NC0060526_Wasteload Allocation_19900312

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING: COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0060526
Pope Industrial Park WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation`'
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 12, 1990
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the resterse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0060526
PERMI 1"1'BE NAME: Pope Industrial Park, Limited Partnership /
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.008 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 % 9 n 9,,
Industrial (% of Flow): -6-%-- 1 o 620
Comments:
STREAM INDEX: 27-43-( 1 )
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Swift Creek
Class: WS-III NSW _
Sub -Basin: 03-04-02
Reference USGS Quad: E24NW, Lake Wheeler
County: Wake
(please attach)
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/90 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
At dam of Lake Benson, becomes C NSW - ca. 4.5 mi.
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Jule Shanklin
3/
qo
.D
Date: 10 1/89
Date: ;3 9
Date: £ 5
Possi hlQ-
ch•
Xfcc'/.
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
7135
lokl` /361
54- 51
Drainage Area (mi2 ) L'
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 1) : L:
7Q10 (cfs) k Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 3 30Q2 (cfs) G C �>
Toxicity Limits: IWC /06 % Acute/y onic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters CO; 00, i 1;.7, „ i-eea/ 4,/ ,-.--
Upstream -1 Location /OC% ,-(17L ��ns�i-ram
Downstream .1 Location f P/: /Ye,/ G / 6, V
ir
v2,0 s6 4
Comments: in.5 eam rim,l4ri , rnRy AP e/rv/IyPI alhPn ie ti
o ee si fit u.t7 ii r) - a , s cit (/, no )ciy emA Vat- Peo. Ge , ,,-P
I tic: r po ili,c „7— dint 1(/.5i:5 eiwe ioerh,c .4rSSK,zrnce. .
illd -e SM ,e7'f /tcc1) fens- (,ni1 Wray 6e ferci,e01ln i .e.
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOBS (mg/1)
1 3
12
NH3-N (mg/1)
,.--!
C?
D.O. (mg/1)
6
TSS (mg/1)
30
3 O
F. Col. (/100 ml)6
0
a 60
pH (SU)
& .-i
(D _cl
MvN n -Port
1 0w i 54-rP YL,.-.)C.
5 LVER .
(M4r,. ,.. 2 w�f'/1
14rS rec.v. > dos
/ i+i t
ReCOrriatiri.G w/
,
r � J
a7%G(/r j 1%1!./371- 510#7r1
pPN PrJ�.;r2Ven
r�44 L.al4i 1 /. n
, > S Pr�/An-h /. /
.orna l� S `mil(/ e;Z: e_ Lrc
73011,,,...i LIA . ?tl.04rQ
y
/I.,Yie S ..0 3i
If r70 41A-)11.(1 i
4 /a fl a?h fs i
/ea/Sr
new kn/ ai• -57/ 4 /6 4 k , „1/anal,

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Ori�\vc� 1sgSel t. t013114
PERMIT NO.: NC0060526
PERMITTEE NAME: Pope Industrial Park, Limited Partnership /
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor �1
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.008 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 90 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 10* %
Comments:
* Changed to reflect 10% industrial component -see attached.
STREAM INDEX: 27-43-( 1 )
RECEIVING STREAM:
Class: WS-III NSW
an unnamed tributary to Swift Creek
Sub -Basin: 03-04-02
Reference USGS Quad: E24NW, Lake Wheeler
County: Wake
(please attach)
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/90 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
At dam of Lake Benson, becomes C NSW - ca. 4.5 mi.
Requested by: Jule Shanklin Date: 1/30/90
Prepared by: Date:
v
Reviewed by: Date:
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Elks
tl3t\qo
E451
2
Drainage Area (mi )
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
N1-I3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
Comments:

