20060952 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20110204

C'� OR52_
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report — MY04
q c
Orange and Durham Counties, NC �c�C.��s�
Basin 03030002 — Contract # D050011 -2
Submitted to:
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: November 2006
Data Collection: 2010
Submitted: December 2010

Monitoring and Design Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Kristin Knight -Meng
Email: kristin.knitzht- men2(a)kci.com
KCI Project No: 12054252
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030003 2010 - MY04

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Objectives ...... ..... .... . ........ . ......... .. .. ... ...... .... ...... . 1
1.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach... . . .. ...... 1
1.3 Location and Setting ..... . .. ....... .. ... . ..... . ..... ... ...... . .. .. 1
14 Project History and Background. .. .... .. .... . .. ... . .. ......... 1
2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS .......................... 6
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ...... ... .. ...... .... ....... 6
2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment Tables . ....... . ...... .. . 6
LIST OF TABLES
Table I Project Restoration Components.. . .... ... . . .. .. .. . . . I
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History . ... .. . .......... . ...... 3
Table 3 Project Contact Table.. .. .... . .. ........ .. ....... .... ... .. ... 3
Table 4. Project Background Table... ..... . ...... .. . ..... .. . ...... .. ... . .... . 3
Table 5 Hydrologic Monitoring Results . .. ..... ... .. . .. . . ..... ... 6
Table 6. Hydroperiod History ........ .. . . . .. . . . ... ............... . ... ... . .... .... 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I Vicinity Map ... ......... . ..... .. .... ... 2
Figure 2 Site Map ...... . . ... ......... .. ........ . .. .. ..... ..... 4
Figure 3. Monitoring Plan View........ ... . . ... . . ...... ...... .... ..... .... . .. 5
APPENDIX A — VEGETATION DATA
APPENDIX B — HYDROLOGIC MONITORING AND HYDROPERIOD
APPENDIX C — PHOTO LOG
Brown Farm Weiland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Project restored 24 6 acres and enhanced 3 3 acres of
riparian wetland New Hope Creek, which runs adjacent to the site, has a contributing drainage
area of 33.3 square miles (21,331 acres) at the downstream limits of the site and is located within
USGS 8 -digit HUC 03030002 and NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -06 -05 of the Cape Fear River Basin
The 46 1 -acre project site is located on an active floodplain of New Hope Creek along the
Orange - Durham County line. The restoration was completed to achieve the following objectives.
• Restore aquatic /terrestrial habitat
• Improve water quality
• Increase groundwater recharge
• Enhance nutrient cycling
• Restore a native bottomland hardwood community
Project construction occurred in November 2006 Construction involved plugging and filling
ditches, installing level spreaders, and creating microtopography The site was planted with native
trees and shrubs common to Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood communities Following
construction and planting, baseline data collection occurred in February 2007 This report
describes the fourth year of monitoring that took place in 2010
Vegetation was planted at densities of approximately 436 and 100 -200 stems per acre in the
restored and enhanced wetlands, respectively Twenty vegetation plots are monitored to assess
planted vegetation survivability, growth, and vigor The fourth year of monitoring counted an
average of 310 planted stems /acre, which is slightly below the success criterion of 320
stems /acre However, the site averages 1,020 total stems /acre, which includes woody volunteers
in the monitoring plots excluding red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua) Supplemental planting with bare root trees was conducted at the site in the winter of
2009 /2010 The planting stock was selected to be larger than traditional bare root material A few
of the monitoring plots had planted trees in them An assessment of the site's vegetation found
Chinese privet (Ligustrum slnense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and multiflora
rose (Rosa multlflora) on the outskirts of the site with Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) and
thistle (Cirslum sp ) observed within the site These species will continue to be monitored to
determine if other corrective action is necessary Fourth year monitoring found the vegetation
component of the project to be on track to meeting the success criteria
The hydrology success criterion states that groundwater must be within 12 inches of the soil
surface in excess of 12 consecutive days (5% of the growing season) at each well During 2010,
wetland hydrology was achieved at all seven wells in the restoration area and the well in the
reference wetland, with five of the seven wells having hydropenods longer than 12 5% of the
growing season
The daily rainfall data depicted on the gauge data graphs were obtained from the on -site
precipitation gauge The precipitation gauge was installed in 2006 prior to project
implementation Daily rainfall data were obtained from the State Climate Office of North
Carolina for Durham, North Carolina to confirm on -site precipitation data. The combined
precipitation data show that the site experienced normal precipitation during the 2010 growing
season
Site photographs were taken from permanent photo points established throughout the site Photo
documentation facilitates the qualitative evaluation of wetland conditions The photo point
locations were selected in order to document representative site conditions
The results of the fourth year of monitoring of the Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Project
indicate that the site is on track to meeting the project's success criteria
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Project Objectives
• Restore aquatic /terrestrial wildlife habitat
• Improve water quality
• Increase groundwater recharge
• Enhance nutrient cycling
• Restore a native bottomland hardwood community
1.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Before restoration, the land use was primarily agricultural for at least the past 50 years The wetland was
restored by plugging and filling drainage ditches throughout the site, removing ditch spoil from wooded
areas to restore natural drainage patterns, placing water diversion features to redistribute the surface
hydrology, recreating microtopography across the site to enhance surface water retention and storage, and
planting the site with Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood Forest species
1.3 Location and Setting
The Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Site is located within the 03030002 (Upper Cape Fear 02)
Watershed Cataloging Unit (8 -digit HUC) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Sub -
basin 03 -06 -05 (Figure 1) New Hope Creek, which runs adjacent to the site, has a contributing drainage
area of 33 3 square miles (21,331 acres) at the downstream limits of the project Jordan Lake is
approximately 11 miles downstream of the site The project watershed is located within the Piedmont
physiographic province and is part of the Triassic Basins Level IV Ecoregion.
1.4 Project History and Background
Table 1. Project Restoration Components
Project Name- Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
ti.
u
o
0
y
CL
Segment / Reach iD
w�
F
Q
Q
g 04
Brown Farm
24 6
R
-
246
1 0
246
Brown Farm
33
E
-
33
05
1 7
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonriparian
Total
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Buffer
Stream I
(Ac)
Ac
Ac
Ac
Comment
263
R = Restoration E = Enhancement
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Basin 03030002
KC/ Associates of North Carolina
2010 - MY04

