20220006 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20211222

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20220006
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Line 11 Replacement
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Dan Zurlo
1 b. Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
12/22/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Beaver Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.082201
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.970730
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
u

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Duke Energy -Piedmont Natural Gas
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Joe Heckman
2d.Address
Street Address
4740 Corporation Dr.
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28306
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Dan Zurlo
4b. Business Name:
WK Dickson
4c.Address
Street Address
1213 W. Morehead St
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
4d. Telephone Number:
4f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Fayetteville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
multiple parcels, see the attached list
2c. Project Address
Street Address
4761 Lake Valley Dr
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28303
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beaver Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040609
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
20.9
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is set in suburban Fayetteville, NC and consists of mixed pine -hardwood with dense understory with commercial buildings interspersed. The USDA-NRCS soil survey of
Cumberland County shows approximately 1.1 % of the investigation area is mapped as soils with hydric inclusions (Soil Survey Figure). National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) GIS data set
revealed potentially occurring forested and riverine wetlands within the investigation area (NWI Figure). The USGS topographic map revealed potential wetlands and two perennial streams
(Beaver Creek and an upper tributary to Beaver Creek) within the project area (USGS Figure). As indicated by the USGS topography, on -site drainage is generally to the South, as water
drains from the ridge in the central part of the property to the lower lying floodplains of Beaver Creek and its tributary. The on -site wetlands directly abut Beaver Creek and its tributary.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
u
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3.4

4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1919
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The Line 11 Replacement project is a transmission replacement project proposed to occur in Fayetteville, NC. The purpose of the project is to decommission an existing transmission line
and replace with a 16" distribution line.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:"
PNG desires to replace approximately 1.24 miles of steel transmission pipeline that is difficult to access for maintenance purposes with a 16" steel distribution pipeline that will be located
within a permanent easement. The replacement will commence near the intersection of Yadkin Road (S.R. 1145) and Brookfield Road at a new proposed city gate station and will generally
run parallel to Yadkin Road approximately 450' south of the southern Yadkin Road right-of-way line before turning to the south near Lake Valley Drive (S.R. 3499). Upon turning south to
follow Lake Valley Drive, the pipeline will generally run just outside of the western Lake Valley Drive right-of-way line before crossing Lake Valley Drive near the Holiday Inn Express &
Suites Fayetteville -Fort Bragg hotel and tying in to the existing network just east of an existing city gate station that will be retired as part of this project. Two unavoidable wetland impacts
are proposed (one permanent [W1] and one temporary [W2]). Permanent wetland impacts will result in just 0.04 ac of conversion from forested to herbaceous wetland. One temporary
stream impact (S1) is proposed that will in 39 If of temporary impact resulting from open trench installation and pump around operations.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan Zurlo, Michael Ellison
Agency/Consultant Company: WK Dickson
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
U
W1
2a1 Reason (?)
Permanent conversion
2b. Impact type* (')
P
2c. Type of W.
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name*
MS3
2e. Forested* ��2f.
Yes
Type of Jurisdicition*
Both
2g. Impact
area
0.040
(acres)
W2
Temporary clearing JL
BottomFore land Hardwood st
DWA
Yes
Both
0.270
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.270
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.310
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.040

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
?)
I
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*F�
3h. Impact
length*
S1
39
Temporary
Excavation
MS3; UT to Beaver Creek
Perennial
Both
Average (feet)
39
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
39
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
39
3j. Comments:
WK Dickson, on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas, is requesting a 52° crossing angle across Stream MS4. This crossing is depicted on sheet 2 (S1;
Temporary Stream Crossing Construction Details) of the Line 11 Decommissioning Project (Distribution Pipeline) design plans. The 52' crossing angle
was selected because it aids in providing a sufficient buffer from the headwall associated with the 10' CMP box culvert that crosses Yadkin Road. The
workspace needed to install a 16" steel pipeline at an angle more square to the existing stream alignment would extend close to the headwall and the
pipe outlet, which we are currently providing a buffer from with the chosen crossing angle. Squaring up the pipe crossing would make the tie-in to the
proposed station on the west side of the stream more complicated and would lead to additional disturbance on the western bank of the stream,
increasing the possibility of stream contamination. Additionally, squaring up the pipe crossing would increase the disturbance to the adjacent wetland.
We believe that the chosen crossing angle is the safest and most effective way of crossing the existing stream.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The site was delineated for streams and wetlands prior to design, and the pipeline was designed to avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Two
unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed (one permanent [W1] and one temporary [W2]). Permanent wetland impacts will result in just 0.04 ac of
conversion from forested to herbaceous wetland. One temporary stream impact (S1) is proposed that will in 39 If of temporary impact resulting from
open trench installation and pump around operations. The pipeline will cross wetland DWA, however it will be directionally drilled so no impact is
proposed. Temporary clearing is necessary in order to maintain line -of -site for the drill will occur.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Wetland DWA and Beaver Creek will be avoided as the pipeline will be directionally drilled beneath them. All impacts to Wetland DWA involve temporary
and minimal hand clearing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent impacts to WoTUS fall below nationwide permit thresholds.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
This project proposes no new impervious surface.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
Comments:
This project proposes no new impervious surface.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is proposed to replace existing pipeline infrastructure. No future development related to this project is proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence data and on -site habitat evaluation. See attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA essential fish habitat mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO GIS data. See attached figure.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No changes in floodplain elevations are proposed.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA firm panel 3720040800J
Miscellaneous

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Line 11 Jurisdictional Waters Impact Plan.pdf
4.21MB
Combined Figures.pdf
4.21 MB
Parcel_Table.pdf
60.34KB
Stream_ and Wetland_Dataforms.pdf
86.45KB
JurisdictionalFeaturesPhotopage.pdf
1.37MB
T&E report.pdf
287.33KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Signature
Sign
Date
12/22/2021