NC0020036_Wasteload Allocation_19881212

NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNINe COVER MEET
NC0020036
Stanley WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
-- :.,
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
December 12, 1988
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reirerse side

is t S01i.
0.� vw�cl e 1 o ca-klo v�
I.0 nkyt
ru.w.D t'.1438.800 '88
DA=.29. a
GSA =
% b.a.
1pW =1G.O C-6
L_..3G6la1- 11.00T'S
y.is3 cis
uc.k..410 o•�ba'a
•
z.
005
Iai ka.`12
630i 35
UTh.)5(.7.5*1-.1.t 38.3Q 12
DM 0.45 ma:
QA r0.63 cf5
9fo6=6.o6e.,g
Moto=0.Ogc-46
3%a.= 0.11 as
idAtc..t i •fit t.��
94 r. alt
j;7= o. I R
t'ow=U. 0 l
41 v.25e-s
•I4Clo
05,54-.2. 1432. g8cb'8e 1
DA=.?1.1 mi. a-.
QA=33.Oc
`Zion=5.3c&
3(oui=IO.00
o4a=p.0

Tcwvt_ &' S-4i
c ,E ibl.o Icai*toVS
IV\0u Ore et u3 C A4- L O 0-( uy suet,
a -E-CO C-eet Jdo Cor 1,06/ ce c o f 0a,one. erects
Pckg
0.b6 0.G5
U.5
aw-,o Quo
pA. la;
GA = get a C-Cs
!0b o. a-1 vs
GL�GD =
p6-5
r)fo,iyt`� o . ekiko
UR - of). a -a
7G5 = 5. a- c•(3
'kW IoC�5
,oar )cis
t.
b .51
1.31
6[Dre. r1_ 172
1 rrb We:6- 103.'7
M= &rnl
0
TRn
9;aW =,1Li-
m`.gs
U o.
Y.
0

woca-e_tec-vk.W (aL.oc,O Cave;
6 u.v\knuA
L; - D5pa 6c15 loo3
6 r ► . o Ina uat60 .ou)
3o vw�,1 Bcv-
1 v\+, ,( 1`( R3(
N8A Do
L el,tc e aoT
uuuvtvitul
6.6 vv Wp you)
I.0 vV jd W CtS,e4ou)
a) Cy). 1.-LD Lbw cov ue c ltw CA
vwd,{ Bop S

A- -
° ~ SUMMER
DISCHARGE ON MAUNEY CR BELOW
CONFL WITH UT OF EXIST DISCH
---------- MODEL RESULT'S
Discharger TOWN OF STANLY
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 5,1.69 mg/l.
The End CBOD is P00187 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 2041 mg/l.
|
segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
DOMn
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach #
|
i
5.05
1"15
2
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
((.ng/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
45.00 48.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.0O
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000

*.h .*. MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
Receiving ivi.t g Stream
Summer 7010
Design T ermperature 'n
TOWN OF STr N1_Y
UT NALiNEY CREEK
0.27
1=r
S ub b< s i n ; 030835
Stream G i as +
Winter 701.0 4 0r47
ILENGTIi1 SLOPEI VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd 1 Kd I Ka I Ka 1 K11 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR I
1 rile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft !design' @20° ldesigni 320° 'design] 320° ldesignl a20 1
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.551 29.401 0 232 10.55 10,48 10.38 113.69 112.281 0,73 1 0.50 10.73 1 0,00 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I
1 I 1 III I 1 1 1 I 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.951 17.801 0495 1 0.61 10.38 1 0.30 16.98 1 6.261 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 10.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I
1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I
Segment 1 I 0.251 17.801 0489 10.66 1 0.37 1 0.29 16s76 I 6.061 0.44 10.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 1
Reach 3 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1
Segment 1 1 0.401 17.801 0,196 1 0.67 1 0.37 1 0.29 1 7.00 1 6.281 0.44 1 0.30 10.44 1 0.00 1
Reach 4 1 1 I III 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
1 Flow 1 CI1Ol:l 1 Nl:OD 1 D.O. I
I cfs 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 0.775 I 4 .4.000 1 48.000 1 t, 000
He;•adwate?r s I 0.270 I 2.000 1 1 .000 1 7.440
Tr i but r y I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
40
* Runoff ff I 0.060 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0.060 1 2.000 I 1.000 i 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.120 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
• Runoff f I 0.000 0 I R.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
Segment, 1 Reach 4
Waste I 0.000 1 0.000 0► 0i_i 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary I n.080 I P.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
• Runoff 1 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
1
* Runoff flow is in cts=lmi 1e

&f.
Z.
| Seg # | Reach #
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 8
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 4
1 4
1 4
1 4
1 4
i
1 4
1 4
1 4
| 8eg # | Reach It |
Geg Mi
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.35
1.40
1.45
1.50
1.50
1.55
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.75
1.75
1.79
1.83
1.87
1.91
1.99
2.03
2.07
2.11
2.15
SUMMER
DISCHARGE ON MAUNEY CR BELOW
CONFL WITH UT OF EXIST DIGCH
| D"O. | CBOD | NBOD | Flow 1
5.63 38.89 35.86 1.04
5.56 38.58 85.41 1.05
5.50 33.28 34.97 1.05
5.46 32.98 84.54 1.05
5.43 82.69 34.11 1.06
5.42 32.89 83.69 1.06
5.41 82"10 33"28 1.06
5.41 31.82 82.87 1.07
5.41 81.53 32.46 1.07
5.42 31.25 32.06 1.07
5"43 30.97 31.67 1.07
5.44 80.69 31.28 1.08
5.09 44 3.631.28 1.08
5.36 30.43 30.98 1.08
5.30 30.17 30.69 1.08
5.24 29.92 30"39 1.09
5.19 29.66 30.10 1.09
5.15 29.41 29.82 1.09
5.12 29.16 29.53 1.10
5.10 28.92 29.25 1.10
5.08 28.67 28.98 1.10
5.06 28.43 28.70 1.10
5.05 28.19 28.43 1.11
5.05 27.95 28.16 1.11
5.05 27.72 27.90 1.11
5.05 27.48 27.63 1.12
5.05 27.25 27.37 1.12
5.06 27.02 27.11 1.12
5.07 26.79 26.86 1.13
5.08 26.57 26.61 1.13
5.09 26.35 26.36 1.13
5.11 26.18 26.11 1.13
5"33 23.82 23.71 1.25
5.34 23.68 23.54 1.25
5.35 23.54 23.37 1.25
5.86 28.40 23.21 1"25
5"38 28.26 23.04 1.25
5.39 28.12 22.88 1.25
5.51 21.86 21.57 1.33
5"53 21.76 21.45 1.33
5.55 21.66 21.83 1.33
5.57 21.56 21.22 1.33
5"59 21.46 21.10 1.38
5.61 21.36 20.98 1.33
5.62 21.26 20.87 1.33
5.64 21.16 20.75 1.33
5.66 21.07 20.64 1.33
5.67 20.97 20.53 1.33
5.69 20.87 20.41 1.33
1 D.O. | CBOD I NBOD | Flow }

,^ d
Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
DISCHARGE ON MAUNEY CR BELOW
CONFL WITH UT OF EXIST DISCH
MODEL RESULTS ----------
g TOWN OF STANLY
A UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 5.75 (nc / 1 a
The End CBOD is 27n51 mg/3.
The End NBCD is 281.46 mg / 1 .
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
WLA WLA WLA
DO M?.n CBOD NE(OD DO Write Flow
(mg/1) Mi1epctint- Reach 4 (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
i
5„S1 0.00 1
i
45.00 49u00
0.00 0.00
0,00 0s00
0.00 0.00
5nc}c)
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0„00000

,
---------- MODEL RESULT--'
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 8.37 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 25`28 mg/1.
The End NBOD is 50.85 mg/1.
WINTER
MAUNEY CR (WHEN THE D.O. = 5,
THE MIN GOES BELOW 5 MG/L)
^
r`
-1-6 f
SO
�LA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l} Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/1) (Mg/1) (mgd)
______ _________ ____ ____ -----------
Segment 1 5.23 0.00 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
45.00 90.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00000
0.00000
0.00000

