Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220210 Ver 1_More Info Received_20220404CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. <mailto:report.spam@nc.gov>
David,
Below responds to comments from your email dated March 2, 2022. The applicant is proceeding with geotechnical investigation on the site to better characterize groundwater conditions.
That information will be forwarded to your office to further address comment #2.
~Michelle
1. NWP 29 General Condition 23(a) requires that the activity be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable (available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes). For the
purposes of documenting that the project complies with this requirement, please provide any additional information as to the end-user of the proposed facility or other justification
of building sizes and attendant features at this location;
The purpose and need of the project is for development of an industrial/commercial site that provides key components for bulk warehousing, distribution with commercial space. Other
aspects of the site include central location, sufficient size for the proposed buildings, can be supported with current infrastructure, and is complimentary to the existing commercial
and industrial properties that are located in the general area. The site is also located in the vicinity of major interstate thoroughfares and access to the Piedmont Triad (GSO) International
Airport.
The selected site offers the following which was important to the intended use:
1. Preferred site location in the vicinity of I-85 and I-40 along major thoroughfares. Access to Piedmont Triad International Airport.
The site is located within approximately 0.5 mile of I-40 via Gallimore Dairy Road and approximately 1.5 miles via Route 68.
2. Utilities in place and or close to the site. The site requires electrical, gas, fiber, water, and sanitary sewer.
Utilities are located within Chimney Rock Road.
3. The site is generally flat and was free of poor soils which is important to the feasibility of bulk warehousing/distribution projects.
The site is slopes in an east to west direction. The larger of the two warehouse buildings is located along the eastern boundary in a more level area of the site.
4. A site was large enough to accommodate the site program and was controlled by a single landowner.
Current industry standard is 200,000-SF for a warehouse/distribution building. The site split warehouse space between two buildings to achieve close to 180,000-SF
5. The site must provide good secondary road access to support the expected truck and employee traffic.
A traffic signal at the intersection of Gallimore Dairy Road and Chimney Rock Road controls traffic adjacent both site entrances.
6. A site that was relatively free of environmental features, streams, and floodplain, and/or features that would be to large building footprints.
7. The site is entitled/zoned to appropriately allow for the intended bulk warehousing/distribution and commercial use.