Request No.: 5459
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
Wasteflow (mgd) :
BOD5 (mg/1) :
NH3N (mg/1) :
DO (mg/1) :
TSS (mg/1) :
Fecal coliform (#/100m1):
pH (su) :
Reviewed by
Pope Industrial Park 7e4�
NC0060526.yA�
90% Domestic/10% Industrial
Existing/Renewal
UT to Swift Creek
WSIII-NSW
30402
Wake
Raleigh
Jule Shanklin
10/31/89
E24NW
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT
EXISTING a
summer winter
0.008 0.008
13 13
4 9
6 6
30 30
1000 1000
6-9 6-19
Instream Assessment Sup:
.1 n
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Drainage�/y9Ffi
are 0
Summer 7Q10: 0:160
Winter 7Q10: 0.53
Average flow: 11.00
30Q2: 0.90
LIMITS
sq mi
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
PROPOSED
summer
RECErta 0.008
13
4
6
! AR u u 1990
ER16199!1
winter
0.008
13
9
6
v 30 30
200 200
6t9 6-9
Toxicity Testing Req.: chronic, Ceriodaphnia @ 99%, quarterly
MONITORING
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location:100 ft upstream of effleunt
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location:below Hwy 401 Bridge
Paramters: DO, Conductivity, Fecal Coliform, and Temperature.
COMMENTS
Will be reclassified as WS-II NSW/HQW. Low instream DO levels
(min.=1.2 mg/1), upstream and downstream of effluent; apply zero flow policy
Recommend priority pollutant analysis prior to reissuance of permit.
Recommend above limits for three years; must submit an engineering report
within 12 months evaluating alternatives to discharge. If no alternatives
are feasible, BOD5/NH3-N limits for summer/winter will be 5&$/10&4.g.
Instream monitoring requirement may be dropped when the facility agrees,
in writing, to a schedule for removal. Monitor effluent for silver.
Recommend toxicity test for ammonia toxicity and industrial waste.
NSW: nutrient limits may be required in the future. Chlorine toxicity likely
PERMITS g:
Recommended by: /
V
Date: 02 /g/90
�-- ' Date:
Date: 3 /qe)
/61,10t_ iat+ i) 0 Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAR 1 5 1990

10/89
Facility Name ope In dus%icA,( Park
Pen -nit # W.-60 (9 0,5 A Co
CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in any two consecutive toxicity tests,
using test procedures outlined in:
I.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is q 9 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish
compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from
issuance of this permit during the months of V MP( AOcr, Na . Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the I4PDES` permitted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7 Q 10 cfs
Permited FI w .O0T MGD Recommended by:
1WC% too
Basin & Sub -basin (1)3- o'.I - 0 3.
Receiving Stream 1 Ti --fin StAiS4' ('k.
County iJ e
rd-e47
Date /11a/a/ 90
**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 99 %, C%.B , mkt, Lu&,kiN See Part 3 , Condition iS .

QGpe 1"aik
U1 `-0 errok
L 4kk
C.3ke eie -
USGS l' o
oz. of76•SRo0
C1 = 4 3 ,
70(0) -- , 09 c‘f
7QIow = i c.(s
•
-.\\Qe InCiu 4ri at 4 , k
At_) 1 iouo s
reC-(45§, "W5 -N5W / tt0,,J 6 4; 10 "' / 1.,ct,..>4-1,c,t i:) "1
u `fi CS _�w. _ z d 5 co? ONO To x . AR s t
f1V►Nm�r.� t� L, w..c - i!✓vl 1 Ll5 \\o-•-•
.008K-t- •po/
Cw s . oo�K (�) ^^✓ i l :.w e --arc
Cw = ooz ti< ) 3 I t III kg/C
USG 5 1`140
0 O. o876.
7Q10141 = o 5-3C
c c f r�C 1( l u S ; `o n c I s-;'c_i c/. La
.Ib.s_ke4••.�-i' IO w ,..—`t..� Lair, Oc..wSG"v-. ) u�+•'r-vr _.f...X1C±14Rr
didcTvrt>
cry 0.1.✓h2.—c( v-P ••••ta v <
f is RAs6 LLNIL23
s Lt..' aur _
Ctuw . C00& - t 0Q16__.
TS5 30 3c)
1143-1`1 LT
['rr,I 006 (000

