Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0005762_Inspection_20140402ATA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III Governor Secretary April 2, 2014 Ronald Locklear Westpoint Home Inc P.O. Box 338 Wagram, NC 28396 SUBJECT: March 17, 2014 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Westpoint Home Inc Wagram plant Permit No: NC0005762 Scotland County Dear Mr. Locklear: Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on March 17, 2014. The cooperation of Mr. Ronald Locklear, facility's ORC, was greatly appreciated. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Mark Brantley, Environmental Senior Specialist, of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0005762. As a reminder, preservation of the Waters of the State can only be achieved through consistent NPDES Permit compliance. Comments o Facility was clean and neat in appearance at the time of the inspection. • All required records, maintenance records, and laboratory data appeared to be in order. ▪ A review of the facility's DMR showed that the wastewater plant only discharges treated water on an average of 1-4 days a month. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any questions, please call me at 910-433-3327. Sincerely, Mark Brantley Environmental Senior Specialist Fayetteville Regional Office NCCDENR cc: Ronald Gene Locklear, ORC Central Files <-.. Fes' ett -i'tle filet Fayetteville Regional Office 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5095 Main Phone: 910-433-3300 1 Internet: http://www.ncdenr.gov • United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 Water CnmpIianr e Inspentinn Report Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8 31 98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection 1 I N I 2 15 I 31 NC0005762 111 121 14/03/17 117 Type Inspector Fac Type 18I C I 19I S I 20II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 166 Remarks 211 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Inspection Work Days • Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved-------- --------- 671 169 701 I 7110 I 72I N I 731 1 174 79 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include POTW name and NPDES permit Number) Wagram plant NCSR 1407 Wagram NC 28396 Entry Time/Date 10:00 AM 14/03/17 Permit Effective Date 11/02/01 Exit Time/Date 12:30 PM 14/03/17 Permit Expiration Date 14/07/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) /// Ronald Gene Locklear/ORC/910-369-4392/ Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Donald Locklear,PO Box 338 Wagram NC 28396//910-369-4392/9103694399 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) • Records/Reports r and checklists as necessary) Permit , Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Mark Brantley FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.727/ le .ilevii-PI Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Belinda S Henson it 91bniFRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.726/ - I ' 3 - 1 y EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page # 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 3I NC0005762 111 121 14/03/17 117 18I cl 1 Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Comments Facility was clean and neat in appearance at the time of the inspection. All required records, maintenance records, and laboratory data appeared to be in order. A review of the facility's DMR showed that the wastewater plant only discharges treated water on an average of 1-4 days a month. Page # 2 Permit: NC0005762 Owner - Facility: Wagram plant Inspection Date: 03/17/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? # Are there any special conditions for the permit? .Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Yes No NA NE ®nnn ® nnn. nn®n ® nnn ®nnn Yes No NA NE ® nnn Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ 0 Judge, and other that are applicable? nn Comment: Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? ®n n n is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ n n n Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? ■ n n n Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ■ n n n Is the chain -of -custody complete? ® n n n Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs 1 Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ®n n n Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? n n ® ❑ (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? n n E n is the ORC visitation log available and current? ■ n n n is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? i n n n Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ■ n n n is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ n n n Page # 3 Permit: NC0005762 Owner - Facility: Wagram plant Inspection Date: 03/17/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? ®n n n Is flow meter calibrated annually? 4n n n Is the flow meter operational? gic ❑ n n (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? n ❑ ® n Comment: Flow meter last calibrated on May 2, 2013 by Carolina Technical Services. Pump Station - Influent Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? 4n n n Is the wet well free of excessive grease? ®n n n Are all pumps present? ®n n n Are all pumps operable? ▪ n n ❑ Are float controls operable? n n n Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? n n ® n Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? n n 4 n Comment: Secondary Clarifier Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? Are weirs level? Is the site free of weir blockage? Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? Is scum removal adequate? Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? Is the drive unit operational? Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth) Comment: Yes No NA NE Yes No NA NE Yes No NA NE ® nnn ®nnn ®nnn ®nnn ® nnn ® nnn ® nnn ® nnn ® nnn ®n❑❑ ®nnn Page # 4 Permit: NC0005762 Owner - Facility: Wagram plant Inspection Date: 03/17/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air Type of aeration system Surface Is. the basin free of dead spots? ®❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 4n n n Are the diffusers operational? n n ® n Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ®❑ n n Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? ®n n n Is the DO level acceptable? [grin n Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) ® n n n Comment: Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE # Is composite sampling flow proportional? n n 4 n Is sample collected above side streams? ■ n n n Is proper volume collected? ® n n n Is the tubing clean? ■ n n n # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n n n Is sampling performed according to the permit? ■ n n n Comment: Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? n n n ■ Is sample collected below all treatment units? ®n n n Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ n n Is the tubing clean? ®n n n # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ® n n n Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ n n n Comment: Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? IN n El - Comment: n Page # 5