.4.
' " *** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger o TOWN OF GTANLY Subbasin : 030885
Receiving Stream UT MAUNEY CREEK 8tream Classo
Summer 7Q10 0.27 Winter 7010 x 0.47
Design Temperature 14.
}LENGTH\ SLOP[} VELbCLlTYI > DEPTH} Kd } Kd } Ka I Ka } KW } KN I KN8 | KNR |
| mile | ft/mi| fps | ft }desiyn| 020: /Uonigni @200 |UesignI @200 |desi0n| 9201 |
Segment l } 0.551 29.40 O 3BO | 0.6V | 0.36 | 0,48 117.66 | 20.121 0.82 1 0.50 | 0.32 } 0.00 |
Reach 1 | } \ ! | |
�
Segment } | 0.951 17.801 0.1320 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.36 } 8.99 } 10.241 0.19 1 0.30 | 0.19 } 0.00 }
Reach 2 | | | 1 | | ) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | } | | |
i
Segment 1 | 0.251 17.80 0|307 } 0.72 } 0.26 | 0.34 | 8.64 | 9.841 0.19 } 0.30 | 0.19 1 0.00 |
Reach 3 | | > | | i | | ) } | |
|
|
Segment 1 } 0.401 11.801 0J317 | 0.73 ! 0.86 } 0.34 1 8.91 } 10,15} 0.19 } 0.30 1 0.19 | 0.0V i
Reach 4 | | > i |
/
|
| Flow | CBOD 1 NBOD I D.O. |
| cfs > mg/l } mg/l I mq/l )
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste | 1.550 | 45.000 | 90.000 } 4.000
Headwatersl 0.470 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 9.280
Tr | 0.00A | 2.000 | 1.000 1 9.280
* Runo�f | 0.110 | 2.000 < 1.000 | 9.280
|
�
i
Segment 1 Reach 2
i
Waste | 0 000 } 0 000 > 0 000 | 0 000
! ^ ^ ^ ^
Tributary | 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 9.280
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste I 0.000 | 0.000 } 0.000 1 O.000
Tributary i 0.210 ( 2.000 | 1.000 | 9.280
* Runoff ) 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 } 9.280
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste } 0.000 | 0.000 ) 0.000 | 0.000
Tributary | 0.140 | 2.000 | 1.000 1 9.280
* Runoff 1 0.000 } 2.000 | 1.000 | 9.280
!
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

Reach
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
to m ro ru 1.13 ru n3 ro m ro m ru 10 ru 10 ru 11.1 ro 1t3 ;0 10 t-= 1--:- 1-
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Reach # |
WINTER
MAUNEY CR (WHEN THE D.O. =
THE MIN GOES BELOW 5 MG/L)
Seg Mi } D.O. 1 CBOD | NBOD | Flow I
0.00 5.23 35.00 69.29 2.02
0.05 5.65 34.80 68.93 2.03
0.10 6.02 34.61 68.57 2.03
0.15 6.34 84.43 68.22 2.04
0.20 6.62 34.24 67.87 2.04
0.25 6.86 34.05 67.51 2.05
0.30 7.07 33.87 67.17 2.05
0"35 7.26 38.69 66.82 2.06
0.40 7.42 33.50 66.48 2.06
0.45 7.56 33.82 66.13 2.07
0.50 7.68 33.14 65.79 2.08
0.55 7.79 32.96 65.46 2.08
0.55 7.79 32.96 65.46 2.08
0.60 7.80 82"80 65.17 2.09
0"65 7.82 32.63 64.88 2.09
0.70 7.84 32.47 64.60 2.10
0.75 7.85 32.31 64.32 2.10
0.80 7.87 32.14 64.04 2.11
0.85 7.88 31.98 63.76 2.11
0.90 7.90 31.82 63.48 2.12
0.95 7.91 31.66 63.20 2.12
1.00 7.98 31.51 62.93 2.13
1.05 7.94 31.35 62.66 2.14
1.10 7.95 31.19 62.38 2.14
1.15 7.97 31.04 62.11 2.15
1.20 7.98 30.88 61.85 2.15
1.25 7.99 80.73 61.58 2.16
1.30 8.00 30"58 61.31 2.16
1.35 8.01 3O.43 61.05 2.17
1.40 8.03 80.28 6A.79 2.17
1.45 8.04 30.13 60.53 2.18
1.50 8.05 29.98 60.27 2.19
1.50 6.16 27.53 55.07 2.40
1.55 8.17 27.46 54.97 2.40
1.60 8.18 27.39 54.87 2.40
1.65 8.19 27.82 54.76 2.40
1.70 8.20 27.25 54.66 2.40
1"75 8.21 27.18 54.56 2.40
1.75 8.27 25.79 51.60 2.54
1.79 8.28 25.74 51.53 2.54
1.83 8.29 25"69 51.45 2.54
1.87 8.30 25.64 51.38 2.54
1.91 8.32 25.58 51.30 2.54
1.95 8.33 25.58 51.23 2.54
1.99 8.34 25.48 51.15 2.54
2"03 8.35 25.43 51.08 2.54
2.07 8.36 25.38 51.00 2.54
2.11 8.37 25.83 50.93 2.54
2.15 8.37 25.28 50.85 2.54
Geg Mi | D.O. | CBOD 1 NBOD | Flow i
5

,
Discharger
Receiving Stream
/
~---------- MODEL RESULTS
: TOWN OF GTANLY
: UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is el.49 mg/l.
The End CBOD is :191.25 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 851.68 mg/l"
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
DO Min
(mg/
----T-
5.37
i
Milepoint
0.00
WINTER
MAUNEY CR (D.O. = 4, MIN GOES
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/1) <mgd>
1
45.00 90.00 3.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.A0
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.50O0O
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000

Discharger
Receiving Stream
- MODEL RESULTS 7
: TOWN OF GTANLY WWTP
o UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 7.93 mg/1"
The End CBOD is 2�19 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 1.51 mg/l.
DO Mzn
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
'SUMMER
DISCHARGE ON HOYLE CR BELOW
CONFL WITH MAUNEY CRE
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/l) (mg/l> (mgd)
0.00 1
45.00 90.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50000
0.00000
0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger TOWN OF STPN1_Y WWTP
Receiving Stream r UT l'•IAUNEY CREEK
Summer 7010 5.2
Design Temperature
Sr..11:,tatisi.r-r v 0301935
Stream Class: C
Winter 7010 a 10.
ILENGTHI SLOPE] VELOCITY 1 DEPTHI Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka .1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
I mile I ft/mil fps 1 ft Idesignl ldesignl 320° ldesignl 320° Idesignl 320° 1
1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 0.721 17.801 0;325 1 1.11 1 0.37 1 0.29 111.61 1 10.411 0.44 10.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 1.101 17.801 1.004 1 2.70 1 0.40 1 0.32 117.53 1 15.721 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 10.00 1
Reach 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Segment 1 1 0.601 4.801 0.686 1 3.27 1 0.29 1 0.23 1 3.23 1 2.901 0.44 10.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 1
Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment :1
Waste
I"'1 e% d w 'Z t e r s 1
Tributary 1
* Runoff 1
1 Flow I C}30D 1 NBQD
I cfs 1 mg/1 I mg/1
Reach 1
1 0.775 I 45.000 I 90.000
5.200 I 7.000 1 1.000
0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000
0.140 I P.000 1 1.000
D.O.
mg/1
t;.t)tit}
7.440
7.440
7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000
Ti- i butar y 1103.700 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
i
Begmentli :l Reach 3
Waste 1 1 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff flow is in cfe!1 1i 1.e

~
| 8eg # I Reach It
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 J.
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
i Seg # | Reach # >
w ra.1 03 0.) 03 0.3 0.3 re 11) TO n) 11.3 ro Mt ro m ;0
SUMMER
DI8CHARGE ON HOYLE CR BELOW
CONFL WITH MAUNEY CRE
Seg Mi I D.O. | CBOD ( NBOD | Flow |
0.00 6.47 7.58 12.54 5.98
0.04 6.57 7.55 12.49 5.98
0.08 6.65 7.52 12.44 5.99
0.12 6.72 7.50 12.89 5.99
0.16 6.79 7.47 12.34 6.00
0.20 6.86 7.45 12.28 6.00
0.24 6.92 7.42 12.23 6.01
0"28 6.97 7.40 12.18 6.01
0.32 7.02 7.37 12.13 6.02
0.36 7.07 7.34 12.08 6.03
0.40 7.11 7.32 12.08 6.03
0.44 7.15 7.29 11.98 6.04
0.48 7.18 7.27 11.93 6"04
0.52 7.22 7.24 11.88 6.05
0.56 7.25 7.22 11.83 6"05
0.60 7"28 7.19 11.78 6.06
0.64 7.30 7.17 11.73 6.06
0.68 7.38 7.14 11.69 6.07
0.72 7.85 7.12 11.64 6.08
0.72 7.43 2.28 1.59 109.78
0.82 7.51 2.28 1.58 109.78
0.92 7.58 2.27 1.58 109.78
1.02 7.64 2.27 1.58 109.78
1.12 7.69 2.26 1.57 109.78
1.22 7.74 2.26 1.57 109.78
1.82 7.78 2.25 1.56 109.78
1.42 7.82 2.24 1.56 109.78
1.52 7.86 2.24 1.56 109.78
1.62 7.89 2.28 1.55 109.78
1.72 7.92 2.23 1.55 109.78
1.82 7.94 2.22 1.54 109.78
1.82 7"94 2.22 1.54 109.78
1.88 7.94 2.22 1.54 109.78
1.94 7.94 2.22 1.54 109.78
2.00 7.94 2.21 1.53 109.78
2.06 7.94 2.21 1.58 109.78
2.12 7.93 2.21 1.52 109.78
2.18 7.93 2.20 1.52 109.78
2.24 7.93 2.20 1.52 109.78
2.30 7.93 2.20 1.51 109.78
2.36 7.93 2.19 1.51 109.78
2.42 7.93 2.19 1.51 109,78
Seg Mi | D.O. | CBOD | NBOD | Flow |

