NC0001384_Permit (Issuance)_20010727

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0001384
Williamsburg Plant WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type-
Permit Issuance`•:
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
July 27, 2001
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse side

CF A Michael F. Easley
Governor
°c- 4`�.�
t 7 r' NC DENR William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
1 Vw�e North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 27, 2001
Mr. Terry Fripp
Burlington Industries, Inc.
PO Box 21207
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0001384
Williamsburg Plant
Caswell County
Dear Mr. Fripp:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Please note that the receiving streams (Buttermilk Creek and Grays Branch) to which your facility
discharges are classified "nutrient sensitive." Although the current permit requires monitoring of nutrients only,
the Division of Water Quality (Division) reserves the right to reopen your permit at any time to impose nutrient limits
on the effluent. You should also be aware of the potential discharge requirements for your facility as a result of
House Bill 515. In 1997 the Clean Water Responsibility Act (House Bill 515) was enacted, with the intent to
strengthen the control of nutrients from all discharges to NSW waters. Facilities permitted to discharge
greater than 500,000 gallons per day, and any new or expanding facilities, will be subject to nutrient
limitations for total nitrogen and total phosphorus according to House Bill 515 requirements. • Since
modifications to treatment systems are expensive and time consuming, it is highly recommended that you
begin planning for this possibility now if a future expansion is anticipated.
Your facility has also recently received two Notices of Violations (NOVs) for failure to meet the permit
requirements. Although you have not been required to implement any plant upgrades as per the December
1997 EAA performed for you facility, continued failure to comply with the NPDES permit requirements may
result in forced implementation of the such upgrades.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Natalie Sierra at telephone number (919)
733-5083, extension 551.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office/Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit
Central Files
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

Permit NC0001384
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Burlington Industries, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Burlington Industries Williamsburg Plant
Intersection of NC Highway 87 and NCSR 1100
Matkins
Caswell County
to receiving waters designated as unnamed tributaries to Buttermilk Creek and
Grays Branch in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2001.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2006.
Signed this day July 27, 2001.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC000138' •
•
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Burlington Industries, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to discharge wastewater from outfalls 001, 002, and 003. The
discharge of treated domestic wastewater occurs from outfall 001 and requires
operation of an existing 0.025 MGD package treatment facility consisting of a bar
screen, aeration basin, integral sludge digester, clarifier, tablet chlorination,
contact chamber, step aeration and sludge thickener/digester. Wastewater
discharged from 002 consists of air washer blowdown, compressor condensate,
compressor cooling tower blowdown and water softener backwash. The
discharge from 003 consists of cooling tower blowdown. All outfalls discharge
from facilities located at Burlington Industries, Inc., Williamsburg Plant,
intersection of NC Hwy 87 and NCSR 1100, Matkins, Caswell County, and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into unnamed tributaries to Buttermilk Creek and Grays Branch, which are
both classified WSII-NSW waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

g \\
)•
`r- .3 C.)•r—
7 / J' / t
if ff r /•\.
/I
1�
y) BM
/ �• l L n ff
— ,
� 4,790
..
•
\�, t �rf Ilk
t �• fi t� U
\.01(
1.1
•
)n`•\ ,�
rbv�ts Arbor `�
royns .Chapel) t '
rk)
\ _.
•
•
• :.. ; -' t
'� ,
—_..•!�
I- -,i ce w. ... 1 /--• •i-•- -. • `.., \ '� i � -t 4',-� t'
t. y'
/ �i.
r, : t`
—sue BM 748 •
•
=—. - ,/•\
L
C'= \
NC00001384 - Burlington Industries, Inc.
Latitude (001):
Longitude(001):
Latitude (002):
Longitude(002):
Latitude (003):
Longitude(003):
36°t5' 18"
79°30'58"
36°15' 19"
79°30'58"
36°15'27"
79°31'00"
Sub -Basin: 03-06-02
Quad 11: B2OSE/Williamsburg
Stream Class: WSII-NSW
Receiving Streams: unnamed tributaries
to Buttermilk Creek
and Grays Branch
Facility
Location
Burlington Industries, Inc.
NC0001384
Williamsburg Plant

Permit NC0001884 •
•
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001 - DOMESTIC WASTEWATER. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
?EFFEUENT " "`` _ E
lui
j �' .LIMITS 4i'
.: t.. ��s��. �r`lY�v ��i i'.�.. �,i .�, :.
-� , „ ._. .� _• , .
J.; J. R' S L. :3: 1v.A+�.S�., t '�9 S
•�•'--
7 ' s � MONIT:ORING� REQUIREMENTS } .x K
'��;�, ��'^".1 'a r wt
�,�z ' 3 :i"— ,
_:� L`'�i'TJ..� i+fFj[ �f 15�r.
rA
!
rCI ARACTER ST CS 5 -
-.wr'f � -'1 t}
�� =` . ' ?"•�' `r-'- .
� �dx-,r•�r'' •�3 r� rs���
,t" �d = s 3 r
.� a�r�.: if. 1x�e�. -:z zs `Vt.�K�!..'t+�',-.�.s:'
c.Monthl .Avers e=
.
. °> ��....,
, :Dail Maximum°"-
•1 �S a. +•.,rW,,,.
447;
. ., �-tee'
? Measuremen �.
-ra�y,><,..� :wfc- ;�
?`Same ampleType: `e
. "
Sam le x •
i . t
. Location. •
,�,
om Frequency
Flow
, 0.025 MGD
Weekly
Instantaneous
Influent or Effluent
BOD5 — 20°C
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Residue
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
NH3-N (April 1— October 31)
2.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
NH3-N (November 1— March 31)
4.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Weekly
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Temperature (°C)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved 0xygen2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent,
Upstream,
Downstream
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100mL
400/100mL
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 Sample Locations: Upstream — Upstream 50 feet from outfall, Downstream — Downstream 50 feet
from outfall.
2 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.

