20220562 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220411

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes 0 No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220562 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
O No payment required
O Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Fayetteville Annexation Phase V Project XV, Area 32 East Section II
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Misty Manning
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/11/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Little Rockfish Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.990729
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-79.024849
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes t% No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
2 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
0 Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
lb. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
❑O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
CI Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0 Yes C; No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
td. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
RI 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
C Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
C Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
0 Yes @ No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes G No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes 0 No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
0 Yes ® No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
1Yes 0No
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Fayetteville Public Works Commission
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Misty Manning
2d. Address
Street Address
955 Old Wilmington Rd
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28301
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
State I Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Dan Zurlo
4b. Business Name:
4c. Address
Street Address
1213 W Morehead St.
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number.
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Fayetteville, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached parcel table
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3251-3201 Dundle Rd
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28306
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Little Rockfish Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040610
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
9
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site currently consists of residential subdivisions and forested riparian areas containing wetlands adjacent
to a UT to Little Rockfish Creek.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
O Yes O No O Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.114
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
83

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Installation of water and sewer lines to serve a residential area of Fayetteville, NC.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Fayetteville Public Works Commission (PWC) is currently managing Annexation Phase V of the sewer and water design and/or construction of areas that have been annexed into the City
of Fayetteville. The Annexation Phase V includes 34 different areas, which may be subdivided for various reasons. Area 32 is comprised of five different projects due to size. The five
different projects are the following: Area 32 East Section I, Area 32 East Section II, Area 32 Outfall, Area 32 North, and Area 32 South. Area 32 East Section I and Area 32 East Section II
are not dependent on the Area 32 Outfall project or any of the other projects stated above. Each of these projects will be independently constructed and tied into PWC's existing sewer
outfall at various locations. This application is for the Project XV, Construction Area 32 East Section II, located near the intersection of Stoney Point Road (State Road 1112) and Dundle
Road (State Road 1109). The project includes construction of approximately 7,605 linear feet of gravity sanitary sewer collection lines and 1,990 linear feet of water lines. Some of the
proposed sewer lines and water lines are anticipated to be within existing City of Fayetteville streets and/or state road right-of-way. However, approximately 7,450 linear feet of new
permanent easement will be required. The total acreage disturbed by the project will be 9.0 acres. Two aerial sewer crossings south of Dundle Road and west of Holmfield Road are
proposed that will result in 0.068 acres of wetland impact within the permanent easement resulting from conversion of forested wetland to herbaceous wetland (W 1-W2). Temporary
clearing will occur within the temporary easement resulting in 0.046 acres of temporary wetland impact. Typical land clearing and sewer construction equipment will be used. The
permanent easement width will be 30' with an additional 10' of temporary easement (in total 40') in order to allow for construction of the concrete piers and pipe bridge across the UT to
Little Rockfish Creek.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
,* Yes O No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary O Approved O Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Dan Zurlo
WK Dickson
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
0 Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Ill Wetlands 0 Streams -tributaries
O Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
0 Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
29. Impact
area*
W1
permanent clearing and
conversion
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WA
Yes
Corps
0.009
(acres)
W2
permanent clearing and
conversion
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WB
Yes
Corps
0.059
(acres)
W3
temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WA
Yes
Corps
0.016
(acres)
W4
temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
WB
Yes
Corps
0.030
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.046
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.114
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.068

2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Streams and wetlands were delineated prior to design so that impacts could be minimized. Unfortunately, two unavoidable crossings are necessary.
0.068 ac. of permanent wetland impact will result from clearing of forested wetland and conversion to herbaceous wetland. However, no stream impacts
are proposed because the crossings are aerial. Impacts fall below both mitigation and notification thresholds.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Typical construction equipment will be used. Temporary impacted areas will be planted with grasses for immediate post construction stabilization and will
be allowed to regrow naturally and convert back to forested wetland.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
0 Yes * No
If no, explain why:
No impervious surface is proposed. Runoff will not increase as a result of this project.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
OYes ®No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)7
OYes 0No
Comments:
No impervious surface or buildings are proposed as a result of this project.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes 0 No
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
O Yes O No
Comments: *
Public expenditure does not exceed NEPA/SEPA thresholds.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)2*
OYes .iNo
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes No
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)

