20130917 Ver 1_401 Application_20130813

Car dhe
ATC Cardno ATC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.cardnoatc.com
August 28, 2013
20130917
Mr. Steven L. Kichefski Email: Steven. L. Kichefskia-usace. army. mil
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers TWO COPIES Via Federal Express 8/28/2013
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Via email 8/28/2013
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number: (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number: (828) 281 -8120
Ms. Karen Higgins Email: karen.higgins(&- ncdenr.gov
NC DWR, Webscape Unit FIVE COPIES and Check for $570.00 hand delivery 08/28/13
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
919- 807 -6360
Cardno ATC Project No. 045.44950.0001
Reference: PCN for NWP 39 and Wetlands and Stream Delineatio
Huntersville Shopping Center
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Enclosed are the appropriate number of copies for the PCN for 401 and 404 permits for the
above referenced project. Please contact Ben Wilson at (919) 871 -0999 or (919) 697 -5446 if
you have any questions or if we can be of further service.
Respectfully,
Cardno ATC
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Ben.WilsonC�Cardno.com
Attachments: PCN for NWP 39 with
Agent Authorization and Right of Entry
Proposed Site Layout
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
AUG Z g T013 '

1 J t r }'i �},
r S_ 1 j�„y !� vrR,

o�ot WAte9O
a r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes Q No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes © No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes © No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Huntersville
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d. Subdivision name:
None
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NC LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
002248/00501
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Chad Hagle
3d. Street address:
4685 MacArthur Court, Suite 375
3e. City, state, zip:
Newport Beach, CA 92660
3f. Telephone no.:
949- 660 -1293
3g. Fax no.:
I NA
3h. Email address:
I chagle @aventinedevco.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
© Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Ben Wilson, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Cardno ATC
5c. Street address:
2724 East Millbrook Road, Suite 121
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604
5e. Telephone no.:
(919) 871 -0999
5f. Fax no.:
(919) 871 -0335
5g. Email address:
ben.wilson @cardno.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
101130203
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.4394 Longitude: 80.7664
1c. Property size:
14.9 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Ramah Creek/Rocky River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Unknown
2c. River basin:
Rocky River /Pee Dee River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This site is presently mostly wooded with some grassed areas and undeveloped.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.85
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 649
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Place fill for construction of retail shops at the site.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Place a culvert in the existing stream and fill over a portion of the site for construction of retail shops using conventional earth moving equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ©No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
© Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.034
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Impacts are in linear wetlands ephemeral channel.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Trib to Ramah Creek
PER
DWQ
3
232
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
_
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
232
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The shopping center has been configured so that the area to be filled has been pushed upstream as far as possible and the through road from
NC Hwy 73 to Poplar Tent Road is pushed to the east so that it impacts the stream to a minimum extent
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All construction in non impact areas will be done from outside the stream and inside of tree protection fencing .
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
X
[] Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes Q No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes Q No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
85
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The storm water management plan will be developed in accordance with Mecklenburg County and Town of Huntersville requirements after the final
building and parking configuration are determined.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County/ Huntersville
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Mecklenburg County/ Huntersville
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
H Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑Yes
Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
© No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facili .
Wastewater will be discharged to the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POM.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
So. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Oyes Q No
Impacts?
5c. It yes, Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Spades or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFW SarAw Designated Cddcal Habbat Portal as mU as NCDENR Natural Hedrago Program Data search and on site ohservaticrL
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a, Will this project occur In or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
tab. What data sources did yo;i use to determine whether your site would. impact ,Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper,
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur In or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ONO
status (e.g.. National Historic Trust designation or properties signmcani in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data scum did you use to determine whether your site would impact historicar archeological resources?
NGHPQ Cultured Resources GIS mapper.
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Be. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes. explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Be. What source(s) did you use to make the tloodplain determination?
FEMA Map Service Center Firm- Map Number 3710467100K Panel Wi - Effective Date March 2, 2008
f�
Benjamin V. Wilson, PE
r- 1
08-28-2013
Applicant/Agerd's Printed Name
pl'� NAgents Signature
Date
(Agent's sl lure is valid only Iran au ghwAian
totter from the appkent is
Page 10 of 10

