NC0074578_Permit (Issuance)_20161215

PAT MCCRORY
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 15, 2016
Ms. Ranae Smith
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
One Williams Center, OTC-8
Tulsa, OK 74172
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0074578
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Greensboro I Terminal
115 S Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro 27409
Guilford County
Dear Ms. Smith:
The Division of Water Resources (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject
facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1
and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated October 15, 2007, or as subsequently amended.
The Division understands that you have made no significant changes to your facility since the last permit
renewal. We have made the following updates to your previous permit in the August 10, 2016 and October 5,
2016 drafts:
1. updated facility description on supplement to permit cover sheet
2. added updates to facility map including adjustment of Outfall 002 coordinates to
36.071979, -79.918421
3. updated receiving stream as Long Branch for Outfall 002 as indicated in GIS mapping instead of
it being an unnamed tributary (UT) to long branch
4. added flow rational equation [see Footnote 2 and Special Condition A. (2.)]
5. added monthly average limit of 30 mg/L for Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
6. changed annual toxicity monitoring to Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing [TGE6G] at
90%; 24 hour static and updated Footnote 6 [Condition A. (3.)]
7. added monthly effluent Turbidity monitoring including 50 NTU effluent limits (both daily
maximum & monthly average) along with Footnote 3 regarding receiving stream turbidity [15A
NCAC 02B .0211 (21)]
8. added electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports (eDMR) in Section A. (4.).
Changes made since the October 5, 2016 draft permit include the following:
9. added Footnote 4 regarding sampling for O&G as in the previous permit; however, the O&G
parameter code [00556] remains the same for submitting DMR/eDMR, but uses test EPA method
1664 (SGT-HEM) with results in mg/L
10. removed footnote regarding samples being collected concurrently with annual Acute Toxicity
State of North Carolina J Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-707-9000

Mr. Gatewood
December 15, 2016
Page 2 of 2
11. added Footnote 5 which requires that all practical quantitation limits (PQL) must be sufficiently
sensitive considering the respective water quality standard for each parameter [see Part II. Section
D. (4.)].
Starting December 21, 2016, federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring
reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then
permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The final
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21, 2015.
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's
Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to your final
NPDES permit. [See Special Condition A. (6)] For information on eDMR, registering for eDMR and
obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/edmr.
For more information on EPA's final NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web
site:
http://www2.epa.gov/compliance/final-national pollutant -discharge -elimination -system -nodes -electronic -
reporting -rule.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request submitted within thirty
(30) days after receiving this letter. Your request must take the form of a written petition conforming to
Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and you must file it with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is
made, this permit shall remain final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources or any
other Federal, State, or Local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Derek Denard at
[[e-mail]] or call [phone].
. Jay Zimmerman, P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure: NPDES Permit NC0074578 (Issuance Final)
hc: Central Files
NPDES Program Files
WSRO Files/ Attn: Sherri Knight
ec: Aquatic Toxicology Branch / Susan Meadows [[e-mail]]
Ranae Smith, Magellan Terminals Holding, L.P., [[e-mail]]

NPDES Permit NC0074578
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L. P.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the
Magellan Terminals Holdings — Greensboro I Terminal
115 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
Guilford County
to receiving waters designated as Long Branch within the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV
hereof.
This permit shall become effective January 1, 2017.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2021.
Signed this day, December 15, 2016.
r�
S Zimmerman, P.G., Di •
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management
Page 1 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L. P.
is hereby authorized to:
1. continue to operate an existing Surface -Water Pollution Control System for stormwater in proximity
to above -ground storage tanks (ASTs) for the surface bulk -storage of petroleum hydrocarbon fuels in
excess of one million gallons, and ethanol, utilizing;
• truck loading rack drains followed by an oil/water separator and a waste holding tank (contents
hauled offsite for disposal)
• dike containment areas that drain to a single retention pond
• a hand operated discharge control valve (normally closed)
• totalizing meter at discharge structure
• dry -ditch draining to UT of Long Branch
located in Greensboro, 115 S. Chimney Rock Road at Magellan Terminals Holdings - Greensboro I
Terminal in Guilford County; and
2. discharge from said treatment works via Outfall 002, a location specified on the attached map, into
Long Branch [stream segment 17-2-1-(1)], a waterbody currently classified WS-IV:* within
Subbasin 03-06-08 [HUC: 030300030102] of the Cape Fear River Basin.
Page 2 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
PART I
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge treated stormwater from Outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited, monitored and
reported' by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
[PARAMETER CODES]
LIMITSMONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Sample
Location
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Flow 2 (MGD)
50050
Episodic
2
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (mg/L)
C0530
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity 3 (NTU)
00070
50 NTU
50 NTU
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Oil & Grease 4 (mg/L)
EPA Method 1664 [SGT-HEM]
00556
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Recoverable Phenolics 5 (µg/L)
32730
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Benzene 5 (µg/L)
34030
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Toluene 5 (µg/L)
34010
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Ethyl Benzene 5 µg/L)
34371
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Naphthalene 5 (µg/L)
34696
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Xylene 5 (µg/L)
81551
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
MTBE 5 (µg/L)
22417
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Acute WET Testing 6
TGE6C
Annually 6
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Starting on December 21, 2016, begin submitting Discharge Monitoring Reports electronically using NC
DWR's eDMR application system. See Condition A. (4.).
2. Each discharge event shall be monitored for Flow volume and duration — During periods of no flow, the
Permittee shall submit a signed, monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge."
Flow may be documented using any one of the following four (4) methods:
1) measure flow continuously via weir or flow meter (totalizer preferred);
2) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event;
3) report flow based on discharge pump logs; or
4) calculate flow based on total rainfall per unit area draining to the outfall using the
Rational Method [see formula, Section A. (2.)].
3. Turbidity — Effluent turbidity shall not cause receiving -stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If background
turbidity naturally exceeds 50 NTU, the effluent shall not cause background turbidity to increase. Any
discharge exceeding this permit limit will require sufficient instream sampling (upstream and/or downstream)
to verify compliance (effluent vs. background). [NCAC 02B. 0211(21)]
Page 3 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
4. Where possible, the grab sample for Oil & Grease should be skimmed from the water surface of a
quiescent (calm water) zone.
5. All practical quantitation limits (PQL) must be sufficiently sensitive considering the respective water quality
standard for each parameter [see Part II. Section D. (4.)].
6. If Acute WET -test fails [TGE6C], the Permittee shall test each subsequent discharge event until testing
indicates "pass," after which Quarterly monitoring shall resume in accord with Section A. (3.). If after a
subsequent five (5) consecutive Quarterly events, WET results demonstrate no toxicity (i.e., "pass"), the
Permittee may petition the Division to relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be
collected concurrently with other POC samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies.
Conditions:
• The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam.
• Direct discharge of tank solids, tank -bottom water, or the rag layer is not permitted.
• Hydrostatic Tank Testing: The Permittee shall discharge no tank solids, no tank bottom -water, no tank
rag -layer; no tank [or pipe] contents, unless Benzene concentration tests less than 1.19 µg/L and
Toluene concentration tests less than 11 µg/L.
A. (2.) FLOW MEASUREMENT RATIONAL [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
The Rational Method - Determination of Peak Runoff:
[REF: FHWA Urban Drainage Design Manual, 3.2.2. Rational Method (3-1)]
Q=KuCIA, where:
Q = flow (peak flow rate in cfs or m3/sec)
Ku = unit conversation factor = 1.008 for U.S. standard units (usually
ignored because it is so close to 1), or 0.278 for metric units
C = dimensionless runoff coefficient for the watershed, loosely defined as the
ratio of runoff to rainfall
I = intensity of rainfall [taken from the intensity -duration -frequency curves
for the specified design return period at the time of concentration, tc
(in/h or mm/h). tc = time of concentration (time after beginning rainfall
excess when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing
simultaneously to outlet flow).
A = area of tributary watershed (acres or km2)
The rational equation is used to calculate the runoff from a region, given:
• the runoff coefficient (accounts for infiltration losses in the region),
• the rainfall intensity to the region,
• the time for runoff to travel from the region's upper reaches to its outlet, and
• the region's drainage area.
Page 4 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
A. (3.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
[15A NCAC 02B .0200 et seq.]
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North
Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A
Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised December 2010 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall
be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. The effluent
concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment
two in the procedure document). The tests will be performed during the months of January, April,
July and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity testing quarter
assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during representative effluent
discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGE6C. Additionally, DWR Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Water Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing,
this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Assessment of
toxicity compliance is based on the toxicity testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that
begins on the first day of the month in which toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues
until the final day of the third month.
Page 5 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.
A. (4.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS
[G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and program
reports and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees
must submit monitoring data and reports electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The final NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21, 2015.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.)
• Section D. (2.)
• Section D. (6.)
• Section E. (5.)
Signatory Requirements
Reporting
Records Retention
Monitoring Reports
1. Reporting Requirements [Supersedes Section D. (2.1 and Section E. (5.) (a)1
Effective December 21, 2016, the permittee shall report discharge monitoring data electronically
using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter
monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's
eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state
electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing,
signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the
following address:
NC DENR / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Permitting Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Page 6 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband
access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted
and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or
alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing
address above. See "How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below.
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
Starting on December 21, 2020, the permittee must electronically report the following compliance
monitoring data and reports, when applicable:
• Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports;
• Pretreatment Program Annual Reports; and
• Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) Annual Reports.
The permittee may seek an electronic reporting waiver from the Division (see "How to Request a
Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below).
2. Electronic Submissions
In accordance with 40 CFR 122.41(1)(9), the permittee must identify the initial recipient at the time
of each electronic submission. The permittee should use the EPA's website resources to identify the
initial recipient for the electronic submission.
Initial recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities means the entity
(EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES data [see 40 CFR 127.2(b)].
EPA plans to establish a website that will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for
each type of electronic submission and for each state. Instructions on how to access and use the
appropriate electronic reporting tool will be available as well. Information on EPA's NPDES
Electronic Reporting Rule is found at: http://www2.ena.gov/compliance/final-national-pollutant-
discharge-elimination-system-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
Electronic submissions must start by the dates listed in the "Reporting Requirements" section above.
3. How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting
The permittee may seek a temporary electronic reporting waiver from the Division. To obtain an
electronic reporting waiver, a permittee must first submit an electronic reporting waiver request to
the Division. Requests for temporary electronic reporting waivers must be submitted in writing to the
Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required
Page 7 of 8

