Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000480_Rutherford College MASTER Annual Self Assessment Template_20211103NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 1 1 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 2 2 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 3 3 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 4 4 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 5 4 2.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ? 6 5 2.B.2. Did Rutherford College submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components not audited by EPA or NCDEQ? 7 5 2.B.3. Did Rutherford College submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180 days prior to permit expiration? 8 5 2.B.3. If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was received by DEQ? 9 1 3.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new fliers to raise general stormwater awareness? 10 1 3.B.1.If so, how many general stormwater awareness fliers were distributed? 11 2 3.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about illicit discharges? 12 2 3.B.2.If so, how many educational fliers about illicit discharges were distributed? 13 3 3.B.3. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about illegal dumping? 14 3 3.B.3.If so, how many educational fliers about illegal dumping were distributed? 15 4 3.B.4. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about chemicals and nutrients and their water quality impacts? 16 4 3.B.4. If so, how many educational fliers about chemicals and nutrients and their water quality impacts were distributed? 17 5 3.B.5. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about the importance of proper waste disposal? 18 5 3.B.5. If so, how many educational fliers about the importance of proper waste disposal were distributed? 19 1 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 20 1 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 21 2 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 22 2 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 23 3 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 24 3 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 25 4 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 26 4 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 27 5 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 28 5 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 29 1 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 30 1 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 31 2 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 32 2 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 33 3 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 34 3 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 35 4 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 36 4 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 37 5 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 38 5 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 39 1 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 40 1 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 41 1 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 42 2 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 43 2 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 44 2 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 45 3 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 46 3 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 47 3 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 48 4 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 49 4 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 50 4 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 51 5 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 52 5 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 53 5 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 54 1 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 55 1 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 56 1 5.B.2. If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 57 2 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 58 2 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 59 2 5.B.2. If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 60 3 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 61 3 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 62 3 5.B.2. If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 63 4 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 64 4 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 65 4 5.B.2. If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 66 5 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 67 5 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 68 5 5.B.2. If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 69 1 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 70 1 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 71 2 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 72 2 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 73 3 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 74 3 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 75 4 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 76 4 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 77 5 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 78 5 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 79 1 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 80 1 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 81 2 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 82 2 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 83 3 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 84 3 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 85 4 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 86 4 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 87 5 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 88 5 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 89 1 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 90 1 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 91 2 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 92 2 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 93 3 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 94 3 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 95 4 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 96 4 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 97 5 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 98 5 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 99 1 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 100 1 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 101 1 10.B.1. If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 102 1 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 103 2 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 104 2 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 105 2 10.B.1. If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 106 2 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 107 3 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 108 3 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 109 3 10.B.1. If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 110 3 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 111 4 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 112 4 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 113 4 10.B.1. If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 114 4 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 115 5 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 116 5 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 117 5 10.B.1. If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 118 5 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 119 1 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 120 1 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 121 2 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 122 2 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 123 3 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 124 3 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 125 4 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 126 4 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 127 5 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 128 5 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 129 1 12.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify a specific staff member who will serve as the default hotline contact? 130 1 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 131 2 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 132 3 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 133 4 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 134 5 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 135 1 12.B.3. Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 136 1 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 137 2 12.B.3. Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 138 2 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 139 3 12.B.3. Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 140 3 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 141 4 12.B.3. Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 142 4 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 143 5 12.B.3. Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 144 5 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 145 1 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 146 2 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 147 3 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 148 4 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 149 5 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 150 1 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 151 2 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 152 3 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 153 4 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 154 5 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 155 1 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 156 2 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 157 3 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 158 4 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 159 5 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 160 1 15.B.2. Did Rutherford College record and track responses, inputs, issues and concerns reported through the stormwater email? 161 1 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 162 2 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 163 3 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 164 4 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 165 5 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 166 1 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 167 1 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 168 2 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 169 2 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 170 3 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 171 3 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 172 4 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 173 4 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 174 5 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 175 5 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 176 1 17.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 177 1 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 178 1 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 179 2 17.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 180 2 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 181 2 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 182 3 17.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 183 3 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 184 3 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 185 4 17.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 186 4 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 187 4 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 188 5 17.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 189 5 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 190 5 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 191 1 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 192 1 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 193 2 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 194 2 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 195 3 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 196 3 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 197 4 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 198 4 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 199 5 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 200 5 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 201 1 19.