HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070115 Ver 1_401 Application_20070107ID-ATLANTIC
A S S O C I AT E S, I N C.
EngineerinK & Environmental Solutions
409 Rogers View Court /Raleigh /North Carolina /27610
800-486-7568/919-250-9918/919-250-9950 Facsimile 2 ~ 0 ,l ~ 1 1
www maaonlin~com
January 9, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
401NVetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject: PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) APPLICATION FORM
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION
WETDECK ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
10475 BOSTON ROAD
ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC PROJECT NO. R1650.04
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of Louisiana Pacific Corporation (LP), Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. (Mid-Atlantic)
respectfully submits the attached Pre Construction Notification (PCN) form (with attachments).
This application is submitted in conjunction with the proposed construction of a wet deck log
storage facility at the above referenced site. LP conducted an extensive evaluation of
alternative means of operating a wet deck log storage facility. This evaluation led to the
conclusion that anon-discharging recycle system was an economically and environmentally
favorable method for operating the wet deck log storage facility. On December 28, 2006, LP
submitted a permit application to operate a Wastewater Recycle Facility at the subject site.
The proposed Wastewater Recycle Facility was designed to meet the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2T .01000. In order to accommodate site constraints and meet the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2T .01000, the wastewater recycle system design impacts a wetlands area. The total
proposed impact area is 0.07 acres.
We have enclosed six copies of this cover letter, the application form and supporting
documentation. One copy has been sent to Eric Alsmeyer with the United States Army Corps
of Engineers.
i,
1j Y r
PCN Form
Louisiana Pacific Facility
Roxboro, North Carolina
January 9, 2007
Page 2
We appreciate your consideration of this application. If you have any questions concerning the
contents of this application, please do not hesitate to call us at 250-9918.
Sincerely,
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Daniel H. Nielsen, PE
Principal Engineer
~~~
Darin M. McClure, PE
Principal Engineer
Attachment: Pre Construction Notification Form (with Attachments)
cc: Mr. Ross Reed, LP
1650.04/ Cover Letter for PCN/DHN/aso
~ID-ATLANTIC
ASSOCIATES.IKC.
Office Use Only: Form Version Mazch OS
20070 1 1 5
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
fir any parncuiar item is not appticable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~° ', ' . 7
Name:_ Louisiana Pacific Corporation
Mailing Address: 10475 Boston Road ~-rr~ - ~ ~ - r~~,.,-~~.;
Roxboro, North Carolina 27874
Attention: Ross Reed
Telephone Number: 336-589-8080 Fax Number: 336-599-5153
E-mail Address:__ Ross.Reednlpcom.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Daniel H. Nielsen
Company Affiliation: Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 409 Ro>?ers View Court
Raleigh North Carolina 27610
Telephone Number: 919-250-9918 Fax Number: 919-250-9950
E-mail Address: dnielsen(a,MAAonline.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, .the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wet Deck Environmental Compliance
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 20560
4. Location
County: Person Nearest Town: Roxboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Approximately 10 miles
north of Roxboro on US 501 (Boston Road). Left side (west) of US 501
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.5189 °N 78.9167 °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 240 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Tributary to Bowes Creek
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is developed to manufacture Oriented Strand Board
(OSB).
Page 6 of 13
.~
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of the construction of a wet deck. Durin non-operational times water is
stored in a holding_pond. When the wet deck is operational water is pumped from the pond
through sprinkler nozzles onto lo~s_By rgravity the water flows through the lo~,piles and on
to the ground. The water is then collected and routed back to the pond.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the svstem is to preserve logs in
storage through a wet deck operation that operates in a closed loop recycle svstem.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On September 14, 2006, Eric Alsmeyer of USAGE, conducted field
verification of wetlands at the subject site. As of January 3 2007 the jurisdictional
determination has not been received from USAGE.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Fill wetlands area of 0.07 acres
for dam of wet deck rec cle water holdin ond.
Page 7 of 13
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flnndir,u
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
T e of Im act
yp p Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Flood lain
p
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
W-7 Fill, dam structure Forested No 700 0.07
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.07
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.6 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea~e_ multiply length x w;drh then ~Ii.,;.iA t,.~ dz can
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name - - - -- - ------
Type of Impact -- - ---- -~~ ~
Perennial o~
Intermittent. . .. ~...wa, .,aavaa M
Average
Stream Width
Before Im act a r aMV V T/,/
Impact
Length
linear feet V V.
Area of
Impact
acres
None
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred~in~_ floodin~_ drainage hnikhaarlc etr
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact .,,
Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.
