SW7080709_HISTORICAL FILE_20210618

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
7n HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

ROY COOPER
Governor
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretary
BRIAN WRENN NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
June 18, 2021
Carter Lumber Partnership of Indiana
601 Tallmadge Road
Kent, OH 44240
Subject: Stormwater Permit Renewal
Stormwater Management Permit SV 7080709
Griggs Lumber — Edenton, NC Site
Chowan County
Dear Sir:
wd lk°
.A Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources file review has determined that
Stormwater Permit SW7080709 for a stormwater treatment system consisting of a wet
detention pond to serve a proposed Griggs Lumber to be located at 121 Whitemon
Lane, Edenton, NC expires on December 30, 2021. This is a reminder that permit
renewal applications are due 180 days prior to expiration. We do not have a record of
receiving a renewal application.
If you wish to maintain this permit, please submit a completed permit renewal
application along with a $505.00 fee for permit renewal. Permit application forms for
renewal can be found on our website at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-
mineral-and-land-resources/stormwater/stormwater-program/post-construction-2. North
Carolina General Statutes and the Coastal Stormwater rules require that this property
be covered under a stormwater permit if the facility is built. If you do not plan to
construct this facility, please advise.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. 1 will be glad to
discuss this by phone or meet with you. If you would like, I can e-mail you a copy of the
application forms. You can request a copy by e-mailing me at
roger.thorpena.ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
�Thorpe��
Ro er K.
Environmental Engineer
— '_ North Carollna Department of Environmental Quality '!, Divlslon of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1/ Washington Regional Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Washington. North Carolina 27889
�^+� /_0�1 252.946n481

WATF9
�j
e <
July 28, 2008
Carter Lu er Partnership of Indiana
Attn.: arles R. Price
60 allmadge Road
Kent, OH 44240
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject:: Stormwater Review SW7080709
Griggs Lumber —Edenton Store
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Price:
This office received a Coastal Stormwater permit application and plans for the subject project on
July 17, 2008. A preliminary review of your project indicates that before a State Stormwater permit can
be issued the following additional information is needed:
1. The Calculations show New Impervious Surface to be 246,496, while the Application and
the Supplement shows 245,056, The plans show that the Griggs parcel impervious
coverage is 194,641. If added with the two outparcel impevious coverages, the total
coverage is 243,704 sf, which does not match with impervious coverage listed in other
documents. Please clarify and revise if needed.
2. The outlet structure detail on pages 2 and 3 of the plans shows in one view that the orifice
size is at elevation of 13.5, while the other view show the orifice to be at elevation of 14.0.
Please revise.
3. Provide 2 sets of signed and sealed plan sheets.
The above requested information must be received in this office prior to August 4, 2008 or your
application will be returned as incomplete. The return of this project will necessitate resubmittal of all
required items including the application fee. If you need additional time to submit the required
information, please mail or fax your request for time extension to me at the Letterhead address and
include the application number on the request. The request must include justification for the amount of
additional time needed. The request will only be granted for justifiable delays that are unforeseen and
beyond the owner or consultant's control.
You should also be aware that the Stormwater Rules require that the permit be issued prior to
any development activity. Construction without a permit is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Please reference the Stormwater Project Number above on all correspondence. If you have
questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Samir Dumpor, PE
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: VWashington Regional Office
Bob Farris, PE, CE Solutions, 201 Lane Dr., Elizabeth City, NC 27909
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet www.ncwateroualitv.ore One
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] NO Carolina
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone] Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50%Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

