20090688 Ver 1_As Built Report Final_20140121

VUD�Z'
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT AND AS BUILT BASELINE REPORT
FINAL VERSION
Charles Williams Stream Wetland and Buffer Site
Randolph County, NC
State Construction Project No. 07- 07125 -01A
EEP Project No. 80
Prepared for the
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
0 I§ 0 v R= Raleigh, NC 27603
�
JA,N 9, ? 2014
1
f KRT WA LITY Eros Sieni
WVeWds 8tcg;rwa r Branxch ' 1�
PROGRAM
September 25, 2013
RECEIVED
SEP 2 6 2013
NC ECOSYSTEM
IRWANCEMENT PR0GRAM

Prepared by:
�ENGOINOEEIRING
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary, NC 27518
919.557.0929
G. Lane Sauls, Jr., Principal
Under Contract with:
A 1I/�
SUP! GATE
DESIGN GROUP
This assessment and report are consistent with NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program Template Version 2.0 (10 114 110)
for Baseline Monitoring Document Format, Data Requirements and Content Guidance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 Executive Summary/ Project Abstract....
2.0 Project Goals, Background and Attributes .................................................. .............................2.
2.1 Location and Setting .................................................................................. ............................... 2
2.2 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................... ............................... 3
2.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach ................................... ............................... 3
2.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data ............................................ ............................... 5
3.0 Success Criteria ........................................................................................ ..............................5
3.1 Morphologic Parameters and Channel Stability ........................................ ............................... 5
3.2 Hydrology .................................................................................................... ..............................5
3.3 Vegetation ................................................................................................... ..............................5
4.0 Monitoring Plan Guidelines ...................................................................... ..............................6
4.1 Hydrology .................................................................................................... ..............................6
4.2 Stream Channel Stability and Geomorphology ......................................... ............................... 6
4.3 Vegetation ................................................................................................... ..............................6
4.4 Digital Photographs ................................................................................... ............................... 6
5.0 Maintenance and Contingency Plans ........................................................ ..............................6
6.0 Baseline Condition ................................................................................... ..............................7
6.1 Record Drawings ........................................................................................ ............................... 7
6.2 Baseline Data Collection ............................................................................ ............................... 7
7.0 Report and Data Submission .................................................................... ..............................7
8.0 References ............................................................................................... ..............................9
Appendix A. General Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Aerial Photograph and Mitigation Components
Figure 3. Site Features
Figure 4. Tree Planting and Invasive Treatment Areas
Figure 5. Permanent Seeding Zones
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B. Cross Section and Profile Data
Appendix C. Baseline Photographs
Appendix D. Record Drawings

1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/ PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, hereinafter referred to as the "Project Site" or "Site," is
located in Randolph County, North Carolina, within US Geological Survey (USGS) 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03030003 and NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) sub -basin 03 -06 -09 of the Cape Fear River Basin
(Figure 1). The project involved the enhancement of 1,753 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Sandy
Creek, 1.96 acres of wetlands and 4.7 acres of riparian buffer. The Site is protected for perpetuity under a
conservation easement purchased from Mr. Charles Williams in 2006.
Existing land use and practices, including unrestricted livestock access were the main reasons for degradation
throughout the Site. The establishment of a protected conservation easement along these areas, channel
enhancements, and the planting of supplemental vegetation will ultimately uplift existing natural and
biological processes. It will also improve the overall function and habitat associated with both the UT and its
receiving stream, Sandy Creek.
The Project Site is located in the 14 -digit Upper Cape Fear Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030003020010,
identified as the Sandy Creek Watershed. This HUC is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in EEP's
Draft 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP) Plan (available at the EEP web site under the link
http: / /www.nceep .net /pages /lwplanning.htm).
The Project's goals were to:
• reduce nutrient and sediment water quality stressors,
• provide for uplift in water quality functions,
• improve instream and wetland aquatic habitats, including riparian terrestrial habitats, and
• provide for greater overall instream and wetland habitat complexity and quality.
Stream enhancement, the primary component, served as the dominant input for achieving this goal.
No restoration goals were identified in the Cape Fear River Basinwide Management Plan (NCDWQ, 2005) with
regard to the Sandy Creek watershed. There were no sources or stressors listed for the watershed area
associated with the Project Site. The NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) develops River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) to guide its restoration
activities within each of the state's 54 cataloging units. RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both
the need and opportunity for wetland, stream and riparian buffer restoration. These watersheds are called
Targeted Local Watersheds (TLWs) and receive priority for EEP planning and restoration project funds. The
2009 Draft Cape Fear River RBRP identified HUC 03030003020010, which includes the Project Site, as a
Targeted Local Watershed. The following information is taken directly from the RBRP. "...This is a largely rural
HU. The main stream, Sandy Creek, flows through Randolph County to Sandy Creek Reservoir, a drinking water
supply for Ramseur and Franklinville. As of 2006, the HU had no streams on DWQ's list of impaired waters,
however, the reservoir shows indications of high nutrient levels, likely related to the large number of animal
operations in the HU. The HU is a Water Supply Watershed and a long portion of Sandy Creek is recognized by
the State's NHP as a Significant Natural Heritage Area. EEP has been active in the HU with five projects that
include components of preserving wetlands (3 acres) and streams (5,100 linear feet) and restoring wetlands
(15 acres) and streams (15,000 linear feet). Piedmont Land Conservancy has also been active in protecting
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 1
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

