NC0037834_Permit (Issuance)_20040628

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0037834
Archie Elledge WWTP
Document Type: (Permit
Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
June 28, 2004
This document is printed earl reuse paper - ignore any
content earl the reverse wide

7
r
47A
NCDENR
Mr. David K. Saunders P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Winston-Salem
P.O. Box 2511
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
Dear Mr. Saunders:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 28, 2004
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0037834
Archie Elledge WW TP
Forsyth County
The Division has reviewed the Winston-Salem comments of Apri116, 2004 in response to their draft NPDES permit.
The Division has considered the concerns raised and has modified the permit in accordance with current Division
policy, all responses to concerns and revisions made to draft permit, NC0037834, are explained below:
Comment #1: Total Mercury Limit.
Response: The Division agrees with your comment regarding the limited data set that exists for conducting a
Reasonable Potential Analysis. The Division will include a 12 months implementation schedule for mercury limit,
during which the City of Winston-Salem will collect additional monitoring data. The mercury effluent limit will be
deleted in the future, if the permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no reasonable potential to exceed
applicable water quality standards.
Comment #2: Annual Pollutant Scan.
Response: The Division agrees with your comment and has changed the Section A (3) of the Permit. The "total
recoverable metals" requirement will be changed to "total metals". You can follow the sampling schedule you have
suggested in your comments for Annual Pollutant Scans.
Comment #3: Definition of Daily Sampling.
Response: The Division disagrees with your comment and does not consider language to be confusing. The
language states "sampling shall be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other disruptions of normal
operations prevent weekday sampling". Floods, ice storms, etc. are clearly a "disruption of normal operations". In
addition, these events are covered under provision "Failure to Monitor for Good Cause".
Comment #4: Failure to Monitor for Good Cause.
Response: The Division agrees with your comment and will include a Special Condition in the final permit that will
allow you to suspend monitoring during times when flooding, ice storms, etc. pose a substantial risk of injury or death
to persons collecting samples.
Comment #5: Flow Measurements.
Response: The Division believes that existing language does not prevent you from replacing a flow meter in a rapid
manner.
N. C. Division of Water Quality l NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center. 1 800 623-7748

Comment #6: Part II, Section D.2, Reporting Requirements.
Response: The language in the draft permit was formulated to assure timely submittal of the DMRs. We have
changed it to say "monthly monitoring reports must be postmarked no later than thirty days following the completed
reporting period". The next paragraph stipulating that "the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the completed repotting period" will remain unchanged. The Division believes that there is no contradiction between
these requirements. If you are required to deliver DMR on the last day of the month to DWQ, you would need to
postmark your report no later than 30 days following the completed reporting period.
Comment #7: Special Conditions for Municipal Facilities.
Response: The Division concurs with you. The procedure you are following meets the requirement of the Permit.
The language in the Draft Permit was intended to cover some unusual occurrences.
Comment #8: Part III; Section C; Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances.
Response: The Division understands your comment and will consider changes to the section. However, .ve need to
evaluate it very carefully since this language is used in Standard Conditions for all permits in the State.
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
This permit includes a TRC limit that will take effect on February 1, 2006. If you wish to install
dechlorination equipment, the Division has promulgated a simplified approval process for such projects. Guidance
for approval of dechlorination projects is attached.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 1S0B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Dr. Sergei Chernikov at telephone number
[phone], extension 594.
s' hAL SIGNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: NPDES Unit
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Pretreatment Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV

Permit NC0037834
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of Winston-Salem
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Archie Elledge Wastewater Treatment Plant
NCSR 2972 (Griffith Road) southwest of Winston-Salem
Forsyth County
to receiving waters designated as Salem Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 2004.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2009.
Signed this day June 28, 2004.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
SUSAN A. WILSON
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC003183y4 ,
z
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the
permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
The City of Winston-Salem is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue operation of an existing 30.0 MGD wastewater treatment system
that includes the following components:
• Mechanical screening and grit removal
• Primary clarification
• Aeration basins
• Final clarification
• Sodium hypochlorite and bisulfite feed for disinfection and
dechlorination
• Two centrifuges with screw conveyors
• Sludge digestion
• Polymer and iron salt feed facilities
• Odor control system
• Instrumented flow measurement
This facility is located at the Archie Elledge Wastewater Treatment Plant off
Griffith Road southwest of Winston-Salem in Forsyth County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the
attached map into Salem Creek, currently classified C waters in the Yadkin -
Pee Dee River Basin.

Latitude- 36°O1'04" Sub -Basin: 03-07-04
Longitude: 80°18'54"
Quad #: C17SE
Stream Class: C
Receiving Stream: Salem Creek
Permitted Flow: 30.0 MGD
Facility
Location
X
North
City of Winston.Salem
NC0037834
Archie Elledge Wastewater Treatment Plant

A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Final Permit No. NC0037834
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001- Wastewater
Treatment Plant Effluent. Such discharses shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as suecified below:
EFFLUENT. C i . 'f` H ; S ,, - N {
,, , A ii :
f „ 1 -,---- , t,. h .
f �i �Y aW�4i��K
m u
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
k.1 ' S �y R' _'�
Iti iii A [� 3
,',f e
S�,%it� a d� '�.�
C 4F .. ` i
3 , '
[, {�, i�i� '' �
u�1. 4 :�•'3�j{.
..!4,-;O
7,� ♦
� t :Avery e',
Y . I�
Mea a Tent
Sample
Sample
Location'
e
Flow (MGD)
30.0
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C (April 1— October 31)2
21.0 mg/L
31.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E, U, D
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C (November 1 — March 31)2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E, U, D
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E
NH3 as N (April 1 — October 31)
1.2 mg/L
3.6 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E, U, D
NH3 as N (November 1— March 31)
9.0 mg/L
27.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E, U, D
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Total Residual Chlorine4
22.5 µg/L
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Conductivity
Monthly
Grab
E, U, D
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Weekly
Composite
E
pH5
-
Daily
Grab
E
Total Cadmium
Quarterly
Composite
E
Cyanide6
Quarterly
Grab
E
Total Zinc
2/Month
Composite
E
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Mercury8
0.016 µg/L
2/Month
Grab
E
Pollutant Scan
Annually
Footnote 9
E
NOTES:
1. Sample Locations: I — Influent, E — Effluent, U — Upstream, Salem Creek 1300 feet above NCSR 112, D - Downstream (1) Salem Creek at NCSR 2991, (2) Muddy Creek
at NCSR 1493, and (3) Muddy Creek at NCSR 1485; Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples collected 3/Week during the months of June, July, August,
and September and Weekly during the remainder of the year with the exception of BOD, NH3-N, and conductivity. BOD and NH3-N instream samples shall be collected
weekly and conductivity samples monthly. Instream monitoring is provisionally waived in light of the permittee's participation in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
Association. Instream monitoring will be immediately reinstated should the permittee end its participation in the Association.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and total suspended residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of their respective influent values (85% removal).
3. The daily average effluent dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 6.5 mg/L.
4. The facility is allowed 18 months from the effective date of the permit to comply with the total residual chlorine limit. This time period is allowed in order for the facility
to budget and design/construct the dechlorination or alternative disinfection systems.
5. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units or greater than 9.0 standard units.
6. The detection level for cyanide (CN) shall be 20 µg/L. CN levels reported as less than 20 µg/L shall be considered zero for compliance purposes.
7. Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) ChV @ 76%; January, April, July, and October; See condition A(2) of this permit.
8. The limit becomes effective on 08/01/2005. The mercury effluent limit will be deleted in the future, if the permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no
reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards.
9. See condition A (3).
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.

Permit NC0037834
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) - 30.0 MGD
The permittee shall conduct chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -November 1995) or
subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration defined as the Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) shall be 76%. The
chronic value will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a
detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The presence of 48 hour acute toxicity will be
determined using Fisher's Exact Test at 48 hours from test initiation. The definition of "detectable
impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are described by
the document referenced above.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using these procedures to
establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter measures 48 hour acute toxicity
or a chronic value less than that specified above, then multiple concentration testing shall be
performed, at a minimum, in each of the two following months. Compliance is defined as a quarterly
average chronic effect level equal to or greater than 76%.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter
code THP3B for the Chronic Value and TGA3B for the 48 hour Acute Toxicity measure (Pass/Fail).
Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and iihe month/year of the
report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted
to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a valid test is submitted. Upon
submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months
specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later
than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NC0037834
A. (3) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Perrnittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in
the attached table (using a sufficiently sensitive detection level in accordance with 40 CFR
Part 136). Samples shall represent seasonal variations. Unless otherwise indicated, metals
shall be analyzed as "total".
Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual,'IRC) 1,1-dichloroethylcne Bis (2-chloroisopropyi ether
Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-cthylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophcnyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene
Hardness 1,1,2,2-tetrachlorocthanc Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony Tetrachloroethylcne Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1 2-dichlorobenzenc
Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzcne
Chromium Trichlorocthylcne 1,4-dichlorobenzcne
Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead Acid-extmciabk compounds; Diethyl phthalate
Mercury P-chloro-m-cress Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol 1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthenc
Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene
Cyanide 2-nitrophenol I-Iexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene
I 'olatile o>zrnic4•omponndr; Pentachlorophenul I-Iexachlorocyclu>-pentadiene
Acrolcin Phenol Hexachloroethanc
Acrylonitrilc 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene Base-neulml cnmpouach: Isophorone
Bromofomi Acenaphthcne Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylcne Nitrobenzene
Chlorobeniene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibre►mometh:me Benzidine N-nitrosodimethvlamine
Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthraccne N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethvl•inyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene
Chloroform 3,4 benzolluoranrhene Pyrene
Dichlorobrt►mometh:►ne Benzo(ghi)peryk nc 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichlorc ethane Benzo(k) Fluorant hene
1,2-dichlon►ethane Bis (2-chtorocthoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- A MR-PPA1 or in a form
approved by the Director within 90 days of sampling. The report shall be submitted to the
following address: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Central Files, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

s
Permit NC0037834
A. (4) POTENTIAL INSTREAM SAMPLING EXEMPTION
Per 15A NCAC 2B .0505(c)(4), stream sampling (as well as influent/effluent sampling) may be discontinued when
flow conditions could result in injury or death of the person(s) collecting the samples. In such cases, on each day that
sampling is discontinued, written justification shall be specified in the monitoring report for the month in which the
event occurred. This provision shall be strictly construed and may not be utilized to avoid the requirements of this
Section when performance of these requirements is attainable. When there is discontinuance pursuant to this
provision, stream sampling shall be resumed at the first opportunity after the risk period has ceased.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0037834
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
City of Winston-Salem — Archie Elledge W TP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 2511, Winston-Salem, NC 27102
Facility Address:
On Griffith Road, Winston-Salem, NC
Permitted Flow
30.0 MGD
Type of Waste:
22% industrial
78% domestic
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal w/o expansion
County:
Forsyth
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
303(d) Listed?:
Salem Creek - 001
C
YES
Regional Office:
USGS Topo Quad:
Permit Writer:
Winston-Salem
C17SE
Sergei Chernikov
Subbasin:
03-07-04
Date:
February 16, 2004
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
67.3
15
18
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%) @ 30.0 MGD:
Primary SIC Code:
Treatment Plant Class:
65
76%
4952
IV
•
SUMMARY
This facility is a major municipal treatment plant operating in Forsyth County. At 30.0 MGD, it is one of
the largest municipal facilities in the state. The facility serves 108,000 people in Winston Salem,
Kernersville, and Walkertown. The City administers an industrial pretreatment program to control the
discharge of industrial and commercial wastes into its collection system and treatment works. Industrial
sources include 15 Significant Industrial Users, 14 of which are Categorical Industrial Users.
As indicated above, this facility discharges into Salem Creek, which is a listed stream on North Carolina's
303(d) list. The creek is listed as impaired as the result of non -point sources of Fecal Coliform and
Turbidity. TMDLs for both parameters are required but have not been developed.
The previous permit for this facility was adjudicated and the special study for CN was conducted. The study
concluded that a 20 ppb cyanide quantitation level was appropriate for the wastewater matrix present. It
indicated that numerous false positive results were reported using quantitation levels lower than 20. The
Division accepted the report's recommendations. As a result of this site specific study, the quantitation level
will remain unchanged at 20 ppb instead of the currently accepted value of 10 ppb. The permit will continue
to require the City to implement its pretreatment program.
IN STREAM MONITORING
The Archie Elledge WWTP discharges treated municipal wastewater to the Salem Creek, a Class C water in
the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin. Instream monitoring is required for BOD, NH3-N, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, fecal coliform, and conductivity. An analysis of DO, temperature and conductivity data showed that
the facility has some negative impact on water quality of the receiving stream (table attached), but not
\VS -- Archie Itll,dze Tact Siicct
NE'I)i " K, nc cal

