NCS000393_Dallas MASTER Annual Self Assessment Template_20211201

NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
1 1 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
2 2 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
3 3 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
4 4 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
5 4 2.B.1.
Did Dallas participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as
scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ?
6 5 2.B.2.
Did Dallas submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components not
audited by EPA or NCDEQ?
7 5 2.B.3.
Did Dallas submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180
days prior to permit expiration?
8 5 2.B.3.
If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was
received by DEQ?
9 1 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
10 1 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
11 2 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
12 2 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
13 3 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
14 3 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
15 4 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
16 4 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
17 5 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
18 5 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
19 1 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
20 1 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
21 2 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
22 2 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
23 3 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
24 3 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
25 4 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
26 4 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
27 5 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
28 5 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
29 1 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
30 1 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
31 2 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
32 2 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
Page 1 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
33 3 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
34 3 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
35 4 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
36 4 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
37 5 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
38 5 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
39 1 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
40 1 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
41 2 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
42 2 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
43 3 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
44 3 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
45 4 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
46 4 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
47 5 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
48 5 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
49 1 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
50 1 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
51 2 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
52 2 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
53 3 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
54 3 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
55 4 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
56 4 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
57 5 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
58 5 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
59 1 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
60 1 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
61 2 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
62 2 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
Page 2 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
63 3 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
64 3 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
65 4 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
66 4 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
67 5 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
68 5 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
69 1 6.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a litter management plan that includes staff
responsibilities and public involvement events?
70 2 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
71 2 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
72 3 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
73 3 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
74 4 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
75 4 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
76 5 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
77 5 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
78 2 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
79 2 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
80 3 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
81 3 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
82 4 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
83 4 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
84 5 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
85 5 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
86 1 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
87 2 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
88 3 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
89 4 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
90 5 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
Page 3 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
91 1 8.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a stormwater issue reporting mechanism for the web
site?
92 2 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
93 2 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
94 3 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
95 3 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
96 4 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
97 4 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
98 5 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
99 5 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
100 1 9.B.1.Did Dallas establish a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
101 1 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
102 1 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
103 2 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
104 2 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
105 3 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
106 3 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
107 4 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
108 4 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
109 5 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
110 5 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
111 1 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
112 1 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
113 2 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
114 2 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
115 3 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
116 3 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
117 4 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
118 4 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
119 5 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
120 5 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
121 2 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
122 1 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
123 2 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
124 3 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
125 4 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
126 5 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
127 1 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
128 1 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
Page 4 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
129 2 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
130 2 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
131 3 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
132 3 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
133 4 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
134 4 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
135 5 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
136 5 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
137 1 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
138 1 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
139 1 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
140 2 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
141 2 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
142 2 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
143 3 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
144 3 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
145 3 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
146 4 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
147 4 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
148 4 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
149 5 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
150 5 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
151 5 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
152 1 12.B.2.
Did Dallas develop a drain stenciling program in which volunteers can
stencil drains with a message aimed at preventing illegal dumping into
storm drains?
153 2 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
154 2 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
155 2 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
156 3 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
157 3 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
158 3 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
159 4 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
160 4 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
161 4 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
162 5 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
163 5 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
164 5 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
Page 5 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
165
166 1 13.B.1.
Did Dallas update the existing MS4 map to include all major outfalls, flow
directions, and receiving waters?
167 2 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
168 2 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
169 3 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
170 3 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
171 4 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
172 4 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
173 5 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
174 5 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
175 2 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
176 3 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
177 4 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
178 5 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
179 2 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
180 3 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
181 4 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
182 5 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
183 1 14.B.1.
Did Dallas adopt an IDDE Ordinance establishing legal authority to prohibit
illicit connections and discharges?
184 2 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
185 3 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
186 4 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
187 5 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
188 1 15.B.1.Did Dallas develop a written IDDE Plan?
189 1 15.B.2.What date did Dallas submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for approval?
190 2 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
191 3 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
192 4 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
193 5 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
194 2 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
195 2 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
196 2 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
197 2 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
198 2 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
199 2 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
200 3 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
201 3 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
202 3 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
203 3 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
204 3 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
205 3 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
206 4 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
207 4 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
208 4 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
209 4 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
Page 6 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
210 4 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
211 4 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
212 5 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
213 5 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
214 5 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
215 5 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
216 5 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
217 5 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
218 1 17.B.1.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge report form?
