HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0043532_Permit (Issuance)_20001113NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0043532
West Stanly / Oakboro WWTP
Document Type: '.,
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
November 13, 2000
This document is pririted on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resrerse side
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E., Director
November 13, 2000
The Honorable Joyce Little, Mayor
Town of Oakboro
P.O. Box 610
Oakboro, North Carolina 28129
Dear Mayor Little:
QTA
DENR
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0043532
Town of Oakboro WWTP
Stanly County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended.) The
following modifications have been made to the permit:
• A limit of 33.8 µg/I for lead has been included at both the Long Creek and Rocky River
discharge points. The limit is added based on the reasonable potential for levels of lead from
your discharge to approach the stream standard for this parameter. The Division urges you to
identify and reduce sources of lead in your system.
• Effluent monitoring for chromium, nickel, mercury, arsenic, and cyanide has been removed
from the permit.
• Twice per month monitoring for copper, silver and zinc will be required at the Long Creek
discharge point.
• Effluent monitoring for zinc will be removed upon relocation to the Rocky River discharge
point.
• Twice per month monitoring for copper and silver will be required at the Rocky River
discharge point. ,47
• There were two typographical errors in the draft permit on A.(2). Effluent Limitations and
Monitoring Requirements that have been corrected.
1) An NH3 limit (April 1— October 31) of 30 mg/I has been removed.
2) The daily maximum lead limit of 33 ug/1 has been corrected to 33.8 ug/l.
It has been confirmed that upon relocation to the Rocky River, the facility will use outfall 001,
Long Creek, as a gravity discharge only in cases of emergency when failure of the pump station
or force main would prevent discharge to outfall 002, the Rocky River. A lockable valve box
with manually turned weir plates will be installed at the 001 discharge pipe after relocation.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-0719
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in
case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits may be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Jacquelyn Nowell at telephone
number (919) 733-5083, extension 512.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Permit No. NC0043532
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
The Town of Oakboro
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Oakboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Off of NCSR 1953
East of Oakboro
Stanly County
to receiving waters designated as Long Creek (outfall 001) and the Rocky River (outfall 002) in
the Yadkin — Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective December 1, 2000
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 29, 2004
Signed this day November 13, 2000
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. NC0043532
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
The Town of Oakboro
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a 0.50 MGD wastewater treatment plant consisting of a manual bar screen, an aerated
grit chamber, influent pump station, instrumented flow measurement, aeration basin with mechanical
aerators, dual secondary clarifiers, chlorine contact basin, dual aerated sludge digesters, aerated sludge
holding basin, dual sludge drying beds, and a standby electric generator located at the Town of Oakboro
WWTP, off of NCSR 1953, east of Oakboro, Stanly County, and
2. Construct facilities for relocation of the outfall to the Rocky River (002), and
3. After receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Water Quality, construct facilities for
expansion of the wastewater treatment plant to 0.9 MGD, the
• addition of an influent pump, aerated grit removal system, and step screen system,
• expansion of the aeration basins with installation of one mixer for each basin,
• installation of a clarifier splitter box with adjustable weirs,
• installation of a 205,620 gallon clarifier,
• expansion of the existing chlorine contact chamber with addition of a dechlorination
unit,
• a 389,000 gallon aerobic sludge digester with two floating aerators, one floating
mixer, a floating decant mechanism, and additional pumps,
• installation of one emergency generator,
• additional piping, valves, control equipment and appurtenances.
with discharge to the Rocky River (Outfall 002), and
4. To continue to discharge from said treatment works at the locations specified on the attached map into
Long Creek (001), and upon relocation to discharge to the Rocky River (002). Both locations are
classified C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Town of Oakboro WWTP
State Grid1USGS Quad:
Latitude: (001) 35° 14' 08" N
Langibude (001) 80° 16' 00" W
Permitted Flow: 0.5 MGD, 0.9 MGD
Receiving Stream Long Creek & Rocky River
Stream Claw both C
G17NE/ Oakboro
Latitude (002) 35° 12' 41" N
Latitude (002) 80° 15' 16" W
Drainage Bassin: Yadkin --Pee Dee
Sub -Basin: 03-07-13
Facility
Location
not to scale
610,1k
NPDFS Permit No. NC0043532
Star11y County
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0043532
During the period beginning ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PERMIT AND LASTING UNTIL RELOCATION TO THE ROCKY RIVER, EXPANSION OR
UNTIL EXPIRATION, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 001 (Long Creek). After relocation to the Rocky River. this outfall may
be used as an emergency backup outfall. in case of pump station failure. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location1
Flow
0.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
. 3/week
Composite
E,
NH3 as N (April 1 - October 31)
4.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E
NH3 as N (November 1 - March 31)
14.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
•
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
pH4
3/week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
Total Residual Chlorine
3/week
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature °C
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Conductivity
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
E
Lead
_
33.8 pg/I
2/Month ' '•
Composite
E
Copper
0
2/Month
Composite
E
Silver
2/Month
Composite
E
Zinc
2/Month
Composite
E
Notes:
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream at least 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream below the discharge point at NCSR 1917.
+ Instream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/I.
4 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
5 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 19%; January, April, July, and October; See Special Condition A (5) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0043532
During the period beginning UPON RELOCATION TO THE ROCKY RIVER AND LASTING UNTIL EXPANSION OR EXPIRATION, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from outfall serial number 002 (Rocky River). Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location1
Flow
0.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
NH3 as N (April 1 - October 31)
3/week
Composite
E
NH3 as N (November 1 - March 31)
-
3/week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
pH4
3/week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
Total Residual Chlorine
3/week
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2+ NO3+TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature °C
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Conductivity
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Chronic Toxicity5
.
Quarterly
Composite
E
Lead
33.8 pg/I
Weekly
Composite
E
Copper
2/Month
Composite
E
Silver
2/Month
Composite
E
Notes:
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream at least 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream 1.7 miles below the discharge point (at
the end of or close to NCSR 1659).
+ lnstream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/I.
4 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
5 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 2.6%; January, April, July, and October; See Special Condition A (6) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (3) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0043532 .
During the period beginning UPON EXPANSION AND LASTING UNTIL RELOCATION TO THE ROCKY RIVER OR EXPIRATION, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from outfall serial number 001 (Long Creek). After relocation to the Rocky River. this outfall may be used as an emergency backup outfall, in case
of pump station failure. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location1
Flow
0.9 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2 (April 1 - October 31)
9.0 mg/I
13.5 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2 (November 1 - March 31)
18.0 mg/I
27.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
NH3 as N (April 1 - October 31)
2.8 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E
NH3 as N (November 1 - March 31)
6.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
pH4
3/week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
Total Residual Chlorine
28 pg/I
3/week
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature °C
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Conductivity
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
E
Lead
33.8 pg/l
2/Month
Composite
E
Copper
2/Month
Composite
E
Silver
2/Month
Composite
E
Zinc
2/Month
Composite
E
Notes: •
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream at least 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream 1.7 miles below the discharge point (at
the end of or close to NCSR 1659).
+ Instream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year. .
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/I.
4 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
5 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 30%; January, April, July, and October; See Special Conditions A (7) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. .
A.(4) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0043532
During the period beginning UPON EXPANSION AND RELOCATION TO THE ROCKY RIVER AND LASTING UNTIL EXPIRATION, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from outfall serial number 002 (Rocky River). Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
Flow
0.9 MGD
Continuous
Recordin '
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2 (April 1 - October 31)
9.0 mg/I
13.5 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2 (November 1 - March 31)
18.0 mg/I
27.0 mg/l
3/week
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E, I
NH3 as N (April 1 - October 31)
3.0 mg/l
3/week
Composite
E
NH3 as N (November 1 - March 31)
6.0 mg/I
3/week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
pH4
•
3/week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
3/week
Grab
E, U, D+
Total Residual Chlorine
28 erg/I
3/week
Grab
E .
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature °C
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Conductivity
3/week
Grab
U, D+
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
E
Lead
33.8 pg/I
Weekly
Composite
E
Copper
2/Month
Composite
E
Silver
2/Month
Composite
E
Notes: .
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream at least 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream 1.7 miles below the discharge point (at
the end of or close to NCSR 1659).
+ Instream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year.
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be Tess than 5.0 mg/I.
