Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0003760_Authorization to Construct_20040510NPDES DOCLI LENT SCANNING COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0003760 DuPont Kinston facility Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Correspondence Owner Name Change Return Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Document Date: May 10, 2004 Thies document is printed on reuse paper - ignore sang contezit on the reirerse side O� 0 QG C!�11 C 17. Y May 10, 2004 Mr. Robert C. Amos, Plant Manager INVISTA, S.a.r.l. (formerly DuPont) P.O. Box 800 Kinston, North Carolina 28502-0800 Michael F. Easley, Govemor State of North Carolina William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality Subject: Authorization to Construct Permit Issuance ATC Number 0003760A01 INVISTA, S.a.r.1. WWTP (formerly DuPont - Kinston) NPDES Permit NC0003760 Lenoir County Dear Mr. Amos: A request for an Authorization to Construct (ATC) was submitted on behalf of your company on January 5, 2004, by Mr. James R. Proctor, Environmental Specialist. The design for this project has been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the following: • The addition of tablet dechlorination for Outfall 002 (via basket -type mechanism), • The addition of tablet dechlorination for Outfall 003 (via basket -on -chain type mechanism), • and any additional appurtenances association with the dechlorination designs for Outfalls 002 and 003. The Division of Water Quality approves this project in terms of compliance with NPDES limits. However, this design is atypical for dechlorination. Should INVISTA experience compliance problems with the total residual chlorine limits for Outfalls 002 and 003, then alternate methods for dechlorination may need to be used at the plant. This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with NPDES Permit No. NC0003760 issued March 10, 2003, and shall be subject to revocation unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and limitations specified in the permit. The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater treatment or disposal facilities. The Washington Regional Office, telephone number (252) 946 - 6481, shall be notified at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State Holidays. North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 (919) 733-7015 FAX (919) 733-0719 On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ Mr. Amos Page 2 Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall employ a certified water pollution control treatment system operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the water pollution control treatment system. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the water pollution control treatment system by the Certification Commission. The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and grade to comply with the conditions of Title 15A, Chapter 8G, .0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, III, and 1V facility at least daily, excluding weekends and holidays, and must properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the facility and must comply with all other conditions outlined in Title 15A, Chapter 8G, .0204. Once the facility is classified, the Permittee must submit a letter to the Certification Commission which designates the operator in responsible charge within: (A) Sixty calendar days prior to wastewater being introduced into a new system or (B) within 120 calendar days of the following, (i) after receiving notification of a change in the classification of the system requiring the designation of a new ORC and back-up ORC or (ii) a vacancy in the position of ORC or back-up ORC. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for the life of the facility. The Operational Agreement between the Permittee and the Environmental Management Commission is incorporated herein by reference and is a condition of this Permit. Noncompliance with the terms of the Operational Agreement shall subject the Permittee to all sanctions provided by G. S. 143-215.6 for violation of or failure to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C. The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction. One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Susan A. Wilson, P.E., telephone number (919) 733-5083, extension 510. cc: Central Files NPDES Unit, Permit File Washington Regional Office, Mr. James Proctor Sincerely, Water Quality INVISTA P.O. Box 800 Kinston, NC 28502-0800 • NCDENR- DWQ NPDES-Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 Attention: NPDES Unit/DWQ DEC. 19, 2003 DEC 2 RE: INITIAL REQUEST FOR THE USE OF DECHLORINATION TABLETS INSTEAD OF A LIQUID FEED STATION FOR OUTFALL 002 & 