20211569 Ver 1_Lake Norman PCN_NCDEQ_20211029

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2021 - 01564 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Lake Norman -Perth Road
2. Work Type: Private � Institutional11
Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
NWP 29 request for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: The Spectrum Companies (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Heath Caldwell
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.6033,-80.8985
Perth Road, Mooresville, NC
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 61a]: 4637690763, 4638506254, 4637595778
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Iredell
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mooresville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Lake Norman
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Catawba/03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 �✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Oa Wks] 11[4111 %

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
October 29, 2021
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: SAW-2021-01564; Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #29 for the Lake
Norman -Perth Road site in Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina
Ms. Stygar, Messrs. Johnson, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit 929 for the Lake Norman -Perth Road site on 39
acres located on Perth Road and River Highway in Mooresville, NC. The site is a proposed
residential development and consists of three streams and three wetlands. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination Request was submitted on July 16, 2021 for the proposed project.
Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information section for information on onsite
surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to two
streams and one wetland for fill due to grading and a road crossing. Overall impacts to site
surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection,
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-b Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
[e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes. Total permanent impacts
proposed include 205 linear feet of stream impact (Streams A and B) and 0.019 acres of wetland
impacts (Wetland Q. Existing grades and required roadway connections have limited the
potential of reducing surfacewater impacts further without sacrificing stability and safety of the
site. As noted in the Design Alternatives and engineer correspondence sections, limiting stream
impacts through the use of 34 foot headwalls would present a safety concern as the sidewalk and
roadway would be adjacent to this wall. Additional grading has been incorporated in the
proposed to limit the safety concerns at this crossing.
Existing drainage and grades, including the required roadway connections, limited the practical
locations for BMP installation and further reduced the potential for avoidance of surface water
impacts due to these design constraints and safety requirements. Stacking requirements and the
associated offset from the entrance limited the potential of moving the BMP further upslope due
to the required road alignment. Additionally, impacts to the proposed wetland are associated with
the fill slope of the dam as well as fill required for appropriate lateral grades which support the
proposed surrounding residential structures. Avoidance of the wetland area would have required
large retaining walls and introduced structural instability to the slope of the dam. Please refer to
the Engineer Correspondence section and the Avoidance and Minimization narrative for
additional information and communication regarding the requirements and encumbrances
considered in determining the proposed roadway connections. The applicant has demonstrated
avoidance and minimization efforts in which 79% of the 0.09 acres of onsite wetlands and 86%
of the 1,479 linear feet onsite streams will be avoided. Due to limited site impacts, no mitigation
is proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation and concurrence letter
from the Fish & Wildlife Service for the site. No listed species were identified within the project
area and we believe that there will be no effect on listed species, or their critical habitat as
designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Please refer to the Threatened and
Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional details on the terrestrial species evaluation
and FWS concurrence. Historic and Archeological Resources were also evaluated for this site.
Please refer to the Cultural Resources Report section for additional details. Thank you for your
consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at
heath. cal dwel I kwetl ands -ep g. com.
Sincerely,
�qcavjw
Heath Caldwell
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetiands-epg.com
r
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

rn
E
Q w c
LL o
Z a w
W
d
a
O W •ta r
Ci
Q `
v y w
0 C N
Z W C
•ay. 'O d
C C
Q d w
�+ a d
O O
V v
U) O
= W 3
Q z
V C O
LL .d.
V
IL
o
d
a
X
a
W
d
a
M
ao
N
0
N
0
li
m
E
12
C
.N
N
V
0
IL
II
z
LD
d
a
N
O
z
z
d
YJ
L
U)
8
m
a
O
Z
O
}
M
N
Q a
d _
r
�LD
d d
U
T
is d LO
m d
a 3 3o �
aL+ W
d d
w
L N d
a
7 N N
m 3 c
Q
a € .
CL EL a
p V O
CL
0 0
cn
d -
ani n
m O ❑
m
co
CO
CD
CO

■ ■'
N
aa)
E
CL
O
N
N
0
�
I
c
O
K
N
N
a
:�
O
7
m
Y
«
vs
_
m
d
P
3
K
E
N
r
d
0
a
3
L.
t
-
Q
O
c
C
O
O
4
c
r
Ol
..
N
o
E
w
A
m
d
IL
c
°
w
[L m
a
m
c m V
2
z €
c
a
Q
n
O
N
cc
w C7 5
f0 ry
ai
CL a
a
(7
z
i
V Or-d
a) (7
Z
L
a
w
v
_
CL
m
Z
d
Z
IL
m
o
d
a
E
O
m d
m
3
O °
O
V
_ a
L @
�_
1.
C
�+ U)
N
=>
N
C
N
v
Z
a
CL
m C
O O
A
z w
d v z 5
L
o❑❑
o
z$
Z
J
o❑❑
a
a�
m E
C '
� w
N LD
r a.
O Ca
a
E y7
N
YQ
d
o 1
.L.. y
3 c
O c
OO
O, O,
C1 ..
@ � i
@ CID
7
Q
a L
m O •°—
a
c
r
3
N @
3
E � '
o .
LL N
N O
N �
7 O
CS '�
a� a
[Y T
CA Ca
c •°
CD
a) P7
i y
C a)
LL Q i
CL
Y
O I
C ,
E O
a � i
d
N cn i
> C'
�LL
L U .
T
L y I
W 3
c 8 I
c,
N m •2
I
8
E m
- c
N � .
.L N
CA V
C
E
LL .
7
N
I ayi
m�
O
c
O
E
is
Cl.
c
0
m
o
w
�
o
c
Q
a
c°�
o
C
30
z°
a�i
O
�
N
�
I
N
}
w
r
�o
N
p
o
a
m
CO
co
O
CO

rn
9
Lo
.7
Q
Lo
O
c
d
it
it
0 0
z z
O
z
C
O
.M
E
Co
c
C
E
cc
O.
d
m
O
z
0
it
d
d
A
O
v
ad..
O7
0
.0
c
v
V
O
d 0
z
CL 0
d
E OJ
O
7 X
a
ca
Cc
cn @
3
0. O
t c
O
00
f0 U
d
oE
O LU
m
c Q
D a
Q
m
t3
m
o.
m
co
co
0
CO

�
�
x
7
;
� 2
co
t <
co R co
49
CL
_
E
0
E
q
-
o
0
t
k
2
c
k
c
&
CL
/
)
k
/
_
m
�
/
C
k
%
k
f
U
3CL
2
7°
a/
\
'
3§§-
t
6
2
�
m
L
;
�
§ 2
§
f
,
—
§
O
§
>
-
$
§
\ to
■
=
2
3}
ƒ
o
7
o
f
k
■
§\
9
/
2
�
/
f
f�
J
o®
s
w
C4
CL
m
N
!
�
m
a
�
/
{

