NC0024571_Wasteload Allocation_19920318

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNINO COVER SHEET
NC0024571
Lumberton WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
(Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Complaint Investigation
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 18, 1992
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the relirerse'side

/ vES(eo
PERMIT NO.: NC0024571
PERMITTEE NAME: City of Lumberton
FACILITY NAME: City of Lumberton WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: 10 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 60 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 40 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: Lumber River
Class: C-Swamp
Sub -Basin: 03-07-51
Reference USGS Quad: I 23 SW (please attach)
County: Robeson
Regional Office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
No change
PLOTTED
Requested by: CharleslM. Lowe Date:
Prepared by: (��,t,�t,.� JLPjKp,Piw -yam. Date: 7 a --
Reviewed by: '2! % C. SI.Cx),W,k._ Date: '3%17ICic?
rD� P7r1.5L5) 15(.1.1)
W ck t L- —i�-- _
3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Sri
v-4z.1Ia1
( o$4
v
Drainage Area (mi ) 1(3 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): SE
7Q10 (cfs) la-6 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 1 a 30Q2 (cfs)
Acutethronic)
Toxicity Limits: IWC )) %
Instream Monitoring: /J
Parameters at igiYL G1 Tjl'k-Pi rad Cv 4 ►„,
Upstream Location ( ►0, w6'- 4 k¢
Downstream V Location y7 02--
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
03
3 6
NH -N (mg/1)
3
1Y
D.O. (mdi)
5
5
TSS (m L 1)
.3o
6
F.Col. (/l0Uml)
cD06
0.00
pH (SU)
6 -c)
(-q
(1 L V'i K.Q 41)
VY1Miuk iz, ✓
Y iveri641✓
ti, '(No ► -{v v. --C-0
v 1 ('aJ vNA;k. 0 Wm)
Nv.o vw, 0 van ,
Pp--,,
/`1i(W, LeoLL,
Comments:
fee u-c& v & t ri A
yet vu��
M Qo i 5

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
City of Lumberton
NC0024571
60% Domestic / 40% Industrial
Existing
Renewal
Lumber River
C-Swamp
030751
Robeson
FRO
Charles Lowe
12/27/91
I23SW
Request # 6684
IF 9T
MAR 9 1992
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICF
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
2.1341.7900
1990
713
120
191
853
11.4
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Renewal of Existing Facility. Increased monitoring for metals required and new fecal coliform
limit.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: ((�'
CC7L1n„nT110 eat/ �kiSa.����ec.\ \��l�.�{-`%Oc l �,�Cf (''c4 'Toi Cw411cc.Y0
Recommended by: ()JAL AA4 OA(.11-epv�_- Date: 02 /--1 f CI �-
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: �Ct,. C. &ti iAAbk_ Date: lJa�I Qc
Regional Supervisor: Oaf Date: 3-/O ? ?
Pern its & Engineering: �,� O Date: 3I LI �Z
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAR 2 3 1992
Ca

2
Existing Limits:
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 10.0 10.0
BOD5 (mg/1): 23 30
NH3N (mg/1): 7 monitor
DO (mg/1): 5 5
TSS (mg/1): 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000 1000
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (4/1): monitor monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1): monitor monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor monitor
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD): 10.0 10.0
BOD5 (mg/1): 23 30 WQ
NH3N (mg/1): 7 monitor WQ
DO (mg/1): 5 5 WQ
TSS (mg/1): 30 30 EL
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 WQ
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 WQ
Residual Chlorine (4/1): monitor monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1): monitor monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor monitor
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal Coliform
New facility information
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

3
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
COD (mg/):
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Phenols (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Recommended Limits
COD (me:
Cadmium (ug/1):
Chromium (ug/1):
Copper (ug/1):
Nickel (ug/1):
Lead (ug/1):
Zinc (ug/1):
Cyanide (ug/1):
Phenols (ug/1):
Mercury (ug/1):
Silver (ug/1):
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Failing toxicity test
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
TOXICS/METALS
Chronic / Quarterly / Pass -Fail
10%
11%
Aug, Nov. Feb., May
Monthly
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monthly
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
Monitor
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
Parameter(s) Affected
Cd, Ni, Pb, Ag
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

