NC0050342_Permit (Issuance)_20040618

NPDES DOCUHENT ! CANNINO COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0050342
Muddy Creek WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
June 18, 2004
Thins document its printed on reuse paper - igriore auy
content on the reYerise aide

6'p' OFWATF9
irtica
NCDENR
r
y
Mr. David K. Saunders P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Winston-Salem
P.O. Box 2511
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
Dear Mr. Saunders:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 18, 2004
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0050342
Muddy Creek WWTP
Forsyth County
The Division has reviewed the Winston-Salem comments of April 23, 2004 in response to their draft NPDES permit.
The Division has considered the concerns raised and has modified the permit in accordance with current Division
policy, all responses to concerns and revisions made to draft permit, NC0050342, are explained below:
Comment #1: Annual Pollutant Scan.
Response: The Division agrees with your comment and has changed the Section A (4) of the Permit. The "total
recoverable metals" requirement will be changed to "total metals". You can follow the sampling schedule you have
suggested in your comments for Annual Pollutant Scans.
Comment #2: 002 Discharge Monitoring. Requirements.
Response: The Division understands your concern and included Special Condition in the final•permit that will allow
you to suspend monitoring during times when flooding, ice storms, etc. pose a substantial risk of injury or death to
persons collecting samples. If the discharge from Outfall 002 occurs during normal business hours, you will be
required to conduct sampling.
Comment #3: Definition of Daily Sampling.
Response: The Division disagrees with your comment and does not consider language to be confusing. The
language states "sampling shall be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other disruptions of normal
operations prevent weekday sampling". Floods, ice storms, etc. are clearly a "disruption of normal operations". In
addition, these events are covered under provision "Failure to Monitor for Good Cause".
Comment #4: Failure to Monitor for Good Cause.
Response: The Division agrees with your comment and will include a Special Condition in the final permit that will
allow you to suspend monitoring during times when flooding, ice storms, etc. pose a substantial risk of injury or death
to persons collecting samples.
Comment #5: Flow Measurements.
Response: The Division believes that existing language does not prevent you from replacing a flow meter in a rapid
manner.
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

Issuance of Permit NC0050342 4
June 18, 200411!
Page 2.
Comment #6: Part II, Section D.2, Reporting Requirements.
Response: The language in the draft permit was formulated to assure timely submittal of the DMRs. We have
changed it to "monthly monitoring reports must be postmarked no later than thirty days following the completed
reporting period". The paragraph that stipulates "the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the
completed reporting period" will remain unchanged. The Division believes that there is no contradiction between
these requirements. If you must deliver a DMR on the last day of the month to DWQ, you would need to postmark
your report no later than 30 days following the completed reporting period.
Comment #7: Special Conditions for Municipal Facilities.
Response: The Division concurs with you. The procedure you are following meets the requirement of the Permit.
The language in the Draft Permit was intended to cover some unusual occurrences.
Comment #8: Part III; Section C; Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances.
Response: The Division understands your comment and will consider changes to the section. However, we need to
evaluate it very carefully since this language is used in boiler plate for all permits in the State.
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Dr. Sergei Chernikov at telephone number
[phone], extension 594.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
U AmWILSON
cc: NPDES Unit l
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Pretreatment Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV

Permit NC0050342
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of Winston-Salem
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Off Cooper Road
Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
to receiving waters designated as the Yadkin River (outfall 001) and Muddy Creek (outfall 002) in the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 2004.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2009.
Signed this day June 21, 2004.
ORIGINAL SINNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0050342.
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
The City of Winston-Salem is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue operation of an existing 21.0 MGD wastewater treatment system that includes the following
components:
> Bar screens
➢ Grit chambers
> Primary clarification
> Three aeration basins
> Secondary clarification
> Chlorination and dechlorination
> Instrumented flow measurement
> Anaerobic sludge digesters
> Gravity thickener
> Sludge storage lagoons
> Belt filter press
> Solids blending tanks
This facility is located at the Muddy Creek WWTP off of Cooper Road near Winston-Salem in Forsyth
County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into the Yadkin
River (outfall 001) and Muddy Creek (outfall 002). Both streams are currently classified WS-IV waters
in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

rrax.� • •\ • ,: 1490
l 1195
Latitude (001):
Longitude (0011:
Latitude (002):
Longitude (002):
Receiving Stream:
Stream Class:
SCALE 1:24000
35°55'51" Sub -Basin:
80°22'09" Ouad #:
6. 59'37" Permitted Flow:
80°22'53"
Yadkin River (001), Muddy Creek (002)
WS-N
03-07-04
D17NE
21.0 MGD
(D'j:K-
)t.
; • 1.... i(
il Ali
is
rr (` i ' 11 ,.^ I
ate__
'
\\*.‘'. . .t. I\ / :'(Fii:,./c.old.Hop4'c..hi. ,...1N: \ 1 .11) 1
i \., '-_-,.,._. . ::_l ) ....--
1 6 l l� r I'►..- \\\ 1 ,
1�.
1,
••., ee Creek)
City of Winston-Salem
NC0050342 •
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant

Permit NC0050342
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [001]
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001 [Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent]. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
-CHARACTERISTICS
DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS
)MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
._
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Average.-;
Meal irement
..,Fi **Cy_ cy
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Flow
21.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
CBOD, 5-Day, 20°C2
25.0 mg/L
40.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent, U, D
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
NH3-N
(April 1 — October 31)
14.0 mg/L
35.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent,
U, D
NH3-N
(November 1 — March 31)
Daily
Composite
Effluent,
U, D
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent,
U,D
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Daily
Grab
Effluent,
U, D
Total Residual Chlorine
28 µg/L
Daily _
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NOz+NO3+TKN)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent,
U,D
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent,
U,D
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
pH5
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Pollutant Scan
Annually
Footnote 6
Effluent
NOTES:
1. U: upstream at Idols Dam. D: downstream 0.26 miles below U.S. Highway 64. Instream sampling
requirements are provisionally waived in light of the permittee's participation in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin Association. Should participation in the Association cease, all instream sampling requirements are
immediately reinstated. Should instream sampling be reinstated, grab samples shall be collected 3/week
during the months of June, July, August, and September and weekly during the remainder of the year.
2. The monthly average effluent CBOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of
their respective influent values (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen concentration in the effluent shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L. Effluent
samples shall be taken prior to entering the 5 mile outfall line.
4. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) ChV @ 5.5%; January, April, July, October [see condition A. (3) of this
permit].
5. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units or greater than 9.0 standard units.
6. See condition A (4).
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE
AMOUNTS.

Permit NC0050342
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [0021
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 002 [Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Overflow]. Such discharges shall
be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
- 11ISCHARGE
;.. L1 • IT:A.TIONS
1VIONITORING REQUIREMENTS
d
:& _: _
. Weekly
Average
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Locat on.
Flow (MGD)
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
CBOD, 5-Day, 20°C'
25.0 mg/L
40.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Influent & Effluent
Total Suspended Solids'
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Influent & Effluent
NH3-N
(April 1— October 31)
14.0 mg/L
35.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
NH3-N
(November 1 — March 31)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen2
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(N 02+N O3+TKN)
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
•
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH3
11
Daily
Grab
Effluent
NOTES:
1. The monthly average effluent CBOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of
their respective influent values (85% removal).
2. The daily average dissolved oxygen concentration in the effluent shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units or greater than 9.0 standard units.
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE
AMOUNTS.
THE WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY UPON ACTIVATION OF
OUTFALL 002.

Permit N C0050344
A. (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
The permittee shall conduct chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Phase II
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -November 1995) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration defined as the Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) shall be 5.5%. The chronic value will
be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of
reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or
survival. The presence of 48-hour acute toxicity will be determined using Fisher's Exact Test at 48 hours from test
initiation. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical
methods are described by the document referenced above.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using these procedures to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October.
Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all
treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter measures 48 hour acute toxicity or a chronic
value less than that specified above, then multiple concentration testing shall be performed, at a minimum, in each of
the two following months. Compliance is defined as a quarterly average chronic effect level equal to or greater than
5.5%.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code THP3B for the
Chronic Value and TGA3B for the 48 hour Acute Toxicity measure (Pass/Fail). Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3
(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility
name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the
comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a valid test is submitted. Upon submission of a valid test, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NC0050342
A. (4) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the attached table (using a
sufficiently sensitive detection level in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). Samples shall represent seasonal
variations. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total metals".
Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kieldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzvl phthalate
Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene
Hardness 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
rid extractable compounds: Diethyl phthalate
Mercury P-chloro-m-cresol Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol 1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene
Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene
Cyanide 2-nitrophenol Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic compounds Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein Phenol H exachloroethane
Acrylonitrile 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene Base -neutral compounds lsophorone
Bromoform Acenaphthene Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene
Chloroform 3,4 benzofluoranthene Pyrcne
Dichlorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- A MR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the
Director within 90 days of sampling. The report shall be submitted to the following address: Division of
Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1617.