Area of
Impact
acres
None
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 8 of 13
~ r
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect~
Stream Im act (acres): 0
Wetland Im act acres : 0.07
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.07
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Dam
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Recycle water storage for wet deck
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: OSB manufacturing
Size of watershed draining to pond: 17.6 Expected pond surface area: 1.1 acres
(wet deck only)
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Initially, LP conducted an
En~ineerin~ Alternatives Analysis (EAA) to determine the technically feasible alternatives for
operating a wet deck at their Roxboro facility. The EAA determined that treatment and discharge
of the wet deck run off was feasible only in a literal sense since the run off would require
treatment to a very high level prior to discharge to the "zero flow" stream system available at the
subiect site. The EAA also established that run off from the wet deck could be disposed into the
Roxboro POTW or could be land applied. Both of these alternatives proved to be extremely
costly. The EAA concluded that the best option was a rec c~ystem The requirements of 15
NCAC 2T mandate that recycle systems must have the capacity to retain a 25-year 24-hour
storm. For the subiect site, this requirement adds substantially to the size of the required storage
pond. Good enQineerin~ practice suggests that desi ping systems to rely on ravity flow
Page 9 of 13
(opposed to lift stational to return water to the stora,.ge pond is advisable Systems desi ng ed in
this fashion are failsafe but are dependent on local topog_raphy and stringent citin ig s required
The pond sizing requirements and the desire for a failsafe desien vielded one location suitable
for the storage pond. This location is coincident with the upstream edge of a wetlands area The
designers have carefully evaluated ways to avoid impacting the wetland Ultimately there was
insufficient topographic relief to avoid the wetlands and still produce a failsafe design The
impact was minimized by reducins the size of the wet deck 15% to 20% However the design
includes the construction of the dam of the storage pond over 0 07 acres of wetlands
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
Page 10 of 13
~~ ,
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
(919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Page 11 of 13
~~
Zone* Impact
s ware feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the neaz bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Approximately 22 acres of the 240 acre site is
impervious (~9%) and will not change as a result of this project As required for recycles sty ems
the wet deck is designed to retain the 24-hour 25-year storm without discharse
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This recycle system will not generate a wastewater discharge
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This is
a stand alone industrial proiect designed to replace an existing wet deck Cumulative impacts are
not conceivable at this time.
Page 12 of 13
~~
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/-~~~
Applicant/Age~(it's Siature Date "
(Agent's signature is valid onl if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
~~
a
rttrtntrvt,tJ:
1. CLUSTER SPRINGS, VA-NC DIGITAL RASTER GRAPHIC, USGS.
SCANNED FROM 1:24,000-SCALE CLUSTER SPRINGS, VA-NC TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP, PUBLISHED 1968, PHOTOREVISED 1987, USGS.
2. INSET MAP DIGITAL DATA FROM BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION
STATISTICS, WASHINGTON, D.C.
SCALE: 1:12,000
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
SITE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DRAWN
Bye EBA
D-ATLANTIC
A S S O C I A T E S
I N c WET DECK
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE DRAFT
CHECK:
_~
_.
3ng~neering .~ Environmen!cl Solul~ons LOUISIANA PACIFIC
ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA ENG.
t7Mti
CHECK:
DATE:
JANUARY200
JOB NO:
DOOR 1650.04
GIS NO:
01G-R1650.04-1
DWG NO: 1
' ~~ r~: s, ;~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY .~ '~ :- .~ +
~.., _. ,.~, ,e.~ h.. r;rte ~ ~~ ~ _
- ~. ~.
;~` "
~~w ~'' ~' ` FIRE ~ ~ J
.a.~POND ;.s ~, ~m _,..
i
..:e- ARE ~ .. '
/ «..
i ~ .' ! ~ RECYCLE ~ `~ ,.~,: ~~ ~: 7
~.:k.~. POND 6fr f ~~ .!~ .,*~ '~c _ t^
~ ~ - ~ ~: p .. .. ~.
- ~ 3 + +~
,` 1
~ ~ - ~ \r ~~.~ t,~11'~ ~r ~ ~ FORMER e~' `~~. &_ j ~~ '~~t#i -
{ ~
UPPER ~ ~ ~ ~ '~. °,~..
~~~ ~ _ -* , ~ r ~' ~ ~~ EEAVER' r EXISTING"`
r<;?,~ ~' POND,' -y ~ ,~T,P` POND ~ DRY STORAGE ~ ~~i=~, -tom
~ ~ a- 4 _ _ ~" .~r~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ AREA ~~ ~ ...•• "' ~•. ~.
Wis.. ' / ~, +lil~ ~ ~. .~' ' ..,,~,
~ ~~ ~ ~ `8`~ ~ -~ ~+EXISTING~~•~• r ~ s1~r ~ k ~_,~~, ,'~s ! ~ 'v ~ ~
`K ~ ' ~ ~ WET DECK ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ;~'t. ~..' " mac.. ..
