HomeMy WebLinkAbout310299_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211122Division of Water. Resources
F�aciityininber.°�- Zvi'.0pivisionofSoil•andWater Conservation,
O Other Agency'
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: qh0 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: l� � �,e,re Title: Phone: 9 ( 0 7-4 C1 zo 0 9-
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
SineN Capacity Pop. '
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder p
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
� •Other,
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
° Wet Poultry
Design Current.
Capacity- pop.° .,
Layer
Non -Layer
Design . Current ..
. Dry Poultry Capacity PoO.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design 'Current
Cattle,.Capacity , .S Eop. s
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef,Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
[2-14o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No P _ ._ -
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No ONA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�' ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: -ZA 9 jDate of Inspection: it t7_Lj2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No r_/� NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: 2
Spillway?:
p
Designed Freeboard (in): L -`L_
Observed Freeboard (in): SO,
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
D-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or envir nmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ YesF2-&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E2 io
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Zf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
WA -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriat o
❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: _
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Applicatio ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall tocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections /] Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [20<A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Z Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes _ No
❑ N
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments,(PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes El No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ,✓ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes D/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Z <NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IComments (refer to question #)t Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pates as necessarv).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
J A5eAe I)
r
Vt \'IJ-e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
ESQ I�- `A-2,
r
P4 C_ v✓ 49 S 6-- ® ,---
VJ t,e- S C_ o__ 1� 0 �
(ze S V"' J I
Phone: el(�i �' 3 T P
Date: rL;i
S/1 II2020