streamside buffers in the HU. Continued implementation of practices to reduce nutrient inputs to Sandy Creek
Reservoir is recommended for this HU."
2.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
2.1 Location and Setting
The Project Site is situated in northeastern Randolph County, west - southwest of the town of Liberty, and six
miles north of Ramseur (Figure 1). It is bordered to the north and west by undeveloped land, the east by
Ramseur - Julian Road and the south by Sandy Creek. Northeastern Randolph Middle School is on the property
opposite of Sandy Creek, to the south. The Project Site can be accessed by using the following directions from
US Highway 64.
• Turn north on US 421 in Siler City, towards the Town of Liberty.
• Proceed approximately 9.5 miles and turn south (left) onto NC 49.
• Proceed approximately 0.7 miles along NC 49 and turn north (right) onto SR 2459 (Sandy Creek
Church Road).
• Follow Sandy Creek Church Road approximately 4.5 miles until it intersects with SR 2442
(Ramseur - Julian Road) and turn north (right),
• Follow Ramseur - Julian Road approximately 0.3 miles, crossing over Sandy Creek. The Charles
Williams Site is on the west (left) side of the roadway, immediately north of Sandy Creek.
Situated in the Piedmont physiographic province and the Cape Fear River Basin, the Project Site encompasses
approximately 18 acres of former pasture and existing riparian forest. Elevations across the Site range between
approximately 550 and 560 feet above Mean Sea Level. The following chart depicts pre - implementation
existing condition information regarding the Site.
Pre - Implementation Existing Conditions
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
County
Randolph
River Basin Name
Cape Fear
Property Owner Name
Charles Williams
USGS 8 -digit HUC
03030003
USGS 14 -digit HUC
03030002020010
Stream 41 Name
UT to Sandy Creek
NCDWQ Subbasin
03 -06 -09
Drainage Area
4.9 sq. mi.
Underlying Mapped Soil(s)
Chewacla loam
NCDWQ Score
(Perennial)
Drainage Class
Somewhat poorly drained
Rosgen Classification
C5
Hydric Status
B
Slope
0 -2
Available Water Capacity
Moderate to High
FEMA Classification
Zone AE
Exotic Vegetation Observed Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora)
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense)
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 2
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

2.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Project goals are to:
• reduce nutrient and sediment water quality stressors,
• provide for uplift in water quality functions,
• improve instream and wetland aquatic habitats, including riparian terrestrial habitats, and
• provide for greater overall instream and wetland habitat complexity and quality.
Stream enhancement, the primary component, serves the dominant input for achieving this goal.
Historic and contemporary land management practices have been the main reasons for the degradation of
biological processes within the Project area. The absence of barriers to livestock movement had resulted in
stream bank erosion., degradation of in- stream habitat, and of suppression of forest succession within the
riparian zone and adjacent wetland areas. Project enhancements were designed to combat various watershed
stressors through the following strategies:
Key Watershed Stressors Management Strategies
Stream bank erosion riparian buffers & livestock exclusion
Absence of vegetative buffer riparian buffers & livestock exclusion
Livestock access to streams Livestock exclusion
Nutrients agricultural BMPs, riparian buffers & livestock exclusion
Fecal coliform agricultural BMPs, riparian buffers & livestock exclusion
The objectives were to exclude livestock in their entirety from the Conservation Easement area, install stream
structures and plantings designed to maintain vertical stability, lateral stability and habitat, eradicate non-
native invasive vegetation, and re- vegetate and supplement those areas lacking suitable vegetation along the
easement area. In addition all areas void of woody vegetation (former pasture) were ripped to alleviate soil
compaction and to facilitate growth of supplemental plantings.
An alternative water supply and livestock exclusion fencing were provided by the Randolph County Soil and
Water Conservation District. The combination of physical improvements to the riparian corridor and improved
land use practices in and around the project area will stabilize sediment export and provide an increase in
pollutant and nutrient uptake of overland flows prior to entering the stream channel.
Current monitoring protocols require baseline data to be collected 21 days after the project is accepted as
complete by EEP and the State Construction Office. However, delays were encountered during the contracting
process between project implementation and the collection of baseline data. This resulted in the stream
baseline data collection being delayed approximately six months.
2.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Two main mitigation components exist at the Site: (1) riparian, riverine wetland enhancement and (2) stream
enhancement (Level 1). These components are depicted on Figure 2 and summarized in Table 1.
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 3
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