Date: August 16, 2013
Agent Authorization & Permission to Enter Property for the
Proposed Shopping Center Site Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PINNo.: 01130203 and 01130201
Ramah Creek/Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter serves as authorization for Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. of ATC Associates to act
as the agent for the owner for the purpose of obtaining 404 wetlands permits and 401
stream permits, from the NCDENR Water Quality Section and The US Army Corps of
Engineers for the above referenced property.
This letter also serves as authorization for personnel from the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Dept.,. the North Carolina Division of Water Quality and U.S. Army Corp of
Engineers to enter the above referenced property with Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. for the
purposed confirming the location of streams and wetlands information contained in the
404/401 permit applications only.
Respectfully,
Owner: Aventine Development, Inc.
Name: Marc Hagle
Title:
Address: 100 E Sybelisa, Ave. Ste 120, Maitland, FL 32751
Phone: 407 - 629 -2040
Fax: [phone]
Email. marc@tricor, tricornet
Signed.• P d wner of th bove Reference PrQ

BLANK PAGE

C
Sbt.ft a- Not—
e1 Davidson Highway
- - -- -
- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
------ - - - - -- c sroRC "�'sero"y `,:s000 sF o 1
0 :., sow,
�t
` �„� s„,�► avMtMcnaw
loo'
% GROCSY
p * SF i'
SF gIg PMT M REWIM
}\ 248 PAS
I x's,
cream CMAMOM
FUTURE ,
VELOPME
i
i
Ii i
O/N WAY
FMM 6OYM.
4 I
1
PWM
/ y CO-Ok .nudlleW .. e� w
er ...+a ro ®e
am
� � 1 I MW Owi 4O W 00100 • OR 1410 000 O OYOlp0111 AQ.' � 100111
Note: Drawing
Reduced to 11x17
d
z ��v
W
W
n
W
Cl
=a
INN
s�
of
i
ftAv--

ATC
aqftftFwm Cardno ATC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.cardnoatc.com
August 26, 2013
Mr. Chad Hagle
Aventine Development Corporation
4685 MacArthur Court, Suite 375
Newport Beach, CA 92660
949 - 660 -1293
Cell: 512- 364 -7669
Email: chagleCa)_aventinedevco.com
Cardno ATC Project No. 045.44950.0001
Reference: Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site
Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek/Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Dear Mr. Hagle:
As authorized, Mr. Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. of Cardno ATC visited the site observed
the entire site and the low lying areas. A determination was made of the streams and
wetlands in accordance with the following methods:
• Wetlands for 404 Permitting - A determination was made of the wetlands based
on the Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetlands Manual using the routine
method which is the currently and the Regional Supplement for the Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0, April 2012.
• Streams for 404 Permitting by the (COE) - A determination was made of the
streams based on our experience with the most recent methodology used by the
US Army Corp of Engineers.
• Streams for 401 Permitting and Determination of Stream Delineation by
NCDENR- A determination was made of the streams using the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) stream determination form method.
The site is located in the drainage area of an unnamed tributary to Ramah Creek which
drains into in the Rocky River in the Pee Dee River Basin. The site is shown as having a
stream on both the Cornelius, NC 7.5 Minute USGS quadrangle and the USDA Soil
Survey (see attached maps).
STREAM EVALUATION. Based on the literature review and the site investigation the
stream noted on the southern portion of the site is a perennial stream.

Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site
Huntersville, North Carolina
Ramah Creek/Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
August 15, 2013
WETLANDS EVALUATION: The investigation of the lowlands adjacent to the stream at
the site indicate that conditions at the site do not support a determination of wetlands
except for the stream area bank to bank. In addition, linear wetlands were noted in the
ephemeral channels at the site. See Attached maps for location of data points soil maps
etc.
The proposed construction at the site will require minimal permanent impacts for the
placement of culverts and Rip Rap for the development of the shopping center and
connector roadway required by Mecklenburg County.
A summary of features at the site is included in the tables below:
Wetlands and Streams on Site Subject to 404 Permitting by COE
Feature
Amount
(Approximate)
Description
Notes
Wetlands
0.051 Acres
Stream Bank to Bank
Perennial
Wetlands
0.034 Acres
Linear Wetlands
The bottom of the
ephemera; streams.
Streams - Perennial
649 linear ft
Flow year round
6 feet deep head cut
the year
begins stream
Streams Intermittent
0 linear ft
Only flow for part of
None
Streams - Ephemeral
NA
the year
NA
Only flow during
These are mentioned
Streams - Ephemeral
721 linear ft
rainfall and dry up quickly after event is
on the 404 permit but
ast.
are not permitted.
Streams and Buffers on Site Subject to 401 Permit by Mecklenberg Co /NCDWQ
Feature
Amount
(Approximate)
Description
Notes
Stream
Streams - Perennial
243 linear ft
Flow year round
approximately 6 feet
bank to bank
Streams Intermittent
0 linear ft
Only flow for part of
No Intermittent on
the year
site or within 100 ft
Only flow during
Streams - Ephemeral
NA
rainfall and dry up
quickly after event is
NA
past.
*Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
2

Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site
Huntersville, North Carolina
Ramah Creek/Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
August 15, 2013
Based on preliminary plans for development of the site we anticipate that avoidance and
minimization can be achieved by using retaining walls and carefully placing the buildings.
This will keep impacts to the stream at the site to less than 250 feet and impacts to
wetlands at the site at less than 0.10 acres. Maps with approximate locations of the
wetlands and streams on the site and the stream point and data point locations are
enclosed with this letter.
A site visit to verify the determinations will be required by USACE, Mecklenburg County
and possibly NCDENR. Prior to the site visits an agent authorization form will be required.
An agent authorization form is attached that should be executed by the owner.
Please contact Ben Wilson at (919) 871 -0999 or (919) 697 -5446 if you have any
questions or if we can be of further service.
Respectfully,
Cardno ATC
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Ben.Wilson(M- Cardno.com
Attachments: Ben Wilson NCSU /NCDENR Stream Certification
Site Maps and Delineation Maps (5)
Wetlands and Stream Points — GPS Locations
Photographs
Stream Forms (3)
Wetlands Forms (5)
Agent Authorization Form
3

W.&Maxr•r H =HR
FORESTRY and�wpr
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESOURCESS
He srsm UNWE rrY
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources
North Carolina State University
Wetlands and Stormwater Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Certificate of Training
This certifies that
Benjamin Wilson
has successfully completed training in
Intermittent and Perennial Stream Identification
For Regulatory Applications
October 5 -8, 2010
Raleigh, NC
Training was provided on: (1) the science of stream networks, hydrologic functions of streams and riparian
zones, stream maps, and stream characteristics for identification of stream types; (2) State of North Carolina
Administrative Rules for Stream Definitions and the Protection and Maintenance of Vegetated Riparian
Buffers, and (3) the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins Version A 11 Sepember 1 2010. The course included written and
field exams.
Dr. lan*fD. Gregory, Ph.D. CPSS,
Emeritus, Course Director

z
a
K
we.
SITE LOCATION
SOURCE: GOOGLE
SITE LOCATION
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
rte
jP
y
�a
CICrair�t©
Highland Creek
X
Golf Club
21 aY
y
s_
1 t 5
Ff ocky Pirr Gott
Club At Curd
Cow
,......� x:`_�.
T
.
r
the tradition �m *i'
F
i
+
l
Got{ Club i
L
W i
x
v
115
L
rs
fir
�d
Ft
Country Club
Hsu' €r Y
Mr5
t zrrldrng rant
w
t
r"
r
[21
SITE LOCATION
SOURCE: GOOGLE
SITE LOCATION
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
rte
jP
y
�a
CICrair�t©
Highland Creek
X
Golf Club
s_
1 t 5
Ff ocky Pirr Gott
Club At Curd
,......� x:`_�.
s_�rra
rtri4n F avt,
�° TO
the tradition �m *i'
Got{ Club i
L
fir
SITE LOCATION
SOURCE: GOOGLE
SITE LOCATION
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
rte
jP
y
�a
CICrair�t©