� � T
• � it �
E 5
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Location Major Roads mmmmmmo�
Major Streams and Rivers Other Roads KCI
w E :1UOC IATEti OF NC.
SLakes and Reservoirs s =.
Municipalities 1:63,360
K C I L -_�'>
1 inch equals 1 miles
Counties 1 0.5 0 1
TECHNOLOGIES Miles EN RowEwrnrTeeHNOLOGES
Iwo CONSTRUCTION. INC.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
May 06
Jun 06
Construction
N/A
Nov 06
Mitigation Plan
Feb 07
Mar 07
Year 1 Monitoring
Sep 07
Nov 07
Herbicide Sprayed for Invasive Species Control
N/A
Jun 08
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep 08
Dec 08
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Supplemental Planting
Feb 10
Feb 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct 10
Dec 10
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Pro ect Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Design, Monitoring, and
KCI Associates of NC
Maintenance Firm
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
17%
4601 Six Forks Rd
Piedmont
Raleigh, NC 27609
Triassic Basin
Contact Ms Kristin Knight -Meng
Wehadkee
Phone [phone]
03030002
Fax (919 ) 783 -9266
Construction Contractor
KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc
65%
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Ryan McDavitt
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Nursery
Cill Ide Native Plant Nursery
621 Starburst Lane
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact Mr George T Swearingen
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Project County
Durham and Orange Counties
Project Area
46 1 Acres
Drainage impervious cover
17%
h sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
core ion
Triassic Basin
Dominant soil types
Wehadkee
USGS HUC for project and reference
03030002
CDWQ Sub -basin for project and reference
03 -06 -05
of project easement fenced
65%
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Basin 03030002
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2010 - M704

2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
The site is immediately adjacent to well - developed wetlands within the New Hope Creek floodplam with
extensive wetland vegetation. These surrounding areas have helped seed the site, contributing to a large
number of volunteers in the monitoring plots There was an increase in the site average of planted
stems /acre during the fourth monitoring year This reflects the addition of planted trees as well as trees that
had been counted as dead resprouting The mortality of the planted stems is primarily related to deer
browse and competition from dense herbaceous vegetation The volunteer plants that were counted during
the 2010 monitoring include green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis),
willow oak (Quercus phellos), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), eastern baccharis ( Baccharls hahmifolla),
and slippery elm (Ulmus fulva) Red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva) were
also counted, but since they are common successional species, they were not included in the density
calculations for this report The fourth year of monitoring found an average of 310 planted stems /acre and
1,052 total stems /acre for the site based on the monitored vegetation plots Even though there has been
some mortality of the planted stems, based on the average total stems /acre, the site is on track to meeting
the success criteria set in the restoration plan of 320 stems /acre
The qualitative vegetation assessment of the site found that there were many woody stems throughout the
site and that there is a healthy mix of wetland herbaceous vegetation covering the site as well For
additional data on the counted stems, volunteer stems, and photos of the vegetation plots, see Appendix A
2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment Tables
Table 5. Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Pro ect Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Well #
H dro eriod
Dates Meeting Success
<5%
15%-8%
8%-12.5%
>12.5%
Max. No. of
Consecutive Da s
1
13%
X
15%
6%
14
3/24/10- 4/7/10
2
24%
35%
44%
X
43
3/24/10- 5/5/10
3
7%
32%
43%
X
47
3/24/10 - 5/9/10
4
5%
15%
X
9%
20
3/24/104/12/10
5
12%
1 34%
45%
X
43
3/24/10 - 5/5/10
6
8%
30%
26%
X
32
5/17/10- 6/18/10
7
9%
30%
29%
X
35
3/24/10- 4/27/10
Ref. Wetlandl
6%
I
16%
I X
1 35
3/24/09- 4/27/09
Table 6. Hydroperiod History
Pro ect Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Well #
Pre - Restoration
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
1
<5%
13%
13%
15%
6%
2
<5%
24%
35%
44%
19%
3
<5%
7%
32%
43%
21%
4
<5%
5%
15%
18%
9%
5
1 <5%
12%
1 34%
45%
19%
6
<5%
8%
30%
26%
14%
7
<5%
9%
30%
29%
16%
Ref. Well
6%
20%
16%
16%
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCl Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030001 6 2010 - MY04

The wetland wells used to monitor site hydrology were installed in early 2007 The maximum number of
consecutive days that the groundwater was within 12 inches of the surface was determined for each
groundwater gauge This number was converted into a percentage of the 223 -day growing season Wetland
hydrology was achieved at all of the gauges on the site in 2010 (Table 5) Based on these data, the site has
exceeded the minimum duration of 12 consecutive days with the water table within 12 inches of the soil
surface for the 2010 growing season (Appendix B) In addition, five of the gauges exceeded 12 5%
saturation Table 5 presents the hydrological monitoring results for 2010 Climatic data for the 2010
growing season were analyzed in companson to historical data to determine whether 2010 was a normal
year in terms of climatic conditions as a precursor to validating the results of the wetland monitonng The
histoncal data were collected from the NRCS, Water and Climate Center, "Climate Analysis for Wetlands
by County" website This evaluation concluded that 2010 was a normal year for rainfall during the growing
season Rainfall was within the 301h to 70th percentiles for the months of February, June, July, and August
Rainfall was less than the 301h percentile threshold in January, March, April, and October and was greater
than the 70`h percentile threshold in May and September (Appendix B)
To illustrate that the site is a riverine system, a stream gauge was installed on New Hope Creek to
document overbank flooding This gauge was installed in February 2008 Since installation, the gauge has
recorded 40 overbank flooding events (over 253.8' elevation) These events typically flood approximately
75% of the site
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCl Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030001 7 2010 - MY04

Appendix A
Vegetation Data
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030001 2010 - MY04

