20130186 Ver 1_Year 7 Monitoring Report_2021_20220124

ID#* 20130186
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 01/24/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/24/2022
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
ID#:* 20130186
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland
Restoration Project
County: Sampson
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: CedarCreek_95718_MY7_2021.pdf 22.37MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Jeremiah Dow
Signature: *
�ur/r af�ox�

CEDAR CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT
MONITORING REPORT
MONITORING YEAR 7
FINAL
SAMPSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CONTRACT No. 005011 - PROJECT No. 95718
USACE ACTION ID No. 2012-00389 — NCDWR PROJECT No. 2013-0186
Prepared for:
Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
January 2022

fires
January 20, 2022
Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite ioo
Raleigh, NC 27610
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 718.520.5400
RE: Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project: MY7 Monitoring Report
(NCDMS ID 95718)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 11, 2022 regarding the Cedar Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration Project: Year 7 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
1. Please ensure that Section 4.2 is updated in the final report with a discussion of the
agreed upon area to be proposed for unrealized credits.
2. Figure 3b — Please clarify what the black hatched area on the CCPV near gauge AW-11 is
and add to the Legend if necessary.
This was a pond removal area that accounted for the 0.62 additional acres of wetland at
as built. It has been added to the legend.
3. There were several minor formatting issues; note that Table 5 UT4 has blank cells for the
woody vegetation column. Also note that the PnoLS cell for MY6 is not color coded and
that portions of the main channel are cut off by the x,y axis limits for cross section figures
1-4.
The minor formatting issues have been corrected.

0
4. It appears that the workbook called "Cedar Creek_MY7_Cross Sections Spreads heet_XSA"
was used for BHR calculations. However, the low top of bank values that were included in
this workbook did not consistently match the low top of bank values included in the
cross section figures. For example, in the workbook cross section 2 has a low top of bank
elevation of 88.145 but in the report it is listed as 90.6. The current year's low bank
height should be used when calculating BHR, and after points outside of the main
channel but below the current year's low bank height are excluded using the Omit BKF
dialog boxes, the bankfull elevation should be adjusted until the cross sectional area is
equal to the MYO cross sectional area. Following this process would produce a BHR of 1.8
for cross section 2. Please review all BHR calculations and submit an updated workbook
that reflects the reported values.
Cross section data has been corrected in the report and updated in the support files.
5. Please include the wetland hydrology figures in Appendix E.
Done.
6. Ensure that the figure for ACG2 is being displayed correctly. The chart type in excel
should be scatter with straight lines.
Done.
7. Please submit updated wetland shapefiles with the new area proposed for unrealized
credits.
Done.

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGSHUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
Cedar Creek
Sampson County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID 95718
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 3030006090060
Prepared by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1061
Resource EnOromnental Solutions, LLC ii

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ 1
1.1 Location and Setting...............................................................................................................
I
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives..................................................................................................
1
1.3 Project Structure.....................................................................................................................
3
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach.....................................................................................
3
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data.........................................................................
5
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................
5
1.4.2 Project Watersheds.........................................................................................................
5
2 Success Criteria..............................................................................................................................
6
2.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
6
2.1.1 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
6
2.1.2 Cross Sections................................................................................................................
6
2.1.3 Bank Pin Arrays.............................................................................................................
7
2.1.4 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................
7
2.2 Wetland Restoration...............................................................................................................
7
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria....................................................................................................
7
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................
7
3 MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................
8
3.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
8
3.1.1 As -Built Survey..............................................................................................................
8
3.1.2 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
8
3.1.3 Cross Sections................................................................................................................
8
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................
8
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays.............................................................................................................
9
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring.......................................................................................
9
3.1.7 Surface Flow...................................................................................................................
9
3.2 Wetland Hydrology................................................................................................................
9
3.3 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................
9
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan .............................................................................................
10
4.1 Stream...................................................................................................................................10
4.2 Wetlands...............................................................................................................................
10
4.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................10
5 Year 7 Monitoring Conditions (MY7).........................................................................................
10
5.1 Year 7 Monitoring Data Collection......................................................................................10
5.1.1 Morphological State of the Channel(MY 7) .................................................................10
5.1.2 Vegetation.....................................................................................................................11
5.1.3 Photo Documentation...................................................................................................11
5.1.4 Stream Hydrology........................................................................................................11
5.1.5 Wetland Hydrology......................................................................................................11
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................12
Resource Envirolunental Solutions, LLC in

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Figure 4. Stream and Wetland Photos
Figure 5. Vegetation Plot Photos
Figure 6. Stream and Vegetation Problem Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Summary
Table 9b. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9c. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data (MY7)
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross -Section Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Figure 7. Cross Section Plots
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphological Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Table 15b. Wetland Hydrology Gauge Summary
Figure 8. 2021 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Figure 9. Headwater Valley Restoration Flow Chart
Resource EnOromnental Solutions, LLC iv

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Site is located in Sampson County approximately 3.1 miles
southwest of Clinton, NC (Figure 1). To access the Site from the town of Clinton, travel west on
Highway 24 (Sunset Avenue), take a left onto Airport Road and go 1.3 miles. Turn right onto West
Main Street Extension, go approximately 350 feet, and turn left onto a dirt farm path. Follow the farm
path along the cultivated field edge to the southwest corner and enter the forest. Follow the dirt path to
cultivated fields adjacent to the project below UT2. Turning to the left will take you to UT2. Going to
the right will take you to UT3.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project has provided numerous ecological and water
quality benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the
project area, others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more
far-reaching effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined
below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through filtering of runoff from adjacent agricultural fields through buffer
Nutrient removal
areas, the conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, improved denitrification and nutrient
uptake through buffer zones, and installation of BMPs at the headwaters of selected reaches.
Benefit will be achieved through the stabilization of eroding stream banks and reduction of sediment
Sediment removal
loss from field areas due to lack of vegetative cover. Channel velocities will also be decreased
through a reduction in slope, therefore decreasing erosive forces.
Increase dissolved oxygen
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures to increase turbulence and
concentration
dissolved oxygen concentrations and riparian canopy restoration to lower water temperature to
increase dissolved oxygen capacity.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas which will infiltrate more water
Water storage
during precipitation events than under current site conditions. Wetland areas will provide additional
storage of runoff and flood waters.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in buffer areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Improved/restored
Benefit will be achieved by restoring the stream to a natural meandering pattern with an
hydrologic connections
appropriately sized channel, such that the channel's floodplain will be flooded more frequently at
flows greater than the bankfull stage.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
Restoration of habitats
ecosystem. Protected riparian corridors will create contiguous natural areas with uninterrupted
migration corridors.
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures designed to improve
Improved substrate and
bedform diversity and to trap detritus. Stream will be designed with the appropriate channel
instream cover
dimension and will prevent aggradation and sedimentation within the channel. Substrate will
become coarser as a result of the stabilization of stream banks and an overall decrease in the amount
fine materials deposited in the stream.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
Addition of large woody
Benefit will be achieved through the addition of wood structures as part of the restoration design.
debris
Such structures may include log vanes, root wads, and log weirs.
Reduced temperature of
water due to shading
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas.
Restoration of terrestrial
habitat
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats.
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project is located in the Great Coharie Creek
Watershed (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/DMS/priorities-map). This 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Code
(RUC 03003006090060) is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the Cape Fear River
Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP).
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) develops River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP) to guide its restoration activities within each of the state's 54 cataloging units. RBRPs
delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both the need and opportunity for wetland, stream and riparian
buffer restoration. These TLWs receive priority for DMS planning and restoration project funds.
Currently, no Local Watershed Plan (LWP) is available for the project area.
The 2009 Cape Fear RBRP identified water quality and agricultural impacts as major stressors within
this TLW. The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project was identified as a Stream and
Wetland opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the TLW.
The project goals addressed stressors identified in the TLW, and include the following:
• Water quality improvements,
• Natural resource protection, and
• Manage agricultural impacts.
The project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Converting active farm fields to forested buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks,
• Reduction in stream bank slope,
• Restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats, and
• Construction of in -stream structures designed to improve bedform diversity.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
1.3 Project Structure
Following 2016 monitoring the NCIRT requested a review of the differential between the Approved
Mitigation Plan and Baseline Monitoring Report. The table below details the discrepancies by reach.
The primary causes of increased baseline SMUs was minor field adjustments during construction along
with survey methodology (thalweg vs. centerline). The Mitigation Plan lengths were based on
centerline. Wetland credits increased to include restoration of a backfilled pond bed (0.22 acres) that
was identified as an opportunity to expand the easement following approval of the Mitigation Plan.
RES does not plan on submitting an asset revision and will revert to the Approved Mitigation Plan
assets. In January 2022, RES delineated the unsuccessful wetland area around AW7. This area totaled
0.33 acres lowering the proposed WMUs to 12.77. This is detailed in Section 4.2.
Table la. Cedar Creek Site Proiect Components — Stream Mitigation
ProposedLength 1VfiApprovedtigation As -Built
Reach Mitigation Type' (LF).. Ratio NEtigation Plan
Baseline SMUs
SMUs
U I
Enhancement II
3,064
2.5:1
1,226
1,226
U I
Enhancement I
415
1.5:1
277
277
U I
Enhancement II
615
2.5:1
246
246
U I
Enhancement I
265
1.5:1
177
177
U I
Enhancement II
827
2.5:1
331
331
UI'2
Headwater Valley
337
1:1
337
337
UI'2
P1 Restoration
504
1:1
504
518
UT2C
Headwater Valley
190
1:1
190
193
UI'3
P1 Restoration
1,912
1:1
1,912
1,941
UI'4
Enhancement II
78
2.5:1
31
31
Total
8,207
5,230
5,276
*P1=Priority 1
**The contracted
amount of credits for
this Site is 5,000 SMUs
* * * Stream lengths are based on the designed
stream centerline
Approvedtigation
1Vfitigation Area
1Vfi
As -Built
Wetland
N litigation Type
NEtigation Plan
(ac)
Ratio
Baseline WMUs
WMIJs
W1
Restoration
13.10
1:1
13.10
13.72
Total
13.10
12.77"
13.72
*The contracted amount of credits for this Site is 9.00 WMUs
**0.33 acres lost due to unsuccessful AW7
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the unnamed tributaries to Great Coharie Creek were accomplished
through analyses of geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applied
a combination of analytical and reference and/or analog reach based design methods that meet
objectives commensurate with both ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment
activities ranged from minor bank grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic
geometry. Reaches that required full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied and verified
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 3

