410019_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211202

Type of Visit: A,Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ;Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
i{;,
Farm Name: V.-1\vei1's \CIK O i RI 4-fA Yid
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Da,o, Sock iv 11
CA I S NC Nk,/ (oI N ; (bsanu ilk(, NY_ 2�?t101
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
County: Go J i R rd Region: s i
\A) Il @_\icth on ,(01A
Phone:
Facility Contact: V\I t lI. a 3S(,kide kt
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Phone: 3 (p 6 I U l 1 Z"
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -Layer
Non -La ers
Pullets
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes IZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes l:Z[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: L
Date of Inspection: VP. Z 1 Z 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
tig``
Structure 2
7
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes xi No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7❑l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? r1 ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes 321 No
❑ Yes 71 No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes IgiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JRINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
CO c r\ s 1I Alt F as-lnr-c_ , soy beC s
.14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
aste Application XWeekly Freeboard
Rainfall Otocicing gCrop Yield 14120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
Waste Analysis jg.Soil Analysis
%Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
jZf\No
❑ No
XYes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
['Other:
❑ No
allo
LzfNo
g-No
igiNo
�No
[,No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
as e rans e Weather Code
❑ NA ❑ NE
taNA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: LI 1 - I
Date of Inspection: l2' Z, 7 )
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
giNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No EXA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
u
Yes
T❑J Yes
❑ Yes
Vi No
❑ No
K'No
No
,No
❑ No
❑ NA ❑NE
EVNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
XNA ❑ NE
u) ZZ
❑ NA
Is No ❑ NA
KNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a) SLUE r (ord 37 ti1(ve r \ AY /M \leaf
S-Ck trciil
aF s �la�e ?
VO o.sk C'(k\' 's ("6'Ypke\8, 3sanqtes 'ub.JY\i d ,2 r-C,paro{- lot is
MS Gvaa� �1Z003 W,,s€9t,n.l1 TC kz) �ibectns 2�� fan
C �(6 1eI C10 is Rwo kc e Card otTui 6 v" i n l U riAick v d, (tka W r 1-c b-f\
S 5
cbtvbfD.hbA ck,L7& 1. per- c\ 20Zs`
W VSe O i\ a c& t (n, e c- cM; b fa.+►-6,+\
u IN o .
\\ed nhhSIZb
Spit\wail \'(\ �Ppe r
Pt t\\e sCLrr\ \91 e `3 IDue CA
yVk
L
4-mveA o t ioada,.1"
awn IN -\x) cI',(
tAChiSe,d Yno�-
de)khak -tv`
(-C Pa\re ck 7 \IeS p c) mck (aA`k-S .
5/lb It) IS S/ ►S
et.aa 0 Cq d,a
ClAtat- -c w C1 2 \D.r\ rCLUN\-kv\c \ t, 111 6M v 23
476 lb P \•1 G{ 'Mm l\ ilk\ \ c ovi { C\jo ?pyy lk\- c0C S41;\ 9.,17,1 l 7.n7 (�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ' S(0 - ( • q q
Date:
•
S/12/2020