20061889 Ver 1_401 Application_20061106

x

Office Use Only: Form version March OS
2006 1889
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or'TT/A".)
I. Processing
~~i~EiVE.G
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
(,r Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ,
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
(~' 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: /~/ f j «; ~p l .~ J~
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Cazolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Cazolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Mailing Address j~~,~~_
a ~~~ 0_f
N~J~ ~ 0 2,006
S'fQRA~YVwTER BRANCH
Telephone Number: Fax Number.
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the ownerlapplicant.}
Name: V Vonn~ Freemc,~n
Company Affiliation: F--~eman S n.e~ a r
Mailing Address: 6. I3ax ~ 55
,Ru ~ C0. ~~~ , ~~~ ~ -~ ~ ~ 10
Telephone N
E-mail Addr~
g
Page 5 of 12
Fax Number:
C C~r~-.
pEC 7 2006
~~8 Mm STOfi~~`~ BFI

.c
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map cleally showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no lazger than I 1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: ~ ic~el~C.~
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIl~: Z 17 b 5 5
4. Location
County: f i u -f l-, ~,r-~ov d Nearest Town: C.~ ~te ~ ~ L-
Subdivision name (include phase/iot number):
Directions to site (include road numberslnames, landmarks, etc.):~.~1,~ ~ hods ~d, ~~f'
5. Site coordinates (For lineaz projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decnnal Degrees (6 digits minimum): ~ 5 ,~~ I d °N ~ ~~ ) ~ `~ 9 °W
6. Property size (acres):. 2~~~
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: !.~ k e ~ ~~
8. River Basin: ~c-~~~
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h?aenr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time ofthis application: ~c~;de~-t',~ (:use c~~;t~ I-~~.s~ ~ %ti,o~H,ar.s~ , ~~r ~ seR, ~tl(
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the ove/call (project in detail,/i/nccluding/the Hype of equipm1en/qt to be used:' ;~_
.UM'.~~. _ e~._.i /~I.1.T~.w W..1 f/1.. I.1L/!. .~Pi._~c (~ W1l` ~P lr._~ri.i`IIOM ItC~~~ f7~/''0 rP'~NJ'r.
S~ a{t~,e~.e ~ pl.c.~.s.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:`~'~o, e c~~a : s Pk'y r~; sra ~~-/~ .
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
description of the proposed impacts:~o :s ; ~; I ; f~ ~~' "~~~e~~~ ~ f~rb,~l
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) ~~ within
100-year
Floodplain
eslno Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) ~
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:~~ f~
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but aze not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the lineaz footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea e, multi I len X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres

Totat Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredeinQ, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) ~`~
. ~U(~ cxe,
. OCR!, ~~,
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Im act acres): ~
Wetland Im act (acres): ~~
O n Water lm act acres : --~-t~
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres ~4f-~
Total Stream Iin act (lineaz feet}; ~
. ~~ ~ ~~
. ~~Otap~
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes (~ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact {acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If constn~ction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. ~,~ tx; f/~ ,..Y~
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minima]. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.htm I.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/lineaz feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
~l
Z. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Cazolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): /U~
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12

lX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Dces the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUst~/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No (~'
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No [/~
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone'' I Cmpact I Multi Tier Required
i~.,~fl... fem..*~ P ~.~:.:__.:--
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near banks of chatmel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. J~/f1
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.~~'/~.rr~~V s~-R ~ ~efv,o~.a d~. ~2D ~laz
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
ti~
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DW Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in addi oval
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No [~
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
ht~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Sppecies, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
~.
Page 12 of 12

xumenuru moo; ivt, - rnntanie iviap
Rutherford Co, NC
Page 1 of 2
Parcels
Tax PIN: 217655
G PI N: 0642063971100000
Account No.: 15128447
Owners Name1: WALCZAK JANET M
Owners Name2: HEICHELBECH SALLY A
Address1: RT 4 BOX 209 C
Address2:
City: HENDERSONVILLE
State: NC
Zip: 28739
Property Address: 213 NORTH SHORE DR
ACAS: 0
AC_DEED: 0
CALC_ACRE: 0.2
No. of Bidgs: 3
Deed Bk/Pg: 719/375
Land Value: $220,000
Bldg. Value: $48,200
Defr. Value: $0
Total Value: $268,200
Sale Price: $229,500
Neighborhood Code: L306
Neighborhood Desc.: RESIDENTIAL LAKE
Property Desc.: RES LAKE LURE PROP.
Zoning:
http://arcims.webgis.net/nc/rutherford/printable.asp?process=id 1 &x2=1043706.395&y2=6... 10/3/2006