As previously noted in Section 1.0, historical landuse activities were primarily responsible for the degradation
of the streams, wetland and riparian areas at the Site. With no barriers to livestock the unnamed tributary
exhibited severe erosion due to cattle -hoof shear, lack of vegetation and lack of grade control. The overall
enhancement of the Site included livestock exclusion from the riparian corridor, stabilization of the stream
banks and livestock crossings, eradication of non - native invasive vegetation and the planting of native
hardwood vegetation.
Enhancement (Level 1) of the UT utilized natural channel design methodologies consistent with Priority Level IV
stream restoration protocols. These protocols specifically include the stabilization of the existing channel in
place. A Conservation Easement recorded on February 22, 2006 affords protection to the Project Site for
perpetuity. Stream enhancement will ultimately result in the reduction of bank erosion and associated
sediment contributions as well as the enhancement and improvement of aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
Wetland enhancement work was performed throughout the existing wetland areas. These wetlands were
severely degraded as a result of continuous soil compaction and grazing from livestock. The enhancement
work included livestock removal via exclusion fencing and supplemental plantings. Benefits include water
quality improvement by trapping nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous, toxic substances and disease -
causing microorganisms. Wetlands also slow and intercept surface runoff, protect stream banks from erosion,
protect upland areas from flooding, as well as provide valuable habitat for wildlife.
Riparian buffers, extending a minimum of 50 feet from the top of bank outward, have been established along
both sides of the UT and the north side of Sandy Creek. These areas will be enhanced with the installation of
supplemental plantings during the 2013 -2014 dormant season (Figure 4). Buffers are one of the most
functionally beneficial and biologically diverse systems that also provide services of great economic and social
value. The benefits associated with a forested buffer include water quality enhancement, stormwater and
floodwater management; stream bank stabilization, water temperature modification, wildlife habitat
protection and absorption of airborne pollutants. This enhancement, along with stream and wetland
enhancement, will aid in reducing overall sediment inputs at the site, as well as downstream. The newly
established buffer areas have been afforded protection from livestock grazing through the installation of
livestock exclusion fencing. Additionally, two non - native invasive species (Chinese privet and multiflora rose)
dominated the stream side vegetation along UT to Sandy Creek. These species were removed mechanically
and herbicide was applied to all remaining stumps and stems. Herbicide was also applied to the non - native
invasive plants (multiflora rose and Japanese stilt grass) found within the riparian and wetland areas (Figure 5).
The project also offered EEP an opportunity to test multiple permanent seed mixes. Three seeding variations
were developed for a cost benefit analysis of seed mix and application rates. Additional goals of this test
include the evaluation of less expensive seed mixes, evaluation of reduced seed application rates, evaluation
of shade tolerant species, evaluation of nitrogen - fixing legumes and the evaluation of red fescue for sediment
and erosion control. Along UT to Sandy Creek, upstream of the culvert, the riparian area was divided into two
planting zones. Downstream of the culvert the riparian area was also divided into two planting zones. The
riparian area along Sandy Creek was designated as a third planting zone (Figure 6). Zone 1 received a seed mix
of red fescue, red clover, little bluestem, Virginia wild rye, deer tongue, river oats, and upland bentgrass. Zone
2 received the same species with the exception of red fescue. The seed mixes were applied at a rate of 30
pounds per acre in both Zones 1 and 2. Zone 3 received the same mix of species as Zone 2; however, the
application rate in Zone 3 was half (15 pounds per acre) of the rate applied in Zone 2. EEP will monitor and
collect data throughout the monitoring period to evaluate germination success, effectiveness in site
stabilization, and benefits to the tree seedling installations. It is important to note the testing of permanent
seed mixes is not a regulatory requirement of the project.
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 4
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

2.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
A mitigation feasibility study and draft mitigation plan for the Site was developed by the NC Department of
Transportation ( NCDOT) in 1999 for stream and wetland mitigation needs related to the Greensboro Bypass
and other transportation projects in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site was not immediately developed by the
NCDOT and it was eventually transferred to EEP for implementation. In 2006, NCDOT acquired a conservation
easement from Mr. Charles Williams (Book 102, Page 99). Mitigation implementation including stream and
wetland enhancement, fencing, stream crossings, and live -stake planting was completed in early 2013.
Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide project reporting and milestone history, project consultants, contractors and
suppliers and relevant attributes /data at the project level and for the individual restoration components.
These tables are provided as a summary of background data.
3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
Mitigation success criteria at the Site will be based on USACE (2003) stream mitigation guidelines, Monitoring
Level I Criterion.
3.1 Morphologic Parameters and Channel Stability
The morphologic contribution to uplift in hydrologic, water quality and habitat functions stem from two main
objectives. The first being the maintenance of a restored or enhanced floodplain connection and associated
dimension that facilitates the transport of in- stream sediment loads in equilibrium and dissipates energy
associated with floodflows. The second is the maintenance of a longitudinal profile /gradient, which supports
these same transport and energy management outcomes. Monitoring will assess and compare the annual
dimension adjustments via cross section overlays and measurements of the substrate at each of the four
established cross sections. It will also assess the longitudinal profile via the annual measurement along thalweg
of the channel. Any trends occurring with regards to cross - sectional area, aggradation or degradation will be
noted. Pattern measurements will not be necessary since no changes were performed as part of overall
implementation.
3.2 Hydrology
A minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the standard five -year monitoring period. In
order for the hydrology -based monitoring to be considered complete, the two events must occur in separate
monitoring years.
3.3 Vegetation
The criteria for vegetation success are dictated by the desired mitigation. Vegetation within the stream and
wetland mitigation areas will meet the USACE Wilmington Regulatory District's guidance for stream and
wetland mitigation. The Wilmington District requires the survival of a minimum of 320 planted woody stems
per acre after monitoring year 3 (MY3). A 10% mortality rate will be allowed for the subsequent monitoring
years with a final requirement of 260 stems per acre survival in monitoring year 5 (MY5). Riparian buffer
mitigation areas will meet the NC Division of Water Resources criteria for buffer mitigation. NCDWR requires
the survival of 320 stems per acres in monitoring year 5 (MY5). Success criteria will also require treatment and
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 5
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