Appendix A - Vegetation Data Tables
Table Al. Planted stem counts for each species arranged by plot
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Species
Plots
Initial Totals
Year 4 Totals
Survival %+
1*
2
1 3
4+
5
6
7
8
9
10
Trees
Diospyros vtr tntana
1
1
1
1
6
1
2
5
1
1
100%
raxinus pennsylvanica
6
4
5
4
1
3
2
23
25
109%
rrrodendron tuli r era
6
0
0%
Quercus laurt olta
1
1
1
1
2
7
4
57%
Quercus 1 rata
1
4
1 2
2
2
1
4
9
11
122%
Quercus michauxii
1
5
1 3
1
1
4
2
1
23
15
65%
Quercus pagoda
1
1
3
3
2
1
3
1
2
2
23
18
78%
Quercus phellos
2
5
1
1
2
9
5
56%
Unknown
44 1
0 1
0%
*Plot I was moved in MY02 ' Additional trees from February '10 supplemental planting
Table Al coat. Planted stem counts for each species arranged by plot
Pro'ect Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Species
Plots
Initial Totals
Year 4 Totals
Survival %
11
1 12
13
14
15
16+
17
18
19+
20
Trees
raxrnus pennsylvanica
1
2
1
1
6
1
2
5
25
19
76%
trrodendron tuli fera
5
0
0%
yssa sylvatica
1
0
0%
Quercus lour foha
1
1
1
7
3
43%
Quercus lyrata
6
1 2
4
3
3
1
4
28
23
82%
Quercus mtchauxtt
1
1
2
2
1
8
7
88%
Quercus pagoda
3
1
5
1
3
1
3
1
22
18
82%
Quercus phellos
5
1
8
6
75%
Unknown
30
0
0%
Additional trees from February '10 supplemental planting
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

Table A2. Planted Stem Density By Plot
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Date : 10 /11 /10 to 10/12/10
Crew: A French, A Helms
ts
y
Zt
O
C
C y
3 p
a e
Q
p
s
Q
e
-M
O
3 s
Plot #
96 a
u
1
6
1
1
1
9
360
2
1
4
4
5
1
1
15
600
3
2
3
3
2
10
400
4
2
1
3
6
240
5
5
2
2
9
360
6
4
1
1
6
240
7
1
1
4
3
1
10
400
8
0
0
9
3
1
2
6
240
10
2
2
2
2
8
320
11
1
1
6
1
3
12
480
12
2
2
1
5
200
13
1
4
1
5
it
440
14
3
3
120
15
3
1
4
160
16
1
1
2
3
5
12
480
17
6
1
7
280
18
1
2
1
4
160
19
2
I
3
1
7
280
20
5
4
1
1
11
440
Total
Average Densityl
310
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030001 2010 - MY04

Table A3. Vegetation History: Stems/Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Plot #
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
planted
planted
planted
planted
total
planted
total
1
640
560
360
360
400
360
360
2
760
720
600
600
800
600
640
3
680
560
520
440
1,040
400
960
4
520
240
240
120
1,120
240
1,720
5
640
520
360
360
560
360
560
6
400
320
160
160
800
240
880
7
680
680
480
400
960
400
920
8
560
280
80
0
840
0
640
9
440
360
280
240
840
240
920
10
480
480
320
320
520
320
1,680
11
640
520
480
480
680
480
1,040
12
520
240
200
200
240
200
480
13
640
560
480
480
1,200
440
1,280
14
720
480
400
160
720
120
1,280
15
320
320
200
160
360
160
1,080
16
480
440
320
320
480
480
880
17
600
560
520
520
1,760
280
1,920
18
320
280
160
160
2,000
160
1,520
19
480
480
260
240
320
280
360
20
640
600
520
440
1920
440
1,920
Site Average
558
460
347
308
878
310
1,052
Notes —Plot 1 was moved to monitoring year 02
—Total stems includes all volunteer woody stems except for red maple (Acer nibntm )
and sweetgum (Ltguidambar styractflua )
— Volunteer woody stems were not counted in MY 01 and 02
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCl Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site. Brown Plot. 1 Date: 10/11/2010
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
•9
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
8
4
Insect Damage
2
Green Ash Frawnus pennsytvanica )
•
7
3
Green Ash Frdxmus pens Ivamca
057
•
•4
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxo )
064
4
•6
5
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
098
4
•3
lGreen Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
066
•5
Browsed
2
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
063
4
8
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytyanica
043
3
Browsed
•1
Green Ash Fraxmus pens Nanica
048
2
Browsed
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
194
4
Insect Damage
2
Green Ash Frawnus pennsytvanica )
086
3
3
Green Ash Frdxmus pens Ivamca
057
4
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxo )
064
4
Top died back
5
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
098
4
6
lGreen Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
066
3
Browsed
7
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
063
4
8
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytyanica
043
3
Browsed
9
Green Ash Fraxmus pens Nanica
048
2
Browsed
Plot was moved In myuz Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good t=weak 1= unlikely to sunnve year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
66.7%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
11.1%
Southern Red Oak Quercus falcata
11.1%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
11.1%
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 9 0.025 acres = 360 stems /acre
Total Number of 9 0.025 acres = 3fi0 stems / acre
DesirableStems'
` This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 9 9 trees X 100 =
Planted Stems
100 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species 10 -50 cm I 50 -100 cm 1100-150cmi >150 cm
Total

