20130891 Ver 1_More Info Received_20131205

Strickland, Bev
From: Jay Keller [jay @kellerenvironmental.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 8:53 PM
To: Smith, Cherri L
Cc: John Teel; Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: SEPTIC IMPACT FOR REX FRAZIER; Yates Mill Estates DWQ 13 -0891
Attachments: dwq supplementals IMPACT AREA.pdf, _Certification_.htm; Yates Mill Estates PCNp6.pdf; DWQ_Re-
S u bm itta I_Letter_YatesM i l l Estates_12 -5 -13. pdf
Thanks for speaking with me today Cherri. Attached is the septic line impacts exhibit that we spoke about. Please let
me or John know if you need any changes or additions to it. I also attached a revised PCN p6 for your files. I'll drop off
hard - copies of the attached to Archdale tomorrow afternoon. Thanks again for your help and have a great weekend.
Jay
From: John Teel [mai Ito: jteelsp(ayahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:23 PM
To: Jay Keller
Subject: SEPTIC IMPACT FOR REX FRAZIER
Jay, attached the revised septic impact area sheet as discussed. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
John A. Teel
STEWART- PROCTOR, PLLC
Engineering and Surveying
office 919 779 -1855

YATES MILL ESTATES PREPARED FOR: GRAPHIC SCALE
REX FRAZIER
WAKE CDUNrY, NORTH CAROLINA 129 MALTLAND DRIVE 100' 0 50" 100
CARY, NC 27518
IWACT MAP FOR SEPTIC LINE DATE : 07 -24 -13
PROJECT ENGINEER: IN FEET )
SMWART- PROCTOR MIKE L. STEWART 1 inch = 100 ft.
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER: NC DWQ MAPS:
SP Design Consultants JOHN A. TEEL AREA IMPACT MAP
319 Chapano Rood PROJECT SURVEYOR: FIGURE #:4
Raleigh, North Coro lino 27603
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] PROJECT SURVEYOR

(to
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
December 5, 2013
Cherri Smith
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands WQ Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
Re: Yates Mill Estates
DWQ Project 13 -0891
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Smith:
Thank you for speaking with me today and your help with this proposed residential
subdivision. We are submitting the additional information regarding the proposed riparian buffer
impacts associated with the road crossing and utility line crossings.
Attached are the following items for your files and review.
• Revised PCN page 6 (buffer impacts).
• Engineering exhibit: Figure 4- Impact Map For Septic Line
If you should have questions or require additional clarification please feel free to contact me at
749 -8259 or email: jay k ll r nvironm ntal.com.
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC
Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: Rex Frazier
John Teel- Stewart- Proctor Engineering /Surveying

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ®P ❑ T
C ro Rossing
UT to Swift Creek
® Nos
5,453
3,225
Utility
❑ Yes
B2 ®P ❑ T
Line
UT to Swift Creek
® No
3,695
2,484
Crossings
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
9,148
5,709
6i. Comments: There are 3 proposed septic line impacts at the rear of Lots 14 -16. The total of those 3 crossings are listed in
B2 above. Please refer to the attached "Impact Map For Septic Line" for details. Permanent grass will be established at the
conclusion of the installations and maintained. Shrubs and trees will not be allowed to re- establish to prevent root damage to
the lines.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road crossing was strategically located near an existing crossing. It's perpendicular alignment will minimize impacts to the
stream and riparian buffers.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The existing dirt road will be utilized during construction then removed and the stream restored when the permanent road is
ready.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version