Discharger
Receiving Stream
:
|»
/
---- MODEL RESULTG
TOWN OF 8TANLY WWTP
UT MAUNEY CREEK
8LJMMER .
DISCHARGE ON HOYLE CR BELOW
The End D.O. is 7.89 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 2 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 2 mg/l.
--- ---- ----- -��������
WLA WLA WLA
DO M n MOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/ K) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
45.00 90.00
0"00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00000
0.00000
0.00000
^�
,
~

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 11, 1988
MEMORANDUM TO: Trevor Clements
FROM: D. Rex Gleason
SUBJECT:
Response to In -Stream Assessment
Town of Stanly WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC 0020036
Gaston County, North Carolina
This Office has received the subject in -stream assessment
dated July 27, 1988 from Carla Sanderson.
Stanly's wastewater treatment plant is considerably
underloaded at present, with an average flow of 0.2493 MGD in a
plant designed for 1.4 MGD. The low flow is a major cause of
operational problems contributing to the non-compliance. This
Office recommends that the additional flow be allowed hopefully
resulting in improved operating efficiency.
If you have questions, please advise.
RGP:se

/orot 04 5764 C Joe 8 g (25
3c44 kJe_ hQ iwzktb
/) cull u,,95-ff t.o t `1) ofri c.1 ! hug Oh(, tad5'2 ;5 -co
L/Kut Pitch e..dy. L-k v vonte.0/-&c- Lt(c5fj LO2 A
(2) nti.o &H r-tiavtis - t.6--y, [is
p vb ktat LoeCc C-e) tos , aiii .euA-4
Ci1.ocQ,` ) and o,uue eoiu1 ic& Aave,J
(,c)a wa.J emiv-' ova .
115 cG►uv.cie loco,
w- 5ry -fLe 1`sch aAe4
()qv, ituk1A-, 61-1A_
i2WJ aten`., act()
"(aid a-tiLte
Waal
CMILOO
cu-t u la.o4k./
wlu..0- dojo (sfrnit.c.r !lbw -
-J
�o cry�, �-°�
1-0 Gf�-ve cfo .�l�2 �ovn) �.� �3 4 a3

repo 1'
T
re It ewe
is
LA) ' `fit + *et- e
tC Nam"
t
ItuAl
Cl G c LatAl'
_ ��
- C 0601%
14.,414- vto tore: /,‘
- �' S' 1i� z u v v 1V J').
` "v \c),_
l z- ee_ccitte,eLE-S)
_ca ce_ _ :+
x ` s �. e:tre r
A, S lceJ CurAcA.... 473
0-c -6-raJ I; 'Flot4)
�C1rtotS c v

Discharger
Receiving Str
G)
---- MODEL RESULTS
: TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC
�am : UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. s 3.93 mg/l.
The End CBOD s 20.35 mg/l.
The End NBOD s 22.13 mg/l.
|
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
SUMMER
PRE JOC FLOW WITH WE) LIMITS
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l> Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/l) (mg/l) ((Tigd)
3.09 0.97 3
46.00 65.25
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.24930
0.00000
0.00000

MEMO.
TO:
rnam Asti
0,054-e _ „ 24c3 d C i -Soc
(s v /1 (5 I ems)
wck54e-'Low ( saGr--)
DATE
SUBJECT: '. % f i ( Ja.
Cho= 49 Alofi C I boc -) G _ <.DS
/(&)'0 = 5 • (((4.5- /v Ham )
i /o e w 1. mod Cc6vv�
cB00 go y i C 53 BG ) o v vim" �. ��(
p3c,t L� �sIrvvyl Cr q , SA( Eta 0)
(_v;c
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger n TOWN OF STAN1_Y WWTP - JOC Subbasi n : 030935
Receiving Stream W UT MAUNEV CREEK Stream Class
Summer " l:s rat Winter 70:10 :
Design i.gn Temperature: Pin
LENGTH; SLOPE; VELOCITY 0 DEPTH! kd E Kd ; Ka I Ka I KN I KN s KNR # KNR
miles ftlimi: fps I ft !design! 820° !design! 320a !design; 820a ;design` 120°
Segment 1 I 0.221 78
Reach 1 !
.001 0.282 10.30 = 0.96 ; 0.76 144.18 ; 39.63! 0.73 0.50 10.73 ; 0.00
I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I : 1 : I
1 1
I i
Segment 1 0.151 21
Reach 2 1 I
.60! 0.182 10.38 ! 0.47 10.38 1 7.87 1 7.061 0.73 1 0.50 10.73 i 0.00 I
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 I I ! 1
1 I 1 1
i ; ; ; 1
Segment 1 I 1.501 21.601 0.139 1 0.55 10.37 I 0.29 ; 6.03 I 5.41! 0.73 ; 0.50 I 0.73 10.00
each! ! 1 I 1 1 1 I 1
e 11 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 1 i
Flow 1 CBOD 1 N}3CI? D.O.
1 cfss 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 mg/1
SWaste e g m en t 1 Reach 1 65.250
Headwaters!
,,{ 0.386 i 46.000 i {.:) n t'� #..) 1 6.000
r"iC: t'tl i t�.�a ter" ;: 0.000 1 2.000 S 1.000 1 7.440
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 i 1.000 1 7.440
Runoff ! 0.000 i P.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
Segment i. Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 P.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
#. Runoff 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 1 0.000 )00 1 0 .. 000 1 0 . 000 1 0.000
TributaryI 0n200 { P.,000 1 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.050 1 2.000 1 1.000 7.440
.rs Runoff flow is in r.: f 7 rn i.:i e

�r
�
'~.0
SUMMER
PRE JOC WITH WQ LIMITS
|Geg#| Reach#
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 2
1
1 2
1 2
1
1 2
1
1 3
1 3
1
1
1 3
1
1 3
1 3
J. 3
1 3
1 3
1
1
1
1 3
ISeg#|Reach#
( Geg Mi
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.22
0.25
0.28
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.37
0.47
0.57
0.67
0.77
0.87
0.97
1.07
1.17
1.27
1.37
1.47
1.57
1.67
1.77
1.87
| Geg Mi
D.O. CBOD NBOD
6.00 46.00 65.25
6.03 45.81 65.04
6.06 45.62 64.84
6.08 45.43 64.63
6.10 45.24 64.42
6.12 45.06 64.22
6.14 44.87 64.02
6.16 44.68 63.81
6.17 44.50 63.61
6.18 44.32 63.41
6.19 44.13 63.21
6.20 43.95 63.01
6.20 43.95 63.01
5.71 43.74 62.54
5.26 43.53 62.08
4.85 43.33 61.62
4.48 43.12 61.16
4.13 42.92 60.71
5.26 28.96 40.35
4.45 28.27 38.74
3.89 27.60 37.21
3.52 26.95 35.78
3.28 26.32 34.32
3.15 25.70 32.96
3.09 25.10 31.67
3.09 24.51 30.42
3.14 23.94 29.23
8.21 23.39 28.08
3.31 22.85 26.98
3.42 22.82 25.93
3.54 21.81 24.92
3.67 21.31 23.95
8.80 20.82 23.02
3.93 20.35 22.13
D.O. CBOT) NBOD
|
Flow �
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.89
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.59
0.59
0.60
0.60
0.61
0.61
0.62
0.62
0.63
0.63
0.64
0.64
0.65
0.65
0.66
0.66
Flow |

.^
i.
SUMMB�
POST JOC FLOW WITH WO LIMITS
---- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
'
The End D.O. is 3.88 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 22.17 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 24.22 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
WLA WLA WLA
C0 Min CB[D} NBOD DO Waste Flow
',mg./I) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
3.08 1.07 3
47.00 65.25
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.28580
0.00000
0.00000

** MODEL SUMMARY DATA *
Discharger
Receiving Stream
Summer 7010
Design Temperature:
.. TOWN OF STANLY WWTF:' - 30C Subbas . n : 03083
UT MAUNEY CREEK Stream Class
Winter 701.0
:LENGTH! SLJPE 1 VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR s KNR 1
1 mile 1 f !mil fps 1 ft !design! 020° ;design: 320° ;design; 820° !design! 320°
Segment 1
Reach 1
1 0.221 78.001 0,313 1 0.31 1 1.02 1 0.81 148.95 1 43.911 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
Segment 1 1 0.151 21.601 0.201 1 0.38 1 0.49 1 0.39 1 8.72 1 7.821 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
Segment 1 I 1.501 21.601 0.148 1 0.55 ! 0.37 1 0.30 I 6.43 E 5.771 0.73 1 0.50 ! 0.73 1 0.00 I
3
Reach
1 1
1
i
Segment
Waste
Headwaters:
Tributary 1
Runoff 1
i 1 1= l ow 1 cfs
1 Reach 1
0.443
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O.
1 mg/I. 1 mg/i. mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1
Tributary 1 :3.c�00
* Runoff + 1 0.000 1
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.200
• Runoff 1 0.050
47.000
P..000
2.000
.. 000
0.000 1
P.000 1
2.000 {.}00 1
0„000 1
P.000 1
2.000 1
* Runoff flow :is in c:f s/mi.:Le
65.950
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.000 1
1.000 1
1.000 1
0.000 1
1.000 1
1.000 1
6.000
7.440
c 3
f �.44
7.440
0„F;}00
7.440
7.4/,0
0.000
7.440