219 1 17.B.2.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge tracking mechanism?
220 1 18.B.1.
Did Dallas identify staff and contractors likely to observe and identify illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
221 1 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
222 1 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
223 2 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
224 2 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
225 3 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
226 3 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
227 4 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
228 4 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
229 5 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
230 5 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
231 2 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
232 2 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
233 3 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
234 3 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
235 4 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
236 4 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
237 5 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
238 5 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
239 1 19.B.1.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge fact sheet?
240 2 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
241 2 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
242 3 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
243 3 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
244 4 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
245 4 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
Page 7 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
246 5 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
247 5 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
248 1 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
249 2 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
250 3 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
251 4 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
252 5 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
253 1 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
254 1 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
255 1 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
256 2 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
257 2 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
258 2 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
259 3 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
260 3 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
261 3 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
262 4 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
263 4 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
264 4 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
265 5 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
266 5 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
267 5 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
268 1 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
269 2 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
270 3 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
271 4 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
272 5 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
273 1 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
274 1 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
275 1 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
276 1 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
277 1 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
Page 8 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
278 2 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
279 2 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
280 2 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
281 2 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
282 2 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
283 3 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
284 3 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
285 3 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
286 3 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
287 3 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
288 4 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
289 4 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
290 4 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
291 4 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
292 4 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
293 5 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
294 5 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
295 5 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
296 5 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
297 5 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
298 1 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
299 2 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
300 3 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
301 4 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
302 5 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
303 1 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
304 2 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
305 3 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
306 4 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
307 5 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
308 1 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
309 2 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
310 3 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
311 4 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
312 5 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
313 1 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
314 2 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
315 3 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
316 4 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
317 5 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
318 1 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
319 1 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
320 1 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
Page 9 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
321 2 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
322 2 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
323 2 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
324 3 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
325 3 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
326 3 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
327 4 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
328 4 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
329 4 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
330 5 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
331 5 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
332 5 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
333 1 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
334 1 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
335 2 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
336 2 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
337 3 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
338 3 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
339 4 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
340 4 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
341 5 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
342 5 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
343 1 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
344 1 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
345 2 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
346 2 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
347 3 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
348 3 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
349 4 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
350 4 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
351 5 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
352 5 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
353 1 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
354 2 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
355 3 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
356 4 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
357 5 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
358 1 33.B.1.
Did Dallas compile an inventory of muncipal facilities and operations with
the potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff?
359 1 33.B.1.
How many municipal facilities are listed in the inventory of muncipal
facilities and operations with the potential for generating polluted
stormwater runoff?
360 1 33.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were identified as having high potential to
generate polluted stormwater runoff?
361 1 33.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were identified as having low potential to
generate polluted stormwater runoff?
362 2 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
363 2 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
Page 10 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
364 2 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
365 3 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
366 3 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
367 3 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
368 4 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
369 4 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
370 4 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
371 5 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
372 5 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
373 5 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
374 1 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
375 2 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
376 3 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
377 4 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
378 5 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
379 2 34.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and implement an O&M plan for each high potential
facility that includes proactive schedules, standard documentation, staff
responsibilities, and proper maintenance training?
380 2 34.B.1.
How many O&M plans were developed for high potential municipal
facilities?
381 2 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
382 3 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
383 4 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
384 5 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
385 1 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
386 2 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
387 3 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
388 4 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
389 5 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
390 1 35.B.1
Did Dallas review written spill response procedure plans for each facility
that requires one?
391 1 35.B.1 How many municipal facilities require a spill response procedure plan?
Page 11 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
392 2 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/update/maintain written spill response plans?
393 2 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
394 3 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
395 3 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
396 4 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
397 4 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
398 5 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
399 5 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
400 1 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
401 1 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
402 2 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
403 2 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
404 3 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
405 3 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
406 4 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
407 4 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
408 5 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
409 5 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
410 1 36.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and implement a training program on stormwater
awareness and pollution prevention for all Town employees involved in
these activities?
411 2 36.B.2.
Did Dallas train all Town employees involved in these activities on
stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
412 2 36.B.2.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
413 3 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
414 3 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
415 4 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
416 4 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
417 5 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
418 5 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
419
420 1 37.B.1.