INSTREAM SELF -MONITORING DATA
4 MONTHLY_AVERAGES
Discharger: QQ.V_ 6--� c�J‘ (�1� Permit No. : NC006 0 S 24
Receiving Stream: ' T - Sub -basin: 0 3 0
Upstream Location: Downstream Location 33o �a„"v�
DATE
E -89
NOV-89
Upstream
TEMP ..0. COND
C. T -89 1 S 2. 8) 1. s'
SEP-89 1.0 2_ °� 4t 2S
AUG-8 12 2•5- 4.10
JUL-89 2 3 1.6 l.1. 4.1v
JUN-89 .22 3.q 1.1 to q
MAY-39 11 1 4.1) 81
APR 9 (4 "1. (6)?j It
MAR-8 Q,l_ 8.3(6.8) 13
FEB-89 io_ia -7.4 (6) JO
_: N-89 CL2 ._ 6,els) Is
DEC-82. 2.b . 4.1124 `-
0V-83 $_I_ 4.2(1) 22
-~` 1_ (-7
S7.72P Zo.S 6.21 _(30
AUG- 8 to_ _3 S 1.3(S) °( 6
UL-38 20.*5 1 (5) .d
J1.3?.;-8: IT g (S1 Jet
:.=' R- 3 11_3 1.1g(L) :b'
''-r�'-83 23 9i$i Sc
_ -88 1.3 _. q(8/ �'01
..
ANV-88 '8 `1(`t) lob
DEC-87 13 to (A) Arr
NGGV-37 q -1 (l.) lo-o
OCT-87 11.y 4C2-1 ..0'
SEP-87 1S S.3_
AUG - 8 7 21 S- 1(`i-S G 24
JUL-87 2qq(6.1 ?z000
UN - 87
1AY-87 l R "1.b(6$) )14•0
APP.-87 1"._. q__ (2.3) 10
MAR-87 _'8__ 11.2(l0$) v
FEB-37 .5 11:101.$) (110
JAN-87 s• t2.401.4 1
i)EC-86
NOV-86
CT-3:6
J L - 8 6
N-86
l'i - 86
R-86
LED - 6
BAN-86
Downstream
TEMP D .0 . 33-0- COND
6 q -'.►), zsy --
. L_ s'C�i. aq 6
2 Z 4 :INA() (10
ty 4.1(Y.3) <1"t
Z 3 s.6 (S -1 10-2
1$ 6 .s(s'.ef 6 y
t'• _ T 6. 2 g`1
91 q(-7•4
TE-
ti.i 1. s (.2)
q 8. t (3.4
3.'8 8iC5=Z) o
q.0 6.g 6) _s.�
s_a 6 :1(.6) `14 S
2o.3 SA?(S) -5'a
to,.B_ Cis(S) 12/
1's 8.80) --
1 8_I Sib - ._1K.
t1. s -7_ 2 (b� I0
• L3 q ® 1-01)
z3 9101 11SD
-7(s) 4a--0
l 3 g (-1) o
10 q($ 1 -to--
I S(s) IS
t.S ,\s(K-`i) 5-4.
7-1 S. q(s1) 11-0
34_ -1(44) ??
Iq_ 1.4 TIT-
(_
3-__ 9.9) 34
9 t1.4 (l04) )14 D
itg( 11-q) <24o
.5.` t 2(to) . < l o

! I
Var -
Mary
MEMO.
TO Lti-rg etEDJ Ftte5
1PbE5 at. 1QCOO 40 5'
NL 1 w,
Mitt. Ted a p %mit
(ddtait.
s/zsleia
DATE:
d6 ivi L.S7 IBC
SUBJECT: 'I9 4 15(751 /
Su bhaoh• p 3Oy0z Cl / -4e, 1, 6 .
'Vanlots, 6/1"751.hve.4-t-
ui's
0
rertha-14-iYics Zia _.2,--td44,011-)V /0.„,LA -0
r-ecc £a.al •wL- rQ •.ec aL . bcie /e- C ,ram
fetAcPWAs 770 rtAKeytcAx it /, 7L. 71.,,,7 -t
710arc, 4 ,?- r EJ ( 16 eQ frtt,lL . 77Le.,7 'C-
J J IncA. -74/ bwt Y44ihL wJ c
h e. eArav 0 poduici a ✓eicl -40A.‘4,%x_ rrta r, tia, 3 ).
?r Id- Va.4.,- . r� � AAA._,, �-a -/- It.L.,
GJ tt � k-c_ oar. kao atA 11 L d
�e� lt��
a -� i vtit.ks a 460.4L ; _i- d ,kI c/
oP► lam 4 bt- jilieni4,14 c A.:5 .pi —: c Ai t L ..- eau_
464dsot.
GU, a, bl, cu2 a-Q
4Atc� , h 7 4 ( dew--
AvaA
take, pit iyxs,
1 A/ &. -n� ---
£ ).Lc iafrieft, a
d,J b/. h.�ol� :c.AA.
#d�Alu , di.r s
&mica, ii ez,--e re.Rizta_
North Carolina Deparment of Natural
Resources &Community Development
( .Ja
Illovin7n6, Ful-feri7 5k_bi
;7-°' 4624 e203'5'3
tet-efts A
it
W tier~- a toiPy c? 74 f 1
L M2 Pex/IP& 6ec