Permit NC0001384
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 002 — AIR WASHER BLOWDOWN, COMPRESSOR
CONDENSATE, COMPRESSOR COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN AND WATER SOFTENER
BACKWASH. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
.EFFLUENT: y "
.,. .ue 'o=,.'s. ,1F�:i:�N.� .r .,.., � l f
} Pt.-4
CHARACTERISTICS $F ,
zz. ¢Oii'xz x �7t!1 ,�1 .L s: %.1.� � .°k$_
s ..- x 7 * , y5�
ii . ' 'e ' wVr }
»: ' 1. iLIMITS r'' ' '`° = `
��..��-- .: �i�. . �
-, ru M ''at d ri.. -4 ' -: � s
.. r .< . , . t ..
� 7 .v`..
' `'MONIT QRING REQUIREMENTS ' $
�..1 .�-5 ? •'[ xti "i -
r,'cz tr ., ,' r?*1 .4-- 3�`n'' i4 .i —,,tea .
, .. , .;;1 . in _.��.. r F 'r
s{`z zZ «e#>�. �`""z'+'�6•. �3� ^'.,a" .a. . �4- 7
�..,
t Monthly Average
(w I^N . t '! {
Daily Maximum
Measurement
}'.: FrequencyY. r
=Sample°Type
r . 7 ',.�'..
_ Sample¢
Locationl
Flow
Monthly
Instantaneous
Effluent
Temperature, 0C1
Monthly
Grab
Effluent,
Upstream,
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine2
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE COOLING
WATER EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored monthly by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
32°C.
2 Monitoring requirements only apply if chlorine is added to the treatment system.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division of Water Quality prior to utilizing
any biocide in the cooling water.

Permit NC000 1384
A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 003 — COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
r, u
,..q
CHARACTERISTICS ;;
�� 2r�i...>i�l S
;1 . $ _ �, M , _ , ; ;:�,
����t r.:.i.4r ' � t r;,
.:.
�f. sk LIMITS' - r
_ Mb „fYL. ., e*, � �YS7� 4*x ;,�,'�},•
x.� . -�: �... ..
"P ' f MONITORINGREQUIREMENTS �;f � . k.
� 7, . , ,
`,...^c � s �t .� l•- r v r.✓1T�'Yr uy ... ' . '�y ' Wz a`,'y. �'s+.. Sy��
°,; _ � , , . x�,f-ss. .r i_"P.=.is9 ` t �t1a` I e+Iti:�:4 � �LS�S ' ,.:
c'rs
r Monthl .
�, ip �,':r••`;,R,,.�+�+ir 4�y...R,
: Avera 1
-L.' ;&.. �
', D-�.a�i'l ��r,
_:R.'a?�� . �
- Maximum
A o� j � •y
', Y� �Measurementj.,• ., �
`�%tc � ;n - �ii�4:;4.Pr,Y�:.c��� •�. %',cg,�
; Frequencyr
N
Sam le T e y
r � "�� , '�' 7e
�. "r.. rti
Sam��leiLocation
�r�NLt,�r' 1.�`� ^ �-�`+,
}=r 3
Flow
Monthly
Instantaneous
Effluent
Temperature, oC1
Monthly
Grab
Effluent, Upstream
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine2
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE COOLING
WATER EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
and shall be monitored monthly by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
1 The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the
receiving stream of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed
320C.
2 Monitoring requirements only apply if chlorine is added to the treatment system.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division of Water Quality prior to utilizing
any biocide in the cooling water.

6/6/01
Permit Number
Facility Name
Permit Writer
Publish Date
Final to Supervisor
NC0041483
Evon Sykes - Plaza MHP
Weaver
Verbal-6/10/01
7/20/01
NC0069965
Larry Scott - Scotty's Mobile Village
Weaver
6/13/01
7/20/01
NC0065358
Michael Power - Hidden Forest Estates
Weaver
6/10/01
7/20/01
NC0063096
Town of Holly Springs
Rodriguez
6/10/01
7/20/01
NC0039586
CP&L - Shearon Harris
Rodriguez
6/10/01 1
7/20/01
NC0025241
OWASA - Mason Farm
Rodriguez
6/13/01
7/20/01
NC0001384
Burlington Industries - Williamsburg
Sierra
Verbal-6/13/01
7/20/01
NC0025305
UNC-Chapel Hill - Steam Elec. Plant
Sierra
6/13/01
7/20/01
NC0021156
City of Mount Holly
Corporon
6/12/01
7/20/01
NC0024112
Town of Thomasville
Templeton
7/20/01
NCS000289
Shenandoah Wood Products
Mills

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MEMORANDUM
From:
Subject:
June 6, 2001
Lee Spencer
NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Natalie Sierra
NPDES Unit
Review of Draft NPDES Permit NC0001384
Burlington Industries, Inc. — Williamsburg Plant
Caswell County
ATA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by
July 6, 2001. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at the telephone number
or e-mail address listed at the bottom of this page.
wwwwwwwwwwANNVwwwww,v„wwww w,�';AN w wwwwwwwwwww
RESPONSE: (Check one)
R...--C
oncur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly. the
stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge. and the discharge does not contravene the designated
water quality standards.
Signed
Concurs with issuance of the above permit. provided the following conditions are met:
Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
r
Date: 6 2 0 f
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 551 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usINPDES Natalie.Sierra@ ncmail.net

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0001384
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
NC0001384 — Burlington Industries — Williamsburg Plant
Applicant Address:
Mr. Terry Fripp; P.O. Box 21207, Greensboro, NC 27420
Facility Address:
NC Hwy 87; Matkins, NC
Permitted Flow
001 — 0.025 MGD; 002 is not limited
Type of Waste:
001: Sanitary Wastewater;
002: Air washer blowdown, compressor condensate, compressor
cooling tower blowdown, water softener backwash.
003: Cooling tower blowdown
Facility/Permit Status:
Active; Renewal
County:
Caswell
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
UT to Buttermilk
Creek and Grays
Branch
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
WSII — NSW
State Grid / USGS Quad:
B20SE/Williamsburg
303(d) Listed?
No
Permit Writer:
Natalie Sierra
Subbasin:
03-06-02
Date:
4/9/01
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.07
001: Lat. 36° 15' 18" N Long. 79° 30'58" W
002: Lat. 36° 15' 19" N Long. 79° 30'58" W
003: Lat. 36° 15' 27" N Long. 79° 31'00" W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs)
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0.075
IWC (%):
100%
BACKGROUND
The Williamsburg Plant for Burlington Industries weaves yarn into cloth,
though no process wastewater is discharged from any of the outfalls. Non -contact
cooling water from various parts of the plant is discharged through 002 and 003.
Outfall 001 discharges domestic wastewater from the facility after treating it in a
package plant system. In 1997, the facility was required to perform an Engineering
Alternatives Analysis (EAA) in order to assess the present value cost (PVC) of reducing
the impact on the receiving streams, both of which are zero flow streams. After
discussions with the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO), it was agreed that the
most feasible alternative, an upgrade to the existing treatment plant, would only be
implemented if the facility began to have difficult meeting the limits specified by the
NPDES permit.
FILE REVIEW
The renewal application describes the treatment works as follows:
001: Domestic waste treated through a package system consisting of a bar
screen, aeration basin, sludge digestion, clarifier, tablet chlorination system (includes
chlorine contact chamber), and step aeration.
002 and 003: Non -contact cooling water from boilers and compressors treated
with sodium thiosulfate as needed.
Effluent from 001 and 002 discharges to an unnamed tributary (UT) to
Buttermilk Creek. Water form 003 is discharged to an UT to Grays Branch.
Fact Sheet
\PDES NC0001383 Renewal
Page 1