U
CE SOLU i Ions
"ai tiyi¢¢s H¢ss
August 4, 2008
Mr. Samir Dumpor
DENR-DWQ
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington NC 27889
RE: Stormwater Review SW7080709 .
Griggs Lumber -Edenton
Chowan County
Dear Samir:
A!JG 0 5 2008
Attached hereto you will find our revised submittal for the Griggs Lumber -Edenton project. In
your letter of 7/28/08 you correctly noted that we had an inconsistency in our numbers relating to
the total amount of impervious surface in the project area. The total impervious surface
requested should have been 243,704 square feet. We have corrected our calculations and revised
the appropriate state forms to reflect the correct impervious area. Attached to this
correspondence you will find two complete copies of of the forms and calculations that -changed.
In addition, your letter pointed out a drafting error that showed the orifice elevation at one
elevation on one drawing and at another elevation in the detail. That error has also been
corrected and revision notes point out the plan changes. Two copies of the revised sheets are
included with this correspondence.
Thanks for your help in this matter.
S rely, EXPRESS
AUG 0 5 2008
obert T. Farris, PE NC ®ENR
A Professional Limited Liability Company . Ifarris@roadrunneccom
201 Lane Drive, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 252-264-3222, Fax [phone]

10/A,3:Z1y0►A
The existing site is an undeveloped flat parcel of land in the Coastal Region. Like much
of the Coastal land the surficial soil has very low permeability, in this case it is Roanoke.
Slope over most of the site is less than one percent.
The project is to construct a Griggs Lumber Store to serve the area surrounding Edenton.
The Griggs Store will occupy 7.18 acres of the 9.06 acre site with Outparccl 1 having
0.86 acres and Outparcel 2 having 1.01 acres of land respectively. The Griggs lot is
proposed to be 62.5% impervious with the remaining lots being restricted by Deed
Restrictions to 60% impervious coverage. Development plans for these lots will be
submitted separately as the parcels develop. Consequently this is a High Density
development.
Stormwater from the built upon area is to be caught in drop inlets and conveyed by storm
pipes to the WQP. The pond has been designed to detain a 5 inch storm. The WQ
portion of the design is based on a 1 inch rain and 90% TSS Pollutant Removal
Efficiency. A 2.5 inch pipe will discharge a 1 inch rain in the temporary pool in 2.7 days.
A subsurface soil evaluation was performed by GET Solutions (copy attached) and their
recommendations were followed.
Stormwater from the site will discharge in the roadside ditch along Hampton Drive, then
south along Whitemon lane, Cross under Whilemon Lane just before SR 32, cross under
SR 32 just west of the Route 17 Bypass, cross under Route 17 south of SR 32 and flow
into Flatberts Creek. Hatberts Creek discharges into the Chowan River. The Chowan in
this area carries a B, NSW classification.
Downstream from the project we are proposing to increase the sire of the Hampton
Drive, Ford driveway, and the Whilemon Lane at SR 32 culverts to prevent localized
flooding. This plan to upgrade culverts has been reviewed and approved in concept by
the Edenton stormwater review officer.
A 0.19 acre wetland was found on site. The wetland has been delineated and reviewed by
the ACOE. On June 19, 2008 the ACOE determined this wetland to be isolated and not
jurisdictional (copy attached). Environmental Professionals, on behalf of Carter Lumber
has sent the ACOE information to DENR along with the five NCDWQ applications to the
NCDWQ 401 wetland certification unit. Their application is a courtesy since formal
notification is not required for isolated wetland impacts less than 1/3 of an acre.

51eL-)9-21 -Y,

Document Index
DENR Expedited Review 7/l/08
Griggs Lumber Store
Edenton, NC
1. Request for Express Permit Review
2. Checks to cover filing fees.
3. Narrative
4. Drainage Map
5. Financial Responsibility Ownership
6. Deed
7. SWU-101 Stormwater Management Permit Application
8. SWU-401 Wet Detention Supplement
9. DRPC-2 High Density With Outparcels Deed Restrictions
W. SW401 Wet Detention Basin O&M
11. Stormwater Calculations
12. GET Solutions Soil Study
13. ACOE Non Jurisdictional Determination

