The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140236 Ver 1_Application_20140311.�� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY GOVERNOR March 11, 2014 Mr. Steven Kichefski Asheville Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 ANTHONYJ.TATA SECRE]'ARY SUBJECT: Pipe ReplacemenUSecondary Road Paving, 55`h Ave.1VE (SR 1697), Catawba CounTy Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Cazolina Department of Transportation (NCDO'1� requests authorization to replace an 18"pipe in conjuncfion with a secondary road paving project on SR 1697 (55`h Ave. NE) in Catawba County. At station 6+ 50, NCDOT proposes to replace an existing 28-foot, 18" RCP with 40-foot, 30" RCP. NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating 28 fooT, 18" RCP with a 40 foot, 30" RCP. The existing pipe is perched and on a 3.5% slope. The stream is piped immediately upstream and downstream of the road crossing. Due to the existing site conditions, the new pipe will be placed at existing stream bed elevation and a�5 foot rock ladder will be constructed aT the outlet for limited aquatic passage. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed azound the pipe inlet and outlet for sttucture stabilization. A jurisdictional ditchline is located on the south side of The roadway. Due to minor road realignment, the jurisdictional ditchline will be filled, which will result in an additional 60 feet of impacts for the road paving projecY. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction site, as needed. Areas affected by temporary cofferdam sysYem wil1 be restored to pre- project condirions. The scope of work will permanently impact 82 feet of two unnamed tributaries to Lake Hickory, which is classified as a WS-V & B waYershed by the N.C. Water Quality Secrion. The project is not located wiihin % mile of any crirical watershed area nor is SR 1697 a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin checklist. The proposed project has been reviewed for cultural resources (ProjecY Tracking # 12-09-0021) - l0/18/12(Archaeology) and 9/26/12 (Historic Architecture). This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project threaYened/endangered species. The federally listed species for Catawba County (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include dwarf SR 1697, 55�' Ave. NE Page 2 March 12, 201A flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan�ora) and schweinita's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). National Heritage Program records document the nearest heartleaf location 3.2 miles southwest of the proposed project area. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy azeas near springheads. There is no suitable habitat in The proposed project area and no heartleaf species was observed within the project footprint Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest Hellanthus Schweinitzii location approximately 16.5 miles southeast of the proposed project area. Although Yhe survey was conducted outside of the opfimal survey window, no plants were observed and the site is located in a regularly maintained NCDOT right of way in a residential neighbarhood; therefore, no impact on the species is anticipated. I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned acrivities, and locarion maps relative to the project. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows: • Work order number: 150460-55120000-12.2 0 1 821-3 1 26 • TIP#: NA • Project Category: $240.00 Fee If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Respectfully yours, Reuben Chandler, P.E. Acring Division Engineer Twelfth Division BY: ��i� �c�Lfi�t—� l Trish Beam Division 12 Environmental Supervisor Enclosures o� fwnrF9pc v�� iv 7 �� Q T Office Use Only: Corps adion ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10.2008 Pre-Construction Noti�cation PCN Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certifcation: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: SR 1697 2b. County: Catawba 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hickory 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 12201821 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Reuben Chandler, Acting Division Engineer 4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020 4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 4h. Email address: rchandler@ncdot.gov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Trish Beam 5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street Sd. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044 5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 5g. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.809 Longitude: - 81.245 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: <.10 acres permit site; secondary road paving = 1.9 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Ut to Lake Hickory proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classifcation of nearest receiving water: WS-V & B 2c. River basi n: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: A deteriorating perched pipe on a unpaved secondary road. Landuse is mostly residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace the deteriorating pipe and bring the unpaved road up to paved road standards for the safety of the travelling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating 28 foot, 18" RCP with a 40 foot, 30" RCP. The existing pipe is perched and on a 3.5% slope. The stream is piped immediately upstream and downstream of the road crossing. Due to the existing site conditions, the new pipe will be placed at existing stream bed elevation and a-5 foot rock ladder will be constructed at the outlet for limited aquatic passage. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed around the pipe inlet and outlet for structure stabilization. A jurisdictional ditchline is located on the south side of the roadway. Due to road realignment, the jurisdictional ditchline will be filled, which will result in an additional 60 feet of impacts for the road paving project. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction site, as needed. Areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored to pre-project conditions. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.) 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or o6tained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by Division 12 DEO. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. Ifyes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ Na ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3 b. 3c. 3 d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, Width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P � T Increase in culvert UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 12` length Hickory � INT � DWQ Rock LaddedRiprap for UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps S2 � P❑ T Structure Hickory � INT � DWQ 1.5 10` Stabilization S3 ❑ P� T Cofferdam bypass UT to Lake ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 60 pumping Hickory � INT � DWQ S4 ❑ P � T Fill (Jurisdictional 2nd UT to Lake ❑ PER ❑ Corps 1 60" Ditch) Hickory � INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts `82 3i. Comments:'Total Permanent Impacts Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑P�T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4£ Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. Sc. 5d. Se. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (far DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re uired? B1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. To bury the pipe per regulation would result in an extreme pipe slope, which could destabilize the stream; therefore, the new pipe will remain perched to maintain a stable channel and a rock ladder will be constructed at the outlet to dissipate energy and to provided limited aquatic life passage. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? NA ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to t he above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA f nal approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater generated from project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? Sb. Have you checked with the USFVIIS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh Sc. If y es, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program database and field site visit. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The project was reviewed/cleared by Cultural Resources (Project Tracking # 12-09-0021) 10/18/12(Archaeology) and 9/26/12 (Historic Architecture). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number:3710373500E '� 1,��°a�/� ��> ��` '� 3 l� �� Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (Agenfs signature is valid only if an authorization letterfrom the applicant is rovided. Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Pipe Replacement/Secondary Road Paving 55th Ave, NE (SR 1697) Catawba County N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles I i i i I i i i I NCDOT HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: � � County: ('atawha Project ID: 12.201811 River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA Route: SR 1697 Water Quality Criteria: Stream: UT to Lake Hickorv Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS ORW WSI Yes No I jM i� �. � WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r' � Roadwav Criteria: Route Designation- Additional Site Information: Yes No Arterial Urban - >� Arterial Rura1 - '"� Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? Yes No - ;�+ Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997). � � � � . V N � •� � � W O' �A l a n N m C � M N U Q Vicinity Map / ; w �,� - � � � � q Site " -�\ � ,_, �- � �, _� � . , � �n_ ,,,o Catawba Countv t�I.C. ► � � � � �. � � �� ' � �� ' �� . � .� � �� . � �� -� � �-� �� I�� (�) ��C ��' ��e « �� i�> � �i b I:I'�(��I(��:�� (��. .I I'�A�I. SR 1697 (SSth Ave.11lE) Catawba County � GRAPHIC SCALE u0 I8� PLANS I� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) u0 '�b� PROFILE (VERTICAL) ROADSIDE ENVlRONM6NTAL UNIT DIVISION OP HfGfIWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLLVA THESE EROSION AND SEDIAIENT CONTROL PLANS GOMPLY WRX IHE REGULAilONS SEi FORZH BY THE NCG010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTfON PERMIT EFFECITVE AUGUST 3, 20➢ ISSUED BY TH6 NORTN GAOLINA DEPARTMEM OF ENVlRONMENT AND NATURAL ItESOURCES DfVfStON OF WA18R pUAl[iY. P�epored in iM 0(flce of: DIVISION 12 - DISTRICT 3 1031 E. GASTON ST. LINCOLNTON� NC 289092 2012 ST.4NDARD SPECIFICATIONS EROS[�N AND SED[MENT C�NTR�L MEASURE� Sed R D...:., .. o , , 1630.03 T�A�...�SileD:a�L__________ ,n 1630A5 T�mpo...� Di.�.dm _ ,y � 1605.01 T�mpe...�StleF�o��__________�� 1606A1 Sp«�.1 S�d:aa�t Co�t.al F�� ____� 1622.01 T�m�...y B�.m..�d Slop� D..:�.________ 1630.02 S�IeB..:�1'rn�6_______________� � 1633.01 T�mpo...� Ro�k SiIkCA«4 T�prA________ � T=mpo...> Ro=k Sile CF«k T�p=-A .deF O M.ui�s .�d Pele.=n1.A:d� (PAM2 _ _ _ _ _ _' _' � 1633.02 T�m�...y Ro�k S:IeCFa4 T�prB____.� W.eel�/Ca. F�6�. W.eai� � W.et1�6Cof. F:6�. W.eel� O .de6 Pol�.�.�l.a1d� (PAM)_ _ _ _"' _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ 1634A1 T�mpo...� Re�k Sedim��t D.m T�prA_____. 163A.02 T�m�...� Ra�4 S�d�m��e D.m TrprA _� 1635.01 Re�kP:p�I�l�aS�dim=�rTe.pT�p=-A______e� 1635.OR Ra�4 Rp� [�l�[ S�diA��e T..p T�prB_ __y� 1630.04 Se06�aB.A�'""__'_"__'___"__'_'_.� 1630.06 Sp«:dSGIB.aB..i�______'_____'_'� Ra�k [�I�t S�d3A�ot T..p: 1632.01 T�pe A A � 1632.04 Tm�g____________'_'_"__"' B� 1632.03 Typ�C C� 54imme. B..in � T:�.�d S6:mmee B..io � InGltr.6uu B.dn � TI-IIS PROJECT CONfAINS SR09ION WNTROL PLANS FOR CLRARIlVG AIVD GRUBBIlVG PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. Ito.dweySmndwd Drmrinyy TLe following rovfivey e�qlieM1 smndv�d� xs uppew �� "ROUdrvry Smndeed D'uwiogs'- Roudwes Desigp Uo@ - N. C.O.yarenmo ofT�vnspo�teuon - Ralei�L, N. C., dered Jxnuery 2012 and fia lems� au tLerero are vppG<abie m thie prajett and Av �J=«�« hcrchy w.. ��n.idunl u vW� nf tbnee plo.n. 1604.01 NeJ.oed F.onio� Covo-ol Oeiwl 1632.01 Rock L�let SeAweut'4ap 'qPe A iGOa-01 "1'emvor�y SA[ Rn��r 1632.02 Rook iole[ 6edime�rc Trep lyye B 1606.01 6vad�19nJimrnt fmwol F�m 1fi32.03 Ruck Ivlco Betimeut Trnp 1'ype C 160].Ol Grevd Gmvuctian Eno-ance 1433.01 'femporuvy Rack Sd[ Chwk Tmc A 1622.01 1'emparey eermv a�d Slov= Mel�s I633.02 Temporxry Rack S�tr Che.k Tm= B 1630.01 Riser Beeiu Ifi34.0 Tampomrg Ibul� 6ndimauc Dvm Tmc A 163U.U2 Sil[ Besi� Trve B 1634.02 Temporen� Roek Sedimenv De�u Type B 1G3LLU3 Temvo�eq�SJ011i[eL IG35.U1 Ro�kWpel..IecSWim�mtTmpTyucd 1630.04 %Oiog Roe�n 1635.U2 Rock P'�pe Ideo Sedimmv Trep "fype N 1630.05 T�mpn�u.y Oke.efno 1640.01 Cd� FLce BoHlc 1630.U6 Sv�� Stilli� Bssin 1645.01 'fempu.nry Sne.m C.uesng /431.01 hlamng Insrelleuan J 60 day option REQD. STORAGE +/— 175 CF PLAN STORAGE +/— 1250 CF GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 PLANS 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTALj Q � PROFILE (VERTICAL) 0 + 0 z C n / � / � / / � � � � � � � � I � _ — — — — — — I / — — — — — — — — —', — — — — — � I Helen I, Helen Steele I Steele i , � I� i 2 z 4 z 3 I with 6aHle ITemPa�ary Roak I - � —� — � — ` \ snrcn.a rm� n J is x...