NC0003760_Approval_20031113

NPDES DOCUMENT !;CANNIN` COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0003760
DuPont Kinston facility
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
/Approval _,
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
November 13, 2003
This document its printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rezrerse side

Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
November 13, 2003
Mr. James R. Proctor
E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 800
Kinston, North Carolina 28502
Subject: Sludge Leachate Request
Kinston Dacron® Plant
NPDES Permit NC0003760
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Proctor:
In your letter of July 9, you requested approval to send a new wastestream to the DuPont - Kinston
Plant's industrial wastewater treatment plant (IWWTP). You wrote that DuPont is preparing to close
its Ash Landfill and proposes to dewater the remaining sludge and to route the resulting leachate to
its industrial wastewater treatment plant (IWWTP) for treatment and disposal.
The Division has reviewed your request along with additional information you provided in your
letter of September 9. Based on our review, the Division is approving the request, effective on this
date and subject to the conditions described below.
Your request is, in effect, a request to modify DuPont's NPDES permit application. Even though the
permit has now been issued, the current application still stands as DuPont's most recent proposal to
discharge from the Kinston Plant. Any change in that proposal could require a corresponding
change in the permit requirements. The addition of the Ash Landfill leachate alters the list of
wastestreams that the application indicates will be treated at the IWWTP.
It does not appear that a permit modification is necessary in this case: you have indicated that the
leachate flow will be minor (probably less than 5 gpm) compared to existing flows at the IWWTP,
that previous testing detected only low levels of a few priority pollutants, and that the dewatering
will probably be completed within the term of the existing NPDES permit.
The Division's approval is conditioned upon DuPont taking the following steps to verify the nature
and quantity of the new wastestream:
Characterization. The analytical results reported for the leachate are from 1996. Once the
dewatering operations are underway, DuPont must conduct new analyses to update its
characterization of the leachate. Representative sample(s) should be collected during the first three
months of dewatering. Analyses should include, at a minimum, BOD, COD, TSS, total nitrogen, total
phosphorus, pH -I, conductivity, and a full priority pollutant scan. Leachate flow rates should be
measured or estimated. Results should be reported to this office and to DWQ's Washington Regional
Office within 45 days of sample collection.
Duration. It is assumed that dewatering operations will be completed during the term of DuPont's
current NPDES permit (expires December 31, 2007). If dewatering is still underway one year priorr to
permit expiration, DuPont must repeat the sampling and analysis (as described above) in the first
and second quarters of 2007 and include the results with its application for renewal.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
FAX [phone]
On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/

Mr. James R. Proctor
Sludge Leachate Request
November 13, 2003
Kinston Dacron® Plant
NPDES Permit NC0003760
Page 2
If any of the monitoring results or other conditions are found to be substantially different from those
considered in granting this approval, the Division may revise or withdraw its approval upon written
notification to the DuPont - Kinston Plant.
This approval does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits, nor affect the
conditions of those permits, that may be required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of
Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental
permit.
If you have any questions concerning the draft permit or the other requirements for your facility,
please contact me at [phone], extension 541 or at [e-mail].
CC:
Sincerely,
Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
Washington Regional Office / Water Quality Section
NPDES Files
Central Files

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attention: Mr. Michael Templeton
Sept. 2, 2003
RE: REVISED REQUEST FOR ADDITION OF SLUDGE LEACHATE TO
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INFLUENT
KINSTON ASH LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION
E.I. DUPONT KINSTON FACILITY, KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Dear Mr. Templeton:
As discussed during our Friday, August 31, 2003 telephone conversation, the following is
a revised request to add the leachate generated from the consolidation of the sludge
within the Ash Landfill located within the E.I. DuPont Kinston, North Carolina facility
(Site) to the site wastewater treatment plant influent diversion structure.
As you may be aware, the NCDENR has mandated closure of both the C&D and Ash
Landfills located within the above referenced Site. After approval of the final design by
NCDENR, the C&D Landfill soil cap was constructed in January 2003. A final design
for the Ash Landfill was submitted to the NCDENR in March 2003 and approved. The
Ash Landfill soil cover consists of the following major stages:
1. Establishment of erosion and sedimentation (E&S) controls;
2. Clearing and grubbing;
3. Installation of a leachate collection trench at the toe of the Ash landfill;
4. Construction of a leachate conveyance system from the Ash landfill to the
Site wastewater treatment plant influent structure;
5. Development of an on -site borrow area, adjacent to the Ash landfill;
6. Placement of buttress fill around the Ash landfill;
7. Installation of high strength geotextiles;
8. Placement of surcharge fill;
9. Installation of prefabricated vertical (PV) drains within the sludge pond;
10. Construction and installation of settlement platforms within the sludge
pond; and
11. Placement of subsequent stages of surcharge fill and cover soils, based on
settlement platform results.
Construction of the soil cover over the Ash Landfill is scheduled to begin this week, and
incorporates dewatering of the existing sludge pond, located within the eastern half of the
landfill. Dewatering of the sludge will be accomplished through the installation of
reinforcement geotextiles, prefabricated vertical (PV) geosynthetic drains, and
incremental placement of a surcharge fill. Due to nature of the sludge (essentially zero
c
SEP — 8 2003