North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Request for Express Permit Review
Reviewer:
Submit
Time:
Confirm
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permitls) you are requesting for express review. FAX or Email the completed form to Express
Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan (PDF file) and vicinity map (same items expected in the application package
of the project location. Include this form in the application package.
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296-4698;alison.devidsonO-ncmail.net
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791-4203, david.lee0ncmail.net
• Mooresville & -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772 or patrick.oropanancmail.net
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946.9215 or lm.hardisorfircmaiLnet
• Wilmington Region -Janet Russell 910-350-2004 or ionetrussell®ncmaiLnet
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day.
Project Name: GRIGGS EDENTON County: CHOWAN
Applicant: ALBERT AVANESYAN Company: CARTER LUMBER PARTNERSHIP OF INDIANA
Address: 601 TALLMADGE ROAD, City: KENT, State: OH Zip: 44240
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone] Email: AAVENESYAN(a)CARTERLUMBER.COM
Project is Drains into B. NSW waters Project Located in CHOWAN River Basin
Engineer/Consultant: BOB FARRIS Company: CE SOLUTIONS
Address: 201 LANE DRIVE City: ELIZABETH CITY, State: NC Zip: 27909
Phone:[phone] Fax::[phone] Email: 1FARR16.ROADRUNNER.COM
(Check all that apply)
❑ Scoping Meeting ONLY ® DWQ, ❑ DCM, ® DLR, ❑ OTHER:
❑ Stream Origin Determination: # of stream calls — Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ® Clear & Grub, [I Utility
❑ Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _ # Curb Outlet Swales ElOff-site[SW (Provide permit #)]
® High Density -Detention Pond 1 # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems ® High Density —Constructive Wetlands 1 # Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Other _ # Treatment Systems ❑ MODIFICATION SW _ (Provide permit #)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
® Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ Land Quality ® Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with 10.0 acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
WETLANDS QUESTIONS MUST BE ADDRESSED BELOW
® Wetlands (401): Check all that apply
Wetlands on Site ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ® Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No
404 Application in Process wl US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Permit Received from US ACOE ❑ Yes ❑ No
Fees lit for multiplepermits: Check#
Isolated wetland on Property ® Yes ❑ No
Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: acre(s)
Minor Variance : ❑ No ❑ YES
Major General Variance ❑ No ❑ YES
401 Application required: ®Yes ❑ No If YES, ® Regular
Perennial, Blue line stream, etc on site ❑ yes ® No
For DENR use only
Total Fee Amount $
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
CAMA
1 Variance ❑ Ma'; ❑ Min
$
SIN ❑ HD, ❑ LID, ❑ Gen
$
401:
$
LQS
I
$
Stream Deter,_
$

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2008-01846 County: Chowan U.S.G.S. Quad: Edenton
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Carter Lumber c/o.Albert Avanesvan
Address: 601 Tallmadge Road
Kent, Ohio
44240
Telephone No.: 330-673-6100
Property description
Size (acres)
9.058 Acres
Nearest Town
Edenton
Nearest Waterway
Filberts Creek
River Basin
Chowan
USGS HUC
03010205
Coordinates
N 36.079 W-76.614
Location description The 9.058 Acre site is located at the intersection of Hampton Drive and NCSR 1321 (Whitemon
Lane), East of Highway
32, North of the town of Edenton,
in Chowan County,
North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Pan 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2

Action Id. SAW-2008-01846
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Josh Pelletier or Emily Jernigan at 252-975-1616.
C. Basis For Determination
The area that was reviewed on the project site was determined to be isolated and not jurisdictional. The proiect area
does not hydrologically connect to a TNW through any means of water body.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will fmd a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Josh Pelletier or Emily Jernigan, Project Manager,
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 08/19/2008.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**.
Corps Regulatory Official: f U
Date 06/19/2008 Expiry ion Date 06/19/2013
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.co to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:
Kendall Tumage, Environmental Professionals, Inc.
Page 2 of 2

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD; Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 06/19/2008
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2008-01846
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 9.058 Acre site is located at the intersection of
Hampton Drive and NCSR 1321 (Whitemon Lane), East of Highway 32, North of the town of Edenton, in Chowan County, North
Carolina.
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Chowan City: Edenton
Center coordinates of site (fat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.0790 nNi, Long.-76.6140
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Filberts Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Filberts Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Albemarle 03010205
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
d Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
r, Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
nx
Field Determination. Date(s): May 6, 2008
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ai'eTn. "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
0 Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
El Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There rr° ei o "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
0 TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
sx Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
h" Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Q Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).