4 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
s Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 4.6%; January, April, July, and October; See Special Condition A (8) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Permit No. NC0043532
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (5). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 0.5 MGD (LONG CREEK)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia
dubia at an effluent concentration of 19 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase 11
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed
during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then
multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North
Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment
of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for
the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the
end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data,
and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will
complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number,
pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during
the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Permit No. NC0043532
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (6). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 0.5 MGD (RocKY RIVER)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia
dubia at an effluent concentration of 2.6%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase 11
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed
during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then
multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North
Carolina Phase 1I Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment
of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for
the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later Than 30 days after the
end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data,
and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will
complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number,
pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during
the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Permit No. NC0043532
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (7). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 0.9 MGD (LoNc CREEK)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia
dubia at an effluent concentration of 30%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase 1I
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed
during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then
multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North
Carolina Phase 1I Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment
of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for
the Chronic Value. Additionally. DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the
end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data,
and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will
complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number,
pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during
the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Permit No. NC0043532
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (8). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 0.9 MGD (Rom( RIVER)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia
dubia at an effluent concentration of 4.6%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed
during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then
multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North
Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration
having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment
of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase 11 Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed. using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for
the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the
end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete. accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data,
and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will
complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number,
pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during
the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving .stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
--/ZIRo rice. .ds go` AtAij fr.�rf‘r
1 o,sA169 r c`.� uoih, i
�.
tAji Permit fi1o. NC0043 2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
The Town of Oakboro
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Oakboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Off of NCSR 1953
East of Oakboro
Stanly County
to receiving waters designated as Long Creek (outfall 001) and the Rocky River (outfall 002) in
the Yadkin — Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 29, 2004
Signed this day
DRAFT
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
DENR/DWQ1
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC00435325
Facility Information '`
,'
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Oakboro/Oakboro WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 610 Oakboro, NC 28129
Facility Address:
Off of NCSR 1953 East of Oakboro
Permitted Flow
0.5, 0.9 MGD
Type of Waste:
Domestic and Industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
Facility Classification
III
County:
Stanly
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Long Creek:
relocating to
Rocky River
Regional Office:
Mooresville
Stream Classification:
C
USGS Topo Quad:
G17NE/ Oakboro, N.C.
303(d) Listed?:
No
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
03-07-13
Date:
August 29, 2000
Drainage Area (mi2):
192.5; 965 (Rocky
R.)
> ; 's;
ih'
r;
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
3.3; 29 (Rocky R.)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
5.8; 51 (Rocky R.)
Average Flow (cfs):
183; 920 (Rocky R.)
IWC (%):
19%; 2.6% (Rocky R.)
Primary SIC Code:
4952
SUMMARY OF FACILITY AND WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
The Town of Oakboro WWTP has requested renewal of existing permit. Facility is a 0.500 MGD
plant that discharges into Long Creek, which is classified C. The facility will be expanding to 0.9
MGD and relocating its outfall to the Rocky River. Long Creek and the Rocky River (030713) are not
listed on DWQ's final draft 2000 303d list. Staff report indicates that Town requested approval to
construct a pump station and 12,700 linear feet of force main for the relocation. Plant capacity after
construction will be 1.2 MGD, but current permit will only cover up to 0.9 MGD. (Town has not
requested expansion to 1.2 MGD.) Oakboro will be able to accept wastewater from nearby towns,
such as Locust and Stanfield.
,In 1993, a QUAL2E model was performed on Rocky River and Mallard Creek to assist with the
'management of wastewater discharge issues in the upper watershed of the Rocky River. It was
recommended that no new or expanded discharges be permitted in the study area unless an
evaluation of engineering alternative shows that it is the environmentally sound alternative. If new
or expanded discharges are permitted, they will receive BAT technology limits in the watersheds
above the confluence of Mallard Creek and the Rocky River, due to severely limited assimilative
capacity. Any new or expanding discharge in the lower watersheds of the Rocky River should receive
a total BODu limit of 32 mg/1 or less, equivalent to 10 mg/1 BODS and 4 mg/1 NH3 for typical domestic
discharges. This level of treatment will protect the DO standard as well as preventing any one
discharge from exhausting 100% of the available assimilative capacity of the river.
The existing limits at Long Creek site, at 0.5 MGD are BOD5= 30 mg/1, summer and winter NH3
limits of 4 and 14 mg/1, respectively, DO = 6 mg/1, TSS =30 mg/1, Fecal = 200/100m1, cyanide of 26
ug/1, mercury of 0.063 ug/l, twice per month monitoring of arsenic, chromium, nickel, lead, copper,
zinc, and silver. Oakboro also has a quarterly chronic toxicity limit of 19% in January, April, July,
October. TP and TN are also monitored quarterly.
Oakboro WW'I'I' Fact. Sheet.
NPDES Renewal
Page 1
Upon relocation to Rocky River with s7Q10= 29 cfs, w7Q10= 51 cfs, QA= 920 cfs. At 0.5 MGD,
30/30 limits with DO=6 mg/l, Chronic tox limit of 2.6% in Jan Apr Jul Oct. Twice per month
monitoring for arsenic, chromium, cyanide, mercury, nickel, lead, copper, zinc, and silver.
Upon expansion to 0.9 MGD:
Summer Winter
BOD5 9 mg/1 18 mg/1
NH3 3 mg/1 6 mg/1
DO 5 mg/1 5 mg/1
TSS 30 mg/1 30 mg/1
Fecal 200/100m1 200/100m1
TRC 28 ug/1 28 ug/1
Monitoring for As, Cr, CN, Hg, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, Ag
MRO: Need to verify the following with the Town: Upon relocation to Rocky River, the
facility will use outfall 001, Long Creek, as a gravity discharge only in cases of failure of
the pump station or force main that would prevent discharge to outfall 002, the Rocky
River. A lockable valve box with manually turned weir plates will be installed at the 001
discharge pipe after relocation.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement: at Long Creek @ 0.5 MGD: 1) Chronic Toxicity Ceriodaphnia P/F @ 19%; Jan
Apr Jul Oct
Upon Relocation to Rocky River: 2) @ 0.5 MGD Chronic Toxicity Ceriodaphnia P/F @
2.6%; Jan Apr Jul Oct, 3) @ 0.9 MGD Chronic Toxicity Ceriodaphnia P/F @ 4.6%; Jan Apr
Jul Oct
Oakboro has a quarterly chronic tox test of 19% at the Long Creek location. Since 1996, the facility
has eight (8) FAILS, with the most recent one occurring in January 2000. There were four fails in
'98, April and May, and October and November. April 1997 was FAIL as were July and August 1996.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
In 1999, Oakboro WWTP had one permit exceedance with flow at 0.5123 MGD in February. The
averages between April 1999 and March 2000 were Qw = 0.3259 MGD, BOD5 =4.68 mg/1, TSS = 6.4
mg/1, and NH3 = 0.61 mg/l.
In 1998, there were two permit exceedances for flow in January and February. The averages between
April 1998 and March 1999 were Qw = 0.4033 MGD, BOD5 =3.50 mg/1, TSS = 5.7 mg/1, and NH3 =
1.25 mg/l.
In 1997, there was one permit exceedance for flow in December. The averages between April 1997and
March 1998 were Qw = 0.4485 MGD, BOD5 =6.07 mg/1, TSS = 6.8 mg/1, and NH3 = 2.54 mg/l.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
Oakboro is a participant in the c000rdinated instream monitoring in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin
and entered into a memorandum of agreement with DWQ. Individual instream monitoring was
waived for their facility.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
• at Long Creek discharge point - drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel, Mercury, Arsenic,
and cyanide
• A daily maximum limit of 33.8 ug/1 for lead.
• Twice per month monitoring for Copper, silver and zinc.
• at Rocky River discharge point are drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel, Mercury,
Arsenic, zinc and cyanide.
• A daily maximum limit of 33.8 ug/1 for lead.
• Twice per month monitoring for Copper and silver.
Oakboro WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 2
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 9/20/00
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 11/6/00
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Jackie Nowell at (919) 733-5038 ext. 512.
/44, azt.46-r/t- 4t/Iter_Y 2-44 21_eeezw_ /4 /4e/le, nee.W
e 2 ,etc' 1�`D /f%CE 442 0, gee ritj /
Cavu44 544 ,rrcZ6)4 /4?a-5 64-tt -4444-
O d° I/ ' H.. ".
