NC0024333_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (3)

Water Resources
Environmental Quality{
August 2, 2017
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
WWTP Superintendent
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 2811.1
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspeeti a
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
ROY COOPER
Governor
AEL S. REGAN
secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the
City of Monroe's Industrial Pretreatment Program on July 25, 2017, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Please inform the City's Pretreatment Coordinator of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed
report,
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at [phone], or via email at [e-mail],
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality; Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
oor illt Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 I Mooresville. North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 'Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
I. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum, Kevin Keesler
3. Title(s): WWTP Superintendent, Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 1/14/16 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES D NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
NC0024333
MM/DD/YY
7/25/17
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
Inspector
S
(INSP)
Fac. Type
1
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
13
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs)?
8.
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11.. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or I0
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No T P, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
1
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Repotting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any ProblemsRelated to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
- 12/201
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
►/ YES ❑ NO
Flow violation for 12/2015; due
to significant rainfall events
❑ YES i:/ NO
•
Limits: None
Reporting: Glenmark Generics; 7/2016
6 time period.
blished: None
NA
❑ YES / / NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? EYES
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LIMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? EYES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES E NO
❑ NO
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW' has copy of Prod am Ele
their files, com•lete with su+ *ort. documents and co of PERCS A* •royal Letter, and dates consistent with Pro . am Info:
en
Program Element
Headwor
Analysis (HWA)
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
Enforce
Long Ter
ortitoring Plan (LIMP)
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT
29. User Name 1
30. lUP Number
3l . Does File Contain Current P
32. Permit Ear • iraoon Date
Last Submittal Reeeived
Date In file?
6/18/13
7/27/16
33. Cate orical Sd A. shed .I.F;. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
34, Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Ins «eetiota Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? See Ins,. • coon Form from PO
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a. Toxic
Organic Manatement Plan TO
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review :Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sams1irt as Re•uired b IUP, includ' flow"?
40. Does File Contain PO. SChain-0f- ustod Fo r ?
41 a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sara.lint as R• • uired b 1UP, includint flow?
41 b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did. SIU submit all reports
on titre?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastesiream Formula (CWF), does
file include :rocess/dilution flows as I2ei uired b IUP?
42be For categorical Ws with Production based linnits, does file include
reduction rates attdlor flows as Rey uired b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Moth POTW and SIU Sam in
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identi
1 Re+ortinon-Corn•liance from SIU Sam+lin
44, a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All. Self -
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resarnple and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
45, During the st Recent Seal Period Was tl,e SIU in SNC?
46. During the Most .Recent. Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement 'Taken
as Ssecified in the POT.'Ws ERP OVs, Penalties, Bonin:, etc. "?
47. Does the File Contain Penal Assessment Notices?
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enf©reement Orders?
b. Is SIU• Com lance with Order?
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of
Re�auested Information For You?
Last Approval
Date In file
5/29/15
0/15/14
9/12/13
8/29/16
a. Yes ©No
b. DYes ©No
YesElNol: INIA
YesDNoDN/A
©YesDNo N/A
Yes©NoDNA
OYesDNol$IN "A
YesDNoCIN/A.
ElYesDNol N/A
DYesDNoN/A
a.QYesDNoNIA
b.OYesONoEINIA
a. DYes QNo
b. pYes pNo
Date Next Due,
If A plieable
OYesONoDN/A
a. DYes pNo
b OYesDNoDN/A
DYes©No©N/A
ElYesONoON/A
IYes:IN©ENIA
OYSONoON/A
OYesDNo©NIA
DYesDNoON/A
a.OYesONoONIA
b,OYesONoON/A
c.O YcsDNo©WA
DYesDNoON/A
OYesONocN/A
a. OYesONoDN/A
b,lJYesONoON/A
a. DYes ©No
b. ®Yes 1 ]No
l Ye DNo03N/A
a. DYes ENo
b.DYesDNoDN/A
OYes©No©N/A
DYesDNo0Ni A
OYesDNoON/A
OYes©NoON/A
YesONoDN/A
a. DY'espNoON/A
b.,0 YesDNoDN/A
c.OYesON©ONIA
• DYesONoON,+A
NC DWR. Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
d 7125/07 Page 2

E REVIEW COMMENTS:
28. The SUO was adopted on 5/21/13.
35. POTW performed ATI inspection on 11/4/16.
37. ATI has previously submitted TOMP (due to IUP TTO monitoring requirement) and TTO Certifications were received on 6/21/17,
11/1/16, and 6/7/16.
39. POTW contracts Shealy Environmental Services and GEL Labs (low level mercury) for sample analyses.
41a. ATI contracts Pace Analytical Services for sample analyses.
46. POTW issued Notice of NonCompliances to ATI for a flow limit violation (Pipe 02) in January 2017 and a chromium limit violation
(Pipe 01) in May 2017.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number
1
C
0
0
2
4
3
3,
3
MM/DD/YY
07
25
17
1. Industry Inspected: ATI — Bakers South Operations
2. Industry Address: 3875 Aeropointe Parkway, Monroe, N.C. 28110
3. Type of Industry/Product: 471/Forming/Forging Metals
4. Industry Contact: Scott Ryan Title: EHS Manager •
(DTIA)
Inspection type
U
Inspector Facility Type
2
(TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
Phone: [phone] Ext. 3470
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? 11 Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview
B. Plant Tour
C. Pretreatment Tour
D. Sampling Review
E. Exit Interview
Industrial Inspection Comments:
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
The facility currently has approximately 125 employees and operates 24/7. The pretreatment system is staffed with wastewater operators during
first shift only. The Pretreatment wastewater system includes the following: holding tanks; pH adjustment; chemical precipitation; flocculation;
clarification, flow measurement; and filter press. Dewatered wastewater solids are disposed at the Anson County Landfill.
Used oils are disposed by a contracted company (Wallace).
The Pretreatment wastewater system appeared to be properly operated and well maintained. The records reviewed during the inspection were
organized and well maintained.
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
The POTW staff must ensure that the contracted laboratories meet the
March 2017 sampling event).
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and well maintained, The POT' industrial Pretreatment Program was being
properly implemented.
NOD: D YES NO
NOV: [] YES b NO
QNCR: © YES /' NO
POTW Rat)
Satisfactory ►ii Marginal [j Uus factory
PCI COMPLETED BY
detection limits for molybdenum (MP) and copper (LTMP —
DATE: August 1, 2017
Wes Bell, Mooresville
Tonal Office
NCOWE .Pretr
i nt Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form F Tat d '7/2 07 Page 4

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
Apri126, 2017
Mr. Kevin Keesler
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
L,
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County
Dear Mr, Keesler:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2016. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)
235-2192 and/or Monti Hassan at [phone] or at wes.bell@ncdenr,Eov and
[e-mail].
cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
MSC-I617 Central -Basement
WB
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality] Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Water Resources
ENVPRONMENTAL QUAUTY
April 26, 2016
Mr. Kevin Keesler
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
PAT MCCRORY
Goverme
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretaq
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Orrecror
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County
Dear Mr. Keesler:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2015. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2017.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes Bell at
[phone] and/or Mr. Monti Hassan at [phone] or at [e-mail] and
monti,[e-mail].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
State of North Carolina Environmental Qualityl Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office I 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

A
NcDmit
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
April 1.5
Mr. Kevin Keesler
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Caro tna 28111-0069
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe WWTP
NPDES Permit No, NC0024333
Union County,
Dear lvfr. Keesler:
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of January through December. 2014, Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in accordance
with 1.5A NCAC 2171: .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1., 2.016.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 235 2.92 and/or
Monti Hassan at [phone] or at v .s,bell`r ncdenr. gov and Monti hass to ne enr.gov.
Sincerely,
Wes Bell.
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
cc: Monti 1 lassan, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Loe,ation610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, O 28115
Phone: [phone] `t Fax: [phone] Customer Service; 1-877-623-6748
Internet www-rcwa'terquallty,org
Actnco Emp oyar - 30% Ne rclesj t0% Post Consumer pap&

