NC0059218_Wasteload Allocation_19940721

NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNING: COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0059218
Captain Stevens Seafood WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
i,_.
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment
(67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
July 21, 1994
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rezrerse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0059218
PERMITTEE NAME: Captain Stevens Seafood Restaurant, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Captain Stevens Seafood Restaurant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: (:}, n0 2 5 m
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
rec'd 4/4/94
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek
Class: WS-IV
Sub -Basin: 03-07-04
Reference USGS Quad: D17NE
County: Davidson
(please attach)
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: -00//00//00�{ - Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes/YHA/Az miles:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Charles Alvarez
Reviewed by: ett i
135
ate, CJtitd-
Date: 6/7/94
Date: 7
Date: _ 1
Modeler
T Date Rec.
#
MN? i4/
61e/ 9/
7156
/
Drainage Area (mi2
/ ) 0 94, Avg. Strcamflow (cfs): f , 0
7Q10 (cfs) 6 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) 0, 0 5
Toxicity Limits: IWC
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters £X)
Upstream it
Downstream
% Acute/Chronic
re(r.Ita1, /UVri1 (2/Mi) C,- d ,
Location jea% F ?o t Upc60 Pt 1
Location 0, 2 61;'v s DS g wo u v t'
unnc�nt�r +rbud v W
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
'•)(i
30
NH -N (mg/1)
3
Mont loxr
Yinb►ii 1.6r
-D.O. (mg/1)
C
5
TSS (mg/1)
30
Ig0
_F. Col. (/100 ml)
OC
2170
pH (SU)
- 1
6 - 9
ilk), eMi) viVtk c. it
Yym n t & v
Mom -17)r
6 1 4-6 reas.k
o
30
lei; era re,
(110ni1-ov
ifklOni -)-

•
-
•
Reedy_
G
558 1 600 000 , FEET
JO 1
FACILITY
COUNTY nsc:N
NPDES I\\ e0 s?zf?
DSN FLOW , v (4- M c11)
^-L
1JE LCO 1
Qv > �, 789
‘--J' -.1-,-,'A
CA A(Al s ev ads5EAF.6bc \t2�T Asti i
(NC�ti lam:>t\.CQ S -L e\I= 1 GeQQS 1)
SUB BASIN o3-o ?-04
�iknKtt -P1D
LATITUDE 3.3 f 5 "/S"
LONGITUDE Siv ° ZD' O ? "
RECEIVING STREAM - E
STREAM CLASS
DISCHARGE TYPE VoµESTKL
S54

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
S ubbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Captain Stevens Seafood
NC0059218
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renew with phased flow
UT to Reedy Creek
WS-IV
030704
Davidson
Winston-Salem
Charles Alvarez
6/7/94
D 17 NE
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
J O 17 1994
Request # 7861
Restaurant
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
WLA requested because facility is capable of treating to 0.0025 mgd and has a permit for
0.014 mgd. (Phased Flow into a zero flow stream 7Q10=0 and 30Q2=0.05). DMR flow values
for last 12 months show an average of 0.0011 mgd with a maximum of 0.0016 mgd. However,
staff repoort states "flow figures from a dosing sand filter are notoriously unreliable. Facility
periodically experiences problems meeting its BOD5 limit. Facility has high (5/93-04/94) average
concentrations of NH3N 18 mg/1 and Chlorine 316 ug/l. in its effluent. Recommend r -flow/ eui LiMLis
•peliey-to apply to 0.014 mgd.
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
211611575
1984
0.95
0
0
1.0
0.05
100
1,0
•
CJ
N r
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
P,/ /7& /its .qj; p/ern5 /- t / WW,7i(,7 71e7 /), 7// /ii .
'S/k'rr //("i'e' , / ii,-,' fn'l ?‘, i/ e7/✓ "'a-7;7
/ 2 a /7,ii-1,4c/5' S7`i-t'?.. ?A--x-,--/7 / SS 'e j7t-lJ /7,, /--
.i., )-- P er/.. ,— dsy5 ..":-/'etll r/Q//SP re/i3/041,-;,-721Pfls/t 4 .
e'rTtw ..17(WA%/y ('rJ G,S" dam' p,,- ,. 67 '. C,c?�-.5 % /.//,i c4 ,sue.
I,? 4 P� el."? , ire/ >y
/k6 bola//�� �.,, ,4,a .070
�/ L ` ��v Date
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:OCiai-S4/7/611)A00-2,--2
Regional Supervisor
Permits & Engineering: 74p7./..--
� t
Date: 11//3) 1/
Date: 7-/--9 4
Date: 7 //94/
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: J U L ► �� .7

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Co1. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (4/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Temperature
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Co1. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Temperature
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.014 0.014
30 30
monitor monitor
5 5
30 30
1000 1000
6-9 6-9
monitor monitor
30 30
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.0025 0.0025
30 30
monitor monitor
550 640
1'1060 ,- foo
monitor
30
monitor
monitor
30
monitor
WQ 6
DEL 30
WQ 200
WQ 6-9
17'
WQ 30
Monthly Average { ,
WQ or EL Summer Winter 0 ,t.
Q 0.014 0.014 \%-
0
WQ 5 10 ���
2 4 WQ
6 Lk)
30 4 L
200
6-9
17 OA
;monitor monitor
ALL LIMIT CHANGES DUE TO A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT:
DUE TO A PHASED FLOW FACILITY ONLY BUILT TO 0.0025 MGD AND
DISCHARGING INTO A ZERO FLOW STREAM (7Q10 =0 and 30Q2 =0.05)
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: At least 20 feet upstream from effluent
Downstream Location: 0.2 miles downstream fOn effluent at mouth of unnamed tributary.
Parameters: D.O., Fecal Coliform, Temp, Conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demgnstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No /
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
n)/ Av.)/ l��iffe /s 74_t
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling analysis
if modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

piyt Ste..;'1
. :
.
u
LJ
Si- 11)/
Sizvo z: 6
Sim ta./ 4
•
'11 • , br
•••-- / , -1
Ca /
...V'
" ,•
ri. •
;;;is:
. •
-- I .,
/ c I 0 , id LI itY-Cp 6 ___.. .
--hleav? 4-z.) ) , Oa? k) /D , D 11 7 P 7Fici 1,.) v 0 I u-es
r, i 1
-1' 1 - )-- I D• /714 0 V. r'iri i •-cs i‘**:.•:., kAj et Pl. !Cri- If" CA: ,,' ! C 0 1/
0'0 '00// ill 6 ij IA)/ a frke.a.Y. (; ; ..
7 0 . 00/6\ fri6o,
Pi
-e ti-Q-k-) .i/d),,., (--/ ‘,1 & v (1
i
a,'-e / ? 0 ro r I 4111.S /I
.,.
": •
• kt./ • ;
Oro': 00 All1-3A)
svc, •(ow +low
1) cs' -/oS .
•
f!' • `,
i•-••
• /
hj) or "/ Ja :

cc:
Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
MP 1 9 1994
F� Office
i �:.�Itlt �..ii
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Charles Alvarez
Date: May 17, 1994
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Davidson
Permit No. NC0059218`'
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Captain Stevens Seafood
Restaurant,Inc.•
Rt. 10, Box 245
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
2. Date of Investigation: May 16, 1994
3. Report Prepared by: Abner Braddy
t.
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. Steve Pappas,
Owner [phone]
[phone]
5. Directions to Site: Take Hwy. 150 south out of Winston-
Salem. The facility is located on the west side of Hwy.
150, approximately 0.15 mile south of the bridge over Reedy
Creek. Turn right onto Friendship Church Rd. (S.R. 1441)
and then immediately turn left into the parking lot.
6. Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 54' 38" Longitude: 80° 19' 37"
U.S.G.S. Quad No. D17NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Welcome
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
Yes No site size asked for or given in application.
No If No, explain: No site size asked for or given in
application.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The
facility is located on level ground, well above any flood
plain.

9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500.0'.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to Reedy
Creek
a. Classification WS IV
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 03-07-04
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Reedy Creek is a rural watercourse.
Its uses are consistent with its WS IV classification.
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 0.0025 MGD
(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? .0.014 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? .002588
Note: It is unclear why the system was previously
permitted at 0.014 MGD. The regulations would yield
0.008 (200 seats at 40 gal/seat), but that is probably
high, as the restaurant is only open for supper.
Additionally, this is a dosing system, so flow does not
equalize through system.
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years. None
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities; Existing: 3000 gallon grease tank; 9000
gallon septic tank; 1300 gallon dosing tank;
distribution box; 2250 ft2 subsurface sandfilter lined
with plastic; chlorinator; 700 gallon baffled contact
tank; step aeration device.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities. N.A.
g Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Chlorine,
Ammonia
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N.A.
in development approved
should be required _ not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Pumped
by septage hauler.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No.
Residuals Contractor •
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP
Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet) . I
4. SIC Code(s): 5812
Primary 10 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 4 4 0 7
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
N.A.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests: None
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) N.A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications N.A.
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
NPDES Permit Staff Report •
Version 10/92
Page 3

Spray Irrigation: Insufficient land.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Perhaps in the future,
but none available at this time.
Subsurface: Inadequate soils
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This WWTP system was repaired in September 1987. At that
time, a new 3000 gallon grease trap was added and the existing
failing subsurface sandfilter was replaced with a new 2250 ft2
lined subsurface filter. As noted in the last staff report, the
facility's flow limit should be revised to reflect the size of
g.p. the face ity is
capable of treating 2587 g.p.d. The DMR flow values for the last
12 months show an average of 1,100 g.p.d. with a maximum of 1,600
g.p.d. It should be noted, however, that flow figures from a
dosing sandfilter are notoriously unreliable.
The facility periodically experiences problems meeting its
BOD limit.
the s
The Region recommends the Permit renewal be handled in
accordance with current Division policy.
i nature of report p
r(JP7aver Quali y R1 oval Supervisor
Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 4