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site. Brown Plot: 2 Date-
Plot Map
10/11/2010
• 4
•5
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
•6
•11
3
Browsed
•3
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxu)
120
4
16
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
1 30
• 12
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
X10
4
•2
X7
074
1 4
• •
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr)
085
4
15 17
7
• 8
•9
18
•
8
Green Ash Fraxrnus penns Mnica
055
3
X
• 1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr)
390
• 13
14 19
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvamca
060
3
Browsed
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxu)
120
4
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
1 30
4
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
1 10
4
5
1 Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rala )
074
1 4
Browsed
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr)
085
4
Browsed
7
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxa
Dead
8
Green Ash Fraxrnus penns Mnica
055
3
9
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr)
390
4
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Green Ash (Fraxrnus nnsylvanrca )
054
3
Browsed
12
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
096
4
Browsed
13
Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rata
124
4
Browsed
14
Unknown
- "
Dead
15
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsytyanica
046
3
Browsed
16
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
141
4
17
Persimmon Drospyros vugrnrana
1 58
4
18
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
0 95
1 4
19
Unknown
Dead
1
Vigor 4= excellent 3 =goad 2--weak 1= unlikely to surwve year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
26.7%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
26.7%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
33.3%
Persimmon (Diospyros vir iniana
6.7%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
6.7%
1
Total
1
Density:
Total Number of 15
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 600
Total Number of 16 0.025 acres 640
DesirableStems' =
* This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems
stems / acre
stems / acre
19 trees X 100 = Q % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1
Total
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 3 Date- 10/11/2010
Plot Map
•5
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Querous a
1 30
• 14
X4
Unknown
•15
3
X6
077
4
4
Unknown
• 13
'-
Dead
• 3
IWIlow Oak (Querous hellos)
051
16
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercusmichauxn )
12 •
Dead
7
• 7
049
X11
X2
Swamp Chestnut Oak Querous michauxa)
Missing
9
Unknown
•10
• 17
• 1
Overcu Oak Querous lyrata)
y9
4
Browsed
11
Unknown
-
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Querous a
1 30
4
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Overcu Oak Querous 1 rated
077
4
4
Unknown
'-
Dead
5
IWIlow Oak (Querous hellos)
051
3
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercusmichauxn )
Dead
7
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
049
2
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak Querous michauxa)
Missing
9
Unknown
Dead
10
Overcu Oak Querous lyrata)
094
4
Browsed
11
Unknown
-
Dead
12
Wilow Oak Querous hellos
191
4
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxa)
` '
Dead
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak Querous michauxn)
097
4
15
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxn)
034
3
16
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxa
074
4
17
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
097
4
Vigor, 4= excellent 3 =good, t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak (Quercus hellos)
20.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
30.0%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
30.0%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
20.0%
Green Ash (Fraxinus penns lvanica)
11
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Density:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 400 stems I acre
Total Number of
24 0.025 acres = 960
DesirableStems'
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
17 trees x 100 = 59
stems t acre
% survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
1
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus penns lvanica)
11
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Total
12
2
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 4 Date- 10/11/2010
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X6 ` ,5
x7
Vigor
Comment
1
x°
IX
Dead
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
_
_ -
Xg
3
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 to
1 31c
10 •
4
3
-
"
13
•
5
0 14
Dead
X1
2
15
X 11
12 •
7
Tulip Poplar Lrnodendron tub fera
r- T', -'
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
Dead
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
_
_ -
Dead
3
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 to
1 31c
4
4
Unknown
-
"
Dead
5
jUnknown
Dead
6
Unknown
is_"
?
Dead
7
Tulip Poplar Lrnodendron tub fera
r- T', -'
Dead
8
Unknown
t ,t
Dead
9
Unknown
rr,
Dead
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxit
1 35
4
11
Unknown
Dead
12
1 Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
066
4
Browsed
13
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
094
4
14
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
041
4
Newl y Planted
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
074
4
Newly Planted
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
50.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
16.7%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
33.3%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
3
3
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Density:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 240 stems I acre
Total Number of — 1%20
DesirableStems' 43 0.025 acres — , stems /acre
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
15 trees x 100 = 40 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
14
17
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
3
3
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Total
17
21

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site- Brown Plot 5 Date.
Plot Map
10/11/2010
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
• 13
• 12
1
�(16
• 15
Dead
2
Overcu Oak Quercus lyrala)
_ �`
41 "- "
X11
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsytyanica
054
• 14
Browsed
4
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanrce
.9
3
Browsed
5
X8
053
3
•7
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 to
088
5 •
8
Unknown
4 •
9
1x
074
4
•3
10
Unknown
=
2
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
Dead
2
Overcu Oak Quercus lyrala)
_ �`
41 "- "
Dead
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsytyanica
054
3
Browsed
4
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanrce
066
3
Browsed
5
Green Ash (Fraxrnus pens /vamca)
053
3
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 to
088
3
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Overcu Oak Quercus lyrata)
074
4
10
Unknown
=
_
Dead
11
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
Dead
12
Cherrybark Oak Quercus gods
122
4
13
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvanica
025
2
Browsed
14
Green Ash Fraxrnus perinsytyanica
063
3
Browsed
15
Cherrybark Oak Querrws pagoda)
1 12
4
16
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
-
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
22.2%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
55.6%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
22.2%
Total
5
Density:
Total Number of 9
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 360 stems / acre
Total Number of 14 0.025 acres 560
DesirableStems' =
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracitlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 9
Planted Stems
16 trees x 100 = 56
stems / acre
% survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
5
Total
5

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot- 6 Date. 10111/2010
Plot Mau
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X4
Height (m)
Vigor
0
1
�3
061
3
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
•5
4
•g
3
•2
•6
=
•6
4
•1
X
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash Fraxmus nns Namca
061
3
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
0 84
4
3
Tulip Poplar (Lrnodendron tub fera)
=
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Green Ash (Fraxmus ennsylvamca)
0 86
3
6
Green Ash (Fraxmus peons Namca)
072
3
Browsed
7
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
Dead
8
Green Ash Fraxmus perinsylvanica
060
3
Browsed
9
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr
068
4
Browsed
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxu
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
66.7%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
16.7%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
16.7%
Sweet um Li uidambar st raciflua
1
1
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
1
Density:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 240 stems / acre
Total Number of 22 0.025 acres = 880
DesirableStems'
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
stems / acre
10 trees X 100 = fi0 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
14
Sweet um Li uidambar st raciflua
1
1
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
1
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Total
1
17