Due to the site’s unique configuration with a wetland and stream in the center of the site, in order to achieve close to the minimum industry standard of 200,000-SF warehouse space,
while avoiding further impacts to the wetland and stream onsite, the warehouse space was split between two buildings. The larger warehouse space was configured as far back from the
wetland to minimize further impacts to the resource. The depth of the building is at the minimum while still providing separation of vehicular and tractor trailer parking and movement
with separate driveways. Separation of vehicular and tractor trailer movements provides safety for both operators. Fire safety requires full access to a minimum of three sides of the
building, which has been provided. Impacts to the wetland were minimized to the maximum extent practicable with grading at a 2:1 slope. A retaining wall was considered, however costs,
maintenance and safety concerns with regard to the height of the wall and additional fencing on top of the wall were considered impracticable.
2. Based on proposed grading, wetland fill, and re-routing of drainage into stormwater ponds, the project appears to eliminate the drainage area/hydrology source for the remainder of
the on-site Wetland downstream of the proposed impact site. Unless otherwise justified, the Corps would consider the remainder of the Wetland as a reasonably foreseeable indirect impact
(see NWP General Conditions “District Engineers Decision”) resulting from a loss of hydrology. Unless otherwise justified, compensatory mitigation would be required for both direct
impacts and indirect impacts resulting in a loss of hydrology and therefore aquatic function; compensatory mitigation is typically required at a 2:1 ratio, depending largely on resource
quality (reference the NCWAM score of “High” for this wetland);
Based upon site characteristics and aerial photos, there is evidence that the wetland was an excavated farm pond, which intercepts groundwater. USGS StreamStats (attached to this email)
depicts an overall drainage area at the bottom of the stream at Gallimore Diary Road as 20 acres. Aerial photos from 1955 depict a farm pond (attached to this email). It is unlikely
that the wetland is completely sustained by surface water runoff and based upon the aerials and drainage area, it is more likely groundwater driven and will be hydrologically sustainable
with the impact shown on the plans. In addition, the applicant is undertaking geotechnical investigations at the site. Additional borings will be performed to confirm the location of
groundwater. Based upon that information, the applicant will make a decision with regard to adding footing drains that would discharge to the remaining wetland area in order to avoid
indirect impacts to sustaining hydrology to this area. The geotechnical investigation is anticipated to occur within the next month. Upon receipt of those results and modifications
to the project design, specifically with regard to the addition of footing drains, the information will be submitted to your office for review as part of this application.