Pat McCrory
Governor
Agif
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Thomas A, Reeder
Director
Mr. Kevin Keesler
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Dear
March 24, 2014
Subject: PAR Revie
Monroe WWTP
NPUES Permit No, NC0024333
Union. County
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of January through December 2013, Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in C'ompre nsj\ (ruidance far North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1., 2015.
If ycru have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] and/or
Monti Hassan at [phone] or at w
cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Region
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 2'6115
Phone: [phone]g61 Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
intemet www n aterguality.oug
eii citncdenr.gov and mopti.lassart t t ccf nr.go
Wes Bell
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional. Operations Section
One
ihCaroiina
Noaturally
An rn4ta6 OrwortrrrOv t Ffi.rmAbvR.4r.linn PTn(e)VRAPna i nrv�.,imv rq.xru,r

I
ATA •
NCDENR
FILE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory Thomas A. keeder John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
August 16, 2013
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent
City of Monroe
PO Box 69
Monroe, NC 28111
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on April 30, 2013 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
,.r Michael L. Parker
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Monti Hassan , PERCS Unit
DH
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet http:llportal.ncdenr.orglweblwq
An Equal Opportunity !Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledfi0% Post Consumer paper
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

rBACKGROUND INFORMATION (Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)I.
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum
3. Title(s): Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent and Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 10/18/2011 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
N
Main Program Permit Number
NC0024333
MM/DD/YY
04/30/2013
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
Inspector
S
(INSP)
Fac. Type
I
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
12
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
6
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of STUB in SNC)
2
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1 _
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
2
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published, for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES ' NO
❑ YES 0 NO
Limits: Tyson for BOD
Reporting: Norton -reporting
)lished:
0
OYES NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/23i07 Page 1

8. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal Received '
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/26/2010
i1 Yes ❑ No
7/25/2010
® Yes ❑ No
4/1/2015
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
9/18/2009
® Yes ❑ No
12/08/2009
Yes ■ No
10/01/2014
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/27/2012
)1/.Yes ❑ No
01/04/2013
Yes ■ No
DWQ
approval/await
ing council
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
3/25/2008
® Yes ❑ No
06/13/2008
// Yes • No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/23/2010
11 Yes • No
11/08/2007
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
29. User Name
1. Great American
2. Norton
3. ATI-ALLVAC
30. IUP Number
CM-32
CM-16
CM-15
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/l Yes ❑ No
./ Yes ❑ No
'/ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
06/30/2015
06/30/2013
06/30/2013
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
N/A
433
471
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
l:1 Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
C/ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
/1 Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
// Yes • No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►liYes ■No
b. [Wes ■No
a. ►:<Yes ❑No
b. DYes ■No
a. ►.iYes •No
b. ■ Yes :No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►EYes No
b.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
a. ► Y*Yes DNo
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ®Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
1:1 Yes ❑ No
Yes • No
i1 Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
/ / Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIT.] Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
42b. For categorical Ms with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑ Yes ❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
®Yes•INo■NA
pYes❑NoEN/A
®YesDNo❑NIA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
EYes❑No❑N/A
EYes❑No❑NIA
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.ttztYes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
c.C31Yes ❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.®Yes ❑No❑NIA
b.❑yes❑NoEN/A
c.DYes ❑No®NIA
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes // No
• Yes 1�/ No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
pYes❑NoEN/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes ❑ Nos N/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoIRIN/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ® No
['Yes '1 No
❑ Yes 1 No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

rRequested Information For You?
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: NOT APPLICABLE THIS INSPECTION
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
. I S 2
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact: Title:
Phone: Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Ma gi+ al LI Unsatisfactoj4 _ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: , / I L' ,r(/ DATE: 8/13/2013
Donna Hood, Mooresvil Regional Office
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25107 Page 3

A II,
NCD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P.E. John E. Skvarlar III
Governor Director Secretary
Mr. Kevin Keesler
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 2.81'.11-0069
April 19. 201 J.
Subject:
PAR Revie
Monroe WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of January through December 2012. Based on the review, the POTW completed the I'AR in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Caron
Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2014.
1 f you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Donna Hood and myself at
(704) 663.-1699 and/or Monti Hassan at [phone] or at donna.hoodunedenr.gov, wes.bell ncdenr.gov, and
[e-mail].
Wes Bell
Environmental, Specialist
Surface Water Protection Section.
cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave Suite 301 Mooresville. NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]D401 Customer Service: 1-877-623 674
Internet wrww.ncwaterquatty.org
NorthCarolina
7Vatllrallf
An Equal Opportutaily 1 A,f6rmallve Acilon Employer - 30% Recycled/10% Pont Consumer paper

I
Aril
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins'. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
1LE
October 19, 2011
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on October 18, 2011 by John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley at [phone].
Sincerely,
Cal Robert B. Krebs
_- Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Monti Hassan , PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave.. Suite 301 Mooresville. NC 28I 15
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
NorthCarolina
naturally
An Equal OpportiuIily 1 AlTnnative Action Empinyer -. SO% Recycled!I0% Post Consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 'Complete Prior To PCI; Review Pr2gram Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2, Control Authority Representative(s). Kyle Ketchum and Lori Baxley
Title(s): WWTP Superintendent and :Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4
5.
6.
Last Inspection Date: 5126/10 Inspection Type:
PCI 111 Audit
Has Program Completed All Requirements from the :Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)?
Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? El YES Z NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? El YES El NO NA
PCS CODING
'frans,Code Main Program Permit Number i\IM/DIANY InspeCrype
NC0024333
Current Number Of Significant Industrial lisers (SlUs)?
I 0/18/2011
(DT1A) (TYPI)
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
Nurr,ber of SiLls Not Inspected By PO'IW in the I,ast Calendar Year/
10, Number of Silas Not Sam led B = POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
.Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
12, Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IL1P
13: Number of SlUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Serni-Armual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
14. Number of SILls in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
15, Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits 'Violations 1-.)uring Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
16, Number of SlUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17, Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, W-hat are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18, Since the Last PCI, lias the POTW had any Problems Related to an industrial
Discharge (interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints,. Increased
Sludge Production, Etc„)'?
If Yes, How are -these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either (tithe Last 2 Senn -Annual Periods'? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUS in SNC)
YES LI NO
Inspector Pa(, Type
S 1
INSP) (FACC)
2 SIUS
0
0
2
CBI S
NOIN
NOCM
PSNC
YES NO
ES NO
SNC for Limuis: Brooks Food Group (REG)
SNCfor Reporting: BFG and Turborneca
Not Published: Publication pending
20, Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SlUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
YES NO
LT 'P/STMPFILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies, t .
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all 1 I'MP/STMP Monitoring? YES LI NO
24. Is LTMP/ST.MP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? • YES Li NO Is 'Table Adequate? YES El NO
25, All LTMP/S'IMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? YES LI NO
26, If NO to 2.3 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LIMP/S*FMP? Y'ES NO
If yes, which o•nes? Eliminated: Added:
NO
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance In.spection (PCI) Form 1 pLi ucd7/25/17 Page i

RETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy ofProgram Element in
eir files, complete with suunortindocuments and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Fr . ..
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/26/10
i1 Yes ❑ No
7/23/10
i1 Yes ❑ No
, 4/1/15
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
9/18/09
IYes ❑ No
12/08/09
►1 Yes ❑ No
10/1/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/24/07
1Yes IIINo
5/30/07
►1 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response.Plan (ERP)
3/25/08
® Yes • No
6/13/08
1Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
3/21/07
/1 Yes.❑ No
11/08/07
11 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name I 1. Brooks Food Group 2. Turbomeca
L
3. Allvac-Bakers SAF
30. IUP Number
CM05
CM31
CM10
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/1 Yes •No
/1 Yes ❑ No
1/ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/12
6/30/12
6/30/14
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
433
471
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
/1 Yes ❑ No
® Yes • No
Z Yes I No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
/1 Yes • No _
/1 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►Z0Yes ■No
b. •Yes ■No
a. IN Yes ■No
b. Yes •No
a. ►iYes ■No
b. •Yes •No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑ Yes ❑NoEIN/A
®Yes❑NoDN/A
El Yes ❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes ■No
b.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes No
b.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes •No
b.®Yes❑Na❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
® Yes ❑ No
/Z1 Yes • No
i/ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
X1 Yes • No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
❑Yes®No❑N/A
❑Yes®No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
41b. During the Most. Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes®No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
. ❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
• ❑Yes❑No®N/A.
❑ Yes ❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
• All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
ElYeslINo❑NA
ElYesDNo❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
e,®yes❑No❑NIA
a.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes ❑No❑NIA
c.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
c.❑Yes ❑NollEIN/A
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
11 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
' ❑Yes❑No®N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
El Yes ❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑ Yes ❑No ON/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑NOON/A
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑NolgIN/A
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
• Yes ® No
E Yes ® No
E Yes 1/ No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Fonn Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
34. IUP Applicartion Date: Brooks Food Group, 2/26/09; Turbomeca, 3/10/09; AI'vac-Bakers SAF, 1/3/11
35. SW Inspection Date: Brooks Food Group, 12/10/10; Turbomeca, 12/14/10; Allvac-Bakers SAF, 9/16/11
41a. Brooks Food Group did not sample for nickel and zinc; Turbomeca, performed <80% of required sampling.
41b. Turbomeca, late reporting.
46. Notices of Non -Compliance (NNC) were sent to Brooks Food Group for BOD, ammonia, oil & grease, and pH in addition for nickel
and zinc missed sampling events. Turbomeca was sent NNC for <80°/© of sampling events being performed and late reporting.
45. Brooks Food Group, SNC for BOD limit violations and reporting (did not sample Ni and Zn). Turbomeca, SNC for Reporting and
failure to sample per IUP requirements.
47. Brooks Food Group and Turbomeca were each assessed civil penalties.
48. Documentation procedures are in place. The civil penalty assessments against Brooks Food Group and Turbomeca were very
recent and payment has not yet been received.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
The Monroe approved Industrial Pretreatment Program is well organized and managed. All files were complete and up to date
Requirements:
See the Program Elements Review section of this report.
Recommendations:
NOD: EYES Z NO
NOV: E YES Z NO
QNCR: L YES NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory Marginal ri Unsatisfactory
PCI COMP E BY DATE: October 19, 2011
John Lesley, Mooresville Regional Office
• NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updaccd. 7125107 Page 3

NCDENR
North Carolina I epartnent of Environment and Natural Resources
of fates. Quality
riy Eaves Perdue Colter" FI. Sullins Dee F'reera a
Governor Director Secretary
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, NC 28111
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
reporting period
accordance with.
North. Cars
if l
or by emu
ina P
April 26, 2011
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDF S Permit No, NC.,00243333
Union Count:\, NC
Regional Office staff has reviewed yrou.r Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
anuary through December "2010. Based on the review, the POT\V completed the PAR in
_A NCAC 211 .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Compr l ensive Guidance for
anent Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2012.
I have and questions concerning yotr PAR, please do not he
john.leslev. i ncdenr.gov.
Cc: Monti Hassan, P[R.C.'.S linit
ne
taverneo p: nr
6
Sincere
ey
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
to contact me at [phone]
An, Equal- t ptpcetorvB A thrmarive Amon Employer -- 5 re Receni

A7A
NCDENR
North Carolina Departtrient of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor • Director Secretary
June 1, 2010
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subj ect: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on May 26, 2010.by John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley at [phone].
Sincerely,
•
2z Robert B. Krebs
7 Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Monti Hassan , PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
• .-_.. _, a, ____... _:... I . Err ___.:.._ .. _.:__ r.• _...t......- CA01. /PAW o..(`n.niemar nanny
Nod thCarolina
J1�a aurally

NORTH AR INA DR SION F \%A FE^ I QL' \LIT\
NCDENR PRETREAT)/ NT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (Pill;) REPOT SI"
IAC'KGROI'NI)1Nf,OR\1.'#'EION (Cornpk tc Prior To PCI: Review Pro rarn Info Database Sheet(s)E
1. Control Authority (P()°I W) Name: t:;ity of "Icsrtt'oe
Control Author:I
yte t etc.num
Title(s): Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator
Last Inspection Date: 7r08l09 Inspection Type: LI PCI Audit
Has Program Completed Ail Requirements from the Previous Inspection an
Is POTW under an (?refer That Includes Pretreatment Conditions?' ❑ Y'ES
Order Type, Number, P
S CODIN(l,
7s,Code
N
Nttn
urrent Number Of Cate Indus
NC'0024333
Nu
as
e,H
nfo Sheet(s)`.' Z
Are Milestone Dates Being Met? E YES NO Z NEB.
e.T `pe
Not Inspected By N)TW in the
d P(
'9c
ber of SIt.°s With No RIP, or With an I pired I
her of Stills ua SNC f°br Either Rcpot°ttng or Limits V'tolatioa)s ming Either of th
-Annual Periods (Total Number of Sills in SNC)
I. Numher of SR1s in SNC For Ret ortin I:)urrrt I:ith
Ann tat)1 Pe
(1YPI)
Inspector
S
P
Nu ber oFSILts Irt SNC Tor L.
ro. Number ofSltls In SNC For Both Reporting anc
Semi-annual Periods
Pe: INTERVIEW
1.7„ Since the Last PC
If Yes, What. are t
19,
20,
rig
oldie Last 2
ions Diann,: Either of the
d an
iods
st 2
0
PSNC.
NC
NPS
Since the Last PC'I, has the POT'W had any Problems I?.eI to an Indust
Discharge (Interference., Pass -Through, Blockage, CitiLCIN (ornF)
Sludge Production, Et:c:I?
if Yes, Iiow are these Proble¢ns Beira. Addressed''
Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or :Repo rting d'artnt
e ither c°tithe Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods'' Not Been Published for
Public. Notice?(Nay refer to PAR it Excessive Si Us in SNC)
5. tt-ruett:t4..c
Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders!? For all Sills on an
Order, Ilas a Signed Copy of the Carder been sent t.o the. Division':'
Are Any Pettxaits Or Civil Pentair
Ones'
littder Adjudication'.' if Yes, Which
'ES El NO
ferr i ratp'ts: Nunc
for° Reporting: None
'ublished: None.
IPISTtP FILE R.EVIE\Y'':
IsUTt lPr`S'FM.P Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate L.catit)tts rand. Frequencies'
2:3, Are Correct Detection I.,evels being use:.d for all 1.37°Ml"STMP Motitforing_? YES [_( NO
NO Is '.Table Adequate`)
ZYES L1NO
2d. Is 1..`l MP,'S`I"Ml' Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent?
25, All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Mont
2<a. UNO 1.o 23 - 26, list violaations:
?7, Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eh
If'sres_ "Itie1i ones? Elirninated:
nmate.d from or Added to 1... 1MP`STN1P? YES ZY()
Added:
• NO
Z YES LI NO
NC l) t) Pretreatment t.1o'nt1)1iance tnspcc(PC1) Forrrr
Paige

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
upporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date . In tile?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/22/10
® Yes ❑ No
6/1/05
1 Yes ❑ No
in review
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
9/18/10
® Yes ❑ No
12/8/09
® Yes ❑ No
10/1/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/24/07
® Yes III No
10/4/07
Xi Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
3/25/08
® Yes • No
6/13/08
// Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
3/21/07
Yes ❑ No
11/8/07
® Yes ❑ No
FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 lU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Turbomeca Manufacturing 2. Pilgrims Pride
3. CMC - Union •
30. IUP Number
CM-31
CM-28
CM=14
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes • No
►1 Yes ❑ No
L Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/12
6/30/12
6/30/10
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
NA
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes • No
// Yes ❑ No
4 Yes • No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
11 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
• Yes' ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►Z@Yes •No
b. ❑Yes ■No
a. ®Yes No
b. ■Yes •No
a. ®Yes ■No
b. ■Yes ■No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
El Yes ❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letterfrom the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►^Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ►Z@Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑Nv❑NIA
a. NYes •No
b.®YesDNo❑NIA
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
// Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
// Yes • No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
' Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
ElYes❑No❑NIA
NYes❑No❑NIA
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
❑Yes®No❑NIA
❑YesONo❑NIA
❑Yes®No❑NIA
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No®NA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
® Yes ❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW reample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event? .
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
6•❑YesQNo®NIA
c.❑Yes❑NolEIN/A
a.OYes❑No®NIA
b.❑YesQNoCENlA
c.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.121Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑NoDNIA
c.®Yes❑No❑NIA
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes 11 No
• Yes ® No
❑ Yes Z No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No[1N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑YescINO N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.IJYes❑Not3lN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoON/A
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.QYes❑No®NIA
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 1/ No
ri_a_...J '1 MC'fl7