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach was to design a
geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat improvements and ties into the existing landscape.
Priority Level I stream restoration, headwater valley restoration, stream Enhancement Levels I and II,
and stream buffers throughout the project site have been restored and protected in perpetuity. Priority
Level I stream restoration was incorporated into the design of a single -thread meandering channel, with
parameters based on data taken from the reference site. Priority 1 stream restoration was proposed on
2,416 linear feet of stream channel. Headwater valley restoration was applied to 527 linear feet of
channel. Enhancement Level I was applied to 680 linear feet of channel that required buffer
enhancement, bank stabilization and habitat improvements. Enhancement Level II was applied to an
additional 4,584 linear feet of channel that required buffer enhancement and/or minimal bank and
habitat improvements.
UTl
UT1 flows from southeast to northwest across the project, totaling 5,186 linear feet of Enhancement
Level I and IL The upper -most portion of UT1 (reaches UT1A and UT1B) is stable and has a forested
buffer along both banks; however, privet was dominant within the right buffer. The downstream portion
of UT1 (reaches UT1C, UTD and UT1E) was moderately stable and exhibited some areas of localized
erosion prior to mitigation activities. The buffer along this section consisted of a five year old clear-cut
along the left bank and cultivated fields along the right bank. A 60-foot easement break is present within
the downstream section (UT1E) to account for an existing farm crossing which has been upgraded. 680
linear feet of Enhancement Level I was performed along reach UT1. Selective locations were identified
to include streambed structures, minor bank grading, planting a native stream buffer and invasive
species control. Primarily, Stabilization/Enhancement II activities included performing minor bank
grading, planting the buffer with native vegetation, and invasive species control.
UT2
UT2 is the middle tributary of the project, totaling 337 linear feet of headwater valley restoration along
the upstream section and 518 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration through the downstream section. The
upper section of the channel was channelized and bordered by cultivated fields to the northwest and a
pine stand to the southeast, while the lower portion was a small ditch surrounded by cultivated fields.
The headwater valley portion relocated the flow path to the natural valley (to the left of the existing
ditch), and the abandoned ditch has been back filled. The performed P1 restoration included relocating
the channel to follow the natural valley and emptying into Cedar Creek near STA 25+50. A 60-foot
easement break crossing is present at STA 4+66 along UT2. Twin 24" HDPE culverts were installed
within the easement break crossing. Restoration activities included constructing a meandering channel,
installing habitat and drop structures, filling and plugging the abandoned channel, planting the buffer
with native vegetation, and invasive species control.
UT2C
UT2C is also located in the middle of the project (adjacent to UT2), totaling 193 linear feet of headwater
valley restoration. The upstream end of the reach begins at an existing wetland that borders a farm path
to the north. Flow from the wetland originally had been diverted to a ditch that ran east -west along the
farm path before it was conveyed across the path and into UT2 near the upstream end. Restoration
activities involved redirecting channel flow to the natural valley and grading out the existing ditch and
path such that the area matches existing grade on either side of the path. Additional activities included
planting the buffer with native vegetation and invasive species control.
UT3
UT3 is the western most tributary of the project, totaling 1,941 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration. The
upper section of the channel was incised/oversized and began at a pond outlet east of the airport and
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 4