NPDES Permit NC0074578
under this permit to begin submitting monitoring data and reports. The duration of a temporary
waiver shall not exceed 5 years and shall thereupon expire. At such time, monitoring data and reports
shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a
new temporary electronic reporting waiver by the Division. Approved electronic reporting waivers
are not transferrable. Only permittees with an approved reporting waiver request may submit
monitoring data and reports on paper to the Division for the period that the approved reporting
waiver request is effective.
Information on eDMR and the application for a temporary electronic reporting waiver are found on
the following web page:
http://deq .nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/edmr
4. Simatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) jb) and Supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)1
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR
reporting purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's
eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the
following web page:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION
WILL BE ACCEPTED:
"1 cert, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
5. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)1
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These
records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period
may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41].
Page 8 of 8

Magellan Terminals Holdings L P
Greensboro I Terminal
NPDES Permit NC0074578
115 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
Receiving Stream: Long Branch
Stream Segment: 17-2-1-(1)
River Basin: Cape Fear
County: Guilford
Stream Class: WS-IV:*
Sub -Basin #: 03-06-08
HUC: 030300030102
NC Grid/USGS Quad: C19SW / Guilford, NC

DEQ / DWR / NPDES
EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NC0074578
Derek Denard, Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit / 919-807-6307
12Dec2016
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
Greensboro I Terminal
Applicant Address
One Williams Center OTC-8, Tulsa, OK 74172
Facility Address
115 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
Permitted Flow (MGD)
not limited
Type of Waste
100% Industrial, fuel (bulk storage)
Facility Class
PC-1
County
Guilford
Permit Status
Renewal
Regional Office
WSRO
Stream Characteristics
Receiving Stream
Long Branch
Stream Classification
WS-IV: *
Stream Segment
[17-2-1-(1)]
Drainage basin
Cape Fear
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Subbasin
[HUC]
03-06-08
[HUC: 030300030102]
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Use Support
Impaired (Cat 5): Fish
Tissue Hg, Benthos Fair,
Fish Community Fair.
30Q2 (cfs)0
Q
303 d Listed
()
Average Flow (cfs)
0
State Grid
C19SW
1WC (%)
100%
USGS Topo Quad
Guilford, NC
Facility Summary
This facility is an industrial (flow <1 MGD) operate an existing Surface -Water Pollution Control System for
stormwater in proximity to above -ground storage tanks (ASTs) for the surface bulk -storage of petroleum
hydrocarbon fuels in excess of one million gallons, and ethanol, utilizing:
• truck loading rack drains followed by an oil/water separator and a waste holding tank (contents
hauled offsite for disposal)
• dike containment areas that drain to a single retention pond
• a hand operated discharge control valve (normally closed)
• totalizing meter at discharge structure
• dry -ditch draining to UT of Long Branch
** Please note: Outfall 001 was for discharge from a groundwater remediation system that was removed
from a previous version of this permit. This facility has one remaining outfall (Outfall 002) for stormwater.
For Renewal — This permit reflects discharge at Outfall 002. DWR updated the following:
1. updated facility description on supplement to permit cover sheet
2. added updates to facility map including adjustment of Outfall 002 coordinates to
36.071979, -79.918421
3. updated receiving stream as Long Branch for Outfall 002 as indicated in GIS mapping instead of it
being an unnamed tributary (UT) to long branch
4. added flow rational equation [see Footnote 2 and Special Condition A. (2.)]
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2016 -- NPDES Permit NC0074578
Page 1

5. added monthly average limit of 30 mg/L for Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
6. changed annual toxicity monitoring to Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing [TGE6G] at
90%; 24 hour static and updated Footnote 6 [Condition A. (3.)]
7. added monthly effluent Turbidity monitoring including 50 NTU effluent limits (both daily
maximum & monthly average) along with Footnote 3 regarding receiving stream turbidity [15A
NCAC 02B .0211 (21)]
8. added electronic reporting of discharge monitoring reports (eDMR) in Section A. (4.).
Changes made since the October 5, 2016 draft permit include the following:
9. added Footnote 4 regarding sampling for O&G as in the previous permit; however, the O&G
parameter code [00556] remains the same for submitting DMR/eDMR, but uses test EPA method
1664 (SGT-HEM) with results in mg/L
10. removed footnote regarding samples being collected concurrently with annual Acute Toxicity
11. added Footnote 5 which requires that all practical quantitation limits (PQL) must be sufficiently
sensitive considering the respective water quality standard for each parameter [see Part II. Section
D. (4.)].
RPA — The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water
quality standards, a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most
recent effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44 (d) (i). The
NC RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1) 95% Confidence Level/95% Probability; 2) assumption of zero
background; 3) use of 1/2 detection limit for "less than" values; and 4) streamflows used for dilution
consideration based on 15A NCAC 2B.0206. Effective April 6, 2016, NC began implementation of
dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards, dated June 10, 2016.
A reasonable potential analysis was conducted on effluent toxicant data collected between Oct2011-
Mar2016. Pollutants of concern included toxicants with positive detections and associated water quality
standards/criteria. Based on this analysis, the following permitting actions are proposed for this permit:
• Monitoring Only. The following parameters will receive a monitor -only requirement since they did
not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria, but the
maximum predicted concentration was >50% of the allowable concentration or remains as a
parameter of concern included in the permitting strategy for this type of facility: Benzene, Toluene,
Ethylbenzene, Xylenes, Naphthalene, MTBE and Phenolics.
[see attached RPA Spreadsheets]
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2016 -- NPDES NC0074578
Page 2

Stream — Updated receiving stream as Long Branch for Outfall 002 as indicated in GIS mapping instead of
it being an unnamed tributary (UT) to Long Branch. (see map image below).
Discharge from Outfall 002 is into Long Branch [Stream Segment 17-2-1-(1)], a waterbody classified
WS-IV:* located within Subbasin 03-06-08 [HUC: 030300030102] of the Cape Fear River Basin. The
segment [17-2-1-(1)] is listed as Impaired (Cat 5) for Fish Tissue Hg, Benthos Fair, Fish Community Fair.
The description for Stream Segment 17-2-1-(1) description is from source to a point 0.5 mile downstream
of Guilford County SR 1541.
NC Surface Water Gassilicatiorrs
ad, Greensboro, NC 27409 X
Stream Index: 17-2.1-(1)
Stream Name: Long Branch
Description: From source to a point
0.5 mile downstream
of Guilford County SR
1541
Classification: WS-IV:'
Date of Class.. March 31, 1999
River Basin: Cape Fear
What does this More info
Class. mean
Data Summary — Effluent Data (Oct 2011— Mar2016) [four and one half years (4 Y2)].
Parameter
Max
of
Value
Min
of
Value
Average
of Value
Count
of
Value
UoM
00556 - Oil & Grease
8.6
5
5.2
29
mg/I
22417 - Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
10
5
10
29
pg/I
32730 - Phenolics, Total Recoverable
5
5
5
29
pg/I
34010 - Toluene
5
1
1
29
pg/I
34030 - Benzene
1
1
1
29
pg/I
34371 - Ethylbenzene
1
1
1
29
pg/I
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2016 -- NPDES NC0074578
Page 3