�
§
x
7
;
!
; U f %
a 2 !
�
..
k
C
§
M
k
aCL
/
k
/
k
/
&
2
c
°
a
_
;
2
.
_
_ §
,
§
§
?
'
c
°
■
«
2
N
/
f
2
$
§
■
§
|
&
@
ƒ
# q
i
t
o n
u
■
c`
9
n
2
z
o
R
d
k
o
N!
k04
4
k
#
d
"
d
a)
0
�
k
-3
/
c

�
§
7
;
!
; U f %
a 2 ! �
c
t
§
0
�
�
§
2
.
k
$
C
@
'
k
E
k
/
0
x
E
/
0
E
2
f
■
;
k)
K
c
§
2
1.3
\
!
§
/
q
§
A
|
k
0{
® /
§
L
%
A
¥
R
Q
�
§
2!
CO
§ )
/
■ q
§
k
{
f
{ k
g
\
«
�
/
�
� f
C e
! m
2
!
N
N
�•:
.
m
®@
/
2

�
(
k
2
/
@
2 0 7 \
M !
" k k § C/)
` / `
E ; E
§
U CO \ o I % f
2 D m 2 ! a ' f
■
k \ �
/ ( CN
A o ! �
49
E 2
■ q
§ co
CL Cf) §
§ � �
E
§
2
e
g
§
�
§
k
&
�
/
0
E
.
�
k
E
§
�
�
k
k
k
of
k
k
CL
% 7 ❑ , 2
/ /
a « CL
it
/
{

�
5
E
0
4.0
2
�
@
.�
IL
L.
0
L.
IL
�
�
@
c
0
m
E
0
�
�
@
.�
IL
i
co
0
\
0
m
t
k
§
■
E
°
2
co
_j
c
§
)
m
CO
d
4
2
!
®
-
■
i
3
\
§
o
a
w
M
C
C-4 7
I
k
R
( ©
2
/
'
ID
CDI2�
-
,
�kk
k q
■ /
0
0
; cor
a
k
7
tE
$
_
-
.
B 2
)
0 U
E
3
-0
[
§ � k
\
CL k�
�`
\ /
a
§ §
q
2
;
k A
ƒ &
-
�
k
! (L
c4
- §

M o
O
O
M
M
m
.o
Q
M
d
0
a
Q
a
d
3
M
a
a
d
C m
d E
cL
G Z
d
z a3
d J
M
rn
Z
Lo
d
d
d
0
C
0
w
U)
m
7 Q
°0 MUM
W
3 cb
a
M
4c
co
O
O
O
UD
O
C7
O
74
V
y �
�mm
o
L � L
O y
Q
co
E
a)
y
Z O
a) m
5 E C
N O "O
O E m
O
C O O
0 0 3
a
�mM
t
zc
m m w
y
L ) c
m � .Q
V7 �
L a)
NNa) LL X
.. r E
O O c
co O
CO y
o Q
C a)
U
7 CO y
E
m O 7
O" m O
ca C >+
O .C—m L
m 3
c
a)ONC
d = O Co
O > p E
0
N a) Z
3 Y
CoE m
•a_,
O
aa)
UO O N m 7
fA % m
Ma a)
a)
E
o —
:3 c
H E O 7
w
rn
CD
d
co
m
�
o
I
a�
o
c
''d
w
d
y
d
O
z $
LL
o
y
Q
}
O c
O Q

rn
0
u
d
.Q
L
Q
N
a
U
C
�3
c
N
E
a
O
N
N
7
K
C
N
N
O
O.
O C
CL
N
H L O
U
s
E
0
z
N
}
O
E
E
0
rn
c0
co
0
m

rn
c
O
y
N
z
_U
z
d
>W
0
0
z
O Q
�O" d
d
7
d c
E
d
a d
� o
v L
g 3
c
Lo
��c m
o w
w 0
d
d E
a
�p d
c
d
rn-0
d O1
c�
o.
0
�Q
0
a �
d
z
tc
O d
c �
d
`f G.
a 'm
14
O
a+
C
V
m
a
E
d
N
O
a
0
IL
r-
q
m
E
3
N
Q.
1■.
) m-
�a
a
E
10
c
i+
N
m
co
co
0
m

�
&
CL 0.)
Cb| /49
2
%
/ 0
m E o
%
a
|
£ _
C
U
E 2
■ Co
C%l
>
LL
-. k
% 2
CL f
# 2
ƒ �
CL
�
CL
d
49
�
§ \
C
E
�
E
IL
E�
C�
�
E
I
a o
C�
■
�
■
CL
E
E
■
2
@
n
k
5
I
2
E
CL
■
§
E
&
£
CL
E5IM
o�
49
#
#
2
>
>
m
A
K ]
&
�
&
�
%
>
>
CL
E
_
2
�
nc
&
«
m
§
k
k
�
CO
CO
>
>
,
Z
E
0
�
-
>
>
CL
�
CL
co
co
E
49
cc
E
E
E
\
2
s
U
U
k
0
�
±
±
k
.
2
�
U)
k
E
d
§
a o
)
c

a
(D
w
R
R
U
a
°
a
E
£
R
R
L
m
w
�
w
c
�
c
N
R
R
L
O
E
£
a
R
O.
aR.
N
7
7
H LO
H
aR+
H LO
O
CD
N
-y O
M N
Q Q
E
W
i r
W
eks
5 Z E
, LEE
CPR
ra
�I E�
GL
z 03
0
A
�.
z LU 1
Q
�zI
O
d
z
0
2
-0o

rn
v
cr
L
a
3
1_0
M
(D
0
u
13
as
E
0
0
m
Cm
C
3
E
O
a+
LL
0
z
no
L
3
'm
a
d
0
w
EL
c
as
cm
C�
L
3
E
O
U)
0
z
}
0
z
}
M
u
N
0
m
U
C
N
7
C
m
L D
cc a
P7
y O
� O
N O
e
p N
N
vO
O
N
N e
P7 U
o
O
= N
N o
O m
U �
U L
Z N
a�
'r m
�r
L U
Y n
U �
Ty
U C
m
E a)
Ea)
`7 Coo)
j C
NM
N E
O
N
CA 0
m
� C�C
() C
c
a o
_°o 0
U N
�o
9
N
z
❑ ❑
a�
0
C0
C
0
C
O
H
m
C0
co
0
CO