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site- Brown Plot. 7 Date. 10/11/2010
Plot Map
Photo
Point
e 6
X7
>( $
Vigor
•
17
1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
096
e g
Y16
2
X5
� 10
Dead
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
044
3
•
15
4 e
e3Y2
151
e14
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quemus mrchauxn)
13
6
1
142
1L 11
7
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
`
12 X
Dead
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
096
4
Browsed
2
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
Dead
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
044
3
4
Laurel Oak Quemus laun/olia)
151
4
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quemus mrchauxn)
Dead
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
142
4
7
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
`
Dead
8
Laurel Oak Quercus launfoha
-
,a p;.
Dead
9
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
148
4
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxrr)
127
4
11
Unknown
T v
Dead
12
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
o
Dead
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
081
4
14
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
058
3
Top Died Back
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
089
4
16
Unknown
Dead
17
Green Ash Fraxmus enns lvanrca
076
3
Browsed
Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
10.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10.0%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
30.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii)
40.0%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
10.0%
1
Sycamore (Platanus Ocadentalis)
Density:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 400 stems / acre
Total Number of 23 0.025 acres = 920
DesirableStems'
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciHua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
stems / acre
17 trees x 100 = 59 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
3
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
8
1
Sycamore (Platanus Ocadentalis)
1
Total
8
4
1
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot 8 Date. 10/11/2010
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X12
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
-Dead
X14
xg
X11
�,t
13^
Dead
3
Unknown
X6
Dead
X8
x
xs
Dead
5
jUnknown
Dead
x1
�2
Dead
7
Unknown
>t 4
Dead
8
Unknown
3
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
-Dead
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
jUnknown
Dead
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Unknown
-
Dead
9
Laurel Oak Quercus launfolia)
Dead
10
Unknown,;
=
Dead
11
Unknown
�_
Dead
12
Unknown
7
Dead
13
Unknown
Dead
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3--good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Density:
Total Number of 0
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 0
Total Number of ,� s 0.025 acres = 640
DesirableStems'
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 0 14 trees X 100 =
Planted Stems
-tea.
stems / acre
stems / acre
0 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
3
5
Sweet um (Li uidambars raciflua)
1
Slippery Elm Ulmus fulva)
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
3
1
Oaks Quercus s
1
Total
1 3
1 8
1 6

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 9 Date 10/12/2010
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X10
•
g
Vigor
$
11
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
079
3
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
_{
} `_ -Dead
3
Unknown
6
s
7
4
5
Dead
5
1 Green Ash (Frawnus pennsyivanica
X4
2
Browsed
,1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
084
4
7
Green Ash Fraxrnus pens Ivanrca
069
3
2X
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
079
3
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
_{
} `_ -Dead
3
Unknown
<
s
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
1 Green Ash (Frawnus pennsyivanica
078
2
Browsed
6
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
084
4
7
Green Ash Fraxrnus pens Ivanrca
069
3
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Laurel Oak Quercus launfolia)
098
4
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Cherrybark Oak ( Quercus pa oo)
082
4
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50.0%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
16.7%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
33.3%
1
Sycamore Platanus Occidentalis
2
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
3
Density:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 240 stems / acre
Total Number of 23 0.025 acres — 920
DesirableStems'
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Ater rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracitlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
11 trees X 100 = 55
stems / acre
% survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
2
12
1
Sycamore Platanus Occidentalis
2
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
3
Total
3
17
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot.
10
Plot Map
Date. 10/11/2010
• 10
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
12
1
11 •
083
4
2
X9
•8
Dead
3
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 28
7
4
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
1 43
4
5
jUnknown
e4
Dead
6
•g
V5
3
7
Cherrybark Oak Quercus a oda
051
A2
Top Died Back
•1
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
048
3
Browsed
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Laurel Oak Quercus launfoha
083
4
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 28
4
4
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
1 43
4
5
jUnknown
Dead
6
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
145
4
7
Cherrybark Oak Quercus a oda
051
4
Top Died Back
8
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
048
3
Browsed
9
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
Dead
10
Laurel Oak Quercus launloha
091
4
11
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
062
2
12
jUnknown
Dead
Vigor 4--excellent 3 =good, 2--weak 1= unlikely to survm year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
25.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
25.0%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
Laurel Oak Quercus launfolia
25.0%
3 1 1
Density:
Total Number of —
Planted Stems $ 0.025 acres — 320 stems /acre
Total Number of —
DesirableStems' 42 0.025 acres — X680 stems /acre
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of $ 12 trees X 100 = 67 % survivability
Planted Stems
Lei ,
l
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species 10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm 100 -150 cm
I >150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica 31
3
Sweetgum (Liquidamber styraciflua) 1
1
Total 32
3 1 1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 11 Date-
Plot Map
10/11/2010
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
016
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 10
4
X15
2
• 13
14
4
• 12
x 11
216
4
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata )
•7 X
4
•5
5
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
6
4
6
•g
Dead
7
Overcup Oak Quercus / to
• 10
4
• 6
Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rata
150
4
9
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvanica )
080
3
•4
10
Laurel Oak Quen:us laurdblia
• 1
4
3
L__L
jUnknown
•2
e
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 10
4
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus mrchauxrr)
1 10
4
3
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
216
4
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata )
225
4
5
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 10
4
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcup Oak Quercus / to
124
4
8
Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rata
150
4
9
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvanica )
080
3
Browsed
10
Laurel Oak Quen:us laurdblia
1 39
4
11
jUnknown
Dead
12
Overcup Oak Quercus l rata
1 19
4
13
Overcup Oak Quercus I rata
095
4
14
Unknown
- �r
,'; -
Dead
15
Unknown
Dead
16
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrala )
091
4
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
50.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
83%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
8.3%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
8.3%
I
1 1
Total
3
1 8 1
Density:
Total Number of 12 0.025 acres = 480 stems / acre
Planted Stems
Total Number of _ 1040
DesirableStems' 26 0.025 acres — , stems /acre
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 12 16 trees X 100 = %y % survivability
Planted Stems
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
1 >150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
3
1 8
1
1 2
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
I
1 1
Total
3
1 8 1
1
1 2