34696 - Naphthalene
2
1
2
29
pg/I
81551 - Xylene
10
1
1
29
pg/I
CO530 - Solids, Total Suspended - Concentration
11
1
5
29
mg/I
Flow — Discharge Rate and Duration (Oct 2011 — Mar2016) [four and one half years (4 % )]. The flow is
Episodic flow (stormwater only).
Parameter
Year
Max of
Value
Min of
Value
Average
of Value
Count of
Value
50050 - Flow,
in conduit or
thru treatment
plant
20113
0.27
0.065
0.167
5
2012
0.423
0.05
0.156
5
2013
0.536
0.056
0.222
13
2014
0.469
0.065
0.177
10
2015
0.327
0.001
0.175
12
20163
0.209
0.209
0.209
1
Max/Min/Average/Total
0.536
0.001
0.186
46
3 three (3) months of data
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) — This facility is combined stormwater and groundwater [complex
wastestream] that flows to a retention pond that discharges episodically. Currently WET testing is Acute
WET [TAE6C] Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas), 24-hr definitive, LC-50 >100%. Acute test history
demonstrates no toxicity issues [See attached data summary].
Acute WET testing is deemed appropriate to evaluate end -of -pipe short-term impacts of episodic
discharges. Chronic WET testing is applied to onsite groundwater remediation because these waste streams
are deemed complex and can be non -episodic. These facilities typically discharge under zero flow
conditions (IWC = 100%), therefore WET testing is conducted @ 90% effluent concentration. [REF Memo:
Coleen Sullins, DWQ, 1999].
For renewal Changed annual toxicity monitoring to Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing [TGE6G]
at 90%; 24 hour static with the following Footnote 5: If Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test fails
[TGE6C], the Permittee shall test each subsequent discharge event until testing indicates "pass," after which
Quarterly monitoring shall resume in accord with Section A. (3.). If after a subsequent five (5) consecutive
Quarterly events, WET results demonstrate no toxicity (i.e., "pass"), the Permittee may petition the Division
to relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be collected concurrently with other POC
samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies.
Compliance History — See attached compliance history for Oct2011 to Jun2016.
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2016 -- NPDES NC0074578
Page 4

Outfall 002 — Adjusted Coordinates to 36° 4' 19.124", -79° 55' 6.316" [36.071979, -79.918421] (see below).
i
19'55'I-W. 26'470't1
•
1755'6.31611V, 36'419.124-N
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2016 -- NPDES NC0074578
Page 5

Magellan Terminals Holdings L P-Greensboro Terminal I REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
NC0074578
Qw (MGD) = 0.53600
1Q1OS (cfs) = 0.00
7Q1OS (cfs) = 0.00
7Q10W(cfs)= 0.00
30Q2 (cfs) = 0.00
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 0.00
Receiving Stream: Long Branch
2016 Generic RPA (non -hardness dependent) - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
WWTP/WTP Class:
IWC @ 1Q1OS =
IWC @ 7Q10S =
IWC@7Q1OW=
IWC @ 30Q2 =
IWC @ QA=
Stream Class:
PC-1
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
WS-IV:*
Outfall 002
Qw = 0.536 MGD
PARAMETER
Benzene
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Mixture
Napthalene
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
Phenolics, Total Recoverable
TYPE
(1)
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
NC WQS / Applied %2 FAV /
Chronic Standard Acute
1.19
WS
51
HH
11
FW
97
FW
670
FW
12
FW
19
WS
1500
HH
300
FW
1-
z
µg/L
µg/L
µg/L
µg/L
µg/L
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
11 # Det. Max Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
29 1
1.1
29 1
1.1
29 1
29 1
29 2
29 1
29 1
29 1
29 1
3.1
1.1
7.0
2.2
10.8
10.8
5.3
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic: 1.19
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic: 51.00
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic: 11.00
No value > Allowable Cw
RECOMMENDED ACTION
No R- P, Predicted Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic 97.00
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic: 670.00
No value Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic: 12.00
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic: 19.00
No value Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Chronic: 1,500.00
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
- Chronic: 300.00
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
No RP, Predicted Max < 50%0 of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
N- o RP, Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw -
Maintain Quarterly Monitoring
No - RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Quarterly Monitoring
N- o RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowbale Cw -
Maintain Monthly Monitoring
Page 1 of 1
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, rpa
8/9/2016

2016 Generic RPA (non -hardness dependent) - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfal I
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
1Q10s (cfs)
Data Source(s)
CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
❑CHECK IF HQW OR ORW
agellan Terminals Holdings L P-Greensboro Terminal I
PC-1
NC0074578
002
0.53600
Long Branch
WS-IV:*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
BIMS data Oct2011 to Mar2016
vlow directions for data entry. In some cases a
comment menu list the available choices or a
dropdown menu will provide a list you may select
from. Error message occur if data entry does not
meet input criteria.
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
E Par05
Par06
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Name
Type Chronic Modifier Acute
PQL Units
Benzene
C
1.19
WS
pg/L
Benzene
C
51
HH
pg/L
Toluene
NC
11
FW
pg/L
. Ethylbenzene
NC
97
FW
pg/L
Xylenes, Mixture
NC
670
FW
pg/L
~
Napthalene
NC
12
FW
pg/L
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
NC
19
WS
pg/L
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
NC
1500
HH
ug/L
Phenolics, Total Recoverable
NC
300
FW
ug/L
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, input
8/9/2016

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Benzene
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/17/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0,0928
2 11/9/2011 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5172
3 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1795
4 4/24/2012 < 1 0.5 n 29
5 7/16/2012 < 1 0.5
6 8/14/2012 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor = 1.0600
7 9/21/2012 < 1 0.5 Max. Value 1.0 pg/L
8 1/7/2013 < 1 0.5 Max. Pred Cw 1.1 pg/L
9 3/4/2013 < 1 0.5
10 4/9/2013 < 1 0.5
11 6/6/2013 < 1 0.5
12 7/17/2013 < 1 0.5
13 8/21/2013 < 1 0.5
14 12/4/2013 < 1 0.5
15 1/30/2014 < 1 0.5
16 3/20/2014 < 1 0.5
17 4/24/2014 < 1 0.5
18 6/18/2014 < 1 0.5
19 8/6/2014 < 1 0.5
20 11/25/2014 < 1 0.5
21 1/26/2015 < 1 0.5
22 2/13/2015 < 1 0.5
23 3/9/2015 < 1 0.5
24 4/17/2015 < 1 0.5
25 8/14/2015 1 1
26 9/29/2015 < 1 0.5
27 11/2/2015 < 1 0.5
28 12/28/2015 < 1 0.5
29 2/9/2016 < 1 0.5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Usa'PASTE SPECIAL
Values" than "COPY"
. MasImum data
points - 58
6
Benzene
t l .Prr/E9 rsEECFg4
«:fWissf tue dI .
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
I 10/17/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0928
2 11/9/2011 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5172
3 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5' C.V. 0.1795
4 4/24/2012 < 1 0.5 n 29
5 7/16/2012 < 1 0.5
6 8/14/2012 < 1 0.5
7 9/21/2012 < 1 0.5
8 1/7/2013 < 1 0.5
9 3/4/2013 < 1 0.5
10 4/9/2013 < 1 0.5
11 6/6/2013 < 1 0.5
12 7/17/2013 < 1 0.5
13 8/21 /2013 < 1 0.5
14 12/4/2013 < 1 0.5
15 1/30/2014 < 1 0.5
16 3/20/2014 < 1 0.5
17 4/24/2014 < 1 0.5
18 6/18/2014 < 1 0.5
19 8/6/2014 < 1 0.5
20 11/25/2014 < 1 0.5
21 1/26/2015 < 1 0.5
22 2/13/2015 < 1 0.5
23 3/9/2015 < 1 0.5
24 4/17/2015 < 1 0.5
25 8/14/2015 1 1
26 9/29/2015 < 1 0.5
27 11/2/2015 < 1 0.5
28 12/28/2015 < 1 0.5
29 2/9/2016 < 1 0.5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Mult Factor = 1.0600
Max. Value 1.0 pg/L
Max. Pred Cw 1.1 pg/L
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, data
-1 - 8/9/2016