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
flowed through a wooded area consisting of saplings and some mature hardwoods, while the lower
section flowed through a cultivated field. The restored channel has been relocated to the west to follow
the natural valley, and now flows through the middle of the wetland restoration area (W1). UT3 now
outlets into Cedar Creek near STA 43+10. Restoration activities included constructing a meandering
channel, installing habitat and grade control structures, filling and plugging the abandoned channel,
planting the buffer with native vegetation, and invasive species control. Small ditches located adjacent
to UT3 and within the conservation easement have also been plugged and filled to redirect and diffuse
flow through the wetland restoration area and/or into UT3.
UT4
UT4 is the eastern most tributary of the project, totaling 78 linear feet of Enhancement Level IL The
reach was relatively stable, but had been historically channelized. The buffer along this section
consisted of an agricultural field along the right bank, and a forested buffer along the left bank; however,
privet was common within the left buffer. Stabilization/Enhancement II activities included performing
minor bank grading, cutting a floodplain bench, and planting the buffer with native vegetation, and
invasive species control.
Wetland WI
This 13.72-acre wetland is located along UT3 and where it reaches the confluence of with UT1 Reach
E. The pre -restoration land use was sparsely wooded and active cropland. Wetland restoration activities
consisted of removing valley fill, filling drainage ditches, removing subsurface drainage tiles, and
raising adjacent stream channels to reconnect the floodplain with seasonal and out of bank flows.
Raising the stream bed will also reduce the "dry shoulder" effect near the stream channel. Specific
wetland restoration activities included: reconnecting low lying areas of hydric soil with the floodplain,
plugging agricultural drainage ditches, planting native tree and shrub species commonly found in small
stream swamp ecosystems, and surface roughening to increase infiltration and storage. Wetland
restoration activities also included the breaching, backfilling, and planting of an old pond (0.22 acres)
that was identified after Mitigation Plan approval. The IRT has not approved these additional 0.22 acres
therefore RES will revert back to the 13.10 WMUs from the Approved Mitigation Plan. Wetland
restoration limits and hydroperiods will be determined by on -site soil investigations and hydrologic
modeling in conjunction with pre -construction water table monitoring at the restoration sites and
reference wetlands. Combined with the stream restoration, these actions will result in a sufficiently high
water table and flood frequency to support hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology, resulting in
restored riparian wetlands.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by Resource Environmental
Solutions, LLC (RES) through a full -delivery contract awarded by NCDMS in 2012. Tables 2, 3, and
4 in Appendix A provide a time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history,
contacts, and baseline information.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 42.0 acres and is broken into four tributaries, UT1, UT2, UT3, and UT4. The land
use in the 2,778-acre (4.34 mil) project watershed that drains to UT1 consisted of row crop production,
livestock production, silviculture, and sand mining areas. Past land use practices caused increased
erosion and sedimentation along drainage -ways and stream banks in the watershed.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
UT2 has a drainage area of 32 acres (0.05 miZ) and flows southwest into UT1. Land use in this small
drainage area consisted entirely of row crop production and disturbed hardwood forest. UT2 originated
in a disturbed hardwood forest and flows through a cultivated field to its confluence with UT1.
UT3 has a drainage area of 147 acres (0.23 miZ) and flows south into UT1. Land use in this drainage
area consisted of row crop production, historical and future livestock production, disturbed hardwood
forest, maintained open space, and impervious surfaces associated with residential commercial
development. Portions of the Sampson County Airport, including parts of the runway, terminal, and
apron areas, lie within the UT3 drainage area. UT3 originates at a pond that is adjacent to the airport
property. This reach flowed through a disturbed hardwood forest, and then through a cultivated field to
its confluence with UT1.
UT4 has a drainage area of 77 acres (0.12 miZ), originates within a disturbed hardwood forest, and flows
southwest into UT1. Land use in this small drainage area consisted of a mix of row crop production
and disturbed hardwood forest located primarily along the drainage way.
UT2, UT3 and UT4 were straightened, dredged, or re -aligned in the past to promote drainage. Soil
investigations showed that much of the low-lying landscape adjacent to UT1 and its confluences with
UT2 and UT3 exhibited hydric characteristics and a shallow seasonal high water table. The low lying
fields in this area were considered prior converted wetlands (PC) that were drained and are currently
utilized for row crop and livestock production.
The land use in the watershed is characterized by evergreen forest (47 percent), cultivation (31 percent),
woody wetlands (9 percent), open space (8 percent) and shrub/scrub (5 percent).
2 Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Cedar Creek Site stream restoration will follow accepted and approved
success criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and
agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Stream Restoration
2.1.1 Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The two
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two
bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Bankfull events will be documented using
crest gauges, auto -logging crest gauges, photographs, and visual assessments for evidence of debris
rack lines.
2.1.2 Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross -sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross -sections are
classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross -sections should fall
within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
2.1.3 Bank Pin Arrays
Bank pin arrays will be used as a supplemental method to monitor erosion on selected meander bends
where there is not a cross section. Bank pin arrays will be installed along the outer bend of the meander.
Bank pins will be installed just above the water surface and every two feet above the lowest pin. Bank
pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed pin will be driven flush with
the bank. There should be little change in as -built cross -sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example
down -cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example
settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
2.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
2.2 Wetland Restoration
Success criteria and monitoring for wetland hydrology within the wetland restoration areas on the site
follows NCDMS Guidance dated 7 November 2011. The target minimum wetland hydroperiod is 9
percent of the growing season. Stream hydrology and water balance calculations indicate the wetland
area will meet jurisdictional criteria (5 percent hydroperiod). However, due to immature vegetation and
reduced PET, a longer success criterion is appropriate. Auto recording gauges are used to measure daily
groundwater elevations throughout the Sampson County growing season in all seven years of
monitoring.
If a hydrology gauge location fails to meet these success criteria in the seven-year monitoring period
then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be undertaken, or groundwater modeling may
be used to demonstrate the limits of wetland restoration.
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland restoration and riparian
buffers on the site will follow NCDMS Guidance dated 7 November 2011. Vegetation monitoring plots
are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of two percent of the planted area. The
following data is recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and
grid location. Monitoring occurs in the fall of Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. The interim measures of vegetative
success for the site is the survival of at least 320 three-year old planted trees per acre at the end of Year
3, and 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. The final vegetative success criteria is the survival
of 210 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 7 of the monitoring period.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or alter
the desired community structure of the site. If necessary, RES will develop a species -specific control
plan.
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology is assessed to determine the success of
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
the mitigation. The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final success
criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to NCDMS.
The monitoring reports will include all information, and be in the format required by NCDMS in
Version 2.0 of the NCDMS Monitoring Report Template (Oct. 2010).
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the NCDMS monitoring template. Annual monitoring
shall be conducted for stream, wetland, and vegetation monitoring parameters as noted below.
3.1 Stream Restoration
3.1.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey was conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE.
3.1.2 Bankfull Events
Three sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges were installed on the site, one along UT2, one along
UT2C, and one along UT3. The auto logging crest gauges were installed within the channel and will
continuously record flow conditions at an hourly interval. Manual crest gauges were installed on the
bank at bankfull elevation. Crest gauges will be checked during each site visit to determine if a bankfull
event has occurred since the last site visit. Crest gauge readings and debris rack lines will be
photographed to document evidence of bankfull events.
3.1.3 Cross Sections
A total of 27 permanent cross sections were installed to monitor channel dimensions and stability. Cross
sections were typically located at representative riffle/shallows and pool sections along each stream
reach. Four cross sections were installed along UT1 where enhancement activities were performed.
Eight cross sections (three pools, two runs, and three shallows) were installed along UT2. UT2C has
one cross section installed throughout its length. Stream reach UT3 has 14 cross sections installed along
its length where stream restoration was performed. Each cross section was permanently marked with
3/8 rebar pin to establish a monument location at each end. A marker pole was also installed at both
ends of each cross section to allow ease locating during monitoring activities. Cross section surveys
will be performed once a year during annual monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 and will include all
breaks in slope including top of bank, bottom of bank, streambed, edge of water, and thalweg.
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital photographs will be taken at least once a year to visually document stream and vegetation
conditions. This monitoring practice will continue for seven years following construction and planting.
Permanent photo point locations at cross sections and vegetation plots have been established so that the
same directional view and location may be repeated each monitoring year. Monitoring photographs will
also be used to document any stream and vegetation problematic areas such as erosion, stream and bank
instability, easement encroachment and vegetation damage.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays
Eight bank pin array sets have been installed at pool cross sections located along UT2 and UT3. These
bank pin arrays were installed along the upstream and downstream third of the meander. Bank pins are
a minimum of three feet long, and have been installed just above the water surface and every two feet
above the lowest pin. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed
pin will be driven flush with the bank.
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas is conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals. The visual assessments include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability include a complete stream walk and
structure inspection. Digital images are taken at fixed representative locations to record each monitoring
event as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual monitoring are presented
in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital images. Photographs will be
used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian
vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal photos should indicate the
absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral photos
should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of
photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
3.1.7 Surface Flow
The headwater valley restoration reaches on UT2 and UT2C will be monitored to document intermittent
or seasonal surface flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation, photo documentation
of dye tests, and continuous flow monitoring devices (pressure transducers). An auto logging crest
gauges has been installed within the headwater valley channel and will continuously record flow
conditions at an hourly interval. This gauge will be downloaded during each site visit to determine if
intermittent or seasonal flows conditions are present.
3.2 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology will be monitored to document hydric conditions in the wetland restoration areas.
This will be accomplished with automatic recording pressure transducer gauges installed in
representative locations across the restoration areas and reference wetland areas. A total of fourteen
automatic recording pressure transducers (Auto -Wells) have been installed on the site. Eleven auto -
wells have been installed within the wetland restoration area and three within reference areas. The
gauges will be downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods will be calculated during the growing
season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory and DMS guidance. Visual observations of
primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators will also be recorded during quarterly site visits.
3.3 Vegetation
A total of 20 vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted stream riparian buffer
easement. Vegetation plots measure 10 meters by 10 meters or 5 meters by 20 meters (0.02 acres) and
have all four corners marked with metal posts. Planted woody vegetation was assessed within each
plot to establish a baseline dataset. Within each vegetation plot, each planted stem was identified for
species, "X" and "Y" origin located, and measured for height. Reference digital photographs were also
captured to document baseline conditions. Species composition, density, growth patterns, damaged
stems, and survival ratios will be measured and reported on an annual basis. Vegetation plot data will
be reported for each plot as well as an overall site average.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as stream bank erosion/instability,
aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic species which prevent the site
from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case by case basis. These areas will
be documented and remedial actions will be discussed with NCDMS staff to determine a plan of action.
If it is determined remedial action is required, a plan will be provided.
4.1 Stream
No stream problems were identified in MY7.
4.2 Wetlands
One wetland problem area was noted during the Year 7 monitoring period. AW7 did not meet success
criteria for the seventh year in a row. In January 2022, RES visited the site with DMS and delineated
the unsuccessful wetland area. The area immediately surrounding AW7 had hydric soil, however, was
slightly higher in elevation. RES used LIDAR to delineate out the area directly around AW7 and
included the filled in swale from 2018 to determine the unsuccessful wetland area (0.33 acres; Figure
3).
4.3 Vegetation
There were no vegetation problems identified in the Year 7 monitoring period. Routine invasive species
treatments were performed in December 2021.
5 YEAR 7 MONITORING CONDITIONS (MY7)
The Cedar Creek Year 7 Monitoring activities were completed in June, August, and November 2021.
Year 7 wetland, stream hydrology, and vegetation monitoring data is present below and in the
appendices. Data presented shows the site has no stream problem areas and no vegetation problem
areas. Overall, the Site has met all stream, vegetation, and wetland success criteria and is recommended
for closeout.
5.1 Year 7 Monitoring Data Collection
5.1.1 Morphological State of the Channel (MY7)
The data below is from MY7 collected during the annual monitoring survey performed during June
2021. MY7 visual assessments found no stream problem areas. Appendix B includes summary data
tables, morphological parameters, and stream photographs.
Profile
The baseline (MY-0) profiles closely matches the proposed design profiles. The plotted longitudinal
profiles can be found on the As -Built Drawings. Longitudinal profiles will not be performed in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE. Morphological summary data tables can
be found in Appendix D.
Dimension
The Year 7 (MY-7) cross sectional dimensions closely matches the baseline cross section parameters.
Minimal changes were noticed for most Year 7 cross section surveys resulting from stable bed and bank
conditions. All cross-section plots and data tables can be found in Appendix D.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 10

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
Sediment Transport
The Year 7 conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all six restoration
reaches. Pre -construction conditions documented all six reaches as sand bed channels and remain
classified as sand bed channels post -construction. Visual assessments (Appendix B) show the channels
are transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and
degradation.
Bank Pin Arrays
Eight pool cross section locations with bank pin arrays were observed and measured for bank erosion
located on the outside meander bends. If bank pin exposure was noticeable, it was measured, recorded,
photographed, and then driven flush with the bank at each monitoring location. No bank pin arrays
recorded any exposure during the Year 7 monitoring season (Table 12).
5.1.2 Vegetation
The Year 7 monitoring vegetation survey was completed in 2021 and resulted in an average of 607
planted stems per acre, well above the final survival density of 210 stems per acre at the end of Year 7
monitoring. The stems per acre in plots ranged from 283 to 1,255. Five volunteer tree species were
noted during MY7 activities. The average planted stem height was 13.1 feet. Vegetation summary data
tables can be found in Appendix C and vegetation plot photos in Figure 5.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations have been established at cross sections, vegetation plots, stream
crossings, and stream structures by RES staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern will
also be documented with a digital photograph during monitoring activities. Stream digital photographs
can be found in Figure 4 and Figure 5 for vegetation photos.
5.1.4 Stream Hydrology
Three sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges were installed on the site, one along UT2, one along
UT2C, and one along UT3. The auto logging crest gauges were installed within the channel and
continuously record flow conditions at hourly intervals. Crest Gauge 1 and 3 are recording bankfull
events and Crest Gauge 2 is recording flow days. Due to maintenance issues and unreliable data on the
manual crest gauges, RES only used HOBO readings to record bankfull events in MY7. Bankfull events
were recorded on both crest gauges this year. Crest Gauge 1 documented 11 bankfull events in MY7
with the highest reading being 0.71 feet above bankfull elevation. Crest Gauge 3 did not document any
bankfull events in MY7. Crest Gauge 2, on the headwater valley restoration reach UT-2C, documented
I I I consecutive flow days and 132 cumulative flow days in MY7. Stream hydrology data can be found
in Appendix E.
5.1.5 Wetland Hydrology
Eight of the nine functioning wetland gauges achieved the success criteria by remaining continuously
within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least nine percent of the growing season. Groundwater gauge
data indicate the hydroperiods being very responsive to rainfall events. Wetland hydrology gauge AW7
fell short of the nine percent success criteria. AW7 documented four days consecutively (one percent)
throughout the growing season. AW7 did not meet success criteria for the seventh year in a row. RES
delineated out the unsuccessful area surrounding AW7 as discussed in Section 4.2. REFAW3 reference
gauge documented a hydroperiod well above the nine percent success criteria at 30 percent of the
growing season. Wetland gauge and rainfall data is presented in Table 15 and Figure 8.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 11