removal of all non - native invasive species prior to project closeout. Bare -root and containerized tree species
will be planted between December 15, 2013 and March 15, 2014.
4.0 MONITORING PLAN GUIDELINES
4.1 Hydrology
A crest gage was installed near the downstream end of the Site (Figure 3). This gage will verify the on -site
occurrences of bankfull events. In addition, observations of wrack and deposition will serve to validate gage
observations. Documentation of the highest stage during the monitoring interval will be assessed during each
Site visit and the gage will be reset. The data related to bankfull verification will be summarized in each annual
report. Based on the elevation of the crest gage, any readings observed higher than 20 inches on the gage will
reflect a bankfull or above bankfull event.
In addition, daily precipitation amounts will be ascertained from the weather station at the Siler City Airport
(SILR), approximately 12 miles southwest of the Site. These amounts will be used to help determine the dates
of important rainfall events.
4.2 Stream Channel Stability and Geomorphology
As previously mentioned, four cross sections have been strategically placed along the UT (Figure 3). Exhibit
Tables 5 and 6 depict the project's hydraulic and geomorphic data. This data is also graphically depicted in
Appendix B.
4.3 Vegetation
Once vegetation has been planted, it will be assessed using plot layouts consistent with the EEP /Carolina
Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level II Vegetation Protocol. Stem count data will be ascertained from 12 permanently
placed 100 meter vegetation plots (Figure 3). Assessments will be conducted for both planted and natural
stems.
4.4 Digital Photographs
Baseline photographs were taken in June 2013 to document existing conditions at the Site (Appendix Q.
Included are 20 individual, strategically placed photostations (Figure 3). Each annual monitoring assessment
and report will depict photographs taken at the same location for that particular year. This will result in a visual
depiction of vegetation succession at the Site.
5.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS
Annual reports submitted for a minimum of six consecutive years (vegetation only in MY6) will document any
observed or anticipated problems with achieving success. Recommendations including increased monitoring,
maintenance or repair may be documented in these reports. Problem areas will be depicted on the monitoring
report plan view and described in detail. In addition, problem severity, as well as probable cause will also be
noted.
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 6
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

6.0 BASELINE CONDITION
6.1 Record Drawings
Record Drawings were submitted in early 2013 once construction implementation activities were completed. A
copy of the drawing set is presented in Appendix D.
6.2 Baseline Data Collection
Monitoring feature installation and baseline data collection occurred during June 2013. These assessments
covered the easement area (visually), enhanced stream channel and crest gage. Vegetation plots were not
included under this assessment since bare - rooted and containerized vegetation implementation will not occur
until the winter /spring of 2013/2014. The actual plot locations were established however. They consist of 12
vegetation plots existing as either 10 -meter by 10 -meter squares or 5 -meter by 20 -meter rectangles with
corners consisting of 1" x 5' PVC pipes attached to 1/2" x 2" rebar posts. The crest gage was purchased from
Remote Data Systems (RDS) and attached to a steel L -brace buried in the streambank. It was reset upon
evaluation. Photographs were taken at each of the 20 established photostations. These photostations are not
individually denoted in the field but tied generally with an identified object (i.e., vegetation plot corner or cross
section).
During June and July 2013, approximately two bankfull events were documented on the crest gage. These
events occurred during early June and late /early June /July 2013. The following chart depicts information from
the nearby weather station.
Observation Date(s) Observation Amount (inches)* Bankfull Event
6/2/2013 to 6/10/2013 4.36 Likely
6/26/2013 to 7/3/2013 4.16 Likely
*Precipitation data from Siler City Airport (SILK) weather station, approximately 12 miles southwest of the
Project Site (NC State Climate Office, 2013).
7.0 Report and Data Submission
Monitoring reports will be submitted to the regulatory agencies on an annual basis. All assessments and
reporting will follow EEP protocols established during the project period. It is understood that EEP will
coordinate any necessary monitoring report submittals with the regulatory agencies. If the monitoring reports
indicate any deficiencies in achieving the success criteria on schedule, EEP will coordinate with the resource
agencies, as applicable, to determine the extent of remedial actions necessary. In some cases, EEP may be
required to submit a remedial action plan, as necessary, as part of the annual monitoring report. Vegetative
monitoring will be conducted during the late summer months (growing season) of each monitoring year.
Monitoring reports will be provided no later than December 15. The proposed schedule is provided below
detailing the monitoring dates.
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report Page 7
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP September 25, 2013

Proposed Monitorine Schedule
February 2013
Construction activities completed.
October 2013
Complete Year One Monitoring.
December 2013
Submit Year One Monitoring Report.
August 2014
Complete Year Two Monitoring.
December 2014
Submit Year Two Monitoring Report.
August 2015
Complete Year Three Monitoring.
December 2015
Submit Year Three Monitoring Report.
August 2016
Complete Year Four Monitoring.
December 2016
Submit Year Four Monitoring Report.
August 2017
Complete Year Five Monitoring.
December 2017
Submit Year Five Monitoring Report.
August 2018
Complete Year Six Monitoring Report (vegetation only)
December 2018
Submit Year Six Monitoring Report (vegetation only)
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Report
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP
Page 3
September 2S, 2013

8.0 References
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts and T.R. Wentworth, 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.0 (http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm).
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 2013. Charles Williams Site Final Report. Prepared by Ecological
Engineering, LLP.
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 2010. Charles Williams Site Final Mitigation Plan. Prepared by
Ecological Engineering, LLP.
NC State Climate Office, 2013. Daily Precipitation Data from Siler City Airport (SILR), Chatham County (www.nc-
cli mate. ncsu.edu).
Piedmont Triad Council of Government (PTCOG), 2008. Little Alamance, Travis and Tickle Creek Watershed
Restoration Plan. Prepared for and Funded by EEP. Available:
http: / /www.nceep .net /pages /lwplanning.htm.).
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife Resources Commission and NC
Department of Environment Division of Water Quality, 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
US Army Corps of Engineers, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y -87 -1.
AD /A176.
Baseline Monitoring Document and As Built Baseline Repert
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site, Randolph County
Prepared by Ecological Engineering, LLP
Page 9
September 25, 2013