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
34. Permit Application dates: Turbomeca Ma facturing„ 3/10109; Pilgrims Pride, 2117109; CMC-Union 2/17107
35. Inspection dates: Turbomeca Manufacturing, 1213/09; Pilgrims Pride, 10.122/09; CMC-Union, 12/15109
37. Turbomeca Manufacturing and the. POTW performed ITO analyses in 2009. The SW must submit a revised TONIP by June 15,
2010 or they will have to conduct TTO analyses.
39* The POTW has contract lab services with Shealy Labs. All chain of custody forms are complete and up to date.
40. Turbomeca Manufacturing uses Prism labs and all chain of custody forms are properly completed, Pilgrims Progress uses K&W
Labs, all chain of custody are properly completed. CMC-Union uses Prism Labs for contract services, all chain of custody forms are
completed properly.
41. Turbomcca Manufacturing, Pilgrims Progress, and CMC-Union all had late . . ittals ofther pi1l and slug control plan annual
revisions. Notices. of Noncompliance were issued for the reporting violations.
SUMMARY AN COMMENT
Comments:
'Ihe Sewer Use Ordinance and the En1rcerncnt '...e,sponse Plan were ipproved. by Council on 3./1 BIOS.
Requirements:
See the Program Elements Review Section of this report for due due.
Recommendations:
The City of Mon„roe Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable, Electronic filing is being, implemented to save resources, Keep up the
good work,
NOD: El YES Z NO
NOV: YES Z NO
(?NCR: EIYESZNO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory El Marginal Unsatisfactory_ El
6,, 11
PCI COMPLETED BY;
•
/Joh it Lesley, Mooresville Regional 9Wice
DATE; May 28, 2010
l'A‘Vrt L tntretninlintice inStleCt
1 pci .:td 7,'25:07 Page

• ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 30, 2010
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2009. Based on the review, it appears that the POTW completed
the PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: (704) 663-I 6991 Fax: [phone] \Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer-- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

Alficip7,4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 10; 2009
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Audit Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the subject facility
on July 8, 2009 by John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley at [phone].
Sincerely,
P-07 bert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Monti Hassan , PERCS Unit
Union County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
• North Carolina
7atllialf
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer —50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer paper

4%7A
NCDENR
Backiround infor
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
I Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2, Control Authority' Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum
3. Title(s) : Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4, Address of POTAki:
Street/Post Office Box 2401 Walkup Avenue/ POBo 69
City/State/Zip Code Monroe, INC 28111-0069
Phone Number 704-282-4832 Fax Number 7(14-283-2820 E-Mail kketchumi,riTeimooro
5, Audit Date 07/08/2009
6. Last Inspection Date: 08/2112008 Inspection Type: z PC. Audit
7, Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s) ? z Yes El No
if No, Explain.
R. in the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? Yes No
If Yes, Explain. Chronic toxicity failure 12/08, passed in 1/09 and 2/09 with CtiV>100`1/0
9, Is POTW under an Order 'Fhat Includes Pretreatment Conditions? LIIJ Yes J No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? Ei Yes LI No z
NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
,PCS (WENDR)Codine:
'Trans.Code
LNJ
Main Program iPermit Number
H!Ci0 0_1_2 j 4±_J 3 1.3_1
NIM/D1)/YY
07 LOS 09 1
(DTIA)
inspeCrype Inspector Fac. Type
(TYP1)
I 0, Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial 1Ssers (CIUS)?
12. Number of SlUs Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW ini„,ast Calendar Year?
14. Enter Higher Number of 12 or 1
15. Number of Silis with No 1UP, or with an Expired IUP
16. Number of SlUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SlUs in SNC)
17. Number of SlUs in SNC for Reporting,:During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
18, Number of Sills in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
19. Number of SlUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of LAM 2
Sem i-Ann ual Periods
20: Number of S Ws in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
(INSP) (FACC)
SlUS
C [US
NOIN
NOCM
PSNC
N1SNC
SNPS
SNIN
TAIXTri A 1 af 1:nrM
lulv 25, 2007 Page 1

. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
Last Submittal
Date In file?
4/21/05
9/30/04
5/24/07
3/25/08
3/21/07
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Last Approval
Date In file
6/1/05
10/16/04
*10/4/07
6/13/08
11/8/07
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
*Two approval letters were sent for the SUO, the first was dated 5/30/07 the most recent approval. is 10/4/07.
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Union County (Wingate, Marshville discharge to Union Co.)
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
24. If yes to #22, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 03/18/2008
26. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
3/1/10
10/1/09
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and'Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
30. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Mar_ginal U=Unsatisfactory
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
Reference Materials
Staff Training (i.e. AnnuaI and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
Rating
®S ❑M ❑U
Zs❑M❑U
® S ❑M ❑U
▪ ❑M ❑U
®S ❑M ❑U
®S❑M❑U
®S ❑M ❑U
two full time staff
1 truck assigned to Pretreatment, other vehicles available on an
as needed basis.
2 refrigerated samplers and 7 portable samplers. Ice is kept on
site in a freezer and supplied by a vendor.
Budgeted annually by Director, contingency funds are
available.
Internet, reference books
Annual conference, PAR Workshop 1/29/08. Budget contraints
may limit travel in 2009.

. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatrnent program".' es
Explain Yes or No. New system installed to backup data on network.
Howe does the PO FW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
Annual administration fee and permit application fee. A sewer surcharge prargratn is also enforced.
ubli
Particiraatio
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program
® Yes No Ryes, Explain. Industry closings and cut backs in production due to economy.
34. Has any one from the public, ever requested to re pretreatment program. files? Yes No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? A request must be made in writing, ales cannot leave
room, copies would he made at the pretreatment office. A small fee for copying would apply.
3). Has any industry ever requested that certain informati 7n rc taaaira w onfidential from the public" Yes Z No If yes Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping tiles confidential
from public,. Ifno, how would the request be addressed?. Files stored seperately in a secured room.
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically° meet with. industries to discuss pretreatment.? \ es No
No
37. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Luca
38. WW'ere all industries in SNC published in the last n
Permtting Indust
Survey-IWS):
odor, plant closittgc new or proposed plants)?
Yes
No
Yes[ No 1NA
39a.., Uowv' does the POTW become aware of nays° or changed Users? 'Water Resources I ngineering Dept. sends a short
1WS form. to each business applicant that requests water service. The short forms go to the. etreatment
C000rdinator, who evaluates the application, and if needed conducts a site visit and sends the customer a long IWS
form.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed l.?sers, how does the POTW deterinin.e Which industries have the
reasonable potential to adverseky° impact the WWII and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision`'' (Who is an
SIC➢?) 15A NCAC 2H.0900 regulatory requirements, IWS front information, potential to impact based on
industrial processes, pollutants of concern, and categorical determination.
40. Does the POT r°eceiv e vw° ste from an groundwater remediation pro acts I e'
'®Yes fNo Lf Y' es, flow many are
Please list each sate and hows permitted, if app
CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
Catalant Schrader and Bloomsburg Industries
4 Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable `.) Truck [�Tyeclicaa
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this ‘kaste?
randests required) sampling, designated point., no industrial waste accep
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
LJ Uniform Limits ® l Jo.torical Industry Need
Explain Other:
cd Pipe '[11 NA
example. designated point, samples drawn,
ed, local permit for septage only.
By Surcharge categorical. Limits Z Other
44, Review POTW's copies t)1 ettrent allocation tabi.es for each WWTP. Are there a.
Ify'cs, What parameters are over allocates"
45. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations'' nt IUP
NA
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve do future grcawkith; safety? Z Yes
If, yes, what percentage of each parameter 24° '0
47. Has the POTV/ experienced. any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adrudieati.
H yes, Explain.
48, hiow does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the Lavern
listed on the application limited, categorical parameters; NPDLS Po
v
a
f Concer)?
allocations? El Yes E No
to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
industry') Y`t.' No
triple: sere only those, pollutants
'.,ss,,.i hilv 75 2007
Page 3