'+
SUMMER
POST JOC WITH WQ LIMITS
| Seg # < Reach # | Seg Mi. D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |
1 1 0.00 6.00 47.00 65.25 0.44
J. tL 0.02 6.05 46.81 65.06 0.44
1 i 0.04 6.10 46.63 64.88 0.44
1 0.06 6.14 46.44 64.69 0.44
1 i 0.08 6.17 46.26 64.50 0.44
1 0.10 6.20 46.07 64.32 0.44
1 1 0.12 6.22 45.89 64.14 0.44
11 0.14 6.24 45.71 63.95 0.44
1 0.16 6.26 45.52 63.77 0.44
1 0.18 6.28 45.34 68.59 0.44
1 1 0.20 6.29 45.16 68.40 0.44
1 1 0.22 6.31 44.98 63.22 0.44
1 2 0.22 6.31 44.98 63.22 0.44
1 0.25 5.86 44.78 62.80 0.44
1 ' 0.28 5.45 44.58 62.38 0.44
12 0.31 5.07 44.38 61.96 0.44
1 0.34 4.72 44.19 61.55 0.44
1 2 0.37 4.41 43.99 61.14 0.44
1 0.87 5.35 30.93 42.43 0.64
119 0.47 4.53 30.23 40.86 0.65
1 0.57 3.95 29.56 39.34 0.65
1 0.67 3.56 28.90 37.89 0.66
13 0.77 3.30 28.26 36.49 0.66
1 3 0.87 3.16 27.63 35.15 0.67
113 0.97 3.09 27.02 33.85 0.67
13 1.07 3.08 26.43 32.61 0.68
1 1.17 3.11 25.85 31.41 0.68
13 1.27 3.17 25.28 30.26 0.69
1 3 1.37 3.25 24.73 29.15 0.69
13 1.47 3.35 24.19 28.09 0.70
1 3 1.57 3.47 23.67 27.07 0.70
1 � 1.67 3.58 23.15 26.08 0.71
1 3 1.77 3.71 22.65 25.13 0.71
1 3 1.87 3.83 22.17 24.22 0.72
Seg # Reach # ( Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

---------- MODEL RESULTS
Discharger u TOWN OF ST sNLY WWTP JIJC
Hat a i v 3. nq Stream „ 1.U..1. M iU1,1EY CREEK
The End D.O. is 3.30 mg/1.
The End CBOD s 57.31 mq/ i .
The End NEtOD Lis 47.71 mq / 1 .
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach
L2...
Reach 3
SUMMER
DES:Ct31\I FLOW WITH WO I....IM1T3
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD h#E3OD DO Waste Flow
(mcJ/:i) Mi1epri:i.nt Reach 1 (ag/I) (mg/1) (mg/I) (mgd)
3.09 1.27 3
80.00 65.25
0„{„0 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.00
0„00
0.00
1.40000
40000
0.00000
(.} . 0 0 0 00

:,a.*.. MODEL SUMMARY ' DATA ***
Discharger
Receiving Strum
Summer 7Q 1. 0
Design Temperature: 25.
TOWN OF S.i ANL.Y WWTF' -. JOC Subbasin
UT Mf1tJNE:Y CREEK Stream ream Class:
Winter 7010 u
a 030:335
!LENGTH! SL1OPE1 VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR 1 KNR 1
1 mile 1 fti it fps 1 ft 'design; H20° !design! 20° !design! a20° !design! 20° 1
_
Segment 1 1 0.221 78.001 1.030 1 0.37 1 1.26 1 1.00 155.75 1 50.0011 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1
11
1 3 1 , 1 i
Segment1 1 0.151 211.601 0.662 1 0.47 1 1.15 1 0.91 128.71 1 25.751 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1
Reach 2 i =
S , , i S, , , ,
S , f , i i S
Segment 1
Reach 3
, , , 1 1 , , ,
13
1 1.501 21.601 0.383 1 0.65 1 0.77 1 0.61 116.59 1 14.881 0.73 1 0.50 1 0.73 1 0.00 1
i 1 i i I i
f Flo
_
1 cfs
Segment 1 ' Re .tch 1
W5;'.-s 2.170
Headwaters; 0„000
Tributary 1 0„000
.. Runoff 1 0.000
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0„000
Tributary ui;aj yj i 0.000
* Runoff 1 0„C)00
Segment 1
Waite.
* Runoff
CfrO0
mg/1
80.000
., 000
2..00
2.000
1 NI3OD
1 mg/?
c")„000 1
2.000 1
2.000
2.000 1
2„000 1
Runoff flow is in t •f s/ m i :i tom}
65.250
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.000 1
1.000 1
1.000 1
0.000 1
1.000 1
1.„000 1
mg/1
6.000
7.440
7„440
7.440
0„000
7..440
7.,440
0.000
7.440
7.440

GUMMER
DESIGN FLOW WITH WO LIMITS
(8eg#
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
|Seg#
| Rearh # | Seg Mi | D.O. CBOD NBOD | Flow |
� 0.00 6.00 80.00 65.25 2.17
1 0.02 5.97 79.88 65.19 2.17
i 0.04 5.95 79.76 65.14 2.17
1 0.06 5.93 79.64 65.08 2.17
0.08 5.91 79.52 65.02 2.17
0.10 5.89 79.40 64.97 2.17
0.12 5.87 79.29 64.91 2.17
0.14 5.85 79.17 64.85 2.17
0.16 5.84 79.05 64.80 2.17
5.83 78.93 64.74 2.17
� 0.20 5.81 78.81 64.68 2.17
� 0.22 5.80 78.70 64.63 2.17
� 0.00 6.00 80.00 65.25 2.17
0.02 5.97 79.88 65.19 2.17
0.04 5.95 79.76 65.14 2.17
j.0.06 5.93 79.64 65.08 2.17
J. 0.08 5.91 79.52 65.02 2.17
�1 0.10 5.89 79.40 64.97 2.17
0.12 5.87 79.29 64.91 2.17
1 0.14 5.85 79.17 64.85 2.17
J. 0.16 5.84 79.05 64.80 2.17
1 0.18 5.83 78.93 64.74 2.17
1 0.20 5.81 78.81 64.68 2.17
.1 0.22 5.80 78.70 64.63 2.17
2 0.22 5.80 78.70 64.63 2.17
2 0.25 5.67 78.50 64.50 2.17
0.28 5.56 78.31 64.36 2.17
0.31 5.45 78.11 64.23 2.17
2 0.34 5.35 77.92 64.10 2.17
0.37 5.27 77.72 63.97 2.17
0.2P 5.80 78.70 64.63 2.17
0.25 5.62 78.45 64.50 2.17
0.28 5.46 78.20 64.36 2.17
0.31 5.31 77.95 64.23 2.17
p 0.34 5.17 77.70 64.10 2.17
0.37 5.04 77.45 63.97 2.17
0.37 5.25 71.09 58.66 2.37
0.47 4.83 70.35 57.86 2.38
11
�] 0.57 4.53 69.63 57.06 2.38
0.67 4.32 68.91 56.28 2.38
0..16 68.20 55.51 2.39
77 4
4.06 67.50 54.75 2.39
1] 0.97 3.99 66.8O 54.00 2.40
' 1.07 3.95 66.11 53.26 2.40
1.17 3.94 65.43 52.53 2.41
1.27 3.93 64.76 51.82 2.41
1.37 3.95 64.09 51.11 2.42
3 1.47 3.97 63.43 50.41 2.42
1.57 4.00 62.78 49.72 2.43
13 1.67 4.03 62.14 49.04 2.43
^� 1.77 4.07 61.50 48.37 2.44
3 1.87 4.11 60.87 47.71 2.44
0.37 5.25 71.09 58.66 2.37
3 0.47 4.59 70.07 57.86 2.38
q 0.57 4.10 69.07 57.06 2.38
3 0 67 3 75 68 08 56 28 2 38
� . . . . .
3 0.77 3.50 67.11 55.51 2.39
3 0.87 3.32 66.15 54.75 2.39
��
�� 0.97 3. 21 65.21 54 . 00 2 . 40
!3 1.07 3.14 64.28 53.26 2.40
3.. 10 63 . 36 52 . 53 2.41
3 1.27 3.09 62.46 51.82 2.41
3 1.37 3.10 61.57 51.11 2.42
3 1.47 3.12 60.69 50.41 2.42
13
1.57 3.16 59.83 49'72 2.43
3 1.67 3.20 58.98 49.04 2.43
i3 1.77 3.25 58.14 48.37 2.44
3 1.87 3.30 57.31 47.71 2.44
| Re-ch # | Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD Flow |