Appendix A.
General Figures and Tables

r
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private �T —., ,l_ 1�
ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal •a, _ �� / I`
t agencies or their designees /contractors involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the o� _= _ _ - U� _ "- )' yy E /
1 restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site i - �a r
visitation or activity by any person outside these previously sanction roles and activities requires prior
coordination with EEP - '.ti
• Mela� '11*n �; S
sw - „� , p � -f;� � -- � •i f 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
� l� � -. t3 °1F -- �i 4 � in �r � � •i
79
A 626
/ - -_ Conservation Easement e, i
B00 0 C `.
A.
s 566
\ Y cria
�o i 2RB
� __� �� f' t ' Y� SaNr�Cre�k C► tr '
• f L Sandy Creek Church Road
cc
1�
I ,
x..-,
GUILFORD -r -
�
E
- ( i I > � � -_mil „ _•.�? `.�+`. ��- c�.
azt ALAMANCE'
Charles Williams Stream
Weiland and Buffer Site
Z Directions:
_ The Project Site can be accessed by using the following directions from US Highway 64.
1
Turn north on US 421 in Siler City, towards the Town of Liberty
Proceed approximately 9.5 miles and turn south (left) onto NC 49.
O - Proceed approximately 0.7 miles along NC 49 and turn north (right)
CHATHAM onto SR 2459 (Sandy Creek Church Road).
RANGOLPH �� Follow Sandy Creek Church Road approximately 4.5 miles
until it intersects with SR 2442 (Ramseur - Julian Road) and turn north (right),
2 7 Follow Ramseur - Julian Road approximately 0.3 miles, crossing over Sandy Creek.
The Charles Williams Site is on the west (left) side of the roadway, immediately north of Sandy Creek.
Prepared By: ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING Charles Williams Site
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101 ®Er3�iFiFRIN�
Cary, NC 27516 Eta iNF kIN Vicinity Map
91 9-557-0929
Randolph County, NC FIGURE
Prepared For: NCEEP EEP Contract No. D08035S 1
217 West Jones St.
S uite 3000A Oti s ) July 2013
Raleigh, 27603
NC
Source: USGS Ouadranale Maus (Grays ChaoeO

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Charles Williams Stream, Wetland and Buffer Site / 80
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen Phosphorus
Stream Riparian Wetland Non - riparian wetland Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R
RE R
RE R
RE
Totals
1,169
0.98
Project Components
94,351.00
-,
Existing Footage/
Restoration or
Restoration
Mitigation
Project Component
Stationing /Location
Approach
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Ratio
Equivalent
Acreage
UT to SandyCreek
10 +00 to 27 +53
1,753linearfeet
El
RE
1,165.16
1.5:1
SandyCreek
area adjacent to
94351 square feet
R
R
94,351.00
1:1
Riparian Buffer
Sand Creek
Riverine Wetland
area east of UT to
1.65 acres
E
RE
0.825
2:1
Area A
Sand Creek
Riverine Wetland
area west of UT to
0.31 acres
E RE
0.155
Area B
Sandy Creek
Component Summation
Non - riparian Wetland
Buff e
Upland
Restoration Level
Stream (linear feet)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
(acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non - riverine
Restoration
-
IF
Enhancement
1
1.96
94,351.00
Enhancement 1
1,753
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
BIVIP Elements
Element
Location
Pu a Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Dente ntion
Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Charles Williams Stream Wetland and Buffer Site / 80
Activity or Repon D-
Mitigation Plan September-08 Ma 09
Final Design - Construction Plans
November -09
Ap ril -12
Construction
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101, Cary, NC 27518
Februa -13
Temporary S &E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
Construction Contractor
Janua -13
Permanent Seed Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 800, Cary, NC 27518
Ja n ua -13
Live Stake Plantings Applied
Hauling Contractor
Janua -13
Bare - rooted Planting Applied*
5434 Amick Road, Julian, NC 27283
* see note below
Baseline Monitoring Document
June -13
July--13
Year 1 Monitoring
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 800, Cary, NC 27518
George Morris
Year 2 Monitoring
Seeding Contractor
Firm Information/ Address
Year 3 Monitoring
5434 Amick Road, Julian, NC 27283
Kenneth L. Strader
Year 4 Monitoring
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC 336 855 -6363
Year 5 Monitoring
Foggy Mountain Nursery (336) 384 -5323
Year 6 Monitoring (vegetation only)
Monitoring Performer
Firm Information/ Address
*Note: Bare -root planting will occur between December 15, 2013 and March 15, 2014
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Charles Williams Stream Wetland and Buffer Site / 80
Designer
Firm Information/ Address
Ecological Engineering, LLP
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101, Cary, NC 27518
Jenny S. Flemin , PE
(919) 557 -0929
Construction Contractor
Firm Information/ Address
Riverworks, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 800, Cary, NC 27518
Bill Wright
(919) 459 -9001
Hauling Contractor
Firm Information/ Address
Strader Fencing, Inc.
5434 Amick Road, Julian, NC 27283
336 697 -7005
Planting Contractor
Firm Information/ Address
Riverworks, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 800, Cary, NC 27518
George Morris
919 459 -9001
Seeding Contractor
Firm Information/ Address
Strader Fencing, Inc.
5434 Amick Road, Julian, NC 27283
Kenneth L. Strader
(336) 697 -7005
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC 336 855 -6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers (live stakes only)
Foggy Mountain Nursery (336) 384 -5323
Mellow Marsh Farm (919) 742 -1200
Monitoring Performer
Firm Information/ Address
Ecological Engineering, LLP
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101, Cary, NC 27518
Lane Sauls (stream,vegetation &wetland)
(919) 557 -0929