N
C
_N
O.
L
U
ld
ld
•L
C L
O •(D
C Z
3 �'
o aD
o
E
o O
c
as
a) N
c _
� O
N
V) N
t O
c �
O O
3
m
3�
E E =
E O �+
V � O
Aj
0
Z
}
0
Z
s
0
0
m
N
Q
z
z
N
d
m=
c
{0 N
R }
Q
w
M
0
Z
CD
}
V
S.'
d
.Q
Q
M
r
0
a
Lo
I
c
d
0 a
Q z
w O
0 Z
d O
U) y
aO
m
co
0

C
O
c
7
7
O
z
O
z
O
z
7Q d d d
W �+ } 2 } w a)
L
0
z
O
}
M
u
c
E
U
w
w
a
O
w
w
z
O
J
O
z
}
Lo
u
u
.�
a� L
U
C �
co
— N
N �
O C_ CO
y O LLLL
A) M
U • C D
0 N O
O -`�
C !A N
N 0
V C. O
3aDa
c_ (D
N U
N 75 C
7 N
C � U
O c
U N O
N � U
c � �
E N
O a �
uD " a
Co
N a)
N O y
•U — L
N C 10
W L uD
N O
Z Co
CM (D 16
O L N
C O N
L
y
Co
Co O N
'0d
C M 7E
+� E a
N � N
"� ld oLjj
Q 2 r
c
L
NN�
LPL
N
C.
L
�O
V
M
M
t
N
E
20
C
N
N
W
w
O
CO
co
O
CO

�
(
§
ƒ
§
a
Mn
\
k
\
k
(D
k
§
)
ƒ
§
0
g
0
a
E
k
«
\
E
±
/
i
2
J
C�-
\
0
o
/
.
o
c
E
L
E
o
a
w0
E
&
EJ
§
/
E
�
§
zz-zk
cm
a
§
C\
2
kk
k
moo/
72
L
7d
@
-
°
b�
CLcD
m of�g
$f
2
/
{

'o Z
d E
4i o
a
c
O
V o
O N
L
d
.0 d
F n
d �
v
d m
J �
p N
d o
t n'
LL
o
IL
� I
N 0 Ui
L
C
49
O
a
1
1
1
i
I
I
l
1
1
�
c
o
MnCD
N
x
E
N
N
E
co
v
coD
f
�
a
V
*L1
a
S
E
to
0
c
d
3
d
f/
=
M
co
li
coO
0
m
co
CC)
O
CD

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Proj ect/Site Name: Spectrum -Perth Road
Property Address: Perth Road, Mooresville, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 4637690763, 4638506254, 4637595778
Select one: I am an interested buyer/seller
Name: Ian Wagoner
Company: The Spectrum Companies
Mailing Address: 300 South Tryon Street, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Property Owner l Interested Buyer* / Other"
6/24/21
Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg.
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
len. [e-mail]

►0
Maps/Plans

't BELLS CROSS ROADS
.1
reek ,' Moaresville
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
ake Norman H,Jrrnare
e� Hwy
w� 7- Dooli
n �
4
t
c�
z
Lake Normar - Sch.oc it
C
AD
AD
Lake
Drman M
irpark Normandy Rd �
r
Lake Norman CK
Airpark
yfRd
Lakes -ore E.er
P
r.
a
a
s
�P
�4 Johnny Brusta's New
York Sty#e...
ti
c E Mon
Dair�=6Qf
Mooresville
IVY
Q
xs
_
Acres: LAKE NORMAN-PERTH ROAD Prepared for:
-39.0 Iredell Co., NC
+� THE SPECTRUM COMPANIES
FIGURE
1 VICINITY MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
06/21/21 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BILK ALL
Memory Lare V1

ij
7*4
3 . •
• L ►� AP e
* k.cft
A.
-I%k- k.F
IN
Okyjal
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
len. r i nd n e r@ wet I an ds-e p g.c o m
[phone]
www.wetiands-epg.com

r
LAKE NORMAN i r
~I38
lo
f
PROJECT BOUNDARY
■ 40, + STUDY LIMITS - [!�-
. * �
f Q �
E
9
LOCATION SCALE �; �
Lat: 35.6033 °N Long:-80.8985 °W 1:24 000
USGS QUAD
N HUC: 03050101 ACRES Lake Norman North NE, NC /}
r .I UPPER CATAWBA 39.0 1993 {
Acres: LAKE NORMAN-PERTH ROAD Prepared for:
+/- 39.0 Iredell Co., NC THE SPECTRUM COMPANIES
FIGURE
S MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
9 06/21/21 Subject to USACC�E/NCDEQ verification BILK ALL

r - +
pr
i qJ7' ., do
fD U8
C3
2 CW
As
Mot
PROJECT BOUNDARY
} STUDY LIMITS
f C2 # F
+ 1
* 2 Cf
%L
JL
Cl2 _.
�% *
0
J. Lo
��Ao � ��
Map Unit Description r
CfB2 Cecil Fine Sandy Loam, 2-6% Slopes, Eroded
CfC2 Cecil Fine Sandy Loam, 6-10% Slopes, Eroded
CfD Cecil Fine Sandy Loam, 10-15% Slopes, Erodec
AsB Appling Sandy Loam, 2-6% Slopes
N ' AsD Appling Sandy Loam, 10-15% Slopes NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
I MoD Moderately Gullied Land, Hilly f Iredell County 1963
Acres: LAKE NORMAN-PERTH ROAD Prepared for:
+/- 39.0 Iredell Co., NC THE SPECTRUM COMPANIES
FIGURE
4 SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
06/21/21 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BILK ALL

NO FEMA FLOODPLAIN
AS PER IREDELL
COUNTY ONLINE GIS
ti
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
r
r
II}
_
co
co
a
,i
a
r
s-
4 11 '_+
171 1711,'1� 11'
1 Y•V i7 ppglf !I'
10.
f
�1181=
r
j
t
130
131)
J13C;o 12�1rF�
12�1
I128
318 s 12$12�4
i� 128,
Acres: LAKE NORMAN-PERTH ROAD Prepared for:
-39.0 Iredell Co., NC
+� THE SPECTRUM COMPANIES
FIGURE -
5 FLOODPLAIN MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
06/21/21 Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification BILK ALL

Otto Loyk en , r r?
15215216gl 60 `-�T/ r- f r r r
Otto� '+ ■'",► �
,� aykr:n Laurel Cs[r.1
102 106,106�• 1 l4" ►`174
� 106 _ 1 ��� 1 M
E� 105�e®r
21
-' 219 '•
171 _
119 L•
�•■,►o ; � ■ ifs
171 119` L% 21.1213/,:
io1761 T+6w1i � � 20* � *2
7 214'�:
lypOinte Or 17B Q� 203 248•A C
• 201 /
199 A \ �t
197
1"� •111
3, . ,
145 93
' 1031 r-41 r
111—I0
13
11
13013
150
f13Q �142 • i
;0-110 J L130
�y1115 111 114•11 94b / f ,] 28 13124:1$
115 ■ ,
'`� +�'` r' ` 12g 12$ 112112
�115115 1.1811 r, 1015 ■+�,
114■■ • `' I'8'12$ 112 .
� r' - 112;�
26126 r� '+ PARCEL: 4637595778 1 u$i ;
12•19126 BRIDGESTONE LLC 1�� �
3 126 996 RIVER HWY EL:4637690763
� 9 130 t QUALITY OIL LLC f •
■ MOORESVILLE, NC 28115 i •J�
209��r141,_ — _ SILAS CREEK PKWY I
199204204 01144' .
�•204
199 21A , • �144
���199 1`'41��
N I Parcel Information Provided
r by Iredell County GIS
I
FIGURE
PARCEL:4638506254
PEGGY BROTHERTON
990 RIVER HWY
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Acres: LAKE NORMAN-PERTH ROAD
+/- 39.0 Iredell Co., NC
9�3 `' •- PARC
■ �. } QUAL
112 � 1540
■ WINSTON SALEM, NC 27127 J 920
f
r i
r— -
Prepared for:
THE SPECTRUM COMPANIES
06/21/21 I PARCEL MAP
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
BILK I ALL

LZWd
— 7�
U) o O uo
W W 13It
3=s
� cc C9 HO
4
oszs ees•roc
ZOZSZ ON '3.U0IkW0
ooz aims'•1S NOANI'S 00C
S31NVdW00 iNnNI03dS 3Hl
VNIIOHVD HIHON '3llIAS380OW
� a
'# m/,v,,)an
d 0 dN1061137
y F am m
z -H
Q� �Q—
Z ��3Z�;1
%a cr 0N LLIj
j10
�j�� a•H?itO+i I j �/
1
wvo ♦ / / (�---f—� —
w /Z N O
I ,
W a ao M<NO<N / / I
(pp/pp/ F 1 O 0 O
Y Q FJ O IL
a �v
*0 r f,<C
O /
i f Z � � �% f Nz -H yC
h
W U W p W
J w C7
¢ O pa w °f pa o� I
Op �Mp
O a N i IL
N Z W
N¢ ¢
n a a N 1
g 0 z Z faNWI / a
*
I
Z 0 �a
cn p s o R"
X Z w z
w 0 wsep
V �3 o a
P
fif
m
wo ax -ie\s m is - saa\wd\wv N n nnwa� Lw- V'o \n

,�zwRa.
V
LI no lei
to N fw°
LLJ� aWC
F
w
0
U
oszs ees•wc
ZOZ8ZON'3.UOIk HO
OOz aims " 1S NOANI'S ON
S31NVdW00 wNI03dS 3Hl
VNIIOHVD HIHON '3111AS380OW
U) V
W Z W I g
O J Q R3fi e
aa� _
U s
��a w` w N
a�� e o
00
wo ax -ie\s m is - sw\wda wro N n nnwa� Lw- V'o \n

Zvi
z
Z
z
-
W g
0=ozz
V) O�/�
L) 0
¢W¢
_
VI
W
0
Uza
`o
"=n
W
o�
3 m
13 at
z 5;13
go,
< $
J
I / 00o
/ � Z
I ``' o
L,0
L�of
O w
L � J
f
i
09Z£'8MtiOL
Z068Z ON '3110-12!WHO
OOZ 3uins "IS NOMAI 'S 00£
S3INVdNOD AmjiO�idS 3Hl
VNIIOHVO HiHON '311VAS32i00W
WMAON �INV-1
-IV r n - DS'.
c
o
U
�o
aw
o
CC
Q
_�
66
w
G
U m
w O
m
sQ
OU
U
a
03J
a` o
W
O I K
52
/ � 6
ME
9M0'O1M;PS—ld\S133HS 101d — 9Ha\9M0\NVW8ON 3NV1 vqn LL03dS 110--409\f'O8dNSOS\:9

M
09Z£'8M170L =O
Z068Z ON '3110�2!WHO
OOZ 3uins "IS NOMAI 'S 00£ � N
S3INVdW00 AmjiO�idS 3Hi C) w
C
VN1IO2ibO H12JON `3111AS32i00W C w
WMAON �INV-1
a�
1 /
-
J
3
p �
W
LLJ
ouQ Z
m
C9
C,
'
0 Z
W
a
i
W
W
� W Z�� m
O W~
LLJ
-�
3
W
W
Q
��z—W
cn
3
WWWQ2
I
~a0
cn z
z
00
.1
00
Wm
a-U�0-U
Q(=
sl I I
o
z .
LL,
H
mWZ
J J V
Q a Z
_ (n O
W
H
n
i o0
V) Z U
Z
0
s
I
0Z Q
—
��
W
'
o LLI 0 0
V)
V) V)
I 30
a-
a
O W OD
z
--
uj
I �
w
a-
V)J a-
LLIIn Q
' N
{ { \ \ \� W W
O 0
Of
0
or
N a r
0
Gd
O
i
0
na
o
OMO'O1M;P5—ld\S133HS 101d — 9Ha\9M0\NVW8ON 3NV1 vqn LL03dS 110--409\f'O8dNSOS\:0

zw
f�
W z
Zz
z
-
g
�Q
O
C7 Z
WN
wza
L)Z
W
o�
3 m
13
Z>g13
<$
09Z£'8M170L
N
LLI
Z068Z ON '3110-12!WHO
Q
J
OOZ 3uins "IS NOMAI 'S 00£
LU
O
S3INVdW00 AmjiO�dS 3Hl
Q
0
I—
`dNI� JVO Hl�ION 'DT11ASM100W
U
a
Q
WMION 3NV-1
°�
CD LO of 'IT CD LM CD
CD
O O > O O O O
Z 0
V
DOM
. of Z
0- H :mO
EKQ�
Z
V)
Q
m I
I
C) I I
I
I
�
0O I
I
z_
N
Q
- m
EK
-------------�-
U
W
O
W
NU
I
r
0
<EK
a ;EK
V)
D
0
E
0LLI
I
I
0
0
N
Cx
Q I
I
f
rij f
1
W I
0
Q
�IW
Z
J IW
z
W IU
a
W IV)
x I I
W
L
I
I � �
I�
W LLJ
m�
m
Q 0
W
o w ,�
�o �:2
0V) �EK `
.. LLJ ilk
i
� J J
W L� QZ
m W Q
00 00
�:m W
WO zz
Q� aN
30 WW
cnm EKo
4ml \
r
N
�
N
r
r
z
iE
r >
Ulm
w
tii
Z
O
m
U
Lo
U
rn
or
a
U
0
W
o
0)
Q
s
O
rl-
s
O O O O O O O LO
CO Ln 'IT LM N — O O
O O O O 00 O O r--
OMO'U1 2Fs-ld\S133HS 101d - qua\9M0\NVW8ON 3NV1 INnUO3dS 110-405\rOltdYs05\:9

w
Design Alternatives

Zvi
W
d
-
O�
C7 Z
, O
:G
WN
13
wZ
Uza
""=n
W
C�Q
3 m
13 at (9
Z � K
5E5,
05Z£'8££'b0L
Z0Z8Z ON '3110-lUVHO
c
OOZ 311ns ''1S NOAUi 'S 00£ � �
o
S31NVdW00 vmUi03dS 3Hl
�
Q w
N
o N
`dNIIOUVOHiUON'3l11AS3UOOVY Q
I I
>m
m o
U
0 3 J
�
OU W
f/7
a ci
O I K
omo'ily awes-id\simws ioid — 9aa\9ma\NvRH0N Mwi rinru03dS Lw—ros\road>sas\:J

09Z£'8££'40L
W
ZOZBZ ON `3110-NVHO
Q
13 Z s
V
OOZ 311ns "iS NOkltll'S 00£
LLI
J
o
Z
SDIN`ddWOO nnuioEidS DHl
Q
N
o g
U
o
0
NO
Z-Z
°
z�,
tN�02�tO 12�ON`3��1/S32�OOW
m
oaZ
W at
N
�
NdWJON 3Nd
wwE
�
Wz
aw❑
a
0-
O
5�
<s
0MO'1lV OIM2PS—ld\S133HS 101d — 9a0\9M0\NVW8ON 3NVl vgnU33dS 110-405\fDudYB05\:9

M
09Z£'8MtiOL
Z068Z ON '3110-12iVHO
OOZ 3uins "IS NOMAI 'S 00£
S3INVdNO3 AmjiO�idS 3Hl
VNIIOHVO HiHON `311VAS32i00W
N` MAON �INV-1
II
W
ola z
m
I
/
o>,00w
1
Z � : i
m
a
~
H
OU W
W
ui
V)
W W W a 0 H
Q U
LL
Lo pW U
z
pW 0
z
ofLai
IL of
1
O cn
0 (n
O::)
00
I
100
Llm
1 I
a_U
0-U
aIIn
sl I I
II
1
II
1 I
1 ,
III
M .�.l
.I
s
unA-���
p
Z
W p U
H
cn 1i D
J J O
In
a a Z
Of
W
m In
Z U
Z
IAN,
..
IOU Q
a
Z
~ m 0o
Q
O
W
J O
of
v
p L
N
W p V)
(n
J
a
1
Ll a O
O W O
Z
� o
w
N LL
W
J
p
�
W N
ZO
m—
:2-H
T)
1
OMO'1lV O1M35-ld\S133HS 101d - 0210\9M0\NVW8ON 3NV1 nnU33dS LL0-405\roudmsus\:9

zw
W gz
z
z
-
�zoa
o
U) O
zz
EEO
N
W
wZ F
T 0
m�s
"
W
c)za
mwz
28EL
a
5>g
I
I
09Z£'8££'40L
ZOZBZ ON '3iiO- NVHO
N
Q
W
J
OOZ 311ns ''1S NOAltli 'S 00£
w
O
SDINVdHOO nnuiOEidS DHl
Q
0
VNPOItI 'O H12iON '3-nIAS3?JOON
U
Q
N` MJ O N 3NV-1
a
2
°
z
Q
O H W
O
co �o
co
U
0Z
O
I
- M v
I
I
i :0 V)
}of
Q2
H
_ vbi O
O J0
LO < — m
CO Wm
UmH
ZWH_
Zm�
aoaf
w~IL
of
O
co
O
CYM
00
O
CYM
00
N
N
F-
F- >
wz
Ulm
w O
m
u
w
OU
U
W
o
a
O
O O
co 00
I I
I
I
I
I
I ;
I
I 3',
I
O
CN
00
O
00
0MO'1lV OIM2PS-ld\S133HS 101d - 9a0\9M0\NVW8ON 3NVl vgnU33dS 110-405\fDudYB05\:9

Engineer
Correspondence

Q
,cc
E
0
4f
a
0
N
M
m
N
C)
N
U
O
ii
r A n
N 00
U U
00 0 C1
(U
U �m
O � 3
O @� (aj
s -0Q
U i
O
a �E
its E
I
Cu
0)
Q
a)
O
C
0
Cu
c
Cu
a
x
a)
a)
O
E
O
U)
E
ii
L
(D
4) n-
> E
'C O
L
U) -0 CO � J
Q) L
O OM E a)
L N -0
Y
V
�o�� �( Q
c
0 p O .0 — (D iZ n7
L a) o to
N 3 E
j E U O U O
4)+ U+ Q
-E 0 O fa _
C (D C (n
c' 0 0
CO p c) _0 U Y m
H E -
_0 Cofa Cn 00
Uco - aL E�
CD U m a) o L
Z�()c 0
�(aMa) �0 m 0
_ ^^ L
LL D � n
C��� O co _1
U a) En
O m
O C O L (D V 6
(1�U O C-O (n V
O)a O E E.0 7
0 U CCD
U)g� _�> omY
Co m
O > O 0) C .O
E N (0 O > a) ���11 p CO
Cn C a) .0 L V
_ ca cn
n N Cp n '
> (0 0 (n c" E E E
a) - u O M o o o
U 0 U Q U U
0 V Q. O)
(ts '� Q p N E L
O) 0 O O 0-) a)
-0-02 a-0
U) CO U) O E Q
(n o - c Co 2 �o
0) N U V ��11
C 4 4m ) E 0 L
—
+J E O L �C
Q._ O) � O E
� "O
c a) 0 U)
0 .tl ^
x U U)� (1 A 0) 0
CD CD O �O X EO QO V
L
p O U�— a)
C '0 E 0 �
L6 a) C U (n U
0 L— O 0 a) c:
. U O 7 +-. CD C O C
a) a) C7 Co c E p U (DC� Up co OU E n 00 E J
0Wc� a-00 E AO3Ln-
oia o c� -2 0 0 no E
L 4) 0 ��0��1Q0
(7 " 0 C E a)0) g p co VvL 0)C)
ca E U O E (o) E C) C c-
�EU E0E U) �-0 oU
(A O m (0 0 N V O E C O N
L
0 ca � (D s= a) d N N a) C:V
c L 70 70— -L3: m
fa L O CO O Y U a) >
C,O E Ouj U c ca Q
(n U U) Q L LL
Q (� 0) Y L
U) 0 (�' L� v M > a)
H L)) >in 0 00_ LL0U)p0Q v
L

O
.4—j
c�
.E
v
v
we
jurisdictional
Determination Information

N Z --�
0
z coLL
i J
LU w rn
a
z
O
z
0
0
Z Q LL
QLn J
W = ii
LU W
Ln
a �
o
z
O w C V
Z F- o g a
N 3 O
LL W
za za
w o w o
0
V
Z N
car Q
�
� O
C
Z
0
z
LL
wJ
LUW (3)
a M
o -
z
W
N
� �
W
LL
\
W
jd
l
D
m
� J
� Q
0
Vf
N
z
r
�
o
�
J
o
M
z
Lu
CL
z
O
Q
a
c
0
a
U
L
0LLJ
O
z
� a v
= aQ
oc z
d Z o
V
Q 4J W
v z
O W p
z o
W n
Y O
Q Q
31 J
7 a O
6oQ
w
a
O
o
a
o LU
` � W
x
� w o
�+ W - L
0 C
a
4' . CD
a CD
de N LL
o
y J O
❑ � ro

77
r k
Fl
,Y
.±a
< 1
a
1�
aIlk-

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
6/16/21 1 Evaluator: I NRN
I Eastin :
-80.8979
Project:
Spectrum -Lake Norman -Perth Rd: Non -Wetland Waters A
I Northing:
35.6048
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
34.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. GeomorphologyGeornorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
17.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
11.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
6/16/21 1 Evaluator: I NRN
I Eastin :
-80.9003
Project:
Spectrum -Lake Norman -Perth Rd: Non -Wetland Waters D
I Northing:
35.6048
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
20.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. GeomorphologyGeornorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
3
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
10.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Hydrology Subtotal
5.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
5.0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Spectrum - Lake Norman - Perth Road City/County: Mooresville/Iredell Sampling Date: 6/16/21
Applicant/Owner: The Spectrum Companies State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland C
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 25-45
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.6042 Long:-80.8987 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PaF: Pacolet sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2) x
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
x Water Marks (131) x
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
x Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland C
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 50
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Lobelia cardinalis
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
MUJUIUIC
UUI I I IQI II
% Cover
Species?
35
Yes
35
Yes
30
Yes
100 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
iuwawi
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.0% (A/B)
15 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 115 (A) 300 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.61
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland C
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 4/1 85 7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Spectrum - Lake Norman - Perth Road City/County: Mooresville/Iredell Sampling Date: 6/16/21
Applicant/Owner: The Spectrum Companies State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 25-45
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.6043 Long:-80.8986 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PaF: Pacolet sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
45
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
85
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinci/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15,
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 80 x 4 = 320
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 185 (A) 635 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.43
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
35
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Polystichum acrostichoides
25
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
40
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

r
V N
70
O
V
O
N
d
p
70
C
O
U
a N
I N
O
Z
10
N
QN
�
l0
ul
_
O
CP
N
rl
rl
M
L�
tp N
O
m
LT
C
lD
r-I
r
rl
r
rl �
C
O
O
O K
T
N
N
N
❑
O
N
N
N
m
� N
N
O7
m
D
0
a C
O
0
O
r
U
O
[0
>m V7
Oi
N
n3 T
M
ON
O ❑
r
C N
M
O
z
M
uo
y N
❑ O
N
U
N
^ VUJ
C
❑
C
o
6
�
o
�
x m
a
o
U
R
y
a 0
UJzn
�
0
O
20
a
� v
^ O O O O O
C
ai
ai
V
al
C
Q
T
O
M
0
O �
Z
T
(6
O
N u1 N M Cl
O
L h N M tD O
rl
C l0 O rl h O1
O D7 tD t0 r-I t0
0 O O 10
UJ
w
rl M CO Q1 O7
C
i
an O
00 N r .0O r
ai
aJ
W
v1 m N rl h �l1
i O O O m N
R O 0D W C7 N
C D7 T CI ID
-6 O O CO . O
OP U) OP OP
O �
U m m vM ID
M M M
w W W W
E z Ln Ln Z Z
ul
z z 0 z
N ri
C W J � M �
O J J W Q }
� W
En w > a m
t Q ~ U a
aai N O
h t0 �l1 � M N ri O
(sayDul) 112JU12\fj

a- J
i
O
Q
v
oC
22
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Spectrum Property — Perth Road
Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co m
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
April 15, 2021
Field investigation conducted April 15, 2021
www.wetlands-epg.co r i
Ashesrile Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Spectrum Property Perth Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Spectrum Property - Perth Road site (+/- 31.4 acre) is located just west of
Perth Road, and just north of River Highway NC 150, in Mooresville, Iredell
County, North Carolina. The site can be found on the Lake Norman NE USGS
Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.6033 ON, longitude is-80.8985 °W.
The topography is moderately sloped with the elevation ranging from 800 to 880
ft. The site features an old farm homesite with barns, shed and outbuildings, and
is primarily covered with young, successional mixed pines and hardwoods and
narrow stream buffer of an unnamed tributary to Lake Norman. (Figures 1-4).
Figure 1:
- - 4 PROJECT BOUNDARY
` }y STUDY LIMITS
i 6410
'i` 4
i
+ r
r9
LOCATION J -
I?r
Lag: -W.293 RN
' °�� .4✓��
Lan 86.8985 QW 1:24,09� USGSOUA6
-N� U ACRES Lake Norman Nu NE, NC ` f
HUER101 Jt I
UPPERCATAATAW8,4 35.4 2993
SPECTRUM —PERTH R6 Prc P.md k- 1 /
ifedellCo, NC
FIGURE 1
USGS MAP Daun By: Revicued By:
oaR�slzg sz6,�rn iousa�p+cnJ�.r.l iron 6LR
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Spectrum Property Perth Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/iredeI1.htmI was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Iredell County North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1).
Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the site was investigated on
April 15, 2021.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Iredell County North Carolina
County: Iredell, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on April 15, 2021
Group Name Status
Flowering Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis Threatened
Plants nanif/ora)
Reptiles Bog (=Muhlenberg) turtle (Clemmys Threatened
muhlenbergii)
Mammals Northern long-eared bat (Myotis Threatened
septentrionalis)
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Spectrum Property Perth Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
One plant species with federal protection is listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora), listed as Threatened,
grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next
to streams and creek heads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides and
ravines.
Two animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenburgii), listed as Threatened, occurs in bogs,
fens, marshy meadows and other wetlands with emergent vegetation.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
RESULTS:
The site features an old farm homesite with barns, shed and outbuildings, and is
primarily covered with young, successional mixed pines and hardwoods and
narrow stream buffer of an unnamed tributary to Lake Norman. There are typical
turf grass roadside shoulders and ditches along River Hwy 150 and the old
connector road. There are a few large trees around the old home and farm
buildings, but the rest of the site is covered in young pines and hardwoods from
old field succession and timber harvesting. Tree species occurring are Short -leaf
Pine (Pinus echinata), Virginia Pine (P. virginiana), Loblolly Pine (P. taeda),
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), White
Oak (Quercus alba), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata),
Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Red Maple (Acer rubra), and Black Gum
(Nyssa sylvatica), Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana). Shrubs include Russian
Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). Vines
present are Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Poison Ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans). Sparse herbs present include Christmas Fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), and
Japanese Stilt Grass (Microstegium vimineum).
WEPG#00889
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Spectrum Property Perth Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Due to disturbance from farming and timber harvesting, there is no
suitable habitat for Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora) on site,
and no plants of the genus Hexastylis were observed. WEPG concludes
Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora) does not occur on the site.
Due to extensive disturbance on site from past and present land
management practices, there is no suitable habitat for Bog Turtles
(Clemmys muhlenbergii) on site, and no bog Turtles were observed.
WEPG concludes Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) does not occur on
the site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http-//www.fws.gov/asheville/htm Is/project_review/N LE B_in_WNC. htm I)
WEPG concludes the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no
further action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the
Northern Long-eared Bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
April 15, 2021
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Spectrum Property Perth Road - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species
Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Discovered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
which led to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant
Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has
become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in both
North and South Carolina.
6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

ua
United States Department of the Interior FSERVIUE
IFE
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
July 6, 2021
Lisa Gaffney
WEPG
10612-D Providence Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
Lisa. gaffneykwetlands-epg com
Subject: Perth Road Development; Iredell County, North Carolina
Dear Lisa Gaffney:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
email correspondence dated June 1, 2021, wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 etseq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the Applicant proposes to construct a mixed use
development on approximately 31 acres in Mooresville, North Carolina and anticipates that
authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be required. Onsite habitats are
dominated by successional mixed forest. Surrounding land cover is composed of mixed forest,
and residential developments along Lake Norman.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
Suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project area for the federally threatened
northern long-eared bat (*otis septentrionalis). However, the final 4(d) rule (effective as of
February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with activities
that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from
a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on the
information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree clearing) would occur at a
location where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the
4(d) rule. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to avoid any associated tree
clearing activities during this animal's maternity roosting season from May 15 — August 15.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is not present onsite for any other
federally protected species. In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate
federal agency or its designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify
any such activities or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their

habitats. if it is determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally
listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Low Impact Development
The Service is concerned about the potential stormwater-mediated impacts to streams and
wetlands onsite. Where detention ponds are used, storm -water outlets should drain through a
vegetated area prior to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should
be designed to allow for the slow discharge of storm water, attenuating the potential adverse
effects of storm -water surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges.
Since the purpose of storm -water -control is to protect streams and wetlands, no
storm -water -control measures or best management practices should be installed within any
stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland. We recommend that retention ponds be located
at least 750 feet from small wetlands to minimize hydrologic disturbance and ecological
function.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-322.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

U
Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
October 22, 2021
Mr. Heath Caldwell
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review
Perth Road Development Tract
Doolie Community, Iredell County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 21-649-157
Dear Mr. Caldwell:
BACKGROUND
During October 2021, R.S. Webb & Associates (RSWA) conducted a cultural resources literature
review for Spectrum Companies' Perth Road development tract in the Doolie Community, Iredell
County, North Carolina. The project area is located north of the intersection of Perth Road and State
Route (SR) 150 (River Highway), also known as the Doolie Community, in southwestern Iredell
County (Figure 1).
For this study, a cultural resource is defined as a discrete area of human activity that is at least 50
years old. Cultural resources include, but are not limited to, archeological sites, historic structures,
military earthworks, mines/mining features, historic cemeteries, and historic landscape features. The
purpose of the current study was to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are located
within the project area.
METHODOLOGY
Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB database, information was
reviewed regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties, Iredell County
surveyed -only historic resources, local landmarks, state study -list sites and historic resources
determined by the SHPO to be eligible for the NRHP. The North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology (OSA) provided RSWA with information via email regarding archeological sites within
1.0 kilometer (km) of the project area. This information included site forms, location maps and
partial or full reports. Historic county maps were examined online through North Carolina Maps,
a collaboration of the University of North Carolina, the State Archives of North Carolina, and the
Outer Banks History Center. Historic aerial photography and additional historic maps were accessed
through Historicaerials.com, Earthexplorer.usgs.gov, Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/, and/or
Alabamamaps.ua. edu.

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Perth Road Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 2
October 22, 2021
The following primary sources were found to be useful in searching for historic resources within and
adjacent to the project area:
• 1891 Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al. reprinted, 1983)
• 1893 USGS Statesville Sheet 30-minute quadrangle
• 1910 USDA Statesville Sheet Soil Map
• 1917 Kenney Map of Iredell County
• 1922 Post Office Department Map of Iredell County
• 1938 and 1968 State Highway and Public Works Commission Maps of Iredell County
• 1951, 1965, 1983 aerial photographs of Iredell County
• 1970 USGS Lake Norman North, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle
• 1985-2018 Google Earth aerial photography.
RESULTS
Previous Archeological Investigations: OSA records indicate one previous cultural resources
investigation project within 1.0 km of the study tract (Figure 1). One of 37 selected Lake Norman
lakeshore survey areas was located approximately 500 m northwest of the current study tract
(Tibbetts and Southerlin 2003) (Figure 1).
Previous Architecturallnvestigations: According to SHPO personnel, the North Carolina HPOWEB
database is the definitive source of all architectural survey information for Iredell County.
National Register of Historic Places: There are no NRHP-listed historic properties located within
1.0 km of the current study tract. The NRHP-listed Johnson -Neel House is located south of SR 150
(River Highway) approximately 1.8 km southeast of the study tract.
Iredell County Historic Resources: The HPOWEB database indicates no study -list sites, local
landmarks, or properties determined eligible for the NRHP within 1.0 km of the study tract. The
database shows 17 surveyed -only historic properties within 1.0 km of the study tract, all located
along or near the SR 150 corridor. There are two surveyed -only historic resources within the study
tract; these properties include a circa 1959 house/office building (Resource No. 1630) and a circa
1875 house (Resource No. 1631). Surveyed -only resources are also located south of SR 150 at the
study tract (Resource No. 1090/Berea Church and Cemetery) and south of SR 150, approximately
200 m southeast of the study tract (Resource No. 1632) (Figure 1). The HPOWEB database
indicates that all of these recorded resources were evaluated by SHPO in 2014 and all were found
to be ineligible for the NRHP.
Recorded Archeological Sites: OSA archeological site records identify two recorded archeological
sites within 1.0 km of the project area, neither of which is within 600 m of the study tract. The
closest recorded site, 31ID328, is a mixed prehistoric and historic surface artifact scatter 660 m
northwest of the project area that has not been assessed for NRHP eligibility status (Figure 1).
Revolutionary War Actions/Features: There was one reported Revolutionary War military
engagement in Iredell County; no such events occurred in Catawba County (west), and two
engagements took place in Lincoln County (southwest). The closest Revolutionary War military
event was at Tarrant's Tavern (February 1, 1781), located about 7 km southeast of the project area.
This tavern served as a rendevous point for numerous Patriot militia companies that scattered in the

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Perth Road Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 3
October 22, 2021
wake of recent actions to the south and southwest. The gathering militia were dispersed again by
attacking British cavalry and the tavern was destroyed the following day by British infantry as they
marched northeast toward Salisbury (Rowan County) (Lewis 2021).
Civil War Actions/Features: A review of The Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al.
1983) indicates no major battle or campaigns located in Iredell County. Broad -scale maps ofmilitary
movements across the southeastern United States indicate extensive cavalry operations north, east
and west of the study tract; none are depicted within 8 km of the project area (Davis et al. 1983).
Historic Cemeteries: Reviewed USGS topographic maps show one cemetery mapped within 1.0 km
of the project area. Berea Church and Cemetery are located south of SR 150, approximately 80 m
south-southwest of the project area (Figure 1).
Structures on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: The 1893 USGS map and the 1910 soil map
show that Perth Road from the north reached the SR 150 corridor further east than the current
intersection; a single building located north of SR 150 (and none south of the road near the project
area) as the road began a northward arc, apparently at or near the study tract, with the label "Doolie".
The 1917 Kenney Map, however, shows the Perth Road/SR 150 intersection at the project area with
an offest (east) "private road" leading further southward. This map shows "owners' residences" in
all four quadrants of the intersection with a church and school located southwest (in the arc of SR
150). The name J.S. Fischer was placed northeast of the intersection of Perth Road and SR 150
(Figure 1) and the only nearby Doolie name was placed south of SR 150, more than 1.6 km west of
the project area.
The county highway from 1938 shows the westward bend of Perth Road as it approached SR 150
from the north via the study tract, the offset road leading further south (aka Doolie Road), and the
label "Dooleys" located above the northern arc of SR 150, west of the study tract (Figure 1). The
193 8 map shows a store/business located northwest of the intersection (in the study tract), a building
located north of SR 150 at Doolie Road (possibly in the study tract), a church/cemetery located south
of SR 150, and a dwelling located west of Perth Road at or near the northeastern study tract corner
boundary (Figure 1). The 1968 highway map illustrates additional residential development along
the western side of Perth Road, from the project area northward, but it suggests little other changes
to the distribution of roads and buildings.
The 1970 USGS map shows the Perth Road/SR 150 intersection with Doolie Road offset to the east
and running southward from the project area. Two dwellings appeared northwest of the road
intersection (in the study tract) and a dwelling with an outbuilding is shown northeast of the
intersection (also in the study tract). A church/cemetery and a dwelling were present south of SR
150 at the study tract. Buildings also appeared along the SR 150 corridor west of the project area
and east of Doolie Road (southeast of the project area); no buildings appeared along Perth Road near
the northern project area boundary as depicted on the 1938 and 1968 highway maps (Figure 1).
Aerial photographs from 1951 show the disjoined road intersection at the project area with groups
of several buildings located on either side of Perth Road in the study tract; a single building also
appeared west of Perth Road, at or near the northern study tract boundary (Figure 1). The eastern
and southern parts of the study tract appeared in either cultivation, pasture, or new -growth woods,
while the central -northwestern section was in mature woods. Aerial photographs dating to 1965

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Perth Road Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 4
October 22, 2021
show no change in the southern part of the study tract; a building previously noted at the northern
study tract boundary was absent by 1965. Aerials taken in 1983 indicate no change to the
distribution of buildings in the study tract, but only areas east of Perth Road were still under
cultivation by that time. Aerial photographs dating to 1998 show buildings still present in the
southern part of the project area with increased woods west of Perth Road and cultivation or pasture
located east of the road. Aerial photographs from 2006 indicate a new road course along the eastern
study tract boundary and a conventional four-way intersection was present at the crossing of Perth
Road (north), SR 150 (east and west) and Doolie Road (south) (Figure 1). This construction isolated
the building complex east of the road (in the project area) from historically associated agricultural
land to the east and northeast, where modern residential/commercial development was initiated by
2006.
CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, determined -eligible properties, study -listed resources,
designated local landmarks, cemeteries, or recorded archeological sites located within the study tract.
There are, however, two surveyed -only historic resources are located within the study tract (Resource
Nos. 1630 and 1631). Two additional resources are located within 200 m of the study tract south
of SR 150 (Resource No. 1090/Berea Church and Cemetery and Resource No. 1632). All of these
properties have been evaluated by the SHPO in 2014 and all determined to be ineligible for the
NRHP. Review of historic maps and aerials indicates that one residence could have been present
in the study tract by 1893 as part of the Doolie crossroads community, which included the project
area. The various sources show groups of buildings present in the study tract throughout the 20'
century.
CLOSING COMMENTS
Mr. Caldwell, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB & ASSOCIATES
kajyt,
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Davis, G.B., L. J. Perry and J. W. Kirkley, compiled by C. D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.
Lewis, J.D.
2021 The American Revolution in North Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at:
http://www.carolana.comNC/Revolution/home.html. Accessed April 2021.

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Perth Road Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 5
October 22, 2021
Tibbetts, R. and B. Southerlin
2003 Archaeological Survey at Lake Norman, Catawba, Iredell, Lincoln, and Mecklenburg
Counties, North Carolina. Brockington and Associates, Inc. Raleigh, North
Carolina.

V-2 31 -
Tibbetts: and
I k
Soutliekin
`
Store/Busines's, �!
on 1938 Map, [ l ► 4
Resource
(1875-P
f Berea Church Eligible
_ and Cemetery
QD
♦ Structure on Historic Maps and Aerials
■ Recorded Historic Resource
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangle
Lake Norman North (1993), NC
*11
• Recorded Archeological Site
Previous Cultural Resource Project
Scale
0 305 meters
0 1000 feet
Figure 1 Project Area, Previous Project and Cultural Resources Location Map