Michael Templeton — NCDENR
-2- Sept. 2. 2003
shear strength), surcharging will be performed in stages to allow the sludge to increase its
shear strength with the decrease in liquid (leachate).
The existing sludge within the Ash Landfill was transported from the trade waste aeration
basin in October 1985. It is estimated that 1.2 million gallons of wet sludge were placed
at that time. Analytical results on both sludge and ash samples, obtained in 1996, show
negligible concentrations of a few organic compounds and metals. All of these
constituents are present in concentrations below Federal Maximum Contaminant Limits
(MCLs).
The Ash Landfill leachate will be transported by gravity to the existing wastewater
treatment plant influent diversion structure on Site through an underground leachate
conveyance system. Due to the nature of the sludge, the leachate quantity or flow rate
cannot be accurately estimated, but is believed to be less than 5 gallons per minute (gpm).
The duration of this flow is unknown at this time, but, as discussed, will be temporary, as
the sludge will only consolidate as a function of the intensity of the surcharge load.
It is understood that the NCDENR may request the Kinston facility to sample the
transported leachate for characterization purposes. This program will be addressed in
separate correspondence.
We hope this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions, please
contact me at 252-522-6443.
Sincerely,
E.I. DUPONT KINSTON PLANT
James R. Proctor
Environmental Specialist
cc: James E. Whitty — URS Diamond, Wilmington
Andrew Alcazar — DuPont CRG, Charlotte
Mac Bonner — URS Diamond, Wilmington
Tyson Campbell - URS Diamond, Wilmington
C:IDOCUME--11PROCTOJR\LOCALS-11Temp\ncdenr templeton It 9-2-03.doc

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Attention: Mr. Michael Templeton
July 9, 2003
RE: REQUEST FOR ADDITION OF SLUDGE LEACHATE TO WASTEWATER 7,
TREATMENT PLANT ^-4,`\.`�
KINSTON ASH LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION
DTI KINSTON FACILITY, KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA re're"
Dear Mr. Templeton:
As discussed with Mr. James Proctor of DTI Kinston, the following is a formal request to
add the leachate generated from the sludge within the Ash Landfill located within the
DTI Kinston, North Carolina facility (Site) to the site wastewater treatment plant.
As you may be aware, NCDENR has mandated closure of both the C&D and Ash
Landfills located from the above referenced Site. After approval of the final design by
NCDENR, the C&D Landfill soil cap was constructed early in 2003. A final design for
the Ash Landfill has been submitted to the NCDENR and approved. Construction of the
soil cover over the Ash Landfill is scheduled to begin shortly, and incorporates
dewatering of the existing sludge pond, located within the eastern half of the landfill.
Dewatering of the sludge will be accomplished through the installation of a reinforcement
geotextile, prefabricated vertical (PV) geosynthetic drains, and placement of a surcharge
load. Due to nature of the sludge (essentially zero shear strength), surcharging will be
performed in stages to allow the sludge to increase its shear strength with the decrease in
liquid (leachate).
The existing sludge within the Ash Landfill was transported from the trade waste aeration
basin in October 1985. It is estimated that 1.2 million gallons of wet sludge were placed
at that time. Analytical results on both sludge and ash samples, obtained in 1996, are
presented in Attachment 1. These results show negligible concentrations of a few organic
compounds and metals. All of these constituents are present in levels below Federal
Maximum Contaminant Limits (MCLs)..
The Ash Landfill leachate will be transported by gravity to the existing wastewater
treatment plant influent diversion structure on Site through an underground leachate
conveyance system. Due to the nature of the sludge, the leachate quantity or flow rate
cannot be accurately estimated, but is believed to be less than 5 gallons per minute (gpm).
Eaaz z inr