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 202 1 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 203 1 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 204 1 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 205 2 19.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 206 2 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 207 2 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 208 2 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 209 3 19.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 210 3 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 211 3 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 212 3 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 213 4 19.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 214 4 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 215 4 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 216 4 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 217 5 19.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 218 5 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 219 5 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 220 5 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 221 1 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 222 2 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 223 3 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 224 4 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 225 5 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 226 1 20.B.1.Did Rutherford College add major outfalls to the existing MS4 map? 227 1 20.B.1. If so, how many existing major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 228 1 20.B.2. Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 229 1 20.B.2. If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 230 2 20.B.2. Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 231 2 20.B.2. If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 232 3 20.B.2. Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 233 3 20.B.2. If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 234 4 20.B.2. Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 235 4 20.B.2. If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 236 5 20.B.2. Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 237 5 20.B.2. If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 238 1 21.B.1.Did Rutherford College update the IDDE ordinance? 239 2 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 240 3 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 241 4 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 242 5 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 243 1 22.B.1.Did Rutherford College develop an updated written IDDE Plan? 244 1 22.B.1. What date did Rutherford College submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for approval? 245 1 23.B.1. Did Rutherford College use the MS4 map to locate priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 246 2 23.B.2. Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 247 3 23.B.2. Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 248 4 23.B.2. Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 249 5 23.B.2. Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 250 1 24.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish dry weather inspection procedures and a schedule? 251 2 24.B.2. Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 252 2 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 253 2 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 254 3 24.B.2. Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 255 3 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 256 3 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 257 4 24.B.2. Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 258 4 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 259 4 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 260 5 24.B.2. Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 261 5 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 262 5 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 263 1 27.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish a list/documentation procedure for tracking illicit discharge connections and illegal dumping violations? 264 1 27.B.2. Did Rutherford College track illicit discharge connections and illegal dumping reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE tracking documentation/list? 265 1 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 266 2 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 267 3 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 268 4 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 269 5 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 270 1 27.B.3. Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 271 1 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 272 1 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 273 2 27.B.3. Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 274 2 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 275 2 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 276 3 27.B.3. Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 277 3 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 278 3 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 279 4 27.B.3. Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 280 4 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 281 4 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 282 5 27.B.3. Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 283 5 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 284 5 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 285 1 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 286 1 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 287 2 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 288 2 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 289 3 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 290 3 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 291 4 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 292 4 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 293 5 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 294 5 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 295 2 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 296 2 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 297 3 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 298 3 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 299 4 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 300 4 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 301 5 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 302 5 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 303 1 28.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify staff and contractors likely to observe and identify illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 304 1 28.B.1. Did Rutherford College train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 305 1 28.B.1. How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 306 2 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 307 2 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 308 3 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 309 3 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 310 4 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 311 4 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 312 5 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 313 5 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 314 1 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 315 1 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 316 1 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 317 2 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 318 2 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 319 2 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 320 3 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 321 3 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 322 3 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 323 4 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 324 4 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 325 4 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 326 5 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 327 5 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 328 5 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 329 1 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 330 1 33.B.1. How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 331 1 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 332 2 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 333 2 33.B.1. How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 334 2 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 335 3 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 336 3 33.B.1. How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 337 3 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 338 4 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 339 4 33.B.1. How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 340 4 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 341 5 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 342 5 33.B.1. How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 343 5 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 344 1 35.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop an ordinance that addresses construction site waste? 345 1 35.B.2. Did Rutherford College adopt an ordinance that addresses construction site waste? 346 2 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 347 3 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 348 4 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 349 5 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 350 1 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 351 1 35.B.3. How many staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 352 2 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 353 2 35.B.3. How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 354 3 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 355 3 35.B.3. How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 356 4 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 357 4 35.B.3. How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 358 5 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 359 5 35.B.3. How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 360 2 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 361 2 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 362 2 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 363 3 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 364 3 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 365 3 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 366 4 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 367 4 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 368 4 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 369 5 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 370 5 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 371 5 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 372 1 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 373 1 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 374 1 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 375 1 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 376 1 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 377 2 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 378 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 379 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 380 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 381 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 382 3 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 383 3 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 384 3 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 385 3 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 386 3 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 387 4 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 388 4 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 389 4 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 390 4 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 391 4 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 392 5 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 393 5 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 394 5 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 395 5 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 396 5 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 397 1 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 398 2 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 399 3 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 400 4 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 401 5 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 402 1 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 403 2 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 404 3 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 405 4 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 406 5 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 407 1 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 408 2 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 409 3 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 410 4 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 411 5 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 412 1 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 413 2 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 414 3 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 415 4 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 416 5 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 417 1 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 418 1 38.B.1. How many staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 419 2 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 420 2 38.B.1. How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 421 3 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 422 3 38.B.1. How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 423 4 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 424 4 38.B.1. How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 425 5 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 426 5 38.B.1. How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 427 1 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 428 1 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 429 1 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 430 2 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 431 2 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 432 2 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 433 3 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 434 3 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 435 3 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 436 4 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 437 4 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 438 4 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 439 5 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 440 5 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 441 5 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 442 1 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 443 2 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 444 3 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 445 4 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 446 5 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 447 1 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 448 1 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 449 1 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 450 1 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 451 1 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 452 1 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 453 1 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 454 2 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 455 2 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 456 2 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 457 2 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 458 2 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 459 2 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 460 2 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 461 3 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 462 3 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 463 3 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 464 3 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 465 3 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 466 3 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 467 3 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 468 4 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 469 4 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 470 4 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 471 4 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 472 4 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 473 4 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 474 4 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 475 5 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 476 5 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 477 5 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 478 5 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 479 5 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 480 5 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 481 5 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 482 1 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 483 1 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 484 2 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 485 2 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 486 3 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 487 3 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 488 4 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 489 4 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 490 5 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 491 5 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 492 1 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 493 1 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 494 2 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 495 2 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 496 3 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 497 3 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 498 4 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 499 4 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 500 5 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 501 5 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 502 1 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 503 2 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 504 3 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 505 4 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 506 5 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 507 1 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop and adopt a Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 508 2 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 509 2 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 510 3 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 511 3 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 512 4 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 513 4 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 514 5 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 515 5 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 516 1 45.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop educational materials on the impacts of unmaintained septic wastewater systems have on water quality? 517 1 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 518 2 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 519 3 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 520 4 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 521 5 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 522 1 47.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish standard operating procedures for municipal facility inspections including a schedule of inspections and standardized reporting and tracking? 523 1 46.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop an O&M Plan for each municipal facility with the potential to generate stormwater pollution? 524 1 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 525 2 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 526 3 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 527 4 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 528 5 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 529 1 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 530 1 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 531 2 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 532 2 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 533 3 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 534 3 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 535 4 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 536 4 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 537 5 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 538 5 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 539 1 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 540 1 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 541 1 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 542 1 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 543 2 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 544 2 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 545 2 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 546 2 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 547 3 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 548 3 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 549 3 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 550 3 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 551 4 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 552 4 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 553 4 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 554 4 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 555 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 556 5 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 557 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 558 5 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 559 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College inspect all low stormwater pollution potential facilities at least once during the permit term? 560 1 48.B.1 Did Rutherford College develop a written spill response procedure plan for each facility that requires one? 561 1 48.B.1 How many facilities required a written spill response procedure plan? 562 2 48.B.2. How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 563 3 48.B.2. How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 564 4 48.B.2. How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 565 5 48.B.2. How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 566 2 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 567 2 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 568 3 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 569 3 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 570 4 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 571 4 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 572 5 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 573 5 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 574 1 48.B.5. How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 575 1 48.B.5. How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 576 2 48.B.5. How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 577 2 48.B.5. How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 578 3 48.B.5. How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 579 3 48.B.5. How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 580 4 48.B.5. How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 581 4 48.B.5. How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 582 5 48.B.5. How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 583 5 48.B.5. How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 584 1 49.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop an MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 585 1 49.B.2.When did Rutherford College submit the MS4 O&M Plan to DEQ? 586 2 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 587 3 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 588 4 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 589 5 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 590 2 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 591 3 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 592 4 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 593 5 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 594 1 50.B.1. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff and contractors on the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 595 1 50.B.1.How many MS4 O&M training sessions were held? 596 1 50.B.1.How many municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 597 2 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 598 2 50.B.2. How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 599 3 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 600 3 50.B.2. How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 601 4 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 602 4 50.B.2. How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 603 5 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 604 5 50.B.2. How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 605 1 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 606 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 607 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 608 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 609 1 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 610 2 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 611 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 612 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 613 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 614 2 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 615 3 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 616 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 617 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 618 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 619 3 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 620 4 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 621 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 622 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 623 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 624 4 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 625 5 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 626 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 627 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 628 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 629 5 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 630 1 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 631 2 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 632 3 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 633 4 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 634 5 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 635 1 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town- owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 636 1 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 637 1 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? 638 2 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town- owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 639 2 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 640 2 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? 641 3 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town- owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 642 3 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 643 3 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? 644 4 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town- owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 645 4 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 646 4 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 647 5 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town- owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 648 5 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 649 5 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? 650 1 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 651 2 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 652 3 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 653 4 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 654 5 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 655 1 54.B.4. How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 656 1 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 657 2 54.B.4. How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 658 2 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 659 3 54.B.4. How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 660 3 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 661 4 54.B.4. How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 662 4 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 663 5 54.B.4. How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 664 5 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 665 1 56.B.1. Did Rutherford College ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers? 666 1 56.B.1. How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers? 667 1 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 668 1 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 669 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 670 3 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 671 4 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 672 5 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 673 1 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 674 1 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 675 1 59.B.2. How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 676 1 59.B.3. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute educational flyers regarding street runoff pollution to help supplement street cleanings? 677 1 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 678 2 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 679 2 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 680 2 59.B.2. How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 681 3 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 682 3 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 683 3 59.B.2. How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 684 4 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 685 4 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 686 4 59.B.2. How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 687 5 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 688 5 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 689 5 59.B.2. How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 690 2 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 691 3 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 692 4 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 693 5 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 694 1 60.B.1. Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 695 1 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 696 2 60.B.1. Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 697 2 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 698 3 60.B.1. Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 699 3 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 700 4 60.B.1. Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 701 4 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 702 5 60.B.1. Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 703 5 60.B.1.How many trash bags were used/collected from public parking lots? 704 1 60.B.2. How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 705 2 60.B.2. How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 706 3 60.B.2. How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 707 4 60.B.2. How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 708 5 60.B.2. How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 709 1 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 710 2 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 711 3 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 712 4 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 713 5 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 714 1 61.B.2. How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 715 2 61.B.2. How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 716 3 61.B.2. How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 717 4 61.B.2. How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 718 5 61.B.2. How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 719 1 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 720 1 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 721 2 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 722 2 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 723 3 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 724 3 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 725 4 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 726 4 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 727 5 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 728 5 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 729 1 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 730 1 62.B.2. How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 731 2 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 732 2 62.B.2. How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 733 3 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 734 3 62.B.2. How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 735 4 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 736 4 62.B.2. How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 737 5 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 738 5 62.B.2. How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 739 1 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 740 1 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 741 2 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 742 2 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 743 3 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 744 3 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 745 4 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 746 4 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 747 5 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 748 5 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 749 1 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 750 1 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? 751 2 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 752 2 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? 753 3 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 754 3 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? 755 4 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 756 4 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? 757 5 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 758 5 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 1 1 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 9 1 3.B.1.Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new fliers to raise general stormwater awareness? 10 1 3.B.1.If so, how many general stormwater awareness fliers were distributed? 19 1 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 20 1 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 29 1 4.B.2.Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 30 1 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 39 1 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 40 1 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 41 1 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 54 1 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 55 1 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 56 1 5.B.2.If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 69 1 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 70 1 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 79 1 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 80 1 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 89 1 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 90 1 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 99 1 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 100 1 10.B.1.If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 101 1 10.B.1.If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 102 1 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 119 1 11.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 120 1 11.B.3.If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 129 1 12.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify a specific staff member who will serve as the default hotline contact? 130 1 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 135 1 12.B.3.Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 136 1 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 145 1 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 150 1 12.B.5.Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 155 1 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 160 1 15.B.2. Did Rutherford College record and track responses, inputs, issues and concerns reported through the stormwater email? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 161 1 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 166 1 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 167 1 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 176 1 17.B.1.Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 177 1 17.B.1.If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 178 1 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 191 1 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 192 1 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 201 1 19.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 202 1 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 203 1 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 204 1 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 221 1 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 226 1 20.B.1.Did Rutherford College add major outfalls to the existing MS4 map? 227 1 20.B.1.If so, how many existing major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 228 1 20.B.2.Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 229 1 20.B.2.If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 238 1 21.B.1.Did Rutherford College update the IDDE ordinance? 243 1 22.B.1.Did Rutherford College develop an updated written IDDE Plan? 244 1 22.B.1.What date did Rutherford College submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for approval? 245 1 23.B.1.Did Rutherford College use the MS4 map to locate priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 250 1 24.B.1.Did Rutherford College establish dry weather inspection procedures and a schedule? 263 1 27.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish a list/documentation procedure for tracking illicit discharge connections and illegal dumping violations? 264 1 27.B.2. Did Rutherford College track illicit discharge connections and illegal dumping reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE tracking documentation/list? 265 1 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 270 1 27.B.3.Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 271 1 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 272 1 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 285 1 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 286 1 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 303 1 28.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify staff and contractors likely to observe and identify illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 304 1 28.B.1. Did Rutherford College train identified staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 305 1 28.B.1. How many staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 314 1 32.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 315 1 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 316 1 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 329 1 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 330 1 33.B.1.How many staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 331 1 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 344 1 35.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop an ordinance that addresses construction site waste? 345 1 35.B.2. Did Rutherford College adopt an ordinance that addresses construction site waste? 350 1 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 351 1 35.B.3.How many staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 372 1 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 373 1 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 374 1 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 375 1 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 376 1 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 397 1 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 402 1 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 407 1 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 412 1 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 417 1 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 418 1 38.B.1.How many staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 427 1 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 428 1 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 429 1 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 442 1 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 447 1 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 448 1 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 449 1 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 450 1 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 451 1 42.B.3.How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 452 1 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 453 1 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 482 1 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 483 1 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 492 1 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 493 1 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 502 1 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 507 1 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop and adopt a Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 516 1 45.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop educational materials on the impacts of unmaintained septic wastewater systems have on water quality? 517 1 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 522 1 47.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish standard operating procedures for municipal facility inspections including a schedule of inspections and standardized reporting and tracking? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 523 1 46.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop an O&M Plan for each municipal facility with the potential to generate stormwater pollution? 524 1 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 529 1 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 530 1 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 539 1 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 540 1 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 541 1 47.B.3.Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 542 1 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 560 1 48.B.1 Did Rutherford College develop a written spill response procedure plan for each facility that requires one? 561 1 48.B.1 How many facilities required a written spill response procedure plan? 574 1 48.B.5.How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 575 1 48.B.5.How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 584 1 49.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop an MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 585 1 49.B.2.When did Rutherford College submit the MS4 O&M Plan to DEQ? 594 1 50.B.1. Did Rutherford College train municipal staff and contractors on the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 595 1 50.B.1.How many MS4 O&M training sessions were held? 596 1 50.B.1.How many municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 605 1 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 606 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 607 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 608 1 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 609 1 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 630 1 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 635 1 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town-owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 636 1 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 637 1 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town- owned SCM? 650 1 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 655 1 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 656 1 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 665 1 56.B.1. Did Rutherford College ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers? 666 1 56.B.1.How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers? 667 1 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College establish standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 668 1 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 673 1 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 674 1 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 675 1 59.B.2.How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 676 1 59.B.3. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute educational flyers regarding street runoff pollution to help supplement street cleanings? 677 1 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 694 1 60.B.1.Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 695 1 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 704 1 60.B.2.How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 709 1 61.B.1.How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 714 1 61.B.2.How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 719 1 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 720 1 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 729 1 62.B.2.Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 730 1 62.B.2.How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 739 1 62.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 740 1 62.B.3.How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 749 1 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 750 1 62.B.4.How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 2 2 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 11 2 3.B.2.Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about illicit discharges? 12 2 3.B.2.If so, how many educational fliers about illicit discharges were distributed? 21 2 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 22 2 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 31 2 4.B.2.Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 32 2 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 42 2 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 43 2 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 44 2 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 57 2 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 58 2 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 59 2 5.B.2.If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 71 2 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 72 2 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 81 2 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 82 2 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 91 2 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 92 2 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 103 2 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 104 2 10.B.1.If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 105 2 10.B.1.If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 106 2 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 121 2 11.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 122 2 11.B.3.If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 131 2 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 137 2 12.B.3.Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 138 2 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 146 2 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 151 2 12.B.5.Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 156 2 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 162 2 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 168 2 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 169 2 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 179 2 17.B.1.Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 180 2 17.B.1.If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 181 2 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 193 2 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 194 2 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 205 2 19.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 206 2 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 207 2 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 208 2 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 222 2 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 230 2 20.B.2.Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 231 2 20.B.2.If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 239 2 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 246 2 23.B.2.Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 251 2 24.B.2.Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 252 2 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 253 2 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 266 2 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 273 2 27.B.3.Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 274 2 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 275 2 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 287 2 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 288 2 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 295 2 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 296 2 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 306 2 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 307 2 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 317 2 32.