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 12 Date- 10/11/2010
Plot Mao
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
•13
12
Tulip Poplar Linodendron tub fend
_
Dead
2
11 •
Dead
3
Unknown
10
X9
4
Unknown
•6
-A
Dead
5
jUnknown
•7
8 •
6
5X
103
4
7
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
162
4
8
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
X2
4
9
Unknown
= _'"
3
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Tulip Poplar Linodendron tub fend
_
Dead
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Unknown
_ -
Dead
4
Unknown
-A
Dead
5
jUnknown
Dead
6
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsytyanica )
103
4
7
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
162
4
8
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
202
4
9
Unknown
= _'"
Dead
10
Unknown
7 _'
Dead
11
Overcu Oak (Querous 1 rata)
191
4
12
Unknown
IDead
13
Green Ash Frawnus perinsylvanica )
065
3
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40.0%
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
40.0%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
20.0%
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
2
1 2
1 2
Total
2
1 2
Density:
Total Number of 5 0.025 acres = ZOO
Planted Stems
Total Number of
DesirableStems' Z 0.025 acres — 480
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetqum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
stems / acre
stems / acre
Survivability:
Total Number of 5 13 X 100 = 38 % survivability
Planted Stems
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 cmj
>150 cm
Slippery Elm Ulmus fulva
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
2
1 2
1 2
Total
2
1 2
1 3

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot 13 Date. 10/11/2010
WMO T' FT:
13 •
Species
14
I6x
16
1
12 •
200
4
2
• 8
261
10
3
Overcu Oak (Querous 1 to )
240
•
11 9
4
Unknown
6X
Dead
5
•2
3
X 5
Dead
6
Unknown
•
4
Dead
1 •
Cherrybark Oak Querous a
170
4
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Querous 1 rated
200
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
261
4
3
Overcu Oak (Querous 1 to )
240
4
4
Unknown
Dead
5
ITulip Poplar Lmodendron tulipifera)
Dead
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Cherrybark Oak Querous a
170
4
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak Querous michauxu
215
4
9
Overcu Oak (Querous 1 rata )
200
4
10
Green Ash (Fraxmus nns lyanrca )
060
1
Top Died Back
11
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda
1 56
4
12
lCherrybark Oak (Querous pagoda)
120
4
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak ( Quercus michauwr)
Missing
14
Overcu Oak Querous 1 rata
254
4
15
Unknown
Dead
16
Cherrybark Oak ( Querous pagoda)
214
4
Vigor 4=excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
9.1%
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
36.4%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
45.5%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
9.1%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
8
1
Sweet um Li uidambar st raciflua
1
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 11 0.025 acres = 440 stems /acre
Total Number of 32 0.025 acres = 1 280
DesirableStems' '
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 1 1 16
Planted Stems
X 100 = 69
stems / acre
% survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4thYear
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>1502m-
Eastern Baccharis Bacchans halimifolia
3
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
8
1
Sweet um Li uidambar st raciflua
1
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
2
6
Total
2
8
2
10

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 14 Date 10/12/2010
dL-�
PVC
Marker
Photo
Point
Plot Mao
North
ID
Species
16
Vigor
17
18 X
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
e° - _
Dead
15 •
13
12 X
11 •
Dead
14
Unknown
i - "
10
4
X 7X
6
8 X
9 •
Dead
5•
Overcup Oak Quercus rata)
4X
4
X1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
2X
e o- '
3
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
e° - _
Dead
2
Unknown
s _
Dead
3
Unknown
i - "
Dead
4
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
-
,A7- C'
Dead
5
Overcup Oak Quercus rata)
174
4
6
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
`,` '
e o- '
Dead Rodent
7
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
_ ,; _ ;
Dead Rodent
8
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
r _ ' -
Dead Rodent
9
Overcu Oak Quercus rata
Missing
10
Unknown
,
Dead
11
Overcu Oak Quercus lyrata)
165
1 4
12
jUnknown
Y
Dead
13
Unknown
Dead
14
Unknown
Dead
15
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
062
4
16
Overcu Oak (Quercus l rata )
Dead (Rodent)
17
Overcu Oak Quercus lyrata )
Dead Rodent
18
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Density:
Total Number of 3 0.025 acres = 120 stems / acre
Planted Stems
Total Number of 32 0.025 acres = 1 ,280 stems / acre
DesirableStems'
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweeigum (Liquidambar styracitlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 3 1 18 X 100
Planted Stems
% % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Eastem Baccharis Bacchans halimifolia
5
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
5
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
3
4
6
Total
6
8
9
6

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot- 15 Date 10/12/2010
ck-
Photo PVC
Pint Man
Point Marker
North
ID
8X
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rate
7X
6,
•5
Unknown
4
Dead
3
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata )
3
4
,1
2X
' `
Dead
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcup Oak Quercus 1 rate
187
4
2
Unknown
-
Dead
3
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata )
112
4
4
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia )
' `
Dead
5
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
161
4
6
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
1 53
4
Browsed
7
Overcup Oak Quercus l rata
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2-veak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
75.0%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
6
1 17
Total
6
1 17
Density:
Total Number of 4
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 160 stems / acre
Total Number of — 1080
DesirableStems' 2% 0.025 acres — , stems /acre
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 4
Planted Stems
X 100 = 50 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
F> 150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
6
1 17
Total
6
1 17

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot: 16 Date 10/12/2010
Plot Man
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
• 11
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
081
4
• 12
•g
• 10
1 15
4
3
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
7
Dead
4
•6
067
4
6
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
074
3
x
•4
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
056
2
Found Alive
7
Unknown
3
Dead
8
•1
•2
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
081
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
1 15
4
3
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
-
Dead
4
Laurel Oak Quercus launfoha)
067
4
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
074
3
6
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
056
2
Found Alive
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
087
4
10
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
061
4
11
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvanica
074
4
12
lWillow Oak Quercus phellos)
060
4
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
085
4
Newly Planted
14
Cherrybark Oak Quercus gods
081
4
Newly Planted
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
080
4
Newly Planted
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
41.7%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.3%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
16.7%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
8.3%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
1 8
Total
2
1 8
Density:
Total Number of 12
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 480
Total Number of 22 0.025 acres = $$Q
DesirableStems'
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Ater rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
stems / acre
stems / acre
Survivability:
Total Number of 12 X 100 = $Q % survivability
Planted Stems
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
I 50 -100 cm
1100-150cni
>150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
2
1 8
Total
2
1 8

