WQ0038087_Staff Report_20220112

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
November 22, 2021
To: WSRO-WQROS: Lon Snider / Jenny Graznak
From: Erick Saunders, Water Quality Permitting Section - Non -Discharge Branch
Permit Number: WQ0038087 Permit Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503 Exempt)
Applicant: Terra Renewal Services, Inc. Project Type: Major Modification
Owner Type: Organization Owner in BIMS? Yes
Facility Name: Terra Renewal Services Class B Resdivals Program Facility in BIMS? Yes
Signature Authority: David C. Coyle Title: Environmental Manager
Address: PO Box 1746, Watkinsville, GA 30677 County: Wilkes
Fee Category: Non -Discharge Major Fee Amount: $395 - Major Modification
Comments/Other Information: [e-mail]
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review, comment,
and/or action. Within 45 calendar days, please take the following actions:
® Return this form completed.
® Return a completed staff report.
❑ Attach an Attachment B for Certification. Issue an Attachment B Certification.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of this sheet, and
return it to the appropriate Central Office Water Quality Permitting Section contact person listed above.
RO-WQROS Reviewer:
DocuSigned by:
�1 L4. 1NA"di-
8B834968199D49D...
Date:
1/11/2022
FORM: WQROSNDARR 09-15 Page 1 of 1

XigIEC:V?
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
January 10, 2022
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Erik Saunders
Application No.: WQ0038087
Facility name: Terra Renewal RLAP
From: Caitlin Caudle
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 1/5/2022
b. Site visit conducted by: Caitlin Caudle
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: David Coyle and their contact information: (479) 747 - 8192
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Luke Mathis Certificate #:1003524 Backup ORC: David Coyle Certificate #:995723
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? n Yes or ® No
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or n No
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or No
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? n Yes ❑ No ® N/A
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes or ® No
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ['Yes ❑ No ® N/A
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? n Yes n No ® N/A
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., annual reports)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: No compliance issues.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2

If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No n N/A
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
Updated LASC form
Mr. Coyle is removing a portion of MF-17.
Updated map for MRF-14
A pond is located off site with a drainage way that passes through the field.
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
I.1
This condition has been satisfied.
I.2
This condition has been satisfied.
I.3
This condition has been satisfied.
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
n Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
n Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: ) ,.—DocuSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparers DoetiSigned�y l.�^�LUTA.
Lo
�8B834968199D49D...
Signature of regional supervisor: T. SA -au -
Date: 1/12 /2 02 2 145B49E225C94EA...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Please see attached summary.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2

WQ0038087 Permit Mod Site Visit Summary
On January 5, 2022, DWR staff Caitlin Caudle conducted a site visit of all fields accompanied by David
Coyle or Terra Renewal. Below is a table of the suggested predominant soil series for each field:
Field
Soil Series
NC-WK-CH-02
Ronda
NC-W K-M F-17
Fairview
NC-WK-MRF-13
Ronda
NC-WK-MRF-14
Danripple
NC-WK-MRF-15
Ronda
All proposed fields were reviewed. The following observations were made:
N C-W K-M F-17
No field ditches were visible. The fields were planted in wheat. Mr. Coyle said silage corn would be
planted in the spring. This field will need to be reviewed again before first application to ensure no
field ditches or other drainage areas are present.
The area across Berry Lane from the main application area is being removed.
Fairview is the predominant soil series.
NC-WK-MRF-14
There is an offsite pond that Mr. Coyle is going to add to the map. The drainage ditch that passes
through the field to the onsite pond had no running water in it.
CLC1 (footslope position, 36.2067730, -80.9731583)
0-9"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 4/6, strong medium granular
9-17"
Clay loam, 10YR 5/8, moderate medium subangular blocky, some gravel present
17-30"
Sandy clay loam, subangular blocky medium moderate, gravel more common, some redox
features present (clay concentrations and depletions)
30+"
10YR 6/8 matrix, 10YR 7/2 depletions, 5YR 5/8 concentrations, moderate/strong fine
subangular blocky, some gley colors present and increase with depth
The above description is within the range of characteristics of Bannister.
CLC2 (backslope position, 36.2063315, -80.9740542)
0-6"
Clay loam, 5YR 4/6, moderate medium granular
6-30"
Clay, 2.5YR 4/6, strong coarse subangular blocky, gravel present, a lot of clay present
30+"
Clay loam, 2.5YR 4/8, strong medium subangular blocky, less clay is present, reduction
features start forming
The above description is within the range of characteristics of Danripple.
The soil description for this field provided by Mr. Coyle was also Danripple. Danripple is the
predominant soil series.