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 318 2 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 319 2 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 332 2 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 333 2 33.B.1.How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 334 2 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 346 2 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 352 2 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 353 2 35.B.3.How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 360 2 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 361 2 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 362 2 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 377 2 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 378 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 379 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 380 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 381 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 398 2 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 403 2 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 408 2 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 413 2 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 419 2 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 420 2 38.B.1.How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 430 2 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 431 2 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 432 2 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 443 2 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 454 2 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 455 2 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 456 2 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 457 2 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 458 2 42.B.3.How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 459 2 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 460 2 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 484 2 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 485 2 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 494 2 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 495 2 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 503 2 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 508 2 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 509 2 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 518 2 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 525 2 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 531 2 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 532 2 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 543 2 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 544 2 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 545 2 47.B.3.Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 546 2 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 562 2 48.B.2.How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 566 2 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 567 2 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 576 2 48.B.5.How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 577 2 48.B.5.How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 586 2 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 590 2 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 597 2 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 598 2 50.B.2.How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 610 2 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 611 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 612 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 613 2 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 614 2 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 631 2 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 638 2 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town-owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 639 2 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 640 2 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town- owned SCM? 651 2 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 657 2 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 658 2 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 678 2 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 679 2 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 680 2 59.B.2.How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 690 2 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 696 2 60.B.1.Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 697 2 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 705 2 60.B.2.How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 710 2 61.B.1.How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 715 2 61.B.2.How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 721 2 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 722 2 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 731 2 62.B.2.Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 732 2 62.B.2.How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 741 2 62.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 742 2 62.B.3.How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 751 2 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 752 2 62.B.4.How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 3 3 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 13 3 3.B.3.Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about illegal dumping? 14 3 3.B.3.If so, how many educational fliers about illegal dumping were distributed? 23 3 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 24 3 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 33 3 4.B.2.Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 34 3 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 45 3 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 46 3 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 47 3 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 60 3 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 61 3 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 62 3 5.B.2.If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 73 3 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 74 3 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 83 3 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 84 3 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 93 3 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 94 3 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 107 3 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 108 3 10.B.1.If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 109 3 10.B.1.If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 110 3 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 123 3 11.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 124 3 11.B.3.If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 132 3 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 139 3 12.B.3.Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 140 3 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 147 3 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 152 3 12.B.5.Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 157 3 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 163 3 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 170 3 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 171 3 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 182 3 17.B.1.Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 183 3 17.B.1.If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 184 3 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 195 3 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 196 3 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 209 3 19.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 210 3 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 211 3 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 212 3 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 223 3 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 232 3 20.B.2.Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 233 3 20.B.2.If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 240 3 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 247 3 23.B.2.Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 254 3 24.B.2.Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 255 3 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 256 3 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 267 3 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 276 3 27.B.3.Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 277 3 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 278 3 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 289 3 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 290 3 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 297 3 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 298 3 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 308 3 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 309 3 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 320 3 32.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 321 3 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 322 3 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 335 3 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 336 3 33.B.1.How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 337 3 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 347 3 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 354 3 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 355 3 35.B.3.How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 363 3 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 364 3 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 365 3 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 382 3 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 383 3 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 384 3 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 385 3 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 386 3 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 399 3 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 404 3 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 409 3 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 414 3 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 421 3 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 422 3 38.B.1.How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 433 3 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 434 3 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 435 3 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 444 3 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 461 3 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 462 3 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 463 3 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 464 3 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 465 3 42.B.3.How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 466 3 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 467 3 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 486 3 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 487 3 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 496 3 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 497 3 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 504 3 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 510 3 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 511 3 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 519 3 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 526 3 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 533 3 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 534 3 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 547 3 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 548 3 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 549 3 47.B.3.Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 550 3 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 563 3 48.B.2.How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 568 3 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 569 3 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 578 3 48.B.5.How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 579 3 48.B.5.How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 587 3 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 591 3 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 599 3 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 600 3 50.B.2.How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 615 3 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 616 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 617 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 618 3 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 619 3 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 632 3 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 641 3 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town-owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 642 3 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 643 3 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town- owned SCM? 652 3 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 659 3 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 660 3 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 670 3 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 681 3 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 682 3 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 683 3 59.B.2.How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 691 3 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 698 3 60.B.1.Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 699 3 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 706 3 60.B.2.How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 711 3 61.B.1.How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 716 3 61.B.2.How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 723 3 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 724 3 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 733 3 62.B.2.Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 734 3 62.B.2.How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 743 3 62.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 744 3 62.B.3.How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 753 3 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 754 3 62.B.4.How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 4 4 1 Did Rutherford College submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 31 each year? 5 4 2.B.1. Did Rutherford College participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ? 15 4 3.B.4. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about chemicals and nutrients and their water quality impacts? 16 4 3.B.4. If so, how many educational fliers about chemicals and nutrients and their water quality impacts were distributed? 25 4 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 26 4 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 35 4 4.B.2.Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 36 4 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 48 4 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 49 4 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 50 4 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 63 4 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 64 4 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 65 4 5.B.2.If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 75 4 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 76 4 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 85 4 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 86 4 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 95 4 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 96 4 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 111 4 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 112 4 10.B.1.If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 113 4 10.B.1.If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 114 4 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 125 4 11.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 126 4 11.B.3.If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 133 4 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 141 4 12.B.3.Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 142 4 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 148 4 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 153 4 12.B.5.Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? 158 4 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 164 4 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 172 4 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 173 4 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 185 4 17.B.1.Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 186 4 17.B.1.If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 187 4 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 197 4 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 198 4 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 213 4 19.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 214 4 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 215 4 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 216 4 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 224 4 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 234 4 20.B.2.Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 235 4 20.B.2.If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 241 4 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 248 4 23.B.2.Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 257 4 24.B.2.Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 258 4 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 259 4 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 268 4 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 279 4 27.B.3.Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 280 4 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 281 4 27.B.3.How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 291 4 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 292 4 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 299 4 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 300 4 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 310 4 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 311 4 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 323 4 32.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 324 4 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? 325 4 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 338 4 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 339 4 33.B.1.How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 340 4 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 348 4 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 356 4 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 357 4 35.B.3.How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 366 4 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 367 4 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 368 4 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 387 4 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 388 4 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 389 4 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 390 4 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 391 4 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 400 4 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 405 4 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 410 4 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 415 4 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 423 4 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 424 4 38.B.1.How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 436 4 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 437 4 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 438 4 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 445 4 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 468 4 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 469 4 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 470 4 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 471 4 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 472 4 42.B.3.How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 473 4 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 474 4 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 488 4 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 489 4 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 498 4 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 499 4 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 505 4 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 512 4 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 513 4 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 520 4 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 527 4 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 535 4 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 536 4 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? 551 4 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 552 4 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 553 4 47.B.3.Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 554 4 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 564 4 48.B.2.How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 570 4 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 571 4 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 580 4 48.B.5.How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 581 4 48.B.5.How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 588 4 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 592 4 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 601 4 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 602 4 50.B.2.How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 620 4 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 621 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 622 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 623 4 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 624 4 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 633 4 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 644 4 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town-owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 645 4 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 646 4 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town- owned SCM? 653 4 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 661 4 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 662 4 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 671 4 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 684 4 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 685 4 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 686 4 59.B.2.How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 692 4 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 700 4 60.B.1.Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 701 4 60.B.1.How many trash bages were used/collected from public parking lots? 707 4 60.B.2.How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 712 4 61.B.1.How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 717 4 61.B.2.How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 725 4 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 726 4 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 735 4 62.B.2.Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? 736 4 62.B.2.How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 745 4 62.B.3.Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 746 4 62.B.3.How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 755 4 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 756 4 62.B.4.How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Line No. Reporting Year (July 1 - June 30) BMP Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting Metric Comments 6 5 2.B.2. Did Rutherford College submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components not audited by EPA or NCDEQ? 7 5 2.B.3. Did Rutherford College submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180 days prior to permit expiration? 8 5 2.B.3.If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was received by DEQ? 17 5 3.B.5. Did Rutherford College develop and distribute new educational fliers about the importance of proper waste disposal? 18 5 3.B.5. If so, how many educational fliers about the importance of proper waste disposal were distributed? 27 5 4.B.1. Did Rutherford College have a booth at the annual Fall Festival to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational games and activities? 28 5 4.B.1.If so, how many attendees were reached? 37 5 4.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide alternative outreach opportunities if the Fall Festival is canceled? 38 5 4.B.2.If so, how many attendees were reached? 51 5 5.B.1. Did Rutherford College have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational activities to youth? 52 5 5.B.1.If so, how many activities/events were provided? 53 5 5.B.1.If so, how many participants were reached? 66 5 5.B.2. Did Rutherford College create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? 67 5 5.B.2.If so, how many presentations provided by teachers or staff were provided? 68 5 5.B.2.If so, how many students were reached by presentations provided by teachers or staff? 77 5 7.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference? 78 5 7.B.1. If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 87 5 8.B.1. Did Rutherford College reevaluate the presence of target pollutants within the Town to identify where outreach can be improved? 88 5 8.B.1.If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? 97 5 8.B.2. Did Rutherford College evaluate target audiences to determine where outreach efforts should be focused to minimize stormwater pollutants? 98 5 8.B.2.If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? 115 5 10.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain and update the stormwater web page by verifying all links and contact information is current/active, and posting the current year educational materials? 116 5 10.B.1. If so, was the annual self-assessment uploaded to the Town of Rutherford College's website? 117 5 10.B.1.If so, did any web page links, contact information, or documents need to be updated? 118 5 10.B.1.If so, were any new/current educational materials added to site? 127 5 11.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide citizen education during the illicit discharge enforcement process? 128 5 11.B.3. If so, how many educational citizen interactions were there during illicit discharge enforcement? 134 5 12.B.2.Did Rutherford College maintain/update the stormwater hotline? 143 5 12.B.3.Did Rutherford College document the calls received by the stormwater hotline? 144 5 12.B.3.How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 149 5 12.B.4. Did Rutherford College stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for referral, and typical stormwater issues? 154 5 12.B.5. Did Rutherford College publicize contact information on the Town webpages and Facebook page? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 159 5 15.B.1. Did Rutherford College maintain the stormwater email complaint/reporting/input contact information on the Town's website? 165 5 15.B.2.How many messages were received through the stormwater email? 174 5 16.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the existing Town Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general stormwater awareness messages? 175 5 16.B.1. If so, how many posts were made on the Town's Facebook page related to the stormwater program? 188 5 17.B.1.Did Rutherford College participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings? 189 5 17.B.1. If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did the Town participate in? 190 5 17.B.1. If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings that the Town participated in? 199 5 18.B.1. Did Rutherford College provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? 200 5 18.B.1.If so, how many surveys were completed? 217 5 19.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? 218 5 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 219 5 19.B.1.If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 220 5 19.B.1.If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 225 5 19.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities hosted by the Town and WPCOG? 236 5 20.B.2.Did Rutherford College add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 map? 237 5 20.B.2.If so, how many newly constructed major outfalls were added to the existing MS4 map? 242 5 21.B.2.Did Rutherford College review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? 249 5 23.B.2.Did Rutherford College review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? 260 5 24.B.2. Did Rutherford College perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP and schedule? 261 5 24.B.2.If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 262 5 24.B.2.If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 269 5 27.B.2.How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 282 5 27.B.3.Did Rutherford College enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? 283 5 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were issued? 284 5 27.B.3. How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement actions were resolved? 293 5 27.B.4. Did Rutherford College establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? 294 5 27.B.4.If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 301 5 27.B.5. Did Rutherford College evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to identify areas for improvement? 302 5 27.B.5.If so, were revisions made to the IDDE Program? 312 5 28.B.2. Did Rutherford College train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 313 5 28.B.2. How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report illicit discharges, illicit connections and illegal dumping? 326 5 32.B.1.Did Rutherford College provide a rapid response to all IDDE complaints received? 327 5 32.B.1. Did Rutherford College utilize the GIS online map layer to track the time of complaint, site visit, type of complaint and all enforcement/resolution measures? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 328 5 32.B.2.What was the average response time for IDDE complaints/reports? 341 5 33.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 342 5 33.B.1. How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site runoff complaints? 343 5 33.B.2.How many construction site runoff complaints were received? 349 5 35.B.4. Did Rutherford College maintain/update the adopted construction site waste ordinance? 358 5 35.B.3. Did Rutherford College train new municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 359 5 35.B.3. How many new staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction site violations? 369 5 35.B.5.Did Rutherford College enforce construction site violations? 370 5 35.B.5.How many construction site enforcement actions were issued? 371 5 35.B.5.How many construction site violations were identified? 392 5 36 Did Rutherford College track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews performed? 393 5 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 394 5 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 395 5 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 396 5 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 401 5 36 Did Rutherford College maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? 406 5 36 How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were performed? 411 5 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 416 5 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 425 5 38.B.1. Did Rutherford College train new field and office staff in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 426 5 38.B.1. How many new staff were trained in WSW Ordinance procedures and enforcement actions? 439 5 38.B.2.How many WSW notices of violation were issued? 440 5 38.B.2.How many WSW Civil Citations were issued? 441 5 38.B.2.How many WSW violations are still in process of abatement? 446 5 39.B.1. Did Rutherford College review post-construction plan review and approval procedures and update as needed? 475 5 42.B.1.How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 476 5 40.B.1.How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 477 5 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 478 5 42.B.2.How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 479 5 42.B.3. How many qualified licensed professional inspections completed with documentation received? 480 5 42.B.3.How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 481 5 42.B.4. Did Rutherford College conduct inspections of 20% of low-density projects this year? 490 5 43.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? 491 5 43.B.3.How many low density educational materials were distributed? 500 5 44.B.2. Did Rutherford College provide educational materials to developers about high density development? 501 5 44.B.2.How many high density educational materials were distributed? 506 5 44.B.3. Did Rutherford College establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the Towns website? 514 5 45.B.1. Did Rutherford College enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance to reduce the amount of pet waste that reaches receiving water bodies? 515 5 45.B.1.How many pet waste violations were issued? 521 5 45.B.2. How many educational materials on the impacts that unmaintained septic systems have on water quality were distributed? 528 5 46.B.2. How many O&M Plans for municipal facilities with stormwater pollution potential does Rutherford College have? 537 5 47.B.2. Did Rutherford College verify/reevaluate the pollution potential of facilities from the existing facility inventory during facility inspections? 538 5 47.B.2.How many facilities were added to the municpal facility inventory? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 555 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution potential facilities? 556 5 47.B.3.How many high stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 557 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College perform facility inspections for low stormwater pollution potential facilities? 558 5 47.B.3.How many low stormwater pollution potential facilities were inspected? 559 5 47.B.3. Did Rutherford College inspect all low stormwater pollution potential facilities at least once during the permit term? 565 5 48.B.2. How many spill response procedure plans were implemented at municipal facilities with a plan? 572 5 48.B.3.Did Rutherford College review/maintain written spill response plans? 573 5 48.B.3.How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 582 5 48.B.5.How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 583 5 48.B.5.How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill response SOP? 589 5 49.B.3. Did Rutherford College implement the MS4 O&M Plan which includes required procedures, inspections, schedules, staff responsibilites and standard documentation? 593 5 49.B.4.How many MS4 inspections were completed? 603 5 50.B.2.How many MS4 O&M training sessions for new staff were held? 604 5 50.B.2.How many new municipal and contractor staff were trained on MS4 O&M ? 625 5 51.B.1.Did Rutherford College inspect the MS4 infrastructure? 626 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 627 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 628 5 51.B.1.How many MS4 issues were documented? 629 5 51.B.1.How many miles of ROW were inspected? 634 5 52.B.2.How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 647 5 53.B.1. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain an inventory of existing Town-owned SCMs with information including type, year built, date of last inspection, and maintenance actions? 648 5 53.B.1.How many Town-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 649 5 53.B.2. Did Rutherford College develop/maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans for each Town-owned SCM? 654 5 54.B.3.How many Town-owned SCMs were inspected? 663 5 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCMs had documented deficiencies/required maintenance? 664 5 54.B.4.How many Town-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were performed? 672 5 57.B.1. Did Rutherford College implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and equipment washing? 687 5 59.B.1. Did Rutherford College identify/track conveyances/inlets that have frequent problems with pollution and prioritize their maintenance? 688 5 59.B.1.How many street lane miles were swept? 689 5 59.B.2.How many high priority roadway stormwater infrastructure cleanings were done? 693 5 59.B.3.How many street pollution fliers were distributed? 702 5 60.B.1.Did Rutherford College empty public parking lot waste receptacles on a weekly basis? 703 5 60.B.1.How many trash bags were used/collected from public parking lots? 708 5 60.B.2.How much trash was collected from areas other than public parking lots (pounds)? 713 5 61.B.1.How many bags of leaves/yard waste were collected from municipal properties? 718 5 61.B.2.How many educational materials on leaf and yard waste impacts were distributed? 727 5 62.B.1. Did Rutherford College train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 728 5 62.B.1. How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 737 5 62.B.2. Did Rutherford College equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material containment tools? NCS000480_RUTHERFORD COLLEGE 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 738 5 62.B.2.How many first responder vehicle spill kits were used and replaced materials? 747 5 62.B.3. Did Rutherford College provide public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks? 748 5 62.B.3. How many public education materials to inform citizens about vehicle leaks were distributed? 757 5 62.B.4. Did Rutherford College enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the IDDE ordinance? 758 5 62.B.4. How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks from parked cars?