SITE AERIAL 2012
SHOWING DATA POINT LOCATIONS
SOURCE: Google Earth
SITE AERIAL AND TOPO
Wetlands and Stream Determination Cardno
PROJECT T NO.
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina 045.44950.0001
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203 SCALE: NOTED
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
<J`
ATC

SITE AERIAL DETAIL SHOWING DATA POINTS North Section
SOURCE: Google Earth Brown Section is EPHEMERAL — Blue Section is PERENNIAL
Note: See attached spreadsheet for Lat/Long of the stream location points and the wetland data
points.
SITE AERIAL AND TOPO
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
r�ar+dnd
Are

SITE AERIAL DETAIL SHOWING DATA POINTS South Section
SOURCE: Google Earth
Brown Section is EPHEMERAL — Blue Section is PERENNIAL
Note: See attached spreadsheet for Lat/Long of the stream location points and the wetland data
points.
SITE AERIAL AND TOPO
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
ATC

SITE USGS MAP
SOURCE: National Map Viewer - USGS Cornelius, NC 7.5' Quadrangle
SITE USGS MAP
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Asheboro Shops Site - Asheboro, North Carolina
Randolph Co PIN No.: 01130203
Deep River /Cape Fear River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
Ar
CafWnc

`q
SITE SOIL MAP - SCS
SOURCE: SCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
SITE SOIL MAP
Wetlands and Stream Determination
Shopping Center Site - Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PIN No.: 01130203
Ramah Creek /Rocky River /Pee Dee River Basin
Cardno ATC
PROJECT NO.
045.44950.0001
SCALE: NOTED
(u'► Ca, -dno
ATC

Huntersville Wetlands and Stream Points - GPS Locations - and Totals
Latitude
Longitude
Point
Notes
Stream
Stream
Stream
North
Minutes
West
Minutes
Width
Distance
Segment
Degrees
Minutes
Decimal
Seconds
Degrees
Minutes
Decimal
Seconds
(feet)
(feet)
Area (SF)
Beging Perennial Stream
5
2.5
35
26
0.276
16.56
80
46
0.001
0.06
points moving upstream
6
SP -1 Stream Data Point
2.5
29
72.5
35
26
0.280
16.80
80
45
0.997
59.82
7
3
34
93.5
35
26
0.285
17.10
80
45
0.000
0.00
8
3
21
63
35
26
0.287
17.22
80
46
0.997
59.82
9
2.5
20
55
35
26
0.290
17.40
80
45
0.995
59.70
10
3.5
48
144
35
26
0.293
17.58
80
45
0.986
59.16
11
4.5
15
60
35
26
0.295
17.70
80
45
0.985
59.10
12
3.5
40
160
35
26
0.301
18.06
80
45
0.986
59.16
13
4
37
138.75
35
26
0.307
18.42
80
45
0.988
59.28
14
4
30
120
35
26
0.311
18.66
80
45
0.985
59.10
15
3.5
47
176.25
35
26
0.317
19.02
80
45
0.979
58.74
16
4
14
52.5
35
26
0.319
19.14
80
45
0.980
58.80
17
4
23
92
35
26
0.323
19.38
80
45
0.981
58.86
18
4
35
140
35
26
0.326
19.56
80
45
0.987
59.22
19
Point On Property Line
4
24
96
35
26
0.329
19.74
80
45
0.988
59.28
WP -1 Wetlands Data Pt
20
4
27
108
35
26
0.346
20.76
80
45
0.985
59.10
20 ft east of Stream
21
4
23
92
35
26
0.335
20.10
80
45
0.990
59.40
22
4
27
108
35
26
0.339
20.34
80
45
0.993
59.58
23
3.5
27
101.25
35
26
0.343
20.58
80
45
0.991
59.46
24
5P -2 Stream Data Point
2
91
250.25
35
26
0.356
21.36
80
45
0.982
58.92
25
Begin Perennial Stream
2
37
74
35
26
0.361
21.66
80
45
0.986
59.16
26
WP -2 Wetlands Data Pt
35
26
0.359
21.54
80
45
0.983
58.98
WP -3 Wetlands Data Pt in
29
linear wetland /ephemeral
35
26
0.379
22.74
80
45
0.985
59.10
channel
Total Length Linear Ft Perennial
649
2197
Total Area Sq -Ft Perennial
232
733.5