DMR Review:
DMRs dating from January 1998 to February 2001 were reviewed for all
outfalls. Average monthly data for 001 is compiled in Table 1 below. Domestic flow
from 001 averaged 0.0059 MGD with a maximum flow of 0.0095 MGD. This flow was
less than that of the cooling water discharged through 002, which averaged 0.023
MGD and had a maximum value of 0.0284. Discharge from both 002 and 003 was
usually consistent in volume from month to month. Average flow from 003 was
0.0046 with a maximum of 0.01036 MGD. TRC from 002 and 003 is always below
detection level.
Parameter Average Value Maximum Value Minimum Value
Flow (MGD) 0.0059 0.0095 0.0035
Temperature (°C) 20.66 28.9 11.5
TRC (mg/L) 1.37 1.52 1.2
BOD (mg/L) 1.67 3.75 0.0
NH3-N (mg/L) 1.12 10.5 0.03
DO (mg/L) 3.01 11.8 0.33
Total Suspended Residue
(mg/L) 7.30 8.8 6.0
Total Nitrogen (mg/L) 24.47 42.5 3.0
Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 6.88 24.4 2.43
Table 1 Summary of monthly average data for outfall 001. Data culled from DMRs dating from January 1998
to February 2001
Instream Data Review
The impact of the domestic waste discharge from 001 is assessed through
instream monitoring of temperature, DO, fecal conform and conductivity.
Upstream/Downstream data for the upper tributary to Buttermilk Creek is
summarized in Table 2. There was only one occasion on which the downstream DO
value was lower than the instream DO standard. No flow was recorded upstream of
the 002 discharge. Temperature data was recorded for flow upstream and
downstream of 003. The average change in temperature between the upstream and
downstream portions of the stream was 2.10C.
Parameter Average Average Percent Change
Upstream Downstream (D - U/D) * 100
Value Value
Temperature ("C) 21.73 19.11 -13.71
Dissolved Oxygen 7.61 8.10 6.05
(mom-)
Fecal Coliform 200.67 31.97 - 5.28
(#/100)
Conductivity 953.13 714.34 - 33.42
Reasonable Potential Analysis:
Reasonable Potential Analysis was not appropriate for any of the pollutants
monitored through this permit.
Correspondence
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC000I 384 Renewal
Palle 2

4
Compliance Evaluation Inspections have been conducted annually from 1996-
2000. During this time, the facility received some NOVs for failure to report certain
parameters as specified in the NPDES permit. The facility is otherwise reported as
well operated and maintained. In 2000, the facility received two NOVs. The first,
given in August of 2000, was assessed for violation of the permit monthly limits for
ammonia nitrogen. A civil penalty of $1056 was paid. The second violation was
assessed in October 2000 for violation of the ammonia nitrogen monthly limit and two
failures to monitor BOD. The $1, 167 fine was paid.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
1997 correspondence from the facility and recent discussions with the WSRO indicate
that the facility will not yet be required to implement any of the upgrades specified by
the 12/97 EAA.
Waste Load Allocation (WLA).
The last waste load allocation was performed in 1992. It indicates that the only
positive flow measurement is the average flow - 0.075-cfs. BOD, ammonia nitrogen,
DO, TSS, fecal coliform are all limited. Monitoring requirements are recommended for
temperature, total phosphorus, total nitrogen and temperature.
Zero Flow Policy
As per NPDES policy, the facility was required to perform an EAA during the last
permitting cycle. They were also given NH3-N limits of 2 mg/L for summer and 4
mg/L for winter. Unless the facility begins to violate the stream DO standard, more
stringent BOD limits will not be implemented. The current limits on BOD and TSR
are 30/30.
Note: The permittee should be alerted via cover letter that failure to meet
NPDES permit requirements will result in re -opening of the permit and action
towards implementation of the findings of the EAA.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
A review of the instream data for the facility at the current monitoring locations
indicates that the discharge may not have much impact in terms of oxygen consuming
wastes. The impact of the effluent with respect to nutrient loading of the receiving
stream is unclear. The receiving streams are likely to be impacted by non -point
sources (the 2000 basin plan for the Cape Fear River Basin indicates that
approximately 35% of nutrient loading in the basin is due to non -point sources).
Although this discharge is small with average nutrient loadings to the receiving
stream, we may wish to alert them to the fact that the receiving waters are NSW and
in the future, limits may be imposed.
Recent Division policy stipulates that for 100% domestic waste (not discharging
to impaired waters), upstream and downstream conductivity and fecal coliform
monitoring are unnecessary. Effluent conductivity monitoring may also be eliminated
from the permit.
Otherwise, no changes to the existing permit are proposed.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: June 135, 2001
Permit Scheduled to Issue: September 1, 2001
Fact Sheet
\('0O01384 Renewal
Pa«e 3

NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
. o
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Natalie Sierra at [phone] ext. 551.
NAME: DATE:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Fact Sleet
NPDES N0)001 384 Renewal
P,<2e 4

Re: NC0001384
Subject: Re: NC0001384
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:06:35 -0400
From: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: Natalie Sierra <[e-mail]>
Hi Natalie,
Thanks for the info. I have one correction ,one comment and two requests.
1) Correction: On the front page of the fact sheet (under file review) it should
read step "aeration" and not step chlorination.
2) Comment: On page #2 of the fact sheet (under Instream Data Review for 001)
you mention that "the discharge caused a violation of the instream DO standard."
Based on my observations at the site, I would find it hard to agree with that.
The #001 discharge is into a dry ditch and not a stream. The upstream flow comes
from outfall #002 so the ditch is not really surface waters. In many cases the
ORC has to sample pooled stagnant water at the downstream site for #001. The low
DO's are more likely due to stagnant warm water than to oxygen depletion from the
organic load, especially since the effluent BOD values are consistently <2.0.
Now, to my soap box (just ask Dave G., he has heard it before).
I was surprised to see that conductivity measurements (E,U,D) were required.
I did not think we were requiring conductivity monitoring for 100% domestic
flows. Especially, since this is only 0.025 MGD. Can this be deleted from the
permit? Current laboratory rules now require that conductivity samples be
performed in a laboratory and not with field instruments on site. This is
approximately 12 samples per month that B.I. must pay for that are basically
inconclusive.
The same goes for fecal coliform U & D monitoring. Fecal coliform compliance is
not an issue for this facility. The flow in the ditch is 100% effluent from
outfall #001 and #002. The stream data for the year 2000 does not indicate any V//
fecal coliform problems. Can this U & D fecal monitoring also be deleted?
Thanks for your consideration. I this does not seem combative. It is just my
opinion that the upstream and downstream data in this instance (and many others)
is pretty much inconclusive and seldom useful. If the shoe was on the other foot
and I was the permittee, I know I would not want to pay for this data.
Thanks again, Mike.
[mike.mickey.vcf
Name: mike.mickey.vcf
Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
Encoding: 7bit
Description: Card for Mike Mickey
1 of I 4/10/01 3:38 PM