3. We acknowledge the information you provided in the PCN pertaining to endangered species (Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act). However, given the general nature of potentially
suitable habitat for Schweinitz’s sunflower and small whorled pogonia, the existence of both open and forested areas within the project area, and given recent USFWS concerns regarding
these species, the Corps cannot currently reach a No Effect determination for these species within the Section 7 Action Area based on the information provided. Note that the Corps is
willing to request concurrence from the USFWS on a May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect determination for both species using the information you provided. However, please be aware
that, if the USFWS cannot concur with this determination based on this information, they may request a plant-by-plant survey for these species within the appropriate survey season(s).
Per NWP 29 General Condition 18, the Corps cannot verify the use of a NWP until Section 7 consultation is complete.
See USFWS letter dated March 9, 2022 (attached) which states that based upon information provided, it appears that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for list under the Act at this site.
MICHELLE SAVAGE‑MEASDAY, PWS | Environmental Senior Project Manager
T 919.861.9910 | D 919.861.9821 <tel:919.861.9821> | C 919.441.2437 <tel:919.441.2437>
5260 Greens Dairy Road | Raleigh | NC | 27616
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
www.ecslimited.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.ecslimited.com/__;!!HYmSToo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPANGyrIzag$>
THE NEW ASTM PHASE I STANDARD IS HERE - Contact us to find out more. <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ecslimited.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions-phase-i-esa-standard-update?utm_source=Act
iveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ECS*Digging*Deeper*2C*Webinars**A26*Lessons*Learned*-*January*2022&utm_campaign=ECS*Digging*Deeper*2C*Webinars**BLessons*Learned*-*January*2022*-*Employees__;
KyslKyslKysrKysrKyUrKysrKysrKysr!!HYmSToo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPANLpM-4_w$>
Instagram <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.instagram.com/ecsatwork/__;!!HYmSToo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPAPy49xNKg$> | LinkedIn <https://urldefense.com/v3
/__http://www.linkedin.com/company/ecs-limited__;!!HYmSToo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPAPH_0MlzQ$> | Facebook <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.facebook.com/p
ages/ECS-Limited/1482338585322965__;!!HYmSToo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPAMGDtPJsQ$> | Twitter <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/ECSlimited__;!!HYmST
oo!NQdafzrhyAVjrvSp1GxuPDv3vkbkTfr_JbFc5WkA_vHSeGv7psJ9kOe9NkwhPAPXK35RdA$>
Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient. 53195319
趰팴뎊躝ꪌ볈䩯溤䑄䦼붃⥓�䧝∓豌ꃬ촬⁋쪒㋋䂹钏侷㔪泍◴�屏䛷麴吖ꏪ�жࠛꇌ쳏俈ﹼ䰒쿶峫ᡎ쮖孛큌䪃⺌啇ငᄐ㒽껨ኻ䲺늭�됋Ⳅ턌呂䴛%탳࣪問䐐ᵑ䈓ዅ䲒엹舄䐯퇫ᠽ딹턔ꢋᑐ칑訬뵂ꀅ쥈쿽庬ⅅ렿劜햩턊躣ﵐἤᇍ屒퇜➝赒켂힊剒傣⪽镒〭⠅�冐⚱쉑쫥蛰�짻㍽쐬躄蓐䌀猢伱㦥굓刎ự뗒Ἴ♍�久㽽勣磪폓荳懘 ҃Ἠ呁쉹ה㩈サ絇턹췌萻쟦ṝ擎귆䧅鵄븶ൊ䜻ﭤ쒈ৰ렢資唻ఽ㖥佖䧝얹픖㒪啜㔵�㽟僭㖹㈠⍥沵۽䓽偔풂