Permit NC0050342
A. (5) POTENTIAL INSTREAM SAMPLING EXEMPTION
Per 15A NCAC 2B .0505(c)(4), stream sampling (as well as influent/effluent sampling) may be discontinued
when flow conditions could result in injury or death of the person(s) collecting the samples. In such cases,
on each day that sampling is discontinued, written justification shall be specified in the monitoring report
for the month in which the event occurred. This provision shall be strictly construed and may not be
utilized to avoid the requirements of this Section when performance of these requirements is attainable.
When there is discontinuance pursuant to this provision, stream sampling shall be resumed at the first
opportunity after the risk period has ceased.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0050342
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Winston-Salem - Muddy Creek \V\V TP
_'‘hplicant Address:
P.O. Box 2511, Winston-Salem, NC 27102
Facility Address:
Off of Cooper Road, Winston-Salem, NC
Permitted Flow
21.0 MGD
Type of Waste:
60% industrial
40% domestic
I acility/Permit Status:
Renewal w/o expansion
County:
Forsyth
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Yadkin River - 001
Muddy Creek - 002
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
WS-IV
USGS Topo Quad:
D17NE
303(d) Listed?:
NO
Permit Writer:
Sergei Chernikov
Subbasin:
03-07-04
Date:
March 23, 2004
Drainage Area (mi2):
1967
_*-
¢�
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
554
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
854
'
.
_ _ '
Average Flow (cfs):
1849'•
'
`'•
I WC (%) @ 21.0 MGD:
5.5%
Primary SIC Code:
4952
Treatment Plant Class:
IV
SUMMARY
This facility is a major municipal treatment plant operating in Forsyth County. Over the
years it has undergone numerous expansions. The facility is currently permitted to
discharge 21.0 MGD
The facility operates two outfalls. The primary outfall is labeled 001. The second outfall,
002, is essentially an overflow outfall for 001. This outfall is used when discharge to the
Yadkin River through 001 is not possible. Discharge through 002 occurs perhaps once a
year for approximately 2 hours during severe flooding events.
The facility serves 121,151 people in Winston-Salem, Clemmons, and a few other small
communities. The City administers an industrial pretreatment program to control the
discharge of industrial and commercial wastes into its collection system and treatment
works. Industrial sources include 10 Significant Industrial Users, 2 of which are Categorical
Industrial Users. The permit will continue to require the City to implement its pretreatment
program
INSTREAM MONITORING
The Muddy Creek WWTP discharges treated municipal wastewater to the Yadkin River, a
Class WS-IV water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin. Instream monitoring is required for
BOD, NH3-N, temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and conductivity.
wa - Muddy ('reek Fact Sheet.
NI'I)ES Renewal
Page 1

Unfortunately, the nearest upstream and downstream monitoring stations are located 8
miles upstream and 10.5 downstream, which makes it impractical to analyze impact of the
discharge on the receiving stream. The Permittee is provisionally exempted from the
instream monitoring requirements based on the participation in the Yadkin Pee -Dee
Monitoring Coalition. We will be consulting with our Coalition Eason to resolve this issue.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
This facility has passed all
Chronic Phase II
001: Chronic ChV @ 5.5%
002: None
001: Chronic ChV @ 5.5%
002: None
January, April, July, and October
toxicity tests during the previous four years.
COMPLIANCE HISTORY
The City had a good compliance record during the previous permit cycle. In 2003 two
Notices of Violation (NOV) were issued for violating fecal, NH3 and DO limits. The most
recent compliance evaluation inspection conducted on 11/13/2002 did not discover any
problems with respect to the operation and maintenance of the facility.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
The following parameters are monitored through the permit: Zn. The following parameters
are monitored through the pretreatment program: As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Zn.
The permit will continue to require the City to implement its pretreatment program.
Reasonable potential analysis was conducted for: Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, F, Hg, Ni, Pb, Se, and
Zn (see attached).
PROPOSED CHANGES:
• Monitoring Frequencies: Due to the good compliance record, Zn monitoring has been
removed from the permit. This parameter will be monitored quarterly through the
pretreatment program. Pretreatment Unit will be notified of this change.
• I istream Monitoring: Due to Winston Salem's participation in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin Association (the Association), instream monitoring requirements have been
provisionally waived and stated as such on the effluent limitations page.
• Limits: No changes are proposed.
• Priority pollutant monitoring on an annual basis has been added to fulfill the permit
application requirement in the future.
The existing monitoring frequency for silver, zinc and copper remains unchanged. Due to
the facility's toxicity record, limits for these action level standards will not be implemented,
but monitoring will remain.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 31, 2004 (est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue: June 15, 2004 (est.)
WS — Muddy ('reek Fact Sheet
NI'l)FS Rcncwal
i'awc 2

STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit,
please contact Sergei Chernikov at [phone] ext. 594.
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
EPA COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
WS — Muddy Creek Fact Shot
NPDES Renewal
Page

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Muddy Creek WWTP
< NC0050342>
Time Period 2001-2003
Ow (MGD) 21
7010S (cls) 554
7010W (cfs) 854
3002 (cfs) n/A
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 1849
Reeving Stream Yadkin River
WWTP Class 4
!WC (%) ® 7010S 5.5494
® 7010W 3.6715
0 3002 WA
@ OA 1.73
Stream Class WS-IV
Outfail 001
Ow = 21 MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
i11
STANDARDS &
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCY/QS/
Monk
fiFAY/
Acute
n
fDA Hex Pried Cw Altonable Mr
Arsenic
NC
50
ugll
0
0
WA
Acute: WA
-_ _----.Ai/
Chronic: 901
._ _ —_—.—_—.—_---_—
I><
Beryllium
C
6.5
ug/L
0
0
WA
Acute: WA
_ _ _ _ _�
Chronic: W/Z6Z
--------- ---------..... -------
NC
2
15
ug>t.
20
0
4.7
Acute: 15
i
i Chronic: 36.0----
t
t
4TT
�•Cadmium
II
-— — --- - ---•---------.—.—
Chromium
NC
50
1.022
ug4
20
0
I Acute: 1,022
8.1 t
Chroni_c: -- 90---
4
0 r �L� �1�
11/ l I'" �'
-i — — — — — ---------------
Copper
NC
7
AL 7.3
ug/L
20
7
: Acute: 7
285.0 - --_
Chronic: ;2�.;--
r
�--�l—h^1 —. --
f�w 1 1 — 5i,--
Cyanide
NC
5
N 22
10
ug/L
0
0
N/A
I Acute: 22
Chronic: 90.1
All ---•---------------
Fluoride
NC
1,800
uglL
13
13
2,100.0
Acute: N/A
_ _ _
Chronic: 32,436
r
el -
Lead
NC
25
N 33.8
uglL
20
0
i Acute: 34
19.3 1 _
Chronic: 450.5
�.N0--- Lir-14-
-------------
Mercury
NC
0.012
0.0002
uglL
12
0
Acute: WA
0.1000 { __
Chronic: 0,2162
i
1.-
---t9—lei
1><
Molybdenum
A
3,500
uglL
0
0
' Acute: WA
i
WA •_ _ ___ _ _
i Chronic: W,074###
1
— .—_—.—_— —_l.r._—_---------.,._ _—
I}C
Nickel
NC
88
261
ug4
17
0
i Acute: 261
17.0 t _ _ _ _
! Chronic: 1,585.8
0 % 1-
(�i
Phenols
A
1
uglL
0
0
' Acute: WA
N/A 1 _—.-----.
Chronic: — 67.8 —
/Vi ------.—.—.—.—.—
N c.\
Selenium
NC
5.0
56
ug/L
14
0
I Acute: 56
98.0 _ ._ _
Chronic: 90.1—
t
1
I �,
�Dit,1 i
�.---.110 (/f')
---�--
Silver
NC
0.06
AL 1.23
ug/L
17
0
: Acute: 1
3.9 :
NO
— _ I %l' l
leil---- ---ar:;4"iiiit
Zinc
NC
50
AL 67
uglL
17
{ j Acute: 67
17 . 145.1
Chronic: 901
,I
0 l� $" i
r
� 1�� — ��--Sfia-w ---
•Legend:
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
-• Freshwater Discharge
50342•RPA•2004, rpa
3/24/2004