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Year 7 Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • January 2022
6 REFERENCES
Chow, Ven Te. 1959.Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
DDMSwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Banc & Exchange (2014). Cedar Creek Stream Restoration Project Final Mitigation
Plan. North Carolina Ecosystems Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC.
Horton, J. Wright Jr. and Victor A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas, Carolina Geological
Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. The University of Tennessee Press. Knoxville, TN.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number
FHWA-HRT-05-072.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.S. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH
654), USDA
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality
Section. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wghome/httnl (June 2005).
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 12

Appendix A
Project Background Data and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map

I
I
i
x
z
w O
�
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
w
p
o
¢
a a W
�c
¢
c
o
2
9
c
U d
¢
o
b
z
u
d
d
H
+
+
+
+
+
x
o
¢
d
i
°
b
v
N
b
x
x
x
x
x
x
xI
x
w
x
w

Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project / DIMS Project #95718
Activity or Report
Data Collection Complete
Completion or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
Aug-14
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Dec-14
Construction Completed
Mar-15
May-15
Site Planting Completed
May-15
May-15
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0
Monitoring — baseline)
Jul-15
Nov-15
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec-15
Feb-16
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct-16
Dec-16
Year 3 Monitoring
XS: July-17Feb-18
VP: Aug-17
Beaver Management
NA
Sep-17
Year 4 Monitoring
VP: Aug-18
Jan-19
Stream and Wetland Repair
NA
Oct-18
Year 5 Monitoring
XS: May -19Jan-20
VP: Aug-19
Invasive Treatment and Pine Thinning
NA
Jul-20
Year 6 Monitoring
VP: August-20
Nov-20
Year 7 Monitoring
XS: June-21
VP: Aug-21
Nov-21

Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project /DMS Project # 95718
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting
O Box 545
Siler City, NC27344
[phone]
Jose hWri ht
Planting Contractor
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
David Godley
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
O Box 545
Siler City, NC27344
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Aibogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Full Delivery Provider
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
ro'ectMana er:
BradBreslow
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
ro'ect Manager:
lRyan Medric

Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Cedar Creek Site
County
Sampson
Project Area (acres)
42
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
34' 57' 59.663" N 78' 22' 0.778" W
qr
Project Watershed Summary Information
Phy s io graphic Province
Outer Coastal Plain
River Bas in
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03030006
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03003006090060
DWQ Sub -basin
03-06-19
Project Drainage Area (acres)
2,890 acres
DA Percentage of Impervious Area
4.50%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Woody wetlands, Shrub/scrub, cultivated crops, evergreen forest
Reach Summary Information (As -Built
Con(litions)
Parameters
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
Length of reach (linear feet)
5,186
1,048
1,941
78
Valley Classification
X
X
X
X
Drainage area (acres)
2780
35
151
77
NCDWQ stream identification score
50
34.5
40
42.5
NCDWQ Water Quality
Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Morphological Description (stream
type)
E5
E5
E5
E5
Evolutionary trend
Stage 11
Stage I1/1I1
Stage
11/I1I
Stage
11/I1I
Underlying mapped soils
BH
Jo
BH
BH
Drainage class
frequently
flooded
undrained
frequently
flooded
frequently
flooded
SoilHydric status
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Slope
0.20%
1.40%
1.10%
1.00%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
AE
N/A
Native vegetation community
cultivated, mixed
hardwood forest
cultivated, mixed
hardwood forest
mixed
hardwood
forest
mixed
hardwood
forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive
vegetation
<5
0
0
<5

Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Table 4 con't. Project Information
Wetland Summary Information
Wetland 1
Parameters UTl/3
Size of Wetland (acres)
13.72
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine
Riparian Riverme
Mapped Soil Series
Bibb/Johnson
Drainage class
Frequently Flooded
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Runoff/Groundwater Discharge
Hydrologic Impairment
Incised Channel, Dredging
Native vegetation community
Forested
Percent compositionof exotic invasive
vegetation
1 — 2%
Regulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Documentation
Waters of the United States -
Yes
Yes
SAW-2013-00389
Section 404
Waters of the United States -
Yes
Yes
DWR # 13-0186
Section 401
USFWS (Corr.
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Letter
SHPO (Corr.
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Letter
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/Coastal Area Management
No
NA
N/A
Act (LAMA)
EEP Floodplain
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Requirements
Checklist
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
NA
N/A

I
,
Cedar Creek Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Site
r) -- I;t� o- �-- 7-fi
Hoondros
r
13K., r--W,
;Set O �� r
0 CD
Q
Sampson County' irport,
r=
ai
m
Z
n
4 �
O
a
M
Legend
® Airports e
� NC Highway •
KenncZ Ca e
State Roads
Streams °
Cedar Creek Easement The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Site is located in Sampson County approximately 3.1 miles southwest
Waterbody of Clinton, NC. To access the Site from the town of Clinton, travel west on Highway 24 (Sunset Avenue),
Ctake a left onto Airport Road and go 1.3 miles. Turn right onto West Main Street Extension, go
5-Mile Aviation Zone approximately 350 feet, and turn left onto a dirt farm path. Follow the farm path along the cultivated field
03030006090060 edge to the southwest corner and enter the forest. Follow the dirt path to cultivated fields adjacent to the
project below UT2. Turning to the left will take you to UT2. Going to the right will take you to UT3.
Figure 1 Date: 11/6/2015
wE Project Vicinity Map Drawn by: BSH
0 0.75 1.5
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site re%s
Sampson County, North Carolina
Miles

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Figure 4. Stream and Wetland Photos
Figure 5. Vegetation Plot Photos

0 C
H O 7777
O N C NKX
KX
Y O E Q Q E77
M — —
o a N N m m A OL o
Z
m U o N O W
LL II R R U R W y o f D 0
'O m E `m E E _ u
ELJ Z o cl -o -o o
U N 01 m m
m � A A
N o a o °� °� a�0i m o °a\i °u\� o
c>>d
U a���a = w wmLL � r n v z Q
0 0 1 ® ® I I • g ® ® ® sapadg anisenu�
4 f l
r
Ilh a
U w

§§
i]fwo
>
■
W\ƒk
=
_
__
{isƒf
\ƒ�
=
_
__
� ƒf
)kk
e°
ee
e
e
e°
�
°
�
2{
E46
/20
=
_
__
LL
».«
E0°
m
J§o
z
§/r
E
Zz
\\
OF\
\ \�
\\
0
) ()
§
\§
{!
)\%E
\ \\
\
\
\ \�
}\
\
\
\
\ }\
\\
�!\\\
::df5
/:
§~/
0,
E
J
!]!{;!
/
]/!/
2/
-
7
-
-
-
-'
~
)
§]
:
-
RJ
w/
\k\

§§
/
/ //
}2)w
«
\/0
_
_ __
ƒtm
G®;
}\oIF
=
_ _
_
E
kkk
o
_
_ __
0
)rk
° 00
zra
J§2
e
e
z
{r
e
e
)«2
mz
\\
\
\
\ \
\\
0�
)
()
§
\§
o
{
!
)
%E
(_
\
\\
\
\
\ \0
}\
0
\
\
\ }\
\\
0!\0.-
::/fr
-
-
§E/
_
5\
E
)
!0
m
/
]
/ !/
2/
b
-
-
R]
j m
2
2 !
!
!
%
\)\
w
=oo
w
wm

§/
/
/ //
}2/w
«
\/0
_
_ __
ƒtm
G®;
}\oIF
=
_ _
_
E
ktm
kk
_
_ __
00
)rk
°
z�a
J§/
r
r
z
)«2
Zz
®
I(10
{
\\
\
\
\ \�
\\
)
()
\§
§
{
!
)
%E
(_
\
\\
\
\
\ \0
}\
\
\
\
\ }\
\\
0!\\\
::
-
§E/
500
f\
)
!]!{;!
/
]
/ !/
2/
-
R]
2
2 !
!
\\
\)\
=oo
w
wm