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary June 1, 1990 Director
Albert E. Finley
Pope Industrial Park
P.O. Box 18571
Raleigh, NC 27619
Subject: Chlorine Toxicity
NPDES Permit No. NC0060526
Wake County
Dear Mr. Finley:
Chlorine, a widely used wastewater disinfectant for the
treatment of coliform organisms, often remains instream in residual
amounts that may prove to be toxic under critical low stream flow
conditions. In the last decade, EPA assessed the potential adverse
effects of chlorine to the aquatic environment and has taken steps to
reduce the impacts through the development of federal criteria. In
1986, EPA recommended that all states have a chlorine standard by
their next triennial review of water quality standards.
In revising its water quality standards in 1989, North Carolina
developed an action level for chlorine of 17 ug/1 (freshwater classes
only). In addition, the fecal coliform limit was reduced from 1000
colonies/100 ml to 200 colonies/ 100 ml. Under a new DEM procedure,
dechlorination and chlorine limits are now recommended for all new or
expanding dischargers proposing the use of chlorine for effluent
disinfection. The Division is reviewing chlorine levels from all
existing dischargers as part of their NPDES permit renewal process.
Our records indicate that chlorine from your facility's effluent
discharge is considered toxic to the receiving stream under low flow..
conditions, i.e., the amount of chlorine discharged causes a
violation of the instream action level for chlorine (17 ug/1) under
7Q10 conditions (the average flow for seven (7) consecutive days
during a ten (10) year period). Action should be taken to reduce the
effluent concentration of chlorine to an acceptable level. Based on
your facility's instream waste concentration of 100%, an acceptable
level of chlorine in your effluent is 17 ug/l. If this level is not
feasible, you should consider dechlorination or alternate methods of
disinfection for your facility to ensure that both chlorine and
bacterial limits are met. In addition, if your facility plans to
undertake any phase of construction, dechlorination or alternate
disinfection should be included. However, please note that an
authorization to construct must be obtained from this Division prior
to any alteration to your treatment plant.
Polludon Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Feu Ial fnneirh enity Affirmative. Artinn FmnInvvr

-2-
The Division is currently reviewing its water quality
regulations pertaining to chlorine. In the future, effluent limits
and/or dechlorination may be required of existing facility's with
chlorine problems. If the chlorine levels in your facility's
effluent remain unchanged, a chlorine limit or a whole effluent
toxicity testing requirement may be added to your permit limitations.
Please feel free to call Tim Donnelly of the Division's Regional
Office at [phone], if you have any questions or comments
regarding this issue.
Sincerely,
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
WLA File

l d 'e nor L'l�la4fs
Finley
COMMERCIAL REALTORS'
May 4, 1990
rPrn
JUN $ 1990
PRETREATMENT UNIT
Mr. Steve Tender
Water Quality Section Chief
Department of Environment, Health,
Division
ision
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
and
F Environmental M .. n.. g.. Management
V1 1'1U 11 Ca:j ClllGll 1.
JUN 8 r3 a
WA
SECitONL.liy
Natural Resources
Permit No. NC0060526
Dear Mr. Tender: Response to Chlorine Toxicity Letter
I have forwarded
Hardin of Hardin
advice on how we
levels.
your letter to our certified operator, Mr. Tom
Environmental Management and asked him for his
should most effectively deal with our chlorine
I will follow up with Tim Donnelly to see if he has any specific
recommendations. We may be able to reduce our chlorine levels
through adjustment to our existing chlorine treatment equipment,
if not we will pursue other methods of removing bacterial growth
from our effluent.
Please keep me advised as to the Division's policies on this mat-
ter.
Sincerely,
f‘44j0
Duke Finley
Project Manager
Pope Industrial Park
cc: Tom Hardin
Tim Donnelly
RFf IVaa
SUN 0 8 1990
jc BRANCH
P. O. BOX 18571
RALE IG H, NC 27619
919/781-0700