4
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: At the Chippewa Street Bridge (SR 2202) (current loctaion)
Downstream Location: At HWY 72 (current location)
Parameters: DO, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Conductivity, and Long -Term BOD
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
See attached special recommendations and monitoring frequencies for Long -Term BOD
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No )(
If no, which parameters cannot be met? cr ;\ C" c\ o v w.
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes X No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _Y_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? Y_ (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
Toxics spreadsheet, instream data, old wasteload allocation model runs

Permit No. N'C00245 ; 1
The Lumber Wastewater Treatment Plant will collect a long-term BOD at the effluent and at both instrean: sampling sites
during 'July, August, and September. Each month's sampling day for. BOD shall be coordinated with .the Fayetteville
Regional Office beforehand.
The laboratory selected to run the long-term BOD tests shall be: made aware by the City of Lumberton of the following
guidelines:
1. No nitrogen inhibitors shall be used.
2. In addition to ultimate BOD, intermediate nitrogen series measurements should be made upon set-up and on days 5, 15,
and 23.
3. Tests shall be run as long as necessary to predict an ultimate BOD, but for at least 30 days.
s* The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective
influent values (85%removal).
** See .Part III, Condition
The pH .shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be
monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. The pH shall be monitored upstream and downstream
by grab sample as specified above(*).
There shall be no discharge of floating sol.:ids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
H3

Facility Name 0:1111d D 7' 2-orgberia Permit # NCOOc24-i6-7l Pipe # CO/
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is / / % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after_thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
Aug,,(./6t/� eb.) May . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
perniitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemicaVphysical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10_) •D cfs
Permitted Flow /() .6 MGD
IWC //.L/ %
Basin & Sub -basin Odd 7 6- /
Receiving Stream LUrvtloer-6, /eK
County -Roh<sQ N
R mmended b :
Date a9 ?--
QCL PIE Version 9/91

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
February 27, 1992
Mr. Howard Revels, ORC WWTP
P.O. Box 1388
Lumberton, North Carolina 28359
Subject: Chlorine Toxicity
NPDES Permit No. NC0024571
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Revels:
Chlorine, a widely used wastewater disinfectant for the treatment of coliform
organisms, often remains instream in residual amounts that may prove to be toxic under
critical low stream flow conditions. In the last decade, EPA assessed the potential adverse
effects of chlorine to the aquatic environment and has taken steps to reduce the impacts
through the development of federal criteria. In 1986, EPA recommended that all states
have a chlorine standard by their next triennial review of water quality standards.
In revising its water quality standards in 1989, North Carolina developed an action
level for chlorine of 17 ug/1 (freshwater classes only). In addition, the fecal coliform limit
was reduced from 1000 colonies/100 rill to 200 colonies/ 100 ml. Under a new DEM
procedure, dechlorination and chlorine limits are now recommended for all new or
expanding dischargers proposing the use of chlorine for effluent disinfection. The
Division is reviewing chlorine levels from all existing dischargers as part of their NPDES
permit renewal process.
Our records indicate that chlorine from your facility's effluent discharge is
considered toxic to the receiving stream under low flow conditions, i.e., the amount of
chlorine discharged causes a violation of the instream action level for chlorine (17 ug/1 for
chronic effects or 28 ug/1 for acute effects) under 7Q10 conditions. An acceptable level of
chlorine in your effluent is 28 ug/1 or 0.028 mg/l. Action should be taken to reduce the
4ffluent concentration of chlorine to an acceptable level. If this level is not feasible, you
should consider dechlorination or alternate methods of disinfection for your facility to
ensure that both chlorine and bacterial limits are met. In addition, if your facility plans to
undertake any phase of construction, dechlorination or alternate disinfection should be
included. However, please note that an authorization to construct must be obtained from
this Division prior to any alteration to your treatment plant.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

-2-
The Division is currently reviewing its water quality regulations pertaining to
chlorine. In the future, effluent limits and/or dechlorination may be required of existing
facility's with chlorine problems. If the chlorine levels in your facility's effluent remain
unchanged, a chlorine limit or a whole effluent toxicity testing requirement may be added
to your permit limitations.
Please feel free to call Tommy Stevens of the Division's Regional Office at (919)
486-0707 if you have any questions or comments regarding this issue.
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
SWT/cms
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Central Files
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

9/42,23 Di,
J� O‘ifi7
NPDES PRETREATMENT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM
FACILITY NAME: ay ac" Zch,q(6 NPDES NO. NC00 (j
REQUESTER: (191WS' 1��,/b� DATh : / / 2„ j / (/ REGION:
PERMIT
CONDITIONS COVERING PRETREATMENT
This facility
This facili
Please incl
✓ Thi
Ple
has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language.
should and/or is developing a pretreatment program.
• ` !`�� g conditions:
DEC 2 3 ;tlat
MANCH
facility is currently impl
e include the fdlf0v1ITIg• co
Program Development
Phase I due / /
Phase II due / /
Additional Conditions
(attached)
ting a pretreatment program.
tions: z
v Program Implementation
Additional Conditions
(attached)
IGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS` (SIUs) CONTRIBUTIONS
SIU FLOW - TOTAL:
- COMPOSITION:
i ► / e I msn
TEXTILE
METAL FINISHING:
OTHER: Wo llm 17an , pri I ma)
60w , (1 � MGD
Ike& /461 MAI : ,p79 MGD MGD
I,SyS mGD
MGD
HEADWORKS REVIEW
PARAMETER
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
CN
Phenol
Other
Cio0
coo
TSs
PASS
THROUGH
ALLOWABLE
18.45
153119
a8.'1 I
a5.53
9`I.13
I(o.y7
DAILY
DOMESTIC
jC.6
, if
- e5
.-z.3
,17
2.1
1 d1b
• 19
35,19
31431
LOAD IN LBS/DAY ACTUAL
PEI 1Trill INDUSTRIAL % REMOVAL
.D,oS11- qz
1,577 o.Syl ' 76
s,do8 11; €._ 8z
1 , V12 0.609 3Z
3 . 333 0.Lly8 81
2.31 I 1/,// 1/
367
I,Z3
y 1 85Z
/ o 06 I
t' 4
59
9L(
9f
96
RECEIVED: ►Z /13/7z- REVIEWED BY:
RETURNED : 2 / i % / 9 Z+

09:04 Wednesday, January 22, 1992
NPDES=NC0024571
Variable
Sum
PIPE
TYPE_
_FREE
MCDL
MCRL
MCUL
MNIL
MPBL
MZNL
MCNL
MHGL
MAGL
MASL
MPHENOLL
MFLL
MBODL
MCODL
MTSSL
MTOLUL
MFLOW
9.0000000
0
302.0000000
0.0511539
0.8412082
14.1855955
0.6091936
0.4484719j
11.1103322
1.2300785✓
•
367.6417606'/
44852.03
100615.26
19695.55
11.9106085

9�o/ayjo
eity of ZumSEdon
PUBLIC UTILITIES LABORATORY
POST OFFICE BOX 1388
1'tungezton, S/oatfi eatofina
28359-1388
January 24, 1992
. .
•
Dept. NRCD-DEM/Pretreatment Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Attn: Joe Pierce
Dear Mr. Pierce,
700 LAFAYETTE STREET
919-671.3858
RFE1».
JAN 2 9 1992
i lr re.} ♦ 4��1i l
In response to the information needed about flows of our
Significant Industrial Users in our Pretreatment Program, they are as
follows:
Elkay Southern Corporation
"Southeastern General Hospital
Jasper Textiles
Kayser -Roth Hosiery
Lumberton Dyeing & Finishing
Sara Lee Knit Products
Sara Lee Hosiery
,Pepsi Cola Bottling Company
78,600 gpd
41,004 gpd
407,500 gpd
104,100 gpd
560,000 gpd
393,000 gpd
80,900 gpd
116,000 gpd
If you need other assistance don't hesitate to contact me at
671-3858.
Respectfully,
4,040.3 lecuj,vaitma*0
Belinda Kay Waltman
Laboratory Supervisor
hgf

IU NAME
LUMBERTON WWTP
I U#
PIPE #
FLOW LIMIT
MAD
CD LIMIT
MG/L
CD LOAD
LBS
CR LIMIT
MG/L
CR LOAD
LBS
CU LIMIT
MG/L
CU LOAD
LBS
ELKAY SOUTHERN
1
1
_
0.0000
_
0.0000
0.0000
SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL
2 _
1
0.0000
,
0.0000
0,6250
JASPER MILLS
3
1
0.0000
0.0000
1.6500
KAYSER ROTH
4
_ 1
0.0000
,
0.0000
1.0900
LUMBERTON DYEING & FINISHING
5
1
0.0000
0,0000
0.0000
SARA LEE KNIT
7
1
0.0000
0.4170
1.6600
SARA LEE HOSIERY
8
1
0.0000
1.1600
0.5830
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
9
1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
,
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
TOTAL ALLOWED FOR INDUSTRIES
ALLOW
IND
CD #REF!
CR #REF!
CU #REF!
PERM
IND
0.00
CD 0.0000
CR 1.5770
CU 5.6080
TOTAL PERMITTED FOR INDUSTRIES
STILL. AVAILABLE FOR INDUSTRIES
AVAIL
LBS
CD #REF!
CR #REF!
CU #REF!
STILL AVAILABLE FOR INDUSTRIES
AVAIL
%
OD #REF!
CR #REF!
CU #REF!
LUMBERIUP.LOAD, 1/22/92, page 1

U#
CN LIMIT
CN LOAD
LBS
PB LIMIT
MG/L
PB LOAD
LBS
HG LIMIT
MG/L
HG LOAD
LBS
NI LIMIT
MG/L
NI LOAD
LBS
AG LIMIT
MG/L
AG LOAD
LBS
ZN LIMIT
MG/L
ZN LOAD
LBS
AS LIMIT
MG/L
1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
_
0.0000
0.0000
2
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3120
3
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.8250
0.0000
0.8250
4
0.0000
1.0900
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.5460
5
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
7
0.0000
1.6600
0.0000
0.4170
0.0000
0.4170
8
0.0000 ,
0.5830
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2910
9
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 •
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
,
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
ALLOW
IND
CN
#REF!
PB
#REF!
R3
#REF!
NI
#REF!
AG
#REF!
ZN
#REF!
AS
PERM
IND
CN
0.0000
PB
3.3330
I-G
0.0000
NI
1.2420
AG
0.0000
ZN
2.3910
AS
AVAIL
LBS
CN
#REF!
PB
#REF!
Ha
#REF!
NI
#REF!
AG
#REF!
ZN
#REF!
AS
AVAIL
CN
#REF!
. PB
#REF!
Ifi
#REF!
NI
#REF!
AG
#REF!
ZN
#REF!
AS
LUMBERIUP.LOAD, 1/22/92, page 2

AS LOAD
LBS
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
#REF!
0.0000
#REF!
#REF!
LUMBERIUP.LOAD, 1/22/92, page 3

I U#
TM LIMIT
TM LOAD
LBS
TTO LIMITTTO
MG/L
LOAD
LBS
NH3 LIMIT
MG/L
NH3 LOAD
LBS
MG/L
LBS
MG/L
LBS
MG/L
1
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
_
0.00
LBS
2
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
3
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
4
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
5
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
7
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
8
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
9
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0,0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
ALLOW
IND
TM
#REF!
TTO #REF!
NH3
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
0.00
PERM
IND ,
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
#REF!
AVAIL
LBS
#REF!
#REF!
#REFI
#REF!
#REF!
0.0000
AVAIL
% _
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
• 'is y
LUMBERIUP.LOAD, 1/22/92, page 4