• significant enough to impair the waterbody for dissolved oxygen. The Permittee is provisionally exempted
from the instream monitoring requirements based on the participation in the Yadkin Pee -Dee Monitoring
Coalition.
TOXICITY TESTING
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Chronic P/F
001: Chronic P/F @ 76%
001: Chronic P/F @ 76%
January, April, July, October
The facility has been consistently passing it's WET test.
COMPLIANCE HISTORY
The City had a good compliance record during the previous permit cycle. In 2003 only two Notices of
Violation (NOV) were issued for violating DO and TSS limits. In 2002 two NOVS were issued for violating
ammonia nitrogen and CN limits. In 2001 one NOV was issued for violating ammonia nitrogen limit. In
2000 no NOVs were issued.
The most recent compliance evaluation inspection conducted on 11/14/2003 did not discover any
problems with respect to the operation and maintenance of the facility.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
The following parameters are monitored through the permit: Cd, CN, Cu, Zn. The following parameters are
monitored quarterly through the pretreatment program: Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Zn. The
permit will continue to require the City to implement its pretreatment program.
Reasonable potential analysis was conducted for: Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn (see attached).
PROPOSED CHANGES:
• Monitoring: Weekly monitoring for mercury and selenium has been introduced due to the
implementation of the new permit limit. Monitoring frequency for Cd has been reduced to quarterly
based on DMR data.
• Limits: Based on the Reasonable Potential Analysis, limit is being introduced for mercury. In
addition, weekly average limits for ammonia nitrogen, and daily maximum limit for total residual
chlorine have been added to the permit. Limit for CN has been removed based on DMR data.
• Priority pollutant monitoring on an annual basis has been added to fulfill the permit application
requirement in the future.
Existing permit limits and recommended limits/monitoring are summarized in the table below:
Parameter
Existing Limit
(µg/L)
Existing
Monitoring
_
Proposed Limit
(µg/L-)
Proposed
Monitoring
Mercury
None
None
0.016
Weekly
The existing monitoring frequency for silver, zinc and copper remains unchanged. Due to the facility's
toxicity record, limits for these action level standards will not be implemented, but monitoring will remain.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 17, 2004 (est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue: June 5, 2004 (est.)
\V-S — Arcliat• 1..1Ict1 .' Fact Sheet
V'I'I)I Rcncykal

STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Sergei
Chernikov at [phone] ext. 594.
Changes made to the final permit:
1) A 12 months implementation schedule for mercury limit was included, during which the City of Winston-
Salem will collect additional monitoring data. The mercury effluent limit will be deleted in the future, if the
permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no reasonable potential to exceed applicable water
quality standards.
2) A Special Condition in the final permit was added that allows the permittee to suspend monitoring during times
when flooding, ice storms, etc. pose a substantial risk of injury or death to persons collecting samples.
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
EPA COMMENT:
Name: Date:
\VS — .\rchie Elledge Fact Sheet
NPDES RencU:jl
Page 3

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
APR 0 5 2004
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit
City of Winston Salem - Permit No. NC0037834
Dear Dr. Chernikov:
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR MOA, we have completed review of the draft permit
referenced above and have no comments. We request that we be afforded an additional review
opportunity only if significant changes are made to the draft permit prior to issuance or if significant
comments objecting to the permit are received. Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit
when issued.
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)

imap://[e-mail]:143...
Subject: Re: NC0037834
From: [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:53:10 -0400
To: Sergei Chernikov <[e-mail]>
that sounds great - just wanted to make sure.
1 of 1 6/23/2004 10:18 AM

mailbox:///q/Documents%20and%20Settings/sergei_chernikov/Appli...
Subject: NC0037834
From: Sergei Chernikov <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:42:37 -0400
To: Marshall <[e-mail]>
Marshall,
The Winston-Salem raised objections against mercury limit that was imposed for Arhie-Elledge WWTP.
They have made a reasonable argument that very limited data set (only 5 samples) does not accurately
reflect composition of the wastewater. They also objected against using the data that was obtained when
the old detection method was used, which also makes sense. We offered them implementation schedule
contingent on your approval. The language is:
The limit becomes effective on 08/01/2005. (1 will put the date that is 12 months from the effective
date of the permit). The mercury effluent limit will be deleted in the future, if the permittee
provides updated effluent data that shows no reasonable potential to exceed applicable water
quality standards.
This language was used for two Greensboro permits, we thought that 12 month would allow us to collect
sufficient amount of data and conduct the RPA on extended data set. If there is a potential, the limit is
automatically implemented. Otherwise, we would need to do a permit modification.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
Thank you!
Sergei
Sc :'gel Crnikov, Ph.D.
Engineer
NPDIS
1617 1,1a . Service Center
Ra, eit. , NC 27699-1617
phone: - '3 3 083 ext. 594
`a;.. J 1
1 of 1 6/23/2004 10:18 AM

imap://[e-mail]:143...
Subject: Re: NC0037834
From: [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:44:56 -0400
To: Sergei Chernikov <[e-mail]>
conceptually, it sounds fine. My one question is how much data do they
have to submit to show no RP? Hopefully more than just minimal
sampling. Shouldn't a minimum number of data pts be spelled out?
1 of 1 6/23/2004 10:18 AM

NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYTH COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
ilif It'', ,1% J. , ,
MAR 2 9 2004 I ! L'::
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, d ly 0Erta- i_TFy
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oath- sonai1`f-Z).... LY'.',c:t1 _
appeared D.H. Stanfield, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is
Controller of the Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper
known as Winston-Salem Journal, published, issued and entered as second class mail
in the City of Winston-Salem, in said County and State: that he is authorized to
make this affidavit and sworn statement: that the notice or other legal advertisement,
a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Winston-Salem Journal on
the following dates:
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a
newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the
General Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning
of Section 1-597 of the general statues of North Carolina.
This 22nd day of March, 2004
AA
(signature of p aking affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 22nd day of March, 2004
My Commission expires: September 28, 2005
1 r1
q 4
d 4��
Notary 1ju#flic
OFFICIAL SEAL
Notary Public, North Carolina
COUNTY OF FORSYTH
KIMALEY,(OHMO,
My Commission Expires (
ruoUL. NU IIL,t -
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSIONiNPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
0n the basis of thorough staff review and application of NC General Stat-
ute 143.21, Public law 92-500 and other lawful standards and regula-
tions, the North Carding Environmental Management Commission pro-
poses to issue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below ef-
fective 45 days from the publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be accepted uiti
30 days after the publish date of this notice. All comments received prior
to that date are considered in the final determinations regarding the pro-
posed permit. The Director o1 the NC Division o1 Water Qualify may de-
cide to hold a public meeting for the proposed permit should the Division
receive a significant degree of public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other,suppoding information on file used
to determine conditions present in the draft permit are available upon re-
quest and payment of the costs of reproduction. Mal comments and/or
requests for information to the NC Division of Water Quality at the above
address or call Ms. Valery Stephens at [phone], extension 520.
Please Intdade the NPDES permit number (attached) in any communica-
tion. Interested persons may also visit the Division of Water Quality at
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file.
The Town of Bermuda Run (169 Yadkin Valley Road, Advance, NC
27006) has applied for renewal of NPDES permit NC0055158 for the Ber-
muda Run WWTP in Davie County. This permitted facility discharges
0.193 MGD of treated wastewater to the Yadkin River in the Yadkin.Pee
Dee River Basin. Currently 60D and total residual chlorine are water
quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in th sportion
01 the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc. (P.O. Box 339, Thomasville, NC
27361) has applied for renewal of NPDES permit NC0023604 for the
SFD/64 Lumber Plant in Davidson County. This permitted facility dis-
charges treated wastewater to Flat Swamp Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. Currently BOD, ammonia nitrogen and total residual chlo-
rine are water quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations
in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Heater Utilities, Inc. (P.O. Drawer4889, Cary, NC 27519) has applied for
renewal of NPDES permit NC0083941 for the Spring Creek WWTP in
Davidson County. This permitted facility discharges 0.08 MGD of treated
wastewater to Fryes Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently
BOO and ammonia nitrogen are water quality limited. This discharge
may affect future allocations in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin.
Heater Utilities, Inc. (P.O. Drawer4889, Cary, NC 27519) has applied for
renewal of NPDES permit NC0065587 for the Frye Bridge WWTP in For-
syth County. This permitted facility discharges 0.027 MGD of reated
wastewater to an unnamed tributary to Muddy Creek in the Yadkin -Pee
Dee River Basin. Currently 80D, ammonia estrogen and total residual
chlorine are water qualify limited. This discharge may affect future alloca-
tions in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Three R's Mobile Home Park (170 Jones Road, Winston Salem) has ap-
plied for renewal its NPDES permit NC0051489 in Forsyth County. This
permitted facility discharges 0.012 MGD of treated wastewater to Leak
Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Currently 80D, and total resid-
ual chlorine are water quality limited. This discharge may affect future al-
locations in this portion of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
The City of Winston-Salem (P.O. Box 2511, Winston-Salem, NC 27102)
has applied for renewal of NPDES permit NC0037834 for the Archie El-
ledge•WWTP in Forsyth County. This permitted facility discharges treat-
ed wastewater to the Salem Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
Currently BOD, ammonia nitrogen, total suspended residue, and total
residual chlorine are water quality limited. This discharge may affect fu-
ture allocations in this portion of the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basic.
WR.1• March 9n. 5001

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 2769911617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and appli-
cation of NC General Statute 143-21, Public law
92-500 and other lawful standards and regula-
tions, the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission proposes to issue a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit
to the person(s) listed below effective 45 days
from the publish date of this notice.
The City of Winston-Salem (P.O. Box 2511,
Winston-Salem, NC 27102) has applied for
renewal of NPDES permit NC0037834 for
the Archie Elledge WWTP in Forsyth
County. This permitted facility discharges
treated wastewater to the Salem Creek in
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. Currently
BOD, ammonia nitrogen, total suspended
residue, and total residual chlorine are
water quality limited. This discharge may
affect future allocations in this portion of
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
Three R's Mobile Home Park (170 Jones
Road, Winston-Salem) has applied for
renewal of its NPDES permit NC0051489
in Forsyth County. This permitted facility
discharges 0.012 MGD of treated waste-
water to Leak Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee
River Basin. Currently BOD, and total
residual chlorine are water quality limited.
This discharge may affect future allocations
in this portion of .the Yadkin Pee -Dee River
Basin.
Heater Utilities, Inc. (P.O. Box 4889, Cary,
NC 27519) has applied for renewal of
NPDES permit NC0065587 for the Frye
Bridge WWTP in Forsyth County. This per-
mitted facility discharges 0.027 MGD of
treated wastewater to an unnamed tributary
to Muddy Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee
River Basin: Currently BOD, ammonia
nitrogen and total residual chlorine are
water quality limited. This discharge may
affect future allocations in this portion of
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin.
Written comments regarding the proposed per-
mits will be accepted until 30 days after the pub-
lish date of this notice. All comments received
prior to that date are considered in the final
determinations regarding the proposed permit.
The Director of the NC Division of Water
Quality may decide to hold a public meeting for
the proposed permit should the Division receive
a significant degree of public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting
information on file used to determine conditions
present in the draft permit are available upon
request and payment of the costs of reproduc-
tion. Mail comments and/or requests for infor-
mation to the NC Division of Water Quality at
the above address or call Ms. Valery Stephens at
[phone], extension 520. Please include
the NPDES permit number (attached) in any
communication. Interested persons may also
visit the Division of Water Quality at 512 N.
Salisbury Street,- Raleigh, NC 27604-1148
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to
review information on file.
The Chronicle: March 18, 2004

Certified Mail #: 7002 0860 0002 8301 6232
Winston-Salem • Forsyth County
/County Utilities
ater • Sewer • Solid Waste Disposal
Manson Meads Complex • 2799 Griffith Road • Winston-Salem, NC 27103 • Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]
April 16, 2004
Mr. Sergei Chernikov
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27102
Subject: Comments on Draft Permit
Permit # NC0037834
Archie Elledge WWTP
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Chernikov:
In)
APR 2 0 2004
The City of Winston-Salem has the following comments and concerns regarding the draft
NPDES permit for our Archie Elledge WWTP that we received on March 25, 2004.
TOTAL MERCURY LIMIT:
The City of Winston-Salem feels that there is no technical basis to support the mercury
limitation proposed in the draft permit. Nearly all of the data used in DWQ's statistical
analysis was produced using the outdated EPA 245.1 protocol. The MDL for this
protocol is 0.2 micrograms per liter and all our monitoring results were reported as less
than the detection level. The water quality standard is seventeen times less than the MDL
for the analytical protocol and we do not feel that that these data can be relied upon to
establish the Elledge Plant's potential to exceed the water quality standard for mercury
with any degree of certainty.
On September 1, 2003 Method 1631 replaced the old protocol. The new method has a
quantitation limit low enough to allow DWQ to accurately assess potential water quality
impacts due to mercury and we feel that only data from the new method should be used
to determine whether a mercury limit is appropriate.
We have analyzed five effluent samples over the period from December 8, 2003 through
March 17, 2004 using the new protocol. Our results average 0.004 micrograms per liter
and they range from 0.00149 to 0.00682 micrograms per liter. All values are well below
the 0.012 microgram per liter water quality standard established for mercury.

