20100099 Ver 3_DRAFT - Poncho BPDP_20130910

DRAFT
Bank Parcel Development Plan
&
As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument
for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits - Neuse River Basin
September 2013
Prepared By:
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan
Restoration Systems’ Neuse River Riparian Buffer &
Nutrient Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide this Bank Parcel Development Plan for the Pancho
Bank Parcel (Parcel), proposed as part of the Restoration Systems’ Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer &
Nutrient Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument) signed March 17, 2008 between
Restoration Systems, and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The Parcel is designed to provide
nutrient and riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the
Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Drainage Basin. Supporting figures are located in Appendix A.
Parcel construction activates were concluded in early April of 2013. An onsite determination for
applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) was conducted in June
2013 (Appendix B). The Sponsor currently holds a Conservation Easement on the Parcel and is attached
as Appendix C. As-built and baseline data was collected in late June of 2013. The As-Built & Baseline
Monitoring Report with detailed baseline vegetation data is attached as Appendix D. This Parcel was
designed and implemented in concurrence with the Pancho Steam & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Corps
Action ID # SAW-2010-00142), Approved by the Interagency Review Team on April 12, 2012
(Appendix E).
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. i

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Parcel Location ................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Parcel Overview .................................................................................................................. 2
2.0 Project Area – Existing Conditions ................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Physiography ...................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Soils .................................................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................. 5
2.5 Environmental & Cultural Constraints ............................................................................... 5
3.0 Restoration Plan ................................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Riparian Corridor Restoration Activates ............................................................................ 6
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan .................................................................................................... 7
4.1 Monitoring Protocol ............................................................................................................ 7
4.2 Parcel Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 7
4.3 Long Term Management Plan ............................................................................................ 7
5.0 Financial Assurance .......................................................................................................................... 7
6.0 Mitigation Potential .......................................................................................................................... 7
7.0 References ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Appendix
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location & Service Area
Figure 2 – NRCS Wayne County Soil Survey
Figure 3 – Pre-Construction Parcel Conditions
Figure 4 – Credit Determination (a & b)
Appendix B: NCDWQ Stream Determination
Appendix C: Conservation Easement
Appendix D: Pancho Bank Parcel As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report
Appendix E: Pancho Steam Mitigation Banking Instrument and Mitigation Plan
(Corps Action ID # SAW-2010-00142)
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 1

1.0Introduction
1.1Parcel Location
The Pancho Bank Parcel is located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western Wayne County;
north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill Road) and State Road
1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin in
the 14-digit United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201150050 of the South
Atlantic/Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of Water Quality \[NCDWQ\] Subbasin Number 03-04-04)
(Figure 2, Appendix A)
Directions to Parcel:
From the City of Raleigh travel east on U.S. Highway 70
Travel ~ 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection with Martin Livestock Road
Turn right at Martin Livestock Road (0.7 mile)
Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
Turn left at T-intersection onto Harper House Road, which turns into Stevens Mill Road
(1.3 miles)
The Parcel is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses Stevens Mill Road
-Latitude: 35.333755° N, Longitude: -78.192699° W
1.2Parcel Overview
The Parcel encompasses approximately 65.62 acres of land located along Kennedy Mill Branch at the
confluence with Mill Creek. According to the Final Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan
(NCDWQ 2009), the lack of buffer and heavy agricultural practices along Kennedy Mill Branch make the
watershed an ideal target for land acquisition to protect the nutrient sensitive Neuse River watershed. The
restored riparian corridor will result in improved water quality within the Parcel and downstream of the
Kennedy Mill Branch watershed. The Parcel is located in a region of the state dominated by agriculture
and livestock; therefore, restoration and enhancement of the riparian corridor is expected to result in
immediate water quality benefits in the vicinity of the Parcel.
The entire Parcel is currently protected by a permanent Conservation Easement (Appendix C). Of the
65.62 acre Parcel, 14.84 acres of riparian corridor were restored through the establishment of native
hardwood vegetation to generate nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation credits. Nutrient offset and
riparian buffer mitigation credits will not be generated within areas generating compensatory wetland
mitigation credits through the Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank.
Construction activities involved with the Pancho Steam & Wetland Mitigation Bank were concluded in
April of 2013. Primary activities designed to restore the stream channels include 1) belt-width preparation
and grading, 2) channel excavation, 3) installation of channel plugs, 4) backfilling of the abandoned
channel, and 5) vegetative planting. Wetland restoration focused on the removal of fill materials,
restoration of vegetative communities, filling drainage ditches, the reestablishment of soil structure and
microtopographic variations, and redirecting normal surface hydrology from ditches back to Site
floodplains. Riparian corridor restoration consisted of re-establishing deep-rooted native riparian
vegetation.
Prior to construction activities the Parcel encompassed agricultural land utilized for livestock grazing, row
crop production, and forest. Pasture areas were accessible to livestock and are routinely cleared and
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 2

mowed for hay production, resulting in local disturbances to stream banks and wetland soil surfaces.
Additional land use practices including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation; ditching of
adjacent riparian wetlands; and relocation, dredging, and channelization of onsite streams resulting in
degraded water quality and excessive sedimentation resulting from unstable banks (stream entrenchment,
erosion, and bank collapse). Figure 3, Appendix A graphically displays pre-construction conditions.
2.0Project Area – Existing Conditions
2.1Physiography
The Parcel is located in the Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces ecoregion on the border of the
Rolling Coastal Plain ecoregion within the Southeastern Plains of North Carolina USGS HUC 03020201
(NCDWQ Subbasin Number 03-04-06) of the Neuse River Basin. Regional physiography is
characterized by broad interstream divides with gentle to steep side slopes dissected by numerous small,
low to moderate gradient sandy bottomed streams and major river floodplains, associated terraces, and
low gradient streams with sandy and silty substrates (Griffith et al. 2002a). Onsite elevations range from
a high of 100 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) on slopes to a low of approximately 75 feet
NGVD at the lowest point of the Parcel (USGS Grantham, North Carolina 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle) (Figure 4, Appendix A)
The Parcel provides water quality functions to a nearly 3.3-square mile watershed at the outfall of
Kennedy Mill Branch. The watershed is dominated by pasture, agricultural land, forest, and sparse
residential property. Impervious surfaces account for less than 5 percent of the upstream watershed land
surface. Surrounding area land use is primarily agricultural, with some low-density residential housing.
Onsite land use was characterized by hardwood forest, agricultural land (row crop production), and
pasture (livestock). Riparian zones and wetland areas were primarily composed of herbaceous vegetation
with sparse hardwood canopy species along the streams. Riparian vegetation adjacent to restoration and
enhancement reaches of the Parcel was sparse and disturbed due to livestock grazing, bush hogging, and
regular maintenance activities.
2.2Soils
Based on county soil survey mapping (USDA 1974), the Parcel contains seven soil series: Bibb sandy
loam (Typic Fluvaquent), Chewacla loam (Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts), Kalmia loamy sand (Typic
Hapludults), Kenansville loamy sand (Arenic Hapludults), Johnston loam (Cumulic Humaquepts),
Norfolk loamy sand (Typic Paleudults), and Wagram loamy sand (Arenic Kandiudults). Parcel soils are
described in Table 1 below.
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 3

Table 1. Parcel Soils
Map Unit Map Unit Hydric
Description
Symbol Name Status
The Bibb series consists of very deep, poorly drained, moderately permeable soils
that formed in stratified loamy and sandy alluvium. These soils are on floodplains of
Bibb sandy Hydric
Bbstreams in the coastal plain. They are commonly flooded and water runs off the
loam
surface very slowly. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The water table is within 8
inches of the surface from 6 to 11 months each year.
The Chewacla series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained, moderately
permeable soils that formed in stratified loamy and sandy alluvium. These soils are
ChewaclaHydric on floodplains of streams in the piedmont and coastal plain river valleys that drain out
Ch
loam of the Piedmont. They frequently to rarely flood for brief to long periods. Slopes
range from 0 to 2 percent. Depth to seasonal high water table is generally 6 to 24
inches from November to April. Bedrock occurs at a depth of more than 80 inches.
The Kalmia series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in
stratified loamy and sandy alluvium. These soils are on stream terraces that never or
KalmiaNon-
KaD rarely flood for very brief periods. Slopes range from 0 and 6 percent. Depth to the
loamy sand hydric
seasonal high water table is 40 to 72 inches or more December to April. Bedrock
occurs at a depth of more than 80 inches.
The Kenansville series consists of well drained, nearly level to gently sloping soils on
Coastal Plain uplands and stream terraces. They have formed in marine and fluvial
Kenansville Non-
Ke sediments. Slopes are generally between 0 and 10 percent. Depth to the seasonal
loamy sand hydric
high water table is greater than 48 inches for the wet substratum phase. Bedrock
occurs at a depth of more than 80 inches.
The Johnston series consists of very poorly drained, moderately rapid permeable soils
that formed in alluvium. These soils are on floodplains and swamps of the lower and
Johnston Hydric upper coastal plain. They frequently or occasionally flood for very brief to long
Js
loam periods of time. Slopes are generally between 0 and 2 percent. Depth to the seasonal
high water table is 0 to 12 inches from November to May. Bedrock occurs at a depth
of more than 80 inches.
The Norfolk series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed
in marine and fluvial sediments. These soils are on uplands or marine terraces in the
Norfolk Non-
NoC lower, middle, and upper coastal plain that never or rarely flood for very brief periods
loamy sand hydric
of time. Slopes are generally between 0 and 10 percent. Depth to seasonal high
water table is 40 to 72 inches from January to March.
The Wagram series consists of somewhat excessively drained, moderately permeable
soils that formed in fluvial and marine sediments. These soils are on uplands in the
Wagram
WaB Hydric middle and upper coastal plain that never or rarely flood for very brief periods of
loamy sand
time. Slopes are generally between 0 and 15 percent. Depth to seasonal high water
table is more than 60 inches. Bedrock occurs at a depth of more than 80 inches.
2.3Vegetation
The Parcel was characterized primarily by agricultural and pasture land with mature disturbed hardwood
forests. Agricultural land was dispersed along the margins of riparian zones in the northern half of the
Parcel. Disturbed hardwood forest occupied the southern portion of the Parcel. Pasture dominated the
majority of the Parcel and consisted primarily of fescue (Festuca sp.), crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), dog fennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), rushes (Juncus sp.), and sedges (Carex sp.). Disturbed hardwood forest are
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 4