Michael Templeton — NCDENR -2- July 9, 2003
We hope this information is sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions, please
contact me at 302-992-6846.
fQ/5k S1�
Sincerely,
URS Diamond
James E. Whitty, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Attachment
cc: James Proctor — DTI, Kinston
Andrew Alcazar — CRG, Charlotte
Mac Bonner — URS Diamond
C:IDOCUMFr11PROCTOJRILOCALS-11TemplTempleton Letter.doc

Attachment 1 - Summary of Ash and Sludge Analytical Results
DTI Kinston Facility
Sample ID
BIO-SLUDGE
F/B-ASH
Date
4/22/1996
4/22/1996
Top (ft)
Total (T)/
Bottom (ft)
Analyte
units
Diss. (D)
Duplicate #
1
1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ug/l
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,4-DIOXANE
ugA
T
ND (70.)
ND (70.)
2-HEXANONE
ugA
T
ND (7.)
ND (7.)
ACETONE
ugA
T
ND (6.)
ND (6.)
ACETONITRILE
ugA
T
ND (25.)
ND (25.)
ACROLEIN
ugA
T
ND (40.)
ND (40.)
ACRYLONITRILE
ugA
T
ND (10.)
ND (10.)
ALLYL CHLORIDE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BROMOFORM
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
CARBON DISULFIDE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
CHLOROBENZENE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
CHLOROETHANE
ug/1
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
CHLOROFORM
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
CHLOROPRENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIBROMOMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
ETHYL METHACRYLATE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ETHYLBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
- IODOMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
ugA
T
ND (100.)
ND (100.)
METHACRYLONITRILE
ugA
T
ND (10.)
ND (10.)
METHYL BROMIDE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
METHYL CHLORIDE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
=METHYL METHACRYLATE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
METHYL -ISO -BUTYL KETONE
ugA
T
ND (5.)
ND (5.)
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
PENTACHLOROETHANE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
G STYRENE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
- TETRACHLOROETHENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
TOLUENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
- TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
ugA
T
ND (15.)
ND (15.)
TRICHLOROETHENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
VINYL ACETATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
VINYL CHLORIDE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
XYLENES (TOTAL)
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,3,5-TRINITROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (5.)
ND (5.)
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
1,4-NAPHTHOQUINONE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit
Page 1 of 4
Kinston Ash Landfill Historical Data:Sheetl
7/23/2003 9:46 AM

Attachment 1 - Summary of Ash and Sludge Analytical Results
DTI Kinston Facility
Sample ID
BIO-SLUDGE
FIB -ASH
Date
4/22/1996
4/22/1996
Top (ft)
Total (T)I
Bottom (ft)
Analyte
units
Diss. (D)
Duplicate #
1
1
1-NAPHTHYLAMINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (5.)
ND (5.)
2,4DINITROTOLUENE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2,6-DICHLOROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2-CHLOROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2-NAPHTHYLAMINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2-NITROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2-PICOLINE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
2-SEC-BUTYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (.07)
ND (.07)
3 OR 4-METHYLPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
3,3'-DIMETHYLBENZIDINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
4,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (5.)
ND (5.)
4-AMINOBIPHENYL
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
4CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
4-CHLOROANILINE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
4-NITROPHENOL
ugA
T
ND (5.)
ND (5.)
4-NITROQUINOLINE-N-OXIDE
ugA
T
ND (10.)
ND (10.)
5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
7,12-DIMETHYLBENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
A-A-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE
ugA
T
NO (1.)
ND (1.)
ACENAPHTHENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ACETOPHENONE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
ANILINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
ANTHRACENE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BENZO(A)PYRENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
3. J
ND (1.)
BENZYL ALCOHOL
ugA
T
3. J
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
CHLORDANE
ugA
T
ND (.1)
ND (.07)
CHLOROBENZILATE
ugA
T
ND (4.)
ND (4.)
CHRYSENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
ugA
T
92 ND (1.)
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIALLATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIBENZOFURAN
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIMETHOATE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ugA
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
ETHYL METHANESULFONATE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
FLUORANTHENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit
Page 2 of 4
Kinston Ash Landfill Historical Data:Sheetl
7/23/2003 9:46 AM