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
7
Toluene
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/17/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev.
2 11/9/2011 < 1 0.5 Mean
3 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 C.V.
4 4/24/2012 < 1 0.5 n
5 7/16/2012 < 1 0.5
6 8/14/2012 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor =
7 9/21/2012 < 1 0.5 Max. Value
8 1/7/2013 < 1 0.5 Max. Pred Cw
9 3/4/2013 < 1 0.5
10 4/9/2013 < 1 0.5
11 6/6/2013 < 1 0.5
12 7/17/2013 < 1 0.5
13 8/21/2013 < 1 0.5
14 12/4/2013 < 1 0.5
15 1/30/2014 < 1 0.5
16 3/20/2014 < 1 0.5
17 4/24/2014 < 1 0.5
18 6/18/2014 < 1 0.5
19 8/6/2014 < 1 0.5
20 11/25/2014 < 1 0.5
21 1/26/2015 < 1 0.5
22 2/13/2015 < 1 0.5
23 3/9/2015 < 1 0.5
24 4/17/2015 < 1 0.5
25 8/14/2015 1 1
26 9/29/2015 < 1 0.5
27 11/2/2015 < 1 0.5
28 12/28/2015 < 5 2.5
29 2/9/2016 < 1 0.5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
llg6 PASTt SPECIAL`.
Values" Then "COPY"
• Rodman* dine
Points" S9
0.3796
0.5862
0.6475
29
1.2300
2.5 pg/L
3.1 pg/L
10
Ethylbenzene
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
v$lu"ittde-0tl'
polms���s
1 10/17/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.09
2 11/9/2011 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.52
3 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1795
4 4/24/2012 < 1 0.5 n 29
5 7/16/2012 < 1 0.5
6 8/14/2012 < 1 0.5
7 9/21/2012 < 1 0.5
8 1/7/2013 < 1 0.5
9 3/4/2013 < 1 0.5
10 4/9/2013 < 1 0.5
11 6/6/2013 < 1 0.5
12 7/17/2013 < 1 0.5
13 8/21/2013 < 1 0.5
14 12/4/2013 < 1 0.5
15 1/30/2014 < 1 0.5
16 3/20/2014 < 1 0.5
17 4/24/2014 < 1 0.5
18 6/18/2014 < 1 0.5
19 8/6/2014 < 1 0.5
20 11/25/2014 < 1 0.5
21 1/26/2015 < 1 0.5
22 2/13/2015 < 1 0.5
23 3/9/2015 < 1 0.5
24 4/17/2015 < 1 0.5
25 8/14/2015 1 1
26 9/29/2015 < 1 0.5
27 11/2/2015 < 1 0.5
28 12/28/2015 < 1 0.5
29 2/9/2016 < 1 0.5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Mult Factor = 1.0600
Max. Value 1.0 pg/L
Max. Pred Cw 1.1 pg/L
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, data
- 2 - 8/9/2016

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
12
Xylenes, Mixture
Date Data
1 10/17/2011 <
2 11/9/2011 <
3 12/30/2011 <
4 4/24/2012 <
5 7/16/2012 <
6 8/14/2012 <
7 9/21/2012 <
8 1/7/2013 <
9 3/4/2013 <
10 4/9/2013 <
11 6/6/2013 <
12 7/17/2013 <
13 8/21/2013 <
14 12/4/2013 <
15 1/30/2014 <
16 3/20/2014 <
17 4/24/2014 <
18 6/18/2014 <
19 8/6/2014 <
20 11/25/2014 <
21 1/26/2015
22 2/13/2015 <
23 3/9/2015 <
24 4/17/2015 <
25 8/14/2015
26 9/29/2015 <
27 11/2/2015 <
28 12/28/2015 <
29 2/9/2016 <
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Uae "RJtSTE SPECtAM
Valtiieitliet 14"
. lMmdilutrh data
paftlt��5e
BDL=1/2DL Results
1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.8720
1 0.5 Mean 0.7241
1 0.5 C.V. 1.2043
1 0.5 n 29
1 0.5
1 0.5 Mult Factor = 1.4000
1 0.5 Max. Value 5.0 pg/L
1 0.5 Max. Pred Cw 7.0 pg/L
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
10 5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
2 2
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 1
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
1 0.5
14
Napthalene
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use -PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points .58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
10/17/2011 < 2 1 Std Dev. 0.2315
11/9/2011 < 2 1 Mean 1.0000
12/30/2011 < 2 1 C.V. 0.2315
4/24/2012 < 2 1 n 29
7/16/2012 < 2 1
8/14/2012 < 2 1 Mult Factor = 1.0800
9/21/2012 < 2 1 Max. Value 2.0 pg/L
1/7/2013 < 2 1 Max. Pred Cw 2.2 pg/L
3/4/2013 < 2 1
4/9/2013 < 2 1
6/6/2013 < 2 1
7/17/2013 < 2 1
8/21/2013 < 2 1
12/4/2013 < 2 1
1/30/2014 < 2 1
3/20/2014 < 2 1
4/24/2014 < 2 1
6/18/2014 < 2 1
8/6/2014 < 2 1
11/25/2014 < 2 1
1/26/2015 < 2 1
2/13/2015 < 1 0.5
3/9/2015 < 1 0.5
4/17/2015 < 2 1
8/14/2015 2 2
9/29/2015 < 2 1
11/2/2015 < 2 1
12/28/2015 < 2 1
2/9/2016 < 2 1
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, data
- 3 - 8/9/2016

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
16
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
Use 'PASTE SPECIAL
Values" then "COPY"
Maximum data
paints = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/17/2011 < 10 5 Std Dev. 1.1573
2 11/9/2011 < 10 5 Mean 5.0000
3 12/30/2011 < 10 5 C.V. 0.2315
4 4/24/2012 < 10 5 n 29
5 7/16/2012 < 10 5
6 8/14/2012 < 10 5 Mult Factor = 1.0800
7 9/21/2012 < 10 5 Max. Value 10.0 pg/L
8 1/7/2013 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 10.8 pg/L
9 3/4/2013 < 10 5
10 4/9/2013 < 10 5
11 6/6/2013 < 10 5
12 7/17/2013 < 10 5
13 8/21/2013 < 10 5
14 12/4/2013 < 10 5
15 1/30/2014 < 10 5
16 3/20/2014 < 10 5
17 4/24/2014 < 10 5
18 6/18/2014 < 10 5
19 8/6/2014 < 10 5
20 11/25/2014 < 10 5
21 1/26/2015 < 10 5
22 2/13/2015 < 5 2.5
23 3/9/2015 < 5 2.5
24 4/17/2015 < 10 5
25 8/14/2015 10 10
26 9/29/2015 < 10 5
27 11/2/2015 < 10 5
28 12/28/2015 < 10 5
29 2/9/2016 < 10 5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55 •
56
57
58
17
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary -butyl Ether)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Use 'PASTE SPECIAL.
Values" then "COPY"
. Maximum data
points = 58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
10/17/2011 < 10 5 Std Dev. 1.1573
11/9/2011 < 10 5 Mean 5.0000
12/30/2011 < 10 5 C.V. 0.2315
4/24/2012 < 10 5 n 29
7/16/2012 < 10 5
8/14/2012 < 10 5 Mult Factor = 1.0800
9/21/2012 < 10 5 Max. Value 10.0 pg/L
1/7/2013 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 10.8 pg/L
3/4/2013 < 10 5
4/9/2013 < 10 5
6/6/2013 < 10 5
7/17/2013 < 10 5
8/21/2013 < 10 5
12/4/2013 < 10 5
1/30/2014 < 10 5
3/20/2014 < 10 5
4/24/2014 < 10 5
6/18/2014 < 10 5
8/6/2014 < 10 5
11/25/2014 < 10 5
1/26/2015 < 10 5
2/13/2015 < 5 2.5
3/9/2015 < 5 2.5
4/17/2015 < 10 5
8/14/2015 10 10
9/29/2015 < 10 5
11/2/2015 < 10 5
12/28/2015 < 10 5
2/9/2016 < 10 5
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, data
- 4 - 8/9/2016

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
18
Phenolics, Total Recoverable
Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 10/17/2011 < 5 2.5 Std Dev.
2 11/9/2011 < 5 2.5 Mean
3 12/30/2011 < 5 2.5 C.V.
4 4/24/2012 < 5 2.5 n
5 7/16/2012 < 5 2.5
6 8/14/2012 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor =
7 9/21/2012 < 5 2.5 Max. Value
8 1/7/2013 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw
9 3/4/2013 < 5 2.5
10 4/9/2013 < 5 2.5
11 6/6/2013 < 5 2.5
12 7/17/2013 < 5 2.5
13 8/21/2013 < 5 2.5
14 12/4/2013 < 5 2.5
15 1/30/2014 < 5 2.5
16 3/20/2014 < 5 2.5
17 4/24/2014 < 5 2.5
18 6/18/2014 < 5 2.5
19 8/6/2014 < 5 2.5
20 11/25/2014 < 5 2.5
21 1/26/2015 < 5 2.5
22 2/13/2015 < 5 2.5
23 3/9/2015 < 5 2.5
24 4/17/2015 < 5 2.5
25 8/14/2015 5 5
26 9/29/2015 < 5 2.5
27 11/2/2015 < 5 2.5
28 12/28/2015 < 5 2.5
29 2/9/2016 < 5 2.5
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Uea "PASTE SPECIAL
Velum" then "COPY"
. Maufmum date
points = 58
0.4642
2.5862
0.1795
29
1.0600
5.0 pg/L
5.3 pg/L
NC0074578 Bulk -Storage 9595 GENERIC non_hardness RPA2016_53.xlsm, data
- 5 - 8/9/2016

