20061277 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20140327

Brock Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project No. 92333
USACE 404 Certification (Action ID #SAW- 2007 - 199 -152)
DWQ 401 Certification (2006 -1277)
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Project Type: Coastal Plain Stream, Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Buffer Restoration
February 2014
Table 1a. Project Setting and Classifications
Brock Stream Restoration Site
County:
Jones
General Location:
Trenton, NC
Basin:
Tar - Pamlico
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Outer Coastal Plain
Ecore ion:
Carolina Flatwoods
USGS Hydrological Unit:
03020204 - 010060
NCDWR Sub - basin:
03 -04 -11
Wetland Classification:
n/a
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
Source Agency:
EEP
Provider:
NCDENR EEP
Designer:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Construction Contractor:
Shamrock Environmental Corporation
Planting Contractor(s):
Natives & HARP
Invasive Treatments:
HARP
Property Interest Holder:
NCDOT, Conservation Easement
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014
Table 1 b. Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Milestone
MonthNear
Restoration Plan:
May 2006
Permitted:
January 2007
Final Design — Connt. Plans:
Aril 2008
Construction:
June 2009
Permanent Seeding:
June 2009
Bare -Root
Unknown
Mitigation Plan /As -Built
August 2009
Year 1 Monitoring
January 2010
Warranty Planting
February 2010
Year 2 Monitoring
January 2011
Year 3 Monitoring
September 2011
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2012
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2013
Supplemental Planting
March 2013
Invasive treatment
June & December 2013
Supplemental Planting
March 2014
Invasive treatment
June & October 2014
Page 1

1.0 PROJECT SETTING AND BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Project is located north of NC Highway 58 in Jones County, approximately six miles northwest of
Trenton and ten miles southeast of Kinston (Figure 1). It is within US Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit
03020204010060 and NC Division of Water Resources ( NCDWR) Sub -basin 03 -04 -11 of the Neuse River
Basin. It is situated in an area dominated by agricultural operations and was previously utilized for crop
production. Although the Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Big Chinquapin Branch is in its natural valley, it had
been somewhat straightened and routinely maintained for agricultural drainage. The DOT purchased a
conservation easement on this stream to meet stream and buffer restoration needs.
Project implementation included stream restoration by establishing floodplain connectivity and riparian
buffer restoration with an average of 75' on either side of the UT. Project restoration efforts provided
1,233 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs), 270,072 square feet (6.20 acres) of buffer. These amounts are
provided in more detail in Section 3.0.
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Project specific goals at the Brock Site include:
• Improvement of water quality by limiting bank erosion;
• Enhance 1,850 linear feet of stable stream channel (Stream Enhancement category II);
• Restoration of 6.2 acres of riparian buffer along the project reach (4.23 acres associated
with the 50 -foot buffer and 1.97 acres associated with the buffer beyond 50 feet);
• Improvement of aquatic and terrestrial habitat within the UT to Big Chinquapin Branch; and,
• A 40 -foot wide floodplain bench on right stream side in order to dissipate channel flow,
serve as a nutrient cycling area between the agricultural field and the stream, and to
increase channel stability during moderate to high discharge events. Stream work was
limited to right bank due to the location of a historic slave cemetery on the left stream bank.
The system of measurement to determine successful implementation includes documentation and
caparison of annual cross section surveys, stream hydrology via a crest gage and documentation of
vegetation development through permanent 100- meter 2 plots.
3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
Table 2. Success Criteria
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Feature
Stream
Success Criteria
Stable conditions at permanently placed cross - sections
Condition
Criteria Met
Hydrology
A minimum of two bankfull events documented in separate monitoring years
Criteria Met
Average of 260 planted woody stems /acre, as indicated by permanent vegetation plots
Vegetation
after five years of monitoring (SMU credit only).
Criteria Met
Average of 320 planted woody stems /acre, as indicated by permanent vegetation plots
after five years of monitoring (BMU or Nutrient Offset Nitrogen Credit only).
The following table denotes the restoration components and summations at the Project.
Closeout Report - Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 2
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

Ell = Enhancement II, R = Restoration, P3 = Priority Level III, Nutrient Offset calculations are per NCDWR recommendation.
Table 4. Mitigation Unit Totals
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Offset Stream Buffer Buffer or Nutrient
1,233 SMUs 184,258.80 ft2 (4.23 ac) 85,813.20 ft2 (1.97 ac.)
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 3
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014
Table 3. Project Restoration Components
Brock Stream Restoration Site
f
r'
Reach 1— UT to Big Chinquapin Branch
1,850
Ell
P3
1.5:1
1,233 SMUs
0 +00 -28 +50.16
Riparian Buffer (Top of Bank to 50 feet)
n/a
R
n/a
1:1
4.23 ac
n/a
Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset Buffer (50
feet to 200 feet)
n/a
R
n/a
1:1
1.97 ac
n/a
Ell = Enhancement II, R = Restoration, P3 = Priority Level III, Nutrient Offset calculations are per NCDWR recommendation.
Table 4. Mitigation Unit Totals
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Offset Stream Buffer Buffer or Nutrient
1,233 SMUs 184,258.80 ft2 (4.23 ac) 85,813.20 ft2 (1.97 ac.)
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 3
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

4.�
�1 As -Built 8 Baseline Monitoring Plan
Kinston
April 2010
� - _
Local Roads
Major Roads
I Railroads
vs 11 Site Boundary
County Boundary
a over Streams
Municipality
Jas Y MAP COURTESY OFSTANTEC
Roy. CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., 2010
a
T
p
U--1
� 2
Br�Pmx*,clt �Sd.
S m
"tea se m
a t
ar c'
'1"M Rd
aiR 1 Trenton
N
W 1 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles
Directions to the Brock Stream Restoration Site:
From Raleigh, take HWY 70 East to Kinston, NC. S
The Brock Restoration Site is located approximately
12 miles southeast of Kinston, North Carolina and lies }
in northern Jones County. From US 70 East in Kinston
turn right on NC 58 and travel approximately 12 miles.
The site is located on the left approximately three miles
past the beginning of the Pine Street loop (SR 1301).
�a
VICINITY MAP
Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County, NC
II7'1 01IICIIt E E P Project No. 92333
� November 19, 2013
Closeout Report - Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014
FIGURE 1
Page 4

PROJECT ASSET MAP
Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County, NC FIGURE 2
{ �4S 7� 1 te111 'Clll�'i E E P Project No. 92333
Ll 181
�� February 18, 2014
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 5
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

a
F33
•
hinquap-
Cem
lag
10
Conservation Easement
5.0
■ ■o
■
- F .
r
k
a _
Map Source: Terrain Navigator, 2013 N
Map Name: Phillips Crossroads, NC
Map Type: 7.5-minute Quadrangle W E
Map Scale: 1:24,000 t
S
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
t�Ip Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County, NC
1' 1 ]tl] C]I1C11� EEP Project No. 92333 February 17, 2014
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014
to
Brunc'
l�
F
0
e�w
FIGURE 3
Page 6

Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 7
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014
f
R
5
fT y�
F
f
Symbol Soil Map Unit Name
Gt Grifton fine sandy loam
GOA Goldsboro loamy 0 to 2%
Mapping W E
sand, slopes
Mk Muckalee loam
NOB Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to4 %slopes
Not ToScale Map Source:
S www. websoi[survey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
[�
Soils Map
k:0systel11
Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County, NC
FIGURE 4
a
EEP Project No. 92333 February 17, 2014
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 7
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

Brock Site Cross Section Comparison Charts
XSC #1 - Brock Site Sta.11 +00
42
39
41
-
38
r
40
37
39
36
c
° 35
38
d
Bankfu112013
0 37
34
w
Bankfu112013
33
OR ---
-
- - - -- - - --
- - - --- -.
36
_ -
1
32
�:\+
35
a
31
34
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance (ft)
- t- AsBult 12009 — 2010 +2011 --w-2012 X201?:
>i
33
32
Y
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Oistanee (ft)
- +- As -Built +2009 —2010 ♦2011 --.*-2012 X2013
XSC #2 - Brock Site Sta.15 +00
40
39
38
37
36
c
° 35
d
Bankfu112013
34
u� rr
33
OR ---
-
- - - -- - - --
- - - --- -.
_ -
32
�:\+
31
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance (ft)
- t- AsBult 12009 — 2010 +2011 --w-2012 X201?:
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 8
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Brock Stream Restoration Site
XSC #3 - Brock Site Sta.23 +00
35
-,
Method
Calculated
Bankfull
Elevation
34
1)
(if available)
10/24/2009
,
Crest gage
14 inches
35 inches
Not available
11/13/2010
7/4/10, 9/27/10 thru 10/1/10
Crest gage
14 inches
40 inches
Not available
7/7/2011
4/27/11 thru 4/29/11
Crest gage
14 inches
15 inches
Not available
f
33
8/16/2012
7/21/12 thru 7/25/12
Crest gage
14 inches
30 inches
Not available
(assumed)
7/9/13 thru 7/14/13
32
1
8/2/13 through 8/4113
Crest gage
14 inches
18 inches
Not available
8/11/13 through 8/18/13
c
(assumed)
0
-
i
`
Bankfu112013
u'
31
30
+r.
-- - - - - - --
------
,
28
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance ft
-+ -As -Built 12009 (2010 —* -2011 — 2012 - -- 2013
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Date of Data
Collection
•. Occurrence
Method
Calculated
Bankfull
Elevation
Measured High
Water Elevation
1)
(if available)
10/24/2009
Unknown
Crest gage
14 inches
35 inches
Not available
11/13/2010
7/4/10, 9/27/10 thru 10/1/10
Crest gage
14 inches
40 inches
Not available
7/7/2011
4/27/11 thru 4/29/11
Crest gage
14 inches
15 inches
Not available
(assumed)
8/16/2012
7/21/12 thru 7/25/12
Crest gage
14 inches
30 inches
Not available
(assumed)
7/9/13 thru 7/14/13
11/22/2013
8/2/13 through 8/4113
Crest gage
14 inches
18 inches
Not available
8/11/13 through 8/18/13
(assumed)
A minimum of five bankfull events were documented over the five year monitoring period with at least
one event occurring in each monitoring year.
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 9
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

Table 6. Cross Section Comparisons
Brock Stream Restoration Site
--T Cross Section #1 Cross Section #2 Cross Section #3
Attribute
Station 11 ii ii ii
Monitoring Year 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Bankfull area (sq. feet)
7.2
4.6
5.7
6.4
6.2
6.9
6.4
7.7
7.5
6.7
7.2
4.6
3.7
3.7
3.3
Bankfull width (feet)
8.7
7.8
7.8
8.2
7.7
8.3
8.0
8.8
9.6
7.5
9.0
9.3
7.9
7.9
7.9
Bankfull mean depth
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
feet
Bankfull max depth
1.4
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
feet
Width -depth ratio
10.5
13.2
10.8
10.5
9.5
9.9
10.0
10.0
12.3
8.4
82.3
18.6
17.0
16.7
19.3
Flood prone area width
52.4
44.3
48.0
49.9
48.3
49.9
49.2
49.8
50.0
49.5
51.0
52.1
50.6
49.7
49.3
feet
Entrenchment ratio
6.0
5.7
6.1
6.1
6.3
6.0
6.2
5.6
5.2
6.6
1.8
5.6
6.4
6.3
6.2
Low bank height ratio
1.0
1.0
1.4
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Vegetation Data Summary
Stem counts were conducted within four strategically placed 10 -meter by 10 -meter plots. The plots
were located based on a representative sample of the entire area of disturbance. They are scattered
throughout the Project Site in order to cover the majority of the habitat variations. Vegetation Plots #1,
#2 and #4 are related to stream and buffer mitigation credit and occur within the 50 -foot buffer of the
channel. Vegetation Plot #3 is outside of the 50 -foot zone and falls under either buffer mitigation credit
or Nutrient Offset Nitrogen Reduction credit.
A total of two supplemental plantings were conducted at the Brock site. In March 2013, an additional
840 containerized hardwood trees were installed due to low vigor. In March 2014, an additional 50
bareroot hardwood trees were installed due to a minor landowner encroachment.
The chart below provides a summary of the vegetation counts within plots as of March 2014. All
vegetation plots met the success criteria required for buffer mitigation or Nutrient Offset Nitrogen
credit, as well as the success criteria for stream mitigation credit.
Vegetation Total Stem Count/ Acre Planted Stem Planted, Hardwood Stem Count/ Acre
Plot No. (SMU Credit) Count/ Acre (BMU or Nutrient Offset N Credit)
1 1,295 688 688
2 364 364 364
3 n/a 323 323
4 647 323 323
Note that the March 2014 planting took place after the MY5 vegetation counts, therefore, are not
reflected in Table 9 on the following page.
Closeout Report - Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 10
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

APPENDIX A. Table 9. CVS Plot Summary Data
EEP Project Code 92333. Project Name: Brock Stream Restoration
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
92333 -ALC -0001
92333 -ALC -0002
92333 -ALC -0003
92333 -ALC -0004
MY5 (2013)
MY4 (2012)
MY3 (2011)
MY2 (2010)
MY1 (2009)
MYO (2009)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnot-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acernegundo
boxelder
1
1
1
Baccharis hatimifolia
eastern baccharis
7Shrub
1
Clethra alnifolia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
2
2
2
Cornus foemina
stiff dogwood
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
14
14
14
2
2
2
16
16
16
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
Linodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
2
2
Platanus occidentatis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
9
9
9
14
14
14
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
9
10
10
8
9
9
6
7
7
6
7
7
9
10
10
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
13
1
2
7
1
2
20
1
2
48
1
2
26
1
2
20
4
Ulmus
elm
Tree
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
2
2
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
17
32
9
9
9
6
6
6
8
9
16
40
41
63
46
48
95
50
52
78
48
50
70
45
46
50
55
63
63
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
2
2
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
7
1 7
9
8
8
1 9
8
8
10
8
8
10
8
8
9
9
11
11
687.966
687.966
1294.99
364.217
364,2171
364.2171242.8111
242.8111
242.811
323.749
364.217
647.497
404.686
414.803
637.38
465.3881
485.623
961 . 1281505.8571
526.091
789.137
485.623
1505.8571
708.2
455.271
465.388
505.857
556.4431
637.38
637.38
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 8. Monthly Rainfall Data in Inches
Brock Stream Restoration Site
Month
January
ii i
2.77
2010 i
3.38
i i
1.98
i i
3.3
i i
2.29
February
1.19
5
2.57
2.46
6.42
March
5.11
3.14
3.98
4.32
1.1
April
1.92
0.72
4.89
3.1
3.27
May
4.84
2.43
0.52
8.85
3.1
June
7.27
6.15
2.83
2.09
8.39
July
4.36
5.63
2.2
11.43
6.07
August
6.66
3.98
17.65
7.44
8.54
September
3.15
11.91
5.03
2.22
3.64
October
1.09
4.57
6.34
3.77
2.49
November
1 8.35
1 1.12
1 3.54
1 0.59
1 2.83
December
1 9.08
1 2.9
1 0.41
1 4.66
1 4.47
Precipitation Data Comparison
20
18
16
14
12
10
Q 8
6
4
2
0
A
4.0 EEP RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Monthly Data 2013
i Monthly Data 2012
Monthly Data 2011
Monthly Data 2010
Monthly Data 2009
-70%
30%
E
Date a N O z
The Brock Stream Restoration Site has demonstrated success in stream and vegetation restoration. All four vegetation
plots exceed the buffer mitigation success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre in year five. All three cross sections
exhibited continuous stability through all monitoring years and greater than five bankfull occurrences were reported in
separate monitoring years. The enhancement of Ut to Big Chinquapin Branch effectively improved water quality through
stabilizing stream banks, revegetating a buffer zone greater than 50 feet along the entire stream reach, and promoting
nutrient removal by restoring access to a floodplain. EEP recommends closing out this Site with 1,233 proposed Stream
Mitigation Units and 270,072 square feet of buffer restoration.
5.0 CONTINGENCIES
EEP recommends closing the Brock Stream Restoration Site out with no contingencies
Closeout Report - Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Page 10
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

ANNUAL MONITORING PHOTOGRAPH SUMMARY
Photostation
Number and Year 0 Baseline - Taken July 2009 Year 1 - Taken November 2009 Year 2 - Taken July 2010 Year 3 - Taken July 2011 Year 4 - Taken July 2012 Year 5 - Taken August 2013
Location
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County Paae 13
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

ANNUAL MONITORING PHOTOGRAPH SUMMARY CONTINUED
Photostation
Number and Year 0 Baseline - Taken July 2009 Year 1 - Taken November 2009
Year 2 - Taken July 2010 Year 3 - Taken July 2011
Year 4 - Taken July 2012 Year 5 - Taken August 2013
Location
#11 Facing
northeast along the
_,,... •.
eastern axis of
_
Vegetation Plot #4
v
1
x
{{
x
#12 Facing
:.
northwest across
Vegetation Plot #4
Ago
#13 Facing
southwest
(upstream) along
the tributary from
Station 28 +25
�p
#14 Facing
northeast along
buffer area
associated with
tributary from
; 5
Station 28 +25
#15 Facing
-
southwest from
Chinquapin
Branch
'e 1
1.
Closeout Report — Brock Stream Restoration Site, Jones County
Page 15
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP, February 2014

Legend - Vegetation Maintenance Plan
Staging Area Brock Site EEP #92333
Supplemental Planting Zones
Invasives Mgmt Zone - Jones County
Brock CE
December 2012
+�
Brock—Cemetery
0 87.5 175 350
Feet �#
L
r
L
I
r
,( L
L
I
L
L
L
L
I
L
IJ
L
LJJ
L
L
LJ
L
L
LJ
L
L
6
�J
f
r
I
LJ
r
I
L
Site access is via dirt farm
road off of Highway 58. L
f'
L
- L
r -err r.rr�J'��F err', —rrrF rFr ^rrr_� —rrr rt
NOTES:
Vehicle access to staging area at upper end of project through
farm road off of Highway.
Vehicle access to both sides of easement area along edge of farm fields.

APPENDIX A- Watershed Planning Summary
The Brock Stream Restoration Site is not within a watershed planning area.

Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes following parcel:
Grantor
County
Site Protection
Instrument
Deed Book &
Page Number
Acreage
protected
Clare Brock
Jones
Fee simple
291/714
8.066
The conservation easement was recorded at the register of deeds office and is available at the
link below:
http: / /www.nceep.net /GIS DATA / Brock %20Site %20 %2392333 %20(DOT) /92333 Brock.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the NC Department of
Transportation will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the conservation easement are upheld.

APPENDIX - C Jurisdictional Determination & Permits
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
ORM ID: SAW- 2007 - 199 -152 County: Jones USGS Quad: Phillips Crossroads
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Telephone No.: (919) 715 -7571
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The Brock restoration site contains 1,850
linear feet of channelized stream through agricultural fields connecting to Big Chinquapin Branch. The site is
located off NC 58 approximately 12 miles southeast of Kinston in Jones County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: A new floodplain will be created on one side of the channel by excavating a
new floodplain bench The area of excavation will be approximately 100 feet wide by 1,850 feet long. The
proposed project will have 6.88 acres of riparian buffer restoration and 0.52 acres of riparian buffer preservation.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
pennittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and /or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact William Wescott at 252- 975 -1616 ext. 31.
Corps Regulatory Official , WS Date: 01/23/2007
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2007
Cc:
Page 1 of 3

APPENDIX D - Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Name Brock
EEP IMS ID 92333
River Basin NEUSE
Cataloging Unit 03020204
Annlied Credit Ratins- 1.1 15.1 9.5.1 5.1 1.1 3.1 2.1 5.1 1 1 31 9.1 5.1 1 1 31 9.1 5�1 1 1 311 19.163261 1l1 1 1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
G
NE m ~ O m d
E
E
N m t c C c
W
Lu
Ir C
E O v
a
a° O C
A
w
W
E
K
K
p
z
0
o
O U
z
E
O C
z
O
O
z
O C
.m w . o
m
N v .E
o
. °c
O 1
N
z U
CO
'
Z
Q
z
i O
o
t t a a
2
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
1,850.00
, .
85,813.20
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
1,233.33
84,258.80
4,478.01
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): NCDOT TIP R -2539
1,453.50
EEP Debits feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2008 -0984
2008 - 02206 -02 5
NCDOT TIP R -2301A -
New Bern Bypass
396.50
Riparian Buffer ILF Credit Purchase
184,258.80
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
1
0.00
85,813.20
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.001
1
0.00
4,478.01
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014

Mitigation Project Name Brock (Intra- program Purchase)
EEP IMS ID 92333
River Basin NEUSE
Cataloging Unit 03020204
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the Riparian Buffer ILF Program purchased from the NCDOT ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site.
Aoolied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 1:1 1:1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
E q
N y
C
E E
M
N L
W
£ E
N N
W
c
°
E
U) `
a
K y
Er
C`
o: U
c
-
_6 L
R- L
W
c
n W
D: `
y
`
a o
o d
Z0'
o
oR
y
o U
Z
`E
n m
au
c
o L
Z W
c
o
A
n
d
o d
Zy
L
m. c o
m`o
N N
A d
o�
o. m
p
mm
41
A U
U
t m
E
mu
Vl A
q L
U W
L ` o c
mi
h N
,p `
o
o
m
R Y
`
N�
uy
N IC ._.
d L
N c
m
1
ZO
y y
N
�0
m O
y c
c
Z
0 n
t p
m
L
o-
Z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
184,258.80
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
184,258.80
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2004 -1055
NCDOT TIP U -3101C
Widening of US 1/64
184,258.80
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
1 0.001
1
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1 0.00
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014