characterized by mesic, floodplain species adjacent to stream channels, such as river birch (Betula nigra),
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), willow oak (Quercus phellos), red maple (Acer rubrum),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), black willow (Salix nigra), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), and
American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). Wetlands are dominated by emergent vegetation such as
rushes, sedges, polygonum (Polygonum sp.), and meadow beauty (Rhexia sp.).
2.4Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for such
listing are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C 1531 et
seq.). One species is federally listed for Wayne County by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) (USFWS 2008): red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). Additionally, the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Habitat for red-
cockaded woodpecker and bald eagle is not present within the Parcel.
In addition to the bald eagle and E, T, and P species, the USFWS list includes a category of species
designated as "Federal Species of Concern" (FSC). A species with this designation is one that may or
may not be listed in the future (formerly C2 candidate species or species under consideration for listing
for which there is insufficient information to support listing). The FSC designation provides no federal
protection under the ESA for the species listed. The nine FSC species listed on the current USFWS list
are presented in the table below.
Table 2: USFWS FSC Species List
Common Name Scientific Name
American elm Anguilla rostrata
Carolina madtom Noturus furiosus
Pinewoods shiner Lythrurus matutinus
Rafinesques big-eared bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Yellow lance Elliptio lanceolata
Cuthbert turtlehead Chelone cuthbertii
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis
Proposed mitigation activities will result in positive benefits for these species through improved habitat
and water quality.
2.5Environmental & Cultural Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on the
Parcel were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities
and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, cultural resources, and
the potential for hydrologic trespass. Existing information regarding constraints was acquired and
reviewed. In addition, any parcel conditions that had the potential to restrict design and implementation
were documented during the field investigation.
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 5

No evidence of natural and/or man-made conditions were identified that had the potential to impede
proposed restoration activities.
3.0Restoration Plan
Restoration of riparian corridors was accomplished in conjuncture with the goals and methods outlined by
the Pancho Stream Mitigation Bank. The primary goals associated with the riparian corridor restoration
focused on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat through
the creation of a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels, and was accomplished by the
following.
1.Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production including a)
removing livestock and b) ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into and adjacent to Site streams through treatment of runoff within the
forested buffer.
2.Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, plowing, and hoof shear adjacent to Site streams, and b)
removing livestock from the Site.
3.Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing Site
floodplains.
4.Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5.Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for
agricultural production.
6.Restoring and reestablishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7.Protecting the Sites full potential of stream and riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
3.1Riparian Corridor Restoration Activates
Restoration of floodplain forest and stream-side habitat will allow for development and expansion of
characteristic species across the landscape. Eco-tonal changes between community types contribute to
diversity and provide secondary benefits, such as enhanced feeding and nesting opportunities for
mammals, birds, amphibians and other wildlife. Stream-side trees and shrubs include species with high
value for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, and the ability to withstand hydraulic forces associated
with bankfull flow and overbank flood events. Stream-side trees and shrubs will be planted along the
reconstructed stream banks, concentrated along outer bends.
Vegetative species composition mimicked reference forest data, onsite observations, and community
descriptions from Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley
1990). Community associations utilized include 1) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest on slopes, 2) Coastal
Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (brownwater subtype) in wetlands that are intermittently to seasonally
inundated for long periods (NCWAM Bottomland Hardwood Forest and Headwater Forest), and 3)
stream-side assemblage within 15 feet of stream banks.
Deep-rooted, riparian vegetation was restored over 49 acres of the Parcel in late April. Bare-root
seedlings of tree species within the Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest and Coastal Plain Bottomland
Hardwoods (brownwater subtype) were planted at a density of approximately 900 stems per acre on 8-
foot centers. The As-Built and Baseline report attached as Appendix D details specific species type and
restoration activities.
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 6