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Cadmium
Chromium
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 1.00 0.5 Std Dev. 0.8034
2 < 5.00 2.5 Mean 1.8250
3 < 1.00 0.5 C.V. 0.4402
4 < 5.00 2.5 n 20
5 < 1.00 0.5
6 < 5.00 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.8900
7 < 2.50 1 3 Max. Value 2.5 ug/L
8 < 5.00 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 4.7 ug/L
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
< 5.00 2.50
< 2.50 1.25
< 5.00 2.50
< 5.00 2.50
< 2.50 1.25
< 2.50 1.25
< 2.50 1.25
< 5.00 2.50
< 5.00 2.50
< 5.00 2.50
< 5.00 2.50
< 2.50 1.25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
2.5 Std Dev. 1.2760
5.0 Mean 3.8750
2.5 C.V. 0.3293
5.0 n 20
2.5
5.0 Mult Factor = 1.6200
2.5 Max. Value 5.0 ug/L
5.0 Max. Pred Cw 8.1 ug/L
5.0
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 10.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 10.00
c 5.00
< 5.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 10.00
< 5.00
< 10.00
< 10.00
2.5
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
-2-
50342-RPA-2004, data
3/24/2004

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Lead
Mercury
Date Data BDL=1/20L Results
1 a' 5 2.5 Std Dev. 3.2036
2 < 20 10.0 Mean 7.0000
3 <> 5 2.5 C.V. 0.4577
4 . < 20 10.0 n 20
5 <• 5 2.5
6 ' < 20 10.0 Mull Factor = 1.9300
7 '<' 10 5.0 Max. Value 10.0 ug/L
8 <; 20 10.0 Max. Pred Cw 19.3 ug/L
9 < 20 10.0
10 .' <; 10 5.0
11 <• 20 10.0
•
12 <' 20 10.0
13 < 10 5.0
14 • <.'• 10 5.0
15 < 10 5.0
16 < 20 10.0
17 <' 5 2.5
18 <• 10 5.0
19 < 20 10.0
20 r' 20 10.0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
< 0.2 0.1 Std Dev. 0.0000
< 0.2 0.1 Mean 0.1000
• 0.2 0.1 C.V. 0.0000
< 0.2 0.1 n 12
<. 0.2 0.1
< 0.2 0.1 Mult Factor = 1.0000
<i 0.2 0.1 Max. Value 0.1 ug/L
<. 0.2 0.1 Max. Pred Cw 0.1 ug/L
< 0.2 0.1
<, 0.2 0.1
< 0.2 0.1
<, 0.2 0.1
-4-
50342-RPA-2004, data
3/24/2004

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Silver
Zinc
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.5871
2 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.1324
3 < 5 2.5 C.V. 0.2753
4 < 5 2.5 n 17
5 < 5 2.5
6 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.5500
7 < 2.5 1.3 Max. Value 2.5 ug/L
8 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 3.9 ug/L
9 < 5 2.5
10 < 3 1.3
11 < 5 2.5
12 < 5 2.5
13 < 3 1.3
14 < 3 1.3
15 < 3 1.3
16 < 5 2.5
17 < 5 2.5
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
47.2 47.2 Std Dev. 18.2433
46 46.0 Mean 59.1588
62 62.0 C.V. 0.3084
60 60.0 n 17
35.5 35.5
43 43.0 Mutt Factor = 1.6300
47 47.0 Max. Value 89.0 ug/L
28 28.0 Max. Pred Cw 145.1 ug/L
47 47.0
70 70.0
57 57.0
54 54.0
84 84.0
84 84.0
70 70.0
82 82.0
89 89.0
-6-
50342-RPA-2004, data
3/24/2004

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary March 16, 2004
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Wilson Technical Community College 24hr LC50 ac monit epis fthd (Grab)
NC0084581/001 Begin:10/12003 Frequency 5 OWD/A
County: Wilson Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU07
PF: 0.0144 Special
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%;100
NonComp
2000 - - - - - H - - - - - -
2001 - - - - - H - - - - - -
2002 - - - - - H - - - - - -
2003 - - - - - - - - - - - -
2004 -
Wilson WWTP chr lim: 90% 2000 - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) -
NC0023906/001 Begin:2/1/2004 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Pass(s) Pass - Pass(s) - - Fail(s) >100 >100(s) Fall(s) 33.5,>100
County: Wilson Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU07 2002 >100(s) Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass -
PF: 14.0 Special 2003 - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) -
7Q10: 0.5 1WC(%;97.37 2004 - Pass(s)
Windsor WWTP CHR LIM: 90% 2000 >100 - - Pass - - Pess -
NC0026751/001 Begin:1/1/2003 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp SINGLE 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pess -
County: Berrie Region: WARO Subbasin: ROAIO 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Fall 33.5
PF: 1.15 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
7Q10: 0.0 I1VC(%;100 2004 Pass
>100
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Winston-Salem Archie Elledgc WWTP P-2 chr lim: 76% 2000 >96 - - >98 - - >96 - - >96
NC0037834/001 Begin:8/1/1999 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp ChV Avg 2001 >98 - - >96 - - >96 - - 80.8
County: Forsyth Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4 2002 80.9 - - >98 - - >96 - - >98
PF: 30 Special 2003 >96 - - >96 - - 80.8 - - >98,>96
7Q10: 15.0 IWC(%;75.6 2004 >96
90- .9,>96
Winston-Salem Lower Muddy Crk P-2 chr lim: 5.5%
NC0050342/001 Begin:7/1/1999 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Forsyth Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4
PF: 21.0 Special
7Q10: 554.0 I WC(%; 5.5
+ NonComp ChV Avg
2000 .22
2001 >22
2002 3.89
2003 15.6
2004 >22>22
>22
- >22 - - >22 - - 15.56
- >22 - - >22 - - >22 -
>22 >22 - - >22 - - >22 -
- >22 - - >22 - - >22 >22 >22.>22
Woodfin Sanitary WTP chr lim: 8%
NC0083178/001 Begin:12/1/2000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Buncombe Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB02
PF:.03375 Special
7Q10: 0.61 I WC(%; 8.0
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Fall >20 >20 Pass - -
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2003 pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2004 Pass
Wright Chemical Corp/001 chr lint: 34% 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >90
NC0003395/001 Begin:1 l/1/2000 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 48.1 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
County:Columbus Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPFI7 2002 - late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Late Pass
PF: 0.2 Special 2003 - Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >90
7Q10: 0.6 1WC(%;34 2004 48.1
Yadldavt1le WWTP chr lim: 50% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PUSS
NC0020338/001 Begin:8/1/1999 Frequency Q P/F Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Sing* 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Yadkin Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO2 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 2.5 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 3.9 I WC('/.; 50 2004 Pass
Yanceyville WWTP chr lim: 37%; ifpf0.6 chr lim 44% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0040011/001 Begin:5/1/1997 Frequency Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Fail >100 - NR/Paas - - Pass
County:Caswell Region: WSRO Subbasin: ROA04 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 0.45 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pasa
7Q10: 1.2 IWC(%;37 2004 Pass
Yorkshire Americas, Inc. chr lim: 0.5%
NC0005274/001 Begin:5/l/2002 Frequency Q 1an Apr Jul Oct
County: Gaston Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB36
PF: 0.40 Special
7Q10: 123.0 IWC(%;0.50
+ NonContp Single
i 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Late
2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pess
2004 Pass
Pass
Pass -
Pass
Late
Pass
Pa- ss
Zebulon WWTP chr lira: 90% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
NC0079316J001 Begin:I0/12003 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Fall >100 >100 Pass - - Pass - - >90,Pass -
County:Wake Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU07 2002 >100 - - >90 - - >100,>100 - - Late,>100 58.1
PF: 1.85 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
7QI0: 0.0 1WC('6;100 2004 Pass
>1- 00,94.9
M Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM - Permit Requirement LET - Administrative Letter - Target Frequency ...Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin = First month required 7Q10 .. Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs + = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF .. Permitted flow (MGD) IWC%.. lnstream waste concentrati P/F r Pass/Fail test AC - Acute CHR= Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; - - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of atated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- a Data not required; NR - Not moat Facility Activity Status: I - inactive, N - Newly Issued(fo construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-Mora data available for month in question; • . ORC signature needed
48
• 41,
•

Certified its: 7002 0860 0002 8301 6294
Winston-Salem • Forsyth County
/County Utilities
ater • Sewer • Solid Waste Disposal
Manson Meads Complex • 2799 Griffith Road • Winston-Salem, NC 27103 • Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]
April 23, 2004
Mr. Sergei Chernikov
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27102
Dear Mr. Chernikov:
r= r v, re: r-
M g - 3 2004
Subject: Comments on Draft Permit
Muddy Creek WWTP (NC0050342)
Winston-Salem/Forsyth
The City of Winston-Salem wishes to offer the following comments regarding the draft
permit for our Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant that was received in our office
on April 6, 2004. Note that many of the comments for this draft permit exactly mirror
those submitted on the draft permit for our Archie Elledge WWTP (NC0037834).
ANNUAL POLLUTANT SCAN:
Winston-Salem understands that an annual priority pollutant scan is being implemented
in the permit to meet EPA requirements. While we have no problem accepting this
provision, we have several questions and concerns regarding how we are to meet some of
the requirements stipulated in Section A (4) of the draft permit.
The draft permit does not stipulate whether the analysis for the various parameters shown
on the Annual Pollutant Scan list are performed on grab or composite samples. The final
permit should stipulate the type of samples needed for this monitoring.
The draft permit also requires "routine" monitoring for at least six of the parameters
included on the Annual Pollutant Scan list. Several of these parameters, such as residual
chlorine and dissolved oxygen, are monitored for on a daily basis. It seems somewhat
irregular for DWQ to require annual monitoring for parameters that have monitoring
requirements imposed on the 001 outfall's limitations page and we request that the annual
scan include only those parameters for which monitoring is not required elsewhere.