~` , r y.R~+ ~ AREA ~ ~- ~ ~ . `~ ~, ~ ~„a.r a .
`for «,ti, ~ ,~~s.. U.S. ROUTt
ti ~~
s
~'~ ~ ~ ~~~ a~ ~ '~ y, r \ 15 - 501
~ ~, _ ~,
~~ ~ ~ ~ s.. ~ •~• ~.,~~ .e _- ti PLANNED ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;»~
t~ ~ .< ~ ~•~• , ~.~~ WET DECKS ~~~~~'
~y ~~ ` . ,~~ ~ STORAGE POND„ _. ~„ i~ ~r~,I
-~ a~~~,~ ~; ~ LEGEND
...,..~. - 3 ~ ~ ~
.~~ L WOODYS STORE RD (SR 1327) ~.~~ '~~i ~'; ~ p. •, ~++.~ ,;~• --- Approximate Pond Boundary
*~~; ,~' ~ _ t'~'~'-.~'~,;~,,~~'"`~~ r'~` -Jurisdictional Stream
~~„ `'...*~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ - ~~~ - ,~ ~ ~ .~ ~- °- Jurisdictional Wetland
x~"t •+~ ~' `~ ~~ . ~ ~'~~ ,~'~~ ~ 1. ~ Existing Operational Areas
,~ `~•~
°~- ~ v' ,~;=._ ,~_,~~ ~,;~,. ~ ~+~ ~< ~ ~ i_-~ Proposed Operational Area
REFERENCE:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FIGURE 2,
PROJECT ER05245.01, MARCH 2006. SCALE: ~ :7,2~~
DISCLAIMER: INFORMATION REPRESENTED ON THIS MAP WAS DERIVED FROM
SECONDARY DATA SOURCES AND IS TO BE USED FOR GENERAL PLANNING Feet
PURPOSES ONLY. NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ACCURACY ARE
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. O F)OO ~ ,'Z~Q
SITE FEATURES MAP DRAWN DATE:
~I~ID-ATLANTIC BY: EBA JANUARY 2007
WET DECK DRAFT JOB NO:
ASSOCIATES , I N C . ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE CHECK: OOOR1650.04
El:grn2ereng C Envnonrientcl Solntlons LOUISIANA PACIFIC ENG. GISNO:
ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA CHECK: DMM 01G-R1650.04-5
APPROVAL: DHN DWG NO: 2
,~
Y r
..
v
i i ; ~'4 ,, y, 111 3~4.~ ~ ~.. ^~\\\
~` ~ ~R
.. . .
' :_":
~ ,y7 ~., +/ .. `
~ ~'~ .»' y. •- ~"s ,r ,.~;'i~ ',...,.fir. _ _ ~ ' _...: • ~ ~ ,~,~,
~_, 'f { ` FIRE °+;
~~ N ~ ,~ w~ ^~ `\ s ~ ~ ~ ' 'A'te r 4R ....r F
t. ~r ~ ~ .RECYCLE - ; - ~'~"
~^~F, t .. POND ~v" ` r „ ~ ,ti ~ y~l+' F. e_
~ * ~ ry ~' ~ ~~ ~ it ~ r~ ~ ~
.,..w• ~ •. y. ;
. ~ "'~
~'~ UPPER ~ v.A r~ '~ W6 '~'i~"t,~. ""'i r,... ~ '®u r ,.1
."h~.. POND ~, .~~. ry~~t - k..' FORMER t., ~ ~~.~;~~'~._ .rte;: .~
~ a;
~`~ W4 f ~a t~ ~ ~~ 4. BEAVER .. .~'gi~~ -
a r a'• ~' LEGEND
w i R v.
_~'~ '` '~ °' '~-,~a~'° . a;;~ -Approximate Pond Bounda
.:~~~'~ar. t ~e .~~~. - -Jurisdictional Stream
D,s~la ner. Informal on represented on Ih s map W" fervcJ f v r Z p ~
~`~~` R ` Jurisdictional Wetland
secondary daU sources and 's to he used for g I planning ` ~~r ~' r+~ .~ ~
purposes only. No warranties or representalwns Maccuracy are ~'~~ '' -, ~ Approximate Property Boundary
expressed orimphed. s
REFERENCE:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FIGURE 2, SCALE: 1:7,200
PROJECT ER05245.01, MARCH 2006.
Feet
0 600 1,200
D
A SITE WETLANDS MAP DRAWN
BY: EBA DATE:
JANUARY 2007
-
TLANTIC WET DECK DRAFT JOB NO:
ASSOCIATES
I N C ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE CHECK: OOOR1650.04
.
.
Pngtneerfng cC• Snvuonmentnl So Citrons LOUISIANA PACIFIC ENG.