Did Dallas develop an MS4 O&M Plan to define inspection schedules, staff
responsibilities, and proper maintenance activities, including regular storm
drain / catch basin cleaning?
421 1 37.B.1.When did Dallas submit the MS4 O&M Plan to DEQ?
422 2 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
423 3 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
424 4 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
425 5 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
426 2 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
427 3 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
428 4 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
429 5 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
Page 12 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
430 2 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
431 3 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
432 4 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
433 5 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
434 1 38.B.1.
Did Dallas develop an inventory of municipally-owned SCMs with
information including type, year built, date of last inspection and
maintenance actions?
435 1 38.B.1.How many municipally-owned SCMs are in the inventory?
436 2 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
437 2 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
438 3 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
439 3 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
440 4 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
441 4 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
442 5 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
443 5 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
444 2 39.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a SCM Operation and Maintenance Plan for each
muncipally-owned SCM?
445 2 39.B.1.
How many municipal SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans were
developed?
446 2 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
447 3 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
448 4 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
449 5 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
450 2 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
451 2 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
452 3 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
453 3 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
454 4 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
455 4 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
456 5 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
457 5 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
458 3 39.B.4.
Did Dallas obtain an inventory of NCDOT-owned or controlled SCMs for
addition to the Town's SCM inventory?
459 1 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
460 1 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
461 2 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
462 2 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
463 3 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
464 3 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
465 4 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
466 4 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
467 5 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
468 5 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
Page 13 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
469 2 40.B.3.
Did Dallas develop or identify a pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling training program?
470 2 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
471 2 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
472 3 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
473 3 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
474 4 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
475 4 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
476 5 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
477 5 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
478 1 41.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a standard inspection checklist to ensure that vehicle
and equipment facilities are following proper procedures to minimize water
quality impacts from vehicle and equipment cleaning and maintenance?
479 2 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
480 2 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
481 3 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
482 3 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
483 4 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
484 4 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
485 5 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
486 5 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
487 2 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
488 3 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
489 4 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
490 5 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
491 1 42.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a training program on stormwater awareness and
pollution prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
492 2 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
493 2 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
494 3 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
495 3 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
496 4 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
Page 14 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
497 4 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
498 5 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
499 5 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
500 1 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
501 1 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
502 1 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
503 2 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
504 2 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
505 2 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
506 3 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
507 3 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
508 3 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
509 4 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
510 4 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
511 4 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
512 5 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
513 5 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
514 5 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
515 1 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
516 2 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
517 3 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
518 4 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
519 5 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
520 1 44.B.1.Did Dallas develop specific vehicle spill response procedures for accidents?
521 2 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
522 2 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
523 3 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
524 3 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
525 4 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
Page 15 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
526 4 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
527 5 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
528 5 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
Page 16 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
1 1 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
9 1 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
10 1 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
19 1 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
20 1 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
29 1 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
30 1 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
39 1 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
40 1 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
49 1 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
50 1 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
59 1 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
60 1 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
69 1 6.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a litter management plan that includes staff
responsibilities and public involvement events?
86 1 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
91 1 8.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a stormwater issue reporting mechanism for the web
site?
100 1 9.B.1.Did Dallas establish a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
101 1 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
102 1 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
111 1 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
112 1 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
122 1 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
127 1 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
128 1 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
137 1 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
138 1 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
139 1 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
152 1 12.B.2.
Did Dallas develop a drain stenciling program in which volunteers can
stencil drains with a message aimed at preventing illegal dumping into
storm drains?
166 1 13.B.1.
Did Dallas update the existing MS4 map to include all major outfalls, flow
directions, and receiving waters?
Page 17 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
183 1 14.B.1.
Did Dallas adopt an IDDE Ordinance establishing legal authority to prohibit
illicit connections and discharges?
188 1 15.B.1.Did Dallas develop a written IDDE Plan?
189 1 15.B.2.What date did Dallas submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for approval?
218 1 17.B.1.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge report form?
219 1 17.B.2.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge tracking mechanism?
220 1 18.B.1.
Did Dallas identify staff and contractors likely to observe and identify illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
221 1 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
222 1 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
239 1 19.B.1.Did Dallas develop an illicit discharge fact sheet?
248 1 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
253 1 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
254 1 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
255 1 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
268 1 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
273 1 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
274 1 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
275 1 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
276 1 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
277 1 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
298 1 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
303 1 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
308 1 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
313 1 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
318 1 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
319 1 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
320 1 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
333 1 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
334 1 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
343 1 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
344 1 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
353 1 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
358 1 33.B.1.