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot:
Photo
Point
17 Date: 10/12/2010
Plot Map
ry
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
15
1
12
13 •
14 •
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
140
4
X
• 11
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
10
4
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
i'.' ` . -
Dead
5
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
9 •
4
Dead
6
7X
6 •
Missing
7
Unknown
5X
Dead
•6
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
065
4
Browsed
Ik •1
2•
080
4
3
ry
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsytvarnca)
085
4
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
140
4
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Dead
4
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
i'.' ` . -
Dead
5
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
4
Dead
6
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
Missing
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
065
4
Browsed
9
Green Ash (Fraxinus enns arnca
080
4
10
Laurel Oak Quercus launfolia
T
Dead
11
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
050
2
Browsed
12
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
-^
Dead
13
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
0 62
3
Browsed
14
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1 30
4
15
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash (Fraxinus enns /vanica )
85.7%
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
0.0%
Laurel Oak (Quercus laurifolia)
0.0%
Overcu Oak Quercus /yrata
14.3%
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
10
12
16
3
Total
10
16
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 7 0.025 acres = 280 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems* 4$ 0.025 acres = 1,920 stems l acre
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Ater rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracirlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 7 15
Planted Stems
X 100 = 47 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Red Maple (Acerrubrum)
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
10
12
16
3
Total
10
16
16
3

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot 18 Date: 10/12/2010
Plot Man
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxo
7 •
8,
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus gods
162
4
3
Unknown
4X
3
•1
2 •
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxo
1 23
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus gods
162
4
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Tulip Poplar (briodendron tulprfera )
Dead
5
1 Green Ash Fraxmus pens /vamca
IDead
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
Dead
7
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu)
104
4
8
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
051
2
Browsed, Res rout
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
50.0%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
18
9
3
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
1
Density:
Total Number of 4
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 1fi0 stems / acre
Total Number of —
DesirableStems' 38 0.025 acres - 1 520
s
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracitlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 4
Planted Stems
stems / acre
• r
X 100 = 50 %survivability
3rd Year
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
1
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
18
9
3
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
4
1
Total
3
24
9
4

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site- Brown Plot: 19 Date- 10/12/2010
PVC
Marker
Plot Mao
Photo
Point
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
X12
1
• 11
Dead
2
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanics
x10
3
3
X5
• 9
6 .
x7
8
4
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
Dead
5
1 Willow Oak (Quercus hellos)
4X
3
)G
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
.2
4
Photo
Point
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
Dead
2
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanics
079
3
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
Dead
5
1 Willow Oak (Quercus hellos)
Dead
6
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 55
4
7
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsytyanica
Dead
8
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
1 58
4
9
Green Ash (Fraxinus pens Ivanica
082
2
10
Water Tupelo N ssa a uabca
Dead
11
Cherrybark Oak Quercus gods
250
4
12
1 Laurel Oak Quercus laun/olia )
1 09
4
Browsed
13
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
075
3
New
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
28.6%
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
14.3%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
42.9%
Laurel Oak Quercus launfolia
14.3%
Sweet um Li uidambar s raciflua
5
6
13
27
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Density:
Total Number of 7
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 280 stems / acre
Total Number of 9 1 0.025 acres = 3fi0 stems I acre
DesirableStems'
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of _
Planted Stems 7 13 X 100 — 54 %survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
Sweet um Li uidambar s raciflua
5
6
13
27
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Total
5
9
13
27

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot 20 Date 1 0/121201 0
Plot Mai)
• 16
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
15 •
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
160
4
13
2
Tulip Poplar (Lmodendron tulpdera)
• 14
3
10 •
- - ! :-
• 11
12 •
9X
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
045
3
Resprout
8 •
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
•
- -
5K
6
7 •
6
2
Browsed
1
Overcu Oak Quercus I to
KI
13X 1
4 •
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
160
4
2
Tulip Poplar (Lmodendron tulpdera)
4 ` ' ­.Dead
3
Tulip Poplar Lmodendron full rera
- - ! :-
!x r �° �o
Dead
4
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
045
3
Resprout
5
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
- -
Dead
6
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
062
2
Browsed
7
Overcu Oak Quercus I to
258
4
8
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsylvanica
045
3
Browsed
9
Unknown
^^
Dead
10
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsytyanica
065
2
Browsed
11
Green Ash Froxmus pens lvamca)
057
2
Browsed
12
10vercup Oak Quercus lyrata)
1 84
4
13
Cherrybark Oak (Querous pagoda)
Dead
14
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
1 32
4
15
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
154
4
16
Green Ash Fraxmus pens lvamca)
0 93
4
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
9.1%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
9.1%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
45.5%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
36.4%
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
20
1 2
11
Total
20
Density:
Total Number of 11 0.025 acres = "0 stems / acre
Planted Stems
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 4$ 0.025 acres = 1 ,920 stems /acre
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracitlua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 1 1 16
Planted Stems
X 100 = 69 % survivability
3rd Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
4th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
1 >150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis)
1 4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
20
1 2
11
Total
20
1 6
11

Appendix B
Hydrologic Monitoring and Hydroperiod
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

256
255
254
253
252
c
0
251
d
250
249
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 1 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
3.5
3
2.5
2
o'
>v
1.5
0.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2010 11/1/2010
0
00 00
kGround Surface
0 Days
11 Days
O
O
N�
00
00
12" Below Surface
14 Days
0o
O
O
O
O
O
NO
O
O O O
O
O
O
Date
r
O
O
Rainfall
WS Elevation
LS jr Ell ation
3.5
3
2.5
2
o'
>v
1.5
0.5
0
00 00
--
O
O
N�
00
00
Iv
\+
0o
O
O
O
O
O
NO
O
O O O
O
O
O
Date
O
O
Rainfall
WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2
o'
>v
1.5
0.5
0
00 00
--
O
O
N�
00
00
Iv
\+
0o
V
O
O
O
tOJ
NO
O
O
O
O
O
O

256
255
254
253
252
a
0
as
251
W
250
249
248
247
N
O
O
Brown Farm Gauge 2 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
N
L M da
c\n
r
N
N N
N
W
O
N
O
N
N
J
tj
O_
O
O_
O O_
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
Date
Rainfall
—WS
Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2 ;c
o'
y
1.5 °
0.5
L M da
0
r
O
00 00
0
J
O_
O_
O O
O
O