Fr parameters and other metals, conventional parameters to establish a baseline, and pollutants of concern.
49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Flow rates and pollutant loading that could cause potential impacts to the system.
Permit Compliance:
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Reporting: track 30 days, due 20`h of each month. First violation is a
NOV with a penalty assessment, penalties esccalate with each day of late reporting and SNC. Failure to provide 24 hour
notification is a NOV with a penalty. Limits violations and SNC determination are based on Comprehensive Guidance
Manual.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
All SIUs must have a slug/spill control plan.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
All SRN must have a slug/spill control plan.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Most representative process wastewater location.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each tirne?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Must follow SOP for sampling.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for Metals Shealy Env. Services
Conventional Parameters Shealy Env. Services
Organics
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
Commercial labs used for all pretreatment sampling. Must be certified by NC Laboratory Certification Section. Chain of
custody forms must be properly filled out and a copy sent with each sample event's data.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA):
60a. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
60c. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
60d. All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO
60e. If NO to any above, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added: '
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone ( )
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) ['Increased average flow ❑NPDES limits change
['More LTMP data available ❑Resolve over allocation ®5 year expiration ❑Other
Explain.
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ❑inhibition ® Pass Through ❑Sludge Quality
.. -.--'- '- -'--ne nnn-v
Page 4

64. Do you see a.ny wav to !!!crease your loading
Explain, '<V%%TP expansion.
ua'e (Example. obtainland for sludge disposal)"?
i1)
Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or change
No.
RIA
66. User' Name
67, EUP Nu
USER PERM
68. Dues File Contain
6
"xt iration Da
70, Categorica
71
to
73. a. Does File Contain
b. Il No, is One Needed`
74. 40 CFR 41.3 and 433 T"I
Organic Management Plan ('
a
dart!
p
UP) FILE RE '
Norton Door
40 CFR, £k:.tc.) Or N/A
e Contain Permit Application Completed'itltitt
rtit Issue Date?
e Contain Inspection Completed 'itltin I ast C.aIcnd<
Control Plan?
ion Fon
O
o the WW "P that may affect pretreatment'.'
. Cotat tan Techno
Certification Does File Contain a Toxic
OMP)?
75. a, Does File Contain Origin al Permit Review Letter frorrt Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
76. During Most Recent 'Semi -Annnal Period, Did PO"CW Corn
Sampling as Required by .IL.JI'', including Flow?'
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
78. During MostRecent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete it
Sampling as Required by 1UP:, including Flow"'
79, .During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did 511J submit all reports on
80a. For categorical It `s itll 'otni
file. include +rocess='dilution t
d
fined Waste
ws as Re t.
cant Formula
IC.IP'°
cal lUs with Production based limits, does file inclu
ates and!`or fit tFs as Required by IFJP°?
st Recent Se
itrri'ts Non -Compliance
ruring.Mc st. Recent Semi
porting Non -Compliance fro
T't' Not
g Violations?
ndustry Resample and submit results to PO I` V wittin 30 Days":'
If applicable, did PO'FW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becoming aware of SRI limit violations in the POTW's sampling of 5Ili?
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU J in SNC?
i Annual Period, Did POTW .Ider:
iaom Both PO'I`W and SRI Sarnpl
d, Did PC7`1
`?4 Hours
Self-
85. l;)uring Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken as
tinning, etc.)''
86.
87,
88,
Specified in POTW's ERP (NOVs, Pen
Does File Contain Penalt
Does File Contain Proof C,ollection`s'
a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders°?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
9. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in. Obtaining Any R
Information For You?
e
ed
CM 16
6d30/2010
4
El
a. " =es ❑No
b. ❑Yes No
No❑'S A
s ONO
b a"tN❑N
Yes
Yes [J N
s❑No❑
oNIA
NoA
❑No
❑NoD
No©N`A
Yes
No
N/A
1"es❑ oD2
Pipe
6/0
Yes ❑
❑NoENIA
es :No
es❑4o❑NIA
Yes ❑'+JoN./ A
No❑N/A
"es ❑No
"es ❑No
a. ryes ❑No
b, Yes0-No0N/A
Yes [ No
ez(No
e•s❑No❑N%A
y'es❑No❑N''A
ICYesDNu-N/A
es❑No0N/A ❑Yes❑NoIN.`
es❑"tolN` ❑ ONta�N,`<
Ye ❑Nod :E.' a.❑YesDSo N'A
Yes❑No, Nr'A. b Yes❑Ni N A
'es 1 No Yes No
t �zs � m. �� A,..44rro ,-o.,

LE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Permit applications: Norton Door Controls 5/4/04; Goulston Tech. 2/23/07; Charlotte Pipe 2/15/07
72. Inspections: Norton Door Controls 10/16/08; Goulston Tech. 11/12/08; Charlotte Pipe 10/28/08.
79. Goulston Tech. failed to notify the POTW of BOD and pH limit violations. Civil penalty assessed and BOD and pH were resampled.
87. Proof of penalty payment is maintained on file consisting of a stamped paid invoice.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
N
Cl0
0
2
4
3
3 I
MM/DD/YY
07
08 r 09
(DTIA)
Inspection type
(TYPI)
1. Industry Inspected: Norton Door Controls
2. Industry Address: 3000 Hwv 74E, Monroe, NC 28112
3. Type of Industry/Product: Door closures and hardware
4. Industry Contact: Jim Zell Title: Environment and Safety Manager Phone: [phone] Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes 111 No
D. Sampling Review ® Yes El No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Inspector Facility Type
11
2
(INSP) (FACC)
Industrial Inspection Comments:
The SIU has operates an evaporator. The process wastewater flow has decreased from approximately 25,000 to 500 gallons per
month. Ash and sludge is taken off site for disposal.
SUMMARY AND' COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: The City of Monroe pretreatment program is commendable. All aspects of the program are well organized
and managed.
Requirements: See the Program Elements Review Section of this report for due dates.
Recommendations: Request an extension of the due date for the HWA. The facilities NPDES Permit expired on I/31/09 and has
vet to be reissued.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: El Yes ® No
QNCR: El Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Mar in 1 ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
A .G
Audit COMPLETED BY: rt,. ,, DATE: July 10, 2009
Jo sley, Mooresville Re tonal Office
Nf'. DWfl Pretreatment Audit. Form Revised: July 25. 2007
Page 6

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 22, 2008_
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on August 21, 2008 by John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Enclosure
Sincerely,
/
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protec ion Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
Monti Hassan , PERCS Unit
Union County Health Department
Mailing Address
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Location
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina
NoO c Carolina
urailly
Internet: www.newaterqualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

if7 NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
.BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info DatAbase Sheel(s)l
Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
Control Authority .Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum
3, Title(s) : Pretreatment Prog,ram. Coordinator
Last Inspection Date: 515/07 :Inspection Type: E PCI E Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? Z YES El NO
6, Is POTW under an Order That Includes, Pretreatment Conditions? \ ES Z NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? El YES EJ NO Z NA
PCS CODING
Trans„Code
Main Program .Permit Number
NC0024333
7. CUITeEII Number Of Signifieant Indusiria
t Number Of Categ
, Nu
sers
ical Industria ers CI s'?
fSIUs Not Inspected By Pl
s Not Samp ed.
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 o
12. Number of Ws With No 1UP, or
p
he
MMIIDDINTY
08/21/08
(DTIA)
ast Calendar Year?
ast Calendar Year?
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
inspector
'SP)
13
0
lac., Type
1
(FACC)
SIDS
NOIN
NOC
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Viola Tons During Either ofthe Las
Serni»Annual Periods (Total Number of STUs in SNC)
14. Number • 'Sllifs in SNC For Reporting During Either ofthe 1,ast 2 SeTniAnnual ?eriods,
PSNC
I+.4SNC
15, Number of SIDS In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
NPS
16. Number of SIDS itt SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During 'Either of the Last 2
Senn -annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last 'PCI„ has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these ProblemBeing Addressed?
18. Since the East PCI, has. the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, ('itizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed'?
1,9, 'Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual. Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive Sills in SNC)
20,
21.
E YES rj NO
Cyanide daily maximum, 3/2008.,
The violation .did not recur,
AIIMPIONIMMW
YES NO
The cyanide violation (above
most likely lab error.
SNC for : Bloomsburg Ho
SNC for Reporting:
Not Published: None
Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SI s on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
LEY P/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LIMPISTMP Monitoring 'Being, Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies?
23, Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LIMP/STMP 'Monitoring? Z YES 111 NO
24. Is ur MP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent'? Z YES 0 NO Is Table. Adequate? YES LI NO
25., All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? YES NO
26, If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27 Should any 'Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LIMP/STMP? El VES NO
If ves, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NO
NO
NC DWQ Pretreatment Cornpliancc lnspecuon (PC1). 1orm Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

RETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
eir files, complete with supporting, documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
. . . _
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/14/05
II Yes ❑ No
6/1/05
® Yes ❑ No
3/1/10
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
1
9/26/04
4 Yes ❑ No
10/16/04
® Yes ❑ No
10/1/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/23/07
Yes • No
10/4/07
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
3/24/08
® Yes ❑ No
6/13/08
).. Yes • No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
3/19/07
11 Yes ❑ No
11/8/07
® Yes ■ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Pilgrims Pride 2. Norton Door Controls
3. Tyson
30. IUP Number
' CM28
CM16
CM11
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
// Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
p.m Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/09
6/30/10
6/30/10
33. Categorical Standard Applied (LE. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
433
NA
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
Yes • No
// Yes ❑ No
►1 Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
Yes ❑ No
1/ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. 4 Yes ❑No
b. ■ Yes ■ No
a. ®Yes ■ No
b. ■ Yes ■ No _
a. ►i Yes ■ No
b. •Yes ■ No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. NYes ❑No
b.EYes❑No❑NIA
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a. @Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
/1 Yes ❑ No
./ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF); does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑ Yes ❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
■ Yes ■NoJNA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a. Cries ❑No®NIA
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
c.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No®NIA
c.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.0Yes ❑No❑N!A
c.®Yes❑Ne❑NIA
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes ❑N°EIN/A
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.❑YcsONoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b:OYesDNo®NIA
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes 11 No
❑ Yes 1i No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Question 34: Permit Application Dates - Pilgrims Pride 5/23/06; Norton Door Controls 2/27/07; Tyson 1/18/07 (modification).
Question 35: Inspection Dates: Pilgrims Pride 12/11/07; Norton Door Controls 10/19/07; Tyson 11/20/07, No significant issues were
found during the inspections.
Question 44: Tyson reported noncompliance for aminonia. The SIU has to sample two times per week.
Question 46: Tyson was issued Notices of Violation for ammonia noncompliance.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
The new Enforcement Response Plan has been sent to all StUs.
ATI Allvac-Bakers Plant begin discharging on 8/6/08 a small amo n . of process aterand potable water from a tank test. A formal
inspection has not been conducted at this time.
Requirements:
See the Program Elements Review Section of this Report.
Recommendations:
NOD: LI YES NO
NOV: El YES 1 NO
QNCR: YES Z NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory' L1 Marginal ED Unsatisfacto
PCI COMPLETED BY:_
,esley, Mooresville Region
DATE: August 22, 2008
NC DWQ Pretreatment Comp 1onn Updated 7125/07 Page 3

J A Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7
IC
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 19, 2007
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2006. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and
guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The
next PAR will be due March 1, 2008.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
`John Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Tom Ascenzo, PERCS Unit
Central Files
Noe Carolina
Attura/1y
c
NCDENs
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
e�-

f?AnCarolina
Naturally
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 20, 2006
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on February 16, 2006 by John Lesley of this Office. The City's
Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: - Central Files
Pretreatment Unit — Jon Risgaard
Union County Health Department
\t‘ LEA_
AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] FAX 704-6
Customer Service Phone: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NCDENR
4,t1Frn.f CAPeoL114.4. at.04.421Ae.t.
Ew.140,..4.6wor,
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION IComplete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)t
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2 Control Authority Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 04 /19 /2005 Inspection Type: PCI [1:1 Audit
5, Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? El Yes E No
6, Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? EJ Yes No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? LI Yes E] No NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
LNJ
Main Program Permit Number
N1C10 10 12 14
3 3
7, Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
Current Number Of Categoricalndustrial Users (C U
M M/DD/YY
1 16 06
(DTIA)
9, Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the st Calendar Year?
O. Number of SIUs Not Sampled I3y POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
Inspec.Type
LE
(TYPI)
2. Number ofS1Us With No IUP, or ith an Expired IUP
. Number of SlUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of S1Us in SNC)
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either ofthe Last 2 Semi -Annual Period
15. Number of SlUs In SNC ForLirnits Violations During Either ofthe ast 2 Semi -Annual Periods
16, Number of SlUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
Inspector Fac, Type
HILs
(INSP) (FACC)
13
0
0
0
SIUS
Clus
NOIN
NOC
PSNC
SNC
SNPS
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PC1, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PC!, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
Yes DNo
Chronic Toxicity 10/05
see comments
SNC Brooks Food Group
SNC for Reporting: Brooks Food Group
Not Published: None
20, Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SlUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
Filename: Monroe0506pci
Revised: 6/30/98
Page

TMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
6/1/05
3/1/10
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
10/16/04
10/1/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
3/15/01 .
12/1/06
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
4/12/0I
.
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/22/02
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? Z Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
26. User Name 1. Swanson Sheetmetal 2. Bloomsburg Mills
3. Allvac-Monroe
27. IUP Number
CM23
CM10
CMI5
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
►/ Yes ❑ No
29. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/07
6/30/08
. 6/30/07
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
471
3I. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
/1 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
1/ Yes • No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
1/ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. 0Yes •No
b. ■Yes E No
a. ►Z4Yes ■No
b. ['Yes ■ No
a. _EYes No
b. •Yes ■ No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®N/A
ElYes❑No❑NIA
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. 0 Yes ■ No
b.ElYes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ■ No
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. 0 Yes ■ No
b.(83Yes❑No❑N/A
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
Yes ❑ No
►1 Yes ❑ No
l/ Yes ❑ No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
// Yes ❑ No
11 Yes ■ No
11 Yes ❑ No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No[N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
39. Does Sampling Indicate FIow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
o )(es❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and STU Sampling?
/1 Yes • No
• NA
1/ Yes • No
❑ NA
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did IndustryResample Within 30 Days?
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes®No❑N/A
b. •Yes Milo
b. _EYes ❑No
b. 0Yes CND
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
❑YesDNo®NIA
® Yes ❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ►/ No
❑ Yes 1/ No
U Yes ®No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑ Yes ❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
0 Yes❑No❑N/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoElN/A
❑ Yes ❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoEINiA
b.❑YesDNo123N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑NOON/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 1. No
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: Monroe0506pci
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Bloomburg Mills was issued Notices of Violation dated 6/11/05 for copper and 622/05 for tetrachloroethane, and for failure to notify
the POTW within 24 hours of first knowledge of permit noncompliance.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments:
1. Brooks Food Group was in SNC during January -June 2005 for reporting and limits violations.
2. The POTW violated the toxicity limit in October 2005. Subsequent tests passed; therefore, a source of the toxicity could not
be determined.
3. L.D. Davis, IUP No. CM27 was dropped (approval from the DWQ on 7/27/2005) because the SIU ceased discharge. The
POTW removed the pipe that connected the facility to the sewer system.
Requirements: See the Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations: The City's Pretreatment Program is most commendable.
NOD: C] Yes 1 No
NOV: 0 Yes 4 No
QNCR: 0 Yes I4 No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Marginal 0 Unsatisfactory 0
/
John Lesley, Mooresville Regional Office
DATE: 2/17/ 2006
Filename: Monroe0506pci
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 3