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 16, 2004
Page 2
Winston-Salem feels that the monitoring results we have obtained thus far using the new
method invalidates DWQ's assumption that the true value of monitoring data previously
reported is actually one half the MDL.
Winston-Salem asks that DWQ remove the proposed weekly average limit for mercury
and replace it with a quarterly monitoring requirement. Monitoring will remain in effect
until sufficient data are produced using method 1631 to determine the plant's true
potential to exceed the water quality standard for mercury. Winston-Salem cannot accept
a limitation that is based on data produced by an inadequate analytical method when we
have data from a better method that indicates mercury is not present in the plant's
discharge in concentrations high enough to pose a threat to the environment.
The draft permit also stipulates that effluent mercury monitoring samples must be
composite samples. We feel that these samples should be grab samples based on the
provisions of Attachment A to the August 30, 2003 letter from the Point Source Branch
that implemented Method 1631. A copy of this letter is attached for you reference and it
explains why composite samples are not appropriate for monitoring using method 1631.
ANNUAL POLLUTANT SCAN:
Winston-Salem understands that an annual priority pollutant scan is being implemented
in the permit to meet EPA requirements. While we have no problem accepting this
provision, we have several questions and concerns regarding how we are to meet some of
the requirements stipulated in Section A (3) of the daft permit.
to analyze "total recoverable metals' as part of the annual pollutant
The requirementsy
scan and "total metals" for the monitoring stipulated on the limitations page confuses us.
It would seem that it would be more appropriate to have monitoring results for metals be
in one form or the other, preferably the form most useful in assessing stream quality.
Note that the draft permit does not stipulate whether the analysis for the various
parameters shown on the Annual Pollutant Scan list are performed on grab or composite
samples. The final permit needs to stipulate what type of samples are needed for this
monitoring.
We would also like to point out that the draft permit provides for "routine" monitoring
for at least six of the parameters listed on the annual scan requirement. Several of these
parameters, such as residual chlorine and dissolved oxygen, are monitored for on a daily
basis. It seems somewhat irregular for DWQ to require annual monitoring for parameters
that have monitoring requirements imposed on the limitations page. We request that the

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 16, 2004
Page 3
annual scan include only those parameters for which monitoring is not required on the
limitations page.
The language included in section A(3) of the draft permit also stipulates that effluent
pollutant scan samples shall "represent seasonal variations". The draft permit does not
provide detailed instructions as to how we are to comply with this requirement.
We propose that annual scans will be performed during January for the first year of the
permit, in April during the second year of the permit, during July of the third year of the
permit and in October of the fourth year. We think that this sampling schedule will meet
DWQ's seasonal variation requirement but we are not sure.
Regardless of whether our proposal is acceptable to DWQ, please provide language in the
final permit that stipulates how this monitoring is to be conducted to meet the seasonal
variation requirement.
DEFINITION OF DAILY SAMPLING:
The definition of Daily Sampling on page 2 of 16 stipulates that parameters subject to
daily sampling shall be sampled five out of every seven days per week unless otherwise
specified. The draft permit goes on to state that the Division expects that sampling shall
be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other disruptions of normal
operations prevent weekday sampling.
This language is confusing. Does this mean that we are required to perform daily
monitoring on weekends and holidays if events such as floods, ice storms etc. prevent our
being able to monitor during a weekday?
State regulations promulgated at 15A NCAC 02B.0503 define daily as being Monday
through Friday excluding state holidays. We ask that the definition of daily sampling
included in the final permit be consistent with the definition of daily as it appears in State
Regulations.
FAILURE TO MONITOR FOR GOOD CAUSE:
In the past there have been instances where we have been unable to perform daily
monitoring because flood waters, severe ice storms etc. either made it impossible to reach
the monitoring location or posed a serious threat to our employees' safety. In these
instances we notified the Regional Office of the situation and documented the reason(s)
why we could not perform the required monitoring. State regulations allow this, provided
the reason(s) for failure to monitor are documented and reported to DWq.
\c .

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 16, 2004
Page 4
We understand that other cities in North Carolina were sued by the Canoe Association
and had court rulings go against them because their permit did not contain specific
language excusing them for failing to monitor when weather conditions were such that
monitoring was impossible.
The Canoe Association successfully argued that since NPDES permits are Federally
enforceable, provisions in state regulations that provide relief from monitoring
requirements during severe weather etc. do not apply unless language to that effect was
included in the NPDES permit. Otherwise, Federal regulations take precedence and there
are no provisions in the Federal regulations that excuse permit holders from failing to
monitor for good cause.
Winston-Salem would like for DWQ to include language in the final permit that allows
us suspend monitoring during times when flooding, ice storms, etc pose a substantial risk
of injury or death to persons collecting samples or when sampling locations are
inaccessible due to events such as flooding that are beyond our control.
We suggest that the notification requirements set forth under 15A NCAC 02B.0505 (4)
be included in this language. Note that it is not Winston-Salem's wish to avoid our
responsibility to perform required monitoring. Rather, we simply want to protect
ourselves in the event we are unable to perform monitoring for good reason and are sued
by a third party as a result.
FLOW MEASUREMENTS:
Section D 3. in the draft permit provides that the Director shall approve the flow
measurement device and monitoring locations prior to installation.
Winston-Salem is concerned that this requirement effectively prevents our being able to
replace a flow transmitter with a similar device in a rapid manner should the original
device be destroyed by lightning etc. We request that the language in the draft permit be
changed to state, "the director shall approve the primary flow metering device and
monitoring location prior to installation ".
This language allows DWQ to review and approve the engineering associated with the
installation of a weir, flume or other primary flow metering device and it allows us to
replace damaged flow transmitters without having to obtain an Authorization to
Construct. ;-, i K X\N"( -. \ r , 0 )� >
V
J �- ^
Vi ,` J�ti V\\,C\ .
\
tif)‘

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 16, 2004
Page 5
PART II, SECTION D.2, REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The first paragraph of this section stipulates that monthly monitoring reports must be
postmarked no later than twenty-eight days following the completed reporting period.
The next paragraph requires that the first DMR is due on the last day of the_month
following the issuance of the permit. These requirements appear to contradict each other.
We ask that the final permit retain the requirement that DMR reports must be postmarked
no later than 30 days following the end of the reporting period. This is the deadline (,/,0
mandated by state regulations codified at 15A NCAC 02B.0506 (a) (1) (A).
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES:
Section A of the draft permit contains language requiring us to provide the Director
adequate notice of any new introduction of pollutants into our POTW from an indirect
discharger or any substantial change in the volume or characteristics of pollutants being
discharged by an indirect discharger.
When these situations occur, our pretreatment group either prepares a new discharge
permit or modifies an existing discharge permit for the user in question and forwards the
permit to the pretreatment section for approval. The permit is issued once it has been
approved by the State. : ,
Winston-Salem feels that this procedure complies with the notification requirements set f , �,, --
forth under Section A (Page 13 of 16) of the draft permit. We would appreciate it if 7 , ;I,�
DWQ would provide us guidance as to whether or not you agree that our continued use of
this procedure meets the requirements mandated by the permit. If not, please provide us ,
some guidance as to what procedures you want us to follow. �,� ��� 'ti•;,'� IPART III; SECTION C; CHANGES IN DISCHARGE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES \-4'' ' l''1
u)k--
The language in this section of the draft permit appears to be taken directly from 40 CFR
Part 122.42 (a) (1) (i) through (iv) and (2) (i) through (iv). Winston-Salem does not feel
that this language is appropriate for an NPDES permit issued to a municipality as this
section of 40 CFR Part 122.42 applies to existing manufacturing, commercial, mining
and silvicultural dischargers. See the copy of 40CFR Part 122.42 that is attached for your
convenience.
The language within 40 CFR Part 122.42 that does apply to POTWs is contained in
122.42 (b) (1) through (3). The draft permI contains this language in Part IV, Section A.
vi
J
wj c-V c�.t
1 fib �%'; , � ,•. '�i
� i `� C �
lam_ �� _

Mr. Sergei Chernikov
April 16, 2004
Page 6
Winston-Salem asks that DWQ delete Section C of Part III because it does not apply to a
POTW and because its functions appear to be duplicated by Part IV, Section A.
Thank you for you consideration of our concerns and comments regarding this matter. If
you have any questions please call me at [phone].
Sincerely:
Stanley B. Webb
Utility Plant Superintendent
City of Winston-Salem
CC: David Saunders, Director of Utilities
Ron Hargrove, Deputy Director
Sherry Bagwell, Pretreatment Coordinator
Kathy Southern, Laboratory Director
Frank Crump, Plant Supervisor
Ref L040804a

•
.n1 A rz• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 30, 2002
Subject: NPDES Mercury Requirement
Implementation of EPA Method' 1631
Dear NPDES Permittee:
Mercury continues to be a water quality concern throughout North Carolina. Fish consumption advisories and
impaired stream segments as a result of elevated mercury levels have been issued for several locations. NPDES
permittees have worked with the state to reduce potential risks from this pollutant. including tasks associated with
collecting and reporting more accurate data. The most commonly used laboratory analysis for total mercury (EPA
Method 245.1) has a method detection level of 0.2 ug/1, while the current water quality standard is an order of
magnitude lower at 0.012 ug/1. Thus, true compliance with the water quality standard could not be judged. A
more recently approved laboratory method (EPA Method 1631) should produce a detection level below the water
quality standard, which would allow the Division to assess potential water quality impacts from dischargers more
accurately. Therefore, this letter serves as notification to your facility that effective September 1, 2003, you will
be required to begin using EPA Method 1631 (or subsequent low-level mercury methods approved by EPA in
40 CFR 136) when analyzing for total mercury. Your facility is subject to this new requirement because either 1)
your facility has a current total mercury limit in its NPDES permit that is <0.20 ug/1: or 2) your facility has limited
instream dilution (i.e., the instream waste concentration (IWC) is >6%). This requirement complies with 15 A NCAC
2B.0505(e)(4), which requires that "test procedures must produce detection and reporting levels below the permit
discharge requirements."
Mercury Laboratory Analysis - EPA Method 1631
On June 22, 1999, the US EPA approved a new analytical method (EPA Method 1631) for measuring very low
concentrations of mercury in water. Subsequent revisions to Method 1631 include Revision C (current approved
method) and Draft Revision D (scheduled for promulgation in October 2002). Method 1631 has a minimum level of
quantitation of 0.0005 ug/1 (0.5 ng/1), which is 400-times more sensitive than Method 245.1. The new method
requires a clean laboratory environment which generally requires some lab retrofitting; thus, many permittees will
likely contract a commercial lab to perform the analysis. Based on data compiled by Ohio EPA, commercial labs
that are currently analyzing for EPA Method 1631 charge between $50-90 per sample, with turnaround times
ranging from 5-28 days. Currently there is one commercial lab certified by North Carolina for EPA Method 1631.
However. it is anticipated that several additional labs will also offer this analysis in the future as the demand for
this method increases. When selecting a lab to perform low level mercury analyses, the permittee should review the
lab's performance. experience, and reliability with the method, as well as cost considerations. Attachment A
provides additional information on this method.
Mercury Clean Sampling Techniques - EPA Method 1669
The greatest risk of contaminating the wastewater sample for low-level mercury analysis is during the sample
collection effort. Thus, those facilities subject to EPA Method 1631 will also need to evaluate clean sampling
recommendations provided in EPA Method 1669. Attachment A provides highlights on this method.
NPDES Compliance
All mercury monitoring data submitted to the Division will be reviewed for compliance with current effluent limits.
If the permit . contains monitoring only, the new method must still be used, and the need for a permit limit
will be evaluated at a later date by comparing a statistical evaluation of the effluent data with the water
quality standard and corresponding allowable effluent concentration. Therefore, the potential problem of
sample contamination cannot be overemphasized, since it could result in NPDES effluent limits for total mercury,
increased monitoring costs, and possibly unnecessary violations. All data submitted to the Division for NPDES
compliance monitoring requirements are the responsibility of the permittee. Therefore, facilities subject to this new
method are strongly encouraged to begin evaluating sampling methods and commercial labs before the deadline
date, to ensure that field staff are properly trained in the use of "clean sampling" techniques, and sampling and lab
procedures are fully developed to minimize sample contamination.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Customer Service 1 800 623-7748
NCDENR