DMM GIS NO:
ROXBORO
NORTH CAROLINA CHECK: 01G-R1650.04-4
, APPROVAL: DHN DWG NO: 3
~~ ~ '~, PRIMARY RETURN FLOW AND
STORM WATER DITCH -
5X SLOPE
APPRO%IMATEI
Y UNIFORM 0
~ ~f ~ I
~ ,f I
~ ` ~
o
0
O
0
~ ~ ARE
(~ Y i ~ .
.
8' WIDE TRAPEZOIDAL CROSS-SECTION ~~ ,~, , ;
s
,
Ck rir~~~~
~ -~~~%~1
, ~ - SJ~Rq~~. ~ r ~~~r~~~~rr ~ ~
~
o
~
~
I
o
~ I C~i A~ Y q
~~
~ .
~- ~
~. o~y ` ~ , ll r ~ '' ~~~ ~
~,,,, E. l,r ~ ~ O ,~'
s r
~
, I.II
J ~
;~
I%/
~ z
-\
L0 ~
DECN~.~A~
WE1 D iORAGE ~ ~
J
~q IMPACTED
0,07 AC.
WETLANDS PROPOSED PUMP `~'~ `~ 1
,;"'~Jy l~r' ~
/ % ".
i
~1~
~ ~~ ~ ~
z O
~
Q O
Z
U
,~--Z~_---
~ _
~ NO w
HOUSE .
?r Q p 3
.
~,_ --~- ®
~ ~ ~ D -~ U D
' ~
~ ~
L DRIVE ~`
~
~
~ - ~ ~
~ ~
~ `
; ~
..~ Q Q4 ~
i~ 2 1y
~
- `
k '
~`, r
~ ~`' WETLAND W- `~ ~ ''+ ~. ~ v
'
` N
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~\\
~?>
, ~~. ; ~,
Q~1r 5400
`
~~;;~ W >
~~ ~~~ ~
~ \ `~ `'C ~
, ~ rk
<~
~ .
~J ~ l~ ^
. ~ 3 Z
~ ~
a
~ ~
~~
ma ~
i~ i ~
GR ~ a
,-,
y, ~,r ~
°`+,~ ~ r
%%
' /
~ t .. _ - S
., ~ y~~F
L
~ . !
%
~
' / ~
L ~
~`` U
\ `e.
,\` \ ~
•
`~;, \ `<, ~.,
~ ~ • A~, ~ G
~~~
~~~
~,,.
DROP INLET ~` ~ _ ~
RUtTE 512.8 ---
.
,. ,_
~.
.,
'~` `
--= ~ ~, '~
-
-
p O ~ ~ ¢
z o v v
~
1
-.
`~~~
'`~ ~ ~INV~5672 ~ %~~ '~, ~
~ - ~ ~ U U a z
w ~
i
~~
~ ~r o~,
'~ ¢
.
.>
~ ~
DROP INLET ~~
GRATE 5}4.7 ~ ~'~'`~., ~o r;
~
INV 5691.
~
ti
,'~
/
1 ~'~
3 C~ O Q ¢ ~
°w ? ~ ~ Q
No z z
~
w O
~
O
\
~
,
~ ~~, ~ /
~,~,
~
,~
,~;,~. - p
3
~
~ ?
'' f
~ ~h
/ '~ '
BEGINNING PRIMARY RETURN
` ~ OHO
a ~ m
D
~ \
~'` •
I,,~
~ .- IdV 581,0 ~o' ~
'/ ~ ~
~
~ ~ FLOW AND STORM WATER Z O
~ ~
¢
~~ --~-~-INV 583.5- ~
aRr
~ r aTCH STA 0+00
~ ~ ELEU 5512' w o
o ,
~
f
~ ~ ~ /
~_ (~
z
~
.:,
~,, r; ~
`~`~~~~~ ~~~ ' ?~~ .,'~/~'/f ~
~ ~ ~'~ ~ "`•~ ,~/i
T ~~ L
LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER LINE SHOWN
IS APPROXIMATE. FIELD VERIFY LOCA110N OF
~ V ~
~ ~ ~~
p
c~
~-
~~` ,
~.
r • ;;
~~ '~ "`''"
`°~~ EXISTING WATER LINE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION
FURNISH AND
ND CONSTRUCTION
FOR
~
0 z
~~ f, -~ ,:. ~
~
~ ~ ~
,~ ,
PO
INSTALL NEW WATER UNE FROM NEW PUMPS
AS REQUIRED.
U1 ~1
W ~ w
w
z
~
- ~
, ~ ~
R1327 60' R ~~~ ~ ; ~ w
---- -~
~ ~
\
~
~ I V ~~
'~ :~~~ ~
~
~
~ ~ W O
cn
~
,~ ~ I ~~~
A
~~ ,~
z
w
'~
0 120'
SCALE: ,~_ 120' ~ w
~