By --ilu< CieK — (1uS ) NSt,V
2l2 Pig-7
I2 `U '7U 350 Ik .t\L. `SPkV(
AC C
_ CoCT ANALYSIS
`t f t r M I -7 ► S i'� iL k- — f Z
Iz161-1 c t-A
(uYaa v\i $L jZl b to
ulP6 t iXP �-�s� 5g6
D lsc 4 -� �--,) U� g� 45 `7
CAR-...120QC-44 "Gb) 1 S 311 z O G
'sc+-c 4 -A C) S, )k' /-__ frL.4>
C-G l o W IS f i�t T H A - CKfGc: TZ rfl - SY S70—/ (AK S 02e
Ape c AsI -)CLpita I 7k-eT c4 LcL( cvr T 7
ciaciam ctruLobt,2) ?A-Naiul
00-7

Stews r P 096 YWL 1F 1- OST FE1\ /L&
FOu©k1) "gy Nldv rvcl pu —pAu__ -1)15c G£ roNayll 1-02.0 S^vt1'I
WILL ir:IL.T FV1idr) -4 becA4 u, e -Th 1- i— I eizoro5 c7J
-tict .t4- i /t Nc o c > L i M - -YLC uc r--
ZoD 1L_ -�1
Co€2-6Po k�N �v
C!Q L . ,to
I --CYo»., wS
vwLLc
0/2--o NO \I -Coo(
�g V�ve+�� �� � � vie I ,
rot1-,ram '
cuk)Jc4 . in 9 (c7

�.� J)LC -
vt'c
2oC)U
31)5 NOV --t t165to q.s
Cr J 61. 0 fea ,m;-1 ovtl b, 4,1 1 rwc
3
T L. 4-12Ioc
i u 12J j\l oil 4$ I I
-6U,• viol aF-N(-1- rV
2 CAA. WA246%L r , J
rt Ku_ (t (a o
G

NC0001384
Burlington Industries - Williamsburg Plant
Date Flow Temperature TRC BOD NH3-N TSR DO TN
(MGD) (oC) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Jan-98 0.0035 12.6 1.5 1.8 1 3.3 6.3 3
Feb-98 0.0047 13.2 1.5 1.5 2 4.3 7.2
Mar-98 0.0043 15.3 1.5 1.2 <0.1 4 6
Apr-98 0.0042 17.3 1.4 <12 0.23 3.3 7.8 24.53
May-98 0.0041 22 1.52 1.5 0.1 2.3 7.2
Jun-98 0.0045 25.3 1.44 <2 <0.1 2.3 7.9
JuI-98 0.0045 26.9 1.45 <2 <0.1 2 7.2 31.9
Aug-98 0.0042 26.4 1.49 <2 <0.1 2 6.5
Sep-98 0.0038 25.5 1.45 <2 0.12 2.4 7.2
Oct-98 0.0045 21.2 1.4 <2 0.1 2.8 7.8 39
Nov-98 0.0043 18.1 1.4 <2 0.1 4.5 7.4
Dec-98 0.0037 15.6 1.4 <2 0.23 1.3 7.5
Jan-99 0.0044 11.5 1.4 3.75 0.85 11.8 7.9 42.5
Feb-99 0.0059 15.3 1.5 <2 <0.1 3 8.2
Mar-99 0.0041 14.9 1.4 <2 <0.1 5 7.8
Apr-99 0.0042 20.6 1.3 2 <0.1 3.8 8.1 41.8
May-99 0.0055 24.6 1.4 2 0.3 1.8 7.3
Jun-99 0.0066 26.8 1.3 2 0.38 2 7.5
JuI-99 0.0074 27.6 1.3 <2 <0.1 2 7.4 33.6
Aug-99 0.0069 28.9 1.4 <2 <0.1 3.4 7.2
Sep-99 0.0075 26.4 1.4 2 <0.1 3.5 7.8
Oct-99 0.0062 21.6 1.3 <2 <0.1 2.5 7.6 3.32
Nov-99 0.0077 19.1 1.3 <2 <0.1 1.8 7.5
Dec-99 0.0072 18 1.3 <2 <0.1 1.3 7.4
Jan-00 0.0059 13.8 1.3 <2 0.3 4 7.4 25.9
Feb-00 0.008 15.1 1.4 3 0.8 4 7.3
Mar-00 0.0077 19.1 1.3 2 0.5 3 7.4
Apr-00 0.0095 20.9 1.3 2.3 1 3.5 6.5 23.3
May-00 0.0069 24.8 1.3 <2 10.5 2.6 8.2
Jun-00 0.0074 28.6 1.3 <2 1 3.5 8.8
Jul-00 0.0058 27.5 1.4 <2 5.6 2.7 7.5 15.7
Aug-00 0.007 28 1.3 1 0.2 3.2 6.9
Sep-00 0.0073 28.9 1.3 2 0.9 1.3 6.6
Oct-00 0.0071 22.9 1.3 0.4 0.6 3.4 6.4 19.7
Nov-00 0.0075 18.1 1.2 3.3 0.2 1.3 6.8
Dec-00 0.0063 13.9 1.3 0 0.03 0.33 6.8
Jan-01 0.0063 11.7 1.3 0 0.84 2 6.6 13.8
Feb-01 0.0066 17.1 1.3 0 0.05 3 6.4
Average 0.0059 20.66 1.37 1.67 1.12 3.01 7.30 24.47
Maximum 0.0095 28.9 1.52 3.75 10.5 11.8 8.8 42.5
Minimum 0.0035 11.5 1.2 0 0.03 0.33 6.0 3.0

