NC0020656_NPDES Permit Renewal App_20090210

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
CRAIG F HONEYCUTT
CITY MANAG_ '
CITY OF.. [WOW] t
PO BOX 249
LAURINBURG NC 28353
Dear Mr. Honeycutt:
kVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
February 10, 2009
DENA-FRO
=.3112 9
DWQ
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Receipt of permit renewal application
NPDES Permit NC0020656
Leith Creek WWTP
Scotland County
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on February 9, 2009. A member of the NPDES
Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to complete your
permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days before your existing permit
expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact James McKay
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
Point Source Branch
cc: CENTRAL FTLFS
Fayetteville:Regignal_Ofice/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
Robert A. Ellis, Treatment Plants Director, Town of Laurinburg, P.O. Box 249, Laurinburg, NC 28353
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North,Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaternuality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarohna
aturaiij

o► Caurirkurg
OFFICE OF THE TREATMENT PLANTS DIRECTOR
February 5, 2009
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NCDENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Renewal Application Packet
Permit# NCO020656
Leith Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Dear Mrs. Sprinkle:
All -America City
1 I
r $ 1967
FEB - 9 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Enclosed is the NPDES Form 2A Application for Pemit NtimberNC0020656, the
City of Laurinburg's Leith Creek WWTP, We are requesting a renewal for this permit.
Question B 1: The governing board flngmally adopted the CIP March 19, 2002. Since
then the CIP has been updatedannually to reflectthe needs of the collection system and
pump stations to help eliminate inflow& Inf ltraton.concerns. Copies of the current CIP
are attached for your review,
•
The Authorized Representative
Sludge that is generated at this,facili
connection with. Land Application of Residuals Permit Number WQ0002526. Leith
Creek WWTP has two aerobic digestersaw th-a total volume of $00.0`00 gallons. We try
to perform four land application events per-year:for a:total of 3.2 million gallons.
However if we needto apply more we will lime stabilize to perform these events more
frequently.
Craig Honeycutt, City Manager.
psis land applied at Laurinburg Marton Airport in
We have one additional fathead minnow toxicity test to complete for the permit renewal
requirements. This test is being analyzed by our contract lab at this time. We will
forward the results as soon as we receive them.
If you have any questions concerning this Renewal request please contact me at 910-277-
0214
Sincerely,
t
Robert E. Ellis
Treatment Plants Director
603 LAUCHWOOD DRIVE • P.O. BOX 249 • LAURINBURG, N.C. 28353 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
1 104 L'�E WwTP CoO_o109D
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
IV.43-161111
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a `Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 MGD must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
FEB - 9 2009
B Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 MGD. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
DEAR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 MGD,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 MGD,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). Sills are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or -
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
wkvr- IBC) 0 D,Q010 51.0
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATI
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
X% Vt ' g9.5I K
:iPARTA.:-•BASIQAPPLICATIONANFORMATIOtt FORA
PLICANTS,
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
Facility. Address
(not P.O. Box)
Oily of hmuo,NEw' - IE/T/m eREEK L wAr LRffAim 7RANT
0 MA 44q..
LA- jiv 3i p N1 2g3.53
Zp3ERT A. aLls
f-rmE'fr ihNT3 1JI EC OR
(9 ud i z77- 0ar4-
6,20 )/i- LJ- Aar'
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
'tim ,q ,4&) Ye
aRRI A- )-%NEVC'l Tr
t'21w f7%fNYA%E/R
(quo) �7�-g3z4
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
Vowner ❑ operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
facility El applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued tothe treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES Fe 00 20L5&, PSD
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type. of Collection System Ownership
TV 0r/11(//V/10 e6 / z'Iz. &A.3T »� f ur too C e
Total population served
17,z42_,
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
467117,4/
Wwi/oozo(.56
ODES
LamBEX.W1v 'RfiS/ V
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ieNo
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes Q No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate
4
b. Annual average daily flow rate
c. Maximum daily flow rate
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment pl
contribution (by miles) of each.
[Separate sanitary sewer
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.?
MGD
Two Years Aqo
Z. 95.
b.
•
5, 032.
Last Year
This Year
2. i06 2.483
ant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
/00
PrYes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
N�A
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
d.
Location:
Number of acres:
N /A
1
0
Q
D
N/A
❑ Yes
MGD
VNo
N/a
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application
❑ continuous .or ❑ intermittent?
N/A
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
MGD
❑ Yes
ID' No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
l ON eXl V/WrP o02of5cp
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
/VP.S
RIVER BASIN:
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
W/n
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number (
V
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name ! `A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( ) V
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
N/A
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. .0 MGD
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): 0 Yes I 'No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method: N/i
Is disposal through this method
❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Ltr W 'W o2o40S
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
liDE5
RIVER BASIN:
J n e.evex sm/lif
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.B.ago to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 MGD."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
00 I
(City or town, if applicable)
2835,E
(Zip Code)
eOTH/VLi
(County)
`` 14-5 ' 00
(Latitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ' W itti jO[N
e. Average daily flow rate
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge?
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Name of receiving water
Name of watershed (if known)
(State)
79 ° a 7 ' //5
N/A
Z.710
(Longitude) .
ft. LIACIE1 CREEK
P IIANS . NDICITE
ft. 171PE ENTER I 141-0
MGD 5TRthnt
❑ Yes IsYNo (go to A.9.g.)
N/A
❑ Yes VNo
Ltsme IrEP _l7iN
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable) EF�� /p
acute cfs
MGD
chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable):
mg/I of CaCO3
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LEtn4 2PEEK kiw P NC Oozo&56
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary [Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal
Design SS removal
Design P removal
Design N removal
Other
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
NHS
RIVER BASIN:
Lk/rem /JVAR 6451
90
9a
go
75
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
JD7)ilu-r( %i ilLORWE
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall?
Does the treatment plant have post aeration?
L_1�es
lit/Yes
Yes
❑ No
❑ No
%.
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: on 1
pH (Minimum)
pH (Maximum)
Flow Rate
Temperature (Winter)
'MAXIMUM DAILY
;AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value'
o
.L
/YIAXX 19 nix
Units.
S.U.
S.U.
/,jy/8 rnlrl.
/t WVG is
Value
Avg 62299)
i
ure (Summer) P (AV
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
Temperature
}fit 2.1 Rohl
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
Conc.
Units`
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
CBOD5
g.fmAx
Units
"Number;of Samples
CAL =31,6 cis
-AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARG
:Conc..'
.o llfl
1
Units
uinber'of:-
Samples
;Oda p
,ANALYTICAL. <,
METHOD`'
, l 62to
FECAL COLIFORM
MAX
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
>zotpo
;33�Iv�x
1 a7A6G
9AvU
Bdnot
ND OF PART A
PLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 'l) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PAR
OF FORM 2A YO.U:MUST COMPLETE
.25odAy.S
2,51k I
Ao•i0Nh0
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ZE1 ill egEE) W WIP lie O© aOCO LP
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
f Tj As
RIVER BASIN:
,
.Lit/n3:R
BASIC APPLIGATION INFORMATION
PART B ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DEN LOWSIGFGREATER THAN OR
'na
EQUAL TO 0 MOD (7 n 00,000 gallos per day)
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 MGD must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration.ti�Estimate the average number of gallons per
ilk OOQ GPD CEj /n D)
day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
infiltration.
Briefl explain any steps underway or plann o minimize inflow d
,/ d iiiil Q L( k./ A ,
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within '/. mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (relatefrto wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes IIWNo
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary). �1
Name: PO
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( ) -
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
, uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LEiri-, ekeEi tVW71 NC 013206,56
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
NHS
RIVER BASIN:
Zia/reek ve in(
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable .
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
-Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational Level
Schedule
MM/DD/YYYY
Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? 0 Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted •
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed. by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 00 1
MAXIMUMDAILY
DISCHARGE
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
3.51 MAY
28mA
!I.O my_
1mr+t
<.10 MIN
h. l miry!
0.311111N
/. inIN
I,28num
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Avr3.5o
Avg, IS
Av3.B.
Avg 1.8
Avg fig
AY3:2.n
Number, of
;Samples.
250
251
12,
az
a
Sm '1500iIN3F
*4..500CLG
54 4500 - OG
EPA, SI.2
EPA 353.2.
EPA3b54
•/0m
L
OTHER
END OF PART B .
IE'APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 9) TO DETERMINE:_ WHICH
M 2A YOU MUST COMPLET''
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT
NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
SUPPLEMENTAL' APPLICATION
INFORMATION
PART E TOXICITY TESTING DATA'
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's oufalls: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that ai'e required
to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• . If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
•
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
('chronic 0 acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conductedin the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
A7— /4D Test number. Test number. Test number:
a. Test information.!/
Test Species & test method number
•
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
.
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
e L/ n(eoozozo_520
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Test number: Test number:
RIVER BASIN:
Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both -
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100% effluent
LCso
95% C.I.
0
0
Control percent survival
0/0
Other (describe)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
1-74 (),2EFMIWAw P /116Oozo66-6
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
/` E 6
RIVER BASIN:
1 &. vee3►Al
Chronic: -
NOEC
%
% 0
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
- %
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes 0 No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions) -
��=b�r END OF PARTE r' ez
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 'I) TOT DETERMINE- WHICH OTHER PARTS
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE r 4
% � i �� } � t `9''CYrk �� f ' Y*�Y° Y '" Gd P .� F ��� r { 3 d•y b
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LEir-( 06)7W' NC ODzOCo3/
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
ODES
RIVER BASIN:.
l.iunt ,ei ve,• A/
' SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART ':INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
❑ Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU. V
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. V
Name:
•
Mailing Address:
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (GPD) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
GPD ( continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (GPD) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
GPD ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
EI Tg (2/EEJ 14l v it 1)6,20656
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Ili°/ ES
RIVER BASIN: -
Liijnt eC, % R /A)
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck
❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount
Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.),
❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ri 5E.EA a1- Ak' 00,2a 51n
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
iNops
RIVER BASIN:
Lu 6� /Yee ,,t
MBINED "SEWER5YSTE
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
c. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County)
(State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
O Rainfall
ft.
ft.
0 CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
O CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
L�rn1( W o 11!LOdder S''b
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
NPDES
RIVER BASIN:
Am 6L /02 6/iN)
c. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or El approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.5. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water: '
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code
c. Name of State Management/River Basin:
(if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit
G.6. CSO Operations. -
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational
code (if known):
by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
NDOFP
RT
1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
MUST COMPLETE,�� ' a
.C„,a 9w _r tl°-,�.,?.' � _.- x 3,. �..g .>,.-, r .">E,a^...,_ .,. ..• ..,, ...
+r,REFER TOTHE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE
��� . OF FORM52A YOU
a L.i -,$ >, x, �Yi "i Ta Ka �, .5
Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
MOP W oo /206.5
:SUPPL' EMEN'TAL APPLIGATION:INFORMATIO
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
NOES
RIVER BASIN: &iii
PART. D
PANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DAT
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 MGD and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number:
001
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM`DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY, DISCHARGE
Conc:`z
Units
Massa
Units
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
Units.:
`Units ..
`ANALYTICAL
METHOD
'MGMDL
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
d3 L
2007
2oo.7
0. 02.0
0.020
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
DL
L3bL
BbL
B17
3®L
]IL
Zoo, 7
2O0•-7
2007
Zoo.
Zoo. `7
2.45. 1'
D. 00z0
06,50
0.010
0.020
0.0(o
0.000oa
NICKEL
SELENIUM
61)L
ZOO, 7
Zoo.
0, 020
0. 02.0
SILVER
THALLIUM
0.7"
o. ©10
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
0.003
BDL
fDL
HARDNESS (as CaCO3) Z2
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
I
I
«'c611 E
4zo, �
)and
0,030.
0650
0. 0I0
30.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
�7 cRE. ww-rP NC 00 2ara5(4
PLICATION INFORMATI
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
f'J MS
RIVER BASIN:
zzine,g4itee z43,p1
T
CERTIFicATI
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
Ef/Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
Ele/PPart D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
Zart E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
0 Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
AF PLICANTS MUST QOMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATIO
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title
Signature
Telephone number
Date signed
(qIO'Dra)irp`i
)
HA &
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
DENR
27699-(NT
F E B - 9 2009
WATER QUALITY
SOURCE BRANCH
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LETN CieaA fit/ W7P NC 00 2.0105ln
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
I�PbES
Outfall number:
00I
RIVER BASIN:
litri6e9_ i vee.?i
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
, MAXIMUM',DAILY'DISCHARGE, •
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
VERAGE:DAILY DISCHARGE;.
ACROLEIN
col
0.05o
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
13DL
0.0010
BROMOFORM
1JL
6z4
0.00ID
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
tDL
�24
0.o6i()
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE •
BDL
4z4
1p24
0•0010
O. 0616
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
i1
R1�L
1
i
GZ4
i 24
.D05b
o . 050
0. Oo50
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
2.4
O..00to
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
BDL
1
i
z4
624
Da0010
D.Ooio
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1024
0. 0610
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
3DL
624
0.06)0
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
Poi)
D L
f
•
0.0650
0, 0OW
TOLUENE
6 DL
2.4
0.6050
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Lr•TM CIZEE ww7-P gea0ao15
PERMIT ACTION
ODES
REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
LiurnZe,4 ve Pik
Outfall number: 0 0 I (Complete once for each outfall
discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
:
,MAXIMUM; DAILY DISCHARGE'
-:-;
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHODS
ML%MDL
-
,Conc
Units
Mass"'
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass .
..Units
Number' `
3 '� of
-Samples.
TRICHLOROETHANE
BD L
I
(c24-
V J1, 0C/�y/1)
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
j
1—J
-I
6)1
O.0WO
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1 DL.
I
&Pi
6.0010
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other volatile organic
compounds
requested
by the permit
writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
•
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
(�
Qo L
5
% Z5
(Q
o. oro
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
��L.
f
I
-/ 2 5
(j� aJ
,Q10
6,01o
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
'l��j�i
1-11JL
I
625
Q'. No
4,6-D I N ITRO-O-C RESO L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
Pt-DL
•
I
�25
Q pr V
]L
l
/Z5V,D)D2-NITROPHENOL3,L
4-NITROPHENOL
(rT5
0,.D>0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
13D`
PHENOL
--B-DL
I
/025
6,610
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
13bL
I
eZ5
��� ���
y�� p( o
V
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other acid extractable compounds
requested
by the permit
writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
i}T L
I
25
D. odi c)
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1--_
I
(O
6
Q, 00/0
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE'ft
L
)
(O26
2.050
t�l
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
L
I,
45
0. 06/0
BENZO(A)PYRENE
`
-DL
I
Z 2
a.a6/e
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Am" ezei< i / p NCB 020656
Outfall number:
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
oot
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
NPDfs
RIVER BASIN:
Lr,tBJ4&-7e- 234.s//�l
(Complete once for each outran discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
Cone"
ll1JL
nits ,•
Conc.
AVERAGE DAILY<DISCHARGE"
Units
Units
umber
.of
Samples'
ANALYTICAL
,METHOD
(z5
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER .
0, CVO
0.00/0
0, 6oi0
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER .
0.610
0•000
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
0,010
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
0-010
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
0.6616
0.CoiD
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
Lz4
O.Obib
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
1
(, 24
425
125
lz5
1Z5
Z5
62,5
0.0610
0.661 D
8. 011D
Q
0 b(!
0,610
0. 01
0.bi0
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
,LEinN�zgx WW1 NC00266569
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
ES
RIVER BASIN:
LLazazWver 3)N
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM_ DAILY`DISCHARGE
Conc:
Units'
Mass
:Units'
Conc.
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Mass
Units
Number -
of
„Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD '
MUMDL
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
FIEXACHLOROBENZENE
IL
425
A(X),10
0, 0010
0.01D
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
O.610
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
A01 6
6,616
6,6616
ISOPHORONE
0.0/0
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
0,0010
0. O IO
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
0.0/b
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
O•650
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
0. 010
PHENANTHRENE
O.OD/o
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
V
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
v
(5. obi b
6.0/0
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides requested by the permit writer
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