§
E�
/
/ //
}2)w
«
\/0
_
_ __
ƒtm
G®;
}\oIF
=
_ _
_
E
kkk
o
_
_ __
0
)rk
° 00
zra
J22
z
{r
)«2
mz
{
\\
ol
\
\ \
\\
0�
)
()
§
\§
o
{
!
)
%E
(
_
\
\\
\
\
\ \0
}\
\
\
\
\ }\
\\
0!\0.-
::/fr
-
§E/
500
f\
)
!]!{;!
/
]
/ !/
2/
r
R]
2
2 !
!
\\
\)\
=oo
w
wm

Er
{j)>
■
9{ƒ)
0
=
_ __
/
){o
=
_ _
_
E Im
mv
kk)
K 7
7
7 }
}
�
�
� �
2 {
46
=is
_
= _
_
to 0
))E
°
z�a
)k2
°
°
z
EE
_
_
z�{�
00
\\
\
\
\ \�
\\
0
)
()
§
{§
{
!
)
%E
(_
\
\}
\
\
\ \�
}\
0
\
\
\ }\
\\
�o0
5
2:
-
/:
-
§E/
o.
E
)
!]!{;!
/
]
/ !/
2/
-
~
`
$�
0
-
-
R]
j
2
2 !
!
!
�
1 %
\)\
w
=oo
w
wm

w
c
R R
0
0
0
0
0
a s
o
0
0
0
0
U
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
w w
O
O
O
O
O
y
E
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
U
O Q
U
O
O
C
N O
�a
7 O
O
O
O
O
O
z a
O
Q
L
R
L
R
U 2
U 0
w m
�=
m
O E
m(D
O E
>
•R
U)
U)
E
U
N
C O
•Q �
N
U
N
U
�
R
F
O
O
N
0
m
N
..
U
C
�
O
U
t/1
m
N
�
m
�
O
..
E
E
N
�
O
V
}
O
N
�
(p
�
�
0
�
)
>
O
N
-2
N
L
m
N
m
O
m
y
�
O
�
L
�
m
N
�
m
O
p
O
U
N
�
�
�
O
U
O
N
�
N
�
O
O
C
O
y
•
o
m
0
>
Q
O
O
R
r
R
�
a
a
�
`o
ate+
O
C9
w
w
p
O
a
Qa
o
LJ:..O;..
m
O
J
fV
Q
M
c w
N
p E R
o
0
a
o
o
o
0
0
v�i U
W Q
w w
c
o
0
y
E U
o
0
O Q
U
O
C
N O
�
7 O
O
O
z a
C
> O
a
U
o
N
a
E Y
U -
U y
-�-)
> o
m
� _
0
U
[if
C O
t
L`
U
N
R �
0
0
N
a
(6
O
m
a
N
a
(6
O
m
a
N
N
O
E
O
O
O
N
N
O
E
O
O
O
N
O
o
Q
`o
o
Q
`o
�
0
m
Q
m
Q
A
a
a
C
c
O
w
U
0
0
R
U
N
a
W
O
R
N
N
�
>
c
E
o
R
W
N
'� m a�Yao: 030
o s m w E -m o E'E w E
m m.� o
o a m
w m m o
E m c E U `m m W
o' o X m
m U o m. o� E o
3 my
O c O m N U 0
ma
U L -E y6 mt L m m O
N O
N'O-' NCO
-0
oEa
m
O m N UI 'O �O/1 E UTI L
N L'm..
-O y6
U m
m L w) o ma E
Y C -O O N a O m m E
o
>-
O h 0
m ° m L' m ms 0
m O a- O O U
m E ai Em�Yma
m O '-0 u1i
m o S
E
N O O U O
p-� N�.U1
a -o moa�Emmmw-�0
a m c o O E O N U
0N 0 N o o N~ o c w
0
U U O -O E U O>
O N_ m m
w m o OY d c
O O
O -C�CCL >,y .Y
N a E U O L m U
�j U
m
L m mL E�-o
N N m O N a N �O/1 'O O N
N m N L -O '_' O w4� ._
U
w mm a�oamm��a
U O E a-O N N Ul
m m > N 0 X.E O m L 0
m M=mm°�����
'X m c O U O U N o O c
O N m U1 .E Y fl-�
m `O > 0 E U N w
O p �O L d 'o
m O
t � 'O 0-- N UI an d
op-O Twp .Lt
..EN aN mo-O
N
O- �=5 N
U m m N Y m Y U N- O
p E OUP
E m� am w w m
E
umi
m Um 3EE
N O N m c m 3
L � m 22 U �C � 0
N m Q OL c
O- O E m N-' -O
m U N O-.O m m m m O
w a�'c
Ul N Tw.L
m N N O N
E a'-S O p Lm� U
E m W- 3-o m c m a
m o �. N O a 0
c
a �E oioca�mmmm
a 0
wt W, m maa`��in -win E ac
E O> -o N O
E m m o m> O o� m> U
m m -mo �! -o.. E '° m-a- 3
mo- c Ym -mo>B
mm o oc m2000'm= -cO
L a m M U d L m m L
'N O E- t - O L. N -E
L N _
O- y6 o O UI N L N �1d
m N N U C_ T U O N O V O O m
U'O O-5 ` N-O O
L m U -O '-'E
O N O O- w �
w m E O o o .. m> o m o
mY m mm mm� wog �Lami
a E'4 .. am
mm � a
m
E m-m>o o�aEi m'-°>m o-o
Y O m 0 0 O a O -O = OU E -O N
o
L m c c L T m m 0 0.0
o H W o II L mL w 0 o> �O6 E
m N ch m v �i in .� W amN w

Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95718
Feature Issue I Station # / Range I Suspected Cause; Repair I Photo Number
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95718
Feature Category I Station Numbers I Suspected Cause; Repair Photo Number

1
l
E
1 •,.�
h �. Kam.:
I

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Cedar Creek NIY7 Vegetation Plot Photos (8/12/2021)
Vegetation Plot 19
Vegetation Plot 20

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Summary
Table 9b. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9c. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted
Stem
Height (ft)
1
971
0
971
yes
13.2
2
1255
121
1376
yes
11.6
3
890
1781
2671
yes
10.9
4
647
11938
12586
yes
19.4
5
445
0
445
yes
18.3
6
728
1174
1902
yes
11.5
7
364
1862
2226
yes
7.0
8
567
1133
1700
yes
19.3
9
364
809
1174
yes
15.6
10
405
2064
2469
yes
6.2
11
526
0
526
yes
15.4
12
688
1133
1821
yes
19.5
13
526
0
526
yes
21.7
14
607
0
607
yes
7.8
15
728
162
890
yes
19.3
16
405
850
1255
yes
12.3
17
445
0
445
yes
11.7
18
931
850
1781
yes
2.2
19
283
0
283
yes
13.6
20
364
121
486
yes
10.8
Project Avg
607
1200
1807
yes
13.1

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9b. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Grayson Sanner
Date Prepared
9/18/2020 10:41
database name
Cedar_Creek_MY6_2020.mdb
database location
S:\@RES Projects\North Carolina\0104 - Cedar
Creek\Monitoring\Monitoring Data\MY6_2020\Vegetation
Data
computer name
DESKTOP-SN39OLO
file size
76546048
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a
summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each
year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live
stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species
(planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95718
project Name
Cedar Creek Restoration Site
Description
River Basin
Cape Fear
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
20

IE�,;E;;;;;E�,,,,:;,�,;11,1
IE;;;:;;;;;:;;;;;:;,"011�1
�'���������������������I���
":;;;;;:,,;,�:;,"oll��
IE;;;:;;;;;:;;,��:;,�,�II„
I
,�,:;;;;;:�„��:;,"III"
iE;;;:;�;;;:;;,��:;,";11�1
I�;;;:;;;;;:;;;;;:;,�,�II��
1
IIII
I
III!
IlI

NUNN110
III
NUNN
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIININ
101,
NUNN
I1110
1
I
III
I
III
II�

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross -Section Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Figure 7. Cross Section Plots

M
O
o
(O
O
N r
O O
m
s
N
a
o
a
F
�
O
A
o
C
O
a
O
A
�
O
a
F
�
O
A
o
rn
N r
CO
a
li
7
a
t�
A o.
w
3oro
ro
v
H
7
�
a
U
X
�
V
ll
^
`w
0
O
O
a
o
v r
ro
H
7
N
O
V V
N
`w
a
a
F
7
O
O
a
a
N
O
�p
m m
M V
rn
N
U
�
r
m
W
U
w
`w
`w
�
o
a
U
� o �
a — �
m m
T m d
U 0 (1)
Z u u
N 0 0
N o o
O N A
Y s s
U U
o o
n o o
w m d
Y K K
m U U
m Z Z

