mond ay
through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the
petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.

The petition may be faxed-provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings
within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]

A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:

Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center

This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.

If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call Rob Ridings at 919-707-3873.

/0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles
Figure 3. Potential Jurisdictional Features Map Extend SR 3126 (Airport Boulevard) from east of SR 1637 (Church Street) to east of NC 54(Chapel Hill Road) in MorrisvilleWake County, North Carolina(Post JD Visit 12/09/2020) updated 2/22/21
Ephemeral
Airport Blvd Ext Study Area
Potential Streams
Potential Wetlands
Potential O pen Water
Stream SC
Wetland WD
Wetland WFWetland WE
Wetland WG
Stream SA
Stream SD
Stream SB
OWA
WC was deem ednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.
Wetland WI
AJD Revie w Area
TC
WA, W B an d TA we re deem ednon-404 features during site visit on 12/09/2020.
AJD Review Area
Ep hemeral Portion of TC
AJD Revie w Area
AJD Revie w Area
OWB
Airport Boulevard Technical Memorandum
Purpose and Need – October 2020 1

Technical Memorandum
PURPOSE AND NEED
Extension of Airport Boulevard (SR 3126)
From Garden Square Lane to Chapel Hill Road (NC 54)
STIP Project No. TBD, WBS No. 36249.4033

Town of Morrisville, NC

October 2020

PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), in cooperation with the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to extend Airport Boulevard from its existing terminus
at Garden Square Lane to its existing terminus at Chapel Hill Road (NC 54), a distance of
approximately 0.8 miles. Construction of the project will complete the current missing link of this
route. As shown in Figure 1, the project study area is located in the vicinity of the Town of
Morrisville. For right-of-way acquisition and construction, the project is divided into two phases,
although an environmental study is being completed for the entire length of the project. Phase 1 of
the project is from Garden Square Lane to Church Street (SR 1637) and Phase 2 of the project is
from Church Street to Chapel Hill Road. The Town of Morrisville has submitted this Phase 1 of the
project, to the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization for Locally Administered Projects
Program (LAPP) funding in State Fiscal Year 2022. The Town has entered into an agreement with
NCDOT for Division 5 to manage the project. The project is being developed with federal funds
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA.)

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Airport Boulevard is a major thoroughfare with two existing segments in the Morrisville area—one
from Davis Drive (SR 1613) to Garden Square Lane and another from Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) to
Aviation Parkway (SR 1002) in the vicinity of the Raleigh Durham International Airport. The
existing segment from Chapel Hill Road to Aviation Parkway includes an interchange with I-40.
The existing segment of Airport Boulevard between Davis Drive and Garden Square Lane is a four-
lane curb and gutter facility with a raised grass median and a shared bicycle lane, and a posted
speed of 45 mph. The current project proposes to extend Airport Boulevard from Garden Square
Lane to Chapel Hill Road with the same typical section. The project typical section would provide a
multi-use use path on one side, a sidewalk on the opposite side, and a five-foot utility strip on each
side. The existing segment between Chapel Hill Road and Aviation Parkway is a five-lane facility
with a center turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and a posted speed of 45 mph.
Airport Boulevard Technical Memorandum
Purpose and Need – October 2020 2

Land uses in the project area southwest of Chapel Hill Road include mainly low- and medium-
density suburban residential developments, schools, and small commercial businesses. Northwest
of Chapel Hill Road, land uses are characterized by commercial and office developments.

THE NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The 2019 Town of Morrisville Comprehensive Transportation Plan identifies Airport Boulevard as
one of the Town’s strategic corridors, noting its importance in helping to support and manage the
Town’s rapid growth. The need for the project arises from the current convoluted traffic patterns
necessary to travel between key locations in Morrisville. Key locations include schools, government
offices, and businesses along Town Hall Drive, which is another of the Town’s strategic corridors,
and along Church Street. Key locations in Morrisville also include the commercial and office
developments on the existing segment of Airport Boulevard northwest of Chapel Hill Road.
The Town of Morrisville has also identified existing capacity concerns about several intersections
on Davis Drive, including the Morrisville-Carpenter Road intersection. The existing convoluted
traffic patterns described above also contribute to this concern.
The Town’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan also includes a recommended policy of prioritizing
“the construction of greenway connections between existing facilities and adjacent neighborhoods.”
The Plan also notes that all roadway projects in the Town should “adhere to complete streets
concepts”, adding that “the Town should continually strive to close gaps in the pedestrian network.”
The Indian Creek Greenway crosses the project corridor between Garden Square Lane and Town
Hall Drive, creating the opportunity for Airport Boulevard to connect to the Town’s greenway
network.

PURPOSE OF PROPOSED ACTION
The purpose of the proposed action is to improve overall, multi-modal traffic mobility on the Town
of Morrisville’s roadway network and to enhance roadway connectivity between Davis Drive and
Chapel Hill Road. The proposed action begins and ends at established roadways and will improve
the local roadway network independently of any future projects, providing an alternative route
between Davis Drive and Chapel Hill Road. The proposed action also completes a missing link in
the Airport Boulevard corridor, which improves connectivity to employment centers in RTP as well
as to I-40 and RDU Airport.
Secondary benefits of the project would include addressing the Town’s capacity concerns about
existing intersections on Davis Drive and fulfilling the Town’s multimodal policy recommendations.