20051241 Ver 2_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20090817

05-I'ayl
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project
Contract #:
County:
Cataloging Unit:
Monitoring Firm POC
Prepared For:
D05016 -3
Iredell
Catawba 03050101
Mid - Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
Christine Cook (704) 782 -4133 x 101
EEP Project Manager, Guy Pearce
Year 3 Monitoring Report - August 2009
M i d- A t l a n t i c
M i t i Q a t i o n L L C
RECEIVED
AUG 1 7 2009
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT ABSTRACT
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
Figure 1: Project Location and Drainage Map
3.0 PROJECT CONDITON AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
3.1.3 Stem Counts
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
3.2 WETLAND ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Wetland Criteria Attainment
3.2.2 Photo Reference Points
4.0 SITE SUCCESS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
TABLES
Table I.
Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Table II.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table III.
Project Contacts
Table IV.
Project Background
Table V.
Preliminary Soil Data
Table VI.
Stems Counts
Table VII.
Success Criteria Attainment
Table VIII.
Wetland Criteria Attainment
Table IX.
Percent of Growing Season by Year
1
1
1
1
5
5
6
7
7
9
9
3
3
4
4
5
6
8
8
8
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 1 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. Vegetation Data and Photo Log
APPENDIX B. Ground and Surface Water Data
APPENDIX C. Monitoring Plan View
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project ii Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
On behalf of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), Mid-
_ Atlantic Mitigation, LLC (MAM) with technical assistance from Environmental Services,
Inc (ESI) restored 4 2 acres of riverme wetlands, enhanced 2 2 acres, an additional 8 26
acres of enhancement and preservation areas not included in the WMU calculation are
present on site Grading of the Reeds Creek Site was completed December 2006 Planting
and seeding of the site were completed in January 2007 Overall, the project will restore,
enhance, and/or preserve approximately 14 66 acres of forested and emergent wetlands
and upland buffer, of which 5 3 will be provided as riverine wetland mitigation units
(WMUs) to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
The goals and objectives of the Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project (Reeds Project)
are to restore the hydrologic functions, the native vegetation of the degraded and drained
wetlands, flood retention and water quality functions within the Reeds Creek watershed
of the Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050101)
Existing berms and spoil piles adjacent to Reeds Creek were graded down to a more
natural elevation and the other existing fill areas were removed Native woody vegetation
has been established in this area Jurisdictional wetlands were preserved in the semi -
permanently impounded area associated with Lake Norman Jurisdictional wetlands were
enhanced and/or restored in the area south of Reeds Creek
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Reeds Project is a 14 66 -acre tract located southwest of Mooresville, Iredell County,
North Carolina off of U S Highway 21, approximately 13 miles northeast of the U S
Highway 21 and Interstate 77 intersection (see Figure 1) The project site is located in
the Catawba River Watershed (USGS 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit 03050101, and NCDWQ
River Basin 03- 08 -32) NCDWQ has assigned Reeds Creek within the project site the
Stream Index Number (SIN) of 11- 104(2) The site is immediately adjacent to Lake
Norman and is characterized by a variable floodplain associated with Reeds Creek The
site is currently owned by Mid - Atlantic Mitigation, LLC with the Conservation Easement
being held by the State of North Carolina
2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of the Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project are to restore
the hydrologic functions, the native vegetation of the degraded and drained wetlands,
flood retention and water quality functions within the Reeds Creek watershed of the
Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050101) A Project Location Map is provided in Figure 1
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 1 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Existing berms and spoil piles adjacent to Reeds Creek were graded down to a more
natural elevation and the other existing fill areas were removed The material was graded
to the surrounding landscape to provide microtopographic complexity and woody
planting zones These areas where the topography was enhanced will create diverse
habitats instead of the monotypical, flat lake fringe area that previously existed Surface
hydrology will be reintroduced to the restoration areas via more frequent overbank
flooding from Reeds Creek Native woody vegetation has been established in this area
Jurisdictional wetlands were preserved in the semi - permanently impounded area
associated with Lake Norman Jurisdictional wetlands were enhanced and /or restored in
the area south of Reeds Creek Minor grading, adjacent to the wettest areas, was done to
f expand the wetland hydrology and create microtopography within the contiguous
floodplam and wetland area
The riparian wetland and buffer vegetation community will transition as the system seeks
its hydrologic and vegetative equilibrium Sediments on site were initially unconsolidated
and mucky with saturation due to Lake Norman water level fluctuations While water
level fluctuations are still anticipated, the areas and duration of inundation can only be
determined through post - construction observation and monitoring It was anticipated that
settling and subsidence would occur throughout the initial growing season, first through
evaporation and then through transpiration as the herbaceous cover (seeded and natural
propagation) established Areas that were not saturated/ponded (i.e fringe areas and/or
microtopographic mounds) were planted with bare root seedlings to establish a
bottomland hardwood riparian wetland community
In order to stabilize the newly constructed wetlands and flood plain areas, both temporary
and permanent grass seed were applied to all restored areas. The types of seeds used
were Leersza oryzoides (Rice Cut grass), Panzcum clandestinum (Deertongue grass),
Panicum virgatum (Switchgrass), Trisacum dactyloides (Gama grass), Juncus effusus
(soft rush) and Secale cereale (Annual rye) Three hardwood planting zones were
established as follows Zone 1 -Swamp Forest Zone (the lowest elevations on site), Zone
2- Bottomland Forest Zone (transitional elevations), and Zone 3 -Levee Forest Zone
(areas associated with the tops of the microtopographic planting mounds) A density of
over 750 stems per acre was planted throughout the project Livestakes were installed in
some of the wetter areas but further livestakmg along Reeds Creek may be necessary as
the new streambank/floodplam area stabilizes with its associated wetlands
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 2 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 1. Proiect Mitigation Structure and Obiectives Table
Table II. Proiect Activitv and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Wetland
Actual
Completion
Date
Restoration Plan
October 2005
Project
Mitigation
February 2006
December 2006
Site Planting and installation of
monitoring devices
Segment
Type
Acreage
WMU's
Comment
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2006
November 2007
Year 2 Monitoring
Restoration areas are
October 2008
Year 3 Monitoring
December 2008
August 2009
located along Reeds
December 2009
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
Creek and front, center
of site near access
Wetland
R
42
42
road (s)
Enhancement areas
are located between
the restored areas and
the existing wetlands
Wetland
E1
22
1 1
reservation area
Wetland
P and E1
826
-
Not included in WMU's
Table II. Proiect Activitv and Reporting History
Project was delayed 9 months due to issues with the Duke Power 760 Contour Lake
Easement for Lake Norman. These issues had been addressed prior to proposal
submittal, however Duke Power's merger with Cinergy created changes in
personnel and policy which required Mid - Atlantic to re -apply for these approvals.
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Proiect 3 Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Activity or Report
Calendar Year of Completion or
Planned Completion
Actual
Completion
Date
Restoration Plan
October 2005
March 2006
Site Work Completed
February 2006
December 2006
Site Planting and installation of
monitoring devices
March 2006
January 2007
Mitigation Plan
April 2006
Aril 2007
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2006
November 2007
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2007
October 2008
Year 3 Monitoring
December 2008
August 2009
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2009
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2010
Project was delayed 9 months due to issues with the Duke Power 760 Contour Lake
Easement for Lake Norman. These issues had been addressed prior to proposal
submittal, however Duke Power's merger with Cinergy created changes in
personnel and policy which required Mid - Atlantic to re -apply for these approvals.
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Proiect 3 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