Did Dallas compile an inventory of muncipal facilities and operations with
the potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff?
359 1 33.B.1.
How many municipal facilities are listed in the inventory of muncipal
facilities and operations with the potential for generating polluted
stormwater runoff?
360 1 33.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were identified as having high potential to
generate polluted stormwater runoff?
361 1 33.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were identified as having low potential to
generate polluted stormwater runoff?
374 1 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
385 1 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
390 1 35.B.1
Did Dallas review written spill response procedure plans for each facility
that requires one?
391 1 35.B.1 How many municipal facilities require a spill response procedure plan?
Page 18 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
400 1 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
401 1 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
410 1 36.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and implement a training program on stormwater
awareness and pollution prevention for all Town employees involved in
these activities?
420 1 37.B.1.
Did Dallas develop an MS4 O&M Plan to define inspection schedules, staff
responsibilities, and proper maintenance activities, including regular storm
drain / catch basin cleaning?
421 1 37.B.1.When did Dallas submit the MS4 O&M Plan to DEQ?
434 1 38.B.1.
Did Dallas develop an inventory of municipally-owned SCMs with
information including type, year built, date of last inspection and
maintenance actions?
435 1 38.B.1.How many municipally-owned SCMs are in the inventory?
459 1 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
460 1 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
478 1 41.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a standard inspection checklist to ensure that vehicle
and equipment facilities are following proper procedures to minimize water
quality impacts from vehicle and equipment cleaning and maintenance?
491 1 42.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a training program on stormwater awareness and
pollution prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
500 1 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
501 1 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
502 1 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
515 1 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
520 1 44.B.1.Did Dallas develop specific vehicle spill response procedures for accidents?
Page 19 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
2 2 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
11 2 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
12 2 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
21 2 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
22 2 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
31 2 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
32 2 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
41 2 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
42 2 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
51 2 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
52 2 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
61 2 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
62 2 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
70 2 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
71 2 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
78 2 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
79 2 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
87 2 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
92 2 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
93 2 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
103 2 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
104 2 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
113 2 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
114 2 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
121 2 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
123 2 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
129 2 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
130 2 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
140 2 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
141 2 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
Page 20 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
142 2 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
153 2 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
154 2 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
155 2 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
167 2 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
168 2 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
175 2 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
179 2 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
184 2 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
190 2 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
194 2 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
195 2 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
196 2 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
197 2 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
198 2 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
199 2 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
223 2 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
224 2 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
231 2 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
232 2 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
240 2 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
241 2 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
249 2 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
256 2 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
257 2 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
258 2 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
269 2 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
278 2 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
279 2 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
280 2 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
281 2 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
282 2 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
299 2 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
304 2 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
309 2 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
314 2 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
321 2 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
322 2 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
323 2 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
Page 21 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
335 2 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
336 2 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
345 2 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
346 2 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
354 2 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
362 2 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
363 2 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
364 2 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
375 2 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
379 2 34.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and implement an O&M plan for each high potential
facility that includes proactive schedules, standard documentation, staff
responsibilities, and proper maintenance training?
380 2 34.B.1.
How many O&M plans were developed for high potential municipal
facilities?
381 2 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
386 2 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
392 2 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/update/maintain written spill response plans?
393 2 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
402 2 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
403 2 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
411 2 36.B.2.
Did Dallas train all Town employees involved in these activities on
stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
412 2 36.B.2.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
422 2 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
426 2 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
430 2 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
436 2 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
437 2 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
444 2 39.B.1.
Did Dallas develop a SCM Operation and Maintenance Plan for each
muncipally-owned SCM?
445 2 39.B.1.
How many municipal SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans were
developed?
446 2 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
450 2 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
451 2 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
461 2 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
462 2 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
469 2 40.B.3.
Did Dallas develop or identify a pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling training program?