41•y ,
Greensboro News Record
Advertising Affidavit
200 E. Market St
Greensboro, NC. 27401
[phone]
NCDENR - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
IBT PROGRAM, WATER SUPPLY PLANNING
BRANCH
1611 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699
Account Number
4019534
Date
October 10, 2016
PO Number Order Category Description
0000273814 Legal Notices
Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/ NPDES Ur
Publisher of the
Greensboro News Record
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Guilford, North Carolina, duly commissioned,
qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared the Publisher
Representative who by being duly swom deposes and says: that he/she is the Publisher's
Representative of the Greensboro News Record, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper
known as Greensboro News Record, published, issued and entered as second class mail in
the City of Greensboro, in said County and State: that he/she is authorized to make this
affidavit and swom statement: that the notice or other legal advertisement, a copy of which
is attached hereto, was published in the Greensboro News Record on the following dates:
10/10/2016
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all
the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.
{signature of person m g affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me the 11 day °CUL)1 ,(0', 20 U0
LEA ANNE LAMB
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
GUILFORD COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 06-15-19
(Notary Public)
THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU

Deep River, Cape Fear River Basin.
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals.
LLC applied to renew NPDES permit
for the Greensboro 2 Terminal
[NC0042501], 6376 Burnt Poplar Rd,
Guilford County, surface -water pol-
lution prevention system discharging
treated stormwater/wastewater to
East Fork Deep River, Cape Fear Riv-
er Basin.
Plantation Pipe Line Company ap-
plied to renew NPDES permit for the
Greensboro Breakout Tank Farm
[NC0051161], 6907-A W Market St,
Guilford County, surface -water pol-
lution prevention system discharging
treated stormwater/wastewater to
East Fork Deep River, Cape Fear Riv-
er Basin.
TransMontaigne Operating Compa-
ny, L.P. applied to renew NPDES per-
mit for the Piedmont Greensboro
Terminal [NC0069256],6907B W
Market St, Guilford County, surface -
water pollution prevention system
discharging treated
stormwater/wastewater to East Fork
Deep River, Cape Fear River Basin.
Center Point Terminal Company, LLC
applied to renew NPDES permit for
the Greensboro Terminal
[NC0071463], 6900 W. Market St.,
Guilford County, surface -water pol-
lution prevention system discharging
treated stormwater/wastewater to
Horsepen Creek, Cape Fear River Ba-
sin.
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.
applied to renew NPDES permit for
the Greensboro I Terminal
[NC0074578], 115 Chimneyrock Rd,
Guilford County, surface -water pol-
lution prevention system discharging
treated stormwater/wastewater to
Long Branch, Cape Fear River Basin.
Motiva Enterprises, LLC applied to
renew NPDES permit for the Greens-
boro Terminal [NC0022209], 101 S.
Chimney Rock Rd, Guilford County,
surface -water pollution prevention
system discharging treated
stormwater/wastewater to Long
Branch, Cape Fear River Basin.

Denard, Derek
From: Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 3:51 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Knight, Sherri; Smith, George; Kinney, Maureen
Subject: RE: Resubmission for Public Notice Draft Permits NC0003671 & NC0074578
Derek,
The permits NC0003671 and NC0074578 for Magellan terminals Greensboro I and Greensboro II, respectively, are
accepted as written for the next term of the NPDES permit.
Thank you,
Ranae Smith
Environmental Specialist II
One Williams Center, OTC-8
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172
Office: 918-574-7195
Cell: 918-378-0926
Pm► WS'REAM PAP," PS L r.
MAGELLAN'
From: Denard, Derek [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 4:24 PM
To: Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Resubmission for Public Notice Draft Permits NC0003671 & NC0074578
Sent by an external sender. Use caution opening attachments, clicking web links, or
replying unless you have verified this email is legitimate.
Ms. Smith,
Please find the attached draft permits NC0003671 [Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro II Terminal] &
NC0074578 [Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro I Terminal] that will be resubmitted for public notice. Please
provide your comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR
/ NPDES Program no later than November 11, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
1

Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard ncdenr.c ov
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Compares,... -
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Denard, Derek
From: Smith, George
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Resubmission for Public Notice Draft Permits NC0003671 & NC0074578
Derek,
Recommend both permits be issued.
George Smith, Assistant Regional Supervisor
email: [e-mail]
Division of Water Resources
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Direct phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 5:24 PM
To: Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Resubmission for Public Notice Draft Permits NC0003671 & NC0074578
Ms. Smith,
Please find the attached draft permits NC0003671 [Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro II Terminal] &
NC0074578 [Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro I Terminal] that will be resubmitted for public notice. Please
provide your comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR
/ NPDES Program no later than November 11, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard(a.ncdenr.Qov
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1

C4-7Y)
Denard, Derek
From:
Sent
To:
Cc:
Subject
Meadows, Susan
Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:56 AM
Corporon, Joe; Denard, Derek
Knight, Sherri; Belnick, Tom; Moore, Cindy; Hennessy, John
RE: Draft Permit N00071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
No, that's good.
I just mentioned the cover letter for understandability purposes, trying to read all of that in the body of the permit is
probably quite confusing, so I thought I would suggest just a simple statement, so it's easy to understand.
Thanks.
Susie
Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
""Nothing Compare.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Corporon, Joe
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:49 AM
To: Meadows, Susan <[e-mail]>; Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Belnick, Tom <[e-mail]>; Moore, Cindy
<[e-mail]>; Hennessy, John <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft Permit N00071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Joe's two cents:
Susan - yes, I feel you and Cindy have correctly assessed our permitting goals, with two minor clarifications:
1. We have thus far (through several permit cycles) required five (5) quarters of "pass," not four (as episodic data
are available) - perhaps arbitrary but consistent; and
2. I believe we were. advised by EPA that the permit cover letter may "explain," but is not "defensible" as part of
the permit, so we have to be clear to define conditions in the permit body.
Question: Have we acheved this?
Respectfully,
Joe R. Corporon, L.G.
NCDEQ
'''Nothing Compares
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:19 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Corporon, Joe <[e-mail]>; Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Belnick, Tom
<[e-mail]>; Moore, Cindy <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Okay, I just want to have a good understanding about this as I am the one that is running Compliance on these facilities
with respect to WET testing, so I need to have be clear on what is expected.
So, the intent is to change them from Annual Monitoring Only to an Annual Limit - Correct?
And if they fail they will revert to quarterly testing permanently until the Division says they can go back to Annual
testing — correct?
Just wondering...Why can't they run 4 quarterly test (and if they pass all of them) automatically go back to Annual
testing?
In talking with Cindy Moore about this, we agree that we don't have a problem with it we just need to stay consistent as
well as adhering to EPA.
So, if this is the intent then we do not have separate language page for this, but I would explain it clearly and simply in
the cover letter.
By stating: If the annual test results in a fail, then the facility will revert to quarterly testing.
Susie
Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
su san. meadows@ncden r. gov
4401 Reedy Creek Road

Raleigh, NC 27607
""'""Not fling Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:53 AM
To: Meadows, Susan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Corporon, Joe <1oe.corporon encdenr.gov>; Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Susan,
We gave them annual monitoring in the effluent table. According to the footnote, once they fail they revert to
quarterly following Condition A.3. Joe's thinking is that annual monitoring is conditional upon pass/fail. If we change the
TOX page to annual there would be no guidelines for what months we require because we would want them to
monitoring quarterly going forward. Would inserting a special condition into the permit better explain what we are trying
to do here? Is there an Annual Acute TOX page that requires them to do quarterly sampling upon failure and remain at
quarterly until they request to go back to annual? I'm not sure we have anything parameter code wise and TOX page
wise that captures this.
Derek
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard (Ibncden r. gov
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Knight, Sherri
Subject: RE: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Hi Derek,
I am still confused. I thought these were going to remain as Annual Monitoring only tests?
All of the permits show conflicting information.
It's listing Annual testing in the Table, then Quarterly Limit language in the footnote and WET Section A(3), see below.
!Anse WET Testing, 713E6C Annually f crab Effluent
6. If Anne W E'f-test fails (r0E6Cj, the Perminee shall teat each subsequent discharge (event until testing
indicates •'pass," after which Qmnwriy mongering shall resume in accord with Section A. (3.). If after a
aubsagaent five (5) consecutive Quarterly events. WET results demonstrate no toxicity ti.e, `pass"). the
Penninec may petition the Division to relax monitoring, es data may wenant. WET -teat samples shall be
collected concertedly with other POC samples, ea appropriate to monitoring frequencies.
A. (3.) ACUTE1'OXiCITY PASS/FAIL, PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
[15A NCAC 02R .0500 et seq.j
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity texts on a guarrerly basis using protocols defined in the North
Carolina Procedure Doctmrent entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A
Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised December 2010 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall
be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Ptmephrrles promelas) 24 hour static test, The effluent
concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90`/t (defined as treatment
two in the procedure document). The tests will be perforated during the months of January, April,
July and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity testing quaver
assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing main obtained during representative effluent
discharge and shall be performed at the NPUES remitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
prom:totes.
Should any single quartery monitoring indicates figure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin Immediately until such time that a Angie test h passed. upon pusing, this
monthly test requirement stW revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
NC0000795 - Kinder Morgan- Greensboro Terminal
NC0031046 - Colonial Pipeline/001
NC0022209 - Motiva Enterprises LLC-Greensboro
NC0026247 - TransMontaige Operating Company
NC0074578 - Magellan Terminal Holdings Greensboro I Terminal
NC0069256 - TransMontaigne-Piedmont Terminal
NC0051161 - Plantation Pipeline Co. (001X002)
NC0042501 - Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
NC0071463 - Center Point Co., LLC -Greensboro Terminal
NC0003671 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro II Terminal

Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
---Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:06 PM
To: [e-mail]; revansernPamail.com
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <[e-mail]>; Meadows, Susan
<qusan.meadowstancdenr.aov>• Kinney, Maureen <Maureen.Kinnevpncdenr.gov>
Subject: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Please find the attached draft permit NC0071463 for Center Point Co., LLC -Greensboro Terminal that will be submitted
for public notice. A hard copy will be mailed to the permittee shortly. Please provide your comments, if any, to me via
email )[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR / NPDES Program no later than
November 11, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard en cdencppv
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
5
Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
6

Denard, Derek
From:
Sent
To:
Cc:
Subject
Meadows, Susan
Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:36 AM
Denard, Derek
Corporon, Joe; Knight, Sherri; Belnick, Tom; Moore, Cindy
RE: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co„ LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Okay, that sounds reasonable to me.
Susie
Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Meadows, Susan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Corporon, Joe <[e-mail]>; Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Belnick, Tom
<[e-mail]>; Moore, Cindy <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
If I understand this correctly, the reason we don't want them to automatically revert back to annual after passing
4 quarters is that they discharge episodically. They may not be able to sample in the given months on the TOX
page. By the time the permit is up for renewal, we would have enough data to determine if they could go back
to annual. In other words, automatically reverting back to annual after passing 4 quarters would only work if
they had monthly discharges.
Derek Denard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard (Incden r qov
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:18:41 AM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Corporon, Joe; Knight, Sherri; Belnick, Tom; Moore, Cindy
Subject: RE: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Okay, I Just want to have a good understanding about this as I am the one that is running Compliance on these facilities
with respect to WET testing, so I need to have be clear on what is expected.
So, the intent is to change them from Annual Monitoring Only to an Annual Limit - Correct?
And if they fail they will revert to quarterly testing permanently until the Division says they can go back to Annual
testing — correct?
Just wondering...Why can't they run 4 quarterly test (and if they pass all of them) automatically go back to Annual
testing?
In talking with Cindy Moore about this, we agree that we don't have a problem with it we just need to stay consistent as
well as adhering to EPA.
So, if this is the intent then we do not have separate language page for this, but I would explain it clearly and simply in
the cover letter.
By stating: If the annual test results in a fail, then the facility will revert to quarterly testing.
Susie
Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]

[e-mail]
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
NC
'''Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:53 AM
To: Meadows, Susan <susan.meadows[tncdenr.eov>
Cc: Corporon, Joe <[e-mail]>. Knight, Sherri <sherri.knightfancdenr.Rov>
Subject: Re: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Susan,
We gave them annual monitoring in the effluent table. According to the footnote, once they fail they revert to
quarterly following Condition A.3. Joe's thinking is that annual monitoring is conditional upon pass/fail. If we change the
TOX page to annual there would be no guidelines for what months we require because we would want them to
monitoring quarterly going forward. Would inserting a special condition into the permit better explain what we are trying
to do here? Is there an Annual Acute TOX page that requires them to do quarterly sampling upon failure and remain at
quarterly until they request to go back to annual? I'm not sure we have anything parameter code wise and TOX page
wise that captures this.
Derek
Derek Donard
Environmental Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denardtaJncdenr goo
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
0
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
9
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Knight, Sherri
Subject: RE: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Hi Derek,
I am still confused. I thought these were going to remain as Annual Monitoring only tests?
All of the permits show conflicting information.
It's listing Annual testing in the Table, then Quarterly Limit language in the footnote and WET Section A(3), see below.
Acute WErTesBmge
r6E6C
Aaaully
Orab
Effluent
6. IfAcure WET -ten fails (TGE6Cl, the Permittce shall test each subsequent discharge event until testing
indicates `pass," after which Quarterly monitoring shalt resume in accord with Section A. (3.). Vetter ■
subsequent tfve (5) consecutive Quarterly event., WET results demonstrate no toxicity (Lc.. "pare), the
Perminee may petition the Division to relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -lest samples shall be
collected concurrently with other POC samples, as appmpriate M monitoring frequencies.
A. (3.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
(I5A NCAC 02R .0500 et seq.)
The pamittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a itearivt,4 basis using protocols defined in the North
Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A
Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised December 2010 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall
be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimepfales promelat) 24 hour static test. The effluent
concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 20`/. (defined as treatment
two in the procedure document). The tests will be performed dining the month* of January, April,
July and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity testing quarter
assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during representative effluent
discharge and shall be performed at the rPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
Should any single quarterly monitoring lndfeate a tenure to meet specified Heats. then monthly
monitoring wW begin imrnedlately until such time that a single test h passed. Upon passing this
monthly test requiretnent will revert to quarterly hi the months specified above.
NC0000795 - Kinder Morgan- Greensboro Terminal
NC0031046 - Colonial Pipeline/001
NC0022209 - Motiva Enterprises LLC-Greensboro
NC0026247 - TransMontaige Operating Company
NC0074578 - Magellan Terminal Holdings Greensboro I Terminal
NC0069256 - TransMontaigne-Piedmont 'Terminal
NC0051161 - Plantation Pipeline Co. (001)(002)
NC0042501 - Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
NC0071463 - Center Point Co., LLC -Greensboro Terminal
NC0003671 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.-Greensboro II Terminal
10

Susan Meadows
Environmental Biologist
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
DWR/Water Sciences Section
Department of Environmental Quality
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:06 PM
To: bsheliI aoexoil.com; [e-mail]
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <georRe.smith{alncdenr.gov>• Meadows, Susan
[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft Permit NC0071463 Center Point Co., LLC-Greensboro Terminal
Please find the attached draft permit N00071463 for Center Point Co., LLC -Greensboro Terminal that will be submitted
for public notice. A hard copy will be mailed to the permittee shortly. Please provide your comments, if any, to me via
email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR / NPDES Program no later than
November 11, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
d e re k. d e n and en cd e n r. c o v
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
11
"Nothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
12

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
August 10, 2016
EHso . V-- l h ler.ic.1 t
Regional Engineer (DWR/PWSS) Act...
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Derek Denard
DWR / Water Quality Permitting Section
919-807-6307; Fax [phone]; [e-mail]
Director
Subject: Review of Discharge from for Outfall 002 into Long Branch [stream segment 17-2-1-(1)], a
waterbody currently classified WS-IV:* within Subbasin 03-06-08 [HUC: 030300030102]
of the Cape Fear River Basin.
for:
NPDES permit NC0074578
Magellan Terminals Holdings, L. P. — Greensboro I Terminal
Industrial Process & Commercial — Petroleum Bulk -Storage Facility
located at 115 S. Chimney Rock Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
Please provide your comments by September 16, 2016 [email OK]
RESPONSE:
I concur with the issuance of this permit provided the Permittee properly operates and maintains the
facility; the Permittee meets the stated effluent limits prior to discharge; and the discharge does not
contravene the designated water quality standards.
Signed:
cc: file
I concur with issuance of the above permit provided the following conditions are met:
I oppose the issuance of the above permit based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Date: 4 '2- 1-`'e I t
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Denard, Derek
lz/f,o
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Denard, Derek
Monday, August 15, 2016 2:44 PM
Mickey, Mike
RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I
Terminal
Hmm. I will look at my files and figure something out. My guess is that maybe this was part of a bigger facility that got
divided up when it was sold. These change hands a lot. The Paw creek terminals in Mecklenburg Co. are pretty much the
same situation.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 2:39 PM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal
Not to my knowledge. They only have one dike and one retention pond.
[e-mail]
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 2:21 PM
To: Mickey, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals
Mike,
zpOZ
C.4 4 J
Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal
Did it ever have an outfall 001? I may not be able to change if there is a record in our files of an omitted Outfall 001. I
will have to research before I can change it. I will make corrections for the rest of your suggestions.
Thanks,
Derek
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal
Derek — The parameter code for TSS is wrong. It should be CO530.
1

This facility only has one outfall. Can you change all outfall references to #001? Not sure why the old permits had 002.
Note the suggested revisions below to the Supplement Sheet:
• Truck loading rack drains followed by an oil/water separator and a waste holding tank (contents hauled offsite
for disposal).
• ).
• Gravity drains to dike containment areas chat drain to a single retention pond.
• Discharge control valve (hand operated; normally closed); a point source discharge.
• I otaiizing meter at discharge structure.
• Dry -ditch draining to UT of Long Branch.
That's all. Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:26 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <[e-mail]>; Mickey, Mike
<[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen <[e-mail]>; Meadows, Susan
<[e-mail]>; Hudson, Eric <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal
Mr. Carson,
Please find the attached copy of the draft permit and factsheet for NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals
Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal. A hard copy will be mailed to the permittee shortly. Please provide your
comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR / NPDES
Program no later than September 16, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denardCa�ncdenr.,gov
2