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Charles Williams Stream Wetland and Buffer Site / 80
Project Information
Project Name Charles Williams Stream Wetland and Buffer Site
County Randolph
Project Area 18 acres
Project Coordinates I latitude and longitude) 35 °49'31.95" North/ 79 °39'02.64" West
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -di it r 03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -di it r 03030003020010
DWQ Subbasin
03 -06 -09
Project Drainage Area
4.9 s . mi.
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
5 to 6%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Reach Summary
Length of Reach
Agricultural Land
Information
1,753 linear feet
Valley Classification
Valley Type VIII
Drainage Area
4.9 s . mi.
NCDWQ Stream ID Score
>50
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -I I I
Morphological Description stream
C5
Evolutionary Trend
C- G -F -E -C
Underlying Mapped Soils
Chewacla loam
Drainage Classification
Poo. ly drained
Soil H dric Status
H dric B
Slope
0 to 2%
FEMA Classification
Zone AE
Native Vegetation Communit
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Percent ComQ2sition of Exotic Invasive Sqgcies
Wetland Summary
Size of Wetiand
Less than 5%
Information
1.96 acres
Wetland Type
R i ve ri ne
Mapped Soil Series
Chewacla loam
Drainage Classification
Somewhat poorly drained
Soil H dric Status
H d ri c B
Source of Hydrology
Overbank flooding
Hydrologic Im airment
None
_
Native Vegetation Communit
Piedmont Alluvial Forest'
Percent ComDosition of Exotic Invasive Spgcies
Regulatory
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Less than 5%
Considerations
Resolved
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Resolved
Endangered Species Act
Resolved
Historic Preservation Act
Resolved
Coastal Zone. /Area Management Acts CZMA/CAMA
Not A olicable
FEMA Flood lain Com liance
Resolved
Essential Fisheries Habitat
Not Applicable

Appendix B.
Cross Section and Profile Data

Cross Section #1
XSC #1 - UT to Sandy Creek Sta.14 +41
(Riffle)
556
555
l o
i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■�
i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i�
l i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i�
554
AS BUILT BAN
FULL
0
LINE 201
553
>
w
552
551
550
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance (ft)
—4 —As -Built 2013
l o
i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■�
i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i i i i i i i i■
i i i i i�
l i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i i i i i i i�
i i i i i�
iiiii�ii�®
iii�l�iiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�iw■
iii■
iiiiiiiiii�iiiii��l�iiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiii�
■ii�iiiiiiiiiiii■iiiiiiii�ii�

Cross Section #2
XSC #2 - UT to Sandy Creek Sta. 19 +36
(Riffle)
554.5 — -- _ - —
554
553.5
553
AS BUILT BANKF
LL LINE 2013
- - -
-
552.5
c
c 552
2E
m
Q51.5
551
550.5
550
0 iU 30 40 5t:
Distance (ft)
tAs -Built 2013
XSC#2 - UT to Sandy Creek

Cross Section #3
XSC X73 - UT to Sandy Creek Sta. 23 +49
(Riffle)
553
552.5
��
AS BUILT BANKF
ULL LINE 2013
ww�ww
���■■n
552
�n.��w�wwwww
551.5
+K
c
3
551
m
m
®wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
W
550.5
■�w■I■�w�■�w■�wwww■�w�wwww�fwww
550
�www
wwwwwwww■�wwwwwww��w
549.5
ww
®wwwwwwwww��wwww
549
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance (ft)
- -As Built 2013
��
ww�ww
���■■n
�n.��w�wwwww
®wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
■�w■I■�w�■�w■�wwww■�w�wwww�fwww
�www
wwwwwwww■�wwwwwww��w
ww
®wwwwwwwww��wwww
wwwwwwwwww�w�www��ww��w
wwwwww��wwwwwwwwwww
w
®wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
0w
wwwwwwwwwwwww
wwwwwwwwwwwwwww�ww
wwwwwwwww�wwwwww�w
wwww�
■wiw�wi�wwwwwww���www■�w■■w

Cross Section #4
XSC #4 - UT to Sandy Creek Sta. 27 +14
(Riffle)
553
552.5
i
552
AS E
UILTBANKFULLLI
E 2013
551.5
551
K
550.5
Te
m
w
550
549.5
59
548.5
.rs48 —
a 20 :ia 4a 50 60 is
Distance (k)
to -Built 2013

556
555
554
553
F 552
0
R 551
d
w
550
549
548
:547
1000
Profile Reach
(UT Sandy Creek Sta. 10 +00 to 17 +53)
1200 1400 1600
♦ As Buik Bankfull 2013
".000 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
Station (ft)
• As Built Edge of Water As Buik Top of Bank —As Buik ThaWeg
G
G
G
♦
i
1200 1400 1600
♦ As Buik Bankfull 2013
".000 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
Station (ft)
• As Built Edge of Water As Buik Top of Bank —As Buik ThaWeg