470 2 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
471 2 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
479 2 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
Page 22 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
480 2 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
487 2 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
492 2 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
493 2 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
503 2 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
504 2 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
505 2 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
516 2 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
521 2 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
522 2 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
Page 23 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
3 3 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
13 3 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
14 3 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
23 3 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
24 3 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
33 3 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
34 3 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
43 3 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
44 3 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
53 3 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
54 3 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
63 3 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
64 3 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
72 3 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
73 3 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
80 3 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
81 3 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
88 3 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
94 3 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
95 3 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
105 3 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
106 3 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
115 3 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
116 3 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
124 3 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
131 3 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
132 3 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
143 3 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
144 3 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
145 3 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
156 3 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
Page 24 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
157 3 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
158 3 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
169 3 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
170 3 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
176 3 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
180 3 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
185 3 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
191 3 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
200 3 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
201 3 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
202 3 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
203 3 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
204 3 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
205 3 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
225 3 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
226 3 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
233 3 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
234 3 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
242 3 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
243 3 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
250 3 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
259 3 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
260 3 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
261 3 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
270 3 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
283 3 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
284 3 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
285 3 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
286 3 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
287 3 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
300 3 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
305 3 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
310 3 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
315 3 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
324 3 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
325 3 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
326 3 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
337 3 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
338 3 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
347 3 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
348 3 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
Page 25 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
355 3 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
365 3 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
366 3 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
367 3 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
376 3 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
382 3 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
387 3 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
394 3 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
395 3 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
404 3 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
405 3 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
413 3 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
414 3 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
423 3 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
427 3 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
431 3 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
438 3 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
439 3 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
447 3 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
452 3 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
453 3 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
458 3 39.B.4.
Did Dallas obtain an inventory of NCDOT-owned or controlled SCMs for
addition to the Town's SCM inventory?
463 3 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
464 3 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
472 3 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
473 3 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
481 3 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
482 3 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
488 3 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
494 3 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
495 3 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
506 3 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
507 3 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
508 3 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
517 3 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
Page 26 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
523 3 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
524 3 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
Page 27 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
4 4 1
Did Dallas submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31
each year?
5 4 2.B.1.
Did Dallas participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as
scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ?
15 4 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
16 4 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
25 4 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
26 4 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
35 4 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
36 4 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
45 4 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
46 4 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
55 4 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
56 4 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
65 4 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
66 4 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
74 4 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
75 4 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
82 4 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
83 4 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
89 4 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
96 4 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
97 4 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
107 4 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
108 4 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
117 4 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
118 4 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
125 4 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
133 4 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
134 4 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
146 4 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
147 4 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
Page 28 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
148 4 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
159 4 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
160 4 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
161 4 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
171 4 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
172 4 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
177 4 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
181 4 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
186 4 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
192 4 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
206 4 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
207 4 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
208 4 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
209 4 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
210 4 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
211 4 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
227 4 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
228 4 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
235 4 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
236 4 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
244 4 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
245 4 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
251 4 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
262 4 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
263 4 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
264 4 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
271 4 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
288 4 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
289 4 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
290 4 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
291 4 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
292 4 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
301 4 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
306 4 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
311 4 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
316 4 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
327 4 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
328 4 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
329 4 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
Page 29 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
339 4 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
340 4 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
349 4 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
350 4 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
356 4 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
368 4 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
369 4 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
370 4 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
377 4 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
383 4 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
388 4 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
396 4 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
397 4 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
406 4 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
407 4 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
415 4 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
416 4 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
424 4 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
428 4 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
432 4 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
440 4 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
441 4 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
448 4 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
454 4 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
455 4 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
465 4 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
466 4 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
474 4 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
475 4 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
483 4 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
484 4 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
489 4 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
496 4 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
497 4 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
509 4 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
510 4 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
511 4 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
Page 30 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
518 4 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
525 4 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
526 4 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
Page 31 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(July 1 -
June 30)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
6 5 2.B.2.
Did Dallas submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components not
audited by EPA or NCDEQ?
7 5 2.B.3.
Did Dallas submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180
days prior to permit expiration?
8 5 2.B.3.
If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was
received by DEQ?
17 5 3.B.1.
Did Dallas develop and distribute general stormwater educational
materials?
18 5 3.B.1.
If so, how many general stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
27 5 3.B.2.
Did Dallas utilize services of Gaston County/ Regional Stormwater
Partnership to provide supplemental educational materials?
28 5 3.B.2.
If so, how many supplemental stormwater educational materials were
distributed?
37 5 3.B.3.
Did Dallas operate an informational booth at a community event to
distribute materials on general stormwater issues?
38 5 3.B.3.If so, how many stormwater educational materials were distributed?