214
ewer Plan
WO-

CIP 5 Yr Plan
Capital Improvements (5) Year Plan
Sewer Lift Stations
Year
Pump Stations
Cost
2008-2009
Upgrade 74 Bypass Pump Station (Pumps, Motors & Valves)
$ 90,000.00
2009-2010
Engineering Study to minimize the number of pump stations
30,000.00
2010-2011
Engineering & Plans for Bridge Creek Pump Station
40,000.00
2011-2012
Upgrade Electrical Controls at Pump Station
30,000.00
2012-2013
Upgrade Electrical Controls at Pump Station
30,000.00
220,000.00

Five Year Capital Projects
Sewer Projects
Year
Street
Problem
Est. Cost
City cost
Total cost
2009-2010
McKay Street
total cost
$675,000.00
$275,000.00
$ 775,000.00
grant
$500,000.00
city cost
$175,000.00
New Construction and repairs
$100,000.00
2010-2011
Creedle St. and area
total cost
$748,438.00
$174,843.00
$ 848,438.00
grant
$673,595.00
city cost
$74,843.00
New Construction and repairs
$100,000.00
2011-2012
Cronly Street
bad pipe
$287,548.00
$387,548.00
$387,548.00
New Construction and repairs
$100,000.00
$387,548.00
2012-2013
Fairly Street
bad pipe
$202,559.00
$503,059.00
$503,059.00
Gill to Dickson Street
bad pipe
$200,500.00
New Construction and repairs
$100,000.00
$503,059.00
2013-2014
S. Main to Biggs Street
bad pipe
$47,100.00
$362,975.00
$362,975.00
Biggs to Wilson Street
bad pipe
$121,675.00
Foraker to Taft Street
bad pipe
$94,200.00
New Construction and repairs
$100,000.00
$362,975.00

pity of Cot,trip6urg:
OFFICE OF THE TREATMENT PLANTS DIRECTOR
April21, 2009
Division of Water Quality
Attention: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Re: Notification of Name Change
NPDES Permit No. NC0020656
NPDES Permit No. NC0021661
NPDES Permit No. NC0036773
Dear Sir or Madam::
All -America City
11 IF
3 1967
p,* 21 7009
N1•10
.1z QUO(
,�E B�p,NCH
This letter is to notify you'tlat our City Manager Craig Honeycutt is no Monger with the
City of Laurinburg and.: council has ap'pointed'-an-Interim City Manager,Dolores A.
Hammond. Please addressany future correspondence to:
Dolor`es
nterirh
it I> ;P.O Box
Laurinburg,
•
She will also be signing our monthly monitoring reports until ,further notice. If you have
any questions please contact meat the number; below"
Robert A. Ellis
Treatment Plants Director
Cc: Dolores A. Hammond, Interim City Manager
603 LAUCHWOOD DRIVE • P.O. BOX 249
LAURINBURG, N.C. 28353 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