Note: Stream is Ephemeral
north of Point 25 - Perennial
South of Pt 25
Heading North - -- Ephemeral
25
35
26
0.361
21.66
80
45
0.986
59.16
Points
2
28
SP -3 Ephemeral Data Pt
1.5
128
224
35
26
0.382
22.92
80
45
0.988
59.28
30
1.5
55
82.5
35
26
0.391
23.46
80
45
0.988
59.28
31
2
60
105
35
26
0.401
24.06
80
45
0.989
59.34
SP -4 Ephemeral Data Pt WP-
32
70
35
26
0.405
24.30
80
45
0.988
59.28
4 Wetlands Data Pt
3
28
33
2
105
262.5
35
26
0.422
25.32
80
45
0.986
59.16
SP -5 Ephemeral Data Pt WP-
34
170
35
26
0.434
26.04
80
45
0.944
56.64
5 Wetlands Data Pt
2
85
Culvert outlet on site at base
42
35
26
0.445
26.70
80
46
0.002
0.12
Hwy 73 South Side
3
35
2
98
245
35
26
0.429
25.74
80
45
0.997
59.82
36
2
54
108
35
26
0.421
25.26
80
45
0.992
59.52
37
2
50
100
35
26
0.413
24.78
80
45
0.993
59.58
38
2
38
76
35
26
0.407
24.42
80
45
0.991
59.46
32
3
20
50
35
26
0.405
24.30
80
45
0.988
59.28
Total Length Linear Ft Ephemeral
721
1493
Total Area Sq -Ft Ephemeral
39
35
26
0.326
19.56
80
45
0.882
52.92
40
35
26
0.324
19.44
80
45
0.881
52.86
Culvert outlet on site at base
41
35
26
0.453
27.18
80
46
0.000
0.00
Hwy 73 North Side
Culvert outlet on site at base
42
35
26
0.445
26.70
80
46
0.002
0.12
Hwy 73 South Side
43
35
26
0.448
26.88
80
46
0.003
0.18
DP1
Wetlands Data Point 1
35
26
0.347
20.82
80
45
0.985
59.10
19B
Re -shoot
35
26
0.324
19.44
80
45
0.996
59.76
19A
Re -shoot
35
26
0.325
19.50
80
46
0.003
0.18
7A
Reshoot Pt 7
35
26
0.283
16.98
80
46
0.000
0.00

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 1: Stream Data Point SP -1 Perennial Stream
Photograph No. 2: Stream Data Point SP -2 Perennial Stream.
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. I Bright soils 10 YR 6/6 at Wetland Data Point WP -1.
Photograph No. 4: Vegetation at WP -1.
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 5: Soils 10 YR 7/3 at 16" at Wetlands Data Point WP -2.
Photograph No. 6: Vegetation at WP -2 and Beginning of Stream at SP -2.
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 7: Soil at 16 inches at wetland data point WP -3 = 10YR 7/3.
Photograph No. 8: Wetlands Data Pt. WP -3 and Ephemeral Stream Pt. SP -3
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 9: Soil at 16 inches at wetland data point WP -4 = 10YR 7/3.
Photograph No. 10: Wetlands Data Pt. WP -4 and Ephemeral Stream Pt. SP -4
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

SITE PHOTOS 7/18/13
SHOPPING CENTER SITE
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 11: Soil at 18 inches at wetland data point WP -5 =10YR 7/3.
Photograph No. 12: Wetlands Data Pt. WP -5 and Ephemeral Stream Pt. SP -5
PROJECT NO. 045.44950.0001 CARDNO ATC

57X� Vt�-IA Ppr -Y
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ' 7
Project/Slte: ffe- 1pcA,02A7C
Latitude:
Evaluator. ejz9tholusb '
County:A(6:GPX_AAS-Ae "
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least Intermittent 3 / 2
Stream Determination (circle oimL
Ephemeral Intermitte
Other
If a 19 or perennial If z 30 Cl�
ere nia
e.g. quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Cv
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uenoe
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Activefrelict flood lain
0
Yes = 3
, 2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
CU
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Notes:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Ci
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =g)
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 )
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
2
1.5
-16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water ble?
No = 0
Yes = 3
U. 131010ftV (Subtotal = "-I rLPS 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7 OBL =1.5 Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual. --
Notes:
Sketch:

5PXeAP0q a.-IA PT' s;eL
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: • f' (, r/ K^ /3
Project/Site: NK- 7'7,200'02A?C.
Latitude:
Evaluator: t5e;(j )1LgbAj
County: L{eGl�'^�gc/2�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
r4l
Stream Determination (circle onflL
Other
t
Ephemeral Intermittent e i
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if Z 30'
2
3
a _ /.{
A. Geomorphology Subtotal fh&j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2 )
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
=
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
U
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
T
1
3
8. Headcuts
.0
FAC = lY 7 OBL =1.5 Other = 0
2
:3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
00 -:,o
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= A,4 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
t'
1.5.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
=
C. Biolo (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
11M
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
eTV
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
2A,
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
, 0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
U
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = lY 7 OBL =1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

TXl5A-&'P( V^-/A P_rj Ll;�-_L
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: '�` I `,i'' �`?>
Project/Sits: /ore-I?2001090C
Latitude:
Evaluator: i5zqc/A(j1LSbN
County: ,6{acp_ed-fd"
Longitude:
Total Points:
e-1
Stream is at least Intermittent I
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
Name:
If 19 or erennial if;)-, 30 J
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 8* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1'
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
I2
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplaln
0
1` ,
2-\
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
05L
2
3
T. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CID
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
GD
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
' No =_0
Yes = 3
atunciai ancnes are not ratea; see alscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = % ,rte; )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
N
= 0
Yes = 3
G. tjlolocly (Subtotal= `t % )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1.
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
COP
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05L
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
6- 1,
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
-
FACW f
0.7W OR =1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

sic 0�71A
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7L>4e1b'P ?
Project/Site: f/G.7r4200V4"7C
Latitude:
Evaluator: 1j A<W-LSb N
Countywantaa^AJ%"
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Is at least Intermittent C51
Stragm Determination (circle one)
Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 219 or erennial If a 3l)• •
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= `: • a
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
, 0 1
470
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le ool se uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active /relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0'
1•
2
3
8. Headcuts
46�
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
L
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Cij
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
° artiftdal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= LIS 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter
' 1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = -5,
18. Fibrous nests in streambed
3
2
" 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
e-old
1 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetiand plants In streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 ther = 0
•perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

T-X� a^-/A PT ` S/"- 5 -
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -I// 7/'? o ( -, °'
ProjectfSlte: 1✓G7742#01O%-4K
Latitude:
Evaluator: AW(-„SbAj
County:A(e1_'t4W_AAfU"
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least Intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if t 19 or perennial if Z 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = � " t I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes = 3
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.�
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Notes:
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discus ns In manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1 , 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
-16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
C,0.5_..3
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No -
Yes = 3
U. blolOaV (Subtotal = S, 4a )
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
r0-)
1
1
2
2
3
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
01
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
they = 0
`perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

ed�r CIt°t-A �T-Li' l
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region J!4 10F3
Al1135mr0i tz
Project/Site: s ✓l a ity /county: L- �LW4fog 4 Sampling Date: i 'tof
Applicant/Owner: ,VjS7 rr/ State: Sampling Point rAI
Invesdgator(s): W (S0AJ C2AW41O GSection, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: G00 �-X S-f NWI classification: / A0'r Al A'Wr°!�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No 7C (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation W& Soil e5f4,� . or Hydrology Ili significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _7�<_ No
Are Vegetation AIL" . Soil n10' . or Hydrology WD naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: Gr rp �j /' F N .3 % �� #q / (! K ej.•J" r y't . r
-o,�402 a/ 5,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondaly indicators (minimum of two required)
PrlmaN Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that aopjyl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (131)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_, Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D6)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No 4< Depth (Inches):
R j
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
,.
i
No Depth (inches): >
No 4, Depth (inches): ZA
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Cover Species? u Number of Dominant Species
1 • �- 940 *9'- That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2. AYN E,4-(e,471 /.�'t' {� r- L1d "4 �[ U
�"`-- Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5' That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
4.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
x 1 =
OBL species
FACW species
x2.
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPI, species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6• I Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover I Hvdrophvtic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: -`
2
3.
4.
5.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophydc Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet
_ Problematic Hydrophyfic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6' be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover nsa..*. *;- . s cj .. co—Z.
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Herb StratUm (Plot size• )
. off► s ,
2. 40 ace-
4.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
s.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
o (Plot size: )
1. 11-ta I N la 1-114" f_ . � >�
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 In. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Heib - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
04 3 0 PJ
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix ' Redox Features
finches) „% Color (moist) Typg� LOCH Texture Remarks
co
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
— Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
OWLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
___, Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FO)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