Map/Blk/Lot: 528 4 7
Nbr Land Seg.: 1
Stamps: 459.00
Land Use:
Township Code: 02
Exempt~ro:
Exempt amt: 0
Flood Plain: N
St_nbr: 213
St_dir:
St_name: NORTH SHORE
St_suffix: DR
Apt_nbr:
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this page is NOT to be construed or used as a "legal
description". Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.
http://www.wetrgis.net Anderson & Associates, Inc. http:/Mrww.andassoc.com
http://arcims.webgis.net/nc/rutherford/printable.asp?process=id 1 &x2=1043706.395&y2=6... 10/3/2006

F!~OM
' FAX NQ. :8773825 Nov, 14 2006 01:11PM P1
~~
~~
~-- _
G~~Z''~'2'"

~ ~~
~~ -~ ~,

APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF WALL ~. - -
TO BE REPLACED t5 90 FEET FILL SIDE
BACK FACE OF _ _ ,,...•- ~" "'~ ~, ,r ~" '~
STONE WALL _ " - --~ .,. - ~'
~.. ~"'
FOOTING OUTLINE ~ - - .... _ ~, ~.. -- ~„ ,~ •~ -
~• ~"
_" ~ ~
~~. "- a~
L____--_
FRONT FAGS OF -I
STONE WALL
~~ ~ ~~ ~~ _ ,~~ ~r
`_,,,..r.----'`~ TI11S DRAWING FOR
____ --- LAKESIDE GENERAL LAYOUT ONLY
___,^..,..-- "'``-.- RETAINING WALL SHALL REPLACE EXISTING,
PLAN VIEW
NO SCALE
90'-0"
ESTIMATED LENGTH
SOLID STONE WALL
DAMAGED STONE WALL AND St1ALL BE
CONSTRUCTED SO THAT THE LAKE SIDE FACE
OF Tt1E NEW WALL 18 FLUSH WITH TI1E REMAINS
OF TFiE EXISTING WALL AND THE SHORELINE AS
DEFINED BY THE TOWN OF LAKE LURE
DOCUMENT "LAKE STRUCTURES REGULATIONS"
r-I-----"-------------------------------------"-----------._~._---------------------~-~
L..~.__..___._~_.~._~------------------------------------ ---_..__..__.~._
FOOTING STEPPED A5 REQUIRED ~ - ~ ' ` r
REBAR CONTINUOUS THROUGH STEP I O" MINIMUM THICKNESS,
3500# CONCRETE FOOTING
ELEVATION
NO SCALE
COMPACTED FILL
UNDISTURBED SOIL
RIP-PAP A5 PER LAKE
STRUCTURES REGULATIONS
FULLY MORTARED SOLID STONE WALL
#Q REBAR CONTINUOUS, SPACED 16" OC
W/TWO AT TOP OF WALL AS SHOWN
#q REBAR W/6" HOOK SPACED I &" O.C.
PROTRUDING 70 WITHIN 12" OF TOP OF
WALL, FULLY MORTARED INTO STONE
#4 REBAR 30" LONG SPACED 18" OC
3 PCS #a REBAR CONTINUOUS IN FOOTING
3500# CONCRETE FOOTING
___. TYPICAL
DESIGN INFORMATION
THE pE51GN5 PRESENTED ON THIS DRAWING INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM VALUES.
VERIFICATION THAT THESE VALUES ARE MET OR EXCEEDED 15 NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
CONCRETE (IF REQUIRED) IMPORTANCE FACTORS (WHEN RELEVANr)
MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WIND I .O
FOOTINGS 1 WALLS/SLABS 3500 / 3000 PSF SNOW I .O
pENSITY 150 PCF SEISMIC I .0
PERFORMING SLUMP 4 INCHES DESIGN LOADS (WHEN RELEVANT)
SOIL ROOF DL /SNOW 15/20 PSF
MINIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE 2000 PSF FLOOR pL / LL I 0 /40 PSF
MINIMUM 501E INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE 30 DEG WIND 90 MPH
COMPACTED BACKFILL DENSITY EXPOSURE CATEGORY C
SLIDING COEFFICIENT q5u SEISMIC DESIGN (WHEN RELEVANT)