TP
(mglL)
4.85
5.19
7.36
6.03
7.56
7.41
5.8
24.4
4.86
5.8
4.35
3.42
2.43

002
Date Flow Temp TRC
(MGD) (oC) (mg/L)
Jan-98 0.018 20 0
Feb-98 0.018 16.1 0
Mar-98 0.0284 14.4 0
Apr-98 0.0284 18.3 0
May-98 0.0284 19.4 0
Jun-98 0.0103 28.3 0
JuI-98 0.0074 29.4 0
Aug-98 0.0284 26.7 0
Sep-98 0.0284 28.3 0
Oct-98 0.0284 25 0
Nov-98 0.018 19.4 0
Dec-98 0.0284 18.9 0
Jan-99 0.0284 5.6 0
Feb-99 0.0284 15.6 0
Mar-99 0.018 17.8 0
Apr-99 0.0284 19.4 0
May-99 0.0284 20.6 0
Jun-99 0.005 31.1 0
JuI-99 0.0284 30.6 0
Aug-99 0.0103 31.7 0
Sep-99 0.018 26.1 0
Oct-99 0.0103 25 0
Nov-99 0.018 23.3 0
Dec-99 0.0284 19.4 0
Jan-00 0.0284 18.3 0
Feb-00 0.0284 7.8 0
Mar-00 0.0284 16.7 0
Apr-00 0.0284 19.4 0
May-00 0.0284 22.8 0
Jun-00 0.0284 27.8 0
JuI-00 0.0284 28.3 0
Aug-00 0.0073 30 0
Sep-00 0.018 26.1 0
Oct-00 0.0284 18.3 0
Nov-00 0.0284 18.9 0
Dec-00 0.0284 15 0
Jan-01 0.0284 12.8 0
Feb-01 0.0284 15.6 0
Average 0.023 21.268 0
Maximum 0.0284 31.7 0
Minimum 0.005 5.6 0
003
Date
Flow
Temp
TRC
(MGD)
(oC)
(mg/L)
Jan-98
0.0018
11.7
0
Feb-98
0
Mar-98
0
Apr-98
0.005
8.3
0
May-98
0.005
13.3
0
Jun-98
0.0018
25
0
J u I-98
0.0003
26.7
0
Aug-98
0.005
23.3
0
Sep-98
0.0103
25.6
0
Oct-98
0.005
20
0
Nov-98
0.005
14.4
0
Dec-98
0.005
11.1
0
Jan-99
0.005
0.6
0
Feb-99
0.005
10
0
Mar-99
0.005
11.7
0
Apr-99
0.0018
13.3
0
May-99
0.005
14.4
0
Jun-99
0.0074
20.6
0
JuI-99
0.0103
23.3
0
Aug-99
0.005
24.4
0
Sep-99
0.005
21.7
0
Oct-99
0.005
21.1
0
Nov-99
0.005
17.8
0
Dec-99
0.0018
24.4
0
Jan-00
0.0018
13.3
0
Feb-00
0.005
8.3
0
Mar-00
0.0081
9.4
0
Apr-00
0.005
15
0
May-00
0.0018
20.6
0
Jun-00
0.005
22.2
0
JuI-00
0.005
25.6
0
Aug-00
0.005
24.4
0
Sep-00
0.005
23.9
0
Oct-00
0.0103
9.4
0
Nov-00
0.005
13.9
0
Dec-00
0.005
3.3
0
Jan-01
0.0018
1.1
0
Feb-01
0.005
3.9
0
Average
0.0046
16.0278
0
Maximum
0.0103
26.7
0
Minimum
0
0.6
0

Upstream/Downstream Monitoring Upper Tributary Buttermilk Creek
NC0001384
Burlington Industries - Williamsburg Plant
Date
Upstream
Temperature DO Fecal Coliform Conductivity
(C) (mg/L) (#/100)
Downstream
Temperature DO Fecal Coliform Conductivity
(C) (mg/L) (#/100)
Jan-98
Feb-98
Mar-98
Apr-98
May-98
Jun-98
JuI-98
Aug-98
Sep-98
Oct 98
Nov-98
Dec-98
Jan-99
Feb-99
Mar-99
Apr-99
May-99
Jun-99
JuI-99
Aug-99
Sep-99
Oct-99
Nov-99
Dec-99
Jan-00
Feb-00
Mar-00
Apr-00
May-00
Jun-00
JuI-00
Aug-00
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
Jan-01
Feb-01
14.7
15.3
16.7
17
24.4
27.8
28.6
27.9
27.3
22.2
17.9
17.7
13.9
16.5
18
21.1
26.7
28.7
28.9
29.8
26.7
23.1
21.1
22.6
15.8
15.3
18.2
18.8
24.3
32
24.7
27.2
24.7
22.5
17.9
17.6
15.2
17
7.1
6.6
5.4
6.6
4.9
4.8
5.7
5.9
6.6
7.7
8.3
7.9
8.6
8.2
8.6
7.8
7.3
7.3
7.1
7
7.4
6.2
8.1
8.1
7.4
8.8
9.3
8.6 <1
8.1
8.4
9.1
8.4
8
8.3
9
8.4
9.2
9.1
5.18
12.8
4.8
10.5
3.6
56
200
200
95
225
230
340
369
1383
634
373
29
33
24
36
60
248
154
34
2184
19
4
3
7
354
59
3
1
8
7
14
2
357.5
353
401.4
358
451
500
632
440
468
11508
8207
2739
354
341
338
370
470
454
452
455
407
478
395
346
396
318
330
218
352
381
251
346
331
484
323
435
384
395
12.4
12.2
13.6
15.3
21
24.5
26.1
25.7
25.6
20
16.6
15.7
11
12.8
15.2
19.9
23.6
26.4
27.2
27.4
24.9
19.5
17.9
16.7
11.3
11.7
15
18.7
22.3
29.9
24.8
26.1
22.7
19.1
14.6
14.1
11
13.5
6.5
7.1
4
7.2
7.4
7.6 <10
6.4
6.3
6.9
8.3
8.9
8.6
9.3
9.3
9.1
7.5
8.1
8.1
8.5 <10
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.9
8.8
8.5
9.3
9
8.7
9.3
8.8
8.8
7.3
7.7
8.6
9
8.8
9.3
9.6
8.18
8.9
8
19.15
4.6
3763
360
488
369
433
489
21 496
22 578
20 553
19 2471
40 4462
39 1223
31 368
46 390
25 394
210 413
25 574
20 486
575
576
484
525
525
391
388
367
419
243
404
487
311
430
380
551
351
572
414
442
7
11
41
19
18
14
11
6
15
2
3
188
214
12
1
7
11
3
1
Average 21.73 7.61 200.67 953.13 19.11 8.10 31.97 714.34
Maximum 32 9.3 2184 11508 29.9 9.6 214 4462
Minimum 13.9 4.8 1 218 11 4 1 243