003 AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AT THE E.I. DUPONT KINSTON FACILITY, KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA. SECONDLY THE NAME HAS CHANGED TO INVISTA INC. KINSTON FACILITY, KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA. Dear NPDES unit: As •. sed during our Friday, August 31, 2003 telephone conversation, the followi 's ,(40 a revised reques . eachate generated a ion o the sludge within the Ash Landfill locate •.. • ' ston, North Carolina facility. I talked to Ms. Susan A.Wilson on Friday the 19th of December 03 about the use of dechlorination tabs on outfall 002 & 003. I was instructed that there was not a provision for fast trak approval on the use of tablets and that there had been recent interest from other facilities about the use of the product. The use of dechlorination tablets is on two low flow, non -contact cooling and steam condensate streams. O utfal 1 characteristics: • Flow: .012- .024 MGD • Chlorine: .40-.30 Mg/L • pH: 6.80- 7.80 At present our permit says monthly testing as of Jan. 04 with a limit of 17 ug/L.. This can be met with 2-3 tablets a day in each outfall out of a feed basket in 002 & 003. The operators (we have 24-hr. coverage) would add the chemicals every morning on their first round of the facilities. The operator could do a daily test using the field colormetric unit to verify .00 Mg/L. Then we would follow this up with our monthly testing of the outfall. If the flow to 002 & 003 was higher I t would be more cost effective to go with liquid but at this time we feel the tablets are better suited to the low flow/ low level chlorine. NPDES-UNIT -2- DEC. 19, 2003 • Ms. Wilson asked that I include documentation on the dechlorination tablets, which is attached to the report. I hope this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-522-6443 Sincerely, E.I. DUPONT KINSTON PLANT James R. Proctor Environmental Specialist, ORC g Lia:461------' cc: Eric Wu — URS Diamond, Charlotte DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY February 26, 2004 MEMORANDUM To: Susan Wilson, Environmental Engineer NPDES Unit Division of Water Quality Thru: Roger Thorpegvironmental Engineer Whington Regional Office From: Al Hodge, Environmental Engineer, Weuhineton Regional Office �/ Subject: E. I. DuPont ATC # 003760A01 Lenoir County MAR 3 2004 DuPont has submitted a request to use dechlorination tabs for the main discharge 001. A request to "add the leachate generated from the consolidation of the sludge within the Ash Landfill" is mentioned The letter does not specify where they want to send the leachate, however I assume they are talking about 001 also. I have no problem using dechlorination tabs for the 001 discharge and recommend the request be granted However, there is not enough supporting information on which to make a recommendation regarding the Ash Landfill leachate. -Tab e f-(, ( qu WA-5 ytni of;&( y14� W A i gpap`icsc) ti/ 0 /c 9. 'jai! 5 Par. c_tST t 5 R2 jI.t-'k-vR- fz 1(1 t-ru6/buA3Si{ i P GrJ4i E • G�- 315/4 tL bi t 5 A(,So P it- D6c4c,92, onl 00 003 - ry=i 90 ) Re: Npdes permit Kinston Nc Subject: Re: Npdes permit Kinston Nc From: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:47:22 -0400 To: James.R.Proctor@invista.com Thanks James - I am finally back looking at it again. If you're in tomorrow (Friday), can you try and call me around 8:30? or really any time between 8 or 9. I may be in earlier if you'd like to try after 7:30. If that's not good for you, try around 11 am or 2 pm. Just have a quick question for you. I'll proceed forward with this, but likely put some clause in saying if DuPont (Arteva) cannot comply with the chlorine limit - they may need to switch to another form of dechlorination with greater control ability; meaning - if the tablet dechlor doesn't provide consistent treatment you may need to switch to some type of drip feed. I'm just putting the out -clause in because of the somewhat unconventionality of the tablet system (esp. re. the basket on chain system). It may work just fine - but I'm not sure. Also - I guess I will issue this ATC permit to DuPont with a provision that they will soon be acquired by Arteva- since we haven't gotten the paperwork in for the name/ownership change yet? If this will cause ya'll some problems - let me know. James. R. Proctor@invista.com wrote: Susan Thanks for the email the other day. I was wondering if after looking at the fax is there anything you need around dechlor so we can get this wrapped up. james 252-522-6443 This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. Francais Deutsch Italian Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean www.invista.com/email_disclaimer.shtml 1 of 1 5/6/2004 5:50 PM