0c. NiArFRQG
tir
Michael F. Easley, G vernor
William G. Ross Jr., ecretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 22, 2005
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on April 19, 2005 by John Lesley of this Office. The City's
Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
-../51 D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
l Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor -
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Pretreatment Unit — Jon Risgaard
Union County Health Department
Nt�i'rthCarolina
;Naturally
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone]
NCDENR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

ATAk
NCDENR
�,. C...o,..,
-....w....V Rz,o,.C..
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)I
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Kyle Ketchum Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Titie(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
monroenc.org
4. Last Inspection Date: 04 /13 /2005 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans. Co de-
IN1
Main Program Permit Number
INICIn In I, 14 I1 li Ii 1
MM/DD/YY
I04119 12n1
lnspec.Typc
I P I
Inspector
IsI
Fac. Type
(DILA) (TYPI)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
(INSP)
(FAC(
SIUS
13
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
5
CIUS
9. Number of STUB Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
.
2
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
_ _ 0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
2
SNPS
16. Number of STUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the. Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
LI Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
SNC for Limits: Norton Door/ Swanson
SNC for Reporting: None
Not Published: None
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If -Yes, Which
Ones?
None
El Yes ® No
Filename: Monroe PCI 0405
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 1

PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Dale of Last Approval
Date Next Duc, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (II WA)
. 12/71(11
4/1/06 .
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
10/16/04
• 10/1/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SILO)
3/15/01
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
4/2/01
Long Term Monitoring flan (LTMP)
7/22/02
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? © Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? © Yes ❑ No is the Table Adequate? L Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
26. User Name
1. Tyson Foods, Inc. 2,
3.
27. IUP Number
CM-1 I
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
© Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
29. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/05
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR. Etc.) Or N/A
NA
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
© Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year'?
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. 0 Yes ONo
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. • Yes ❑No
b. EYes ❑No
a. • Yes ■No
b. ❑Yes ■No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑No0N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. [Wes ENo
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ['Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
© Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-Custodv Forms?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoONIA
❑Yes❑NOON/A
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
E Yes ❑ No
■ NA
❑ Yes • No
❑ NA
❑ Yes • No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a.E1Yes❑No❑NIA
b. ®Yes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
b. ■Yes ❑No
b. EYes •No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Art Violations (Per ERP)?
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period. Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
ElYes❑No0N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Ycs❑NoElN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No N/A
❑Ycs❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NOON/A
h.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
hi: Yes❑No N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Filename: Monroe PCI O4O5
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Codc Main Program Permit Number MM/DD(VY lnspcc.Typc Inspector Fac.
! N 1 I N I ('1 o I 0 1_2 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 04 1 1'9 1 0-; 1 LLJ LaJ 1 2 1
(DTlA> (TIP!) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected: 'Tyson Foods, Inc.
2. Industry Address: 233 South Secrest Avenue, Monroe. NC
3. Type of Industry/Product: Chicken Processing
4. Industry Contact: Andrew Hagler Title: Complex Environmental Manager
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour 1E1 Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review ® Ycs ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
Tyson Foods, Inc. is allowed to pump stormwater for the first 30 minutes of a storm event to the Off -Fall Building and subsequently
to the DAF. This stormwater discharge is deemed a special case with approval from the POTW Director consistent with the City's
Sewer Use Ordinance. The pump tank also serves as a means of spill containment in the parking lot. In the event of a spill the
material can be pumped to the pretreatment system for treatment and discharge to the collection system.
A large EQ Basin (no longer in use) is located on site also.
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
The IUP for Tyson Foods, Inc. is currently being modified for reissuance (expires 6l30/2005).
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: The Ci1v's Industrial Pretreatment Program is very commendable. All records were well organized and up-to-date.
Requirements: Sec the Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations: Include the addition of the stormwater side stream in the IUP.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Ratinz:
Satisfactory IZ
PCI COMPLETED BY.
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory CI
i
Jo esley, Mooresville Regio Office
DATE: April 21, 2005
Filename: Monroe PCI 0405 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

6616
OF p Michael F. ley. Governor y,
O North Carolina William G. Ro Ir.. Secretary
GDepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
stagemataantar
--I Division of Water Quality
Coleco H. Sullins_ Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 15, 2004
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Audit
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on April 15, 2004 by John Lesley of this Office. The City's.Pretreatment Program is
commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Pretreatment Unit
Union County Health Department
JL
One
sNatural! NorthCarolina ►
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] - Customer Service
1-877-623-6748 -

r
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCGa•YDENIR PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
M�.
I
5. Audit Date 04/13/2004
6. Last Inspection Date: 03/18/2003 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain. NPDES flow limit violations in February, March, April, 2003. Civil Penalties assessed for March
and April 2003.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Coding
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
INI INICI0 10 I2 14 I3 13 I3 I I04I13I041 ICI • Is I . LiJ
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
14
SIUS
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)?
5
CIUS
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
14. Enter the Higher Number of 12 or 13
0
NOIN
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-AnnuaFPeriods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
1
PSNC
16. Number of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
0
17. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
0
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
0
SNIN
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

• a • 1A A_.. 1 A
I'LL VIL►►-rlease re‘ lelvru
hies anu complete uie IoiIowmi:
rProgram Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
12/07/2001
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
02/22/2002
10/01/2004
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
03/15/2001
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
04/02/2001
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
07/22/2002
Legal Authoritic(Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
21. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Wingate, Marshville, Union County
22. If yes to #21, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agfeements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
23. If yes to #21, Have you -had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
24. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 01/16/2001
25. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
26. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
27. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
28. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
NA
Resources
29. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
®S ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
®S ❑M ❑U
-
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
►ZI S ■ M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sarpling and/or Analysis
ZS ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
®S ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
S ■ M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
®S ❑M ❑U
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit form

3U. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. Excel Spreadsheets
31. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Prograrn from their industries? Explain.
Yearly administration fee, surcharge program, IUP Application fee
Public Perception/ Participation
32. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
33. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, Explain,procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? Provide a written request, SIU is notified.
34. Does the POTW have a procedure in place that addresses requests by an industry for certain information to remain confidential?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Confidential material is marked and the files are kept separate.
35. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
36. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes 0_ No
37. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes ❑ No
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
38. How does the POTW determine which industries have the reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and
therefore require a permit? (Who is an SIU?) IWS Survey, IUP Application, PT staff inspections, Comprehensive
Guidance document.
39. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or IandfIl leachate?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, How many are there? 3 - Bloomsburg (included in IUP), RP Shearer (local IUP) and Schrader
Automotive (local IUP)
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable: See above
40. Does the POTW accept waste•by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
41. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Portable toliet and septage are taken at designated point by permit only.
42. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ❑ Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
43. Review copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated? 2 Bis Ethyl Hexyl Phalate in influent samples - effluent sampling shows
nondetect
44. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
45. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter 20%
46. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in aIIocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
47. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
All the above, plus sludge requirements in 503 Regs.
48. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Potential to impact based on flow rates and historical data.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Dn....

49. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
requirements and permit conditions as well as for SNC Compliance judged d data is received
th Non -reporting data
50. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
is u a as sampleand Compliance
Judgement Worksheets are completed each 6 mon
ths. s. on-repor ing ofa a is considered SNC.
51. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
52. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug and spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
53. What criteria are used to determine if a slug control plan is needed?
All SHJs must develop a slug/spill control plan per City policy.
54. What criteria does the POTW use to review a submitted slug control plan?
Contact information, mitigation procedures, chemical storage, and materials on -site.
55. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Most representative location of the process wastewater discharge.
56. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: swirling the sample bucket uniformly) ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, Explain. SOP developed
57. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for
Metals Pace metals General Engineering mercury method 163I on effluent.
Conventional Parameters Pace/ Prism (BOD)
Organics Pace
58. ExpIain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
Use of chain of custody forms are required for all samples.
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
59. Is LTMP maintained in a table? ® Yes ❑ No
Review Data and Explain. Complete and up-to-date.
60. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone ( j
61. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply)
❑Increased average flow ®NPDES limits change ®Other
['More LTMP data available ['Resolve over allocation 05 year expiration
Explain. WWTP Expansion
62. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA?
❑inhibition ® Pass Through ['Sludge Quality
63. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain. WWTP Expansion
Summary
64. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
Expansion of WWTP.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

r. User Name
. rUP Number
.ND[ STRi- . USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 iUP FILE REVIEWS)
1. Gold Signature
2. ORO Manufacturing
. Does File Contain Current Permit.
. Permit Expiration Date
. Categorical Standard Applied (LE. 40 CFR. Etc.) Or NIA
. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
71 Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
72. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan'?
b. If No. is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
73. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
74. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
75. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
76. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
77. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
78. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
79. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
80. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self -
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
81. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
82. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period. Was the SIU in SNC
83. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP?
84. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
85. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
36. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
87. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
CM-05
® Yes ❑ No
06/30/2006
NA
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
a. ®Yes ENo
b. ❑Yes ENo
❑Yes❑No®NIA
a. ®Yes ENo
b. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑No
Yes❑No❑NIA
Ycs❑No❑N/A
3. Allvac
CM-25
® Yes ❑ No
06/30/2004
433
O Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ENo
b. ❑Yes ❑No
®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ® Yes ❑ No❑ NIA
® Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
I Yes❑No❑NIA
® Yes ❑ No
a.❑Yes❑NeDN/A
b. ®Yes ENo
ElYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
�C1 Yes ❑ No
a.❑Ycs❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes ENo
®Yes❑No❑NIA
CM-15
1
® Yes ❑NoI
06/30/2004 1
471
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
a. ®Yes [No
b. ['Yes ❑No
®Yes❑No❑NIA
see comments
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑No
®Yes❑No❑NIA
Yes❑No❑N/A
Yes ❑ No
a.�Yes❑No❑N/A
b. ®Yes ENo
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑ Yes ®No
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑i /A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑YesCEINo❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑ Yes ® No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Gold Signature Foods was in SNC in the January - June 2003 period.
Allvac must certify for TTO because their QA/QC lab is considered a 40 CFR 433 industry.
❑ Yes
No
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
a. ❑Yes❑ No®NIA
b.❑Yes❑NG®N/A
Yes ® No
❑ Yes
N
Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
b.❑Yes❑NOON/A •
❑ Yes
No
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number
LsLJ I N I C I 0 H H 14 3 13 I_3 1
1. Industry Inspected: Gold Signature Foods
2. Industry Address: 2701 Simpson Street, Monroe. NC 28112
3. Type of Industry/Product: Processed chicken products •
4. Industry Contact: Kevin Tucker Title: Warehouse Manager
MM/DD/YY
04 1 13 1 04 I
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
LL!
(TYPI)
Phone: [phone] Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Inspector Fac. Type
IS I I
(INSP) (FACC)

A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial inspection Comments:
Gold Signature Foods has implemented a program to take waste cooking oil and batter to rendering. The result has been to
more efficiently operate the wastewater treatment system and lower the strength (BOD, TSS) in the discharge.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: The Citv's Pretreatment Program is most commendable.
Requirements: See the Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations: None
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: El Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory El
Audit COMPLETED BY:
Marmal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Jo n Lesley, Mooresville Re ' nal Office
DATE: April 15, 2003
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Dr."... 4

Michael F. Easley, Gover r
William G. Ross Jr., Secret r�y
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour s
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 7, 2005
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for
the reporting period of January through December 2004. Based on the review, it appears that the
POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John Lesley
of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
cri D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
/ Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Cc: PERCS Unit — Jon Risgaard
Central Files
JL
North Caro linu
7Vaiurallf
4 CLIEN t
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional office, 610 E, Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623.6748

Michael F. Easley. G error
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Deputy Dirotor
Division of Watew Quality
•
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
March 29, 2004
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for
the reporting period of January through December 2002. Based on the review, it appears that the
POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John Lesley
of this Office at [phone].
Cc: Pretreatment Unit - Central Office
Central,Files T
JL
NorthCarolina
eXaturally
Sincerely,
c
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
MCDENrt
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] - Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

11Ankis,/
of WATE9
Michael F. Easley
Governor
9
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Air
:NCDENR
March 20, 2003
Mr. Russell Colbath
Water Resources Manager
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
City_of Monroe
NPDES Permit No. NC0024333
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Colbath:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on March 18, 2003 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office. The City's
Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
•
Sincerely,
4A. <27
. Rex Gleason, P.
_Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Dana Folley, Pretreatment Group
Union County Health Department
JL
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748
FAX [phone]

NCDENR
•.,,,H. DC.,.A ..'.a,
N.nn.- flrea:wrY1
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1.
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Monroe
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Mr. Kyle Ketchum Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail:
4. Last Inspection Date: 3 /04 /2002 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
INI
Main Program Permit Number
NI CI n 10 12 14 1 3 1 3 13 1
MM/DD/YY
10311R103I
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
IPf
(TYPI)
Inspector
Is1
(INSP)
Fac. Type
1 I
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
14
S1US
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
5
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of STUB With No EUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
2
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC.For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
2
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, BIockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
SIudge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
I 9. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
SNC for Limits: See Comments Section
SNC for Reporting: NA
Not Published: NA
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: Monroe pci 0203
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 1

TREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Date of Last Approval Date Next Due, If Applicable
Program Element
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
12/7/01 4/1/06
2/22/02
3/15/01
• 4/2/01
7/22/02
10/1/04
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTM.P Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. . Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVI
26. User Name
27. IUP Number
1. Tyson
2. Pilgri
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
29. Permit Expiration Date
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit. Issue Date?
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self -
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
is Pride
3. ACME/GM
CM-11
CM28
CM20
® Yes • No
8 Yes
III No ,
Yes • No
6/30/03
6/30/04
6/30/05
NA
433
NA
-•
Yes ❑ No
® Yes ■ No
!• Yes ❑ No
13 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
a. ®Yes ■No
b. ❑Yes ■No ,
a. ►3Yes ONo
b. Yes ❑No
a. ►I Yes ■No
b. ❑Yes LINo
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑NoGINIA e
a. ■Yes No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ®Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑NotEN/A
• Yes ❑ No
® Yes • No
® Yes ❑ No
• Yes 111 No
.
0.
Yes ❑ No
f l Yes ❑ No
_
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
ElYes❑No❑NIA
ElYes❑No❑N/A
ElYesONo❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
r l� Yes ❑ No
_ ❑ NA
® Yes ■ No
❑ NA
0 Yes ❑ No
■ NA _
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. ®Yes ■No
a.®YesONo❑N/A
b. ®Yes ■No
a.ElYes❑NoDN/A
b. 0 Yes ❑No
1 ®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
_
//
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes /.4 No -
ElYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A f
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑YesDNo®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑YesDNolEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑NOON/A
b.❑Yes❑NotilNIA
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.❑YesDNo®NIA
a.❑Yes❑NooN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑ Yes • No
_
• Yes ® No
❑ Yes 1l No
Filename: Monroe pci 0203
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Tyson: SIU Inspection date 12/10/02. (See PCI comments below).
2. Pilgrim's Pride: SIU Inspection date 12/9/02. No IUP approval Ietter — permit modification (name change) submitted on 11/8/02
3. ACME/GM Nameplate: SIU Inspection 11/12/02
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments:
1. Tyson was in SNC for copper limit violations in the period July -December 2002. Goulston Technologies was in SNC for BOD
limit violations in the period July -December 2002.
Requirements: See the Pretreatment Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations: The City's Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory 0
esley, Mooresville I Tonal Office
DATE: March 20, 2003
Filename: Monroe pci 0203 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph,D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2002
Mr. Kyle Ketchum
City of Monroe
Post Office Box 69
Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0069
Subject: PAR Review
City of Monroe
NPDES Permit No, NC0024333
,w.{ n County, NC
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) or
the reporting period of January through December 2001. Based on the review, it appears that the
POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment. Prograrns,
If you have any questions concerniirg your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John Lesley
of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
,D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Dana Foll.ey, Pretreatment Unit Cent Office
Central Files
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]