Upstream/Downstream Monitoring
Outfall 002
Upper Tributary Buttermilk Creek
Upstream IDownstream
Date Temperature Temperature
(C) (C)
Upstream/Downstream Monitoring
Outfall 003
Upper Tributary Stoney Creek
Upstream 'Downstream
Temperature Temperature
(C) (C)
Jan-98 NO FLOW 17.2 7.4
Feb-98 NO FLOW 13.3 5.6
Mar-98 NO FLOW 12.2 8
Apr-98 NO FLOW 15.6 9.9
May-98 NO FLOW 13.9 14.7
Jun-98 NO FLOW 21.1 17.9
JuI-98 NO FLOW 26.1 19.7
Aug-98 NO FLOW 23.3 18.3
Sep-98 NO FLOW 25 20.6
Oct-98 NO FLOW 23.3 15.6
Nov-98 NO FLOW 15 11.9
Dec-98 NO FLOW 16.7 10.3
Jan-99 NO FLOW 7.2 10.3
Feb-99 NO FLOW 13.3 5.3
Mar-99 NO FLOW 13.9 7.4
Apr-99 NO FLOW 20 13.9
May-99 NO FLOW 20.6 17.9
Jun-99 NO FLOW 26.1 21.5
JuI-99 NO FLOW 28.9 23.3
Aug-99 NO FLOW 28.9 22.5
Sep-99 NO FLOW 25 21.3
Oct-99 NO FLOW 21.7 17
Nov-99 NO FLOW 22.2 15.2
Dec-99 NO FLOW 11.1 12.8
Jan-00 NO FLOW 18.3 9.4
Feb-00 NO FLOW 7.2 4
Mar-00 NO FLOW 16.7 8.8
Apr-00 NO FLOW 19.4 16.5
May-00 NO FLOW 24.4 19.9
Jun-00 NO FLOW 28.9 22.3
JuI-00 NO FLOW 27.8 22.8
Aug-00 NO FLOW 26.7 21.5
Sep-00 NO FLOW 26.1 20.4
Oct-00 NO FLOW 16.7 14.1
Nov-00 NO FLOW 20 10.3
Dec-00 NO FLOW 10 6.7
Jan-01 NO FLOW 5.6 3.1
Feb-01 NO FLOW 12.2 6
10.6
NO DISCHARGE
NO DISCHARGE
9.4
13.9
20.6
20
20
22.2
21.1
12.2
9.4
9.4
1.7
6.1
14.4
15.6
20
24.4
23.3
22.8
18.9
17.8
15.6
12.2
1.1
10.6
14.4
16.1
23.3
26.1
25.6
22.8
9.4
13.3
1.1
0.6
2.8