Oi of
Cattriofturg,
OFFICE OF THE TREATMENT PLANTS DIRECTOR
March.18, 2009
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NCDENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
22 2 s
MAR 2 3 2009
A
ll -America
re
1956 2bb3 1967
Subject: Renewal Application Packet DENR - WATER QUALITY
Permit# NC0020656 POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Leith Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Dear Mrs. Sprinkle:
We have enclosed the additional fathead Winn, toxicity test iil for the permit
renewal requirements and a schematic of the wastewater flow and process rocess for your
review. " " .
Along with the above mentione
process.
The City of Laurinburg's collet
throughout the system." There-
mains. Our Leith Creek Plant consist o
plant, consisting of 2 aeration basins,
return sludge pump station with 3 pumps, total capacity 2.0 million gallons per day
nat on we are sending a narrative of our treatment
(MGD)
Moff34 pump stations located
avity sewers and24 miles of force
es of treatment, one `extended aeration
erg
clarifiers, 2-chlorine contacfchambers and one
The second plant is an. oxidation.;ditch�style with 1 clarifier, 1 chlorination point and 1
return sludge pump station with 3 dual"speed pumps, total capacity.2.0 MGD, for a total
treatment capacity of 40 MGD. The facility has 2 aerobic digesters, (1) 150,000-gallon
tank and (1) 650,000-gallon tank with course air diffusers.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Ellis
City of Laurinburg
Treatment Plants Director
Cc: Dale Lopez, Division of Water Quality
603 LAUCHWOOD DRIVE • P.O. BOX 249 • LAURINBURG, N.C. 28353 • PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

SC1 c 1`:'A71C of VvpSri: WATee RDN/ 4.116D
Nr )=S-NCO3P0656- D1=-1A 5.e191- t>,.OD
NA1' '� S iSok
Co 111=L1.X.c: ).1
GAL
EQ-1/4.&z.ZZATsclwj
$4,Sr►J
-rm.0=1.7 ctFrh
-1.0 p;G
DAY
C.£1
COIL —
��v 7 S.O MuL?
I\[oT To ANq
Sri D-13Y
GemtraZ
A:)A:)d2 pump
STAr1aa
A
MED
101r11d6
Isx
E0X
. E EA71kJ S1N
O
-!4o . Z
A1=EATJGN SAS!Q
0 O
No-1
ciA zI m=P
No. 3
Siu�� DPY1Nb ZEDS
V
zr
Lke...14
krrEt
STAN -i3Y
GEAtf2AT7A F
86TP PM/47S

Effluent Toxiv.ity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:2/18/2009
Facility: Laurinburg
NPDES # NCO() 20656
Pipe #: 001 County: Scotland
Laporatory: Me itech, Inc.
X _.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
Inversion at 15.5%
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time
%Elf:
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
7.75
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
15.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original ,#
Wt/original (mg)
31
62
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
100
Surviving #
Original #,
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) !nit/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) !nit/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
. Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
2/3/2009
1
2
1:15 PM
3
4
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.621
0.615
0.665
0.616
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.578
0.591
0.563
0.582
10
10
10
10'
10
10
10
10
0.551
0.620
.0.460
0.550
10
10
9
9
10
10
10
10
0.663
0.597
0.558
0.541
10
9
_ 10
9
10
10
10
10
0.628
0.583
0.638
0.556
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0:633
0.522
0.515
0.554
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
• Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.629
100.0
0.629
100.0
0.579
100.0
0.545
95.0
0.590
95.0
0.601 I
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
100.0
0.556
Test Organisms
r Cultured In -House
I-4 Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 2/2/09
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
1
2
3
4
6
8.09 /
7.96
8.06
/ 7.75
7.96 /
7.71
7.92 /
7.93
8.17 /
7.98
7.98 /
7.68
7.98 /
7.54
7.60 ' /
6.94
7.70
17.01
7.91 /
6.88
7.70 /
7.83
8.02 /
7.79
7.90 . /
7.10
7.64 /
7.13
24.8 /
25.0
24.8
/ 24.9
24.6 /
25.0 '
24.9 /
24.9
24.8 /
25.0
24.9 /
24.9 '
24.9 /
25.2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6.33 /
6.74
6.48 /
6.80
6.46 /
6.80
6:45
/ 6.74
6.66
/ 6.92
6.51 /
6.52
6.39 /
6.54
7.96. /
7.09
8.03 /
6.94
8.26 /
6.79
7.91
17.80
8.06
17.75
7.85 /
6.94
8.48 /
6.75
24.8 /
25.0
24.8 /
24.9
24.6 /
25.0
24.9
/ 24.9
24.8
/ 25.0
24.9 /
24.9
24.9 /
25.2
.1
2
3
2/1/2009.
2/2/2009
2/5/2009
26.0
24.1
24.6
22
22
22
12
10
10
324
326
334
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.4 .
0.6
328
46
60
241
329
330
48
44
58
58
226
211
Normal
Horn. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Surv'val
I(=
ft�
100
>100
>100
Growth
FIB
Fl:
100
>100
>100
Steel's ' Dunnet's
Overall Result
ChV
>100
Stats
Conc.
7.75
15.5
31
62
Survival
Critical
10
10
10
10
Calculated
18
18
14
14
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 1.5817
2.41
2.41
2.41
2.6179
1.2310.
0.8726
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
100
10
18
2.41
2.2829

Initials/Signature:
•
End Date:
End Time:
Client:
Laurinburg
NPDES #: NC 0020656
Initiated by: 1 / /
Date/Time Fed: 2/3/09 /6364,n
Date/Time Born: 2/2/09 3:00 PM CT
Day 1
Day2 2/5 /03c2,,,_ yr�L
Day 3 2/6
Day 4 2/7 1C; O M'
Day 5
Day 6 2/9 —1 (Do"-&- 1/
;Transferred by:
Date
2/4
Time Initials
2/8 ) in0 M a
Test Termination Data:
f�7
AL -.2.
A,UM-12-1\-"-
2/10/09
Meritech, Inc.
Chronic Fathead Minnow Benchsheet
Transfer and Feeding Dates and Times
# of Organisms per Chamber: 10
Test Vessel Size: 400 ml
Test Solution Volume: 250 ml
Temp. of Stock: Z'-\ °C
# of Reps: 4
Day 0
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Date Time 1
2/3
2/4
Start Date: 2/3/09 Time:
End Date: 2/10/09 Time: l otiL C
if
No
Randomization:
Incubator #:
Fed by:
Initials Time 2 Initials Time 3 Initial
1030,41y) 13oP() mp.
i l 'ram ti ` \\720 - YYl \ -
2/5 79,E --
2/6 (:00Ain UU- 11,t,L�,
2/7
C• ,f�\ �/41
is-ti.%%i.o'--•-• 6,
2/8 1Z:Crep., M.L
2/9 7(�w m
O
/43
= Weekend, only 2 feedings needed