�.nrianr 60'R\W }urnouf 1 i +La% � � 78 3+00 \, is° waa�, o. \J\ Type A Check+� sa ,pod�e \\V°� Plure nP .aP in ! permavmtdirchline� Hugh � 3 x 6 x 3 with 6affle Huffman R� a,,,,,,,,�,,,,, � " Place weephalu in silrfence ns needed. �I \ �� I �� kaQ '--�� o nol FII � ^ dislurb a s.\ � e "�� i 7 i � — � 4 x 8 x � — — � with baf � � � 60 day op � — — — Linda r°'" sxc Huffman �.' f SOIL STABILIZATIOIV TIMEFRAMES SIrE OESCR/PT10N STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS vEA�uE*ca oixes swa�es,o�*cxES nxo s�aaES � oars uaHE HIGH OIIALIiY WPiEfl MOW)30NE5 > �dYS NONE SLOPES STEEPEP iHAN 3:1 1 OPYS IF SLOPES PFE 10'pP LESS IN LENGiN LN� APE NOi SiEEPEF iN4H 2J.i9 �AYS ARE ALLOWEO. SLOPES 3:IaR FldiiEF � �DYS GOP SLOPES LFFAiEN THpN 50'IN LEN6iH. LL OiHEP APEAS WIiH SLOPES FLAiiEP iHAN 4:1 19 OPYS YONE.E%CEPi FOP PEPIMEiEPS PNO XOW ZONES. Lake Hickory / Charles R. � Hoke / .'� / � , \ � \ \ \ � \ \ \�� /' � Morlene / i Berry / � / � � / � \ , � � \� � � \ / � / � \ \ � � Marlene 6erry / ' „ Place weePholu in / / silifence os needed. ' � / ,( \ � ,"\ \ \ \ '�xOp / / � � I � Madene \ � � � � / � Berry / \ � � � � � � i g ryll \ 6+5o II \ le Short a�+�.�4" ` MCP nd piuce R��e m jlowa6le � 1 nP +aP in hote. �1 e�isc IS" MCP amry 0.eck mrk Trye A � eirhei9M \ / � � / \ James I � 1 Cleary I ` � � � � — � _ xbz � A + �.// a + waalu or A Check Plo�e nP raP in p¢�mn�n� di�aF/ine Wolier Ikerd i �-y 35' \ }urnou} 13+50 50' r,maa�n _ � siu cne�k Ti is n..�„� 3 x 6 x 18° Watt/es or Type A Chea/u 100'+Pm^s Duke Energy 942 940 938 936 934 932 930 IO 942 948 938 936 934 932 930 EXISTING 18" RCP PVL.EMISi1NG IIPSiPEPM LPP�I4Ni =] ��O W-� RVG E%ISiIHG DOVMiPEPM GfiP01PM = i Type = Reinforced Concrete Invert Elevation = 937.40' Outlet Elevation = 936.40' Total Length = 28.0' Existing Gradiant = 3.5% PROPOSED 3�" RCP PV4E%ISi1NGI1P5iflEPM6PMI4Ni=] FLOW~ 9VGE%ISiING�VH5TPE9MWP01PM=i B+Bm 0+25 0+58 m+75 1+m8 1+25 1+50 1+75 Type = Reinforced Concrete Invert Elevation = 937.50' Outlet Elevation = 936.40' Total Length = 40.0' Proposed Gradiant = 2.8% GTO7 rp 57ATE Slte Sketch S �� Avg. WoSer Elev. = 934.00' Nf'� i Full Pand Elev. = 934.3� ;� La9ce / \ vassr� � Nickory �� ///�\\ �, �\ /,' �s.s y0� � \ 93�5' 9.�] t _� I � 3 �so� � �1�p� � I 912.00' l ?�0 93d'16' I / � � �°° �'•�� Buffer 1 �� ` � \' � 9]9.3i' 93�31' � t ti I{I/ f\ 9 '�L."' +.ti 9'J955 39 .�,i,... ^"�" t(. 19 °�-+.., Ll�«' r � �, � � � �� f � �� z � � J `\ Q.m�" Buffer 2 �' � � �-- "� 0��9>� . `�'3�I � ` k�o. � `��y .- J 1 ` � x � � . o,n\ -...,, II' J I � 56, IB•11CP rr�saos� Idn 9 95 8'%5"SCOII� II+6 Q-18'deep +oa3' v9�5' I�\ \ Iu66• \ � 9]9.9' 9]B.0'�-��iO'�M1\er \ � ' �{.i_ 'I Inb( - � � � � 93�.]�' I GN II \ \GF � � ` � � ` _ 9ae�' . I � '/.ea � Ee 90�NIe� � I � \ �� vB Sf�� Rg �4• � \ 9NO' _ '\ � ` _� �� 9.,,, _: \ �' �, �v.,EVPo'sro„a qa } ), `-�-�o., � \ , e� � 91330' , ��, \ ,, ° I FIRamova approxa� Of Oz3T.2�'NCP __ _ hll * _ - _ _ . mi.�ox .�w Note: FuIlPOnd Elevotion is based on avg. GPS water elevation of 932.00' observed on 3/4/14 at which time Duke Energy reported actualfull pond as 230'above the current lake level. {fYCf fOCk GpyOk LO' M1}. _�� --- e_ 91�� 9151]' —r_'__ ___' PROJE� �' / � � LL L L L e �� p;,m o��- —� � � � � / �a Remove or fawade ' enex�ar�nq4' -'-"�'�� Aemove aOprot.p' \ o} BzBT.J'PYC Linp 11/0 SCCIIe PIPE REPLACEMENT 55th Ave, NE SR 1697 Catawba County NC •• NOTES 1.PUMPWG SYSTEM TO BE OSEO TO �IVERT STREPM FiROUN� THE CONSTftUCTION AREA AS NEEOE�. 2. ANV CONTaMIN/aTEO WlaTER WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO eE auwaEO iNro a si�T eac. 3.SI�T FENCE TO BE PLFCEO laR0UN0 THE STOCKPILE P.NO PROJECT !+S NECESSFaftY. 4.UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT /+LL SILT FENCES ARE TO 8E PLFCEO AS NEEOEO. 5.laLL OISTURBED FREAS WILL BE SEEDEO laN� Ml1LCHE� 11PON PROSECT COMPLETION. 6. ELEVP.TIONS ARE BASED ON R T6M INAfU IN THE BASE OF !a POWER P�LE HHVING HN RSSIGNE� ELEVATI�N OF 5a0.00'. � � 74-16' ////\\//// — — — � 28' of 18" RCP 3.5% Inlet Outlet 937.40' FL 936.40' FL EXISTING ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION � 4' 5" � �'�I � 40' of 30" RCP ~ Inlet 937.50' FL 4' slope tlet Derched approx. I.0' -- --- ?'/ 2.8 % grade Outlet� Rock Latlder I.0' ht. 936.40' PROPOSED ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION NO SCal2 Proposed Pavement Stucture 4" Asphalt Base Course, Type B 25.0B I" Asphalt Sur-Face Course, Type SF9.SA