䝥ﵕ乧急篖咒皫뫔꿥킃ꆥ収㹋᱖윧봛鷐켸堍붼鵛嬔䱗폏䮽㵗剩즜穗픰秕�휆㲭멗횫棴瓕譴킼䷇푤䙝엗ᲃ桽㯘횀㊡냖쪩�훑῝镑䉷ↅⵕ숕㚌善捽鲿塧硕故ₒ穕㥙垾闕핒খ距㗏⍂聝齃夕啗腍巖�ꁭ鵁�ꨋ키欥ꗕ𐾉咊懱篙킏剽獓䁚騭㷓ख़尜㕔媢㋝讀�녍ﴭ�됭居췎熭畎Ꙟ겭ﶼ즛罵췙墺黽ր学녍镚䦾ꎽ赔呶जꎈ婌佣呌阭뽍萸펬⭒윯ⲵⰽ尷൛쪿繭��켥픚�ግᩝ�අ멘孱㪌鷛�艹헙咁艍浖姒팥뱝��瓘�阙▅톓괿솊뗥�衑颭얧끢釐앃媆牍
間州鷑ᯬ퀵�嵷᧰뙍᷈ꫤ쨕㶳�궽孲뷍ෟ�欄紪�ε牛袿欛浚홏拡ꑟ᠈ፃ槞嶬乥앎嫌䳟ꅵ귟�ॖ簭閭㻛嬌Į䔥郲꽵Ն奿ꆰ蕟忝✔﮽淅郼糺㖔㢦佥ګ倍腰᷃�㒬ᵡ鯶姠ព�࡞㙙ᬤ姢❖降㬕㗥譠嗖譈㣢�赢扁⾆絍훫ⴆ�㷞씍뗎㻭谍뗚쨈징똽嬟⪓땢埼Ԧ䙕혢㰆ൣ侰㼦丗弉ۣ䵂靵ꏢ掕靛Ⴔ䏦�摃梊污��뭡垼ㅠ悲ꉄỐ呆仐褿㈆ꓤ斕售瘗婩鹤䱘굢뺦堕虤퉙奶ﭥ篠昻㐋✷숝웏䩌◾ざ쎄捎ᑦ欞ᘖ泉홤
嵮濆㸗홝鄢跅톄玾䗗��ჽ䙦⍸䭖㹋더熮언쏥㠮뚭흼繪�⾜웦ᖂ涮㷨蕎♝卹랥풪匆躋�ຘ桟劎ㆮ컞랁缞⧚寮깤厃戎閛꒕ﵨ敳駆︕窫曨嶜蜎횿嶏㥞滗嶘다㹖�䚤陖ᛩ寧卪찕嚕鲔횜䢝슕毕�ꛩꔮ暐༩陪亴뎅凤ɥ�ኖ기誌ꌾ峫比뵖☿손酞仢빻鿖붸悪⋵뻪樛셪巕槵蠖쒗惓梦ᙫꦾ룾륬촾홈柭渪ᆷ닶虛횠늬藝쇵㖁컫䯐빾絭死曻汨⯭汢績䉝찦藪嫨頞⻦�癟渻⑉ღ�糮ώ턾懊昖囕完ᾮ珝ẙퟖ鑮溛칠淆
Ɪꏭ泳瓻浣죝엲첆�䲮诺⡮劵﹥濝섨睮栀쮅ᵰ鋭ᶆ奦჻鍫ᵴ师缴❯ⴊ帻㏤�蹪㳶㠱⛒Ό蝶훥빪ి濝뀋諆奱瀌圌焋枌駱�칮軘鿰焚ྯ괖乯럳ᰏ蘷づ繾⻈旛鄣�ꅞ蘫瀽䋮杰ଡ�兘煕璶둬ሢὯ獑㔧朚渢䯴㭲牘㣓癯燄焝鷕諪ꦖى爗䃆ꟳ訶⻧᳴獬䌇ཚ堶졆趯䛖�Ꮦ䳴䭟㜗⭜镳儋㜞䤼漹쭆㸾瑁꧈⽴㕖卯翵畅鴄⯰瀔ﹶ奏의畚リ�侏ᚇ࿐퇂ﭠᗏݢ敛䃧ꘀ睵奪堗뷶璕韆⫶菄䵵礡幭捗㷷�껖㝲癶ᑟ
恹支ꑔ䯶�疟܊睫㻯佷䢀ퟪ끬滰朏湠澮狏鷴∜㢊侏끆憏뱸퐋囬石䡹ế❨硾鳰㺖脯籹率谓ꓲ研ꥎ峸탒꿍ㅱ餷窋圉揞㝺溢렰ꟷ섦⭷均榥⟷횰皯ゎ忹覥靿�盈꽿䝍끿꽁㆜⥿軦ךּ푖頫竕뀇ឿﮡ⊉鱺領谷ꟻĔЏ꒡眳ƫ抭焗굲猌ᖇῼঽ긿忼윿흇ᶚ눷럐먤鸷龳粸㚎轹秎漟腶墋뭷칭⬬猜�쑳ギ뗼럒屦ࠧ畽쭗ﲦ�蝖緈廬齼籆�덹ﳞ翋�㷠륷廾列蘥枨첪铟뿢㪮緺䁞ﺦ֬溜徇黽籕翞�䋶놟�婄�⾳r�旧
瑥瞦Ԃ舃恁磐♄କ䎆큡蓸╆訓扅磑曄ᬵ䞎텣ӹ䖆鈣摉秒Ꙅ⭕䮖퉥ⁱ䎀渉ᬸ鱗㭵侞퍧蔆ꉃ桑烔옄ɧ춚듧沪ꄲ鈶ꁒ᩵晅宵䪮푪ꝶ荎樶ꛭ毕�蠠∴靖㱼⻛磗纕堉첲閯鑙:뜣ぞ⯕蟵謏揆�藼앗牤糙柆鬵城寧䖇튣瑩磚乞茋比�蛽旇�癭ஷ펕᭨ꗌ涓쮗ᙶ膽䞨ᆶؒᾅ㠯纽柇�矮푻վ薃籹翞ꙇ穵他圹࿑얶Ì뵼絟ἧᮝ샷ꣿ︓䃼ొ�欮ப㜃᭐ꦾʴ㾌ᩏࡑ裁뺊볐ู췃쏠ᳱ쯄㹋쑿峱ᙙ쿅䉴싦粑ᩩ퇆熼윜㑉ㄱ禜뜘Ҳ≷檾Ṝ㶲�ἁㆤ飬䊎㱫
Ꚅ຺Ғ㫪㓒⺹틋쇼䨗␒㋃폌퀼짋⍳㋊�∶峓㫓銢ছ℧ఐ㬭獅ᓬ퀼ఴ先㔒㴺㩴യ㒵ⵢⵇ䨋췒퍋�ꈸ㑅䇭푐챉凇헔儽핔摑ᤳሦ�읕乒ℵ텛ꐯ㡽꣔긔뫩閵抉훘弼�崖暙嵒兊諳栽텙귅줠�歵隸Ɛ䅂谫漏ᘰ峝峆딑珗흝꙽囁蔷竩铄�ﵓ祳矟Ǿ䕕⅛뾁ꔕ㶩꣖늭䊔怕㛋ᔞ�蜸塙䇮罹㡏힇䕲醻뒶巎ꥋ㏈ꡜ쑅枅謹鐑楬枠Ლ颻驨逾徵业ꚙ碫鷾鹚䦩្᎖憏蚻�ꊂ湙闃霠Ⰶ䬀뛙탭ꅦ鹛鉥⣫샾澅㘨먣鬳개칹鱷遜͟�䰒곡孂嬲뎽
霼쨓骶ⴷ忚층㯳㶏ṝ녝䬼럎㗒쪣鱀鮄↟乻헗�熿ꝸ�컷Ï疑黖鵷�⋓ⴞṹⅾ䫗栧紬拘푞액ﻫ⎗窻᨟첉齼]緎帟齽ꇸ⯼苉忒ꊜ践�蜱ó⏠綉ᛐ䀄皒困�蠜졀蜔ᰞ甓奏쀟둶鯬쎲摷䇪周念⬄쪅ꕤ풠蘳�㾦ᝆ嬉ⷤઇ璬ቖ蝛ựⰤ毨戒㡤䒂੦ᢽ켸葠繍芰㨫☦짩#行颷쪢ﳞ萢㳐㾄돘ἁ毄좍ᢖ觤岢蹳�썓⢨죾樼ڏ쪉㉆9㑢避᷒䍶ᇉ�佼ᅵ龘籠⌝䐍銂閎䧭쭦ਘ塌躌䲶䞦鎝檒롑揧搩릻늍墶堛ⳣꅥ躶횲䭜⾔鄞뜼
亗偎秊䩄⒤颿᳓쯙釩�鍌눡莡⧌㌡谠镼檋쵫Ն餗攼ⲛ濶ॊ㠹㈙頕紳䶇ꇓ碶椘㱧ꍧ藺㈎콺╪⏢೭왇㧇葓䣡䂓첋Ś䍡咙蠶ྜྷ內㵝仴쥟㴨⠔ᄑᒝ晅읍䞅嵞鴄ᨴ튂㭨줸≥㊚宩꩒흀ﴧ뛄퍹瑺摛㭕풧黼푏䴿ͪ讍銊칳䬩倛ઝ떨社呻ꉪ馧惔㾤敪樬ࣅ궪⁊ȿ䷪鴇꺔킱ꪆ商꽺ꪯ岉ꅫ꜍혵䶼歚緍㖢有㫽腩ꔪ淒쇾綅橏荵풱蜮堭鉬꿇㚆홀⭻ⱈಡ㚱�᭙븶鷫꺣�埓䗫浪ධ쇂�ਉ蠤뙕켭⮆᠑薼嚶껾㭕撁뗭嗃崶婵턊湛头픶헜榋镮딺嘗�넛꿽
ਫ਼夭絈뮍麗崫톫椃鉡咹ૈ㰷쵬뷭�䚭齶敬蔵㞴﮾⮪胅핧샗犖惡ᕼ矀ޣ宾䏈㚯숋⛐懵썸챼ᢲ쭱ৢ綵嵪⇅⎷⸍㏬ⴶᯅ閄豘⥣䚱怩䝸䰛ർ枎⮮飇퍠軍蔰ⷼṶꗝ햆눀䴆⟻⭣巴藫쐙﹗쿚늇麋奙蹖機㡏ꪢꕇ輙䏖㎑靔秇掶鳡윉낙妣្땓駎췽Ⱨ觕Ⱗ鑢ō퇠꽼剌譖貢앗绁謁틝澘吱뎌璈컑㋇ࣨꜯ꛱툳뚸捩坙땒楦꒿啷⑪鹋鐵쵶훺桘焭뫆窴틸嵡끹盚컀鋺㝲ൽ檦⃮嫑㑷ꪑﷆ팚㸲뤜䟍敪ꢵ왔鳓䋛ģ颩猃롓險곳廛�疪ﮦ骉翟
﵇삍╸�뎶骁蕽磁᭣㣡涧巪犕麴��᧭ὅ皻믢뷢給諫䔲腼쮍꧊ᙯ㮸蛛綣ꬉ뮸챘㼎涔䵎⊿岊顫뺩퀏罡㮗琻镾멎ꘝ⟢蕳뻴誥侺缼楹嵮暃꽫换횃ꜷ㤜癉猞뛄虊蛥ꞻ识衵柷홓흽⸩楲痙뀆ӕቻ럖�翉ॸ병뻪젷콌樓텳弾祔뾁糔鶏鹠紿毭ꄽꙸ屼篵㠄窹뜷迊ﹻ雾핺뮾ꞇ﹤峲忲眽쟻낯臞祳蘿빷쭗鹼㹁ꕾ範Ꮮ粩�秶梆鿳弧薧俴뮾솶膿볺줱�⛸꘍먭ꬔ缤鳮䫢籏콶桮䷧ﲢ툣俻㉦냹㘒ἰ܂☐⽾ˇ㋐汅쮄脎䴃
ﮤ㚮軻쩼뽏酎愬찀拦ﬤ젅쬲䱯녰㡨껵頰먮⿷鏌浰ǧ뢏쏿M伈넏అީ뚏跓훮Ⲓ駯ဋ纲⬐蜋Ο뼐䌌ω⎐瀋Ŀ虰귧ћ쟐쬍ԃ轎ꠅ띀刯컜ि䝩퀎骄읎蔎ﭪ䁐ロ䤯⌈x퉏큿㜄ᡱ낶祦謐浏洅困醽ላ⠌ፙ☱탁ᓏ酇턋푊ᄕ䕖쪐煵щ티燭콤讈鄕蝮呱俩ヲ倆田ထۿ㮮긆Ⴡ鷰上诧ᅃꉑ톡㌜鉰灥矲┑ԗ녖꜀ᙟꉰ冐п뼑挛ˏ칑煪ᵏⵇ鄜ớⴃ쌕ᵋ旫蠀웒꾏鑪涂넍⃣笏倗酑洘�臑鈟ℏ覐椋ر껛�퀯㉞⭲輢⌋᭰焑@꣱醽皰뗱┠แ
钱㆚⌹飑Íܲᒵ昲ㅷ⛙�눞❳릂挞❃穲鄤⣿詒ሲ삂烴ꬭꐒ�톭逗ィ껊醤⪝ᳲ䫾�豊褭᪳⏃⸬⑱ڐዞ跒㈤ᑥ䠐カ◕銧ᑫ쬒中͗㉰⽱魆ሩ・夂⸛ʓሯらዓ㈫샾䲒㋞浔儥⎃긲紇伲⻳ㄻ�ྦ࿐䈄㍋괭⹛䌨⠯㗑㌴ᘗ易뉩㛹䟆錱㝳ㆂ椰めম툱Έ㬑ꈴㄏ笓䜹⚻阓튉⥓ဴ㏍윭퀳ⳁꋳ㦳ῑ切힐䘶ﺬ݊猼⇓댻㖩훳㵱滌ᏹ㻣厂ᴱ줯鈻穆䢓䋳㤽乀㷥ڴ㉿꽳㊧᧔ሳ瓬螓䜮ਕඔ퀥㐑Ῡ댉㯎뭲졂㣷㸴㍦䓡琷㥋�╴輣⍗ሑ
됣䔃欔ᐽ䘋짇ཁ䇻흉ꌺ㫳挒݂䕇ב㌟䟷紴퐭䎍쾄㎒Պ䑑Ꚕ㎤䫧닔琠썔墴득㒋⿔ⵃꌰ槴呋䥳컴ᒓ答퐫礪茴吉矜솴㌣䥗햴錖㘴咊ᆗ免䑟ص⍽偁㗆㕍✓렴琱좤匓瑈헶ⓕ吼凍ⶔ畑儳荔푃䡟�喾ꑄ䡵躑卧熎ᑐ圵勭帕푎嚫Ռᕋ坫ἕ乣⧕匉猕딻堷鄚剥퐲㍷Ჴ헱䉍ꥲ镎劅鷕剃㣓崕팺俓訵풞孱觅镖蛂瞕镜싎�ᗲᱻ歆쥸絫ᕝ尵걪舼꾮剙必襳챚騰嗴座껐㗶⧺ꋰ夽䞐镏囧ਸ਼畇拇鵔뙞挫�ཛྷ崕쪓펣䃃훏㸳覕蕤徑뤓啟᪡ᆶ镇˿⿶㕁撹맢㔪䴄떵啈
控熶鑚暽院䮂䶖镨拃䔭텎䳁䒶雉㦏赖൪ù暫썌꼹曙턒녫Ꜣ鞶歪㣷큏㚍唵㙔䱽읖댮洹懈ᙑ哢ꕶ镮椙卯湳囨斱ꮕ爴㊞봑轠灿췲澏ꏔ휓攟垔둬䊑ᾖᙝ燳ޤ睨弲햕靳㌿蟴㵇ﭶ葴旓靲浱枋뽜붊ᘓ琷⯷툸棁묔睲ܙ檷睟毄睳뜖酸凛폕靶福箓흴梚ឭ妵ᄲ靰弓�៶㭅뭕ᝈ䐼욄䳶ٝ섗㿕ᇷ圵眝玏츗㜻纇텃탪錗甚缋ﬗ陯羳迅嘩ꮗ횀㗡猗ཛⵗሊ㿩ᷘ롃䌁儏嚂喉ᙻ緑靵㜆耣댷碃䁂莄纹仸㟊⟴墅ɟ变আ穻띎砏䜕陻㑶跱牣玑쵸㖱
枘㡌蜹䟘硎圻碇莍饘֊滯ꙸ顕訩࿏鎅㢙뎸튋虹뽘롸突럒顺慇鮸㖮埵㘐犋甖녿惇봷墄㱳喗傌禫頼轍心㦌묂래砮厇팸鞐糿ᛙ�輇ꔕ⺒鋻孶҄坛蟊㞈裑趸卬腝⤑�棭巸쎑週伙頞閱�詁煕妑せߙ莖隿ᢇ⬘牙ᆶ媡䄴ᢑ挓䯊隔錱៶礟碎䤍횗脡湙墖骫ᕐ馕풪彙馏陃嵖阃뿙릙褯ꕳ鎗鱩㮗�㨶쏹番㪫ﭘ禉菥릅⮽礗劣鲣彃㦕䷺꽙ಠ鯛띕璍馧ߺ礦ꇝ彆�咑༺婲諹ꟾꀅ᭚㈦餛⦙鹇멽权立䎣龇仺㦹ꔛ煍떠鹋厕㪡ᵛᥚ銦ꈅ徖�뱈퉹릝虍攔卉黕褚躝緝骟㍮厚
芩ꛭ黚�饟獚㩋ꩧ坑㪪䆲꺷稥ꍷ�캧ꓩ꿕碙ꢽ孓驐錺驸ꮁ㶅骚ϣ뮸馮炲ᇤ鶴拋녚ꯝコ艽궵ꦏ⧕멠苓ֹ颹罵勇魹了䎰ꥃ娴돭潑ᖮ곩㭻�됳䭛�┹땲喱뇏잔吠惡⭹驉뗍൵﮳╌㏻ҷꕁ瞛ᬂ〃ﴚ�둣螛횸곟ㇳ�楫焏똉㼘ᡷ覝읖﮶▎甛ර눵똻�隁Ὰ톻롣잻횼矚靛骲ꬑ揚箜憟⟛뭉簏꿻뭃箛뾓靏풾뢓者믳상ଡ଼㮘쁝귙窤諃サ⋁뼱Ἴᮦ쉑靎퓁삡⨼㯻쏋絛㚃鹟ﮯ㿜㲫쌯⎢㳂蝓�諅ꪋꎘ�쐒駛삉澜禆숳论笼굣폛穭脣儜屋잍ᕂ糅쒓뤙諉욣甹헉灳Ꝝ