i7C ® I
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water 'Technology ant? C-or.trots. loc.
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAUGROWTH DATA SHEET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW
Facility: Lk°r1
NPDES #: me_ Oc; 2.6 G S
Date of Test: 2-/31oq
Initial weights taken on: 2-2, - 09 by: Organism: Pimephales promelas
Final weights taken on: .,'� !�• - .cY by:
Page: / of 2
Outfall: 00
CONC
REP
PAN WT.
(mg)
PAN + ORG.
WT. (mg)
WT. OF ORG.
(mg)
# ORG.
MEAN
WTJORG. (mg)
SURV %
L
O
N
1
k
L
A
81o. 82
17./%3
(0. ?1 .
I 0
O. t5,-2 t
100
B
eo0.13
Ssl2,
Ca. l
to
Li&lc-
WV
c
PO(,
55r--,),. 11
(,, (,
(0
0, (d.cS
I(
ID
r(q (a. I2
- c> z ,9,8
r 1(..
(0
`'t I. L
IW
7 75 /
A
8co.'13
c6:. cl
. --)
10
6, 5---n
ECD
B
eol. 58
950 ,fir,
4; q C
I°
o . cc) ( .
00
c
1798, i.3
-6`t ,
(_3
10
o - C
00
D
802,42J
Tcpwi.2.
.l a a
10
JOb
6 g'
KS
A
803.36
gc .�-7
S---, S 1
10
D9 sr7
l W
B
Mc.81
13.O1
(0. 61
10
n 0
IOC
c
POO, rig
c; 37
LI• c
(0
C•46 2
lop
o
nqg. D4
�()1, .ii
-GE.)
1 �
e. s7s---6)
(00

E
ITEC , 11 C.,
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A DiViSiOn of Water hnology and Colltrols,
FISH LARVAL SURVIVAL/GROWTH DATA SHEET
CHRONIC FATHEAD MINNOW
Facility: L r14100,1
NPDES #: cy)2.0(0.5-6
Date of Test:
Initial weights taken on: 2- 3-0
by: Mt,
Final weights taken on: -- 9 by:
Page: 2- of 2
Outfall:
Organism: Pimephales promelas
CONC
REP
PAN WT.
(mg)
PAN + ORG.
WT. (mg)
WT. OF ORG.
(mg)
# ORG.
MEAN
WT./ORG. (mg)
SURV %
•
31 rt
A
ficii,91
717.
6,, L.:?:,
, ID
r).&63
to-o
B
/NCI ,84 •
W bc--,1
_ CeoC7
10
6.,5-q7
W .
iff 0
c
rig 1.5
—76417, C.)
5.--S--
C3(
a, .s--5--•
• D
quigi
'7 clqictS.
:c-, 4 1
q
Os-4 i
. _
q0.
62 /
-
•
A
r192,98
pv- A • la-ol
.- 1 C 2 7 - -lic i -•,?..
.2,k-
10
0, (::,2.•
to
B
riga b(r)
t i 5 Dciset
__-.7,U•
A
c
-805,05
V\ , ,1_;
co ,7, g
10
c).. (03+g
.fo)
D
- POS-.511
•c6 1) 4.6
s.,c-G
9
.
IOD 7,
•
,
A
RA.(12,
, ) i 5-
(0.33
ID
ei,633 .
100
B
Boo/6
D S-, 0-
5---/ :?Ic3
10
c •
801.09
/-)i::., N
-C. /-C-
CO
too'
e),675
D
802AB
q1) , Cp,
s---:, 514
(0

Client: L,1urn.borg
ENVIROtVMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of 41atr_r Technology and Contr'o/s, /nc.
Chemical and Physical Determinations
NPDES#: roc CX O &SG, Start Date: Z/3)0 7
Test Organism: Pimephales promelas Analyst(s): 11(rill r,na- End Date: 2-1iO4
Time:. /S
Time: /04.,-
Da
Concentration: control
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
, Remarks
Batch #
,3 Z0
—
3 2ij
,30
1'
pH Initial
8.09
57,0to
-NI,
?,'Z.
R--%
i,()B
7
Final
7,q(o
,-75
7,7/
7.9 3
rT, %g
"7 (J
?•-S
D.O. Initial
7 too
-2 ,7 0
?Ai
7.20
g- D?
1.1 G
7, 6, `7
Final
(er-{
-2,01
., c(
7 83
rt.'
1! 1C�
7.13
Temp. Initial
Zi.�.e
2 q.,'
.
zy.4
2 y,cJ
7 �j.;�'/
2.Ifi
ve. `f
Final
25,0
ZV . y
2-S. C
`2 iI ,q
25.O
2..'L f
2 S2—
Conductivity Initial
9,91
29-1
..5.r-
221,
CIS
2,J8
1%
Final
/FO
2 97
2t e
xot
G.rl(o
2I/6
2y
Residual Chlorine
G•O. 1
4.Q • i
40.1
2- C , /
4 0 •• /
40, /
i0• l
Hardness
C/(;
ig
>
qy
—
Alkalinity
([)
.---
j �j
—
.6
--->
Da
Concentration: 7,75 y
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
Remarks
pH Initial
7.q1
-7•c17
?,`41
?f/o
7 9
q.cl4
7,675'
Final
7,?/
-7,7t.f
7 (, g
7. 7
'7, Ito
.76,0
?,S3
D.O. Initial
7, (,1
7 ,71 .
-i. ??
-7 6 0
55-O 7
r(. (E,i
7 /n K
Final
(0,13
7,Z3
(L. (
7,g--R
(1,111
7,/+
7. OD
Temp. Initial
2q,s
2.4,p, ..
2,1,6
7q,7
2ii,g/
2,4,1
.7_tf• 1
Final
7_5;0
Zi 'I
Z.51.0
22q•'t
25.0
Zy/(
2-S.2.—
Conductivity Initial
2.91
258
Mb,
2 q q
) 9
232,
2. 3
Final
,201s
Zq 1
2 t 5
31 d
321
L f7
•x i 7
Residual Chlorine
GO . I
LO • /
40, (
40 • f
Lv , (
i 0.1
L O. /
Da
Concentration: (6$ Y.
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
Remarks
pH Initial
7,7 0
' 7.$.7-
7,7'
7.Si /
7. L2.
rt. 6l
7, 77
Final
'7, (D /
-7, %V
7, •7
g-3
'7. 62.
?,, 7
III(
D.O. Initial7(o6.
%77
_7.
7.R0
7,6'7
"3
r(,84
7,•7f_
Final
7,0?
)•2--
(,G /
7, Va
gin
7,0T
‘.qy
Temp. Initial
2 7• 0
Z i. f
zi.f b
29;,.r
7 c, -
21. CI
l' y, Y
Final
7.5•O
z .q
_-,c
-,.q8
2S'.O
2.4U(
2,S,2-
Conductivity Initial
Q'j 1
2 (D.
-21-,0
251
2S-9
2LIB
Z 3 ✓
Final
26 8
7ifq.
273
31 1
319
2-(o(o
5---
Residual Chlorine
4O• /
L.O. j
L0.1
G0. (
4.0 .1
GO. /
GO • (

IV1ER0TE'C14; 1/V4"_
trer-
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of ',Voter technology nna:/ Controls. ,nc.
Chemical and Physical Determinations
Page 2 of 2
Client: Loa) c' i vt 10 a rq NPDES#: Nc. CO2(', (,;, -G Start Date: 213 /Dy' Time: f //
Test Organism: Pimephales promelas Analyst(s): p91 LIMP.- - End Date: Z/0/7 Time:
Da
Concentration: 317
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
Remarks
pH Initial
7, .51e
7 WI
7,(0.1
7 (e '
7, (03
.1. W..
7, �2
Final
7.%f
7, 50
`7, (0_
). 7 (0
17, q I
1,(i7
-7, z6
D.O. Initial
7,(o5
7.7(0
?-gS
-?,(e, y
. b
1.iy)
7 79
. Final
707
(0A-
(r t%
`7• m
'7, 9
?: /3
1 y
Temp. Initial
Zt}.b
2y.D
Zy6
211,7
.2.US
Zta ci
Z�l I
Final
2.5.0
ZLI,9
2,1..CI
?1i,`7
25.o
Zii,`(
25 -
Conductivity Initial
ag't,
2_72
2.60
2.6 (4
26$
214, I
2-3
Final
3oS
3o4'
290
:7,0
314
27L%
:..S �'
Residual Chlorine
L0, /
L 0, /
40. i
10-/
L 0. 1
' 0, /
1.0. /
Da
Concentration: (o z '7,
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
Remarks
pH Initial
7,13
7, ?i(�
7, Z
7, -
, .S
I,.�i�a
7 I
Final
7.tf .
?,30
7.Ll
?• �v
tj:So
-7,2
/9
D.O. Initial
7. 3 Z.
7, C1 3
'25,0
"7, ? ,s---
q.-, b 6
r(.'7'1
?.q 7_
Final
-7 IC
7.I9
L'•cQ
7tg1
1.'72,
4,,qZ.
(Q.S,.
Temp. Initial
24. j
&/, 8
74.6
zit , l
:vs/
2e1,,cj
z V, 7
Final
2,5: 0
Z t(.9
ZST&
= ,
25.O
-Z'/ M
,s; a --
Conductivity Initial
309
2q8
LSO
290
�� 14
2q0
= V)
Final
22..
��!
315
3
359
303
3
Residual Chlorine
410, (
C 0, L -
40. (
io. /
1. O. (
I O. /
4O.
Da
Concentration: 100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
—
3-4
4-5
5-6 5-6
6-7
Remarks
pH Initial
6, 33
//
(D • L 71
t (0, ct1
L1 �
.7r
(a a S (
6.) 3
75---
Final
(p 1 41
W .gel
( , g'e
r-((.
to, 7 N1
.
� sq
D.O. Initial
7, qh
WWF, o
�,1(19,�
l
p91/eJa
7c0-
V . V� Vl
I�6,./}�{7
2 ti l5
f R
Final
7. 0?
'3t.
(0 ,� Y'
G .7q
7.g0
'7,'7S .
Cagy
7S
Temp. • Initial
214.8
z4.6 '
24,5
2)4.3
2 r f , r
2 LI . ct
Z7 . 7
Final
Zs . 0
4J
2 , S • G
%(-/'
25.0
7-1 , c(
7,-,CZ
Conductivity Initial
3 2, 1
•32. (o
32 -
3 2 -1
3 3 q-
33
3 3 J
Final
3
z 7 /
3(73
37
Rr1
.-5�2-
3'-t 7
Residual Chlorine
G 0, I
10, /
I 0, /
40./
L o • /
L. 0.1
40.1
Hardness
2
22
9_2,
.
Alkalinity
t L.
11
10

MERITECH, INC.
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Test
Client: L o c` (vL bo c`ej Start Date: Zj3�t�9 Start Time: I
I End Date: 2/0/007 End Time: 164S0^,✓
Concentration Cori+rol
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Dal/3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day17
Rep #1 0 0 0 q- 0 0 0 I.J
Rep #2 C1 0 (0 c. 0 0 0 O
Rep #3 0 0 0 C. C) 0 0
Rep #4
0 0 0 Ci 0 0 0 0
Concentration -7, 757,
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1
0 0 0 c_ 0 0 0 0
Rep #2 0 0 0 C' 0 0 0 0
:
Rep #3 0 0 0 ram
l-' 0 00 0
Rep #4 0 0 0. C 0 O 0 0
Concentration I6 s
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0
Rep #2 0 0 0 c' 0 0 0 0
Rep #3 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Rep #4 0 0 0 (0 0 0 0

Client: Lau r i n to of j
MERITECH, INC.
Mortality Data: Chronic Fathead Test
Start Date: 43�07 Start Time: ). J�
End Date: 1�__ End Time: {`NSCI
Concentration 31 v,
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 0 0 0. C' 0 0 ____Q__— 0
Rep #2 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0
Rep #3 0 0 0 () 0 0 1 0
Rep #4 0 0 ___I-- L� 0 . 0 0 0
Concentration Z '
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 0 0 C 'CI 0 0 0 0
Rep #2 0 .0 0 0 6 0 ___i— 0
Rep #3 0 0 0 L' 0 0 0 0
Rep #4 0 0 0. 0 ° 0 0
Concentration , /(j 1,
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
Rep #1 V 0 0 C C) 0 0 0
Rep #2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rep #3 0 0 0 G' 0 7 0 0
Rep #4 0 0 iJ V o Q

Client: C,
Contact Person:
Address:
City:
County:
vC Lete.;
P o; e?) P S
MERITECH, INC. Meritech Sample ID #: 3GI
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd, Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: txmrtech(bellsouth.net Web Site: www.meritech-Iabs.com
CLIENT INFORMATION
LvW.-FP PO#:
NPDES#: NC 9O�05 s G,
Phone: 9/0 - /7/7
Pipe #: LJ
— H1 7-7
State: ,4. L
Zip: e 3 3-.2
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Sample Site: �r/%e
Sample Type: ❑ Grab
Sampling Time: Start Date:
End Date:
Composite
c9ja/a i
# of containers:
Start Time: ( 7?4� f 7 PM
End Time: J O CPO AM PM —♦ CHRONIC TESTS SHOULD BE TAKEN
AFTER 10:00 AM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
*** SAMPLE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY FULL (no air space), CHILLED AND COVE WITH ICE ***
1
Collectors Name: Print: j Gl_. C26 7 - Signature:
Test Required: ❑ Chronic (7 days)
❑ Acute (24-48 hours)
Comments:
TOXICITY TEST INFORMATION
Test Organism:
❑ Ceriodaphnia dubia (water flea)
❑ Pimephales prordelas (fathead minnow)
❑ Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp)
Test Concentrations (if multiple dilutions):
Relinquished by:
Received b
Relinquished by: o1_8
Received by: " ,_
4i'-f- = ZL I,
SHIPPING INFORMATION Date: a g�%
02/.09
Date: ©0407
Date:
Date: 07' a-64'
�.a_65
Sample Temperature (°C):
Time: /4 ps AM PM
Time: /p •`d AM PM
Time/t0 /OA re4 PM
Time: /% /d 033 PM
Method of Shipment: ❑ UPS ❑ Fed EX ❑ Meritech Pick-up
**Samples shipped on Friday must be FedEx and must be clearly labeled for Saturday delivery **
SAMPLE RECEIVING (Laboratory Use Onlyi
Relinquished by: .4-
Received by:
Sample Temperatures (°C): / G, a
/
Date:
Time: 09c-t AM
Sample Condition: 1711CCGtt
PM
WHITE = Laboratory copy YELLOW = Client copy

MERITECH, INC. Meritech Sample ID #: 0 0 M`4
Bioassay.Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd, Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: txmrtechnbellsouth.net Web Site: www.meritech-Iabs.com
j r f CLIENT INFORMATION
Client C,51J �T i2
Contact Person:
Address:
City:
County:
44-7f
1 "i349,(
SC4.974 / State: //.<•,
PO#:
NPDES#: NC GBo`?O�S�
Phone: 1// ' 07%r/ 2/6'"
Pipe #: .544//
Zip: 9A'35� a
Sample Site:
Sample Type:
Sampling Time:
SAMPLE INFORMATION
❑ Grab
Start Date:
End Date:
[ Composite # of containers:
. /3/,7
Start Time: /Qao 4) PM
End Time: /OLDS- PM
�► CHRONIC TESTS SHOULD BE TAKEN
AFTER 10:00 AM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
*** SAMPLE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY FULL (no air space), CHILLED AND COVER WITH CE ***
Collector's Name: Print:G �1%i'�� Signature: o'
Test Required: 0 Chronic (7 days)
❑ Acute (24-48 hours)
IWC: . • %
Comments:
TOXICITY TEST INFORMATION
Test Organism: ❑ Ceriodaphnia dubia (water flea)
12- Pimephales pronielas (fathead minnow)
❑ . Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp)
Test Concentrations (if multiple dilutions):
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
tz
** Samples s
SHIPPING INFORMATION
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
0,
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
AM
1 a: ` 3"
re . /bZ
Sample Temperature (°C): 2,d7, d 8 ys''
AM
,449.totrof Shipment: ❑ UPS ❑ Fed X V �j Meritech Pick-up 9 F t7
ped on Friday must be FedEx and must be cleatly labeled for Saturday delivery"
SAMPLE RECEIVING (Laboratory Use Only)
Ii
Sample Temperatures (°C): U , Ll / i�, L\ /
Date:
PM
PM
PM
Time: 0 '? '_ I go PM
/ Sample Condition:
WHITE = Laboratory copy YELLOW = Client copy

MERITECH, INC.
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd, Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: txmrtecht bellsouth.net Web Site: www.meritech-Iabs.com
CLIENT INFORMATION
Client: C it 2 q,�J
-';Ah 7 L re
(i
Contact Person: T J!! -� l L s
Address: i1/U • &,r 3, YS
City: C-j�/1f4
County: �Cv ;'Y State:
Zip:
Meritech Sample ID #: V � (o V
7? L
PO#:
NPDES#: NC
Phone: 9/0`•01 Vl
Pipe #:. 6 /
5? 1
Sample Site:
Sample Type:
Sampling Time:
SAMPLE INFORMATION
•
❑ Grab Composite # of containers:
Start Date: - =5G' Start Time: 9 99!) <M PM
End Date: ,, /1.1l End Time: . 4.2;L).-5-- AM
.s- Z vNufY
.—► CHRONIC TESTS SHOULD BE TAKEN
AFTER 10:00 AM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
*** SAMPLE CONTAINERS ARE TO B//E.. COMPLETELY FULL (no air space), CHILLED AND CORED WITH ICE ***
Collector's Name: Print: l' k}/ �/ �,/}^ Signature:
Test Required: ❑ Chronic (7 days)
❑ Acute (24-48 hours)
Comments:
TOXICITY TEST INFORMATION
Test Organism: ❑ Ceriodaphnia dubia (water flea)
❑ Pimephales pronielas (fathead minnow)
❑ Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp)
Test Concentrations (if multiple dilutions):
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by.
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
SHIPPING INFORMATION
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Sample Temperature (°C):
c .., 6 , ,3 9 0c)
e Ofcrprn�eo-E1 UPS ❑ FRI / U ] Meritech Pick-up G 3 r //Pi
** Samples shipped on Fri ay must be FedEx and must be clearly labeled for Saturday delivery**
SAMPLE RECEIVING (Laboratory Use Only)
C Jo>7 �S
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
/Pis
1 l ',$-0
(13�
AM PM
PM
Ot
PM
P
fikl,C��1� col 5 Date:
Sample Temperatures (°C): 0
-7-09
I2Ice
Time: 7)0 PM
Sample Condition: / e e .
WHITE = Laboratory copy YELLOW = Client copy

Title: laurinburg
File: laurinburg Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Shapiro - Wilk's Test for Normality
D=
W=
0.0371
0.9591
Critical W = 0.8840 (alpha = 0.01 , N = 24)
W = 0.9160 (alpha = 0.05 , N = 24)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0.01). Continue analysis.

Title: laurinburg
File: - laurinburg Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated B1 statistic = 7.6423 (p-value = 0.1771)
Data PASS B1 homogeneity test at 0.01 level. Continue analysis.
Critical B = 15.0863 (alpha = 0.01, df = 5).
= 11.0705 (alpha = 0.05, df = 5)

• Title: laurinburg
File: laurinburg Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
ANOVA Table
SOURCE
DF SS MS F
Between
5 0.0188 0.0038 1._8227
Within (Error) 18 0.0371 0.0021
Total
23 0.0558
(p-value = 0.1591)
Critical F = 4.2479 (alpha = 0.01, df = 5,18)
= 2.7729 (alpha = 0.05, df = 5,18)
Since F < Critical F FAIL TO REJECT Ho: All equal (alpha = 0.05)