Denard, Derek
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 2:09 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Tank Farm Drafts
Makes sense. Thanks for digging up the additional info. Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:55 PM
To: Mickey, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Tank Farm Drafts
Mike,
See below what Joe Corporon wrote up so far as a rational for turbidity and 0&G. Please but read on afterward below as
I dig deeper.
4. Oil & Grease [00556] vs. EPA 1664 [STG-HEM]
Because these facilities have potential to discharge heavy hydrocarbons, they shall monitor O&G._
Recommendations:
Under table EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS [permit section A. (1.)]:
➢ Monitor Monthly— if not present, add permit limit of 15 mg/L.
➢ replace test method for "Oil & Grease" with "Oil & Grease - EPA
Method 1664 [STG-HEM]."
➢ Include number EPA 1664 [column 1); 00556 in column 2 stays the same until 1BIMS is
updated).
➢ in BIMS, retain the parameter code 00556 [1664 will not appear]
➢ Based on the current narrative, O&G shall be limited by a Daily Max only (if discharge is episodic); If
continuous, add both DM and MA limits.
Delete existing O&G footnote >: "Where possible, the grab sample for Oil & Grease should be
skimmed from the water surface of a quiescent (calm
water) zone."
1

Rationale: Previously used test method for Oil & Grease targets animal and vegetable fats, oils and greases typical
for 100% domestic discharges. Method 1664 -STG-HEM [silica gel transfer -hexane extraction method] targets non -
polar oil and grease more typical of industrial waste discharges. The previous footnote directing samplers to "...skim
from the water surface of a quiescent zone..." is hereby deemed inappropriate and shall be deleted.
5. Turbidity
Because it has a standard (50 NTU), facilities shall monitor Turbidity._
• If no data exist, monitor Quarterly, minimum.
• To evaluate compliance, use all available data.
• If RP exists (based on 50 NTU) - add limit based on RP; increase monitor to Monthly.
Include the following footnote:
"Effluent turbidity shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If effluent
turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, the Permittee shall sample upstream and downstream (as
appropriate considering zero -flow receiving -stream conditions). Non-compliance with this
Standard may require additional stream monitoring and a Turbidity Corrective Action Plan
(TCAP)."
Rationale: EPA questioned the potential for these facilities to violate stream standards because little or no
turbidity data were available. If sufficient data exists, evaluate reasonable potential. If no data, add monitoring
and include footnote to Table A. (1.), and others as appropriate (see above).
However, digging deeper into 0&G, which is a native limit found in 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (12). Since we are asking them
to use Method 1664 -STG-HEM, which is a for non -polar hydrocarbons then we have a better measure of O&G for a
facility that stores millions of gallons of non -polar hydrocarbons.
For O&G with a limit, we have seen this before in other permits including stormwater. For wastewater NPDES I found
one example. This in a factsheet for the NC500000 for cooling water that explains what we are thinking of as far as a
native limit:
Oil & Grease limits are governed by 15A NCAC 28.0211 (3)(f). The specific limit of 20 mg/I is a numeric
interpretation of the minimum standard listed in .0211(3)(f). A discharge of 20 mg/I into the receiving stream
would cause a visible sheen (as described in .0211 (3)(f)) and would constitute an unacceptable contamination
of the receiving stream.
Please note 2B was rewritten with 0&G found at (12) not (3)(f).
So, the best rationale for 0&G is 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (12). 0&G is a parameter of concern and has a native limit.
The best rationale for Turbidity is 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (21). It is pretty clear that they have to meet 50 NTU and yes they
can look at up and down stream for comparison for compliance. However, these facilities discharge to zero flow
conditions. So the stream limit of 50 NTU applies at the end of the pipe.
Hope this makes sense. We can discuss further.
Derek
2

From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 11:08 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Subject: Tank Farm Drafts
Derek — Was surprised to see that turbidity (monitoring and limit) was added to all the permits as well as a limit for
O&G. What was the rational? The cover letters did not mention a reason for the change? Thanks, Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
3

Denard, Derek
loX
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:42 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Mickey, Mike; Moore, Cindy
Subject: RE: Draft Permits
I agree Mike,
I think the below example from Derek is referring to something different. Please read the emails below.
Susie
Still not sure that the correct footnote. These facilities just have annual monitoring with no pass fail requirement. They
simply report the LC-50 value on the DMR.
Also, the previous permits required that the annual test be performed by June 30th. Does that need to be in the Section
A language?
[e-mail]
NC DEQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:26 PM
To: Meadows, Susan <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft Permits
Susan,
Here is what Joe Corporon laid out in the Oil Terminal stagey (see below). I believe he copied you on some time ago. I
believe what we intended is "monitoring only" for Acute and failure would reopen the permit to increase monitoring
frequency. But my question for us is why would we not give them limited Acute monitoring instead of this footnote that
reopens the permit. Do both "acute with Limited" and this footnote as written accomplish the same thing?
Derek
1. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) -- Acute [TAE6C] vs. Chronic [TGP3B]
i

.;.
Rationale: [REF Memo: Coleen Sullins, DWQ, 1999] Acute WET testing is deemed appropriate to evaluate end -
of -pipe short-term impacts of episodic discharges. Chronic WET testing is applied to onsite GW-REM because
these wastestreams are deemed complex and can be non -episodic. These facilities typically discharge under zero -
flow conditions (IWC = 100%), therefore WET testing is conducted @ 90% effluent concentration.
Recommendations: Evaluate the previous 5-year WET test compliance / establish if current monitoring is
appropriate. Make note:
➢ Does a GW-REM system operate onsite? Yes No
➢ If yes, does GW-REM have a dedicated outfall (no stormwater)?
Consider the following:
a. For stormwater-only [episodic/simple wastestream]: Verify Acute WET [TAE6C] Fathead Minnow
(Pimephales promelas), 24-hr definitive, LC-50 >100%. If Acute test history demonstrates no toxicity,
relax monitoring from Quarterly to Annually [BPJ - but only at the Permittee's request], or renew
Annual monitoring [see Footnotes below].
b. For GW-REM only or combined stormwater/ GW-REM [a complex wastestream], apply Chronic
WET [TGP3B] (Ceriodaphnia dubia) monitoring Quarterly [see footnotes]. If Chronic history
demonstrates no toxicity, relax monitoring from Quarterly to Annually [BPJ - but only at the
Permittee's request], or renew Annual monitoring [see Footnotes below].
WET -Test Footnotes: Footnotes provide DWR the option to modify the permit without Public Notice. Verify
existing or insert the following, as appropriate:
4. For Acute: "If Acute WET -test fails [TAE6C], the Permittee shall test each subsequent discharge
event until testing indicates "pass," after which Quarterly monitoring shall resume in accord with
Section A. ( ). If after a subsequent five (5) consecutive Quarterly events, WET results
demonstrate no toxicity (i.e., "pass" or LC-50 > 100%), the Permittee may petition the Division to
relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be collected concurrently with other
POC samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies."
For Chronic: "If any Quarterly or Annual Chronic WET -test fails, the Permittee shall test each
subsequent discharge event until testing indicates "pass," after which at minimum Quarterly
monitoring is required in accord with Section A. ( ). If after a subsequent five (5) consecutive
Quarterly events, WET results indicate "Pass," the Permittee may petition the Division to relax
monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be collected concurrently with other
POC samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies."
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:18 PM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft Permits
Hey Derek,
I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
If this is redundant for you I apologize, but for clarification of WET testing...
We have four types of tests:
Acute and Chronic Monitoring AND Acute and Chronic Limits.
Monitoring:
if a test FAILS (Acute or Chronic) the "monitoring" facility is not required to follow-up with more tests.
2

Limiting:
For Acute Limit: If test FAILS the facility needs to begin monthly testing until a SINGLE test is PASSED, then they can go
back to their quarterly (or annual) testing.
For Chronic Limit: If test FAILS the facility needs to run 2 multi -concentration Tests on the following two month after the
fail.
Hope that helps!
Susie
Okay wait -
So, what you have written states they have to do follow-up testing if they fail:
"If Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test fails [TAE6C], the Permittee shall test each subsequent discharge event
until testing indicates "pass," after which Quarterly monitoring shall resume in accord with Section A. (3.). If after a
subsequent five (5) consecutive Quarterly events, WET results demonstrate no toxicity (i.e., "pass" or LC-50 > 100%),
the Permittee may petition the Division to relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be collected
concurrently with other POC samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies."
And that would be the case for an Acute Limit, whereas these facilities are "Monitoring only" and would have no follow-
up testing.
They should still be Monitoring Only correct?
Susie
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 12:47 PM
To: Meadows, Susan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mickey, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft Permits
Susan,
Yes, you are right I should have inserted a different footnote for Acute:
If Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test fails [TAE6C], the Permittee shall test each subsequent discharge event
until testing indicates "pass," after which Quarterly monitoring shall resume in accord with Section A. (3.). If after a
subsequent five (5) consecutive Quarterly events, WET results demonstrate no toxicity (i.e., "pass" or LC-50 > 100%),
the Permittee may petition the Division to relax monitoring, as data may warrant. WET -test samples shall be collected
concurrently with other POC samples, as appropriate to monitoring frequencies.
Thanks,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denardancdenr.gov
3

