The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0004825_2021 Residuals Annual Report Review_20220404ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR. Director Michael Glass, Wastewater Director City of Randleman 204 S. Main Street Randleman, NC 27137 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality April 4, 2022 SUBJECT: 2021 Residuals Annual Report Review City of Randleman Residuals Land Application Programs Permit No. WQ0004825 Randolph County Dear Mr. Glass: Division of Water Resources staff Caitlin Caudle completed a review of the 2021 Residuals Annual Report. This review was mostly compliant with the subject permit. The following items of concern were noted: A. The Winston Salem Regional Office was not notified of the August land application activities. Land application notifications can be directed to Caitlin Caudle at 336- 776-9699 or caitlin.caudle@ncdenr.gov. B. Fields RD19-2 and -3 had zinc indexes greater than 2000. High levels of zinc can be toxic to some plants. Please continue to monitor zinc levels in this field after future land application activities. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional comments and observations. If you have any questions about this letter please contact Caitlin Caudle at the letterhead address or phone number, or by email. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: L-on. l . Jn lAts 145B49E225C94EA... Lon T. Snider, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ-WSRO Enc: Inspection Report Cc: Ryan Copeland, Synagro (electronic copy) Randolph County Environmental Health (electronic copy) Laserfiche File WQ0004825 WSRO Electronic Files GDE NORTH C OLI JA ' omm mr� ep..of o�.i North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 336.776.9800 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: WQ0004825 Effective: 02/13/20 Expiration: 05/31/26 Owner : City of Randleman SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: City of Randleman RLAP County: Randolph 3475 Applewood Rd Region: Winston-Salem Contact Person: Scott Douglas Berg Directions to Facility: Randleman NC 27317 Title: Phone: 336-998-7150 Ext.13 System Classifications: LA, Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: NC0025445 City of Randleman - Randleman WWTP Inspection Date: 03/31/2022 Entry Time 09:OOAM Exit Time: 10:45AM Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle Phone: 336-776-9699 Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503) Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Sampling II Pathogen and Vector Attraction (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 4 Permit: WQ0004825 Owner - Facility: City of Randleman Inspection Date: 03/31/2022 Inspection Type : Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Division of Water Resources staff Caitlin Caudle completed a review of the 2021 Residuals Annual Report. This review was mostly compliant with the subject permit. The following items of concern were noted: A. The Winston Salem Regional Office was not notified of the August land application activities. Land application notifications can be directed to Caitlin Caudle at 336-776-9699 or caitlin.caudle@ncdenr.gov. B. Fields RD19-2 and -3 had zinc indexes greater than 2000. High levels of zinc can be toxic to some plants. Please continue to monitor zinc levels in this field after future land application activities. Other observation: • The wrong calendar year was listed on the Annual Land Application Certification Form. • The land applier did not sign the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form. Page 2 of 4 Permit: WQ0004825 Owner - Facility: City of Randleman Inspection Date: 03/31/2022 Inspection Type : Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine Type Distribution and Marketing Land Application Record Keeping Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required? Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters? Are there any GW quality violations? Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? Is a copy of current permit on -site? Are current metals and nutrient analysis available? Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters? a. TCLP analysis? b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)? Are PAN balances being maintained? Are PAN balances within permit limits? Has land application equipment been calibrated? Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization? Are there pH records for the land application site? Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place? Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary? Are hauling records available? Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date? # Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window? Comment: Pathogen and Vector Attraction a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B) Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only) Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A) c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B) Temperature corrected d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day) Yes No NA NE El • Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ▪ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ▪ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ▪ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE O 000 O 000 O 000 • ❑ ❑ ❑ • O 000 Page 3 of 4 Permit: WQ0004825 Owner - Facility: City of Randleman Inspection Date: 03/31/2022 Inspection Type : Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine e. Time/Temp on: Digester (MCRT) Compost Class A lime stabilization f. Volatile Solids Calculations g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results Comment: Sampling Describe sampling: Is sampling adequate? Is sampling representative? Comment: Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 4 of 4