f�
Table III. Proiect Contacts
Project Manager
Project County
Mid - Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
1960 Derrta Road
4 9 square miles
Concord, NC 28027
10%
Rich Mogensen (704) 782 -4133
Designer
Ecoregion
Environmental Services Inc
9401 -C Southern Pine Blvd.
Palustrine, Forested, Broad - leaved
Deciduous
Charlotte, NC 28273
PFO1 Fh
Paul Petitgout (704) 523 -7225
Construction Contractor
Reference site ID
Environmental Services Inc
9401 -C Southern Pine Blvd
03050101
Charlotte, NC 28273
03- 08 -32, SIN 11- 104(2)
Paul Petitgout (704) 523 -7225
Planting & Seeding Contractor
271 Windrush Trail
Southeastern Tree
Walhalla, SC 29691
And
Bill Knowles (864) 710 -5970
Mid - Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
1960 Denta Road
Concord, NC 28027
Kristy Rodrigue (704) 277 -3383
Monitoring Performers
Mid - Atlantic Mitigation, LLC
1960 Derrta Road
Concord, NC 28027
Christine Cook (704) 782 -4140
Table IV. Project Background
Project Background Table
Project County
Iredell
Drainage Area
4 9 square miles
Drainage Cover Estimate ( %)
Impervious area at time of Restoration Plan
10%
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Southern Outer Piedmont 45b
Wetland Type
Palustrine, Forested, Broad - leaved
Deciduous
Cowardm Classification
PFO1 Fh
Dominant soil types
Chewacla with inclusions of Wehadkee
Reference site ID
Reeds Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03050101
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03- 08 -32, SIN 11- 104(2)
% of protect easement fenced
12 5 — Urban site surrounded by private
residence
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 4 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3.1.1 Soil Data
Table V. Prelimina Soil Data
Series
Max Depth
(in)
% Clay on
Surface
K
T
OM
%
Chewacla
60
10-27
.28
5
1 -4
Wehadkee
62
6-20
24 - 28
1 3
1 <1
3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
At this time, no vegetative problem areas or invasive species issues have been identified
The site has been stabilized and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species.
1 Black willows colonized the site between Year 2 and 3 at a high rate Currently, based on
the composition of the sample plots, the enhancement areas of the site are approximately
60% black willows, while the restoration areas show only about 4% black willows. These
numbers seem to indicate a black willow monoculture could be forming However, the
�- composition of the on -site preservation areas indicate that while black willow may be the
dominate species it does not out compete or prevent other species from thriving as well
The black willows in the enhancement area will be thinned between Year 3 and 4, but no
aggressive strategies, such as herbicide treatments of willows are proposed at this time
3.1.3 Stem Counts
The prevalent vegetation should consist of macrophytes that typically are adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions These species should have the ability to grow, compete,
reproduce, and persist in anaerobic soil conditions A maximum of 15% nuisance
vegetation in wetland areas with planted and volunteer vegetation will successfully
indicate establishment of native wetland vegetation Study plots show that the
composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas compares closely to the
reference areas Stem counts of over 320 trees per acre after 3 years, and 260 trees per
acre after 5 years will be considered successful Photos taken at established photo points
should indicate maturation of the riparian vegetation community Photographs will help
to illustrate the health of the planted vegetation and the seventy of the invasive or exotic
species that are found within the site Permanent vegetation sampling plots have been
established at 2 random locations and sample each planting zone Plot A is located in the
restoration area, and Plot B is located in the enhancement area The success of vegetative
plantings will be measured through stems counts These plots will be used to sample
both the riparian buffer and restored wetlands Each plot will cover 100 square meters
for tree counts. During the counts, the health of the vegetation will be noted In
addition to stem counts, the samples will inventory species diversity to allow for
comparison between the reference and restoration wetlands and track the percent cover of
nuisance species The vegetation survey will occur during the growing season.
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 5 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

On July 23rd, 2008, the third year - vegetative monitoring was performed on the
established vegetation sampling plots. Table VI below summarizes the results of this
survey
Exhibit Table VI. Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot (Part A)
Species
Plots -
Actual
Count
Surviving Planted Stems
Survival
N
A
B
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Shrubs
960
960
Plot B
83%
78%
65%
1320
Cephalanthus ocadentahs
7
9
13
11
11
11
85%
Cornus amomum
10
10
19
15
15
19
100%
Totals
17
19
32
26
26
30
94%
Trees
Betula nigra
4
1
10
5
5
3
30%
Fraxmus pennsylvan►ca
1
1
11
6
6
2
18%
Linodendron tulipifera
0
1
1
0
0
0%
Quercus lyrata
4
3
4
3
3
1 3
75%
Quercus michauxu
1
2
6
5
4
3
50%
Quercus pagodifoha
3
7
7
5
5
71%
Quercus phellos
1
3
3
3
1
33%
Salix nigra
1
39
3
3
3
3
100%
Totals
10
19
45
33
29
20
44%
Woody Stems Total:
24
31
77
59
55
50
65%
Part B
Survival
2007
Survival
2008
Survival
2009
SPA
2007
SPA
2008
SPA
2009
Plot A
70%
65%
65%
1040
960
960
Plot B
83%
78%
65%
1320
1240
1040
Total
1 77%
71%
1 65%
1 1180
1 1100
1 1000
3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary
Vegetation success will be defined as tree survival to meet 320 stems per acre after 3
years and 260 stems per acre after 5 years inside the permanent vegetation sampling plots
and herbaceous cover evaluated with photos showing 75% coverage, after 5 years
In general, the site was over planted to allow for mortality. The site as a whole shows an
average of 1000 planted stems per acre and demonstrates 65 percent survival of planted
species The community is diverse and rich with healthy volunteers Large numbers of
buttonbush and black willow volunteers are present on site and in plots.
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 6 Monrtormg Year 3 of 5

The herbaceous cover plant community was monitored in a 1 in by 1 in square at one
corner of each plot Each herbaceous quadrant is at or close to 100% cover with no
invasive species noted Additional data from the vegetation sampling plots is located in
Appendix A
3.2 WETLAND ASSESSMENT
3.2.1 Wetland Criteria Attainment
There are three water level monitoring gages located on the Reeds Creek Project
Gages 1 and 2 are located in the restoration area and Gage 3 is located in the
enhancement area in the same location as the pre - construction gage. There are both
mature forested and emergent areas of preservation which were not included in the WMU
calculations adjacent to the small unnamed tributary entering the site from the southeast
corner and flowing into the cove for the Huntington neighborhood. There is a 4t' gage
located in the preservation/fringe area of the site to be used as an on site reference The
data will be downloaded once a month throughout the monitoring period A USGS rain
gage located on Lake Norman (Gage #35301408052495 CRN -42 Norman Shores) will be
used to monitor the amount of rainfall This will be correlated with the ground water data
4 Lake Norman lake levels will also be monitored if the site becomes inundated from high
lake levels As stated in the Mitigation Plan, jurisdictional hydrology for the site will be
defined as saturation within the upper 12 inches of the surface of the soils for a period of
approximately 24 consecutive days during the growing season (239 days between March
and October) or approximately 10% of the growing season Inundation periods of
between 5 and 10% of the growing season may be acceptable in a year that is on record
for moderate to severe drought. The NC Cooperative Extension Service actually lists the
average growing season for Iredell County as 179 days. Therefore, in a year of average
precipitation hydrological success for the Reeds Creek site will be a minimum of 18 days
Gages 1 through 3 entered the onset of the growing season at jurisdictional levels
and maintained them throughout the spring season The Reference gage (4) has been
' dryer than the site gages, but achieved jurisdictional hydrology in the spring as well. The
reference area is thickly vegetated, including a large stand of mature Black Willows near
the gage and is far removed from the inundation effect of Lake Norman Both of these
factors could affect the hydrology of this gage Graphs showing water levels and
corresponding rainfall data are located in Appendix B.
Based on the gage data for 2009, the site has achieved jurisdictional hydrology for the
third consecutive monitoring year Lake Norman Lake levels were higher in Year 3 than
any previous years The area of inundation located in the center of the site closest to the
leading edge of the lake is a mapped NWI wetlands and is considered on site preservation
and not included in the credit calculations for the site This area has remained inundated
for the better part of this year (2009) to date A table showing the 2008 — 2009 13 month
lake level history is provided in Appendix B
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 7 Monrtormg Year 3 of 5

Exhibit Table VII: Success Criteria Attainment
Exhibit Table VIII: Wetland Criteria Attainment
Well ID
Well
Gage 2 R]
Well
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?
Total days w/
Jurisdictional
Hydrology
Percent of
Growing Season
w/ Jurisdictional
Hydrology
Reeds
Hydrology
88
49%
Vegetation
Y
84
Threshold
Reeds 3
Vegetation Plot
Survival
41%
Well ID
Met?
Mean
ID
Threshold Met?
Mean
Reeds 1
Y
100
Plot A
Y
100
Reeds 2
Y
Reeds 3
Y
Plot B
Y
Reeds
Ref
Y
Exhibit Table VIII: Wetland Criteria Attainment
Well ID
Gage 1 [R]
Gage 2 R]
Well
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?
Total days w/
Jurisdictional
Hydrology
Percent of
Growing Season
w/ Jurisdictional
Hydrology
Reeds
Y
88
49%
Reeds 2
Y
84
47%
Reeds 3
Y
73
41%
Reeds Ref
N
24
13%
Ehxibit Table IX: Percent of Growing Season (179 days) with groundwater
continuously within 12 inches
Below 10% but above 5%
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project g Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Gage 1 [R]
Gage 2 R]
Gage 3 (E)
Gage 4
(REF)
Mon. Year 1 (2007)
6.7
8.9
38.0
19.0
Mon. Year 2 (2008)
100
39.7
70.4
5.6
Mon. Year 3 (2009)
49.2
46.9
40.8
13.4
Mon. Year 4 (2010)
Mon. Year 5 (2011)
Below 10% but above 5%
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project g Monitoring Year 3 of 5

3.2.2 Photo Reference Points
There are eight permanent photo reference points located throughout the Reeds
Project included in this monitoring report Two of the photo reference points are located
in the southwest corner of each vegetation plot All the Photographs will help to illustrate
the health of the planted vegetation and the surface water hydrology (e g. standing water)
The Photo Log is located in Appendix A
4.0 SITE SUCCESS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Overall, the adjacent Reeds Creek stream channel has developed and stabilized well after
the berm was lowered The herbaceous vegetative cover has also developed a healthy and
diverse community. The planted trees and shrubs have done very well and are
supplemented by a robust existing buffer community which provides seed source for
volunteers well suited to the current site conditions Ground water gages demonstrate
favorable trends and junsdictional wetland hydrology throughout the entire site.
Additionally, a local chapter of the North Carolina Wildlife Federation, the Lake Norman
Wildlife Conservationists has taken a special interest in the Reeds Creek project The
group has worked with Boy Scouts and other local volunteers to build and install wood
duck, barred owl, blue bird, and warbler nesting boxes on the site in 2008 Two Bat
Boxes and constructed basking logs for the turtle population were installed in 2009 The
group regularly visits the site to pick up litter and monitor for trespassing and vandalism
The group and the site have continued to receive lots of positive press this year. No more
-_ habitat structures are planned for the site, but the group continues to frequent the site to
look for problems and pick up litter
Reeds Creek Wetland Restoration Project 9 Monitoring Year 3 of 5

APPENDIX A. Vegetation Raw Data
Vegetation Raw Data
Site Photo Log w/ Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Photos

Exhibit Table VI. Stem
Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot (Year 2)
Species
Plots- Actual Count
Surviving Planted Stems
Survival
M
A
B
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Shrubs
Cepholanthus occidentalis
7
9
13
11
11
11
85%
Cornus amomum
10
10
19
15
15
19
100%
Totals
17
19
32
26
26
30
94%
Trees
Betula nigra
4
1
10
5
5
3
30%
Froxinus pennsylvanico
1
1
11
6
6
2
18%
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
1
1
0
0
0%
Quercus lyrato
4
3
4
3
3
3
75%
Quercus michauxii
1
2
6
5
4
3
50%
Quercus pagodifolia
3
7
7
5
5
71%
Quercus phellos
1
3
3
3
1
33%
Solix nigra
1
39
3
3
3
3
100%
Totals
15
46
45
33
29
20
44%
Woody Stems Total:
24
26
77
59
55
50
1 65%
Total w/ Vols.
32
65
-
-
67
97
Stems Per Acre
1040
1040
15401
1180
1100
1040
Stems Per Acre w /vols.
1280
2600
-
-
1340
1960
SPA Calcs.
Stems per plot stems per acre
2152 43560
2009
Total 1000
W/ vols. 1940
2 vol plot A, 3 vol plot B
1 vol plot A
2 vol plot A
2 vol plot A
1 vol plot A, 36 vol plot B

Shrubs
Cephalonthus occidentolis
7
Cornus amomum
10
Totals
17
Trees
Betula nigra
4
Froxinus pennsylvanica
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
Quercus lyrato
4
Quercus michouxii
1
Quercus pagodifolia
3
Quercus phellos
1
Salix nigra
1
Totals
15
Woody Stems Total:
24
Total w/ Vols.
32
Stems Per Acre
1040
Stems Per Acre w /vols.
1280
Herbaceaous Cover:
soft rush
deertounge grass
swamp rose mallow
Invasives:
chinese lespedeza
100%
Juncus effusus
Panicum clandestinum
Hibiscus moscheutos
Lespedeza cuneata
Plot A Total 960
W/ vols. 1280

Shrubs
Cepholonthus occidentolis
9
Cornus amomum
10
Totals
19
Trees
Betulo nigra
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus lyrota
3
Quercus michauxii
2
Quercus pogodifolia
Quercus phellos
Solix nigra
39
Totals
46
Woody Stems Total:
26
Total w/ Vols.
65
Stems Per Acre
1040
Stems Per Acre w /vols.
2600
Herbaceaous Cover:
soft rush
pennsylvania smartweed
water smartweed
100
Juncus effusus
polygonum pennsylvanicum
polygonum hydropiperoides
Plot B Total 1040
Plot B is 60% Black Willow

Reeds Creek Photo Log
Photo Point 1
Photo Point 2

Photo Point 3
Photo Point 4

Photo Point 5
Photo Point 6

Vegetation Plot A
Vegetation Plot B

APPENDIX B: Water Level and Rainfall Data
Water Level Gage Graphs
USGS CRN 42 Rainfall Data
13 Month History — Lake Norman Lake Levels

01- Nov -2008
11- Nov -2008
21- Nov -2008
01- Dec -2008
11- Dec -2008
21- Dec -2008
31- Dec -2008
10- Jan -2009
20- Jan -2009
30- Jan -2009
09- Feb -2009
w 19- Feb -2009
cD
01- Mar -2009
11- Mar -2009
21- Mar -2009
31- Mar -2009
10- Apr -2009
20- Apr -2009
30- Apr -2009
10- May -2009
20- May -2009
30- May -2009
09- Jun -2009
Water Level (inches)
1 --• i � -' N N W
U1 O Ul O Ui O Cn O Cn O
FIR
X C- X
a) m
73 U m
v a o
o cn
0
E-.
N
r
M
CD
O
M
(D
m
Q
N
0
19
CD
CD
X
m
M
m
v
U)
w
-
o
�
Cp
Cb
o
o
v
Cn
cn
�
Cn
CD
v
,
(.
a
(n
0
0
w
FIR
X C- X
a) m
73 U m
v a o
o cn
0
E-.
N
r
M
CD
O
M
(D
m
Q
N
0
19
CD
CD
X
m
M
m
v
U)

N
01- Nov -2008
11- Nov -2008
21- Nov -2008
01- Dec -2008
11- Dec -2008
21- Dec -2008
31- Dec -2008
10- Jan -2009
20- Jan -2009
30- Jan -2009
09- Feb -2009
19- Feb -2009
01- Mar -2009
11- Mar -2009
rt
m
21- Mar -2009
31- Mar -2009
10- Apr -2009
20- Apr -2009
30- Apr -2009
10- May -2009
20- May -2009
30- May -2009
09- Jun -2009
19 -Jun -2009
29 -Jun -2009
09 -Jul -2009
19 -Jul -2009
Water Level (inches)
O (J1 O m O U1
� � N
O Ui O
v m
v � o
CO
O• N
7
0)
M.
CD
r
(D
O
O
m
m
Q
M
n
4
O
m
C�
G
m
N
m
m
v
CIO
N
v
-
O
00
�
O
�
C-
�
c
CO
�.
CD
a
O
=
o.
3
v
v m
v � o
CO
O• N
7
0)
M.
CD
r
(D
O
O
m
m
Q
M
n
4
O
m
C�
G
m
N
m
m
v
CIO
N

01
01- Nov -2008
11- Nov -2008
21- Nov -2008
01- Dec -2008
11- Dec -2008
21- Dec -2008
31- Dec -2008
10- Jan -2009
20- Jan -2009
30- Jan -2009
09- Feb -2009
19- Feb -2009
01- Mar -2009
11- Mar -2009
r+
m
21- Mar -2009
31- Mar -2009
10- Apr -2009
20- Apr -2009
30- Apr -2009
10- May -2009
20- May -2009
30- May -2009
09- Jun -2009
19- Jun -2009
29- Jun -2009
09-Jul-2009
19 -Jul -2009
Water Level (inches)
O C31 O (n O
� N N
Cn O m
I
v. m
m
m a o
Cn
sy
M
r
CD
CD
O
m
m
Q
N
n
1
m
CD
C�
G
CD
W
m
m
v
Cn
W
Cn
v
o_
G)
w
0
5
ca
�
Cn
c
fD
�.
can
a
o
�•
o'
woo
v
I
v. m
m
m a o
Cn
sy
M
r
CD
CD
O
m
m
Q
N
n
1
m
CD
C�
G
CD
W
m
m
v
Cn
W

w
Ui
01- Nov -2008
11- Nov -2008
21- Nov -2008
01- Dec -2008
11- Dec -2008
21- Dec -2008
31- Dec -2008
10- Jan -2009
20- Jan -2009
30- Jan -2009
09- Feb -2009
19- Feb -2009
01- Mar -2009
11- Mar -2009
21- Mar -2009
31- Mar -2009
10- Apr -2009
20- Apr -2009
30- Apr -2009
10- May -2009
20- May -2009
30- May -2009
09- Jun -2009
19- Jun -2009
29 -Jun -2009
09 -Jul -2009
19 -Jul -2009
Water Level (inches)
W N N i
O U1 O (n O Ul
O (J1 O
I I I
L
v m
5 v,' m
� � D
o m
m
C-
M
m
r
CD
CD
-h
O
CD
CD
M
N
0
N
CD
CD
77
CD
CD
cD
0
CCD
C
CD
rn
IM
v
m
n
,..
--u
—ash=
POO
o
c
0 0-
LLP
o
�
v
m
m
0
OCILE
MHUMO
I I I
L
v m
5 v,' m
� � D
o m
m
C-
M
m
r
CD
CD
-h
O
CD
CD
M
N
0
N
CD
CD
77
CD
CD
cD
0
CCD
C
CD
rn
IM
v
m
n
,..

11 Daily Sum Precipitation, total, inches CRN42 Norman Shores
May ' 3un Jul Dec Mar DATE; 2008;
00� 008 008, 0081 2009 1 2009 I 009 009 009 2009 2009 2009
_ Q P
O OO AI O OO � O OO AI
0.0� O OOO "�
O OOO "0
065 "�
O O46 P O O0O �I
O OOO p
O OOO P
�=000
"000"'000 "'000";0040
"�0170�=0103"600
9PjO000PjOOOO�1OO93PI
{
3 r
A A{ A
0 00 j 0 00 0 OOJ
AI A A
0 00 � 0 010 0 000
At
0 000
A P� P
f 0 207 10 000 10 000
p P
0 000 10 000P
4
O OO " O OO A O OO A
O OO A 0
Fc o-qO-AFc
g-oO AI O 075 PI 0 796 P! 0 000 P'10 170 P'
��OOOA1OO_
OOOA!
OOOAIOOIOAIOOOOAIOOOOA�OOOOAj0037P2199
°0000°!0055°'
6 i�
AI
0 00
AI AI
0 00 j 0 00
AV A
0 00 0 910
A
0 000
A
0 000
A P PI P
0 028 J 0 708 1 0 000 1 0 074
P
0 000 '
7
E----=O
O A
O Al A
O OO O
O A' A00
O 0 360
0 Al
0 0I
O OOO A (1 02024-3 ° O 00PO
000 P
O OOO P
FFi I
I
A
0 29
A�
0 63 j
A
6 00
Al A
0 00 0 000 j
Al
0 000
A
6 000 1
A P P�
0 000 I O 018 j 0 000
P
0 000
PI
0 000
9
O OO AI
O 05 AI
O OO A
O O1 Aff O OOO AI
O OOO A
O OOO A
�O OOO AI
0 307 PI
O OOO PI
1 fi
0 OOO PI
10
1 33 AI
O OO Al
O OO A
O 87 A
O OOO AI
O OOO A
O 000 AI
1 812 AI
O OOO PI
0 046 PI
O OOO P
O OOO PI
1t
F
0 OO'
q
AI
0 05 1
A
0 00
A
O OO J
AI
2 28 1
A
0 000 l
A
0 090
A
0 000 {
AI
O 000 !
PI
0 562
P
0 207
P
0 000
P
0 028 j
12 t
—
0 0000
0 00 AI
0 00 AE
I 00 AI
O 116 AI
Fo- 0 �00 A�
!
0 000 AI
0�OOO�A�
0 000 A'
FOOOO P
0 009 PI
0 000 PI=
_13 J1
O Z1Z1
q I
!
A
0 00 ?
AI
0 00 i
A
0 11' I
FOOO AI
—'
AI
0 000
AI
0 000
A
0 027
AI
lo 316
P
0 000 I
---
P)
0 028 _I
P
0 478
14 !
O OO
A
AI
0 00
A
C 0
— I
A
1 94
AE
0 03
--_]
{{{
Ai
0 000 10
A
020
AI
0 681 10
AI
075 10
000
PE�10
--
P,
000 ,�
15 ��
0 OO i
Ai
0 07 1
A
0 00
A
0 05
AI
0 OS -
AI
0 000
A�
0 060
A
0 559
AI
0 028
P
0 000
PI
0 009 1
P
0 000
000 I
A
0 74 1
AI
0 00�
AI
0 00—
AI
0 00 J
Al
0 000
q
0 080 jIO
AI
046 i
E-oo �o-Aj'
Pi
0 65 10
PI
552
Pl
0 000
i)
`16
10
II
A08 1
A
A
0 O1
A
0 28
AI
0 00 1
AI
0 O1 10
AI
000 J
A
0 000
AI
0 000 10
AI
000
P{
0 130 ;
P
0 372 10
PI
000
I
—17
18
O OO I
O OO Al
O O2 A'
0 OO A,
0 OS AI
O 000 AJI
J
0 470 A�
O OOO AI
O OOO Al
0 OOO PI
O OOO P
O 000 PI
1
FOO O I
AI
0 00�
AI
0 00 10
A�
00
0 00 Al 10
Al
000 !
AI
0 000
A
0 093
A
0 018
PI
0 000
P
0 000 10
P19
000
J
20 ��O
OO
AI
0 00
AI
0 00
A
O 00
Aj
0 18 j
A
0 000]
A
0 000 J
0 000 Al
AI
O 589 j
J
P
0 000 j
P
0 000
PI
O 000
J
I
21
II
O0 O I
I q �IO
AI(�AI
00 IIO
J
00
A
0 00 JI
r AIr
O 35 {IO
Al
000
A
0 000 IIO
j� A
000 1
AIj�
0 000 1IO
PI
000
J
PI
0 000
pl
0 160 j�
22 j
O OO
q
A
0 00
A
0 00 ;
A
O 00
A
0 00
_I
A
0 000 10
AI
000 `
0 000
AF--
AI
00 1
pI
0 000
P
Fo-o—o 0 ;
P
lo 000 �l
i
O OO
O OO AI
O OO AI
O 00 A
O OO A
O AO
000 '
OOO AO
OO
O23 I
--
O PI
103
O OOO P
0 065 P'
24
O�OO
0O OO AiAI
0 0 AI
0 25 AA
0 31 AIAI
O O�lO AI
[O O�OO A��O
OO�O A4
O OOO AI
O Z�H9 P1
O�OOO�PI
— — — —
O OOO P
_
25 I
JI
1 04
I
0 23 AI
O OS A
O 07 AI
_JI___
O OOO A
_ I�i
O OOO AI
0 224 AI
O OOO AI
_
1 049 PI
__I�_
O OOO PI
O OOO P`
26 'FA
�5I
I
;O
O0AI000A'
001AI000OAIOOOOAjO354AI000OA1O253P
I
I
0000°;0047°
2277 i3�85iO3�3A�00�0AOO�OAIOO�lAIOO�lOAlO�223A��036�4
_ _ ��
_
_
_i
"��OOOO"�O�142�P1000OPIO151PI
_
I_
I
_ CIF__
O O1
q
ii
AI
0 O1 I
___JI_II_�,If�__11____11__�i_
AI
O 00 10
A
00
AI
0 00 1
�22
A
0 559
A
0 652 J
I__il��
AI
O 000 J
P'
O 873 1
PI
0 000 1
P
0 289 1�
29
(O�OO I
( A.
AI
0 00 10
AI
00
A
0 04 10
A'
00 10
A
000 �F
E
o 009
fo A
000 J
P
0 019 i
P
0 000 1
P1—
0 781
30 1
F
O�OO�I
q;
A!
0 00 j
Fo Ai
0
A
0 88 J
P
Ai
0 000 {�
I
AI
0 000 J
AI
0 000
P
0 000
P
0 000
P;�
0 047
31 i
O OO IOO
0 O�O Al'
III
[7[o
O�O A
Foo O0 AIIIII��1
II
0 OO�O A{
__
I
F _ I_
Fo—o PI
JI
0 102 P
�I-,_
�;i_!I _
COUNTS
F 21 J 28 31 J F 30 I _3= 31 28 I _29 30 31 30 I 31 J v 11
MAX 13
85 =13 0 =63F--94 2.28 0 910 0 559 I 0 681 { 1.812 1.049 ; 2.199 1.269 ? 0.170
MIN
O 00 ; 0 00 j
0.00 i 000; 0 :00- 0.000 0 000 I 0 OOOj 0`000 1 0.000 j O.000J 0000 j 0,000
Explanation
P Approved for publication -- Processing and review completed
Prowslonal data subject to revision