4 NPDES Mercury Requirement
Page 2 of 3
Additional Information
For additional information and guidance
following resources:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Laboratory Analysis:
Lab Certification:
Clean Sampling:
NPDES Permitting:
Pretreatment::
US Environmental Protection Agency
Method 1631/1669 Questions:
regarding EPA Methods 1631/1669, the
Roy Byrd, 919-733-3908, ext. 213
Lab Staff, 919-733-3908
Sandy Mort, 919-733-2136, ext 245
Tom Belnick, 919-733-5083, ext 543
Tom Poe, 919-733-5083, ext 522
permittee may consult the
Maria Gomez -Taylor, 202-566-1005
EPA Sample Control Center, 703-461-2100
Websites:
http: / /www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/guidance/permit l0att3.pdf
The state of Ohio EPA provides an updated listing of laboratories providing contract services for EPA
Method 1631, including costs, turnaround time, and lab contacts. The labs are identified for informational
purposes only, and do not constitute an endorsement. The listed commercial laboratories may also provide
advice on training, equipment, and sampling techniques appropriate for Method 1631.
http: / /www.epa.gov/ost/methods/ 1631.html
This EPA site provides information on the 1631 Method requirements and implementation guidance.
http: / /www. esb . enr. state.nc. us /lab
This DWQ site provides information on EPA Methods (including 1669 clean sampling techniques). and a
listing of state -certified labs for EPA Method 1631.
http://www.h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/NPDESweb.html;click Documents
This DWQ website includes a copy of this letter plus a list of facilities currently subject to EPA Method
1631.
Conclusion
The Division realizes that changing the method of mercury measurement will not be without difficulty on the part of
the permittees. The requirement will affect approximately 155 facilities with mercury limits and/or monitoring
requirements. These permittees will need to evaluate available laboratories, costs, and sampling techniques. For
these reasons, the implementation date for EPA Method 1631 was delayed until September 1, 2003. The Division
thanks you for your cooperation and understanding in this matter. If you have any questions about the contents of
this letter, please contact the applicable staff listed above.
Sincerely,
J. William Reid, PE
Supervisor, Point Source Branch
cc (hardcopy): CLANC. c/o Lew Hicks, Environmental Chemistry Inc.. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington. NC 28405
cc (email): EPA Region 4, Marshall Hyatt, Scott Gordon. Roosevelt Childress
DWQ Water Quality Section; Coleen Sniltins Regional Offices
DWQ Laboratory Section; Steve Tedder. Larry Ausley, Jim Meyer. Roy Byrd. Connie Brower
DWQ Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Sandy Mort
DWQ Pretreatment Unit, Tom Poe
DWQ Modeling/TMDL. Michelle Woolfolk
DWQ NPDES Compliance Unit, Shannon Langley
DWQ NPDES Unit
MCIC. Michael Johnson
NC League of Municipalities. Paula Thomas
Clean Water Fund of NC, Hope Taylor
Severn Trent.Lab, Ohio. Mark Bruce

NPDES Mercury Requirement
, Page 3 of 3
A1( ," 7 t3
ATTACHMENT A
Summary of EPA Methods 1631/ 1669
Effluent samples collected for mercury may become contaminated by numerous routes, including: 1) metal -
containing labware, reagents, containers. and sampling equipment; 2) improperly cleaned or stored equipment; and
3) atmospheric mercury inputs in dirt and dust. Even human contact can be a source of mercury contamination
(e.g., mercury amalgam fillings in the mouths of lab/field personnel can contaminate samples directly exposed to
exhalation). Thus, it is essential that every effort be made to minimize sample contamination during collection. The
US EPA provides recommendations to minimize contamination during sample collection in EPA Method 1669:
Sampling Ambient Water for Determination of Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria Levels. This guidance
describes a "clean hands/dirty hands" sampling technique to collect mercury samples, which is ideally performed
with two people. A designated "clean hands" sampler handles all operations involving direct contact with the
sample bottle. while the "dirty hands" sampler is responsible for all activities that do not involve direct contact with
the sample bottle. This team sampling technique is recommended as a means to minimize sample contamination,
but is not required. The US EPA is developing a trace metal sampling guidance strictly for effluent collection
(Method 1670). The permittee will need to evaluate the various sampling recommendations and develop a sampling
strategy appropriate for their particular situation. The overall philosophy behind any mercury, sampling strategy
should be to ensure that any object or substance that contacts the sample is nonmetallic and free from any
material that may contain metals, in order to produce a reliable mercury measurement.
Requirements and recommendations for EPA Method 1631
and clean sampling for low level mercury include:
• It is strongly recommended that the permittee discuss sample collection, preservation, and shipping
requirements with their laboratory, to ensure that the most current requirements of Method 1631 will
be met. There have been several revisions to EPA Method 1631, and Revision D is proposed.
• Each laboratory must perform and meet the minimum requirements of Method 1631 Quality Control.
■ Effluent samples for mercury analysis must be collected in clean fluoropolymer or borosilicate glass
containers. It is recommended that the permittee request appropriate clean sample bottles or a
mercury sampling kit from their lab.
Method 1631 requires that a minimum of one field blank accompany each set of samples collected at a
given site. The field blank is used to identify contamination from sample collection and transport. If
mercury is present in the field blank at levels that would compromise reliable measurement of mercury
in the wastewater sample, you should assume that the sample was contaminated during collection or
transit, and you will need to eliminate any source of contamination that has been identified and
possibly resample. Including the field blank, the permittee should budget for two samples per
monitoring event.
• Samples must be preserved or analyzed within 48-hours after collection. Samples do not need to be
refrigerated/iced during shipment provided they are tightly capped, shipped overnight to the lab, and
preserved or analyzed by the lab within 48 hours of collection (per Draft Revision D).
■ If the samples are preserved within 48 hours, then they have a maximum holding time of 90 days prior
to analysis (per Draft Revision D).
• Sampling personnel must wear clean, non -talc latex gloves during sample collection and handling.
• EPA currently recommends that mercury samples for Method 1631 analysis be collected as grab
samples, since automatic composite samplers may be subject to contamination and loss of mercury via
volatilization. Therefore, the Division will allow permittees to collect single grab samples directly into
lab -provided sample bottles for permit requirements. The grab sample must be representative of the
discharge.
• If the person collecting the sample cannot directly reach the wastewater stream, a pole -type sampler
may be attached to the sample bottle to extend the reach for sample collection. The pole and bottle
clamp should be made of plastic and/or stainless steel and the mouth of the bottle should be held
facing upstream of the pole. The use of a transfer vessel should be avoided.
• All sampling equipment must be nonmetallic, or free of material that may contain metals. All materials
that will directly or indirectly contact the sample must be cleaned using the procedures in Method
1631.
• To minimize atmospheric contamination, do not sample during rainy weather or when the wind could
blow dust particles into the sample bottle. To minimize human contamination, do not breathe into the
sample bottle if you have mercury amalgam fillings in your teeth.
• Sampling personnel should be trained in techniques for sampling mercury at low levels. Sample
collection via the "clean hands/dirty hands" technique is recommended, but not required.
• Since Method 1631 is performance -based, there is some flexibility in Method requirements.

§ 122.42
caused by operational error, improp-
erly designed treatment facilities, in-
adequate treatment facilities, lack of
preventive maintenance, or careless or
improper operation.
(2) Effect of an upset. An upset con-
stitutes an affirmative defense to an
action brought for noncompliance with
such technology based permit effluent
limitations if the requirements of para-
graph (n)(3) of this section are met. No
determination made during adminis-
trative review of claims that non-
compliance was caused by upset, and
before an action for noncompliance, is
final administrative action subject to
judicial review.
(3) Conditions necessary for a dem-
onstration of upset. A permittee who
wishes to establish the affirmative de-
fense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contempora-
neous operating logs, or other relevant
evidence that:
(i) An upset occurred and that the
permittee can identify the cause(s) of
the upset;
(ii) The permitted facility was at the
time being properly operated; and
(iii) The permittee submitted notice
of the upset as required in paragraph
(1)(6)(ii)(B) of this section (24 hour no-
tice).
(iv) The permittee complied with any
remedial measures required under
paragraph (d) of this section.
(4) Burden of proof. In any enforce-
ment proceeding the permittee seeking
to establish the occurrence of an upset
has the burden of proof.
(Clean Water Act (33 U.B.C. 1251 et seq.), Safe
Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.),
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act (42
U.S.C. 6901 et seq.))
(48 FR 14153, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 48
FR 39820, Sept. 1, 1983; 49 FR 38049, Sept. 26,
1984; 50 FR 4514, Jan. 31, 1985;, 50 FR 6940, Feb.
19, 1985; 54 FR 255, Jan. 4, 1989; 54 FR 18783,
May 2, 1989; 65 FR 30908, May 15, 2000)
§ 122.42 Additional conditions appli-
cable to specified categories of
NPDES permits (applicable to State
NPDES programs, see § 123.25).
The following conditions, in addition
to those set forth in §122.41, apply to
all NPDES permits within the cat-
egories specified below:
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-00 Edition)
(a) Existing manufacturing, commercial,
mining, and silvicultural dischargers. In
addition to the reporting requirements
under § 122.41(1), all existing manufac-
turing, commercial, mining, and sil-
vicuitural dischargers must notify the
Director as soon as they know or have
reason to believe:
(1) That any activity has occurred or
will occur which would result in the
discharge, on a routine or frequent
basis, of any toxic pollutant which is
not limited in the permit, if that dis-
charge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels":
(i) One hundred micrograms per liter
(100 µ g/1);
(ii) Two hundred• micrograms per
liter (200 µ g/1) for acrolein and acrylo-
nitrile; five hundred micrograms per
liter (500 µ g/1) for 2,4-dinitrophenoi and
for 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol; and one
milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for anti-
mony;
(iii) Five (5) times the maximum con-
centration value reported for that pol-
lutant in the permit application in ac-
cordance with §122.21(g)(7); or
(iv) The level established by the Di-
rector in accordance with § 122.44(f).
(2) That any activity has occurred or
will occur which would result in any
discharge, on a non -routine or infre-
quent basis, of a toxic pollutant which
is not limited in the permit, if that dis-
charge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels":
(i) Five hundred micrograms per liter
(500 µ g/1);
(ii) One milligram per liter (1 mg/1)
for antimony;
(iii) Ten (10) times the maximum
concentration value reported for that
pollutant in the permit application in
accordance with §122.21(g)(7).
(iv) The level established by the Di-
rector in accordance with § 122.44(f).
(b) Publicly owned treatment works. All
POTWs must provide adequate notice
to the Director of the following:
(1) Any new introduction of pollut-
ants into the POTW from an indirect
discharger which would be subject to
section 301 or 306 of CWA if it were di-
rectly discharging those pollutants;
and
(2) Any substantial change in the vol-
ume or character of pollutants being
introduced into that POTW by a source
Environmental Protection Agency
introducing pollutants into the POTW
at the time of issuance of the permit.
(3) For purposes of this paragraph,
adequate notice shall include informa-
tion on (i) the quality and quantity of
effluent introduced into the POTW, and
(ii) any anticipated impact of the
change on the quantity or quality of ef-
fluent to be discharged from the
POTW.
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer sys-
tems. The operator of a large or me-
dium municipal separate storm sewer
system or a municipal separate storm
sewer that has been designated by the
Director under § 122.26(a)(1)(v) of this
part must submit an annual report by
the anniversary of the date of the
issuance of the permit for such system.
The report shall include:
(1) The status of implementing the
components of the storm water man-
agement program that are established
as permit conditions;
(2) Proposed changes to the storm
water management programs that are
established as permit condition. Such
proposed changes shall be consistent
with §122.26(d)(2)(iii) of this part; and
(3) Revisions, if necessary, to the as-
sessment of controls and the fiscal
analysis reported in the permit appli-
cation under § 122.26(d)(2)(iv) and
(d)(2)(v) of this part;
(4) A summary of data, including
monitoring data, that is accumulated
throughout the reporting year;
(5) Annual expenditures and budget
for year following each annual report;
(6) A summary describing the number
and nature of enforcement actions, in-
spections, and public education pro-
grams;
(7) Identification of water quality im-
provements or degradation;
(d) Storm water discharges. The initial
permits for discharges composed en-
tirely of storm water issued pursuant
to §122.26(e)(7) of this part shall require
compliance with the conditions of the
permit as expeditiously as practicable,
but in no event later than three years
after the date of issuance of the per-
mit.
[48 FR 14153, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 98049, Sept. 28, 1984; 50 FR 4514, Jan. 31,
1985; 55 FR 48073, Nov. 16, 1990; 57 FR 60448,
Dec. 18, 1992]
§ 122.43 Establishing permit
(applicable to State pro
§ 123.26).
(a) In addition to conditioi
in all permits (§§ 122.41 and
Director shall establish con
required on a. case -by -case
provide for and assure comp]
all applicable requirements c
regulations. These shall inc]
tions under §§ 122.46 (durati
mits), 122.47(a) (schedules
ante), 122.48 (monitoring), al
permits only 122.47(b)
schedule of compliance) and :
siderations under Federal lav
(b)(1) For a State issued
applicable requirement is a ;
utory or regulatory requiren
takes effect prior to final a
tive disposition of a permit.
mit issued by EPA, an app
quirement is a statutory or
requirement (including an.
final regulation) which to
prior to the issuance of tl
Section 124.14 (reopening of
period) provides a means for
EPA permit proceedings at •
tion of the Director where ne
ments become effective durii
mitting process and are of
magnitude to make additi
ceedings desirable. For Statt
administered programs, an
requirement is also any re
which takes effect prior to
fication or revocation and rei
a permit, to the extent a
§ 122.62.
(2) New or reissued permi
the extent allowed under § 1';
fied or revoked and reissues
shall incorporate each of the
requirements referenced in §f
122.45.
(c) Incorporation. All perr
tions shall be incorporated
pressly or by reference. If in<
by reference, a specific citat
applicable regulations or req
must be given in the permit.
[48 FR 14153, Apr. 1, 1983, as am
FR 30908, May 15, 2000]