.04 °I` =
.c)
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary August 3, 1988.
Abf
Linda Medley, Town Manager .A
. Town of Stanley
Post Office Box 279
Stanley, North Carolina 281644" `)Fir4� 10
`/r
SUBJECT: Judicial Order by Consent Allocation Request
o d«'
Town of Stanley . -
JOC j 88-25, Allocation // 1 '�'
NPDES NC0020036, Gaston County
Dear Ms. Medley:
R. Paul Wilms
Director
In accordance with the Town's request of 14 June 1988 and as
allowed under paragraph 10 of the subject Consent Judgement and pursuant to
the provision of NCGS 143-215.670) l herebyauthorize
to 200, 000 GPD of additional wastewater intotheY
Stanle tW Wastewathe er
of up
Treatment Plant. The Town should allocate this flow toproposed
carefully to allow for orderly growth during the term of i
this Judicoalcts
Order. The Division may evaluate toxicity at the Stanley Wastewater
Treatment Plant and any study which projects significant impacts on the
receiving stream may result in the Division suspending flow allocations to
the treatment system. Acceptance of flow into the treatment facilit is
subject to the following conditions: y
1) All additional wastewater shall have characteristics
not exceeding that of normal domestic wastewater.
2) Monthly reports shall be submitted to the attention
of Mr. Rex Gleason, NRCD/DEM, 919 N. Main Street, P.O.
Box 950, Mooresville, NC 28115 listing those projects
which have been allocated flows, amount allocated, and
once connected data on actual water consumption.
4
Any violation of terms of your Consent Judgement inclu' ,
effluent limitations and schedule dates shall terminate�a
allocation. Any this flq�, �Q�,18
portion of the authorized additional waste not prev'•. :,;;rI
connected to the system shall not thereafter be connected until the .:. necessary sewerage system improvements have been completed and place&
operation. Such violations shall also subject the Town to the enforEA c
authority of the Commission and of the Director pursuant to NCGS 1437:215.6 ...
and Commission rules in 15 NCAC 2J. r:-
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]

Ms. Linda Medley
Page Two
August 3, 1988
If you have questions, or if we can be of any further assistance,
please contact Mr. Rex Gleason of our,Mooresville Regional Office at
704/663-1699.
Jr
cc: Rex Gleason
George Everett
Kent Wiggins
Permits and Engineering ve'
J.
R. P ; Wilms
Sin erely,
4
.., s;t 5 1 8)-.,,,_.
,44,........4
v
tV _
A-- /k.
. h,u1/40.40) �t
r�
,r, covi''''.-
VI ti

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 15, 1988
MEMORANDUM TO: Trevor Clements
c;
FROM: D. Rex Gleason V,rI
SUBJECT: Request for Instream Assessment
Town of Stanley WWTP
Additional Flow Under JOC
Gaston County, North Carolina
Please find attached a request for Instream Assessment for
the Town of Stanley Wastewater Treatment Plant. It is requested
that this Office be provided with the maximum additional flow
Stanley may be allocated which will protect the quality in the
receiving stream.
The request should be self-explanatory, but if questions
should arise please advise.
Attachment
RGP:se

Request Form for In -Stream Assessment for 67B
NAME OF FACILITY: Town of Stanley WWTP
COUNTY: Gaston REGION: Mooresville DESIGN FLOW: 1.40 MGD
RECEIVING STREAM: Unnamed Tributary to Mauney Creek
BACKGROUND DATA:
A. Why is SOC needed? (Facility is out of compliance
with which effluent limits?) Plant currently has JOC
and is requesting additional flow allocation.
B. History of SOC Requests:
1. Monthly Average waste flow prior to any SOC:
.2493 MGD
Time period averaged: 6/87 through 5/88
2. Previously approved SOC's: EMC WQ 86-10
Flow: 1.4 MGD
3. Flows lost from plant (facilities that have gone
off line): N/A
4. Current JOC request:
Flow: 0.0365 MGD
5. Total plant flow post-SOC (sum of original flow
and SOC flow minus losses): N/A
6. Is this an accurate flow balance for plant?
Why/why not? Plant has capacity to handle
requested flow.
C. Please attach DMR summary for past year for all
permitted parameters. If possible, include reports
from previous years if facility has been under SOC for
more than a year. See attached
CURRENT SOC REQUEST:
A. Request is for domestic or industrial waste? If it is
a combination, please specify percentages. Domestic
only - see attached
B. What type of industry? Please attach any pertinent
data. N/A

C. The region proposes the following JOC limits:
D.
BOD:
TSS:
Fecal Coliform:
60 mg/1
6.0 mg/1
60 mg/l
1000/100 ml
What is the basis for these limits? As per
negotiations between Region and Town

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
July 27, 1988
To: Rex Gleason
IFrom: Carla Sanderson ��
Through: David Vogt ; '7 0
Trevor Clemen
Steve Tedder
Subject: In -stream Assessment
Town of Stanly Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0020036)
Stanly County, North Carolina
JOC Case No. 88-25
The Town of Stanly WWTP has requested a JOC since they have been out of com-
pliance with their effluent limits for BOD5, ammonia, and TSS. The plant is
presently under a JOC (1.4 MGD) and is now requesting that an additional 0.0365
MGD of domestic waste -water be added to their current average flow of 0.2493 MGD;
suggested interim limits are 60 mg/1 BOD5, no ammonia, 60 mg/1 TSS, and 6 mg/1
D.O.
The current average flow (0.2493 MGD) and the suggested JOC limits were used
in a Level-B analysis to estimate the impact of the WWTP's effluent at the recom-
mended higher concentration of BOD5. The highest ammonia value for last year's
summer period (14.5 mg/1) was also included in the analysis to account for the
impact of ammonia on the receiving stream. This is an unnamed tributary to Mau-
ney Creek and at the location of the Town of Stanly's discharge the 7Q10 is zero.
The Level-B analysis predicted that an instream D.O. minimum of 1.65 mg/1
will occur at the sag point. Therefore, Technical Services believes that these
interim limits are too high for the integrity of the receiving stream to be pro-
tected. In addition, the impact of additional wastewater cannot be predicted for
a zero flow stream since the model results are dependent on effluent concentra-
tion only (i.e. identical results are produced for all wastef lows with the same
wastewater characteristics).
However, even though the additional flow cannot be modeled, the threshold for
protection of fish survival (3 mg/1 of D.O.) is predicted to be violated with the
higher concentrations of BOD5 and ammonia. Thus, it would be expected that addi-
tional flow would result in increased BOD5 and ammonia toxicity and potentially
cause more frequent violations of the DO standard, even under conditions greater
than 7Q10.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding this
matter.
cc:
Kent Wiggins
Steve Reid
Chuck Wakild

town ol Sian" WvcvTP -.Svc
lore -.50C G . t24 93 mjci
,5f-5OC D. a858 m9ccl
t,,iel(L
0A=1.1- p(45
74o;,=,d 8u cis
Wow = . C-( )
( 1754O.I438.3630`IS
DA= a.3$ rwi,as
pA=a.1C%
-.pA=3.3arUa
(?,A=3.61c-s
�05-U•�8c-�s
flow=o.`?C
U-6
0/76
030235
7--as -fa
OA /.?3
C+Da = , u5,lk) a
(;=,(oC-rs
t Nu= 5 x catfir
[E&5j43. 3o
Dfr 0.3 mi.a'
QA=0.4
7405' O
`l(ou) 7 D

DA 0.3 :a
X03
3jO
Wdeat.Ad I
0. as
11w=
e6»o 90
M800= 41.760
190
FOI4= . Sy
130 = o
FUlfotA) 2: 0
i
IR 004=.sq
HO�o�= 0
R°Aw 0
� • O/Z! at Co
FD Rt� 1 a Rerr-:-. ..Y7
dry (.6 14/.37
P ct c3
o)4(,5--as)
W05( o.
Atu(-&/ ,.�
,541
. C-64u:
5 - , Uti 4/;41,i
• 13 C-4Yeki
,c1804 = 9 ag,ic NlfsX Cy�� ave) i( sus= ep, 76

0 ps+Atmen
pale a O.
/8 I q 8.8
402 14 5
"541 /2.
also /1.1,
AR 5 12.3
8 lo.$
Af1 13 /6.4
'�8'] /3 8.1
rgrl cZI 1.1
A7 02L3
-241 7 .41A sku.i
57n lb 71
`Ygel /3 9. b
.3/91 ►0.3 9.5
a/8'1 10.5
Ygi 51 Io.B
ial8la ID.I