N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ki
`°'NOthing Compares.."....
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Meadows, Susan
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 12:33 PM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mickey, Mike <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft Permits
Hey Derek,
Regarding the 8 Draft Permits sent out Friday:
I think you may have used the wrong language for the WET testing footnotes and on the cover letters.
It is language used for a "Chronic" test with a "Limit" rather than an "Acute," "Monitoring Only," which is the case for
these facilities.
If you are wanting to change these facilities from Acute Monitoring to a Chronic Limit, then there should also be changes
in the tables and on the WET Testing language sheet, Section A(?).
I imagine this was just a copy/paste error??
If so,
The language used in the WET Footnote #6 should read something like the following:
6. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) - Acute (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour P/F), Annual testing.
And that also goes for the comment on the Cover Letter.
NC0000795 - Kinder Morgan- Greensboro Terminal
NC0031046 - Colonial Pipeline/001
NC0022209 - Motiva Enterprises LLC-Greensboro
NC0026247 - TransMontaige Operating Company
NC0074578 - Magellan Terminal Holdings Greensboro
NC0069256 - TransMontaigne-Piedmont Terminal
NC0051161 - Plantation Pipeline Co. (001)(002)
NC0042501 - Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
Please let me know if this was just a mistake.
Thanks.
Susie
4

Denard, Derek
Pew, 4-c C
From: Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:31 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I
Terminal
Follow Up Flag: Follow Up
Due By: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 7:54 PM
Flag Status: Flagged
Hello Derek,
In reviewing the NPDES permit #NC0074578, for Magellan's Greensboro I terminal, Magellan is in agreement with all of
the changes with 2 exceptions.
1. The new contact person for this area is: Ranae Smith, Environmental Specialist, One Williams Center, OTC-8, Tulsa, OK
74172, [e-mail]
2. "inserted Footnote 5 for naphthalene concerning a petition to remove if Permittee can demonstrate its facility does
not now, nor ever, stored diesel fuel or heavy fuels."
I am new to this position, but could not find anyone that knew anything about a petition to drop the naphthalene
monitoring. This Magellan terminal does have diesel at this facility.
Otherwise, Magellan Greensboro I will adhere to the new permit when it is finalized.
Thank you,
Ranae Smith
Environmental Specialist II
One Williams Center, OTC-8
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172
Office: 918-574-7195
Cell: 918-378-0926
Original Message
From: Denard, Derek [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:26 PM
To: Carson, Steve <[e-mail]>; Smith, Ranae <[e-mail]>
Cc: Knight, Sherri <[e-mail]>; Smith, George <[e-mail]>; Mickey, Mike
<[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen <[e-mail]>; Meadows, Susan
<[e-mail]>; Hudson, Eric <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal
1

Sent by an external sender. Use caution opening attachments, clicking web links, or replying unless you have verified this
email is legitimate.
Mr. Carson,
Please find the attached copy of the draft permit and factsheet for NPDES Permit NC0074578 - Magellan Terminals
Holdings, L.P. - Greensboro I Terminal. A hard copy will be mailed to the permittee shortly. Please provide your
comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR / NPDES
Program no later than September 16, 2016.
Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[cid:image003.png@O1D1F3E4.A0634B50]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
2

MAGELLAN'
MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: NPDES Permit Renewal
Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP. — Greensboro I Terminal
Permit No. NC0074578
To Whom it May Concern:
February 26, 2016
RECEIVEDINCDEQIDWR
MAR 032016
Permltt+
Water ng Q S ctlon
Enclosed please find one signed original copy of the application to renew the NPDES permit for the
Magellan Terminals Holdings (MTH) Greensboro I Terminal. MTH is requesting renewal of the permit.
Should you have questions, or need additional information related to the application, please feel free to
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve Carson
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
cc: Greensboro I Water Quality Files — Tulsa

Greensboro !Terminal
Outfall 002
(flows SE)
co
Z.
a
m
ry
E
EJ 0 1,500
-U Feet
n
N State Grid/Quad: C 19 SW / Guilford, NC
u Latitude: 36° 04' 20' N Longitude: 79° 55' 07" W
2 Receiving Stream: UT of Long Branch [Stream Segment 17-2-1{11 Stream Class: WS-IV
Drainage Basin: Cape Fear River Basin Sub -Basin: 03-06-08
co
Prepared By:
LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
Professional Groundwater and
Environmental Engineering Services
8 Pine Tree Drive, Suite 250
St. Paul, Minnesota 55112
[phone]
MAGELLAN TERMINALS HOLDINGS, L.P.
GREENSBORO I TERMINAL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
�'
G
aiii,
SITE LOCATION
NPDES PERMIT NC0074578
FILE:
g3maggrn01b.MXD DATE: 2/5/2016 I FIGURE:
1

BACKFLOW
PREVENTER
C
LVERT
ADDITIVE
CONTROL 11
PANE
FOAM
HOUSE
LOADING
RACK
TA2
COLLECTIO
BOX
OVkf
°Oh,
00
TANK
1
TANK
i7
COLONIAL INACTIVE)
'IPELINE �
BURNT POPLAR ROAD
■
DRY
STORAGE
WALKWAY
TANK
#5
TANK
#B
STAIRWAY
E
THIS DRAWING (INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES, STRUCTURES, AND
LOCATION OF BURIED UTILITIES) IS NOT EXACT. FOR PRECISE
LOCATION CONSULT A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, OWNER, AND/OR
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES.
RETENTION
POND
BERM
OII Storage Containers
Storage Tank I.D, (Type
Shell Capacity
of Oil)
(Gallons)
Tank 1 (Gasoline)
1,260,000
Tank 2 (Gasoline)
- 924,000
Tank 3 (Diesel)
- 1,318,800
Tank 4 (Diesel)
1,318,800
Tank 5 (Diesel)
1,260,000
Tank 6 (Ethanol)
1,260,000
Tank 7 (Inactive)
Inactive
Tank 8 (Gasoline)
2,118,800
Tank 136 (Lubricity)
4,000
Tank 90 (Invigorate 3.0)
2,000
Tank 130 (Keropur)
5,000
Tank 133 (Red Dye)
518
Tank 150 (Inactive)
2,000
WEIR
DRAINAGE DITCH
UNDERGROUND OIL/WATER SEPARATOR TANK (15,000 GAL.)
O SPILL RESPONSE EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA (INSIDE WAREHOUSE)
O 500 GAL. UNDERGROUND VCU KNOCKOUT TANK
O MINI —SUMP #1 — 100 GAL.
O MINI —SUMP #2 — 100 GAL.
O EMERGENCY SUMP (150 GAL)
O/ RECEIVING MANIFOLD (COLONIAL)
V RECEIVING MANIFOLD (PLANTATION)
CAA CENTRAL ACCUMULATION AREA: WAREHOUSE
TRANSFER AREAS
TA 1
TA2
TA3
LEGEND
TRUCK LOADING AREA
AODIIIVE TANK LOADING
ETHANOL OFF—LOADING
0
r —1
L J
DS1
F.D.C.
ABOVE GROUND TANK
BELOW GROUND TANK
DRUM STORAGE AREA
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
O SPILL KFf
❑ TRANSFORMER (UTILITY OWNED)
ABOVE GROUND DRAINAGE
BELOW GROUND DRAINAGE
• DRAIN/CATCH BASIN
• FIRE MONITORS (ON CEILING)
FIRE EXTINGUISHER
a FIRE HYDRANT
ABOVE GROUND PROCESS PIPING
— — — BELOW GROUND PROCESS PIPING
D4— DRAIN VALVE
—X— FENCE
® SHRUBBERY
MMIDSTREAMGELLAN"
SIP e
CRITICAL
DRAWING
Prepared ;
LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
Professional Groundwater end Environmental Engineering Serrirw
Nonhpa4 c.nparne Center
8 Pine Tee Drive, Saila230
St. Paul, Minsmote 55112
[phone]
FIGURE: C-6 (FRP)
5.1 (ERAP)
DRAINAGE DIAGRAM
GREENSBORO I TERMINAL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY:
bat
DATE:
DRAFTED 8Y: AGO APPROVED BY:
RLE NAME GREENSBORO_I
DATE 12/22/2015 DATE: