20031306a Ver 1_Year 7 Monitoring Report_20110915

03- r�o� q I
Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Year -7 Annual Monitoring Report (2010)
Anson County, North Carolina
WBS Element 34398.4.1
TIP No. R- 2239WM
NCEEP Project 206
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
r�
Submitted by:
PBS &J, an Atkins company
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27609
December 2010
�
faai�PRzJ
Arvid „� SHS
77V S iTL
03- 13�
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 2011
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY 1
1 0
INTRODUCTION
2
1 1 Project Description
2
12 Purpose
2
1 3 Project History
2
2 0
HYDROLOGY
3
21 Success Criteria
3
22 Hydrologic Description
3
23 Results Of Hydrologic Monitoring
3
2 3 1 Site Data
3
2 3 2 Climatic Data
4
30
STREAM ASSESSMENT
5
31 Stream Monitoring Requirements
5
32 Post - Construction Condtions
5
33 Results of Stream Monitoring
5
40
VEGETATION ASSSESSMENT
7
41 Success Criteria
7
42 Description Of Species
7
43 Results Of Vegetation Monitoring
7
50
REFERENCES
14
Morntonng Year 7 (20 10) i December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
APPENDIX A
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDICES
Figures
Site Location Map
Current Conditions Plan View
Key Branch 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010
Groundwater Gauge Hydrographs
Site Photos
Stream Survey Data
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Key Branch Hydrologic Monitoring Results
4
Table 2
Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
6
Table 3.
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
7
Table 4
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
8
Table 5
Stream Reach Data Summary
9
Table 6
Results of Riparian Vegetation Plots Monitoring
11
Table 7
Results of Wetland Vegetation Plots Monitoring
11
Table 8
Riparian Plot Vegetation Summary Data
12
Table 9.
Wetland Plot Vegetation Summary Data ..................
. .. ................ 13,14
Morntonng Year 7 (20 10) n December 2010
n

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
SUMMARY
The 118 acre Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (hereafter referred to
as the "Site ") located in Anson County, was constructed in 2003 The Site covers
approximately 6,200 linear feet of restored channel and 108 9 acres of wetland
restoration Approximately 47,800 bottomland hardwood trees were planted on
70 2 acres of the Site To be successful, the Site must meet jurisdictional success
criteria for both wetland hydrology and vegetation for five consecutive years or until the
Site is deemed successful Additionally, the stream must show vertical and horizontal
stability within the channel with respect to as -built conditions The following report
details the Year -7 monitoring of wetland hydrology, wetland vegetation, and stream
stability during the 2010 monitoring season
Thirteen groundwater gauges were monitored in 2010, of which seven met the success
criteria for jurisdictional hydrology (saturation within 12 inches of the surface for greater
than 12 5 percent of the growing season) Five of the additional gauges did not meet
success criteria, but maintained saturation near the surface for more than 10 percent of
the growing season All gauges attained their longest saturation period at the beginning
of the growing season The remaining gauge (Gauge 13) was replaced late in the
growing season after continued malfunctions early in the growing season Gauge 13
was replaced late in the growing season, in preparation for the upcoming season
Four vegetation plots established under North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) protocol, and four riparian vegetation plots established following replanting in
2005 were monitored to measure woody stem density In the current monitoring year,
the Site had an average tree density of 228 trees per acre for the stream restoration
acreage (riparian vegetation plots) and an average tree density of 692 trees per acre
within the wetland restoration acreage (wetland vegetation plots) This provides an
overall average of 460 trees per acre which is significantly higher than the minimum
success criteria of 260 trees per acre
Success criteria for the restored stream reach has been established to confirm that no
significant changes have occurred to the dimension, pattern, profile, and bed material
over the monitoring period Location surveys of the constructed features were
conducted to verify the performance of the stream A total station survey was
performed to describe the stream longitudinal profile and 12 permanent stream cross -
sections Overall, the stream channel bed form and banks are stable Engineered
structures placed within the restored channel were found to be visually absent and non-
functioning towards their originally intended purpose Based on the cross - sections,
longitudinal profile and visual observations, the channel dimensions have not changed
significantly compared to as -built conditions
Monitoring Year 7 (20 10) 1 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC -
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1. Project Description
The Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site is located in Anson County and
encompasses approximately 118 acres It is situated between Lower White Store Road
(SR 1252) and Mineral Springs Church Road (SR 1240) (Figure 1)
1.2. Purpose
In order to demonstrate successful mitigation, the Site must be monitored for a
minimum of five years or until success criteria are achieved Success criteria are based
on federal and state guidelines for stream and wetland mitigation Criteria for wetland -
hydrologic conditions, restored stream channel stability, and vegetation survival are -
included in this document The following report describes the results of the hydrologic,
vegetation, and restored stream channel monitoring during the 2010 growing season at
the Key Branch Mitigation Site
1.3. Project History
Fall 2003
Construction
November 2003
Site Planted
March - November 2004
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 1)
July 2004
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring (Year 1)
February 2005
Site Replanted
March- November 2005
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 2)
August 2005
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring (Year 2)
March - November 2006
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 3)
September 2006
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring (Year 3) -
March - November 2007
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 4)
September 2007
Vegetation Monitoring (Year 4)
October 2008
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 5)
October 2008
Vegetation Monitoring (Year 5) -�
August 2009
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 6)
August 2009
Vegetation Monitoring (Year 6) _
September 2010
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 7)
September 2010
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring (Year 7)
Monitonng Year 7 (20 10) 2 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
2.0 HYDROLOGY
2.1. Success Criteria
In accordance with federal and state guidelines for wetland mitigation, the success
criteria for hydrology requires that these areas be inundated or saturated (within
12 inches of the surface) by surface or groundwater consecutively for at least 12 5
percent of the growing season Areas inundated for less than 5 percent of the growing
season are classified as non - wetlands Areas inundated between 5 percent and
12 5 percent of the growing season can be classified as wetlands depending upon such
factors as the presence of wetland vegetation and hydric soils
The growing season in Anson County begins March 11 and ends November 23
(258 days) These dates correspond to a 50 percent probability that air temperatures
will not drop below 28 °F or lower after March 22 and before November 15 Minimum
wetland hydrology is required for at least 12 5 percent of this growing season, for Anson
County, 12 5 percent equals 30 consecutive days Local climate must represent
average conditions for the area
2.2. Hydrologic Description
On -site hydrologic monitoring is facilitated by thirteen, continuously recording
groundwater gauges located throughout the wetland restoration area (Figure 2) During
the 2010 monitoring season, groundwater data was collected monthly from all
monitoring gauges
2.3. Results of Hydrologic Monitoring
2.3.1. Site Data
The maximum number of consecutive days that groundwater was within 12 inches of
the surface was determined for each groundwater gauge This number was converted
into a percentage of the 258 -day growing season The results are summarized in
Table 1
Appendix B contains hydrographs of the water depth for each groundwater gauge In
general, groundwater levels show a typical pattern of flooding or high water table during
the winter to early spring, followed by a summer and early fall drawdown period,
punctuated by peaks of associated precipitation events
Mon1tonng Year 7 (20 10) 3 December 2010

Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Table 1. Key Branch Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Monitoring
Success
Number of Days
Gauge
<5%
5 -12.5%
>12.5%
Actual %
Dates
Gauges met
Success Criteria
KBMG1
✓
67.8
March 11 —
175
September 1
KBMG2
✓
13.6
May 520 June
35
KBMG3
✓
21.7
March 5
56
KBMG5
✓
10.9
March 11 —
28
April 7
KBMG6
✓
44.6
March 11 —
115
July 3
KBMG7
✓
43.8
March 11 —
113
July 1
KBMG8
✓
14
March 11 —
38
.7
April 17
KBMG9
✓
11
March 11 —
30
.6
April 9
KBMG10
✓
12.0
March 11 —
31
April 10
KBMG11
✓
12.0
March 11 —
31
April 10
KBMG12
✓
48.4
March 11 —
125
July 3
KBMG13'
✓
0
N/A
0
KBMG14
✓
10.5
March 11 —
27
April 6
°gauge maitunctions repeatedly tnrougnout monitoring penoa
2.3.2. Climatic Data
Figure 3 shows a comparison of 2010 monthly rainfall to historical precipitation for the
area. The figure shows average rainfall data collected between 1948 and 2010 and
compares 30 percent and 70 percent of all observations with the actual 2010 monthly
rainfall amount to determine average. (Climate data only available through
August 2010)
The Site experienced 6 months of average rainfall throughout the monitoring period.
The months of April and June received below average rainfall. April and June
experienced amounts less than half of the monthly average. On balance, the yearly
precipitation was close to the historical average.
Monitoring Year 7 (20 10) 4 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
3.0 STREAM ASSESSMENT
3.1. Stream Monitoring Requirements
The Key Branch monitoring plan requires an assessment of geomorphologic
parameters in keeping with the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) "Stream
Mitigation Guidelines ", dated April 2003 The monitoring plan includes the protocol and
provisions for providing photographs and channel stability analysis on a yearly basis
PBSU used GPS equipment along with metal detectors to locate existing cross section
pins Twelve permanent cross - sections were located and surveyed The existing cross -
sections were divided evenly between riffle and pool bed features A 3000 foot
longitudinal profile of the restored channel was surveyed beginning near station 13 +00
Bank stability and overall condition of the site was assessed during the cross - section
and longitudinal profile surveys Lateral photographs were collected at each cross -
section (Appendix D) A stream monitoring gauge located in the channel provides
stream elevation data to verify bankfull events
3.2. Post Construction Conditions
The Key Branch project involved the construction of approximately 6200 linear feet of
channel using a Priority 1 restoration approach All of the riparian buffer mitigation was
categorized as Priority 2 enhancement Engineered structures included -hook vanes,
log vanes, rock cross vanes, rootwad revetments, step pools, and additional bank
sloping A step pool was installed at the beginning and end of the reach to maintain
grade A rootwad complex was installed in the apex of numerous bends with cover logs
for habitat Cross vanes, log vanes, and j -hook vanes were installed throughout the
reach to direct higher flow velocities into the center of the channel Throughout the
entire reach the inner berm was maintained, enhanced, or created as channel
modifications were made
3.3 Results of Stream Monitoring
The mitigation plan stipulated placing a cross - section every 20 bankfull widths, a total of
twelve cross sections were surveyed Three cross - sections were identified as riffles,
cross sections 5, 10, and 12 For this report, only cross sections containing riffles were
used in the comparison of channel morphology presented below in Table 4 Data
shown in Table 3 includes all cross sections surveyed along the reach The stream
channel was dry at the time of survey, therefore no water surface was recorded The
stream gauge registered three bankfull events during the 2010 monitoring year (March
13, March 30, and July 4)
Since the construction of Key Branch, a beaver impoundment located approximately
150 feet upstream of the end of the project has caused the water to back up throughout
the reach (see Figure 2, Appendix A) Two additional beaver impoundments found at
the start of the site have been removed as recent as November 2010 (see photos in
Monitonng Year 7 (2010) 5 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Appendix C) EEP dispatched wildlife control specialists on multiple occasions over the
projects monitoring period to remove beaver and the associated dams, however, the
combination of the sites size, wetland extent and abundant beaver population
surrounding the site has made for persistent recolonization Creeping water primrose
(Ludwigta hexapeta/a), an exotic invasive, was found growing densely throughout the
stream channel
Monitonng Year 7 (2010)
I
J
December 2010
_J

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
4.0 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
4.1. Success Criteria
According to the 2003 USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines, the success criteria for
vegetation requires that at least 320 stems per acre must survive after the completion
of the third growing season The required survival criterion will decrease by 10 percent
per year after the third year of vegetation monitoring (i e , for an expected 290 stems
per acre for Year 4, 260 stems per acre for Years 5, 6, and 7 NCDOT Stem Counting
Protocol was used as the standard sampling methodology
4.2. Description of Species
Based on the mitigation plan, the wetland restoration area and the riparian restoration
area were to be planted with the following species
- Wetland
Quercus pagoda (Cherrybark Oak)
_ Quercus phellos (Willow Oak)
Quercus mlchauxi► (Swamp Chestnut Oak)
Quercus lyrata (Overcup Oak)
Quercus n/gra (Water Oak)
Ulmus amencana (American Elm)
Frax/nus pennsylvanica (Green Ash)
Betula nlgra (River Birch)
Riparian
Betula n/gra (River Birch)
Salix nlgra (Black Willow)
Cephalanthus occldentalls (Buttonbush)
Corpus amomum (Silky dogwood)
4.3. Results of Vegetation Monitoring
The average stem density for the riparian plots were less than the 260 stems per acre
needed for the success criteria, however, the overall average for the Site was
460 stems per acre, which is significantly more than the criteria needed for success
(Photographs from the vegetation plots are provided in Appendix C)
Monitoring Year 7 (20 10) 10 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
D......i f Dimftriftn \ /nnntotinn Pinto Mnnitnrinn
'r 99 1., 7 0 i .,t Wetion.i vonotntinn Pinto Mnnitnrinn
i
3 N
l9
N
�
i
W:
la
N
i
E
i
Riparian
m
L
c
?
L°
y
is
N
L o
c
Cn
y N
Plots
r
R
N
��
L
2
�M
�,
mo
U.
O
E O
v CL
M
N
E
F-
2
m
U
a
yW
Cn
«`.
Plots
i
R1
5
0
12
2
6
0
2
2
10
0
39
390
R5
4
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
2
0
12
120
R6
3
0
3
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
12
120
R10
1
0
11
1
8
6
0
0
0
1
28
280
TOTAL
1 13
1
26
3
20
9
4
2
12
1
91
910
Average Tree Density: 228
'r 99 1., 7 0 i .,t Wetion.i vonotntinn Pinto Mnnitnrinn
Monitoring Year 7 (20 10) 11
December 2010 -
''x
m
L
•C
E
R
N
L
2
tM
U)
E
l4
Wetland
S
2
N
E
yW
Cn
«`.
Plots
i
C
'
L
L
E C
E
rte+
v
Q
m
D.
V d
J N
d
7
N
N 0
>
I•-
C
Q
O
D2
0
0
2
0
4
0
4
14
2
6
1
0
33
579
D3
0
0
4
0
38
0
4
9
0
0
0
6
61
1070
D5
0
1
6
1
10
2
4
6
8
2
0
0
40
400
D8
1
2
2
0
7
1
1
18
6
3
0
0
41
719
TOTALS
1
3
14
1
59
3
13
47
16
11
1
6
175
2768
Average Tree Density: 692
Monitoring Year 7 (20 10) 11
December 2010 -

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Table 8. Riparian Plot Vegetation Summary Data
Species
Riparian Plot_ Numbers
Year
1
5
6
10
Betula nigra
(River birch)
2005
2
1
0
0
2006
2
1
0
0
2007
1
1
0
0
2008
5
4
3
1
2009
5
4
3
1
2010
5
4
3
1
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
(Green ash)
2005
0
1
1
1
2006
1
1
3
3
2007
0
1
2
3
2008
12
0
3
12
2009
12
0
3
11
2010
12
0
3
11
Ouercus laurifolia
(Laurel oak)
2005
0
0
0
0
2006
0
0
0
0
2007
0
0
1
1
2008
2
0
0
0
2009
2
0
0
0
2010
2
0
0
1
Ouercus /grata
(Overcup oak)
2005
1
1
4
0
2006
0
0
4
0
2007
0
1
3
0
2008
5
2
2
7
2009
6
4
2
8
2010
6
4
2
8
Ouercus michauxii
(Swamp chestnut
oak)
2005
0
0
0
1
2006
0
0
0
0
2007
0
0
0
2
2008
0
1
2
6
2009
0
1
2
6
2010
0
1
2
6
Salix nigra
(Black willow)
2005
1
1
7
0
2006
1
3
7
0
2007
1
3
5
0
2008
10
1
0
0
2009
10
2
0
0
2010
1 10
2 1
0 1
0
Monitoring Year 7 (2010) 12 December 2010

i
Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Tahle 9_ Wetland Plot Venetation Summary Data
Species
Wetland Plot Numbers
Year
2
3
5
8
Betula nigra
(River birch)
2005
0
3
0
1
2006
0
3
1
1
2007
1
4
4
2
2008
2
4
3
1
2009
2
4
4
2
2010
2
4
6
2
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
(Green ash)
2005
3
11
0
4
2006
2
16
0
4
2007
4
32
6
11
2008
6
33
10
3
2009
4
38
9
7
2010
4
38
10
7
Quercus laurifolia
(Laurel oak)
2005
7
0
0
0
2006
3
0
2
0
2007
8
2
4
4
2008
1
1
3
0
2009
4
4
5
1
2010
4
4
4
1
Quercus lyrata
(Overcup oak)
2005
14
11
4
0
2006
5
11
4
3
2007
8
8
10
15
2008
14
11
4
19
2009
14
9
6
18
2010
14
9
6
18
Quercus mkhauxii
(Swamp chestnut oak)
2005
2
0
2
4
2006
2
0
1
4
2007
2
0
6
6
2008
2
0
8
5
2009
2
0
8
6
2010
2
0
8
6
Quercus pagoda
(Cherrybark oak)
2005
0
0
8
7
2006
3
0
1
0
2007
0
0
0
1
2008
0
0
0
0
2009
0
0
0
0
i
Monitonng Year 7 (20 10) 13 December 2010 -

Ir'
I r�
I
J
Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Species
Wetland
Plot Numbers
Year
2
3
5
8
2010
0
0
0
0
Quercus phellos
(Willow oak)
2005
2
1
0
0
2006
0
2
0
0
2007
1
1
0
0
2008
0
0
0
0
2009
0
0
0
0
2010
0
0
0
0
Salix nigra
(Black willow)
2005
0
0
0
0
2006
0
0
0
0
2007
0
0
0
0
2008
0
0
0
0
2009
0
0
0
0
2010
0
0
0
0
ti
Monitonng Year 7 (20 10) 14 December 2010

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
5.0 REFERENCES
State Climate Office of North Carolina CRONOS precipitation database [online]
Retrieved 11 -29 -10
NRCS USDA National Water and Climate Center Climate Information- Wetlands
Retrieval for Anson County Growing Season [online] Retrieved 11 -29 -10
http / /www wcc nres usda gov /cgibin /getwetco pl ?state =nc
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003 Authored by a workgroup consisting of -
USACE (Wilmington District, USEPA, NCWRC and NCDWQ) Riparian Restoration
pg 18
PI
Monitonng Year 7 (20 10) 15 December 2010 _I

Key Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Mon►tonng Year 7 (20 10) December 2010

t J
' ' r
d •. j �
t - —�V0.
PE
R, i;,'.r J
{ t 9
,_N I S 0 N
142
J %
I
5
t.
PROJECT.f°'`��
STUDY
AREA
tic
'1
-�, F r
..E.
Directions: 0 1,500 3,000 6,000
Go west on Hwy 74 from Wadesboro in Anson County to Peachland. Feet
Turn left onto Mineral Springs Church Rd. and then right onto Lower White Store Road.
Pass Hasty Rd. and then just before Turkey Growing Rd, turn left into Key Branch Site on a gravel road.
Client Dwn By. CkA By.
SITE LOCATION
TAL MCG FIGURE
ti Date:
jy� KEY BRANCH STREAM & DEC 2009
S0elll WETLAND RESTORATION SITE Scale
AS SHOWN 'O
11 1<tl Va J11clit Anson County, North Carolina
ESC Project No.
08 -414
si

LEGEND
--99-- EXISTING CONTOURS
— — — PROJECT STUDY AREA
{ PRESERVED WETLANDS (6 AC.)
RESTORED WETLANDS (91.4 AC.)
EXISTING FOREST (NOT PLANTED) (26.9 AC.)
CONSTRUCTED STREAM CHANNEL
2010 SURVEYED STREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO LOCATIONS
KBSG -1 STREAM MONITORING GAUGE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING GAUGES
MAXIMUM PERCENT OF GROWING SEASON WITH
CONTINUOUS SATURATION IN TOP 12 INCHES
> 12.5%
]75
5 -12%
<5%
VEGETATION PLOTS
R6 • ♦113 <260 STEMS
R6 • ♦113 >260 STEMS /ACRE
z" ua
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF
EAVER IMPOUNDMENT (4.70 ACRES ±)
250 0 250
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
MATCHLINE (SEE SHEET 2)
pwal .
y
an Atkins company
SIONS
Client:
r~
7
1Ak0system
Project:
KEY BRANCH
STREAM &
WETLAND
RESTORATION
SITE
ANSON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Dwn. By: Ckd. By:
RLG JWG
Date: Scale:
DEC 2010 1" =250'
Project No.:
100005068
FIGURE
2A
Vvi'
250 0 250
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
MATCHLINE (SEE SHEET 2)
pwal .
y
an Atkins company
SIONS
Client:
r~
7
1Ak0system
Project:
KEY BRANCH
STREAM &
WETLAND
RESTORATION
SITE
ANSON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Title:
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Dwn. By: Ckd. By:
RLG JWG
Date: Scale:
DEC 2010 1" =250'
Project No.:
100005068
FIGURE
2A

E,.
MATCHLINE (SEE SHEET 1)
asc ,b
•E
250' 0 250'
MWEEMW
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
.44 -
O�
0
tr'�yetti�'
1p ;4
41. "°`
LEGEN
--99-- EXISTING CONTOURS
— — — — PROJECT STUDY AREA
{ PRESERVED WETLANDS 6 AC.
RESTORED WETLANDS (91.4 AC.)
a _ EXISTING FOREST (NOT PLANTED) (26.9 AC.)
CONSTRUCTED STREAM CHANNEL
�l 2010 SURVEYED STREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO LOCATIONS
KBSG -1 STREAM MONITORING GAUGE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING GAUGES
MAXIMUM PERCENT OF GROWING SEASON WITH
CONTINUOUS SATURATION IN TOP 12 INCHES
© > 12.5%
a
5 -12%
MG -5
<5%
VEGETATION PLOTS
R6 • ♦D3 <260 STEMS
R6 • ♦D3 >260 STEMS /ACRE
M"offo
J0
an Atkins company
IONS
ent:
r�
f 0syste�m I(
Project:
KEY BRANCH
STREAM &
WETLAN D
RESTORATION
SITE
ANSON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
'itle:
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Dwn. By: Ckd. By:
RLG JWG
Date: Scale:
DEC 2010 1" =250'
Project No.:
100005068
FIGURE
al

6
5
4
0
CZ 3
0-
.0
N
a 2
M
Fig 3. Key Branch 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010
Wadesboro, NC
Jan -10 Feb -10 Mar -10 Apr -10 May -10 Jun -10 Jul -10 Aug -10
® 2010 Rainfall
70th Percentile
30th Percentile
Date

e
f I
I Fi
Key Branch Stream and Weiland Restoration (EEP Project 206) Anson County, NC
Monitonng Year 7 (20 10)
APPENDIX B
GROUNDWATER GAUGE HYDROGRAPHS
December 2010

0
a�
N
O_
O
00
0
CD
n
CD
3
Cr
CD
N
O
O
IZ-
#. -a
Q
N
i
Cll
Cz
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 1 - 1130E7CF
0)
LO
N
O E
L N — N
Cz 2 Q p
a Z
Month
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
m
C=
O
Cz
Q
�U
Cll
i

K
0
o�
N
O
A
00
N
0
CD
n
CD
3
a-
N
O
O
4--p
Q
N
r)
i
CO
►i
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 2 - AB35E52
CO r
N =
i L Q N
cn 2 Q >
g o
Z
Month
2.5
mm
1.5
1.0
0.5
m�
C
C
O
'+-a
C�
Q
�U
N
i

0
CD
w
N
O_
O
0
CD
CD
3
0-
N
O
L-1
Q
i
CTS
G
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 3 - A28C2B0
CO
N N
2 L >
Cz 2 a z°
C
Month
2.5
2.0
1.5
w
0.5
[$
C
O
Cz
Q
�U
N
i
0-

K
0
o�
Q
CD
W
N
O
0
0
CD
0
CD
3
07
CD
1
N
O
0
Q
0
Cz
►i
J
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 5 - A286E29
W
t!) CO a
N
Q O
ro Z
Month
2.2
wiz
1.8
1.6 �
1.4
1.2 , O
1.0 Q
0.8 U
N
i
0.6 0—
0.4
0.2
ms

CD
0
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
CL 4
(1) 0
0 -4
N -8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 6 - 9DE7A19
r co r
I_— N _ E
2 L Q a)
co 2 Q a
Month
2.5
w
1.5 0
1.0 -QL
N
MR
MI
ri1

O
D
CD
o�
w
N
O
1
O
0
n
CD
3
07
N
0
Q
i
(z
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
4
-4
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Key Branch
2010
Monitoring Gauge 7 - 9DE535B
2 2
r 1
-C N -
- Q
c0 2 Q
w
� c
c O
U)
U) co T
Ay
N
E
N
O
Z
c
0
Month
2.5
2.0
1.5 0O
a--0
Cz
1.0 - CL
i
0.5
fl
,i1

�IY�I�I�I
��_I�.I■�rl
�
IY�I
111�I■N�I■I�
Key BranchiWetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County
S—Y Date
sill 3/10 — 9/14/10
Suley Weather
Michael Gaden. Jeremy Schmid. Jeriii Ger.0

. • .
.
' ..
_.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
�.
-�-
I�Iillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
�_�_
''
��111111111111111111111111111�
'■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■
■ ■•••
--
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��llllllll��illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
�-�-
Ilillllllllllllllllllllli�!!
�illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
____
1
su—Y Oct.
9/13/10 — 9/14/10
Survey Weather
S.nny
Loco ion
Station 26+50

0
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllll
... IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.:
- . Illllllllllllllllllllllllli��lllllllll
' .. Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
.
®__
®__
�_�_
�_�_�_�_
'■
�������IIIIIIIIIIII��1�!
��■
��IIIII�IIIIIII��11111111111111111111111111��������
A11111111111111111��1II��
■.�...�.
���'�
��
����
.!�illllllllllllllllllllllll
____
____
IN!
MEN
w-
s
Cross-section
:�
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County
Survey Date
SuNey Weather
Team

Survey
Data
I
ti
e�
Summary
Data
9/13/1 1 — 9/14/10
Sunny
Michael Gi,d­ densmy Schmid. Jens Ge,,t,

Survey Data
IIYIIIIIIINIIIIIIYIII�IIRIIII
III�IIlullllll�llllllllllllllllllllllllllll
-
��
"
"��UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIIIr;;■
■;;VIII
MMM
01111 M-101.
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County

0
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
:.. I..
Illlllllllll���lllli'
- . Illlllllllllllllllllllli�llllllll�illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
' Illlllllllllllllllllllllllliiii�llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
'
"�-
....... . .
®
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
l,,,���������illlllll
�_�___
-��
111111111111111�i11��llllllllllllllllllllllll
����
____
YY1i
• _
•
��
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County
Su'.Y Date
9/14/10
SuNey Weather
Stmny
F.ld Team
Michael Gl.d�.. Jeremy Schmid, dens Geratz
L.. !an
Station 44+00

•.
Data
IIIIIIIIIIililllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�lllll
:.. Illllllllllllllllllllli;
.: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��
= . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
' .. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
®
®®
!!!!!!!!:�����IIII
�11111111111111111111111111111111111111
�_�_
} ..:..:...
,.
INS
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
®_
�_
=_
=_
____
a
-
-
--
M
* •
t
\t
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County

N�IIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAIIIIiI
1. A —medlonm facing
fleld
�
�
non
-ate
W �•
v
MCross-Section
10
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County
Survey Date
9/' 3/10 — 9/14/10
S—y Weather
Sunny
Field Team
Wchael Glode, Jeremy Schmid. Jens GeraU

Data
Survey
��
I�III�II�II�II
ICI
=�
���
1►1
■II■1
�asJ
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site. Anson County
3/10 _ 9/14/10
Sunny
Michael Gloclen. Jere.y Schmid. Jen. ..0

•t 12 Fiffte
..
IIIIIIII_
:.. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiii�111111111111�
' .: Illlllllllllllllllllllllllliilllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
• . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
' .. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
•
r.
�,..,
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
_IIIIIIIIIII
®_
®_
;illlllllllllllllllllllllllll
�____�__
'? -.: , . • ....
. •
®_�_
OEM=.
____
____
ow
-
-
--
0
Cross-Section
i1
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site. Anson County
9/1 3/10 - 9/1*/10
S.ny
Michael Gicd.n. Jer'emy Schmid. Jens Geratz

Legend
2010 (YEAR 7) BANKFULL
2010 (YEAR 7) GRADE ELEVATION THALWEG
104,
103
102
0 1 01
° 100
w99
-
— -—
- - -
- -- L- ; - --
I—
98
0 97
-
�—
-
—
+
--
9 6
a�
951
4—,
94
-- - --
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200
Station
_- NOTE: NO WATER IN CHANNEL
BANKFULL SLOPE:0.00057 AT TIME OF SURVEY.
Title
Longitudinal Profile
Project
Key Branch Wetland and Stream Restoration Site, Anson County
Project p
306
Figure
Longitudinal Pro file
Survey Date
1
Survey Weather
I
Field Team
Location
9/13/10 — 9/14/10
Sunny
Michoel Gloden, Jeremy Schmid. Jens Geratz
Station