13 Month History- Lake Norman Lake Levels
101
100
99,
98
97-,
96-
95 -
94
93
92 -
91
90
07)04)08 08/21/08 10)08)08 1125= 01112/
-- -,-101
MAX 1 100
-99
�TTARPET -98
-tv rwh '-97
`9G
95
+-94
r-93
92
-91
-90
T -i r r - -r -89
03101/09 04118)09 06 )05 )09 0723/09

APPENDIX C: Monitoring Plan View

TER
a,rmBtrc OF mmc
r \ oBroau
\arwra PP4 '•'�� �TOanrt a
\ g� ` EJ �Bao's arooc
e.Tr
PP5 ~�~ -c�� . or mn
\ \ /759 — �R — - -- -y`� crAu
REEDS?
LOT 15 / \
\+
LOT 16 \ \
\ PP7
N �gM LOT 17 \ ` \\ Mkf— Atfarttfc MltJgatwk LLC
\ 4656 -06- 6960.000
\ (US Htghwoy 21, fraddJ County, NC)
-rte
\ D$ 1676 Pages 556 -560
� \\ \
LOT 19 \
°x
\ 150.ca$�F�
/ `\ -A - / r VF.P,
E S2
n
761 ` ^PP1
fl
\\ \\ PP2 nt REEDS3
GRAPHIC SCALE
.�— > 1
P LOT 19
IN FUT
r
\ ��✓ �'rQ LOT 20
oil
LAW
P.
I CERTIFY THESE ASBUILT CONTOURS
WERE FIELD RUN ON 1/28 do 31/07
AND BASED ON SURVEY CONTROL
PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
41 LEGEND
•'� _, �, � ,� , /. /, / ��,,6�,�/ � � -- '�- - - - - -- PRE — CONSTRUCTION
LOT 21
CONTOUR
AS —BUILT CONTOUR
,y°rtB aec .eo rnpq - -5/ 1 i /'Ql y(j iiii /i / / PP 2 PHOTO POINT
MG 1 MONITORING GAUGE
roaaa
= 0.33 AC. « 50.00' _
3 022W8
CI / These fLeaard curnsnis Rave
�'� treBr'car tr prepared Oared on
(wrBCOt teCA710B7 / inJormuction provided Dy otlwrs.
cocuauearuv Q, has not verif[ed
the ay and/ comptetenoss
v t
not ' spon aTiAI� jbr�ane
sz rrrors
that V b.
ineorpomted as a reavlt of
a \ e>raneovs SnJbrmation Provided
/ Oy others.
Q
p
OW
U
tyi
k 11
1
y u
tv
c
K
y <
R
i e F
C
� f <
Y
i vv11
fit] j
E-�
G O O
Z
O
*-i 1 6 rA