Non -wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
C. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:; -ic Lis
Elevation of established OH WM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The Wetlands on the project area are Isolated.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section HLB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically Bow year-round or have continuous Bow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) Bow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial now,
skip to Section 1H.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HLBA for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IILB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HLC below.
L Characteristics of non-TNWs that Bow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: �,ick`�LI
" �'sc tic-
Drainage area: Pick"tii5
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.

(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW-
❑ Tributary flown di ... dy into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through P.ickiLis tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are PiCIVEis river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ris river miles from RPW.
Project waters are .1%kLi aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are PickiLisl aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWs:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that appjy)_
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: ick Gis .
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑Concrete
❑ Cobbles
❑ Gravel El Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/%cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: :ic 6Lis
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Plow:
Tributary provides for. .ickSliist
Estimate average number of flowevents in review area/year: ,ick• -'ts
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: �E Lis . Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: 02. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM' (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
sA natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.

❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑
❑ sediment deposition ❑
❑ water staining ❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM ' Explain:
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWAjurisdiction (check all that apply):
0 High Tide Line indicated by: [] Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non=FNW that flow directly or indirectly into TN'W
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: ,ick bs . Explain:
Surface flow is: ieka[;i"s
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: !."Ak lits . Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Fcological connection. Explain:
'Ibid.

❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity Relation t
Project wetlands are ,:,ck�Eis river miles from TNW.
Project waters are tck7L`is�aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: is�
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the ,ick;L'is floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: ick�L>is
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/Nl Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the Bow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the Bow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TN Ws, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle surpnt't functions for fish and
vm.r aPvvtcat ouvh as MOti% ❑QIIIlgt spawning, or rearing young for species that arc present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?

• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Noic: the above 113t or considerations Is not Inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
+d TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Lj Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
_?9 Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
!" Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
LJ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
mr Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that now directly or indirectly into TNWs.
id Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Q Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abuccin6 an RPW; ,
"See Footnote M 3.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arejurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters!
As a general rule, the impoundment of ajurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
® Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
0 Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
as Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):1'
0 which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
Q from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
0 which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
LI Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
ssay
El Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
t-gym
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
0. Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
0 If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
P d Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
NA
P' Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
TD complete the analysis refer to the key in Section II1.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
1D Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA IIQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: 0.19 acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
aaffinding is required forjurisdiction (check all that apply):
IJ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Hr.
�ns Lakes/ponds: acres.
(MJ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
to Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
12 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Kendall Tumage, Environmental Professionals
Inc.
® Data sheets. prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
8. Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
ect
® Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NUD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Edenton (Digital Rendetion).
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Chowan County.
t
{{�5, National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
Ld State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
tx
t FEMA/FIRM maps:
Fel 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
+ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
E; '3 Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter
El Applicable/supporting case law
:, Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
M Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

F
Applicant: Carter Lumber c/o Albert File Number: SAW-2008-
Date: 06/19/2008
Avanesyan 01846
Attached is:D
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
A-PP>=nL: tfro" d`s.Braa ""th rho aPPrQYcd JD, you may appeal the approvca JD under the Carps oP Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
17hN cy� I4�f f +AG4 .��p+�; �:+Qs` ''g k4t' R` . � u t �.' 9.0. A TdE�r'—�9,1 },So 4ed" S£K3�en.�.. Ft4 d h
piSl CTIONIIIRI a VEST I OR�AP,PEAL AN'INI,TIA-0
or,OBJEGpTIONS,TI® PROF,I E $ D PERM a
µ(Describe
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may at additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
IF POINpT OF COt TACTaFORr U ST>ONSyO (ryiNF,ORIVIA-'TION "* a _ ttt,u;_,
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
US Army Corps of Engineers Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn:Josh Pelletier or Emily Jernigan CESAD-ET-CO-R
Post Office Box 1000 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
27889 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this
form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Josh Pelletier and Emily Jernigan, Project
Manager, Washington Regulatory Field Office, Post Office Box 1000, Washington, North Carolina
27889
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9MIS, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303-8801