NC-WK-MRF-15
CLC3 (toeslope/floodplain, 36.2055862, -80.9815888)
0-3"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 3/6, weak fine
granular, mica
3-15"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 4/6, weak fine
granular, mica
15-29"
Sandy loam, 10YR 5/6, weak fine
granular, mica
29-41+"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 3/4, weak fine
granular, mica
The above description is within the range of characteristic of Ronda.
CLC4 (toeslope/floodplain, 36.2064776, -80.9796084)
0-6"
Sandy loam, 10YR 3/8, moderate fine
granular, mica
6-24"
Sandy loam, 10YR 4/4, weak
medium/fine subangular blocky, mica
24-30"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 4/4, massive,
mica
30-44+"
Sandy loam, 10YR 5/6, massive, mica
The above description is within the range of characteristics of Comus.
The soil descriptions for this field provided by Mr. Coyle were Comus and Ronda. Comus and Ronda are
both components of the map unit, with Dan River making up 50% of the map unit. Based on the soil
borings, the extent of Ronda in the field may be greater than shown. Ronda may be a more appropriate
soil series than Dan River.
No additional conveyances were noted along the banks of the river.

NC-WL-MRF-13
CLC5 (slight nose slope in before floodplain, 36.2089589, -80.9749584)
0-9"
Clay loam, 10YR 4/4, moderate fine
granular, mica
9-18"
Clay loam, 10YR 5/8, weak medium
subangular blocky
18-25"
Clay loam, 10YR 5/6 moderate
medium subangular blocky, redox
features present (Fe conc. and Mn
conc.)
25-40+"
Clay loam, 10YR 6/4, moderate
medium subangular blocky, many
medium Fe conc., 7.5 YR 5/8 and 10YR
6/8 conc.
The above description is within the range of characteristics of Banister.
CLC6 (floodplain, 36.2114763, -80.9742664)
0-3"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 3/3, strong
medium granular, mica
3-14"
Sandy loam, 10YR 3/4, weak fine
granular, mica
14-22"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 4/4, weak fine
granular, mica
22-31"
Silty clay loam, 10YR 2/2, weak fine
subangular blocky
31-40+"
Silty clay, 10YR 4/6, moderate medium
subangular blocky
The above description is within the range of characteristics of Ronda.
Based on the soil borings a map units, the extent of Ronda may be greater than shown. Ronda may be a
more appropriate soil series.
No additional conveyances were noted along the banks of the river.

N C-W K-C H-02
CLC7 (toeslope/floodplain, 36.12180977, -80.9208003)
0-6"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 4/4, weak medium
granular, mica
6-30"
Sandy clay loam, 10YR 5/6, weak medium
granular, mica
30-40+"
Clay loam, 10YR 5/6, weak medium subangular
blocky, mica, clay content increased and more
structure was present
The above soil description is within the range of characteristics of Ronda. Ronda is also the predominant
soil series according to the soils map submitted with the modification application. Ronda composes
38.9% of the field. Ronda is the predominant soil series of the field.
No additional conveyances were noted along the banks of the river.
Other observations:
• According to Mr. Coyle, the 8,000 gallon storge tank has been adequate in the past. They have
been hauling from this facility for about 5 years, taking residuals to SC and GA. About 2 to 3
loads are hauled from the facility per week. They haul on a set schedule, or the facility will call
beforehand when increased flows are anticipated.
• SAR for Innospec was 6.5. Mr. Coyle stated that they will sample the residuals based on
requirements in Attachment A. If SAR gets close to 10 they will resample to confirm the results.
Corrective measures would either be taken at the facility or by mixing the residuals with lower
value residuals in the field prior to application. Residuals are staged in a frac tank at field sites.
The other higher volume residuals typically have SAR values <3.
• Application equipment is calibrated when crops change or there is a significant change in the
PAN concentration of the residuals from high volume source.
• The staff gauges have been installed on the storage tanks.