Title: laurinburg
File: laurinburg Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Dunnett's Test - TABLE 1'OF 2 Ho:Control<Treatment
GROUP IDENTIFICATION
TRANSFORMED MEAN CALCULATED IN SIG
MEAN
ORIGINAL UNITS T STAT 0.05
1 control 0.6293 0.6293
2 7.75 0.5785 0.5785 1.5817
3 15.5 0.5453 0.5453 2.6179 *
4 31 0.5898 0.5898 1.2310
5 62 0.6012 0.6012 0.8726
6 100 0.5560 0.5560 2.2829
Dunnett critical value = 2.4100 (1 Tailed, alpha = 0.05, df = 5,18)
Title: laurinburg
File: laurinburg Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Dunnett's Test - TABLE 2 OF 2 Ho:Control<Treatment
NUM OF MIN SIG DIFF % OF DIFFERENCE
GROUP IDENTIFICATION REPS (IN ORIG. UNITS) CONTROL FROM CONTROL
1 control 4
2 7.75 4 0.0773 12.3 0.0508
3 15.5 4 0.0773 12.3 0.0840
4 31 4 0.0773 12.3 0.0395'
5 62 4 0.0773 12.3 0.0280
6 100 4 0.0773 12.3 0.0733

Title: laurinburg - survival
File: laurinsurviv Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Shapiro - Wilk's Test for Normality
D=
W=
0.0200
0.7552
Critical W = 0.8840 (alpha = 0.01 , N = 24)
W = 0.9160 (alpha = 0.05 , N = 24)
Data FAIL normality test (alpha = 0.01). Try another transformation.
Warning - The first three homogeneity tests are sensitive to non -normality
and should not be performed with this data as is.

Title: laurinburg - survival
File: laurinsurviv
Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Hartley's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
These two tests can not be performed because at least one group has
zero variance.
Data FAIL to meet homogeneity of variance assumption.
Additional transformations are useless.

Title: laurinburg - survival
File: laurinsurviv Transform: NO TRANSFORMATION
Steel's Many -One Rank Test Ho: Control<Treatment
MEAN IN RANK CRIT. SIG
GROUP IDENTIFICATION ORIGINAL UNITS SUM VALUE DF 0.05
1control 1.0000
2 7.75 1.0000 18.00 10.00 4.00
3 15.5 1.0000 18.00 10.00 4.00
4 31 0.9500 14.00 10.00 4.00
5 62 0.9500 14.00 10.00 4.00
6 100 1.0000 18.00 10.00 4.00
Critical values are 1 tailed ( k = 5 )

MERITECH, INC. Meritech Sample ID #:
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd,;Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: txmrtech anbellsouth.net Web Site: www.meritech-labs.com
-141-117' 7
CLIENT INFORMATION
Client: i %7' _JrI �r' �r 1 /z94 -7 /
Contact Person: J_64? r / • S
Address: e?,i'. L (/
City:
County: S <- J 7r fe.:
PO#:
NPDES#: NC s
Phone: 5% t/ /2 "
Pipe #:a
State: // - <. Zip: ' 3S
Sample Site:
Sample Type: ❑ Grab a Composite # of containers:
y _r SAMPLE INFORMATION
Sampling Time: Start Date: 2,.2; J 9 Start Time: 4M PM
End Date: G/ 3/1 7 End Time: /J)) S `AM__� PM —► CHRONIC TESTS SHOULD BE TAKEN
AFTER 10:00 AM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
*** SAMPLE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY FULL (no air space), CHILLED AND CO E WIT E k**
Collector's Name: Print: C Z:),0,/7' \ Signature: d-
_'. ...,.._TOXICITY TEST INFORMATION
Test Required: ❑ Chronic (7 days) Test Organism: ❑ Ceriodaphnia dubia {water flea)
Comments:
❑ Acute (24-48 hours)
❑ Pimephales pronielas (fathead minnow)
❑ Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp)
IWC: . % Test Concentrations (if multiple dilutions):
SHIPPING INFORMATION
Relinquished by: Date: Time: AM _ PM
r. . Received by: :'' `�;;,�-
�h • ��-aK.t-._ Date: a ; Time: ` 7/ -
EAM' PM
Relinquished by:t •; ,,,�a ., L-�� h�- Date: Time: AM PM
, -'.
Received by: . Date: Time: AM PM
Sample Temperature (°C):
Method of Shipment: El UPS ❑ Fed EX ❑ Meritech Pick-up -
** Samples shipped on Friday must be FedEx and must be clearly labeled for Saturday delivery **
SAMPLE RECEIVING (Laboratory Use Only)
Relinquished by:
Received by: Date: Time: AM PM
Sample Temperatures (°C): / / I Sample Condition:
WHITE = Laboratory copy YELLOW = Client copy

MERITECH, INC. Meritech Sample ID tt:
Bioassay Sample Chain of Custody
642 Tamco Rd, Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: txmrtech(@bellsouth.net Web Site: www.meritech-labs.com
CLIENT INFORMATION
,.
Client: f A-4,0/14 A.--f 12 r
Contact Person: ‘,
Address: (.-1) C-7/
City:
PO#:
NPDES#: NC
Phone: 9'lb ‘1P /-1
Pipe #: Z")
County:
State: /kJ Zip:
Sample Site:
r . f
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Sampling Time: Start Date:
Sample Type: 0 Grab Composite
cy5
# of containers:
Start Time.: 4tvV PM
End Date: a/ ‘4/1-"' /0 AS 7Thp
End Time: / • LAM, M CHRONIC TESTS SHOULD BE TAKEN
AFTER 10:00 AM IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
**" SAMPLE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY FULL (no airspace), CHILLED AND7ERED,1.TH ICE ***
Collector's Name: Print: /Sri ky
Signature:
TOXICITY TEST INFORMATION
Test Required: CI Chronic (7 days) Test Organism: El Ceriodaphnia dubia (water flea)
. . ,
Comments:
LI Acute (24-48 hours)
I WC
El Pimephales pronielas (fathead minnow)
CI Mysidopsis bahia (shrimp)
Test Concentrations (if multiple dilutions):
SHIPPING INFORMATION
Relinquished by: Date: Time: AM PM
Received by:
Date:
Time: IANk PM
Relinquished by: :-
..,k \ _,...,..j„..;, .... Date: Tin AM PM
:= • -
Received by: —
Date: Time: AM PM
/ . •
/ , / -----
' 1.". Sample Temperature (°C):
• Method of Shipment: CI UPS 0 Fed EX 111 Meritech Pick-up
A.7.
" Samples shipped on Friday must be FedEx and must be clearly labeled for Saturday delivery **
SAMPLE RECEIVING (Laboratory Use Only)
Relinquislid by:
Received by: Date: Time:
• f\
AM PM
Sample Temperatures (°C): I I I Sample Condition:
WHITE = Laboratory copy YELLOW = Client copy