r _
C110b1AN County
LAID TRANSFER TAX
t 7,'S=00
I
NC REAL PROPERTT
EXCISE TAX
01.50UM
Space Above This Line For Recording Data
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Prepared by M. H. Hood Ellis, Attorney
Return to M. H. Hood Ellis, Attorney
Excise Tax: $ 1,500.00
Transfer Tax: $17 500,00
North Carolina, Chowan County
Tax Parcel: 7805-00.46.4211
THIS GENERAL WARRANTY DEED made this 26t° day of March, 2007, by and between
Chowan Land Investments, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and Carter Lumber
Partnership of Indiana, whose mailing address is 601 Tallmadge Road, Kent, Ohio 44240 (hereinafter
referred to as "Grantee"):
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by tho Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, has given, granted, bargained, sold, and conveyed, and by these presents does hereby
give, grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto said Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors, administrators and
assigns, all of that certain piece, parcel, or tract of land situate, lying and being in First Township,
Chowan County, State of North Carolina, and being more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Reing also the same property conveyed to Chowan Land Investments, LLC by deed dated
December 9, 2003, which deed is of record in Deed Book 314, Page 253, of the Chowan County Public
Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described lands and premises, together with all
appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any way appertaining, unto the Grantee, Grantee's heirs,
successors, administrators, and assigns forever.

SENT BY: 0000000000; JUN-16-08 9:16; PAGE 2
BBC M PAGE n1
AND THE SAID GRANTOR COVENANTS to and with said Grantee, Grantee's heirs,
.,ccessors, administrators, and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of said lands and
premises, and have Full right and power to convey the same to the Grantee in fee simple, and that said
lands and premises are free from any and all encumbrances, except as set forth herein, and that the
Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, with the
exception of the following: Ad valorem taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years, easements and
restrictions of record, and any local, county, state, or federal laws, ordinances, or regulations relating to
zoning, environment, subdivision, occupancy, use, construction, or development of the subject property.
IN WITNESS WffEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed and sealed this document, this the day
and year first above written.
CHOWAN LAND WVESTMENTS, LLC
M
B. Do oy, Member/Manager of
,an Inveatmadts. LLC
BY: Ur (SEAL_)
Robert S. Thomas, Member/Manager of
Chowan Land Investments, LLC
DOWDY BROTHERS, LLC, Member/Manager of
Chowan Land Investmen , LLC
BY: (SEAL)
'Dennis M Do dy, Membe ager of
wdy Soothe C1.
STATE OF COUN /CITY OF 772.,, ,
17
0
I, ---ru id a Notary Public, certify that John B. Dowdy personally came
before me this day and acknowled ed that he is a Member/Manager of Chowan Land investments, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company, and that he, as Member/Manager, being authorized so to do,
executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the company. Witness my hand and official seal, this
day of March. 2007.
NoF Public /
f131?GJSI SEAL) Printed Name: �ud,'iLi �✓w/ f�sCCA/Ex
t 0r
yAe;
4 ' bt .isiioi fires: z�.U9
2

SENT BY 0000000000; JUN-16-08 9:17; PAGE 3/4
4
��E OF N e` COUNT IT'Y OF .. 375 PAGE 752
1, a Notary Public, certify that Robert S. Thomas personally came
before me this day and AknowJedged that he is a Member/Manager of Chowan Land investments, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company, and that he, as Member/Manager, being authorized so to do,
executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the company. Witness my hand and official seal, this �$
day of March, 2007.
AFFIX'NCl°$, KY SEAL)
GTAny.?ss. p
x y.walmissjptiiexpires: 0 7
Il�sa aba.�_ ..� iu tM a
Notary Public 0I �
Printed Name: n/1C AydC- . (umer
.........
ETA"1& OF COUNTY CITY OF %I/f
dr
T
t, fAoy�a' a Notary Public, certify that Dennis M. Dowdy, personally came
.............
before me this day and acknowle ged that he is a Member/Manager of Dowdy Brothers, LLC, a North
Carolina limited liability company which is a Member/Manager of Chowan Land Investments, LLC, and
that he, as a Member,/Manager, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of
the Dowdy Brothers, LLC as a Member/Manager in Chowan Land Investments, LLC. Witness my hand
and official seal, thisP'rday of March, 2007.
e�1t1 .ANN. a`l No&ry Public
AMP) Printed Name: fu j /['Nti 1p�c/ d r tl
ires: 2?2g4 3/r 2al
3