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 23, 2004
Page 2
The language included in section A(4) of the draft permit also stipulates that effluent
pollutant scan samples shall "represent seasonal variations" but there are no instructions
as to how we are to comply with this requirement.
We propose that annual scans will be performed during January for the first year of the
permit, in April during the second year of the permit, during July of the third year and in
October of the fourth year. The cycle then repeats itself. We think that this sampling
schedule will meet DWQ's seasonal variation requirement but we are not sure.
Regardless of whether our proposal is acceptable to DWQ, please provide language in the
final permit that stipulates how this monitoring is to be conducted so as to meet the
requirement for seasonal variation.
002 DISCHARGE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS:
The Muddy Creek Plant's 002 discharge consists of an overflow on the plant's effluent
outfall pipe that automatically diverts a portion of the plant's treated flow into Muddy
Creek when the 001 outfall's carrying capacity is exceeded. The 002 discharge occurs
when the plant is receiving abnormally high flow rates due to heavy precipitation and the
receiving stream will be at or near flood stage.
The duration of a 002 discharge is highly variable and we never know how long it will
last. We have experienced discharges as short as two hours and as long as thirty-three
hours. Because of the unpredictable nature of 002 discharges, we initiate monitoring as
soon as the discharge begins so that we can stand a better chance of completing
monitoring before the discharge stops. The failure to perform all the required monitoring
before the discharge stops constitutes a permit violation.
This causes operational problems because our two to three person operations crew, must
complete field analyses, collect and document samples and transport samples to our
laboratory located five miles away while simultaneously setting up the plant to protect it
from washout and flood damage. If the 002 discharge occurs at night, as they usually do,
the plant operators also have to call in a laboratory technician to set up fecal coliform
samples.
Since most 002 discharges occur at night during storm events, employees performing the
monitoring are in danger of being isolated by flood water because the monitoring site is
located —225 yards out in the floodway and darkness prevents them from being able to
see rising water. This constitutes a very dangerous situation and we request that language
be included in the permit that defines a minimum discharge duration before monitoring is
required on the 002 outfall.

1
Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 23, 2004
Page 3
Winston-Salem asks that language be inserted into our permit that stipulates that
monitoring for all parameters listed on the limitations page except for flow shall be
required only if the duration of the discharge exceeds ten hours.
Such language will allow us to postpone monitoring for 002 events that occur at night
until the next morning when we can see what we are doing and provide for the safety of
our employees. While this may result in a small number of 002 discharges where only
flow monitoring occurs, we do not feel that these situations constitute a threat to the
receiving stream for the following reasons:
Limitations assigned to this discharge are based on the assumptions that Muddy Creek is
at its 7Q10 flow and that the plant's entire discharge is entering the receiving stream over
a 24-hour period. In truth, the flow diverted into the 002 outfall averages only 8.7% of
the plant's total discharge on days when an 002 discharge actually occurs.
It should also be noted that Muddy Creek would be at or near flood stage when an 002
discharge occurs rather than the 7Q10 flow that the limitations are based on. Winston-
Salem feels that the limitations assigned to this discharge are overly protective of the
receiving stream and that water quality is not threatened by language that defines a
minimum duration of discharge, i.e. ten hours, before monitoring is required.
We ask that DWQ include this provision in the final permit.
DEFINITION OF DAILY SAMPLING:
The definition of Daily Sampling on page 2 of 16 stipulates that parameters subject to
daily sampling shall be sampled five out of every seven days per week unless otherwise
specified. The draft permit goes on to state that the Division expects that sampling shall
be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other disruptions of normal
operations prevent weekday sampling.
This language is confusing. Does this mean that we are required to perform daily
monitoring on weekends or holidays if events such as floods, ice storms etc. prevent our
being able to monitor during a weekday?
State regulations promulgated at 15A NCAC 02B.0503 define "daily" as being Monday
through Friday excluding State Holidays. We ask that the definition of daily sampling
included in the final permit be consistent with the definition of daily as it appears in State
Regulations.

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 23, 2004
Page 4
FAILURE TO MONITOR FOR GOOD CAUSE:
In the past there have been instances when we have been unable to perform daily
monitoring because flood waters, severe ice storms etc. either made it impossible to reach
monitoring locations or posed a serious threat to our employee's safety. In these
instances we notified the Regional Office of the situation and documented the reason(s)
why we could not perform the required monitoring. State regulations allow this,
provided the reason(s) for failure to monitor are documented and reported to DWQ.
We understand that other cities in North Carolina were sued by the Canoe Association
and had court rulings go against them because their permit did not contain specific
language providing them relief for failing to monitor when weather conditions were such
that monitoring was impossible.
The Canoe Association successfully argued that since NPDES permits are Federally
enforceable, provisions in State Regulations that provide relief from monitoring
requirements during severe weather etc. do not apply unless language to that effect was
included in the NPDES permit. Otherwise, Federal regulations take precedence and there
are no provisions in the Federal regulations that provide relief to permit holders for
failing to monitor for good cause.
Winston-Salem would like for DWQ to include language in the final permit that allows
us to suspend monitoring during times when flooding, ice storms, hurricanes, etc. pose a
substantial risk of injury or death to persons collecting samples or when sampling
locations are inaccessible due to events such as flooding that are beyond our control.
We suggest that the notification requirements set forth under 15A NCAC 02B.0505 (4)
be included in this language. Please note that it is not Winston-Salem's wish to avoid our
responsibility to perform required monitoring. Rather, we simply want to protect
ourselves in the event we are unable to perform monitoring for good reason and are sued
by a third party as a result.
FLOW MEASUREMENTS:
Section D.3 in the draft permit provides that the Director shall approve the flow
measurement devices and monitoring locations prior to installation.
Winston-Salem is concerned that this requirement effectively prevents our being able to
replace a flow transmitter with a similar device in a rapid manner should the original
device be destroyed by lightning etc. We request that the language in the draft permit be
changed to state, "the director shall approve the primary flow metering device and
monitoring locations prior to installation ".

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 23, 2004
Page 5
This language allows DWQ to review and approve the engineering associated with the
installation of a weir, flume or other primary flow metering device and it allows us to
replace damaged flow transmitters without having to obtain an Authorization to
Construct.
PART II, SECTION D.2: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The first paragraph of this section stipulates that monthly monitoring reports must be
postmarked no later than twenty-eight days following the completed reporting period.
The next paragraph requires that the first DMR is due on the last day of the month
following the issuance of the permit. These requirements appear to contradict each other.
We ask that the final permit retain the requirement that DMR reports must be postmarked
no later than thirty (30) days following the end of the reporting period. This is the
deadline mandated by state regulations codified at 15A NCAC 02B.0506 (a) (1) (A).
PART IV: SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES:
Section A of Part IV contains language requiring us to provide the Director adequate
notice of any new introduction of pollutants into our POTW from an indirect discharger
or any substantial change in the volume or characteristics of pollutants being discharged
by an indirect discharger.
When these situations occur, our pretreatment group either prepares a new discharge
permit or modifies an existing permit for the user in question and forwards the permit to
the pretreatment section for approval. The permit is issued once it has been approved by
the State.
Winston-Salem feels that this procedure complies with the notification requirements set
forth under Part IV, Section A (page 13 of 16) of the draft permit. We would appreciate
it if DWQ would provide us written response as to whether or not you agree that our
continued use of this procedure meets the requirements mandated by the permit. If not,
please provide us some guidance as to what procedures you want us to follow.
PART III; SECTION C; CHANGES IN THE DISCHARGE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
The language in this section of the draft permit appears to be taken directly from 40CFR
Part 122.42 (a) (1) (i) through (iv) and (2) (i) through (iv). Winston-Salem does not feel
that this language is appropriate for an NPDES permit issued to a municipality as this