In -Stream DO Assessment Instructions -
Shaded areas require user inputs. If salinity and/or elevation are
determined then leave blank, this will not affect the final outcome.
drag the DO saturation cells, percent saturation cells, and impact
down 10 the appropriate line.
Note: that if salinity or elevation values are not enter then the DO
represent the temperature corrected values only.
unknown and cannot be
After entering data
assessment cells
saturation values only
In -stream DO Assessment
for NPDES Permit No. NC0086901-
1713G'-1
Number of upstream D0 violations
5
Number of Downstream DO violations
1
Number of Downstream DO violations
where upstream was above standard
0
Upstream Sampling Point Elevation
1 Stream D0 Standard 1 6 'Note
since this is swamp water the DO standard is not applicable. however the facility
has an effluent DO limit of 6.0 mg/L.
Upstream
above
standard
Upstream Downstream downstream
Standard Standard below
Violatalion Violatation Standard
Downstream Sampling Point Elevation
6.0 mg/L if trout water, otherswise 5.0mg/L
Impact
Assessment
U/D
Percent
Saturation
Idimensanlessl
Temperature
'C
Temperature
K
Field
Measured
DO
mg/L
Field
Measured
Salinity
g/L
Upstream
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
Percent
Saturation
%
Temperature
°C
Temperature
K
Field
Measured
DO
mg/L
Downstream
Field
Measured
Salinity
g/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
DO Saturation
mg/L
Percent
Saturation
%
14.7
15.3
16.7
17
24.4
27.8
28.6
27.9
27.3
22.2
17.9
17.7
13.9
16.5
18
21.1
25.7
28.7
28.9
29.8
26.7
23.1
21.1
22.6
15.8
15.3
18.2
18.8
24.3
32
24.7
27.2
24.7
22.5
17.9
17.6
15.2
17
287,85
7.1
6.6
5.4
6.6
4.9
4.8
5.7
5.9
6.6
7.7
8.3
7.9
8.6
8.2
8.6
7 8
7.3
7.3
7.1
7
7.4
6.2
8.1
8.1
7.4
8.8
9.3
8.6
8.1
8.4
9.1
8.4
8
8.3
9
8.4
9.2
9.1
10.15
10.15
10.15
69.95
12.4
12.2
13.6
15.3
21
24.5
26.1
25.7
25.6
20
16.6
15.7
11
12.8
15.2
19.9
23.6
26.4
27.2
27.4
24.9
19.5
17.9
16.7
11.3
11.7
15
18.7
22.3
29.9
24.8
- 26.1
22.7
19.1
14.6
- 14.1
_ 11
13.5
285.55
6.5
7.1
4
7.2
7.4
7.6
6.4
6.3
6.9
8.3
8.9
8.6
9.3
9.3
9.1
7.5
8.1
8.1
8.5
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.9
8.8
8.5
9.3
9
8.7
9.3
8.8
8.8
7.3
7.7
8.6
9
8.8
9.3
9.6
10.68
10.68
10.68
60.88
1.15
0
0
0
288.45
10.02
10.02
10.02
65.88
285.35
10.73
10.73
10.72
66.20
1.00
0
0
0
_ 289.85
9.73
9.73
9.73
55.52
286.75
10.40
10.40
10.39
38.49
1.44
1
1
0
290.15
9.66
9.66
9.66
68.29
288.45
10.02
10.02
10.02
71.89
0.95
0
0
0
297.55
8.36
8.36
8.36
58.64
294.15
8.92
8.92
8.91
83.04
0.71
1
0
0
300.95
7.86
7.86
7.86
61.10
297.65
8.34
8.34
8.34
91.16
0.67
1
0
0
301.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
73.59
299.25
8.10
8.10
8.10
79.05
0.93
1
0
_ 0
301.05
7.84
7.84
7.84
75.24
298.85
8.16
8.16
8.16
77.25
0.97
1
0
0
300.45
7.93
7.93
7.93
83.27
298.75
8.17
8.17
8.17
84.45
0.99
0
0
0
295.35
8.71
8.71
8.71
88.40
293.15
9.09
9.09
9.09
91.32
0.97
0
0
0
291.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
87.49
289.75
9.75
9.75
9.74
91.35
0.96
0
0
0
290.85
9.53
9.53
9.53
82.93
288.85
9.93
9.93
9.93
86.61
0.96
0
0
0
287.05
10.33
10.33
10.33
83.26
284.15
11.03
11.03
11.02
84.37
0.99
0
0
0
289.65
9.77
9.77
9.77
83.96
285.95
10.58
10.58
10.58
87.90
0.96
0
0
0
291.15
9.47
9.47
9.47
90.84
288.35
10.04
10.04
10.04
90.67
1.00
0
0
0
294.25
8.90
8.90
8.90
87.66
293.05
9.11
9.11
9.11
82.35
1.06
0
0
0
299.85
8.01
8.01
8.01
91.12
296.75
8.48
8.48
8.48
95.53
0.95
0
0
0
301.85
7.73
7.73
7.73
94.42
299.55
8.06
8.06
8.05
100.59
0.94
0
0
0
302.05
7.70
7.70
7.70
92.15
300.35
7.94
7.94
7.94
107.09
0.86
0
0
0
302.95
7.58
7.58
7.58
92.29
300.55
7.91
7.91
7.91
99.89
0.92
0
0
0
299.85
8.01
8.01
8.01
92.37
298.05
8.28
8.28
8.28
93.04
0.99
0
0
0
296.25
8.56
8.56
8.56
72.41
_
292.65
9.18
9.18
9.18
82.79
0.87
0
0
0
294.25
8.90
8.90
8.90
91.04
291.05
9.49
9.49
9.48
83.31
1.09
0
0
0
295.75
8.64
8.64
8.64
93.71
289.85
9.73
9.73
9.72
90.51
1.04
0
0
0
288.95
9.91
9.91
9.91
74.65
284.45
10.95
10.95
10.95
77.65
0.96
0
0
0
288.45
10.02
10.02
10.02
87.83
284.85
10.85
10.85
10.85
85.74
1.02
0
0
0
291.35
9.43
9.43
9.43
98.64
288.15
10.08
10.08
10.08
89.28
1.10
0
0
0
291.95
9.31
9.31
9.31
92.34
291.85
9.33
9.33
9.33
93.25
0.99
0
0
0
297.45
8.37
8.37
8.37
96.76
295.45
8.69
8.69
8.69
107.01
0.90
0
0
0
305.15
7.30
7.30
7.30
114.99
303.05 _
7.57
7.57
7.57
116.26
0.99
0
0
0
297.85
8.31
8.31
8.31
109.52
297.95
8.29
8.29
8.29
106.14
1.03
0
0
0
300.35
7.94
7.94
7.94
105.79
299.25
8.10
8.10
8.10
90.17
1.17
0
0
0
297.85
8.31
8.31
8.31
96.28
295.85
8.63
8.63
8.62
89.28
1.08
0
0
0
295.65
8.66
8.66
8.66
95.84
292.25
9.26
9.26
9.25
92.93
1.03
0
0
0
291.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
94.87
_
287.75
10.17
10.17
10.17
88.51
1.07
0
0
0
290.75
9.55
9.55
9.55
88.00
287.25
10.28
10.28
10.28
85.61
1.03
0
0
0
288.35
10.04
10.04
10.04
91.63
284.15
11.03
11.03
11.02
84.37
1.09
0
0
0
290.15
9.66
9.66
9.66
94.16
286.65
10.42
10.42
10.42
92.16
1.02
0
0
0
MJM
1
4/4/01

Ratio Percent DO Saturation Upstream DO/ Percent DO Saturation
MJM
Downstream
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
u N 6Zb N. "Rai cE5 hj W ►�
1101:026362 Coco 13S-4
Ratio of Percent DO Saturation Upstream to Percent DO Saturation Downstream of Permitted
Outfall(s)
4/4/01

04/04/2001 14:44 3367714630
DIV OF WATER QUALITY PAGE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
TO:
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: CN\Oa\c\
FROM:
Mike Mickey _ ([e-mail])
DATE:
Number of pages (including cover page):
COMMENTS: � 4 % , 1. LA) CR,Z cj \\\ Ukk

04/04/2001 14:44 3367714630
DEC i5 11:4SAM B I ANNEX
DIV OF WATER QUALITY PAGE 02
P.1
Burlington House Fabrics Group
December 15, 1997
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Wavghtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
ATTN: Mr. Ron Linville
Subject: Burlington Industries Williamsqurg Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0001384
Engineering Alternatives Analyses
A division of aur!naton Indvatrtss
aH Amex
P.4. lox «1
6vrllnglon, N.C. 27216.0691
Dear Mr. Unville;
As required by the NPDES permit issued to the subject facility. Burlington industries submitted o
revised Engineering Alternatives Analyses for the Williamsburg wastewater treatment plant. This
report was prepared by Wojek Engineering Associates. On December 12, 1997 you had a
telephone conversation with Donald Wojek regarding the conclusions of the report This letter
has been prepared to document Burlington Indusfrlos proposed action plan.
We propose continued discharge of effluent from outfall 001 without institution of an
alternative discharge method or additional wastewater treatment. Cost estimates presen t :: c ;n
the alternatives analyses demonstrate that the technically feasible methods of alternative
discharge are not economically feasible. Data presented in the alternatives analyses and
available on Discharge Monitoring Reports demonstrates that the existing discharge meets
wurrent and proposed effluent limitations. We do not believe that additiot wastewater
treatment and/or attentive disposal of existing wastewater is needed or technically justified.
We propose additional treatment should only be required, if following imposition of new
effluent limitations monitoring demonstrates that the existing treatment facilities cannot meet
those limitations.
The attached table is abstracted from the alternatives analyses_ This table presents alternative
disposal methods and associated costs. As you requested, we have added an alternative that
consists of upgrading the existing plant and discharge to the Haw River. We have COO shown
the present value of operating the existing facility with a monitoring schedule of five days per
week.