Permittee: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES
SIN21Vd SIHIVIN rSV :As POWJeA
71 71 71
T T T
Cn - A co
N
O) 01
A
A CO
'co O1 O
N r
1 j
o
mD
z�
003.
Or
�c
m
z�
GI
m O
xim
0
O
z
0)
m
z
Z
0
m
0
0 O
cn
0 z
H
m
cn
999
°r
N
▪ N
t0 W O)
c0 c0 c0
0 o O r
CO CO CO
O N 0)
W O1
00
0 -0 rj C
0 OACM
lo_<nr-�7nm
�Zx z�0*
0 0 r' -1
m z*m
m 7)
u NN00(n00
�cncn000
m m m m m m 1
S3) lIM :A uno3
APPLICATION AREA & SETBACK MAP

PERMITTEE: TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES, INC
L4-�W :al3Id
Q
Q
0 N 0
v99 D
PD
v
CD
S
zD
vz
D
1
m
z
0
Q
3aal0006 = 49u!
dVW 073Id 3IHdbelOOdOi
ON `A1NfOa 93)11IM
cn
Z�
m

NI'•`'
na a.
` `
/ ♦ � — •
/ / 21
/ / a •�
♦ / T::

North Carolina - Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) Summary
Permit #: WQ0038087
Permittee: Terra Renewal Services, Inc
2021
(Updated for Permit Modification)
Field ID
Net
Acres
County
Predominent Soil Series & Slope
Crop 1
PAN
(Ib/ac)
RYE
Crop 2
PAN
(Ib/ac)
RYE
CH-1
21.8
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
CH-2
19.3
Wilkes
RyB - Ronda 0-5%
Corn (silage)
162
13.7 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
78
6.4 tons/ac
CH-3
41.6
Wilkes
BaB - Banister 1-6%
Corn (silage)
285
26.6 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
113
10.5 tons/ac
CH-4
35.8
Wilkes
CoA - Codorus 0-2%
Corn (silage)
270
26.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
9.0 tons/ac
DF-1
8.8
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
DF-2
68.5
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
DF-3
35.5
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
DF-4
18.5
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
DM-3
11.4
Wilkes & Yadkin
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
DM-5
21.0
Wilkes
CcB2 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
DM-6
25.6
Wilkes
CcB2 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
DM-7
32.6
Wilkes & Yadkin
CcB2 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
DM-8
26.2
Wilkes & Yadkin
CcC2 - Clifford 6-10%
Corn (silage)
231
21.2 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
112
10.1 tons/ac
DS-1
53.6
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
DS-2
42.1
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
DS-3
33.6
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
DS-4
28.7
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
DS-5
16.0
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
DS-6
16.7
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
DS-7
23.8
Wilkes
DpB2 - Danripple 2-8%
Corn (silage)
212
19.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
98
8.8 tons/ac
DS-8
41.4
Wilkes
PaB - Pfafftown 1-6%
Corn (silage)
219
20.1 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
101
9.1 tons/ac
DS-9
41.2
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
DS-10
6.3
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
ED-1
30.0
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
ED-2
14.8
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
ED-3
12.1
Wilkes
BaB - Banister 1-6%
Corn (silage)
285
26.6 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
113
10.5 tons/ac
ED-4
25.1
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
HP-1
15.9
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
HP-3
14.5
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-6
22.5
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-8
12.7
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-9
13.2
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
MF-10
19.6
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
MF-11
22.5
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-13
33.8
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
MF-14
23.4
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-15
13.8
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-17
39.5
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
MF-23
59.2
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
MRF-3
18.9
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
MRF-5
25.3
Wilkes
DpB2 - Danripple 2-8%
Corn (silage)
212
19.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
98
8.8 tons/ac
MRF-6
20.4
Wilkes
DpB2 - Danripple 2-8%
Corn (silage)
212
19.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
98
8.8 tons/ac
MRF-12
25.1
Wilkes
PaB - Pfafftown 1-6%
Corn (silage)
219
20.1 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
101
9.1 tons/ac
MRF-13
41.0
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
MRF-14
18.5
Wilkes
DpC2 - Danripple 8-15%
Corn (silage)
179
16.4 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
82
7.4 tons/ac
MRF-15
34.9
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
MRF-20
52.3
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
MRF-21
27.8
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
MRF-22
31.4
Wilkes
RyB - Ronda 0-5%
Corn (silage)
162
13.7 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
78
6.4 tons/ac
RJ-1
20.6
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
R1-2
57.8
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
RI-5
45.1
Wilkes
DaA - Dan River & Comus 0-4%
Corn (silage)
237
21.8 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
103
9.3 tons/ac
R1-7
24.6
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
SP-1
12.7
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
SP-2
26.8
Wilkes
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
TA-1
32.3
Yadkin
CcB2 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
WB-1
23.2
Wilkes
RyB - Ronda 0-5%
Corn (silage)
162
13.7 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
78
6.4 tons/ac
YF-1
13.5
Yadkin
NaB - Nathalie 2-6%
Corn (silage)
203
18.6 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
98
8.8 tons/ac
YF-3
22.3
Yadkin
CcB2 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
YF-4
23.3
Yadkin
CeB3 - Clifford 2-6%
Corn (silage)
246
22.5 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
120
10.8 tons/ac
YF-5
51.5
Wilkes & Yadkin
FcC2 - Fairview 8-15%
Corn (silage)
174
16.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
80
7.2 tons/ac
YF-7
10.3
Wilkes
FcB2 - Fairview 2-8%
Corn (silage)
207
19.0 tons/ac
Small Grains (silage)
95
8.6 tons/ac
NOTES: 1702.2
- RYE are based on predominant soil series for field and data provided by NCSU at https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu (adjusted rates November 2021)