쏑꾜ﲮ깹厖㞴衭�쪃煐ﰘꤩⵛ䋋쥻흼볌쵝៊㟊뙗䕔볊컫넼벷룳맼岥鉉杜粨뻅ശ챂ꮛ뱱쾑�铏츗ḝΞ⁰湦㩚檗�᷍⠥玼韓쾛ﯙ쐟짔窽鎑喸鳑퇣㿝ﵷ픅뫋∮툍ﯔ珓캝懽㇖퍑矝�驽뾬틫༼㗌쒛ㄫ坡헱�뷕瑽괼퉫ւꟖ뭵宼팹楖瓚휿뾽哜⇏伽圣첫榐�蹅ᷓ⋆鿝��ꃚ�磢編鈁늝뷉텳㳓ᅺ넱襌뷔쐑䅚鯐�餷볙�睝點褌榭㲡Ǿỏ츱돜ᯤ樯䷚珢籹蝝鋎�쮲뵧�濚ﳤ掽ﻢ奇诽饕洪ᤙ�벃쳶�㻡뵯㔍禝铵柾ﻉ핫駞蛨츳ॴ姑未
ㇼ廤쓃㻑먿뇘폪姲�즥ꦞﻓ音꾶��궴鿮瘃ើ碶�畽㚏鏓얓䶭�ᳮ㥝翰夈ᡱ嗞徹丣宾㿩縱⾿韴还忔鉅县㩎갬䅖Ǡ뷲櫟�꼵镝ᨛ纅生뺔忘Ῐ磹访彲馃椟텯珿◹ޛ馀沁ꦟ뽓≠앿翻拉켟�ﱙ䯖싳풅蔸鳱꽟羮웕ꕝۿﯙ¢脀墐Ḵऑ䊅郡⃘䂐脡Ჷɰ℠䖊熡�䅞谅ꏁᣲ穌☫䪕鋥瓙憾餱㧒交㝓亝鏧臾ꅁ媔ḵ䦑劥铩痚ꄾꥑ媕庵㚃즃ᕫ셾녡宖鸵槑媵雭痛륱宗�⡯庎儤뼧济ᩮ觹担飱뷛煪
읻岙徶猱㧳䅿톡㉑嬐迾ꥑ櫕髵盝⦿퍚⠘ዖꕥ氀寶庉懗臁ꛮ㹛즑狥鳹矞ꄿ례ờ德�盭鷻셿़髗敖ᢣ锼濷郯눟绲鿿⋝鈢켾ߴ䀂㊰촒䄆⎰탁➔䈊늰䅔蒐器༾ମ梁༰ᡲ㻽᭱逺㬒숓铮鹒㇂杴䘚뒱ᱯⱇⅤ윕ⁿ㉈蜔䐋⒱≛㉉兓┣擏⒟ࡅ榒㴙艱⨓ኦ腪줭뎾劷쇌䰲㊳Е흔㘶쓒㙻㏎쌸㨤ง칃䀼䳛ᑨ⬲懌㴿貯�兄疴䠟㑒⁅斔䰧㑓㟕㭎薲萎ᑐ䁍풖͏틔䦵唑薏렮采ꔌ❘喕屑흜㑕蘕훖╖撏⭙䌼璮價㗊欝�ﱉ孋濆
讣奞炿㝜䔓屣㕷瓏㝝㽍�괶蝜ퟚ幵蛜針�ⴕ霪韞剭ᚸ萉⥡莍憅玸胯啅ᾞ把䖶膘⹏ﳅ�鵖㺻뇝䊏�荝�坖斖営韋㥦枖侚觵廉䏆鎡垥瞦�츍䬣䥤菮�⺏隐㥥격덦悮蚙낻ぬゞ挀畋픖梤빹㩨閎溱뚻볯騿澾鷿舘梺澷꤅ᱰ腖▨䵼䄍鉅ꖫ枚ጋ歰괖㾪켹㑴띾瓑ꚳ폷㵵ፓ沲ᛏ숹뵲펋犸锘塛蹨玔弝㹸꜒磔㝾嵓䇢�⯺ퟆ狨罓憯篩ழ��윓糒㑿흗ﬥ➙鸵h待㳌珚绮�翾綿︯䀁࠸龚້Ԗ末ﲴ鍒⧗�㪡ᘈꃰ
ᖤރ飁촸骜缁癰䈑㰸埤칐�좶䰛⸍ᵐ㺡䤘愍㞴ᰆ롃ཹ⸿쎚뤄ℑⅴ쨵졀慚㓘蠴︌씋ꠘ⁞嗜⇒顅쎸뎓䢮ꂭ슽Ἑ�䕷ᦪ栒ᜓ瑣蹯ȉ윭挝瞴亀糩♁呈轼⧱쟦⏨ꌘ盃犊䔞㠕⊯燤蹏㹲⥉娷醳ﺪ쾌즕ᤷ蓗覀줶䤹攩퀱㊒喞롊⫱扥趽툯ㄤࣙ扖눴漩�塋ދ볝暯⚲䱠愲昣윤쵲⢶襌薘ꨤ䝺扒䴴倸ꇽ표鈷Ꮮ擂ꋜ峦鳍蘓ᡱ巙幚葎⳥㭡鵮賓촽Χ訯�銖撎㦹㯵ᰖ鿂軓偣씙根ܥ㌻⣍⛽鑟錦榲䉩韂栿ᝅᒣꙤ橐䜵ꉘ紴퇓హꇡ殤爡鬌Ⱟ巕ꐫ⫱伶䒊⢙㔅
咕鰎穊丹ꆘ艉䚆끙ꃒ퐋箒⩊佩痪唈ꤚ啕뎚ꯒ᥆懸ꦴ剥뗤꩖叛㮞꩓ᷕ깭鈅삠䭪혻튖쓰ꨗ䍐땨끱ؖ嚏污햬썾痒㱦芒냅ᮛ氅톲숂魙쌸瑟ꇗ䊶�錚擵뚳햦㭌樷痭㢯慕�愫교꼓瓕孙ݵ앬莽뚶峠缵찹駍燣甮駏ગ巨ꤻ氌㉍㜤⮡ꥫ뭭嶆뚫뙿�窥狯롬컖䬢솪❙譁绛郿㞷㰀婺潨馣趛З㏠秽揰뷉㵘�◜内펨ꑪ률ᛰ쐖蔘懩䕌溉維碪ছ㳖趩襝蜗ᨕᴼ�ᄶ컆ኛ鱣湹萱逎紸㳛뿉넻䟮ᣉ᛫鱤鎙獲暩쨘幚쌺졋ꍄ妶
❗粙陫컛쬸̚쪳퇢苟执⚳칯파玝겱旎̻鳏钵ﻥ썁㺖䓓钻刖⟆跚촒س檍䱈쵌ᐴ篎껐㙋뭏郥麴풟弚䤝瑯ꕆ껅뵪韛ꊉ˲꾃�䉌떜璖ꡦ뤮屷�긟曙힒㯒ꩊ枍⢟麖妼埿ᷬ뎙癔�䛛ꑽ�፳飚攫饬㟮ۤ▶��酽䮵멆쳜帧雮됑搷�彵褚쾏㮉瞗뷯菸ỵ༖灖괝뚪Ꮌ�竞鷢맃씲뙣澘않됽ᓟ魓貯웝웡埱怵솇韂腾㳟轟빲류W⌓쌔륒ᅇ鱯�삋훝ꌜ栿桎䕇鱘ꑫ⸬툻阠켛殞兼磉�굧乎홷翝�庽߮휿﹗衝䳆痧絜밷
績꺠ᙹ쿴�ি拡滗�ᔧ߷兼뉟掵봻ﮡ鱎�潱➓⏊窽茗嗟翷ﲡꩌ佹煽뽾篙뮸汏崥ꁗ롹확蒂>₻蒯綧얏繱ꢛ路쩡侽籠䜟⧩ݍ뻳힟ᓻ妉蹳띾逅罿矤뉏綒罈ἶ熕靺ﶰ绱翨襻�㋹㚻菃㊺㋬ﬢ猸뿎턿뼜Լ뮑샻㭳䎽㡮浣䀄ಌ粼䀈໔ꎫ⇆ロ붠⥁벥㕃箞䃯뛃撾㼗ᘌⲿ䄅ଙ汀通썁쀭袙́쇹⃜钻䈝∔㇂ゟᨼ款솞d岻뼃◼尕섘ࠔ铂連ᬬ쇂숂ⴤ첱숞ヴᓃ㴒㇜㓃鰳蛪ା쁜謠莧䌏҄멂먣₼ﰽ쌹푂輼⸌䌆㿄ᓄ쌱䇴㓄띃釁䀦輑ꯂ
썼㙛鮯뿋䃔䃄䏫䯜�쐔㣓듄앎༄ⱄ앐᱅봿靣歂詥⬴箟쓁圣⥅䐃姌撎앓㦱椿䑤峼엵忄⏐䫔㭄䓝䶌嫅䒓嵺䳆㼊勴赡婬ꃆ䛘欌⒓멝奤푆쉯氬Ӈ豱䙼꓃摜댺閛鱆Ṵꓹ泆൸欔ꑇ䁕箬㽮칳鱇䡽쌃ᑇ좀눠㌲졌䧅쐗罔䯈얡螄粍䡻쪐鮊ങģ읤豼좘込Ꮙ鬫㓆쒑⪁鑁鲅虤䏉쟾鞔㲎䦊얚跔㤳욗鳴짂鼌ᓊ탢둃䜣顔钧슓䖜資둼蠴䩶ꦔ게䪚ƴ瓉钬繄హ쪞냤䒺쮠눔Ⓓ㲥蜄ꑇ즎䝤䐸锗ꨜ㓁쩶慴ள갴썋쪱분岒㚯뀤룁눤쳃㩁䨦<筋쳞쑬蓈쳅뮐퓋髊
鮬쇌䰗䐄糆췍昃㑌췐숤뱋੦ᦋ䪶륌ే䷁먨뱌췘쵌ꅍ찆㓫췛勣컞騄㳍쮴顺㍀㷋㗲葍츳䒊컙ꑰﳍ賨�ᒵ컝꒳컩寋냸젌蓁伦鈔瑍丯Њ俨뱒꛶蓏껹ꑏ쓻溺汍ொ픬쒟웥=쁏侬ťⓃ탏匲镏퀄칢땏퀆ⶄÃ쿱믰屐큊ࠕ薊퀂럓総묎Ց꼑ߵ◑숓㚴䒠貺ﵴ蒾䬶岄뷐ࠔꉑ탑᯽ꖢ턙ổ儓ﳅ躶ᝅ吩왵ổၒ톁▵涕툜ᩲ嗒툨莢ג툪䇄◒倊䃋剡▝淒刬ⲽҊ㛫㗓갵㈅旓븷ক꒵䦵겼샳溱ꑓ占㡕紉툱㞭厚㥁ී푁恂ᕔ푄뱣⨰룺碪㑎틢퍄襆䀍ꕒ푅鏀⩔푶亽
Ꮥ䪁凝㓕하꠬嗉쨽噭赋饊倝췊퉃䴍赒啎蘸凜픵岥唻必Ꮦ㉟膋�且륌斳䨹廥剛恵ᣖ喁䗐황蓂镖홬㫣鮵홱䡊㑆営撕ꔲ䁗杝핑剨浝镪狕ꙹ眽ꕗ뉻�챣题딨兲ឌ鰼仰祥鵖剶笕㵕ᆵ앗ꞇ蕅蕘늉㓖㒦聕㗗꩕⾕Ჹ坃᭕䗘�䲕慘�訍剙夑锭珙�㗘슌邥鵙奡Ἕ赙�蔺뷙�嘂뗍�봣綫儣俰ꐥ趾톔鱅펝麅▒媨갭ﶟ媪껕鶱啾融絊튥蹽핊튚鿕冩껕�럅釛寳륵닛ퟭꅲ궈쮺㜼淚㹴룅᷑冶뺽륛尃쌕叜娂씝珜ꁐ喣ௗ᰽㰕ﱏ�柼室展◜尚융嶱툕�퐵粪
䄵뀽鑄豥㧻䎂쐵퇏푅偝����ዞ좌㤽븲㢤ꗓ쨊⒥㴵앇�跐凜᳞�퇞廾�﬩蓞䇆ୟ塲줝ⷈ僩║탮ꮅ锣�ᶟ忸ﲵ哔塳ꗼ䳕䯅哞屖듔㱇�٥痟�ۅ酟﵍鉠尩८닠�䵉謗粸힆䤅䷛姒Ֆۑ켆߆욑ᚾ躙愔ᡶ໑┑班ජ䳾ꕵ䑞憼ͥ㕡彩卡�ᦦㅢ拕⌎勢循ꍡ勪ⵢ慑䱢拯舙⛡빢⬅걠�쳐瑝ǭ귢쥢ぎ釣㥮닣쩰☎溰�ⷦ默퀵㪆໎섷⧎뻣魃䆾䙤ꝅ㴆Ꙕ밝ြ鬩䒪㍮纽켸䂾湐䵅䋮䘬搿偦喲刖햄㉔뗤쌺Ზ㔶斛蜅헤搆
�搆叆퉥左혞鍣�盧浥惘吼㕤敌ҝ곥⺼幦馡繦䏂痤埦蚿딲൮吧悓㻕赥晼ͭ뱦曌羋㹧놁幧ᾢ�뚍뵖東먒ⲻ琉䷧窞栻萶桒虖풭뢁嫭絞홛೨棸ﰜ䮇쮝颏趦۩蘖๛陽貽么쾋豮뻏榑℣膡蛩翂䱅娚쁅뙋푩靦ꙏ雦칩�鏶䙪�ꀶ帽䕔ꌦ価ꊞ乨檩걦暬껖ꖮ㯦鑖핊ᶜ쓪櫭둪뵩癪殯쾄蹆ᄁᗤ첟ꞅ鸾캳듎滏즵뚖殱쒮왖躮㮨Ŗ䛍氀╄�믉葾똿풷섞噏䧂쌖泎퉶仓涥퐶绬㉰阚瑥㢄쵝䓖吅구決ѭ댑
继滕縄転刢䚪曗﹅㷋䌽뾮剮쿓Ѭ淪�涉召♭磥䛭洆荂홼呑찕ỡퟛ훎죫㚯﨎濸ﲶ隸𫬮毯�ﰮوퟯ踅ϗ杰찇詮洧率曚댎ꕯ漶瓰灴��焈ࠦ杬ɂ搫쪅왜杊쨮鵫㌝烪狼ॱᒯ焗῏ᇲ羡툘ᛷ윉ח睎츛뿆젝ṗῲ긫Ꮷ쟲鸭麎槮춫兓골蓲狧⽳献할俳疁㏊巇⒟♣赛쳳珞緳珡㣟ᗴ䇗㋴哾⟧䨦됣輏넿䁗츾䠇瑋䰿蟢仗瞤[ṳ쇈뉞䟏别䪯屌嘿�蟵鱙∇纾痦亏졵悅짾䵉喏字恿ꝵ
�妿䝶魥뮮뷬溙뻽붫烚珮툴ᑶ㌤ꋲ晇ၷ燯㟷渞ᱎ囅毤ᣯ眙⠍�矚ㄬ盗珏탷累皅땵褼䚏似쵼耀肀ࡀᘤ܍䊄偡撸ᴶ蠏扄㡑嚤ᜭ䚌兣㵶速摈㥒阤❍䪔ꉠAᚆ烜㥓횤㝭亜卧緶ꀿ偏䑨秸튠ቨ瓉愞ꔲ橔㩕嚥垭嚬啫뵶끟汘㭖阥柍媴噭喻弲똱湜㭗횥短庼坯ﷶ쁿灠㱘ᘦ䲥슧៱嘈ꄮ醆ꍣⱙ垆霭曌뉱䛘㔧킟瑨㭚़꓿櫔婵撽�켊癫㵛䌵톢틶簝挛硰㹜ᜧ잍狤屹暾箏욝穳㹝垧盬嵻뵷㟇䳼掤�竴幽ꌻ繼ﵙ켷懼㬼翯ﳧ샿謊ꍰษ
샱䰰ԕ郁ᵬ숇谐괤梿ᄬ쌉찐വ郃㷬쐏譄䮴씑䨑ε놿嵔븗갯ᥡ迆⩜䊂곱ᵵサ琛䗭粌ⅹ鋈贬줣䰒�猄쨥谒⦥鋊궬쬫尋詎桋몄䮉쳲㍈촜괳鐑㗑词鬄촧貳郤큇괫츲챳㷵鏏댿簳䁛鑐ഭ텃䴔끉ڵ䮎䛣펢ᮂꕈ網䔥诓푎僕铔՝吡䲵㪩뒺嗽홗贕奥郖俵흚촕嵵闗�틞׀䞁뒢䏀Ꝡ犵揃呓觍婟촉梕鋚䜝�ᴒ汯郛墅�燅韜촭ꕳ�痑韝��䴋萶牞鷵⁔炃ᚫ襥幽紷胹迠꾕딏蓕軡븽湸褥飢ⶮ愚빸贵飣㷮幓黬䟾搷糽礥㽎縹�怒沞븹뽴挮บꆅ诨
珎业ꖕ軩F抹锧璯⮢橤؉ꚱ駔맾꺯깙뇁�줾얳뗑鯭�沢绛맥鯮旞⻖⻳럶潺齺球듯ꕶ垛씑箧ᤗ꧇⭼쏝ᳲ햫狅쿜촵鏳༝텅髝፺⫓ꛚ뾡⤟巒윜�ﲡ楷橊혓ᵷ䗫矙軸㿷梨伞緇ག⫧垝셏Ấ餇署뿞�嵻迯ﳮ⼛✥y촏ﷳ丟��ﻷ谟㴣叧贈Ὁ靈齓黜 ̄콲ž剀ヤ㒠脉⹐ဆৈ怃ᆄ傂홌枵ꗬ쓟標솾⡸₠ὄどᄆ젶ट䅡糦穰숔巘�⟬ႆᫎ塃歬壥郗곶ⅅ콣炅ᯪ�ᅃﱘ褤ᘍ䐙ʶ䷏䜄톉⩎噅ጷ둢譙湑㨔罹쬆㱬誋⤚㙆ሓ㎣謟ꔑ䕱挙煤冎姍롆ᷩ
쓣捹䅏욖唈鄟퐣퀫觼ᣄ蛴蒣岇ꋑ㡅⇹跬酚좸饈┥쓤䪙�䥍㷙픧糧劈ጁ⡈⥽排艹ዑ᱐ⴙ唫賬ຖ䟆槈Ꝧꄤ閃�䭞糙⒀뿤厘戎褤비䑥鐘䠏設재뎏扂妘㕷䱕鮲䘋쵠ᄡ䬮펛犎华㝧㑧鷩걓䷹ढ✟쥼펁໊뉌㯋�鷶ڊ줡⚭ᅯ㍖膢礦헀ꄅ⹔䖆欙⠫ᅭ咢獎ꗁ㺛斦輐뒯侞㴂ꔗᠭᒟ뽐⩎魈൨儧ሴ▕ชⴵ咦髎樒䵙앩ꜹ剈酇ꥹ❈몛蒚轶㌝덨ꌦ厹頚位㑏꧞䨣属痪ꭕ湕햚륊愅乼럨共啦穥톳퇕쒪潍륆騥嶽䭗왕垼⭓羽嚰숎ꨚ㻑呫꧱酬壞歇迥ᕍ짒鬤攃浐