REINFORCING (IF REQUIRED) SEISMIC USE GROUP I
ALL REINFORCING STEEL 15 TO BE ASTM A615 GRADE 60, SITE CLASSIFICATION D
FABRICATED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 3 18. SPECTRAL RESPONSE
ALL LAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 36 BAR DIAMETERS. ACCELERATION SD5 39% g, SDI 2 I % g
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM MOMENT FRAME
SEISMIC BASE SHEAR Vx= I . I k, Vy= I . I k
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQVLNT LTRL FRCS
SEAWALL DESIGN SHOWN BY KIM B, WARNER, PE, LLC, BASED ON GENERAL LAYOUT FURNISHED BY LENNY FREEMAN
TABLE OE VALUES
VERTICAL FOOTING FOOTING FOOTING WATER DRY WALL RIP-RAP
HEIGHT THICKNESS WIDTH DEPTH DEPTH HEIGHT HEIGHT
A B C B+D E F G
ESTIMATED 5'-6" 24" 39" 24" 24" 30" 24"
MINIMUM N/A 10" 39" 24" 12" 27" 24"
MAXIMUM 6'-0" 24" N/A" 27" 36" 36" 24"
THE SEAWALL 5110WN ON Tt11S DESIGN DOCUMENT 15 TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING
THE 2006-2007 LAKE LEVEL DRAW DOWN PERIOD. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT
BEGIN BEFORE THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF TI1E 501E UNDER TI1E NEW FOOTING HAS
DRIED SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT LEACHING CONCRETE CONTAMINANTS FROM
ENTERING TI1E LAKE. IN ADDITION, ALL CONCRETE PLACED BELOW TI1E 990 FOOT
ELEVATION SHALL HAVE BEEN PLACED SOON ENOUGH TO ALLOW A 28 DAY CURE
BEFORE CONTACTING RISING LAKE WATER AT THE END OF ThE DRAW DOWN PERIOD.
~~\~~~~ ~ CA R~ //,i
\\\OQ~``1~~~fnupl~' /y~~i
,w =```aOFBS S /O p~ 9 i
Z ~ ~
? 9.
r
~ l~l
II"~•
•i!' a~'GI N E~~~~~Q \~
~ / l/1111111\\ \
SIGNIFICANT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THESE PLANS ARP
CORRECT AND COMPLETE AND SATISFY THE pESIGN CRITERIA. HOWEVER,
KIM B. WARNER, PE, LLC, WILL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES
DUE TO UNFORESEEN pESiGN LOApS OR 501E CONDITIONS THAT WILL NOT
SUPPORT 2000 PSF LOADS.
ALL FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL GOpES AND ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS
SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OP THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THIS RETAINING WALL AND SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANYTHING
SHOWN, DESCRIBEp, OR IMPLIED WHERE VARIANCES OCCUR.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CHECKING AND VERIFYING ALL
DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS. VARIATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT
TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION.
ROCK SEAWALL DESIGN FOR PLAN, ELEVATION ~ KIM B. WARNER, PE, LLG DREA~E 10- 12-06 SHEET
139 COUNTRYWOOD DRIVE, I
WALCZAK/hEIChEL8ECf1 RESIDENCE TYPICAL SECTION FOREST CITY, NC 28043 Rev
2 13 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, LAKE LURE, NC 28746 SCALE - AS NOTED PE NO 19856
__ LENNY FREEMAN -CONTRACTOR OF I