256
255
254
253
252
a
0
i
251
LLi
250
249
248
247
N
O
O
Brown Farm Gauge 3 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
tr N N to
MI
3
2.5
2 X
>v
0
-e
L7
1.5
0.5
0
as
as J 00
O
O
N
0\0
W PJ �p
O O_
O_
O_ N
O O_
N
O_
N N O
O_ O_
O O O
O
C:> O O
O
O O O
O_
Date
O O
O
Rainfall
WS Elevation
MI
3
2.5
2 X
>v
0
-e
L7
1.5
0.5
0
N
O
O
0\0
000
1—)
00
J
O_ O_
O_
N
N
O_
O
O O
O
O
O

256
255
254
253
252
C
O
w
W
251
W
250
249
248
247
O_
O
Brown Farm Gauge 4 Hydrograph
1/1/10 to 11/20/10
V
N
O
_
O
3.5
3
2.5
2 X
m
o'
1.5
0.5
0
t j
O O
O_ O_
O_ N
O
N N
O
N
N O N
N
N IJ O
O O
O
O O
O
O O
Date
Rainfall
WS Elevation
V
N
O
_
O
3.5
3
2.5
2 X
m
o'
1.5
0.5
0
t j
O O
O_ O_
O_ N
O
O O
O
O
V
N
O
_
O
3.5
3
2.5
2 X
m
o'
1.5
0.5
0

256
255
254
253
252
a
0
251
W
250
249
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 5 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
cn %A
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2010 11/1/2010
N N
N
C
O N
O_
N
O_
Ground Surface Y
v
43 Days
O
O
O
O C
37 Days
933 Days
12" Below Surface
WS Elevation
O_ O_
O
NO
O
O_ O
ISensor Elevation
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
cn %A
N N
N
C
O N
O_
N
O_
O N N
O C_
O
O
O
O C
Date
Rainfall
WS Elevation
O_ O_
O
NO
O
O_ O
O O
O
O
O
O O
cn %A
N N
N
C
O N
O_
N
O_
O N N
O C_
O
O
O
O C
Date
Rainfall
WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
7
_m
0
m
1.5'a
0.5
0
W
O_ O_
O
NO
NO
O O
O
O
O

256
255
254
253
` 252
c
0
az
251
W
250
249
248
1 -17
Brown Farm Gauge 6 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
O O O
J O N N N tJ O
O O _O
O O O O O
Date
Rainfall — WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2
a'
a�
1.5 °,
0.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2010 11/1/2010
N
W W
Ground Surface
O
O
25 Days
32 Days
N
O N
12" Below Surface
12 Da
O
O
O
O
O
Sensor Elevation
O O O
J O N N N tJ O
O O _O
O O O O O
Date
Rainfall — WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2
a'
a�
1.5 °,
0.5
N
W W
O
O
O
N
N
O N
O
O
O
O O O
J O N N N tJ O
O O _O
O O O O O
Date
Rainfall — WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2
a'
a�
1.5 °,
0.5
0
O
O
10 00
00
O
O

Brown Farm Gauge 7 Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
256
255
254
253
252
a
0
251
w
250
249
248
247
3.5
3
2.5
2
m
1.5 .°.
1
0.5
0
1\ W
W
A
lA lli
O�
O� J 00
00
\C
O_
O_
O_
O O
Date
Rainfall
WS Elevation

Brown Farm Reference Gauge Hydrograph
1 /1 /10 to 11/20/10
251
250
249
248
247
A 246
W
245
244
243
242
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2010 H/1/2010
Ground Surface
00 �C
w t J �O
r
12" Below Surface
35 Da
N
W W
I
t
O
O O
10 00
Date
Sensor Elevation
Rainfall
WS Elevation
uge M functio
O_
O
N
N
O N
O_
O_
O
_O
O
IL
C _O
O
O
O
LA
242
• .N-.
00 �C
w t J �O
O_
N
W W
O
O
O O
10 00
Date
N
Rainfall
WS Elevation
O_
O
N
N
O N
O_
O_
O
_O
O
C _O
O
O
O
O
3.5
3
2.5
2
m
1.5
p
0.5
• .N-.
00 �C
w t J �O
O_
O
O O
O
O
O O
10 00
Date
N
Rainfall
WS Elevation
3.5
3
2.5
2
m
1.5
p
0.5
0
00 �C
10 00
0o
N
O_
O_
N
N
_O
O_
O O
O
_O
O
O

257
256
255
E— 254
a
0
W 253
252
251
N
_O
O
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Site
New Hope Creek Stage
1 /1 /10 to 12/3/10
Entire Site Flood Stage
Woo?
75% of Site Flood Stage
00-�j�
a
f
to as 01 -1 J 00 00 �O �O
,�,
N N N O� \ t\ O — O A W Oro W ONO N J
N O_ N O N N N N N N N N N N
O_ O_ O_
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O
Date
1111111111111111Ramfall —Stage
35
30
25
20
0
15:
e
10
05
00

10
9
8
7
G
e_
5
w
e_
t 4
3
I
I
Brown Farm 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2009 -2010
Durham, NC Monthly Rainfall
0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o a�i �a a cO
0j) CL (U o
Date
t� 2009 Rainfall 020 10 Rainfall 30th Percentile —10— 70th Percentile

Appendix C
Photo Log
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCl Associates o, f North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2010 - MY04

Photo Point IA: View looking east towards vegetation plot #1. 12/9/10 — MY -04
Photo Point 1 B: View looking northeast toward vegetation plot #5. 12/9/10 — MY -04

Photo Point 1 Supplemental: View looking northeast towards Wetland Gauge #6. 12/9/10 — MY -04
Photo Point 2: View looking north toward vegetation plot # 3. 12/9/10 — MY -04

Photo Point 3: View looking north with vegetation plot #10 on left. 12/9/10 — MY -04
Photo Point 4: View looking north toward vegetation plot #17. 12/9/10 — MY -04

Photo Point 5: View looking north from the far eastern part of the project site. 12/9/10 — MY -04
Photo Point 6: View looking south toward vegetation plot #20. 12/9/10 — MY -04

Photo Point 7: View looking south. 12/9/10 — MY -04