11%
8UMMER
PRE JOC FLOW AND JOC LIMIT8
- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : TOWN OF 8TANLY WWTP -- JOC
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. s 2.77 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 38.23 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 22.13 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 8
WL.A WLA WLA
DO Min COS OD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l > Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
1.65 0.37 2
90.00 65.25
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.24930
0.00000
0.00000

v
m
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC Subbasin : 030835
Receiving Strewn : UT MAUNEY CREEK Stream Class:
Summer 7Q10 : Winter 7010 :
Design Temperature: 25.
|LENGTH( SLOPE! VELOCITY | DEPTH( Kd | Kd / Ka | Ku | KN | KN | KN8 ( KNH (
� mile | ft/mi| fps | ft |design! Q201 Wesign| @200 |des 8n| 0201 |deoign| 2301 �
|
Segment 1 | 0.221 78.001 0.282 | 0.30 1 1.21 | 0.96 144.18 | 39,631 0.73 | 0.50 | 0,73 1 0.00 1
Reach 1 |
( |
Segment 1 | 0,151 81
Reach 2 | |
.601 0,182 | 0.38 | 0.?2 | 0,58 | 7.87 | 7.061 0.73 | 0,50 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
|
. . . . . . < . .
Segment 1 | 1,501 21.60/ 0.139 1 0.55 | 0,37 ( 0.29 | 6.03 | 5.411 0,73 | 0,50 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
Reach 3 1
| Flow | CBOD | NBOD | D.O.
� cfs | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste Is 0.386 | 90.000 | 65.250 | 6.000
Headwaters| 0.000 | 2.000 < 1.7.440
Tributary 0.000 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000
Tributary 000 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000
Tributar0.200 | 2.000 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.050 2.000 | 1.000 7.440
�(.- Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

, ..
Seg
| Seg # Reach
1 1
2.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1 3
/
1
1 3
# I Reach #
#|Seg Mi
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.22
0.25
0.28
0.31
0.34
0.37
0.22
0.25
0.28'
0.31
0.84
0.37
0.37
0.47
0.57
0.67
0.77
0.87
0.97
1.07
1.17
1.27
1.37
1.47
1.57
1.67
1.77
1.87
I Seg Mi
D.O.
6.00
5.87
5.76
5.67
5.60
5.54
5.50
5.46
5.44
5.42
5.40
5.39
6.00
5.78
5.60
5.45
5.33
5.24
5.16
5.10
5.05
5.02
4.99
4.97
4.97
4.39
3.85
3.36
2.92
2.51
4.97
4.18
3.46
2.80
2.20
1.65
3.62
2.85
2.32
1.98
1.78
1.68
1.66
1.69
1.77
1.87
2.00
2.14
2.29
2.45
2.61
2.77
D.O.
CBOD
90.00
89.63
89.26
88.89
88.52
88.15
87.79
87.43
87.07
86.71
86.35
85.99
90.00
89.53
89.06
88.60
88.14
87.68
87.22
86.76
86.31
85.86
85.41
84.97
84.97
84.56
84.16
83.76
83.36
82.97
84.97
84.35
83.73
83.12
82.52
81.92
54.66
53.35
52.07
50.82
49.61
48.43
47.29
46.17
45.08
44.02
42.99
41.99
41.01
40.06
89.13
38.23
CBOD
|
SUMMER
PRE JOC FLOW AND JOC LIMITS
NBOD Flow |
65.25 0.39
65.04 0.39
64.84 0.39
64.63 0.39
64.42 0.39
64.22 0.39
64.02 0.39
63.81 0.39
63.61 0.39
63.41 0.39
63.21 0.39
63.O1 0.39
65.25 0.39
65.04 0.39
64.84 0.39
64.63 0.39
64.42 0.39
64.22 0.39
64.02 0.39
63.81 0.39
63.61 0.39
63.41 0.39
63.21 0.39
63.01 0.39
63.01 0.39
62.54 0.39
62.08 0.39
61.62 0.39
61.16 0.39
60.71 0.39
63.01 0.39
62.54 0.39
62.08 0.39
61.62 0.39
61.16 0.39
60.71 0.39
40.35 0.59
38.74 0.59
37.21 0.60
35.73 0.60
34.32 0.61
32.96 0.61
31.67 0.62
30.42 0.62
29.23 0.63
28.08 0.63
26.98 0.64
25.93 0.64
24.92 0.65
23.95 0.65
23.02 0.66
22.13 0.66
NBOD Flow |

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC
Receiving Stream � o UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. s 3.76 mg/l.
The End CBOD s 40.98 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 15.59 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
8UMMER
POST JOC FLOW WITH JOC LIMITS
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1), Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/l) (mgd)
2.96 0.37 2
90.00 41.76
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.28580
0.00000
0.000O0

SUMMER
PRE JOC FLOW WITH JOC LIMITS
---------- /MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O.
The End CBOD
The End NBOD
� �s
zs
|
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
is 3.83 mg/l.
�Ju.e-zx mg/I.
14.26 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/l) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
2.55 0.37 2
90.00 41.76 6.00 0.24930
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000

.^ "
� *** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF STANLY WWTP - JOC Subbasin : 030835
Receiving Str�am : UT MAUNEY CREB< Stream Class:
Summer 7Q10 : Winter 7Q10 :
Design Temperature: 25.
|LENGTH| | VELDC�TY | DEPTH| Kd | KU ( Ka / Ka | KN ( KN | KN8 | KNk |
| mile | ft/mi( fps | ft !design! 3201 |dmyiUn| 3800 !design! 3201 (deeiUm| 3200 |
. . .
. . . . .
Segment 1 1 0.221 78,001 0,282 | 0.30 | 1.21 | 0.96 144.18 | 39.631 0.73 | 0.50 | 0,73 1 0,00 |
Reach 1 | |
( |
Segment 1 | 0,151 21
Reach 2 | |
.601 0.182 1 0.38 | 0.72 < 0.58 | 7.87 7.061 0.73 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 0,00 �
| | |
Segment 1 | 1.501 21.601 0.139 | 0.55 | 0.37 1 0.29 | 6.03 5.411 0.73 0.50 | 0.73 | 0,00 |
Reach 3 |
| Flow CBOD NBOD D.O. |
| c f s mg /l mg/l mg/l
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste i 0.886 � 90.000 41.760 1,6.000
Headwaters| 0.000 < 2.O00 | 1.000 < 7.440
Tributary | 0.000 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
* Runof-F* 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste | 0.000
Tributary | 0.000
* Runoff | 0.000
0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000
2.000 | 1.000 ( 7.440
2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste | 0.000 < 0.000 It 0.000
Tributary | 0.200 | 2.000 | 1.000
* Runoff 1 0.050 | 2.000 1.00O
-9- Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
0.000
7.440
7.440

.-t, ,°
SUMMER
PRE JOC FLOW WITH JOC LIMITS
| Seg # < Rea h # | Seg Mi | D.O. | CBOD NBOD | Flow, |
1 1 0.00 6.00 90.00 41.76 0.39
1 1 0.02 5.93 89.63 41.63 0.39
1 0.04 5.88 89.26 41.50 0.39
1 0.06 5.84 88.89 41.36 0.39
1 0.08 5.81 88.52 41.23 0.39
1 0.10 5.78 88.15 41.10 0.39
1 0.12 5.76 87.79 40.97 0.39
1 0.14 5.75 87.43 40.84 0.39
1 0.16 5.74 87.07 40.71 0.39
1 0.18 5.73 86.71 40.58 0.39
1 0.20 5.73 86.35 40.45 0.39
1 0.22 5.73 85.99 40.32 0.39
11 0.00 6.00 90.00 41.76 0.39
11 0.02 5.85 89.53 41.63 0.39
1 0.04 5.72 89.06 41.50 0.39
1 0.06 5.62 88.60 41.36 0.39
1 0.08 5.54 88.14 41.23 0.39
1 0.10 5.47 87.68 41.10 0.39
1 0.12 5.42 87.22 40.97 0.39
1 0.14 5.39 86.76 40.84 0.39
1 0.16 5.36 86.31 40.71 0.39
1 0.18 5.33 85.86 4�0.58 0.89
1 1 0.20 5.32 85.41 40.45 0.39
1 0.22 5.31 84.97 40.32 0.39
1 0.22 5.31 84.97 40.82 0.39
1 0.25 4.86 84.56 40.03 0.39
12 28 4.45 84.16 39.73 0.39
J. 2 0.31 4.07 83.76 39.44 0.39
1 0.34 3.73 83.36 39.15 0.39
1 0.37 3.42 82.97 38.86 0.39
1 0.22 5.31 84.97 40.32 0.39
12 0.25 4.65 84.35 40.03 0.39
1Ej 0.28 4.05 83.73 39.73 0.39
1 2 0.81 3.51 83.12 39.44 0.39
1 2 0.34 3.01 82.52 39.15 0.39
1 0.37 2.55 81.92 38.86 0.39
1 0.37 4.22 54.66 25.94 0.59
1 0.47 3.70 53.35 24.92 0.59
1 0.57 3.35 52.07 23.93 0.60
1 0.67 3.13 50.82 22.99 0.60
1 0.77 3.00 49.61 22.08 0.61
1 3 0.87 2.95 48.43 21.21 0.61
13 0.97 2.95 47.29 20.38 0.62
1 8 1.07 2.99 46.17 19.58 0.62
13 1.17 3.06 45.08 18.81 0.63
1 3 1.27 3.14 44.02 18.08 0.63
1 3 1.37 3.24 42.99 17.38 0.64
1 1.47 3.35 41.99 16.70 0.64
1 1.57 3.47 41.01 16.05 0.65
1 3 1.67 3.59 40.06 15.43 0.65
J. 3 1.77 3.71 39.13 14.83 0.66
1 3 1.87 3.83 38.23 14.26 0.66
| Seg # | Reach # | Seg Mi. | D.O. C13OD NBOD Flow |