DATE: January 22, 1990
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY: Wake
NPDES PERMIT No.: NC0060526
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Pope Industrial Park
PO Box 18571
Raleigh, NC 27619
2. Date of Investigation: 1/21/89
3. Report Prepared By: Judy Garrett
4. Persons Contacted & Telephone No.: Duke Finley
[phone]
.,:
j
5. Directions to Site: U.S. 401 South of Raleigh City
limits (2 miles). Pope Industrial Park is on the West
Side of U.S. 401.
6. Discharge Point - Latitude: 35°42'26°
Longitude: 78 39'56
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No. E24NE or USGS Quad Name Lake Wheeler
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
>10 acres
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Slopes less than 5 percent (plate site). Plant site is
approximately 15 feet above the flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: >1000 feet

Pope Industrial Park
Page -2-
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to
Swift Creek
a. Classification: WS-III NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03:04:02
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Small stream tributary to Swift
Creek. Lake Benson (approx. 5 miles downstream) is
a water supply source for the City of Raleigh.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 90o Domestic
10o Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: .008 MGD
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
25 gal. per day of wastewater from a printer,
including a silver recovery unit.
c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: Ag
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only)
in development approved
should be required
not needed X
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in
pounds: N/A
a. Highest month in the last 12 months
b. Highest year in last 5 years
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and
applicable CFR Part and Subpart:

Pope Industrial Park
7age -3-
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or
existing): Existing 7,500 gpd wastewater treatment
plant consisting of a bar screen, aeration tank,
clarifier, chlorinator and chlorine contact tank,
sludge holding tank & chemical addition facilities for
phosphorus removal.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: land application
6. Treatment Plant Classification: III
7. SIC CODE: Industrial Park
8. Wastewater Codes: 02
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests: Silver, Chronic Toxicity,
Priority Pollutants, Total Phosphorus and Total
Nitrogen
3. Additional effluent limits requests: Silver and
Toxicity
4. Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permittee has applied for renewal of the subject
NPDES Permit. The following commercial & light industrial
businesses were discharging waste to the wastewater
treatment plant at the time of the site inspection:

Pope Industrial Park
Page -4-
1. Raychem - Warehouse storage
2. Norman Killette Printing Co. - has the potential
of discharging printing make up solution waste and
was discharging waste from a silver recovery unit
- may discharge waste w/approximately 15 mg/1 of
Ag.
3. Boxes unlimited - box storage
4. Thomas & Howard Co. - Food Distributors. This
facility has 2 five -gallon buckets of insecticide.
5. Young Moving and Storage Co.- furniture moving and
storage.
6. Weatherking - Offices
7. Caskie Paper Co. - Paper Storage
8. Dept of Human Resources - furniture storage
9. Veterinary medical Supply - Storage of
pharmaceuticals
10. Hefner Tire Co. - Wholesale tire sales
11. Winn Dixie
Any of these businesses could at times discharge
toxicants to the WWTP. Duke Finley, VP of Pope Industrial
Park has ordered the Kilette Printing Co. to cease
discharging of process wastewater to the WWTP. However,
until an alternative waste disposal method is available and
used by the Kilette Printing Company, it is recommended that
a limit for Silver be placed in the permit.
The Pope Industrial Park WWTP effluent has been tested
for toxicity and the results indicated that the discharge
may cause toxicity problems in the stream. Therefore,
monitoring and a limit for chronic toxicity is recommended.
The WWTP itself has been experiencing toxicity problems
causing die -off of activated sludge and the need to reseed
the plant quite frequently. Therefore it is recommended
that tests for Priority Pollutants be required.
It is recommended that the permit be reissued in
accordance with the basin -wide permitting plan and wasteload
that considers the industrial components.
AM:JG:bas
igna3ure of Report Preparer
Water Quality 'gional Supervisor