NAME- d'Orr-Ge/‘Y-"Zt-DATE:
NPDES SUPERVISOR COMMENT:
NAME: 7), �l
/Hal) r446-,--
-raoi
ei,v/f-Avt.t/7/,
)4a-:4,./
6taLL-
DATE: /b
S 0 'j . 4.-e<1,,u
41f--
°0 sue,°kee
, �Jr 1
(14/
Oakboro WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 3
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSIOWNPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
2T999-1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES W0SSTENWTER PERMIT
on the basis or thorough staff renew and appli-
cation of NC General Stable 143.21. Public law
02-500, and other lawful standards and repute -
lions, the North Carolina Environmental Manage-
ment Commission proposes to issue a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
wastewater discharge lo the person(s) listed on
the etmched pages effective 45 days from the
publish date of this notice.
Vaitten comments regarding the proposed permit
wig be accepted until 30 days after the publish
date of this notice. All comments received prior to
that date are considered in the final determina-
tions regarding the proposed permit The Director
of the NC Division of Water Quality may decide to
hold a public meeting for the proposed permit
should the division receive a significant degree of
public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting
information on file used to determine conditions
present in the draft permit are avaiade upon
request and payment of the costs of reproduction.
Mar comments and/or requests for information to
the NC Division of Water Quality at the above
address or call Ms. Christie Jackson at (919)733-
5083. extension 538, Please ndirde the NPOES
permit number (attached) in any communication.
Interested persons may also visit the Division of
Water Quality al 512 Nor Salisbury Street
Raleigh. NC 27604-1148 behveen the hours or
8:00am5:00pm to review Information on file.
NPDES Permit NC0043532. 0akboro Town.
1NWTP. PO Bea 610. Oakb0ro, NC 28129 has
applied for a permit renewal for a teary located
in Stably County discharging treated wastewater
into long Creek {relocating to the Rocky River) In
the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently NH3
and dissolved oxygen are water quality limited.
This discharge may affect future allocations in
this portion e1 the receiving stream.
September 17. 2000
Stanly News Press
237 W. North St.
P.O. Box 488
Albemarle, NC 28002
Phone: 704 982-2121
Fax: 704 983-7999
Ad Number: 19849
Ad Classification: 300
Ad Type: Legal
Payment Method: Bil ed
Customer: APHY
NCDENR/DWQ/BUDGET OFFICE
PO BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
Customer Phone: (919) 733-5083
I� 6 LJLS O U E
IP
EEP 1 9 2000 0
DE.RR - WATER QUALITY
Putty SOURCE BRANCH
Original Salesperson: CHRISTYH
Salesperson Generating Bill: CHRISTYH
Initial text: PUBLIC NOTICE STATE
Start: 09/17/00 Stop: 09/17/00 Total inserts: 1
Publication: Start: Stop:
Stanly NewsPress 09/17/00 09/17/00
Gross: $ 65.94
Surcharge: 0.00
Total: 65.94
Credits: 0.00
Amt paid: 0.00
Amt due: 65.94
Inserts:
1
MRO Staff Report — (NPDES NC0043532 Permit Renewal)
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: NO
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Date: June 22, 1999
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATI
County: Stanly
NPDES Permit No.: NC0043532
MRO No.: 99-098
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Page 1 of 4
TITTUF
JUN 24 1999
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
1. Facility and Address: Town of Oakboro WWTP
Mailing Address Physical Address
PO Box 610 24939-B Barbees Grove Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129 Oakboro, Stanly County
2. Date of On -site Investigation: June 18, 1999
3. Report Prepared By: Charley Schwartz, Environmental Engineer
4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number:
Main Contact: Larry Branch (Phone# (704)485-8322)
ORC Name: Troy Branch (Cert# 16896; Phone# (704)485-4613)
Backup ORC: Lloyd Curlee
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of NC Highway 138 and SR 1953 east of the
Town of Oakboro, travel northeast on SR 1953 (Barbees Grove Rd) approximately 2.2
miles to the junction with a paved road (no road name or number). The WWTP is located
north of the junction at the end of the paved road.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: -
Long Creek
Latitude: 35 ° 14' 08"
Longitude: 80° 16' 00"
Rocky River
35° 12' 41"
80° 15' 16"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G 17 NE USGS Quad Name: Oakboro, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There is ample area
available for expansion.
MRO Staff Report — (NPDES NC0043532 Permit Renewal)
Page 2 of 4
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Sloping east towards the receiving
stream at the rate of 5-10%. The WWTP is not located within the 100 year flood plain.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: One dwelling is approximately 1,000 feet from the
WWTP site.
10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Long Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 03-07-13
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream is 30-45 feet wide at the outfall. The channel bottom was not visible at the
time of the site visit on account of the high sediment load and water discoloration
of Long Creek (brown to purple color).
d. The permittee has plans to relocate the outfall to the Rocky River (Class C). The
Rocky River is of considerable size at the proposed outfall. The width of the
River is approximately 90-120 feet with a depth of 1-5 feet.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater (Actual Flow from DMRs): 0.3967 MGD
b. What is the current permitted capacity: 0.50 MGD
c. Current design capacity: 0.50 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the
previous two years: 12/29/97 ATC application — The permittee requested
approval to construct a pump station and 12,700 linear feet of force main in order
to relocate the WWTP outfall to Rocky River. A staff report recommending
issuance of the ATC was submitted to Raleigh by this Office on January 14, 1998,
but a final approval letter is not in this Office's files. However, a revised permit
was issued by the Division on August 3, 1998 that presented discharge limits at an
allowed Rocky River outfall location. 8/25/98 ATC application — The permittee
proposed modifications to the facility as identified in item "f." below. The ATC
was approved by the Division on December 2, 1998.
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of a manual bar screen, aerated grit chamber, comminutor
(not in use), instrumented flow measurement, dual aeration basins with
mechanical aerators (one aeration basin is used as a sludge holding basin), dual
clarifiers, dual 12,750-gallon aerated sludge digesters, chlorine disinfection, dual
sludge drying beds, and standby power.
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: The proposed facilities will have a
design capacity of 1.2 MGD, although the facility is to be permitted for only 0.9
MGD. The following alterations and additions to the existing facility are
MRO Staff Report — (NPDES NC0043532 Permit Renewal)
g•
Page 3 of 4
proposed: addition of 100 HP influent pump, installation of a clarifier splitter
box, installation of a 205,620-gallon clarifier, expansion of the existing aeration
basins, expansion of the existing chlorination basin, addition of a dechlorination
unit, addition of a 389,000-gallon aerobic sludge digester with two floating
aerators.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: The facility receives industrial
wastewater and chlorine is added to the waste stream; however, the facility
consistently passes toxicity tests.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): The facility has an approved pretreatment
program.
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied specify DWQ Permit No.: WQ0005387
Residuals Contractor: Wheelabrator Water Technologies, Inc.
Telephone No. (704)732-8500
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
c. Landfill: N/A
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class III (New rating sheet is attached; however, no
change from previous rating).
4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary — 01; Secondary - 55
5. MTU Code(s): 02013
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? This facility was constructed with public monies.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None at this time.
3. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation
a. Spray Irrigation: Insufficient area and steep sloped topography
b. Connect to regional sewer system: N/A
c. Subsurface: Insufficient area and steep sloped topography
d. Other disposal options: N/A
MRO Staff Report — (NPDES NC0043532 Permit Renewal)
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 4 of 4
At the time of the site visit, the existing plant appeared to be well operated. Several of
the treatment system additions and modifications proposed in the August 25, 1998 ATC
application were observed to be under construction. Upon completion of construction the plant
will have a total design capacity of 1.2 MGD. The Oakboro WWTP is being expanded such that
it will be capable of accepting wastewater from the towns of Locust and Stanfield and
accommodating anticipated growth within the area. Plans for the collection systems to bring
Stanfield's and Locust's wastewater to the plant are still in the early stages (PERs recently
submitted to the Division).
Since construction at the plant is not complete, any new permit should include limits
associated with flows of 0.5 MGD and 0.9 MGD. In addition, the limits should cover discharges
at the Rocky River and Long Creek outfall locations (Outfall piping to Rocky River is not
complete, and the Long Creek outfall is intended to remain as a backup discharge location). It is
recommended that the NPDES Permit be renewed as requested.
CfA3-791
Signature fReport Preparer Date
Water Quali egional
h:\\npdes\oakboro.doc
Supervi
sor Date
Permit Notes
NC0043532
The Town of Oakboro WWTP has requested renewal of existing permit. Facility is a 0.500
MGD plant that discharges into Long Creek, which is classified C. The facility will be
expanding to 0.9 MGD and relocating its outfall to the Rocky River. Long Creek and the
Rocky River (030713) are not listed on DWQ's final draft 2000 303d list. Staff report
indicates that Town requested approval to construct a pump station and 12,700 linear feet of
force main for the relocation. Plant capacity after construction will be 1.2 MGD, but current
permit will only cover up to 0.9 MGD. (Town has not requested expansion to 1.2 MGD.)
Oakboro will be able to accept wastewater from nearby towns, such as Locust and Stanfield.
8/29/00 — Telecon with Larry Branch, Utilities Director — the construction for the relocation
has been completed, however they have just finalized all financial and contract matters with
the engineer, and still need to send the certification of completion. They have discharged to
the relocation point on Rocky River just on a trial basis to test the pipe for leaks, etc. He will
contact the engineer so that the completion information can be sent to us.
Model Background
In 1993, a QUAL2E model was performed on Rocky River and Mallard Creek to assist with
the management of wastewater discharge issues in the upper watershed of the Rocky River.
Also determined the appropriate WLA for the CMUD-Mallard Creek WWTP. This calibrated
model for 47.6 miles in the Yadkin River Basin was used to predict DO and BOD demand
concentrations at low flow conditions for both permitted and summer average discharge
conditions.
Model results indicated that water quality in the upper watershed was not adequately
protected by the NPDES permit limits. Under actual flows, which were well below permitted
loads, the DO standard was not predicted to be violated in the Rocky River. But three DO
sags are predicted to drop to or near the stream standard, indicating little assimilative
capacity remains for oxygen consuming wastes.
It was recommended that no new or expanded discharges be permitted in the study area
unless an evaluation of engineering alternative shows that it is the environmentally sound
alternative. If new or expanded discharges are permitted, they will receive BAT technology
limits in the watersheds above the confluence of Mallard Creek and the Rocky River, due to
severely limited assimilative capacity. Any new or expanding discharge in the lower
watersheds of the Rocky River should receive a total BODu limit of 32 mg/1 or less,
equivalent to 10 mg/1 BOD5 and 4 mg/1 NH3 for typical domestic discharges. This level of
treatment will protect the DO standard as well as preventing any one discharge from
exhausting 100% of the available assimilative capacity of the river.
Existing Permit
The existing limits at Long Creek site, at 0.5 MGD are BOD5= 30 mg/1, summer and winter
NH3 limits of 4 and 14 mg/1, respectively, DO = 6 mg/1, TSS =30 mg/1, Fecal = 200/100m1,
cyanide of 26 ug/l, mercury of 0.063 ug/1, twice per month monitoring of arsenic, chromium,
nickel, lead, copper, zinc, and silver. Oakboro also has a quarterly chronic toxicity limit of
19% in January, April, July, October. TP and TN are also monitored quarterly.
Permit Notes
NC0043532
Page 2
If the Oakboro facility should expand to 0.9 MGD at Long Creek before relocating to Rocky
River, limits would be:
BOD5
NH3
DO
TSS
Fecal
TRC
Summer
9 mg/1
2.8 mg/1
5mg/1
30 mg/1
200/100m1
28 ug/1
Winter
18 mg/1
6 mg/1
5mg/1
30 mg/1
200/100m1
28 ug/1
Cyanide 17 ug/1 17 ug/1
Mercury 0.04 ug/1 0.04 ug/1
Monitoring for As, Cr, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, Ag
Upon relocation to Rocky River with s7Q10= 29 cfs, w7Q10= 51 cfs, QA= 920 cfs. At 0.5
MGD, 30/30 limits with DO=6 mg/1, Chronic tox limit of 2.6% in Jan Apr Jul Oct. Twice per
month monitoring for arsenic, chromium, cyanide, mercury, nickel, lead, copper, zinc, and
silver.
Upon expansion to 0.9 MGD:
Summer
BOD5 9 mg/1
NH3 3 mg/1
DO 5 mg/1
TSS 30 mg/1
Fecal 200/100m1
TRC 28 ug/1
Monitoring for As, Cr, CN,
Winter
18 mg/1
6 mg/1
5mg/1
30 mg/1
200/100m1
28 ug/1
Hg, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, Ag
Need to verify the following with the Town: Upon relocation to Rocky River, the facility will
use outfall 001, Long Creek, as a gravity discharge only in cases of failure of the pump
station or force main that would prevent discharge to outfall 002, the Rocky River. A
lockable valve box with manually turned weir plates will be installed at the 001 discharge
pipe after relocation.
Review of Compliance Data
In 1999, Oakboro WWTP had one permit exceedance with flow at 0.5123 MGD in February.
The averages between April 1999 and March 2000 were Qw = 0.3259 MGD, BOD5 =4.68
mg/1, TSS = 6.4 mg/1, and NH3 = 0.61 mg/l.
In 1998, there were two permit exceedances for flow in January and February. The averages
between April 1998 and March 1999 were Qw = 0.4033 MGD, BOD5 =3.50 mg/1, TSS = 5.7
mg/1, and NH3 = 1.25 mg/1.
In 1997, there was one permit exceedance for flow in December. The averages between April
1997and March 1998 were Qw = 0.4485 MGD, BOD5 =6.07 mg/1, TSS = 6.8 mg/1, and NH3 =
2.54 mg/1.
Pretreatment Program
Oakboro has a modified program, so only do a Short Term Monitoring Program (4 samples in
the year before headworks is due). The last one was done in 1998 and the new STMP must
Permit Notes
NC0043532
Page 3
be run in July 2000 — April 2001. Pollutants of concern (POCs) — BOD,TSS, NH3, As, Cd,
Cr, Cu, CN, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Ag, Zn
POTW's one SIU (Stanley Knitting) - only has limits for CN. They also monitor for Cu + Pb.
Rest of metals are in STMP only because of 40 CFR 503
**8/24/00 — MRO received letter that Stanley Knitting Mills will be closing its
Oakboro plant starting on September 21, 2000. This closing will effect Oakboro's
pretreatment program since it was the only SIU.
Correspondence File
See attached
Instream Data
June 1998 — Oakboro is a participant in the c000rdinated instream monitoring in the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin and entered into a memorandum of agreement with DWQ.
Individual instream monitoring was waived for their facility.
April — May 1998 — Long Creek - Upstream site on at Bridge on Hartsell Rd. Downstream
site at Bridge on Highway 138. DO values range from 7.7 to 8.3 mg/1 both upstream and
downstream. Instream fecal coliform values < 60/100m1.
Toxicity Test Results
Oakboro has a quarterly chronic tox test of 19% at the Long Creek location. Since 1996, the
facility has eight (8) FAILS, with the most recent one occurring in January 2000. There were
four fails in '98, April and May, and October and November. April 1997 was FAIL as were
July and August 1996.
Upon relocation to Rocky River, the chronic test limit will be 2.6% at 0.5 MGD and 4.6% at
0.9 MGD.
8/29/00 — Telecon w/ Kevin Bowden — Aq Tox sent several NOVs for the noncompliance
violations — not really known what caused the toxicity problems. No THE done or info from
the Town on why they were failing. Last real contact with ESB was in 1989 when Black and
Veetch (engineering firm) sent letter and felt that solids were causing problems.
Recommends renewal of tox limit. Even with the potential for no SIUs in the future, because
of Oakboro's past problems would not recommend immediate dropping of tox text without
another year of testing with no FAILs.
Reasonable Potential Analysis
Performed analysis using DMR data from Jan. 1999 thru April 2000. Because of dilution in
the Rocky River, allowable concentrations are greater for many Oakboro parameters of
concern. Ran the analysis at four scenarios:
1) Existing location at Long Creek @ 0.5 MGD;
2) Existing location at Long Creek @ 0.9 MGD;
3) Relocation to Rocky River @ 0.5 MGD;
4) Relocation to Rocky River @ 0.9 MGD
Permit Notes
NC0043532
Page 4
Analysis results at Long Creek discharge point are drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel,
Mercury, Arsenic, and cyanide. A limit is needed for lead because of reasonable potential
shown. *Note that lead values reported in year 2000 appear to be high compared with 1999
data submitted. However, since this data was given reported and the Town has not notified
DWQ of problems with lab, I will use the DMR data. A daily maximum limit of 33.8
ug/1 for lead. Only a daily max. limit will be given because it is more stringent than the
weekly average limit of 131 ug/l. Twice per month monitoring for Copper and Zinc.
Analysis results at Rocky River discharge point are drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel,
Mercury, Arsenic, zinc and cyanide. A daily maximum limit of 33.8 ug/1 for lead.
Twice per month monitoring for Copper.
Recommend renewal of existing NPDES limits with some changes.
• at Long Creek discharge point - drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel, Mercury,
Arsenic, and cyanide
A daily maximum limit of 33.8 ug/1 for lead.
Twice per month monitoring for Copper, silver and Zinc.
• at Rocky River discharge point are drop monitoring for Cr, Nickel, Mercury,
Arsenic, zinc and cyanide.
A daily maximum limit of 33.8 ug/1 for lead.
Twice per month monitoring for Copper and silver.
own oi Oahtoro
P.O. Box 610
0akboro, North Carolina 28129
Telephone 704-485-3351
Fax 704-485-2439
August 24, 2000
Mr. John Lesley
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Pretreatment Section
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Stanly Knitting Mills, Inc. Pretreatment
Dear Mr. Lesley:
Enclosed is a copy of a letter addressed to the Town of Oakboro from the office of Stanly Knitting
Mills, Inc. notifying us of their intention to permanently close it's Oakboro facility. As you well
know, Stanly Knitting Mills is our only Significant Industrial User (SIU). We are at present
collecting quarterly samples for the updated Headworks Analysis due to Raleigh June 30, 2001,
as outlined in letter dated February 14, 2000. This unfortunate news will affect and cease the
Town of Oakboros' Pretreatment program as it is at present.
Please notify this office of any advice or instructions regarding the demise of our Pretreatment
Program, and sampling plan already under way.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Troy B. Branch
Town of Oakboro
Pretreatment Coordinator
tbb/pretreatmentltr.
enclosure: letter dated July 24, 200 from Stanly Knitting Mills, Inc
cc: Dana Rees Folley, Pretreatment Staff, with enclosures
itonly knitting mill:. inc.
349 South Main Street • P. O. Drawer 479
Oakboro, North Carolina 28129
Phone 704-485-3311 • Fax 704-485-8114
July 24, 2000
TO: Joyce Little
Mayor
Town of Oakboro
109 A N. Main Street
Oakboro, NC 28129
FROM: Judy Meggs
BR Director
On July 24th Stanly Knitting Mills, Inc. notified its employees, including those affected,
that its management has decided to close two of its facilities. One is known as the Main
Street Plant and is located at 329 S. Main Street, Oakboro, NC. The other is known as
the Richfield Plant and is located at 231 N. Hwy. 49, Richfield, NC. It is anticipated that
the closure will be permanent.
The closing will commence on September 21', 2000 and will continue through the end of
the year.
For further information contact Judy Means at 485-3311.
JM/dl
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Facility Name
Oakboro WWTP
NPDES #
nc0043532
Ow (MGD)
0.5
7010s (cfs)
29
IWC (%)
2.60
c'ving Stream
Rocky River
Stream Class
C
FINAL RESULTS
Cr
Max. Pred Cw
7.5
ug/
Allowable Cw
1921.0
ug/
Max. Value
5
Cu
Max. Pred Cw
3120
ug/
Allowable Cw
268.9
ug/
Max. Value
780
Pb
Max. Pred Cw
1368
ug/
Allowable Cw
960.5
ug/
Max. Value
360
Ni
Max. Pred Cw
10.2
ug/
Allowable Cw
3380.9
ug/
Max. Value
6.8
Ag
Max. Pred Cw
3.75
ug/
Allowable Cw
2.3
ug/
Max. Value
2.5
Zn
Max. Pred Cw
475
ug/
Allowable Cw
1921.0
ug/
Max. Value
250
Hg
Max. Pred Cw
0.1
ug/
Allowable Cw
0.5
ug/
Max. Value
0.1
As
Max. Pred Cw
8.48
ug/
Allowable Cw
1921.0
ug/
Max. Value
5.3
Cn
Max. Pred Cw
16
ug/
Allowable Cw
192.1
ug/
Max. Value
10
Pay
Ito"
�1 M�
Po-f)
Alk
Pkvf
Puf
8/17/00
f OC4- . i d - c/1(311 s/L'il
Facility Name
NPDES #
Ow (MGD)
7010s (cfs)
AWC(%)
'ving Stream
Stream Class
Cr
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Value
Cu
Max. Pred Cw 3120
Allowable Cw 152.5
Max. Value 780
Pb
Max. Pred Cw 1368
Allowable Cw 544.7
Max. Value 360
Oakboro WWTP
nc0043532
0.9
29
4.59
Rocky River
C
Ni
Max. Pred Cw 10.2
Allowable Cw 1917.4
Max. Value 6.8
Ag
Max. Pred Cw 3.75
Allowable Cw 1.3
Max. Value 2.5
Zn
Max. Pred Cw 475
Allowable Cw 1089.4
Max. Value 250
Hg
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Value
As
Max. Pred Cw 8.48
Allowable Cw 1089.4
Max. Value 5.3
Cn
Max. Pred Cw 16
Allowable Cw 108.9
Max. Value 10
0
Max. Pred Cw 0
Allowable Cw 0.0
Max. Value 0
0
Max. Pred Cw 0
Allowable Cw 0.0
Max. Value 0
0
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Value
FINAL RESULTS
7.5
1089.4
5
0.1
0.3
0.1
0
0.0
0
Parameter =
Standard =
Cr
50
TOXICANT ANALYSIS Parameter = Cu
pg/I Standard =
n BDL=1/2DLctual Data RESULTS
1/00 1
2
3
4
5
6
ugA 7
ug/I 8
9
10
ugA 11
ugll 12
13
14
ugA 15
ugA 16
4/00 17
18
ugA 19
ugA 20
21
22
ugA 23
ugA 24
25
26
ug/I 27
ug/I 28
29
30
ug/I 31
ug/I 32
33
34
ug/I 35
ug/I 36
37
38
ug/I 39
ug/I 40
41
42
ug/I 43
ug/I 44
45
46
ug/I 47
ug/I 48
49
50
ug/I 51
ug/I 52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
7
Poll
niDL=1/2Dl;tual Data RESULTS
1 <2 Std Dev. 0.668077603 1/00 1 25 25 Std Dev. 153.729
1 <2 Mean 1.166666667 2 29 29 Mean 84.9167
1 <2 C.V. 0.572637945 3 500 500 C.V. 1.81035
1 <2 4 290 290
1 <2 5 780 780
1 <2 Mull Facto 1.5 6 180 180 Mult Factor] 4
2 <4 Max. Value 5 pg/1 7 200 200 Max. Value 780 pg/I:
5 5 Max. Pred . 7.5 pg/1 8 160 160 Max. Pred ( 3120 pg/f
1 <2 Allowable C 1089.43 pg/1 4/00 9 140 140 Allowable C 152.52 pg/E
1 <2 10 22 22
1 <2 11 21 21
1 <2 12 27 27
2 <4 13 35 35
1 <2 14 27 27
1 <2 15 19 19
1 <2 16 9 9
1 <2 17 14 14
1 <2 18 30 30
1 <2 19 17 17
1 <2 20 52 52
1 <2 21 16 16
1 <2 22 19 19
1 <2 23 36 36
1 <2 24 41 41
2 2 25 20 20
4 4 26 28 28
1 <2 27 20 20
1 <2 28 21 21
1 <2 29 19 19
1 <2 30 21 21
1 <2 31 42 42
1 <2 32 25 25
1 <2 33 20 20
1 <2 34 42 42
1 <2 35 54 54
1 <2 36 56 56
1 <2 37
1 <2 38
1 <2 39
1 <2 40
1 <2 41
1 <2 42
1 <2 43
1 <2 44
1 <2 45
1 <2 46
1 <2 47
1 <2 48
1 <2 49
1 <2 50
1 <2 51
1 <2 52
1 <2 53
1 <2 54
I <2 55
1 <2 56
I <2 57
I <2 58
1 <2 59
1<2 60
Parameter =
Standard =
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
8/17/00
Pb tiarameter= Ni
pg/l Standard =
25
3DL=1/2Dhctual Dat RESULTS
1 <2 Std Dev. 50.848
1 <2
2.9
200
52
4.6
76
8.5
360
27
17
21
11
15
11
12
'6_ =6
6 6
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
9 9
5 5
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
5 5
4 4
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
2 2
14 14
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
2 2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
Mean 13.848
2.9 C.V. 3.6718
200
52
4.6 Mutt Facto 3.81
76 Max. Value 360
8.5 Max. Pred ( 1368 pg/1
360 Allowable C 544.71 pg/1
27
17
21
11
15
11
12
88
:: i?arameter = Ag i arameter =
PO i Standard = I 0.061/rg/I !:Standard =
•
n BDL=1/2DUctual Dat RESULTS n 3DL=1/2Dllctual Data RESULTS n
1 2.6 2.6 Std Dev. 1.27525 1 1 <2 Std Dev. 0.4665 1
2 2 2 Mean 2.59063 2 1 <2 Mean 1.1579 2
3 3.5 3.5 C.V. 0.49226 3 1 <2 C.V. 0.4029 3
4 1<2 4 1<2 4
5 3.6 3.6 5 1 <2 5
6 3.7 3.7 Mult Factor' 1.51 6 1 <2 Mutt Facto 1.51 6
7 4.1 4.1 Max. Value 6.8 pg/ii 7 1 <2 Max. Value 2.5 pgAiii 7
8 6.8 6.8 Max. Pred ( 10.2 pg4iii 8 1 <2 Max. Pred 1 3.75 pg/E ; 8
9 5.3 5.3 Allowable C 1917.39 pg/M 9 1 <2 Allowable( 1.31 irg/i:l 9
10 6.6 6.6 10 1 <2 10
11 4 4 11 1 <2 11
12 3 3 12 1 <2 12
13 4 4 13 1 <2 13
14 2 2 14 1 <2 14
15 4 4 15 1 <2 15
16 2 2 16 1 <2 16
17 3 3 17 1 <2 17
18 1 <2 18 1 <2 18
19 1 <2 19 1 <2 19
20 2 2 20 1 <2 20
21 3.2 3.2 21 1 <2 21
22 3 3 22 1 <2 22
23 3 3 23 1 <2 23
24 2 2 24 1 <2 24
25 1 <2 25 1 <2 25
26 1 <2 26 1 <2 26
27 2.7 2.7 27 1 <2 27
28 2 2 28 1 <2 28
29 4 4 29 2.5 <5 29
30 3 3 30 2.5 <5 30
31 1 <2 31 2.5 <5 31
32 2 2 32 2.5 5 32
33 2 2 33 1 <2 33
34 2 2 34 1 <2 34
35 2.2 2.2 35 1 <2 35
36 1 <2 36 1 <2 36
37 1 <2 37 1 <2 37
38 6 6 38 1 <2 38
39 3 3 39 39
40 1 <2 40 40
41 2 2 41 41
42 2 2 42 42
43 2 2 43 43
44 3 3 44 44
45 1 <2 45 45
46 1 <2 46 46
47 1 <2 47 47
48 2.5 <5 48 48
49 2.5 <5 49 49
50 2.5 <5 50 50
51 2.5 <5 51 51
52 2.5 <5 52 52
53 2.5 <5 53 53
54 2.5 <5 54 54
55 2.5 <5 55 55
56 2.5 <5 56 56
57 2.5 <5 57 57
58 2.5 <5 58 58
59 2.5 <5 59 59
60 2.5 <5 60 60
61 2.5 <5 61 61
62 2.5 <5 62 62
63 2.5 <5 63 63
64 2.5 <5 64 64
65 65 65
66 66 66
67 67 67
68 68 68
69 69 69
70 70 70
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
8/17/00
Zn
50
l41n
Parameter = Hg Parameter = As
atandard=1 0.012Ipgn TOXICANT ANALYSIS Standard=
50
Parameter =
$$, tandard =
3DL=1/2DIActual Data RESULTS n3DL=1/2Drlctual Data RESULTS
75 75 Std Dev. 60.734 1 0.1 <0.2 Std Dev.
120 120 Mean 94.029 2 0.1 <0.2 Mean
85 85 C.V. 0.6459 3 0.1 <0.2 C.V.
220 220 4 0.1 <0.2
180 180 5 0.1 <0.2
230 230 Mutt Factor) 1.91 ? 6 0.1 <0.2
250 250 Max. Value 250 pg/l 7 0.1 <0.2
220 220 Max. Pred t 475 pglii 8 0.1 <0,2
170 170 Allowable C ###### pgI) 9 0.1 <0.2
44 44 10 0.1 <0.2
71 71 11 0.1 <0.2
64 64 12 0.1 <0.2
80 80 13 0.1 <0.2
98 98 14 0.1 <0.2
69 69 15 0.1 <0.2
44 44 16 0.1<0,2.
63 63 17 0.1 <0.2
46 46 18 0.1 <0.2
32 32 19 0.1 <0.2
16 16 20 0.1 <0.2
69 69 21 0.1 <0.2
50 50 22 0.1 <0.2
62 62 23 0.1 <0.2
140 140 24 0.1 <0.2
56 56 25 0.1 <0.2
82 82 26 0.1 <0.2
71 71 27 0.1 <0.2
67 67 28 0.1 <0.2
65 65 29 0.1 <0.2
56 56 30 0.1 <0.2
66 66 31 0.1 <0.2
83 83 32 0.1 <0.2
81 81 33 0.1 <0.2
72 72 34 0.1 <0.2
35 0.1 <0.2
36 0.1 <0.2
37 0.1 <0.2
38 0.1 <0.2
39 0.1 <0.2
40 0.1 <0.2
41 0.1 <0.2
42 0.1 <0.2
43 0.1 <0.2
44 0.1 <0.2
45 0.1 <0.2
46 0.1 <0.2
47 0.1 <0.2
48 0.1 <0.2
49 0.1 <0.2
50 0.1 <0.2
51 0.1 <0.2
52 0.1 <0.2
53 0.1 <0.2
54 0.1 <0.2
55 0.1 <0.2
56 0.1 <0.2
57 0.1 <0.2
58 0.1 <0.2
59 0.1 <0.2
60 0.1 <0.2
61 0.1 <0.2
62 0.1 <0.2
63 0.1 <0.2
64 0.1 <0.2
65 0.1 <0.2
66 0.1 <0.2
67 0.1 <0.2
68
69
70
•
•
5.7E-09
0.1
5.7E-08
Mult Factor) 11
Max. Value 0.1 pgfl
Max. Pred r 0.1 pg/I?
Allowable C 0.26 pg/I
n BDL=1/2DLkctual Data RESULTS
1 <2 Std Dev.
1 <2 Mean
1 <2 C.V.