47 5 4.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed the list of target
pollutants/stressors and their likely sources ?
48 5 4.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target pollutants/stressors and their likely sources
on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
57 5 5.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update as needed a list of the target audiences
likely to experience stormwater impacts?
58 5 5.B.1.
Did Dallas post the list of target audiences likely to experience stormwater
impacts on the Town's website and Facebook page ?
67 5 5.B.2.
Did Dallas share information on the stormwater program with several
specific target audiences such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/
disadvantaged communities specifically addressing identified target
pollutants/sources?
68 5 5.B.2.
If so, how many materials were distributed to specific target audiences
such as scouts, schools, civic groups, and minority/ disadvantaged
communities specifically addressing identified target pollutants/sources?
76 5 6.B.2.Did Dallas implement the litter management plan?
77 5 6.B.2.
How many regular inspections of public properties in accordance with litter
management planwere performed?
84 5 6.B.3.Did Dallas conduct biannual public litter sweep events?
85 5 6.B.3.
If so, how many volunteers participated in biannual public litter sweep
events?
90 5 7.B.1.
Did Dallas maintain and update the stormwater web page to include new
educational materials, the most recent SWMP and other pertinent
stormwater information?
98 5 8.B.2.
Did Dallas monitor and maintain the web based stormwater reporting
mechanism?
99 5 8.B.2.
How many reports of stormwater issues were received through the web
based reporting mechanism?
109 5 9.B.2.Did Dallas maintain a stormwater hotline and responsible party?
110 5 9.B.2.How many hotline calls were received?
119 5 9.B.3.
Did Dallas stormwater hotline staff receive training on public education and
outreach and handling questions and complaints on stormwater issues?
120 5 9.B.3.How many stormwater hotline staff were trained?
126 5 9.B.4.
Did Dallas publicize the hotline number through the web site and other
mechanisms?
135 5 10.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct an annual public meeting before the Town's Board of
Aldermen to report on the stormwater program and issues of current
concern?
136 5 10.B.2.If so, how many meeting particiants were there?
149 5 12.B.1.
Did Dallas sponsor biannual cleanup events to pick up trash or clean up
litter from streams or public ROW?
150 5 12.B.1.
If so, how many town-sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter
from streams or public ROWwere held?
Page 32 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
151 5 12.B.1.
If so, how many volunteers (total of all events) participated in town-
sponsored events to pick up trash or clean up litter from streams or public
ROW?
162 5 12.B.3.Did Dallas implement the storm drain stenciling program?
163 5 12.B.3.How many volunteers participated in storm drain stenciling this year?
164 5 12.B.3.How many storm drains were stencilied this year?
173 5 13.B.2.
Did Dallas map stormwater control infrastructure such as catch basins,
ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
174 5 13.B.2.
What percentage of the MS4 area is currently mapped, including major
outfalls, flow directions, receivign waters, stormwater control
infrastructure such as catch basins, ditches, storm drainage pipes, etc.?
178 5 13.B.3.Did Dallas add pertinent state infrastructure to the MS4 map?
182 5 13.B.4.Did Dallas update / add newly constructed infrastructure to the MS4 map?
187 5 14.B.2.Did Dallas review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed?
193 5 15.B.3.Did Dallas implement the IDDE plan?
212 5 16.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct annual inspections of all major outfalls during dry
weather in accordance with the IDDE Plan?
213 5 16.B.1.How many dry weather major outfall inspections were performed?
214 5 16.B.1.How many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
215 5 16.B.1.How many confirmed illicit/dry weather discharges were identified?
216 5 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather enforcement actions were issued?
217 5 16.B.1.How many illicit/dry weather discharges were remedied?
229 5 18.B.1.
Did Dallas train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
230 5 18.B.1.
How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit
discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills?
237 5 18.B.3.
Did Dallas utilize the Town's Safety Committee as a means of educating all
Town departments about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
238 5 18.B.3.
How many Town staff were educated through the Town's Safety
Committee about the impacts of illicit discharges/connections?
246 5 19.B.2.Did Dallas post the illicit discharge fact sheets in each departmental facility?
247 5 19.B.2.
How many illicit discharge fact sheets were posted in departmental
facilities?
252 5 20.B.1.