MEMO
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
April 12, 2004
Memorandum to: LeToya Fields, NPDES Unit
Through:
From:
Subject:
Steve W. Tedder
WSRO Water Quality Supervisor
Rose Pruitt
Environmental Tech IV
Frye Bridge WWTP Draft NPDES Permit,
NC0065587 request for comments, Forsyth County
Archie Elledge WWTP Draft NPDES Permit,
NC0037834 request for comments, Forsyth County
Three R's Mobile Home Park Draft NPDES Permit,
NC0051489 request for comments, Forsyth County
I have no comments on the draft permits at this time.

imap://sergei.chernikov%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @cros.ncmail.net:143...
Subject: Draft Permit reviews (3)
From: John Giorgino <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:23:44 -0500
To: sergei chernikov <[e-mail]>
Sergei, I have reviewed the following:
NC0024112 Hamby Creek WWTP
NC0037834 Archie Elledge WWTP
NC0029246 Norfolk Southern Railway
I have no comments concerning the tox sections. Thank you for sending them to our
unit for review.
John Giorgino
Environmental Biolocrist
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mailing Address:
1621 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1�21
Office: 919 733-213+
Fax: [phone]
EmaiJ : [e-mail]
WEB:.) Page: htto:!!ww.;.esb.enr.state.nc.us
1 of 1 4/ 14/2 004 10:44 AM

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary February 16, 2C04
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 'NOV DEC
Wilmington Northslde WWTP 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% D. pules Y 2000 - NR/Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass.Fail
NC0023965/001 Begin:8/1/1996 Frcqucncy Q + Feb May Aug Nov NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County:NewHanovcr Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
PF: 8.0 Special 2003 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: Tidal IWC(%; NA 2004
Wilmington Southside \VWTP-1M1'Kean 24hr p/f ac lim: 90%, D. pules
NC0023973/001 Begin:9/I/1996 Frcqucncy Q + Mar Jun Sep Dcc
County: New Hanover Rcgion: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17
PF: 12.0 Special
7Q10: 1149 IWC(%;1.59
NonComp Single
Y 2000 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 - - Pass - - Late Pass - Pass - - Pass
2004
Wilson Technical Community College 24hr LC50 ac monit cpis Rhd (Grab)
NC0084581/001 Begin: I0/I/2003 Frcqucncy 5 OWD/A
County: Wilson Rcgion: RRO Subbasin: NEU07
PF: 0.0144 Special
7Q10: 0.0 (WC('/.;100
NonComp
2000 - - - - - H
2001 - - - - - H
2002 - - - - - H
2003 _- - - - - -
2004
Wilson WWTP chr lim: 90'/, 2000 - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) -
NC0023906/001 Bcgitt:2/I/2004 Frcqucncy Q Fcb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Pass(s) Pass - Pass(s) - - Fail(s) >100 >100(s) Fail(s) 33.5.>100
County: Wilson Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU07 2002 >100(s) Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass -
PF: 14.0 Special 2003 - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s) - - Pass(s)
7Q10: 0.5 I\VC(%; 97.37 2004
Windsor \V\VTP CHR LIM:90% 2000 >100 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
NC0026751/001 Bcgin:1/I/2003 Frcqucncy Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp SINGLE 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
County: Bertic Rcgion: WARO Subbasin: ROA10 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Fail 33.5 >100 Pass
PF: 1.15 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%: 100 2004
Winston-Salem Archie Elledge WWTP P-2 chr lim: 76%
NC0037834/001 Bcgin:8/1/1999 Frcqucncy Q Jun Apr Jul Oct
County: Forsyth Rcgion: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4
PF: 30 Special
7Q10: 15.0 1\VC(%; 75.6
2000 >96 - - >96 - - >96 - - >96
NonComp ChV Avg 2001 >96 - - >96 - - >96 - - 80.8
2002 80.9 - - >96 - - >96 - - >96
2003 >96 - - >96 - - 00.0 - - >96>96 90.9,>96
2004
Winston-Salem Lower Muddy Crk P-2 chr lim: 5.5% 2000 >22 - - >22 - - >22 - - 15.56
NC0050342/001 Bcgin:7/1/1999 Frcqucncy Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp ChV Avg 2001 >22 - - >22 - - >22 - - >22
County: Forsyth Rcgion: WSRO Subbasin: YADO4 2002 3.89 >22 >22 >22 - - >22 - - >22 -
PF: 21.0 Spccia! 2003 15.6 - - >22 - - >22 - - >22>22 >22>22
7Q10: 554.0 IWC(%' 5.5 2004
\Voodffn Sanitary WTP chr lim: 8% (Grab)
NC0083178/001 Begin:12/I/2000 Frcqucncy Q tan Apr Jul Oct
County: Buncombc Rcgion: ARO Subbasin: FRB02
PF:.03375 Special
7Q10: 0.61 IWC(%;8.0
+ NonComp Singlc
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Fail >20 >20 Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004
Wright Chemical Corp/001 chr lim: 34%
NC0003395/00I Bcgin: I I/1/2000 Frcqucncy Q Fch May Aug Nov + NonComp Single
County: Columbus Rcgion: WIRO Subbasin: CPFI 7
PF: 0.2 Special
7Q10: 0.6 I1VC(. ;34
2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >90
2001 48.1 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2002 - late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Late Pass
2003 - Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Fail >90
2004
Yadldnsille \VWTP chr lim: 50%
NC0020338/001 Bcgin:8/1/1999 Frcqucncy Q P/F Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Yadkin Region: WSRO Subbasin: YADO2
PF: 2.5 Special
7QI0: 3.9 IWC('/.;50
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Pass
2004
Yanceyvllle WWTP chr lim: 37%; if pf 0.6 chr lim 44%
NC00400I 1/001 Bcgin:5/I/I997 Frcqucncy Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct
County: Caswell Rcgion: WSRO Subbasin: ROA04
PF: 0.45 Special
7Q10: 1.2 IWC(%; 37
+ NonComp Single
2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2001 Pass - - Fail >100 - NR/Pass - - Pass
2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2004 Pass
Y Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Pcrmit Rcquircment LET = Administrativc Letter - Target Frcqucncy = Monitoring frcqucncy: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Bcgin = First month required Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs + =quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan. Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Rcquircmcnt
PF = Permitted flow (MGD) IWC% = Instrcam waste concentrati P/F = Pass/Fai! test AC = Acute CHR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathcad Minnow; • • Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic vaiuc; P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bt • Bad test
Reporting Notation: •-- - Data not rcquircd; NR - Not rcporte Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Ncwly Issucd(To construct); H - Activc but not discharging: +-Mort data available for month in question; • = ORC signature nccdcd
48

NC0037834 Winston-Salem
Upstream
Downstream
Date
Temp D.O. Conductivity
(QC) (mg/L) umhos/cm)
Temp D.O. Conductivity
(QC) (mg/L) umhos/cm)
07/01/1998
07/08/1998
07/16/1998
07/21/1998
07/28/1998
08/04/1998
08/11/1998
08/19/1998
08/28/1998
09/02/1998
09/12/1998
10/06/1998
10/21/1998
11/12/1998
12/04/1998
01/07/1999
02/10/1999
03/11/1999
04/08/1999
05/06/1999
05/14/1999
05/21/1999
05/24/1999
06/04/1999
06/09/1999
06/16/1999
06/21/1999
07/01/1999
07/09/1999
07/15/1999
07/23/1999
07/26/1999
08/04/1999
08/13/1999
08/18/1999
08/23/1999
08/30/1999
09/10/1999
09/15/1999
09/22/1999
09/29/1999
10/14/1999
11/04/1999
12/09/1999
01/13/2000
02/14/2000
25.0 7.2 26.0 4.6
25.0 7.8 26.0 6.8
25.0 6.6 202 27.0 5.9 652
26.0 7.4 28.0 7.1
25.0 6.6 27.0 6.4
23.0 7.3 203 27.0 6.3 698
25.5 6.7 27.0 6.3
24.5 7.1 182 26.5 6.0 618
27.0 8.2 29.0 6.0
22.5 6.5 241 26.5 5.5 780
24.5 7.2 26.0 6.9
18.0 7.8 209 23.0 6.6 788
14.5 9.1 205 19.0 6.7 730
11.0 9.2 123 14.0 8.2 400
9.0 9.2 185 15.0 7.2 737
3.0 11.0 196 6.5 10.2 455
9.0 10.0 168 12.5 8.8 486
3.5 8.0 228 10.0 11.2 584
15.2 9.3 156 17.9 8.3 488
17.1 8.3 144 18.9 7.7 436
16.3 8.4 16.5 8.2
16.7 8.3 183 19.7 7.3 516
21.1 7.9 22.3 7.1
18.5 8.1 21.0 7.2
22.9 6.5 203 25.5 5.8 707
20.4 6.4 156 23.8 5.9 626
18.0 8.3 20.9 7.5
23.9 6.0 25.3 5.9
22.5 7.1 24.0 6.4
20.2 7.1 174 23.8 6.1 615
25.7 6.4 222 28.2 5.9 785
24.6 7.0 27.8 6.0
22.7 5.2 217 26.5 4.8 770
23.9 6.0 27.7 5.2
24.3 6.5 207 27.7 5.4 788
19.5 7.4 22.5 7.0
18.0 7.7 21.5 7.0
18.5 7.4 21.0 7.0
18.0 7.2 207 22.0 7.0 728
14.5 8.4 187 17.0 8.0 439
18.0 8.3 20.0 7.6
16.4 8.0 185 19.8 7.3 516
8.0 9.1 173 14.3 7.2 588
5.6 9.4 198 12.1 7.3 586
6.9 10.7 153 10.5 8.0 420
6.5 9.7 114 8.2 10.3 275

03/20/2000 10.5 8.6 73 11.4 8.6 170
04/27/2000 16.3 7.1 153 18.3 7.5 513
05/03/2000 17.4 7.8 192 20.1 8.8 606
05/11/2000 18.6 7.3 21.3 6.8
05/18/2000 20.3 7.7 204 22.2 6.3 621
05/25/2000 21.7 5.7 22.0 6.2
06/02/2000 22.9 7.7 24.5 6.0
06/09/2000 19.8 8.4 22.3 6.6
06/15/2000 24.9 6.9 207 26.2 5.1 553
06/23/2000 23.3 7.7 209 25.4 6.1 619
06/30/2000 24.2 7.3 25.9 6.4
07/08/2000 24.3 7.5 23.8 7.2
07/14/2000 23.8 7.4 25.6 6.6
07/19/2000 24.4 7.1 211 26.3 5.6 697
07/24/2000 21.2 7.7 22.0 7.6
07/31/2000 25.0 7.4 27.5 5.7
08/11/2000 25.4 5.8 27.1 5.3
08/18/2000 23.9 8.0 26.9 5.9
08/26/2000 25.3 7.5 227 27.0 5.9 718
08/29/2000 21.9 6.4 192 24.4 6.0 604
08/31/2000
09/05/2000 22.2 6.7 23.5 4.4
09/12/2000 21.0 8.1 226 24.2 6.5 788
09/20/2000 23.0 8.4 116 23.9 7.5 438
09/29/2000 17.9 10.2 21.3 7.1
10/23/2000 16.5 10.0 202 20.6 6.2 720
11/13/2000 11.7 10.0 194 17.9 6.8 696
12/26/2000 0.4 13.5 199 7.2 10.5 584
01/22/2001 4.7 11.9 156 8.9 10.5 508
02/12/2001 5.6 12.2 204 10.1 10.5 566
03/21/2001 9.2 11.0 106 10.8 10.0 297
04/09/2001 22.9 8.8 177 22.0 8.2 592
05/03/2001 20.9 9.0 23.4 6.6
05/11/2001 20.3 8.1 23.4 6.8
05/14/2001 16.5 8.3 193 19.8 7.9 433
05/25/2001 20.5 6.9 115 21.4 6.8 337
05/30/2001 23.0 7.3 24.5 6.7
06/06/2001 24.3 7.2 204 26.9 5.9 836
06/12/2001 21.9 8.9 24.9 6.4
06/22/2001 25.8 7.1 207 27.9 6.0 772
06/27/2001 25.4 6.7 27.6 6.2
07/02/2001 24.7 5.5 26.8 5.3
07/17/2001 21.6 6.0 158 24.7 5.3 781
07/24/2001 23.3 5.1 160 26.0 5.1 772
07/30/2001 21.3 6.5 23.3 6.5
08/07/2001 23.8 5.8 193 26.4 5.1 898
08/13/2001 24.5 5.4 26.2 5.0
08/21/2001 22.2 5.8 174 25.7 5.2 817
08/27/2001 23.2 6.2 26.2 5.4
09/04/2001 21.2 5.6 25.0 5.1
09/11/2001 22.8 5.9 174 26.0 5.6 883
09/17/2001 18.2 6.1 20.7 5.6

09/25/2001
10/09/2001
11/13/2001
12/04/2001
01/15/2002
02/12/2002
03/05/2002
04/09/2002
05/07/2002
05/14/2002
05/21/2002
05/30/2002
06/04/2002
06/11/2002
06/20/2002
06/26/2002
07/01/2002
07/09/2002
07/16/2002
07/24/2002
08/06/2002
08/13/2002
08/20/2002
08/27/2002
09/03/2002
09/10/2002
09/19/2002
09/24/2002
10/08/2002
11/05/2002
12/03/2002
1 /7/2003
2/11/2003
3/18/2003
4/8/2003
5/6/2003
5/13/2003
5/20/2003
5/28/2003
6/3/2003
6/10/2003
6/17/2003
6/24/2003
7/15/2003
7/29/2003
8/12/2003
8/26/2003
9/9/2003
9/23/2003
18.8 6.9 89 21.4 6.5 413
10.3 8.6 148 13.9 7.9 682
7.5 9.7 98 10.7 9.1 539
7.8 9.7 83 10.7 9.2 473
3.2 10.3 127 4.3 10.1 503
5.2 10.8 97 7.7 10.4 371
3.0 10.9 86 5.8 10.8 363
14.7 7.6 16.5 6.5
18.3 6.8 216 19.8 6.1 587
18.6 7.5 21.5 6.6
15.7 8.2 16.8 7.2
22.8 6.4 156 23.7 6.0 396
25.7 5.7 26.6 5.4
22.7 5.6 283 24.0 5.3 593
21.6 5.5 22.8 5.3
27.1 5.6 362 28.5 5.3 749
26.4 5.8 27.3 5.4
24.2 5.6 322 25.4 5.2 687
26.1 5.6 26.7 5.4
27.8 5.5 354 28.3 5.3 712
26.4 5.5 326 27.7 5.2 686
27.6 5.4 28.8 5.1
28.2 5.4 387 28.8 5.3 682
23.4 6.0 23.5 5.8
24.1 5.9 24.1 5.7
22.3 5.8 273 23.1 5.6 563
22.7 6.2 22.8 6.0
22.4 5.9 307 23.1 5.6 611
20.9 6.1 311 21.5 6.0 504
12.8 7.1 184 13.5 7.0 322
6.2 10.0 148 6.9 9.8 342
5.1 10.1 129 5.7 9.8 283
4.6 10.4 248 5.4 10.3 321
12.5 9.9 121 13.3 9.7 223
14.1 9.3 112 14.4 9.4 201
16.8 9.5 17.0 9.1
18.3 7.6 182 18.5 7.8 274
17.5 8.3 17.8 8.6
18.6 8.9 168 18.8 9.1 203
17.9 8.8 18.0 8.3
19.4 7.9 116 19.8 7.8 167
19.6 8.6 19.9 8.4
20.7 7.6 245 20.3 7.8 297
22.2 7.4 169 22.5 7.4 212
24.5 6.9 209 24.7 7.1 268
22.9 8.5 121 23.1 8.6 159
23.6 6.8 173 24.0 6.7 212
20.6 7.2 221 20.6 7.5 261
20.6 7.5 62 21.0 7.3 93
Average
Maximum
Minimum
19.07
28.20
0.40
7.66
13.49
5.10
187.22
387.00
62.00
21.17
29.00
4.30
6.95
11.20
4.43
533.86
898.00
93.00

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC(%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
2.50
0.08
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mull Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.0000
2.5
0.0000
20
1.00
2.50 µg/1
2.50 µg/1
0.08 µg/I
N3 Jfr;
Parameter =
Standard =
Silver
0.06
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
. Aul itv Ctl
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50

t f•
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
2.50
ff.
66.1
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.0000
2.5
0.0000
10
1.00
2.5 µg/I
2.50 µg/1
66.1 µg/1
Parameter =
Standard =
Date n < Actual Data
1 < 5.0
2 < 5.0
3 < 5.0
4 < 5.0
5 < 5.0
6 < 5.0
7 < 5.0
8 < 5.0
9 < 5.0
10 < 5.0
N,
Arsenic
50.0
BDL=1/2DL
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5

Facility Nance =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
2.6
2.6
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.1813
2.5
0.0733
94
1.05
2.5 µg/1
2.6 µg/1
2.6 µg/1
Parameter =
Standard =
Cadmium
2.0
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1 < 5.0 2.50
2 < 5.0 2.50
3 < 5.0 2.50
4 < 5.0 2.50
5 < 5.0 2.50
6 < 5.0 2.50
7 < 5.0 2.50
8 < 5.0 2.50
9 < 5.0 2.50
10 < 5.0 2.50
11 < 5.0 2.50
12 < 5.0 2.50
13 < 5.0 2.50
14 < 5.0 2.50
15 < 5.0 2.50
16 < 5.0 2.50
17 < 5.0 2.50
18 < 5.0 2.50
19 < 5.0 2.50
20 < 5.0 2.50
21 < 5.0 2.50
22 < 5.0 2.50
23 < 5.0 2.50
24 < 5.0 2.50
25 < 5.0 2.50
26 < 5.0 2.50
27 < 5.0 2.50
28 < 5.0 2.50
29 < 5.0 2.50
30 < 5.0 2.50
31 < 5.0 2.50
32 < 5.0 2.50
33 < 5.0 2.50
34 < 5.0 2.50
35 < 5.0 2.50
36 < 5.0 2.50
37 < 5.0 2.50
38 < 5.0 2.50
39 < 5.0 2.50
40 < 5.0 2.50
41 < 5.0 2.50
42 < 5.0 2.50
43 < 5.0 2.50
44 < 5.0 2.50
45 < 5.0 2.50
µg/1

46 < 5.0 2.50
47 < 5.0 2.50
48 < 5.0 2.50
49 < 5.0 2.50
50 < 5.0 2.50
51 < 2.5 1.25
52 < 5.0 2.50
53 < 5.0 2.50
54 < 5.0 2.50
55 < 5.0 2.50
56 < 5.0 2.50
57 < 5.0 2.50
58 < 2.5 1.25
59 < 5.0 2.50
60 < 5.0 2.50
61 < 5.0 2.50
62 < 5.0 2.50
63 < 5.0 2.50
64 < 5.0 2.50
65 < 5.0 2.50
66 < 5.0 2.50
67 < 5.0 2.50
68 < 5.0 2.50
69 < 5.0 2.50
70 < 5.0 2.50
71 < 5.0 2.50
72 < 5.0 2.50
73 < 5.0 2.50
74 < 5.0 2.50
75 < 5.0 2.50
76 < 5.0 2.50
77 < 5.0 2.50
78 < 5.0 2.50
79 < 5.0 2.50
80 < 5.0 2.50
81 < 5.0 2.50
82 < 5.0 2.50
83 < 5.0 2.50
84 < 5.0 2.50
85 < 5.0 2.50
86 < 5.0 2.50
87 < 5.0 2.50
88 < 5.0 2.50
89 < 5.0 2.50
90 < 5.0 2.50
91 < 5.0 2.50
92 < 5.0 2.50
93 < 5.0 2.50
94 < 5.0 2.50

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
29.0
9.3
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mutt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
3.7120
8.1
0.4583
• 20
1.93
15.0 µg/I
29.0 µg/1
9.3 µg/1
No i v‘j-
Parameter =
Standard =
Copper
7.0
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1 <
2 <
3
4
5 <
6
7 <
8 <
9 <
10
11
12 <
13 <
14 <
15 <
16
17
18 <
19
20
10
10
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
11
10
10
10
10
14
12
10
13
10
0.-tA ary eA/€1)
5.0
5.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
10.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
12.0
11.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
14.0
12.0
5.0
13.0
10.0

J
•
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7QlOs (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
17.6
66.1
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Malt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
1.6654
5.2
0.3203
20
1.60
11.0 µg/1
17.6 µg/1
66.1 µg/1
AtAdtk-t-
Np
Date
Parameter =
Standard =
Chromium
50.0
n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
µg/I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
10
7
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
6
10
10
10
10
11
10
10
2.5
5.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
11.0
5.0
5.0

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q1Os (cfs)=
1WC(%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
16.315
116.4
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
1.9270
9.4
0.2061
20
1.36
12.000 µg/1
16.315 µg/l
116.4 µg/1
2 4tj-j iL
�m 1=
Date
n <
Parameter =
Standard =
Nickel
88.0
Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1 <
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 <
11 <
12 <
13 <
14 <
15 <
16 <
17 <
18 <
19 <
20 <
10
20
12
20
20
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
5.000
10.000
12.000
10.000
10.000
5.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
5.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
µg/1

• •S1
• r
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
IWC(%) =
Wonston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
16.8
33.065
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mutt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
2.9553
8.4
0.3529
20
1.68
10.0 µg/1
16.8 µg/I
33.1 µg/I
A--
N'ort- t
Parameter =
Standard =
Lead
25.0
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1 /2 DL
1 < 5 2.5
2 < 20 10.0
3 < 5 2.5
4 < 20 10.0
5 < 20 10.0
6 < 5 2.5
7 < 20 10.0
8 < 20 10.0
9 < 20 10.0
10 < 20 10.0
11 < 20 10.0
12 < 20 10.0
13 < 10 5.0
14 < 20 10.0
15 < 20 10.0
16 < 20 10.0
17 < 20 10.0
18 < 20 10.0
19 < 20 10.0
20 < 10 5.0

'
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7QIOs (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
Wonston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Allowable #/day
305.1
66.1
0.0,
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mull Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
34.9069
116.3
0.3002
20
1.56
196.0 µg/1
305.1 µg/1
66.1 µg/1
Po
Parameter =
Standard =
Zinc
50.0
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
131
156
146
167
110
99.6
122
116
65
121
84
56
121
73
76
112
196
131
116
127
1-4 _ ;,Ie v�
[74
131.0
156.0
146.0
167.0
110.0
99.6
122.0
116.0
65.0
121.0
84.0
56.0
121.0
73.0
76.0
112.0
196.0
131.0
116.0
127.0

d•
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q1Os (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
10.0
6.6
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.0000
10.0
0.0000
43
1.00
10.0 µg/1
10.0 µg/1
6.6 µg/1
Nu IiW�il
c�ll Juw
Parameter =
Standard =
Date n < Actual Data
1 <
2 <
3 <
4 <
5
6 <
7 <
8 <
9
10 <
11 <
12 <
13 <
14 <
15 <
16 <
17 <
18 <
19 <
20 <
21 <
22 <
23 <
24 <
25 <
26 <
27 <
28 <
29 <
30 <
31 <
32 <
33 <
34 <
35 <
36 <
37 <
38 <
39 <
40 <
41 <
42 <
43 <
20
Cyanide
5.0
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
BDL=1/2DL
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
!tg/1

g ! ;J 0
.4 4
•
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
1WC(%)=
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Selenium
Max. Fred Cw
Allowable Cw
80.2
6.6
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Malt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
6.2236
6.9
0.9053
20
3.21
25.0 µg/1
80.2 µg/1
6.6 µg/1
11(AA-A = 56JjiL
/1/4 bvi-61.
Parameter =
Standard =
Selenium
5.0
Date n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
25.0
5.0
25.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0

•
i•
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Winston-Salem
NC0037834
30
15
75.61
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.02404
0.01587
RESULTS
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
Number
of data points
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.00193
0.00372
0.51810
5
3.526
0.00682 AO
0.02404 µg/1
0.01587 µg/1
Parameter =
Standard =
Mercury
0.012
Date n < Actual Data. BDL=1/2DL
1 0.00149 0.00149
2 0.00682 0.00682
3 0.00341 0.00341
4 0.00346 0.00346
5 0.00341 0.00341
µgll

s � J
Winston-Salem • Forsyth County
/County Utilities
ater • Sewer • Solid Waste Disposal
Manson Mcads Complex • 2799 Griffith Road • Winston-Salem, NC 27103 • 'lel 336.765.013(1 • Fax [phone]
December 17, 2003
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Weaver:
CENR-WATER QIJALrrY
(- 1•`c!NT SOL1ilCc Ei}iAty( rf
Re: Request for NPDES Permit Renewal
Archie Elledge WWTP (NC0037834)
City of Winston-Salem
The City of Winston-Salem requests the simple renewal of the NPDES permit for our
Archie Elledge Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0037834). This permit expires on June
30, 2004. We are not requesting an increase in permitted flow at this time and the permit
limitations should reflect the current 30 MGD limit.
The application and the supporting documents requested in your August 15, 2003
Renewal Notification Letter are attached.
Please note that our monitoring program did not include all the parameters required by
the EPA's permit application form (EPA 3510-2A) when we were notified last August
that we were now required to use this form.
We have been trying to get the additional monitoring performed in time to meet the
deadline but we have been unable to do so. Commercial labs are inundated with samples
from other permit holders and we have not performed any of the EPA 1631 mercury
monitoring because special equipment needed to collect the samples has not been
delivered. We cannot collect these samples by "hand" as required by the protocol so a
special pump must be used.
We have completed one of the three priority pollutant scans required by EPA and two of
the three multi -species bioassay tests. Samples for two more priority pollutant scans have
been shipped to our contract lab but the results were not available in time to include them
in this application package. Sampling for the final multi -species bioassay test is
scheduled for early January 2004.

Mr. Charles Weaver
December 16, 2003
Page 2
We spoke to Mark McIntyre about this matter and he instructed us to provide all the data
we currently have in our application and to submit amendments to the application when
the additional data is obtained.
We plan to submit amendments on or before January 30, 2004 for Section B.6 of page 8
of 22, a revised Part D and a revised sheet 17 of 22 for the portion of Part E that includes
the data on bioassay test #22. The amended Part D will include the low-level mercury
monitoring data.
Also note that no topographic maps are included to show the locations of our biosolids
disposal sites. Our disposal strategy uses land application and land filling of dewatered
sludge and a tremendous number of topographical maps would be required to cover all
our disposal sites.
We contacted Mark McIntyre and explained that we felt it was unnecessary to provide
these maps because they were included in the renewal application for our land application
program that was submitted to DWQ December 12, 2003. Mark agreed that it was not
necessary to submit this information twice and for us to explain this situation in our cover
letter.
There have been several changes at the plant since the last permit was issued in 1999.
This information is provided below:
• Facilities were constructed to allow for chlorination and dechlorination processes
using sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite rather than chlorine and sulfur
dioxide gas. This safety improvement went on line in July 1999.
• Facilities were constructed to enable the plant's activated sludge basins to operate
in a step -feed mode rather than plug flow. Construction was complete on October
27, 2000.
• Dewatering facilities and a truck loading station were constructed and placed into
service in early January 2001. These facilities are designed to process twenty-five
dry tons of biosolids daily.
We have received instructions from Madolyn Dominy at EPA's Region IV office that we
are not required to submit them a copy of our Land Application Program renewal
application when we apply for renewal of our NPDES Permit. Region IV does not intend
to process the application. This is contrary to the requirements mandated by the 503

Mr. Charles Weaver
December 7, 2003
Page 3
Sludge Regulations, but we are complying with Region IV's instructions regarding this
matter.
We have also received instructions from Marshall Hyatt at EPA Region IV as to how to
average monitoring data for submission in Part D of the renewal application. We were
unsure how EPA wanted an average calculated for monitoring data when the majority of
the monitoring data was reported as less than the detection level.
EPA instructed us to only average the results for monitoring events that were above the
detection level and provide an attachment giving information as to the total number of
monitoring events that produced results less than the detection limit. In cases where all
the data were less than the detection level, we were to report the maximum daily and the
average as being less than detection level.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you or your staff has any questions regarding the
content of this application or if you need additional information please contact Mr. Stan
Webb at [phone].
Since
David K. Sa . : ers P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Winston-Salem
CC: Stan Webb, Plant Manager
Frank Crump, Plant Supervisor
Ref: L 120703a

558 1600000 FEET 559
;hed by the Geological Survey
Ind North Carolina Geodetic Survey
ompiled from
3
thods 1949-1950
forth American datum
rth Carolina coordinate system
h only
erse Mercator grid ticks,
ompiled from aerial
This information not field checked
MN
315
62 MILS
0°24`
7 MILS
560 20'
UTM GRID AND 1971 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
\------/-*4"4-rS
1000
561
0
1000
H { H
.5
(WELC*'ME)
4955 IV NE
SCALE 1:24000
0
2000
3000
0
4000
5000
FRIEDBUR
6000
2.3 MI.
7000 FEET
1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
NOTE: 'A MILE AREA AROUND PLANT IS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW
WATER BODIES WITHIN V MILE OF PLANT ARE HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE
LOCATIONS OF WELLS WITHIN'/< OF PLANT ARE DENOTED BY RED DOTS.
ROUTES OF INFLUENT OUTFALLS FEEDING THE PLANT ARE NOTED BY ORANGE LINES _ff
� I
1 MILE
womo
0T EMI :��
17'30" 564 565
LOCATION MAP
ARCHIE ELLEDGE WWTP
NPDES # NC0037834
FROM USGS SURVEY MAP: 1971
FORSYTH COUNTY, N.C.
WINSTON-SALEM WEST QUADRANT
SCALE 1:24000
566
Heavy-duty__
Medium -duty
U.
L;.
WIN

KIMEL OUTFALL 1.42 MGD
SALEM OUTFALL 13.56 MGD
SOUTHFORK OUTFALL 5.30 MGD
.107 MGD
20.47 MGD
A
PRE-TREATMENT
BASIN (NIS)
CFNTRATF -*
DEWATERING
FACILITY
.085 MGD
.127 MGD
LINED
LANDFILL
DISPOSAL
2400 DRY TONS/YEAR
1
D
E
W
A
I
N
.192 MGD
A
SCREENING &
GRIT REMOVAL
20.75 MGD ,
PRIMARY
CLARIFIER
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTER
SYSTEM
.152 MGD
.087 MGD
.052 MGD 00.0 MGD
SLUDGE
LAGOONS
I
L
..282 MGD A
GRAVITY
BELT
THICKNER
.284 MGD
SAND DRYIN
BEDS (NIS)
LAND APPLICATION 13 MG/YEAR
OVER THE LAST 2 FISCAL YEARS
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
ARCHIE ELLEDGE WWTP
WINSTON-SALEM, NC
NPDES # NC0037834
Oct. 2002 - Sept. 2003
.255 MGD
SLUDGE
HOLDING
TANK
LEGEND
NIS = NOT IN SERVICE
RAS = RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
WAS = WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
= WASTEWATER FLOW
= SOLIDS FLOW
H 17.9 MGD
V
E
R
F
L
0
WRAS
.539 MGD
RAS
HYPOCHLORITE
ADDITION
►
20,6 MGD
38.76 MGD
ACTIVATED
SLUDGE
BASIN
38.76 MGD
FINAL
CLARIFIERS
1 1 R 4 MOD
1012 GPD
BISULFI'rE
ADDITION
20.41 MGD
CONTACT
CHAMBER
232 GPD
•
20.41 MGD
DISCHARGE
TO SALEM
CREEK
20.41 MGD
►

227
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Adele Knits, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3304 Old Lexington Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Dye Nylon and Polyester Yarns
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Synthetic Circular Knit Fabric
Rawmaterial(s): Nylon, Polyester Yarn, Acid Dyes and Disperse Dyes
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
31,500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ?at Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

,11
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E1 No If yes, describe each episode.
Adele Knits, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
P-q= 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND,RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
L Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: B/E Aerospace Inc.
Mailing Address: 1455 Fairchild Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal Finishing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principalproduct(s): Parts for aircraft seats
Rawmaterial(s): Aluminum, steel, cleaners, acids, caustic and nickel
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
5,517 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b- Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.a.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
B/E Aerospace Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
0 Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE -
OTHER PARTS
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
.:PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Bekaert Textiles USA, Inc.
Mailing Address: 240 Business Park Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Woven Fabric Finishing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Mattress Ticking
Rawmaterial(s): Rayon, polyester, cotton, acids, scouring compounds, polymers
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
22,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes El No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes El No If yes, describe each episode.
Bekaert Textiles USA, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes Ig] No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or wit be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
lOt. -,
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
®Yes ID No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Corn Products International, Inc.
Mailing Address: 4501 0verdale Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Wet Corn Milling
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Corn feed, corn meal, corn germ, corn syrup
Rawmateriat(s): Corn, acids, caustics and enzymes
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
887,800 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes MI No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.o.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes In No If yes, describe each episode.
Corn Products International, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PARTF. --
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST:COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.'INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and •
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Corr Flex Display and Packaging
Mailing Address: 555 Aureole Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27117
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture corrugated containers and print containers.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Corrugated display and packaging
Rawmaterial(s): Caustic, starch, inks, glue and paper
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
18,250 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes a No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

L
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
Corr Flex Display and Packaging
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes E. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method bywhich RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
nP !PnPnn 9Ayni 1 MI ICT rrintiDI GTE
miiwkAiWEiosk
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1P of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIALUSER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA`WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.•
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Dairy Fresh LLC
Mailing Address: 2221 Patterson Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe at the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Dairy processing and sanitizing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Milk, ice cream, non -carbonated flavored drinks
Rawmateriat(s): Raw milk, sugar, fruit concentrates, flavorings, bleach caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a- Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
130,500 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits M Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards D Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
D Yes El No If yes, describe each episode.
Dairy Fresh LLC
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes E. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b_ Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F-3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Deere -Hitachi Construction Machinery Corp.
Mailing Address: 1000 Deere -Hitachi Road
Kernersville, NC 27285
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing due to metal preparation
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Mobile Hydraulic Excavators
Rawmaterial(s): Steel, metal cleaning and etching chemicals, paint, oil, and
hydraulic fluid.
F.6. Flow Rate.
of process wastewater discharge into
or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1,300 gpd ( continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits 12 Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards a Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

L -♦
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Deere -Hitachi Construction Machinery Corp.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
-
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and •
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 1.4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.
Mailing Address: 500 Battery Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture automotive and industrial lead -acid batteries.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Lead -Acid Batteries
Rawmaterial(s): Lead, lead oxide, polypropylene, polyethylene, acids and caustics.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
22,000 gpd (_ x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits c] Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 10 Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 461 Subpart C
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes is No If yes, describe each episode.
Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
•
END OF PART'F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION -
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14.'
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Highland Industries, Inc.
Mailing Address: 215 Drummond Street
Kernersville, NC 27284
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Textile Finishing Operation
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Tire products, rubber drive belts, air bag material
Rawmaterial(s): Rubber, Latex, solvents, polyurethane
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9,500 gpd L continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits 0 Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ja No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
Highland Industries, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or wit be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST:COM,P.LETE_
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces E?A forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIONINFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Grass America, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1202 Hwy. 66 South
Kernersville, NC 27284
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing due to coating operation
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Powder coat kitchen and bath cabinet hardware
Rawmaterial(s): Steel. powder paints, alkaline cleaner, iron phosphate cleaner
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7,440 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: .
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ! Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Grass America, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) [] No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs.
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Hanes Dye and Finishing Co.
Mailing Address: 600 N. W. Blvd.
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Woven textile facility which dyes and finishes fabrics.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Woven textiles
Rawmaterial(s): Acids, dyes, caustics, flame retardant, fabric protection chemicals
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
514,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits f] Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes 1-Zi No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes Ej No If yes, describe each episode.
Hanes Dye and Finishing Co.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) C] No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OFPARTF.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and •
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: HOH Corporation
Mailing Address: 1701 Vargrave Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Centralized waste treatment for non -hazardous wastewater.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Pretreat wastewater and solidify non -hazardous sludges
Rawmaterial(s): non -hazardous wastewater and sludges
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
25,250 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits E Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards E Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 437 Subpart D
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
-Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
HOH Corporation
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE :
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
r
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION :.
PART F..INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
3 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: ITW Texwipe
Mailing Address: 1210 South Park Drive
Kernersville, NC 27284
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Prepare Lint -Free Cloths.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Textile wiping cloths
Rawmaterial(s): Polyester, Nylon, Cotton and Detergents
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
11 ,000 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits g] Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes a No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
ITW Texwipe
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA harrrdous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
f
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes El No If yes, describe each episode.
Kaba I1co Corporation
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 1E No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLNRCRNor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
•
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
........ .:.... ..._.. -..,.'..47. ., . .-...... .r, ,,...;,.a- u�--r [wrax,.,..4:,.:1, .,ar.:i.:,'; .�'&.- •"_f watpa 4..Sk; . :$1.',`q
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
. PART F.,INDUSTRIALUSER DISCHARGES AND,RCRAJCERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
M Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Kaba Ilco Corporation
Mailing Address: 2941 Indiana Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Security hardware (lock manufacturing)
Rawmaterial(s): Nickel, Zinc, Copper, brass, acids,caustics, bleach and brightners.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
29,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits a Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards la Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
;PART F.aNDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and .
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
0 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of Gills. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Microfibres, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3821 Kimwell Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Nylon upholstery fabric is printed or dyed.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Flocked nylon upholstery fabric
Rawmaterial(s): Nylon, adhesive, dye and softerners
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
970,000 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Er Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes la No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
-Page 18of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Microfibres, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes El No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data an volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
OTHER PARTS
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
''PART F..INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAJCERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Pepsi Bottling Ventures
Mailing Address: 3425 Myer Lee Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe at the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Soft drink bottling
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Carbonated and non -carbonated soft drinks
Rawmaterial(s): Water, corn syrup, flavorings, colors, cleaners and caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
98,500 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits IN Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes f ] No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Pepsi Bottling Ventures
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes LE: No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
a;;»r
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER P.ARTS
.iiiiOF FORM 2A YOU_ MUST:, COMPLETE_
iiiiiiiiiiiii..R
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F_3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
®Yes ❑No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 15
b. Number of Gills. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Piedmont Aviation Component Services
Mailing Address: 3817 North Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing, maintenance of aviation systems
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Aviation products maintenance
Rawmaterial(s): metals, cleaners, acids, and caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2,500 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits a Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards a Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes In No If yes, describe each episode.
Piedmont Aviation Component Services
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes Eiji No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check at that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
sa.�x +...i..-,^-�x�3 .:F-
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
..PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
L3 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of Gills. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. - 171
Mailing Address: 500 Patterson Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing of machine parts
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Machine Shop
Rawmaterial(s): Metals, oils, cleaners, acids and caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
775 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits g3 Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards a Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR Part 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F_8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. - 171
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes El No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
■ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION a�,i�^dfi?n`x; ,.
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and .
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
M Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (Sills) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company - 200
Mailing Address: 200 Cunningham Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Rotogravure printing of packaging materials.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Aluminum foil and packaging material
Rawmaterial(s): paper. aluminum, inks, solvents and adhesives
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
600 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits III Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes IRI No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company - 200
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
14MEND OF PART F. - -``-
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F INDUSTRIAL, USER DISCHARGES AND,R.CRA/CER.CLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
-
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Roadway Express, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1255 NC Hwy. 66 South
Kernersville, NC 27284
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Garage Operations/Truck Maintenance
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Maintenance for heavy trucks and trailers
Rawmaterial(s): Acids, caustics, surfactants, oil, grease
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
14,300 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits fac Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes at No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
Roadway Express, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15-) 1K1 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
`'PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND.RCRA/CERCLA`WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
0 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Salem Coatings, Inc.
Mailing Address: 2450 Cragmore Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing using powder coating
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Coated metal products (Job Shop)
Rawmaterial(s): powders, cleaners and sealants
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
200 gpd ( continuous or x intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ) Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13of22

e'V
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.a.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Salem Coatings, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes EI. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) E No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
,-t.i.illiagnitl
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST,COMPLETE
= ..
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
21 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Sara Lee Underwear
Mailing Address: 700 South Stratford Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Textile dying, finishing and printing of underwear and outerwear
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Underwear and outerwear garment parts
Rawmateriat(s): Cotton and synthetic fibers, caustics, bleach, dyes and finishing
chemicals.
F.6. Flow Rate.
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
650,000 gpd ( x continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits U Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
Sara Lee Underwear
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes E No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ®No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
'..;, - - ._ - -..x e .. ,ram ", ;
•" _ - -' END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND.RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
2 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Southern Tool Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Mailing Address: 535 East Clemmonsville Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing Job Shop
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Finished cabinetry hardware
Rawmaterial(s): Copper, brass, steel, degreasers, acids and caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2,250 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR Part 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes In No If yes, describe each episode.
Southern Tool Manufacturing Co., Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes E No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F. :,
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
0 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 15
b. Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Stratford Metal Finishing, Inc.
Mailing Address: 807 South Marshall Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating and metal finishing Job Shop
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Finished metal hardware
Rawmaterial(s): Copper, Nickel, Chrome, Zinc, Cadmium, Silver, Gold, Acid
F.6. Flow Rate. Caustics and cleaners.
of prccess wastewater discharge into
or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
5,000 gpd ( continuous
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Et Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards a Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR Part 413 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Stratford Metal Finishing, Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 1 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Fomi 3510-2A {Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND.RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
gi Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Textilease Inc.
Mailing Address: 526 Piney Grove Road
Kernersville, NC 27284
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Industrial laundry
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Clean uniforms, aprons, table linen, mats, shop towels
Rawmaterial(s): water, soap, bleach
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
59,000 gpd ( x continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes Jj No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
Textilease Inc.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
;PART F.:INDUSTRIAL USER`DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b- Number of CIUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU- If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Tyco Electronics Corp.
Mailing Address: 3900 Reidsville Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Electroplated electrical connectors
Rawmaterial(s): Copper, Nickel, Gold, Cleaners, Acids and Caustics
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
17,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards I1 Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR Part 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
Tyco Electronics Corp.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ®. No (go to F.12)
F.1 0. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) Cj No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A-YOU MUST.COMPLETE.
- - '.r
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION -
::PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
13 Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: U. S. Airways
Mailing Address: 4400 Lansing Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal finishing
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principalproduct(s): Repaired aircraft parts
Rawmaterial(s): Aircraft parts, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, zinc,
F.6. Flow Rate. acids and caustics.
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,500 gpd ( X continuous
_
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits E Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR Part 433 Subpart A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU_ Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
U. S. Airways
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 1E1 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) IE No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE'.`
EPA Form 3510-2A Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 15
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of ClUs. 14
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: V. F. Jeanswear
Mailing Address: 3201 Centre Park Blvd.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Wet Process Denim Jeans
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principalproduct(s): Stone washed, acid washed, sandblasted jeans
Rawmaterial(s): Jeans, Detergent, Bleach, Acids, and Pumice Stones
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
553,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Ila Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes R No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Archie Elledge WWTP 'NC0037834
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Simple Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Yadkin
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes E No If yes, describe each episode.
V F Jeanswear
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes E. No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Fomi 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19of22

BIOSOLIDS DISPOSAL STRATEGY
Winston- Salem/Forsyth County Utility Commission
ARCHIE ELLEDGE WWTP
MUDDY CREEK WWTP
Residual biosolids from both of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utility
Commission's two wastewater treatment plants are treated to meet Class B criteria
established by EPA's Sludge Disposal Regulations. This level of treatment is achieved by
subjecting the biosolids to anaerobic digestion at -97 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 45
days. The average digestion time at the Elledge Plant is -48 days and the Muddy Plant
digestion time is -50 days. Both facilities meet or exceed the volatile solids reduction
criteria established by U.S. EPA for vector control.
Winston-Salem's primary sludge disposal strategy is to land apply its digested biosolids
to farm land at agronomic rates. Winston-Salem currently has 6269.17 acres permitted to
receive biosolids under its Non Discharge Permit WQ0000094 issued by the State of
North Carolina's Division of Water Quality section. This land is located in Forsyth,
Davie and Yadkin Counties.
Winston-Salem has also applied to EPA Region TV for a federal sludge disposal permit.
The application was submitted in 1998 but the permit has not been issued.
Archie Elledge WWTP
The Archie Elledge WWTP currently produces 16.4 dry tons of digested biosolids daily.
Under normal conditions, these solids are stored in one of three sludge holding lagoons
until they are land applied. These three lagoons have a combined storage capacity of 32.4
million gallons.
While in the lagoons free water forms as the solids separate and settle to the bottom. This
free water is removed and is recycled back through the WWTP. This process serves to
thicken the solids content of the of the biosolids -2% to -5%. The solids concentration in
the biosolids actually land applied varies according to the crop being grown, but
generally this value is around 5%.
Adverse weather conditions and cropping patterns may prevent our being able to land
apply biosolids on a continual basis. During these times biosolids are stored in the
holding lagoons until land application can resume or they are dewatered by our Biosolids
dewatering facility utilizing centrifuges. This cake material averages -21.8% TS and is
disposed of in a lined solid waste landfill.
Muddy Creek WWTP
The Muddy Creek WWTP produces - 7.4 dry tons of biosolids daily. The plant has
mechanical dewatering facilities which dewater ^-46.7% of the daily biosolids production.

*•
elt Q
The remaining solids are stored in the plant's 12.8 million gallon lagoon storage system
until they are land applied. The plant's lagoons are not large enough to contain the daily
sludge production during periods when land application is not possible, so the belt filter
presses are operated continually to supplement the lagoons storage capacity
The Muddy Creek Plant is equipped with a sludge blending facility which is designed to
mix dewatered cake with the thinner biosolids removed from the holding lagoons. This
operation allows the plant to formulate a biosolids slurry with a nutrient content that is
appropriate for the crop being grown on the application site.
In the event the plant exhausts all it's lagoon and cake storage capacity during periods
when field operations cannot be conducted, the plant's strategy is to dewater it's entire
daily solids production and dispose of the resulting cake in a lined solid waste landfill.
FUTURE DISPOSAL STRATEGY
The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utility Commission has retained HDR Engineering
,Inc. of the Carolina's to develop a Wastewater Treatment Master Plan Report for our
facilities for the next ten years. Part of this report will outline general recommendations
for Biosolids management at both Plant's
The Commission has awarded contracts for the demolition of some old sludge sand
drying beds and the construction of a covered dewatered cake biosolids storage facility to
store biosolids for extending our land application program to farmland . The premise
behind this facility is to move away from liquid land application to a Class B cake
application program. Due to development land availability for land application of
biosolids is decreasing each year. The ability to land apply a cake material will extend
this program until a Class A biosolids handling facility can be designed and constructed
for a long-term solution. These contracts should be completed by late 2004. In addition
the Plant's will continue to use the option to dispose of dewatered cake as needed in a
lined solid waste landfill.
The Commission will be awarding a contract to Black&Veatch to design a Class A
treatment process for Biosolids produced at the Divisions two wastewater treatment
plant's. The final scope for this project will be developed by the Engineer but will include
thickening, dewatering and drying equipment additions needed to produce and dispose of
a Class A product. Projections are for the design and construction to be completed by late
2006.
Signed
David K. Sa 'rector of Utilities
Date /e/q/Q,3