111111
111111
111111
111111
111111
1i1101
111111
111111
111111
i11191
9A1111
111111
111111
IAIIII
111111
0�eeee
meo��o
IAIIII
IAIIII
111111
111111
IIIIAI
1111@I
111111
111111
101111
■11111111
■IIIIIIAI
■119111A1
■IIIBIIII
■�eeeo�ea
e�om'o�eo
6
HIIIIIIII
■eo11'aao
011111111
■191A1IB1
011111111
eIomvIIo'
011111111
■11111111
■19111111
■A1911111
■11991111
■1911111@
011111111
811111111
011111111
011111111
■IB111191
■11111191
■e1mva11m
■IIIAl1A1
■eseve111
HIIIIIIII
■1ao1o1oo
011111111
■IIIAIIBI
■11111111
BAIIIIIBI
BIIIAIIBI
■11111111
■ea11aseo
■A11119A1
011111111
■AIIAIIII
011111111
■tom"�oo
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
811111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
811111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
811111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
011111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
®11111111
811111111

av'a�aem���
■�v��'�m���
■a�a��ve�ee
■e'�"oma�e
■BIIIIIBIII
■e��ooe����
e����������
aa�a�0ee�ee
■�s��a�����
■o�e�0veaee
■�a�oao�o��
■Oa�A'e�a�e
■oaaoae�e��
e����������
eo0e�0e��o�
e�s��e�m��e
■oOeAav�O��
■o�aoavoo��
■�0��'o�e�e
■osa�'ve'��
e����������
e����������
■��e���e�o�
■�'e���avo�
aoo��o�e��t
a'a���o'o�v
■����mo����
■�a�m��o��'
■��a��ve���
■�a����se��
■eo�'ao0��e
■'e�'o�o��e
■��e��e'A��
■�ee���0e��
a����������
a����������
■�e��m�'�ee
■�'���emeot
a0o��vea�ee
aeeo�'eae�v
■t'�"o0a��
■�o�o'�o��e
■�ae��e'e��
■��em��o���
ea'�"o'��e
e���oe�'��e
■�se�meoo�e
■�eem��a��t
0
3
e
'a
a
e
3
3
c
E
x
s
� .�
'� 'c
a E
d H
3 �
d
3 �
° Ca
� B
� �
� E
v, .�
e
z E

S.
0
e
a
R
v
U)
C
3
O
0
C
R
d
U)
CL
D
co
I
�
I
LO
�n
`m
I
I
N
I
I
rn
N
Cl)
a
\�
C
I
coM
o
-o
I
o
M
M
C
I
O
a+
I
o
co
in
I
N
00
U
H
N �
} 0
t
U
I
N
I
Y
G1
coLO
w
c
I
U
m
Y
T
w d
v
I
a
U
I
I
r
I
I
I
O)
I
I
� r
Cl)
cu
m a)I
I
0
I
rn rn rn
mGoGoGoro00
rn
(13)
UO!IBAGl3
r,
✓�'
U
�
�
O
N
M
N�
�
N
U
m
pm
' 0
-0
-0
y
U
ry
x
°o
w
o
d
a
�
�
w

J
D
MEOW
UNION
111111
���
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
\
>
�
$
%
\
\
\
\
~
\
\
\
3
]
/
°
\
/
m
d
)
)
�

R
v
U)
c
3
0
0
R
m
U,
a
D
I'
ao
L
I'
rn
M
a
�
M
G1
(O
o
a
o
o
co
M
Cl)
CD
NI:
Cl)00
N
In
cS
m
cS
UI
UI
O0
:
w
N
m
I:
U
N 0
O
h
10
N
}
00
N
In
D
V
tv
N
I:
Y
•`
00
N
O00
M
N
N
Y
C
N
T
a)a
CN
N
N
or
r.
O
I'
•
p
Iz
N
CD
�«
o
M
Mr
0
U)v
r>
rn
rn
rn
00
00 ro
ro
00
00
0
x
(g) UO!Jenal3

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
\
>
co
§
p
{
?
�
!
7
'Onoe
9'%}
g/
4
c
%]
co
`
/9t
r_
(0
co
2
_;
\\\
R
g
g
e
«
e
m
J
/
2/
4
±
$
co
%
f
o
/®\g
{\
�
\N
m
>
g
Aco
}
/
CN0
E
3)\
0
\\
i
)
7
K
y
}
\
\
e
m
,
\
«
®
/
g
2
12\
m
»
]
\
%
%
2
a) �
QCL
2
/
/
d\
o
\\}/).(
\
)
\
~
\
}
\ \
\
\
\
\
co]
/
|
\
�
0
2
Ln
co
co
co
r Go
=
rI-
r
r
]
■
&
Ai«g

R
i
U)
c
3
O
0
C
R
d
U)
a
D
co
N
Ln
�
N
}
N
rn
�
M
Q
c
(h
0
M 0
O
_
� O
Cl)}
LL
LO
(M
C
I
O
CD
u
co
IN-
N
OL
�
m
0
N
FM-
N
}
M
0
1
t
V
R
_
N
N
Y
00
12
Gl
c
L
m
L
r
R
2
N O_
} Q
U
CN
CN
I
I
I
rn
(0
Cl)
}
I
O
o
rn
o
ao
0
r- ro L
0 0 0
v
0
(u) UOi;enal3
k
F;
F
K
C
C
t
t
F;
f
K
C
C
C
F;
C
C
t
t
C
C
t
r
t
f
F;
F
F
C
C
U
m
m
N.
x
d
�
w
1,
CG
`
e

C
R
U)
CL
D
co
z
z
LO
cv
I.N
I�
O
c.�j
o
`� -0
0
✓„
vi
O`
O
,�
N
/
a
}LL
co
c
'ao+
N
CD
M
0
N
m
'.
L
IC
m
N
Y
00
O
v1
O
O
CV
L
[L1
`
G�
N
'�
~O
~O
L
T
� d
Q
o
I
y
U
I
I
CG
�
o
o
U
�
CL
�
r
I
I
c
r
w
`�
o
P,
M
m }
A
I
p
x
O
W
00
O
r�
O
f0
O
0 7
O O
M
O
N
O
x
�Q
(g) UO!IEAGl3

C
v
U)
CL
D
co
✓�
M
�
N
N
M
�
N
�
�
�
G�
M
a
r
Cl)
CL
o
/
lL
(�
�
n
Cl)}
Cl)
C
CD
v'
r
o
�
°
N
o
u
o
N
4)
I;
O
M
30
t
_
N
v,
M
M
l\
O
O
6
O
v1
N
N
O
Y
I;
co
L
I
(t]
m
'(f
CL
N O_
Y
LJ
Iriv
W
.S:
.S:
.S:
O
M
o
r
c
w
o
r
N
v�i
a1
Q1
Cl)
m }
A
a1X
I:
'
I
p
z
o
^"
•w
r
(D
LM
7
M
N
�Q
(g) UOl;enal3

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
\
>
&
i
?
:
)
\
/
g
®
«
«
|
}
\
}
,
c/
g
!
#
a
o
%
\
(�
®
\ \
}Cl)co
Cl)
\
�
Cl)o
(/
g\
~
^
R
°
e,
g/
9
g
\
k
)
�
�
§
■ :
04
�
2
�
§
k
o
'a
L
2
a) �
kk
»
j$
�
ƒ
\
CN
|
{CL
-
(
)
/
\
\
)
\
\
\
)
f
_
�
\
com/
i
o
2
r-
(D
m
m
a
■
b u
qg

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
i
$
12
&
)
C
|.
�
2
}
J
Cl)/
0
) ±
co
| �
�
o
_
u
,
n
cn
;
2 F
=
o
a 2
n
3 ))
\
\
§
■ !
%
�
R
■
_
r
2
|
]
�
k
2
2
\
u
(
2
| |
0
�
Cl)=
w co
\ \
»
o
| |
m u q g

R
v
U)
c
3
0
0
v
U)
CL
D
I
00
LO
I
M
:4
I
a
o
Cl)
cL
o�
oo
o
I
MID
u
y
co
O
OM
I
I: I
�
0
O
M
h
N
v
N
fA
;I
I
N
m
N
} J
In
o
N
N
co
Y
Gl
'I
LO
m
r
CL
c
o
3
w
co
o
'
Cl)m
I
p
�
O
w
o
rn
ao r co
u�
0
o
rn
rn rn rn
rn
x
(y) Uogenel3

R
i
U)
C
3
O
0
v
U)
a
D
co
/
LO
N
N
M
a
r,
d
M
°
✓'c'
(Y
N o
�+
/
�
�
O�
C
N
N
O
} LL
Cd
(h
IC
O
'
CD
Cl)
O
N
NV
O
O
I,
N
m
O
I•
am
N O
`m
0
Z
V
I
N
00
w
O
O
N
N
Y
y
m
L
I.
L
N _
ID0Q
DC
.S:
Q
y
I
r
I
CG
-o
CL
.0
0
,4
r:
CL
-0
0
I.
c
o
a
3
W
Cl)
m �
A
I•
Io
p
f0
M
7
Cl) N
f-
W
0)
0)
O)
O)
a1 a1
O)
�
�Q
(u) UOl;enal3

R
i
U)
3
0
0
R
v
U)
a
D
co
'T
N
M
Q
m
cu
}
N
a
M
a
�
N
c
rl
0
(O
co
0
a
N
Cl)
}L
a)
Cl)
C
O
I:
I'
O
m
%
✓�
~
V1
O
M
N
O
ar
Cl)
O
v1
o
N
I•
4)
IA
N
[�
OL
U
I;
a)
N 0
m F-
N
}
N
M
I:
0
I'
N
Y
co
Y
P�
y
c
d
L
I
c°
m
d
N
.0
�o
L
I.
T
I'
N O_
Y
Q
Q
o
x
0y
ra
x
w
's
r
I:
CL
-o
w
Q1
O
I•
•
c
CG
P1
0�
o
co
w
w
o
_r
co
m >-
A
Q1
Q1
O
LO
7
Cl) N
O
O
W
0)
0)
CD
0)�
CY)
x
(u) UOl1en013