Attachment 1 - Summary of Ash and Sludge Analytical Results
DTI Kinston Facility
Sample ID
BIO-SLUDGE
F/B-ASH
Date
4/22/1996
4/22/1996
Top (ft)
Total (T)/
Bottom (ft)
Analyte
units
Diss. (D)
Duplicate #
1
1
FLUORENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
ug/1
T
ND (3.)
ND (3.)
HEXACHLOROETHANE
ug/
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
HEXACHLOROPROPENE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
ISODRIN
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ISOPHORONE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
ISOSAFROLE
ug/
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
M-DINITROBENZENE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
M-NITROANILINE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
METHAPYRILENE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
METHYL METHANESULFONATE
ugA
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
N-NITROSO-DI-N-BUTYLAMINE
ug/
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE
ug/l
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE
ugl
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
ug/l
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSOMETHYLETHYLAMINE
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSOMORPHOLINE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
N-NITROSOPIPERIDINE
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
N-NITROSOPYRROLIDINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
NAPHTHALENE
ug/
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
NITROBENZENE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
O,O,O-TRIETHYL PHOSPHOROTHIOAT
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
O-CRESOL
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
O-NITROANILINE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
O-TOLUIDINE
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
P-DIMETHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
P-NITROANILINE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE
ug/1
T
ND (20.)
ND (20.)
PENTACHLOROBENZENE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE
ug/l
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PHENACETIN
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
PHENANTHRENE
ugl
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PHENOL
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PRONAMIDE
ug/1
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PROPIONITRILE
ug/I
T
ND (30.)
ND (30.)
PYRENE
ug/I
T
ND (1.)
ND (1.)
PYRIDINE
ug/I
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
SAFROLE
ug/1
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
TETRAETHYLDITHIOPYROPHOSPHATE
ugl
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
2,4,5-T
ug/
T
ND (.05)
ND (.05)
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
ug/l
T
ND (.04)
ND (.04)
2,4-D
ug/1
T
ND (.1)
ND (.1)
AROCLOR 1016
ug/
T
ND (.07)
ND (.07)
AROCLOR 1221
ug/I
T
ND (.1)
ND (.1)
AROCLOR 1232
ugA
T
ND (.08)
ND (.08)
AROCLOR 1242
ug/I
T
ND (.04)
ND (.04)
AROCLOR 1248
ug/
T
ND (.06)
ND (.06)
AROCLOR 1254
ug/1
T
ND (.05)
ND (.05)
AROCLOR 1260
ug/
T
ND (.06)
ND (.06)
4,4'-DDD
ugl
T
ND (.006)
ND (.006)
4,4-DDE
ug/1
T
ND (.005)
ND (.005)
4,4'-DDT
ug/I
T
0.01 ND (.007)
ALDRIN
ug/I
T
ND (.04)
ND (.004)
ALPHA-BHC
ug/I
T
ND (.002)
ND (.002)
BETA-BHC
ug/I
T
ND (.07)
ND (.007)
DELTA-BHC
ug/1
T
ND (.004)
ND (.004)
DIELDRIN
ug/1
T
ND (.005)
ND (.005)
< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit
Page 3 of 4
IGnston Ash Landfill Historical Data:Sheetl
7/23/2003 9:46 AM