Did Dallas use various means of communication (utility bill flyers,
newsletter, website, Facebook, electronic message board, etc.) to provide
general information on the hazards associated with illegal discharges and
the improper disposal of waste?
265 5 23.B.1.
Did Dallas train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
266 5 23.B.1.
How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site
complaints?
267 5 23.B.2.How many construction site complaints were received?
272 5 25.B.1.Did Dallas maintain an ordinance that addresses construction site waste?
293 5 26
Did Dallas track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
294 5 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
295 5 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
296 5 26 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
297 5 26 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
302 5 26
Did Dallas maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
307 5 26
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
312 5 26 How many low-density inspections were performed?
317 5 26 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
330 5 27.B.1.
Did Dallas conduct an annual review of the Post-Construction Site Runoff
Control program?
331 5 27.B.2.
Were any changes to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control program
needed?
332 5 27.B.2.
Were any changes made to the Post-Construction Site Runoff Control
program?
Page 33 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
341 5 28.B.1.How many BMP / SCM O&M Plans were approved?
342 5 31.B.1.What percentage of low density projects was inspected this year?
351 5 3.6.6.Did Dallas maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance?
352 5 3.6.6.Did Dallas implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance?
357 5 3.6.6.
Did Dallas implement and maintain a program to ensure proper operation
and maintenance of septic systems?
371 5 33.B.2.How many new municipal facilities were added this year?
372 5 33.B.2.
How many new municipal facilities were inspected for potential to generate
polluted stormwater runoff?
373 5 33.B.3.
How many annual inspections of municipal facilites classified as as having
high potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff were performed?
378 5 33.B.4.
Did Dallas complete an annual review and update of the inventory of
muncipal facilities and operations with the potential for generating
polluted stormwater runoff?
384 5 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good housekeeping
/ spill prevention and control measures are implemented in accordance
with the O&M program?
389 5 34.B.2.
How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s) following
inspection?
398 5 35.B.3.Did Dallas review/maintain written spill response plans?
399 5 35.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised?
408 5 35.B.4.
How many Public Works and Fire Department staff were trained on spill
response procedures?
409 5 35.B.5.
How many facility staff at high potential municipal facilities were trained on
pollution prevention / good housekeeping and spill response procedures?
417 5 36.B.3.
Did Dallas provide annual training for all appropriate employees, including
new employees, on stormwater awareness and pollution prevention?
418 5 36.B.3.
How many Town staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
425 5 37.B.2.Did Dallas implement the MS4 O&M Plan?
429 5 37.B.2.How many MS4 inspections were completed?
433 5 37.B.3.How many MS4 maintenance activities were performed?
442 5 38.B.2.
Did Dallas update the inventory of municipally-owned SCMs to include new
SCMs?
443 5 38.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCMs were added to the inventory?
449 5 39.B.2.How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed?
456 5 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required
maintenance?
457 5 39.B.3.
How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were
performed?
467 5 40.B.1.
Did Dallas ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying
pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers?
468 5 40.B.1.
How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides,
herbicides and fertilizers?
476 5 40.B.4.
Did Dallas provide staff training in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
477 5 40.B.4.
How many staff were trained in pollution prevention and chemical use,
storage, and handling?
485 5 41.B.2.
Did Dallas perform bi-annual inspections of appropriate facilities using the
inspection checklist and follow up on any corrective actions needed?
486 5 41.B.2.
How many bi-annual inspections of appropriate vehicle and equipment
facilities were performed using the inspection checklist?
490 5 41.B.3.
How many re-inspections of deficient vehicle and equipment facilities were
performed?
498 5 42.B.2.
Did Dallas conduct annual training on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention for all town employees involved in these activities?
499 5 42.B.2.
How many staff were trained on stormwater awareness and pollution
prevention?
512 5 43.B.1.Did Dallas maintain the trash and leaf/yard waste collection program?
513 5 43.B.1.How much trash was collected (cubic yards)?
514 5 43.B.1.How much yard waste was collected (cubic yards)?
Page 34 of 35
NCS000393_DALLAS 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
519 5 43.B.3.Did Dallas publicize the schedule fro trash and leaf collection?
527 5 44.B.2.
Did Dallas train Public Works and Fire Departmet staff in vehicle spill
response procedures?
528 5 44.B.2.
How many Public Works and Fire Departmet staff were trained in vehicle
spill response procedures?
Page 35 of 35