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 23, 2004
Page 6
section of 40 CFR Part 122.42 applies to existing manufacturing, commercial, mining
and silvicultural dischargers. See the copy of 40CFR Part 122.42 that is attached for
your convenience.
The language within 40CFR Part 122.42 that does apply to POTWs is contained in
122.42 (b) (1) through (3). The draft permit contains this language in Part IV, Section A.
Winston-Salem asks that DWQ delete Section C of Part II because it does not apply to a
POTW and because its functions appear to be duplicated by Part IV, Section A.
Thank you for your consideration of our concerns and comments regarding this matter. If
you have any questions please call me at [phone].
LU)
Stanley B. Webb
Utility Plant Superintendent
City of Winston-Salem
CC: David Saunders, Director of Utilities
Ron Hargrove, Deputy Director
Sherry Bagwell, Pretreatment Coordinator
Kathy Southern, Laboratory Director
Chris Shamel, Plant Supervisor
Ref:L042304a

§ 122.42
caused by operational error, improp-
erly designed treatment facilities, in-
adequate treatment facilities, lack of
preventive maintenance, or careless or
improper operation.
(2) Effect of an upset. An upset con-
stitutes an affirmative defense to an
action brought for noncompliance with
such technology based permit effluent
limitations if the requirements of para-
graph (n)(3) of this section are met. No
determination made during adminis-
trative review of claims that non-
compliance was caused by upset, and
before an action for noncompliance, is
final administrative action subject to
judicial review.
(9) Conditions necessary for a dem-
onstration of upset. A permittee who
wishes to establish the affirmative de-
fense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contempora-
neous operating logs, or other relevant
evidence that:
(i) An upset occurred and that the
permittee can identify the cause(s) of
the upset;
(11) The permitted facility was at the
time being properly operated; and
(iii) The permittee submitted notice
of the upset as required in paragraph
(1)(6)(ii)(B) of this section (24 hour no-
tice).
(iv) The permittee complied with any
remedial measures required under
paragraph (d) of this section.
(4) Burden of proof. In any enforce-
ment proceeding the permittee seeking
to establish the occurrence of an upset
has the burden of proof.
(Clean Water Aot (33 U.B.O. 1251 et seq.), Safe
Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.),
Olean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act (92
U.S.C. 6901 et seq.))
[48 FR 14153, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 48
FR 39820, Sept. 1, 1983; 49 FR 38049, Sept. 26,
1984; 60 FR 9514, Jan. 31, 1985;. 50 FR 6940, Feb.
19, 1985; 64 FR 255, Jan. 4, 1989; 54 FR 18783,
May 2, 1989; 65 FR 30908, May 15, 2000]
§ 122.42 Additional conditions appli-
cable to specified categories of
NPDES permits (applicable to State
NPDES programs, see I} 123.25).
The following conditions, in addition
to those set forth in §122.41, apply to
all NPDES permits within the cat-
egories specified below:
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-00 Edition)
(a) Existing manufacturing, commercial,
mining, and silvicultural dischargers. In
addition to the reporting requirements
under § 122.41(1), all existing manufac-
turing, commercial, mining, and sil-
vicultural dischargers must notify the
Director as soon as they know or have
reason to believe:
(1) That any activity has occurred or
will occur which would result in the
discharge, on a routine or frequent
basis, of any toxic pollutant which is
not limited in the permit, if that dis-
charge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels":
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter
(100 µg/1);
(ii) Two hundred• micrograms per
liter (200 µ g/1) for acrolein and aerylo-
nitrile; five hundred micrograms per
liter (500 µ g/1) for 2,4-dinitrophenol and
for 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol; and one
milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for anti-
mony;
(iii) Five (5) times the maximum con-
centration value reported for that pol-
lutant in the permit application in ac-
cordance with § 122.21(g)(7); or
(iv) The level established by the Di-
rector in accordance with § 122.44(f).
(2) That any activity has occurred or
will occur which . would result in any
discharge, on a non -routine or infre-
quent basis, of a toxin pollutant which
is not limited in the permit, if that dis-
charge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels":
(i) Five hundred micrograms per liter
(500 µ g/1);
(ii) One milligram per liter (1 mg/1)
for antimony;
(iii) Ten (10) times the maximum
concentration value reported for that
pollutant in the permit application in
accordance with §122.21(g)(7).
(iv) The level established by the Di-
rector in accordance with § 122.44(f).
(b) Publicly owned treatment works. All
POTWs must provide adequate notice
to the Director of the following: •
(1) Any new introduction of pollut-
ants into the POTW from an indirect
discharger which would be subject to
section 301 or 306 of OWA if it were di-
rectly discharging those pollutants;
and
(2) Any substantial change in the vol-
ume or character of pollutants being..
introduced into that POTW by a source
Environmental Protection Agency
introducing pollutants into the POTW
at the time of issuance of the permit. •
(3) For purposes of this paragraph,
adequate notice shall include informa-
tion on (i) the quality and quantity of
effluent introduced into the POTW, and
(ii) any anticipated impact of the
change on the quantity or quality of ef-
fluent to be discharged from the
POTW.
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer sys-
tems. The operator of a large or me-
dium municipal separate storm sewer
system or a municipal separate storm
sewer that has been designated by the
Director under § 122.26(a)(1)(v) of this
part must submit an annual report by
the anniversary of the date of the
issuance of the permit for such system.
The report shall include:
(1) The status of implementing the
components of the storm water man-
agement program that are established
as permit conditions;
(2) Proposed changes to the storm
water management programs that are
established as permit condition. Such
proposed changes shall be consistent
with § 122.26(d)(2)(iii) of this part; and
(3) Revisions, if necessary, to the as-
sessment of controls and the fiscal
analysis reported in the permit appli-
cation under § 122 .26(d)(2)(iv) and
(d)(2)(v) of this part;
(4) A summary of data, including
monitoring data, that is accumulated
throughout the reporting year;
(5) Annual expenditures and budget
for year following each annual report;
(6) A summary describing the number
and nature of enforcement actions, in-
spections, and public education pro-
grams;
(7) Identification of water quality im-
provements or degradation;
(d) Storm water discharges. The initial
permits for discharges composed en-
tirely of storm water issued pursuant
to §122.26(e)(7) of this part shall require
compliance with the conditions of the
permit as expeditiously as practicable,
but in no event later than three years
after the date of issuance of the per-
mit.
[48 FR 14163, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 38049, Sept. 28, 1984; 50 FR 4514, Jan. 31,
1985; 55 FR 98073, Nov. 16, 1990; 57 FR 60448,
Dec. 18, 1992]
0122.43 Establishing permit
(applicable to State pro
§ 123.25).
(a) In addition to conditio:
in all permits (§§122.41 and
Director shall establish con
required on a case -by -case
provide for and assure comp:
all applicable requirements
regulations. These shall inc:
tions under §§ 122.46 (durati
mits), 122.47(a) (schedules
ance), 122.48 (monitoring), ai
permits only 122.47(b)
schedule of compliance) and
siderations under Federal 1a1
(b)(1) For a State issued
applicable requirement is a
utory or regulatory requirer
takes effect prior to final a
tive disposition of a permit.
mit issued by EPA, an apr
quirement is a statutory or
requirement (including an
final regulation) which to
prior to the issuance of t:
Section 124.14 (reopening of
period) provides a means for
EPA permit proceedings at
tion of the Director where of
ments become effective durii
mitting process and are of
magnitude to make addit
ceedings desirable. For Stat.
administered programs, an
requirement is also any re
which takes effect prior to
fication or revocation and ref
a permit, to the extent e
§ 122.62.
(2) New or reissued perm!
the extent allowed under §1:
fled or revoked and reissue,
shall incorporate each of the
requirements referenced in §i
122.45.
(o) Incorporation. All parr
.tions shall be incorporated
pressly or by reference. If in4
by reference, a specific citat
applicable regulations or req
must be given in the permit.
[48 FR 14153, Apr. 1, 1983, as am
FR 30908, May 15, 2000]

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
APR I 11 2004
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit
City of Winston Salem - Permit No. NC0050342
Dear Dr. Chernikov:
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR MOA, we have completed review of the draft permit
referenced above and have no comments. We request that we be afforded an additional review
opportunity only if significant changes are made to the draft permit prior to issuance or if significant
comments objecting to the permit are received. Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit
when issued.
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • F'rinted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Subject:
March 31, 2004
Lee Spencer
NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Washington Regional Office
Sergei Chernikov
NPDES Unit
Review of Draft NPDES Permit NC0050342
Forsyth County
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
.. RECEiVED •MI
14. .
N.C. Dept. of ENR
APR 0 8 2004
., Winston- r ' "•1
Regional .s..:L:e
ka
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and retum this form by
May 7, 2004. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at the telephone
number or e-mail address listed at the bottom of this page.
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑D❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
RESPONSE: (Check one)
H77--
Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the
stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the
designated water quality standards.
Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met:
Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed
Date: 4-hZ`0
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 594 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES
Sergei.Chernikov@ ncmaii.net