ⱺ曵姌㷛龽嚴튎䨖倽唌ꍬ嫔ꍙ浤割隲ᧅᯚ籨퇬덣�寞䗘국쇵冸퍮ꋚ懫ᷘ궎㘤�䤲ॲ瞶ཅ皨짭멟帗差믗깵傼簮ꉜ㍽䶬ꇏ绣廳촲瞺ࣅ駨藯뿷�參섃랼뱞䈃∫괸ᷘ弆ᠼ꽿坉১屡투軰쌗浘悷ᘻ進ꚧ׃쯡羖㘫㼦㬸ḕ㎜宋끍ᣆ�赟왱挹窸꿦喻煻측ₛⱡ踩ڎ줬弇ᆹ늌其䳊⛛㳥閭ᷗ⋨酉ꦐ惦㦨ٳ籤檰嚲执蜘愵ꄼ玛熆奠㦳屧ӭ⻮⭢怲쵼첝槎ې⫯㓨魭㛴톉ᶽ廮碚힖ꫧ諛깱퉿ଆ楁厳璣귲劇塪鵁㘵햩塉ﮬ璗領崙冗돪ꝷ둵핯
�ꖕ疭쇦䧘偋㵬농껮麻럺楙坄�컞᫇摫봖땱์�ࠈ₢Ꝃ㚵䟜浿㵮맍ױ搢ᗹ�מ歿㫯竇녷흹Ꮞ줄༂볜與印轃鈶铽럖ᖃ䫃ᛢ敯㉱뻏뛩濜秇ℇ畒쌥ﳮ뽽虎붘䏻Ἆ览ዯצ轷㋳옷輌Პ⯮竏䄇䠰蚟㹩쁕ﺱ엌뽜Ꭱ放盓㿿ת鱏﹑푵쟺絙ꍼ琅땾ﯗਇ䞨䵅柲ퟯ홡̮餎䧘伏ᛮ둃㹫췧☿뾽믕যﻯ숏瘒�ꖻ㘗∾ﭽ藧�짋쵯콉違离㶏�脗�튃卺쉥Ἵ羹�⎿裩鑧ᗶ톯㉻វ�篞蟜뷔쇷䛸푛뵗틝㞱쭾李⾿䣳룿ﺔ퓫꾹ﯗ潟
쩸얨Ɐ籲ꮻ싽㜿ꞿᮼ㧭忾㿿෩�뎶秤钏俸브℄ꓯ迭ãᒰ濶ǫᵰﰐ鑩껵○華 ĕ퀂̡醭倃н䐰긯풊㣐냷1䂰烻я屰烕旰戆ۑ꼅խ켆އ椐ܡ膐漈켊皏〈࣋鵋켇ݡ伉७覐洊ਇꤐ⢮뒤몰郴ﺜ곰郴ி찐냍ೇ퓰냧蹯賺ೡ㾯⼌෭⬯倎࿗ꔬ퀎㦮괍赮⼎烾셉ဏᇽ玬ㄑምĮଐl輑ါ㛰ჸ贼㇑儒㥱ㄔʼn쒏倢㸑뇰ﴴₑۨᔟ䭱氖ᔫ槱퍰擑燰ﵚ氱蓧獱漘ᑝ襱萑퇯ﱺ绑揧ᑰ㠡倓ᤓ갱뇚뗱氛ᥩﭮ꼙᮹朮턛Ჹ薫儜
᷍갬炤ၷ쾰လᡙῐ넄ổ疱儞῭ମ逝ᶟ췐༞Ῡ爠᠉눠螺儌⇑┲樢∋⤲⇹뀡↯귯툢䐲銘⑁䱲銻ᄵ㤒鈊屮䬒♡ㄩ♥梫䋋ᔟ댰瀥▧鮯鈦⡭萲犌⢁赲Ჷ퀧⁻酒⊡鶲㈪⪩ᆰ丩⧡薏눨⮭벲늀⮹엲爬➉覐伫ⲃ줲爭秘핲눭⻡崨หⷃ넏爪튊ﵲ⸅솎켮⽻Ƴ洐ෳ㌱ㄙ閧丰タ福猱㈝ⲳ獨㈩㗳栳Ᵽ蟐倲⾣㤓猴祈㌳댴㕑⌭ᄎ㑩䴑㙕搳፹㙏浳㌱臐켵㙡熳垀紓㌸㢉⦦า㞵䶏猸㦍鲳㦙ꗳ昺㝡罐伹㩋ꤳ猻䲸뗓댻㳁椥ู㮳줐匴㷅퐳덝㶿�㫉
槐켼㵁困퇓㌿㿹㦦踼㺱㾏팾䃽᎘䃷ᗴ敁䃝꜎佀䀽ᦔ瑂㬨╴둂䌱鄵䉧ﴏ㑁䐵䐴璓䑁䵴䅁ꇎ큃䓯冴䕠⽔㑆䙩릣久䖛▏瑆䝭粴뒤䝝藴瑈䍉䮑假䢋褴瑉킘懳둉䪡괤็䦅ए鑇䮥됴냒䬉뵴㹫材콊䬇섔镴㑍䷙蹊䲃ホ푌仝㓴亻晏䰕敐乎份璉畐鐈땐儑䔭텈偉啐刕�ᕒ別ⲵ钨᷵됂勗㷵匏䆵畔⽈ᗨ⥵땔䙙埕땕卡仵뗧引㕖䑱潕㕗偹暵闧眵땗䆉蝕땘䶑纵痧ᖃ䕕㕙媡∰媫굕奷浮뉙䥷뇵ꣀ༵㕜峉涢乛孧떎巍熳镝廝䌴嵡덎ᕞ忥䤳
ᕟ念ྴ蹞幅뇎镟惽ᦳ陠愍�恃Ꝏᙡ戕ᙢ戥랳蹡慁ꇎ院挭붲陣搽茳挻魎ᙤ故贲ᙥ敕厳蹤搹藎陥晝䶲陦杭⬳昷荎ᙧ桵ᄲᙨ梅蹧札臎陨榍춱险檝윲椧�殥팳ᙪ段ꆲ蹪模秎陫沽䎱陬淍攲氛睎᙭滕휰᙮滥⦲蹭洍淎陮濭膰陯烽漋응ᝫ焅㔳ᝰ焕꾱蹰瀉闑爝ླ靱猭漱爃䕎ᝳ琵흛瑅㖴蹳猁䏎畍靴癝Uこ畝䅎靵睥靲睵斳൵盿㯎硽靷禍㜳൸磳p窕窥⾷遶祇㟎靸箭鞶靺粽赹篭ⵎ靻緅漷緕뮲赼糧⟎绝靽翭圶ၻ繅ᕒ胵ᴱ顾
者辷酑罃ᯎ颀脍㾰ᢀ舝┲ൾ臡ൎ颁茥愰ᢂ茵趂苑ᡶ落玱ᢃ蕍蜷避葃ॎᢅ處ᢆ虥ή藏濘颃蝭쎱颇衽ܸ邅蜽❑ᢈ覅強硜覕ඇ裍ᅪ领誝䖱预训쬱ඊ談颊貵Ἤᢌ賅ᾭ趋诅颌跍澰ᢉ軝�ᆁ赁颍迥꼫ᢏ迵ힱ邈踻颏都澫馐鄍㌭႐逡텍ᦑ鈕㬫ᦒ鈥⾬ඍ釃쿍馒錭ﶪ馓鐽㌲邑錟쵍ᦔ镅뤪ᦕ镕붫ඓ钷쟍馕陝熪首靭紫ඖ隱앍ᦗ页✪ᦘ颅䖫趗鞫쏍馘馍香骝ܫ馑띍ᦚ鮥録ᦎ鮵徸邔騝뇍ᦛ鲽箩馜鷍īႜ鰗녑馛黕鄬ᦝ黥宪趚鶏Ῐᦋ鿭厭馞ꃽᤪඟ龍轍᪠ꄅ촨᪡ꄕ
펩趠ꂇ跍骡ꈝ鶨骢ꌭ䤲邝ꈕ蝍᪣ꐵ弨᪤ꑅ宩ජꎅ藍骤ꕍ▨骥ꙝᬩඥꖃ荍᪦ꝥ̳ꝵ뮱那ꘋ种ᪧ펧骨ꦍ爐Ⴈꠅ獍᪩ꪕ�骧ꪥƬ趦ꥹ淍᪪ꮭ綧骫경䬨ණꭳ㝘骟귅霰骪귕ꎫ趬걭嗍᪬껝⮧骮꿭ථ깗y骭냵ᬪᮯ뀅춧趯꽕䷐᮰넍鮰눝䴳辩뇱䭍᮲댥錦᮳댵澧න뉓䧍鮳됽澦鮴땍㤧ප둍䍍᮵뙕鮱뙥枪趵땋ᯭ띭綻❕㩚砠ᑏ臻﮸릑픷媸뢃熑ᬧ몕ꔻ瞺륣鮚ힹ렷箻뮹Ꮇ�묫椑᮶벽鮶뷍伺農럯㝍鮼뻕唥ᮾ뻥ᮦභ뵉菐ᮽ뿭ඨ鮾샽醎뼥콘鲿섅�᳀섕즥쁃᷍鳁숝�
鳂쌭ꄥෂ숽ᝍ᳃쐵Ꜵ᳁쑅䞺辽쏭ᗍ᳄앍ⶫ鳄왝࿅엧ፍ鳅읥甤᳇익釀옣鳇졽䞤鳈즍Ꜫ迆죥ꭐ᳆쪕ᔳ쪥뾫迉짙짏Ჭ쮭꾼鳋첽鄨跃쬷杘鳊췅館췕枧跌찡컝鳎쿭欤츟⽑鳍탵朻᷌퀅Ꭸ跏켝᷏턍ꖣ鷑툝鼬ᇈ턝᷒팥ବ鷐팵솧ෑ툗鷓퐽솦ᷓ핍ු퐕텐᷐확ꤥᷕ홥⾧࿋헓헌鷖흭覯ᷖ�S࿗ퟍ콌鷗�ģᷙ�㶮还�뇌鷙�闄�득ᵭ텘ꐽ�쑽嵞�ﷻ䣍ꮱ뭑ᛅ썽㷝无䤝⏞�㏽귛�緞�릥��ෟ�Ꝍ巠켽黟㘔ꓡƍ탠�↾̞Ớ㠰ﻎ
쨨㔾뻣䵉ᥞꏤ傞�츾䋞�摾庽깽ễ䑬婞뻎쥞捾㻧⎀罾꾱鴴磝�䮱绨环麉⾜眞凩ꦞ曫�뤞泪�⌾ử⛔즞뻭췞첾廇랾믮縺췢︑տﻨ굩㿰ⴌ爵ﻌ�ᅿ㿱㬠�呾鄛歾㿲옸㜿꿳t䅟ṁ࿃㏟ᄃ啿繃屿ᅯཋ亿翆᯾뿶ᐩ쇻�滶秿槸蠿ꛝ躿翨郞胟뿅辰퍽㫺竬锟䋺녬놿神풚ᆹﰭ匞탷ﯳ鎏忸솾�寝אָ텿缍쏔얟뷾₄䄂萀ԁ䆃躛ﰆᤞ蜍᠑五ᔩ䖋ᇣ풘㥮輝ᤒ踔╉䦓ዥ咙妮霭ᤓ캔㕩䶛Ꮷ풙
秮脴愈뤰︌㶃冣ᓩ喚餮ꝍᨕ井喩喫ᗫ햚慮蘿毑ᮖ踕旉妳Ꮽﶗ펮띭ᬗ캕庥�霮햛燐뽽ᰘ༖蔉懃ᣱ嚜잍ᰙኖ撼᧳횜㥯쾝ᬚሥ∕僒媴嚝妯ᴛ骖弇횝篮罫㣯Ḝท镑櫛鰸垞餯侀ḝ侗햩痫᷻澛ᤚﱷ輗榬黣㞏�ﹻᬟ瀏�緹�㚄Ӱ̋ፄ䄅摰ܛ⊄샰⭈৭倸⎢䈋༻헓ꀀ�ፁ卄䔕筨ዩ釅抄㿀钑᭫倰忌윛ύ茄䠡⑲ぇ谤䗆䫒☫ሹꍔ䨩ꍬ詪勇뎤䬭鲺쏴⌱ꓱ㏇醼䴨搓㟛丹ꑳ쓪卍펲㠑⒱㲛̅偁╴䌋錽༅䕅ⶓ
䜗㍅剉ꕴ䬫㏅㑍贴伷䌅呑╵卋爾ྲ听揵䚥뗕뎃홎ꔵ孫珅坝浰幧茅켟ᕶ掋Ꮽ奤൭晟緭婨ꕶ殫독䑭≨㿯楛ﯴ�┗룊靘팵嵵ꕮ皕鵵幸㵫窥彽흞㿲恴☸鈊磠ጶ憅㕫蛝抈险訁㏆掍谺�௲慴น测饤匶斕晨阝╾暘㹨驁復珆枝鯑�씝뙵ꉑ難但쁔ṷ躓婦㥶ꮫ頻닆櫦険隅�쏖桅ᛛ돋祓콶嘛긋뭭溹ꙻꓪ苖宠뛻⡃埽炿⑼뒷런�巄잛윗ﱱ⎇柉浼상켣즶켻༷嫐埜橇뵲匷痕
Current industry standard is 200,000-SF for a warehouse/distribution building. The site split warehouse
space between two buildings to achieve close to 180,000-SF
5. The site must provide good secondary road access to support the expected truck and employee traffic.
A traffic signal at the intersection of Gallimore Dairy Road and Chimney Rock Road controls traffic adjacent
both site entrances.
6. A site that was relatively free of environmental features, streams, and floodplain, and/or features that would
be to large building footprints.
7. The site is entitled/zoned to appropriately allow for the intended bulk warehousing/distribution and
commercial use.
Due to the site's unique configuration with a wetland and stream in the center of the site, in order to achieve close to the
minimum industry standard of 200,000-SF warehouse space, while avoiding further impacts to the wetland and stream
onsite, the warehouse space was split between two buildings. The larger warehouse space was configured as far back
from the wetland to minimize further impacts to the resource. The depth of the building is at the minimum while still