4 4
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
1<2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1<2
5.3 5.3
1 <2
1<2
1 <2
1 <2
2 2
2 2
2 2
3.3 3.3
5 5
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
2 2
2 2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
3 3
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
2.4 2.4
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
2 2
3 3
1 <2
1<2
2 2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
0.9126
1.3824
0.6602
Mutt Facto>I 1.61
Max. Value 5.3 pg4ii
Max. Pred ( 8.48 pg/f':,
Allowable C 1089.43
n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
8/17/00
•
Cn TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Spgn
3DL-1/2DRctual Data RESULTS
1 <2 Std Dev. 2.5034
2 2 Mean 4.1147
5.6 5.6 C.V. 0.6084
4 4
6 6
5.4 5.4 Mutt Factor 1.61
5.4 5.4 Max. Value 10 pg/1
1 <2 Max. Pred I 16 pgli
7 7 Allowable C 108.94 pgll
3.1 3.1
3.4 3.4
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2
1 <2 yam_
3.1 3.1
3.1 3.1
3.8 3.8
4.7 4.7
1 <2
5 5
s 6
2 2
2 2
4 4
4 4
1 <2
1 <2
4 4
5 5
6.8 6.8
1 <2
5 <10
5 5
1 <2
5 5
10 10
8 8
9 9
5 5
5.3 5.3
8 8
7 7
4 4
3 3
9.9 9.9
8 8
2 2
2 2
2 2
2.1 2.1
2 2
2 2
7 7
6 6
7 7
2 2
2.4 2.4
4 4
4 4
6 6
5 5
9.7 9.7
5 5
6 6
3 3
8/17/00
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Facility Name
Oakboro WWTP
i
NPDES #
nc0043532
Qw (MGD)
0.9
7Q10s (cfs)
29
1WC (%)
4.59
'c'ving Stream
Rocky River
Stream Class
C
FINAL RESULTS
Cr
Max. Pred Cw
7.5
ug/
Allowable Cw
1089.4
ug/
Max. Value
5
Cu
Max. Pred Cw
3120
ug/
Allowable Cw
152.5
ug/
Max. Value
780
Pb
Max. Pred Cw
1368
ug/
Allowable Cw
544.7
ug/
Max. Value
360
Ni
Max. Pred Cw
10.2
ug/
Allowable Cw
1917.4
ug/
Max. Value
6.8
Ag
Max. Pred Cw
3.75
ug/
Allowable Cw
1.3
ug/
Max. Value
2.5
Zn
Max. Pred Cw
475
ug/
Allowable Cw
1089.4
ug/
Max. Value
250
Hg
Max. Pred Cw
0.1
ug/
Allowable Cw
0.3
ug/
Max. Value
0.1
As
Max. Pred Cw
8.48
ug/
Allowable Cw
_ 1089.4
ug/
Max. Value
_ 5.3
Cn
Max. Pred Cw
16
ug/
Allowable Cw
108.9
ug/
Max. Value
10
8/17/00
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Facility Name
Oakboro WWTP
NPDES #
nc0043532
Qw (MGD)
0.9
7010s (cfs)
3.3
!WC (%)
29.71
c'ving Stream
Long Creek
Stream Class
C
FINAL RESULTS
Cr
Max. Pred Cw
7.5
ug/
Allowable Cw
168.3
ug/
Max. Value
5
Cu
Max. Pred Cw
3120
ug/
ug/
Allowable Cw
23.6
Max. Value
780
Pb
Max. Pred Cw
1368
ug/
Allowable Cw
84.1
ug/
Max. Value
360
Ni
Max. Pred Cw
10.2
ug/
Allowable Cw
296.2
ug/
Max. Value
6.8
Ag
Max. Pred Cw
3.75
ug/
Allowable Cw
0.2
ug/
Max. Value
2.5
Zn
Max. Pred Cw
475
ug/
Allowable Cw
168.3
ug/
Max. Value
250
Hg
Max. Pred Cw
0.1
ug/
ug/
Allowable Cw
0.0
Max. Value
0.1
As
Max. Pred Cw
8.48
ug/
Allowable Cw
168.3
ug/
Max. Value
5.3
Cn
Max. Pred Cw
16
ug/
ug/
Allowable Cw
16.8
Max. Value
10
8/17/00
TOXICANT ANALYSIS
Facility Name
Oakboro WWTP
i
NPDES #
nc0043532
Ow (MGD)
0.5
7010s (cfs)
3.3
/WC (%)
19.02
c'ving Stream
Long Creek
Stream Class
C
FINAL RESULTS
Cr
Max. Pred Cw
7.5
ug/
Allowable Cw
262.9
ug/
Max. Value
5
Cu -}
Max. Pred Cw
3120
ug/
Allowable Cw
,, 36.8
ug/
Max. Value
' 780
Pb
Max. Pred Cw
1368
ug/
Allowable Cw
131.5
ug/
Max. Value
IF 360
a
Ni
Max. Pred Cw
10.2
ug/
Allowable Cw
462.7
ug/
Max. Value
6.8
Ag of
Max. Pred Cw
3.75
ug/
ug/
Allowable taw
0.3
Max. Value
0 2.5
4
Zn.
Max. Pred Cw
s 475
Lig/
Allowable Cw
$ 262.9
rug/
Max. Value
250
Hg
Max. Pred Cw
0.1
ug/
ug/
Allowable Cw
0.1
Max. Value
0.1
As
Max. Pred Cw
8.48
ug/
Allowable Cw
262.9
ug/
Max. Value
5.3
Cn
Max. Pred Cw
16
ug/
Allowable Cw
26.3
ug/
Max. Value
10
8/17/00
144
LtIA' 1-kortfr4
vor
Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary July 17, 2000
IA(:ILI11' REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Newton WWTP Prnn chr lim: 56%; upon cap 7. MGD chr lim 66% Y 1996 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0036196/001 Begin:ll/I/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp:Single 1997 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Catawba Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB35 1998 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 5.0 Special 1999 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 6.0 IWC(%)3632 Order: 2000 - -- Pass - -
Norfolk And Western Railway Co. PERM: 24HR LC50 AC MONIT EPIS FTHD (GRAB) 1996 - -- - - - - - - - - NR
NC0046931/001 Begin:9/1/1993 Frequency: 50WD/A NonComp: 1997 - -- - - >100 - - - - - - -
County: Forsyth Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4 1998 - - - - >100
PF: VAR special 1999 - - - - - >100
7Q10: 0 IWC(%):100 Order; 2000 - - -
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Penn chr lim: 29%
NC0029246/011 Bcgin:3/1/2000 Frequency: Q Mar Jun Scp Dcc
County: Davidson Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4
PF: 0.317 Special
7Q10: 1.2 IWC(%)29.0 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
Y 1996 •- - Fail NRIPass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
1997 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - Pass
1998 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -- - Pass
1999 - - NRIPass - - Fail Pass - Pass - - Fail
2000 Pass - Pass - -
North Wilkesboro W WTP Penn chr lim: 1.5•/.
NC0020761/001 Begin:5/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County. Wilkes Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO1
PF: 2.0 Special
7Q10: 196.0 I W C(%):I.5 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
1998 >100 - - >t0o - - >100
1997 >100 - - NR/>100 - - >100
1998 >100 - - BI - - Pass
1999 Pass - - Pass - - NRIPass
2000 Pass - - Pass
>100
>100
Pass
Pass
Norwood W WTP Perm chr lim: 2.7% Y 1996 - - Pass
NC0021628/001 Begin:6/12000 Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp:Singlc 1997 - - Pass
County. Sternly Region: MRO Subbasin: YADI3 1998 - - Pass
PF: 0.75 Special 1999 - - Pass
7Q10: 42.0 IWC('/.)2.68 Order: 2000 - - Pass
Pass - - Pass - - Pass
Pass - Pass - - Pass
Pass -- - Pass - - Pass
01 - - Pass - - Pass
Oakboro W WTP PERM CFIR LIM: 19%. 2.6% @ REL TO ROCKY R. Y 1996 Pass - - Pass --
NC0043532/001 Begin: I/1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:SINGLE 1997 NRIPass - - Fail Pass
County: Sternly Region: MRO Subbasin: YADI3 1998 Pass - - Fail Fail
PF: 0.50 Special 1999 Pass - - Pass -
7Q10: 3.3 IWC(%):19 Order: 2000 Fall >76 >76 Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
r,,4
Fadlate
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
Occidental Chemical Corp/001 Penn chr Iim: 4.6% Y 1996 - >12(s) - - >12
NC0003875/001 Begin:11/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Single 1997 - >12 - - 6.1(s)
County: Ncw Hanover Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF23 1998 - >12(s) - - 8.06(s)
PF: 0.785 Special 1999 - 6.1 - - 9.7(s)
7Q10: 25 IWC(%):4.6 Order: 2000 - 9.8 - - Pend(s)
>12(s) - - >12
6.0(s) - - >12(s)
>12(s) - - >12(s)
>12(s) - - >12
Ocracoke Sanitary District Penn 24hr p/f ac monit: 90% mysid 1996 - - - -
NC0041530/001 Bcgin:8/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp: 1997 - - - -
County. Hyde Region: WARO Subbasin: PAS55 1998 - - - - -
PF: 0.45 Special 1999 - - - - -
7Q10: NA IWC(%):NA Order: 2000 - Pass - - Pass
(31
Old Fort W WTP PERM CHR LIM: 22%; IF PF 1.2 PERM CHR LIM 28% Y 1996 - - Pass - - Pass - -- NRiPo5s - Pass Pass
NC0021229/001 Begin:6/1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dee NonComp:SINGLE 1997 - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail Pass - Pass
County: McDowell Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB30 1998 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 0.80 Special 1999 - - Pass - - Pass - -- Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 4.40 IWC(%):21.96 Order: 2000 - - Pass - -
Omni Supply Inc. Penn clu lim: 8.0%
NC0006254/001 Begin:11/1/1998 Frequency: Q P/F + Mar Jun Sep Dec
County: Caldwell Region: ARO Subbasin: YADOI
PF: 0.45 Special
7Q 10: 8.00 I W C(%)d).02 Order:
+ NonComp:Singlc
1996 -- - Pass - - Pass - Pass - - Pass
1997 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
1998 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
1999 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2000 - - Pass - -
OWASA/Mason Farm Penn chr lim: 90'/. Y 1996 - Faigs)t - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass
NC0025241/001 Begin:4/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp:Single 1997 -- Pass - - Pass(s) - - Pass(5) - - Pass(s)
County: Orange Region: RRO Subbasin: CPF06 1998 •- Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass(s)
PF: 10.0 Special 1999 - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Fal(s) 97.46 - Pass(s)
7Q10: 1.1 IWC(%)92.54 Onkr: 2000 •- Pass(s) - - Pass(s)
Y Pre 1996 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency - Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin = First month required 7010 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) + - quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr. Jul. Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Pcrmined flow (MGD) IWC/. = lnstrcam waste concentration P/F - Pass/Fail test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f- Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P • Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Ton Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: -- = Data not required; NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status:1 - Inactive, N • Newly Issucd(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question; • = ORC signature needed
34
ri Terrain Navigator - Fayetteville/Charlotte/Sendhllls [NC) - [CHARLOTTE]
-1' File Vie., GoTo Markers Routes Tracks Bookmark Zoom
Ej Start
K]
GPS Window Help
24,100 14 12 11
X'
0
2'1 rF-!I35.2500422° Pr 80.2705
Click to place a Marker; Click over a marker to select; Click over marker text to edit [Shift: Zoom (Jul] [Ctrl: Drag Tool] [Shift+Ctrl: Cer
"Gale, Susan" Tue 081291...I Inbox - Netscape Folder I i4 Exploring - Station database I PR Yadkin/Pee Dee River Ba.. {{i Terrain N,
Data request
Subject: Data request
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:45:34 -0400
From: Susan Gale <susan.gale@ncmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Jackie.Nowell @ncmail.net
I've attached a Word file that shows a map of the area around Oakboro,
showing the two stations on Long Creek. Please confirm that these are
the stations that you are interested in. If not, please refer to the
station list at http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/Coalitions/ypdrba.htm and
let me know the correct stations.