I������������������������������

Appendix C.
Baseline Photographs

Baseline Photographs Taken July 2013
Vegetation Plot #1— Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #2 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #3 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #4 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #5 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #6 — Facing southwest

Vegetation Plot #7 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #8 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #9 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #10 — Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #11— Facing southwest
Vegetation Plot #12 — Facing southwest

Cross Section #1— Facing downstream
Cross Section #2 — Facing downstream
Cross Section #1— Facing west
Cross Section #2 — Facing west
Cross Section #3 — Facing downstream
Cross Section #3 — Facing west

Cross Section #4 — Facing downstream
Cross Section #4 — Facing west

Appendix D.
Record Drawings

r
-
Ica.naos.l
m a� S
o
SITEm
a 19 @3
m
s
(� O
z In e
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
- US 421 TO NC 49.
- TURN SOUTH ON NC 49.
- PROCEED APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES AND
TURN NORTH ON SR 2459 (SANDY CREEK CHURCH ROAD).
- PROCEED APPROXIMATELY 4.5 MILES TO INTERSECTION
WITH SR 2442 (RAMSEUR JULIAN ROAD). TURN NORTH.
- PROCEED APPROXIMATELY 0 3 MILES AND CROSS OVER
SANDY CREEK. PROJECT ENTRANCE LS ALONG THE
WEST SIDE OF ROADWAY, IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
THE BRIDGE OVER SANDY CREEK.
DISTURBED AREA ACREAGE: 4.8 AC
PROJECT LENGTH:
UT TO SANDY CREEK LENGTH: 1,748 LF
SANDY CREEK BUFFER ENHANCEMENT: 4.7 AC
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT: 1.96 AC
SANDY CREEK - CHARLES WILLIAMS
STREAM, WETLAND AND BUFFER SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
SCO PROJECT #070712501
EEP PROJECT #80
15' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LATITUDE 03549'45.62"
LONGITUDE: 0793903.73"
�— CONSERVATION EASEMENI
!ccc. UT TO SANDY CREEK
TO MELANCHTON, NC
I I E 1808602.168
PERMANENT 20' ACCESS EASEMENT
EASEMENT
r
END ENHANCEMENT i �� ♦ 1
JSTATION 27t$8'/ ��.i ♦ ♦ SUY_ 1
i ♦ 1
.♦ 1
TO RAMSE R, NC
,1
RECORD DRAWINGS
JENNY SUMMERLIN FLEMING, PE
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
G. LANE SAULS
PROJECT MANAGER
(919) 557 -0929
OFFICE PHONE NUMBER
PREPARED FOR THE OFFICE OF.
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
EEP Project Manager: Melonie Allen
EEP Review Coordinator: Wyatt Brown
SCOS 070712501
r_�_f
tea aI meat
ENC4NEEK
��q�►3
m
z
0
w
x
a UN
t W
PO
e O � W� Imo•.
�! wWP4V
uzpa�
d w
u ¢z
d
W cn
< Q
U) z u
W
C>
r
o� a
g
xw
x
0-4
O
O Z
I\ uJ
N uJ
O a
�
zt
VE2=
ow $
z
o0'y
WWo
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET Num
SHEET
ISH1,1
TR It—
E41dJ
9,uwe 1)w
"+ mpk-
h,
and Nad
P91 -W.a
Snc A +h4 +1a�11an
JENNY SUMMERLIN FLEMING, PE
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
G. LANE SAULS
PROJECT MANAGER
(919) 557 -0929
OFFICE PHONE NUMBER
PREPARED FOR THE OFFICE OF.
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
EEP Project Manager: Melonie Allen
EEP Review Coordinator: Wyatt Brown
SCOS 070712501
r_�_f
tea aI meat
ENC4NEEK
��q�►3
m
z
0
w
x
a UN
t W
PO
e O � W� Imo•.
�! wWP4V
uzpa�
d w
u ¢z
d
W cn
< Q
U) z u
W
C>
r
o� a
g
xw
x
0-4
O
O Z
I\ uJ
N uJ
O a
�
zt
VE2=
ow $
z
o0'y
WWo