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and appli-
cation of NC General Statute 143.21, Public law
92-500 and other lawful standards and regula-
tions, the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission proposes to issue a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Sys-
tem (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to
Ithe person(s) listed below effective 45 days
'from the publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed per-
mit will be accepted until 30 days after the pub-
lish date of this notice. All comments received
prior to that date are considered in the final
determinations regarding the proposed permit.
The Director of the NC Division of Water
Quality may decide to hold a public meeting for
the proposed permit should the Division receive
a significant degree of public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting
information on file used to determine conditions
present in the draft permit are available upon
request and payment of the costs of reproduc-
tion. Mail comments and/or requests for infor-
mation to the NC Division of Water Quality at
the above address or call Ms. Valery Stephens at
[phone], extension 520. Please include
the NPDES permit number (attached) in any
communication. Interested persons may also
visit the Division of Water Quality at 512 N.
Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1148
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to
review information on file.
The City of Winston-Salem (P.O. Box 2511,
Winston-Salem, NC 27102) has applied for
renewal of NPDES permit NC0050342 for
the Muddy Creek WWTP in Forsyth
County. This permitted facility discharges
treated wastewater to the Yadkin River in
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. Currently
CBOD, ammonia nitrogen, and total resid-
ual chlorine are water quality limited. This
discharge may affect future allocations in
this portion of the Yadkin Pee -Dee River
Basin.
R. J. Reynolds Company, 950 Reynolds
Blvd., Winston-Salem, North Carolina has
applied for renewal of NPDES permit
NC0055093 for its Tobaccoville Facility in
Forsyth County. This permitted facility dis-
charges treated groundwater to Barkers
Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
This allocation may affect future allocations
in this portion of the watershed.
The Chronicle; April I, 2004

Winston-Salem • Forsyth County
/County Utilities
' later • Sewer • Solid Waste Disposal
Manson Meads Complex • 2799 Griffith Road • Winston-Salem, NC 27103 • Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]
December 17, 2003
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Weaver:
[0 1/))!:-1-1-WI
JAN-2 2004
DENR-WATER OUALfTY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH �J
Re: Request for NPDES Permit Renewal
Muddy Creek WWTP (NC0050342)
City of Winston-Salem
The City of Winston-Salem requests the simple renewal of the NPDES permit for our
Muddy CreekWastewater Treatment Plant (NC0050342). This permit expires on June 30,
2004. We are not requesting an increase in permitted flow at this time and the permit
limitations should reflect the current 21 MGD limit.
The application and the supporting documents requested in your August 15, 2003
Renewal Notification Letter are attached.
Please note that our monitoring program did not include all the parameters required by
the EPA's permit application form (EPA 3510-2A) when we were notified last August
that we were now required to use this form.
We have been trying to get the additional monitoring performed in time to meet the
deadline but we have been unable to do so. Commercial labs are inundated with samples
from other permit holders and we have been unable to complete this monitoring.
We have completed one of the three priority pollutant scans required by EPA and two of
the three multi -species bioassay tests. Samples for two more priority pollutant scans have
been shipped to our contract lab but the results were not available in time to include them
in this application package. Sampling for the final multi -species bioassay test is
scheduled for early January 2004.

1
Mr. Charles Weaver
December 7, 2003
Page 2
We spoke to Mark McIntyre about this matter he instructed us to provide all the data we
currently have in our application and to submit amendments to the application when the
additional data is obtained.
We plan to submit amendments on or before January 30, 2004 for Section B.6 of page 8
of 22, a revised Part D and an additional Part E form for the last multi -species bioassay
test. The Muddy Creek Plant is not required to perform EPA 1631 mercury monitoring so
data from our "Headworks Long Term Monitoring Plan" is included on Part D of this
application.
Also note that no topographic maps are included to show the locations of our biosolids
disposal sites. Our disposal strategy uses land application and land filling of dewatered
sludge and a tremendous number of topographical maps would be required to cover all
our disposal sites.
We contacted Mark McIntyre and explained that we felt it was unnecessary to provide
maps because they were included in the renewal application for our land application
program. Mark agreed that it was not necessary to submit this information twice and for
us to explain this situation in our cover letter.
There have been several changes at the plant since the last permit was issued in 1999.
This information is provided below:
• An upgrade was substantially complete on June 30, 1999 to provide the plant
additional peak flow hydraulic capacity. This included the addition of two 15,000
gallon per minute screw pumps, elimination of a hydraulic bottleneck in the
preliminary treatment building, additional pipe underground to carry flow through
the plant, improvements to the plant's RAS pumping capability, replacement of
the plant's SCADA system and additional emergency power capacity.
• A mechanical mixing facility was constructed at the plant's dechlorination facility
to reduce the dosage of chemical needed to remove residual chlorine. Work was
completed on this project in December 2003.
We have received instructions from Madolyn Dominy at EPA's Region IV office that we
are not required to submit them a copy of our Land Application Program renewal
application when we apply for renewal of our NPDES Permit. Region IV does not intend
to process the application. This is contrary to the requirements mandated by the 503

1
Mr. Charles Weaver
December 7, 2003
Page 3
Sludge Regulations, but we will comply with Region IV's instructions regarding this
matter.
We have also received instructions from Marshall Hyatt at EPA Region IV as to how to
average monitoring data for submission in Part D of the renewal application. We were
unsure how EPA wanted an average calculated for monitoring data when the majority of
the monitoring data was reported as less than the detection level.
EPA instructed us to only average the results for monitoring events that were above the
detection level and provide an attachment giving information as to the total number of
monitoring events that produced results less than the detection limit. In cases where all
the data were less than the detection level, we were to report the maximum daily and the
average as being less than detection level.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you or your staff has any questions regarding the
content of this application or if you need additional information please contact Mr. Stan
Webb at [phone].
Sincerely.
David K. Saunders P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Winston-Salem
CC: Stan Webb, Plant Manager
Chris Shamel, Plant Supervisor
Ref:L 120703b

MUDDY
CREEK
OUTFALL
1
SOUTH FORK
OUTFALL
0.9MGD
18.03 MGD
DECANTING AND
FILTRATE
0.1639 MGD
LAND
APPLICATION
SCREENING AND
GRIT REMOVAL
18.03 MGD
1.2 MGD FILTRATE
1
BLENDED
SLUDGE
STATION
0.0605 MGD
BELT
FILTER
SYSTEM
SLUDGE 'r
LAGOONS 0.0634 MGD
18.03 MGD
002 DISCHARGE TO
YADKIN RIVER
(002 FLOW=0.19 MGD)
BISULFITE
ADDITION
140.17 GPD
4
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTER
SYSTEM
MLSS
1.2 MGD
GRAVITY
THICKENER
0.044 MGD1
0.0916
MGD
PRIMARY
CLARIFIER
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
BASIN
18.03
MGD
18.03 MGD
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
MUDDY CREEK WWTP
WINSTON-SALEM, NC
NPDES# NC0050342(NOV.01,2002 - OCT.31,2003)
HYPOCHLORITE
ADDITION
718 GPD TO EFFL.
FINAL
CLARIFIER
411.7 MGD
RAS
LEGEND:
RAS = RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
MLSS= MIXED LIQIOUR SUSPENDED SOLIDS
= WASTEWATER FLOW
= SOLIDS FLOW

IRNI
BM- WS 29
IP 2: ROWARD trF Slci4 3 •
EDra2FAID El. 495.77,
CooPEK RoA0
sNr.‘;‘-:
113. M-1N3 30
TP2 RIIWARD Or
MAIL BOX EL.144.1113
; • t•
PLOT PLAN
6.1.1.2.0
131,A-WS 31
1U5 AKTMK 2 0(.310E
OF TALI IL 1,110,14
,
1.1.0CKE.NISP
SL0066"
MANI' 61;001J-
Aj.i@PuFAC.51"711:"611-11'4:e.---'1
•
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
VVINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY UTILITY COMMISSION
LOWER MUDDY CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
FIGUREII- 1 - 2