C
co
v
LO
}
N
IV
rn
a
Cl)
Q
O
p
o
Cl)o
C
M a
a
I o
ID 0
M
m
M
co
C
O
I
U
0
co
0
w
C:
IA
OL
N
m
O
U
U
N
3
N
}
p
1 :
t
V
R
N
N
_
Y
0
Y
d
L
m
m
L
LO
R
)C
U
I
r
I
I
I
cm
o
a�
c r
m a`Di
M
m }
I
I
0
0)
0)
rn
rn rn
co
co
(11) UO!1BA013
F
E
E
E
F
E
E
f
F
t
E
t
E
t
E

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
\
>
$
LO
�
)
2
|
g
]
)
Cl)/
n
\
z
/
�)
r
o
n
(
Z«
R«
K,
K
9
9
g
u
^
§
2 F
=
Q
S\
))
2
\
e
c
«
m
n
3
\
�:
§
■ :
2
\
R
®®Q
`
©d
/
3
3
-
�
-
) \
z33�©
y
s@
<®@/
/
|
f
)
\
\
\
)
\
\
\
)
Iz
|
) )
;
°
\
_
n
3
)
)
)
|
/
_
CD)
)
a
a
a a a
co
_
§
■
b u qg

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
\
>
_
�
2
(
&
/
Q
o
C
m
{
Cl)co
cL
R
ID
2/}
/)
t
�
I I
\
\
{
u
2
«
§
I,-
=
/
\
(
3
\
\
�
§
■ :
J
2
kk
/%4
`
2
) k
\k
]
@
_
=
e
=
/
2
)
)
e
,
/
■
/
/
a
»
;
e
t
2
CN-
i
a
)
\
\
)
\
!
a)
Cl)]
�
�
|
)
_
�
o
a
a
a
m Go
co
co)
§
■
& u qg

E
C
R
v
U)
a
D
Oo
IcT
v
co
N
I
M
ID
O
0
M
0
M -o
a
IDo
>- LL
�p
�
M
M
C
I
O
O
U
Ch
4)
IA
N
m
U
N 0
r
N o
M
F-
N w
3
M
t
V
R
N
N
Y
C
w
Y
d
L
m
m
L
LO
2
CL
D a
U
I
r
I
I
I
a7
`"'
m}
r
o
o)
co co
co
oo
0
I
(u) UOl1en013
F
IE
f
E
F
t
t
F
t
�It
F
E
i
i
E

i
U)
3
O
0
C
R
v
U)
CL
D
00
v
L
,I
N
I
;I
V
M
`
a
O
Cl)
0
M -o
a°
ID o
ti
�
M
co
C
I
O
O
U
co
0
0
N
`
U
N D
:I
VN
M
MD
}N p
t
V
R
N
N
Y
00
Y
d
m
L
m
L
L
2
'I
Q
U
:I
r
I
I
:I
:I
a7
I
:I
•I
c r
:I
M
co
m }
:I
:I
O
I
Go
co
co
co
co
ro
rn
(u) UO!1BA013

v
U)
a
D
00
LO
`m
N
I
M
a5
d
Q
a:
d
Cl)CL
o
M o
`m
�
coco
coM
C
O
O
U
(h
4)
IAA
I,- +
N
m
N O
O
0
U
c
t
V
N
w
Y
00
�
d
L
m
V
LO
2
a
a
U
r
, I
I
I
ID
M
w a` ))
m }
O
I
Go
Go oo co
co
co
rn
(g) UO!1BA013
o
�
N
U
U
m
m
N
��
h
o
�
n
o
N
o
00
Q\
O
In
v1
O
O
V1
M
M
N
O
0
O
In
N
N
4�
4�
~0
~O
c
m�
o�
w
0
w
m
A
m
�i
w

§
)
»
0
J
D
\
>
00
&
)
,
CN
2
)
�
Cl)
\ j
i
k
Cl)
2
KCD
|
u
n
,
A^
C'4
g
�)
°
'
•
3 )
/ 5
>
\
®
©°
©2
/
k
R
�
f
)
§
�(
kkk
9\4
2
\
�k
�(
L
®
/
)
)
©
•
�
$
)
)
�
»
;e
�:
s@
<®@/\)
=
d
)
o
®
&
f
)
�(
a
_
)
~
/
)
/
j
R
to co
\
m
/
Cl)
]
_
)
m
�}
�
o
-
)
■
b u qg

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
&
?
)
C
|#
}
2
\ 0
\
co
co
|}
K
u
2
,
A
|
;
2 F
=
°
2
o
e
!
§
�j|\
m
R
|
J
|
-
2
\
Q
x
Q
|
CL
) L
|
L;
CN
�
|
|
m
|
|
_
\ \
n
=»
o
| (
b u
qg

R
i
U)
3
0
0
v
U)
a
D
00
v
�o��
oom
zz
LO
}
N
I
M
a
�
�
N
O
Cl)M
0
cL
o
0✓
o
o
a
�oO��oo
m
zz
M
}L
�
N
C
.0
CD%
OO"
✓ti
O
O
M
h
M
N
O
U
M
0
0
0
0
M
O
N
G1
V
:I
ou
N O
N
O
O
O
N
O
N
IDo
0
0
N
L
V
R
N
v,
oc
O
�
o
O
M
N
CV
O
Y
Y
0
0
cj
N
d
�
N
ED
~O
~O
)
y
o
Q
�x
o
3
W
o
m
w
w
�
o
0
0
`m
U
m
m
M
m }
0
Iz
7
M
N
O
O
Ln
w
�Q
(u) UOl1en013

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
\
>
co
&
)
�
�
o
m
|
co
Cl)
B
) E
t
cm
|K
CD/
(m
r
g'T
°
z
r
K
m
g
5
Cl)
I
(
k
/a)
~CN
k)
\
\
(
\
3
]
\
§
!
\
C4
_
u
�kk©\\
/\\
2
\ L
)
j
\
/072
\
\
f
)
/
CL
\
\
)
\
\
\
)
~lz
_
_
�2
—
)
\
\
\
\
\
m
] )
m
/
n
/
)
/
/
| |
Q
=
/
CD]
r
■
& u qg

i
f e0
t�4
r ' ,y�rF11
V
II
'F
l
R
v
U)
CL
D
i
00
LO
E
N
t
M
4
a
ID
M
oco D-
N
4
U
M
cm(
co
M
I
U
U?
C
r
p
m
O
00
M�
M
N
O
U
Ch"
M
O
M
A
v�
f
0
}
Z
V
R
N
"
O
E
M
0
N
O
pp
c
00
O
M
N
m
w
w
N
'�
"o
"o
U
f
L
2
4
Y
�a
Q
o
I
LG
E
o
w
I
0
3
(0
_
w
�
o
t
w `)
U
�
�
com
�
0
x
o
a0
r-
f0 N
7
O)
M
W
m
m
a)a)
m
a)
a
x
(u) uol1en013

m
U)
a
D
00
L
}
N
I
M
`
a
O
O
M
0
M -o
a
�o
cm
N
M
co
I
C
O
0
U
(h
G1
N 0
U
3
H
N
} -oj
M
L
V
R
N
N
2
Y
C
Y
d
m
L
m
L
2
CL
U
r
I
I
I
cu
M
m
I0
rn
rn rn rn
rn
rn
rn
(g) UOl;enal3
F
t
c
E
E
t
F
�f
E
t
E
f
F
t
E
i
E
t
ELi

C
R
v
U)
CL
D
00
i
�
N
L
}
E
IN
f
rn
4
M
a
o
M
o
E
° o
D
O
j
d
M
co
LO
I
N
C
O
.2
co
a
U
Nr--
y
N
m
( /
C
r
3
L)
N _
N
0
I
H
D
t
E
N
U
R
�
w
Y
m
d
LLO
X
O
U
u
a)
4
a
13
E
U
r
E
rn
E
t
ID
M
m
IO
rn
rn
rn
rn rn
00
LO rn
(u) UOl1en013

E
R
v
U)
C
3
O
0
C
R
v
U)
CL
D
o
f
Ln
i
E
fi
�
If
II
a
c
Cl)
o
(
M 0-
N O
I
Ln
Cl)
N O
} U-
E
m
I
N
I
C
M
O
i
f
rn
(
�
N
(
m
o
o
i
N
U
N H
U
N
f
}
N
L
U
R
O
N
w
Y
d
r
m
L
m
()
I
X
o
R
r
I
I
I
E
00
i
�
� r
f
f
m }
I
�
I
LO
O
'
7
O
M
O)
N
O
O
O)
O
00
(u) UOi;enal3
N
M
B
Fln
m
N
F
O
O
o
o
N
oc
O
Rn
M
O
h
O
N
N
N
v,
M
10
O
r
'n
°
o
4
U
O
U
�
U
x
U
�
A
c
co
m
co
d
b
�
�
w
�Q

§
)
»
0
J
§
_
/
2
_
—
LO
t
\
\
/
{
'C,'
e
t
r
/
2
(
7
g
(
R
,
/
2=
r
c
c
H§
A=
\
co
co/
cc
�
§
\
g
/
/
\
/
f
3
—
§
2 F
=
§
o
CN
�
CN
R,®
oc
c
J
2
A=
j
/
°
m
�
) \
S
S
=�±a
=
a
a
\
§
=
W
o
§
°
\))
_
m
W
m
=
)
_
comID
3
/
(
|
)
\
k
oCD
o
_
£
mu
qg