�20
6go
Sfrc4m : ma,ui�.
l6tLJ-Lic
�
1'14;nSte_ m
SieP e. CaIcu Ltio n S
a s1 ohs
/±6I = '72 4 VV'
c2 s = (700-()(10
,50q-, ace — =ai
kv
`7a6
cunt
d i st
gist.,sloe!:
o aca d7
700 acn
(r go
(,Coo
go
� . (fi q a�
1
4
.3,
o I. 7
tJ)av
110.
.41

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 21, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rex Gleason
FROM: Randy Dodd
THRU: Trevor Clements
SUBJECT: Town of Stanley WLA
Per your request, we have reviewed the WLA for Stanley, and in spe-
cific, the issue of whether the current limits (BODS = 12 mg/1, NH,-N = 8
mg/1) could be relaxed in the event that a permit request was received for a
decrease in the design flow from 1.4 mgd to 0.4 mgd. Such a determination
requires demonstration that the existing limits are not necessary to protect
water quality. Since the discharge is to a zero flow stream, the IWC is
100% regardless of design flow. It is therefore our recommendation that the
existing limits be maintained. This interpretation is consistent with DEM's
handling of existing dischargers to zero flow streams.
In the event that Stanley were to pursue a relocation of their current
outfall on a UT to Mauney Creek to Mauney Creek 0.3 miles downstream, it is
possible that less stringent limits could apply to a flow of 0.4 mgd, since
the 7Q10 at this point is 0.2 cfs.
Please advise if questions.
RD:gh

L
of m+e.A-.e, a�, U I w� IX1o� plaid"0
TeJA_ -Fc-k (73 F.ct-3 -F4-
°I
r)i05" , afl Gg gon = 4-5 -
$0: .4r1 c, Aigoor: _
pa •=-5
Wb7,63-": .0(11 • o(.o o 6
66 =.11 .11 b d
,slope a9-41- 173 rig 17. 2
(►iib .1a 7103=.Od
IOW =./'1'
t = i.a4-1
4-1 ' YA4 okictie
7)-kt kzc.
o V ` a-Lf)
J fAA /AP 11A-F /it,/ f of

�
/ --- - MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TOWN OF 8TANLY
ReCeiving Stream UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 5.37 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 27 51 mg/l.
Segment
Reach
Reach
Reach
Reach
-,t• ti) NI i-- I--
SUMMER
MODEL RUN BB -OW CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIST DIGCH LOCATED
WLA WLA WLA
CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/l) (mg/1) (mgd)
1.25 2
45.00 62.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00000
0.A0000
O.00000
0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
|
Discharger : TOWN OF GTANLY
Receiving Stream o UT MAUNEY CREEK
Summer 7Q10 : 0.27
Design Temperature: 25.
Subbasin : 030885
Stream Classx
Winter 7010
}L[NGTH| SLDPE| VELOCITY } 0EPTH> Kd } Kd } Ka } Ka | KN > KH | KNR | KNk |
| mile | ft/mi| fps | ft |design| 3201 Idpsigo1 9201 |deoign| 8201 Nesign! 820" |
|
Seoment 1 i O 55| 29 4O� 0 �Q | 0.59 > O 58 } O 46 |80 65 } 0 . 52> V 73 } V 50 | O 73 } 0 0O }
' . . � . . . . ` . . .
Reach 1 | | | \ | ( | 1 | | I | | |
Segment 1 0.951 17,801 0 291 1 0.66 ! 0.43 1 0.84 110.40 9.321 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.44 i 0.00 }
Reach 2 | | >
�
Segment 1 | 0.251 17.801 0271 | 0.71 > 0.41 | 0.32 1 9.69 } 8.781 0,44 | 0,30 | 0,44 | 0.00 }
Reach 8 | | 1 | 1 | | | I | } | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | ) | | |
Segment 1 } 0.401 17.801 O | 0.71 } 0.41 | 0.33 | 9.86 | B.851 0.44 1 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Reach 4 | | | | / 1 | | | i | 1 | | |
,
` | Flow | CBOD | NBOD | D.O. |
| cfs } (rig /l > mg/1 i mg/l |
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste | 1 1.550 | 45.000 } 62.000 } 5.000
[dead waters1 0.270 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Tributary } 0.000 | 2.000 ) 1.000 } 7.440
* Runoff | 0.060 | 2,000 | 1.00( | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste | 0.000 | 0.000 / 0.000 } 0.000
T ib t \ 0 000 | 2 000 | 1 000 | 7 440
r u y . , , ,
* Runoff ) 0.060 } 2.000 > 1.000 | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste } 0.000 | 0.000 > 0.000 } 0.000
Tributary | 0.120 1 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 } 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste | 0.000 | 0.000 } 0.000 > 0.000
Trib t y | 0.080 | 2.000 } 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
~ �
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
!

i
,
iSeg#
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
J.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
iGeg#
�
| Reach |
1 �
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
3
8
3
3
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 Reach
# }
SUMMER
MODEL RUN BELOW CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIST DISCH LOCATED
Geg Mi ( D.O. | CBOD | NBOD | Flow |
0.00 5.36 38.62 52.95 1.82
0.05 5.36 38.37 5B.53 1.82
0.10 5.36 38"11 52.11 1.88
0.15 5.86 37.86 51.69 1.83
0"20 5.36 37.62 51.28 1.88
0.25 5.87 37.37 50.87 1.83
0.80 5.38 37.12 50.46 1.84
0.35 5.40 36.88 50.06 1.84
0.40 5.41 36.64 49.66 1.84
0.45 5.42 36.40 49.26 1.85
0.50 5.44 36.16 48.87 1.85
0.55 5.46 35.92 48.48 1.85
0.55 5.46 35.92 48.48 1.85
0.60 5.38 35.71 48.18 1.86
0.65 5.32 35.49 47.88 1.86
0.70 5.27 35.28 47.59 1.86
0.75 5.22 35.06 47.29 1.86
0.80 5.18 84.85 47.00 1.87
0.85 5.15 34.64 46.71 1.87
0.90 5.12 34,43 46.42 1.87
0.95 5.10 34.23 46.14 1.88
1.00 5.08 34.02 45.85 1.88
1.05 5.07 33.82 45.57 1.88
1.10 5.06 33.61 45.29 1.89
1.15 5.05 33.41 45.01 1.89
1"20 5.05 33.21 44.73 1.89
1.25 5.04 33.01 44.45 1.89
1"30 5.04 32.81 44.18 1.90
1.35 5.05 32.61 43.91 1.90
1.40 5.05 32.42 48.64 1.90
1.45 5.06 32.22 43.37 1.91
1.50 5.06 32.03 43.10 1.91
1.50 5.20 30.26 40.62 2.08
1.55 5.20 80.12 40.41 2.03
1.60 5.20 29.98 40.21 2.03
1,65 5.19 29.84 40.02 2.03
1.70 5.19 29.71 39.82 2.03
1.75 5.19 29.57 39.62 2.03
1.75 5.28 28.52 38.16 2.11
1.79 5.29 28"42 38.01 2.11
1.83 5.80 28.32 37.86 2.11
1.87 5.81 28.22 37.71 2.11
1.91 5.31 28.11 87.57 2.11
1.95 5.32 28.01 37.42 2.11
1.99 5.33 27.91 37.27 2.11
2.03 5.34 27.81 37.13 2.11
2.07 5.35 27.71 36.98 2.11
2.11 5.36 27.61 36.84 2.11
2.15 5.37 27.51 36.70 2.11
8eg Mi. | D.O. i CBOD | NBOD } Flow |