Attachment 1 - Summary of Ash and Sludge Analytical Results
DTI Kinston Facility
Sample ID
BIO-SLUDGE
FIB -ASH
Date
4/22/1996
4/22/1996
Top (ft)
Total (T)1
Bottom (ft)
Analyte
units
Diss. (D)
Duplicate #
1
1
ENDOSULFAN I
ugA
T
ND (.03)
ND (.003)
ENDOSULFAN II
ug/I
T
ND (.009)
ND (.009)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
ugA
T
ND (.006)
ND (.006)
ENDRIN
ugA
T
ND (.005)
ND (.005)
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ug/I
T
ND (.008)
ND (.008)
GAMMA-BHC
ugA
T
ND (.02)
ND (.002)
HEPTACHLOR
ugA
T
ND (.004)
ND (.004)
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
ugA
T
ND (.003)
ND (.003)
KEPONE
ugA
T
ND (.3)
ND (.3)
METHOXYCHLOR
ugA
T
ND (.03)
ND (.03)
THIONAZIN
ugA
T
ND (2.)
ND (2.)
TOXAPHENE
ugA
T
ND (.9)
5.2 J
ND (2.7)
580
ND (1.3)
ND (.9)
ANTIMONY
ugA
T
ND (3.1)
ARSENIC
ugA
T
ND (2.7)
310
ND (1.3)
BARIUM
ug/I
T
BERYLLIUM
ugA
T
CADMIUM
ugA
T
ND (2.7)
ND (2.7)
CHROMIUM
ugA
T
ND (4.3)
ND (4.3)
33.0 J
ND (3.8)
COBALT
ugA
T
ND (5.5)
COPPER
ugA
T
ND (3.8)
LEAD
ugA
T
ND (2.0)
ND (2.0)
MERCURY
ugA
T
ND (.043)
ND (.040)
50
ND (2.7)
NICKEL
ugA
T
ND (5.4)
SELENIUM
ugA
T
ND (2.7)
SILVER
ug/I
T
ND (3.6)
ND (3.6)
4.7 J
ND (25)
THALLIUM
ugA
T
ND (4.5)
TIN
ugA
T
ND (25)
VANADIUM
ugA
T
ND (7.0)
206
35
ND (500)
ND (7.0)
252
ND (4)
ZINC
ugA
T
CYANIDE, TOTAL
ugA
T
-SULFIDE AS S
ugA
T
I ND (500)
< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit
Kinston Ash Landfill Historical Data:Sheetl
Page 4 of 4 7/23/2003 9:46 AM

mailbox:///Cl/Documents%20and%20Settings/shannon_thornburg/App...
Subject: Re: dupont (a.k.a. dti) leachate letter
From: Shannon Thornburg <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:44:20 -0400
To: Mike Templeton <mike.templeton @ncmail.net>
CC: Al Hodge <[e-mail]>, Christie Jackson <[e-mail]>, Charles
Weaver <[e-mail]>
Thanks for the clarification, Mike! I will assume that further involvement from NDPU
is not needed. I will send you the information that I have collected on this issue
this afternoon.
Shannon
Mike Templeton wrote:
Shannon & Al -
I spoke with Jim Twitty of URS and James Proctor of DuPont - Kinston
this afternoon about the mystery letter of July 9. Here's what I got out
of it.
First, DTI (DuPont Textile Interiors) is an internal working name for a
group of plants that DuPont is selling to Koch. It sounds like they have
made the deal and are going through the paperwork. Once the change is
made, they will apply for ownership changes for their permits.
The Kinston plant has closed one landfill (the C&D Landfill) and is in
the process of closing another (the Ash Landfill). The Ash Landfill has
coal ash and wet sludge and has to be dewatered before they can cap it.
They propose to install a filtered drainage system in the sludge, cover
it with a layer of geotextile, and gradually add clean soil cover to
squeeze the water out, similar to a large-scale belt press. They then
propose to drain the "filtrate" by gravity to DuPont's existing WWTP for
treatment and discharge. Flow would be up to 5 gpm and would continue
for several months to several years, depending on how readily the
dewatering proceeds.
No sludge or water will leave the landfill except what drains from the
landfill to the WWTP. Certainly none will go to the City of Kinston's
facilities. James P will give the City a courtesy call to clarify this
and put the City at ease.
Shannon, there don't appear to be any sludge issues that affect you
directly. DuPont has worked with Jim Barber (Raleigh) and John Crowder
(WaRO) of Solid or Haz Waste on the closure, and they may know more
about it. Would you be interested in calling them to see what light they
can shed on this?
Al, I think the rest of this is for you.
DuPont needs to submit a more thorough description of their proposal, as
an amendment to the most recent application in the files. James P
indicated they will get that to Raleigh next week; I'll forward a copy
to you. We can decide whether it needs a permit mod and respond
accordingly.
Based on what I know from this phone call and their letter, I'm fairly
comfortable approving it without changing their permit. The flow is
insignificant compared to their existing flows, and the one scan yielded
very few hits on priority pollutants. It shouldn't present a problem at
the WWTP, and it's their responsibility if it does. On the other hand,
they only collected one sample from the whole landfill and that dates
1 of 2
9/3/2003 11:44 AM