MG/L
LBS
O&GLIMIT
MG/L
O&GLOAD
LBS
COD LIMIT
MG/L
COD LOAD
LBS
BOD LIMIT
MG/L.
BOD LOAD
LBS
TSS LIMIT
MG/L
TSS LOAD
LBS
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227,03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
1353.78
1227.03
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0,0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.0000
0,00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
#
#REF!
O&G
#REF!
OCO
#REF!
RCD #REF!
TSS #REF!
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
#######
#######
#
#REF!
#REF!
,
#REF!
#REFF
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
4 V .
•
. 4
LUMBERIUP.LOAD, 1/22/92, page 5

C � 0-r L u )9e1(--6 -APB (
01r,d)-7-.1001)C-.0
Lumber Fiver
------ O. &
ups
YVtJK;-k V
1 co-4 iO
a -Sofa vn p
Alpha Cd1vIo5�,
ustx-5 c. \341.'TM 'Qo
QA=-(ta-.0 &co.
pp� s53.6 c,cs
J(06= lao.c c-&
oil 'Z(oti..)= ►c t.oe
V1A1316--!bv
To eaAx 6a.vvA:pU -Q(
IP�WIp , DO, cco-( Cd kovvv`- , Cm o 1-61/9- vvu D
E fi 5fin �vwt�s
b 4 , . Al3,_ Surwntivi 5h o l� !.�e_. 1.b ryt_JA / r_c
W i2 / / / / a. 4 Li n44 -�-- rT / G '
riz� � - �
e . t ` j pa6i T/ --rei 1,r /) `l' urho w r Iv /?///
GV /'« etp (m aveivicei cebt ail hhac) /o /14)
amorvfrifi ( invent - 3 mct4 Osoo 0 j4
yuo L

-i-v15-f -rearn Odcu L mher-f-tn iicJWTF
alli ppewa_ , r(e- 3rib e A YerceS
Urts-f reaYY1
-e -W-rnp 0. U. (04; r.) Feec)
%4 l l3 g.5 (g.6) q5.3
f�i
/9 7. (73) 46.2_
K 25
�/q1 021
4-Y1 1 1 9
A 1 )6
/oil io
A 1 9
54 641) iLib
6 D (5.6) la
1.5 (5b) a. 3
L (.o (5.9) y-o5
S , 3 C7 0 J5,eit
9,0 (8.5) i`T ,_-
9 . I N.b) /D5
ill itlq 7 9,
iwea
Imp 00.6. (n 4 )
/g.4 e7.5) 67-a-
,-0 io (60) 024 i
a-� 5.3(1)
aLD 5.5NO 161
. - 60 LS 2) qaq
a L (5?) 43a
1(fi 8- (6,9) ba-
11 g- `7 C U) 4..17. K
I o S.e) Cgs) 1 -2)
/ - .s (7.4) 156
JK 6.6 (7a) ?fy
ar Co ,ct C5-c= -g -
al -7_3 C5.-)) )0q
.-) (J.-) (Go. I) .23g
.21 (,.6 (5.5) q .
a5 (6.5 (4.5) [47