SEN-r` BY: 0000000000; JUN-16-08 9:32; PAGE 1/l
WOK 375 PAGE 753
Exhibit A
BEING THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN FIRST
TOWNSHIP, C110WAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT AN ]RON PIN MARKING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERN
EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF N.C.S.R. 1321 AND THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HAMPTON DRIVE, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING HAVING NORTH
CAROLTNA STATE PLANE COORDINATES N: 855,709.245 ANT) E: 2,704,221.973 AND
BEING LOCATED N 14-17-24 W 1,547.44' 1-ROM N.C.G.S. MONUMENT " VIRGINIA.,,
AND RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING AND ALONG AND WITH
THE NORTHERN EDGE OF TI1F: RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID HAMPTON DRIVE THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: N 75-03-37 W 78.33' TO AN IRON PIN AND
S 75-22.00 W 261.12' TO AN IRON PIN MARKING A SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
EDENTON HOSPITALITY GROUP, D.C. THENCE ALONG AND WITH A
NORTHEASTERN PROPERTY LINE OF SAID EDENTON HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC N
46-53-04 W 591.50' TO AN IRON PIN MARKING A NORTH CORNER OF EDENTON
IOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC: IN AN EASTERN PROPERTY LINE OF WILLIFORD
BARHAM FUNERAL HOME,'THENCL' ALONG AND WITII SAID EASTERN PROPERTY
LINE OF WIL LIFORD BARHAM FUNERAL HOME N 16-21-25 F. 300.33' TO AN IRON PIN
MARKING A NORTHEAST CORNER OF WILLIFOR.D BARHAM FUNERAL HOME IN A
SOUTHERN PROPER'l'Y LINE OF .IOHN WE$LEY ROL LINS, THENCE ALONG AND
WITH SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINES OF JOHN WESLEY ROLLINS AND CURTIS M.
SIMONS, ET Al,. S 78-17-04 E 800.30' TO AN IRON PIN IN THE WESTERN EDGE CIF THE
RTGHT-OF-WAY OF N.C.S.R. 1321,11TENCE ALONG AND WITH THE WESTERN 1'iDGE
OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF N.C.S.R. 1321 S 12-28-56 W 454.60' TO AN IRON PIN, AND
THENCE. CONTINUING ALONG AND WITH THE WESTERN EDGE; OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF N.C.S.R. 1321 AND WITH A CURV1 TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 967.70' AN ARC LENGTH OF 41.51' AND A CHORD BEARING S 13-42-40 W
A DISTANCE OF 41.50' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 9.059 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITII A PRIVATE, NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER
HAMPTON DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RECORD IN PLAT CABINET 1, SLIDE
164-D OF THE CHOWAN COUNTY PUBLIC RF.;GISTRY, TNCORPORATH.D BY
REFF RF,NCE, FOR PURPOSES OF ACCESS AND UTILITIES.
SAID 9.058 ACRES BEINU TRACT ONE SET FORTH 1N THE DEED DA I D DEC EMBER
9, 2003 FROM JOHNSON, DOWDY BROTHERS AND TITOMAS TO CHOWAN LAND
INVESTMENTS, LLC OF RECORD IN BOOK 314, PAGE: 253 OF THE Cl-IOWAN COITNTY
PUBLIC REGISTRY, TNCORPORATED BY REFERENCE FOR FURTHER DESCRIPTION
ANT) CHAIN OF TITLE.