SITE STABILIZATION PLAN
PERMANENT SEEDING (BY ZONE) FD-s-31
NOTE:
WETLANDS = 2 ACRES, SEEDED WITH TREATMENT 1 OR TREATMENT 2 SEED MIX
PERMANENT SEEDING AND PELLETIZED SOIL AMENDMENTS APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED
AREAS, INCLUDING THOSE REQUIRING HERBICIDE TREATMENT.
ALL FESCUE AND MICROSTEGIUM WITHIN EASEMENT TREATED VIA BACKPACK SPRAY APPLICATION OF HERBICIDE.
PRIVET AND ROSE TREATED VIA BACKPACK SPRAY APPLICATION OF HERBICIDR
OR BASAL BARKED AND PAINTED WITH HERBICIDE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING
Ds2
Zone 1
Acres
4.23
Species Name
Stratum
Commo
Rate: lbs /ac
Total lbs
Mixapplied
at rate of
r 0
applbsr ox. x. 3 3
Festuca rubra
Herb
Red
12(40%)
50.1
Trifolium pratense
Herb
Red
6(20%)
25.4
Schizachrium scoparhan
Herb
Little
4.5(15%)
19.0
Elymus virginicus
Herb
Virginia
3(10%)
12.7
Panicum c/andestinum
Herb
Deer
1.5(5%)
6.3
Mulch
Density /
Thickness
Chasmanthium latifolitan
Herb
River
1.5(5%)
6.3
Agrostis perennans
Herb
Upland
1.5(5%)
6.3
4'
Subtotal
30(100%)
96.1
9800
Zone 2
Acres
4.71
Species Name
Stratum
Commo
Rate: Ibs/ac
Total Ibs
Mix applied
at rate of
approx. 30
Ibs /acre
Trifolum pratense
Herb
Red
9(30%)
42.4
Schizachyrium scoparium
Herb
Little
7.5(25%)
35.3
Elymus virginicus
Herb
Virginia
4.5(15%)
21.2
Panicum clandestinum
Herb
Deer
3(10%)
14.1
Chasmanthium lagolium
Herb
River
3(10%)
14.1
Agrostis perennans
Herb
Upland
3(10%)
14.1
Subtotal
30(100%)
141.2
Zone 3
Acres
2.27
Species Name
Stratum
Commo
Rate: Ibs/ac
Total Ibs
Mixapplied
at rate of
approx. 15
16s /acre
Trifolum pratense
Herb
Red
4.5(30%)
10.2
Schizacltvrium sc•opariton
Herb
Little
3.75(25%)
8.5
Emus virginicus
Herb
Virginia
2.25(15%)
5.1
Panicum clandestinurn
Herb
Deer
1.5(10%)
3.4
Chasmanthiwn latifoliuni
Herb
River
L5 (10 %)
3.4
Agrostis perennans
Herb
Upland
1.5(10%)
3.4
Subtotal
15(100%)
34.0
Total (Permanent Seeding)
271.3
11.2
NOTE:
WETLANDS = 2 ACRES, SEEDED WITH TREATMENT 1 OR TREATMENT 2 SEED MIX
PERMANENT SEEDING AND PELLETIZED SOIL AMENDMENTS APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED
AREAS, INCLUDING THOSE REQUIRING HERBICIDE TREATMENT.
ALL FESCUE AND MICROSTEGIUM WITHIN EASEMENT TREATED VIA BACKPACK SPRAY APPLICATION OF HERBICIDE.
PRIVET AND ROSE TREATED VIA BACKPACK SPRAY APPLICATION OF HERBICIDR
OR BASAL BARKED AND PAINTED WITH HERBICIDE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING
Ds2
SOIL PREPARATION AND AMENDMENTS
Soil Preparation and Amendment Summary per Zone
Charles Williams Site - SCO Project Number 070712501 EEP Project Number 80
Common Name
Max Spacing
Unit Type
Zone 1- StreamSide Area
Temporary Seeding Throughout Disturbed Areas
0.7
Mechanical
Treatment
Acres
4.8
Year round
Secale cereale
Herb
Grain rye
130 lbs /ac
Single
May - September
Panicum ramosum
Herb
Brown top millet
40lbs /ac
species to
May - September
Setaria italics
Herb'
German millet
25lbs /ac
plied
be aPp
September - March
Dactylis glonterata
Herb
Orchard grass
15 Ibs /ac
Ground
Cover
Fabric
2'
Mulch
Density /
Thickness
Nutrient
Amendments
Nutrient
Total lbs
4'
SOIL PREPARATION AND AMENDMENTS
Soil Preparation and Amendment Summary per Zone
Charles Williams Site - SCO Project Number 070712501 EEP Project Number 80
Common Name
Max Spacing
Unit Type
Zone 1- StreamSide Area
Acres
0.7
Mechanical
Treatment
Approx.
Date
Ground
Cover
Fabric
Mulch Type
Mulch
Density /
Thickness
Nutrient
Amendments
Nutrient
Totallbsl
4'
Disking
1/10 - 3/10
Coir
Wheat straw
759E cover
n/a
n/a
4'
3000
Subtotal
0
10'
T
Zone 2 - Ri avian Area
Acres
15.1
Mechanical
Treatment
Approx.
Date
Ground
Cover
Fabric
2'
Mulch
Density /
Thickness
Nutrient
Amendments
Nutrient
Total lbs
4'
Herbicide
1 /10
n/a
EWheatstraw
n/a
n/a
n/a
4'
Disking
1/10 -3/10
n/a
9800
759E cover
10 / 10110 Pellet
Fertilizer
3020
n/a
1/10 -3/10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ground
Limestone
3020
Subtotal
6040
Total 6040 15.8
LIVE STAKING'JTUBLING
Species
Common Name
Max Spacing
Unit Type
Size
Stratum
Indiv.Spacing
liofStems
Salix nigra
Black Willow
2'
L
2'- 3'
Subcanopy
4'
1000
Corms amontnm
Silky Dogwood
2'
L
2'- 3'
Shrub
4'
3000
Ahtusserrulata
Tag Alder
10'
T
N/A
Shrub
20'
8W
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
2'
L
2'- 3'
Shrub
4'
3000
Salixseric•ea
Silky Willow
2'
L
2' -3'
Subcanopy
4'
2000
Total
9800
NOTE: UNIT TYPE CHOICES INCLUDE LIVE STAKE (L) AND TUBLING (T).
ENGINEER
X113
O t>~ m
v
�'rj > 0
W v I E
C'4 bo
N
C)
0
N �
EM-I O
Np z
a` o ri G
N o
d O a
e--t
W
ttY
U
O
O
Z
W
Zug
° az°
�
J
p. 0..�z
W
W
Q W
3
�Z
< �
to N
Z u
W
EM-I O
Np z
a` o ri G
N o
d O a
e--t
W
ttY
U
O
O
Z