•
,04/04/2001 14: 44 3367714630
DEC 15 '97 112 46AM E I ANNF .1
DIV OF WATER QUALITY
COST OF ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL. OR UPGRADE
(listed in order of increasing present value)
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES WILLIAMSBURG PLANT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0001384
PAGE 03
P. 3
ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL COST ANNUAL 0 & M PRESENT.VALIJE
1. Continua Existing WWTP Operation $0 $44,314 $452,616
2. Upgrade Eidst ng WWTP $216,710 $53,053 $758.585
3. Discharge to Non -Zero Flow Stream $782,080 $30,993 $1.098,637
(Haw River) '
4. Upgrade pcisting WWTP and $998,790 $94.046 $1.857.222
Discharge to Non -Zero Flow Stream
(Haw River)
5. Spray lnigation $1,142,740 $94,534 $2,108,295
6. Drip Irrigation $1.185,350 $110,676 $2.315,776
7. I.PP System S1,876,581 $55,913 $2.4447,667
8. Discharge to POTW Not Technically Feasible
9. Discharge to Privately Owned Not Feasible
Treatment Works

04/04/2001 14:44 3367714630
DEC 15 '97 11:46RN E 1 ANNEX
DIV OF WATER QUALITY
PAGE 04
Please call me at [phone] with any additional questions or comments.
Sincerely.
Miriam S. Whlfo. P.E.
Division Environmental tend
Safety Engineer
cc:
Russell Johnsen
Joe HatopOulos
Oscar Everittc
Jim Wright
David Goodrich, NPDES Unit Supervisor, Division of Water Quolity
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
P.2

J U L 1 7 2000
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Burlington Industries, Inc.
July 13, 2000
Mr. David Goodrich
NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Executive Offices
P.O. Box 21207
Greensboro, NC 27420
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Subject: NPDES Renewal Application
Burlington Industries, Williamsburg Plant - NPDES No. NC0001384
Dear Mr. Goodrich,
Attached you should find a completed renewal application(3 copies) for the NPDES No.
NC0001384 permit at the Burlington Industries, Williamsburg Plant. Based on the attached
Permit Fee Schedule there is no fee for the permit renewal.
The treatment facility at the Williamsburg Plant treats domestic sanitary waste only. The
Waste Activated Sludge from the on -site wastewater treatment plant is aerobically stabilized in
a sludge holding basin. The sludge is then applied to agricultural land located on -site in
accordance with Land Application of Sludge Permit No. WQ0005045 issued 9/27/96.
Per my conversation with Charles Weaver of your office on 7/6/00, and the attached Notice of
Intent, it is Burlington's understanding that the Division of Water Quality plans to extend the
current NPDES permit expiration date by 4 months to 5/31/01.
If you have any questions or additional information, please call me at [phone].
Sinceely,
/(2'(Zip
1 '—
Tix�Holland
Burlington Industries
cc: Jeff Overman - Williamsburg
David Gibson - Williamsburg
Jim Wright - Greensboro (Cover Only)

in
■
■
•
NCDENR-DWQ
Fax:[phone] Jul 10 '00 6:51 P.01/01
Notice of Intent
To Extend the Duration of NPDES Discharge Permits in the Cape Fear River basin
SUBJECT: The Division of Water Quality plans to extend the duration of existent NPDES
Permits for the following facilities:
Permit
Facility
County 8ubbasin
NC0001.384 Burlington Industries -- Williamsburg
PURPOSE: The facilities listed above discharge into the Cape Fear River basin. The revised
expiration -date schedule for Cape Fear River basin permits requires that the
existing permits be extended. The facilities listed above have permit expiration
dates in 2001 that will occur prior to the earliest allowable date for issuance of
permit renewals in subbasin 30602. These permits will have their expiration dates
extended by 4 months. No conditions in the existing permits will be changed or
modified, This is an administrative change only, to better align permitting and
Basinwide Planning operations within the Division of Water Quality. Therefore, on
the basis of preliminary staff review of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes
of North Carolina (and other lawful standards and regulations), the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission proposes to extend the duration of the
NPDES permits listed above, subject to specific pollutant limitations and special
conditions.
INFORMATION: A copy of the existing NPDES permits and a map showing the location of each
discharge is available by writing or calling:
Ms.' Natalie Sierra
NC DENR — DWQ - NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], extension 551
The existing permits are on file at the Division of Water Quality, Archdale Building, 512 North
Salisbury Street (Room 925), Raleigh North Carolina. They may be inspected during
ofnormal
the
office hours. Copies of the information on file are available upon request and payment
costs of copying.
7/6/ad
LE Q PA4,o5
gFNr-w14z
Pagc 1 of 1
CZi c,�3/4rFr Qv,JLrr:/ SFerr"onl
A,it`Jes GJeauer-
T�
1 Er7Ear=
Caswell 30602
_Liso 7 I L. %n 174:: A L+ to•
t1.4 ff
rn401(

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 18, 2000
Mr. Phillip H. Klein
Burlington Industries
P.O. Box 21207
Greensboro, NC 27420
A7A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit NC0001384
Williamsburg Plant
Caswell County
Dear Mr. Klein:
The Division is beginning the cycle of permit renewals for the Cape Fear river basin. An examination of the Cape
Fear basin plan and the NPDES permit schedule has revealed that the existing expiration dates in Cape Fear NPDES
permits do not coincide with the revised permit expiration dates for the basin. This discrepancy could create unnecessary
delays in the processing of over 200 permit renewals. Accordingly, the Division is changing the permit expiration dates for
NPDES permits in the Cape Fear river basin.
This permit modification changes the expiration date of the subject permit in subbasin 30602 to May 31, 2001. Please
find enclosed the revised permit cover page. Insert the new cover page into your permit and discard the old page. All
other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification
is issued under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
In accordance with the modification of the permit expiration date, the new due date for your renewal application is
December 2, 2000. Renewal application forms will be sent to you approximately 6-8 weeks in advance of the new due
date or you may download the forms from the NPDES web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents.html.
You will need to download Short Form C. If you have already submitted a permit renewal form, there is no need to
submit any other forms to the Division; the application will be processed during the renewal period for your subbasin.
If any part of this permit modification are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions concerning this permit modification, please contact Natalie Sierra at [phone],
extension 551.
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
NPDES Unit
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Permit NC0001384
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Burlington Industries
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Williamsburg plant
NC Highway 87 8v NCSR 1100
Matkins
Caswell County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Buttermilk Creek in the
Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2000.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2001.
Signed this day August 18, 2000.
Kerr T. Stevens, 1 irector
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission