20220266 Ver 1_Landing on Andrews PCN Attachments_20220214

DAVEY#-.
Resource Group
TO: US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
February 14, 2022
NC Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5095
RE: The Landing on Andrews; Cumberland County, NC
NWP 29 & 401 WQC Application
Action ID# SAW-2013-00420
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of The Landing on Andrews, LLC, Davey Resource Group is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification form and associated attachments for The Landing on Andrews residential development
located off Andrews Road in Fayetteville, NC. The purpose of the project is to construct a residential
subdivision within the tract to serve the housing needs of Cumberland County.
The project proposes to permanently impact 0.284 acre of wetlands and 248 LF of streams for road
crossings and a city -required sidewalk. Temporary impacts to 0.053 acre of wetlands and 41 LF of
streams are also needed to install headwalls and allow for dewatering/pump around during
construction. The applicant proposes to purchase credits from the Daniels Creek Mitigation Bank to
offset these impacts.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss the application, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
,jam,,,, WLI
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

THE LANDING ON ANDREWS
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Preliminary Wetland Map
Figure 6. Site Plan Showing Proposed Impacts
3.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
RCW SLOPES Assessment
4.0 MITIGATION CREDIT AVAILABILITY LETTER

1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

,A LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
w reparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for e andin on Andrews project located in Cumberland County, NC. All questions regarding
this project should be directed to Land Management Group.
Sincerely,
1AA45 / AY4 oil P+A_)'I>
Applicant
.L I lI1 w aue y M v,4,&IZ—
Print Name
ate
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 9 Wilmington, NC 28403

2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Preliminary Wetland Map
Figure 6. Site Plan Showing Proposed Impacts

v ,�s Cu.rin sr I
kakrra�Gr �
mRa Racntl Ra
i,acr" Rv !I
7Y
PoonR .2 //
'vEar - SIOe°mH to
3^ e° mah
aeacvntlaap,
n
+a' sr.e re,k slo..�ear G.
�"r, y°p°+try vann u / e^nc�a
ash _ m
p
w sl Site
WYn.: PoM o� rep ^ " � halal
E C B a uc olrRv
Je'Ae
41
;
rcln,earw�
— r r
_&v
. vk o_-. - enM1ga�e Or k„fh sM1aRer r aye arrRa rvervfarr. Rem n"b.lo
mG ass I � _ A r kin r�PcaMax`p
a>mer st 5 oaea�
JaooSt I � a eCr
'. e a v .. [� •r ue kvooe.a �kc : , ra4y^, ealhm _
�s Rip9" A//vy cr^G
�R° a a o rah
o #
°"•o, % g°v a°� srrlra. ' °^a 3 • eona.o-"r,
d a R
'09 n wham pa- _ a q o n /�Rohw-IJ� KMlarr aao �kAO _
e+yn0� ervy p. .c p, nvrey
' po 3°�,O Staxy ei nk^ vavp va � via fie`
�Or gQ J
a,r^a 4� m^' p�S e`OnOrra
tt we G+ a m` d E sn,,y pn m"r Rd
°Ca yY CI
eG $ $u'p, M%` ao among prcrarepr
,M1 eO�er 3 kMra. _ R.�e,
ei ehv�w .o a y:
SUCs ri`.Rd " O daYt" �11a Or o i
_ o v
g m ,.,� vra"sam o. Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
i (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), N`GCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIs User
- Community -
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.468 --- N 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Andrews Road Tract, Paramounte\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: GIS World Street Map Scale applies to 11X17" print.
The Landing on Andrews LM G Cumberland County, NC Figure 1
rAND Ml NA(,'NIt:NI (,'O P Vicinity Map
December 2020 a'o�r� ` .F-y
3805 Wightsville Avenue
LMG20.468 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

It ' �,`
S
r &%—
1 �E
- � E
` 4
■ il�
a
Lill
rill I?
i
■
�z
1
i + IIIIII.L.Ii.,
i
6
+..,,1
to
.■
i 4
i tom, -
llr
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.468 --- N 0 100 200 400
Andrews Road Tract, Paramounte\Maps Feet
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Cumberland County Totiociraph Scale applies to 11X17" print.
The Landing on Andrews 4�LMG
Cumberland County, NC Figure 2
GTopographic Map
December 2020 ate&—pany
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG20.468 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

Ull
-
m
Soils 4
BaD: Blaney loamy sand, 8-15% slopes
CaB: Candor sand, 1-8%slopes
GdB: Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes
JT: Johnston loam
VaD: Vaucluse loamy sand, 8-15% slopes
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.468 ---
Andrews Road Tract, Paramounte\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: GIS Soils Data
The Landing on Andrews
Cumberland County, NC
December 2020
LMG20.468
L M G
I.ANI7 MANAGEMENTGROUP
a DAVE'A rompany
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
N 0 100 200 400
Feet
Scale applies to 11 X17" print.
Figure 3
Soils Map

.6.4
X l
,{
.41
Tj f
Stt
0-1
VT
t
to

This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field
' `
•
notes. The site has not been field verified by the USACE at this time.
,�
1
This delineation was performed by Nick Howell and Jimmy Toth on 12-
17-20.
O'V
e
-
...
Site
t
'
11, ---- ,alr Yalu --
�
a1k
v�
J,
r� ,'�
__ eau .,� �r►;r ,I..
-�-
•� .Jai �� i
')i45
.p,•��awl
yy�r
�a7..pill
-
wi
_
p
�
Legend
Project Boundary —52.2 Acres
Uplands —42.7 Acres or 82%
_ .-.. Potential 404 Wetlands —9.5 Acres or 18%
......... Potential Streams 2,739 L.F.
Data Points
L:\WETLANDS\2020 WETLANDS FILES\LMG20.468 ---
Andrews Road Tract, Paramounte\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2017 NAPP Color Aerial Photography
Andrews Road Tract
Cumberland County, NC
December 2020
LMG20.468
4nFLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAM#- mmp-y
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
N 0 100 200 400
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Figure 5
Wetland Sketch

C-�
FIT
' wNENENEN
MMEMMMEM
w1rym�x�eN
a:iENEEEE
: � �M'i:;a'IEMMMMM®
MMMMM
NONE
NNE
EEE
MMM
-
NEE
' -
MEN
NNE
:'
WEE:n1rv1Ewwwww
EMloio
...EiNinNENEEEE
MgMEEE
mom
MMMMM►OMMMMM181MMMMMMM
MMMMMMrJMMMMMItIM
MMM®
0MMMMw��NONEl®VM
MMM
NNEN
Nr:�nE
s.E
ear
MMMM
EEEE
MMMM
:
MI�IIIIM
E
MBIlail�E
MMMM
E
MEM
EEE
www
11M
w
0
\
a"
v"
a
Cam=
a
s
gg

3.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
RCW SLOPES Assessment

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
February 5, 2022
Kim Williams
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Andrews Road
Dear Kim Williams:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-17072
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

� �
CO
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
M
M
n
M
CO
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
N
n
n
-0 C
(.C)
z
0
M
O ro
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
CJ
M
(3
0
�
0
N
Q
>
>
>
>
>
>
O
N
ro N
N
N
N
N
N
o
N m N
m
N m
N m N
m N
N
.O
CO +
O
+, f6
LF CO
C
C
C
C
C
LF CO
(n
W
W
W
W
W
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
°
in
—
N
N
N
N
N
�
N
N
N
N
N
CO
C
C
C
C
C
FY
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
N
C
C
C
C
C
—
W
W
W
W
W
N
i
�
7
7
7
7
7
7
°
>
>
�
0
7
°
7
O
o
J
N
N
N
N
N
N
I
i°
(D
i
O
O J
N
I
N
CO
u
C
N
+O
cn
CU
N
C
E
E
E W
W
X
W
r
r
W
U
r
r
W
W
Q
CD
co
I
I
CD
I
I
Q
O
N
O
O
N N
0) Co O
CO
W
c
O
(nQO
N
O
O
co
r0
(D Q9
N
O
Q9
O
O9
C9
Ln
N
N o I
o
O
�
O
0-)O
O
O
O
O
O
un
C 7
CO
Q
N
C) N
N
-
�
ob
O
O
N
Q9
C9
O
Q U
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
CO W Z
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CD
Q
a
CO
CO
0
CO
z
O
E
o
co°
O
N
a
cn
o
O
_
o
z
D
U
Q
c
-0�
>
U
CO
COh
°
CO
o
a o
a o
a o
a o
a�
n
-0
�
Cl
E
°
°
°
°
°
a CO
a
E
-
o°°°°°
��
o o
E
E
O
o
O
Q�(n
W
U
(n
W
Q
O
CO
NCO
in
in
_
CO
CO
U
°
tn
tn
tn
tn
tn
>
W
—
co
—
co
—
co
—
co
—
co
°
ro
+CO
c
CC3
c
O
c
a c
c
°
O o
a
a
a
a
a
o�
—
E
a°= a
z
X
�
°
�°
D
mo
E
c
o
v
0
v
0
v
0
v
0
v
E
o
o°
Co
o
a
a�
D
o
Q
a
a
a
a
a
Q
n
n�
(n
Q (o
uo
(n E
U n n n
co
z
o
O
O
O
O
NN
C9
(n
O-)
M
M
O
O
7
O
O
O
c-
O
O
CO
>
>_
>
> >
>
c
c
c
N
Q
�
i
N
i
N
c—
°
N c
� °
N
�
ro
E
2 E
W�
('J
Q
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C)
C) C)
C)2:
2:
Z
u
Z u

//
a a
e
r.
r.
\
/
/ /
t
%
o f
%
o 5
e
3
5
e s
3/
s
/
//
c o
-E m o
s u=
7
s .- e
s u u
CO
a s
u u
e e
e
CO/
®e®
/=
E/
o E/
o f o/
f o/\
CO
S=®
e=
e
e
g
p g
p
>
> e
e
\
\CO
//
s
�
/
>
E
E
«
CO
2
2
D
D
e
e
e
CO%
\
\
\
> o
/ /
\
/
� >
u
%
x
&
x
3
%
3
&
&
&
--
o e
©
/
3
} 2 a e
u
e / ./
/%I
b\
}\
CO Co
/
e
/
2
0
2
c
\
e
_
2
FY
CO
3 /
O
/
2
0
/
/
/
cc)
\
3
%
\
/
\
>
\ /
& ©
0
7
/
\
6
6
COCO\
4 ^ °
© ©
\
6
\
\
\
\
\
\
CO
\
\
©
\
\
N
2
®
\
u
\
%
%
\
`
0
�\
E2\
c
=
4
m
,
\
.0 .g =
\
\
/
0
0
u
0
mo
E
a)\
2/
E
E
»«
g
2
3 t e
_
�/
\
\
z
§
§
ƒ\��
»
y\/
/
2
}
®
\
\
\
\
$
/
/
/ \ 2
/
»
\
®
®
3
E
/
°
\ _
s
/
~
3
\
G ƒ
\
co
\
\
\
\
2 /
\
/ O \
E
E o
CO
s
o
4
s
o
CO
y
3
3
s
3
CO
s
CO
s
g
e
2
CO
e
2
e
/
g
k
CO
COCO
CO
»
E
\
Cl
CO
0
CO
/
\
\
6
/ E
\
>%
2
/
a
/
s
\
z
_
2
_
CO
0
CO
a
e
a
§
=
z
O
% CO
.g
J
/ §
E
\
u
e.9
e.9
O
CO
±
s
E
3
%3%3
e
k
? U
\
_ /
%
$
CO
/
e
e e e
=
?
-F-
D-
E
\ e
\
2
CO
Co
\
\
e (
e t
e 9/
s
>
w s
E CO
m
e s
=
s
t
e
z
e
s
s
a s a
\
s
u
e$
E.e
= O
/
2/\/
4 y
e
3
z
>\>\
D
~ e
us
Csesssss
w
eE
o
3
2
e>e>
s
/
=
a®6
0
o
g
2
/
/
0
E
= _
/\\
©
} \
3
©
»
\
&
a
g
o
a
E
e
=
e
2
\
/
/
\
/
%
\
/
\
/
\ /
o
\ \
/ o
e
v
a
e
a
a
o
c o
—_
E
/
e / ( CO
/
>
>
>
> CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
\
} \
±
± } \ z
\
\
\
\
\
\
%
\
\
/
\
\
\
\ \
4
\
\
\ >
®
// z
2 E
2
E 2
E 2
= e
E 5
e
5
e
5
e
5
e
5
e
5
—
2`(
e
e
e_ 2
e�®
E 0/
D E
E 2
E 2
E/
u
u
u
u
u
2\>%
///>\
//\
\/
\/////>
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO\/\
///\/
ra
s
/

N
Q
o co CC3
CC3 CC3
+ + N N N
O (n (n LL LL LL
C
7
LL
N
CO
CO E
N CO
Q �
+ CO
u J
U
a
z
U
z
0
cn U
z
C
N CO
E
N �7
C Q
O
CO 0
CO
cn
E
0
U
c �
E
C) N LL
0E(-D
C) Co co
cnz
co c
N N �
Q Qco
N N �
co
Co Co J
C C-
CU CU U
�2:z
C
7
LL
N
r0 N N N
0 0 0
> > >
CO
J .—
U���
z���
u co co co
z Ln Ln
o LL LL LL
U (n (n (n
z »
N
CO
C
0
CO
N
U
N
C
CO
CO
0
C
0
0
U
z
0
U
z
N
7
CO
z
0 �o
� 0
o
0
LL N N N n
E E E a
N N N CO
CO N N N +
Q Q Q
-.0E0 M M M cn>
co I I I N
J i cn
Z n n n U
r
G
u

`
!y
w
q Vie,.
py
�S
d
O
Q9'Da 7dO 9
yy�4.�]�l
•S�'�1.�IIef•Li`R4•dq' %.•0�e�t�
as
1
� z
w
o z �
m T
U ❑
C 0 L`
❑ Q y Q
(Ny
o
� a �
M
p� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
IL
r
J,
N
a

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. -\ r
Location 10,V
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly. '
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species
and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Clams
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
SAT
NAME STATUS
N 1�
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of th`e�
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
COO
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly aus plexippus
Whereverfound
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered

Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
Endangered
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves. 1\4
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
-and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory girds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data data mapping (Tip:

enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
.....................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
........................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETII�dE I
............................................................ ... .......
THE TIMEFRAME Sf�ECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
......................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
............ .....................................B....................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
TS ENTIORANGE. "BREEDS
.........................................................................
HERE" INDICATES THAT THE
.................................................................
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
..........................................................................................
YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus�
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
M
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Breeds May 1 to Sep 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
//ecis.fws. ov/ec /s ecies/6177
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project interse s,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, anxS
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activitie nr
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in -your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birpotentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. #
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory ird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derive rom a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
40 x
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
Tits, what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
ro (d), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if
you re unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information om
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
i
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
1
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report 0%
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your proj ct a, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; rnot your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey efforr #is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm pretence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
mealures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME

Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very
large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at
this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaiss Iel information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analys of hi%inherent
altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margom c e r in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may res in evision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine t6da e source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may havesin e the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundariesi i ations between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions <00
,000
Certain wetland habitats Je excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
SNme deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
The habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.

SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
September 2021
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Appendix B — Red -cockaded Woodpecker Effects Determination Key
Note that when the USACE is the lead federal agency for a project, it is responsible for determining (1) the
ESA action area for that project and (2) the effects to federally listed species and/or designated critical
habitat. Please contact the appropriate USACE representative for any questions as to the action area or
the effects determination (for a list of USACE representatives, please see the contact list at http://saw-
req.usace.army.mil/FO/PMList.pdf). The USFWS is available to offer technical assistance to prospective
permittees for proposed actions, to include providing guidance on species presence in the action area and
how the proposed action is likely to affect the species and/or designated critical habitat.
ORM2 No.:
USFWS Reference No. (if applicable):
Date
1) Is the action area' located within the RCW consultation area (see Appendix A and project -specific
results from a project -specific IPaC or internal USACE GIS review)?
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................................go to 2
b) No...................................................................................................................................................No effect'
2) Is the action area' located in the northeastern coastal plain (see Appendix A)?
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................................go to 3
b) No (the project is located in piedmont, sandhills, or southeastern coastal plain)..................go to 4
3) Is the action area' located in a forested area with pine trees present in northeast North Carolina (e.g.,
high pocosin, Atlantic white cedar, nonriverine swamp forests, pond pine woodland, coastal fringe
evergreen forest, wet successional pine/pine-hardwood forest, or pine plantation or uplands)? If yes,
are the pine trees greater than 30 years of age (if stand age is not readily determined, refer to Table
1 for a description of the minimum dbh of 30-year-old pines associated with each community type).
If the answer to both of these questions is yes, choose Yes below. If the answer to one or both
questions is no, then choose No below.
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................................go to 8
b) No................................................................................................................................................... No effect'
4) Is the action area' located within suitable RCW foraging or nesting habitat (pine or pine/hardwood
stands in which 50% or more of the dominant trees are pines and the dominant pine trees are 30
years of age or older or >_8-inches dbh')?
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................................go to 5
b) No...................................................................................................................................................No effect'
Uplands within the site have been timbered and now support a sparse canopy of oaks. Wetlands
support hardwoods. Attached are site photos from December of 2020.
5) Will any activity in the action area' remove trees equal to or greater than 8 inches dbh; or occur within
200 feet of known RCW cavity trees? If unable to determine the location of a cavity tree with
confidence, contact the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office.
a) Yes.......................................................................................................................................................go to 6
b) No.........................................................................................................................................................NLAA'
6) Is the action area located in suitable RCW nesting habitat (in the sandhills and piedmont: pine or
pine/hardwood stands that contain pines 60 years in age or older or >_10 inches dbh; in the
PIN

SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
September 2021
southeastern coastal plain: pine or pine/hardwood stands that contain pines >_8 inches dbh, including
but not limited to pine flatwoods, pocosin, pine savannah, upland pine/hardwood)?
a) Yes........................................................................................................................................................go to 9
b) No.........................................................................................................................................................go to 7
7) Does suitable nesting habitat occur within 0.5 miles of suitable foraging habitat that would be
impacted by any activity in the action area?
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................................go to 9
b) No.........................................................................................................................................................NLAA3
8) Refer to Table 1 in the SLOPES for the northeastern North Carolina habitat type in the action area. Are
pine trees with a dbh equal to or greater than that shown in Table 1 proposed to be removed in the
action area', or is the action area' within 200 feet of a cavity tree? If the answer to either of these
questions is yes, chose Yes below. If unable to determine the location of a cavity tree with confidence,
then contact the USFWS Raleigh Field Office.
a) Yes......................................................................................................................................................go to 9
b) No.........................................................................................................................................................NLAA3
9) Contact the appropriate USACE representative for a pre -application meeting to determine if a survey
is necessary (for a list of USACE representatives please see the contact list at http://saw-
reg.usace.army.mil/FO/PM List.pdf). Note that project -specific information, such as a delineation of
waters of the U.S. and project plans, may be needed for the USACE to determine the action area(s)'
of the project. If a survey is required and agreed to by the applicant, all suitable RCW nesting habitat
within 0.5 miles of the action area should be surveyed according to USFWS protocol for the presence
of RCW cavity trees'. If the applicant is unwilling or unable to conduct the survey, standard
consultation with the USFWS should begin. Such surveys are conducted by running line transects
through stands and visually inspecting all medium-sized and large pines for evidence of cavity
excavation by RCWs. Transects must be spaced so that all trees are inspected and are run north -south.
Was a survey performed?
a) Yes, a survey was performed, and RCW cavity trees were observed.......................................go to 10
b) Yes, a survey was performed, no RCW cavity trees were observed, and the USFWS agreed with
thesurvey results................................................................................................................................NLAA3
c) No, after conversations with the USFWS the USACE determined that a survey was not
necessary.............................................................................................................................................. N LAA3
d) No, a survey was not performed..........................................................................Consultation required'
10) Does the project involve a disturbance (e.g., seismic activity, percussive activity, all -terrain vehicle or
other off -road vehicle use, motorized equipment, forest management or similar disturbance) within
the 200-foot cavity tree buffer, and/or removal or damage to RCW cavity trees (e.g., via root
compaction, soil compaction)? If yes to either or both then consultation is required.
a) Yes............................................................................................................................Consultation required'
b) No......................................................................................................................................................go to 11
11) Has a foraging habitat analysis (FHA)' been conducted to determine whether enough foraging habitat
would remain for each RCW group post -project? For information on how to conduct an FHA, refer to
the "Procedures for Determining Foraging Habitat Availability' and the Private Land Guidelines.'
13

SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
September 2021
a) Yes, the FHA has been submitted to the USFWS for concurrence' and the USFWS concurred that
adequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post-project..........................................NLAA'
b) Yes, and review of the FHA by the USACE along with concurrence from USFWS determined
inadequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post -project.......... Consultation required'
c) No, an FHA has not been conducted..................................................................Consultation required'
'Please contact the appropriate USACE representative for any questions as to the size of the action area. For a list of USACE
representatives please see the contact list at.http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/FO/PMList.pd .
2No effect — The proposed project would result in no effect to this species and/or its federally designated critical habitat (if
applicable). Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville Ecological Services field offices is not necessary for the
project as described.
3NLAA—The proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect this species and/or its designated critical habitat (if
applicable). NLAA determinations for projects made pursuant to this key require no further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh
and Asheville Ecological Services field offices, therefore, consultation is considered complete for this species. For General Permits,
a Pre -Construction Notification will be required for all NLAA determinations.
4Follow link to USFWS RCW Recovery Plan, Appendix 4 for additional information on nesting and foraging habitats, and survey
protocol (https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecovery/files/RecovervPlan/survey protocol.pdf)
5Consultation required — Contact the USACE to begin this consultation process. For a list of USACE representatives please see the
contact list at http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/FO/PMList.pdf. Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville
Ecological Services field offices is necessary to discern if the activity would result in a "no effect," "not likely to adversely affect,"
or "likely to adversely affect' determination.
6Follow links for additional information on conducting FHA (https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecoverv/matrix.html) and for
determining foraging habitat availability(https://www.fws.gov/ncsandhills/files/fha data collection procedures.pdf).
'Follow link for additional information regarding determination for adequate amount of foraging habitat
(https://www.fws.gov/rcwrecoverv/files/RecovervPlan/private lands guidelines.pdf).
8 FHA — When an FHA is conducted, the USACE must provide the FHA to USFWS for review and concurrence.
Additional Information
14

SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
September 2021
Appendix C — Conservation Recommendations
These recommendations are optional and, if implemented, would support the agency's goals toward
recovery. These recommendations are to be used at the discretion of the permittee, but any measures that
avoid and minimize effects to the species are highly encouraged by the USFWS.
1. Minimize project impacts within clusters and foraging habitat whenever possible (i.e., conduct large
pine removal outside of nesting season [April 1 to July 31], trim branches instead of complete tree
removal, switch building plans to retain large pines).
2. The USFWS strongly recommends that occupied habitats be avoided and preserved. The first measure
is to modify the project footprint to avoid direct impacts to RCW habitat. This habitat could be
designated as an environmentally sensitive area and set aside by deed restriction, easement, or
another protective covenant. If the occupied habitat on the property exceeds 5 acres (2 hectares),
then a habitat management plan is also recommended. Incorporating these recommendations into
the project design and documenting them in the habitat management plan might result in the project
being not likely to adversely affect the RCW.
3. On -site habitat enhancements are recommended by the USFWS in situations where a project
proposes to impact occupied RCW habitat. If the site has been physically altered by exotic species
invasion, lack of fire, or other anthropogenic actions, these alterations have produced on -site habitat
conditions that have resulted in marginally suitable habitats for RCW's survival and propagation. The
planned action, through project redesign, has avoided impacting a substantial portion of the habitat;
however, some habitat loss will still occur. The project proposes on -site habitat enhancements and
management actions that provide habitat quality improvements that balance losses of small amounts
of marginally suitable habitats. Incorporating these recommendations into the project and
documenting them in a habitat management plan can result in the project being not likely to adversely
affect the RCW.
4. Remove vines and thick underbrush/mid-story to improve site suitability.
5. Provision starts and/or completed cavities in suitable large pines to provide additional housing
opportunities to an RCW cluster.
15

View of the road frontage of the property facing east.
View of the southern portion of the property facing
north.
Phase I ESA ILMG
Andrews Road Tract Site Documentation
200 Andrews Road LANDMA. 'JI;XTGROU' Photos
Fayetteville, NC oa r* —N.a
i nnrr')n AG❑ December N.

View of the central portion of the property facing
northeast.
View of the barn located in the southern portion of the
property facing north.
Phase I ESA ILMG
Andrews Road Tract Site Documentation
200 Andrews Road LANDMA. 'JI;XTGROU' Photos
Fayetteville, NC oA * —N.a
i nnrr')n AG❑ December 2020

Typical view of the stream features located on the
property.
View of the pond located in the northeastern portion
of the property facing northwest.
Phase I ESA ILMG
Andrews Road Tract Site Documentation
200 Andrews Road LANDMA. 'JI;XTGROU' Photos
Fayetteville, NC oA * —N.a
i nnrr')n AG❑ December 2020

4.0 MITIGATION CREDIT AVAILABILITY LETTER

HOLDINGS*
Stream & Riparian Wetland Credit Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 04 Watershed
February 8, 2022
The Landing on Andrews, LLC
2919 Breezewood Rd; Suite 100
Fayetteville, NC 28303
Attn: Mr. David Vannoy
RE: Availability of Stream and Riparian Wetland Credits for the "The Landing on Andrews" project
Bank Name: Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Site: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Permittee: The Landing on Andrews, LLC
Stream Credits Needed: 578.00 LF
Stream Credits Available: (anticipated March 2022—1,202.40 LF)
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 0.50 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: (anticipated March 2022 —1.392 acres)
Cape Fear 03030004 River Basin
Dear Mr. Vannoy,
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC will have sufficient stream and riparian wetlands credits from the Middle
Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site to satisfy the mitigation
requirements related to the above -mentioned project. Upon final approval by the IRT, the Daniels Creek
Mitigation Site is anticipated to receive its next credit release before the end of March 202Z this will
fulfill the total mitigation requirement for stream and riparian wetland credits for the above -mentioned
project. The project is located within the Cape Fear HUC 03030004 watershed.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. This letter is not a
guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first serve basis. An invoice for this
transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve both the credits and price
quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
within the 404 permit approving the mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your
payment to Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
[phone] x124 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Ashley N. Yarsinske
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Marketing & Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 124
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Liz Hair I USACE —Wilmington District
Ms. Kim Williams, Section Manager I Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203