III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
1. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 615 Mathis Farm Rd (Location of Office of LJC Environmental, LLC)
City: Roaring River State: NC Zip: 25669-
Coordinates: Latitude: 36° 08' 51" Longitude: 80° 59' 09"
Datum: NAD 83 Level of accuracy: Nearest Second
Method of measurement: MAP
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Wilkes
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
Designation
Name
Affiliation
Certification Number
ORC
Luke Mathis
LJC Environmental, LLC
1003524
Back -Up ORC
David Coyle
Terra Renewal Services, Inc
995723
Additional Back -Up
Will Hodges
Denali Water Solutions
997282
ORCs
(if applicable)
Ivan Heatwole
Denali Water Solutions
1002031
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test: Andrew Epting; Environmental Specialist; Denali Water Solutions; Estimate Cert. in Summer 2022.
4. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available Nitrogen Summary: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in the
following table:
Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: 5,260 dry tons per year.
PAN
Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton
(Weighted Average)
Pounds of PAN per Year
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
First -Year
40.9
57.4
215,134
270,364
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted
51.4
67.8
301,924
356,628
b. Land Application Site Use Summary: Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and
proposed for certification with this application:
Category
Use
Acres
Comments
Crops
Forest or Plantation
Row Crops
1,702.2
Hay
Pasture
Total:
1,702.2
Methods
Surface
Incorporation or Injection
1,702.2
.
Total:
1,702.2
FORM: RLAP 06-16
Page 2 of 5

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
Land application sites currently certified: 1,549.0 net acres and Total to be certified: 1,702.2 net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Codes
Site/Field ID
Landowner(s)Lessee(s)or
Operator(s)
Net Acres
CountyCrop(s)
pO
Predominant Soil
Series Name
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slopes
N
NC-WK-CH-02
Mathis Properties, LLC
ASJ Mathis Farms
19.3
Wilkes
Row Crop
Ronda
RyB
N
NC-WK-MF-17
Mathis Properties, LLC
ASJ Mathis Farms
39.5
Wilkes
Row Crop
Fairview
FcC2
N
NC-WK-MRF-13
Blue Ridge Conservancy
ASJ Mathis Farms
41.0
Wilkes
Row Crop
Dan River
DaA
N
NC-WK-MRF-14
Blue Ridge Conservancy
ASJ Mathis Farms
18.5
Wilkes
Row Crop
Danripple
DpC2
N
NC-WK-MRF-15
Stephen C. & Jane H.
Motsinger
ASJ Mathis Farms
34.9
Wilkes
Row Crop
Dan River
DaA
a Status Code for land application sites are: • N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Currentand Proposed
ro p
Class
NC-WK-CH-02
36°
13' 04"
80°
55'
11"
NAD 83
MAP
Nearest Second
Yadkin River 12-(47.5)
WS-IV
NC-WK-MF-17
36°
09' 49"
80°
58'
10"
NAD 83
MAP
Nearest Second
Grays Creek 12-49-(1)
C
NC-WK-MRF-13
36°
12' 36"
80°
58'
31"
NAD 83
MAP
Nearest Second
Yadkin River 12-(45)
WS-V
NC-WK-MRF-14
36°
12' 23"
80°
58'
25"
NAD 83
MAP
Nearest Second
Yadkin River 12-(45)
WS-V
NC-WK-MRF-15
36°
12' 19"
80°
58'
53"
NAD 83
MAP
Nearest Second
Yadkin River 12-(45)
WS-V
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16
Page 1