WHOLE htr. ,T TOXICITY TESTING 0[SELF-MONITORING SUMMARY) Thu, Feb 13, 1992 a.
FACILITY
REOUIRFMF.NT
YEAR JAN FEB
O- ,V>0.3% —
FAIL PASS
PASS —
LOVE OIL COMP.
NPDES8: NC0070491
County: ROCKINGHAM Rcgion: WSRO
PF:.0173
7010: 0.0 IWC(%):100
PERMIT CHRONIC LIMIT:99% (GRAB)
Begin: 8/15/91 Frequency. Q P/F G
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
SOCOOC Rcq:
'88
'89
'90
'91
'92
LOWELL WW1?
LETTER ACUTE TARGET:74%
'88
NPDES8: NC0025861
Begin: 10/1/89 Frequency. Q
'89
County, GASTON Region: MRO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
'90
PP:0.60
SOC/JOC Reg:
'91
7010: 124.0 1WC(%):0.74
'92
LUMBERTON WWTP
PERMIT °IRONIC LIMIT:11 %
Y '88
NPDESM: NC0024571
Begin:7/1/87 Frequency: Q P/F
'89
County. ROBESON Region: FRO
Months: AUG NOV FEB MAY
'90
PF: 10.00
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'91
7010: 129.0 1wq%):10.70
'92
MACrI PSFIFLD WWTP
LETTER CHRONICTARGET:995S
'88
NPDESE NC0050661
Begin:5/31/91 Frequency. Q P/F a
'89
County: EDGB.COMBE Region: RRO
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
'90
PF:0.175
SOC/JOC Roq:
'91
7Q10: 0.0 IWq%):100.0
'92
MAOOIB VALLEY WWTP
PERMIT °IRONIC LIMIT: 6% (AT 1.0 MGD)
'88
NPDESM: NrruM61
Bogk: 8/1/89 linyiiericy: Q P/P A
'89
County: HAYWOOD Region: ARO
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
'90
PF:1.0
SOC/JOC Roq:
'91
7Q1o:23.0 IWC(%):63
'92
MAIDEN WWI?
PERMIT CHRONIC LLMIT:11 %
'88
NPDFRSM: NO3039594
Bogin:12/1/87 Frequency. Q P/F
'89
County: CATAWBA Region: MR0
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
'90
PF: 1.00
SOC,00C Roq:
'91
701(112.00 IWQ%):11.44
'92
MALLARD FOOD SHOP 812
PERMIT CHRONIC L1M1T:99%(GRAB)
'88
NPDES8: NC0079979
Begin: 8/26/91 Frequency. Q P/F G
'89
County: LENOIR Region: WARO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
90
PF: -
SOC/JOC Reg:
'91
7Q10:0.0 IWq%):100
'92
MAN7?.O WWTP
PERMIT ACUTE LIMIT:NO ACUTE (FT1ID) 24 HR AT 90%.
'88
NPDES8: NCC079057
Begin:4/16/91 Frequency: Q P/F G
'89
County: DARE Region WARO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
'90
PF: 1.0
SOC/JOC Roq:
'91
7Q10:OTIDAL 1Wq%):1o0
'92
MARATHON PETROLEUM
PERMIT:48 HR ACUTE MONTf EPIS
'88
NPDES8: NC0046213
Begin:9/15/89 Frequency. 5 OWD
'89
County: MECK ENBURG Region: MRO
Months:
'90
PF: VARIES
SOC/10C Rcq:
'91
7010: 0.0 IWq%):100%
'92
MAR10N-Q.INCHPTE D WWI?
FETTER CHRONIC TARGET:61%
Y '88
NPDESI: NC0027413
Begin:4/1/88 Frequency: Q P/F G
'89
County: MCDOWEIL Rogton: ARO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
'90
PP: 0.30
SOC/JOC Reg:
'91
7Q10:0.30 IWC(%): 60.79
SOC:8/20/91-5/I/94 CHR Q P/F LEdff 61%
'92
MAR APR MAY 11JN JUT. AUG SFP OCT NOV DEC
— — ChV>.3 — — — — — — -
- NONE — — PAIL — — PASS
— PASS — — FAIL bt PASS PASS — -
- PASS — — LATE PASS — bt NR NR
— — — — — — — — NR FALL FAIL
NR 28 >90 >90 >90 — — NONE — — NONE -
- NONE• — — 12• 37 NONE <5 <5 — NONE
(FAIL) — bt (PASS) — — (•—) LATE FAIL — PASS -
- PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — FAIL PASS
— PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — PASS -
- PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — PASS
FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL
PASS
PASS
PASS LATE PAIL
PASS
— — (PASS) — — (—) — NR (—) PASS
PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — PASS
FAIL — — PASS — — PASS — — PASS —
PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — FAIL PASS
PASS
N
N
PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS NR — PASS NR —
PASS PASS — — PASS — — PASS — — PASS -
- PASS — — FAIL FAIL PAIL PASS — — FAIL ht
PAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PA11. FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIT.
FAILS IG
0 2 consecutive failures = significant noncompliance Y Prc1988 data available
LEGEND:
PP=Permitted flow (MGD), 7Q10=Receiving stream low flow criterion (e6), IW C%=)nsneam waste concentration, Begin=Fint month required, Frequency<Monitoring frequency): IQ -Quarterly, M-Monthly, BM -Bimonthly; SA•Semiarmually; A -Annually;
OWD-Only whoa mash.-ging; D-Discontinued monitoring requirement; LS-Conducting indcpondcnt study), P/F=Pass/Fail chronic bioassay, Ac=Acute, Chr=°aonic, Agturterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure,
(Data Notation): (f=Fatbcad Minnow, •--Ccriodaphnia tap., my=Mysid shrimp. CbV=Crironic value. P=Morality of stated percentage at highest concentration, at=Performed by DEM Aq Tox Group, bt=Bad teat),
(Reporting Notation): [—,data not required, NR=Not reported, ( )=ISegimng of Quarter), (Facility Activity Status): (l=lnactivc, N=Newly lssucd(i o construct), H=Active but not discharging)
32

.. . 4 s ► 'a
0t/20/92 ver 3.1 TOXICS REVIEW
' Facility: City of Lumberton
NPDES Permit No.: NC0024571
w
Status (E, P, or M) : E
Permitted Flow: 10.0 mgd
Actual Average Flow: 5.5 mgd
Subbasin: '030751
Receiving Stream: Lumber River I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ----
Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTED'
7Q10: 120.0 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY
IWC: 11.44 % 1 Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic
Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria
Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations
(ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam)
Cadmium S 2.0 1 92% 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.0 0.060 1 I
Chromium S 50.0 1 76% 0.1 0.1 0.22 1.6 1.717 1 22.0 1 I
Copper AL 7.0 1 82% 0.9 14.9 15.75 5.6 6.458 1 290.0 1 N
Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.2 0.6 0.84 1.2 1.472 1 1 P
Lead S 25.0 1 81% 0.2 0.4 0.62 3.3 3.503 1 I U
Zinc AL 50.0 1 77% 3.0 11.1 14.09 2.4 5.371 1 120.0 1 T
Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 1.2 1 1
Mercury S 0.012 1 0f 1 1 S
Silver AL 0.06 1 94% 0.1 1.2 1.37 1 1 E
Selenium S 5.00 1 0% 1 1 C
Arsenic S 50.00 1 0% 1 I T
Phenols S NA 1 89% 367.0 367.00 1 1 I
NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 O
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N
Pollutant
ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S--
Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd
Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ?
(#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO)
Cadmium S 1 17.33 17.484 0.192 0.104 0.00 Monitor 1 1 A
Chromium S 1 144.39 437.097 1.165 8.923 2.52 Monitor Monitor 1 NCAC NO I N
...9.220.2L... AL 1 26.95 61.194 61.389 25.171 33.17 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES I A
Nickel S 1 89.69 769.290 12.354 21.675 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 L
Lead S 1 91.20 218.548 2.543 14.412 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 Y
Zinc _ AL 1 150.67 437.097 70.174 26.750 13.73 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Monthly NO I S
Cyanide S 1 8.45 43.710 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 I
Mercury S 1 0.01 0.105 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 S
Silver AL 1 0.69 0.525 1.780 0.000 0.00 Monitor 1 I
Selenium S 1 3.47 43.710 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R
Arsenic S 1 34.65 437.097 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 E
Phenols S 1 0.000 874.165 0.000 0.00 Limit 1 1 S
NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U
T.R.Chlor.AL 1 148.613 0.00 1 1 L
T
S
rnbiti./7)y -a v : 06a/1,i/ion/I, Cho vx t v a
'CDPI244,
(,tad crew 5-t L0Pil