4.0Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
4.1Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 (Lee et al. 2006). Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be
performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled, Restoration Systems shall submit to
st
NCDWQ an annual monitoring report, no later than December 31 of each year. Detailed qualitative and
quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas; marsh treatment areas will be visually
inspected periodically and reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report, which will include
photographic record of the Parcels assets. Success criteria within the buffer and nutrient offset restoration
areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 320 stems per acre after five years of
monitoring.
4.2Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWQ in the event
that the Site or a specific component of the Site fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. In the event
that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical and/or
chemical methods in accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and
regulations.
4.3Long Term Management Plan
The Sponsor currently holds a Conservation Easement on the Parcel Site. The Conservation Easement and
appropriate title insurance documents are attached as Appendix B. The Conservation Easement is
perpetual, preserves all natural areas, and prohibits all use of the property inconsistent with its use as
mitigation property, including any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity. The North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation will be the long-term holder of the Conservation Easement and
responsible for long-term stewardship of the Parcel site. The Sponsor will provide a financial sum
appropriate for the long-term holder of the Conservation Easement to carry out its responsibilities.
5.0Financial Assurance
Financial Assurances are in place for the wetland and stream mitigation bank that has been established on
the Parcel site. These Financial Assurances consist of a 10-year casualty insurance policy approved by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in coordination with the Interagency Review Team (which includes the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources). In addition to this casualty insurance, the Sponsor may, if
requested, put in place a performance bond to provide additional financial assurances for the Parcel
during its five-year monitoring period.
6.0Mitigation Potential
The Parcel will provide nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation credits within the Neuse 03020201
Watershed, excluding the Falls Lake Drainage Basin (Figure 1, Appendix A). Neuse River Water Supply
Nutrient Strategy states restored areas used for nutrient offset credit generate 2,249 pounds of nitrogen
credits per acre. Riparain buffer credits will be measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into
square ft.
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 7

The Parcel will generate 14.84 acres of restored riparian corridor. 11.34 acres will be used specifically for
nutrient offset credit generating 25,503.66 lbs of nitrogen offset credit. Restored riparian corridor within
50 feet, measured horizontally from the top of bank is considered the riparian buffer mitigation zone and
may generate both nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation credits. Initially, the Pancho Bank Parcel
will use the entire 3.50 acres within this zone to produce 152,460sq. ft. of riparian buffer mitigation
credits. The sponsor reserves the right to shift these 3.50 acres between riparian buffer and nutrient offset
credit with written notification to the NC DWQ Wetlands, Buffers, Streams Compliance and Permitting
Unit. The table below outlines the amount of nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit the Parcel will
generate over its lifetime.
Table 3: Credit Determination Table
Credit Type Total Acreage Credits per Acre Total Credit
Nutrient (Nitrogen) 11.34 2,249 lbs. 25,503.66 lbs.
Riparian Buffer 3.50 43,560 sq. ft. 152,460 sq. ft.
7.0References
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson,
J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .0241, and 15A NCAC 02B .0242
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Guidelines
for Riparian Buffer Restoration. October 2004
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Alamance County, North Carolina Available:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wayne.html \[March, 2013\]. United States Fish and
Wildlife Service.
USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1974. Soil Survey of Wayne County
DRAFT– Pancho Bank Parcel Development Plan pg. 8

Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location & Service Area
Figure 2 – NRCS Wayne County Soil Survey
Figure 3 – Pre-Construction Parcel Conditions
Figure 4 – Credit Determination (a & b)
Pancho Bank Parcel Appendix A: NC DWQ Stream Determination
Draft As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report – September 2013

Legend
q
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

Approximate Project Extents for
the Pancho Mitigation Bank

Pre-Construction
Pancho BPDP
Figure 3
Site Conditions

Legend
q
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

Legend
q
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC

Appendix B: NC DWQ Stream Determination
Pancho Bank Parcel Appendix B: NC DWQ Stream Determination
Draft As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report – September 2013

Appendix C: Conservation Easement
Pancho Bank Parcel Appendix C: Conservation Easement
Draft As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report – September 2013

Appendix E: Pancho Stream Mitigation Banking Instrument & Mitigation Plan
(USACE # SAW-2010-00142)
Pancho Bank Parcel Appendix E: Pancho Stream Mitigation Banking Instrument & Mitigation Plan (USACE # SAW-2010-00142)
Draft As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report – September 2013

(Version June 2009)
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Final Mitigation Plan
Appendix B: Property Surveys and Legal Description
Appendix C: Geographic Service Area
Appendix D: Bank Ledger
Appendix E: Model Performance Bond
Appendix F: Model Conservation Easement
Appendix G: North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation Letter
18