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphological Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Figure 8. Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Figure 9. Headwater Valley Restoration Flow Chart

Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Crest Gauge
Flow Events
Maximum
Consecutive
Flow Days
Cumulative Flow Days
Consecutive Flow Date
Range
Crest Gauge 2 (HWV
UT-2C)
MY2
36
117
186
NA
MY3
36
35
130
NA
MY4
32
57
168
NA
MY5
6
122
151
NA
MY6
11
104
182
NA
MY7
3
ill
132
1/1/2021 - 4/22/2021
Note: Starting in MY5, flow days w ere calculated using the height of the dow nstream riffle
Crest Gauge
Number of
Ba n kfu I I Eve nts
Maximum Bankfull Height (ft.)
Crest Gauge 1 (UT3)
MY 1
0
NA
MY2
4
1.15
MY3
0
NA
MY4
4
1.05
MY5
3
0.8
MY6
8
0.67
MY7
11
0.71
Crest Gauge 3 (UT2)
MY 1
0
NA
MY2
1
0.4
MY3
0
NA
MY4
2
0.25
MY5
0
NA
MY6
5
0.13
MY7
0
NA

Appendix E - Hydrology Data
Table 14.2021 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Clinton
Precipitation
30 Percent
70 Percent
January
4.33
3.32
5.03
5.20
February
3.23
2.14
3.87
5.92
March
4.50
3.23
5.32
3.60
April
3.16
1.70
3.85
1.60
May
3.68
2.69
4.34
0.85
June
4.49
3.11
5.34
5.28
July
6.06
4.16
7.22
8.27
August
5.40
3.12
6.56
5.51
September
5.00
2.04
6.07
2.02
October
3.21
1.62
3.92
1.73
November
2.89
1.83
3.49
0.25
December
3.24
2.14
3.88
---
Total
49.19
31.10
58.89
40.23
Above Normal Limit
Below Normal Limit

Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Table 15a. 2021 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
2021 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 17-Mar through 14-Nov, 243 days)
Success Criterion 9%
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
AW1**
99
41
99
41
1
AW2
229
94
229
94
1
AW3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AW4
108
44
222
92
3
AW5
34
14
112
46
16
AW6
86
36
182
75
6
AW7**
4
1
14
6
7
AW8***
35
14
81
33
10
AW9***
54
22
119
49
6
AW10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AW11 * * *
30
12
68
28
8
RAW1 *
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RAW2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RAW3 * * *
72
143
59
3
*Well destroyed during Hurricane Florence
**HOBOs died in June 2021, data represents the first 90 days of the growing season
***HOBOS died in August 2021, data represents the first 149 days of the growing season
NA = Data not available due to HOBO failure

w
_
QQ
QQ
QQ
QQ
L.
O � _
=
O
V
M
M
CO
N
r.
O
N
� L
i pp m
N
Qi
7
b
Q
L.
O � _
=
O
N
�
L.
O � _
=
O
C
i � L
bD N
N
� Qi
L.
O � _
=
O
C
i � L
bD N
N
� Qi
V
O
O
N
h
L.
o � _
=
o
0
7 a
�N1
J^
_
L.
o � _
o
0
O
N
py
7
N
M��
b
r
00
�
O
•-�
"'i
N
M
�
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa

(Soegmi) uoi4e4!dl3OJd
O O O O O o
(O Ln V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
I
I
I N
I (.0
I
I
0
I
I
N
I
rn
�
O
I
I
N
00
�
�
I
00
Q
I
L
I
N Q
AL
I
LLB Q T
'Ow
V
I
�
O-
I
N
CO U
L
U
I
N
Ico
U
N
I
�
N
N
O
I
N
I
N
I
I o
I N
I N
I
I C)
N
O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O
N N M r
(say3ui) u014en813 aa;empunoaE)

(segmi) uoi4e4idl3OJd
m v o
O W r M In V M N O N
I
I
I
N
I
I
o
I
N
CD
�
Q
c
I
I
v�i
I
N
M
U)
I
�
c
I
�
L
Q
U
�
I
I
N
I
CD
=
I
L
cfl
(7
I
a„'
w
LO p
�
I
�
I
�
ai
I
N
o
U
I
i
I
I
V
�
(p
U
I
I
M
N
N
I
I
N
I
_
N
I
I
I
N
CD
I
I
N
I
CD
N
LO
O l.f)
O
'
l!i
O
N
LO
N
O
M
O
(say3ui)
uoi;enBIB
aa;empunoaE)

bsmpui) uol4e4ldl3OJd
0 0 0 0 0 0
(O In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O�
O W r M In V M N � ON
I
I
I
N
I
C)
C)
I
I
N
rn
�
I
I
N
Q
y
I
00
0
+�
O
I
I
N
I
N
0
L
�
I
I
;
T
C
N
O
U
i
I
v I
U
I
I
I
N
co
I
r>
U
I
04
N
p
I
N
N
I
N
I
I
I
o
N
I N
I
I C)
N
O In O In O In O In O
N N Mr
(say3ui) u014en813 aa;empunoaE)

O O O O O o (smpul) uoi4e4!dl3OJd
(O In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
O W r M In V M N � ON
I
I
N
I
o
N
0')
I
ICN
C
O
N
co
Q
�
00
N
3
(.0
�
o
L
�
CO
Q
U
C
I
N
0
0
I
LO 0
�C
I
_
N °
� U
�
� I
U
I
L
I
_
N
co
I
co
U
N
r
CVO
�
CN
I
I
N
N
I
I
N
I
I
I
O
N
I N
I
I C)
N
O In O In O In O In O r
N N co
(say3ui) u014en813 aa;empunoaE)

O O O O O o (smpul) uoi4e4!dl3OJd
(O In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
I
I
I
N
I
0
I
I
N
C
y
�
N
Q
I
00
d
�
C
I
00
I
�
�
i
I
N
v
Lo
A,
I
I
CN
N
(.0
0
o
A
U
U
I
I
N
co
U
I
I
N
N
p
N
N
I
I
N
I
I o
I N
I N
I
I C)
N
O In O In O In O In O r
N N Mr
(say3ui) u014ena13 aa;empunoaE)

(segmi) uol;e;ldl3oad
O O O O O O O O O•
00 I� M In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
ci O W r-� M In V M N O
I
I_
I N
I
I
0
I
I
N
I
0')
�
I
I
N
(.0
Q
y
f3
I
00
d
�
I
I
�
CN
L
I
I
LO p
T
I
CN
(.0
o
L
N
co
�
co
V
I
I
N
I
N
O
N
N
I
N
I
I
o
N
CN
N
I
MM
O
N
O O
O
N
O
M
O
V
O
ln�
O
r
(say3ui)
u014en813
ao;empunoaE)

(segmi) uoi4e4idl3OJd
O O O O O O O O O•
00 I� M In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
I
I
I N
I (.0
C)
I C)
I
I N
I
rn
�
I
00
�'
I
N
Q
�
I
I
00
�
/1�
�
a
U
U
L
N
=
I
CN
co
m
O
ILo
T
I
N
o
I
�
U
�
Ii
I
U
I
N
c�
I
co
d
I
U
N
�
CVC
�
I
N
N
j
N
I
I
o
I
N
I N
I
I C)
N
O O O O O O O-
N N M V�
(say3ui) uoi;enBIB aa;empunoaE)

(smpui) uoi4e4idl3OJd
O O O O O O O O O•
00 I� M In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
c O W r-� M In V M N O
N
O
N
O
N
�
Q
00
N
L
� U
N
L
v
LO
�
T
r
N
o
CO
o
�
�
U
N
co
U
N
r
�
N
CN
O
N
N
N
O
N
N
MR O
N
O O O O O O O r
N N M V�
(say3ui) uoi;enBIB aa;empunoaE)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(a
cn
�
�
o
c9
�F
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I

O O O O 0 0 (smpui) uol4e4ldl3OJd
In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
I
I
I N
I (.0
I
I
0
I
I
N
I
rn
Q
�
�
W
0
(
3
I
CN
CN
00
Q
U
N
I
I
�J
N
ate+
0LO
I
I
I
N o
(.0
ai
o
L�
U
N
d
Ico
I
U
I
N
N
O
I
N
N
I
N
I
4(.0
I 0
I N
I N
I
I C)
N
O In O In O In O In O In O r
' N N M M V�
(say3ui) u014en813 aa;empunoaE)

(smpui) uol4e4ldl3OJd
O O O O 0 0
In V M N O O O O O O O O O O O
I
I N
I
I
0
I
I
N
M
I
rn
Q
o
CN
y
W
I
ao
c
I
o
I
r
�
LL
W
CO
U
�
(D
I
I
�
N
QoLO
+�+
p
I
L
I
T
I
CN
o
(.0
o
I
I
�
V
I
N
co
I
N
V
N
N
I
N
I
N
(.0
I
I 0
I N
I N
I
I C)
N
O In O In O In O In O In O-
N N M M V�
(say3ui) u014en813 aa;empunoaE)

0
rn
(ul) Ile;uleb
ro r co
u� v m N
� o
N
V
�
_
N
V
_
N_
I
I
I
I
V
O
LL
N
N
I
I
U
Q
�
Y
�
N
I
I
�
cu
U
I
r
N
>
I
O
N
ai
N
�
U
I
I
I
I
I
�
N
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
\
O
N
O
N
I
(11) y;daa aa;eM