mailbox:///Cl/Documents%20and%20Settings/shannon_thornburg/App...
from 1996. On -going monitoring of some sort may be called for, through
the permit or by letter. I'd like to hear your thoughts on all of this,
either now or after you've looked at the next submittal - or both.
That's it for today. I'll talk to you guys next week.
- Mike T
Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919-733-5083 x541 FAX: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]
2of2
9/3/2003 11:44 AM

Re: dupcitnt (a.k.a. clti) leachate letter
z
Subject:
Date:
From:
Organization:
To:
CC:
Re: dupont (a.k.a. dti) leachate letter
Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:44:20 -0400
Shannon Thornburg <[e-mail]>
NC DENR DWQ
Mike Templeton <[e-mail]>
Al Hodge <[e-mail]>,
Christie Jackson <[e-mail]>,
Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
Thanks for the clarification, Mike! I will assume that further
involvement from NDPU is not needed. I will send you the information
that I have collected on this issue this afternoon.
Shannon
Mike Templeton wrote:
>Shannon & Al -
>1 spoke with Jim Twitty of URS and James Proctor of DuPont - Kinston
>this afternoon about the mystery letter of July 9. Here's what 1 got out
>of it.
>First, DTI (DuPont Textile Interiors) is an internal working name for a
>group of plants that DuPont is selling to Koch. It sounds like they have
>made the deal and are going through the paperwork. Once the change is
>made, they will apply for ownership changes for their permits.
>The Kinston plant has closed one landfill (the C&D Landfill) and is in
>the process of closing another (the Ash Landfill). The Ash Landfill has
>coal ash and wet sludge and has to be dewatered before they can cap it.
>They propose to install a filtered drainage system in the sludge, cover
>it with a layer of geotextile, and gradually add clean soil cover to
>squeeze the water out, similar to a large-scale belt press. They then
>propose to drain the 'filtrate" by gravity to DuPont's existing WWTPfor
>treatment and discharge. Flow would be up to 5 gpm and would continue
>for several months to several years, depending on how readily the
>detvatering proceeds.
>No sludge or water will leave the landfill except what drains from the
>landfill to the WWTP. Certainly none will go to the City of Kinston's
>facilities. James P will give the City a courtesy call to clarify this
>and put the City at ease.
>Shannon, there don't appear to be any sludge issues that affect you
>directly. DuPont has worked with Jim Barber (Raleigh) and John Crowder
>(WaRO) of Solid or Haz Waste on the closure, and they may know more
>about it. Would you be interested in calling them to see what light they
1 of 2 9/5/038:57A1V

Re: clupant (a.k.a. dti) leachate letter
>can shed on this?
>AI, I think the rest of this is for you.
>DuPont needs to submit a more thorough description of their proposal, as
>an amendment to the most recent application in the files. James P
>indicated they will get that to Raleigh next week; I'll forward a copy
>to you. We can decide whether it needs a permit mod and respond
>accordingly.
>Based on what I know from this phone call and their letter, I'm fairly
>comfortable approving it without changing their permit. The flow is
>insignificant compared to their existing flows, and the one scan yielded
>very few hits on priority pollutants. It shouldn't present a problem at
>the WWTP, and it's their responsibility fit does. On the other hand,
>they only collected one sample from the whole landfill and that dates
>from 1996. On -going monitoring of some sort may be called for, through
>the permit or by letter. I'd like to hear your thoughts on all of this.
>either now or after you've looked at the next submittal - or both.
>That's it for today. I'll talk to you guys next week.
>- Mike T
>-
>Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
>North Carolina Division of Water Quality
>NPDES Unit
>1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
>9I9-733-5083 x541 FAX: [phone]
>mailto:[e-mail]
2of2 9/5/038:57AN.