0r O t°rR 0T AJPZ
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region i late.?
- .1- - - /V41"46 f4Lt_
ProJect/Slte: EZ-!V1 Uc !V'`— cry ity /County 1 &CWLC-✓i 6'X9 Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner. T/�7t%�r/ State: Sampling Point,
Investigator(s): G0 CSOA- f— GW4ob C.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): Ll L44 �— Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope(-Q: -it ~Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat• Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: WL)_ NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes X_ No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No � Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetiand? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remark`.-.��.•
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two require()
,
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is
required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
,-_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water•Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No �C_ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): �t_
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
a4 0? ?//9W
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
tAJ '0 l��G�t/� 2
pC'ZaF�
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover S s Number of Dominant Species
1. 7S KZEEEZ4 w4d Z� W That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. -- A I0...► 7 lam+ ��.
�-` Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5 Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1
LJ
2.�
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
x 1 =
OBL species
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x3.
FACU species
x4.
UPL species
x5-
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: i _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1g Y.�IY )jQQ _ 3 •Prevalence Index is 53.0
2. _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheeQ
4 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10.
11.
- Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
(Plot size: ) _
2. y f 4'^ Q -�
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
photo numbers hen: or on a separate
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation
20% of total cover: I Present? Yes
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
,,er& ov ,-\ jqr PP
00 4 0-3
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) is Color (moist) % Remarks
�o
0
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Stirface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
` Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type;
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Project/Site: M
Applicant/Owner.
Investigator(s): _
Landforn (hillsiol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region [dF3
CC$
pd� Sampling Date: 2O
State: Sampling Point: _
)• GO /VC.t NW_ Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: 101t K ^' AI'07" &.O %C A'"� NWI classificadon: +✓o 7- ► 4/i 4�
Are climatic i hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation AA0 . Soil /VJ • or Hydrology �� significantly disturbed? Are ° ormal Circumstances° present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation /V) . Soil /W . or Hydrology /0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
l X
.?."/
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B7)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
— Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth pnches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
�F
Depth Qnches): IS
Saturation Present? Yes 4- No
Depth (inches): , J# 1 if
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(Includes ca Ella frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
< ��� G►
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
6.
_&D J,6 Total Cover
50% of total cover. 2096 of total cover.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1
1.
2.
.3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: t
1. 15!-j*A1CSf AW 11-C TIL /_ 19 F--
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
.� /C1Lc�
2. f �—
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
p4 zd�.?
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ()
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �
Total % Cover of:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
) % Cover See Status
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
2. It
x4=
UPL species
3. IRLON APOCANE
4. W
(A) (B)
6.
_&D J,6 Total Cover
50% of total cover. 2096 of total cover.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1
1.
2.
.3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: t
1. 15!-j*A1CSf AW 11-C TIL /_ 19 F--
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
.� /C1Lc�
2. f �—
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
p4 zd�.?
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ()
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
XS=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-_ 3 - Prevalence index Is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more In height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height,
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
it (1 m) in height.
10.
11 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: j / /-�
1. VIP"Mild c
2.
3`
5.
Remarks:
5096 of total cover:
,rs here or on a separate
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No/
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

04 3 oF3
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color (moist %_ Color (moist) Ty eT, Loci Texture Remarks
Ala TO! AVfL � fvl2�. -� Art dc/c_ �
A& AC ZO '
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Hisfic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
T Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type: S vl
Depth (inches): it
11�yoweg,
47'
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
0 it
indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
�P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