providing separation of vehicular and tractor trailer parking and movement with separate driveways. Separation of
vehicular and tractor trailer movements provides safety for both operators. Fire safety requires full access to a minimum
of three sides of the building, which has been provided. Impacts to the wetland were minimized to the maximum extent
practicable with grading at a 2:1 slope. A retaining wall was considered, however costs, maintenance and safety concerns
with regard to the height of the wall and additional fencing on top of the wall were considered impracticable.
2) Based on proposed grading, wetland fill, and re-routing of drainage into stormwater ponds, the project appears
to eliminate the drainage area/hydrology source for the remainder of the on -site Wetland downstream of the
proposed impact site. Unless otherwise justified, the Corps would consider the remainder of the Wetland as a
reasonably foreseeable indirect impact (see NWP General Conditions "District Engineers Decision") resulting
from a loss of hydrology. Unless otherwise justified, compensatory mitigation would be required for both direct
impacts and indirect impacts resulting in a loss of hydrology and therefore aquatic function; compensatory
mitigation is typically required at a 2:1 ratio, depending largely on resource quality (reference the NCWAM score
of "High" for this wetland);
Based upon site characteristics and aerial photos, there is evidence that the wetland was an excavated farm
pond, which intercepts groundwater. USGS StreamStats (attached to this email) depicts an overall drainage area
at the bottom of the stream at Gallimore Diary Road as 20 acres. Aerial photos from 1955 depict a farm pond
(attached to this email). It is unlikely that the wetland is completely sustained by surface water runoff and based
upon the aerials and drainage area, it is more likely groundwater driven and will be hydrologically sustainable
with the impact shown on the plans. In addition, the applicant is undertaking geotechnical investigations at the
site. Additional borings will be performed to confirm the location of groundwater. Based upon that information,
the applicant will make a decision with regard to adding footing drains that would discharge to the remaining
wetland area in order to avoid indirect impacts to sustaining hydrology to this area. The geotechnical
investigation is anticipated to occur within the next month. Upon receipt of those results and modifications to
the project design, specifically with regard to the addition of footing drains, the information will be submitted to
your office for review as part of this application.
3) We acknowledge the information you provided in the PCN pertaining to endangered species (Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act). However, given the general nature of potentially suitable habitat for Schweinitz's
sunflower and small whorled pogonia, the existence of both open and forested areas within the project area,
and given recent USFWS concerns regarding these species, the Corps cannot currently reach a No Effect