4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes • No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes • No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
• Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes • No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
UYes CNo
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ®No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ®No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ®No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USACE and NCNHP data
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA essential fish habitat mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes • No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO gis data
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes • No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA firm panel 3710949500J
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
signed Agent Authorization.pdf 373.91 KB
Figures_red.pdf 2.29MB
Parcel Table.pdf 71.64KB
Impact Figure.pdf 2.34MB
WA upland data.pdf 216.14KB
Wetland WA data.pdf 251.69KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature

CI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Daniel Zurlo
Signature
paD?diis!_4(.1Q
Date
4/11/2022

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Applicant: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
The undersigned applicant for 404/401 permitting, does hereby authorize
Daniel Zurlo , of W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification, and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Contractor/agent to act as agent for wetland delineation discussions and not for any financial
obligations.
Applicant's Address:
955 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
.itre---i�
Authorized Sgnature Authorized Signature
Date: / .7-0 2 / Date: 3/2/21

ky
North Carolina
Kn i l te4111t•1.l t• 0Wartt
Sou
. Atlanta,. Carrol`na
Georgia
Cumberland County
J
ram
Ras
ab4Grio w _
4 n a
COSe
�a
ass
41
t�y
p� a dry cur 5'�'c� f
.i„.0 :260 1,
0. 1
a 1l
a
King Rd
Rockn,h az�r
Legend
A32SE2-LOD
cc
rDICI<SON
community Infrastructure cansuuonts
Figure 1. Project Location
Area 32 - Section 2
0 2,500
5,000
Feet
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 1 inch = 5,000 feet

NWI indicated
wetland is a
maintained yard
within the existing
residential
subdivision. No
wetland exists.
National Wetlands Inventory
IPkWK
dIP ©CKS©N
,ommunlly Inleaslructure canaullant,
National Wetlands Inventory
Area 32 - Section 2
0
450
900
Feet
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 1 inch = 900 feet

North Carolina
t l [)T i 01
n ®X��j►�11rf#11.1L1I� Li
411
r_IiirR/4- MO �
. Atlantan South ow�
Carolina
Georgra
Blue -Barefoot
Cumberland County
Project Location
CD0887
Legend
Area 32 Section LOD
NCHPOpoints
Status, LocalStat, HDstatus
■ SL entry, Gone
Surveyed Only
Lindsey-Warick
4 K.
,,•4* .'
ark �, .
i©iCl<SON
%ommunlly Introslructure canaullant,
NCSHPO Map
Area 32 - Section 2
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
0
450
900
Feet
1 inch = 900 feet

Legend
A32SE2-LOD
Soil Survey
BaD ° ► � = i ..�. �' 4
V
Map Unit Symbol and Description Hydric (Y/N) Coverage (%)
Autryville loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes No 12.7%
Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 0.3%
Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes No 1.8%
Candor sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes Yes 22.3%
Johnston loam Yes 2.7%
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Yes 0.2%
McColl loam Yes 7.6%
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes No 9.8%
Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Yes 2.4%
Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes Yes 2.2%
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes Yes 38.0%
Totals for Area of Interest: 100.0%
BaD
1
dB
CaB
�a CKSON
sommunity tntrostructura con,UNCM1ts
USDA-NRCS Soil Survey
Area 32 - Section 2
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
0
500
1,000
Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet

North Carolina
South
Carolina
Cumberland County
Project Location
American alligator occurence
over 2 miles away from the LOD
Legend
Area 32 Section LOD
T&EOccurrences
�D ICKSON
,; ommunuy rntrosuuctura con,uotcnts
NCSHPO Map
Area 32 - Section 2
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
0
1,500
3,000
Feet
1 inch = 3,000 feet

WI<
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants-
USGS Topogrpahy
Area 32 - Section 2
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet

DICKSONPkW
,; ommunuy rntrasuuctura con,uotcnts
Approximate
wetland data form
location
Waters of the US
Area 32 - Section 2
0
300
600
Feet
Fayettville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 1 inch = 600 feet