I'll be forwarding your request to Phil Bethea when I get the required
information, instead of Zi-Qiang Chen (the Coalition Coordinator) as I
had indicated on the phone earlier. If you have any more questions,
feel free to contact me or Phil.
Thanks
Susan
Ploakboro.doc
Name: oakboro.doc
Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with message
Susan Gale <susan.gale@ncmail.net>
Environmental Technician
NC Department of Water Quality
Ecosystems Unit
1 of 1 8/29/00 11:03 AM
tv1.0,1,,(Aec,( fro
9i(v
00
tigc . _ Tc 3 cL-Qk e 43-9/oo
Prd
ot a „I
�.,co� �� VUf
J&to Jo A . q g 7 s� e�'e,-��
G GV`^.ul
ST1P
10481)2- (A) coTP
(0-0,
Ksi-AdO geiBE3a. slyyt. Pstzgz- Lilo/
5) o1Li
Flo 1 luArxiA.4s Co►,���e�-�090c,)
o�
Vow ,
A3) C6L) C) , CAI
{)v I Lu �5 arm S (�,l ("j " .Q�.�� a-t, CN.
@IN -14--4}3 GdAif, rv•-cy4=6A Dr5-1 Curt- P
" &jacPF2. s--03
"'U
boro WWTP Removal Rates
sed on quarterly data for 1998
Parameter
Mercury
Aresenic
in (mgll) out (mg/I) %R EPA 8th % EPA median
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0 79 60
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
LT 0,002 LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0 53 53
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
I Cadmium LT 0.001 LT 0.001 0 91 67
BOD
TSS
NH3
TKN
LT 0.001 LT 0.001 0
LT 0.001 LT 0.001 0
LT 0.001 LT 0.001 0
113 13.4 0.8814
115 3.7 0.9678
128 6.32 0.9506 O`lii-
106 5.4 0.9491 0,937231
40 2.3 0.9425
141 7.6 0.9461
93 8.3 0.9108 0 j1--
132 7.9 0.9402 0.934876
4 2.81 0.2975
12.6 1.85 0.8532
7 1.35 0.8071
4 0.95 0.7625 0.680079
2.(-, H=1o),(i
6.7 6 0.1045
16 4.6 0.7125
16 6 0.625
11 3.5 0.6818 0 *L
0.673106
1998 NH3 ave. effluent value
apr 1.12
may 0.58
jun 0.55
jul 2.02
aug 1.19
sep 1.51
oct 0.82 1.1129
nov 1.13
dec 1.39
jan 4.43
feb 3.59
mar 3.94 2.896
oakremoval.xls
2/16/99
i
ti
kboro WWTP Removal Rates
ased on quarterly data for 1998
Parameter in
Chromium
coLk
a
Copper
(VI) out (mg/I) %R EPA 8th % EPA median
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0 91 82
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
0.005 LT 0.002 0.6
LT 0.002 LT 0.002 0
0.033
0.07
0.086
0.059
Lead 0.002
LT 0.002
LT 0.002
LT 0.002
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
ave zn
21-Jan
22-Jan
23-Jan
0.04-0.2121 95
0.019 0.7286
0.059 0.314
0.057 0.0339
0.002 0 76
LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 0
LT 0.002 0
LT 0.005 LT 0.005
LT 0.005 LT 0.005
LT 0.005 LT 0.005
LT 0.005 LT 0.005
LT 0.002 LT 0.002
LT 0.002 LT 0.002
LT 0.002 LT 0.002
LT 0.002 LT 0.002
0.054
0.074
0.084
0.067
0.072
0.048
0.032
0.0615714
86
61
0 62 • 42
0
0
0
0 88
0
0
0
0.061 -0.1296 88
0.035 0.527
0.042 0.5
0.1-0.4925
0.03 0.5833
0.03 0.375
0.03 0.0625
75
79
- , °LI
`l -1
t)C.)s
oakremoval.xls
2/16/99
70Wfl oi OaUoro
P.O. Box 610
Oakboro, North Carolina 28129
Telephone 704-485-3351
Fax 704-485-2439
May 6, 1999
NCDENR
Attn: Charles H. Weaver
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RE: Town of Oakboro
Permit # NC 0043532
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Weaver,
This letter is to request "renewal of permit" for subject Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
The following is an update of changes at the WWTP:
1) On August 3, 1998, we received a NPDES Permit Issuance which
states the changes to our pervious permit (Copy enclosed).
2) We received "authorization to construct" on December 2, 1998
(Copy Attached).
3) Project was awarded April 13, 1999 and "Notice to Proceed" April
19, 1999
4) On February 6, 1998, we received "Authorization to Construct" for
the relocation of effluent discharge to Rocky River in the Yadkin -
Pee Dee River Basin
5) Project is approximately 75% complete at this time.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at
704.485.4613 or 704.485.8322
Sincerely,
Itr, ydze_e_
Joyce H. Little
Mayor
The Town of Oakboro currently operates a bio-solids land application program as
permitted by the State of North Carolina Division of Environmental Management under
permit number WQ0005387 to expire July 31, 2001. The Town of Oakboro currently
removes liquid waste bio-solids from their 250,000 gallon aeration basin and applies the
sludge to a 37.5 acre site that is specified in above mentioned permit. This basin
stabilizes the bio-solids through aerobic digestion, such that the bio-solids meet all
requirements for land application outlined by the Division of Environmental
Management. The estimated volume of bio-solids to be land applied is 36.31 dry tons per
year. The site approved for land application contains 37.5 acres of land, excluding buffer
areas. The permit has been in place since August 26, 1996.
The Town of Oakboro is proceeding with an expansion to the wastewater
treatment facility, and it is the intention to evaluate the need for additional land
application site for bio-solids. If additional sites are required, or if other sludge
management practices will need to be considered, these alternatives can be evaluated
during the design process. The plant expansion has been based on speculative limits, and
will affect the amount of bio-solids produced at the plant, no reliable estimates of bio-
solids production from the expanded plant can be made at this time.