determination for these species within the Section 7 Action Area based on the information provided. Note that
the Corps is willing to request concurrence from the USFWS on a May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect
determination for both species using the information you provided. However, please be aware that, if the
USFWS cannot concur with this determination based on this information, they may request a plant -by -plant
survey for these species within the appropriate survey season(s). Per NWP 29 General Condition 18, the Corps
cannot verify the use of a NWP until Section 7 consultation is complete.
2
See USFWS letter dated March 9, 2022 (attached) which states that based upon information provided, it appears
that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species,
their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for list under the Act at this site.
MICHELLE SAVAGE-MEASDAY, PWS I Environmental Senior Project Manager
T 919.861.9910 I D 919.861.9821 I C 919.441.2437
5260 Greens Dairy Road I Raleigh I NC 127616
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
www.ecslimited.com
THE NEW ASTM PHASE I STANDARD IS HERE - Contact us to find out more.
Instagram I Linkedln I Facebook I Twitter
Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.
3
•
••
• <
•
• i;
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
March 9, 2022
Michelle Measday
ECS Southeast LLP
5260 Green Dairy Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
Re: 415 Gallimore Dairy Road —Guilford County
Dear Mrs. Measday:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by aproposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office'sproject planning website at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that are
known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, ensure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
'The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Ourcomments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856-4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
StreamStats Report
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC20220318142729797000
Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 36.06786,-79.95152
Time: 2022-03-18 10:27:49 -0400
Basin Characteristics
Parameter Code Parameter Description
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream
Value Unit
0.0313 square miles
USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the
purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and
approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for
other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the software has been
subjected to rigorous review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty,
expressed or implied, is made by the USGS or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of
release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held
liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government.
Application Version: 4.7.0
StreamStats Services Version: 1.2.22
NSS Services Version: 2.1.2