PWC DWG # DWS-1536

PARCEL ID
ADDRESS
OWNER NAME
9495-21-7641
GATES FOUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC Elm
9495-21-7467
7112 HOLMFIELD RD
OBANOR, NOSA;OBANOR, ITOHAN
9495-30-0953
7132 HOLMFIELD RD
AAZAM, PEGGY F;AAZAM, DAVID
9495-21-4187
PELICAN PROP HOLDINGS LLC;CJR PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC;K&JS PROPERTIES LLC
9495-11-8313
3305 BROOMSGROVE DR
TOBIN, QUETABALA L
9495-11-7225
7401 HAMMERSLEY RD
ORTIZ, LUIS;ORTIZ, ITZEL
9495-11-5087
3320 DUNDLE RD
IVEY, D C;IVEY, BETTY J
9495-10-9789
7376 STONEY POINT RD
BURNS, KAZI HASIBA
9495-20-0333
7352 STONEY POINT RD
TODD, JOHNNY R
9495-10-5805
7422 STONEY POINT RD
IVEY, D C;IVEY, BETTY J LIFE ESTATE
9494-19-7662
7351 STONEY POINT RD
WHITEHEAD, RONALD W JR
9494-19-7990
7355 STONEY POINT RD
BLESSED OASIS PET RESORT LLC
9495-10-5082
3459 DUNDLE RD
DAVIS, TIMOTHY M;DAVIS, ANDREA H
9494-19-5845
3477 DUNDLE RD
WHITEHEAD, RONALD WJR;WHITEHEAD, JOY L
9494-19-5712
3489 DUNDLE RD
DAVIS, TIMOTHY M;DAVIS, ANDREA H
9494-19-4671
3495 DUNDLE RD
HERRON, CARMEN;HERRON, MARK
9494-19-5532
3507 DUNDLE RD
DEJESUS, EDGAR R;DEJESUS, JUDY G
9494-19-4495
3515 DUNDLE RD
BOWEN, DAVID L
9494-19-3251
3529 DUNDLE RD
MT CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
9495-10-2006
0 DUNDLE RD
QUICK, DOROTHY M
9494-19-1848
3484 DUNDLE RD
QUICK, LACY M
9494-19-0796
3496 DUNDLE RD
QUICK, LACY M;QUICK, DOROTHY M
9494-09-9677
0 DUNDLE RD
QUICK, LACY III
9494-09-7426
3514 DUNDLE RD
LINDSAY, CELENA P
9494-19-1317
3526 DUNDLE RD
SESSOMS, GLORIA MARLENE;SESSOMS, MARLENE QUICK
9494-19-0139
3550 DUNDLE RD
DEES, ALLEN L;DEES, LONA E
9494-19-0075
3560 DUNDLE RD
DEES, ALLEN L;DEES, LONA E
9495-10-2718
7437 STONEY POINT RD
SMITH, NEILJ
9495-10-1836
7453 STONEY POINT RD
SMITH, NEIL J
9495-10-0946
7475 STONEY POINT RD
JACKSON, J L JR;JACKSON, J L;JACKSON, ANN K
9495-00-9919
7475 STONEY POINT RD
SCHULT, WILLIAM ERIC;SCHULT, PATRICIA MCCABE;SCHULT, JOEL
9495-00-8708
0? DR
SCHULT, WILLIAM ERIC;SCHULT, PATRICIA MCCABE;SCHULT, JOEL
9495-00-6837
7481 STONEY POINT RD
SCHULT, WILLIAM ERIC;SCHULT, PATRICIA MCCABE;SCHULT, JOEL
9495-02-3327
7624 HAMMERSLEY RD
MASTRANGELO, MICHAEL J;MASTRANGELO, CAROLYN M
9495-02-1458
3524 COKEFIELD CT
JONES, RICHARD M
9495-02-2314
7628 HAMMERSLEY RD
DAVIS, JENNIFER ANNE;DAVIS, TEVERENCE A
9495-02-0327
0 STONEY POINT RD
AQUA NORTH CAROLINA
9495-02-1233
7625 HAMMERSLEY RD
COX, BRITNEY ELIZABETH;KIELDSEN, ROBERT F. III
9495-01-0726
0 ROCKFISH RD
AUTRY, JAMES J JR;AUTRY, TERES Mr MI.
9485-91-9971
0 ROCKFISH RD
AUTRY, JAMES JULIAN JR;CONSTANCE, AUTRY BAXLEY
9485-92-9110
7647 STONEY POINT RD
BAXLEY, BRANDON SCOTT;BARRETT, CHRISTIAN
9485-91-7861
7667 STONEY POINT RD
SCHULTZ, WILLIAM FJR;SHIRLEY, ANN BAKER HEIRS
9495-02-3580
3437 BROOMSGROVE DR
LUTZEN, ANDREW; LUTZEN, CARRIE
9495-10-6231
3439 DUNDLE RD
LIEBERS, CHARLES EDWIN;LIEBERS, WIFE
9494-18-0933
3572 DUNDLE RD
EDWARDS, RICHARD M;ROSA G
9495-11-5715
0 DUNDLE RD
PELICAN PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC;CJR PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC;K&JS PROPERTIES LLC
9495-10-3969
7446 STONEY POINT RD
WILSON, LEWIS EDWARD
9495-30-1810
7136 HOLMFIELD RD
BANZON, ROBERTO P;BANZON, ELEANOR
9495-01-7011
7487 STONEY POINT RD
SINGER, STORMY MICHELE;LOGAN, RYAN