SUMMER
1"IODEL RUN BELOW j CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIST D I CCH LOCATED •
---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger a TOWN OF STANLY
Receiving Stream p IJT MALINEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 5a69 mg/1.
The End CBCD is 20.97 mq / 1 p
The End NBOD is 20.41 mg / 1 .
Segment 1
Reach 1.
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
DO M i n
(mg/1) M7.1ep►c'5nt Reach #
1.15 2
0, 6 d
zo (SOPS
J) gg5A1
WLA (I....A WLA
CEOD NE;(JD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) (mg/ 1) (mg:°].) (mgd)
4 , p 00 48
p 00 ,; 0(_} 0.50000
!l_}i }t };_}
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00000
t{�l p f�;`t 31 t�] „ i_} t) ir�} p :r.} ({ } 0.00000
5�} p �^/ t_} 0.00 tr} p i«} �~} 0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TOWN OF GTANLY
Receiving Stream : UT MAUNEY CREEK
Summer 7010 : 0.27
Design Temperatureo 25.
Gubbasin : 030835
Stream Class:
Winter 7Q10 o 0.47
|L[NGTH| SLUPE| VELOCITY | UEPTHI Kd | Xd | Ka } Ku i KN I KN } KNR | KNR |
I mile i ft/mil fps | ft }dpsign| 9201 Nes\gn| 3200 |dps yn| W20: |desi0ni O20|
| I | | 1 ! i | | | | | |
Segment 1 | 0.551 29.401 0,232 1 0.55 } 0.4B } 0.38 >13,69 | 12.281 0.73 | 0.50 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
Reach 1 \ / | | | | | | | | } | |
I | | | | | > | | | } | |
Segment 1 | 0.951 17.801 0.195 } 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 6.98 | 6.261 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Reach 2 i | | | } | | | 1 | 1 > |
| | | I | | / | i ( > | I
Segment l } 0.251 17.801 0.189 | 0.66 } 0.37 | 0.29 | 6.76 | 6.061 0.44 i 0.30 1 0.44 | 0.00 }
Reach 8 | | > | | | | 1 | | > } |
Segment 1 | 0.401 17.801 0.496 } 0.67 | 0.37 > 0,89 > 7.00 | 6.281 0.44 | 0.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 |
Reach 4 | | ! | ( | | > | i | | | |
,
! ( Flow i CBOD | NBOD | D.O. |
�
| cfs } mg/l | mg/l } mg/l |
Gegme Reach J.
Waste ( 0.775 | 45.000 | 48.000 | 5.000
Headw Es 0.270 i 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
Tribut aT y } 0.000 | 2.000 > 1.000 } 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.060 | 2.000 | 1.000 i 7.440
Segment| 1 Reach 2
Waste > 0.000 > 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000
Tribut ar y | 0.000 | 2.000 | 1.000 1 7.440
* Runofif | 0.060 > 2.000 |' 1.000 | 7.440
Segment,- 1 Reach 3
Waste } 0.000 } 0.000 | 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.120 | 2.000 | 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 > 2.000 | 1.000 ) 7.440.
Gegment|1 Reach 4
Waste > 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 1 0.000
T r i b u t y | 0.080 | 2.000 | 1.000 | 7.440
* Runoff | 0.000 | 2.000 1 1.000 > 7.440
.
�
^ . /
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

SUMMER
MODEL RUN BELOW CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIGT DISCH LOCATED
Seg Mi | D.O. | CBOD | NBOD | Flow |
0.00 5.63 33.89 35.86 1.04
0.05 5.56 88.58 35.41 1.05
0.10 5.50 83.28 34.97 1.05
0.15 5.46 32"98 34.54 1.05
0.20 5.43 82.69 34.11 1.06
0.25 5.42 82"39 33.69 1.06
0.80 5.41 32.10 33.28 1.06
0.35 5.41 31.82 32.87 1.07
0.40 5.41 31.53 32.46 1.07
0.45 5.42 31"25 82.06 1.07
0.50 5.43 30.97 31.67 1.07
0.55 5.44 30.69 31.28 1.08
0.55 5.44 30.69 31.28 1.08
0.60 5.36 30.43 80.98 1.08
0.65 5.30 30.17 30.69 1.08
0.70 5.24 29.92 30.89 1.09
0.75 5.19 29.66 30.10 1.09
0.80 5.15 29.41 29.82 1.09
0.85 5.12 29.16 29.53 1.10
0.90 5.10 28.92 29.25 1.10

,
-
Discharger
Receiving Stream
SUMMER
MODEL RUN BELOW CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIST DISCH LOCATED
---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
: TOWN OF STANLY
x UT MAUNEY CREEK
The End D.O. is 6.03 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 14.36 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 13.07 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach A.
-
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mgd)
--- - - -------
5.07 1.05 2
45.00 48.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
5.00
0"00
O.00
0.00
0.25A00
0.00000
0.00000
O.00O0O

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
Receiving Stream
Summer 7C 1 t_>
Deeiq i Temperature
TOWN OF STANLY
UT MAUNEY CREEK
0.P7
25 r ,»
.
S+ ib L a s i n u 030835
Stream Class:
Winter 7010 : 0.47
ILENOTHI SLOPE VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd 1 Kd I Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1 KN 1 KNR I KNR I
1 mile 1 ft/mil fps 1 ft !design! H0° ldesignl APO' ldesignl 880° ldesignl 380° 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 I 0.551 29.401 0.165 10.52 10.43 1 0.34 1 9,74 I 8.731 0.73 10,50 1 0.73 1 0.000 1
Reach 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
Segment 1 1 0.951 17:801 0.141 1 0.58 10.35 10.88 15.05 1 4.531 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 10.00 1
Reach P I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1
Segment 1 1 0.251 17.801 0.1143 1 0.63 1 0.34 1 0.27 1 5.12 1 4.601 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 l
Reach 3 l 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
l 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 0,401 17.801 0451 1 0.65 1 0.35 10.28 15.41 1 4.851 0.44 1 0.30 1 0.44 1 0.00 I
Reach 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I
Flow 1 GD0D I NBOD I D.O. I
I cfs 1 mg/I 1 mg/1 1 me/1 1
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 I 0.388 I 45.000 1 48.000 I 5.000
l-1aad wa t er s 1 0.270 I 2.000 1 1.000 ;0c:> I 7.440
Tributes y I 0„000 I P.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.060 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.440
Segment1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I r'.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
• Runc't F I 0.060 I P. 0c >0 I 1.000 I 7.440
1
Segment; 1 Reach ;
Waste 1 I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tr•ibutatry 1 0,.1E0 1 Pact{; I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0.000 I P.000 l 1.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste 1 0.000 I 0.000 I 0„000 I 0W000
Ti- i. butary I 0.080 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.44n
• Runoff �c:o.f1' I 0.000 1 P.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff f:ic{w is in c'f'e/rni.1e

| Reach #
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
8
4
4
IF
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
| Seg Mi } D.O. } CBOD (
27.34
0.05 5.88 27.01
0.10 5.70 26.69
0"15 5.60 26.87
0.20 5.52 26.05
0.25 5.46 25.74
0.30 5.43 25.44
0.35 5"40 25.13
0.40 5.39 24.84
0.45 5.39 24.54
0.50 5.39 24.25
0.55 5.40 28.97
0,55 5.40 23.97
0.60 5.83 23.69
0"65 5.26 28.42
0.70 5.21 23.15
0.75 5.16 22.89
0.80 5.13 22.63
0.85 5.11 22.37
0.90 3.09 22.12
0.95 5.07 21.86
1.00 5.07 21.62
1.05 5.07 21.37
1.10 5.07 21.13
1.15 5.08 20.89
1"20 5.09 20.66
1.25 5.10 20.43
1.30 5.12 20.20
1.35 5.13 19.97
1.40 5.15 19.75
1.45 5.17 19.53
1.50 5"20 19.31
1.50 5.51 16.92
1.55 5"53 16.80
1.60 5.56 16.67
1.65 5.59 16.55
1.70 5.61 16.43
1.75 5.64 16.31
1.75 5.79 15.10
1.79 5.82 15.02
1.83 5.85 14.98
1.87 5.88 14.85
1.91 5.91 14.77
1.95 5.93 14.69
1.99 5.96 14.60
2.03 5.98 14.52
! 2.07 6.00 14.44
|
2.11 6.03 14.36
|
SUMMER
MODEL RUN BELOW CONFLUENCE OF
UT WHERE EXIST DI8CH LOCATED
NBOD | Flow |
28.70 0.66
28.19 0.66
27.69 0.66
27"19 0.67
26.71 0.67
26.24 0.67
25.77 0.68
25.32 0.68
24.87 0.68
24.43 0.68
24.00 0.69
28"57 0.69
23.57 0.69
23.25 0.69
22.94 0.70
22.63 0.70
22.32 0.70
22.02 0.71
21.72 0.71
21.43 0.71
21.14 0.71
20.86 0.72
20.58 0.72
20.31 0.72
20.03 0.73
19.77 0.78
19.50 0.73
19.24 0.74
18.99 0.74
18.74 0.74
1B.49 0.74
18.24 0.75
15.86 0.87
15.71 0.87
15.56 0.87
15.42 0.87
15.27 0.87
15.13 0.87
13"94 0.95
13.84 0.95
18.74 0.95
13.64 0.95
13.55 0.95
13.45 0.95
13.85 0.95
13.26 0.95
13.17 0.95
13.07 0.95
|