`,orre_aWof OrtA Ara
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ldF3
ProjecUSlte: CS✓141[L Afw-- 7r4 =fYi W4 11E L��✓�y� amplingDate: i� ��
Appltcant/Owner:�?�% %/ State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): -_ K1 Gtl LGSo �J- C'�CONO /�"j �ect on, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): F}7 LLStA /t Local relief (concave, convex, none): e+oVt/EX Slope (%): �
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrolqlc conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil 1110. or Hydrology 0A significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes „X_ No
Are Vegetation Soil /✓J or Hydrology AAQ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology ` � Present?
�� Yes No
Remarks: n 04e s jot,-/, &-ic T
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reo fu red)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apow _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) 'z_0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _& Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 2Q Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_,&__ No �_ Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes �4 No Depth (Inches):��'1/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No C
includes capillary fri e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
- /
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) � c s Status
2. "Q 194W-C-
3.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Sa ing Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Shrub Str turn (Plot size: 1
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
p4 Zn�3
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBI., FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z2 V y WB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of., MultIDIV bm
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3.
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5--
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydmphytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet
_ Problematic Hydrphytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Veaetation Strata:
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum Plot size: ) r.N � approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 4jL? (w�s� � J: (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
s.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woo6 Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. VI /A/ t,4-
2.
3.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
rs hen: or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
AAa-rru 1 RA-M PrAW
004, 3 oF3
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color ( " ewe Locz Texture RemadSs
=1Z 72t
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Ep(pedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) CiLRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
._ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type: �i N �dla,d'r C
Depth Cinches):
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136,122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
If lick L4���
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Piedmont F(oodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Sol Z, @ ,SLA ( -4ZZ It '�
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Project/Site: A
Applicant/Owner.
re-40WIAW OVM ArLip 5
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region d�F3
Sampling Date: l r ?013
_ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): fZIEZU wLLbO /V "C:�4/0 /11 lC-Sectlon, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): !fig U ftem Local relief (concave, convex, none): l o /J Y±4 Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No -?—k (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, -(L Soil Al-. or Hydrology IVO significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes No
Are Vegetation -A4 Soil W-0— or Hydrology QLO_ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NO-!— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No --X— within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
�' -W --r l�/e�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary_ Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) _&Crayfish Burrows (C13)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): AO
Water Table Present? Yes No
f
Depth (Inches): 91
Saturation Present? Yes �! No
Depth (inches): f� I I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No,2L
includes capillary frin e 1
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %C over Species? Status
2
3. J
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3._
4.
5.
6.,
= Total Cover
50910 of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. _
rs here or on a separate
20% of total cover:
f'4 zd�3
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)
Prevalence Index workshebt;
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x3-
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5-
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Veaetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) In height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes N
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Wr&r,Vl Oh—rA � =.
or-4 4 oF3
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) QgI o >� Color (moist) • % - -. Loci Texture Remarks
L—� 1oa� J
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)'
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F73) (MLRA 136,122)
3 indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be presen4
Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
RGJY�YYYG Lo�G, \Y VYJGI YOY
Type: lV J?/ At F_ At lCiC LA11t C
Depth (inches): — Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Date: August 16, 2013
Agent Authorization & Permission to Enter Property for the
Proposed Shopping Center Site- Huntersville, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County PINNo.: - 01130203 and 01130201
Ramah Creek/Rocky River /Pee ,Dee River Basin
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter serves as authorization for Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. of ATC Associates to act
as the agent for the owner for the purpose of obtaining 404 wetlands permits and 401
stream permits from the NCDENR Water Quality Section and 'The US Army Corps of
Engineers for the above referenced property.
This letter also serves as authorization for personnel from the Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Dept.,, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality and U.S. Army Corp of
Engineers to enter the above referenced property with Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. for the
purpose of confirming the location of streams and wetlands information contained in the
404/401 permit applications only.
Respectfully,
Owner: Aventine Development, Inc.
Name: Marc Hagle
Title:
Address: 100 E Sybelisa, Ave. Ste 120, Maidancl FL 32751
Phone: [phone]
Fax: 407 - 629 -5030
Email. marc@tricor. net
Signed:
Owner of the bove Reference Pro rb