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Area 32- Stoney Point Rd. & Toggel Ave.
Applicant/Owner: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Investigator(s): Sharon Appel!, Ward Marotti
City/County: Fayetteville/ Cumberland/Hoke Sampling Date: 4-23-19
State: NC Sampling Point: Up #2
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P137, P133A
Soil Map Unit Name: VaD-
Lat:
Slope (%): 5-10%
34.98883333 Long: -79.02333333 Datum: DD
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
NWI classification: n/a
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No X
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Sample point was on a gently sloped
upslope sharply. Pine trees made up
ground.
hillside where the fence line to the neighborhood angled
most of the canopy layer and pine needles covered the
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ ❑
❑ El
❑ ❑
❑ 0
0 II
El ❑
a El
El
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators present. Soil was not saturated and no water table was visible in the auger
hole.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Up #2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Pinus taeda
Carpinus caroliniana
Quercus stellata
Magnolia tripetala
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ligustrum sinense
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
15 FAC
30 Y
30 Y
10
FAC
UPL
FACU
85 = Total Cover
42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Carpinus caroliniana
Quercus stellata
Magnolia tripetala
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
None
10 Y FAC
15 Y FAC
15 Y UPL
5 FACU
45
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
2 Smilax bona-nox
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 2.5
2.5
2.5
5
FAC
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
0
0
5
1
1
7
x 1 =
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
0
0
15
4
5
(A) 24 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.43
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No indicators of wetland plants.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Up #2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-3 7.5YR 2.5/3
3-12 7.5YR 3/2
12-18 10YR 5/2 95
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
loam
sandy
10YR 2/1 5 sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
(Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
.❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ ❑
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
B
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
w/ sand particles
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
B
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ I Red Parent Material (TF2)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
No indications of hydric soil. No soil saturation or water table visible.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Area 32- Stoney Point Rd. & Toggel Ave.
Applicant/Owner: Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Investigator(s): Sharon Appel!, Ward Marotti
City/County: Fayetteville / Cumberland/Hoke Sampling Date: 4-23-19
State: NC Sampling Point: Wet #2
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P137, P133A Lat: 34.98876944 Long: -79.02333333 Datum: DD
Soil Map Unit Name: JT- Johnston loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification: PF01A
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Sampled in a bottom -land area. Holmfield Road is up the sloped hillside to the north/northeast and
Toggel Avenue is to the west.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑✓ ❑
0 El
El El
0 0
0 II
El ❑
a
El
El
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
• Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
.11 Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Depth (inches): 8
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Multiple primary and secondary hydrology indicators. Strong H2S odor with first auger pull. Soil was
saturated at surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet#2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Acer rubrum
Ilex opaca
Liriodendron tulipifera
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
35 Y FAC
5 FACU
30 Y FACU
70
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ligustrum sinense
Fraxinus spp.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10
1 Onoclea sensibilis
10 FAC
20 Y FACW
30
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
2 Osmunda regalis
3 Carex spp.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
12 Y FACW
12 Y OBL
6 FACW
30
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Toxicodendron radicans
10 Y FAC
10
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
3
3
2
0
9
x 1 = 1
x2= 6
x3= 9
x4= 8
x5= 0
(A) 24 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Dominance test and prevalence index both indicate hydrophitic vegetation. Many areas of the
bottomland were sparsely vegetated. Trunk fluting, multiple trunks and buttressed trunks were also
noted.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet #2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-7 10YR 4/3 90 2.5YR 3/6 10 Sandy
Texture Remarks
7-12 10YR 2/2 50 10YR 4/2
12-18 10YR 2/1 100
50 RM Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
.❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ ❑
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
B
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Clayey sand
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
with fines
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
B
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ I Red Parent Material (TF2)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil was saturated at the surface. Water entered the auger hole at approximately 8 inches.
Strong H2S odor with first auger pull.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0