ELEVATION IN FEET
ELEVATION IN FEET
710
700
690
670
EL.666 II
EL.66S 90
EL.69700
EL 666.27
EL.666 001.
EL.665.441
L66440:
EL.67300
L
E .666 I
91
EL.665 40
EL.706.08 EL 706.08 EL 2
EL705.LI I 1,fL..70.'.41 r '
L 4. 7 1 1 EL 704 47 EL 704 '.
E 703.77 1EL 70,1.77 EL
EL 705.82 •
L.706.
E:.705.67
EL.704.71
EL.704.04
709
E L.704.00
EL.703.00
EL.665 61
EL.56560 SCREW PUMPS
EL.665.24
EL.666.10 EL.665.59
:pL.6 8
EL.66540 L. 522
EL 66436 .66 . I
1 FL�SD 1 fL 705.77
EL.703.64 EL705.15
EL 70427
l EL 703.62
MECHANICAL
BAR SCREENS
(3UN1TS)
"EL.704.93
"EL 704.22 ,
"EL 702 37l
"EL701.95i
II
EL.704.97
EL.70483
EL 702.98
EL 702.12
EL70588 '"EL 705.46
EL.705.32 "EL 704.841
EL.70554 "EL. 704221
EL.70S.97 '-`L 703.80 I
EL 704.46 L.70414-
.704.42 EL.
.70 IS eL70.E0-'
L. 06 EL.
EL. 70438 EL.70400"
I EEL. 704.38 EL-704.00"
II L.70225 L.702.61"
I
L. 702.03
GRIT CHAMBERS MEASURING
(3 UNITS) FLUME
I8' TiROAT
EL
EL.70575
EL.70475
EL.7Q0 25
54' DIA
EL 703.66 EL.70328"
EL. 703.65 EL.703.26"
EL. 70261 ' EL.702.37'
EL.7 1. 5 EL.701.81
EL.700.50
r INV. EL. 693 SO
-EL.689.08
EL.68075
660
54' INFLUENT
• SEWER INV
EL.663.67
710
700
690
680
670
L_ 30' PLANT SEWER
COURSE
BAR SCREENS
(2 UNITS )
L 697 5
EL. 69
EL 696 27
EL.696.57
EL.696.62
4 EL.696. 62
EL69E. 95
jl EL69546
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT BUILDING
EL.692.83
EL692.20
EL.691.4,6
EL.691.08
EL.701.50
EL.696 99
6
EL. 69642
WEIR CREST
EL.698.00
5
EL.698.00
61F CHANNEL
INV EL69425
EL.696.'50
L. 694.01
EL. 694 04
EL 69398
EL,693.94
EL.693.76
EL 693.04
EL. Og.a3_
EL69L55
WEIR CREST EL.693.83
HP EL693.75
LP. EL.688.50
DISTRIBUTKIN
CHAMBER
660
EL 669.00 '
II
11
EL.691 40
EL.691.40
EL691.15
EL . 7
EL 666.70
EL 701.12
EL 701.14
EL 701.09
1 EL 701 06
EL. 703 50
LE 700.90
EL.700.36
EL.699.45
ELF
WEIR CREST
EL 700.92-
NV.EL.69963 l
VARIES
EL.6B9.08-
4fi
EL
j++ EL.69892
EL.698.52
PRIMARY CLARIFIERS
(4 UNITS )
EL 690.23 EL.686.66-1 EL.68752 EL.6866 . EL 685.9
646 EL.686.96
690.23 7 1 7
EL.668.53 �L.686 .667 EL.684.62 Ei.66351
EL.68786 E1.66567 I EL.68747 E1.584.41 . E1.652.767
WEIR CREST
EL69050
DISTRIBUTION
CHAMBER
EL 68404
EL 689.69 1.
EL683.08i
EL.68265
EL.696.00
Mwm
EFF TROUGH
1NV.EL.66533
EL.673.50
42' DIA CENTER
COLUMN
36' DIA EFF
PIPE
NOTES,
I. THE HYDRAULIC PROFILE ABOVE
FLOW CONDITION
1990
1990
1990
2000
PEAK FLOW
AVE. DAY MAX MONTH
MINIMUM FLOW
PEAK FLOW
IS BASED ON THE
PLANT INFLUENT
MO D
30 00
15.60
.7 10
40.00
AERATION TANKS
(3 UNITS)
FOLLOWING FLOWS
PLANT SEWER
P1 GC.
4.67
4.67
4-1 1
6 54
RETURN SLUDGE
MGIO
13.05.
9.32
6 20
17 14
2FIGURES INDICATED IN THE HYDRAULIC PROFILE ABOVE CORRESPOND TO THE
FOLLOWING FLOW CONDITIONS,
2000 PEAK FLOW AND ONE UNIT OUT OF SERVICE'
1990 PEAK FLOW AND @NE UNIT OUT OF SERVICE
1990 AVE DAY MAX MOI�TH AND ONE UNIT OUT OF SERVICE'
1990 MINIMUM FLOW AND ONE UNIT OUT OF SERVICE'
•INCLUDES SUM OF PLANT INFLUENT, PLANT SEWER AND RETURN
SLUDGE IN ACTIVATED SLUDGE LOOP.
»ELEVATIONS CORRESPOND TO FLOW CONDITIONS WITH ALL UNITS
IN SERVICE.
ELEVATION IN FEET
710
700
690
680
670
660
SECONDARY CLARIFIERS
(4UNIT3 )
54'DIA-
48' .,
DIA
2'INA
30' DIA
EL683 74
EL.683.45
EL66293
EL 682.56
EL.
681.92
u4x�
FLUME6�THROAT
EFF
FIGURE II- 1 - 3
710
700
690
680
670
r 660
EL.660.1 BASED ON NORMAL
WS. i YADKIN RIVER.
W/2000 PEAK FLOW
66' OUTFALL
IJPw PUMP STATION
EL 68956
ELMS 56 )
EL.689.56
EL68955
EL.688.45
EL.688.29
t EL.686.29
EL.683. 23
EL 68722
EL 6869�
EL.686 1919
EL.68688
EL.687.45
EL 68745
EL.68745
EL.68745
EL.687 la
EL.666- 6I
EL.686.56
EL686.6
EL.680.00
EL.68E.00
EL.680.00
EL.660.00
TO YADKIN RIVER
EL696.00�
WASTE
WEIR CREST
EL 669.25
EL696.00
TNOCENER
NN(E-UP
DISTRIBUTION
CHAMBER
EL 683.00
r
EFF TROUGH
RIV EL.686.0
EL.67350
HYDRAULIC PROFILE
&DIA CENTER
COLUMN
NVERT OF
WEIR NOTCH
EL667.33
us' ma EFF PIPE
THICKENER
(1UN T)
16
-*To PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT BUILDING
VIA PLANT SEWER
OPERATION .AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
WINSTON-SALEM/FORS YTH COUNTY UTLITY COMMISSION
LOWER MUDDY CREEL .WASTEWATER. TREATMENT PLANT
710
700
690
680
670
660
710
700
690
680
660
ELEVATION.IN FEET
ELEVATION IN FEET
ELEVATION IN FEET

BIOSOLIDS DISPOSAL STRATEGY
Winston- Salem/Forsyth County Utility Commission
ARCHIE ELLEDGE WWTP
MUDDY CREEK WWTP
Residual biosolids from both of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utility
Commission's two wastewater treatment plants are treated to meet Class B criteria
established by EPA's Sludge Disposal Regulations. This level of treatment is achieved by
subjecting the biosolids to anaerobic digestion at —97 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 45
days. The average digestion time at the Elledge Plant is —48 days and the Muddy Plant
digestion time is —50 days. Both facilities meet or exceed the volatile solids reduction
criteria established by U.S. EPA for vector control.
Winston-Salem's primary sludge disposal strategy is to land apply its digested biosolids
to farm land at agronomic rates. Winston-Salem currently has 6269.17 acres permitted to
receive biosolids under its Non Discharge Permit WQ0000094 issued by the State of
North Carolina's Division of Water Quality section. This land is located in Forsyth,
Davie and Yadkin Counties.
Winston-Salem has also applied to EPA Region IV for a federal sludge disposal permit.
The application was submitted in 1998 but the permit has not been issued.
Archie Elledge WWTP
The Archie Elledge WWTP currently produces 16.4 dry tons of digested biosolids daily.
Under normal conditions, these solids are stored in one of three sludge holding lagoons
until they are land applied. These three lagoons have a combined storage capacity of 32.4
million gallons.
While in the lagoons free water forms as the solids separate and settle to the bottom. This
free water is removed and is recycled back through the WWTP. This process serves to
thicken the solids content of the of the biosolids —2% to —5%. The solids concentration in
the biosolids actually land applied varies according to the crop being grown, but
generally this value is around 5%.
Adverse weather conditions and cropping patterns may prevent our being able to land
apply biosolids on a continual basis. During these times biosolids are stored in the
holding lagoons until land application can resume or they are dewatered by our Biosolids
dewatering facility utilizing centrifuges. This cake material averages—21.8% TS and is
disposed of in a lined solid waste landfill.
Muddy Creek WWTP
The Muddy Creek WWTP produces — 7.4 dry tons of biosolids daily. The plant has
mechanical dewatering facilities which dewater —46.7% of the daily biosolids production.

The remaining solids are stored in the plant's 12.8 million gallon lagoon storage system
until they are land applied. The plant's lagoons are not large enough to contain the daily
sludge production during periods when land application is not possible, so the belt filter
presses are operated continually to supplement the lagoons storage capacity
The Muddy Creek Plant is equipped with a sludge blending facility which is designed to
mix dewatered cake with the thinner biosolids removed from the holding lagoons. This
operation allows the plant to formulate a biosolids slurry with a nutrient content that is
appropriate for the crop being grown on the application site.
In the event the plant exhausts all it's lagoon and cake storage capacity during periods
when field operations cannot be conducted, the plant's strategy is to dewater it's entire
daily solids production and dispose of the resulting cake in a lined solid waste landfill.
FUTURE DISPOSAL STRATEGY
The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utility Commission has retained HDR Engineering
,Inc. of the Carolina's to develop a Wastewater Treatment Master Plan Report for our
facilities for the next ten years. Part of this report will outline general recommendations
for Biosolids management at both Plant's
The Commission has awarded contracts for the demolition of some old sludge sand
drying beds and the construction of a covered dewatered cake biosolids storage facility to
store biosolids for extending our land application program to farmland . The premise
behind this facility is to move away from liquid land application to a Class B cake
application program. Due to development land availability for land application of
biosolids is decreasing each year. The ability to land apply a cake material will extend
this program until a Class A biosolids handling facility can be designed and constructed
for a long-term solution. These contracts should be completed by late 2004. In addition
the Plant's will continue to use the option to dispose of dewatered cake as needed in a
lined solid waste landfill.
The Commission will be awarding a contract to Black&Veatch to design a Class A
treatment process for Biosolids produced at the Divisions two wastewater treatment
plant's. The final scope for this project will be developed by the Engineer but will include
thickening, dewatering and drying equipment additions needed to produce and dispose of
a Class A product. Projections are for the design and construction to be completed by late
2006.
Signed
Da K. "a , de :, Director of Utilities
Date t

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MQDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
£ ,w i. & RL Vial\ ' .b M r
J 1 T .2 .i k 1 a, C 3
`i` '. 7. '.'�. 'A Y , 7 .a
Sl.1P�EEM:ENTAL.-142ICATEON INFORMATION
,--, • ➢. 4- - �•t '�,°`. a s a c-
ter?..-�:�-`-�.?._:c,� i3.�, •.�.�-_•� - w--...�....�,.`....�•_.�.x-,.-��w"���."�4.st:-..s
+.��` --
,Y x �: --, -2^ �, ,.. - C - . g7 .i4L..'s•.-'. 4
t_ �.au,r_...z-�.» �_:."�a :'.s;.=rC+i_.._�-s.��"�.,._c ��'
..,as56,
t z .,aa:Wkt>iIR+,-. 7 . - .ac, a� ar-s - Z r YF+ .�3 -a-.- ...•s:�---aem .i i-,PARTFNDLSTRIALVSERMIS H;ARGGICERGLAWASTEri..:='^;&
..i .v=5VS4 +l v F i.r. .t!*7.7 e4.� .-Wa ., si,c, 't- - � .. t -'
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
12 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 8
of each of the following types of
b. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Advanced Turbine Components, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3050 Westinghouse Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Milling, shot and grit blasting, acid cleaning, heat treating, grinding
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Steam and combustion turbine components
Rawmaterial(s): Stainless steel, aluminum oxide, nitric acid, phosphoric acid,
magnesium hydroxide.
of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
13,000 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits I2F Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Advanced Turbine Components, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes a No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PARTF.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NO0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPP'LEM:ENTAL APP'LIGATlON INNFORMATION ate''
-5-.�,G]^�irk. ''w`'� ��y'F. .R:;, 5 nv'�t " =iM -ihS 3 e...t+.. .ay?.[ry Yn.1 4 ;•. -MAY +iP4 � r^-i:..f .
a,. ..r."".'$..Y.iX•'.s63.+..(.G.+4RC'c'Y^l�N'i"Y.Qa'�.c•a.'`.4D.t :'4.^.y._d.u: 'cu^..a 'o-=<.�`df '�^ L2 __ v.....'S:7'e...f-� .•Je.,.Y "`i_t.-
rDUSTRAL R'Q1 CHARGEADyRGRACER,
_--,—.0-,.
# � u =N.xis
WASTE ,_ ;
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
M Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 8
b. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Lantal Textiles, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1300 Langenthal Drive
Rural Hall, NC 27045
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Textile Dye Operation
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Woven textile fabric for Transportation Industries
Rawmaterial(s): Dyes, Acids, Fire Retardant and Binders
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
75,000 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes $] No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Lantal Textiles, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 12 No (go to F.12)
F.10, Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Forrn 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MIIDDY CREEK WWTP NG0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SIiPPLEMENTA,L APP, -I rINFORMATION —
t .. 'd ^4 S,, ,4 a , ,, --tom§ ..{ar4 V: 4 1s 't 1 i , r' _
PART Fkf,,ND:USTRJ A USER DISCHARG SAND RCRAICE , - WASTES ��w Y� ` _ ; �
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
[it Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 8
b. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Rexam Beverage Can Company
Mailing Address: 4000 Old Milwaukee Lane
Winston—Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Aluminum cans are cleaned, printed and coated.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Aluminum beverage cans
Rawmaterial(s): Aluminum coils, coatings, inks, and water treatment chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewaterdischarge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
120,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: .
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 465 Subpart D
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Rexam Beverage Can Company
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 12 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 51 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PART
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F D INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES ANRCRAICERCLA WASTES : _ = ..
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
12 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 8
b. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company - Whitaker Park
Mailing Address: 1 101 Reynolds Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Cigarettes, reconstituted tobacco sheet, flavorings also utilities from coal fired
generator plant.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Cigarettes and reconstituted tobacco sheet
Rawmaterial(s): Tobacco, tobacco stems, tobacco dust, paper,glues
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
980,000 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: .
a. Local limits IE Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company — Whitaker Park
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes [ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15_) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PARTF.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE -
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUF,PLEM':ENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
�-
PART F INDUSTRIALUSER DISCHARGSA ENDRCRA[CERCLAAS WTE S
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION: •
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
It Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical IndUstrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 8
b. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. - Tobaccoville
Mailing Address: 7655 King - Tobaccoville Road
King, NC
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures cigarettes and a coal-fired utility plant
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Cigarettes
Rawmaterial(s): Tobacco, casings, flavorings, menthol, paper, glues
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
375,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards D Yes E No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. - Tobaccoville
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes a No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NG0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION r
ARTFfHD TRIALU DSGHARGS ANDRGRAICER Lq WASTES y� ' �Y� ,y t. µ^yy�� q V
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
It Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical IndUstrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 8
b. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each S1U.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: R. J. R. Packaging LLC
Mailing Address: 220 East Polo Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures flexible packaging material and aluminum foil
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Print labels, cartons, rolls of laminated film, foil and paper
Rawmaterial(s): Paper board, inks, solvents, glues, paper, film and metal plating
chemicals
of process wastewaterdischarge into
or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000 gpd ( continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
R. J. R. Packaging LLC
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes a No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ®No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART'F.
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
KIDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
[t Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Indlstrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 8
b. Number of Gills. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Salem Health Services Laundry
Mailing Address: 195 Park Plaza Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Health Care Laundry
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Industrial laundry
Rawmaterial(s): Detergent, bleach and fabric softner
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
102,000 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory? .
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Salem Health Services Laundry
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes [i No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
t
_ _: - . _- _ - .END- O -
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE
OF FORM 2A YOU
ART F.
1) TO DETERMINE WHICH
MUST COMPLETES _
'
OTHER PARTS
••
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NG0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
:PART F. IND.USTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAr"CER.CLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
[3 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 8
b. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.•
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Sara Lee Hosiery, Weeks Plant
Mailing Address: 401 Hanes Mill Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Hosiery Dyeing for women's hosiery
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Women' s hosiery
Rawmaterial(s): Dyes, Inks, Binders, Defoamer
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
164,750 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b_ Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits IE Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8_ Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
D Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Sara Lee Hosiery, Weeks Plant
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F_9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes Di No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F_14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or wit be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

a
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP N00050342
-
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND.RCRA;CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION: •
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program'?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
at Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 8
b. Number of Gills. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Smurfit -Stone Corporation
Mailing Address: 8080 North Point Blvd.
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture corrugated containers and print containers
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Corrugated cardboard containers
Rawmaterial(s): Caustics, starch, inks, glue and paper
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
17,300 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: .
a. Local limits MI Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Smurfit -Stone Corporation
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes I2 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check at that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
_ x ..,:.-c -c..=, _.-: a. 4°T ,,,xtea
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MDDDY CREEK WWTP NG0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
'PART F.INDU.STRIAL USER DISCFIARGES AND.RCRA/CERCLA.GVASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
12 Yes
❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
8
2
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Superior Manufacturing Company
Mailing Address: 4102 Indiana Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal Fabrication: Powder Paint Application
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Rawmaterial(s): Alkaline cleaner, Iron phosphate, sealers, coatings
F.6. Flow Rate.
Job Shop metal fabricating
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2,000
gpd ( continuous or _ X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards IN Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MUDDY CREEK WWTP NC0050342
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
YADKIN
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes IN No If yes, describe each episode.
Superior Manufacturing Company
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes a No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is This waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH
. :: OF. FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETEAiii..
..'
OTHER PARTS
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22